Next Article in Journal
Single-Walled Carbon-Nanotubes-Based Organic Memory Structures
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Enantiomer Specific Biokinetics and Radiation Doses of [18F]Fluspidine—A New Tracer in Clinical Translation for Imaging of σ1 Receptors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 21
Issue 9
10.3390/molecules21091162
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of the Essential Oil Composition of Selected Impatiens Species and Its Antioxidant Activities

by
Katarzyna Szewczyk
1,*,
Danuta Kalemba
2,
Łukasz Komsta
3 and
Renata Nowak
1
1
Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, Medical University of Lublin, Chodźki 1 St., 20-093 Lublin, Poland
2
Institute of General Food Chemistry, Lodz University of Technology, Stefanowskiego 4/10 St., 90-924 Łódź, Poland
3
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Medical University of Lublin, Jaczewskiego 4, 20-090 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2016, 21(9), 1162; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21091162
Submission received: 18 July 2016 / Revised: 24 August 2016 / Accepted: 26 August 2016 / Published: 1 September 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Products Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The present paper describes the chemical composition of the essential oils obtained by hydrodistillation from four Impatiens species, Impatiens glandulifera Royle, I. parviflora DC., I. balsamina L. and I. noli-tangere L. The GC and GC-MS methods resulted in identification of 226 volatile compounds comprising from 61.7%–88.2% of the total amount. The essential oils differed significantly in their composition. Fifteen compounds were shared among the essential oils of all investigated Impatiens species. The majority of these constituents was linalool (0.7%–15.1%), hexanal (0.2%–5.3%) and benzaldehyde (0.1%–10.2%). Moreover, the antioxidant activity of the essential oils was investigated using different methods. The chemical composition of the essential oils and its antioxidant evaluation are reported for the first time from the investigated taxon.

1. Introduction

The genus Impatiens L. (Balsaminaceae) includes about 850 species, which occur mainly in tropical and subtropical climate zones, in particular in parts of the Old World, such as tropical Africa, India, southern China and the southwestern part of Asia. Some species also occur in Japan, Europe, Russia and North America [1,2]. Three species, Impatiens glandulifera Royle (Himalayan balsam), I. noli-tangere L. (touch-me-not balsam) and I. parviflora DC. (small balsam), occur in Central Europe, and they are perennial plants that grow in riparian zones along rivers on humid soils and in wet woodlands [3,4]. I. glandulifera and I. parviflora are among the invasive plants originally native to Asia that are rapidly spreading across Europe. In Poland, these are two of the top 20 invasive alien plants [2,5]. As I. parviflora is an extremely invasive plant in Europe, its relation with other plants [6] and with soil yeast complexes was recently investigated [7]. Furthermore, the different extracts from I. glandulifera, I. noli-tangere and I. parviflora showed a strong allelopathic effect on the seed germination of Leucosinapis alba and Brassica napus [4].
Many groups of active compounds have been isolated from different species of the genus Impatiens L. Phytochemical studies conducted on various organs of Impatiens have revealed the presence of quinones, flavonoids, phenolic acids, leucocyanidins, anthocyanins, tannins, coumarins, saponins, phytosteroids, peptides, alkaloids and essential oils [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. However, only one report is available concerning the volatile constituents of Impatiens species. In the n-hexane extract of I. bicolor growing in Pakistan, fatty acid methyl esters were the major compounds [9].
Because of the rich and varied composition, numerous studies have been conducted to investigate the feasibility of a medicinal use of members of Impatiens. Among the representatives of the genus Impatiens L., some species have been used since a very long time in Asian and American medicine. In traditional therapeutic systems, I. balsamina L. has been the most popular species. Depending on the type of ailment, the dried herb has been used in the form of compresses, directly on the skin, or as a tea prepared by pouring hot water on dried leaves [14]. Moreover, it has been applied in Chinese traditional medicine to treat rheumatism, against fractures, swelling, contusions, beriberi disease and for its anticancer properties [16,17,18]. It has been also used to alleviate parturient and puerperal pain [14]. I. balsamina flowers have been used as a remedy against the effects of snake bites [19]. I. parviflora has been used in the treatment of warts [20]. Flowers of I. glandulifera are used in Bach flower remedies, which causes sedation, relaxes and helps to balance the emotional state, and they are recommended for psychological problems and pain [21]. The rhizomes of Impatiens pritzellii Hook. f. var. hupehensis Hook. f. [22] and whole plant of Impatiens textori MIQ [23] have been also used in Chinese medicine. In our previous study, we confirmed that the extracts from species of Impatiens, especially I. balfourii Hook. f., I. glandulifera and I. parviflora, contained significant amounts of phenols and flavonoids and have interesting multidirectional biological activity, such as antimicrobial and antioxidant abilities [11].
Based on the significance of these plants from an ecological perspective and no available reports on the essential oils of Impatiens species, the aim of the present study was to investigate the essential oil composition of herb and root of the two most invasive in Poland Impatiens species, I. glandulifera Royle and I. parviflora DC. For comparison, herb oils of two other species, I. balsamina L. and I. noli-tangere L., were included. The antioxidant activity of the essential oils of these species was also evaluated.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemical Composition of Essential Oils from Impatiens L.

Six Impatiens essential oils were obtained by steam distillation from air-dried herbs and roots. All of them were yellowish and fragrant. The highest yield of essential oil (w/w relative to dry material weight) was observed for the herb of I. parviflora (0.24%) and I. glandulifera (0.22%), while for the other materials, the yield amounted to 0.10%–0.16%. The chemical composition was analyzed by the GC-MS method, which resulted in identification of 54–94 volatile compounds comprising from 61.7%–88.2% of the total volume in individual oils. In total of 226 compounds was identified. All identified compounds in Impatiens oils are listed in Table 1.
The essential oils differed significantly in their chemical composition. What is more, all investigated oils contained specific constituents that distinguished the essential oils from each other. However, some similarities in the qualitative composition can be observed.
Seventy six compounds were identified in the herb oil of I. glandulifera, representing 82.5% of the total oil. The oil was dominated by oxygenated monoterpenes (28.2%), and α-terpinyl acetate (16.6%) was the major constituent, followed by phellandral (3.8%). Phthalides were the most characteristic constituents of this oil: (Z)-ligustilide (11.0%) and (Z)-butylidenphthalide (8.5%) were accompanied by small amounts of their (E)-isomers and butylphthalide. This oil was the only one that contain pronounced amounts of monoterpene hydrocarbons (9.9% in total), and β-phellandrene (7.4%) was the main one in this group.
Root oil of I. glandulifera (94 compounds, 87.4%) had a totally different composition than herb oil. Three major groups of the constituent were aliphatic, mono- and sesquiterpene oxygenated compounds, each amounting to ca. 20%. The main component was sesquiterpene ketone vulgarone B (14.9%). Linalool (5.3%), borneol (4.9%) and bornyl acetate (4.3%) were the major monoterpenes. Another important constituent was pentadecanal (5.8%). The main feature of this oil was the presence of sixteen sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (12.7%), with β-barbatene (5.3%) being the major one. Eighteen constituents were identified in both herb and root oils of this species, e.g., hexanal, heptanal, nonanal, benzaldehyde, linalool, borneol and bornyl acetate, terpinene-4-ol, α-terpineol, β-ionone and its epoxide. It is worth mentioning that among the twelve sesquiterpene hydrocarbons ((5.1%) that were identified in the herb oil of this species, only one, δ-cadinene, was common for both oils.
In the essential oil of I. parviflora herb, seventy compounds were identified amounting to 88.2%, and among them, (E)-hex-3-en-1-ol (16.8%), linalool (15.1%) and benzaldehyde (10.2%) were the most prominent. The number of identified components in the oil of I. parviflora roots was eighty nine (86.3% of the total oil), and the major compounds were citronellol (17.9%), geranial (12.8%) and linalool (4.9%). Despite significant differences in the content of major constituents, both herb and root oils contained the same aliphatic saturated and unsaturated alcohols, aldehydes and ketones C6–C16, which were their common distinctive features and constituted 42.8% and 26.1%, respectively. Isomeric heptadienals and octadienones that were identified in these oils were only rarely identified in the remaining investigated oils.
The yield of essential oil obtained from I. balsamina herb was 0.1%. Eighty components were identified, representing 84.2% of this oil. The major constituent was hexahydrofarnesyl acetone (13.4%). Pronounced contents of ionones and damascones (15.8%), as well as fatty acids C6-C16 (9.5%) and alkanes (5.9%) were characteristic features of this oil. The main member of the first group was (E)-β-ionone (5.7%), and of the second group, dodecanoic acid (4.1%), ionones and damascones, which occur in a variety of essential oils, are degradation products of carotenoids and have the same C13 carbon skeleton, but differ in the site of oxygenation. (E)-β-Ionone and its epoxide were also found in other investigated oils, however in smaller amounts. Among 54 identified constituents, which accounted for 61.7% of the total essential oil from I. noli-tangere herb, the main compounds were (Z)-hex-3-enol (9.5%), linalool (6.5%) and benzaldehyde (4.7%).
Fifteen compounds were shared among the essential oils of all investigated Impatiens species. The majority of these constituents was linalool (0.7%–15.1%), hexanal (0.2%–5.3%) and benzaldehyde (0.1%–10.2%). Linalool is a naturally occurring monoterpene constituent found in more than 200 oils obtained from herbs, leaves, flowers and wood. This compound has many proven activities and is present in several remedies used in traditional medicine for sedative purposes. Moreover, linalool revealed antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antihyperalgesic and analgesic properties [24]. Chang and Shen investigated the cytotoxic activity of linalool. This study suggested good inhibitory effects against breast, colorectal and liver cancer cells [25].
According to the only available report on the composition of Impatiens volatiles, 42 components were characterized in the n-hexane extract of I. bicolor growing in Pakistan. The major ones were fatty acid methyl esters, such as trans-methyl 13-octadecenoate, methyl heptadecanoate, methyl octadecanoate, methyl docosanoate, methyl tetracosanoate, and methyl eicosanoate and aliphatic hydrocarbons [9].
Compounds of these two groups were identified in the essential oils of all investigated Impatiens species. However, their content was significantly lower.
The invasive ability of some vigorous nonnative plants was thought to be associated with the competitive ability of the invasive species or a release from natural enemies. The allelopathic activity of invasive species also has recently been reported as a significant factor that negatively influences species biodiversity and ecosystem succession [26]. Among the allelochemicals, essential oils and their individual components belong to the most investigated [27]. Oxygenated monoterpenes were proven to possess high phytotoxic activity that inhibits the seed germination and seedling growth of many plants [28]. Terpinene-4-ol, which is a minor constituent of each investigated oil, appeared to be the most active of the 47 monoterpenes against Lactuca sativa, and the linalool, citronellol and geranial, major constituents of I. glandulifera and/or I. parviflora, revealed a pronounced phytotoxic effect [29].

2.2. Chemometric Analysis

The main constituents common for all tested essential oils (hexanal, heptanal, benzaldehyde, phenylacetaldehyde, nonanal, linalool, terpinen-4-ol, α-terpineol, geranylacetone, β-ionone epoxide, (E)-β-ionone, methyl palmitate, phytol, tricosane, pentacosane) were compared with hierarchical cluster analysis with Euclidean distance as the similarity measure. The so-called “heatmap” with corresponding dendrograms is presented in Figure 1. Benzaldehyde and linalool form distinct cluster with different values than the rest of the analyzed main constituents. However, Euclidean distance does not uncover any distinct cluster among plant material samples, besides a distinct difference of I. parviflora herb (IPH) compared to the other samples.
To the compare correlation between constituents (regardless of the absolute concentrations), scaled principal component analysis was carried out. Forty eight-point-four percent and 32.4% of variance was explained by the first two PCs, respectively (Figure 2). Analyzing the loading vectors (Figure 3), it can be concluded that the compounds form three intercorrelated groups:
  • Terpinen-4-ol and α-terpineol, explained mainly with PC2 and weakly (reversely) correlated with other compounds;
  • Hexanal, nonanal, linalool, heptanal and benzaldehyde, located mainly in PC1, intercorrelated and reversely correlated with Group 3;
  • Geranyl-acetone, β-ionone-epoxide, methyl-palmitate, phytol, tricosane and pentacosane, explained by PC1 and negatively correlated with Group 2.
I. glandulifera roots (IGR) and I. glandulifera herb (IGH) contain the high concentration of group (1), whereas other material samples have smaller concentrations of them, and the differences arelocated mainly along the PC1 axis.

2.3. Antioxidant Activity

In the present study, the antioxidant activities of the essential oils from herb and roots of Impatiens species were determined using two different methods. The free radical scavenging activity of essential oils was evaluated by the DPPH method in comparison with that of ascorbic acid, at different concentrations. Radical scavenging activity was expressed as the amount of antioxidants necessary to decrease the initial DPPH absorbance by 50% (EC50). The highest antiradical activity was detected for herb oils of I. glandulifera (3.96 ± 0.03 µg/mL) and I. noli-tangere (4.76 ± 0.05 µg/mL), whereas the lowest was detected for herb oil of I. balsamina (Table 2). The EC50 value of ascorbic acids to scavenge hydroxyl radicals was 2.05 ± 0.01 µg/mL. Our results are comparable to those obtained by Nisar and co-authors for the hexane extract of I. bicolor. The EC50 values obtained for different fractions ranged from 23.22 ± 0.75 µg/mL–59.00 ± 2.01 µg/mL, while the value for ascorbic acid was 7.80 ± 0.14 µg/mL [9].
The inhibition of linoleic acid peroxidation revealed low capacities of the essential oils of Impatiens species in comparison to the DPPH test (Table 2). The most active essential oils from herb and roots of I. glandulifera showed even up to six-times higher IC50 values than the lipophilic antioxidant BHT.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Reagents and Materials

Aerial parts and roots of plants were collected during July–September 2014. I. balsamina L. (No. IB-0714) was collected in the Maria Curie-Skłodowska University (UMCS) Botanical Garden, which is a part of Maria Curie Sklodowska University in Lublin, Poland, at an altitude of 197 m a.m.s.l. (coordinates N 51°08’41’’; E 22°18’17’’). I. glandulifera Royle (No. IG-0814) and I. noli-tangere L. (No. INT-0914) were gathered in Józefów near Biłgoraj (Poland) at an altitude of 240 m a.m.s.l. (coordinates N 50°29’06’’; E 23°02’12’’ and N 52°57’58’’; E 23°04’46’’ respectively). I. parviflora DC. (No. IP-0914) was collected in Motycz Leśny near Lublin (Poland) at an altitude of 180 m a.m.s.l. (coordinates N 51°14’57’’; E 22°20’36’’). Voucher specimens were deposited in the Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Lublin. Plants were identified by Prof. Tadeusz Krzaczek.
All chemical reagents used in the experiment were purchased from various commercial suppliers and were of the highest purity available. 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), ascorbic acid, 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT) and linoleic acid (LA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

3.2. Isolation Procedure

The essential oils (EOs) of 100 g of dried herb or roots of Impatiens species were obtained by hydrodistillation for 3 h using the Clevenger-type apparatus, according to European Pharmacopoeia 5.0. Next, the EOs were trapped in 2 mL of freshly-rectified diethyl ether. After distillation, the organic layers were collected and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. After filtration and additional washing of diethyl ether, the solvent was evaporated at room temperature, and the residues were weighed. The oil yields were calculated on the basis of the dry weight of plant material and according to the formula [30]:
EO (%) = W1/W2 × 100
where W1 is the net weight of oils (g) and W2 is the total weight of dry samples (g).

3.3. GC-MS Analysis

The chemical composition of the essential oils was analyzed using GC-MS on a Trace GC Ultra apparatus (Thermo Electron Corporation, Milan, Italy) with FID and the MS DSQ II detector after dilution in diethyl ether (10 μL in 1 mL). A simultaneous GC-FID and MS analysis was performed using an MS-FID splitter (SGE, Analytical Science, Austin, TX, USA). Operating conditions: apolar capillary column Rtx-1ms (Restek), 60 m × 0.25 mm i.d., film thickness 0.25 μm; temperature program, 50–310 °C at 2 °C/min; SSL (splitless) injector temperature 280 °C; FID temperature 300 °C; split ratio 1:20; carrier gas helium at a regular pressure 300 kPa. Mass spectra were acquired over the mass range of 30–400 Da, ionization voltage 70 eV; ion source temperature 200 °C. Identification of the components was based on a comparison of their mass spectra and relative retention indices with data stored in computer libraries NIST 98.1, Wiley 8th Ed. and MassFinder 4.1. Retention indices (RI, apolar column) were determined with relation to a homologous series of alkanes (C8–C26) under the same conditions with linear interpolation. Percentages were calculated from the FID response without the use of correction factors.

3.4. Free Radical Scavenging Activity

To determine the antioxidant activity of essential oils from Impatiens species, the method based on the reduction of the methanolic solution of colored free radical DPPH· was used. The changes in color from deep-violet to light-yellow were measured at 515 nm in a UV/visible light spectrophotometer (Thermo Evolution 300, Madison, WI, USA). Radical scavenging activity was measured according to the Brand-Williams et al. [31] method with the use of six dilutions of the analytes in methanol. The activity of ascorbic acid was evaluated for comparison. Antioxidant activity was expressed as EC50 (efficient concentration): the amount of dry extract (µg of DW) needed to obtain 50% activity per 1.0 mL of the initial solution.

3.5. Inhibition of Linoleic Acid Peroxidation

The antioxidant activity was also determined as the degree of inhibition on the hemoglobin-catalyzed peroxidation of linoleic acid according to the method described in previous studies [32,33] with a slight modification. The hydroxyperoxide formed was assayed according to the ferric thiocyanate method with mixing with 0.02 M FeCl2 followed by 30% ammonium thiocyanate. The absorbance of the sample (As) was measured at 480 nm. The absorbance of blank (A0) was obtained without hemoglobin to the reaction mixture; the absorbance of the control (A100) was determined without the sample added to the mixture. Thus, the antioxidative activity of the sample was calculated according to the formula:
AA [%] = [(1 − (As − A0) / (A100 − A0)] × 100
Antioxidant activity was expressed as IC50 (inhibition concentration): the amount of antioxidant needed to decrease the linoleic acid peroxidation by 50%.

3.6. Data Analysis

All measurements were performed at least in triplicate and expressed as the means ± standard deviations (±SD). Statistical significance was estimated through Tukey’s test for the data obtained from three independent samples of each essential oil in three parallel experiments (n = 9). Besides the classical pairwise correlation check, we applied the scaled principal component analysis. Statistical tests were performed using Statistica 6.0 software (Stat-Soft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).

4. Conclusions

It is well understood that invasive species produce specific compounds affecting native plants occurring in the same habitat. This phenomenon is known as allelopathy. Identification of chemical constituents produced and emitted by invasive species helps to understand their impact on the local environment.
Taking into account the chemical composition of I. glandulifera and I. parviflora essential oils and previous data on the allelopathic activity of monoterpenoids, it seemed possible that the emission of monoterpenes by herb and root of these two Impatiens species plays a role in their invasive ability. However, this hypothesis needs further research.

Author Contributions

K.S. conceived and designed the experiments, and wrote the paper; K.S. and D.K. performed the experiments and analyzed the data; Ł.K. performed the statistical analysis; R.N. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Grey-Wilson, C. Introduction to the genus Impatiens. In Impatiens of Africa: Morphology, Pollination and Pollinators, Phytogeography, Hybridisation, Keys and a Systematic Treatment of All African Species, 6th ed.; A.A. Balkema: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1980; p. 3. [Google Scholar]
  2. Utami, N.; Shimizu, T. Seed morphology and classification of Impatiens (Balsaminaceae). Blumea-Biodivers. Evol. Biogeogr. Plants 2005, 50, 447–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vieira, M.N.; Winterhalter, P.; Jerz, G. Flavonoids from the flowers of Impatiens glandulifera Royle isolated by high performance countercurrent chromatography. Phytochem. Anal. 2016, 27, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vrchotová, N.; Šerá, B.; Krejčová, J. Allelopathic activity of extracts from Impatiens species. Plant Soil. Environ. 2011, 57, 57–60. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tříska, J.; Vrchotová, N.; Sýkora, J.; Moos, M. Separation and Identification of 1,2,4-Trihydroxynaphthalene-1-O-glucoside in Impatiens glandulifera Royle. Molecules 2013, 18, 8429–8439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chmura, D.; Sierka, E. Relation between invasive plant and species richness of forest floor vegetation: A study of Impatiens parviflora DC. Pol. J. Ecol. 2006, 54, 417–428. [Google Scholar]
  7. Glushakova, A.M.; Kachalkin, A.V.; Chernov, I.Y. Effect of invasive herb species on the structure of soil yeast complexes in mixed forests exemplified by Impatiens parviflora DC. Microbiology (Russ. Fed.) 2015, 84, 717–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Akanksha, K.C.; Rahuja, N.; Mishra, D.P.; Srivastava, A.K.; Maurya, R. Major alkaloidal constituent from Impatiens niamniamensis seeds as antihyperglycemic agent. Med. Chem. Res. 2011, 20, 1505–1508. [Google Scholar]
  9. Nisar, M.; Qayum, M.; Shah, M.; Zia-Ul-Haq, M.; Khan, I.; Ahmad, K.; Qayum, Z. Chemical constituents and antioxidant activity of n-hexane extract of Impatiens bicolor. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2012, 48, 143–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sakunphueak, A.; Tansakul, P.; Umehara, K.; Noguchi, H.; Panichayupakaranant, P. Effect of methionine on production of naphthoquinones in Impatiens balsamina root cultures and detection of some secondary metabolites. Pharm. Biol. 2013, 51, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Szewczyk, K.; Zidorn, C.; Biernasiuk, A.; Komsta, Ł.; Granica, S. Polyphenols from Impatiens (Balsaminaceae) and their antioxidantand antimicrobial activities. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2016, 86, 262–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tatsuzawa, F.; Saito, N.; Mikanagi, Y.; Shinoda, K.; Toki, K.; Shigihara, A.; Honda, T. An unusual acylated malvidin 3-glucoside from flowers of Impatiens textori Miq. (Balsaminaceae). Phytochemistry 2009, 70, 672–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, Y.C.; Li, W.Y.; Wu, D.C.; Wang, J.J.; Wu, C.H.; Liao, J.J.; Lin, C.K. In vitro activity of 2-methoxy-1,4-naphthoquinone and stigmasta-7,22-diene-3β-ol from Impatiens balsamina L. against multiple antibiotic–resistant Helicobacter pylori. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 2011, 704–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yang, X.; Summerhurst, D.K.; Koval, S.F.; Ficker, C.; Smith, M.L.; Bernards, M.A. Isolation of an antimicrobial compound from Impatiens balsamina using bioassay-guided fractionation. Phytother. Res. 2001, 15, 676–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhou, X.F.; Tang, L.; Zhang, Y.H.; Pi, H.F.; Ruan, H.L.; Wu, J.Z. Nitrogenous compounds from Impatiens pritzellii var. hupehensis (Balsaminaceae). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2007, 35, 308–310. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhou, X.F.; Zhao, X.Y.; Tang, L.; Ruan, H.L.; Zhang, Y.H.; Pi, H.F.; Xiao, W.L.; Sun, H.D.; Wu, J.Z. Three new triterpenoid saponins from the rhizomes of Impatiens pritzellii var hupehensis. J. Asian. Nat. Prod. Res. 2007, 9, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Fukumoto, H.; Yamaki, M.; Isoi, I.; Ishiguro, K. Antianaphylactic effects of the principal compounds from the white petals of Impatiens balsamina L. Phytother. Res. 1996, 10, 202–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zeng, R.; Zhang, A.; Chen, J.; Fu, Y. Impact of carboxymethyl cellulose coating enriched with extract of Impatiens balsamina stems on preservation of ‘Newhall’ navel orange. Sci. Hortic. 2013, 160, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gomes, A.; Das, R.; Sarkhel, S.; Mishra, R.; Mukherjee, S.; Bhattacharya, S.; Gomes, A. Herbs and herbal constituents active against snake bite. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2010, 48, 865–878. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Pavela, R.; Vrchotová, N.; Šerá, B. Repellency and toxicity of three Impatiens species (Balsaminaceae) extracts on Myzus persicae Sulzer (Homoptera: Aphididae). J. Biopestic. 2009, 2, 48–51. [Google Scholar]
  21. Thaler, K.; Kaminski, A.; Chapman, A.; Langley, T.; Gartlehner, G. Bach Flower Remedies for psychological problems and pain: A systematic review. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2009, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhou, X.; Zhao, X.; Tang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Ruan, H.; Pi, H.; Qiu, J.; Wu, J. Immunomodulatory activity of the rhizomes of Impatiens pritzellii var. hupehensis on collagen-induced arthritis mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 109, 505–509. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Ueda, Y.; Oku, H.; Iinuma, M.; Ishiguro, K. Effects on blood pressure decrease in response to PAF of Impatiens textori Miq. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2003, 26, 1505–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Peana, A.T.; Moretti, M.D.L. Linalool in essential plant oils: Pharmacological effects. In Botanical Medicine in Clinical Practice, 1st ed.; Preedy, V.R., Watson, R.R., Eds.; Cromwell Press: Trowbridge, UK, 2008; pp. 716–724. [Google Scholar]
  25. Chang, M.Y.; Shen, Y.L. Linalool exhibits cytotoxic effects by activating antitumor immunity. Molecules 2014, 19, 6694–6706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ridenour, W.M.; Callaway, R.M. The relative importance of allelopathy in interference: The effects of an invasive weed on a native bunchgrass. Oecologia 2001, 126, 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Amri, I.; Hamrouni, L.; Hanana, M.; Jamoussi, B. Reviews on phytotoxic effects of essential oils and their individual components: News approach for weed management. Int. J. Appl. Biol. Pharm. 2013, 4, 96–114. [Google Scholar]
  28. De Martino, L.; Mancini, E.; Marandino, A.; Rolim de Almeida, L.F.; de Feo, V. Chemistry and antigerminative activity of essential oils and monoterpenoids from Mediterranean plants. Curr. Bioact. Compd. 2012, 8, 13–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vokou, D.; Douvli, P.; Blionis, G.J.; Halley, J.M. Effects of monoterpenoids, acting alone or in pairs, on seed germination and subsequent seedling growth. J. Chem. Ecol. 2003, 29, 2281–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Jiang, H.; Wang, J.; Song, L.; Cao, X.; Yao, X.; Tang, F.; Yue, Y. GCxGC-TOFMS analysis of essential oils composition from leaves, twigs and seeds of Cinnamomum camphora L. Presl and their insecticidal and repellent activities. Molecules 2016, 21, 423–434. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, E.; Berset, C.M. Use of free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kuo, J.M.; Yeh, D.B.; Pan, B. Rapid photometric assay evaluating antioxidative activity in edible part material. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 3206–3209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nowak, R.; Szewczyk, K.; Gawlik–Dziki, U.; Rzymowska, J.; Komsta, Ł. Antioxidative and cytotoxic potential of some Chenopodium L. species growing in Poland. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2016, 23, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Sample Availability: Not Available.
Molecules 21 01162 g001 550
Figure 1. The heatmap analysis of the essential oil constituents. IBH, I. balsamina herb; IGH, I. glandulifera herb; IGR, I. glandulifera roots; INH, I. noli-tangere herb; IPH, I. parviflora herb; IPR, I. parviflora roots.
Figure 1. The heatmap analysis of the essential oil constituents. IBH, I. balsamina herb; IGH, I. glandulifera herb; IGR, I. glandulifera roots; INH, I. noli-tangere herb; IPH, I. parviflora herb; IPR, I. parviflora roots.
Molecules 21 01162 g001
Molecules 21 01162 g002 550
Figure 2. Scores of scaled principal component analysis: a comparison of the correlations between constituents among investigated materials. IBH, I. balsamina herb; IGH, I. glandulifera herb; IGR, I. glandulifera roots; INH, I. noli-tangere herb; IPH, I. parviflora herb; IPR, I. parviflora roots.
Figure 2. Scores of scaled principal component analysis: a comparison of the correlations between constituents among investigated materials. IBH, I. balsamina herb; IGH, I. glandulifera herb; IGR, I. glandulifera roots; INH, I. noli-tangere herb; IPH, I. parviflora herb; IPR, I. parviflora roots.
Molecules 21 01162 g002
Molecules 21 01162 g003 550
Figure 3. Loading vectors of scaled principal component analysis presented in Figure 2.
Figure 3. Loading vectors of scaled principal component analysis presented in Figure 2.
Molecules 21 01162 g003
Table
Table 1. Composition of the essential oils of four Impatiens species. IGH, I. glandulifera herb; IGR, I. glandulifera roots; IPH, I. parviflora herb; IPR, I. parviflora roots; IBH, I. balsamina herb; INH, I. noli-tangere herb; RIexp, experimental retention index; RIlit, literature retention index; t, trace (percentage value less than 0.05%).
Table 1. Composition of the essential oils of four Impatiens species. IGH, I. glandulifera herb; IGR, I. glandulifera roots; IPH, I. parviflora herb; IPR, I. parviflora roots; IBH, I. balsamina herb; INH, I. noli-tangere herb; RIexp, experimental retention index; RIlit, literature retention index; t, trace (percentage value less than 0.05%).
No.ConstituentRIexpRIlitIGHIGRIPHIPRIBHINHClass of Compound
Content (%)
1Hexanal 7767710.21.75.31.60.73.6AO
2Furfural 803795-0.80.71.4--O
3(E)-Hex-2-enal826822-0.32.11.42.9-AO
4(E)-Hex-3-en-1-ol8388380.6-16.80.30.7-AO
5(Z)-Hex-3-en-1-ol8488510.2---0.29.5AO
6Hexanol852856-1.74.90.3--AO
7Heptan-2-one 868871-0.20.20.1-0.2AO
8Heptanal 8788820.10.41.20.50.10.1AO
92-Butoxyethanol888888-0.20.10.6--AO
10Heptan-3-ol893884-0.1----AO
11Butyraldehyde diethyl acetal8968802.4-----AO
12Nonane900900---0.1--AH
131-Butoxypropan-2-ol926936-0.4- --AO
14Benzaldehyde 9299280.11.810.22.30.74.7Ar
15Dimethyl trisulfide942942-0.4----O
16Benzonitrile945940-0.5----Ar
17Isovaleraldehyde diethyl acetal9469300.7-----AO
18Hept-1-en-3-one954956-0.1----AO
19Heptanol956952-0.30.90.3--AO
20Octane-2,3-dione961959-0.30.40.5--AO
21Oct-1-en-3-ol964962-1.30.90.70.3-AO
226-Methylhept-5-en-2-one964962--0.3---AO
23Octan-3-one965963-1.2----AO
24β-Pinene969970-0.1----MH
25(E,E)-Hepta-2,4-dienal969967--0.60.2--AO
262-Pentylfurane979981-0.31.20.80.41.4O
27Octanal980982-0.3----AO
28Hexanoic acid981973----0.6-AO
29Hepta-2,4-dienal (isomer)981---4.21.2-1.2AO
30(E)-2-(Pent-2-enyl)furan986984--0.50.2t-O
31α-Phellandrene9979970.5-----MH
32Decane10001000---0.1--AH
33Phenylacetaldehyde 10091012t2.02.73.30.83.4Ar
34α-Terpinene100910130.2-----MH
35Salicylaldehyde10111013-1.00.10.4--Ar
36p-Cymene101210150.7-----MH
372,2,6-Trimethylcyclohexanone10131013--t-t-O
382-Ethylhexan-1-ol10151011-0.10.30.50.1-AO
39β-Phellandrene102210237.4-----MH
40Limonene102510250.3-----MH
41(Z)-β-Ocimene102810290.6-----MH
42(E)-Oct-2-enal10321034-0.10.20.3-0.2AO
43Acetophenone10331030-0.2-0.2-0.1Ar
442,6,6-Trimethylcyclohex-2-enone10371045--0.1---O
45Octa-3,5-dien-2-one (isomer)1043---0.30.4--AO
46γ-Terpinene104810590.1t---0.1MH
47(E)-Oct-2-en-1-ol10521052-0.20.60.1--AO
48Octanol105510540.2---0.1-AO
49trans-Linalool oxide (F)10581058-0.12.30.4-1.0MO
50Guaiacol106110590.1-0.10.1--Ar
51(E,E)-Octa-3,5-dien-2-one10651063--0.40.40.1-AO
52Nonan-2-one10701072---0.1--AO
53cis-Linalool oxide (F)10721072t-1.00.1-0.3MO
546-Methylhepta-3,5-dien-2-one10771075--0.10.3--AO
55Terpinolene107910820.1-----MH
56Nonanal108310860.11.11.91.50.51.2AO
57Linalool108610870.75.315.14.91.66.5MO
58Isophorone10921094--0.1-t-MO
59cis-Rose oxide10961096--0.20.5-0.1MO
60α-Campholenal11041105t-----MO
61Oxoisophorone11051005--t0.3t0.2MO
62(E)-But-1-enylbenzene110711100.5-----Ar
63trans-Rose oxide11131114--0.10.3-0.1MO
64trans-Pinocarveol11221126-0.3----MO
65trans-p-Menth-2-en-1-ol11231123-0.7----MO
66Citronellal11261129--0.40.5--MO
67o-Acetylphenol11291135---0.3--Ar
68Hexyl isobutyrate113311320.1-----AO
694-Vinylanisol11341134----0.2-Ar
70(E)-Non-2-enal11341139---0.5 -AO
71(E,E)-Nona-3,6-dien-1-ol11361145----0.2-AO
72Pinocarvone11371137-0.1----MO
73Pentylbenzene114311500.3-----Ar
74Borneol114911500.14.9----MO
75cis- or trans-Linalool oxide (P)11531148--0.1---MO
76Benzoic acid11561157----2.0-Ar
77p-Cymen-9-ol11561157-0.4----MO
78Nonanol11571149---0.9--AO
79Cryptone115711605.7-----O
80Terpinen-4-ol116011641.51.70.30.20.50.5MO
81Octanoic acid11641160----0.1-AO
82p-Cymen-8-ol11661169---0.30.5-MO
83Methyl salicylate11681171----0.1-Ar
84Myrtenal11681172-0.3----MO
85α-Terpineol117411761.91.51.00.30.40.7MO
86Safranal11791182--0.3t0.5tMO
87cis-Piperitol118111810.1-----MO
88Myrtenol11811184-0.6-4.21.2-MO
89Decanal11841184-0.80.11.60.4-AO
90(E,E)-Nona-2,4-dienal11861188--0.1---AO
91Benzothiazole11881186-0.1----O
923,5,5-Trimethyl-4-methylenecyclohex-2-enone11901200--0.3---O
93trans-Piperitol119111930.3-----MO
94Octyl acetate119311910.9-----AO
95Carvotanacetol11931195----0.2-MO
96β-Cyclocitral11951195-0.10.60.10.50.4MO
97trans-Carveol119912000.1-----MO
98p-Isopropylbenzaldehyde121212140.9-----Ar
99Citronellol12141213--2.517.9-1.9MO
100Carvone121512140.6-----MO
101Piperitone122612260.2-----MO
102(2,6,6-Trimethylcyclohex-1-en-1-yl)acetaldehyde12351236----0.4-O
1032-Phenylbut-2-enal12351237-0.2----Ar
104Geranial12401235--0.712.8--MO
105Phellandral125112503.8-----MO
1064-Ethylguaiacol125312570.2-----Ar
107Terpinen-7-al125712570.3-----MO
108Nonanoic acid12581263----0.2-AO
109p-Cymen-7-ol126612660.9-----MO
110Bornyl acetate126812700.34.3----MO
111Thymol12711267-----0.2MO
112Undecan-2-one12731274-0.3-0.4--AO
113Carvacrol128012780.2-----MO
1144-Vinylguaiacol12841282--0.31.21.7-Ar
115Undecanal12861286-0.5-0.6-2.1AO
116(E,E)-Deca-2,4-dienal12891288--0.10.20.10.2AO
117Theaspirane A12901293--0.1---O13
118Theaspirane B13041304--0.1---O13
119Eugenol13291331--1.0-0.11.1Ar
1201,1,6-Trimethyl-1,2-dihydronaphthalene13351336----0.1-Ar
121α-Terpinyl acetate 1336133516.6-----MO
122(E)-Undec-2-enal13391341--0.21.6--AO
123Neryl acetate13411342-----0.2MO
124Decanoic acid13521350----0.3-AO
125α-Longipinene13541360-0.3----SH
126Geranyl acetate135913620.6-----MO
127(E)-β-Damascenone13611361--t0.33.6tO13
128Methyl eugenol136913690.1-----Ar
129α-Copaene137513790.3-----SH
130cis-β-Elemene13771381--0.1---SH
131Dodecan-2-one13851377----0.5-AO
132Dodecanal13851386---0.70.2-AO
133β-Elemene138613890.30.9----SH
134(E)-β-Damascone13921398----1.0-O13
1357,8-Dihydro-β-damascenone13961424----0.7-O13
136Tetradecane14001400-0.10.1---AH
137(E)-α-Ionone14041413-t0.10.1-0.2O13
138α-Barbatene14111414-0.9----SH
139cis-α-Bergamotene14121411-0.1----SH
140α-Santalene14161422-2.0----SH
141Geranylacetone142714280.10.60.10.62.70.7O
142γ-Elemene142714290.5-----SH
143trans-α-Bergamotene14311434-0.1----SH
144Isobazzanene14391442-0.5----SH
145β-Barbatene14441445-5.3----SH
146Sesquisabinene B144514450.6-----SH
1474-(2,4,4-Trimethyl-cyclohexa-1,5-dienyl)-but-3-en-2-one1456-----0.8-O13
148β-Santalene14581460-0.4----SH
149β-Ionone epoxide145914560.10.40.20.93.33.7O13
150(E)-β-Ionone14621468t0.60.81.15.7tO13
1514,5-di-epi-Aristolochene14651470-0.1----SH
152γ-Muurolene147014740.5-----SH
153ar-Curcumene14711473-0.2----SH
154γ-Curcumene14721475-0.1----SH
1555-epi-Aristolochene147314770.1-----SH
156Tridecan-2-one14741476-0.6-0.2--AO
157trans-β-Bergamotene14771480-0.1----SH
1583,4-Dimethyl-5-pentyl-5H-furan-2-one14801481-1.10.1-2.41.5O
159Aristolochene148114860.7-----SH
160Dihydroactinidiolide14871487----0.8-O
161Tridecanal14881490-0.3-1.0--AO
162α-Selinene149014940.7-----SH
163Cuparene14931498-1.3----SH
164Pentadecane15001500----0.3-AH
165Germacrene A15001503--0.7---SH
166β-Bisabolene15021503-0.2----SH
167Methyl dodecanoate15041507----0.7-AO
168γ-Cadinene150515070.2-0.30.3--SH
169trans-Calamenene150815170.1-----SH
170Photosantalol15091511-0.2----SO
171δ-Cadinene151815200.70.1-t--SH
172Selina-4(15),7(11)-diene152815340.4-----SH
173Dodecanoic acid15461554---1.34.1-AO
174(E,E)-Pseudoionone15551563----0.3-O13
175(2E)-2-Methyl-4-(2,6,6-trimethylcyclohex-1-en-1-yl)but-2-enal15681584----0.4-O13
176Maaliol15731565-0.5----SO
177Globulol15741578---0.61.21.7SO
178Tetradecanal15921592-1.0-0.9--AO
179Hexadecane16001600---0.10.1-AH
180Butylphthalide161016160.4-----Ar
181ar-Bisabolol16131619-0.1----SO
182T-Cadinol16241623---0.1--SO
183T-Muurolol162616330.2-----SO
184Vulgarone B16301632-14.9----SO
185α-Cadinol16391642---0.2--SO
186Pogostol16391647--t--0.3SO
187(Z)-Butylidenphthalide164116448.5-----Ar
188α-Barbatenal16521659-0.5----SO
189Hexahydrofarnesol16591667----0.8-O
190Tetradecanol16641670---0.5--AO
191α-Bisabolol16701673---0.30.31.0SO
192Acorenone16711681-4.0----SO
193Pentadecan-2-one16761677-t-0.20.2-AO
194(E)-Butylidenphthalide168116730.8-----Ar
195Pentadecanal 16921693-5.80.6-1.61.7AO
196Heptadecane17001700---0.10.4-AH
197(Z)-Ligustilide1703173211.0-----Ar
198Methyl myristate17101713---0.10.5-AO
199Phenanthrene17461744-0.9----Ar
200Myristic acid174717480.3--0.93.3-AO
201(E)-Ligustilide175617820.1-----Ar
202Hexadecanal17931782-0.1-0.30.2-AO
203Octadecane18001800-t-0.30.50.3AH
204Hexahydrofarnesyl acetone182918321.0-0.4-13.40.3O
205Farnesylacetone18941895----1.9-O
206Nonadecane19001900-0.2-0.50.50.7AH
207Methyl palmitate190419040.20.30.10.71.83.0AO
208Isophytol19391949---0.40.90.3O
209Palmitic acid194519511.1--0.60.9-AO
210Ethyl palmitate19741954-----0.3AO
211Eicosane20002000---0.2-0.3AH
212Fluoranthene20262020-0.9----Ar
213Methyl linoleate20672046-0.1-0.30.40.2AO
214Methyl palmitate207121020.1-----AO
215Methyl linolenate20722102-0.2-0.71.30.3AO
216Pyrene20762070-0.6----Ar
217Methyl oleate20872082-----0.2AO
218Heneicosane21002100-0.3-0.30.30.2AH
219Phytol210721040.50.30.10.22.80.1O
220Docosane22002200----0.20.2AH
221Tricosane230023000.30.40.10.61.81.4AH
222Tetracosane24002400-0.1--0.20.2AH
223Pentacosane250025000.50.30.10.41.71.7AH
224Hexacosane26002600-0.1----AH
225Heptacosane270027000.2-----AH
226Nonacosane290029000.5-----AH
Total identified constituents 82.587.488.286.384.261.7
Aliphatic hydrocarbons AH1.51.50.32.76.05.0
Oxygenated aliphatics AO7.220.042.826.123.324.0
Monoterpene hydrocarbons MH9.90.10.10.4-0.1
Oxygenated monoterpenes MO28.220.324.742.85.412.1
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons SH5.112.61.10.3--
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes SO0.220.2-1.21.53.0
Aromatic compounds Ar23.08.114.47.85.79.3
Other O + O137.3 + 0.1 3.4 + 1.23.7 + 1.13.6 + 2.426.5 + 15.84.3 + 3.9
Identified compounds769470888054
Oil yield0.220.190.240.160.100.14
Table
Table 2. Comparison of the antioxidant activity of Impatiens L. essential oils and standard antioxidants. Different superscripts in each column indicate significant differences in the means at p < 0.05.
Table 2. Comparison of the antioxidant activity of Impatiens L. essential oils and standard antioxidants. Different superscripts in each column indicate significant differences in the means at p < 0.05.
Essential OilsRadical Scavenging Activity DPPH (EC50, µg/mL)Inhibition of Linoleic Acid Peroxidation (IC50, µg/mL)
I. balsamina herb (IBH)16.14 ± 0.68 g468.06 ± 2.03 f
I. glandulifera herb (IGH)3.96 ± 0.03 b102.08 ± 0.71 b
I. glandulifera roots (IGR)5.84 ± 0.03 d116.98 ± 0.43 c
I. noli-tangere herb (INH)4.76 ± 0.05 b,c123.18 ± 1.34 c
I. parviflora herb (IPH)9.06 ± 0.07 e190.94 ± 0.76 d
I. parviflora roots (IPR)10.38 ± 0.17 f323.66 ± 0.24 e
Ascorbic acid2.05 ± 0.01 a-
BHT-18.21 ± 0.11 a
Means values followed by different superscripts (a–g) in a column are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Szewczyk, K.; Kalemba, D.; Komsta, Ł.; Nowak, R. Comparison of the Essential Oil Composition of Selected Impatiens Species and Its Antioxidant Activities. Molecules 2016, 21, 1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21091162

AMA Style

Szewczyk K, Kalemba D, Komsta Ł, Nowak R. Comparison of the Essential Oil Composition of Selected Impatiens Species and Its Antioxidant Activities. Molecules. 2016; 21(9):1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21091162

Chicago/Turabian Style

Szewczyk, Katarzyna, Danuta Kalemba, Łukasz Komsta, and Renata Nowak. 2016. "Comparison of the Essential Oil Composition of Selected Impatiens Species and Its Antioxidant Activities" Molecules 21, no. 9: 1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21091162

APA Style

Szewczyk, K., Kalemba, D., Komsta, Ł., & Nowak, R. (2016). Comparison of the Essential Oil Composition of Selected Impatiens Species and Its Antioxidant Activities. Molecules, 21(9), 1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21091162

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop