Next Article in Journal
Miro1 Enhances Mitochondria Transfer from Multipotent Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MMSC) to Neural Cells and Improves the Efficacy of Cell Recovery
Previous Article in Journal
Thiazoles and Thiazolidinones as COX/LOX Inhibitors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 23
Issue 3
10.3390/molecules23030686
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Diabetes Drug Discovery: hIAPP1–37 Polymorphic Amyloid Structures as Novel Therapeutic Targets

by
Isaac Fernández-Gómez
1,†,
Marquiza Sablón-Carrazana
2,†,
Alberto Bencomo-Martínez
2,
Guadalupe Domínguez
3,
Reyna Lara-Martínez
4,
Nelly F. Altamirano-Bustamante
5,
Luis Felipe Jiménez-García
4,
Karina Pasten-Hidalgo
5,6,
Rosa Angélica Castillo-Rodríguez
5,6,
Perla Altamirano
7,
Suchitil Rivera Marrero
2,
Cristina Revilla-Monsalve
1,
Peter Valdés-Sosa
2,
Fabio Salamanca-Gómez
8,
Eulalia Garrido-Magaña
9,
Chryslaine Rodríguez-Tanty
2,* and
Myriam M. Altamirano-Bustamante
1,*
1
Unidad de Investigación en Enfermedades Metabólicas, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México 06720, Mexico
2
Departamento de Neuroquímica, Centro de Neurociencias de Cuba, Habana 11600, Cuba
3
Instituto de Fisiología Celular, UNAM, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico
4
Departamento de Biología Celular, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico
5
Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de México 04530, Mexico
6
Cátedras Conacyt, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de México 04530, Mexico
7
Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital de Especialidades, CMN, La Raza, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México 06720, Mexico
8
Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México 06720, Mexico
9
UMAE Hospital de Pediatría, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México 06720, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
I.F.-G. and M.S.-C. contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2018, 23(3), 686; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23030686
Submission received: 9 January 2018 / Revised: 20 February 2018 / Accepted: 21 February 2018 / Published: 19 March 2018
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Human islet amyloid peptide (hIAPP1–37) aggregation is an early step in Diabetes Mellitus. We aimed to evaluate a family of pharmaco-chaperones to act as modulators that provide dynamic interventions and the multi-target capacity (native state, cytotoxic oligomers, protofilaments and fibrils of hIAPP1–37) required to meet the treatment challenges of diabetes. We used a cross-functional approach that combines in silico and in vitro biochemical and biophysical methods to study the hIAPP1–37 aggregation-oligomerization process as to reveal novel potential anti-diabetic drugs. The family of pharmaco-chaperones are modulators of the oligomerization and fibre formation of hIAPP1–37. When they interact with the amino acid in the amyloid-like steric zipper zone, they inhibit and/or delay the aggregation-oligomerization pathway by binding and stabilizing several amyloid structures of hIAPP1–37. Moreover, they can protect cerebellar granule cells (CGC) from the cytotoxicity produced by the hIAPP1–37 oligomers. The modulation of proteostasis by the family of pharmaco-chaperones A–F is a promising potential approach to limit the onset and progression of diabetes and its comorbidities.

1. Introduction

Up to relatively recent data, proteins were thought of as perfectly functional and well folded structures. Nowadays, we know that they can also present disordered elements both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, proteins tend to unfold, misfold and aggregate due to intrinsic and extrinsic causes [1,2,3]. Unfolding and aggregation of proteins gives way to what is known as “conformational diseases (CDs)”: One of the most challenging CDs is diabetes [1,4,5,6,7,8]. The prevalence of diabetes is increasing rapidly: 29.1 million people or 9.3% of the population of the USA has diabetes resulting in a total cost of $245 billion [9]. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) rates have been rising faster than type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D), and with the increased obesity, we are currently facing a T2D pandemic in paediatric stages, thus, representing a great challenge for the medical community of the 21st century [10].
The human islet amyloid polypeptide (hIAPP1–37) is a 37-residue peptide produced by the pancreatic β-cell. It participates in glucose homeostasis, controlling gastric emptying, and suppression of glucagon release. The hIAPP1–37 deposition occurs in ∼90% of autopsies of individuals with T2D [11,12]. hIAPP1–37 has a propensity to aggregate with the formation of toxic oligomers and fibres that contribute to the onset of T2D [13,14]. The islet in T2D is characterized by an approximate 60% β-cell deficit, increased β-cell apoptosis, and high auto-phagosome formation [15]. The membrane-disrupting oligomers of amyloidogenic hIAPP1–37 initiate apoptosis, at least in part, by inducing ER stress and disrupting the proteasome [14,16,17,18,19,20,21]
Chaperones are a group of molecules that assist in the folding process of proteins. Chaperones bind to unfolded intermediaries and prevent them from interacting with other compounds. They also promote their correct folding and can rescue their functionality if they are misfolded [1,22,23,24]. It is to be noted that there are many different kinds of compounds which have been considered as chaperones [22,24], and have been classified as molecular, chemical and pharmacological [25,26,27]. The pharmaco-chaperone family can do different things: either accelerate or inhibit the protein-aggregation process (depending on their concentration levels); stabilize the native conformer; stabilize fibres; and even binding to oligomers thus, accelerating the formation of fibres [28].
Different studies have demonstrated that there are several types of compounds that can inhibit protein aggregation into amyloid structures, among these it is possible to find many polycyclic and polyphenolic substances [29,30,31,32]. All of these drugs contain aromatic rings in their general structure; various investigations based on these chemical structures aim to find molecules that can be used in treatment of CDs.
Our group described some naphthalene derivatives that can successfully bind to amyloid fibrils by forming aromatic interactions within the steric zippers’ dry surface, and disrupt their structure [28]. The pharmaco-chaperone family (Table 1) encompassed N-(2-aminoethyl)-N′-1-naphthylsuccinamide A; methyl (2-{[4-(1-naphthylamino)-4-oxobutanoyl]amino}ethyl) dithiocarbamate B; (2R)-2-(6-methoxy-2-naphthyl)propanoic acid (Naproxen) C; N-[4-(1-naphthylamino)-4-oxobutanoyl]-β-alanine D; 6-{[4-(1-naphthylamino)-4-oxobutanoyl]amino} hexanoic acid E; N3,N3′-ethane-1,2-dyilbis(N1-1-naphthylsuccinamide) F; and N-(4-aminobutyl)-N′-1-naphthylsuccinamide G. All of them have chemical structures related to naproxen (C)—whose anti-aggregating property against the β-fibril conformation has been previously demonstrated—and are a potential chemical scaffold to generate novel and promising antiamyloidogenic agents [33,34,35].
According to Sablón [28], it was noteworthy for us to extend this evaluation to hIAPP1–37 as a target protein since it provides a reasonable foundation for treating T2D. In the present study a pharmacophore-based virtual screening is applied (using the pharmaco-chaperone family above mentioned), alongside cross-functional experimental methodologies in order to study its effect on protein aggregation and fibril formation process of hIAPP1–37; thus, shedding light upon the discovery of novel therapeutic approaches in T2D. The discovery of pharmaco-chaperones family as potent modulator with multi-target capacity in the hIAPP1–37 aggregation-oligomerization process, supports the idea that it may be a fruitful approach to delay the onset and progression of diabetes.

2. Results

2.1. Molecular Framework of Interaction of Pharmacological Chaperones and the Human Islet Amyloid Polypeptide

hIAPP1–37 has been implicated in the pathology of type 2 diabetes mellitus: in 90% of post-mortem studies amyloid plaques were found in the patient’s pancreas. Hence, this protein is a target to find breaking agents of the β conformer. Eisenberg et al. [36] described that the IAPP molecules are capable of adopting a dimeric structure and that this structure is an intermediate on the pathway to fibrillation. Additionally, in the study, they suggest that the non-fibrillary state of hIAPP1–37 can form dimers with the two IAPP molecules interacting at helical interfaces centred at the aromatic stack of two Phe15 residue [36]. In others reports, Eisenberg et al. studied the influence of different sequence fragments of amino acid (a.a) on the conformational polymorphism of the hIAPP1–37 peptide [37]. Because of this, the A13NFLVH18, L16VHSSN21, F23GAILSS29 and N22FGAILS28 sequences—which are located in the molecular zipper of the IAPP conformation—were specifically studied. In addition, the contribution of His and Asp amino acids in the formation of these zones were evaluated. According to their in silico findings, these sequences have a high propensity of the fibril core of IAPP to form anti-parallel β sheet structures over parallel structures.
In our work, molecular docking studies were carried out with the 2L86—a micelle-stabilized NMR structure—which is a structure in non-amyloid form of hIAPP1–37. This type of molecule is used as reference in the existing literature and—in studies that regard the fibrillation process—is generally considered as a native structure of the hIAPP1–37 since it does not form any amyloid structures [28,38,39,40,41,42]. For example, in the correlation studies between structure and function of the hIAPP, the two structures of hIAPP1–37 that are used for docking studies and MD simulation, are the NMR structures of hIAPP1–37 bound to SDS-micelles (PDB 2L86 or 2KB8). This is the initial monomeric protein structure for investigating the interaction of small molecules [38,39]. During an investigation Nedumpully-Govindan et al. applied atomistic DMD simulations to uncover the anti-aggregation mechanism of two polyphenol molecules (curcumin and resveratrol) using as initial structure PDB 2L86 [43]. In a similar investigation, Lolicato et al. demonstrated that the resveratrol interferes with the aggregation of membrane-bound human-IAPP by an extensive set of MD simulations—the initial protein structure they used was PDB 2KB8 [44]. In another investigation Misra et al. performed molecular docking of dehydrophenylalanine (DF) that contained peptides with the 3D structure of hIAPP (2kB8), and demonstrated the inhibition of hIAPP fibrillization using the initial structure PDB 2KB8 [45].
The aim of this study was to identify which amino acids of hIAPP1–37 peptide interact with the evaluated pharmacological chaperones and to verify if they are in agreement with ones involved in the formation of the zipper structure of fibrils. To do this, the conformer with the lowest binding energy was calculated from 10 different conformations for each docking simulation at 5 Å distance between the chaperones and hIAPP1–37. This permitted us to locate all potential docking sites of chaperones on the hIAPP1–37 structure. The location of the sites in the 3D structure of hIAPP1–37 are shown in Figure 1.
In all docking assays the chaperones interact in the same pseudo-cavity formed in the helical hIAPP1–37. These results revealed that the chaperones bind to hIAPP1–37 region essentially via hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions and by Van der Waals forces, mainly with the Arg11, Leu12, Asn14, Phe15, His18, Asn21, Asn22, Ala25 and Ser28 residues. The interactions π∙∙∙π were located between naphthyl ring of each chaperones and phenyl ring of the Phe15. In addition, the hIAPP1–37 amino acid alignment, as percent of with a.a., was explored to determine the specific interaction between them and the chaperones (Table 2).
In all docking studies carried out hydrogen bonds (H-bonds) were found between the hydrogen atom of amino group of the Arg11 and the oxygen atom of the carbonyl moiety of amide, carboxylic and succinimidyl groups of the molecule. The chaperone E, unlike of the rest of chaperones, has four hydrogen-bonding interactions. In particular, a double H-bond with the Arg11 was established between the oxygen atoms of the terminal carboxyl group and the carbonyl moiety (close to naphthyl ring) of chaperone E with the hydrogen atoms of the primary and secondary amine groups of Arg11, respectively. In addition, another H-bond was located between the hydrogen atoms of amino group of the Asn14 with the oxygen atom of the amide-group of the succinimidyl chain of chaperone E. The last one was found between the hydrogen atoms of the terminal carboxyl group with the oxygen atom of the amide group of the Asn31 (Figure 2). The possibility of forming multiple H-bonds in chaperone E could be explained by its length of amidoalkylic chain, which allows it a higher conformational flexibility.

2.2. Molecular Framework of Interaction of Pharmacological Chaperones A and E with the Human Islet Amyloid Polypeptide Fibrillar Structure

The hIAPP1–37 amyloid fibrils are very stable protein assemblies; they are built on steric zipper spines, resist SDS treatment and withstand in the pancreatic tissue [21,46,47,48,49].
Great efforts have been made in the last decade to inhibit the production of amyloid fibres, limit their growth and propagation, and diminish its fibre formations. Our approach to identify the best chaperone that avoids growth and propagation of the fibres, is capping fibrils with docking chaperones. To do this we rendered a docking with amylin fibres with the chaperones A and E: The first one has a mild effect, while the second one inhibits the formation, growth and propagation more effectively [40,41,47,50].
With Figure 3 we demonstrated that in this arrangement—which resulted more proficient—a hydrophobic interaction could be established between the side chains of phenylalanine 15, valine 17 and the naphthyl group of each ligand, ergo the closeness of the electronic “clouds” π in the space (similar results were obtained for the RMN conformations of the hIAPP). Furthermore, the existence of hydrogen bonds between chaperone E and the fibres with serine 19 was notable. This may increase the stability of the interaction with the ligand–protein compound that was formed—thing that matches the experimental results of this work—.
Curcumin was used as a positive control in the docking studies since other studies showed that: (a) it binds fibres; and (b) it affects the fibrillation process and its propagation [6,46,50,51,52]. The interaction between curcumin, the native structure and the amylin fibres, is shown in Figure 4.

2.3. hIAPP1–37 Misfolding: Aggregation and Amyloid Formation of Toxic Species and Its Modulations by the Family of Pharmaco-Chaperones

An augmentation in the intensity of the ThT fluorescence in time was observed in the sigmoidal curves, this shows an increase in the formation of fibrils from hIAPP1–37. hIAPP1–37 was incubated at a concentration of 12.8 µmol/L to develop the kinetics of aggregation. Then, hIAPP1–37 was incubated with each chaperone in a molar ratio of 1:0.5 (6.4 µmol/L), 1:1 (12.8 µmol/L), and 1:1.5 (19.2 µmol/L) (Table 1, Figure 5 and Figure 6). Considering the equimolar conditions, chaperone A showed a lag phase similar to the hIAPP1–37 alone (Figure 5a,b). At the final time, a significant increase was observed in the ThT fluorescence intensity (9509 ± 1032 A.U./s) compared with hIAPP1–37 alone (6944 ± 772 A.U./s), which was 37% superior. (Figure 5b,c). This suggests that chaperone A facilitates fibril formation.
Chaperons B, C, D, E, F and G showed a significant increase in the lag phase compared to hIAPP1–37 alone (3.989 ± 0.373 h), and at equimolar concentrations (Figure 5 and Figure 6, Table 1), suggesting a delay in the process of aggregation.
Chaperones B and E revealed a similar kinetic profile. These chaperones had a significantly higher Vmax (B = 8562 ± 110 A.U./s and E = 9055 ± 149 A.U./s) compared with hIAPP1–37 (6944 ± 772 A.U./s) (Figure 5a,c), but in a larger dose of 64 µmol/L it decreased (B = 5328 ± 672 A.U./s and E = 4465 ± 835 A.U./s) (Figure 6 and Table 1). This suggests that both chaperones delay the aggregation of hIAPP1–37, but could also avoid fibril aggregation (larger dose).
Chaperones C, D, F and G did not show significant differences in the Vmax with respect to hIAPP1–37 alone (Figure 5a,c).
Chaperone D showed an effect of dose-response, when increasing its concentration, the intensity of the fluorescence decreases, which is proportional to the number of fibrils formed (6.4 µmol/L = 6946 ± 1126, 12.8 µmol/L = 6326 ± 944 and 64 µmol/L = 5255 ± 289) (Figure 6 and Table 1). This suggests that chaperone D avoids the aggregation of hIAPP1–37 to fibrils.
Some chaperones delayed the process of fibrillation of the IAPP, thus avoiding the toxic effect of the oligomers during a time interval. In addition, some of them produced a regression from cytotoxic oligomers to oligomers or monomers depending on the dose (Figure 3 and Figure 4). All the samples in presence of chaperones were analysed at the final time with TEM (Figure 7).

2.4. The Pharmaco-Chaperones Protect Granular Cells of Mouse Cerebellum from Toxicity of the hIAPP1–37 Oligomers

It is well known that hIAPP1–37 can misfold in the pancreas and then migrate through the blood-brain barrier and initiate seeding in the brain [14]. Diabetes mellitus is a strong risk factor for the development of Alzheimer Disease for their overlapping pathophysiological mechanisms such as amyloidogenic events, oxidative stress, and so forth [53]. Hence, we chose cerebellar cells to evaluate in more astringent conditions the pharmaco-chaperone as potential drugs against diabetes and its comorbidities. In order to prove that the chaperones could avoid the toxicity of the hIAPP1–37 oligomers, cell viability assays (by MTT) were carried out in cerebellar granule neurons (CGN) (Figure 8). If it protects neurons that are more labile, then it can protect any other cell [53,54,55,56,57].
Several studies have shown that CGN cultured with physiological concentrations of potassium (5 mM KCl; K5) during more than five days in vitro (DIV) die by apoptosis [58,59]. In contrast, the survival and differentiation of these cells in culture are markedly increased in the presence of high concentrations of potassium (25 mM KCl; K25) [59,60]. Thus, culturing CGN with K25 for 7–8 DIV and then transferring the cells to an identical medium with K5, induces apoptotic death of CGN in 24–48 h. It is widely accepted that K5 is a typically pro-apoptotic model and it is a suitable tool for this paradigm [58,59]. In addition, it has been shown that cerebellar granule neurons (CGN) treated with K25 do not show any significant sign of necrotic death. Therefore, in this study the control is the condition that promotes survival (K25) and the experimental condition inducing apoptotic death is K5.
The experimental conditions as dose of hIAPP1–37 oligomers and the vehicles used for preparing IAPP (using acetic acid as described by Meier [61]) and chaperones (using DMSO) solutions were evaluated which did not affect the cell viability by itself. All chaperones, except A, maintain the same cell viability as the control under a normal concentration of potassium (K25; not significant differences) and they also reversed the IAPP toxic effect (Figure 8).

3. Discussion

The Diabetes mellitus in particular, and the conformational diseases in general, are the medical challenges of the 21st century since they defy the physio-pathological, diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms known to date [1,6,48,62].
Our strategy to modulate the process of fibrillogenesis was to use pharmaco-chaperones derived from naphthalene (Table 1). Given that Islet Amyloid Polypeptide (hIAPP1–37) is the most abundant protein in amyloid fibres in the pancreas and its toxic oligomers are a crucial element in the physiopathology of Diabetes Mellitus, we have studied the hIAPP1–37 aggregation-oligomerization pathway (Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9). Using a wide array of methods, strategies and ideas derived from extant knowledge in organic chemistry, protein physio-chemistry, biochemistry, cell biology, and proteomic medicine, we demonstrate that these new naphthalene-derived pharmaco-chaperones help modulate hIAPP1–37 aggregation processes (Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9). Approximately, in terms of the reduction of fibre formation as shown by the ThT experiments, the inhibition scale of the pharmaco-chaperones is E > G > B > A (Figure 5 and Figure 6) at molar relation protein: Chaperone 1:0.5. Contrary, the chaperone C favours the formation of fibres as described by Fortin et al. [35]. Meanwhile, the scale of delay of the fibres formation would be: E ~ G >D > C > B > A. τ lag, “represents a time required for the nuclei that are formed early on in the reaction to grow and proliferate in order to reach an aggregate concentration” [63]. This property can be useful in a chronic stage of diabetes because it stabilizes the native and fibril structures by halting self-catalysis and the creation of cytotoxic oligomers due to fibre formation [28]. At 1:1.5 molar ratio only the chaperone E showed a significant decrement in the fibril formation similar to the effect observed at 1:0.5 (Figure 4, Table 1). Chaperone E presented the best results, both in the delay and in the decrease of the fibres formation (Figure 5 and Figure 6); this data agrees with the results observed in the TEM micrograph (carried out at 1:0.5 molar ratio), which reveal the absence of fibres (Figure 7). Furthermore, said molar ratio showed that the treatment of hIAPP1–37 oligomers with chaperone E increases cellular viability monitored by the MTT assay (Figure 8). In what respects of the chaperone A case, the TEM micrographs show the presence of scarce short fibres and a larger proportion of circular structures named cytotoxic oligomers, which relates with the decrease of cellular viability (Figure 7 and Figure 8); this data is in accordance with the previous reports, which have proven that the intermediates in fibre formation, called cytotoxic oligomers, are responsible for the cytotoxicity in cells [64,65]. The cell damage mechanism that has been proposed is such since oligomers are capable of binding to cellular membranes to allow the formation of pores, which would lead to the loss of selectiveness in membranes, followed by the activation of molecules implicated in cellular death [66]. Meanwhile, the TEM micrographs of the presence of chaperones B, D and F, showed a large quantity of fibres but no presence of cytotoxic oligomers, fact that is in agreement with the cell viability assays (Figure 7 and Figure 8). The results show that most pharmaco-chaperones have a cytoprotective effect; the observations of TEM’s microscopy were that the fibres of the hIAPP1–37, in absence of the chaperones are long, thick and abundant; whereas in presence of the chaperones they are short, thin and in minor quantity, or in some cases absent (Figure 7 and Figure 8). We have several multi-target effects while Jiang and collaborators only have the cytoprotective effect [67], or in the case of BRICHOS, only stabilize the fibril structures halting self-catalysis [14]. These results are promising in the research of compounds that inhibit or delay the fibril formation process or in addition work as an “off-pathway” drug (Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7).
According to the molecular docking studies, the chaperones interact with the region comprised between amino acids 11 to 28, by hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, and by Van der Waals forces. This region is one of those reported by Eisenberg et al. [36,37], which is involved in the formation of the steric zipper. All chaperones engage strongly through the interactions π∙∙∙π stacking with key amino acid Phe15. In addition, hydrogen bonds with Arg11 favours native state of the peptide, this suggests that these molecules could prevent the formation of hIAPP1–37 dimer. The aforementioned interactions, in particular the chaperone E, have three probable additional hydrogen bonds (Arg11, Asn14 and Asn31) which should contribute to a greater stability of the native species, blocking the potential sites of peptide dimerization. These in silico results are in concordance with those found in vitro and could be the explanation by which chaperone E delays and decreases the amount of cytotoxic oligomers formed. The challenge was to find a pharmaco-chaperone that would be able to interact with the native form and the amyloid fibres of the amylin. Chaperone E meets this double function since, as shown by this research, in solution form it interacts with the native form of hIAPP1–37 (Figure 2 and Figure 5), and avoids fibrillar growth and propagation (Figure 3). Comparing chaperone E with curcumin (an anti-amyloid drug) we can see that the first one has more interaction surface, hence, being much more effective in the inhibition of the fibre formation and its propagation. As a matter of fact, curcumin, as seen by the docking studies, is significantly similar to chaperone A in the ligand-protein interaction (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4).
The modulation of proteostasis by the family of pharmaco-chaperones A–F is a promising potential approach to limit the onset and progression of diabetes and its comorbidities (Figure 9). As a consequence we got additional insights into the complex mechanisms of protein aggregation and its effects on conformational diseases (Figure 9).
The bonding sites construct structural blocks that can overlap in various target proteins and make a meta-structure called meta-pharmacophore, which allows the development of novel drugs. Our results are novel and highly promising, for they allow researchers to build a set of molecules that can be used for studying and potentially treating the various physio-pathological stages of diabetes. For instance, when dealing with an acute phase of cytotoxicity, what is needed is the recruitment of cytotoxic oligomers, thus having chaperones that accelerate fibre formation would be very useful, whereas in a chronic stage it is better to have a chaperone that stabilizes the native and fibril structures in order to halt self-catalysis and the creation of cytotoxic oligomers as a consequence of fibre formation. This is demonstrated by means of analyses of the apoptosis produced by hIAPP1–37 toxic oligomers, which results in a protective effect of many chaperones regardless of their capacity for accelerating or inhibiting in vitro formation of fibres. This is extremely relevant as it allows for a close examination of the fibre-formation phenomena and, potentially, to control cytotoxicity. The pharmaco-chaperons act as modulators that provide dynamic interventions and the multi-target capacity (native state, cytotoxic oligomers, protofilaments and fibrils of hIAPP1–37) required to meet the treatment challenges of diabetes.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Preparation and Characterization of Chaperones and hIAPP1–37

Chaperones A, B, C, D, E, F and G were synthesized and purified at Neuroscience Centre of Cuba (Havana, Cuba) (see Table 1) [68]. Chaperones were dissolved in DMSO at stock concentrations of 50 mM. hIAPP1–37 was purchased from ProteoGenix, France. Lyophilized hIAPP1–37 was dissolved in DMSO to prepare a 256 µmol/L stock solution, aliquots were stored at −80 °C. The stocks were then diluted with the buffer to obtain the desired final hIAPP1–37 or chaperone concentrations just before use.

4.2. Oligomer Preparation

hIAPP1–37 oligomers were prepared essentially as described by Kayed [64]. Briefly, 1 mg of hIAPP1–37 was solubilized in 400 μL of hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFIP) for 15 min at room temperature. 100 μL of the resulting hIAPP1–37 solution were added to 900 μL Mili-Q H2O in a siliconized Eppendorf tube. After 20 min of incubation at room temperature the samples were centrifuged for 15 min at 14,000× g at 4 °C and the supernatant fraction (pH 2.8–3.5) was transferred to a new siliconized tube and subjected to a gentle stream of N2 for 10 min to evaporate the HFIP. The samples were then stirred at 500 rpm using a heating block from Thermomixer comfort Eppendorf for 30 min at 22 °C. 10 μL aliquots were taken for observation by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). In order to prepare highly pure samples, residual trifluoroacetic acid was removed by lyophilisation in 0.1 M HCl followed by lyophilisation in 50% acetonitrile. Then, the lyophilized oligomers of hIAPP1–37 were dissolved in DMSO to prepare a 256 µmol/L stock solution. The stock solution was then diluted with the medium to obtain the desired final hIAPP1–37 concentrations.

4.3. Molecular Docking

The crystallographic structure of hIAPP1–37 was downloaded from Protein Data Bank (PDB, entry 2L86). The structures of the chemical chaperones were refined using Avogadro software and converted to PDBqt (Protein Data Bank in format qt) with the program Autodock Tools, considering all ligand bonds as flexible. The chaperones were docked with hIAPP1–37 using AutoDock Vina [69]. The determination of the interaction zones between the IAPP amino acids and all of the tested compounds were carried out using the molecular graphic program UCSF Chimera [70]. All calculations were performed on a cluster of 10 computers (30 CPU) with Linux as operating system.
In addition, the Amylin fibrils of 4 monomers in size (amylin_single-1.pdb) was downloaded from fibrilizer-a computational tool to build polymorphic amyloid fibrils at an atomic level resolution: http://amyloid.cs.mcgill.ca/database/Amylin/Amylin.html#single [40,41,42]. The chaperones A, E and curcumin as positive control were docked with amylin fibrils using AutoDock Vina. The rest of the analysis was made as above.

4.4. Thioflavin T (ThT) Fluorescence Assay

ThT Fluorescence assay was performed as described by Meier [61] and Peinado [71]. Briefly, hIAPP1–37 fibril formation in the presence or absence of chaperones A, B, C, D, E, F and G, was monitored using thioflavin T (ThT) fluorescence, a dye known to preferentially bind amyloid fibrils as previously described [72]. All the experiments were performed in triplicate at 20 °C. ThT fluorescence increases in a solution of freshly reconstituted hIAPP1–37 as amyloid fibrils grow. The samples of hIAPP1–37 at a concentration of 12.8 µmol/L were incubated in the presence of chaperone A, B, C, D, E, F and G, at a molar ratio of hIAPP1–37/chaperone of 1:0.5, 1:1, and 1:1.5 in 20 mM Tris buffer of pH 7.4 with a 100 mmol/L of NaCl. Each fibril formation reaction was performed and real-time emission intensities were measured at 482 nm with excitation at 450 nm. Measurements were performed at room temperature (20 °C) with excitation and emission slit widths of 1 and 10 nm, respectively. Fluorescence measurements were registered using M1000 Tecan (Viena, Austria). Plots of ThT emission intensity as a function over the time were fitted to a sigmoidal curve (nonlinear regression analysis) using Origin Software.

4.5. Transmission Electron Microscopy

A 6 μL droplet of the fibrillization reaction was deposited on a 400-mesh copper grid coated with collodion film, and allowed to settle for 4 min. The excess solution was wicked away by gently applying a piece of blotting paper to the edge of the grid. Then a 40 μL droplet of 2% uranyl acetate was deposited on the grid and allowed to settle for 60 s. The excess solution was removed as mentioned above. The grid was left air-drying for 24 h to be later observed using a JEM-1010, JEOL (Tokyo, Japan) microscope operated at an acceleration voltage of 80 kV. The electronic micrographs were acquired using a MTI model CCD-300-RC camera (Tokyo, Japan). All the experiments were performed at least three times

4.6. Primary Cell Cultures

Cerebellar granule neurons (CGN) were prepared as previously described [73]. Briefly, cell suspensions dissociated from 8-day-old Wistar rat cerebellum were plated at a density of 1.5 × 105 cells/cm2 in dishes coated with poly-L-lysine (5 mg/mL). Basal Medium Eagle (BME) was supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat inactivated foetal calf serum, 2 mM glutamine, 4.5 mM glucose, 20 mM KCl, 50 U/mL penicillin and 50 mg/mL streptomycin. The dishes were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2/95% air atmosphere. Cytosine arabinoside (10 µmmol/L) was added 20 h after seeding. Cells were maintained for 6–8 days in vitro (DIV).
All the animals were obtained from the Vivarium of the Cell Physiology Institute, University of Mexico. Wistar rat pups of 6 to 8 postnatal days were euthanized by decapitation following the recommended procedures to avoid unnecessary infliction of pain and using the strictly necessary animals.
All animal studies were performed in compliance with UNAM Animal Care Guideline NOM-062-ZOO 1999. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of Instituto de Fisiología Celular, UNAM. SAGARPA-SENASICA AUTO-B-C-1216-030

4.7. Cell Viability

Reduction of MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) was used to assess cell viability as described previously [74,75,76]. To test the effects of chaperones or oligomers, cells were seeded on a 48 well plate at 1.5 × 105 cells/mL. The next day, the medium was replaced with fresh medium containing freshly dissolved hIAPP1–37 (80 µmol/L), chaperones (40 µmol/L) molar ratio of hIAPP1–37/chaperone of 1:0.5, or vehicle (acetic acid 0.002%) for hIAPP1–37 as described by Meier [61] and DMSO 0.8% for chaperones as described by Sablón [28]. Twenty-four hours later, MTT (0.1 mg/mL) was added to the CGN and incubated for 15 min at 37 °C. After the removal of medium containing MTT, DMSO 100% was added to the dishes and incubated during 15 min at room temperature in darkness. Formazan blue formed was measured at 560 nm in an ELISA plate reader (microplates ELx800, BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). Values were corrected with the background signal. All the experiments were performed at least three times.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as mean ± SM. Statistical Analyses were carried out by ANOVA followed by Fisher’s test for Vmax analysis and Tukey test for tau analysis using GraphPad PRISMA 7.02. Statistical significance was determined using Newman–Keuls Multiple Comparison Test. A p value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

5. Conclusions

We used a cross-functional approach that combines in silico and in vitro biochemical and biophysical methods to study the hIAPP1–37 aggregation-oligomerization process as to reveal novel potential anti-diabetic drugs. The family of pharmaco-chaperones are modulators of the oligomerization and fibre formation of hIAPP1–37 by interacting with the amino acid in the amyloid-like steric zipper zone. They inhibit and/or delay the aggregation-oligomerization pathway by binding and stabilizing several amyloid structures of hIAPP1–37. Furthermore, they are able to protect cerebellar granule cells (CGC) from the cytotoxicity produced by the hIAPP1–37 oligomers. Our results provide evidence that the pharmaco-chaperones may be a fruitful approach to delay the onset and progression of diabetes.

Acknowledgments

I.F.-G. was a recipient of a master fellowship awarded by CONACYT-Mexico, M.S.-C. and A.B.-M. were a recipient of an international research-stay fellowship to work in Mexico awarded by IMSS. The contributions of Mario Andrés Romo-Romero, Rafael Payro and Daniela Monroy-Fraustro from Universidad Iberoamericana for proofreading and editing of the manuscript and for their participation in fruitful discussions are greatly appreciated. Funding for this study was provided by Mexico's National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT) SALUD-2010-C02-151942, Institute of Science and Technology of Mexico City (ICYTDF).

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: M.M.A.-B., I.F.-G., M.S.-C., C.R.-T. Performed the experiments: I.F.-G., M.S.-C., A.B.-M., R.L.-M., G.D., S.R.M., L.F.J.-G., C.R.-T., M.M.A.-B. Analysed the data: I.F.-G., M.S.-C., A.B.-M., R.L.-M., G.D., N.F.A.-B., R.A.C.-R., K.P.-H., C.R.-T., M.M.A.-B. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: M.S.-C., E.G.-M., N.F.A.-B., S.R.M., L.F.J.-G., C.R.-M., C.R.-T., P.V.-S., M.M.A.-B. Wrote the paper: M.M.A.-B., I.F.-G., M.S.-C., C.R.-T. Contributed with helpful discussions: I.F.-G., M.S.-C., R.L.-M., A.B.-M., E.G.-M., G.D., N.F.A.-B., L.F.J.-G., C.R.-T., P.V.-S., K.P.-H., C.R.-M., F.S.-G., R.A.C.-R., M.M.A.-B.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares having filled two patent applications WO2010118706 A2 and WO2014131374 A1.

References

  1. Chiti, F.; Dobson, C.M. Protein Misfolding, Amyloid Formation, and Human Disease: A Summary of Progress Over the Last Decade. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2017, 86, 27–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bemporad, F.; Ramazzotti, M. From the Evolution of Protein Sequences Able to Resist Self-Assembly to the Prediction of Aggregation Propensity. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2017, 329, 1–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chiti, F.; Dobson, C.M. Amyloid formation by globular proteins under native conditions. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Carrell, R.W.; Lomas, D.A. Alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency—A model for conformational diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 346, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Carrell, R.W. Cell toxicity and conformational disease. Trends Cell Biol. 2005, 15, 574–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Carrell, R.W.; Lomas, D.A. Conformational disease. Lancet 1997, 350, 134–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Eisenberg, D.; Jucker, M. The amyloid state of proteins in human diseases. Cell 2012, 148, 1188–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Leyva-García, E.; Lara-Martínez, R.; Morán-Zanabria, L.; Revilla-Monsalve, C.; Jiménez-García, L.F.; Oviedo, N.; Murata, C.; Garrido-Magaña, E.; Altamirano-Bustamante, N.F.; Altamirano-Bustamante, M.M. Novel insight into streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats from the protein misfolding perspective. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Avila-Vazquez, M.; Altamirano-Bustamante, N.; Altamirano-Bustamante, M. Amyloid Biomarkers in Conformational Diseases at Face Value: A Systematic Review. Molecules 2017, 23, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. American Diabetes Association. National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2014 Estimates of Diabetes and Its Burden in the Epidemiologic estimation methods. Natl. Diabetes Stat. Rep. 2014, 2009–2012. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cameron, F.J.; Wherrett, D.K. Care of diabetes in children and adolescents: controversies, changes, and consensus. Lancet (Lond. Engl.) 2015, 385, 2096–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Clark, A.; Cooper, G.J.; Lewis, C.E.; Morris, J.F.; Willis, A.C.; Reid, K.B.; Turner, R.C. Islet amyloid formed from diabetes-associated peptide may be pathogenic in type-2 diabetes. Lancet (Lond. Engl.) 1987, 2, 231–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Engel, M.F.M. Membrane permeabilization by Islet Amyloid Polypeptide. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2009, 160, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zraika, S.; Hull, R.L.; Verchere, C.B.; Clark, A.; Potter, K.J.; Fraser, P.E.; Raleigh, D.P.; Kahn, S.E. Toxic oligomers and islet beta cell death: Guilty by association or convicted by circumstantial evidence? Diabetologia 2010, 53, 1046–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ankarcrona, M.; Winblad, B.; Monteiro, C.; Fearns, C.; Powers, E.T.; Johansson, J.; Westermark, G.T.; Presto, J.; Ericzon, B.-G.; Kelly, J.W. Current and future treatment of amyloid diseases. J. Intern. Med. 2016, 280, 177–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Huang, C.-J.; Haataja, L.; Gurlo, T.; Butler, A.E.; Wu, X.; Soeller, W.C.; Butler, P.C. Induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced beta-cell apoptosis and accumulation of polyubiquitinated proteins by human islet amyloid polypeptide. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007, 293, E1656–E1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Westermark, P.; Engstrom, U.; Johnson, K.H.; Westermark, G.T.; Betsholtz, C. Islet amyloid polypeptide: Pinpointing amino acid residues linked to amyloid fibril formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 5036–5040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Herczenik, E.; Gebbink, M.F. Molecular and cellular aspects of protein misfolding and disease. FASEB J. 2008, 22, 2115–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ahmad, B.; Winkelmann, J.; Tiribilli, B.; Chiti, F. Searching for conditions to form stable protein oligomers with amyloid-like characteristics: The unexplored basic pH. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1804, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zanuy, D.; Ma, B.; Nussinov, R. Short peptide amyloid organization: Stabilities and conformations of the islet amyloid peptide NFGAIL. Biophys. J. 2003, 84, 1884–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shigihara, N.; Fukunaka, A.; Hara, A.; Komiya, K.; Honda, A.; Uchida, T.; Abe, H.; Toyofuku, Y.; Tamaki, M.; Ogihara, T.; et al. Human IAPP-induced pancreatic β cell toxicity and its regulation by autophagy. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 3634–3644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chiti, F.; Dobson, C.M. Protein Misfolding, Functional Amyloid, and Human Disease. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2009, 756, 333–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Papp, E.; Csermely, P. Chemical chaperones: Mechanisms of action and potential use. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2006, 172, 405–416. [Google Scholar]
  24. Scheibel, T.; Buchner, J. Protein aggregation as a cause for disease. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2006, 172, 199–219. [Google Scholar]
  25. Scheidt, H.A.; Morgado, I.; Huster, D. Solid-state NMR reveals a close structural relationship between amyloid-β protofibrils and oligomers. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 22822–22826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mogk, A.; Tomoyasu, T.; Goloubinoff, P.; Rudiger, S.; Roder, D.; Langen, H.; Bukau, B. Identification of thermolabile Escherichia coli proteins: Prevention and reversion of aggregation by DnaK and ClpB. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 6934–6949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Seong, I.S.; Oh, J.Y.; Lee, J.W.; Tanaka, K.; Chung, C.H. The HslU ATPase acts as a molecular chaperone in prevention of aggregation of SulA, an inhibitor of cell division in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 2000, 477, 224–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zahn, R.; Perrett, S.; Stenberg, G.; Fersht, A.R. Catalysis of amide proton exchange by the molecular chaperones GroEL and SecB. Science 1996, 271, 642–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Sablón-Carrazana, M.; Fernández, I.; Bencomo, A.; Lara-Martínez, R.; Rivera-Marrero, S.; Domínguez, G.; Pérez-Perera, R.; Jiménez-García, L.F.; Altamirano-Bustamante, N.F.; Diaz-Delgado, M.; et al. Drug Development in Conformational Diseases: A Novel Family of Chemical Chaperones that Bind and Stabilise Several Polymorphic Amyloid Structures. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0135292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wang, Q.; Yu, X.; Li, L.; Zheng, J. Inhibition of amyloid-β aggregation in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2014, 20, 1223–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Doig, A.J.; Derreumaux, P. Inhibition of protein aggregation and amyloid formation by small molecules. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2015, 30, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Guo, J.-P.; Yu, S.; McGeer, P.L. Simple in vitro assays to identify amyloid-beta aggregation blockers for Alzheimer’s disease therapy. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2010, 19, 1359–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bu, X.-L.; Rao, P.P.N.; Wang, Y.-J. Anti-amyloid Aggregation Activity of Natural Compounds: Implications for Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 53, 3565–3575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Breitner, J.C.; Welsh, K.A.; Gau, B.A.; McDonald, W.M.; Steffens, D.C.; Saunders, A.M.; Magruder, K.M.; Helms, M.J.; Plassman, B.L.; Folstein, M.F. Alzheimer’s disease in the National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council Registry of Aging Twin Veterans. III. Detection of cases, longitudinal results, and observations on twin concordance. Arch. Neurol. 1995, 52, 763–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Agdeppa, E.D.; Kepe, V.; Petri, A.; Satyamurthy, N.; Liu, J.; Huang, S.-C.C.; Small, G.W.; Cole, G.M.; Barrio, J.R. In vitro detection of (S)-naproxen and ibuprofen binding to plaques in the Alzheimer’s brain using the positron emission tomography molecular imaging probe 2-(1-{6-[(2-[18F] fluoroethyl)(methyl) amino]-2-naphthyl} ethylidene) malononitrile. Neurosciences 2003, 117, 723–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fortin, J.S.; Benoit-Biancamano, M.-O. Inhibition of islet amyloid polypeptide aggregation and associated cytotoxicity by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2016, 94, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wiltzius, J.J.W.; Sievers, S.A.; Sawaya, M.R.; Eisenberg, D. Atomic structures of IAPP (amylin) fusions suggest a mechanism for fibrillation and the role of insulin in the process. Protein Sci. 2009, 18, 1521–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Soriaga, A.B.; Sangwan, S.; Macdonald, R.; Sawaya, M.R.; Eisenberg, D. Crystal Structures of IAPP Amyloidogenic Segments Reveal a Novel Packing Motif of Out-of-Register Beta Sheets. J. Phys. Chem. B 2016, 120, 5810–5816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Patil, S.M.; Xu, S.; Sheftic, S.R.; Alexandrescu, A.T. Dynamic α-helix structure of micelle-bound human amylin. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 11982–11991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Nanga, R.P.R.; Brender, J.R.; Vivekanandan, S.; Ramamoorthy, A. Structure and membrane orientation of IAPP in its natively amidated form at physiological pH in a membrane environment. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2011, 1808, 2337–2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Smaoui, M.R.; Poitevin, F.; Delarue, M.; Koehl, P.; Orland, H.; Waldispühl, J. Computational assembly of polymorphic amyloid fibrils reveals stable aggregates. Biophys. J. 2013, 104, 683–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Smaoui, M.R.; Waldispühl, J. Computational re-engineering of Amylin sequence with reduced amyloidogenic potential. BMC Struct. Biol. 2015, 15, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Smaoui, M.R.; Orland, H.; Waldispühl, J. Probing the binding affinity of amyloids to reduce toxicity of oligomers in diabetes. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 2294–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Nedumpully-Govindan, P.; Kakinen, A.; Pilkington, E.H.; Davis, T.P.; Chun Ke, P.; Ding, F. Stabilizing Off-pathway Oligomers by Polyphenol Nanoassemblies for IAPP Aggregation Inhibition. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lolicato, F.; Raudino, A.; Milardi, D.; La Rosa, C. Resveratrol interferes with the aggregation of membrane-bound human-IAPP: A molecular dynamics study. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 92, 876–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mishra, A.; Misra, A.; Sri Vaishnavi, T.; Thota, C.; Gupta, M.; Ramakumar, S.; Chauhan, V.S. Conformationally restricted short peptides inhibit human islet amyloid polypeptide (hIAPP) fibrillization. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 2688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Landau, M.; Sawaya, M.R.; Faull, K.F.; Laganowsky, A.; Jiang, L.; Sievers, S.A.; Liu, J.; Barrio, J.R.; Eisenberg, D. Towards a pharmacophore for amyloid. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9, e1001080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Nelson, R.; Sawaya, M.R.; Balbirnie, M.; Madsen, A.Ø.; Riekel, C.; Grothe, R.; Eisenberg, D. Structure of the cross-beta spine of amyloid-like fibrils. Nature 2005, 435, 773–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Riek, R.; Eisenberg, D.S. The activities of amyloids from a structural perspective. Nature 2016, 539, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Wiltzius, J.J.; Sievers, S.A.; Sawaya, M.R.; Cascio, D.; Popov, D.; Riekel, C.; Eisenberg, D. Atomic structure of the cross-β spine of islet amyloid polypeptide (amylin). Insulin 2008, 17, 1467–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Eisenberg, D.S.; Sawaya, M.R. Structural Studies of Amyloid Proteins at the Molecular Level. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2017, 86, 69–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yang, F.; Lim, G.P.; Begum, A.N.; Ubeda, O.J.; Simmons, M.R.; Ambegaokar, S.S.; Chen, P.P.; Kayed, R.; Glabe, C.G.; Frautschy, S.A.; et al. Curcumin inhibits formation of amyloid beta oligomers and fibrils, binds plaques, and reduces amyloid in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 5892–5901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Reinke, A.A.; Gestwicki, J.E. Structure-activity relationships of amyloid beta-aggregation inhibitors based on curcumin: Influence of linker length and flexibility. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2007, 70, 206–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. De Matos, A.M.; de Macedo, M.P.; Rauter, A.P. Bridging Type 2 Diabetes and Alzheimer’s Disease: Assembling the Puzzle Pieces in the Quest for the Molecules with Therapeutic and Preventive Potential. Med. Res. Rev. 2017, 38, 261–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Profenno, L.A.; Porsteinsson, A.P.; Faraone, S.V. Meta-analysis of Alzheimer’s disease risk with obesity, diabetes, and related disorders. Biol. Psychiatry 2010, 67, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Despa, S.; Margulies, K.B.; Chen, L.; Knowlton, A.A.; Havel, P.J.; Taegtmeyer, H.; Bers, D.M.; Despa, F. Hyperamylinemia Contributes to Cardiac Dysfunction in Obesity and Diabetes: A Study in Humans and Rats. Circ. Res. 2012, 110, 598–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Srodulski, S.; Sharma, S.; Bachstetter, A.B.; Brelsfoard, J.M.; Pascual, C.; Xie, X.S.; Saatman, K.E.; Van Eldik, L.J.; Despa, F. Neuroinflammation and neurologic deficits in diabetes linked to brain accumulation of amylin. Mol. Neurodegener. 2014, 9, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Benedet, A.L.; Labbe, A.; Lemay, P.; Zimmer, E.R.; Pascoal, T.A.; Leuzy, A.; Mathotaarachchi, S.; Mohades, S.; Shin, M.; Dionne-Laporte, A.; et al. CSF Biomarkers and Incipient Alzheimer Disease in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment. Neurobiol. Aging 2017, 6, 643–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Alavez, S.; Pedroza, D.; Morán, J. Mechanisms of cell death by deprivation of depolarizing conditions during cerebellar granule neurons maturation. Neurochem. Int. 2003, 43, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Xifro, X.; Malagelada, C.; Miñano, A.; Rodríguez-Álvarez, J. Brief exposure to NMDA produces long-term protection of cerebellar granule cells from apoptosis. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2005, 21, 827–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Moran, J.; Patel, A.J. Stimulation of the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor promotes the biochemical differentiation of cerebellar granule neurons and not astrocytes. Brain Res. 1989, 486, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Meier, J.J.; Kayed, R.; Lin, C.-Y.; Gurlo, T.; Haataja, L.; Jayasinghe, S.; Langen, R.; Glabe, C.G.; Butler, P.C. Inhibition of human IAPP fibril formation does not prevent β-cell death: Evidence for distinct actions of oligomers and fibrils of human IAPP. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2006, 291, E1317–E1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hartl, F.U.; Bracher, A.; Hayer-Hartl, M. Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature 2011, 475, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Arosio, P.; Knowles, T.P.J.; Linse, S. On the lag phase in amyloid fibril formation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 7606–7618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kayed, R. Common Structure of Soluble Amyloid Oligomers Implies Common Mechanism of Pathogenesis. Science 2003, 300, 486–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Sengupta, U.; Nilson, A.N.; Kayed, R. The Role of Amyloid-β Oligomers in Toxicity, Propagation, and Immunotherapy. EBioMedicine 2016, 6, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Walsh, D.M.; Selkoe, D.J. A beta oligomers—A decade of discovery. J. Neurochem. 2007, 101, 1172–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Jiang, L.; Liu, C.; Leibly, D.; Landau, M.; Zhao, M.; Hughes, M.P.; Eisenberg, D.S. Structure-based discovery of fiber-binding compounds that reduce the cytotoxicity of amyloid beta. Elife 2013, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Sablón, C.M.; Rodriguez-Tanty, C.; Perera, P.A.; Rivera, M.S.; Perez, P.R.; López, B.R.M.; Prats, C.A.; Vélez, C.H.; Pérez, M.C.S.; Valdés, S.P. Method for Obtaining Novel Derivatives of Naphthalene for the In Vivo Diagnosis of Alzheimer´s Disease. U.S. Patent 9,764,047 B2, 19 September 2017. [Google Scholar]
  70. Kayed, R.; Glabe, C.G. Conformation-dependent anti-amyloid oligomer antibodies. Methods Enzymol. 2006, 413, 326–344. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  71. Trott, O.; Olson, A.J. AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Pettersen, E.F.; Goddard, T.D.; Huang, C.C.; Couch, G.S.; Greenblatt, D.M.; Meng, E.C.; Ferrin, T.E. UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1605–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Peinado, J.R.; Sami, F.; Rajpurohit, N.; Lindberg, I. Blockade of islet amyloid polypeptide fibrillation and cytotoxicity by the secretory chaperones 7B2 and proSAAS. FEBS Lett. 2013, 587, 3406–3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Holm, N.K.; Jespersen, S.K.; Thomassen, L.V.; Wolff, T.Y.; Sehgal, P.; Thomsen, L.A.; Christiansen, G.; Andersen, C.B.; Knudsen, A.D.; Otzen, D.E. Aggregation and fibrillation of bovine serum albumin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1774, 1128–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Moran, J.; Patel, A.J. Effect of potassium depolarization on phosphate-activated glutaminase activity in primary cultures of cerebellar granule neurons and astroglial cells during development. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 1989, 46, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Balázs, R.; Hack, N.; Jørgensen, O.S. Selective stimulation of excitatory amino acid receptor subtypes and the survival of cerebellar granule cells in culture: Effect of kainic acid. Neuroscience 1990, 37, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Not available.
Molecules 23 00686 g001 550
Figure 1. Molecular docked model of most probable interaction of pharmaco-chaperones located within the pseudo-cavity of hIAPP1–37 in cartoon and sphere views. (a) At 5 Å distance the amino acids residues surrounding chaperones (A, B, C, D, E and F) are represented in orange colour. The H-bonding interaction between chaperones and amino acids residues of hIAPP1–37 are shown as a dotted line; (b) Most probable docking interaction of chaperones with the hIAPP1–37 amino acid sequence.
Figure 1. Molecular docked model of most probable interaction of pharmaco-chaperones located within the pseudo-cavity of hIAPP1–37 in cartoon and sphere views. (a) At 5 Å distance the amino acids residues surrounding chaperones (A, B, C, D, E and F) are represented in orange colour. The H-bonding interaction between chaperones and amino acids residues of hIAPP1–37 are shown as a dotted line; (b) Most probable docking interaction of chaperones with the hIAPP1–37 amino acid sequence.
Molecules 23 00686 g001
Molecules 23 00686 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) Comparative representation of the interaction between chaperone A (magenta) and E (green). The hydrogen bonds formed by chaperone E are illustrated in black while the hydrogen bonds formed by chaperone A are depicted in yellow; (B) Hydrophobic interaction between amino acid Phe 15 and chaperone E—it is to be noted that the orientation of the electronic “clouds” are coupled—; (C) Hydrophobic interaction between amino acid Phe 15 and chaperone A. Contrary to (B), the orientation of the electronic “clouds” do not match.
Figure 2. (A) Comparative representation of the interaction between chaperone A (magenta) and E (green). The hydrogen bonds formed by chaperone E are illustrated in black while the hydrogen bonds formed by chaperone A are depicted in yellow; (B) Hydrophobic interaction between amino acid Phe 15 and chaperone E—it is to be noted that the orientation of the electronic “clouds” are coupled—; (C) Hydrophobic interaction between amino acid Phe 15 and chaperone A. Contrary to (B), the orientation of the electronic “clouds” do not match.
Molecules 23 00686 g002
Molecules 23 00686 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) Chaperone A–Amylin fibrils (4 monomers) interaction; (B) Chaperone E–Amylin fibrils (4 monomers) interaction. As shown, there is a hydrophobic interaction between phenylalanine 15, valine 17 and the naphthyl group of each chaperone. Additionally, there is a hydrogen bond between serotonin 19 and chaperone E.
Figure 3. (A) Chaperone A–Amylin fibrils (4 monomers) interaction; (B) Chaperone E–Amylin fibrils (4 monomers) interaction. As shown, there is a hydrophobic interaction between phenylalanine 15, valine 17 and the naphthyl group of each chaperone. Additionally, there is a hydrogen bond between serotonin 19 and chaperone E.
Molecules 23 00686 g003
Molecules 23 00686 g004a 550Molecules 23 00686 g004b 550
Figure 4. (A) Curcumin–hIAPP1–37 interaction; (B) Curcumin–Amylin fibrils (4 monomers) interaction. The similitude of the amino acids that participate in the protein-ligand interaction is to be noted. They are the same as those in the interaction of the pharmaco-chaperone A and E.
Figure 4. (A) Curcumin–hIAPP1–37 interaction; (B) Curcumin–Amylin fibrils (4 monomers) interaction. The similitude of the amino acids that participate in the protein-ligand interaction is to be noted. They are the same as those in the interaction of the pharmaco-chaperone A and E.
Molecules 23 00686 g004aMolecules 23 00686 g004b
Molecules 23 00686 g005a 550Molecules 23 00686 g005b 550
Figure 5. Kinetics, ν max and τ lag in hIAPP1–37 aggregation incubated with the chaperones A, B, C, D, E, and G at 37 °C. All data corresponds to equimolar relation between hIAPP1–37 and each pharmaco-chaperone (12.8 µmol/L). (a) The kinetics adjust to a sigmoidal curve. hIAPP1–37 only = red line, chaperone A = blue line, chaperone B = green line, chaperon C = orange line, chaperone D turquoise line, chaperon E = black line, Chaperon G = pink line. Chaperone F not shown; (b) Phase lag in hIAPP1–37 aggregation and fibril formation reached by the chaperones A, B, C, D, E and G. All chaperones reveal a superior time compared to hIAPP1–37, except chaperone A; (c) Vmax in hIAPP1–37 aggregation and fibril formation were reached by the chaperones A, B, C, D, E and G. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 when compared with hIAPP1–37 condition only as control. One-way ANOVA and post-hoc Newman–Keuls Multiple Comparison Test.
Figure 5. Kinetics, ν max and τ lag in hIAPP1–37 aggregation incubated with the chaperones A, B, C, D, E, and G at 37 °C. All data corresponds to equimolar relation between hIAPP1–37 and each pharmaco-chaperone (12.8 µmol/L). (a) The kinetics adjust to a sigmoidal curve. hIAPP1–37 only = red line, chaperone A = blue line, chaperone B = green line, chaperon C = orange line, chaperone D turquoise line, chaperon E = black line, Chaperon G = pink line. Chaperone F not shown; (b) Phase lag in hIAPP1–37 aggregation and fibril formation reached by the chaperones A, B, C, D, E and G. All chaperones reveal a superior time compared to hIAPP1–37, except chaperone A; (c) Vmax in hIAPP1–37 aggregation and fibril formation were reached by the chaperones A, B, C, D, E and G. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 when compared with hIAPP1–37 condition only as control. One-way ANOVA and post-hoc Newman–Keuls Multiple Comparison Test.
Molecules 23 00686 g005aMolecules 23 00686 g005b
Molecules 23 00686 g006 550
Figure 6. Kinetics, ν max and τ lag in hIAPP1–37 aggregation with the chaperones A, B, C, D, E, F and G. The experiments were conducted in 20 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl (pH 7.5) at 37 °C. In all the conditions the chaperones were incubated with hIAPP1–37 (12.8 µmol/L). (a) We incubated the chaperones at different molar relations. Blue line 1:05 (12.8 µmol/L:6.4 µmol/L), green line 1:1 (12.8 µmol/L:12.8 µmol/L), purple line (12.8 µmol/L:64 µmol/L), and black line (12.8 µmol/L:128 µmol/L), using the oligomers of hIAPP1–37 (red line) as the control (12.8µmol/L); (b) Phase lag (τ lag) in hIAPP1–37 aggregation and fibril formation reached by the chaperones A, B, C, D, E, F and G; (c) Vmax in hIAPP1–37 aggregation and fibril formation reached by the chaperones A, B, C, D, E, F and G. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 when compared with hIAPP1–37 condition only as control. One-way ANOVA and post-hoc Newman–Keuls Multiple Comparison Test. n.s. = data not shown.
Figure 6. Kinetics, ν max and τ lag in hIAPP1–37 aggregation with the chaperones A, B, C, D, E, F and G. The experiments were conducted in 20 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl (pH 7.5) at 37 °C. In all the conditions the chaperones were incubated with hIAPP1–37 (12.8 µmol/L). (a) We incubated the chaperones at different molar relations. Blue line 1:05 (12.8 µmol/L:6.4 µmol/L), green line 1:1 (12.8 µmol/L:12.8 µmol/L), purple line (12.8 µmol/L:64 µmol/L), and black line (12.8 µmol/L:128 µmol/L), using the oligomers of hIAPP1–37 (red line) as the control (12.8µmol/L); (b) Phase lag (τ lag) in hIAPP1–37 aggregation and fibril formation reached by the chaperones A, B, C, D, E, F and G; (c) Vmax in hIAPP1–37 aggregation and fibril formation reached by the chaperones A, B, C, D, E, F and G. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 when compared with hIAPP1–37 condition only as control. One-way ANOVA and post-hoc Newman–Keuls Multiple Comparison Test. n.s. = data not shown.
Molecules 23 00686 g006
Molecules 23 00686 g007 550
Figure 7. Morphological analysis of hIAPP1–37 aggregation process with and without chaperones (A–F) by TEM. The image Oligomer and fibre are the control with hIAPP1–37 alone. The electron micrographs show the aggregation process of hIAPP1–37 with or without incubation with chaperones in different relations. All conditions had hIAPP1–37 chaperone (12.8 µmol/L). (A) hIAPP1–37 vs. Chaperone A 1:1, there is presence of big oligomers and some fibrils; (B) hIAPP1–37 vs. Chaperone B 1:5, fibril aggregation; (C) hIAPP1–37 vs. Chaperone C 1-1, no presence of cytotoxic oligomers; (D) hIAPP1–37 vs. Chaperone D 1-1, thick fibrils were aggregated; (E) hIAPP1–37 vs. Chaperone E 1-0.5, there were no fibril aggregation; (F) hIAPP1–37 vs. Chaperone F 1-1, thin fibril aggregation is evident. Scale bar = 200 nm.
Figure 7. Morphological analysis of hIAPP1–37 aggregation process with and without chaperones (A–F) by TEM. The image Oligomer and fibre are the control with hIAPP1–37 alone. The electron micrographs show the aggregation process of hIAPP1–37 with or without incubation with chaperones in different relations. All conditions had hIAPP1–37 chaperone (12.8 µmol/L). (A) hIAPP1–37 vs. Chaperone A 1:1, there is presence of big oligomers and some fibrils; (B) hIAPP1–37 vs. Chaperone B 1:5, fibril aggregation; (C) hIAPP1–37 vs. Chaperone C 1-1, no presence of cytotoxic oligomers; (D) hIAPP1–37 vs. Chaperone D 1-1, thick fibrils were aggregated; (E) hIAPP1–37 vs. Chaperone E 1-0.5, there were no fibril aggregation; (F) hIAPP1–37 vs. Chaperone F 1-1, thin fibril aggregation is evident. Scale bar = 200 nm.
Molecules 23 00686 g007
Molecules 23 00686 g008 550
Figure 8. Effect in cells survival at increasing concentrations of hIAPP1–37 oligomer: We added increasing concentrations of hIAPP1–37 and observed apoptosis statistically different with the dose of 80 µmol/L. We verified that the concentrations of DMSO used to dilute the chaperones did not interfere in the cell viability by itself. We also verified that the dose of the vehicle where the hIAPP1–37 was diluted did not interfere in cell viability. CGN cells were treated with 80 μmol/L of hIAPP1–37 cytotoxic oligomers plus 40 μmol/L of each chaperone. All conditions, except K5, were incubated with DMSO 0.8%. K25 and K5 are potassium 25 mmol/L (normal) and 5 mmol/L (toxic), respectively as controls; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 when compared with K25 as control. One-way ANOVA and post-hoc Newman-Keuls Multiple Comparison Test. hIAPP1–37 cytotoxic oligomers treatment as well as K5 reduces in approximately 50% CGN viability. Chaperones prevent neuron cell death, except for Chaperon A.
Figure 8. Effect in cells survival at increasing concentrations of hIAPP1–37 oligomer: We added increasing concentrations of hIAPP1–37 and observed apoptosis statistically different with the dose of 80 µmol/L. We verified that the concentrations of DMSO used to dilute the chaperones did not interfere in the cell viability by itself. We also verified that the dose of the vehicle where the hIAPP1–37 was diluted did not interfere in cell viability. CGN cells were treated with 80 μmol/L of hIAPP1–37 cytotoxic oligomers plus 40 μmol/L of each chaperone. All conditions, except K5, were incubated with DMSO 0.8%. K25 and K5 are potassium 25 mmol/L (normal) and 5 mmol/L (toxic), respectively as controls; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 when compared with K25 as control. One-way ANOVA and post-hoc Newman-Keuls Multiple Comparison Test. hIAPP1–37 cytotoxic oligomers treatment as well as K5 reduces in approximately 50% CGN viability. Chaperones prevent neuron cell death, except for Chaperon A.
Molecules 23 00686 g008
Molecules 23 00686 g009 550
Figure 9. Proposal mechanism of pharmaco-chaperone E on protein aggregation/disaggregation. Pharmaco-chaperone E can regulate fibre formation processes by binding to the native state, minimizing the formation of IAPP misfolded and cytotoxic oligomers, and in the case of existing IAPP misfolded and cytotoxic oligomers, redirecting the pathway process. Furthermore, it interacts with the amylin fibres and avoids their growth and propagation.
Figure 9. Proposal mechanism of pharmaco-chaperone E on protein aggregation/disaggregation. Pharmaco-chaperone E can regulate fibre formation processes by binding to the native state, minimizing the formation of IAPP misfolded and cytotoxic oligomers, and in the case of existing IAPP misfolded and cytotoxic oligomers, redirecting the pathway process. Furthermore, it interacts with the amylin fibres and avoids their growth and propagation.
Molecules 23 00686 g009
Table
Table 1. Values of ν max and τ lag in IAPP1–37 aggregation with the incubation of chaperones.
Table 1. Values of ν max and τ lag in IAPP1–37 aggregation with the incubation of chaperones.
ConditionDose (µM)VmaxSdν max (%)τ lagSdτ lag (%)
IAPP1–3712.869447721003.9890.37388100
Chaperone A
Molecules 23 00686 i001		6.46701775974.1720.42174105
12.8950910321373.9730.35464100
646582730953.9670.37299
Chaperone B
Molecules 23 00686 i002		6.45783707834.2500.46283107
12.8856211001234.6020.55049115
645328672774.6390.51981116
Chaperone C
Molecules 23 00686 i003		6.4912812171314.6500.60413117
12.8879111751274.7970.6116120
646348885914.8400.65495121
Chaperone D
Molecules 23 00686 i004		6.4694611261005.7871.14215145
12.86326944915.2120.80756131
645255289762.0710.2487752
Chaperone E
Molecules 23 00686 i005		6.44341783636.3201.48342158
12.8905514881305.5591.0796139
644465835646.5691.76324165
Chaperone G
Molecules 23 00686 i006		6.45182867756.3221.36815158
12.8845512811225.2940.86324133
646252847905.6590.81244142
Table
Table 2. In silico determination of contact percent of the pharmaco-chaperones with the amino acids of IAPP1–37 involved in the interaction.
Table 2. In silico determination of contact percent of the pharmaco-chaperones with the amino acids of IAPP1–37 involved in the interaction.
Contact % with aa of hIAPP1–37
Cys7Arg11Leu 12Asn 14Phe 15His 18Asn 21Asn 22Ala 25 Ser 28Asn 31
Chaperone A-909291898885909091-
Chaperone B-918991909080--89-
Chaperone C-899091899082919290-
Chaperone D-87919187888588889130
Chaperone E-96989697959895989892
Chaperone F-909288848086878990-
Chaperone G5090928791908790908940

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fernández-Gómez, I.; Sablón-Carrazana, M.; Bencomo-Martínez, A.; Domínguez, G.; Lara-Martínez, R.; Altamirano-Bustamante, N.F.; Jiménez-García, L.F.; Pasten-Hidalgo, K.; Castillo-Rodríguez, R.A.; Altamirano, P.; et al. Diabetes Drug Discovery: hIAPP1–37 Polymorphic Amyloid Structures as Novel Therapeutic Targets. Molecules 2018, 23, 686. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23030686

AMA Style

Fernández-Gómez I, Sablón-Carrazana M, Bencomo-Martínez A, Domínguez G, Lara-Martínez R, Altamirano-Bustamante NF, Jiménez-García LF, Pasten-Hidalgo K, Castillo-Rodríguez RA, Altamirano P, et al. Diabetes Drug Discovery: hIAPP1–37 Polymorphic Amyloid Structures as Novel Therapeutic Targets. Molecules. 2018; 23(3):686. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23030686

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fernández-Gómez, Isaac, Marquiza Sablón-Carrazana, Alberto Bencomo-Martínez, Guadalupe Domínguez, Reyna Lara-Martínez, Nelly F. Altamirano-Bustamante, Luis Felipe Jiménez-García, Karina Pasten-Hidalgo, Rosa Angélica Castillo-Rodríguez, Perla Altamirano, and et al. 2018. "Diabetes Drug Discovery: hIAPP1–37 Polymorphic Amyloid Structures as Novel Therapeutic Targets" Molecules 23, no. 3: 686. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23030686

APA Style

Fernández-Gómez, I., Sablón-Carrazana, M., Bencomo-Martínez, A., Domínguez, G., Lara-Martínez, R., Altamirano-Bustamante, N. F., Jiménez-García, L. F., Pasten-Hidalgo, K., Castillo-Rodríguez, R. A., Altamirano, P., Marrero, S. R., Revilla-Monsalve, C., Valdés-Sosa, P., Salamanca-Gómez, F., Garrido-Magaña, E., Rodríguez-Tanty, C., & Altamirano-Bustamante, M. M. (2018). Diabetes Drug Discovery: hIAPP1–37 Polymorphic Amyloid Structures as Novel Therapeutic Targets. Molecules, 23(3), 686. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23030686

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop