Next Article in Journal
Panax Notoginseng Saponins: A Review of Its Mechanisms of Antidepressant or Anxiolytic Effects and Network Analysis on Phytochemistry and Pharmacology
Next Article in Special Issue
High Molecular Weight Hyaluronan Suppresses Macrophage M1 Polarization and Enhances IL-10 Production in PM2.5-Induced Lung Inflammation
Previous Article in Journal
Dendrimers for Drug Delivery
Previous Article in Special Issue
Charge-Controlled Synthetic Hyaluronan-Based Cell Matrices
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 23
Issue 4
10.3390/molecules23040939
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Pursuing Intracellular Pathogens with Hyaluronan. From a ‘Pro-Infection’ Polymer to a Biomaterial for ‘Trojan Horse’ Systems

by
Elita Montanari
1,
Chiara Di Meo
1,
Angela Oates
2,
Tommasina Coviello
1 and
Pietro Matricardi
1,*
1
Department of Drug Chemistry and Technologies, Sapienza University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
2
School of Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2018, 23(4), 939; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040939
Submission received: 28 February 2018 / Revised: 12 April 2018 / Accepted: 13 April 2018 / Published: 18 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hyaluronic Acid and its Derivatives for Biomedical Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hyaluronan (HA) is among the most important bioactive polymers in mammals, playing a key role in a number of biological functions. In the last decades, it has been increasingly studied as a biomaterial for drug delivery systems, thanks to its physico-chemical features and ability to target and enter certain cells. The most important receptor of HA is ‘Cluster of Differentiation 44’ (CD44), a cell surface glycoprotein over-expressed by a number of cancers and heavily involved in HA endocytosis. Moreover, CD44 is highly expressed by keratinocytes, activated macrophages and fibroblasts, all of which can act as ‘reservoirs’ for intracellular pathogens. Interestingly, both CD44 and HA appear to play a key role for the invasion and persistence of such microorganisms within the cells. As such, HA is increasingly recognised as a potential target for nano-carriers development, to pursuit and target intracellular pathogens, acting as a ‘Trojan Horse’. This review describes the biological relationship between HA, CD44 and the entry and survival of a number of pathogens within the cells and the subsequent development of HA-based nano-carriers for enhancing the intracellular activity of antimicrobials.

1. Introduction

Intracellular pathogens are considered to be among the major bacterial public health threats [1]. The outcome of intracellular infections is largely due to the ability of pathogens to utilise specific cell receptors [2] and host components [3] for invading and subverting cellular activities. Evidences suggest a number of microorganisms can utilise hyaluronan (HA) and/or Cluster of Differentiation 44 (CD44) [4,5,6], an important receptor for HA [7,8,9], to promote attachment, invasion and replication within the cells. This ability has been recognised to be a potential factor in persistent infections and treatment failure.
Despite the ability of certain antibiotics to cross cell membrane, their intracellular efficacy can be poor due to: (I) intracellular concentrations below the minimum inhibitory value; (II) intracellular environment (e.g., acidic pH) that may affect the antibiotic activity; (III) antibiotic accumulation in subcellular compartments that are different from those in which pathogens reside.
In 1934, Karl Meyer and John Palmer isolated an unknown chemical substance from the vitreous body of bovine eyes, which contained two sugar molecules [10]. As one of these sugar molecules was an uronic acid, the name “hyaluronic acid” (HA) was coined by joining three words: hyaloid (vitreous) and uronic acid. Further work by Karl Meyer and his associates led to the resolution of the chemical structure of HA by the 1950s [11]. HA is a linear and non-sulfated glycosaminoglycan (Figure 1A), a poly-anionic polysaccharide composed of alternating d-glucuronic acid and N-acetyl-d-glucosamine monomeric units linked together through β-1,4 and β-1,3 glycosidic bonds. In early 1980s, Endre Balazs was successful in isolating a purified high molecular weight HA, which was used to produce plastic intraocular lenses for implantation [12]. In 1986, the term “hyaluronan” was introduced, to encompass the various forms the HA macromolecules could take: the acid form, hyaluronic acid, and its salts, such as sodium hyaluronate, which forms at physiological pH [13]. The injectable form of HA (‘Hyalgan®’) was approved in 1997, by the FDA for the treatment of pain associated with knee osteoarthritis by viscosupplementation [14] and, more recently, thanks to its biocompatibility, biodegradability [15] and its ability to provide high osmotic pressure and hydration, HA has found a market as a biomaterial in the cosmetic industry [14,16] and ophthalmology [17].
An important in vitro receptor of HA is CD44 [18] (Figure 1B); after the binding with HA, CD44 facilitates: (I) HA endocytosis [19] (Figure 1C) and (II) signalling events that generate a number of cell specific responses [18]. Cells which are known to highly express CD44 and internalise HA are keratinocytes [20], activated macrophages [21], fibroblasts [22], chondrocytes [23] and certain cancer cells [18,24]. The first three cell lines can act as ‘reservoirs’ of intracellular pathogens and, more interestingly, a number of works have shown these pathogens can utilise CD44 and/or HA for invading and surviving within such cells. Consequently, the incorporation/linkage of antimicrobials into HA-based nano-carriers represents a novel paradigm in the delivery of therapeutics against intracellular pathogens, as HA may enhance the sub-cellular targeting in addition to the efficacy of such antimicrobials by enabling the system to act as a ‘Trojan Horse’.

2. Biodistribution and Roles of HA

HA is a bioactive polysaccharide that naturally occurs in all living organisms [25], it is mostly found in the extracellular and pericellular matrices [26] such as the connective tissues, synovial fluid of joints and vitreous humour of the eye, however, intracellular locations such as the cytoplasm and vesicles, have also been documented [26]. In mammals, HA is synthesised by at least three synthases (HAS1, HAS2 and HAS3) [27] with expression of HAS genes appearing to be both tissue- and site-specific [28]. These enzymes (which are glycosyltransferases) differ from each other in their catalytic activities (HAS3 > HAS2 > HAS1) as well as in the size of their final products [29].
Degradation of HA typically occurs through a step-wise process [30] and its turnover can occur locally (in the cellular micro-environment) or at the tissue level. The local degradation includes: (I) HA binding, predominantly via CD44 [18] or via receptor for HA-mediated motility (RHAMM) [31,32]; (II) internalisation; (III) degradation within the cells by a series of coordinated enzymatic reactions in which HA fragments of decreasing size are progressively generated [33]. For the turnover at the tissue level, HA is released from tissue matrices, drained into vascular and lymphatic systems and then predominantly removed by liver and kidney [34]. The receptors involved in this pathway are HA receptors for endocytosis (HARE) [35] or lymphatic vessels endothelial HA receptors (LYVE-1) [36]. The enzymes required for HA synthesis and degradation are also involved in producing specific HA molecular weights, which in turn are related to specific functions of the HA fragments [37]. Furthermore, both location and HA concentration are also important variables in relation to the biological role that HA will take within the body [38]. High molecular weight HA (>1000–5000 repeating units) are typically extracellular, space-filling and have several structural functions which include lubrication of movable parts of the body, such as joints and muscles [39] and the maintenance of the viscoelasticity of connective tissues [39,40]. Moreover, high molecular weight HA controls the supramolecular assembly of proteoglycans in the extracellular matrix [38] and it is involved in the suppression of the angiogenesis [41] and immune-system [42]. In contrast, the small HA fragments appear to act as endogenous ‘danger signals’ [43], playing an active role in inflammation [44,45], immune-stimulation [46], cell detachment [47], migration [48] and tumour development [49].
Despite current data, there is a degree of uncertainty in HA biology; areas which require further exploration, include (I) the mechanism by which enzymes of synthesis and degradation of HA are able to cooperate for providing a proper HA size, (II) the binding of HA to CD44 and the subsequent internalisation within the cells; (III) the explicit role HA plays during the inflammation: evidences suggest in the alveolar tracts, released fragments of HA play a pivotal role in the host defenses, stimulating the innate immune responses, by activating TLR2 and TLR4 receptors promoting lung inflammation [50] and HA role in the resolution of inflammation, [51] and (IV) the role HA plays during the infection processes. The latter is one of the main focus of this review.

3. CD44-Mediated Uptake of HA in Host Cells

CD44 is a widely expressed family of class I transmembrane glycoproteins present on the surface of most mammalian cells [18,52]. CD44 is formed by an amino-terminal domain, which is known as the ‘link domain’ that enables the receptor to bind to HA as well as other glycosaminoglycans [53] (Figure 1B). The amino-terminal domain is separated from the plasma membrane by a short stem structure, which is followed by the transmembrane region and the cytoplasmic-tail [54,55]. After the binding with HA, CD44 works especially for two purposes: (I) to allow the HA endocytosis; (II) to trigger signalling events that induce a number of cell specific responses. In 2003, R. Stern proposed a general mechanism for the endocytosis of high molecular weight HA (hMWHA) and its catabolism within the cells [33] (Figure 1C). He proposed that hMWHA (Mw ≥ 1 × 106) is first degraded by the combined action of HA receptors and hyaluronidase2 (HAase2) into intermediate-sized fragments (Mw ≈ 1 × 104) and then it is taken up by the cells. These fragments are then delivered to endosomal and lysosomal vesicles where a further catabolism could occur by HAase1, coordinated with the activity of two specific lysosomal enzymes; finally, HA fragments are exocytosed [33].
HA binding and uptake through CD44 appear to be two separate events that often do not take place simultaneously. Evidences suggests that the HA uptake requires the acylation of the CD44 cytoplasmic tail [56] which can be a cell type specific event. Specifically, it was reported CD44 is associated with cholesterol-rich lipid rafts [57] and this association is dependent on the palmitoylation of both Cys286 and Cys295, which are in the highly conserved transmembrane domain and in the proximal cytoplasmic domain of CD44, respectively [58]. The prevention of CD44 localisation within lipid rafts blocks HA internalisation as well as the turnover/cycling of the receptor itself, but does not interfere with the ability of the receptor to bind to HA [56]. This evidence may explain why HA is not internalised in all CD44 expressing cell types.
Overall, cells that highly express CD44 and take up HA, leaving aside cancer cells [18,24], are keratinocytes [20], activated macrophages [21], fibroblasts [22] and chondrocytes [23]. In 2001, Tammi and colleagues showed keratinocytes express high level of CD44 and are able to internalise exogenous HA; however, HA and especially HA oligosaccharides can also enter keratinocytes via non-receptor mediated pathway [20]. Intracellularly, HA can be found in small vesicles with a diameter of ~100 nm, which are close to the plasma membrane and in larger perinuclear structures (>1 µm). Interestingly, a similar HA intracellular profile was found in liver endothelial cells [59]. These cells showed a greater ability to internalise HA, particularly into vacuoles with a diameter ranging from 0.3 to 1.2 µm, with the majority located close to the perinuclear region. The HA binding and internalisation profile has also studied in healthy human skin, normal scar and hypertrophic scar fibroblastic cell lines. These cells lines showed similar binding as well as internalisation curves of HA for all cells tested [24]. Moreover, normal scar fibroblasts showed greater ability to generate HA-derived partial degradation products.
Alveolar macrophages reside in the respiratory tract and alveolar space, where they are responsible for the uptake and clearance of pathogens as well as debris. These cells bind and take up HA in a CD44-dependent manner [60]; once internalised HA was found in the cytoplasm. Evidences also suggest that these cell types are the only immune cells that show to bind high levels of HA under homeostatic, non-infectious or non-inflammatory conditions, in both rodents and humans [58].

4. Role of CD44 and HA in the Uptake and Proliferation of Intracellular Pathogens

Keratinocytes, macrophages and fibroblasts can all act as ‘reservoirs’ for intracellular pathogens. Interestingly both HA and CD44, are utilised by a number of microorganisms to facilitate their invasion of such cells and persistence within the cellular micro-environment (Table 1). For example, Streptococcus pyogenes has been shown to be able to attach to epithelial cells through its HA-rich polysaccharide capsules, which mediates attachment to CD44 receptors on pharyngeal and epidermal keratinocytes [4,61] facilitating colonisation and infection in the throat and skin [61]. HA also appears to play a key role in the adherence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to human lung epithelial cells (A549) [5]. Evidence suggest that M. tuberculosis utilises extracellular DNA-binding proteins to attach host cells through HA, indicating that HA represent the major binding site of M. tuberculosis in A549 cells; whilst CD44 appears to be involved in the binding and subsequent cellular internalisation of M. tuberculosis in murine primary macrophages [7]. CD44 is also implicated in the cellular uptake of Staphylococcus aureus in human neutrophils [8], possibly influencing the pathogen phagocytosis through its structural and functional linkage to the cytoskeletal microfilaments. A similar outcome was obtained for the cell internalisation of Shigella spp. in epithelial cells [62] where it appears that CD44 associates with Shigella spp. through IpaB, a protein which is secreted by the pathogen upon cell contact [62]. This IpaB-CD44 interaction led to the transduction of signals which participate in the cytoskeletal rearrangements and the subsequent internalisation of the pathogen within the cells. CD44 has also been shown to facilitate the intracellular growth of Listeria spp. in murine primary macrophages and fibroblasts. However, this may not be an ubiquitous effect; as comparisons, in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimorium, CD44 did not play a role in their intracellular growth [9].
Once internalised, the ability of the microorganism to proliferate intracellularly is another advantage to survival. HA also seems play a role in this stage of infection. Evidence suggests that HA is important for the growth of the parasite Leishmania in primary and RAW 264.7 macrophages [6]. A study by Naderer et al. [6] indicates that HA is taken up by infected macrophages and is transported to the phagolysosome where Leishmania replicates; once internalised, HA provides Leishmania with essential nutrients for growth and virulence. With the aim to investigate this aspect the strategy adopted by the Nader group was generate N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) acetyltransferase (GNAT) deficient Leishmania (Δgnat). This mutant was unable to grow or survive even when macrophages were cultivated in the presence of exogenous GlcNAc, suggesting intracellular HA provides Leishmania with essential carbon sources [6].
Other microorganisms have also been shown to utilise HA as a nutrient source for intracellular groth; for example strains of M. tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG, an attenuated strain of M. bovis and a live vaccine against tuberculosis) have been shown to be able to utilise HA as a carbon source for proliferation [63]. In order to investigate this, 3H-labeled HA was added to an infection cell culture model where it was found to be incorporated into the live BCG, demonstrating HA uptake by the pathogen. Further work using l-Ascorbic acid 6-hexadecanoate (Vcpal), which is an inhibitor of HAase, suppressed the enhancing effect of HA on the growth of Mycobacteriae, suggesting: (I) short HA chains are preferred as a carbon source; (II) Mycobacteriae utilise the exogenous HA [63].
Further experiments by the Matusmoto group also demonstrated that both BCG and M. tuberculosis grew when co-cultured with HA-synthase1 (HAS1) and HAS3 (which synthesise HA with a broad range of molecular weights, ranging from 2 × 105 to 2 × 106) but not HAS2 (which synthesises HA with molecular weights higher than 2 × 106), confirming shorter HA chains are preferential for growth. Specifically, HAS1 appeared to be the major HA synthase in Mycobacteriae-infected mouse lungs [63] Treatment with hyaluronidase inhibitors (such as Vcpal, apigenin or quercetin [64]) could be an interesting approach to begin to give both an indication about which size range is preferential for growth and information about the intracellular or extracellular use of HA by the pathogen. However, to confirm the use of intracellular HA, radiolabelled HA should be also employed. Another interesting approach could be the use of HA synthesis inhibitors (such as 4-methylumbelliferone, 4-MU) [65]. Among the inhibition mechanisms, 4-MU appears to work as a competitive substrate for UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT), which is an enzyme involved in HA synthesis [66]. The application of such treatment should confirm the need of certain pathogens to use HA for growth and virulence. Interestingly, the utilisation of HAase inhibitors, such as Vcpal [67], apigenin or quercetin [64] have been shown to suppress the growth of Mycobacteriae in mouse lungs, evidencing that HAase or a potential transporter of short size HA fragments could be potential targets for therapies against such pathogens.
Taking together these data, it is reasonable to assume HA may be a suitable biomaterial for building nano-carriers to target intracellular pathogens, acting as ‘Trojan Horse’, as: (I) a number of host cells (e.g., keratinocytes and macrophages) highly express CD44 and internalise HA; (II) HA can enter cells through CD44 receptor that is also used by such pathogens for the cell invasion; (III) like other nanoparticles, HA nano-carriers can be engineered in order to target sub-cellular compartments (e.g., lysosome or cytoplasm) where the microorganism grows and replicates; IV) HA nano-carriers may be cleaved by HAase that are produced by several pathogens, such as Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. [68], facilitating the release of the drug in situ. Moreover, the depolymerisation/degradation of HA can also occur in the presence of host enzymes, free radicals [15], and at low pH values, leading to the drug release intracellularly, thus guaranteeing the efficacy of the targeted therapy also against microorganisms that typically do not produce HAase.

5. HA-Based Nano-Carriers in Drug Delivery

In recent years, HA has received enormous attention as a biomaterial for building nano-carriers, thanks to its biocompatibility, low-toxicity, biodegradability, hydrophilicity, ability to protect the entrapped drug and to enhance the solubility of hydrophobic molecules. Furthermore, HA chains can be easily functionalised, in order to develop materials suitable for drug delivery. Chemical modifications of HA have been extensively reviewed [69,70] and target three functional groups: the carboxylic acid group, the primary and secondary hydroxyl groups, and the N-acetyl group (following deamidation). In the last decades, several kinds of HA-based nano-carriers have been developed, including self-assembling nanohydrogels (NHs) [71,72,73], covalently [74,75] or physically cross-linked nanoparticles, HA-coated liposomes [76,77] or inorganic nanoparticles [78,79] and bio-conjugates [80,81], and employed for a wide range of applications [82,83]. A number of stimuli-responsive HA nano-carriers have been also developed for the targeted and responsive delivery of therapeutics [84,85].
For example, HA-based nanoparticles are produced by using a number of strategies and are classified by the type of cross-linking from which they are formed: the most common nanoparticles are made by hydrophobic associations [71], chemical cross-linking [74] or electrostatic interactions [86]. HA nanoparticles made up of hydrophobic associations are usually obtained through the partial hydrophobisation of HA; both hydrophobic molecules and/or hydrophobic long chains can be grafted to HA, to obtain self-assembled nano-structures with internal hydrophobic domains, in aqueous environment. Specifically, 5β-cholanic acid [73], cholesterol [71], 2′3′4′5′-tetrabutyrilriboflavin [72], PLGA [87] and PEG-PCL [88] have been successfully linked to HA, allowing the formation of HA nanoparticles, usually named nanohydrogels (NHs). Self-assembling HA NHs can be used to deliver a wide range of therapeutic molecules or polypeptides [71,89]. However, the HA poly-anionic nature represents a limitation in encapsulating negatively charged macromolecules such as siRNA and DNA. To overcome this drawback, HA chains have been modified with mono-functional fatty amines (with different alkyl chain lengths) or cationic polyamines, such as polyethyleneimine, or poly(l-lysine), in order to achieve self-assembled HA NHs, capable to physically encapsulate and deliver genetic material [90].
Chemically cross-linked nanoparticles are usually more stable than the physically cross-linked analogues. However, the methods used for forming cross-linked nanoparticles, such as the micro-emulsion method [91], generally require high energy sources and drastic conditions (such as high speed mechanical stirring or the use of organic solvents and surfactants), which, for example, represent a limitation for the entrapment of sensitive molecules. Moreover, the permanent cross-linkages may inhibit drug release at the target site, resulting in a reduced therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, several degradable linkages including di-sulfide [92] and other pH-sensitive derivatives [93], have been used to obtain chemically cross-linked stimuli-responsive nanoparticles. For example, HA-boronate derivative has been synthesised with the aim to develop pH-responsive and chemically cross-linked nanoparticles [85], by spontaneously forming boronate esters with polycatechols, by very mild conditions. The same strategy was also applied for the development of pH-responsive HA bio-conjugates with a number of diol/catechol-based therapeutics [81].
The ionotropic gelation process represents another useful technique to prepare physically cross-linked HA nano-carriers. An example is represented by HA/chitosan nanoparticles [86]: the strong ionic interactions between the positively charged chitosan amino groups and the negatively charged HA carboxylic groups allow the nanoparticle network’s formation.
Among the advantages that HA-based nano-carriers offer, the binding of HA to CD44, is one of the most relevant; this property ensures both an active targeting to cells that over-express CD44 and the intracellular delivery of therapeutics. Among the cells, certain cancers, such as breast cancer, over-express CD44 and, for this reason, HA-based nano-carriers have been especially studied for cancer therapy and theranostics purposes. The synthesis and application of HA-based nano-carriers for targeting tumours have been extensively reviewed in a number of works [82,94], and therefore will be omitted here. However, it should be pointed out, HA is not internalised in all CD44 expressing cell types: therefore, tumours that highly express CD44 may take up only a little amount of HA [95].
The ability of HA to cross the cell membrane is another important advantage; this attribute represents an extremely useful strategy to deliver certain drugs intracellularly. Small molecules [87,88], poly-peptides [65,89,96] and genetic material [86,97] have been efficiently loaded into HA-based nano-carriers and delivered intracellularly. For example, HA naturally interacts with several proteins inside the body (hyaladherins) [38] (a number of biological functions of HA are attributed to this specific binding). Therefore, HA-based nano-carriers could represent a useful system to conjugate peptides [96] or proteins [71] and deliver them within the body, preserving their activity and increasing their stability and availability within the tissues. However, the shortcomings of using HA are its rapid clearance from the blood circulation, due to its recognition by HA receptors of reticuloendothelial system organs, such as the liver and spleen and subsequent degradation. This is the reason why, PEGylation is typically used for reducing HA degradation and prolongs its circulation within the body [98]. However, PEGylation could significantly affect the HA binding affinity to CD44 receptors, decreasing the nano-carrier cellular uptake in the desired site of action. Therefore, the degree of functionalisation of HA with PEG and the PEG molecular weight are fundamental parameters that should be controlled, to increase the nano-carrier circulation in the blood and to decrease their liver uptake, without affect their internalisation in the targeted site.
Keratinocytes, activated macrophages and fibroblasts are cells that express CD44 and highly take up extracellular HA, representing another interesting target for HA-based nano-carriers. Recently, the cellular uptake of HA/chitosan nanoparticles by activated macrophages, for a targeted therapy and CD44-mediated nucleic acid delivery, has been investigated in depth [97,99]. All these cell types can act as ‘reservoirs’ for facultative or obligate intracellular pathogens, therefore HA-based nano-carriers may represent an interesting approach for enhancing the targeting and intracellular uptake of antimicrobials, opening novel opportunities in this field. In this respect, it should be noted that the sub-cellular accumulation of antimicrobials in the same site of infection (e.g., endosome, lysosome, cytosol) may represent a key point for the effectiveness of the treatments, as different microorganisms can invade and replicate in different sub-cellular compartments (Figure 2). For example, Mycobacteriae can survive and replicate within macrophages by resisting lysosomal delivery by residing in early phase endosomal compartments [100], whilst microorganisms such as Salmonellae [101] and Brucellae [102] survive by preventing vacuole-lysosome fusion and pathogens such as Shigella spp. [103], Listeria spp. [104] and Rickettsiae [105] are able to escape from phagosomes and survive in the cytoplasm. To survive and disseminate intracellularly S. aureus [106,107] and Leishmania [6] appear to resist the fusion of phagosomes with lysosomes allowing them to multiply within the phagolysosomes of macrophages. Consequently, when treating an intracellular infection, a suitable antibiotic should be chosen in order to ensure drug concentration: (I) is above the minimum inhibitory concentration and (II) is delivered to the site of infection. Depending on their physico-chemical properties, antibiotics accumulate in different cell compartments at various concentrations [108,109]; typically, weak bases tend to accumulate in membrane-bound acidic compartments, whereas weak acids are excluded from those sites. Specifically, aminoglycosides [110] and macrolides [111] predominantly accumulate in lysosomes, quinolones accumulate in the cytoplasm [111], whereas β-Lactams [112] have been shown to accumulate at low level within the cells (predominantly in the cytoplasm) likely due to their acidic character.
Therefore, among all the drug delivery systems for antimicrobial activity, the HA-based nano-carriers may represent a novel paradigm for targeting to cells where pathogens persist, enhancing the intracellular drug concentration in the specific sub-cellular compartments. Indeed, such nano-carriers can be customised in order to target lysosomes [113] or to escape the endosome, being released into the cytoplasm [114].

6. HA-Based Nano-Carriers for Targeting Sub-Cellular Compartments

6.1. Lysosomal HA-Based Nano-Carriers

Even if a number of works have shown HA-based nano-carriers, are internalised by cells especially by CD44 receptors [115,116,117], the subsequent intracellular trafficking of these nano-systems is often not clear or is not investigated. It has been demonstrated self-assembled HA-cholesterol nanohydrogels (HA-CH NHs) (HA Mw = 2.2 × 105, CH degree of functionalisation = 15% (mol/mol, %), mean diameter~180 nm) quickly accumulate (within 1 h) in acidic endosomal and lysosomal compartments of human keratinocytes (HaCaT cells), reaching the highest co-localisation with those vesicles in 4 h [113]. Intracellularly, ApoTome analysis showed HA-CH NHs located into vesicle-like structures, those with a diameter of approximately 0.3 µm close to the plasma membrane and those in larger vesicles, with diameter up to 1.5 µm close to the nucleus. A similar outcome was reported by Tammi and colleagues (2001) using free HA in rat epidermal keratinocytes [20].
Self-assembling oleic acid-ethylendiamine nanoparticles, coated with HA (mean diameter~150 nm) showed co-localisation with lysosomes of colon cancer cells (HCT-116) over 6 h. Moreover, it was found that this nano-system is taken up by cells through both CD44 and clathrin-dependent endocytosis routes [117].
The intracellular pathway of polycarbonate: polyethylene: cholesterol (65:5:30) liposomes grafted with HA has been investigated on human lung carcinoma epithelial cells (A549) and human breast cancer cell lines (MB-231 and MCF7) [118]. A549 and MB-231 represent CD44 positive cell lines, whilst MCF7 represents the CD44 negative one. Several HA Mw (from 5.0 × 103 to 1.6 × 106) and degree of grafting density (HA final amount ranging from 0.2 to 1.5 mg) have been employed with the aim to investigate the impact of these parameters on the liposome uptake (the mean diameter ranged from 120 to 180 nm). Results showed HA-liposomes bind to CD44; this binding increases by increasing either HA Mw or grafting density (this trend was evident in A549 or MDA-MB-231 cells, but not in MCF7). Moreover, CD44-mediated uptake of HA-liposomes happened through lipid raft-mediated endocytosis (that is a cholesterol-dependent route) and it was independent from clathrin-coated vesicles or the caveolae or macropinocytosis pathways. HA-liposomes were found to be predominantly localised in acidic endosomal and lysosomal compartments [118].
Taking together these results, it is reasonable to assume that negatively charged and amphiphilic HA-based nano-carriers (formed by hydrophobic core/domain/particle and HA shell, and showing a mean diameter smaller than 200 nm) may enter cells especially through CD44 and predominantly accumulate into lysosomes, by following the endosomal-lysosomal pathway. Consequently, these nano-systems may be particularly suitable for targeting to pathogens that accumulate and replicate into these vesicles, such as S. aureus, Leishmania and, possibly, M. tuberculosis.

6.2. Cytosolic HA-Based Nano-Carriers

The nanoparticle uptake through endosomal-lysosomal pathway may show some drawbacks: (I) in lysosomes, the low pH (~5) and the presence of an array of hydrolytic enzymes may lead to the destruction of such therapeutic molecules; (II) drugs do not reach the desired site of action, showing low effectiveness [119,120]. Therefore, recently, a number of strategies have been studied with the aim to develop nano-carriers that are able to escape the endosome or lysosome and as such accumulate into the cytoplasm [121]. In 1997, Jean-Paul Behr introduced the concept of ‘proton sponge’ effect [122] (Figure 3). After endocytosis, the buffering capacity of polycation/polyanion complexes will tend to both inhibit the action of the lysosomal nucleases (that have an acidic optimal pH) and alter the osmolarity of the vesicle [122]. The simultaneous occurrence of these two phenomena will firstly cause the swelling of endosomes/lysosomes and then the breakage of the vesicle membrane, leading to the release of ‘cargo’ into the cytoplasm. Nano-carriers able to exploit these properties are typically made of positively charged macromolecules such as polymers with low pKa amine group (e.g., polyethylenimine, poly-l-lysine, chitosan) or cationic lipids, which have been especially employed for gene therapy [123]. HA/chitosan nanoparticles represent a typical example of nano-carrier successfully designed for gene transfection (e.g., DNA, siRNAs) [124]. Their intracellular trafficking has been studied in phagocytic cells (e.g., macrophages) [114] and human epithelial cell lines derived from the conjunctiva and the cornea [124], showing the ability of HA/chitosan nanoparticles to escape lysosomes and target to the cytoplasm. Other examples of HA-based nano-carriers showing a strong ‘proton sponge’ effect and able to release the cargo in the cytoplasm, are represented by core/shell nanoparticles formed of poly(β-amino) ester coated with HA [125] and self-assembled HA-g-poly(l-histidine) micelles [126]. In order to enhance the endosomal/lysosomal breakage, a photochemically triggered self-assembling HA-based nanoparticle has been developed [127] by simultaneously linking a positively charged polymer poly-(diisopropylaminoethyl aspartamide) and a photosensitizer (chlorin e6) to the carboxyl and hydroxyl groups of acetylated HA, respectively. For example, these nano-carriers may be employed for targeting to microorganisms that typically replicate in the cytoplasm, such as Shigella spp. and Listeria spp.
The endosomal escape can be also achieved by using fusion proteins able to catalyse the membrane fusion between the particle and endosomes or to generate a pore on the membrane or the lysis of the membrane in order to empty their ‘cargo’ in the cytoplasm [128]. Also the use of cationic lipids represents another strategy that could be adopted for destabilizing the endosome membrane [129]. Indeed, after endocytosis, cationic lipids form ion pairs with the anionic ones, leading to the release of ‘cargo’ in the cytoplasm [130]. However, to the best of our knowledge, HA-based nano-carriers which exploit these properties have not been developed, yet.

7. The Application of HA-Based Nano-Carriers for the Intracellular Delivery of Antimicrobials

With increasing interest in the potential application of HA-based nano-carriers for the intracellular delivery of antimicrobials, there have been a growing number of investigations looking at their in vitro and in vivo efficacy. The use of HA-based nano-carriers for antimicrobial purposes could show several advantages in comparison to those of nano-carriers made of other polymers/materials: (I) a number of host cells (e.g., keratinocytes and macrophages) express CD44 and highly internalise HA, providing an active targeting; (II) HA can enter cells through CD44, the receptor also used by pathogens for the cell invasion; (III) HA-based nano-carriers may be cleaved by HAase that are produced by several pathogens, such as Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. [68], thus facilitating the release of the drug in situ. The depolymerisation/degradation of HA can also occur in the presence of host enzymes, free radicals [15], and at low pH values, leading to the intracellular drug release, thus guaranteeing the efficacy of the targeted therapy also against microorganisms that typically do not produce HAase. In this scenario, HA-based nano-carriers have been started to be developed and studied for the intracellular delivery of antimicrobials, both in vitro and in vivo.
A study by using bone-marrow derived macrophages infected with M. tuberculosis or Mycobacterium avium showed that treatment with an antimicrobial peptide (LLKKK18) entrapped into self-assembling HA-based NHs provided cellular/sub-cellular targeting and prevented the degradation of LLKKK18 by proteases [96]. Specifically: (I) the cytotoxicity of entrapped LLKKK18 was reduced in vitro; (II) the infected macrophages successfully internalised self-assembled HA NHs; (III) the targeting to mycobacteriae was enhanced using HA NHs even though the exact kind of vesicles in which the co-localisation occurred was not identified; (IV) experiments carried out with LLKKK18-loaded NHs showed the new system was more effective against both M. avium and M. tuberculosis than the free LLKKK18 in vitro and in vivo; (V) un-loaded HA NHs reduced the infection in mice.
It has also been reported that HA-streptomycin bio-conjugate showed the ability to enhance the antimicrobial activity of free streptomycin against S. aureus or Listeria monocytogenes in phagocytic cells (RAW macrophages) or non-phagocytic cells (VERO) [131]. Authors reported that HA did not improve the MIC of streptomycin on planktonic pathogens, but did show a high capability to enhance the antimicrobial activity against the two pathogens within phagocytic and non-phagocytic cells, in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, HA was able to enhance the streptomycin uptake, which was CD44-mediated and to reduce the ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity of streptomycin in mice. In previous study by the same research group, the capability of chitosan-based carriers to improve streptomycin activity intracellularly was demonstrated [132]. However, the cationic polysaccharide exhibited significant cytotoxicity at concentration higher than 500 µg/mL.
Investigations have also begun to focus on microorganisms that have not traditionally been thought as intracellular bacteria as there in increasing evidence suggesting that this mode of growth may facilitate persistent and chronic infections, and may be a cause of treatment failures. For example, axenic P. aeruginosa and S. aureus infected HeLa cells (a model cell line) were incubated with levofloxacin (LVF), a broad spectrum and highly active and cytosolic antibiotic [133], loaded into self-assembled HA-CH NHs. The reported results showed entrapped LVF was able to eradicate both intracellular microorganisms after only 2 h of incubation, whilst free LVF was ineffective intracellularly. A similar study was conducted on human keratinocytes (HaCaT cells) infected with S. aureus [113]; infected cells were incubated with LVF or gentamicin (GM)-loaded HA-CH NHs or their controls (free LVF, GM, NHs). These two antibiotics were selected as they have different intracellular pathways: LVF is a cytosolic drug, whilst GM is a lysosomal one. Results showed that NHs highly enhanced the antimicrobial activity of LVF against the intracellular S. aureus, but they did not improve the antibacterial activity of GM, which showed a significant effect without the employment of NHs. As it has been demonstrated that NHs co-localise with lysosomes of HaCaT cells and it is known that free LVF predominantly accumulates in the cytoplasm, these results suggested NHs may be able to change the intracellular fate of LVF from cytoplasm to lysosome, thereby targeting intracellular S. aureus, illustrating the importance of a targeted antibiotic treatment, and the the opportunity to enhance the intracellular activity of such antibiotics by using HA-based nano-carriers. It should be noted that, in both works, extracellular pathogens were previously eliminated, and the LVF-loaded NHs were tested only against the intracellular microorganisms. Though it is still not clear where the sub-cellular sites in which the loaded antibiotic was acting, the experiment was designed to remove any extracellular pathogen, so only intracellular microorganisms were counted after treatment. Moreover, as the free NHs was not effective against both intracellular and extracellular pathogens, it can be stated the antibacterial activity was only due to the intracellular LVF [113,133].
Recently, HA-amikacin was synthesised by ‘click’ reaction between HA-propargyl amide and amikacin-azide [134]. The obtained bio-conjugate was tested against planktonic P. aeruginosa, S. aureus and L. monocytogenes; HA did not improve the MIC of amikacin on planktonic pathogens, but did show a high capability to enhance the antimicrobial activity against the three pathogens within RAW 264.7 macrophages. The bio-conjugate was then tested in vivo, on mice infected intraperitoneally with L. monocytogenes, which received subcutaneous injection of HA-amikacin or its controls. Like the in vitro results suggested, the bio-conjugate showed an improvement of the antimicrobial activity of amikacin, evidencing the HA capability to enhance the efficacy of the antimicrobial against such intracellular pathogen. To the best of our knowledge, these are the only examples which describe the development and use of HA-based nano-carriers for targeting to intracellular pathogens. None of these works has shown a significant increase in toxicity of the loaded antimicrobials, both in vitro and in vivo. In contrast, a significant toxicity has been noted for chitosan-based nanoparticles [132], However, further studies are necessary to increase the understanding of the possible side effects that loaded antibiotics may cause (e.g., long-term side effects), the way in which the loaded antibiotics are acting against both intracellular and extracellular pathogens and the intracellular pathways that are involved in the uptake of these nano-formulations. Further investigations promise to be very productive.

8. Conclusions and Perspectives

The relationship between HA, CD44 and the invasion and survival of a number of pathogens within the cells is becoming increasingly evident. Several microorganisms utilise CD44 and/or HA to enter and replicate within the cellular micro-environment. Furthermore, a number of host cells highly express CD44 and internalise HA, ensuring an intracellular uptake of antimicrobials loaded into HA-based nano-carriers. This scenario makes HA a possible candidate for the development of ‘Trojan Horse’ systems to target intracellular microorganisms, thus overcoming the ineffectiveness of many antibiotics intracellularly. Previous works showed the ability of HA-based nano-carriers to enhance the intracellular activity of certain antimicrobials; however, little has been carried out in biology, microbiology and drug delivery fields, therefore further studies are necessary. HA is already extensively used for topical administration in cosmetics or ophthalmology. The incorporation of antimicrobials within HA-based nanogels may represent an interesting approach for enhancing the intracellular delivery of some drugs, thus targeting to pathogens that are a common cause of chronic topical infections (e.g., S. aureus) [113]. Moreover, the local HA administration could reduce the drawbacks due to the in vivo uptake and catabolism of HA into cells that express LYVE-1 or HARE (e.g., liver and kidney). This aspect reduces the efficacy of the targeted therapy, representing an important disadvantage for HA-based injectable formulations. Several strategies have however been found for overcoming these drawbacks; for example, stealth HA nanoparticles have been shown to reduce the uptake by liver and kidney, improving the targeting to the desired site of action [98]. Toxicity is another aspect that must be taken into account: HA carriers should be able to enhance the intracellular uptake of antimicrobials and possibly, change their intracellular trafficking. So far, none of the authors reported a significant increase in toxicity of the loaded antibiotics in their experiments, both in vitro and in vivo but further work is necessary before clinical applications are fully realised. Furthermore, in the alveolar tracts, released fragments of HA play a pivotal role in the host defences stimulating the innate immune responses, by activating TLR2 and TLR4 receptors, thus inducing lung inflammation. There is a great deal of published and ongoing work into the role of HA during the inflammation processes even though a number of mechanisms are not yet clarified and with the indication that some pathogens may take advantage of these pathways for invading and surviving within host cells; this information is far from being clearly elucidated and our understanding in this area should be improved.
Antibiotic resistance is one of the major public health threats, and the novel approach based on HA nano-carries may represent an interesting strategy for overcoming some antibiotic failures in the treatment of intracellular infections.

Acknowledgments

“Progetti di Ricerca (Piccoli, Medi)—Progetti Medi”, grant n. RM11715C1743EE89, is acknowledged. E.M. was supported by the ATENEO SAPIENZA fellowship (D.R. n. 225512A16 del 19/09/2016).

Author Contributions

All the authors contributed equally to the manuscript preparation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Casadevall, A. Evolution of Intracellular Pathogens. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 62, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pizarro-Cerdá, J.; Cossart, P. Bacterial Adhesion and Entry into Host Cells. Cell 2006, 124, 715–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Aquino, R.S.; Park, P.W. Glycosaminoglycans and infection. Front. Biosci. 2016, 21, 1260–1277. [Google Scholar]
  4. Schrager, H.M.; Albertì, S. Hyaluronic acid capsule modulates M protein-mediated adherence and acts as a ligand for attachment of group A Streptococcus to CD44 on human keratinocytes. J. Clin. Investig. 1998, 101, 1708–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Aoki, K.; Matsumoto, S. Extracellular Mycobacterial DNA-binding Protein 1 Participates in Mycobacterium-Lung Epithelial Cell Interaction through Hyaluronic Acid. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 39798–39806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Naderer, T.; Heng, J. Intracellular Survival of Leishmania major Depends on Uptake and Degradation of Extracellular Matrix Glycosaminoglycans by Macrophages. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1005136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Leemans, J.C.; Florquin, S. CD44 is a macrophage binding site for Mycobacterium tuberculosis that mediates macrophage recruitment and protective immunity against tuberculosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 111, 681–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Moffat, F.L.; Han, T. Involvement of CD44 and the cytoskeletal linker protein ankyrin in human neutrophil bacterial phagocytosis. J. Cell. Physiol. 1996, 168, 638–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Eriksson, E.; Dons, L. CD44-Regulated Intracellular Proliferation of Listeria monocytogenes. Infect. Immun. 2003, 71, 4102–4111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Meyer, K.; Palmer, J.W. The polysaccharide of the vitreous humor. J. Biol. Chem. 1934, 107, 629–634. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rapport, M.M.; Weissmann, B. Isolation of a Crystalline Disaccharide, Hyalobiuronic Acid, from Hyaluronic Acid. Nature 1951, 168, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Laurent, U.B.G.; Fraser, J.R.E. Turnover of hyaluronate in the aqueous humour and vitreous body of the rabbit. Exp. Eye Res. 1983, 36, 493–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Balazs, E.A.; Laurent, T.C. Nomenclature of hyaluronic acid. Biochem. J. 1986, 235, 903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fakhari, A.; Berkland, C. Applications and emerging trends of hyaluronic acid in tissue engineering, as a dermal filler and in osteoarthritis treatment. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9, 7081–7092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Stern, R.; Kogan, G. The many ways to cleave hyaluronan. Biotechnol. Adv. 2007, 25, 537–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhu, Y.; Crewe, C. Hyaluronan in adipose tissue: Beyond dermal filler and therapeutic carrier. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8, 323ps4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Endre, A.B. Hyaluronan as an Ophthalmic Viscoelastic Device. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2008, 9, 236–238. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ponta, H.; Sherman, L. CD44: From adhesion molecules to signalling regulators. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Racine, R.; Mummert, M.E. Hyaluronan Endocytosis: Mechanisms of Uptake and Biological Functions. In Molecular Regulation of Endocytosis; InTech: London, UK, 2012; ISBN 978-953-51-0662-3. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tammi, R.; Rilla, K. Hyaluronan Enters Keratinocytes by a Novel Endocytic Route for Catabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 35111–35122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Underhill, C.B.; Nguyen, H.A. CD44 Positive Macrophages Take up Hyaluronan during Lung Development. Dev. Biol. 1993, 155, 324–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bertolami, C.N.; Berg, S. Binding and Internalization of Hyaluronate by Human Cutaneous Fibroblasts. Matrix 1992, 12, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Aguiar, D.J.; Knudson, W. Internalization of the Hyaluronan Receptor CD44 by Chondrocytes. Exp. Cell Res. 1999, 252, 292–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Culty, M.; Shizari, M. Binding and degradation of hyaluronan by human breast cancer cell lines expressing different forms of CD44: Correlation with invasive potential. J. Cell. Physiol. 1994, 160, 275–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Fraser, J.R.E.; Laurent, T.C. Hyaluronan: Its nature, distribution, functions and turnover. J. Intern. Med. 1997, 242, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Toole, B.P. Hyaluronan: From extracellular glue to pericellular cue. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2004, 4, 528–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Weigel, P.H.; Hascall, V.C. Hyaluronan Synthases. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 13997–14000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Itano, N.; Kimata, K. Molecular Cloning of Human Hyaluronan Synthase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1996, 222, 816–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Itano, N.; Sawai, T. Three Isoforms of Mammalian Hyaluronan Synthases Have Distinct Enzymatic Properties. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 25085–25092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Stern, R. Hyaluronan catabolism: A new metabolic pathway. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2004, 83, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zhang, S.; Chang, M.C.Y. The Hyaluronan Receptor RHAMM Regulates Extracellular-regulated Kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 11342–11348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hofmann, M.; Assmann, V. Problems with RHAMM. Cell 1998, 95, 591–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Stern, R. Devising a pathway for hyaluronan catabolism: Are we there yet? Glycobiology 2003, 13, 105R–115R. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rice, K.G. The Chemistry, Biology, and Medical Applications of Hyaluronan and Its Derivatives. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 5336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhou, B.; Weigel, J.A. Identification of the Hyaluronan Receptor for Endocytosis (HARE). J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 37733–37741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Banerji, S.; Ni, J. LYVE-1, a New Homologue of the CD44 Glycoprotein, Is a Lymph-specific Receptor for Hyaluronan. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 144, 789–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Stern, R.; Asari, A.A. Hyaluronan fragments: An information-rich system. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 85, 699–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Day, A.J.; Prestwich, G.D. Hyaluronan-binding proteins: Tying up the giant. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 4585–4588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tamer, T.M. Hyaluronan and synovial joint: Function, distribution and healing. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2013, 6, 111–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Moskowitz, R.W. Hyaluronic acid supplementation. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2000, 2, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Feinberg, R.; Beebe, D. Hyaluronate in vasculogenesis. Science 1983, 220, 1177–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Delmage, J.; Powars, D.R. The selective suppression of immunogenicity by hyaluronic acid. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 1986, 16, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Powell, J.D.; Horton, M.R. Threat matrix. Immunol. Res. 2005, 31, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nikitovic, D.; Tzardi, M. Cancer Microenvironment and Inflammation: Role of Hyaluronan. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hascall, V.C.; Majors, A.K. Intracellular hyaluronan: A new frontier for inflammation? Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1673, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Termeer, C.; Sleeman, J.P. Hyaluronan-magic glue for the regulation of the immune response? Trends Immunol. 2003, 24, 112–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Abatangelo, G.; Cortivo, R. Cell detachment mediated by hyaluronic acid. Exp. Cell Res. 1982, 137, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Koochekpour, S.; Pilkington, G.J. Hyaluronic acid/CD44H interaction induces cell detachment and stimulates migration and invasion of human glioma cells in vitro. Int. J. Cancer 1995, 63, 450–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Assmann, V.; Fieber, C. CD44 is the Principal Mediator of Hyaluronic-Acid-Induced Melanoma Cell Proliferation. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2001, 116, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Jiang, D.; Liang, J.; Fan, J.; Yu, S.; Chen, S.; Luo, Y.; Prestwich, G.D.; Mascarenhas, M.M.; Garg, H.G.; Quinn, D.A.; et al. Regulation of lung injury and repair by Toll-like receptors and hyaluronan. Nat. Med. 2005, 11, 1173–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Teder, P.; Vandivier, R.W.; Jiang, D.; Liang, J.; Cohn, L.; Puré, E.; Henson, P.M.; Noble, P.W. Resolution of lung inflammation by CD44. Science 2002, 296, 155–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zöller, M. CD44: Can a cancer-initiating cell profit from an abundantly expressed molecule? Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11, 254–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Sleeman, J.P.; Kondo, K. Variant Exons v6 and v7 Together Expand the Repertoire of Glycosaminoglycans Bound by CD44. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 31837–31844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Stamenkovic, I.; Amiot, M. A lymphocyte molecule implicated in lymph node homing is a member of the cartilage link protein family. Cell 1989, 56, 1057–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Idzerda, R.L.; Carter, W.G. Isolation and DNA sequence of a cDNA clone encoding a lymphocyte adhesion receptor for high endothelium. PNAS 1989, 86, 4659–4663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Thankamony, S.P.; Knudson, W. Acylation of CD44 and Its Association with Lipid Rafts Are Required for Receptor and Hyaluronan Endocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 34601–34609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Oliferenko, S.; Paiha, K. Analysis of CD44-Containing Lipid Rafts. Recruitment of Annexin II and Stabilization by the Actin Cytoskeleton. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 146, 843–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Liu, D.; Sy, M.S. A cysteine residue located in the transmembrane domain of CD44 is important in binding of CD44 to hyaluronic acid. J. Exp. Med. 1996, 183, 1987–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. McGary, C.T.; Raja, R.H. Endocytosis of hyaluronic acid by rat liver endothelial cells. Evidence for receptor recycling. Biochem. J. 1989, 257, 875–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Culty, M.; O’Mara, T.E. Hyaluronan receptor (CD44) expression and function in human peripheral blood monocytes and alveolar macrophages. J. Leukoc. Biol. 1994, 56, 605–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Cywes, C.; Stamenkovic, I. CD44 as a receptor for colonization of the pharynx by group A Streptococcus. J. Clin. Investig. 2000, 106, 995–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Skoudy, A.; Mounier, J. CD44 binds to the Shigella IpaB protein and participates in bacterial invasion of epithelial cells. Cell. Microbiol. 2000, 2, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hirayama, Y.; Yoshimura, M. Mycobacteria Exploit Host Hyaluronan for Efficient Extracellular Replication. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5, e1000643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Li, M.W.; Yudin, A.I.; VandeVoort, C.A.; Sabeur, K.; Primakoff, P.; Overstreet, J.W. Inhibition of monkey sperm hyaluronidase activity and heterologous cumulus penetration by flavonoids. Biol. Reprod. 1997, 56, 1383–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Nagy, N.; Kuipers, H.F.; Frymoyer, A.R.; Ishak, H.D.; Bollyky, J.B.; Wight, T.N.; Bollyky, P.L. 4-Methylumbelliferone treatment and hyaluronan inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in inflammation, autoimmunity, and cancer. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Kakizaki, I.; Kojima, K.; Takagaki, K.; Endo, M.; Kannagi, R.; Ito, M.; Maruo, Y.; Sato, H.; Yasuda, T.; Mita, S.; et al. A novel mechanism for the inhibition of hyaluronan biosynthesis by 4-methylumbelliferone. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 33281–33289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Braun, S.; Botzki, A. Design of benzimidazole- and benzoxazole-2-thione derivatives as inhibitors of bacterial hyaluronan. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 46, 4419–4429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Hynes, W.L.; Walton, S.L. Hyaluronidases of Gram-positive bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2000, 183, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Burdick, J.A.; Prestwich, G.D. Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, H41–H56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Prestwich, G.D.; Kuo, J.W. Chemically-modified HA for therapy and regenerative medicine. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2008, 9, 242–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Montanari, E.; Capece, S. Hyaluronic Acid Nanohydrogels as a Useful Tool for BSAO Immobilization in the Treatment of Melanoma Cancer Cells. Macromol. Biosci. 2013, 13, 1185–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Di Meo, C.; Montanari, E. Highly versatile nanohydrogel platform based on riboflavin-polysaccharide derivatives useful in the development of intrinsically fluorescent and cytocompatible drug carriers. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 115, 502–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Choi, K.Y.; Min, K.H. Self-assembled hyaluronic acid nanoparticles as a potential drug carrier for cancer therapy: Synthesis, characterization, and in vivo biodistribution. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 4102–4107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pitarresi, G.; Craparo, E.F. Composite Nanoparticles Based on Hyaluronic Acid Chemically Cross-Linked with α,β-Polyaspartylhydrazide. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 1890–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Jha, A.K.; Hule, R.A. Structural Analysis and Mechanical Characterization of Hyaluronic Acid-Based Doubly Cross-Linked Networks. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Park, J.H.; Cho, H.J. Hyaluronic acid derivative-coated nanohybrid liposomes for cancer imaging and drug delivery. J. Control. Release 2014, 174, 98–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Mizrahy, S.; Raz, S.R. Hyaluronan-coated nanoparticles: The influence of the molecular weight on CD44-hyaluronan interactions and on the immune response. J. Control. Release 2011, 156, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Li, J.; He, Y. Hyaluronic acid-modified hydrothermally synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles for targeted tumor MR imaging. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 3666–3677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Chudobova, D.; Nejdl, L. Complexes of Silver(I) Ions and Silver Phosphate Nanoparticles with Hyaluronic Acid and/or Chitosan as Promising Antimicrobial Agents for Vascular Grafts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 13592–13614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Chen, B.; Miller, R.J. Hyaluronic Acid-Based Drug Conjugates: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2014, 10, 4–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Gennari, A.; Gujral, C. Revisiting Boronate/Diol Complexation as a Double Stimulus-Responsive Bioconjugation. Bioconjug. Chem. 2017, 28, 1391–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Arpicco, S.; Milla, P. Hyaluronic Acid Conjugates as Vectors for the Active Targeting of Drugs, Genes and Nanocomposites in Cancer Treatment. Molecules 2014, 19, 3193–3230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Mero, A.; Campisi, M. Hyaluronic Acid as a Protein Polymeric Carrier: An Overview and a Report on Human Growth Hormone. Curr. Drug Targets 2015, 16, 1503–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Dreaden, E.C.; Morton, S.W. Bimodal Tumor-Targeting from Microenvironment Responsive Hyaluronan Layer-by-Layer (LbL) Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 8374–8382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Montanari, E.; Gennari, A. Hyaluronan/Tannic Acid Nanoparticles via Catechol/Boronate Complexation as a Smart Antibacterial System. Macromol. Biosci. 2016, 16, 1815–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. De la Fuente, M.; Seijo, B.A.; Alonso, M.J. Novel Hyaluronic Acid-Chitosan Nanoparticles for Ocular Gene Therapy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008, 49, 2016–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Lee, H.; Ahn, C.H.; Park, T.G. Poly [lactic-co-(glycolic acid)]-grafted hyaluronic acid copolymer micelle nanoparticles for target-specific delivery of doxorubicin. Macromol. Biosci. 2009, 9, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Yadav, A.K.; Mishra, P.; Jain, S. Preparation and characterization of HA-PEG-PCL intelligent core-corona nanoparticles for delivery of doxorubicin. J. Drug Target 2008, 16, 464–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Montanari, E.; Di Meo, C.; Sennato, S.; Francioso, A.; Marinelli, A.L.; Ranzo, F.; Schippa, S.; Coviello, T.; Bordi, F.; Matricardi, P. Hyaluronan-cholesterol nanohydrogels: Characterisation and effectiveness in carrying alginate lyase. New Biotechnol. 2017, 37, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Ganesh, S.; Iyer, A.K.; Morrissey, D.V.; Amiji, M.M. Hyaluronic acid based self-assembling nanosystems for CD44 target mediated siRNA delivery to solid tumours. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 3489–3502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Craparo, G.F.; Cavallaro, G.; Bondì, M.L.; Giammona, G. Preparation of polymeric nanoparticles by photo-crosslinking of an acryloylated polyaspartamide in w/o microemulsion. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2004, 205, 1955–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Shu, X.Z.; Liu, Y.; Luo, Y.; Roberts, M.C.; Prestwich, G.D. Disulfide cross-linked hyaluronan hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 2002, 3, 1304–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Oishi, M.; Nagasaki, Y. Stimuli-responsive smart nanogels for cancer diagnostics and therapy. Nanomedicine 2010, 5, 451–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Ossipov, D.A. Nanostructured hyaluronic acid-based materials for active delivery to cancer. Exp. Opin. Drug Deliv. 2010, 7, 681–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Rios de la Rosa, J.M.; Tirella, A. The CD44-Mediated Uptake of Hyaluronic Acid-Based Carriers in Macrophages. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2017, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Silva, J.P.; Gonçalves, C. Delivery of LLKKK18 loaded into self-assembling hyaluronic acid nanogel for tuberculosis treatment. J. Control. Release 2016, 235, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Lallana, E.; Rios de la Rosa, J.M.; Tirella, A.; Pelliccia, M.; Gennari, A.; Stratford, I.J.; Puri, S.; Ashford, M.; Tirelli, N. Chitosan/Hyaluronic Acid Nanoparticles: Rational Design Revisited for RNA Delivery. Mol. Pharmaceut. 2017, 14, 2422–2436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Choi, K.Y.; Min, K.H.; Yoon, H.Y.; Kim, K.; Park, J.H.; Kwon, I.C.; Choi, K.; Jeong, S.Y. PEGylation of hyaluronic acid nanoparticles improves tumor targetability in vivo. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 1880–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Almalik, A.; Day, P.J.; Tirelli, N. HA-Coated Chitosan Nanoparticles for CD44-Mediated Nucleic Acid Delivery. Mol Pharm. 2013, 13, 1671–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Pieters, J. Entry and survival of pathogenic mycobacteriain macrophages. Microbes Infect. 2001, 3, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Richter-Dahlfors, A.; Buchan, A.M.J. Murine Salmonellosis Studied by Confocal Microscopy: Salmonella typhimurium Resides Intracellularly inside Macrophages and Exerts a Cytotoxic Effect on Phagocytes in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 1997, 186, 569–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Köhler, S.; Porte, F. The intramacrophagic environment of Brucella suis and bacterial response. Vet. Microbiol. 2002, 90, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Suzuki, T.; Sasakawa, C. Molecular Basis of the Intracellular Spreading of Shigella. Infect. Immun. 2001, 69, 5959–5966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Portnoy, D.A.; Auerbuch, V. The cell biology of Listeria monocytogenes infection. The intersection of bacterial pathogenesis and cell-mediated immunity. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 158, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Van Kirk, L.S.; Hayes, S.F. Ultrastructure of Rickettsia rickettsii Actin Tails and Localization of Cytoskeletal Proteins. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 4706–4713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Flannagan, R.S.; Heit, B. Intracellular replication of Staphylococcus aureus in mature phagolysosomes in macrophages precedes host cell death, and bacterial escape and dissemination. Cell. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 514–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Haggar, A.; Hussain, M. Extracellular Adherence Protein from Staphylococcus aureus Enhances Internalization into Eukaryotic Cells. Infect. Immun. 2003, 71, 2310–2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Van Bambeke, F. Cellular pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of antibiotics: Current views and perspectives. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Dev. 2006, 9, 218–230. [Google Scholar]
  109. Carryn, S.; Chanteux, H. Intracellular pharmacodynamics of antibiotics. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2003, 17, 615–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Maurin, M.; Raoult, D. Use of Aminoglycosides in Treatment of Infections Due to Intracellular Bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 2977–2986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Falzari, K.; Zhu, Z.; Pan, D.; Liu, H.; Hongmanee, P.; Franzblau, S.G. In Vitro and In Vivo Activities of Macrolide Derivatives against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 1447–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Van Bambeke, F.; Michot, J.M. Antibiotic efflux pumps in eukaryotic cells: Occurrence and impact on antibiotic cellular pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and toxicodynamics. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2003, 51, 1067–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Montanari, E.; Oates, A.; Di Meo, C.; Meade, J.; Cerrone, R.; Francioso, A.; Devine, D.; Coviello, T.; Mancini, P.; Mosca, L.; et al. Hyaluronan-Based Nanohydrogels for Targeting Intracellular S. aureus in Human Keratinocytes. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2018, accepted. [Google Scholar]
  114. Zaki, N.M.; Nasti, A. Nanocarriers for Cytoplasmic Delivery: Cellular Uptake and Intracellular Fate of Chitosan and Hyaluronic Acid-Coated Chitosan Nanoparticles in a Phagocytic Cell Model. Macromol. Biosci. 2011, 11, 1747–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Platt, V.M.; Szoka, F.C. Jr. Anticancer therapeutics: Targeting macromolecules and nanocarriers to hyaluronan or CD44, a hyaluronan receptor. Mol. Pharm. 2008, 5, 474–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Sun, H.; Benjaminsen, R.V. Hyaluronic Acid Immobilized Polyacrylamide Nanoparticle Sensors for CD44 Receptor Targeting and pH Measurement in Cells. Bioconjug. Chem. 2012, 23, 2247–2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Palvai, S.; Kuman, M.M. Hyaluronic acid cloaked oleic acid nanoparticles inhibit MAPK signaling with sub-cellular DNA damage in colon cancer cells. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 3658–3666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Qhattal, H.S.S.; Liu, X. Characterization of CD44-Mediated Cancer Cell Uptake and Intracellular Distribution of Hyaluronan-Grafted Liposomes. Mol. Pharm. 2011, 8, 1233–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Rajendran, L.; Knölker, H.J. Subcellular targeting strategies for drug design and delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Yameen, B.; Choi, W.I. Insight into nanoparticle cellular uptake and intracellular targeting. J. Control. Release 2014, 190, 485–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Vasir, J.K.; Labhasetwar, V. Biodegradable nanoparticles for cytosolic delivery of therapeutics. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2007, 59, 718–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Behr, J.P. The Proton Sponge: A Trick to Enter Cells the Viruses Did Not Exploit. Chim. Int. J. Chem. 1997, 51, 34–36. [Google Scholar]
  123. Guo, S.; Huang, L. Nanoparticles escaping RES and endosome: Challenges for siRNA delivery for cancer therapy. J. Nanomater. 2011, 2011, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Contreras-Ruiz, L.; De la Fuente, M. Intracellular trafficking of hyaluronic acid-chitosan oligomer-based nanoparticles in cultured human ocular surface cells. Mol. Vis. 2011, 17, 279–290. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  125. An, T.; Zhang, C. Hyaluronic acid-coated poly([small beta]-amino) ester nanoparticles as carrier of doxorubicin for overcoming drug resistance in breast cancer cells. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 38624–38636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Qiu, L.; Li, Z. Self-assembled pH-responsive hyaluronic acid–g-poly(l-histidine) copolymer micelles for targeted intracellular delivery of doxorubicin. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10, 2024–2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Lee, C.S.; Na, K. Photochemically Triggered Cytosolic Drug Delivery Using pH-Responsive Hyaluronic Acid Nanoparticles for Light-Induced Cancer Therapy. Biomacromolecules 2014, 15, 4228–4238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Wagner, E. Application of membrane-active peptides for nonviral gene delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1999, 38, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Cullis, P.R.; Hope, M.J. Lipid polymorphism and the roles of lipids in membranes. Chem. Phys. Lipids 1986, 40, 127–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Hafez, I.M.; Maurer, N. On the mechanism whereby cationic lipids promote intracellular delivery of polynucleic acids. Gene Ther. 2001, 8, 1188–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Qiu, Y.; Hou, Y. Hyaluronic acid conjugation facilitates clearance of intracellular bacterial infections by streptomycin with neglectable nephrotoxicity. Glycobiology 2017, 27, 861–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Mu, H.; Niu, H. Chitosan conjugation enables intracellular bacteria susceptible to aminoglycoside antibiotic. Glycobiology 2016, 26, 1190–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Montanari, E.; D’Arrigo, G. Chasing bacteria within the cells using levofloxacin-loaded hyaluronic acid nanohydrogels. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2014, 87, 518–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Wang, Z.; Qiu, Y. Synthesis of hyaluronan-amikacin conjugate and its bactericidal activity against intracellular bacteria in vitro and in vivo. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 181, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 23 00939 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) Chemical structure of the HA repetitive unit. (B) Model structure of the standard CD44 receptor. (C) Schematic overview of HA endocytosis and degradation within the cells. ((C) reproduced with permission from © 2012 Racine R, Mummert ME. Published in Molecular Regulation of Endocytosis, IntechOpen, 2012, under CC BY 3.0 license. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/45976 [19]).
Figure 1. (A) Chemical structure of the HA repetitive unit. (B) Model structure of the standard CD44 receptor. (C) Schematic overview of HA endocytosis and degradation within the cells. ((C) reproduced with permission from © 2012 Racine R, Mummert ME. Published in Molecular Regulation of Endocytosis, IntechOpen, 2012, under CC BY 3.0 license. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/45976 [19]).
Molecules 23 00939 g001
Molecules 23 00939 g002 550
Figure 2. Scheme of the intracellular fate of several pathogens and antibiotics.
Figure 2. Scheme of the intracellular fate of several pathogens and antibiotics.
Molecules 23 00939 g002
Molecules 23 00939 g003 550
Figure 3. The ‘proton sponge’ hypothesis: H+ and Cl− enter into the endosome, lead to osmotic swelling and finally to the endosome breakage.
Figure 3. The ‘proton sponge’ hypothesis: H+ and Cl− enter into the endosome, lead to osmotic swelling and finally to the endosome breakage.
Molecules 23 00939 g003
Table
Table 1. CD44 and HA involvement in the host cell infections.
Table 1. CD44 and HA involvement in the host cell infections.
PathogenCell LineCD44 RoleHA Role
S. pyogenes [4]Human keratinocytesCD44 represents the main receptor for cell attachment.HA-based capsules are synthesised for promoting the cell invasion.
S. pyogenes [61]Murine epithelial keratinocytesCD44 is found to be widely expressed in the site of infection, acting as a major cellular receptor for the cellular entry.HA-based capsules are synthesised for promoting the cell invasion.
M. tuberculosis [5]Human lung epithelial cells Employment of extracellular DNA-binding proteins to attach host cells through HA.
M. tuberculosis [7]Murine macrophagesCD44 involvement in the binding and subsequent cellular internalisation.
S. aureus [8]Human neutrophilsCD44 influences the pathogen phagocytosis through its structural and functional linkage to the cytoskeletal microfilaments.
Shigella spp. [62]Human epithelial cellsThe IpaB-CD44 interaction leads to the transduction of signals that participate in the cytoskeletal rearrangements and the subsequent internalisation of the pathogen within the cells.
Listeria spp. [9]Murine macrophages and fibroblastsCD44 facilitates the intracellular growth of the pathogen intracellularly.
M. tuberculosis [63]Human lung epithelial cells Short HA chains are utilised as a carbon source for proliferation.
M. bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin [63]Human lung epithelial cells Short HA chains are utilised as a carbon source for proliferation.
Leishmania [6]Murine macrophages HA acts as endogenous essential nutrient for the growth and virulence.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Montanari, E.; Di Meo, C.; Oates, A.; Coviello, T.; Matricardi, P. Pursuing Intracellular Pathogens with Hyaluronan. From a ‘Pro-Infection’ Polymer to a Biomaterial for ‘Trojan Horse’ Systems. Molecules 2018, 23, 939. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040939

AMA Style

Montanari E, Di Meo C, Oates A, Coviello T, Matricardi P. Pursuing Intracellular Pathogens with Hyaluronan. From a ‘Pro-Infection’ Polymer to a Biomaterial for ‘Trojan Horse’ Systems. Molecules. 2018; 23(4):939. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040939

Chicago/Turabian Style

Montanari, Elita, Chiara Di Meo, Angela Oates, Tommasina Coviello, and Pietro Matricardi. 2018. "Pursuing Intracellular Pathogens with Hyaluronan. From a ‘Pro-Infection’ Polymer to a Biomaterial for ‘Trojan Horse’ Systems" Molecules 23, no. 4: 939. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040939

APA Style

Montanari, E., Di Meo, C., Oates, A., Coviello, T., & Matricardi, P. (2018). Pursuing Intracellular Pathogens with Hyaluronan. From a ‘Pro-Infection’ Polymer to a Biomaterial for ‘Trojan Horse’ Systems. Molecules, 23(4), 939. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040939

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop