Indium-Catalyzed Direct Conversion of Lactones into Thiolactones Using a Disilathiane as a Sulfur Source

Abstract

An indium-catalyzed reaction of lactones and a disilathiane leading to thiolactones is described. The direct synthesis of thiolactones from lactones with an appropriate sulfur source is one of the most attractive approaches in organic and pharmaceutical chemistry. In this context, we found an indium-catalyzed direct conversion of lactones into thiolactones in the presence of elemental sulfur and a hydrosilane via formation of the disilathiane in situ. On the basis of the previous reaction, the application utilizing the disilathiane as a sulfur source was performed herein for the efficient synthesis of a variety of thiolactone derivatives from lactones by an indium catalyst.

1. Introduction

The introduction of a sulfur atom to organic molecules is a significant topic in synthetic chemistry because it potentially provides complex and important sulfur-containing compounds directly. Therefore, a search for an undiscovered sulfur source that could be applicable to organic sulfur chemistry is imperative, and extensive efforts have been devoted to the development of molecular transformations utilizing a novel sulfur source by many research groups thus far [1,2,3,4,5,6]. In this context, our group has demonstrated that the copper-catalyzed construction of diaryl sulfides from aryl iodides and hexamethyldisilathiane, (Me₃Si)₂S [7]. In the reaction, the disilathiane functioned as an effective S1 source of sulfides, and the results suggested to us that the strategy employing the disilathiane could be acceptable for any other sulfur-introduction reactions [8,9,10,11,12].

Recently, we also reported the indium-catalyzed reductive conversion of lactones 1 into thiolactones 2 using a combination of elemental sulfur (S₈) and a hydrosilane, wherein the generation of a disilathiane ([Si]₂S) from S₈ and a hydrosilane is a key process for the formation of thiolactones 2 (Scheme 1a) [13]. Although the in situ formation strategy of the disilathiane is a useful and an easily handled procedure, the yields of thiolactones 2 obtained by the method remained at low to moderate levels. We envisioned that the problem could be overcome by utilizing the activated disilathiane, which can be easily prepared from S₈ and a hydrosilane in advance. Herein, we describe the indium-catalyzed direct formation of thiolactones 2 from lactones 1 using hexamethyldisilathiane as an effective S1 source (Scheme 1b).

2. Results and Discussion

On the bases of our previous study on the InCl₃-catalyzed transformation of lactones 1 to thiolactones 2 employing elemental sulfur (S₈) and a hydrosilane, optimization studies utilizing a disilathiane as a sulfur source were initially conducted (

Table 1. Screening of the reaction conditions for the catalytic conversion of 1a to 2a ^a.

Entry	Catalyst	Solvent	GC Yield of 2a
1	InCl3 (5 mol %)	1,2-Cl2C6H4	77
2	InBr3 (5 mol %)	1,2-Cl2C6H4	62
3	InI3 (5 mol %)	1,2-Cl2C6H4	69
4	In(OAc)3 (5 mol %)	1,2-Cl2C6H4	78
5	In(OTf)3 (5 mol %)	1,2-Cl2C6H4	99 (94) b
6	Cu(OTf)2 (5 mol %)	1,2-Cl2C6H4	94
7	none	1,2-Cl2C6H4	0
8	In(OTf)3 (5 mol %)	ClC6H5	76
9	In(OTf)3 (5 mol %)	ClCH2CH2Cl	95
10	In(OTf)3 (5 mol %)	CH3C6H5	59
11	In(OTf)3 (1 mol %)	1,2-Cl2C6H4	97 (83) b
12	In(OTf)3 (1 mol %)	1,2-Cl2C6H4	78 b,c
13	TfOH (100 mol %)	1,2-Cl2C6H4	99
14	TfOH (15 mol %)	1,2-Cl2C6H4	23

^a Reaction conditions: 1a (0.5 mmol), (Me₃Si)₂S (0.55 mmol), catalyst (0.005–0.025 mmol), solvent (0.5 mL) at 80 °C for 24 h. ^b Isolated yield. ^c 5 mmol scale.

). When γ-phenyl-γ-butyrolactone (1a) was treated with 1.1 equiv of hexamethyldisilathiane, (Me₃Si)₂S, in the presence of 5 mol % of InCl₃ in 1,2-dichlorobenzene at 80 °C for 24 h, the corresponding γ-butyrothiolactone 2a was obtained in a 77% GC yield (entry 1). The formation of 2a was also observed in cases with other catalysts, such as InBr₃, InI₃, In(OAc)₃, In(OTf)₃, and Cu(OTf)₂ in good yields (entries 2–6). Especially, In(OTf)₃ proved to be the most effective catalyst for the reaction, shown in entry 5, which provided 2a in a 99% GC yield with a 94% isolated yield. In contrast, in the absence of the catalyst, thiolactone was not generated (entry 7). We next chose chlorobenzene, 1,2-dichloroethane, and toluene as potential solvents for the transformation based on our previous results [13]. Although these solvents were also acceptable to the reaction, these yields were not higher than those using 1,2-Cl₂C₆H₄ as a solvent (entries 8–10 vs. entry 5). The reaction with a lower catalyst loading (1 mol % of In(OTf)₃) made it possible to form 2a in a 97% GC yield with an 83% isolated yield (entry 11), and then a gram-scale application using 1a (5 mmol) and (Me₃Si)₂S (5.5 mmol) provided 0.70 g (3.9 mmol) of thiolactone 2a (entry 12). Employing a stoichiometric amount of TfOH instead of In(OTf)₃ catalyst provided thiolactone quantitatively (entry 13), whereas its application to the TfOH-catalyzed reaction did not proceed well (entry 14).

Conversion of lactone 1a into thiolactone 2a, and not into the other possible sulfur-containing compounds, such as the thionolactone 3a and the dithiolactone 4a, can be easily discriminated by ¹H and ¹³C-NMR spectroscopy (

Table 2. Selected ¹H and ¹³C-NMR spectral data (CDCl₃, rt) for 1a, 2a, 3a, and 4a.

1H-NMR	δ 5.52 (OCH)	δ 5.01 (SCH)	δ 5.86 (OCH)	δ 5.29 (SCH)
13C-NMR	δ 176.9 (C=O)	δ 207.9 (C=O)	δ 221.9 (C=S)	δ 245.3 (C=S)

and Figure 1). In the ¹H-NMR spectrum of the thiolactone 2a, a signal for the methine proton (CH) next to the oxygen appeared at 5.01 ppm in CDCl₃, which is clearly different to those of the corresponding protons of 1a (5.52 ppm), 3a (5.86 ppm), and 4a (5.29 ppm). The chemical shifts of the carbonyl (C=O) or the thiocarbonyl (C=S) in the ¹³C-NMR spectrum can also identify the difference between 1a (176.9 ppm in CDCl₃), 2a (207.9 ppm), 3a (221.9 ppm), and 4a (245.3 ppm). For most of the isolated products by this procedure shown below (e.g.,

Table 3. Indium-catalyzed conversion of lactones 1 to the thiolactones 2.

Entry	Lactone 1	Thiolactone 2	Isolated Yield of 2 (%)
			Conditions A a	Conditions B b
1	1b (R = 2-Me)	2b	73	71
2	1c (R = 3-Me)	2c	82	55
3	1d (R = 4-Me)	2d	64	66
4	1e (R = 2,5-Me2)	2e	65	49
5	1f (R = 4-Ph)	2f	61	n/a c
6	1g (R = 3-MeO)	2g	79	16
7	1h (R = 4-MeO)	2h	22	8 d
8	1i (R = 4-F)	2i	79	61
9	1j (R = 4-Cl)	2j	87	60
10	1k (R = 4-Br)	2k	74	60
11	1l	2l	36	34
12	1m	2m	23	0
13	1n	2n	66 e	n/a c
14	1o (R = H)	2o	18 f	0
15	1p (R = Ph)	2p	85	10
16	1q (Ar = Ph)	2q	10 g	14
17	1r (Ar = 4-MeC6H4)	2r	9	n/a c
18	1s (Ar = 4-ClC6H4)	2s	4	n/a c
19	1t	2t	88 h	23

^a This work: 1 (0.5 mmol), (Me₃Si)₂S (0.55 mmol), In(OTf)₃ (0.005 mmol), 1,2-Cl₂C₆H₄ (0.5 mL) at 80 °C for 24 h. ^b Previous work: 1 (0.5 mmol), S₈ (0.55 mmol of S atom), PhSiH₃ (0.33 mmol), InCl₃ (0.025 mmol), 1,2-Cl₂C₆H₄ (0.5 mL) at 120 °C for 24 h. ^c Not applicable. ^d 4-(4-Methoxyphenyl)butanoic acid (30%) was formed. ^e NMR yield. ^f 7 d. ^g 120 °C, 3 days. ^h InCl₃ (0.025 mmol, 5 mol %), 120 °C, 20 h.

), therefore, these structures were assigned as thiolactone 2 forms by ¹H and ¹³C-NMR analyses (The detailed spectral data are summarized in Section 3.4. Product Characterization and the Supplementary Materials).

Examination of the In(OTf)₃-catalyzed direct transformation of several lactones 1 was then conducted under the conditions described for entry 10 in Table 1. The results of the present reaction utilizing an In(OTf)₃/(Me₃Si)₂S system (conditions A) and our previous yields of thiolactones 2 by an InCl₃-catalyzed reaction using S₈/PhSiH₃ (conditions B) [13] are summarized in Table 3. In most of the substrates, the conditions A showed a better reactivity for the conversion of 1 into 2 than that of conditions B. Reactions of γ-aryl-γ-butyrolactons 1b–1k bearing various functional groups at the aryl ring, such as methyl, phenyl, methoxy, and halogen, afforded the corresponding γ-aryl-γ-butyrothiolactones 2b–2k (entries 1–10). Among these entries, the yield of a 4-methoxy-substituted one 2h was not sufficient (entry 7), probably because of benzylic C–O bond cleavage prior to the reaction with disilathiane due to the strong electron donation by the 4-methoxy substituent. Similar results were also obtained in the case of our previous investigation employing an S₈/PhSiH₃ system prominently, which provided 4-(4-methoxyphenyl)butanoic acid as a side product in a 30% yield (entry 7, conditions B). A tetralin and a thiophene ring were also acceptable to γ-aryl substituents of the butyrolactons 1l and 1m, forming 2l and 2m (entries 11 and 12). The simple unsubstituted γ-butyrolactons 1n, phthalide (1o), and its derivative 1p were converted into the products 2n–2p, respectively (entries 13–15). When δ-lactones 1q–1t were used as starting substrates, the formation of the expected six-membered thiolactones 2q–2t were observed (entries 16–19).

Finally, the present procedure was evaluated using substrates involving an ester moiety, but not lactones. When phthalic anhydride (1u) was treated with a disilathiane, the corresponding reaction proceeded to give thiophthalic anhydride (2u) in a 74% isolated yield (Scheme 2).

Although an acyclic ester, the methyl benzoate derivative 1v was not acceptable to the transformation under the optimal conditions; the use of 5 mol % of InI₃ catalyst at 120 °C for 20 h improved the reactivity for the reaction, leading to the expected thioester 2v in a 38% isolated yield. Along with the formation of the thioester 2v in those conditions, the unexpected dithioester 4v was also isolated in an 18% yield (Scheme 3).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Information

¹H- and ¹³C-NMR spectra were recorded on a 300 or 500 MHz spectrometer. Chemical shifts in the ¹H- and ¹³C-NMR spectra were reported in ppm relative to the residual solvent peaks, such as those of chloroform (δ 7.26 for ¹H and δ 77.0 for ¹³C) or of the internal reference tetramethylsilane (δ 0.00 for both ¹H and ¹³C). High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were measured using NBA (3-nitrobenzylalcohol) as a matrix. GC analyses were performed using a DB-5 capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm, film thickness = 0.25 μm). Reactions were monitored by TLC analysis of the reaction aliquots. Column chromatography was performed using a silica gel. All indium compounds and hexamethyldisilathiane were commercially available and were used without further purification. 1,2-Dichlorobenzene was distilled from CaH₂. The lactones 1a, 1f, 1n, 1o, 1q, and 1t, phthalic anhydride (1u), and an ester 1v were purchased and used without further purification. The lactones 1b and 1l were prepared by the gallium-catalyzed reductive cyclization of keto acids [14]. The lactones 1c, 1d, 1e, 1g, 1h, 1i, 1j, 1k, 1m, 1p, 1r, and 1s were prepared via a modified literature method [15].

3.2. General Procedure A for the Indium-Catalyzed Conversion of Lactones or Their Derivatives 1 into Thiolactones 2 Using a Disilathiane (In the Case of 1 in Solid State at Room Temperature)

To a screw-capped tube, lactone or the derivative 1 (0.50 mmol) was added. The tube was sealed and moved into a glovebox, then In(OTf)₃ (2.8 mg, 0.0050 mmol) was added. The tube was sealed again and removed from the glovebox. 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (0.5 mL) and hexamethyldisilathiane (98.1 mg, 0.550 mmol) were successively added, and after the tube was sealed, the mixture was heated at 80 °C for 24 h. The resulting mixture was cooled to room temperature and chloroform was added. The mixture was transferred into a round-bottom flask, which was then evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude material was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc) followed by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) in some cases.

3.3. General Procedure B for the Indium-Catalyzed Conversion of Lactones 1 into Thiolactones 2 Using a Disilathiane (In the Case of 1 in Liquid State at Room Temperature)

To a screw-capped tube, In(OTf)₃ (2.8 mg, 0.0050 mmol) was added in a glovebox. The tube was then sealed and removed from the glovebox, and 1,2-dichlorobenzene (0.5 mL), lactone 1 (0.50 mmol), and hexamethyldisilathiane (98.1 mg, 0.550 mmol) were added in this order. After the tube was sealed, the mixture was heated at 80 °C for 24 h. The resulting mixture was cooled to room temperature and chloroform was added. The mixture was transferred into a round-bottom flask, which was then evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude material was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc) followed by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) in some cases.

3.4. Product Characterization

Dihydro-5-phenyl-2(3H)-thiophenone (2a) [13]. General procedure A was followed with 5-phenyldihydrofuran-2-one (1a, 80.2 mg). Column chromatography (10/1 hexane/EtOAc) afforded 2a as a colorless oil (73.4 mg, 83%): ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 2.24–2.32 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.59–2.82 (m, 3 H, CH₂, CH₂), 5.01 (dd, J = 10.0, 5.5 Hz, 1 H, CH), 7.30–7.44 (m, 5 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 35.0, 42.9, 54.3, 127.4, 128.1, 128.9, 139.4, 207.9; MS (EI) m/z (%) 178 (M⁺, 78), 117 (100).

Dihydro-5-(2-methylphenyl)-2(3H)-thiophenone (2b) [13]. General procedure B was followed with 5-(2-methylphenyl)dihydrofuran-2-one (1b, 89.9 mg). Column chromatography (10/1 hexane/EtOAc) afforded 2b as a colorless oil (69.7 mg, 73%): ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 2.26–2.34 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.42 (s, 3 H, CH₃), 2.55–2.61 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.67–2.74 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.78–2.84 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 5.25 (dd, J = 9.5, 5.5 Hz, 1 H, CH), 7.19–7.27 (m, 3 H, ArH), 7.56 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 19.5, 33.4, 42.7, 50.3, 126.5, 126.7, 127.8, 130.7, 135.7, 137.2, 208.0; MS (EI) m/z (%) 192 (M⁺, 82), 117 (100).

Dihydro-5-(3-methylphenyl)-2(3H)-thiophenone (2c) [13]. General procedure B was followed with 5-(3-methylphenyl)dihydrofuran-2-one (1c, 92.3 mg). Column chromatography (10/1 hexane/EtOAc) afforded 2c as a dark yellow oil (81.9 mg, 82%): ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 2.23–2.31 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.37 (s, 3 H, CH₃), 2.57–2.81 (m, 3 H, CH₂, CH₂), 4.97 (dd, J = 10.0, 5.5 Hz, 1 H, CH), 7.13 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.21–7.28 (m, 3 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 21.4, 35.0, 42.9, 54.3, 124.4, 128.1, 128.7, 128.9, 138.6, 139.3, 208.0; MS (EI) m/z (%) 192 (M⁺, 100).

Dihydro-5-(4-methylphenyl)-2(3H)-thiophenone (2d) [13]. General procedure A was followed with 5-(4-methylphenyl)dihydrofuran-2-one (1d, 87.5 mg). Column chromatography (10/1 hexane/EtOAc) afforded 2d as a colorless oil (61.3 mg, 64%): ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 2.21–2.29 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.35 (s, 3 H, CH₃), 2.56–2.78 (m, 3 H, CH₂, CH₂), 4.96 (dd, J = 10.0, 5.5 Hz, 1 H, CH), 7.17 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 7.30 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 21.0, 35.0, 42.9, 54.1, 127.2, 129.5, 136.4, 137.9, 208.0; MS (EI) m/z (%) 192 (M⁺, 82), 117 (100).

Dihydro-5-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-2(3H)-thiophenone (2e) [13]. General procedure A was followed with 5-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)dihydrofuran-2-one (1e, 94.5 mg). Column chromatography (10/1 hexane/EtOAc) afforded 2e as a yellow oil (66.6 mg, 65%): ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 2.24–2.31 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.33 (s, 3 H, CH₃), 2.36 (s, 3 H, CH₃), 2.53–2.58 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.65–2.73 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.76–2.82 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 5.22 (dd, J = 10.0, 5.5 Hz, 1 H, CH), 7.01 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.07 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.36 (s, 1 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 19.0, 21.0, 33.4, 42.7, 50.3, 127.1, 128.5, 130.6, 132.5, 136.2, 136.9, 208.1; MS (EI) m/z (%) 206 (M⁺, 85), 131 (100).

Dihydro-5-([1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yl)-2(3H)-thiophenone (2f). General procedure A was followed with 5-[1,1′-Biphenyl]-4-yldihydro-2(3H)-furanone (1f, 96.2 mg). Column chromatography (10/1 hexane/EtOAc) and GPC afforded 2f as a colorless solid (61.6 mg, 61%): m.p. 120–121 °C; ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 2.78–2.36 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.63–2.83 (m, 3 H, CH₂, CH₂), 5.05 (dd, J = 10.0, 5.5 Hz, 1 H, CH), 7.35–7.61 (m, 9 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 35.0, 42.9, 54.1, 127.0, 127.5, 127.6, 127.9, 128.8, 138.4, 140.4, 141.1, 207.8; MS (EI) m/z (%) 254 (M⁺, 100); HRMS (EI) calcd for [M]⁺ (C₁₆H₁₄OS) m/z 254.0765, found 254.0771.

Dihydro-5-(3-methoxyphenyl)-2(3H)-thiophenone (2g) [13]. General procedure B was followed with 5-(3-methoxyphenyl)dihydrofuran-2-one (1g, 100.9 mg). Column chromatography (10/1 hexane/EtOAc) afforded 2g as a yellow oil (86.4 mg, 79%): ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 2.21–2.30 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.59–2.78 (m, 3 H, CH₂, CH₂), 3.81 (s, 3 H, CH₃), 4.96 (dd, J = 10.0, 5.5 Hz, 1 H, CH), 6.85 (dd, J = 8.0, 3.0 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 6.97 (s, 1 H, ArH), 7.00 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.28 (dd, J = 8.0, 8.0 Hz, 1 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 34.8, 42.7, 54.2, 55.2, 113.1, 113.3, 119.6, 129.8, 140.9, 159.8, 207.8; MS (EI) m/z (%) 208 (M⁺, 100).

Dihydro-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2(3H)-thiophenone (2h) [13]. General procedure B was followed with 5-(4-methoxyphenyl)dihydrofuran-2-one (1h, 97.7 mg). Column chromatography (10/1 hexane/EtOAc) afforded 2h as a colorless solid (23.2 mg, 22%): m.p. 74–75 °C; ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 2.21–2.29 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.56–2.59 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.65–2.80 (m, 2 H, CH₂, CH₂), 3.81 (s, 3 H, CH₃), 4.97 (dd, J = 10.5, 5.5 Hz, 1 H, CH), 6.90 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 7.35 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 35.2, 43.1, 54.0, 55.3, 114.2, 128.6, 131.3, 159.4, 208.1; MS (EI) m/z (%) 208 (M⁺, 79), 147 (100).

Dihydro-5-(4-fluorophenyl)-2(3H)-thiophenone (2i) [13]. General procedure B was followed with 5-(4-fluorophenyl)dihydrofuran-2-one (1i, 96.3 mg). Column chromatography (10/1 hexane/EtOAc) afforded 2i as a pale green oil (82.3 mg, 79%): ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 297 MHz) δ 2.17–2.29 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.56–2.82 (m, 3 H, CH₂, CH₂), 4.99 (dd, J = 9.8, 5.0 Hz, 1 H, CH), 7.03–7.08 (m, 2 H, ArH), 7.38–7.42 (m, 2 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 75 MHz) δ 35.1, 42.8, 53.5, 115.7 (d, J_C–F = 20.9 Hz), 129.0 (d, J_C–F = 9.0 Hz), 135.2 (d, J_C–F = 3.7 Hz), 162.3 (d, J_C–F = 246.8 Hz), 207.4; MS (EI) m/z (%) 196 (M⁺, 72), 135 (100).

Dihydro-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-2(3H)-thiophenone (2j) [13]. General procedure A was followed with 5-(4-chlorophenyl)dihydrofuran-2-one (1j, 98.1 mg). Column chromatography (10/1 hexane/EtOAc) afforded 2j as a colorless solid (85.5 mg, 87%): m.p. 45–48 °C; ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 2.18–2.26 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.59–2.80 (m, 3 H, CH₂, CH₂), 4.97 (dd, J = 10.0, 5.5 Hz, 1 H, CH), 7.34–7.35 (m, 4 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 34.9, 42.7, 53.5, 128.7, 129.0, 133.8, 138.0, 207.2; MS (EI) m/z (%) 214 (M⁺+2, 23), 212 (M⁺, 63), 117 (100).

Dihydro-5-(4-bromophenyl)-2(3H)-thiophenone (2k) [13]. General procedure A was followed with 5-(4-bromophenyl)dihydrofuran-2-one (1k, 120.1 mg). Column chromatography (10/1 hexane/EtOAc) afforded 2k as a colorless solid (96.1 mg, 74%): m.p. 58–60 °C; ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 2.18–2.26 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.58–2.80 (m, 3 H, CH₂, CH₂), 4.95 (dd, J = 10.0, 5.5 Hz, 1 H, CH), 7.30 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 7.50 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 34.9, 42.7, 53.6, 122.0, 129.1, 132.0, 138.6, 207.2; MS (EI) m/z (%) 258 (M⁺ + 2, 59), 256 (M⁺, 58), 117 (100).

Dihydro-5-(5,6,7,8-tetrahydronaphthalen-2-yl)-2(3H)-thiophenone (2l) [13]. General procedure B was followed with 5-(5,6,7,8-Tetrahydronaphthalen-2-yl)dihydrofuran-2(3H)-one (1l, 96.8 mg). Column chromatography (10/1 hexane/EtOAc) and GPC afforded 2l as a colorless oil (37.4 mg, 36%): ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 1.78–1.81 (m, 4 H, CH₂), 2.23–2.31 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.55–2.80 (m, 7 H, CH₂, CH₂), 4.94 (dd, J = 10.5, 5.5 Hz, 1 H, CH), 7.07 (d, J = 8.0 Hz 1 H, ArH) 7.12–7.15 (m, 2 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 23.0, 23.1, 29.1, 29.4, 35.0, 43.0, 54.3, 124.4, 128.1, 129.6, 136.4, 137.3, 137.7, 208.3; MS (EI) m/z (%) 232 (M⁺, 100).

Dihydro-5-(thiophen-2-yl)-2(3H)-thiophenone (2m). General procedure B was followed with dihydro-5-(3-thienyl)-2(3H)-furanone (1m, 89.0 mg). Column chromatography (10/1 hexane/EtOAc) afforded 2m as a light green oil (22.3 mg, 23%): ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 2.34–2.42 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.65–2.85 (m, 3 H, CH₂, CH₂), 5.29 (dd, J = 7.5, 5.5 Hz, 1 H, CH), 6.97 (dd, J = 5.0, 3.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.07 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.27 (dd, J = 5.0, 3.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 35.6, 42.3, 49.1, 125.3, 125.6, 126.9, 143.7, 207.0; MS (EI) m/z (%) 184 (M⁺, 64), 123 (100); HRMS (EI) calcd for [M]⁺ (C₈H₈OS₂) m/z 184.0017, found 184.0011.

Thiophthalide (2o) [16]. General procedure A was followed with phthalide (1o, 67.6 mg). Column chromatography (10/1 hexane/EtOAc) afforded 2o as a colorless solid (26.8 mg, 18%): m.p. 68–70 °C; ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 4.48 (s, 2 H, CH₂), 7.48 (dd, J = 7.5, 7.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.55 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.63 (dd, J = 7.5, 7.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.85 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 34.6, 123.9, 126.3, 128.0, 133.1, 135.8, 147.0, 198.0; MS (EI) m/z (%) 150 (M⁺, 89), 121 (100).

3-Phenyl-benzo[c]thiophen-1(3H)-one (2p) [13]. General procedure A was followed with 3-phenylisobenzofuran-1-one (1p, 105.9 mg). Column chromatography (10/1 hexane/EtOAc) afforded 2p as a pale yellow solid (7.5 mg, 85%): m.p. 87–88 °C; ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 5.91 (s, 1 H, CH), 7.25–7.36 (m, 6 H, ArH), 7.48 (dd, J = 7.5, 7.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.56 (dd, J = 7.5, 7.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH), 7.86 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 54.6, 123.6, 126.6, 128.29, 128.33, 128.4, 129.1, 133.6, 135.7, 138.8, 151.2, 197.2; MS (EI) m/z (%) 226 (M⁺, 100).

Tetrahydro-6-phenyl-2H-benzothiopyran-2-one (2q) [13]. General procedure A was followed with tetrahydro-6-phenyl-2H-pyran-2-one (1q, 89.3 mg). Colum chromatography (10/1 hexane/EtOAc) afforded 2q as an orange oil (9.7 mg, 10%): ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 1.94–2.10 (m, 2 H, CH₂), 2.14–2.19 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.37–2.41 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.57–2.43 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.59–2.78 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 4.65 (dd, J = 11.0, 4.0 Hz, 1 H, CH), 7.29–7.32 (m, 1 H, ArH), 7.35–7.39 (m, 4 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 22.7, 32.4, 40.5, 50.5, 127.7, 128.1, 128.9, 140.4, 201.3; MS (EI) m/z (%) 192 (M⁺, 59), 104 (100).

Tetrahydro-6-(4-methylphenyl)-2H-thiopyran-2-one (2r). General procedure A was followed with tetrahydro-6-(4-methylphenyl)-2H-Pyran-2-one (1r, 92.3 mg). Column chromatography (10/1 hexane/EtOAc) and GPC afforded 2r as a colorless oil (9.5 mg, 9%): ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 1.93–2.07 (m, 2 H, CH₂), 2.15–2.17 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.35 (s, 3 H, CH₃), 2.37–2.44 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.72–2.76 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 4.61 (dd, J = 11.0, 3.5 Hz, 1 H, CH), 7.17 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 7.26 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 21.1, 22.7, 32.4, 40.5, 50.2, 127.5, 129.5, 137.4, 137.9, 201.6; MS (EI) m/z (%) 206 (M⁺, 62), 118 (100); HRMS (EI) calcd for [M]⁺ (C₁₂H₁₄OS) m/z 206.0765, found 206.0766.

6-(4-Chlorophenyl)tetrahydro-2H-thiopyran-2-one (2s). General procedure A was followed with 6-(4-chlorophenyl)tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-one (1s, 107.5 mg). Column chromatography (10/1 hexane/EtOAc) and GPC afforded 2s as a colorless oil (4.8 mg, 4%): ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 1.93–2.02 (m, 2 H, CH₂), 2.04–2.19 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.34–2.39 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.56–2.63 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.73–2.78 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 4.62 (dd, J = 11.0, 4.5 Hz, 1 H, CH), 7.30–7.35 (m, 4 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 22.6, 32.4, 40.5, 49.7, 129.0, 129.1, 133.9, 139.0, 200.8; MS (EI) m/z (%) 226 (M⁺+2, 20), 210 (M⁺, 23), 138 (100); HRMS (EI) calcd for [M]⁺ (C₁₁H₁₁OSCl) m/z 226.0219, found 226.0241.

1,4-Dihydro-3H-2-benzothiopyran-3-one (2t) [13]. General procedure A was followed with 1,4-dihydro-3H-2-benzopyran-3-one (1t, 74.3 mg). Column chromatography (10/1 hexane/EtOAc) afforded 2t as a pale yellow solid (40.9 mg, 50%): m.p. 90–93 °C; ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 3.79 (s, 2 H, CH₂), 4.22 (s, 2 H, CH₂), 7.21–7.32 (m, 4 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 34.2, 49.2, 126.6, 127.4, 128.0, 128.7, 133.7, 134.2, 202.9; MS (EI) m/z (%) 164 (M⁺, 14), 104 (100).

Phthalic thioanhydride (2u) [17]. General procedure A was followed with phthalic anhydride (1u, 77.3 mg). Column chromatography (10/1 hexane/EtOAc) afforded 2u as a yellow solid (56.1 mg, 74%): m.p. 68–70 °C; ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 7.81–7.83 (m, 2 H, ArH), 7.97–7.99 (m, 2 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 123.8, 135.0, 138.7, 189.8; MS (EI) m/z (%) 164 (M⁺, 100).

S-Methyl 4-methylbenzothioate (2v). General procedure A was followed with methyl 4-methylbenzoate (1v, 75.0 mg). Column chromatography (100/1 hexane/EtOAc) afforded 2v as a red oil (31.8 mg, 38%): ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 2.40 (s, 3 H, CH₃), 2.46 (s, 3 H, CH₃), 7.24 (d, J = 14.5 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 7.87 (d, J = 14.5 Hz, 2 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 11.6, 21.7, 127.2, 129.2, 134.5, 144.1, 192.1; MS (EI) m/z (%) 166 (M⁺, 5), 119 (100).

Methyl 4-methylbenzodithioate (4v) [18]. General procedure A was followed with methyl 4-methylbenzoate (1v, 75.0 mg). Column chromatography (100/1 hexane/EtOAc) afforded 4v as an orange oil (15.9 mg, 18%): ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 2.38 (s, 3 H, CH₃), 2.77 (s, 3 H, CH₃), 7.18 (d, J = 13.5 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 7.94 (d, J = 13.5 Hz, 2 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 20.5, 21.5, 126.8, 129.0, 142.6, 143.2, 228.8; MS (EI) m/z (%) 182 (M⁺, 22), 135(100).

5-[1,1′-Biphenyl]-4-yldihydro-2(3H)-furanone (1f). A colorless solid: m.p. 100–102 °C; ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 2.19–2.29 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.66–2.72 (m, 3 H, CH₂), 5.54–5.57 (m, 1 H, CH), 7.35–7.46 (m, 5 H, ArH), 7.58–7.62 (m, 4 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 29.0, 30.9, 81.0, 125.8, 127.1, 127.45, 127.53, 128.8, 138.3, 140.4, 141.4, 176.9; MS (EI) m/z (%) 238 (M⁺, 100); HRMS (EI) calcd for [M]⁺ (C₁₆H₁₄O₂) m/z 238.0994, found 238.1002.

Tetrahydro-6-(4-methylphenyl)-2H-pyran-2-one (1r). A colorless solid: m.p. 81–83 °C; ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 1.80–1.88 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 1.92–1.98 (m, 2 H, CH₂), 2.09–2.14 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.34 (s, 3 H, CH₃), 2.51–2.56 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.57–2.71 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 5.30 (dd, J = 10.5, 3.5 Hz, 1 H, CH), 7.17 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 7.22 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 18.4, 21.0, 29.3, 30.3, 81.5, 125.5, 129.1, 136.6, 137.8, 171.4; MS (EI) m/z (%) 190 (M⁺, 42), 118 (100); HRMS (EI) calcd for [M]⁺ (C₁₂H₁₄O₂) m/z 190.0994, found 190.0995.

Tetrahydro-6-(4-chlorophenyl)-2H-pyran-2-one (1s). An orange solid: m.p. 91–98 °C; ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃, 500 MHz) δ 1.77–1.85 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 1.96–2.01 (m, 2 H, CH₂), 2.12–2.16 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.53–2.60 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 2.67–2.73 (m, 1 H, CH₂), 5.32 (dd, J = 10.5, 3.0 Hz, 1 H, CH), 7.28 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2 H, ArH), 7.34 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2 H, ArH); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃, 126 MHz) δ 18.4, 29.3, 30.4, 80.8, 127.0, 128.6, 133.9, 138.2, 171.0; MS (EI) m/z (%) 212 (M⁺+2, 7), 210 (M⁺, 23), 70 (100); HRMS (EI) calcd for [M]⁺ (C₁₁H₁₁O₂Cl) m/z 210.0448, found 210.0449.

4. Conclusions

An indium-catalyzed formation of thiolactones from lactones and a disilathiane was developed. A disilathiane was found to be a novel and an effective sulfur source for this type of conversion, and a wide range of lactone derivatives were successfully converted into the corresponding thiolactones.