Next Article in Journal
Reactions of an Isolable Dialkylsilylene with Aroyl Chlorides. A New Route to Aroylsilanes
Next Article in Special Issue
Current Advances of Tubulin Inhibitors in Nanoparticle Drug Delivery and Vascular Disruption/Angiogenesis
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and In Vitro Cytotoxic Properties of Polycarbo-Substituted 4-(Arylamino)quinazolines
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Novel Natural Product- and Privileged Scaffold-Based Tubulin Inhibitors Targeting the Colchicine Binding Site

1
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China
2
School of Environment, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Environmental Exposure and Health and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2016, 21(10), 1375; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21101375
Submission received: 10 September 2016 / Revised: 10 October 2016 / Accepted: 11 October 2016 / Published: 15 October 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tubulin Inhibitors)

Abstract

:
Tubulin inhibitors are effective anticancer agents, however, there are many limitations to the use of available tubulin inhibitors in the clinic, such as multidrug resistance, severe side-effects, and generally poor bioavailability. Thus, there is a constant need to search for novel tubulin inhibitors that can overcome these limitations. Natural product and privileged structures targeting tubulin have promoted the discovery and optimization of tubulin inhibitors. This review will focus on novel tubulin inhibitors derived from natural products and privileged structures targeting the colchicine binding site on tubulin.

1. Introduction

Microtubules, a key component of the cytoskeleton, play essential roles in important cellular events, such as the maintenance of cell shape, cell division, cell migration and intracellular transport. Microtubules are dynamic polymers composed of tubulin heterodimers formed from α- and β-tubulins. The dynamics of microtubule polymerization are tightly regulated. Under normal physiological conditions, a dynamic equilibrium exists between the intracellular pool of α,β-tubulin heterodimers and the microtubule polymer [1,2]. The dynamics of microtubule polymerization are central to their biological functions.
In dividing cells, the most important role of microtubules is to form the mitotic spindle involved in cell division. This function makes microtubules an attractive target for anticancer therapy. To date, many chemically diverse compounds have been discovered and shown to possess anticancer activities by binding to tubulin and inhibiting the functions or dynamics of microtubules. These compounds are known as antimitotic agents and include taxanes, paclitaxel, vincristine, colchicine, docetaxel, ixabepilone, cabazitaxel and navelbine [3]. Based on their effects on microtubule polymerization, antimitotic agents are divided into two major classes [4]: microtubule-destabilizing agents and microtubule-stabilizing agents. The destabilizing agents, such as vinca alkaloids and colchicine, inhibit tubulin polymerization by binding to the vinca domain or the colchicine domain (at the α-β interfacial site) of tubulin. The microtubule-stabilizing agents, including taxanes, paclitaxel, docetaxel and epothilones, stimulate tubulin polymerization by binding to an overlapping taxoid binding site on β-tubulin, which is located on the inner surface of the microtubule [5]. The well-characterized binding sites for these agents on tubulin include the taxoid binding site, the vinca site, and the colchicine site [2,3].
The binding of antitubulin agents regulates microtubule polymerization at high concentrations or suppresses microtubule dynamics at lower concentrations (10–100 times lower), which is the common mechanism by which these drugs block mitosis and induce cell apoptosis [6,7]. Other mechanisms of action include anti-angiogenesis activity and vascular disruption [3]. Over the last two decades, much effort has been devoted to identifying structurally diverse inhibitors of tubulin polymerization from both natural and synthetic sources. Notably, most of the known active antitubulin agents are of natural origin, characterized by a very complex structure and are difficult to synthesize and scale up. Other drawbacks of the use of tubulin inhibitors in cancer therapy include multidrug resistance (MDR), dose-limiting toxicity and poor water solubility. Thus, many studies have been performed over the years to explore new antitubulin agents inspired by natural products, which include combretastatin A-4, chalcones, phenstatins, podophyllotoxin, chalcones, taxol and vinca alkaloids. Structurally, these small active molecules have various heteroaromatic cores, such as the indole [8], benzofuran [9,10], thiazole [11,12] and imidazole [13,14,15] moieties. For many years, the potential of using colchicine binding site inhibitors (CBSIs) to overcome the clinical limitations of the available tubulin inhibitors has been recognized [16]. In this review, we will focus on novel, chemically diverse antitubulin agents targeting the colchicine binding site on tubulin.

2. Colchicine Analogues

Colchicine (1), a natural product extracted from Colchicum autumnale, has been used to treat acute gout. Although colchicine (1) is a powerful antimitotic agent, the use of colchicine in cancer chemotherapy is hampered by its toxicity and the development of MDR [17]. However, the remarkable biological activity of colchicine in microtubule depolymerization has stimulated the exploration of new colchicine analogues with improved anticancer activity and low systemic toxicity. Structurally, colchicine consists of a trimethoxyphenyl ring (A-ring), a saturated seven-membered ring containing an acetamido group (B-ring), and a tropolone ring (C-ring) (Figure 1). As shown in previous structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies, the A- and C-rings of colchicine are key structural features required for its high binding to tubulin and biological activity [18,19,20,21]. Any modification in the A-ring of colchicine causes a complete loss of binding, whereas modifications to both the B- and C-rings are possible. In addition, both a minimal size and a nitrogen atom at C-7 of the B-ring are required for P-glycoprotein (P-gp) recognition and transport [22] (Figure 1). Therefore, many studies have focused on structural modifications of C-7 of the B-ring to discover colchicine analogues with improved potency and less toxicity or analogues that overcome drug resistance.
For example, colchicine and isocolchicine analogues modified at the C-7 position of the B-ring have been reported [23]. In addition to the strong inhibition of tubulin polymerization, compounds 2 and 3 (Figure 2) also possessed an increased cytotoxic activity compared to that of colchicine. Among the new colchicinoids with a variable triazole unit at C-7 [24], three active compounds, the phenylalanine derivative 4 (Figure 2), the 4-fluorobenzyl ester 5 (Figure 2), and the β-alanine ester 6 (Figure 2), exhibited pronounced cytotoxic activities against several human cancer cell lines and inhibited tubulin polymerization, with IC50 values ranging from 2–3 μM. These active compounds distorted the microtubule morphology by depolymerizing tubulin; in particular, compound 4 (Figure 2), also exhibited a pronounced centrosome declustering effect in triple negative breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231) and non-small cell lung cancer cells (H1975). Based on the SAR analysis, the distance between the lipophilic moiety (phenyl or tert-butyl) and the colchicine core in the colchicine-derived triazoles played a key role in improving their anticancer activities.
In another study, colchicine B-ring analogues were prepared by incorporating aryl-substituted fragments to improve the affinity and to overcome MDR [25]. Compared with colchicine, compound 7 (Figure 2) possesses improved antiproliferative activity against drug-sensitive (IC50 < 30 nM) and drug-resistant cancer cells (IC50 values for A2780A and HeLaβIII cells are 17.2 ± 1.4 and 14.1 ± 0.8 nM, respectively) and inhibited tubulin polymerization (IC50: 1.52 ± 0.18 μM). Furthermore, colchicine analogues modified at the C-ring through the incorporation of aliphatic and heterocyclic amines showed potential for prodrug derivatization to evade traditional resistance mechanisms and improve target selectivity [26]. In the study by Zefirova et al., several colchicine analogues with various modifications at C-7 of the B-ring not only showed a colchicine-like ability to promote microtubule disassembly but also induced tubulin assembly into clusters [27,28]. The active compounds, which inhibited the growth of the human lung carcinoma cell line A549 at nanomolar concentrations (EC50 < 13 nM), were several times more cytotoxic than colchicine and exhibited both microtubule depolymerizing and tubulin clustering activities. Based on the SAR analysis of the analogues, both cytotoxicity and tubulin clustering ability were very sensitive to the linker length but were less sensitive to the position of the linker. The presence of a bulky hydrophobic and non-aromatic moiety in compound 8 (Figure 2) played an important role in the formation of tubulin clusters. Compound 8 (Figure 2) competed with both colchicine and taxol for binding to tubulin in vitro and induced tubulin assembly into regular wavy-shaped clusters composed of protofilaments bundles [28]. The proposed mechanism of compound 8 and its analogues includes specific interactions with the α-tubulin subunit and the induction of cell cycle arrest at G2/M and apoptosis.
Recently, new colchicine derivatives with C- and B-ring substitutions were evaluated for P-gp induction and antiproliferative activity [29]. A number of derivatives showed a lower P-gp-induction liability compared to colchicine due to their reduced ability to interact with and change the conformation of P-gp. The most active compound, 9 (Figure 2), showed antiproliferative activity in HCT-116 cells (IC50: 0.04 μM) and inhibited microtubule assembly and tumor growth in a mouse model, revealing new opportunities for the colchicine scaffold. Amine derivatives of colchicine have been obtained by modifying the C(10)-OCH3 position of the C-ring and evaluating their cytotoxicity against drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cancer cell lines [30]. Among these compounds, compound 10 (Figure 2) with a bis(2-methoxyethyl)amine substituent is the most active compound, with IC50 in the nanomolar to submicromolar concentrations, indicating the importance of the amine substitution at the C-10 position of the C-ring for anticancer activity and selectivity. In addition, hybrid molecules containing the colchicine moiety and a pironetin analogue fragment connected through an ester-amide spacer of variable length have been prepared [31]. These compounds showed lower cytotoxicity than the parent molecules colchicine and pironetin, and the length of the connecting spacer influenced the binding of the hybrid compounds to tubulin. Hybrid molecules with short spacers will reversibly bind the colchicine site and molecules with longer spacers covalently bind the pironetin binding site. In conclusion, appropriate modification of colchicine or hybridization with other active molecules can attenuate toxicity, which is of great benefit in cancer treatment.

3. Combretastatin A-4 Analogues

Combretastatin A-4 (CA-4, 11, Figure 3 and Figure 4), a natural cis-stilbene derivative isolated from the bark of the African willow tree Combretum caffrum, is a typical inhibitor of tubulin polymerization that binds to the colchicine binding site [32]. CA-4 shows strong cytotoxicity against a variety of cancer cells, including MDR cell lines [33]. However, poor solubility and the isomerization to the less active trans-form prevent the clinical translation of CA-4 [34]. The SAR (Figure 3) analysis showed that trimethoxy moiety, the cis-configuration of the double bond and the para-methoxy group on the B-ring exert dominant effects on modulating the pharmacological properties [35,36]. Because modifications of the A-ring reduce the bioactivity of most CA-4 (11) analogues (Figure 4), other studies have focused on modifying the B-ring and the bridge [35,37]. The analogues CA4P (12) (Figure 4), CA-1P (OXi4503: 13) (Figure 4) and AC7700 (AVE8062: 14) (Figure 4), three early prodrugs of CA-4 obtained by modifying the B-ring, are currently in clinical trials as potential vascular-targeting agents [38,39,40,41,42,43]. Currently, a large number of analogues of CA-4 (11) has been evaluated, some of which have recently been reviewed elsewhere [33].

3.1. B-Ring-Modified Analogues

Modifications to the B-ring are further subdivided into three main lines of research: (a) substituted phenyl rings, (b) heterocyclic rings, and (c) non-substituted aromatic rings. As shown in the SAR analysis, the presence of a para-methoxy group was required for the biological activity, whereas the presence of the meta-hydroxyl group was not essential. The meta position can undergo substitution with electron-donating (e.g., amino) [35] or electron-withdrawing groups (e.g., fluorine) [37], but substituents cannot exceed the size of the hydroxyl group. Among those analogues, heterocyclic rings were often exchanged for the benzene B-ring. Thus, compound libraries were prepared with indole [44], benzoxazolone [45], benzothiophene [46] and naphthalene [47] as the B-rings. These analogues maintained the ability to bind tubulin and inhibit microtubule polymerization. Furthermore, some modifications exhibited enhanced cytotoxicity. For example, compound 15 (Figure 4), one of the compounds prepared by replacing the B-ring with a benzoxazolone scaffold, showed enhanced cytotoxicity against several human cancer cell lines, including a combretastatin-resistant cell line, with IC50 values ranging from 0.19 to 0.73 μM [45].

3.2. Bridge-Modified Analogues

The linkage was reported to tolerate modifications, but the cis-configuration is required for the high cytotoxicity and antitubulin activity. Successful modification of the double bond was mainly achieved by replacing the olefinic bridge with heterocyclic rings to maintain a cis-locked configuration [48,49]. Alternatively, because heterocyclic compounds usually possess pharmacological properties, these substitutions might improve the therapeutic potential of these agents. The substitution of the double bond with five-membered rings appears to be the best option [36]. Currently, heterocyclic moieties such as triazoles [49], tetrazoles [50], furan [10], β-lactam [51], thiazole [12], imidazole [15], and selenadiazole [52], thiophene [53] have been shown to maintain or enhance the biological activities. For example, the 1,2,3,4-tetrazole ring is a suitable mimic to identify potent antiproliferative agents and novel inhibitors of tubulin polymerization that act at the colchicine site [50]. Compound 16 (Figure 4) is a representative example of one such structure that exhibited anticancer activity in eleven cancer cell lines, including MDR cancer cells, with IC50 values below 10 nM; compound 16 also significantly reduced the growth of HT-29 xenografts in vivo. Compound 17 (Figure 4) was identified from a screen of a focused library of benzo[b]furans as a potent inhibitor of tubulin polymerization (IC50: 3.0 ± 0.6 μM) with selectivity toward activated endothelial cells and a panel of cancer cell lines, including a range of MDR cells [10]. The disodium phosphate ester prodrug of compound 17 exhibited superior vascular-disrupting and tumor growth inhibitory properties compared with CA4P (12).
The incorporation of the 1,4-diaryl-2-azetidinone (β-lactam) ring system in place of the ethylene bridge resulted in CA-4 analogues with potent antiproliferative activity in breast cancer cells [51]. Among these compounds, the most potent compound 18 (Figure 4), exhibited low nanomolar activity in both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells and inhibited the tubulin polymerization with improved efficacy compared with CA-4 (11). Compound 19 (Figure 4), in which the olefinic core structure of CA-4 (11) was replaced with 2(3H)-thiazole thione, selectively inhibited cancer cell proliferation (IC50: 31.6–52.7 μM) and depolymerized tubulin [12].
Compound 20 (Figure 4), one of the 4,5-biarylated-2-aminoimidazole CA-4 analogues, showed higher antiproliferative activity than CA-4 (11) against five different cancer cell lines, including a drug-resistant cell line, and had an IC50 value of less than 3 nM [15]. Compound 20 inhibited the assembly of purified tubulin with an IC50 of 1.6 μM and strongly perturbed the microtubule network. Sanghai et al. synthesized a series of novel 2-aryl-3-arylamino-imidazo-pyridines/pyrazines [54]. Among these compounds, compound 21 (Figure 4) significantly inhibited tubulin polymerization and disrupted tubulin-microtubule dynamics, similar to CA-4 (11). These compounds showed potent anticancer activities in kidney, breast and cervical cancer cell lines and relatively low toxicity to normal cells compared to CA-4 (11). As shown in a molecular modeling analysis, the bridging NH and the imidazo-pyridine/pyrazine ring in the title compounds provided additional pharmacophoric features for the inhibition of tubulin polymerization. In addition, the hexa-cyclic compounds bearing B-C ring condensation and containing a C=C bond in the B-ring (22) (Figure 4) exhibited excellent antiproliferative activities against various cancer cell lines at nanomolar concentrations (IC50: 46–80 nM) and inhibited tubulin assembly at micromolar concentrations (IC50: 2.56 ± 0.15 μM) [55]. Instead of inhibiting tubulin polymerization, novel cyclopropylamide analogues of CA-4 derivatives were able to stimulate tubulin polymerization [56]. Compound 23 (Figure 4), the most potent analogue, showed antiproliferative activity against seven human cancer cell lines, including paclitaxel-resistant cancer cells (IC50: 2~20 μM), and effectively inhibited tumor growth in the A549 xenograft model without causing significant body weight loss. In the analysis of pyridine-bridged analogues of CA-4 (11) reported by Zheng et al., the activities of the analogues with 3-atom linkers varied widely, depending on the phenyl ring substitutions, but the most potent compounds exclusively display the nitrogen-containing linker configuration [57].

4. Compounds with an Indole Nucleus

The indole skeleton is a scaffold that probably represents one of the most important structural subunits for the discovery of new drug candidates [58,59]. A number of tubulin polymerization inhibitors, such as arylthioindoles, aroylindoles, diarylindoles and indolylglyoxyamides, include an indole nucleus [8,60,61].
Arylthioindoles (ATIs) are a class of potent inhibitors of tubulin polymerization and cancer cell growth [62]. The ATIs inhibit tubulin assembly by interacting with the colchicine site on β-tubulin [8]. In recent years, excellent work on the optimization of the structures of ATI derivatives and SAR analyses has been reported [62,63,64,65,66,67]. For example, compounds 24 (Figure 5) and 25 (Figure 5) inhibited tubulin polymerization with IC50 values of 2.0 and 4.5 μM, respectively, and inhibited MCF-7 cell growth at nanomolar concentrations [62,63]. Some ATI derivatives bearing a halogen atom or a small-sized ether group at position 5 of the indole moiety also inhibited tubulin polymerization to a comparable level as colchicine (1) and CA-4 (11) [64]. ATI derivatives, along with the corresponding ketone and methylene compounds, were potent inhibitors of tubulin assembly with IC50 values ranging from 0.67 to 4.6 μM [65], and some compounds (26, 27 and 28) (Figure 5) inhibited human MCF-7, HeLa and HCT116/chr3 cell growth by 50% at nanomolar concentrations. ATI derivatives in which the 2-alkoxycarbonyl group was replaced with a bioisosteric 5-membered heterocycle, such as a pyrrole, furan, or thiophene moiety, not only inhibited tubulin polymerization and cancer cell growth but also exhibited high metabolic stability (29, 30) (Figure 5) [66]. ATI derivatives possessing different cyclic substituents at position 2 of the indole inhibited tubulin polymerization with IC50 values ranging from <1.0 to 2.0 μM and inhibited the growth of MCF-7 cells, with IC50 values in the nanomolar range [67]. The most potent compound 31 (Figure 5), was uniformly active in a larger panel of cancer cells, including MDR cells, and showed initial vascular-disrupting effects in a tumor model of liver rhabdomyosarcoma [67].
In addition to the ATI derivatives, other potential tubulin inhibitors containing an indole ring as the core nucleus have also been investigated. For example, compounds (32, 33) (Figure 5) designed based on indole-3-glyoxylamides inhibited tubulin polymerization (IC50 values of 8.3 and 6.6 μM, respectively) and displayed improved cancer cell cytotoxicity in vitro (LC50 values of 31 and 55 nM against the FaDu cell line, respectively) and in vivo [68]. Inspired by OXi8006 (34, Figure 5), a well-known 2-aryl-3-aroyl indole-based potential tubulin inhibitor, a series of diversely functionalized analogues were prepared for biological evaluation. Compound 35 (Figure 5), which incorporates methoxy group at position 7, showed comparable activity in terms of the inhibition of tubulin assembly (IC50 < 5 μM) and cytotoxicity against three human cancer cell lines (SK-OV-3, NCI-H460 and DU-145) [69]. Two representative members of the 2-phenylindole derivatives of the indole (compounds 36 and 37, Figure 5) inhibited tubulin polymerization with IC50 values of 1.0–2.0 μM, and uniformly inhibited a panel of cancer cells at nanomolar concentrations [70]. However, the replacement of the B-ring and the cis olefinic core of CA-4 (11) with an indole moiety and selenium atom, respectively, maintained or slightly improved the antiproliferative activity of the compound [71]. Compound 38 (Figure 5), the most potent derivative, inhibited the proliferation of three human cancer cell lines (SGC7901, KB and HT-1080) with IC50 values of 12.3 ± 1.6, 13.5 ± 1.5 and 25.1 ± 2.0 nM, respectively. Compound 38 inhibited tubulin polymerization and disrupted microtubule dynamics in a similar manner to CA-4 (11).
In recent years, a series of novel hybrids of two crucial components of the pharmacophore in antitubulin drugs have resulted in many antitubulin agents with improved activity compared to the parent structures. For example, Kamal et al. [72] synthesized imidazopyrimidine-oxindole conjugates based on the biological activities of oxindole and imidazopyridine moieties. Some of the compounds displayed impressive antiproliferative activities (GI50: 0.17–9.31 μM) against sixty different human cancer cell lines and remarkable inhibitory effects on tubulin polymerization, similar to CA-4 (11). Hwang et al. synthesized a series of indolyl-imidazopyridines (IIP) and found that some potently inhibited tubulin polymerization in a panel of human melanoma and prostate cancer cell lines, with IC50 values ranging from 3 to 175 nM [73]. The 6-indolyl derivative 39 (Figure 5) showed the strongest inhibition (IC50 at 3 nM on A375 and 8 nM on PC-3) and best metabolic stability, 56.3 min, in human liver microsomes (HLM). As shown in the SAR analysis, the pyridine D-ring moiety of IIP provided some benefits toward metabolic stability in HLM. Hu et al. synthesized novel hybrids of an indole-pyrimidine containing a piperazine moiety [74]. The majority of these compounds possessed significant cytotoxicity. The most promising compound 40 (Figure 5) inhibited tubulin polymerization (IC50: 11.2 μM) and showed broad-spectrum cytotoxicity (IC50 values ranged from 5.01 to 14.36 μM) toward several human cancer cell lines, but not normal human cells. Thus, hybrids of pharmacophores might be an efficient strategy for the development of tubulin inhibitors.

5. Chalcone Analogues

Chalcones, the precursors of flavonoids and isoflavonoids, are abundant in edible plants. Chalcone comprises a characteristic framework of 1,3-diaryl-2-propen-1-one and represents an attractive scaffold for the design of novel colchicine site ligands that inhibit tubulin assembly [75]. As chalcones are easy to synthesize and contain excellent leading skeletons, studies have been performed to modify chalcones and enhance their antitumor activities [76]. For example, Lawrence et al. reported the synthesis of a 644-membered library of chalcones by parallel synthesis using the Claisen-Schmidt reaction [77]. Seven chalcones exhibited an IC50 of less than 1 μM against K562 cells. The most active compound 41 (Figure 6) was impressively cytotoxic (IC50: 30 nM) and inhibited tubulin polymerization (IC50: 1.5 μM) at levels comparable to CA-4 (11). Ducki et al. incorporated the aryl substitution pattern of CA-4 (11) into chalcones and obtained several chalcones with substantial in vitro activity against the K562 human leukemia cell line [78]. As shown in the SAR analysis, the 3,4,5-trimethoxy A-ring substitution markedly increases cytotoxicity, and the most cytotoxic analogues are those chalcones most resembling CA-4 (11), such as compounds 42 and 43 (Figure 6). Compound 44 (Figure 6), the most potent compound of a series of novel dithiocarbamate compounds with the chalcone scaffold [79], inhibited the growth of MCF-7 cells with an IC50 value of 0.04 ± 0.01 μM, and tubulin polymerization, with an IC50 value of 6.8 ± 0.6 μM. Compounds 45 and 46 (Figure 6) were obtained from a series of trimethoxychalcones [80]. These compound inhibited tubulin assembly similar to colchicine (1), with IC50 values of 2.2 μM and 2.8 μM, respectively, and selectively inhibited the growth of various human cancer cell lines at nanomolar concentrations, causing microtubule destabilization and mitotic arrest. The SAR analysis suggested that the presence of a 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl group in the A-ring is beneficial for tubulin interaction as well as antiproliferative and antimitotic effects [80]. As reported by Wang et al., chalcone oxime derivatives maintained their ability to inhibit tubulin polymerization and the antiproliferative activity against human cancer cell lines by binding to the colchicine binding site [81]. Among these novel compounds, compound 47 (Figure 6) displayed the most potent inhibition of tubulin polymerization (IC50: 1.6 μM) and displayed potent antiproliferative activity against A549, HeLa and MCF-7 cells, with GI50 values of 2.1, 3.5 and 3.6 μM, respectively, which were comparable to colchicine (1) and CA-4 (11).
Compounds 48, 49, 50 and 51 (Figure 6) are ortho-aryl chalcones. These compounds inhibited microtubule polymerization and exhibited significant antiproliferative activity against a panel of parental and MDR cancer cell lines with IC50 values ranging from moderate to low nanomolar concentrations. This activity is several thousand-fold superior to the abilities of colchicine, paclitaxel, doxorubicin, and vincristine to inhibit the growth of MDR cancer cell lines, implying that ortho-aryl chalcones represent a new scaffold targeting tubulin and mitosis for novel antitumor drug discovery [82]. Compound 52 (Figure 6) is a new pyranochalcone derivative containing an indole moiety. This compound displayed cytotoxic activity against ten human cancer cell lines, including cells with an MDR phenotype, with IC50 values ranging from 0.22 to 1.80 μM, and exerted potent anticancer activity against HepG2 human liver carcinoma in BALB/c nude mice [83]. An N-methyl-5-indolyl group on the right ring and a propionyloxy group at the 4 position of the left phenyl ring had beneficial effects on the cytotoxic activity. Chen et al. designed and synthesized a series of novel chalcone analogues through the aldol condensation of indanones and indole carbaldehydes [84]. Compounds obtained from 4,5,6-trimethoxy indanone with different indole carbaldehydes usually exhibited more potent antiproliferative activities. The GI50 values for the most potent compound, 53 (Figure 6), against five cancer cell lines ranged from 26 nM to 35 nM. Based on mechanistic studies, compound 53 effectively inhibited cellular tubulin polymerization and interfered with mitosis in vitro, resulting in a prolonged arrest of the cell cycle at G2/M and ultimately the apoptosis of cancer cells. Twenty-nine novel indole-chalcone derivatives were synthesized to develop additional tubulin inhibitors [85], among which compound 54 inhibited tubulin polymerization (IC50: 2.68 ± 0.15 μM) and exhibited the most potent activity against six cancer cell lines (IC50 values of 3–9 nM), with a 3.8- to 8.7-fold increase in activity compared with that of compound 53 (Figure 6). Compound 54 (Figure 6) displayed nearly equally potent antiproliferative activity toward drug-resistant cancer cell lines, good metabolic stability in mouse liver microsomes and antitumor activity in vivo without apparent toxicity, which was better than compounds CA-4P (12) and 53.
In addition to individual compound, a number of potent hybrid molecules with anticancer activities have been developed by grouping different pharmacophores [86]. For example, the hybrid of imidazothiazoles and chalcones resulted in 2,3-diaryl imidazo[1,2-b]thiazole-chalcone conjugates that exhibited significant antiproliferative activities against several cancer cells. Among these conjugates, compound 55 (Figure 6), which contains a pyridyl ring, is the most active, with IC50 values ranging from 0.64 to 1.44 μM in all tested cell lines. This compound disrupted microtubule dynamics and induced the formation of an abnormal spindle structure and centrosome by binding tubulin at the colchicine site [87]. In another study, twenty-three compounds containing a resveratrol skeleton and a chalcone moiety were synthesized. Compound 56 (Figure 6) was the most potent compound in a cytotoxicity assay, and it inhibited the growth of the cells lines HepG2, B16-F10, and A549, with IC50 values of 0.47 ± 0.02, 3.27 ± 0.19, and 0.23 ± 0.35 μM, respectively, and inhibited tubulin polymerization, with an IC50 of 6.07 ± 1.4 μM [88].

6. Podophyllotoxin Derivatives/Analogues

Podophyllotoxin (57, PTOX, Figure 7 and Figure 8), a naturally occurring cyclolignan isolated from Podophyllum species, inhibits the assembly of tubulin into microtubules by binding to the colchicine site of tubulin [89]. The severe toxicity of PTOX limits its application as a cancer therapy. However, PTOX is still considered an attractive lead candidate for the development of new therapeutic agents [90]. Derivatives of podophyllotoxin, such as etoposide, etopophos and teniposide, have been developed and are currently used in the clinic for the treatment of a variety of malignancies. The main mechanism by which PTOX derivatives exert their antitumor activities is the inhibition of microtubule assembly and DNA topoisomerase II [89,90]. Podophyllotoxin-like compounds preferentially inhibit tubulin polymerization by reversibly binding to the colchicine site, which leads to arrest of the cell cycle in the metaphase [91]. Based on the structural complexity of podophyllotoxin arising from the presence of four stereogenic carbons in the C-ring, most of the SAR studies have been performed using podophyllotoxin analogues [92]. The structural features required for the antitubulin activity of podophyllotoxin analogues are the transfused γ-lactone, the fused dioxole ring, and the nearly orthogonal free-rotating 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl fragment [93] (Figure 7).
Recently, numerous modifications to podophyllotoxins structures have been generated to develop novel tubulin-targeting anti-tumor drugs. For example, novel pinacol derivatives of podophyllotoxins with different side chains at C-7 were synthesized through the reductive cross-coupling of podophyllotoxin with several aldehydes and ketones [93]. Analyses of the cytotoxicities toward neoplastic cells and the disruption of microtubules showed that epipodopinacol (7β-OH) analogues 5860 (Figure 8) proved to be the most potent inhibitors of three cancer cell lines (A549, HT-29 and SK-BR3) with GI50 values less than 100 nM. Significantly, 7α-isopropyl-7-deoxy-podophyllotoxin (61, Figure 8), without any hydroxyl functional group, appeared to be as a promising lead compound for a novel type of tubulin polymerization inhibitor. Liu et al. [95] reported a biological evaluation of eight novel podophyllotoxin derivatives, of which compound 62 displayed significant antiproliferative activities against four human tumor cell lines, with IC50 values of 0.75–1.36 μM, as well as strong inhibition of tubulin polymerization. Labruere et al. synthesized two novel series of azapodophyllotoxin analogues. Several new compounds 6366 (Figure 8) with inhibitory activity toward tubulin polymerization similar to CA-4 (11) and colchicine (1) were identified [96], indicating that 4-azapodophyllotoxin analogues are potential lead compounds for the development of vascular-disrupting agents.

7. Myoseverin Derivatives

Myoseverin (67, Figure 9) was previously identified as a novel inhibitor of microtubule assembly from a screening of a 2,6,9-trisubstituted purine-based library [97]. The myoseverin-induced inhibition of microtubule assembly promoted the synthesis of novel trisubstituted triazine libraries [98,99,100]. Compounds identified from these libraries exhibit novel anti-tubulin activities in vitro and in vivo. For example, compounds 68 and 69 (Figure 9) exhibited activities comparable to myoseverin (67), whereas compound 70 (Figure 9) exhibited an at least 4- to 10-fold improvement in inhibition in tubulin and U937 cell growth assays compared to myoseverin (67) [98]. The N9 cyclohexyl derivative 71 (Figure 9) prevented microtubule polymerization in Xenopus laevis egg extracts and inhibited the polymerization of purified bovine brain tubulin [99]. The GI50 of compound 71 against U937 cells is 20-fold less than the GI50 of myoseverin (67). The SAR analysis showed that hydrophobic substituents at the N9 position potently inhibited microtubule assembly [99,101]. Further optimization of myoseverin led to the discovery of the pyrazolo[4,3-d]pyrimidine 72 (Figure 9) [100] and pyrazolo[1,5-a]-1,3,5-triazine (73 and 74) (Figure 9) [102] analogues that exhibited potent inhibition of tubulin polymerization and specific antiproliferative activity in cancer cell lines at micromolar concentrations. Compared with other agents interfere with microtubule, such as taxol, vinblastine, nocodazole and colchicine, the nontoxicity of these purine-based microtubule-interfering agents suggests that they are suitable for potential application as anticancer agents [101].

8. Sulfonamides

Sulfonamides possess many types of biological activities, such as antibacterial, diuretic, antidiabetic, antithyroid, antihypertensive, or antiviral activities, and have been used in clinical settings [103]. The observation that many novel sulfonamide derivatives exhibit substantial antitumor activity is particularly interesting [104,105,106]. Since the discovery of E7010 (75, Figure 10) in 1992, sulfonamides targeting tubulin have emerged as an important class of anticancer agents [107]. E7010 (75), also known as ABT-751, is an orally bioavailable sulfonamide that inhibits tubulin polymerization by binding to the colchicine site on β-tubulin. E7010 exhibited a broad spectrum of antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo [108,109] and has entered Phase II clinical trials [110]. A series of compounds were identified from sulfonamide-focused libraries based on the structure of E7010 (7680 (Figure 10) [111,112], 81, 82 (Figure 10) [108,111,113], 83 (Figure 10) [114,115]). These compounds inhibited tubulin polymerization and induced G2/M arrest, similar to E7010 (75). Medina et al. reported a series of pentafluorobenzenesulfonamide derivatives that displayed potent antiproliferative activity against a variety of tumor cells lines, including MDR tumor cell lines [116], with the compound T138067 (84) (Figure 10) showing the best activity. Interestingly, T138067 (84) (Figure 10) disrupted tubulin polymerization by covalently modifying β-tubulin at Cys239 [117]. Recently, some novel sulfonamide-based compounds have been shown to exhibit antiproliferative activity in different human cancer cell lines, with typical characteristics of tubulin-interacting agents [118,119,120,121]. For example, 2-(N-(3-chlorophenyl)-4-methoxyphenylsulfonamido)-N-hydroxypropan-amide (MPSP-001) inhibited the growth of 12 different types of human cancer cells (IC50 values ranging from 1.9 to 15.7 μM) and tubulin polymerization by directly binding to the colchicine site of β-tubulin [119]. A screen of the anticancer activity of twenty-four compounds containing the sulfonamide scaffold led to the identification of a naphthalene sulfonamide that acts as a novel reversible antimitotic agent by interfering with tubulin polymerization, which inhibited cancer cell motility and the growth of a representative panel of human cancer cell lines, with IC50 values in the nanomolar-to-low micromolar range [120]. In addition, some novel (E)-N-aryl-2-arylethene-sulfonamides showed potent cytotoxicity against a wide spectrum of cancer cell lines (IC50 values ranging from 5 to 10 nM) by disrupting tubulin assembly [121]. Among these compounds, compound 85 (Figure 10), the most potent compound, exhibits increased blood-brain barrier permeability compared to many clinically used antimitotic agents and inhibited tumor growth in vivo. Molecules with an aryl sulfonamide moiety containing 3-hydroxy, 4-methoxy groups or 3-amino, 4-methoxy groups and a styryl ring with methoxy groups at the 2, 4, and 6 positions showed optimum biological activity in SAR studies. Furthermore, the dimethyl quinone ester, water-soluble disodium phosphate or glycine analogue of compound 85 (Figure 10) showed good activity.

9. Thiazolidinone, Thiazole and Imidazole Analogues

9.1. Thiazolidinone Analogues

Thiazolidine is an important scaffold known to be associated with broad pharmacological activities in medicinal chemistry [122,123]. 4-thiazolidinones are derivatives of thiazolidine with a carbonyl group at the 4-position [122]. In a random screen of commercial compounds, compounds 86 and 87 (Figure 11), which contain a 4-thiazolidinone core structure, selectively killed drug-resistant cancer cells overexpressing P-gp by inducing apoptosis [124,125,126,127]. An iterative focused thiazolidinone library containing 372 compounds were synthesized and screened to explore the optimal pharmacophore structure and SAR for cytoselective toxicity and to improve the therapeutic window [128]. As a result, 10 potent cytoselective anticancer agents that selectively killed the paclitaxel-sensitive and paclitaxel-resistant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines H460 and H460TaxR, respectively, but not normal cells, were identified. IC50 values for H460 and H460TaxR cells were all <2.93 μM, and the IC50 values for normal NHFB cells were all >100 μM [128], indicating that these compounds are more effective but less toxic than previously reported compounds [125]. As shown in the SAR (Figure 12) studies, (a) the nitrogen atom on the 4-thiazolidinone ring cannot be substituted; (b) several substitutions on the A-ring are tolerated at various positions; and (c) the substitution on the C-ring is restricted to the -NMe2 group at the 4 position. A pharmacophore derived from active molecules suggested that two hydrogen bond acceptors and three hydrophobic regions were common features [128]. These active compounds exhibited anticancer activities across a wide variety of cancer cell lines, independent of P-gp expression, in further in vitro and in vivo studies [129,130,131,132,133,134]. As shown in mechanism studies, the inhibition of tubulin polymerization is one of the anticancer mechanisms of these active thiazolidinone compounds 8895 (Figure 11).
Clinically available tubulin inhibitors, such as paclitaxel, vincristine, and colchicine, exhibit severe toxicity toward normal cells. Thus, in addition to the tubulin-targeting activity, other targets involved in the synergistic inhibition of cancer cells by thiazolidinone compounds and the mechanism underlying the reduced toxicity toward normal cells/organs have also been investigated. HSP90 has been shown to be another target of compound 88 (Figure 11) [131,132], whereas compound 89 (Figure 11) inhibited Dyrk1B kinase activity, which accounts for its 10-fold greater potency in the inhibition of rhabdomyosarcoma (RD) compared with compound 90 [135]. Interestingly, several active compounds 9194 (Figure 11) were discovered to be histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors [130], which accounts for their low toxicity [130,136,137] and synergistic anticancer effects [130,138,139]. Recently, the aqueous solubility (5-fold improvement in solubility, from 0.1 to 0.5 μg/mL) and anti-cancer activity (10-fold improvement in EC50 from 0.72–0.98 μM to 0.08–0.16 μM) of the new lead thiazolidinone compound were improved through all-around modifications, consecutive library synthesis, and testing [140]. In conclusion, thiazolidinone analogues have the potential for further development as a selective anticancer drug with low toxicity.

9.2. Thiazole and Imidazols Analogues

A series of 4-substituted methoxybenzoyl-aryl-thiazoles (SMART) based on the lead compound 2-arylthiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid amides (ATCAA) have been synthesized [141]. Of these SMART compounds, compound 96 (Figure 13) is a representative analogue that possesses nanomolar activity in inhibiting melanoma and prostate cancer cell growth in vitro. Based on preliminary studies, SMART compounds inhibit tubulin polymerization, effectively prevent the formation of functional microtubules and block cell mitosis. Furthermore, SMART compounds also showed great promise in overcoming Pgp mediated MDR in vitro [142]. Introducing an amino group between the A- and B-rings creates phenyl-aminothiazole (PAT); among these compounds, analogues 97, 98 and 99 (Figure 13) showed similar antiproliferative potency against cancer cells, including MDR cancer cell lines. However, the solubility and in vivo bioavailability were greatly improved compared with the SMART compounds [143]. New derivatives with modifications at the carbonyl linker of SMART and modification of the A-ring of the PAT template have been synthesized To block the metabolically labile sites on 96 (Figure 13) [144]. The SAR analysis (Figure 14) of these compounds led to the identification of new benzimidazole and imidazo[4,5-c]pyridine-fused ring templates, represented by compounds 100 and 101 (Figure 13), respectively. Both compounds showed enhanced anticancer activity and substantially improved metabolic stability in liver microsomes compared to compound 96 and stronger inhibition of tubulin polymerization compared to colchicine. In addition, a series of 4,5-diarylthiazole derivatives were synthesized based on chemical modification of CA-4 through the transformation of N and S atom in the thiazole ring, and some new microtubule-destabilizing agents were identified [145]. Compound 102 (Figure 13), which contains a 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl group at the C-4 position and 4-ethoxyphenyl group at the C-5 position of the 2-amino substituted thiazole, was the most potent compound against five human cancer cell lines (IC50 values of 8.4–26.4 nM) in the SAR study. Compound 102 also circumvents drug resistance, possesses high antivascular activity in vitro and significantly suppresses tumor growth in xenograft models, indicating that compound 102 is a potent microtubule-destabilizing and vascular-disrupting agent for use in cancer treatment.
The thiazole ring of the SMART compounds was replaced with an imidazole to generate aryl-benzoylimidazoles (ABI), thus further improving the stability and hydrophilicity of these compounds [14]. The antiproliferative activities of these compounds were assessed in three melanoma cell lines and four human prostate cancer cell lines in vitro. The average IC50 of the most active compound (103) (Figure 13) was 15.7 nM. As revealed in mechanistic studies, the ABI analogues inhibit tubulin polymerization by interacting with the colchicine binding site. The ABI compounds exhibit substantially improved aqueous solubility and are equally potent against MDR cancer cells and the drug-sensitive parental melanoma cancer cells. Compound 104 (Figure 13) was more effective than dacarbazine (DTIC) in inhibiting melanoma xenograft tumor growth in vivo. Based on a rational structural modification of previous ABI analogues, a series of 4-aryl-2-benzoyl-imidazoles, named reverse ABI (RABI) analogues, were designed and synthesized [146]. Several RABI compounds exhibited excellent antiproliferative properties in vitro, with IC50 values in the low nanomolar range against eight cancer cell lines including MDR cancer cell lines. Among these compounds, compound 105 (Figure 13) was the most potent analogue, with an average IC50 of 14 nM. In addition, these new RABI analogues maintain their mechanisms of action by disrupting tubulin polymerization, similar to the ABI analogues (Figure 14). The SAR analysis of another new series of 4-aryl-5-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-2-alkylthio-1H-imidazoles indicated that the presence of a 3,4,5-trimethoxy- phenyl moiety on the A-ring and 4-methoxy substituent on the B-ring had a beneficial effect on the cytotoxicity, which was related to the inhibition of microtubule polymerization [147].

10. Conclusions

Antitubulin agents are an important class of anticancer agents. Many antitubulin agents are derived from natural products and contain various heteroaromatic structures. Substantial efforts have been devoted to the development of new antitubulin agents by preparing analogues of the natural products or by synthesizing small molecules based on some privileged structures. Natural product- and privileged structure-promoted synthesis has been shown to be effective in lead compound discovery and optimization through the rapid generation of potential candidates for screening in vitro, thereby accelerating the discovery of novel therapeutic agents. Novel lead compounds or agents can overcome the limitations of existing tubulin inhibitors by improving the therapeutic window, the activity against MDR cancer cell lines, and the physical or pharmacological properties, such as aqueous solubility or pharmacokinetics. High throughput screening, molecular docking and SAR analyses will continue to play important roles in the discovery of antitubulin agents and drug discovery in general.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (21677090) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016T90634, 2015M582094).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wilson, L.; Jordan, M.A. Microtubule dynamics: Taking aim at a moving target. Chem. Biol. 1995, 2, 569–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dumontet, C.; Jordan, M.A. Microtubule-binding agents: A dynamic field of cancer therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9, 790–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jordan, M.A.; Wilson, L. Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2004, 4, 253–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fojo, T.; Menefee, M. Mechanisms of multidrug resistance: The potential role of microtubule-stabilizing agents. Ann. Oncol. 2007, 18, v3–v8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Buey, R.M.; Barasoain, I.; Jackson, E.; Meyer, A.; Giannakakou, P.; Paterson, I.; Mooberry, S.; Andreu, J.M.; Díaz, J.F. Microtubule interactions with chemically diverse stabilizing agents: Thermodynamics of binding to the paclitaxel site predicts cytotoxicity. Chem. Biol. 2005, 12, 1269–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jordan, M.A.; Thrower, D.; Wilson, L. Mechanism of inhibition of cell proliferation by vinca alkaloids. Cancer Res. 1991, 51, 2212–2222. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Jordan, M.A.; Wendell, K.; Gardiner, S.; Derry, W.B.; Copp, H.; Wilson, L. Mitotic block induced in Hela cells by low concentrations of paclitaxel (taxol) results in abnormal mitotic exit and apoptotic cell death. Cancer Res. 1996, 56, 816–825. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Brancale, A.; Silvestri, R. Indole, a core nucleus for potent inhibitors of tubulin polymerization. Med. Res. Rev. 2007, 27, 209–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Flynn, B.L.; Hamel, E.; Jung, M.K. One-pot synthesis of benzo (b) furan and indole inhibitors of tubulin polymerization. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2670–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Flynn, B.L.; Gill, G.S.; Grobelny, D.W.; Chaplin, J.H.; Paul, D.; Leske, A.F.; Lavranos, T.C.; Chalmers, D.K.; Charman, S.A.; Kostewicz, E.; et al. Discovery of 7-hydroxy-6-methoxy-2-methyl-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoyl)benzo (b) furan (BNC105), a tubulin polymerization inhibitor with potent antiproliferative and tumor vascular disrupting properties. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 6014–6027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ohsumi, K.; Hatanaka, T.; Fujita, K.; Nakagawa, R.; Fukuda, Y.; Nihei, Y.; Suga, Y.; Morinaga, Y.; Akiyama, Y.; Tsuji, T. Syntheses and antitumor activity of cis-restricted combretastatins: 5-Membered heterocyclic analogues. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 3153–3158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Banimustafa, M.; Kheirollahi, A.; Safavi, M.; Ardestani, S.K.; Aryapour, H.; Foroumadi, A.; Emami, S. Synthesis and biological evaluation of 3-(trimethoxyphenyl)-2(3H)-thiazole thiones as combretastatin analogs. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 70, 692–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, L.; Woods, K.W.; Li, Q.; Barr, K.J.; McCroskey, R.W.; Hannick, S.M.; Gherke, L.; Credo, R.B.; Hui, Y.H.; Marsh, K.; et al. Potent, orally active heterocycle-based combretastatin A-4 analogues: Synthesis, structure-activity relationship, pharmacokinetics, and in vivo antitumor activity evaluation. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 1697–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chen, J.J.; Wang, Z.; Li, C.M.; Lu, Y.; Vaddady, P.K.; Meibohm, B.; Dalton, J.T.; Miller, D.D.; Li, W. Discovery of novel 2-aryl-4-benzoyl-imidazoles targeting the colchicines binding site in tubulin as potential anticancer agents. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 7414–7427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chaudhary, V.; Venghateri, J.B.; Dhaked, H.P.S.; Bhoyar, A.S.; Guchhait, S.K.; Panda, D. Novel combretastatin-2-aminoimidazole analogues as potent tubulin assembly inhibitors: Exploration of unique pharmacophoric impact of bridging skeleton and aryl moiety. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 3439–3451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lu, Y.; Chen, J.J.; Xiao, M.; Li, W.; Miller, D.D. An overview of tubulin inhibitors that interact with the colchicine binding site. Pharm. Res. 2012, 29, 2943–2971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Finkelstein, Y.; Aks, S.E.; Hutson, J.R.; Juurlink, D.N.; Nguyen, P.; Dubnov-Raz, G.; Pollak, U.; Koren, G.; Bentur, Y. Colchicine poisoning: The dark side of an ancient drug. Clin. Toxicol. 2010, 48, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Quinn, F.R.; Neiman, Z.; Beisler, J.A. Toxicity quantitative structure-activity relationships of colchicines. J. Med. Chem. 1981, 24, 636–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ringel, I.; Jaffe, D.; Alerhand, S.; Boye, O.; Muzaffar, A.; Brossi, A. Fluorinated colchicinoids: Antitubulin and cytotoxic properties. J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 3334–3338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Das, L.; Datta, A.B.; Gupta, S.; Poddar, A.; Sengupta, S.; Janik, M.E.; Bhattacharyya, B. -NH-dansyl isocolchicine exhibits a significantly improved tubulin-binding affinity and microtubule inhibition in comparison to isocolchicine by binding tubulin through its A and B rings. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 3249–3258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Sapra, S.; Bhalla, Y.; Nandani Sharma, S.; Singh, G.; Nepali, K.; Budhiraja, A.; Dhar, K.L. Colchicine and its various physicochemical and biological aspects. Med. Chem. Res. 2013, 22, 531–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tang-Wai, D.F.; Brossi, A.; Arnold, L.D.; Gros, P. The nitrogen of the acetamido group of colchicine modulates P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 6470–6476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cifuentes, M.; Schilling, B.; Ravindra, R.; Winter, J.; Janik, M.E. Synthesis and biological evaluation of B-ring modified colchicine and isocolchicine analogs. Bioorgan. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 2761–2764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Thomopoulou, P.; Sachs, J.; Teusch, N.; Mariappan, A.; Gopalakrishnan, J.; Schmalz, H.-G.N. New colchicine-derived triazoles and their influence on cytotoxicity and microtubule morphology. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 7, 188–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cosentino, L.; Redondo-Horcajo, M.; Zhao, Y.; Santos, A.R.; Chowdury, K.F.; Vinader, V.; Abdallah, Q.M.A.; Abdel-Rahman, H.; Fournier-Dit-Chabert, J.; Shnyder, S.D.; et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of colchicine B-ring analogues tethered with halogenated benzyl moieties. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 11062–11066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Fournier-Dit-Chabert, J.; Vinader, V.; Santos, A.R.; Redondo-Horcajo, M.; Dreneau, A.; Basak, R.; Cosentino, L.; Marston, G.; Abdel-Rahman, H.; Loadman, P.M.; et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of colchicine C-ring analogues tethered with aliphatic linkers suitable for prodrug derivatisation. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 7693–7696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zefirova, O.N.; Nurieva, E.V.; Shishov, D.V.; Baskin, I.I.; Fuchs, F.; Lemcke, H.; Schroder, F.; Weiss, D.G.; Zefirov, N.S.; Kuznetsov, S.A. Synthesis and SAR requirements of adamantane-colchicine conjugates with both microtubule depolymerizing and tubulin clustering activities. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011, 19, 5529–5538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zefirova, O.N.; Lemcke, H.; Lantow, M.; Nurieva, E.V.; Wobith, B.; Onishchenko, G.E.; Hoenen, A.; Griffiths, G.; Zefirov, N.S.; Kuznetsov, S.A. Unusual tubulin-clustering ability of specifically C7-modified colchicine analogues. ChemBioChem 2013, 14, 1444–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Singh, B.; Kumar, A.; Joshi, P.; Guru, S.K.; Kumar, S.; Wani, Z.A.; Mahajan, G.; Hussain, A.; Qazi, A.K.; Kumar, A.; et al. Colchicine derivatives with potent anticancer activity and reduced P-glycoprotein induction liability. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 5674–5689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Huczynski, A.; Rutkowski, J.; Popiel, K.; Maj, E.; Wietrzyk, J.; Stefanska, J.; Majcher, U.; Bartl, F. Synthesis, antiproliferative and antibacterial evaluation of C-ring modified colchicine analogues. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 90, 296–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Vilanova, C.; Diaz-Oltra, S.; Murga, J.; Falomir, E.; Carda, M.; Redondo-Horcajo, M.; Diaz, J.F.; Barasoain, I.; Marco, J.A. Design and synthesis of pironetin analogue/colchicine hybrids and study of their cytotoxic activity and mechanisms of interaction with tubulin concepcion. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 10391–10403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lin, C.M.; Singh, S.B.; Chu, P.S.; Dempcy, R.O.; Schmidt, J.M.; Pettit, G.R.; Hamel, E. Interactions of tubulin with potent natural and synthetic analogs of the antimitotic agent combretastatin: A structure-activity study. Mol. Pharmacol. 1988, 34, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Nam, N.H. Combretastatin A-4 analogues as antimitotic antitumor agents. Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 10, 1697–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lee, L.; Davis, R.; Vanderham, J.; Hills, P.; Mackay, H.; Brown, T.; Mooberry, S.L.; Lee, M. 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-2-thioxopyrimidine analogs of combretastatin-A4. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 43, 2011–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pettit, G.R.; Rhodes, M.R.; Herald, D.L.; Hamel, E.; Schmidt, J.M.; Pettitt, R.K. Antineoplastic agents. 445. Synthesis and evaluation of structural modifications of (Z)- and (E)-combretastatin A-4. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 4087–4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tron, G.C.; Pirali, T.; Sorba, G.; Pagliai, F.; Busacca, S.; Genazzani, A.A. Medicinal chemistry of combretastatin A4: Present and future directions. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 3033–3044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Alloatti, D.; Giannini, G.; Cabri, W.; Lustrati, I.; Marzi, M.; Ciacci, A.; Gallo, G.; Tinti, M.O.; Marcellini, M.; Riccioni, T.; et al. Synthesis and biological activity of fluorinated combretastatin analogues. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 2708–2721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Nagaiah, G.; Remick, S.C. Combretastatin A4 phosphate: A novel vascular disrupting agent. Future Oncol. 2010, 6, 1219–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ng, Q.S.; Mandeville, H.; Goh, V.; Alonzi, R.; Milner, J.; Carnell, D.; Meer, K.; Padhani, A.R.; Saunders, M.I.; Hoskin, P.J. Phase Ib trial of radiotherapy in combination with combretastatin-A4-phosphate in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, prostate adenocarcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Ann. Oncol. 2012, 23, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Delmonte, A.; Sessa, C. Ave8062: A new combretastatin derivative vascular disrupting agent. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2009, 18, 1541–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Lippert, J.W. Vascular disrupting agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 605–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Pettit, G.R.; Lippert, J.W. Antineoplastic agents 429. Syntheses of the combretastatin A-1 and combretastatin B-1 prodrugs. Anti-Cancer Drug Des. 2000, 15, 203–216. [Google Scholar]
  43. Devkota, L.; Lin, C.M.; Strecker, T.E.; Wang, Y.F.; Tidmore, J.K.; Chen, Z.; Guddneppanavar, R.; Jelinek, C.J.; Lopez, R.; Liu, L.; et al. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of water-soluble amino acid prodrug conjugates derived from combretastatin, dihydronaphthalene, and benzosuberene-based parent vascular disrupting agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2016, 24, 938–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Duan, Y.T.; Man, R.J.; Tang, D.J.; Yao, Y.F.; Tao, X.X.; Yu, C.; Liang, X.Y.; Makawana, J.A.; Zou, M.J.; Wang, Z.C.; et al. Design, synthesis and antitumor activity of novel link-bridge and B-ring modified combretastatin A-4 (CA-4) analogues as potent antitubulin agents. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gerova, M.S.; Stateva, S.R.; Radonova, E.M.; Kalenderska, R.B.; Rusew, R.I.; Nikolova, R.P.; Chanev, C.D.; Shivachev, B.L.; Apostolova, M.D.; Petrov, O.I. Combretastatin A-4 analogues with benzoxazolone scaffold: Synthesis, structure and biological activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 120, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Do, C.V.; Faouzi, A.; Barette, C.; Farce, A.; Fauvarque, M.O.; Colomb, E.; Catry, L.; Berthier-Vergnes, O.; Haftek, M.; Barret, R.; et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of thiophene and benzo b thiophene analogs of combretastatin A-4 and isocombretastatin A-4: A comparison between the linkage positions of the 3,4,5-trimethoxystyrene unit. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Guan, Q.; Zuo, D.Y.; Jiang, N.; Qi, H.; Zhai, Y.P.; Bai, Z.S.; Feng, D.J.; Yang, L.; Jiang, M.Y.; Bao, K.; et al. Microwave-assisted synthesis and biological evaluation of 3,4-diaryl maleic anhydride/n-substituted maleimide derivatives as combretastatin A-4 analogues. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 631–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Pati, H.N.; Wicks, M.; Holt, H.L.; LeBlanc, R.; Weisbruch, P.; Forrest, L.; Lee, M. Synthesis and biological evaluation of cis-combretastatin analogs and their novel 1,2,3-triazole derivatives. Heterocycl. Commun. 2005, 11, 117–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Odlo, K.; Hentzen, J.; dit Chabert, J.F.; Ducki, S.; Gani, O.; Sylte, I.; Skrede, M.; Florenes, V.A.; Hansen, T.V. 1,5-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles as cis-restricted analogues of combretastatin A-4: Synthesis, molecular modeling and evaluation as cytotoxic agents and inhibitors of tubulin. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 4829–4838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Romagnoli, R.; Baraldi, P.G.; Salvador, M.K.; Preti, D.; Tabrizi, M.A.; Brancale, A.; Fu, X.H.; Li, J.; Zhang, S.Z.; Hamel, E.; et al. Synthesis and evaluation of 1,5-disubstituted tetrazoles as rigid analogues of combretastatin A-4 with potent antiproliferative and antitumor activity. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 475–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Carr, M.; Greene, L.M.; Knox, A.J.S.; Lloyd, D.G.; Zisterer, D.M.; Meegan, M.J. Lead identification of conformationally restricted β-lactam type combretastatin analogues: Synthesis, antiproliferative activity and tubulin targeting effects. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 5752–5766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Guan, Q.; Yang, F.S.; Guo, D.D.; Xu, J.W.; Jiang, M.Y.; Liu, C.J.; Bao, K.; Wu, Y.L.; Zhang, W.G. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel 3,4-diaryl-1,2,5-selenadiazol analogues of combretastatin A-4. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, Z.; Yang, Q.K.; Bai, Z.S.; Sun, J.; Jiang, X.W.; Song, H.R.; Wu, Y.L.; Zhang, W.G. Synthesis and biological evaluation of 2,3-diarylthiophene analogues of combretastatin A-4. MedChemComm 2015, 6, 971–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sanghai, N.; Jain, V.; Preet, R.; Kandekar, S.; Das, S.; Trivedi, N.; Mohapatra, P.; Priyadarshani, G.; Kashyap, M.; Das, D.; et al. Combretastatin A-4 inspired novel 2-aryl-3-arylamino-imidazo-pyridines/pyrazines as tubulin polymerization inhibitors, antimitotic and anticancer agents. MedChemComm 2014, 5, 766–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hu, J.H.; Yan, J.; Chen, J.; Pang, Y.Q.; Huang, L.; Li, X.S. Synthesis, biological evaluation and mechanism study of a class of cyclic combretastatin A-4 analogues as novel antitumour agents. MedChemComm 2015, 6, 1318–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chen, H.; Li, Y.; Sheng, C.; Lv, Z.; Dong, G.; Wang, T.; Liu, J.; Zhang, M.; Li, L.; Zhang, T.; et al. Design and synthesis of cyclopropylamide analogues of combretastatin-A4 as novel microtubule-stabilizing agents. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 685–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zheng, S.L.; Zhong, Q.; Mottamal, M.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, C.D.; LeMelle, E.; McFerrin, H.; Wang, G.D. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel pyridine-bridged analogues of combretastatin-A4 as anticancer agents. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 3369–3381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kaushik, N.K.; Kaushik, N.; Attri, P.; Kumar, N.; Kim, C.H.; Verma, A.K.; Choi, E.H. Biomedical importance of indoles. Molecules 2013, 18, 6620–6662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Alves, F.R.D.; Barreiro, E.J.; Fraga, C.A.M. From nature to drug discovery: The indole scaffold as a “privileged structure”. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2009, 9, 782–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Patil, S.A.; Patil, R.; Miller, D.D. Indole molecules as inhibitors of tubulin polymerization: Potential new anticancer agents. Future Med. Chem. 2012, 4, 2085–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Giansanti, V.; Piscitelli, F.; Camboni, T.; Prosperi, E.; La Regina, G.; Parks, M.; Silvestri, R.; Scovassi, A.I. Arylthioindoles: Promising compounds against cancer cell proliferation. Oncol. Lett. 2010, 1, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  62. De Martino, G.; La Regina, G.; Coluccia, A.; Edler, M.C.; Barbera, M.C.; Brancale, A.; Wilcox, E.; Hamel, E.; Artico, M.; Silvestri, R. Arylthioindoles, potent inhibitors of tubulin polymerization. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 6120–6123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. De Martino, G.; Edler, M.C.; La Regina, G.; Coluccia, A.; Barbera, M.C.; Barrow, D.; Nicholson, R.I.; Chiosis, G.; Brancale, A.; Hamel, E.; et al. New arylthioindoles: Potent inhibitors of tubulin polymerization. 2. Structure-activity relationships and molecular modeling studies. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 947–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. La Regina, G.; Edler, M.C.; Brancale, A.; Kandil, S.; Coluccia, A.; Piscitelli, F.; Hamel, E.; De Martino, G.; Matesanz, R.; Diaz, J.F.; et al. Arylthioindole inhibitors of tubulin polymerization. 3. Biological evaluation, structure-activity relationships and molecular modeling studies. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 2865–2874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. La Regina, G.; Sarkar, T.; Bai, R.L.; Edler, M.C.; Saletti, R.; Coluccia, A.; Piscitelli, F.; Minelli, L.; Gatti, V.; Mazzoccoli, C.; et al. New arylthioindoles and related bioisosteres at the sulfur bridging group. 4. Synthesis, tubulin polymerization, cell growth inhibition, and molecular modeling studies. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 7512–7527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. La Regina, G.; Bai, R.; Rensen, W.; Coluccia, A.; Piscitelli, F.; Gatti, V.; Bolognesi, A.; Lavecchia, A.; Granata, I.; Porta, A.; et al. Design and synthesis of 2-heterocyclyl-3-arylthio-1H-indoles as potent tubulin polymerization and cell growth inhibitors with improved metabolic stability. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 8394–8406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. La Regina, G.; Bai, R.L.; Rensen, W.M.; Di Cesare, E.; Coluccia, A.; Piscitelli, F.; Famiglini, V.; Reggio, A.; Nalli, M.; Pelliccia, S.; et al. Toward highly potent cancer agents by modulating the C-2 group of the arylthioindole class of tubulin polymerization inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 123–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Colley, H.E.; Muthana, M.; Danson, S.J.; Jackson, L.V.; Brett, M.L.; Harrison, J.; Coole, S.F.; Mason, D.P.; Jennings, L.R.; Wong, M.; et al. An orally bioavailable, indole-3-glyoxylamide based series of tubulin polymerization inhibitors showing tumor growth inhibition in a mouse xenograft model of head and neck cancer. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 9309–9333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. MacDonough, M.T.; Strecker, T.E.; Hamel, E.; Hall, J.J.; Chaplin, D.J.; Trawick, M.L.; Pinney, K.G. Synthesis and biological evaluation of indole-based, anti-cancer agents inspired by the vascular disrupting agent 2-(3′-hydroxy-4′-methoxyphenyl)-3-(3″,4″,5″-trimethoxybenzoyl)-6-methoxyindole (oxi8006). Bioorgan. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 6831–6843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. La Regina, G.; Bai, R.L.; Coluccia, A.; Farniglini, V.; Pelliccia, S.; Passacantilli, S.; Mazzoccoli, C.; Ruggieri, V.; Verrico, A.; Miele, A.; et al. New indole tubulin assembly inhibitors cause stable arrest of mitotic progression, enhanced stimulation of natural killer cell cytotoxic activity, and repression of hedgehog-dependent cancer. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 5789–5807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Wen, Z.Y.; Xu, J.W.; Wang, Z.W.; Qi, H.; Xu, Q.L.; Bai, Z.S.; Zhang, Q.; Bao, K.; Wu, Y.L.; Zhang, W.G. 3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenylselenyl)-1H-indoles and their selenoxides as combretastatin A-4 analogs: Microwave-assisted synthesis and biological evaluation. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 90, 184–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Kamal, A.; Reddy, V.S.; Karnewar, S.; Chourasiya, S.S.; Shaik, A.B.; Kumar, G.B.; Kishor, C.; Reddy, M.K.; Narasimha Rao, M.; Nagabhushana, A. Synthesis and biological evaluation of imidazopyridine-oxindole conjugates as microtubule-targeting agents. ChemMedChem 2013, 8, 2015–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Hwang, D.J.; Wang, J.; Li, W.; Miller, D.D. Structural optimization of indole derivatives acting at colchicine binding site as potential anticancer agents. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 993–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Hu, M.J.; Zhang, B.; Yang, H.K.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.R.; Ma, T.Z.; Lu, L.; You, W.W.; Zhao, P.L. Design, synthesis and molecular docking studies of novel indole-pyrimidine hybrids as tubulin polymerization inhibitors. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2015, 86, 1491–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Orlikova, B.; Tasdemir, D.; Golais, F.; Dicato, M.; Diederich, M. Dietary chalcones with chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic potential. Genes Nutr. 2011, 6, 125–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Mahapatra, D.M.; Bharti, S.K.; Asati, V. Anti-cancer chalcones: Structural and molecular target perspectives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 98, 69–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Lawrence, N.J.; Rennison, D.; McGown, A.T.; Ducki, S.; Gul, L.A.; Hadfield, J.A.; Khan, N. Linked parallel synthesis and MTT bioassay screening of substituted chalcones. J. Comb. Chem. 2001, 3, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Ducki, S.; Rennison, D.; Woo, M.; Kendall, A.; Chabert, J.F.D.; McGown, A.T.; Lawrence, N.J. Combretastatin-like chalcones as inhibitors of microtubule polymerization. Part 1: Synthesis and biological evaluation of antivascular activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 7698–7710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Qian, Y.; Ma, G.Y.; Yang, Y.; Cheng, K.; Zheng, Q.Z.; Mao, W.J.; Shi, L.; Zhao, J.; Zhu, H.L. Synthesis, molecular modeling and biological evaluation of dithiocarbamates as novel antitubulin agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 4310–4316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Salum, L.B.; Altei, W.F.; Chiaradia, L.D.; Cordeiro, M.N.S.; Canevarolo, R.R.; Melo, C.P.S.; Winter, E.; Mattei, B.; Daghestani, H.N.; Santos-Silva, M.C.; et al. Cytotoxic 3,4,5-trimethoxychalcones as mitotic arresters and cell migration inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 63, 501–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Wang, Y.T.; Qin, Y.J.; Zhang, Y.L.; Li, Y.J.; Rao, B.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Yang, M.R.; Jiang, A.Q.; Qi, J.L.; Zhu, H.L. Synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular docking studies of novel chalcone oxime derivatives as potential tubulin polymerization inhibitors. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 32263–32275. [Google Scholar]
  82. Zhu, C.G.; Zuo, Y.L.; Wang, R.M.; Liang, B.X.; Yue, X.; Wen, G.S.; Shang, N.N.; Huang, L.; Chen, Y.; Du, J.; et al. Discovery of potent cytotoxic ortho-aryl chalcones as new scaffold targeting tubulin and mitosis with affinity-based fluorescence. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 6364–6382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Wang, G.C.; Li, C.Y.; He, L.; Lei, K.; Wang, F.; Pu, Y.Z.; Yang, Z.; Cao, D.; Ma, L.; Chen, J.Y.; et al. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of a series of pyrano chalcone derivatives containing indole moiety as novel anti-tubulin agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014, 22, 2060–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Chen, J.; Yan, J.; Hu, J.H.; Pang, Y.Q.; Huang, L.; Li, X.S. Synthesis, biological evaluation and mechanism study of chalcone analogues as novel anti-cancer agents. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 68128–68135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Yan, J.; Chen, J.; Zhang, S.; Hu, J.H.; Huang, L.; Li, X.S. Synthesis, evaluation, and mechanism study of novel indole-chalcone derivatives exerting effective antitumor activity through microtubule destabilization in vitro and in vivo. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 5264–5283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Singh, P.; Kaur, M.; Holzer, W. Synthesis and evaluation of indole, pyrazole, chromone and pyrimidine based conjugates for tumor growth inhibitory activities—Development of highly efficacious cytotoxic agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 4968–4982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Kamal, A.; Balakrishna, M.; Nayak, V.L.; Shaik, T.B.; Faazil, S.; Nimbarte, V.D. Design and synthesis of imidazo 2,1-B thiazole-chalcone conjugates: Microtubule-destabilizing agents. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2014, 9, 2766–2780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Ruan, B.F.; Lu, X.A.; Tang, J.F.; Wei, Y.; Wang, X.L.; Zhang, Y.B.; Wang, L.S.; Zhu, H.L. Synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular docking studies of resveratrol derivatives possessing chalcone moiety as potential antitubulin agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011, 19, 2688–2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Imbert, T.F. Discovery of podophyllotoxins. Biochimie 1998, 80, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Liu, Y.Q.; Tian, J.; Qian, K.; Zhao, X.B.; Morris-Natschke, S.L.; Yang, L.; Nan, X.; Tian, X.; Lee, K.H. Recent progress on C-4-modified podophyllotoxin analogs as potent antitumor agents. Med. Res. Rev. 2015, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Gordaliza, M.; Castro, M.A.; del Corral, J.M.M.; San Feliciano, A. Antitumor properties of podophyllotoxin and related compounds. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2000, 6, 1811–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. You, Y.J. Podophyllotoxin derivatives: Current synthetic approaches for new anticancer agents. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2005, 11, 1695–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Abad, A.; Lopez-Perez, J.L.; del Olmo, E.; Garcia-Fernandez, L.F.; Francesch, A.; Trigili, C.; Barasoain, I.; Andreu, J.M.; Diaz, J.F.; San Feliciano, A. Synthesis and antimitotic and tubulin interaction profiles of novel pinacol derivatives of podophyllotoxins. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 6724–6737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Nepali, K.; Ojha, R.; Sharma, S.; Bedi, P.M.S.; Dhar, K.L. Tubulin inhibitors: A patent survey. Recent Pat. Anti-Cancer Drug Discov. 2014, 9, 176–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Liu, Y.Q.; Wei, D.F.; Zhao, Y.L.; Cheng, W.D.; Lu, Y.; Ma, Y.Q.; Li, X.; Han, C.; Wei, Y.X.; Cao, H.M.; et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of a series of podophyllotoxins derivatives as a class of potent antitubulin agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012, 20, 6285–6295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Labruere, R.; Gautier, B.; Testud, M.; Seguin, J.; Lenoir, C.; Desbene-Finck, S.; Helissey, P.; Garbay, C.; Chabot, G.G.; Vidal, M.; et al. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of the first podophyllotoxin analogues as potential vascular-disrupting agents. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2010, 5, 2016–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Rosania, G.R.; Chang, Y.-T.; Perez, O.; Sutherlin, D.; Dong, H.; Lockhart, D.J.; Schultz, P.G. Myoseverin, a microtubule-binding molecule with novel cellular effects. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 304–308. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  98. Moon, H.-S.; Jacobson, E.M.; Khersonsky, S.M.; Luzung, M.R.; Walsh, D.P.; Xiong, W.; Lee, J.W.; Parikh, P.B.; Lam, J.C.; Kang, T.-W.; et al. A novel microtubule destabilizing entity from orthogonal synthesis of triazine library and zebrafish embryo screening. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11608–11609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Chang, Y.-T.; Wignall, S.M.; Rosania, G.R.; Gray, N.S.; Hanson, S.R.; Su, A.I.; Merlie, J.; Moon, H.-S.; Sangankar, S.B.; Perez, O. Synthesis and biological evaluation of myoseverin derivatives: Microtubule assembly inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 4497–4500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Krystof, V.; Moravcova, D.; Paprskarova, M.; Barbier, P.; Peyrot, V.; Hlobilkova, A.; Havlicek, L.; Strnad, M. Synthesis and biological activity of 8-azapurine and pyrazolo 4,3-d pyrimidine analogues of myoseverin. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 41, 1405–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Perez, O.D.; Chang, Y.-T.; Rosania, G.; Sutherlin, D.; Schultz, P.G. Inhibition and reversal of myogenic differentiation by purine-based microtubule assembly inhibitors. Chem. Biol. 2002, 9, 475–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Popowycz, F.; Schneider, C.; DeBonis, S.; Skoufias, D.A.; Kozielski, F.; Galmarini, C.M.; Joseph, B. Synthesis and antiproliferative evaluation of pyrazolo[1,5-a]-1,3,5-triazine myoseverin derivatives. Bioorgan. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 3471–3478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Drews, J. Drug discovery: A historical perspective. Science 2000, 287, 1960–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Scozzafava, A.; Owa, T.; Mastrolorenzo, A.; Supuran, C.T. Anticancer and antiviral sulfonamides. Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 10, 925–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Banerjee, M.; Poddar, A.; Mitra, G.; Surolia, A.; Owa, T.; Bhattacharyya, B. Sulfonamide drugs binding to the colchicine site of tubulin: Thermodynamic analysis of the drug-tubulin interactions by isothermal titration calorimetry. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 547–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Hu, L.X.; Li, Z.R.; Jiang, J.D.; Boykin, D.W. Novel diaryl or heterocyclic sulfonamides as antimitotic agents. Anti-Cancer Agents Med. Chem. 2008, 8, 739–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Yoshino, H.; Ueda, N.; Niijima, J.; Sugumi, H.; Kotake, Y.; Koyanagi, N.; Yoshimatsu, K.; Asada, M.; Watanabe, T.; Nagasu, T. Novel sulfonamides as potential, systemically active antitumor agents. J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 2496–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Yamamoto, K.; Noda, K.; Yoshimura, A.; Fukuoka, M.; Furuse, K.; Niitani, H. Phase I study of E7010. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 1998, 42, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Hande, K.R.; Hagey, A.; Berlin, J.; Cai, Y.N.; Meek, K.; Kobayashi, H.; Lockhart, A.C.; Medina, D.; Sosman, J.; Gordon, G.B.; et al. The pharmacokinetics and safety of ABT-751, a novel, orally bioavailable sulfonamide antimitotic agent: Results of a phase 1 study. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12, 2834–2840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Mauer, A.M.; Cohen, E.E.W.; Ma, P.C.; Kozloff, M.F.; Schwartzberg, L.; Coates, A.I.; Qian, J.; Hagey, A.E.; Gordon, G.B. A phase ii study of ABT-751 in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2008, 3, 631–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Owa, T.; Okauchi, T.; Yoshimatsu, K.; Sugi, N.H.; Ozawa, Y.; Nagasu, T.; Koyanagi, N.; Okabe, T.; Kitoh, K.; Yoshino, H. A focused compound library of novel n-(7-indolyl)benzenesulfonamides for the discovery of potent cell cycle inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 1223–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Yokoi, A.; Kuromitsu, J.; Kawai, T.; Nagasu, T.; Sugi, N.H.; Yoshimatsu, K.; Yoshino, H.; Owa, T. Profiling novel sulfonamide antitumor agents with cell-based phenotypic screens and array-based gene expression analysis. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2002, 1, 275–286. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  113. Chang, J.Y.; Hsieh, H.P.; Chang, C.Y.; Hsu, K.S.; Chiang, Y.F.; Chen, C.M.; Kuo, C.C.; Liou, J.P. 7-aroyl-aminoindoline-1-sulfonamides as a novel class of potent antitubulin agents. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 6656–6659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Hu, L.X.; Li, Z.R.; Wang, Y.M.; Wu, Y.B.; Jiang, J.D.; Boykin, D.W. Novel pyridinyl and pyrimidinylcarbazole sulfonamides as antiproliferative agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 1193–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Wang, Y.M.; Hu, L.X.; Liu, Z.M.; You, X.F.; Zhang, S.H.; Qu, J.R.; Li, Z.R.; Li, Y.; Kong, W.J.; He, H.W.; et al. N-(2,6-dimethoxypyridine-3-yl)-9-methylcarbazole-3-sulfonamide as a novel tubulin ligand against human cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 6218–6227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Medina, J.C.; Shan, B.; Beckmann, H.; Farrell, R.P.; Clark, D.L.; Learned, R.M.; Roche, D.; Li, A.; Baichwal, V.; Case, C.; et al. Novel antineoplastic agents with efficacy against multidrug resistant tumor cells. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 2653–2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Shan, B.; Medina, J.C.; Santha, E.; Frankmoelle, W.P.; Chou, T.C.; Learned, R.M.; Narbut, M.R.; Stott, D.; Wu, P.G.; Jaen, J.C.; et al. Selective, covalent modification of β-tubulin residue CYS-239 by t138067, an antitumor agent with in vivo efficacy against multidrug-resistant tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 5686–5691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Abbassi, N.; Chicha, H.; Rakib, E.; Hannioui, A.; Alaoui, M.; Hajjaji, A.; Geffken, D.; Aiello, C.; Gangemi, R.; Rosano, C.; et al. Synthesis, antiproliferative and apoptotic activities of n-(6(4)-indazolyl)-benzenesulfonamide derivatives as potential anticancer agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 57, 240–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Liu, Z.L.; Tian, W.; Wang, Y.; Kuang, S.; Luo, X.M.; Yu, Q. A novel sulfonamide agent, MPSP-001, exhibits potent activity against human cancer cells in vitro through disruption of microtubule. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2012, 33, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Aceves-Luquero, C.; Galiana-Roselló, C.; Ramis, G.; Villalonga-Planells, R.; García-España, E.; Fernández de Mattos, S.; Peláez, R.; Llinares, J.M.; González-Rosende, M.E.; Villalonga, P. N-(2-methyl-indol-1H-5-yl)-1-naphthalenesulfonamide: A novel reversible antimitotic agent inhibiting cancer cell motility. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2016, 115, 28–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Reddy, M.V.R.; Mallireddigari, M.R.; Pallela, V.R.; Cosenza, S.C.; Billa, V.K.; Akula, B.; Subbaiah, D.; Bharathi, E.V.; Padgaonkar, A.; Lv, H.; et al. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of (E)-n-aryl-2-arylethenesulfonamide analogues as potent and orally bioavailable microtubule-targeted anticancer agents. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 5562–5586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Verma, A.; Saraf, S.K. 4-thiazolidinone—A biologically active scaffold. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 43, 897–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Zhang, Q.; Zhou, H.Y.; Zhai, S.M.; Yan, B. Natural product-inspired synthesis of thiazolidine and thiazolidinone compounds and their anticancer activities. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2010, 16, 1826–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Teraishi, F.; Wu, S.; Sasaki, J.; Zhang, L.; Davis, J.; Guo, W.; Dong, F.; Fang, B. Jnk1-dependent antimitotic activity of thiazolidin compounds in human non-small-cell lung and colon cancer cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2005, 62, 2382–2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Teraishi, F.; Wu, S.; Sasaki, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, H.-B.; Davis, J.J.; Fang, B. P-glycoprotein-independent apoptosis induction by a novel synthetic compound, MMPT [5-[(4-methylphenyl) methylene]-2-(phenylamino)-4(5H)-thiazolone]. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2005, 314, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Wu, S.; Guo, W.; Teraishi, F.; Pang, J.; Kaluarachchi, K.; Zhang, L.; Davis, J.; Dong, F.; Yan, B.; Fang, B. Anticancer activity of 5-benzylidene-2-phenylimino-1, 3-thiazolidin-4-one (BPT) analogs. Med. Chem. 2006, 2, 597–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Teraishi, F.; Wu, S.; Zhang, L.; Guo, W.; Davis, J.J.; Dong, F.; Fang, B. Identification of a novel synthetic thiazolidin compound capable of inducing c-Jun NH2-terminal Kinase-Dependent apoptosis in human colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 6380–6387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Zhou, H.; Wu, S.; Zhai, S.; Liu, A.; Sun, Y.; Li, R.; Zhang, Y.; Ekins, S.; Swaan, P.W.; Fang, B. Design, synthesis, cytoselective toxicity, structure-activity relationships, and pharmacophore of thiazolidinone derivatives targeting drug-resistant lung cancer cells. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 1242–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Li, L.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, A.; Li, X.; Zhou, H.; Liu, Y.; Yan, B. Proteome interrogation using nanoprobes to identify targets of a cancer-killing molecule. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 6886–6889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Zhang, C.; Zhai, S.; Li, X.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, L.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, C.; Zhou, H.; Li, F.; Zhang, S. Synergistic action by multi-targeting compounds produces a potent compound combination for human NSCLC both in vitro and in vivo. Cell Death Dis. 2014, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Zhang, Q.; Zhai, S.; Li, L.; Li, X.; Zhou, H.; Liu, A.; Su, G.; Mu, Q.; Du, Y.; Yan, B. Anti-tumor selectivity of a novel tubulin and HSP90 dual-targeting inhibitor in non-small cell lung cancer models. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2013, 86, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Zhang, Q.; Zhai, S.; Li, L.; Li, X.; Jiang, C.; Zhang, C.; Yan, B. P-glycoprotein-evading anti-tumor activity of a novel tubulin and HSP90 dual inhibitor in a non-small-cell lung cancer model. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2014, 126, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Mu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, L.; Tian, C.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, Q.; Yan, B. The novel tubulin polymerization inhibitor mhpt exhibits selective anti-tumor activity against rhabdomyosarcoma in vitro and in vivo. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0121806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Zhang, Q.; Liu, X.; Li, X.; Li, C.; Zhou, H.; Yan, B. Antitumor activity of (2E,5Z)-5-(2-hydroxybenzylidene)-2-((4-phenoxyphenyl) imino) thiazolidin-4-one, a novel microtubule-depolymerizing agent, in U87MG human glioblastoma cells and corresponding mouse xenograft model. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2013, 122, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Li, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, B. Comparison of cancer cell survival triggered by microtubule damage after turning DYRK1B kinase on and off. ACS Chem. Biol. 2014, 9, 731–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Dokmanovic, M.; Clarke, C.; Marks, P.A. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: Overview and perspectives. Mol. Cancer Res. 2007, 5, 981–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Lee, J.-H.; Choy, M.; Ngo, L.; Foster, S.; Marks, P.A. Histone deacetylase inhibitor induces DNA damage, which normal but not transformed cells can repair. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 14639–14644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Dowdy, S.C.; Jiang, S.; Zhou, X.C.; Hou, X.; Jin, F.; Podratz, K.C.; Jiang, S.-W. Histone deacetylase inhibitors and paclitaxel cause synergistic effects on apoptosis and microtubule stabilization in papillary serous endometrial cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2006, 5, 2767–2776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Zuco, V.; de Cesare, M.; Cincinelli, R.; Nannei, R.; Pisano, C.; Zaffaroni, N.; Zunino, F. Synergistic antitumor effects of novel HDAC inhibitors and paclitaxel in vitro and in vivo. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e29085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Liu, Y.; Li, F.; Wu, L.; Wang, W.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, H.; Yan, B. Improving both aqueous solubility and anti-cancer activity by assessing progressive lead optimization libraries. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 1971–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Lu, Y.; Li, C.M.; Wang, Z.; Ross, C.R.; Chen, J.; Dalton, J.T.; Li, W.; Miller, D.D. Discovery of 4-substituted methoxybenzoyl-aryl-thiazole as novel anticancer agents: Synthesis, biological evaluation, and structure-activity relationships. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 1701–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Li, F.; Lu, Y.; Li, W.; Miller, D.D.; Mahato, R.I. Synthesis, formulation and in vitro evaluation of a novel microtubule destabilizer, smart-100. J. Control. Release 2010, 143, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Lu, Y.; Li, C.M.; Wang, Z.; Chen, J.J.; Mohler, M.L.; Li, W.; Dalton, J.T.; Miller, D.D. Design, synthesis, and SAR studies of 4-substituted methoxylbenzoyl-aryl-thiazoles analogues as potent and orally bioavailable anticancer agents. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 4678–4693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Lu, Y.; Chen, J.J.; Wang, J.; Li, C.M.; Ahn, S.; Barrett, C.M.; Dalton, J.T.; Li, W.; Miller, D.D. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of stable colchicine binding site tubulin inhibitors as potential anticancer agents. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 7355–7366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Wang, F.; Yang, Z.; Liu, Y.B.; Ma, L.; Wu, Y.Z.; He, L.; Shao, M.F.; Yu, K.; Wu, W.S.; Pu, Y.Z.; et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of diarylthiazole derivatives as antimitotic and antivascular agents with potent antitumor activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 3337–3350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Xiao, M.; Ahn, S.J.; Wang, J.; Chen, J.J.; Miller, D.D.; Dalton, J.T.; Li, W. Discovery of 4-aryl-2-benzoyl-imidazoles as tubulin polymerization inhibitor with potent antiproliferative properties. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 3318–3329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Assadieskandar, A.; Amini, M.; Ostad, S.N.; Riazi, G.H.; Cheraghi-Shavi, T.; Shafiei, B.; Shafiee, A. Design, synthesis, cytotoxic evaluation and tubulin inhibitory activity of 4-aryl-5-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-2-alkylthio-1H-imidazole derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 2703–2709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. SAR of colchicine.
Figure 1. SAR of colchicine.
Molecules 21 01375 g001
Figure 2. Structures of colchicine derivatives.
Figure 2. Structures of colchicine derivatives.
Molecules 21 01375 g002
Figure 3. SAR of CA-4 [15].
Figure 3. SAR of CA-4 [15].
Molecules 21 01375 g003
Figure 4. Combretastatin A-4 analogues.
Figure 4. Combretastatin A-4 analogues.
Molecules 21 01375 g004
Figure 5. Arylthioindole derivatives and other indole-based compounds.
Figure 5. Arylthioindole derivatives and other indole-based compounds.
Molecules 21 01375 g005
Figure 6. Chalcone analogues.
Figure 6. Chalcone analogues.
Molecules 21 01375 g006
Figure 7. SAR of podophyllotoxin [94].
Figure 7. SAR of podophyllotoxin [94].
Molecules 21 01375 g007
Figure 8. Podophyllotoxin and its derivatives/analogues.
Figure 8. Podophyllotoxin and its derivatives/analogues.
Molecules 21 01375 g008
Figure 9. Myoseverin and its derivatives.
Figure 9. Myoseverin and its derivatives.
Molecules 21 01375 g009
Figure 10. Sulfonamides.
Figure 10. Sulfonamides.
Molecules 21 01375 g010
Figure 11. Thiazolidinone analogues.
Figure 11. Thiazolidinone analogues.
Molecules 21 01375 g011
Figure 12. SAR of Thiazolidinone [128].
Figure 12. SAR of Thiazolidinone [128].
Molecules 21 01375 g012
Figure 13. Thiazole and imidazole analogues.
Figure 13. Thiazole and imidazole analogues.
Molecules 21 01375 g013
Figure 14. SAR of thiazole and imidazole analogues.
Figure 14. SAR of thiazole and imidazole analogues.
Molecules 21 01375 g014

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dong, M.; Liu, F.; Zhou, H.; Zhai, S.; Yan, B. Novel Natural Product- and Privileged Scaffold-Based Tubulin Inhibitors Targeting the Colchicine Binding Site. Molecules 2016, 21, 1375. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21101375

AMA Style

Dong M, Liu F, Zhou H, Zhai S, Yan B. Novel Natural Product- and Privileged Scaffold-Based Tubulin Inhibitors Targeting the Colchicine Binding Site. Molecules. 2016; 21(10):1375. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21101375

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dong, Mengqi, Fang Liu, Hongyu Zhou, Shumei Zhai, and Bing Yan. 2016. "Novel Natural Product- and Privileged Scaffold-Based Tubulin Inhibitors Targeting the Colchicine Binding Site" Molecules 21, no. 10: 1375. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21101375

APA Style

Dong, M., Liu, F., Zhou, H., Zhai, S., & Yan, B. (2016). Novel Natural Product- and Privileged Scaffold-Based Tubulin Inhibitors Targeting the Colchicine Binding Site. Molecules, 21(10), 1375. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21101375

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop