Next Article in Journal
The Up-Regulation of Oxidative Stress as a Potential Mechanism of Novel MAO-B Inhibitors for Glioblastoma Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Daidzein Glycosides, α-Tocopherol Glycosides, Hesperetin Glycosides by Bioconversion and Their Potential for Anti-Allergic Functional-Foods and Cosmetics
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Diethyl Phosphate, a Non-Specific Metabolite of Organophosphorus Pesticides, on Serum Lipid, Hormones, Inflammation, and Gut Microbiota
Previous Article in Special Issue
UHPLC-UV/Vis Quantitative Analysis of Hydroxylated and O-prenylated Coumarins in Pomegranate Seed Extracts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

The Difference in Cytotoxic Activity between Two Optical Isomers of Gelsemine from Gelsemium elegans Benth. on PC12 Cells

1
College of Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
2
Hunan Engineering Technology Research Center of Veterinary Drugs, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(10), 2004; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24102004
Submission received: 2 May 2019 / Revised: 20 May 2019 / Accepted: 22 May 2019 / Published: 25 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Products as Tools in Drug Discovery and Development)

Abstract

:
Two optical isomers, +/− gelsemine (1, 2), together with one known compound were isolated from the whole plant of G. elegans. The structures of the separated constituents were elucidated on 1D and 2D (1H-1H COSY, HMBC, HSQC) NMR spectroscopy and high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). The isolated alkaloids were tested in vitro for cytotoxic potential against PC12 cells by the MTT assay. As a result, (+) gelsemine (compound 1) exhibited cytotoxic activity against PC12 cells with an IC50 value of 31.59 μM, while (−) gelsemine (compound 2) was not cytotoxic.

1. Introduction

Gelsemium elegans Benth. (G. elegans), referred to as “Gou-Wen” and “Duan-Chang-Cao” in China, belongs to Loganiaceae family and is a famous toxic plant that is widely distributed in Southeast Asia and southern China [1]. This plant has been used as a traditional medicine for the treatment of pain, spasticity, skin ulcers, migraines, neuralgia, sciatica, cancer, and various types of sores [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. The Gelsemium genus includes three species, all of which have a large number of alkaloids, including indole, bisindole, and monoterpenoid alkaloids [7,9,10,11]. To date, more than 120 kinds of alkaloids, including some stereo-isomer compounds, have been isolated from G. elegans. Most of the alkaloids are classified into five types based on their chemical structure characteristics: gelsedine-, koumine-, humantenine-, sarpagine-, and gelsemine-type [5,12]. The Gelsemium alkaloids have potent cytotoxic, analgestic, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulating, and antiarrhythmic activities, which means they have potential as new drugs [7,13]. Their tremendous effects and the unusual and densely functionalized nature of the hexacyclic structure have been used in the development of synthetic approaches toward gelsemine, humantenine, and gelsedine-type alkaloids. The first total syntheses of (±)-gelsemine were disclosed in 1994 by the groups of Johnson. Gelsemine and koumine of G. elegans inhibited Tetrahymena thermophila cells’ growth in a dose-dependent manner [14,15]. In the present study, two optical isomers, +/− gelsemine (1, 2), together with one known compound, koumine, were isolated from the whole plant of G. elegans (Figure 1). According to the structure of gelsemine, gelsemine has seven chiral carbon and two chiral nitrogen atoms. The structures of these compounds were elucidated mainly by NMR spectroscopic and high resolution mass spectroscopic methods. Furthermore, all compounds have been tested in vitro for cytotoxic potential against PC12 cells by MTT assay.

2. Results and Discussion

Compound 1 was isolated as a white powder (for 1H and 13C-NMR, see Table 1). The molecular formula was determined as C20H23N2O2 by HR-ESI-MS in positive mode (m/z 323.1758 [M + H]+, calcd for [M + H]+ 323.1751). The 1H and 13C-NMR (See supplementary materials Figures S1–S6) profile of compound 1 matched with the reported data for gelsemine [16].
Compound 2 was isolated as a yellow powder and had similar NMR data to 1 (Table 1), but the purity of compound 2 was lower than 1. The molecular formula was determined as C20H23N2O2 by HR-ESI-MS in positive mode (m/z 323.1763 [M + H]+, calcd for [M + H]+ 323.1751). The retention time of compound 1 and 2 was 16.861 min and 16.619 min, respectively. The MS2 spectra of compounds 1 and 2 are shown in Figure 2. The product ions of compounds 1 and 2 were quite similar. According to the data of 1H and 13C-NMR(See supplementary materials Figures S7–S12), compound 2 was identified as gelsemine.
Compound 3 was isolated as a yellow powder with the following properties: positive ESI-MS m/z: 307.1812 [M + H]+, 13C-NMR (See supplementary materials Figure S13) (101 MHz, MeOD) δ 187.85 (2-C), 155.04 (13-C), 144.59 (8-C), 137.95 (19-C), 129.51 (11-C), 127.72 (10-C), 124.58 (9-C), 121.47 (12-C), 116.93 (18-C), 71.88 (3-C), 61.91 (17-C), 58.97 (7-C), 58.15 (21-C), 57.77 (5-C), 46.59 (20-C), 42.84 (N-Me), 38.52 (16-C), 33.97 (15-C), 30.46 (6-C), 25.93 (14-C). 1H-NMR(See supplementary materials Figure S14) (400 MHz, MeOD) δ 7.65 (1H, d, J = 7.3 Hz, 12-H), 7.55 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz, 9-H), 7.40 (1H, td, J = 7.6, 1.2 Hz, 11-H), 7.33 (1H, td, J = 7.5, 1.0 Hz, 10-H), 4.92 (1H, dd, J = 8.3, 1.7 Hz, 18α-H), 4.82 (dd, J = 11.2, 0.8 Hz, 1H, 18β-H), 4.69 (1H, dd, J = 17.6, 11.3 Hz, 19-H), 4.32 (1H, dd, J = 12.0, 4.6 Hz, 17α-H), 3.64 (1H, d, J = 12.0 Hz, 17β-H), 3.29 (1H, d, J = 11.9 Hz, 21α-H), 3.03 (1H, m, 21β-H), 2.88 (1H, m, 5-H), 2.67 (1H, s, N-Me), 2.42 (2H, m, 6-H), 1.87 (dt, J = 14.8, 2.0 Hz, 1H, 14β-H). This profile was consistent with the reported NMR data for koumine [16].
The effects of the three compounds on the activity of poorly differentiated PC-12 cells and highly differentiated PC-12 cells (Figure 3) were investigated, and it was found that only compound 1 inhibited viability in highly differentiated PC-12 cells, while the other compounds were not toxic to either type of PC-12 cells. As shown in Table 2, compound 1 on poorly differentiated PC-12 cells showed no toxicity (IC50 > 100 μM), and did not affect its activity. However, compound 1 showed toxicity to highly differentiated PC-12 cells and decreased cell activity, and its IC50 was 31.59 μM. The results indicated that compound 1 exhibited some cytotoxic activity against PC12 cells, while compound 2 did not. 2D (1H-1H COSY, HMBC, HSQC) NMR spectroscopy (Figures S1–S12) showed that compounds 1 and 2 are quite similar. However, the optical rotation results showed that compound 1 and 2 are two optical isomers of gelsemine (1: [α]25D = 793.79 (c = 0.047, MeOH), 2:[α]25D = −909.09 (c = 0.025, MeOH)) which explained why they differ in cytotoxic activity on PC12 cells.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Experimental Procedures

NMR spectra were acquired using a Bruker ACF-400 spectrometer (the 1H-NMR spectra at 400 MHz and 13C-NMR spectra at 100 MHz, (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany). The mass spectra were determined by an Agilent 1290 HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, California, CA, USA) coupled with a 6530 Q-TOF/MS accurate-mass spectrometry. Silica gel (100–200, 200–300, 300–400 mesh) was used for column chromatography (CC) and silica GF254 for TLC was supplied by Qingdao Haiyang Chemical Factory, Qingdao, RP China. All solvents used were of analytical grade and obtained from Shanghai Chemical Reagents Company, Shanghai, RP China. Acetonitrile and methanol used for chromatographic grade were purchased from Merck, German. PC12 cells were purchased from Cell bank of Chinese academy of sciences. Staurosporine (STSP) was obtained from MedChem Express, Shanghai, China.

3.2. Plant Material

The whole plant of G. elegans was collected from Longyan city, Fujian province (24.699739 N, 116.98967 E). The samples were authenticated by Dr Qi Tang at Hunan Agricultural University.

3.3. Extraction and Isolation

The air-dried whole plant of G. elegans (100 kg) was powdered and extracted two times (2 × 24 h) with 0.5 % sulfuric acid solution (100 L) at room temperature. The extracted solution was filtered through a 200-mesh filter and combined, then was basified with NaOH (8 mol/L) to pH 7.0, and dried under reduced pressure. Then, the fraction (1 kg) was extracted by reflux in 1.5 L of 95 % ethanol for twice times (each for 2 h). After filtration, the extract was combined and concentrated under reduced pressure. The ethanol fraction (138 g) was further fractionated through a silica gel column chromatography (CC), eluting with CH2Cl2–MeOH (from 100:0 to 0:100, v/v) to obtain 14 fractions according to TLC analysis (Frs. 1–14). Fraction 7 (2.85 g) was subjected to silica gel CC (CH2Cl2-MeOH -ammonia, 95:5:0.05, v/v/v) to afford compound 1 (78 mg). Fraction 3 (5.00 g) was subjected to silica gel CC (CH2Cl2-MeOH-ammonia, 95:5:0.05–90:10:0.05, v/v/v) to afford three subfractions (Fr. 3-1 and Fr. 3-3). Fr. 3-1 (0.50 g) was subjected to silica gel CC (CH2Cl2–MeOH-ammonia, 20:0.8:0.05, v/v/v) to obtain compound 2 (71 mg) and compound 3 (99 mg).

3.4. Cell Line and Culture

Poorly differentiated PC-12 cells: PC12 cells (Cell bank of Chinese academy of sciences) were grown in 100 cm2 culture flasks (1 × 106 cells per flask) at 37 °C in serum-containing medium, 85% RPMI 1640, 10% heat-inactivated horse serum (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA ), 5% fetal calf serum (Biowest, Nuaillé, France ), penicillin & streptomycin (1× P/S, Procell, Tongxiang, China, Lot: 16050130) and no NGF. Culture medium was exchanged three times weekly. Highly differentiated PC-12 cells: PC-12 cells were grown in serum-containing medium (90% RPMI 1640, 10% fetal calf serum, 1× P/S), treated with 20 ng/mL of NGF (Sigma, San Francisco, CA, USA, Lot: SRP3018). The medium was changed every 2–3 days and NGF was added if required.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Figure S1: The 13C-NMR spectrum of compound 1, Figure S2. The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 1, Figure S3: The 1H-1H COSY spectrum of compound 1, Figure S4: The HMBC spectrum of compound 1, Figure S5: The HSQC spectrum of compound 1, Figure S6: The DEPT135 spectrum of compound 1, Figure S7: The 13C-NMR spectrum of compound 2, Figure S8: The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 2, Figure S9: The 1H-1H COSY spectrum of compound 2, Figure S10: The HMBC spectrum of compound 2, Figure S11: The HSQC spectrum of compound 2, Figure S12: The DEPT135 spectrum of compound 2, Figure S13: The 13C-NMR spectrum of compound 3, Figure S14: The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 3.

Author Contributions

Z.-Y.L. conceived and designed the experiments; Y.-C.L. performed extraction, isolation, MS experiment; L.L. performed NMR experiments and contributed to the preparation of the manuscript; Z.-Y.L. revised the manuscript.

Funding

Support was received from the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 2017JJ1017)

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, W.; Xu, W.; Wang, G.Y.; Gong, X.Y.; Li, N.P.; Wang, L.; Ye, W.C. Gelsekoumidines A and B: Two Pairs of Atropisomeric Bisindole Alkaloids from the Roots of Gelsemium elegans. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 5194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sun, M.X.; Gao, H.H.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, L.; Xiao, K. New oxindole alkaloids from Gelsemium elegans. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015, 56, 6194–6197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Noriyuki, K.; Naoko, I.; Mariko, K.; Sumphan, W.; Hiromitsu, T. Four novel gelsenicine-related oxindole alkaloids from the leaves of Gelsemium elegans benth. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3085–3088. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jin, G.L.; Su, Y.P.; Liu, M.; Xu, Y.; Yang, J.; Liao, K.J.; Yu, C.X. Medicinal plants of the genus Gelsemium (Gelsemiaceae, Gentianales)—A review of their phytochemistry, pharmacology, toxicology and traditional use. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 152, 33–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kitajima, M. Chemical studies on monoterpenoid indole alkaloids from medicinal plant resources Gelsemium and Ophiorrhiza. J. Nat. Med. 2007, 61, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, Y.K.; Yang, L.; Liao, S.G.; Cao, P.; Wu, B.; Hu, H.B.; Guo, J.; Zhang, P. Koumine, Humantenine, and Yohimbane Alkaloids from Gelsemium elegans. J. Nat. Prod. 2015, 78, 1511–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lei, W.; Wang, J.F.; Xia, M.; Li, J.; Wang, X.J. Gelsedine-type oxindole alkaloids from Gelsemium elegans and the evaluation of their cytotoxic activity. Fitoterapia 2017, 120, 131. [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu, Y.C.; Lin, L.; Cheng, P.; Sun, Z.L.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Z.Y. Fingerprint analysis of Gelsemium elegans by HPLC followed by the targeted identification of chemical constituents using HPLC coupled with quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Fitoterapia 2017, 121, 94–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.H.; Zhang, Q.; Yan, X.H.; Di, Y.T.; He, H.P.; Hao, X.J. Three novel beta-carboline alkaloids from Gelsemium elegans. Fitoterapia 2012, 83, 704–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Liang, S.; He, C.Y.; Szabo, L.F.; Feng, Y.; Lin, X.; Wang, Y. Gelsochalotine, a novel indole ring-degraded monoterpenoid indole alkaloid from Gelsemium elegans. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 887–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Qu, J.; Fang, L.; Ren, X.D.; Liu, Y.B.; Yu, S.S.; Li, L.; Bao, X.Q.; Zhang, D.; Li, Y.; Ma, S.G. Bisindole Alkaloids with Neural Anti-inflammatory Activity from Gelsemium elegans. J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76, 2203–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kitajima, M.; Kogure, N.; Yamaguchi, K.; Takayama, H.; Aimi, N. Structure reinvestigation of gelsemoxonine, a constituent of Gelsemium elegans, reveals a novel, azetidine-containing indole alkaloid. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fang, L.; Zhou, J.; Lin, Y.L.; Wang, X.; Sun, Q.; Li, J.L.; Huang, L. Large-scale separation of alkaloids from Gelsemium elegans by pH-zone-refining counter-current chromatography with a new solvent system screening method. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1307, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ye, Q.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Z.; Feng, Y.; Zhou, A.; Xie, S.; Xiang, Q.; Song, E.; Zou, J. Induction of oxidative stress, apoptosis and DNA damage by koumine in Tetrahymena thermophila. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0212231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ye, Q.; Feng, Y.Y.; Wang, Z.L.; Jiang, W.Z.; Qu, Y.X.; Zhang, C.N.; Zhou, A.G.; Xie, S.L.; Zou, J.X. Effects of gelsemine on oxidative stress and DNA damage responses of Tetrahymena thermophila. Peer J 2018, 6, e6093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Su, Y.P.; Shen, J.; Xu, Y.; Zheng, M.; Yu, C.X. Preparative separation of alkaloids from Gelsemium elegans Benth. using pH-zone-refining counter-current chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 3695–3698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Figure 1. The structures of compound (±)-gelsemine (1/2) and koumine (3).
Figure 1. The structures of compound (±)-gelsemine (1/2) and koumine (3).
Molecules 24 02004 g001
Figure 2. The MS/MS spectra of compound 1 (a) and 2 (b).
Figure 2. The MS/MS spectra of compound 1 (a) and 2 (b).
Molecules 24 02004 g002
Figure 3. The cell viability of the three compounds in a series of concentrations (5, 10, 25, 50, 100 μM) and positive drug staurosporine (STSP) on two types of PC-12 cells after exposure for 48 h. (a) the three compounds’ concentration responses of poorly differentiated PC-12 cells; (b) STSP concentration response in poorly differentiated PC-12 cells; (c) the three compounds’ concentration responses in highly differentiated PC-12 cells; (d) STSP concentration response in highly differentiated PC-12 cells.
Figure 3. The cell viability of the three compounds in a series of concentrations (5, 10, 25, 50, 100 μM) and positive drug staurosporine (STSP) on two types of PC-12 cells after exposure for 48 h. (a) the three compounds’ concentration responses of poorly differentiated PC-12 cells; (b) STSP concentration response in poorly differentiated PC-12 cells; (c) the three compounds’ concentration responses in highly differentiated PC-12 cells; (d) STSP concentration response in highly differentiated PC-12 cells.
Molecules 24 02004 g003
Table 1. 1H-NMR (400 MHz) and 13C-NMR (100 MHz) data for Compound 1 and 2 in MeOD (δ in ppm and J in Hz).
Table 1. 1H-NMR (400 MHz) and 13C-NMR (100 MHz) data for Compound 1 and 2 in MeOD (δ in ppm and J in Hz).
PositionCompound 1Compound 2
δCδHδCδH
2179.26/180.56/
369.583.60 (1H, s)70.973.64 (1H, s)
571.814.12 (1H, d, 11.0)73.284.13 (1H, d, 11.0)
650.631.99 (1H, s)51.932.01 (1H, s)
754.19/55.55/
8131.70/133.00/
9127.997.46 (1H, d, 7.6)129.307.46 (1H, d, 7.6)
10121.237.00 (1H, t, 7.6)122.657.00 (1H, t, 7.6)
11128.107.22 (1H, t, 7.7)129.497.22 (1H, t, 7.7)
12108.976.87 (1H, d, 7.7)110.406.87 (1H, d, 7.7)
13141.20/142.60/
1422.342.04 (1H, m)23.702.04 (1H, m)
2.84 (1H, dd, 14.3, 2.1)2.84 (1H, m)
1535.632.34 (1H, t)36.982.38 (1H, s)
1637.502.49 (1H, m)38.972.50 (1H, m)
1760.813.97 (1H, d, 11.0)62.143.97 (1H, m)
3.72 (1H, s)3.72 (1H, s)
18111.594.98 (1H, d, 17.8)113.164.98 (1H, d, 17.8)
5.05 (1H, d, 11.0)5.06 (1H, d, 11.0)
19138.316.26 (1H, dd, 17.8,11.0)139.486.25 (1H, dd,17.8, 11.0)
2053.68/55.02/
2165.172.78 (1H, d,10.8)66.452.80 (1H, d, 10.7)
3.33 (1H, d, 1.3)/
N-CH339.032.28 (3H,s)40.432.31 (3H, s)
Table 2. Cytotoxicity of compounds 13 against PC12 cell lines (IC50, μM)
Table 2. Cytotoxicity of compounds 13 against PC12 cell lines (IC50, μM)
CompoundPC12 Highly Differentiated CellsPC12 Poorly Differentiated Cells
1>10031.59
2>100>100
3>100>100
STSP0.19440.022

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, L.; Liu, Y.-C.; Liu, Z.-Y. The Difference in Cytotoxic Activity between Two Optical Isomers of Gelsemine from Gelsemium elegans Benth. on PC12 Cells. Molecules 2019, 24, 2004. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24102004

AMA Style

Lin L, Liu Y-C, Liu Z-Y. The Difference in Cytotoxic Activity between Two Optical Isomers of Gelsemine from Gelsemium elegans Benth. on PC12 Cells. Molecules. 2019; 24(10):2004. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24102004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Li, Yan-Chun Liu, and Zhao-Ying Liu. 2019. "The Difference in Cytotoxic Activity between Two Optical Isomers of Gelsemine from Gelsemium elegans Benth. on PC12 Cells" Molecules 24, no. 10: 2004. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24102004

APA Style

Lin, L., Liu, Y. -C., & Liu, Z. -Y. (2019). The Difference in Cytotoxic Activity between Two Optical Isomers of Gelsemine from Gelsemium elegans Benth. on PC12 Cells. Molecules, 24(10), 2004. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24102004

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop