Next Article in Journal
Scutellarin Mitigates Aβ-Induced Neurotoxicity and Improves Behavior Impairments in AD Mice
Next Article in Special Issue
Erratum: Demesa, A.G.; et al. Valorization of Lignin by Partial Wet Oxidation Using Sustainable Heteropoly Acid Catalysts. Molecules 2017, 22, 1625
Previous Article in Journal
N-Confused Porphyrin Immobilized on Solid Supports: Synthesis and Metal Ions Sensing Efficacy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Production of Micro- and Nanoscale Lignin from Wheat Straw Using Different Precipitation Setups
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Production of Flocculants, Adsorbents, and Dispersants from Lignin

by
Jiachuan Chen
1,
Armin Eraghi Kazzaz
2,
Niloofar AlipoorMazandarani
2,
Zahra Hosseinpour Feizi
2 and
Pedram Fatehi
1,2,*
1
Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Science and Technology of Ministry of Education, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250353, China
2
Chemical Engineering Department, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2018, 23(4), 868; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040868
Submission received: 11 March 2018 / Revised: 3 April 2018 / Accepted: 6 April 2018 / Published: 10 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lignin for Energy, Chemicals and Materials)

Abstract

:
Currently, lignin is mainly produced in pulping processes, but it is considered as an under-utilized chemical since it is being mainly used as a fuel source. Lignin contains many hydroxyl groups that can participate in chemical reactions to produce value-added products. Flocculants, adsorbents, and dispersants have a wide range of applications in industry, but they are mainly oil-based chemicals and expensive. This paper reviews the pathways to produce water soluble lignin-based flocculants, adsorbents, and dispersants. It provides information on the recent progress in the possible use of these lignin-based flocculants, adsorbents, and dispersants. It also critically discusses the advantages and disadvantages of various approaches to produce such products. The challenges present in the production of lignin-based flocculants, adsorbents, and dispersants and possible scenarios to overcome these challenges for commercial use of these products in industry are discussed.

1. Introduction

Greenhouse gas emission is a major driver of global warming; mainly caused by human activities, such as fossil fuel combustion, deforestation, livestock farming, use of synthetic fertilizers, and industrial processes. Contamination of global freshwater systems with industrial chemicals is another crucial problem calling for the generation of nontoxic chemicals and transition to more sustainable processes [1,2]. Currently, many oil-based chemicals are used in industry for a variety of purposes, and unwillingly some will be released to the environment, causing wildlife and environmental issues, consequently. Also, these oil-based chemicals are heavily used in treating water and wastewater systems [3,4]. These commercial materials are mainly expensive, inefficient, and sometimes environmentally unfriendly, raising the need for being replaced by environmentally friendly analogs, such as biomass based value-added products.
Lignin is the most abundant natural aromatic polymer composing 18–35 wt. % of wood [5,6]. It was estimated that (5–36) × 108 tons of lignin are produced annually [7]. In woody plants, lignin plays a critical role in providing strength to fiber walls, controlling fluid flow, and protecting against enzymatic degradation [8]. Lignin contains phenylpropanoid units originating from three aromatic alcohol precursors (monolignols), p-coumaryl, coniferyl, and sinapyl alcohols [9]. It was reported that 50 million tons of lignin are produced annually only by the pulping industry; however, the majority of lignin is burned and used as a fuel source, implying that lignin is currently under-utilized [9,10]. Lignin’s physicochemical advantages are classified as: (a) being rich in functional groups; (b) having high adsorption capacity; and (c) having high potential for value-added product production [10]. Interestingly, lignin’s renewable, nontoxic, and biodegradable nature allows for its effective valorization into value-added products [11]. The efforts to convert lignin derivatives into sensor components [12], biocomposites [13], biofuels [14,15], and hydrogels [16,17] are currently under development.
Lignosulfonate is a by-product of the sulfite pulping process, providing up to 90% of commercial lignin with an annual production of around 1.8 million tons [18,19,20,21,22,23]. The hydrophobicity, water solubility, and negative charge density of lignosulfonate, in addition to its thermal stability, renewability and eco-friendliness [24], make this polymer a promising candidate to be used in industry [21,24]. Kraft lignin is produced via pulping of wood chips using sodium sulfite and sodium hydroxide, while alkali lignin is produced via pulping of wood chips using sodium hydroxide [18,19,20,21,22,23]. Kraft lignin and alkali lignin are not water soluble at pH 7 in opposition to lignosulfonates [18,19,20,21,22,23].
Technical lignin’s application as a flocculant and dispersant has received a considerable attention [25], which is the focus of this review paper. In this work, the advantages and disadvantages of using lignin for producing flocculants, coagulants, and dispersants are also critically reviewed.

2. Flocculant

Flocculants have been extensively used in treating wastewater effluents with the aim of removing colloidal particles from the solutions and suspensions [4,26]. Flocculants aggregate colloidal particles via charge neutralization, patching, and bridging mechanisms as shown in Figure 1. In the charge neutralization mechanism, the charges of colloidal particles are neutralized by adsorption of flocculants, and thus repulsion force existing between adjacent particles is diminished/reduced, which causes these particles to agglomerate via developing van der Waals interaction, for example (Figure 1a). In the patching mechanism, flocculants adsorb on a colloidal particle due to their opposite charges, and they neutralize a part of the particle’s surface. Due to their opposite charges, the adsorbed flocculants will act as anchoring points for another adjacent particle for aggregation (Figure 1b). In the bridging mechanism, high molecular weight flocculants adsorb on particles. Due to their large sizes, the flocculants bridge particles and hence generate large flocs (Figure 1c). Although synthetic organic flocculants have been mostly used in industry [27,28,29], they are non-biodegradable, inefficient, and expensive [30]. Biomass based flocculants can be produced to replace synthetic flocculants. Table 1 classifies different kinds of modified lignin used as flocculants in various fields [31]. In the following sections, the application of lignin-based flocculants in different wastewater treatment systems is described.

2.1. Flocculants for Wastewater Systems

To remove natural organic substances from wastewater, the most frequently used and economically feasible method is coagulation/flocculation [32]. Generally, hydrophobic and high molecular weight compounds could be removed via coagulation. However, this method is inefficient for removing low molecular weight and hydrophilic compounds from wastewater [33]. To address this problem, Li and coworkers [34] synthesized a sludge-based flocculant by grafting amine groups onto the organics of sludge (Figure 2). The sludge contained a major portion of lignin, and thus the chemical structure of lignin was considered for describing its reaction mechanisms with other chemicals in Figure 2. The reaction was conducted by reacting sludge with epichlorohydrin and N,N-dimethylformamide at a ratio of 1/1.6/1.6 (w/v/v) dried sludge/epichlorohydrin/N,N-dimethylformamide at 60–70 °C for 1 h. Then, ethylenediamine was added to the reactor at the ratio of 1/0.4 (w/v) dried sludge/ethylenediamine and the mixture was treated for another hour. Afterward, triethylamine was reacted with the product under the conditions of 1/1.2 (w/v) dried pulping sludge/triethylamine for two hours at 60–70 °C. The produced amine-crosslinked sludge-based cationic polymer used as a flocculant along with aluminum sulfate (AS) and poly aluminum chloride (PAC) for removing humic acid from a wastewater effluent. The AS and PAC were used for improving the efficiency of flocculation in a dual system. The results showed that the product could be used as a flocculant in this system and its efficiency was 25% higher under acidic conditions [34].
In another study, the sludge of a pulping process containing 45–50 wt. % lignin and 5–10 wt. % cellulose was used to produce acrylamide-based polymers in a free radical polymerization system under alkaline pH (Table 1) [39]. The product of this reaction was used as a flocculant along with polyaluminum chloride (PAC) to treat humic acid solution [40]. However, the poor solubility of the flocculants at a higher pH was cited as the main problem of this flocculation system.
Lignosulfonate can be used in the production of flocculants. Lignosulfonate has been reported to have the highest molecular weight among all lignin products [21]. Generally, it was suggested that the higher the molecular weight of the polymer, the better its flocculation performance [22]. The water solubility of lignosulfonate has led to its vast utilization as a flocculant in wastewater systems [21]. Table 2 shows lignosulfonate applications as a flocculant in various fields. The charge density and molecular weight of these samples were not reported in these reports.
Liu and coworkers grafted olefin monomers to lignosulfonate by using radiation graft polymerization and used the resulting natural-based polymers as flocculants for removing furfural from wastewater [42]. In another work, lignosulfonate was used as a flocculant along with a high molecular weight linear polyacrylamide-based polymer for flocculating particles in a mining waste. The dual polymer system having lignosulfonate and polyacrylamide-based polymer at the dosages of 1 and 2.5 g/L, respectively, was found to be effective as it increased the chord length of the particles from 20 to 145 µm for the flocs, while decreasing the number of particle in suspension from 100,000 to 80,000 as determined by focused beam reflectance measurement (FBRM) analysis [43].
Even though lignosulfonate is water soluble [22], there are some barriers in its use: (1) it is less available than kraft lignin worldwide since the kraft pulping process is more common than the sulfite pulping process; (2) its high sulfur content is a limitation for some applications such as polymer synthesis; (3) sulfur removal from lignosulfonate is challenging since it is chemically bonded to lignin; and (4) the sulfite spent liquor containing lignosulfonate contains hemicelluloses, indicating the impurity in the produced lignosulfonate [45].

2.2. Flocculants for Dye Removal

Textile effluents contain a significant amount of dyes, which are generally non-biodegradable and have a high level of toxicity and strong color [38]. To treat this source of environmental pollution [46], adsorption, oxidation, hyper-filtration, biodegradation, flocculation, and ozonation processes were considered in the past [47,48,49,50,51,52]. Inorganic coagulants including aluminum sulfate, ferric chloride, and polyaluminum salts are used as flocculants for dye removal due to their low costs; however, these inorganic coagulants need to be applied in high concentrations, resulting in a large volume of sludge. The use of high concentration of ferric or aluminum ions generally yields a high concentration of salts in the solution after treatment, which has a harmful effect on the ecosystem [38].
Lignin has been aminated (Table 1) for removing anionic dyes from solutions. In a work conducted by Fang and coworkers, a quaternary ammonium salt was grafted onto kraft lignin with a mass ratio of 2/1 of trimethyl quaternary ammonium/lignin at 70 °C [35]. The modified lignin at 2–3 g/L dosage showed 94.02% removal of Acid Black dye from a 0.1 g/L dye concentration in acidic conditions (pH 2–3) [35]. It was also discovered that the aminated lignin could remove 94.91% of Acid Black ATT (0.1 g/L concentration) and 97.11% of Methylene Blue (0.1 g/L concentration) at 30 °C and pH 3 and 8, respectively [36]. Kong et al. (2015) grafted glycidyl-trimethylammonium chloride (GTMAC) onto softwood kraft lignin (Table 1) in the molar ratio of 2/1 GTMAC/lignin for 1 h at 70 °C, in which aminated lignin with the charge density of 1.10 meq/g was generated [11]. In this reaction, GTMAC reacts with the phenolic group of lignin under alkaline conditions and renders lignin cationically charged and water soluble. The use of this lignin as a flocculant for the removal of Remazol Brilliant Violet (V5), Reactive Black 5 (B5), and Direct Yellow 50 (Y50) (100 mg/L concentration) led to more than 87% dye removal at the lignin concentrations of 95, 235, and 375 mg/L for V5, B5, and Y50, respectively [11]. In another study, enzymatically hydrolyzed cornstalk lignin was polymerized via the Mannich reaction with dimethylamine, acetone, and formaldehyde. The addition of 75, 50, and 35 mg/L of this cationic flocculant in Acid Black, Reactive Red, and Direct Red dyes solutions (100 mg/L) led to 97.1, 98.3, and 99.5% removals, respectively [11]. He and coworkers reported that a ternary graft copolymer of lignosulfonate-acrylamide-chitosan could be used as a flocculant in wastewater treatment systems. The copolymer was produced with a chitosan/sodium lignosulfonate/acrylamide mass ratio of 1.5/1.5/3 mixed with potassium persulfate/sodium thiosulfate in the mass ratio of 0.05/0.05 and reacted for 5 h at 60 °C. Three different dyes of Reactive Black 5 (Rb-5) (neutral), Methyl Orange (MO) (cationic), and Acid Blue 113 (Ab-113) (anionic) were used to simulate textile wastewater and the produced amphoteric copolymer was used as a flocculant in the system. The polymer removed 50, 85, and 98% of dyes (50 mg/L concentration) when 335, 135, and 35 mg/L of the polymer were used for MO, Rb-5, and Ab-113, respectively. The flocculation mechanism was determined to be charge neutralization in this work [44].
Lignin has also been modified to increase its anionic charge density for removing cationic dyes from solutions. In one study, softwood kraft lignin was oxidized (Table 1) with nitric acid (20 wt. % based on lignin, 60–100 °C for 0.5–4 h) and then sulfomethylated under the conditions of 1/1 mol/mol formaldehyde/lignin, 0.5/1 sodium metabisulfite/lignin, and 4 wt. % sodium hydroxide concentration at 60–100 °C for 1 h. The produced lignin had a charge density of −4.61 meq/g and the molecular weight of 18,300 g/mol, and was able to coagulate 99.1% of ethyl violet dye (200 mg/L concentration) at a 300 mg/L dosage [41]. Couch et al. (2016) reported that, thermomechanical lignin-carbohydrate complex (LCC), containing 76 wt. % lignin and 24 wt. % of hemicellulose, was oxidized (Table 1) with nitric acid under different concentrations of 70 and 30 wt. % at 60–100 °C for different times (20–120 min). The oxidized lignin had a charge density of −3.02 meq/g and molecular weight of 6270 g/mol. The use of this product as a flocculant resulted in 70–80 wt. % of Ethyl Violet and 80–95% of Basic Blue dye removals from simulated solutions [37]. Generally, the charge density of this modified lignin had a significant impact on their performance since the main driving force for the removal was the charge neutralization mechanism [53].
Effluents of the textile industry may contain salts and have different pH. It was reported that the reduction of pH improved the efficiency of aminated lignin in dye removal. The presence of salts (NaCl and NaNO3) up to 0.05 mol/L concentration did not affect their performance significantly [38]. However, NaCl (at a 3 g/L concentration) reduces the efficiency of oxidized lignin in Basic Blue dye removal from 84% to 77% [37].
However, the main barrier to produce lignin-based flocculants are the complex and heterogeneous structure of the flocculants [54,55]. Also, lignin obtained from different processes (sulfite, kraft, and organosolv) have different physical and chemical characteristics, thereby affecting their modification processes and product performance [56]. The current challenge in producing lignin-based flocculants is to identify environmentally friendly and cost-effective processes for lignin modification (Table 1) in order to induce flocculants with a high charge density, molecular weight, and hydrophilicity. On the other hand, lignin contains many functional groups such as phenol hydroxyl, methoxy, hydroxy, and carboxy groups [57,58], which makes it feasible to engraft the functional groups to its structure [59].

3. Adsorbent

3.1. Adsorbent for Heavy Metals

Wastewater from mining operations, fossil fuel combustion, metal plating, and tanneries contain heavy metals and poses environmental concerns [60]. Application of lignin to adsorb these heavy metals from solutions has shown a profound efficiency [61]. A summary of lignin application in metal removal is compiled in Table 3.
Generally, adsorbents have charges and these charges will interact with ions in wastewater via the charge neutralization mechanism. The results of this interaction are the complexation of ions with the adsorbents, as shown in Figure 3. The produced complexes may be removed from wastewater effluents via filtration and/or sedimentation.
Kraft lignin, without modification, has been used as an adsorbent in many simulated wastewater systems. In one report, bonding strength among various ions and kraft lignin was reported to be in the order of Pb(II) > Cu(II) > Cd(II) > Zn(II) > Ni(II) [62]. Results demonstrated the higher efficiency of lignin’s phenolate group than lignin’s carboxylate groups in coagulating metals [62]. In another study, the adsorption of heavy metals on kraft lignin followed the order of Cr(VI) > Cd(II) > Cu(II) > Zn(II) [66]. As shown in Table 3, lignin had different efficiencies in metal removal as differently sourced lignin contained varied properties originating from wood species and pulping process [62,63,64,65,66,67,68].
Modification of lignin has also been examined as a means to produce adsorbents for heavy metal removal. One study introduced secondary amino groups on enzymatic hydrolysis lignin’s backbone via reacting with poly(N-methylaniline, PNMA) for 4 h at 25 °C [13]. Introduction of methyl and imino groups onto lignin enhanced electron donating properties of the final product. The product removed silver ions from wastewater. A high silver uptake of 1556.8 mg/g was reported for this modified lignin. In the past, influence of aminated-Fe lignin complex on   PO 4 3 uptake from wastewater was studied [71]. First, lignin was aminated by triethylenetetramine in an alkaline solution for 4 h at 65 °C. Then, aminated lignin was chelated with Fe Cl 3 by stirring for 4 h at 35 °C to allow the uptake of Fe 3 + . When the modified lignin was applied to wastewater system, the phosphate-Fe-lignin complexes were formed with the particle size of 452.4 nm. Results reported a maximum PO 4 3 removal capacity of 90%. It was confirmed that Fe(III) was the active site for adsorption, and charge interaction was the main interaction force between phosphate and iron. Another novel modification for alkynylated lignin production was performed through thiol-yne reaction to remove different ions from water [69], as shown in Figure 4. In the first reaction, alkynylated lignin was prepared via reacting lignin and propargyl bromide under alkaline conditions for 2 h and 75 °C (Figure 4). In the next reaction, thiol-yne click reaction was conducted on alkynylated lignin, in which 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone (DMPA) and 1,2,4-triazole-3-thiol monomers were reacted with the modified lignin in tetrahydrofuran under UV radiation. Introduction of thio-triazole units into lignin led to an increased molecular weight of the product (6756 g/mol) with an alkynylation degree of 2.47 mmol/g. The produced coagulant exhibited a selective adsorption capacity in the order of Cd(II) > Pb(II) > Cu(II) > Ni(II) > Zn(II), which is consistent with what was reported for unmodified lignin [66].
In all cases stated above on modified lignin, maximum adsorbed mass is correlated to the charged groups and molecular weight of lignin, which in turn enhanced the solubility of modified lignin. But even insoluble lignin seems to be an efficient adsorbent. In one study, a two-step process to synthesize porous lignin has been developed [70]. Mannich reaction to graft polyethylenimine (PEI) onto alkali lignin matrix at 90 °C for 5 h was first implemented to introduce amine groups to lignin. Then, carbon disulfide was used for completing modification, while introducing dithiocarbamate groups to lignin. The final product possessed 8.5 mmol/g of nitrogen and 2.8 mmol/g of dithiocarbamate groups. The higher surface area of this adsorbent (22.3 m 2 /g) compared to lignin (1.8   m 2 /g) confirmed the porous structure of the functionalized lignin matrix. The final product exhibited excellent adsorption performance toward lead ions with 90% removal from the solution (120 mg/g). However, the two stages of the Mannich and esterification reaction may be too complex to be implemented in industry. Yang and coworkers formed a lignin-based interconnected foam in an oil/water interface by in-situ polymerization containing lignin (1 wt. %) and melamine formaldehyde (25 wt. %) in a water/toluene mixture at 60 °C for 4 h [73]. The product was employed to remove Cu 2 + and Cd 2 + from wastewater. The highest adsorbed capacities of 73.2 mg/g and 142.3 mg/g were reported for Cu 2 + and Cd 2 + , respectively.

3.2. Adsorbent for Dyes

Table 4 demonstrates that lignocellulosic material can be a good candidate to remove dyes from aqueous media. Unmodified wheat straw lignin with a molecular weight of 3510 g/mol and carboxylate content of 3.8 mmol/g was applied for adsorbing Brilliant Red dye [50]. Thermodynamic parameters confirmed a spontaneous endothermic adsorption process. The driving force for adsorption stems from electrostatic interaction between the oppositely charged groups of lignin and dye. The highest adsorption capacity was 10.13 mg/g at 20 °C.
The counterions attached to lignin were proposed to influence its adsorption efficiency. In one work, carboxymethylated lignin was produced under basic conditions via reacting with monochloroacetic acid [75]. The product was treated with FeCl 3 · 6 H 2 O solution for 24 h to ensure that Fe 3 + was coupled to the lignin backbone. The final product with a molecular weight of 1890 g/mol was shown to be a potential adsorbent for Brilliant Red dye. The high adsorbed amount of 73.6 mg/g indicated an electrostatic attraction between carboxymethyl Fe-based lignin and an anionic dye. In another study, Al 3 + and Mn 2 + based carboxymethylated lignins were produced and the coagulation of Procion blue dye with these lignins was studied [77]. Al-lignin and Fe-lignin complexes showed similar adsorption capacity [75,77]; while the Mn-based lignin complex yielded a lower adsorption capacity. This difference may be attributed to the ion charge capacities of the metals.
Li and coworkers used larch-based and poplar-based lignins to form esterified lignin via reacting lignin with maleic anhydride in acetone at 60 °C [78]. The esterified lignins, along with Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles, were dissolved in tetrahydrofuran. After investigating the adsorption capacity of modified lignins for Methylene Blue dye, it was observed that larch-based adsorbent with the molecular weight of 3200 g/mol exhibited an adsorption capacity of 31.23 mg/g. Monolayer surface coverage of lignin with dyes was claimed to occur via van der Waals interaction between the benzene ring of the dye and the esterified lignin. Results obtained from this insoluble lignin suggests that adsorbent’s particle diameter and surface area play significant roles on its adsorption capacity. Also, the incorporation of Fe 3 O 4 may hinder the commercialization step to produce such adsorbent.

3.3. Adsorbent for Other Applications

Lignin appears to be an excellent adsorbent in chemical processes, which is tabulated in Table 5. As a 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (TNT) adsorbent for military wastes, the chlorinated/aminated lignin was prepared by reacting lignin with 1,2-dichloroethane monomer and aluminum chloride [79]. The chlorinated lignin was aminated via reacting with N,N-dimethylformamide and ethylenediamine monomers. Adsorption of TNT on lignin reached 55.7 mg/g, mostly through hydrogen bonding.
In the past, lignin had also been used as an adsorbent to recover gold from the mining industry. In one report, kraft lignin in an acidic HCl solution was used to uptake gold at 40 °C [80], where 100% coagulation of gold and lignin was achieved due to the reduction of Au(III) ions by acidic Cl ions in a redox reaction. Thermodynamics of adsorption documented that the gold flakes were formed in an endothermic (ΔH > 0 )   entropy-driven process (ΔS   > 0 ) . This high removal of gold was attributed to attachment of Au Cl 4 complex to the positively charged surface of adsorbent through electrostatic interactions. However, high dissolution of lignin at elevated temperatures was a barrier for this process, and the use of other water insoluble lignin in developing adsorbents needs to be evaluated in the future.

4. Dispersants

Dispersants are widely used for suspending colloidal particles in cosmetics, paints, pharmaceuticals, drilling mud, cement, and ceramic applications [87]. Many synthetic polymers have been used as dispersants [88,89,90]. However, their toxic nature and/or non-biodegradability limits their use in industry [89]. The semi-natural or natural polymers have been proposed to be utilized as dispersants [91]. Lignin has been modified and used as a dispersant for different applications, as listed in Table 6.
Figure 5 shows the mechanism of dispersants in stabilizing particles in suspensions. In Figure 5a, the adsorption of a dispersant, e.g., lignin, increases the surface charge density of particles, which enhances repulsion force development between particles and stabilizes them in suspensions. In Figure 5b, the adsorption of a dispersant, e.g., lignin, improves the hydrophilicity of particles and thus facilitates the interaction of water molecules and hydrated particles, thus reducing the hydrophobic/hydrophobic interaction developed between particles to prevent their agglomeration [92,93].

4.1. Dispersant for Dyes

Dispersive dyes have very low solubility in aqueous solutions. Adding dispersants is beneficial for preventing agglomeration of dye particles and for stabilizing dye dispersion [103]. Dispersants prevent the agglomeration of particles by introducing steric hindrance and electrostatic force among particles [109,110]. Commercial dispersants are mainly naphthalene-sulfonated formaldehyde and acid-phenol-formaldehyde condensates. Sulfonated lignin has been used as a dispersant for dye dispersion.
Qin and coworkers produced a dispersant for dye suspension through hydroxypropyl sulfonation of pinewood alkali lignin (HSL) (Table 6) under the conditions of 10/3.5 (w/w) lignin/sodium 3-chloro-2-hydroxy-propanesulfonate at 90 °C for 2 h, which was followed by crosslinking reaction with epichlorohydrin for 1 h [103]. The produced products had a molecular weight of 11,020 g/mol and contained 2.10 mmol/g of sulfonate group. The produced polymers and commercial sodium naphthalene sulfonic acid formaldehyde (SNF) dispersant showed similar results in dispersing dye particles.
It was observed that temperature affected the dispersion process in that a more dispersed dye solution was observed at a lower temperature of 25 °C [103]. The molecular weight of the sulfonated product also impacted the dispersion of dyes. The increase in the molecular weight of lignin-based dispersants from 8750 g/mol to 11,020 g/mol reduced the particle size of azo dye by 40%. On the other hand, increasing the molecular weight from 11,020 to 14,830 g/mol increased the particle size of an azo dye by 36% [103]. Therefore, the molecular weight of the dispersant should be tailored for achieving an acceptable efficiency.

4.2. Dispersant for Cement

Dispersants are used in the construction industry to boost the fluidity of concrete and decrease the water content of cement pastes [111,112]. Generally, sulfonated products are used as dispersants for cement admixtures. This is because sulfonate anions have more hydrophilic affinity than carboxylate anions [110]. However, common dispersants used in cement admixtures, such as sulfonated melamin-formaldehyde and sulfonated naphthalene-formaldehyde, have the disadvantages of enhanced concrete shrinkage, meager dispersibility, and pollution [113,114].
In the past, hardwood kraft lignin was sulfomethylated (Table 6) under the conditions of sodium hydroxymethylsulfonate/lignin ratios of 0.3–1.2 mol/mol in the temperature range between 80 and 140 °C and different periods of time (1–4 h). This process improved the anionic charge density and molecular weight of lignin to −1.60 meq/g and 53,360 g/mol, respectively. The application of this lignin (1.2 wt. %) improved the cement fluidity by 50% [94]. In another work, the oxidation (with 10–30 wt. % nitric acid, 60–100 °C and 0.5–4 h) and sulfomethylation (CH2O/lignin of 0.4–1.2 mol/mol and Na2S2O5/lignin of 0.3–0.7 mol/mol, 60–100 °C and 0.5–4 h) of softwood kraft lignin generated a sulfomethylated lignin with the charge density and molecular weight of −3.8 meq/g and 18,299 g/mol, respectively. The 0.5 wt. % dosage of this product increased the fluidity of cement from 65 mm to 200 mm [44].
In another study, kraft lignin from wheat straw was sulfonated (Table 6) by sodium sulfite in water in the temperature range between 45 and 55 °C. The product was hydroxymethylated via reacting with formaldehyde aqueous solution of 37% concentration at 98 °C for 3 h, which generated a sulfonated lignin with sulfonate group contents in a range between 1.5 to 3.7 mmol/g and the molecular weight of 30,000 g/mol. The results depicted that the use of this product yielded a fluidity of 290 mm, which was higher than that of a commercial naphthalene dispersant (250 mm) for a cement paste [101]. In another study, esparto grass lignin (Table 6) was sulfonated with sodium sulfite and formaldehyde, which generated sulfonated lignin with a molecular weight of 10,000 g/mol, and the sulfonate degree of 0.8 mmol/g. The use of sulfonated lignin in cement at the dosage of 0.4–0.6% showed a remarkable decrease in water requirement of cement (7–12%) [107]. In another work, a more complicated scenario was followed for producing sulfonated lignin [102]. At first, wheat straw alkali lignin was oxidized under the conditions of 10/2/0.1 (w/w/w) alkali lignin/H2O2/FeSO4 at 55–95 °C for 1 h. The product was then hydroxymethylated with 37% HCHO at 75 °C for 2 h. Finally, the sulfonation reaction was conducted with Na2SO3/lignin ratio of 1–2/4 (w/w) at 75–95 °C for 3 h. As reported, the produced sulfonated lignin could improve the dispersion of the cement admixture by 3% more than the commercial lignosulfonate [102]. The charge density and molecular weight seemed to impact the performance of sulfonated lignin in dispersing cement.
Ozone was also used as an oxidizing agent for producing lignin-based dispersants. In one study, alkali lignin was ozonated under the conditions of 50–55 °C for 2 h (Table 6) and used as a dispersant for clay, titanium dioxide, cement and calcium carbonate suspensions (the suspension concentrations were 41, 35, 68.5, and 50 wt. %, respectively, at the dispersant concentrations of 0.126, 0.25, 1, and 0.25 wt. %, respectively). It was observed that the produced modified lignin could decrease the viscosity of clay, titanium dioxide, cement, and calcium carbonate suspensions up to 77, 98, 86, and 90%, respectively [95].
Table 7 lists the applications of lignosulfonates in industries as dispersants. The use of lignosulfonate as a dispersant for cement had been studied recently due to its acceptable performance and cost-effectiveness [115,116,117]. In some studies, lignosulfonate was modified to improve its dispersant performance in cement. In one study, calcium lignosulfonate was modified through oxidation (using hydrogen peroxide/lignosulfonate ratio of 0.12 (w/w) at 80 °C for 1.5 h), hydroxymethylation (using formaldehyde/lignosulfonate ratio of 0.35 (w/w) for 2 h at 80 °C) and sulfomethylation (using sodium sulfite/lignosulfonate mass ratio of 0.2 and formaldehyde/lignosulfonate mass ratio of 0.2 for 2 h at 90 °C). The performance of the product was evaluated as a dispersant for cement admixture. The adsorption of the oxidized, hydroxymethylated, and sulfomethylated lignosulfonates onto the cement surface was increased 7.5, 6.9, and 1.2 times with respect to that of the unmodified lignosulfonate, respectively. Although the adsorption of hydroxymethylated lignosulfonate was remarkable, its dispersion performance was rather poor compared to the oxidized and sulfomethylated lignosulfonates. The better dispersion performance of oxidized and sulfomethylated lignosulfonates was attributed to their higher negative charge densities [118]. In another work, sodium lignosulfonate underwent two consecutive reactions of oxidation (using 30% polyacrylic acid and 0.5% iron (II) sulfate for 2 h at 80 °C) and sulfomethylation (using 20% of formaldehyde and 30% of sodium sulfite for 3 h at 95 °C). These modifications led to an increase in both molecular weight (up to 10 times) and sulfonate content (up to two times) of the sodium lignosulfonate, which made the polymer 15% more efficient than the unmodified sodium lignosulfonate in enhancing the fluidity of a cement paste [115].
The counter ions attached to lignosulfonate may impact its efficiency as a dispersant. Among calcium, magnesium, sodium, and potassium lignosulfonates; calcium lignosulfonate was reported to reduce the cement viscosity, while magnesium lignosulfonate could hamper the cement admixture’s viscosity [117]. In addition, calcium lignosulfonate demonstrated the highest (11.1%) and sodium lignosulfonate showed the lowest (6.5%) capacity in reducing the water use of cement paste [117].

4.3. Dispersant for Mineral Particles

Kaolin suspensions are used as raw materials for paper, ceramic, healthcare formulations, and pharmaceutical applications [129,130,131]. In these applications, the fluidity of a kaolin paste without settling is important to produce the products with appropriate properties [125,132]. By using dispersants, they adsorb on particle’s surfaces and change the overall surface charge density of the suspensions by inducing electrostatic or steric repulsion between particles. Various synthetic polymers, such as sodium tripolyphosphate and sodium polyphosphate, are used for dispersing kaolin suspensions, but their toxicity, price, and non-biodegradability are the main barriers for their implementation in industry [89,133].
Lignin based dispersants were also used for kaolin dispersion. He and coworkers oxidized softwood kraft lignin (Table 6) using hydrogen peroxide under varied reaction times (1–3 h) and temperatures (60–100 °C), which generated oxidized lignin derivatives with the charge density of −2.2 meq/g and molecular weight of 14,825 g/mol (Figure 6) [96]. Several lignin derivatives can be generated in this reaction, but the exact product of this reaction was not identified [96]. The anionic product improved the dispersion of kaolin suspensions by 18%. In another study, hardwood lignin (Table 6) was oxidized by using nitric acid (4–12 wt. % nitric acid/lignin at 100 °C for 1 h), and the product with the charge density of −3.6 meq/g and molecular weight of 30,243 g/mol showed the best performance in dispersing kaolin suspensions. Dispersion studies in this work suggested that both molecular weight and charge density had great impacts on the stability of kaolin particles [97].
Various lignin-based chemicals have been used to other suspensions, such as titanium dioxide slurry and graphite suspensions [98,100,106]. Graphite is extensively used in different industries, such as ceramics, and conductive coating, due to its corrosion resistance, superior electric, thermal conductivity, and chemical stability. Since graphite is a non-polar mineral with strong hydrophobicity, it is difficult to disperse it in polar solvents, such as water. However, in most of the applications, graphite particles should be dispersed in aqueous suspensions [134]. To address this challenge, wheat straw alkali lignin was carboxymethylated using monochloroacetic acid under the conditions of monochloroacetic acid/lignin ratio of 6/10 (w/w) at 70 °C for 90 min. As reported, carboxymethylated lignin with the dosage of 1 wt. % enhanced the suspension stability of graphite by around 4% [98].
Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is a material broadly used in plastics, inks, papermaking, paints, ceramics, and fibers, where its dispersion is critical [135,136]. However, titanium dioxide particles tend to agglomerate due to their large surface area. In order to address this problem, sulfomethylated wheat straw alkali lignin was modified by the horseradish peroxidase (HRP) under the conditions of ratio of 3/0.41 (w/w) lignin/formaldehyde at 95 °C for 1 h. After the reaction, the sulfonate and carboxylate groups, and the molecular weight of lignin were increased by 55%, 75%, and 470%, respectively. The dispersion performance of the produced polymer in titanium dioxide suspension showed a reduction of 84% in TiO2 particle size [106].

4.4. Dispersant for Coal-Water Slurry

Coal-water slurry is one of the alternative energy sources, which is cost-effective and easy to handle. Since this slurry contains a high coal content to meet the energy requirement, the water content of the slurry is of great importance. To reduce the water requirement, dispersants are used for diminishing the interaction among the particles in the slurry [133,137]. Lignosulfonate by itself may not be an effective dispersant for the coal-water slurry. As an inexpensive product, several studies were carried out to improve the efficiency of lignosulfonate as a dispersant for the slurry [138]. In one study, the molecular weight of lignosulfonate has been increased through the reaction of alkyl chain (conducted under alkaline condition using 1,6-dibromohexane in various mass ratios of lignosulfonate/1,6-dibromohexane of 1/0.08, 1/0.12, 1/0.16, 1/0.24, and 1/0.30, and potassium iodide for 8 h at 70 °C) and the products were used as dispersants for the coal-water slurry. It was disclosed that the lignosulfonate’s molecular weight was increased from 42,800 g/mol to 125,000 g/mol. All produced lignosulfonates worked better than the unmodified lignosulfonate and naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde in reducing the coal-water slurry’s viscosity. This result was attributed to the higher molecular weights of the produced polymers, which may affect their adsorption affinity on the coal particles [128].
Ultrafiltration was used as a method to generate lignosulfonates with different molecular weights to refine them as dispersants for coal-water slurry [121,138]. The results showed that sulfonate group content of lignosulfonates with the lowest (2000 g/mol) and highest (17,000 g/mol) molecular weights were 1.36 and 1 mmol/g, respectively. Also, the carboxylate group content was determined to be 1.72 and 1.04 mmol/g for the highest and the lowest molecular weight lignosulfonate, respectively [138]. Overall, the molecular weight range of 10,000–30,000 g/mol was reported to be optimum for lignosulfonate to act as a dispersant for coal-water slurry [138].

4.5. Dispersant for Carbon Nanotubes Suspensions

Aqueous carbon nanotube (CNT) nanofluids have widely been studied for the preparation of nanocomposite materials with enhanced properties [139,140], such as large surface area, small size, remarkable electrical conductivity, and high mechanical strength [141,142,143]. However, they have poor solubility in water due to their tendency to agglomerate through van der Waals forces [144], which hampers CNTs’ utilization and application as dispersants. Although chemical and physical treatments have been suggested to address this problem [145,146], the disadvantage of chemical modification of CNTs is the disconnection of π-networks within CNTs, causing a decline in their electrical and mechanical properties [146,147]. Adding surfactants or polymers help cover CNTs by noncovalent interactions [148,149]. By adsorbing polar polymers on CNTs, intermolecular hydrogen bonding functionalized CNTs would enable CNT dispersion [150,151]. The most commonly used surfactants for this purpose are sodium dodecylsulfate, sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, octyl phenol ethoxylate, and hemadecyltrimethylammonium bromide [152,153,154,155,156,157].
Kraft lignin has been shown to have an efficient dispersion performance for CNTs. In one study, lignin (Table 6) was used without any modification as a dispersant for CNT, and its performance was compared with that of sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (SDBS). The results revealed that lignin (2 wt. %) could reduce the suspension’s viscosity by 70% (comparing to SDBS) without increasing the thermal conductivity of the suspension. Thus, it was suggested that lignin acted better than SDBS in dispersing the carbon nanotubes suspended in water at 0.55 vol. % [97].
Rochez and coworkers used spruce alkali lignin (Table 6) with the molecular weight of 14,000 g/mol to disperse multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT). By adding 10 g/L of lignin to 1 wt. % of MWCNT suspension, the transmission electron microscopy analysis showed that the nanotubes were distributed in the polymer matrix without morphological degradation or aggregation [104]. In another study, spruce wood alkali lignin, with the molecular weight of 14,000 g/mol (Table 6) was used to disperse multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT). Lignin was added to MWCNT with a lignin/MWCNT ratio of 1/6 (w/w). The lignin-MWCNT dispersion stability was monitored for several months at ambient conditions through which the lignin efficiency to disperse multiwalled carbon nanotubes was proved [104].

4.6. Dispersants for Other Suspensions

Dimethomorph, named (E,Z)-4-[3-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl) acryloyl] morpholine, is a fungicide, which acts as a pesticide by protecting vegetables and plants from downy mildews, late blights, crown, and root rots [123]. The utilization of this pesticide requires its mixing with water. System stability and dispersion are critically important since the ingredients need to spread evenly on the plant surface after spraying [123]. Lin and coworkers dispersed a dimethomorph suspension by a synthesized pine kraft lignin-based polyoxyethylene ether (KL-PEG) [100]. KL-PEG production was carried out via reacting kraft lignin with poly(ethylene glycol) in a weight ratio of 100/0.8. The ethoxyethane-trifluoroborane then proceeded at 55 °C for 2 h [100]. The products had a molecular weight ranging from 18,061 to 29,201 g/mol (Table 6). Among three different samples with similar molecular weights, the highest dimethomorph dispersion of 99.2% was observed using lignin modified with ethoxyethane-trifluoroborane/poly (ethylene glycol) in a molar ratio of 1/1, while dimethomorph dispersion was 93.1% using commercial lignosulfonate [100].
Lignosulfonate has also been studied as a dispersant for the dimethomorph suspension. In one study, the dispersion performance of lab-made and commercial lignosulfonates with different molecular weights and sulfonate groups were evaluated in an aqueous dimethomorph suspension (Table 7) [124]. As reported, both the lab-made and commercial lignosulfonates could act as dispersants for dimethomorph suspensions with similar results in reducing dimethomorph’s particle size. It was revealed that the lab-made lignosulfonate having a molecular mass of 16,000 g/mol contributed to the system stability through steric repulsive forces; while the commercial lignosulfonate with higher sulfonate groups provided the system stability with the electrostatic repulsive forces [124].
The effects of lignosulfonate’s molecular weight and sulfonate group content were analyzed in two other studies on the dimethomorph suspension stability (Table 7). It was revealed that the higher the polymer’s molecular weight, the greater its adsorption and thus the greater the electrostatic repulsion force between the particles, leading to the stability of dimethomorph. It was also reported that a lignosulfonate with a molecular weight higher than 30,000 g/mol was inefficient in dispersing dimethomorph due to its longer branched structure that might bridge the particles [123,126]. Lignosulfonates with similar molecular weights, but various sulfonation degrees, were also evaluated for their dispersion performance in the dimethomorph granule suspension, and the results revealed that an increase in the sulfonation degree from 1.58 to 1.81 mmol/g increased the suspending ratio by 10% [123].
In addition, the performance of sulfonated lignin with various cations of sodium, magnesium, and iron as a dispersant was evaluated and it was determined that an increase in the valence of a cation led to a slight enhancement (i.e., 4%) in the dispersion performance [123]. However, in order to increase the efficiency of lignin-based dispersants, lignin needs to undergo various chemical modifications to increase its charge density and solubility. Discovering the reactions with high efficiency and environmentally friendly features is a challenge.
Matsushita and Yasuda produced several types of sulfonated lignin by hydroxymethylating, sulfonating, phenolating, sulfomethylating and arylsulfonating of the phenolated lignin to use as dispersants in gypsum pastes [120]. It was also claimed that the increase in molecular weight (to around 15,000 g/mol) and sulfur content (to 11.4%) enhanced the dispersibility of the gypsum paste by 70% compared to the commercial lignosulfonate [120].
In another work, lignosulfonate was sulfobutylated (using varied proportions of 1,4-butane sulfonate and 1,6-dibromohexane for 7 h at 70 °C) and used as a dispersant for the antifungal agent carbendazim suspensions. It was found that the modified lignosulfonates having the molecular weights of 11,850 and 13,120 g/mol with sulfonate group contents of 2.66 and 2.18 mmol/g, respectively, improved the dispersion properties of the suspension and that these samples could act as better dispersants than a commercial lignosulfonate [127].
Yang and coworkers (2008) investigated the dispersion performance of calcium lignosulfonate with different molecular weights in the range of less than 1000 g/mol to more than 30,000 g/mol in a titanium dioxide suspension (Table 7) and observed that an increase in the molecular weight from 927 g/mol to 21,646 g/mol led to an increase in the adsorption of lignosulfonate on titanium oxide particles [125]. Lignosulfonate with the molecular weight of 7621 g/mol had the highest sulfonate group content of 10.28 wt. % and showed the best dispersion performance in the dosage below 4 mg/L. System stabilization, in this case, has been pronounced to be due to the electrostatic forces between the titanium dioxide particles. Meanwhile, by increasing the modified lignosulfonate concentration, the sample with a higher molecular weight (21,646 g/mol) demonstrated a better dispersion via promoting steric hindrance.

5. Conclusions

Although promising results were reported for the modification and application of lignin as flocculants, adsorbents, and dispersants, the modification procedures seemed to be industrially unattractive, as they mainly applied solvent-based systems. Also, more analyses were carried out for assessing the performance of lignin-based flocculants, adsorbents, and dispersants in simulated samples than industrially produced samples. The application of these products in industrially produced samples must be examined for further development of lignin-based processes for valorizing lignin. Although the results on the importance of molecular weight and charge density of lignin-based flocculants are available in literature, the contribution of lignin in the flocculation systems should be investigated in detail. The use of lignin as a flocculant for dyes has been examined more than for other wastewater effluents. However, the volume of municipal and industrial wastes produced annually make the expansion for the potential use of lignin-based flocculants in these effluents appealing. The use of unmodified lignin as an adsorbent for dyes and heavy metals appears promising, and its simplicity in use may be attractive to industry. The uses of unmodified and modified lignin and lignosulfonate as dispersants were more practiced in the past and the reports showed a similar performance (or better) for lignin-based dispersants than for synthetic ones. Different values were reported as optimum values for molecular weight and charge density of lignin-based dispersants for altered systems. These results suggest that the properties performance relationships for lignin-based dispersants are case dependent.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank NSERC Canada, Canada Research Chairs, and Northern Ontario Heritage Fund Corporation programs for supporting this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schwarzenbach, R.P.; Escher, B.I.; Fenner, K.; Hofstetter, T.B.; Johnson, C.A.; Von Gunten, U.; Wehrli, B. The challenge of micropollutants in aquatic systems. Science 2006, 313, 1072–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Luong, N.D.; Binh, N.T.T.; Park, I.-K.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, D.S.; Lee, Y.S.; Lee, Y.K.; Kim, B.W.; Kim, K.H.; Yoon, H.K. Chemical and rheological characteristics of thermally stable kraft lignin polycondensates analyzed by dielectric properties. BioResources 2013, 8, 4518–4532. [Google Scholar]
  3. Marinović, V.; Ristić, M.; Dostanić, M. Dynamic adsorption of trinitrotoluene on granular activated carbon. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, 117, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wei, Y.; Cheng, F.; Zheng, H. Synthesis and flocculating properties of cationic starch derivatives. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 74, 673–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Akin, D.; Benner, R. Degradation of polysaccharides and lignin by ruminal bacteria and fungi. Appl. Environ. Microb. 1988, 54, 1117–1125. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mathers, R.T. How well can renewable resources mimic commodity monomers and polymers? J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 2012, 50, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Belgacem, M.; Gandini, A. Monomers, Polymers and Composites from Renewable Resources, 1st ed.; Elsiver: Amsterdam, The Netherland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  8. Boerjan, W.; Ralph, J.; Baucher, M. Lignin biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2003, 54, 519–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Dorrestijn, E.; Laarhoven, L.J.; Arends, I.W.; Mulder, P. The occurrence and reactivity of phenoxyl linkages in lignin and low rank coal. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 2000, 54, 153–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mousavioun, P.; Doherty, W.O. Chemical and thermal properties of fractionated bagasse soda lignin. Ind. Crops Prod. 2010, 31, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kong, F.; Parhiala, K.; Wang, S.; Fatehi, P. Preparation of cationic softwood kraft lignin and its application in dye removal. Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 67, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Caballero-Calero, O.; Díaz-Chao, P.; Abad, B.; Manzano, C.; Ynsa, M.; Romero, J.; Rojo, M.M.; Martín-González, M. Improvement of Bismuth Telluride electrodeposited films by the addition of Sodium Lignosulfonate. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 123, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chung, Y.-L.; Olsson, J.V.; Li, R.J.; Frank, C.W.; Waymouth, R.M.; Billington, S.L.; Sattely, E.S. A renewable lignin–lactide copolymer and application in biobased composites. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2013, 1, 1231–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Crestini, C.; Crucianelli, M.; Orlandi, M.; Saladino, R. Oxidative strategies in lignin chemistry: A new environmental friendly approach for the functionalisation of lignin and lignocellulosic fibers. Catal. Today 2010, 156, 8–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Lü, Q.-F.; Luo, J.J.; Lin, T.T.; Zhang, Y.Z. Novel Lignin–Poly (N-methylaniline) Composite Sorbent for Silver Ion Removal and Recovery. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2013, 2, 465–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Feng, Q.; Chen, F.; Wu, H. Preparation and characterization of a temperature-sensitive lignin-based hydrogel. BioResources 2011, 6, 4942–4952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Thakur, V.K.; Thakur, M.K. Recent advances in green hydrogels from lignin: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 72, 834–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Li, R.; Yang, D.; Guo, W.; Qiu, X. The adsorption and dispersing mechanisms of sodium lignosulfonate on Al2O3 particles in aqueous solution. Holzforschung 2013, 67, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Oveissi, F.; Sitter, T.; Fatehi, P. PDADMAC as a flocculant for lignosulfonate of NSSC pulping process. Biotechnol. Prog. 2016, 32, 686–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Telysheva, G.; Dizhbite, T.; Paegle, E.; Shapatin, A.; Demidov, I. Surface-active properties of hydrophobized derivatives of lignosulfonates: Effect of structure of organosilicon modifier. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 82, 1013–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Klapiszewski, Ł.; Szalaty, T.J.; Szatkowski, T.; Jesionowski, T. Lignosulfonate as a byproduct of wood pulp production: A potential precursor for the preparation of functional hybrid materials. Ann. Chem. 2016, 71, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Aro, T.; Fatehi, P. Production and application of lignosulfonates and sulfonated lignin. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 1861–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ji, X.; Dong, Y.; Yuan, B.; Li, B.; Guo, M. Influence of glutaraldehyde on the performance of a lignosulfonate/chitosan-based medium density fiberboard adhesive. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 45870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fatehi, P.; Gao, W.; Sun, Y.; Dashtban, M. Acidification of prehydrolysis liquor and spent liquor of neutral sulfite semichemical pulping process. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 218, 518–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Carrott, P.; Carrott, M.R. Lignin—From natural adsorbent to activated carbon: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 2301–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Singh, R.P.; Nayak, B.R.; Biswal, D.R.; Tripathy, T.; Banik, K. Biobased polymeric flocculants for industrial effluent treatment. Mater. Res. Innov. 2003, 7, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, W.W.; Zhou, W.Z.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Wang, J.; Zhu, X.B. Flocculation behavior and mechanism of an exopolysaccharide from the deep-sea psychrophilic bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. SM9913. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 6893–6899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lu, Q.; Yan, B.; Xie, L.; Huang, J.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, H. A two-step flocculation process on oil sands tailings treatment using oppositely charged polymer flocculants. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 565, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Gumfekar, S.P.; Rooney, T.R.; Hutchinson, R.A.; Soares, J.B. Dewatering Oil Sands Tailings with Degradable Polymer Flocculants. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 36290–36300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Shih, I.L.; Van, Y.T.; Yeh, L.C.; Lin, H.G.; Chang, Y.N. Production of a biopolymer flocculant from Bacillus licheniformis and its flocculation properties. Bioresour. Technol. 2001, 78, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. You, L.; Lu, F.; Li, D.; Qiao, Z.; Yin, Y. Preparation and flocculation properties of cationic starch/chitosan crosslinking-copolymer. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 172, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Semerjian, L.; Ayoub, G.M. High-pH-magnesium coagulation–flocculation in wastewater treatment. Adv. Environ. Res. 2003, 7, 389–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sillanpaa, M.; Matilainen, A. NOM removal by coagulation. In Natural Organic Matter in Water: Characterization and Treatment Methods, 1st ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann Elsevier Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  34. Li, R.; Gao, B.; Sun, S.; Yue, Q.; Li, M.; Yang, X.; Jia, R. Amine-Cross-Linked Lignin-Based Polymer: Modification, Characterization, and Flocculating Performance in Humic Acid Coagulation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 3253–3261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fang, G.Z.; He, W.H.; Song, Z.Q. Synthesis and performance of quaternary ammonium salt of lignin as cationic flocculant. Chem. Ind. For. Prod. 2003, 23, 37–41. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang, Q.; Wang, D.; Bei, Y.; Ren, S.; Fang, G. Flocculation performance of trimethyl quaternary ammonium salt of lignin-sodium alginate polyampholyte. BioResources 2013, 8, 3544–3555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Couch, R.L.; Price, J.T.; Fatehi, P. Production of Flocculant from Thermomechanical Pulping Lignin via Nitric Acid Treatment. ACS Sustain. 2016, 4, 1954–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fang, R.; Cheng, X.; Xu, X. Synthesis of lignin-base cationic flocculant and its application in removing anionic azo-dyes from simulated wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 7323–7329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Rong, H.; Gao, B.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, S.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Li, Q. Advanced lignin-acrylamide water treatment agent by pulp and paper industrial sludge: Synthesis, properties and application. J. Environ. Sci. 2013, 25, 2367–2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rong, H.; Gao, B.; Dong, M.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, S.; Yue, Q.; Li, Q. Characterization of size, strength and structure of aluminum-polymer dual-coagulant flocs under different pH and hydraulic conditions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 252, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. He, W.; Zhang, Y.; Fatehi, P. Sulfomethylated kraft lignin as a flocculant for cationic dye. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2016, 503, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, H.; Yang, X.; Liu, X.; Yao, H.; Li, Y. Study on preparation and application in flocculants of modified lignin. Mod. Appl. Sci. 2011, 5, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Haroon, M.H. Flocculation and Dewatering of Kaolinite Suspensions and Oil Sands Mature Fine Tailings Using Dual Polymers. Master’s Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  44. He, K.; Lou, T.; Wang, X.; Zhao, W. Preparation of lignosulfonate–acrylamide–chitosan ternary graft copolymer and its flocculation performance. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 81, 1053–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Vishtal, A.G.; Kraslawski, A. Challenges in industrial applications of technical lignins. BioResources 2011, 6, 3547–3568. [Google Scholar]
  46. Mishra, A.; Bajpai, M. The flocculation performance of Tamarindus mucilage in relation to removal of vat and direct dyes. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 1055–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Nigam, P.; Armour, G.; Banat, I.M.; Singh, D.; Marchant, R. Physical removal of textile dyes from effluents and solid-state fermentation of dye-adsorbed agricultural residues. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 72, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mohan, D.; Pittman, C.U., Jr.; Steele, P.H. Single, binary and multi-component adsorption of copper and cadmium from aqueous solutions on Kraft lignin-a biosorbent. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 297, 489–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Chakrabarti, S.; Banerjee, S.; Chaudhuri, B.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Dutta, B.K. Application of biodegradable natural polymers for flocculated sedimentation of clay slurry. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 3313–3317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Suteu, D.; Malutan, T.; Bilba, D. Removal of reactive dye Brilliant Red HE-3B from aqueous solutions by industrial lignin: Equilibrium and kinetics modeling. Desalination 2010, 255, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Altaf, A.; Noor, S.; Sharif, Q.M.; Najeebullah, M. Different techniques recently used for the treatment of textile dyeing effluents: A review. J. Chem. Soc. Pak. 2010, 32, 115–116. [Google Scholar]
  52. Qu, Y.Y.; Yang, Q.; Zhou, J.T.; Gou, M.; Xing, L.L.; Ma, F. Combined MBR with photocatalysis/ozonation for bromoamine acid removal. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2009, 159, 664–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Maximova, N.; Österberg, M.; Koljonen, K.; Stenius, P. Lignin adsorption on cellulose fibre surfaces: Effect on surface chemistry, surface morphology and paper strength. Cellulose 2001, 8, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Imel, A.E.; Naskar, A.K.; Dadmun, M.D. Understanding the impact of poly (ethylene oxide) on the assembly of lignin in solution toward improved carbon fiber production. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 3200–3207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Oveissi, F.; Fatehi, P. Characterization of four different lignins as a first step toward the identification of suitable end-use applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Alriols, M.G.; Tejado, A.; Blanco, M.A.; Mondragon, I.; Labidi, J. Agricultural palm oil tree residues as raw material for cellulose, lignin and hemicelluloses production by ethylene glycol pulping process. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 148, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sun, R.; Tomkinson, J. Comparative study of lignins isolated by alkali and ultrasound-assisted alkali extractions from wheat straw. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2002, 9, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhou, Q.; Chen, Z.H. Chemical properties of the fractionated compounds from wheat straw alkali lignin. Trans. China Pulp Pap. 1998, 13, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhou, M.; Qiu, X.; Yang, D.; Lou, H.; Ouyang, X. High-performance dispersant of coal–water slurry synthesized from wheat straw alkali lignin. Fuel Sci. Technol. 2007, 88, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Okamura, H.; Aoyama, I. Interactive toxic effect and distribution of heavy metals in phytoplankton. Environ. Toxicol. 1994, 9, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Erbring, H.; Peter, H. Zur Kenntnis des Lignins. Kolloid-Zeitschrift 1941, 96, 47–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Guo, X.; Zhang, S.; Shan, X.-Q. Adsorption of metal ions on lignin. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 151, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Guo, X.; Huang, H. Adsorption of chromium (III) on lignin. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 7709–7715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Jin, W.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, G.; Tolba, R.; Chen, A. Integrated lignin-mediated adsorption-release process and electrochemical reduction for the removal of trace Cr (VI). RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 27843–27849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Albadarin, A.B.; Ala’a, H.; Al-Laqtah, N.A.; Walker, G.M.; Allen, S.J.; Ahmad, M.N. Biosorption of toxic chromium from aqueous phase by lignin: Mechanism, effect of other metal ions and salts. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 169, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Šćiban, M.B.; Klašnja, M.T.; Antov, M.G. Study of the biosorption of different heavy metal ions onto Kraft lignin. Ecol. Eng. 2011, 37, 2092–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Merdy, P.; Guillon, E.; Aplincourt, M. Iron and manganese surface complex formation with extracted lignin. Part 1: Adsorption isotherm experiments and EPR spectroscopy analysis. New J. Chim. 2002, 26, 1638–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Todorciuc, T.; Bulgariu, L.; Popa, V.I. Adsorption of Cu (II) from aqueous solution on wheat straw lignin: Equilibrium and kinetic studies. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2015, 49, 439–447. [Google Scholar]
  69. Jin, C.; Zhang, X.; Xin, J.; Liu, G.; Wu, G.; Kong, Z.; Zhang, J. Clickable synthesis of 1,2,4-triazole modified lignin-based adsorbent for the selective removal of Cd (II). ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 4086–4093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, Z.; Xiao, D.; Ge, Y.; Koehler, S. Surface-functionalized porous lignin for fast and efficient lead removal from aqueous solution. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 15000–15009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Luo, X.; Liu, C.; Yuan, J.; Zhu, X.; Liu, S. Interfacial Solid-Phase Chemical Modification with Mannich Reaction and Fe (III) Chelation for Designing Lignin-Based Spherical Nanoparticle Adsorbents for Highly Efficient Removal of Low Concentration Phosphate from Water. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 6539–6547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Parajuli, D.; Inoue, K.; Ohto, K.; Oshima, T.; Murota, A.; Funaoka, M.; Makino, K. Adsorption of heavy metals on crosslinked lignocatechol: A modified lignin gel. React. Funct. Polym. 2005, 62, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yang, Y.; Wei, Z.; Wang, C.; Tong, Z. Lignin-based Pickering HIPEs for macroporous foams and their enhanced adsorption of copper (II) ions. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 7144–7146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Li, Y.; Wu, M.; Wang, B.; Wu, Y.; Ma, M.; Zhang, X. Synthesis of magnetic lignin-based hollow microspheres: A highly adsorptive and reusable adsorbent derived from renewable resources. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 5523–5532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Da Silva, L.G.; Ruggiero, R.; Gontijo, P.D.M.; Pinto, R.B.; Royer, B.; Lima, E.C.; Fernandes, T.H.; Calvete, T. Adsorption of Brilliant Red 2BE dye from water solutions by a chemically modified sugarcane bagasse lignin. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 168, 620–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Nair, V.; Panigrahy, A.; Vinu, R. Development of novel chitosan–lignin composites for adsorption of dyes and metal ions from wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 254, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Adebayo, M.A.; Prola, L.D.; Lima, E.C.; Puchana-Rosero, M.; Cataluna, R.; Saucier, C.; Umpierres, C.S.; Vaghetti, J.C.; da Silva, L.G.; Ruggiero, R. Adsorption of Procion Blue MX-R dye from aqueous solutions by lignin chemically modified with aluminium and manganese. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 268, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Li, S.; Ogunkoya, D.; Fang, T.; Willoughby, J.; Rojas, O.J. Carboxymethylated lignins with low surface tension toward low viscosity and highly stable emulsions of crude bitumen and refined oils. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 482, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Zhang, J.; Lin, X.; Luo, X.; Zhang, C.; Zhu, H. A modified lignin adsorbent for the removal of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 168, 1055–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Adhikari, B.B.; Gurung, M.; Alam, S.; Tolnai, B.; Inoue, K. Kraft mill lignin—A potential source of bio-adsorbents for gold recovery from acidic chloride solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 231, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Allen, S.J.; Koumanova, B.; Kircheva, Z.; Nenkova, S. Adsorption of 2-nitrophenol by technical hydrolysis lignin: Kinetics, mass transfer, and equilibrium studies. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 2281–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Han, W.; Luo, L.; Zhang, S. Adsorption of bisphenol A on lignin: Effects of solution chemistry. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 9, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ludvík, J.; Zuman, P. Adsorption of 1,2,4-triazine pesticides metamitron and metribuzin on lignin. Microchem. J. 2000, 64, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Rupp, E.B.; Zuman, P.; Sestakova, I.; Horak, V. Polarographic determination of some pesticides. Application to a study of their adsorption on lignin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1992, 40, 2016–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Privman, M.; Rupp, E.B.; Zuman, P. Hexazinone: Polarographic reduction and adsorption on lignin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1994, 42, 2946–2952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Parajuli, D.; Kawakita, H.; Inoue, K.; Funaoka, M. Recovery of gold (III), palladium (II), and platinum (IV) by aminated lignin derivatives. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 6405–6412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sharma, B.R.; Dhuldhoya, N.C.; Merchant, U.C. Flocculants-an ecofriendly approach. J. Polym. Environ. 2006, 14, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Brumbach, M.; Carty, W.M. Dispersant demand curves: Effect of PAA on the viscosity of several clays. Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 2003, 24, 183. [Google Scholar]
  89. Papo, A.; Piani, L.; Ricceri, R. Sodium tripolyphosphate and polyphosphate as dispersing agents for kaolin suspensions: Rheological characterization. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2002, 201, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Piani, L.; Papo, A. Sodium tripolyphosphate and polyphosphate as dispersing agents for alumina suspensions: Rheological characterization. J. Eng. 2013, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Qin, Y.; Yang, D.; Gu, F.; Li, X.; Xiong, W.; Zhu, J.Y. Biorefinery lignosulfonates as a dispersant for coal water slurry. Sustain. Chem. Process. 2016, 4, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Konduri, M.K.; Fatehi, P. Adsorption and dispersion performance of oxidized sulfomethylated kraft lignin in coal water slurry. Fuel Procss. Technol. 2018; in press. [Google Scholar]
  93. He, W.; Fatehi, P. Preparation of sulfomethylated softwood kraft lignin as a dispersant for cement admixture. RSC Adv. 2015, 58, 47031–47039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Konduri, M.K.; Fatehi, P. Production of water-soluble hardwood Kraft Lignin via Sulfomethylation using formaldehyde and sodium sulfite. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 1172–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Detroit, J. Lignin Dispersing Agent. U.S. Patent No. 3726, 17 January 2012. [Google Scholar]
  96. He, W.; Gao, W.; Fatehi, P. Oxidation of Kraft Lignin with Hydrogen Peroxide and its Application as a Dispersant for Kaolin Suspensions. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 10597–10605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Estelle, P.; Halelfadl, S.; Mare, T. Lignin as dispersant for water-based carbon nanotubes nanofluids: Impact on viscosity and thermal conductivity. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2014, 57, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Gan, L.; Zhou, M.; Yang, D.; Qiu, X. Preparation and evaluation of carboxymethylated lignin as dispersant for aqueous graphite suspension using Turbiscan Lab analyzer. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2013, 34, 644–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Konduri, M.K.; Fatehi, P. Designing anionic lignin based dispersant for kaolin suspensions. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2018, 538, 639–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lin, X.; Zhou, M.; Wang, S.; Lou, H.; Yang, D.; Qiu, X. Synthesis, structure, and dispersion property of a novel lignin-based polyoxyethylene ether from kraft lignin and poly (ethylene glycol). ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 1902–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Lou, H.; Zhu, J.; Lan, T.Q.; Lai, H.; Qiu, X. pH-Induced lignin surface modification to reduce nonspecific cellulase binding and enhance enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses. ChemSusChem 2013, 6, 919–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Ouyang, X.; Ke, L.; Qiu, X.; Guo, Y.; Pang, Y. Sulfonation of alkali lignin and its potential use in dispersant for cement. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2009, 30, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Qin, Y.; Yang, D.; Qiu, X. Hydroxypropyl sulfonated lignin as dye dispersant: Effect of average molecular weight. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 3239–3244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Rochez, O.; Zorzini, G.; Amadou, J.; Claes, M.; Richel, A. Dispersion of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in water by lignin. J. Mater. Sci. 2013, 48, 4962–4964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Teng, N.Y.; Dallmeyer, I.; Kadla, J.F. Effect of softwood kraft lignin fractionation on the dispersion of multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2013, 52, 6311–6317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zhou, H.; Chang, Y.; Wu, X.; Yang, D.; Qiu, X. Horseradish peroxidase modification of sulfomethylated wheat straw alkali lignin to improve its dispersion performance. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 518–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kamoun, A.; Jelidi, A.; Chaabouni, M. Evaluation of the performance of sulfonated esparto grass lignin as a plasticizer–water reducer for cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 2003, 33, 995–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Qiu, X.-Q.; Wang, B.; Lou, H.-M.; Yang, D.-J. Graft Sulfonation and Water Reducing-Performance Strengthening Effect of Acid Precipitation Lignin. J. South China Univ. Technol. 2007, 4, 3. [Google Scholar]
  109. Kano, K.; Minamizono, H.; Kitae, T.; Negi, S. Self-Aggregation of Cationic Porphyrins in Water. Can π-π Stacking Interaction Overcome Electrostatic Repulsive Force? J. Phys. Chem. Biophys. 1997, 101, 6118–6124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Deng, Y.; Zhang, W.; Wu, Y.; Yu, H.; Qiu, X. Effect of molecular weight on the adsorption characteristics of lignosulfonates. J. Phys. Chem. 2011, 115, 14866–14873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Heikal, M.; Morsy, M.S.; Aiad, I. Effect of polycarboxylate superplasticizer on hydration characteristics of cement pastes containing silica fume. Ceram. Silik. 2006, 50, 5–14. [Google Scholar]
  112. Lim, G.G.; Hong, S.S.; Kim, D.S.; Lee, B.J.; Rho, J.S. Slump loss control of cement paste by adding polycarboxylic type slump-releasing dispersant. Cem. Concr. Res. 1999, 29, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Ran, Q.; Miao, C.; Liu, J.; Wu, S.; Shen, J. Performance and mechanism of a multi-functional superplasticizer for concrete. Mater. Trans. 2006, 47, 1599–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ran, Q.; Somasundaran, P.; Miao, C.; Liu, J.; Wu, S.; Shen, J. Adsorption mechanism of comb polymer dispersants at the cement/water interface. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2010, 31, 790–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Yu, G.; Li, B.; Wang, H.; Liu, C.; Mu, X. Preparation of concrete superplasticizer by oxidation-sulfomethylation of sodium lignosulfonate. BioResources 2013, 8, 1055–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Mudiastuti, S.; Suryokusumo, S.; Syahbirin, G.; Yumairoh, Y. Prospect of sodium lignosulfonate derived from hardwood black liquor as ingredient in mortar. Int. Soc. Southeast Asian Agric. Sci. J. 2011, 17, 184–193. [Google Scholar]
  117. Arel, H.Ş.; Aydin, E. Effects of Ca-, Mg-, K-, and Na-lignosulfonates on the behavior of fresh concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 157, 1084–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Pang, Y.X.; Qiu, X.Q.; Yang, D.J.; Lou, H.M. Influence of oxidation, hydroxymethylation and sulfomethylation on the physicochemical properties of calcium lignosulfonate. Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2008, 312, 154–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ratinac, K.R.; Standard, O.C.; Bryant, P.J. Lignosulfonate adsorption on and stabilization of lead zirconate titanate in aqueous suspension. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 273, 442–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Matsushita, Y.; Yasuda, S. Preparation and evaluation of lignosulfonates as a dispersant for gypsum paste from acid hydrolysis lignin. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Yang, D.; Qiu, X.; Zhou, M.; Lou, H. Properties of sodium lignosulfonate as dispersant of coal water slurry. Energy Convers. Manag. 2007, 48, 2433–2438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Yang, D.; Qiu, X.; Pang, Y.; Zhou, M. Physicochemical properties of calcium lignosulfonate with different molecular weights as dispersants in aqueous suspension. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2008, 29, 1296–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Li, Z.; Pang, Y.; Lou, H.; Qiu, X. Influence of lignosulfonates on the properties of dimethomorph water-dispersible granules. BioResources 2009, 4, 589–601. [Google Scholar]
  124. Li, Z.; Pang, Y.; Ge, Y.; Qiu, X. Evaluation of steric repulsive force in the aqueous dispersion system of dimethomorph powder with lignosulfonates via X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 115, 24865–24870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Yang, D.; Li, H.; Qin, Y.; Zhong, R.; Bai, M.; Qiu, X. Structure and properties of sodium lignosulfonate with different molecular weight used as dye dispersant. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2015, 36, 532–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Pang, Y.; Gao, W.; Lou, H.; Zhou, M.; Qiu, X. Influence of modified lignosulfonate GCL4-1 with different molecular weight on the stability of dimethomorph water based suspension. Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2014, 441, 664–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Qiu, X.; Zeng, W.; Yu, W.; Xue, Y.; Pang, Y.; Li, X.; Li, Y. Alkyl chain cross-linked sulfobutylated lignosulfonate: A highly efficient dispersant for carbendazim suspension concentrate. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 1551–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Hong, N.; Li, Y.; Zeng, W.; Zhang, M.; Peng, X.; Qiu, X. Ultrahigh molecular weight, lignosulfonate-based polymers: Preparation, self-assembly behaviors and dispersion property in coal-water slurry. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 21588–21595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Baird, J.C.; Walz, J.Y. The effects of added nanoparticles on aqueous kaolinite suspensions: II. Rheological effects. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 306, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Zhang, L.; Lu, Q.; Xu, Z.; Liu, Q.; Zeng, H. Effect of polycarboxylate ether comb-type polymer on viscosity and interfacial properties of kaolinite clay suspensions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012, 378, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Schott, H. Controlled flocculation of coarse suspensions by colloidally dispersed solids I: Interaction of bismuth subnitrate with bentonite. J. Pharm. Sci. 1976, 65, 855–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Marco, P.; Llorens, J. Adsorption of some linear copolymers onto kaolin particles in concentrated suspensions. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2005, 270, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Pawlik, M. Polymeric dispersants for coal–water slurries. Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2005, 266, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Yoo, M.; Frank, C.W.; Mori, S.; Yamaguchi, S. Effect of poly (vinylidene fluoride) binder crystallinity and graphite structure on the mechanical strength of the composite anode in a lithium ion battery. Polymer 2003, 44, 4197–4204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Boisvert, J.P.; Persello, J.; Castaing, J.C.; Cabane, B. Dispersion of alumina-coated TiO2 particles by adsorption of sodium polyacrylate. Colloids Surf. A. Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2001, 178, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Farrokhpay, S.; Morris, G.E.; Fornasiero, D.; Self, P. Effects of chemical functional groups on the polymer adsorption behavior onto titania pigment particles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 274, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Konduri, M.K. New Generation of Dispersants by Grafting Lignin or Xylan. Ph.D. Thesis, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  138. Zhou, M.; Qiu, X.; Yang, D.; Lou, H. Properties of Different Molecular Weight Sodium Lignosulfonate Fractions as Dispersant of Coal-Water Slurry. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2004, 27, 851–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Iijima, S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 1991, 354, 56–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Lu, P.; Hsieh, Y.L. Multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) reinforced cellulose fibers by electrospinning. ACS Appl. Mater. Interface 2010, 2, 2413–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Ajayan, P.M.; Stephan, O.; Colliex, C.; Trauth, D. Aligned carbon nanotube arrays formed by cutting a polymer resin-nanotube composite. Science 1994, 265, 1212–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Dillon, A.; Jones, K.M.; Bekkedahl, T.A.; Kiang, C.H.; Bethune, D.S.; Heben, M.J. Storage of hydrogen in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nature 1997, 386, 377–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Planeix, J.M.; Coustel, N.; Coq, B.; Brotons, V.; Kumbhar, P.S.; Dutartre, R.; Ajayan, P.M. Application of carbon nanotubes as supports in heterogeneous catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 7935–7936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Bandyopadhyaya, R.; Nativ-Roth, E.; Regev, O.; Yerushalmi-Rozen, R. Stabilization of individual carbon nanotubes in aqueous solutions. Nano Lett. 2002, 2, 25–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Kharissova, O.V.; Kharisov, B.I.; Casas Ortiz, E.G. Dispersion of carbon nanotubes in water and non-aqueous solvents. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 24812–24852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Jung, D.H.; Ko, Y.K.; Jung, H.T. Aggregation behavior of chemically attached poly (ethylene glycol) to single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) ropes. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2004, 24, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Lu, F.; Zhang, S.; Zheng, L. Dispersion of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) by ionic liquid-based phosphonium surfactants in aqueous solution. J. Mol. Liq. 2012, 173, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Star, A.; Liu, Y.; Grant, K.; Ridvan, L.; Stoddart, J.F.; Steuerman, D.W.; Heath, J.R. Noncovalent side-wall functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 553–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Vaisman, L.; Wagner, H.D.; Marom, G. The role of surfactants in dispersion of carbon nanotubes. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 128, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Zhao, J.; Lu, J.P.; Han, J.; Yang, C.K. Noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes by aromatic organic molecules. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 3746–3748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Chen, R.J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, D.; Dai, H. Noncovalent sidewall functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes for protein immobilization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3838–3839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Wang, H.; Zhou, W.; Ho, D.L.; Winey, K.I.; Fischer, J.E.; Glinka, C.J.; Hobbie, E.K. Dispersing single-walled carbon nanotubes with surfactants: A small angle neutron scattering study. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 1789–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Wen, D.; Ding, Y. Effective thermal conductivity of aqueous suspensions of carbon nanotubes (carbon nanotube nanofluids). J. Thermophys. Heat Transf. 2004, 18, 481–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Wusiman, K.; Jeong, H.; Tulugan, K.; Afrianto, H.; Chung, H. Thermal performance of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) in aqueous suspensions with surfactants SDBS and SDS. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2013, 41, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Nasiri, A.; Shariaty-Niasar, M.; Rashidi, A.; Amrollahi, A.; Khodafarin, R. Effect of dispersion method on thermal conductivity and stability of nanofluid. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2011, 35, 717–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Hwang, Y.J.; Lee, J.K.; Lee, C.H.; Jung, Y.M.; Cheong, S.I.; Lee, C.G.; Jang, S.P. Stability and thermal conductivity characteristics of nanofluids. Thermochim. Acta 2007, 455, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Assael, M.J.; Metaxa, I.N.; Arvanitidis, J.; Christofilos, D.; Lioutas, C. Thermal conductivity enhancement in aqueous suspensions of carbon multi-walled and double-walled nanotubes in the presence of two different dispersants. Int. J. Thermophys. 2005, 26, 647–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mechanisms of flocculation: (a) charge neutralization; (b) patching; and (c) bridging.
Figure 1. Mechanisms of flocculation: (a) charge neutralization; (b) patching; and (c) bridging.
Molecules 23 00868 g001aMolecules 23 00868 g001b
Figure 2. Reaction scheme for producing crosslinked amine-based sludge flocculant [34]. The sludge contained mainly lignin and hence the structure of lignin was selected to represent sludge as the raw material in this reaction.
Figure 2. Reaction scheme for producing crosslinked amine-based sludge flocculant [34]. The sludge contained mainly lignin and hence the structure of lignin was selected to represent sludge as the raw material in this reaction.
Molecules 23 00868 g002
Figure 3. Mechanism of adsorbents in adsorbing ions.
Figure 3. Mechanism of adsorbents in adsorbing ions.
Molecules 23 00868 g003
Figure 4. Schematic reaction mechanism of thiol-yne alkynylation lignin [69].
Figure 4. Schematic reaction mechanism of thiol-yne alkynylation lignin [69].
Molecules 23 00868 g004
Figure 5. Mechanism of dispersants in stabilizing particles in suspensions (a) surface charge density effect and (b) hydrophilicity effect.
Figure 5. Mechanism of dispersants in stabilizing particles in suspensions (a) surface charge density effect and (b) hydrophilicity effect.
Molecules 23 00868 g005
Figure 6. Oxidation of softwood kraft lignin [96].
Figure 6. Oxidation of softwood kraft lignin [96].
Molecules 23 00868 g006
Table 1. Lignin-based flocculants used in different fields.
Table 1. Lignin-based flocculants used in different fields.
Lignin TypeApplicationCharge Density meq/gMW (g/mol)ModificationReferences
Pulping sludge containing ligninWastewater N/A510,000Amination with triethylamine[34]
Kraft lignin from black liquorDye removalN/AN/AGrafting trimethyl quaternary ammonium salt[35]
Alkali ligninDye removalN/AN/AGrafting trimethyl quaternary ammonium salt and along with sodium alginate[36]
Thermomechanical pulping lignin (76 wt. % lignin)Dye removal−3.026270Nitric acid oxidation[37]
Hydrolysis ligninDye removal+1.792669Dimethylamine-acetone-formaldehyde copolymer grafting, Mannich reaction[38]
+2.112762
+2.556143
Papermaking sludge (45–50 wt. % lignin and 5–10 wt. % cellulose)Wastewater N/A1000Acrylamide graft copolymerization [39,40]
Softwood kraft ligninDye removal+1.1021,600Cationization with GTMAC[11]
Softwood kraft ligninDye removal−4.6118,300Oxidation and sulfomethylation[41]
N/A: not available.
Table 2. Lignosulfonate as a flocculant in different areas.
Table 2. Lignosulfonate as a flocculant in different areas.
Application as a FlocculantModification Reference
Wastewater containing furfural Radiation polymerization with olefins monomers[42]
oil sandsNo modification, but applied along with polyacrylamide-based polymers[43]
WastewaterGrafting with acrylamide and chitosan[44]
NA: not available.
Table 3. Lignin potential in heavy metal removal.
Table 3. Lignin potential in heavy metal removal.
MaterialAdsorbentAdsorption CapacityReference
Pb(II)Wheat straw lignin85%[62]
Cr(III) + Pb, Cr(III) + Cu, Cr(III) + Zn, Cr(III) + CdIsolated lignin from black liquor≥90%[63]
Cr(VI)Kraft lignin33.33 mg/g[64]
Cr(VI)Alkali lignin65 mg/g[65]
Cu + Ni
Cu + Cd
Kraft lignin≥80%
≥80%
[66]
Fe(III)
Mn(III)
Wheat straw lignin100%
100%
[67]
Cu(II)Wheat straw lignin35 mg/g[68]
Cd(II)Alkynylated lignin87.4 mg/g[69]
Pb(II)Aminated/esterified alkali lignin120 mg/g[70]
Cu(II)
Pb(II)
Aminated sulfomethylated lignin≥60%
≥60%
[68]
PO 4 2 Fe-Aminated lignin complex≥90%[71]
Al(III)
Co(II)
La(III)
Crosslinked lignocatechol80%
100%
100%
[72]
Ag + Lignin-polyaniline1556.8 mg/g[15]
Cu(II)
Cd(II)
Lignin-melamine formaldehyde73.2 mg/g
142.3 mg/g
[73]
Table 4. Lignin as an adsorbent for dye removal.
Table 4. Lignin as an adsorbent for dye removal.
MaterialAdsorbentAdsorption Capacity Reference
Brilliant Red HE-3B dyeWheat straw lignin10.17 mg/g[50]
Methylene Blue dyeEsterified Lignin31.23 mg/g[74]
Brilliant Red 2BE dyeEtherified lignin- Fe 3 + complex73.6 mg/g[75]
Anthraquinonic dyeChitosan-alkali lignin complex≥90%[76]
Procion Blue dyeCarboxymethylated lignin- Al 3 + complex
Carboxymethylated lignin- Mn 2 + complex
73.52 mg/g
55.16 mg/g
[77]
Methylene BlueReticulated formic lignin34.12 mg/g[50]
Table 5. Lignin as an adsorbent in other chemicals.
Table 5. Lignin as an adsorbent in other chemicals.
MaterialAdsorbentAdsorption CapacityReference
TNTChlorinated aminated lignin55.7 mg/g[79]
2-nitrophenolHydrolysis lignin1.8 mg/g[81]
BisphenolBlack liquor isolated lignin237.07 mg/g[82]
Metamitron, metribuzin pesticiderot-wood lignin53%
62%
[83]
Dazomet/tiram pesticideIndulin kraft lignin38–40%[84]
Hexazinone pesticideIndulin kraft lignin47%[85]
Au(II)Crosslinked lignophenol ≥30%[86]
Au(III)HCl mediated kraft lignin100%[77]
Au(III)
Pd(II)
Aminated lignin100%
80%
[86]
Table 6. Proposed lignin-based dispersants for various fields.
Table 6. Proposed lignin-based dispersants for various fields.
Lignin TypeApplicationCharge Density (meq/g)Molecular Weight (g/mol)ModificationReferences
Hardwood kraft ligninCement admixture−1.60 53,360Sulfomethylation[94]
Softwood kraft lignin Stellar clay, cement, calcium carbonate and titanium dioxideN/AN/AOzone oxidation[95]
Softwood kraft ligninKaolin suspension−2.214,825Oxidation [96]
Lignin N/ACarbon nanotubes nanofluids N/AN/AAs is[97]
Straw alkali ligninDispersant for graphite suspensionN/AN/ACarboxymethylation[98]
Softwood kraft ligninDispersant for cement admixture−3.818,299Oxidation and sulfomethylation[44]
Hardwood ligninKaolin suspension(−)1.2–3.62 26,700–83,543Oxidation[99]
Hardwood kraft ligninKaolin suspension1.80 29,960Carboxymethylation[94]
Kraft ligninDimethomorph suspensionN/A18,061–29,201Grafting poly(ethylene glycol) functionalized with epichlorohydrin using BF3-Et2O[100]
Wheat straw kraft ligninCement admixtureN/A25,700Sulfonation[101]
Wheat straw alkali ligninCement admixtureN/A9688Hydroxymethylation and sulfonation[102]
Pinewood alkali ligninDye suspensionN/A11,020Hydroxypropylation and sulfonation[103]
Spruce alkali ligninMultiwalled carbon nanotubesN/A14,000As is[104]
Softwood kraft ligninMultiwalled carbon nanotubesN/A6500–7000 and 34,000–36,000Fractionization[105]
Wheat straw alkali ligninTiO2 slurryN/A17,400–35,700Sulfomethylation, horseradish peroxide utilization[106]
Esparto grass ligninCement admixtureN/A10,000Sulfonation[107]
Acid precipitated ligninCement admixtureN/AN/ASulfonation[108]
N/A: not available.
Table 7. Lignosulfonates as dispersants in various applications.
Table 7. Lignosulfonates as dispersants in various applications.
Lignosulfonate TypeApplicationCharge Density (meq/g)Molecular Weight (g/mol)Modification Reference
NAElectroceramic suspensions−0.061 ± 0.002 C/m237,000No modification[119]
NAGypsum pasteNA9000–62,000Hydroxymethylation, sulfonation, phenolation, sulfomethylation, arylsulfonation[120]
NACoal-water slurryNA2000-17,000No modification[59]
Sodium lignosulfonateCoal-water slurryNAless than 5000 to more than 50,000No modification[121]
Calcium lignosulfonateTitanium dioxide suspensionNAless than 1000—more than 30,000No modification[122]
Calcium lignosulfonateCement admixtureNANAOxidation, sulfomethylation, hydroxymethylation[118]
NADimethomorph suspensionNALess than 1000—more than 30,000No modification[123]
Hardwood lignosulfonateCement admixtureNANANo modification[120]
NADimethomorph suspensionNA4800–160,000No modification[123]
Sodium lignosulfonateCeramic suspensionNA13,000No modification[124]
Sodium lignosulfonateConcrete admixtureNA2378 and 23,650Oxidation, sulfomethylation [115]
NADye suspensionNA9010–17,307No modification[125]
NADimethomorph suspensionNA9600–35,500Oxidation, sulfonation[126]
NACarbendazim suspensionNA1900–13,120Sulfobutylation[127]
NACoal-water slurryNA13,100–251,000Alkyl chain coupling polymerization[128]
Calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium lignosulfonateCement admixtureNANANo modification[117]
NA: not available.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, J.; Eraghi Kazzaz, A.; AlipoorMazandarani, N.; Hosseinpour Feizi, Z.; Fatehi, P. Production of Flocculants, Adsorbents, and Dispersants from Lignin. Molecules 2018, 23, 868. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040868

AMA Style

Chen J, Eraghi Kazzaz A, AlipoorMazandarani N, Hosseinpour Feizi Z, Fatehi P. Production of Flocculants, Adsorbents, and Dispersants from Lignin. Molecules. 2018; 23(4):868. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040868

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Jiachuan, Armin Eraghi Kazzaz, Niloofar AlipoorMazandarani, Zahra Hosseinpour Feizi, and Pedram Fatehi. 2018. "Production of Flocculants, Adsorbents, and Dispersants from Lignin" Molecules 23, no. 4: 868. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040868

APA Style

Chen, J., Eraghi Kazzaz, A., AlipoorMazandarani, N., Hosseinpour Feizi, Z., & Fatehi, P. (2018). Production of Flocculants, Adsorbents, and Dispersants from Lignin. Molecules, 23(4), 868. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040868

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop