N-Monosubstituted Methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol) Carbamate Ester Prodrugs of Resveratrol

Abstract

Resveratrol is a natural polyphenol with many interesting biological activities. Its pharmacological exploitation in vivo is, however, hindered by its rapid elimination via phase II conjugative metabolism at the intestinal and, most importantly, hepatic levels. One approach to bypass this problem relies on prodrugs. We report here the synthesis, characterization, hydrolysis, and in vivo pharmacokinetic behavior of resveratrol prodrugs in which the OH groups are engaged in an N-monosubstituted carbamate ester linkage. As promoiety, methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol) groups (m-OEG) (CH₃–[OCH₂CH₂]_n–) of defined chain length (n = 3, 4, 6) were used. These are expected to modulate the chemico-physical properties of the resulting derivatives, much like longer poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) chains, while retaining a relatively low MW and, thus, a favorable drug loading capacity. Intragastric administration to rats resulted in the appearance in the bloodstream of the prodrug and of the products of its partial hydrolysis, confirming protection from first-pass metabolism during absorption.

1. Introduction

Evolution has endowed organisms with a powerful apparatus designed to detoxify “xenobiotic” substances which reach the cytoplasm [1,2,3]. These compounds tend to be hydrophobic/apolar to pass the cell membrane. In specific cells, such as enterocytes and hepatocytes, they are modified by the addition of polar groups (Phase I metabolism). One of the most common processes is the insertion of hydroxyl groups by P450 oxidases [4,5]. These hydroxyls are then targeted by conjugative enzymes of Phase II metabolism, in particular sulfotransferases [6,7] and uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases [8,9], to produce water-soluble, inactivated metabolites which can be re-exported via Organic Anion/Cation Transporters (OATPs) [10] and ATP-Binding Cassette (ABC)/Multi Drug Resistance (MDR) efflux transporters [11,12,13] and eliminated.

Plant polyphenols already possess, by definition, a number of hydroxyl groups. They are, thus, ready-made substrates for Phase II metabolism. Indeed, the modifications just mentioned have been long recognized and studied for representative members of this huge family of natural compounds, including resveratrol, which is of specific interest here. Rapid glucuronidation and sulfation in enterocytes, hepatocytes, and other cells (e.g., [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]) and re-export to the intestinal lumen by MDR proteins [15,22,23], or possibly OATPs [24], are thought to limit the potential impact of this celebrated “natural drug” in vivo. This is a pity, given the pleiotropic effects this dietary compound is reported to have in important pathophysiological respects (for recent reviews see, e.g., [25,26,27,28,29,30]). Possibly its most widely discussed activities are as an activator of the deacetylase SIRT1 and a repressor of inflammation, to which one might add its estrogen-like features (e.g., [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]). Pronounced metabolism may be an important reason why resveratrol’s effects are often unclear in human clinical studies [39,40,41,42,43,44]—a weakness shared with other polyphenols. A tool to increase resveratrol’s bioavailability and body levels may help dispel (or support) doubts, and, more importantly, allow the development of a full pharmacology of this compound.

One of the strategies used to prevent or delay drug metabolism and enhance bioavailability and effectiveness is based on prodrugs: the sites undergoing phase II conjugation, in our case the phenolic hydroxyls, are temporarily protected (–OH → –O–X–R) by removable groups during absorption, first pass through the liver and distribution, with final regeneration of the active principle following the removal of protective groups by chemical and/or enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis.

Three features of the protecting group are most relevant: (1) the reactivity of the bond engaging the group to be protected must be suitable for the regeneration of the parent molecule in an appropriate time frame under the conditions prevailing in vivo; (2) the promoiety “capping” the reactive site ought to favor absorption and distribution to the desired body districts; and (3) the side-products resulting from its eventual dismantling ought to be innocuous or beneficial.

This strategy is being actively applied to polyphenols (rev.s: [45,46]). A first family of resveratrol prodrugs was produced and tested [47], in which the phenolic OH groups are masked as N,N-disubstituted carbamate esters (–O–C(=O)–N(CH₃)R), where R is a methoxy-poly(ethylene glycol)-350 (mPEG-350) or a butyl-glucosyl group. These derivatives are highly soluble in aqueous media but too stable to be used as prodrugs. N-monosubstituted carbamates are expected to undergo faster hydrolysis. However, the ideal promoiety remains to be chosen. Poly(ethylene glycol) chains are a strong candidate: their presence can increase aqueous solubility of hydrophobic drugs, prolong circulation time, slow down hydrolysis, and increase stability in the gastrointestinal tract [48,49,50,51,52,53]. This type of decoration is particularly valuable for protein/polypeptide drugs and drug-carrying liposomes (rev.s, e.g., [54,55,56,57,58,59]), which can be protected from phagocytosis and are less at risk of provoking an immune response. In general, polymer chains with MW in the range of a few to many kDa are employed for these modifications, as they perform better vis-à-vis hydration and immunogenicity.

Their size and size dispersion, however, complicate their chemistry in particular for purification and analytical aspects. Furthermore in the case of small molecules such as resveratrol the incorporation of such large structures in the prodrug means that the “drug loading capacity” of the construct, i.e. the amount of active principle associated with a given weight of precursor, is low. Siddalingappa et al. have recently reported micelle-forming constructs in which the resveratrol kernel was linked to 2- to 20-KDa PEG and PEG-PLA block copolymer chains via ether or carboxyester functionalities (succinyl linker) [60]. Micelle formation was concluded to enhance stability vis-à-vis ester hydrolysis. Constructs with MW up to 6.6 KDa were used injected intravenously into rats to study their pharmacokinetic behavior. We have explored the use of short-chain, defined-MW (monodispersed) methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol) (m-OEG) as a convenient alternative to higher-MW PEGs [61]. These oligomeric moieties turned out to be useful in modulating physicochemical and absorption properties of derivatives, maintaining many properties of longer PEG chains with a more favorable drug loading capacity, and to be fully compatible with absorption from the gastrointestinal tract when linked to the stilbenoid kernel via acetal or ketal bond systems.

Herein we develop this approach reporting the synthesis and characterization of a small library of resveratrol prodrugs consisting of methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol) amines linked to the resveratrol phenolic functions via the N-monosubstituted carbamate linkage (Scheme 1). Hydrolysis assays and pharmacokinetic studies in rats were then performed in order to evaluate stability, in vivo, absorption and metabolism of these new prodrugs.

Scheme 1. Resveratrol (1) and methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol)-carbamate substituted prodrugs (2–4).

Scheme 1. Resveratrol (1) and methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol)-carbamate substituted prodrugs (2–4).

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis

Synthesis of N-monosubstituted carbamate esters is usually carried out in two steps: reaction of the desired primary amine with phosgene or its equivalent to give a reactive isocyanate derivative, followed by its coupling with the phenolic function [49]. These procedures tested on resveratrol led to low yields for the trisubstituted derivatives, probably due to the high reactivity of the isocyanate group promoting side reactions of polymerization entraining the stilbene double bond function. In this study we prepared N-monosubstituted resveratrol carbamate esters through conversion of the corresponding methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol) amines (2c–4c) to the activated 4-nitrophenyl carbamates (Scheme 2). Isolation of the activated 4-nitrophenyl carbamate esters (2d–4d) followed by transesterification with resveratrol (1) provided the desired trisubstituted N-(methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol)) carbamate prodrugs of resveratrol (2–4) in good yields (75%–88%) under mild conditions along with traces of di- and monosubstituted resveratrol conjugates, which were separated from the desired product by flash chromatography. Methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol) amines (2c–4c) (key intermediates for the synthesis of 2–4) were synthesized under mild conditions and with excellent yields (96%–98%) by Staudinger reduction of the corresponding methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol) azides (2b–4b), in turn obtained by substitution of the tosylated methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol) (2a–4a) with sodium azide (Scheme 2).

Scheme 2. Synthesis of resveratrol N-monosubstituted carbamate ester prodrugs. Reagents and conditions: (i) TsCl, DMAP, Pyridine, DCM, 0 °C to r.t., 6 h; (ii) NaN₃, H₂O/Acetone 3:1, 75 °C, overnight_; (iii) PPh₃, THF, r.t., 5 h, then H₂O, 80 °C, overnight; (iv) bis-(4-nitrophenyl) carbonate, DMAP, ACN, 50 °C, 3 h; and (v) resveratrol, ACN, DMAP, 50 °C, 24 h.

Scheme 2. Synthesis of resveratrol N-monosubstituted carbamate ester prodrugs. Reagents and conditions: (i) TsCl, DMAP, Pyridine, DCM, 0 °C to r.t., 6 h; (ii) NaN₃, H₂O/Acetone 3:1, 75 °C, overnight_; (iii) PPh₃, THF, r.t., 5 h, then H₂O, 80 °C, overnight; (iv) bis-(4-nitrophenyl) carbonate, DMAP, ACN, 50 °C, 3 h; and (v) resveratrol, ACN, DMAP, 50 °C, 24 h.

2.2. Hydrolysis Studies

The hydrolytic reactivity of the synthesized new resveratrol derivatives was tested in solutions mimicking gastric and intestinal pH and in blood. All turned out to be stable at pH values close to that of the human stomach (no reaction over 24 h at 37 °C in 0.1 N HCl), but underwent hydrolysis at near-neutral pH (at pH 6.8, representing intestinal pH) and in blood, at rates that may be suitable for use in vivo.

Kinetic analysis of the data was performed by assuming that hydrolysis to resveratrol occurred via consecutive losses of the three protecting groups in pseudo-first order processes and by considering each pair of isomeric intermediates (potentially) resulting from the first and second hydrolysis steps as a single species, i.e. the two monosubstituted and the two disubstituted intermediates were handled as species I and II, respectively (Scheme 3).

Scheme 3. Kinetic scheme for stepwise hydrolysis of triprotected (III) derivatives 2–4 to resveratrol (1). II and I represent, each, the two possible isomeric derivatives resulting from hydrolysis of one (II) and two (I) carbamoyl linkages, respectively.

Scheme 3. Kinetic scheme for stepwise hydrolysis of triprotected (III) derivatives 2–4 to resveratrol (1). II and I represent, each, the two possible isomeric derivatives resulting from hydrolysis of one (II) and two (I) carbamoyl linkages, respectively.

Figure 1 shows, as an example, the time course of the four species (III, II, I, and 1) involved in the reaction of derivative 3 in PBS 0.1 M (panel A) and in whole rat blood (panel B). As hydrolysis proceeds resveratrol will eventually form with the kinetics dictated by the constants, up to 100% conversion. The fit of the experimental data was obtained using a set of equations analogous to those utilized by Kozerski et al. [62] and in our previous work [61].

Figure 1. Hydrolysis of 3 in PBS 0.1 M, at pH 6.8, 37 °C (A) and in whole rat blood (B). Data are expressed as % of the initially-loaded compound. The fit is for pseudo-first order kinetics as outlined in Scheme 3 and accompanying text.

Figure 1. Hydrolysis of 3 in PBS 0.1 M, at pH 6.8, 37 °C (A) and in whole rat blood (B). Data are expressed as % of the initially-loaded compound. The fit is for pseudo-first order kinetics as outlined in Scheme 3 and accompanying text.

The full set of kinetic constants resulting from fits of this type for all the derivatives is presented in Table 1 and in Figure 2.

Table 1. Kinetic data obtained for hydrolysis of resveratrol derivatives 2–4 in aqueous PBS 0.1 M, at pH 6.8 and in rat blood at 37 °C.

Derivative	PBS 0.1 M, at pH 6.8, 37 °C				Blood
	t1/2 (h)	kIII (h−1)	kII (h−1)	kI (h−1)	t1/2 (h)	kIII (h−1)	kII (h−1)	kI (h−1)
2	6.0	0.104 ± 0.002	0.030 ± 0.002	0.005 ± 0.002	0.5	1.47 ± 0.08	0.43 ± 0.04	0.155 ± 0.009
3	3.5	0.134 ± 0.007	0.042 ± 0.005	0.007 ± 0.003	0.3	2.0 ± 0.2	0.42 ± 0.06	0.17 ± 0.03
4	4.5	0.158 ± 0.002	0.051 ± 0.001	0.025 ± 0.001	0.5	1.25 ± 0.08	0.49 ± 0.05	0.22 ± 0.03

Table 1. Kinetic data obtained for hydrolysis of resveratrol derivatives 2–4 in aqueous PBS 0.1 M, at pH 6.8 and in rat blood at 37 °C.

Derivative	PBS 0.1 M, at pH 6.8, 37 °C				Blood
	t1/2 (h)	kIII (h−1)	kII (h−1)	kI (h−1)	t1/2 (h)	kIII (h−1)	kII (h−1)	kI (h−1)
2	6.0	0.104 ± 0.002	0.030 ± 0.002	0.005 ± 0.002	0.5	1.47 ± 0.08	0.43 ± 0.04	0.155 ± 0.009
3	3.5	0.134 ± 0.007	0.042 ± 0.005	0.007 ± 0.003	0.3	2.0 ± 0.2	0.42 ± 0.06	0.17 ± 0.03
4	4.5	0.158 ± 0.002	0.051 ± 0.001	0.025 ± 0.001	0.5	1.25 ± 0.08	0.49 ± 0.05	0.22 ± 0.03

Figure 2. Hydrolysis rate constants (37 °C) for compounds 2–4 in PBS 0.1 M, at pH 6.8 (A) and in whole rat blood (B).

Figure 2. Hydrolysis rate constants (37 °C) for compounds 2–4 in PBS 0.1 M, at pH 6.8 (A) and in whole rat blood (B).

Hydrolysis of N-monosubstituted carbamate esters has been studied and reported in literature [63,64]. The stability of the N-monosubstituted carbamate group in acidic solution and its reactivity at higher pH values, are coherent with a mechanism which envisions the deprotonation of the amidic nitrogen ArO-C(O)-NHR′ followed by aryloxide elimination, thus regenerating the original phenolic functionality, ArOH. The isocyanate intermediate adds water and decomposes releasing the amine and carbon dioxide [63,64] (Scheme 4). As reported by L.W Dittert and T. Higuchi [64] the isocyanate intermediate formed during the hydrolysis of N-monosubstituted carbamate esters involves a lower energy of activation compared to the tetrahedral intermediate which is the only possible pathway for the OH⁻ catalyzed hydrolysis of N,N-disubstituted carbamate esters. This results in higher hydrolysis rates of N-monosubstituted carbamate esters under physiological pH conditions making this linkage more suitable for use as prodrug than the N,N-disubstituted carbamate ester bond.

Scheme 4. Mechanism of base-induced hydrolysis of carbamates 2–4.

Scheme 4. Mechanism of base-induced hydrolysis of carbamates 2–4.

The sensitivity of the carbamoyl group to pH ought to be taken into account when planning for an eventual oral administration of compounds of this type, since the pH of saliva in humans can normally vary from slightly acidic to slightly basic (pH 7.4) and hydrolytic enzymes are present. The residence time in the mouth would, in any case, be expected to be relatively short. The t_1/2 of the compounds in blood (which has a slightly basic pH and hydrolytic enzymes) is in the order of 20–30 min. (Table 1).

The 4-h period over which the hydrolysis was monitored in whole blood was set by the stability of blood itself under the experimental conditions. It was in any case sufficient to compute the rate constants according to the model adopted. As hydrolysis proceeds resveratrol must eventually form with the kinetics dictated by the constants up to 100% conversion.

The data of Table 1 and Figure 2 clearly show that hydrolysis rates are much larger in blood, suggesting the involvement of enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis.

2.3. Pharmacokinetic Studies

All the N-monosubstituted methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol) carbamate ester prodrugs were tested for their in vivo absorption and metabolism. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed with rats, and each compound was administered as a single intragastric bolus, in an equimolar dose/kg body weight (88 µmol/kg). Blood samples were taken at different time points, treated as described in the Materials and Methods section and analyzed.

Administration of compound 2 did not result in the appearance of detectable amounts of resveratrol, derivatives or any metabolites in blood samples, while measurable levels of stilbene derivatives (all compounds containing the stilbenic structure detected in blood, which can only originate from the administered prodrugs) were found in blood samples in the case of compounds 3 and 4. The pharmacokinetic behavior of the prodrugs-absorption is bound to depend on the promoiety attached to the core compound. The fully protected and partially de-protected species for compounds 3 and 4 were consistently found in the samples taken, and the time course of their concentration is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3. Blood pharmacokinetic profiles after intragastric administration of compounds 3 (A) and 4 (B) to rats. Data represent average values + standard deviation (an error bar of the same size in the negative direction is also implied but not shown for graphic clarity). N (number of PK experiments performed for each compound) = 3 in all cases.

Figure 3. Blood pharmacokinetic profiles after intragastric administration of compounds 3 (A) and 4 (B) to rats. Data represent average values + standard deviation (an error bar of the same size in the negative direction is also implied but not shown for graphic clarity). N (number of PK experiments performed for each compound) = 3 in all cases.

Both 3 and 4 were rapidly absorbed, peaking 10 min after their administration. In agreement with the results previously obtained with acetal prodrugs [61], the derivative with four units of ethylene glycol (3) was better absorbed than its counterpart with six units (0.3 µM vs. 0.1 µM). In both cases the di-substituted hydrolysis products were also present.

The results of PK studies confirm the observations reported in [61]: variations in the length of the methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol) sequence can have an impact on the absorption of the prodrug. Thus, compounds 3 and 4, which contain four and six units of ethylene glycol per phenolic oxygen, respectively, worked better than 2, which contains three. The extent of absorption may be expected to be related to the affinity of the prodrugs for membranes if the step determining the rate of absorption is diffusion into the latter, i.e., if the constructs are rather more hydrophilic than lipophilic. While we have not measured the distribution of the present compounds between water and an oily phase and their solubility, it is reasonable to presume that they may follow the same pattern as the corresponding acetal-based compounds of ref. [61].

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Materials and Instrumentation

Resveratrol was purchased from Waseta Int. Trading Co. (Shangai, China). Other starting materials and reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy), Fluka (Milan, Italy), Merck-Novabiochem (Milan, Italy), Riedel de Haen (Milan, Italy), J.T. Baker (Milan, Italy), Cambridge Isotope Laboratories Inc. (Rome, Italy), Acros Organics (Milan, Italy), Carlo Erba (Milan, Italy), and Prolabo (Milan, Italy) and were used as received. TLCs were run on silica gel supported on plastic (Macherey-Nagel Polygram^®SIL G/UV₂₅₄, silica thickness 0.2 mm, Duren, Germany) and visualized by UV detection. Flash chromatography was performed on silica gel (Macherey-Nagel 60, 230–400 mesh granulometry (0.063–0.040 mm)) under air pressure. The solvents were analytical or synthetic grade and were used without further purification. ¹H-NMR spectra were recorded with a Bruker AC250F spectrometer operating at 250 MHz and a Bruker AVII500 spectrometer (Milan, Italy) operating at 500 MHz. Chemical shifts (δ) are given in ppm relative to the signal of the solvent. HPLC-UV analyses were performed with an Agilent 1290 Infinity LC System (Agilent Technologies, Milan, Italy), equipped with binary pump and a diode array detector (190–500 nm). HPLC/ESI-MS analyses and mass spectra were performed with a 1100 Series Agilent Technologies (Milan, Italy) system, equipped with binary pump (G1312A) and MSD SL Trap mass spectrometer (G2445D SL) with ESI source. ESI-MS positive spectra of reaction intermediates and final purified products were obtained from solutions in acetonitrile, eluting with a water:acetonitrile = 1:1 mixture containing 0.1% formic acid. High-resolution mass measurements were obtained using a Mariner ESI-TOF spectrometer (PerSeptive Biosystems, Framingham, MA, USA). HPLC/ESI-MS analysis was used to confirm the purity (>95%).

3.2. Hydrolysis Assays

3.2.1. Hydrolysis under Physiological-Like Conditions

The chemical stability of all new compounds was tested in aqueous media imitating gastric (0.1 N HCl, NormaFix) and intestinal (0.1 M PBS buffer, at pH 6.8) pH conditions. A 5 µM solution of the compound was prepared from a 5 mM stock solution in DMSO, and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h; samples withdrawn at different times were analyzed by HPLC-UV. Hydrolysis products were identified by HPLC/ESI-MS analysis of selected samples. Non-linear curve fitting was performed using Origin 8.0 data analysis software, using the equations described in [61,62].

3.2.2. Stability in Rodent Whole Blood

Rats were anesthetized and blood was withdrawn from the jugular vein, heparinised and transferred into tubes containing EDTA. Blood samples (1 mL) were spiked with 5 µM compound (dilution from a 5 mM stock solution in DMSO), and incubated at 37 °C for 4 h (the maximum period allowed by blood stability). Aliquots were taken after 10 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h and 4 h and treated as described below (blood sample treatment and analysis). Cleared blood samples were finally subjected to HPLC-UV analysis.

3.2.3. Blood Sample Treatment and Analysis

Before starting the treatment, 4,4′-dihydroxybiphenyl was added as internal standard to a carefully-measured blood volume (25 µM final concentration). Blood was then stabilized with a freshly-prepared 10 mM solution of ascorbic acid (0.1 vol) and acidified with 0.6 M acetic acid (0.1 vol); after mixing, an excess of acetone (4 vol) was added, followed by sonication (2 min) and centrifugation (12,000× g, 7 min, 4 °C). The supernatant was finally collected and stored at −20 °C. Before analysis, acetone was allowed to evaporate at room temperature using a Univapo 150H (UniEquip, Martinsried, Germany) vacuum concentrator centrifuge, and up to 40 μL of CH₃CN were added to precipitate residual proteins. After centrifugation (12,000× g, 5 min, 4 °C), cleared samples were directly subjected to HPLC-UV analysis. Metabolites and hydrolysis products were identified by comparison of chromatographic retention time with true samples.

The recovery yields of resveratrol and its metabolites have been reported previously [65,66]. For the new prodrugs the corresponding recoveries, expressed as ratio to the recovery of internal standard, were as follows: 2: 0.914 ± 0.116 3: 0.903 ± 0.104; 4: 0.967 ± 0.100. Recoveries of partially protected (disubstituted) derivatives were assumed to be the same as those of the corresponding fully substituted prodrug. Knowledge of these ratios allowed us to determine the unknown amount of analyte in a blood sample by measuring the internal standard recovered [54], and using the same calibration curve of resveratrol, since derivatives have the same absorption coefficient of resveratrol itself (y = 5.3085x, where y is the concentration of analyte and x is the integrated area of the HPLC-UV peak).

Since sample treatment includes an evaporation/concentration step, and there are no interfering peaks from the tissue matrix, LOD (limit of detection) and LOQ (limit of quantification) were determined relative to the analytical part of the method (HPLC-UV analysis) and were the same as resveratrol (i.e., 0.04 µM and 0.12 µM, respectively; [65]).

3.3. Pharmacokinetic Studies

Derivatives 2–4 were administered to overnight-fasted male Wistar rats from the facility of the Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, as a single intragastric dose (88 µmol/kg, dissolved in 250 µL DMSO) delivered with a commercial stainless steel feeding tube (www.2biol.com) to have a precise starting time. Wistar rats are commonly used for such studies (e.g., [60]). Relatively young adults (3–5 months) were used in order to have a fully developed metabolism as well as a body weight (300–400 g) which would limit the amount of synthetic compound to be used.

Blood samples were obtained by the tail bleeding technique: before drug administration, rats were anesthetized with isoflurane and the tip of the tail was cut off; blood samples (80–100 µL each) were then taken from the tail tip at different time points after drug administration. Blood was collected in heparinized tubes, kept in ice and treated as described above within 10 min. All experiments involving animals were performed with the permission and supervision of the University of Padova Ethical Committee for Experimentation on Animals (CEASA) and Central Veterinary Service, in compliance with Italian Law DL 116/92, embodying EU Directive 86/609. Significance in comparisons was assessed using the Wilcoxon Rank Test.

3.4. Synthesis

3.4.1. General Procedure for the Preparation of Methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol)-p-toluenesulfonates (2a–4a)

Pyridine (1.09 mL, 13.5 mmol, 2.0 eq.) and DMAP (1.65 g, 13.5 mmol, 2.0 eq.) were added to a solution of methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol) (6.75 mmol, 1.0 eq.) in DCM (10 mL), and the mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 15 min. A solution of tosyl chloride (1.93 g, 10.1 mmol, 1.5 eq.) in DCM (10 mL) was then added dropwise and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 6 h. The resulting mixture was diluted in DCM (150 mL) and washed with 0.5 N HCl (100 mL). The aqueous layer was washed with DCM (5 × 75 mL) and all the organic fractions were collected, dried over MgSO₄ and filtered. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by flash chromatography.

2-(2-(2-Methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethyl 4-methylbenzenesulfonate (2a). Purified by flash chromatography using DCM/EtOAc 8:2 as eluent. 95% yield as a colourless oil. ¹H-NMR (250 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 2.43 (s, 3H, Ar–CH₃), 3.35 (s, 3H, –O–CH₃), 3.49–3.66 (m, 10H, 2 × –O–CH₂–CH₂–O– + –O–CH₂–), 4.14 (t, 2H, Ts–CH₂–, ³J_H–H = 5.75 Hz), 7.32 (d, 2H, Ar–H, ³J_H–H = 8.25 Hz), 7.77 (d, 2H, Ar–H, ³J_H–H = 8.25 Hz); ¹³C-NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 144.7, 132.9, 129.7, 127.9, 71.8, 70.6, 70.5, 70.4, 69.2, 68.6, 58.9, 21.6; ESI-MS (ion trap): m/z 337 [M + H₂O + H]⁺. HRMS (ESI+): m/z 319.1222 [M + H]⁺, calcd for C₁₄H₂₃O₆S: 319.1215.

2,5,8,11-Tetraoxatridecan-13-yl 4-methylbenzenesulfonate (3a). Purified by flash chromatography using DCM/Acetone 8:2 as eluent. 94% yield as a colourless oil. ¹H-NMR (250 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 2.41 (s, 3H, Ar–CH₃), 3.33 (s, 3 H, –O–CH₃), 3.48–3.67 (m, 14 H, 3 × –O–CH₂–CH₂–O– + –O–CH₂–), 4.12 (t, 2H, Ts–CH₂–, ³J_H–H = 4.90 Hz), 7.30 (d, 2H, Ar–H, ³J_H–H = 8.30 Hz), 7.76 (d, 2H, Ar–H, ³J_H–H = 8.00 Hz); ¹³C-NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 144.7, 132.8, 129.7, 127.8, 71.8, 70.6, 70.4, 70.4, 70.4, 70.3, 69.1, 68.5, 58.9, 21.5; ESI-MS (ion trap): m/z 381 [M + H₂O + H]⁺. HRMS (ESI+): m/z 363.1463 [M + H]⁺, calcd for C₁₆H₂₇O₇S: 363.1477.

2,5,8,11,14,17-Hexaoxanonadecan-19-yl 4-methylbenzenesulfonate (4a). Purified by flash chromatography using DCM/Acetone 6.5:3.5 as eluent. 98% yield as a colourless oil. ¹H-NMR (250 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 2.35 (s, 3H, Ar–CH₃), 3.27 (s, 3H, –O–CH₃), 3.42–3.60 (m, 22H, 2 × –O–CH₂–CH₂–O– + –O–CH₂–), 4.05 (t, 2H, Ts–CH₂–, ³J_H–H = 5.00 Hz), 7.25 (d, 2H, Ar–H, ³J_H–H = 7.93 Hz), 7.70 (d, 2H, Ar–H, ³J_H–H = 8.34 Hz); ¹³C-NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 144.6, 132.7, 129.6, 127.7, 71.7, 70.5, 70.4, 70.4, 70.3, 70.3, 70.3, 69.1, 68.4, 58.8, 21.4; ESI-MS (ion trap): m/z 451 [M + H]⁺. HRMS (ESI+): m/z 451.2008 [M + H]⁺, calcd for C₂₀H₃₅O₉S: 451.2002.

3.4.2. General Procedure for the Preparation of Methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol)-azides (2b–4b)

Sodium azide (10.72 g, 0.165 mol, 5.0 eq.) were added to a solution of methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol)-p-toluenesulfonate (2a–4a) (33 mmol, 1.0 eq.) in a water/acetone solution (1:3, 65 mL), and the mixture was stirred at 75 °C overnight. The mixture was then diluted in DCM (250 mL) and washed with water (250 mL). The aqueous layer was washed with DCM (5 × 100 mL) and all the organic fractions were collected, dried over MgSO₄ and filtered. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by flash chromatography.

1-Azido-2-(2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethane (2b). Purified by flash chromatography using DCM/Acetone 9:1 as eluent. 99% yield as a colourless oil. ¹H-NMR (250 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 3.32–3.36 (m, 5H, –O–CH₃ + –O–CH₂–CH₂–N₃), 3.48–3.58 (m, 2H, –O–CH₂–CH₂–N₃), 3.48–3.58 (m, 8H, 2 × –O–CH₂–CH₂–O–); ¹³C-NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 71.7, 70.5, 70.5, 70.4, 69.9, 58.8, 50.5; ESI-MS (ion trap): m/z 190 [M + H]⁺. HRMS (ESI+): m/z 190.1207 [M + H]⁺, calcd for C₇H₁₆N₃O₃: 190.1192.

13-Azido-2,5,8,11-tetraoxatridecane (3b). Purified by flash chromatography using DCM/Acetone 85:15 as eluent. 97% yield as a colourless oil. ¹H–NMR (250 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 3.32–3.36 (m, 5H, –O–CH₃ + –O–CH₂–CH₂–N₃), 3.48–3.52 (m, 2H, –O–CH₂–CH₂–N₃), 3.58–3.65 (m, 12H, 3 × –O–CH₂–CH₂–O–); ¹³C-NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 71.8, 70.5, 70.5, 70.5, 70.4, 70.3, 69.9, 58.9, 50.5; ESI-MS (ion trap): m/z 234 [M + H]⁺. HRMS (ESI+): m/z 234.1460 [M + H]⁺, calcd for C₈H₂₀N₃O₄: 234.1454.

19-Azido-2,5,8,11,14,17-hexaoxanonadecane (4b). Purified by flash chromatography using DCM/Acetone 8:2 as eluent. 96% yield as a colourless oil. ¹H-NMR (250 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 3.28–3.32 (m, 5H, –O–CH₃ + –O–CH₂–CH₂–N₃), 3.43–3.48 (m, 2H, –O–CH₂–CH₂–N₃), 3.53–3.61 (m, 20H, 5 × –O–CH₂–CH₂–O–); ¹³C-NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 71.6, 70.4, 70.4, 70.3, 70.3, 70.3, 70.3, 70.3, 70.2, 69.7, 58.7, 50.4; ESI-MS (ion trap): m/z 322 [M + H]⁺. HRMS (ESI+): m/z 322.1989 [M + H]⁺, calcd for C₁₃H₂₈N₃O₆: 322.1978.

3.4.3. General Procedure for the Preparation of Methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol)-amines (2c–4c)

Triphenylphosphine (10.88 g, 41.5 mmol, 1.25 eq.) in anhydrous THF (25 mL) was added dropwise to a solution of methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol)-azide (2b–4b) (33.0 mmol, 1.0 eq.) in anhydrous THF (25 mL), and the solution was stirred at RT for 5 h. Distilled water (20 mL) was then added and the mixture was heated under reflux (80 °C) and vigorously stirred overnight. The resulting mixture was evaporated under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by flash chromatography.

2-(2-(2-Methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethanamine (2c). Purified by flash chromatography using DCM/MeOH = 9:1 (+ 1% Et₃N) as eluent. 97% yield as a pale yellow oil. ¹H-NMR (250 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 1.57 (s, 2H, –CH₂–NH₂), 2.79 (t, 2H, ³J_H–H = 5.25 Hz, –CH₂–CH₂–NH₂), 3.31 (s, 3H, –O–CH₃), 3.41–3.51 (m, 4H, –O–CH₂–CH₂–O– + –O–CH₂–CH₂–NH₂), 3.52–3.63 (m, 6H, –O–CH₂–CH₂–O– + –O–CH₂–CH₂–O–); ¹³C-NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 73.2, 71.6, 70.3, 70.3, 70.0, 58.8, 41.5; ESI-MS (ion trap): m/z 164 [M + H]⁺. HRMS (ESI+): m/z 164.1275 [M + H]⁺, calcd for C₇H₁₈NO₃: 164.1287.

2,5,8,11-Tetraoxatridecan-13-amine (3c). Purified by flash chromatography using DCM/MeOH = 9:1 (+ 1% Et₃N) as eluent. 96% yield as a pale yellow oil. ¹H-NMR (250 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 1.54 (s, 2H, –CH₂–NH₂), 2.71 (t, 2H, ³J_H–H = 5.25 Hz, –CH₂–CH₂–NH₂), 3.22 (s, 3H, –O–CH₃), 3.34–3.41 (m, 4H, –O–CH₂–CH₂–O– + –O–CH₂–CH₂–NH₂), 3.45–3.51 (m, 10H, 2 × –O–CH₂–CH₂–O– + –O–CH₂–CH₂–O–); ¹³C-NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 40.7, 39.3, 38.0, 37.9, 37.9, 37.9, 37.6, 26.4, 9.1; ESI-MS (ion trap): m/z 208 [M + H]⁺. HRMS (ESI+): m/z 208.1552 [M + H]⁺, calcd for C₉H₂₂NO₄: 208.1549.

2,5,8,11,14,17-Hexaoxanonadecan-19-amine (4c). Purified by flash chromatography using DCM/MeOH = 9:1 (+ 1% Et₃N) as eluent. 98% yield as a pale yellow oil. ¹H-NMR (250 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 1.78 (s, 2H, –CH₂–NH₂), 2.76 (t, 2H, ³J_H–H = 5.25 Hz, –CH₂–CH₂–NH₂), 3.26 (s, 3H, –O–CH₃), 3.39–3.46 (m, 4H, –O–CH₂–CH₂–O– + –O–CH₂–CH₂–NH₂), 3.51–3.56 (m, 18H, 4 × –O–CH₂–CH₂–O– + –O–CH₂–CH₂–O–); ¹³C-NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 72.8, 71.6, 70.3, 70.3, 70.3, 70.2, 70.2, 70.2, 70.0, 58.7, 41.4; ESI-MS (ion trap): m/z 296 [M + H]⁺. HRMS (ESI+): m/z 296.2077 [M + H]⁺, calcd for C₁₃H₃₀NO₆: 296.2073.

3.4.4. General Procedure for the Preparation of Activated 4-Nitrophenyl Methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol) Urethanes (2d–4d)

A solution of methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol) amine (2c–4c) (8.2 mmol, 1.0 eq.) and DMAP (2.00 g, 16.4 mmol, 2.0 eq.) in acetonitrile (15 mL) was added dropwise to a solution of bis(4-nitrophenyl) carbonate (2.74 g, 9.0 mmol, 1.1 eq.) in acetonitrile (15 mL) and the resulting solution was stirred at 50 °C for 3 h. The reaction mixture was then diluted in DCM (150 mL) and washed with 0.5 N HCl (100 mL). The aqueous layer was washed with DCM (5 × 100 mL) and all the organic fractions were collected, dried over MgSO₄ and filtered. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by flash chromatography.

4-Nitrophenyl (2-(2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethyl)carbamate (2c). Purified by flash chromatography using DCM/Acetone = 9:1 as eluent. 87% yield as a pale yellow oil. ¹H-NMR (250 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 3.31 (s, 3H, –O–CH₃), 3.37–3.43 (m, 2H, –O–CH₂–CH₂–NH–), 3.49–3.63 (m, 10H, 2 × –O–CH₂–CH₂–O– + –O–CH₂–CH₂–NH–), 6.06 (t, 1H, –NH–, ³J_H–H = 5 Hz), 7.25 (d, 2H, Ar–H, ³J_H–H = 9.25 Hz), 8.15 (d, 2H, Ar–H, ³J_H–H = 9.25 Hz); ¹³C-NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 155.9, 153.1, 144.3, 124.8, 121.8, 71.6, 70.2, 70.2, 69.9, 69.3, 58.7, 40.8; ESI-MS (ion trap): m/z 329 [M + H]⁺. HRMS (ESI+): m/z 329.1357 [M + H]⁺, calcd for C₁₄H₂₁N₂O₇: 329.1349.

4-Nitrophenyl 2,5,8,11-tetraoxatridecan-13-ylcarbamate (3c). Purified by flash chromatography using DCM/Acetone = 85:15 as eluent. 85% yield as a pale yellow oil. ¹H-NMR (250 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 3.17 (s, 3H, –O–CH₃), 3.24–3.30 (m, 2H, –O–CH₂–CH₂–NH–), 3.35–3.50 (m, 14H, 3 × –O–CH₂–CH₂–O– + –O–CH₂–CH₂–NH–), 6.21 (t, 1H, –NH–, ³J_H–H = 5 Hz), 7.15 (d, 2H, Ar–H, ³J_H–H = 9.25 Hz), 8.03 (d, 2H, Ar–H, ³J_H–H = 9.25 Hz); ¹³C-NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): ¹³C-NMR (63 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm) 156.1, 153.2, 144.3, 124.9, 121.9, 71.7, 70.4, 70.3, 70.2, 70.1, 69.4, 58.7, 41.0; ESI-MS (ion trap): m/z 373 [M + H]⁺. HRMS (ESI+): m/z 373.1619 [M + H]⁺, calcd for C₁₆H₂₅N₂O₈: 373.1611.

4-Nitrophenyl 2,5,8,11,14,17-hexaoxanonadecan-19-ylcarbamate (4c). Purified by flash chromatography using DCM/Acetone gradient from 8:2 to 6:4 as eluent. 84% yield as a pale yellow oil. ¹H-NMR (250 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 3.30 (s, 3H, –O–CH₃), 3.37–3.50 (m, 4H, –O–CH₂–CH₂–NH–), 3.55–3.61 (m, 20H, 5 × –O–CH₂–CH₂–O–), 6.04 (t, 1H, –NH–, ³J_H–H = 5 Hz), 7.26 (d, 2H, Ar–H, ³J_H–H = 9.25 Hz), 8.17 (d, 2H, Ar–H , ³J_H–H = 9.25 Hz); ¹³C-NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 125.8, 124.9, 121.8, 115.5, 71.6, 70.3, 70.3, 70.3, 70.2, 70.0, 69.3, 58.8, 40.9; ESI-MS (ion trap): m/z 461 [M + H]⁺. HRMS (ESI+): m/z 461.2137 [M + H]⁺, calcd for C₁₃H₃₀NO₆: 461.2135.

3.4.5. General Procedure for the Preparation of 3,4′,5-N-Monosubstituted-methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol) Resveratrol Carbamate Esters (2–4)

A solution of resveratrol (0.24 g, 1.1 mmol, 1.0 eq.) and DMAP (0.52 g, 4.2 mmol, 4.0 eq.) in ACN (15 mL) was added to a solution of the activated 4-nitrophenyl methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol) urethane (2c–4c) (4.8 mmol, 4.5 eq) in ACN (5 mL) and the resulting mixture was allowed to react under vigorous stirring at 50 °C for 24 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with DCM (150 mL) and washed with 0.5 N HCl (100 mL). The aqueous layer was washed with DCM (5 × 75 mL) and all the organic fractions were collected, dried over MgSO₄ and filtered. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by flash chromatography.

(E)-5-(4-(2-(2-(2-Methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethyl)carbamate)-1,3-phenylene bis((2-(2-(2-methoxyethoxy) ethoxy)ethyl)carbamate) (2). Purified by flash chromatography using DCM/Acetone = 6.5:3.5 as eluent. 75% yield as a pale yellow oil. ¹H-NMR (250 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 3.08 (m, 9 H, 3 × –O–CH₃), 3.39 (s, 9H, 3 × –O–CH₃) 3.42–3.69 (m, 36H, 6 × –O–CH₂–CH₂–O– + 3 × –O–CH₂–CH₂–NH–), 5.80 (m, 3H, 3 × –NH–), 6.86 (t, 1H, ⁴J_H–H = 2.0 Hz, H–4), 6.90–7.12 (m, 6H, H–2, H–3′, H–5′, H–6, H–7, H–8), 7.45 (d, 2H, ³J_H–H = 8.75 Hz, H–2′, H–6′); ¹³C–NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 154.6, 154.3, 151.6, 150.7, 139.1, 133.9, 129.2, 127.4, 127.1, 121.8, 116.3, 114.3, 71.8, 70.5, 70.2, 70.2, 69.8, 59.0, 40.9; ESI-MS (ion trap): m/z 818 [M + Na]⁺. HRMS (ESI+): m/z 796.3873 [M + H]⁺, calcd for C₃₈H₅₈N₃O₁₅: 796.3868.

(E)-5-(4-(5,8,11-Tetraoxatridecan-13-ylcarbamate)styryl)-1,3-phenylene bis(2,5,8,11-tetraoxatridecan -13-ylcarbamate) (3). Purified by flash chromatography using DCM/Acetone = 5:5 as eluent. 88% yield as a colourless oil. ¹H-NMR (250 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 3.35 (s, 9H, 3 × –O–CH₃), 3.41–3.56 (m, 12H, 3 × –O–CH₂–CH₂–NH–), 3.60–3.68 (m, 36H, 9 × –O–CH₂–CH₂–O–), 5.81–5.88 (m, 3H, 3 × –NH–), 6.80–7.14 (m, 7H, H–2, H–4, H–3′, H–5′, H–6, H–7, H–8), 7.44 (d, 2H, ³J_H–H = 8.75 Hz, H–2′, H–6′); 13C–NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 154.5, 154.2, 151.5, 150.6, 138.9, 133.7, 129.1, 127.3, 126.9, 121.7, 116.2, 114.2, 71.7, 70.4, 70.3, 70.3, 70.1, 70.0, 69.6, 58.8, 40.8; ESI-MS (ion trap): m/z 928 [M + H]⁺. HRMS (ESI+): m/z 928.4669 [M + H]⁺, calcd for C₄₄H₇₀N₃O₁₈: 928.4654.

(E)-5-(4-(2,5,8,11,14,17-Hexaoxanonadecan-19-ylcarbamate)styryl)-1,3-phenylene bis(2,5,8,11,14,17-hexaoxanonadecan-19-ylcarbamate) (4). Purified by flash chromatography using DCM/Acetone from 4:6 to 2:8 as eluent. 76% yield as a colourless oil. ¹H-NMR (250 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 3.33 (s, 9H, 3 × –O–CH₃), 3.38–3.51 (m, 12H, 3 × –O–CH₂–CH₂–NH–), 3.57–3.68 (m, 60H, 15 × –O–CH₂–CH₂–O–), 5.80–5.86 (m, 3H, 3 × –NH–), 6.80–7.12 (m, 7H, H–2, H–4, H–3′, H–5′, H–6, H–7, H–8), 7.41 (d, 2H, ³J_H–H = 8.75 Hz, H–2′, H–6′); ¹³C-NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl₃) δ (ppm): 154.4, 154.1, 151.5, 150.6, 138.9, 133.8, 129.1, 127.3, 127.0, 121.7, 116.2, 114.2, 71.7, 70.4, 70.4, 70.3, 70.3, 70.3, 70.2, 69.7, 58.8, 40.9; ESI-MS (ion trap): m/z 1193 [M + H]⁺. HRMS (ESI+): m/z 1192.6231 [M + H]⁺, calcd for C₅₆H₉₄N₃O₂₄: 1192.6227.

4. Conclusions

It was previously shown [47] that the N,N-disubstituited carbamate protecting group is too stable to regenerate resveratrol at convenient rates under physiological conditions. This work also marks progress in comparison with ref. [60]. The ether and ester bonds used in [60] were too stable or too unstable for use in prodrugs, respectively. The only carboxylic ester derivative hydrolyzing relatively slowly in plasma was the PEG–PLA copolymer conjugate which formed supramolecular structures in aqueous solution and presumably after i.v. injection [60]. How this construct would behave after oral or intragastric administration was not tested. The N-monosubstituted carbamate ester derivatives synthesized herein show, instead, optimal stability for use as prodrugs: high stability under acidic conditions to withstand passage through the stomach, slow hydrolysis at intestinal pH, and faster hydrolysis in blood. The selected promoieties, short monodispersed methoxy-oligo(ethylene glycol) chains, may be a convenient tool for modulating the properties and, thus, improving the performance of the resulting prodrugs.