Next Article in Journal
High-CO2 Modified Atmosphere Packaging with Superchilling (−1.3 °C) Inhibit Biochemical and Flavor Changes in Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) during Storage
Previous Article in Journal
Exogenous Melatonin Modulates the Physiological and Biochemical Mechanisms of Drought Tolerance in Tartary Buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 12
10.3390/molecules25122825
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Lignans, Amides, and Saponins from Haplophyllum tuberculatum and Their Antiprotozoal Activity

by
Abdelhalim Babiker Mahmoud
1,2,3,*,
Ombeline Danton
2,
Marcel Kaiser
1,
Sohee Han
4,
Aitor Moreno
5,
Shereen Abd Algaffar
6,
Sami Khalid
3,6,
Won Keun Oh
4,
Matthias Hamburger
2 and
Pascal Mäser
1,2,*
1
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, 4002 Basel, Switzerland
2
Faculty of Science, University of Basel, 4001 Basel, Switzerland
3
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Khartoum, 11111 Khartoum, Sudan
4
Korea Bioactive Natural Material Bank, College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
5
Bruker BioSpin, 8117 Fällanden, Switzerland
6
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Science and Technology, 14411 Omdurman, Sudan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(12), 2825; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122825
Submission received: 5 June 2020 / Revised: 16 June 2020 / Accepted: 17 June 2020 / Published: 19 June 2020
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A screening of Sudanese medicinal plants for antiprotozoal activities revealed that the chloroform and water fractions of the ethanolic root extract of Haplophyllum tuberculatum exhibited appreciable bioactivity against Leishmania donovani. The antileishmanial activity was tracked by HPLC-based activity profiling, and eight compounds were isolated from the chloroform fraction. These included lignans tetrahydrofuroguaiacin B (1), nectandrin B (2), furoguaiaoxidin (7), and 3,3′-dimethoxy-4,4′-dihydroxylignan-9-ol (10), and four cinnamoylphenethyl amides, namely dihydro-feruloyltyramine (5), (E)-N-feruloyltyramine (6), N,N′-diferuloylputrescine (8), and 7′-ethoxy-feruloyltyramine (9). The water fraction yielded steroid saponins 11–13. Compounds 1, 2, and 5–13 are reported for the first time from Haplophyllum species and the family Rutaceae. The antiprotozoal activity of the compounds plus two stereoisomeric tetrahydrofuran lignans—fragransin B2 (3) and fragransin B1 (4)—was determined against Leishmania donovani amastigotes, Plasmodium falciparum, and Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense bloodstream forms, along with their cytotoxicity to rat myoblast L6 cells. Nectandrin B (2) exhibited the highest activity against L. donovani (IC50 4.5 µM) and the highest selectivity index (25.5).

1. Introduction

Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) are a group of infectious diseases that are prevalent in tropical and sub-tropical developing countries. NTDs are strongly associated with poverty, and of high socio-economic impact. NTDs account for 48 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and 152,000 deaths per year [1,2]. The NTD leishmaniasis, caused by Leishmania spp., imposes a global burden of 3.3 million DALYS and 51,600 annual deaths [1,2]. There is no vaccine, and current drugs are problematic given their serious adverse effects and the emergence of drug-resistant parasites [3]. There is one efficient and safe drug, AmBisome, a liposomal formulation of amphotericin B [4]. However, the high price of the drug and the need of an uninterrupted cold chain for delivery severely limits its use. In Eastern Africa, a high-burden region of visceral leishmaniasis [5], sodium stibogluconate is still the mainstay of leishmaniasis chemotherapy [3]. This pentavalent antimonial can cause hepatotoxicity and cardiotoxicity [6]. Thus, there is an urgent need for the development of new, efficacious, safe, and cost-effective drugs for the treatment of leishmaniasis and other diseases caused by kinetoplastid parasites [7,8].
A library of Sudanese medicinal plants traditionally used as anti-infectives was screened for antiprotozoal activity against Leishmania donovani, Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense, Trypanosoma cruzi, and Plasmodium falciparum. One of the most promising hits was Haplophyllum tuberculatum (Forssk.) A. Juss. (Rutaceae). Chloroform and aqueous fractions obtained by partitioning of an ethanolic extract from roots of the plant were active against L. donovani and P. falciparum (˃85% growth inhibition at 10 µg/mL) [9].
Haplophyllum tuberculatum is a perennial herb distributed throughout North Africa and the Middle East. In Sudan, the plant is locally known as Haza, and the aerial parts have been used traditionally to treat malaria, asthma, kidney diseases, gynecological and bowel disorders [10,11]. Anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antibacterial, and antifungal activities have been reported [10,11,12], and alkaloids, flavonoids, coumarins and lignans have been identified [13,14,15]. The methanolic extract of the aerial part and roots of H. tuberculatum possessed activity against P. falciparum [16], and Justicidin A was found active [17]. The essential oil from the leaves had antileishmanial activity [18]. Justicidin B, a lignan isolated from the leaves, showed trypanocidal activity [19].
The aim of this project was a systematic evaluation of the antiparasitic activities of H. tuberculatum and the identification of the bioactive compounds by means of HPLC-based activity profiling.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Extraction and HPLC-based Activity Profiling

The chloroform and the water fractions from roots of H. tuberculatum had been previously found to be active against L. donovani when tested at 10 µg/mL [9]. The antileishmanial activity was tracked by HPLC-based activity profiling, a procedure combining time-based microfractionation with bioactivity testing [20]. One-minute microfractions were collected and tested for growth inhibition of L. donovani axenic amastigotes. The HPLC-ESIMS traces (base peak chromatograms in positive ion mode) overlaid with the antileishmanial activity of microfractions are shown for the chloroform (Figure 1) and the water fraction (Figure 2). Pronounced antileishmanial activity (˃50% growth inhibition) was found in the chloroform fraction in the time window of 16–21 min, and moderate activity (30–40% growth inhibition) in the window of 12–15 min. For the water fraction, the antileishmanial activity was confined to a narrow time window between 19–20 min.

2.2. Compound Isolation and Structure Elucidation

Preparative separation by MPLC of the chloroform fraction on a C18 cartridge yielded 13 subfractions (A-M). HPLC-PDA-MS analysis showed that subfractions B and C contained peaks from the active time window. Further purification by semipreparative RP-HPLC afforded compounds 1 and 2 from subfraction B. Based on NMR data (Table S1, Supporting Information), the two compounds were identified as the known lignans tetrahydrofuroguaiacin B (1) and nectandrin B (2) (Figure 3) [21,22,23]. Semipreparative RP-HPLC of subfraction C afforded compounds 5–10. By means of 1D and 2D NMR data (Tables S2 and S3, Supporting Information), these were identified as four cinnamoylphenethyl amides, namely dihydro-feruloyltyramine (5) [24], (E)-N-feruloyltyramine (6) [25], N,N′-diferuloylputrescine (8) [26], and 7′-ethoxy-feruloyltyramine (9) [27], and two lignans, furoguaiaoxidin (7) [23] and 3,3′-dimethoxy-4,4′-dihydroxylignan-9-ol (10) [28] (Figure 3). Compounds 9 and 10 showed optical rotation close to zero, and no cotton effects in the ECD spectra (Figures S1 and S2, Supporting Information). From a comparison with published data for the two compounds, we conclude that they mostly likely were racemic mixtures.
Preparative RP chromatography by MPLC of the water fraction on a C18 cartridge yielded 15 subfractions (A-O), whereby subfractions J and K contained the peaks from the active time window of the activity profile (Figure 2). Semipreparative HPLC on a Hilic column afforded inseparable mixtures of 11 and 12 from subfraction J, and 11 and 13 from subfraction K. The HRESIMS spectrum of 11 exhibited a sodium adduct ion (m/z 1039.5083 [M + Na]+, calcd for C50H80O21Na+ 1039.5085) indicative of a molecular formula of C50H80O21. The NMR data (Table S4, Supporting Information) pointed to a steroidal saponin consisting of aglycon and four sugars. A comparison of 13C chemical shifts with literature data identified the aglycon as yamogenin [29]. This was corroborated by a detailed analysis of the 2D NMR spectra, in particular by cross peaks in the ROESY spectrum between H-1β (δH 1.78), H3-19 (δH 0.94), H-8 (δH 1.54), H3-18 (δH 0.72), and H-20 (δH 1.75), between H-1α (δH 0.96) and H-3 (δH 3.46), and between H3-21 (δH 0.92), H-17 (δH 1.65), H-16 (δH 4.27) and H-14 (δH 1.07). After hydrolysis and derivatization the sugars were identified as ᴅ -glucose, ʟ -rhamnose, and ᴅ -xylose [30]. The interglycosidic linkages and the attachment position of the sugar chain at the aglycon were established by HMBC correlations (Figures S3 and S4, Supporting Information) from δH 4.43 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-1-Glc1) to δc 76.9 (C-3), from δH 5.04 (1H, br s, H-1-Rha1) to δc 76.4 (C-2-Glc1), from δH 4.34 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-1-Glc2) to δc 81.1 (C-4-Glc1), and from δH 4.38 (1H, d, J = 7.1 Hz, H-1-Xyl) to δc 86.4 (C-3-Glc2). saponin 11 was identified as (3S,20S,22R,25S)-spirost-5-en-3-yl-(β-ᴅ-xylopyranosyl-(1→3)-β-d-glucopyranosyl-(1→4) [α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)]-β-d-glucopyranoside [31].
Compound 12 had a molecular formula of C51H82O21 (HRESIMS data m/z 1053.5233 [M + Na]+, calcd for C51H82O21Na+ 1053.5241). As for compound 11, NMR data (Table S4, Supporting Information) indicated yamogenin bearing four sugars. The only difference was in the presence of a rhamnopyranose instead of a xylopyranose (Figures S3 and S4, Supporting Information). Thus, saponin 12 was identified as (3S,20S,22R,25S)- spirost-5-en-3-yl-(β-d-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→3)-β-d-glucopyranosyl-(1→4)[α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)]-β-d-glucopyranoside [32]. Compound 13 had a molecular formula of C50H80O21 (m/z 1039.5072 [M + Na]+, calcd for C50H80O21Na+ 1039.5085). Based on the NMR data and especially the carbon chemical shifts (Table S4, Supporting Information), the aglycone was identified as diosgenin [29]. The sugar moiety was identical to that in saponin 11 (Figures S5 and S6, Supporting Information). Compound 13 was therefore identified as (3S,20S,22R,25R)-spirost-5-en-3-yl-(β-d-xylopyranosyl-(1→3)-β-d-glucopyranosyl-(1→4)[α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)]-β-d-glucopyranoside [31] (Figure 4). It is interesting to note that 11 and 13 are diastereoisomers with the C-25 methyl group in axial or equatorial orientation, respectively.

2.3. Comparison to Previously Reported Compounds

The two tetrahydrofuran-type lignans 1 and 2 were previously reported from different Myristicaceae, Elaeagnaceae, Poaceae, and Piperaceae species [22,33].
Arylnaphthalen-type lignans had been identified in aerial part and roots of H. tuberculatum [34,35], but tetrahydrofuran-type lignans are reported here for the first time from Haplophyllum species.
Cinnamoylphenethyl amides such as 5, 6, 8 and 9 have been reported from over 30 families of flowering plants [36]. Amides 5 and 6 have been previously reported from different species of Annonaceae [24,37,38] and Lauraceae [39,40]. Compound 6 was also found in Papaveraceae [41], Cannabaceae [42], Solanaceae [25,43], and Portulacaceae [44,45], while 9 was identified in Portulacaceae [44,45] and Cactaceae [27]. Amide 7 has been previously reported from Guaiacum officinale [23], while compound 8 has been found in Tribulus terrestris [46], Peltophorum pterocarpum [47], and Zea mays [48]. Amide 10 has been previously identified in Schisandra bicolor var. tuberculata [28].
Saponins 11–13 have been previously isolated, together with a series of similar compounds, as molluscicidal saponins from the Sudanese medicinal plant Balanites aegyptiaca (Zygophyllaceae) [31,32,49]. It can be assumed that saponins 11–13 contributed to the molluscicidal activity that has been described for H. tuberculatum [50].
To the best of our knowledge, compounds 1, 2, and 5–13 have been isolated here for the first time not only from Haplophyllum species but also from plants of the Rutaceae family.

2.4. Biological Testing

Compounds 1–10 were tested for their in vitro activities against the following protozoan parasites: Leishmania donovani (MHOM/ET/67/L82) axenic amastigotes, Plasmodium falciparum (NF54) proliferative erythrocytic stages, and Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense (STIB 900) bloodstream forms (Table 1). In parallel, cytotoxicity of these compounds in rat skeletal myoblasts (L-6 cells) was determined in order to obtain an initial assessment of their selectivity. The results are reported in Table 1. Subfractions J and K from the aqueous fraction containing steroidal saponins 11 and 12 in J, and 11 and 13 in K, exhibited IC50 ˂ 8 µg/mL across all parasites and a selectivity index ˂2, indicative of general cytotoxicity.

2.4.1. Activity against Leishmania Donovani Axenic Amastigotes

Nectandrin B (2) was the most active (IC50 of 5 µM) and the most selective (SI 26) of all compounds tested. This finding contrasts with a previous report on nectandrin B being inactive against L. donovani [51]. The discrepancy may come from the fact that, in the aforementioned study, nectandrin B was tested against the promastigote form of the parasite (i.e., the proliferative form in the gut of the sandfly vector) while we tested against the amastigote form (i.e., the proliferative form in the mammalian host). The antileishmanial activity cannot be ascribed to any particular mode of action at this point. In general, some tetrahydrofuran lignans have been reported to inhibit trypanothione reductase [52], an enzyme of a thiol-redox system that is unique to trypanosomatid protozoa and essential for their survival [53,54]. Compared to 2, tetrahydrofuroguaiacin B (1) was less active and more toxic. The two compounds only differ in their stereochemistry at the tetrahydrofuran ring, which therefore appears to play a crucial role in the antileishmanial activity of such lignans. To better understand the role of the stereochemistry at the central ring and the contribution of substituents at the aromatic rings, structurally related lignans 3 and 4 that had been previously reported from Myristica fragrans Houtt. [21,22] were also included in the testing.
However, both compounds were significantly less active than nectrandrin B (2). Unfortunately, the activity of nectandrin B (2) against L. donovani was lost in the intracellular amastigote assay tested up to a concentration of 30 μM.

2.4.2. Activity against Plasmodium Falciparum

Lignans 2 and 10 were the most active and least toxic compounds (IC50 9–9.5 µM, SI 12–14). Compound 10 was selectively active against P. falciparum. Compared to 2, fragransin B1 (4) (IC50 17 µM, SI 8), was less active against P. falciparum, but was slightly more active and less cytotoxic than its stereoisomer fragransin B2 (3). Amides 8 (IC50 30.6 µM, SI 4.8), and 9 (IC50 30.4 µM, SI 6.8) showed comparable activity, while the congener 5 was the least active among all tested compounds.
A wide spectrum of biological activities of cinnamoylphenethyl amides has been described, including antiproliferative [55], antibacterial [56], antifungal [57] and antioxidant activities [58]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of antileishmanial and antiplasmodial activities of such compounds.

2.4.3. Activity against Trypanosoma Brucei Rhodesiense

Of all compounds tested, diferuloylputrescine (8) exhibited the highest activity against T. b. rhodesiense and the highest selectivity (IC50 19 µM, SI 8). The lignan 10 showed a lower activity and selectivity index (IC50 28 µM and SI 5), while 5 and 6 were the least active among all tested compounds. None of the tetrahydrofuran lignans 1–4 exhibited significant activity against T. b. rhodesiense.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Experimental Procedures

HPLC grade solvents from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), and Macron Fine Chemicals (Avantor Performance Materials, Phillipsburg, NJ, USA), and ultrapure water from a Milli-Q water purification system (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) were used for HPLC separations. For extraction and preparative separation, technical grade solvents (Scharlab S. L., Barcelona, Spain) were used after distillation. Silica gel 60 F254 coated aluminum TLC plates were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).
Optical rotation was measured in methanol on a JASCO P-2000 digital polarimeter (Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a sodium lamp (589 nm) and a temperature-controlled microcell (10 cm). UV and ECD spectra were recorded in methanol on a Chirascan CD spectrometer (Applied Photophysics, Leatherhead, UK) using 110 QS 1 mm path precision cells (Hellma Analytics, Müllheim, Germany). NMR spectra of compounds 1, 2, and 5–10 were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE III 500 MHz spectrometer (Billerica, CA, USA) operating at 500.13 MHz for 1H and 125.77 MHz for 13C. 1H, COSY, HSQC, HMBC, and NOESY spectra were measured at 23 °C in a 1-mm TXI probe with a z-gradient. The sample volume was 10 µL. NMR spectra of 11–13 were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE NEO 600 MHz spectrometer operating at 600.18 MHz for 1H and 150.92 MHz for 13C with an inverse 1.7 mm TCI micro-cryoprobe (30 µL sample volume) at 23 °C. This cryogenically cooled probe delivered a 4-fold gain of mass sensitivity over the 1 mm TXI room-temperature probe and enabled the NMR analysis of small sample amounts (µg range), usually obtained for natural products. Spectra were analyzed by Bruker TopSpin 3.5 pl 7 and ACDLabs Spectrus Processor. NMR spectra were recorded in DMSO-d6 99.9 atom%D (Armar Chemicals, Dӧttingen, Switzerland).
HRESIMS data were measured in the positive ion mode on an Orbitrap LQT XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). HPLC-PDA-ELSD-ESIMS data were recorded in positive- and negative-ion mode (scan range of m/z 200−1500) on a Shimadzu LC-MS/MS 8030 triple quadrupole MS system (Kyoto, Japan) connected via a T-splitter (1:10) to a photo diode array detector (PDA) (SPD-M20A, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), and evaporative light scattering detector (ELSD) (3300, Alltech, Büchi, Flawil, Switzerland). For data acquisition and processing, LabSolutions software (Kyoto, Japan) was used.
Separations were performed on a C18 SunFire column (3.0 × 150 mm i. d., 3.5 μm) equipped with a precolumn (10 × 3.0 mm i. d.) (Waters).
Microfractionation was carried out with the same HPLC instrument connected via a T split to an FC204 fraction collector (Gilson, Mettmenstetten, Switzerland) with only UV detection, using a SunFire C18 (3.5 μm, 150 × 3.0 mm i.d.) column equipped with a guard column (10 × 3.0 mm i.d.) (Waters). Semipreparative HPLC were performed on an Agilent 1100 system (Santa Clara, CA, USA) with PDA detector. A SunFire C18 column (5 μm, 10 × 150 mm i. d.) fitted with a guard column (10 × 10 mm i.d.) (Waters) and a Nucleodur Hilic column (5 μm, 10 × 150 mm i. d.) (Macherey-Nagel), were used for separations. ChemStation software (Agilent Technologies) was used for data acquisition and processing. Preparative HPLC was carried out on a PuriFlash 4100 system (Interchim, Montluçon, France). Separations were performed on RediSep Rf Gold ®-C18 MPLC cartridge 100g (Teledyne Isco).

3.2. Plant Material

Roots of Haplophyllum tuberculatum were collected in February 2018 in Khartoum, Sudan. The taxonomic identity was confirmed by the Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research Institute, Sudan. A voucher specimen (HTR 02) is deposited at the Herbarium of the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Science and Technology, Omdurman, Sudan. The plant material was dried at room temperature and milled with a hammer mill before extraction.

3.3. Extraction

The powdered roots of H. tuberculatum (300 g) were extracted with 1 L of 70% ethanol under stirring for 24 h. The extract was filtered through Whatman no. 1 filter paper and concentrated in a rotary evaporator to obtain 35.7 g of extract. The extract amount was suspended in water and partitioned consecutively with petroleum ether, chloroform, and ethyl acetate. Three repetitive partitioning procedures, each with 500 mL of either solvent, were performed. In total, 0.4 g of petroleum ether fraction, 4.0 g of chloroform fraction, 2.0 g of ethyl acetate fraction, and 16.4 g of the water fraction were obtained after evaporation.

3.4. Microfractionation for Activity Profiling

HPLC-based microfractionation of the chloroform and the water fractions was performed [H2O + 0.1% formic acid (A), CH3CN + 0.1% formic acid (B); 0→100% B (0–30 min), 100% B (30–40 min); flow rate 0.4 mL/min; sample concentration 10 mg/mL in DMSO; injection volume 2 × 35 μL] by collecting one-minute fractions from minute 1 to 40 into a 96-deep-well plate. Plates were then dried in a Genevac EZ-2 evaporator (Ipswich, UK) and prepared for antiprotozoal activity testing based on previously established protocols [20,59].

3.5. Preparative Isolation

The chloroform fraction was reconstituted in DMSO and separated on a RediSep Rf Gold ® RP-C18, 100 gm cartridge [H2O (A), CH3CN (B); 5→100% B (0–120 min), flow rate 20 mL/min]. A total of 13 subfractions (A-M) were combined based on TLC patterns. The subfractions were analyzed by HPLC-PDA-MS to track peaks previously detected in the active time windows of the activity profile.
Subfraction B (247 mg) was submitted to semipreparative HPLC on a C18 column [H2O (A), CH3CN (B); 56% B (0–35 min), 56→100% B (35–40 min), 100% B (40–45 min), flow rate 4 mL/min; sample concentration 50 mg/mL in DMSO; injection volume 50 μL; detection at 208 nm] to afford tetrahydrofuroguaiacin B (1, 2.2 mg, tR 22.3 min) and nectandrin B (2, 1.9 mg, tR 29.5 min).
A portion (200 mg) of subfraction C was separated by semipreparative HPLC on a C18 column [H2O (A), MeOH (B); 39→48% B (0–30 min), 48→100% B (30–40 min), 100% B (40–45 min), flow rate 4 mL/min; sample concentration 50 mg/mL in DMSO; injection volume 50 μL; detection at 254 nm], and dihydro-feruloyltyramine (5, 2.5 mg, tR 9.4 min), (E)-N-feruloyltyramine (6, 10.6 mg, tR 16.2 min), furoguaiaoxidin (7, 1.4 mg, tR 16.2 min), N,N′-diferuloylputrescine (8, 1.4 mg, tR 23.4 min), 7′-ethoxy-trans-feruloyltyramine (9, 1.1 mg, tR 27.3 min), and 3,3′-dimethoxy-4,4′-dihydroxylignan-9-ol (10, 2.5 mg, tR 36.5 min) were obtained.
For the water fraction, an aliquot (8 g) was re-dissolved in water and separated by preparative HPLC on a RediSep Rf Gold ® RP-C18, 100 gm cartridge [H2O (A), CH3CN (B); 20→65% B (0–120 min), 65→100% B (120–135 min), flow flow rate 20 mL/min]. Fractions with similar TLC patterns were combined to yield 15 subfractions (A-O). HPLC-PDA-MS analysis located the peaks detected in the active time window in subfractions J and K. Subfraction J (17 mg) was submitted to semipreparative HPLC on a C18 column (H2O (A), CH3CN (B); 41% B (0–40 min), 41→100% B (40–45 min), 100% B (45–50 min), flow rate 4 mL/min; sample concentration 50 mg/mL in DMSO; injection volume 50 μL; detection at 193 nm) to afford compounds 11 and 12 as a mixture (2 mg, tR 22.3 min).
Subfraction K (53 mg) was submitted to semipreparative HPLC on a C18 column (H2O (A), CH3CN (B); 40% B (0–40 min), 40→100% B (40–45 min), 100% B (45–50 min), flow rate 4 mL/min; sample concentration 50 mg/mL in DMSO; injection volume 50 μL; detection at 193 nm), yielding subfraction K3. Subfraction K3 (16 mg) was further purified by semipreparative HPLC on a Nucleodur Hilic column (H2O (A), CH3CN (B); 92% B (0–35 min), 92→20% B (35–45 min), flow rate 4 mL/min; sample concentration 50 mg/mL in DMSO; injection volume 50 μL; detection at 193 nm), to afford compounds 11 and 13 as a mixture (4.2 mg, tR 25.2 min).
Tetrahydrofuroguaiacin (1): amorphous solid; [α]25D −1.9 (c 0.2, MeOH); 1H and 13C NMR, see Table S1, Supporting Information; ESI-MS m/z 345 [M + H]+.
Nectandrin B (2): amorphous solid; [α]25D −1.2 (c 0.2, MeOH); 1H and 13C NMR, see Table S1, Supporting Information; ESI-MS m/z 345 [M + H]+.
Fragransin B2 (3): amorphous solid; ESIMS m/z 405 [M + H]+.
Fragransin B1 (4): amorphous solid; ESIMS m/z 405 [M + H]+.
Dihydro-feruloyltyramine (5): amorphous solid; 1H and 13C NMR, see Table S2, Supporting Information; ESIMS m/z 316 [M + H]+.
(E)-N-Feruloyltyramine (6): amorphous solid; 1H and 13C NMR, see Table S2, Supporting Information; ESIMS m/z 314 [M + H]+.
Furoguaiaoxidin (7): amorphous solid; 1H and 13C NMR, see Table S2, Supporting Information; ESIMS m/z 357 [M + H]+.
N,N′-Diferuloylputrescine (8): amorphous solid; 1H and 13C NMR, see Table S2, Supporting Information; ESIMS m/z 441 [M + H]+.
7′-Ethoxy-trans-feruloyltyramine (9): amorphous solid; [α]25D −2.6 (c 0.11, MeOH); UV λmax (MeOH) (log ε) 228 (0.23), 288 (0.12), 320 (0.11) nm; ECD (MeOH, c 2.0 × 10−4 M, 1 mm path length) λmax(Δε) 207 (+4.04), 224 (+2.40), 235 (+1.72) nm; 1H and 13C NMR, see Table S3, Supporting Information; ESIMS m/z 358 [M + H]+.
3,3′-Dimethoxy-4,4′-dihydroxylignan-9-ol (10): amorphous solid; [α]25D −4.9 (c 0.25, MeOH); UV λmax (MeOH) (log ε) 230 (0.18), 280 (0.08) nm; ECD (MeOH, c 1.4 × 10−4 M, 1 mm path length) λmax(Δε) 205 (+3.07), 215 (+1.39), 235 (+0.89) nm; 1H and 13C NMR, see Table S3, Supporting Information; ESIMS m/z 693 [2M + H]+.
(3S,20S,22R,25S)-Spirost-5-en-3-yl (β-d-xylopyranosyl-(1→3)- β-d-glucopyranosyl-(1→4)[α-l- rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)]-β-d-glucopyranoside (11): amorphous solid; 1H and 13C NMR, see Table S4, Supporting Information; HRESIMS m/z 1039.5083 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C50H80O21Na+ 1039.5085).
(3S,20S,22R,25S)-Spirost-5-en-3-yl (β-d-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→3)- β-d-glucopyranosyl-(1→4)[α-l- rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)]-β-d-glucopyranoside (12): amorphous solid; 1H and 13C NMR, see Table S4, Supporting Information; HRESIMS m/z 1053.5233 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C51H82O21Na+ 1053.5241).
(3S,20S,22R,25R)-Spirost-5-en-3-yl (β-d-xylopyranosyl-(1→3)-β-d-glucopyranosyl-(1→4)[α-l- rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)]-β-d-glucopyranoside (13): amorphous solid; 1H and 13C NMR, see Table S4, Supporting Information; HRESIMS m/z 1039.5072 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C50H80O21Na+ 1039.5085).

3.6. Activity against Leishmania Donovani Axenic Amastigotes

Amastigotes of L. donovani strain MHOM/ET/67/L82 were grown under an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air in axenic culture at 37 °C in SM medium [60] at pH 5.4 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum. Next, 50 µL of culture medium was added in the wells of a 96-well plate and serial drug dilutions of eleven 3-fold dilution steps covering a final range from 100 to 0.002 μg/mL were prepared. Then, 50 µL of culture medium with 2 × 105 amastigotes from axenic culture were added to each well. The plates were incubated for 70 h and then inspected under an inverted microscope to assure growth of the controls and sterile conditions. 10 μL of resazurin (12.5 mg resazurin dissolved in 100 mL distilled water) were added to each well of the plates and allowed for additional 2 h incubation. Afterwards, plates were read with a Spectramax Gemini XS microplate fluorometer (Molecular Devices Cooperation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) using an excitation wavelength of 536 nm and an emission wavelength of 588 nm. Data were analyzed using the software Softmax Pro (Molecular Devices Cooperation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Decrease of fluorescence (=inhibition) was expressed as percentage of the fluorescence of untreated control cultures and plotted against the drug concentrations. From the sigmoidal inhibition curves the IC50 values were calculated by linear regression using Microsoft Excel. Miltefosine was used as positive control drug. Assays were performed in two independent replicates at least.

3.7. Activity against Leishmania Donovani Intramacrophage Amastigotes

Mouse peritoneal macrophages (4 × 104 in 100 µL RPMI 1640 medium with 10% heat-inactivated FBS) were seeded into wells of a 96-well plate. After 24 h, 100 µL of 2 × 105 amastigote Leishmania donovani were added. The amastigotes were taken from an axenic amastigote culture grown at pH 5.4. The medium containing free amastigote forms was removed after 24 h and replaced with fresh medium. The washing step was repeated and afterwards the serial drug dilution was prepared with at least 6 dilution steps. Compound was dissolved in DMSO at 10 mg/mL and further diluted in medium. After incubation for 96 h at 37 °C under a 5% CO2 atmosphere, the medium was removed and cells were fixed by adding 50 µL 4% formaldehyde solution followed by a staining with a 5 µM DRAQ5 solution. Plates were imaged in ImageXpress XLS (MD) microscope using a 20× air objective (635 nm excitation: 690/50 emission). Nine images were collected per well. Automated image analysis was performed with a script developed on Meta Xpress Software (MD). Three outputs were provided for each well: (i) number of host cell nuclei; (ii) numbers of infected and non-infected host cells; (iii) number of parasite nuclei per infected host cell. The IC50 values were calculated based on the infection rate and the numbers of intracellular amastigotes. Miltefosine was used as control. Assays were performed in two independent replicates at least.

3.8. Activity against Plasmodium Falciparum

In vitro activity against the erythrocytic stages of P. falciparum was determined using a 3H-hypoxanthine incorporation assay [61], using the drug-sensitive NF54 strain [62]. Compounds were dissolved in DMSO at 10 mg/mL and further diluted in medium before addition to parasite cultures incubated in RPMI 1640 medium without hypoxanthine, supplemented with HEPES (5.94 g/L), NaHCO3 (2.1 g/L), neomycin (100 U/mL), AlbumaxR (5 g/L) and washed human red cells A+ at 2.5% haematocrit (0.3% parasitaemia). Serial drug dilutions of eleven 3-fold dilution steps covering a range from 100 to 0.002 μg/mL were prepared. The 96-well plates were incubated in a humidified atmosphere at 37 °C; 4% CO2, 3% O2, 93% N2. After 48 h 50 μL of 3H-hypoxanthine (=0.5 μCi) was added to each well of the plate. The plates were incubated for a further 24 h under the same conditions. The plates were then harvested with a Betaplate™ cell harvester (Wallac, Zurich, Switzerland), and the red blood cells transferred onto a glass fibre filter then lysed with distilled water. The dried filters were inserted into a plastic foil with 10 mL of scintillation fluid, and counted in a Betaplate™ liquid scintillation counter (Wallac, Zurich, Switzerland). IC50 values were calculated from sigmoidal inhibition curves by linear regression using Microsoft Excel. Chloroquine (Sigma C6628) was used as positive control. Assays were performed in two independent replicates at least.

3.9. Activity against Trypanosoma Brucei Rhodesiense

The stock was originally isolated from a Tanzanian patient and adapted to axenic culture conditions after several mouse passages and cloned. Minimum Essential Medium (50 µL) supplemented with 25 mM HEPES, 1 g/L additional glucose, 1% MEM non-essential amino acids (100×), 0.2 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1mM Na-pyruvate [63] and 15% heat inactivated horse serum was added to each well of a 96-well microtiter plate. Serial drug dilutions of eleven 3-fold dilution steps covering a range from 100 to 0.002 μg/mL were prepared. Then 4 × 103 bloodstream forms of T. b. rhodesiense STIB 900 in 50 µL were added to each well and the plate incubated at 37 °C under a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 70 h. 10 µL resazurin solution (resazurin, 12.5 mg in 100 mL double-distilled water) was then added to each well and incubation continued for a further 2–4 h [64]. Then the plates were read with a Spectramax Gemini XS microplate fluorometer (Molecular Devices Cooperation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) using an excitation wavelength of 536 nm and an emission wavelength of 588 nm. Data were analyzed with the graphic programme Softmax Pro (Molecular Devices Cooperation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), which calculated IC50 values by linear regression [65], and 4-parameter logistic regression from the sigmoidal dose inhibition curves using Microsoft Excel. Melarsoprol (Arsobal Sanofi-Aventis, received from WHO) was used as control. Assays were performed in two independent replicates at least.

3.10. In Vitro Cytotoxicity with L-6 Cells

Assays were performed in 96-well microtiter plates, each well containing 100 μL of RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 1% l-glutamine (200 mM) and 10% fetal bovine serum, and 4000 L-6 cells (a primary cell line derived from rat skeletal myoblasts) [66]. Serial drug dilutions of eleven 3-fold dilution steps covering a range from 100 to 0.002 μg/mL were prepared 24 h post seeding L-6 cells. After 70 h of incubation the plates were inspected under an inverted microscope to assure growth of the controls and sterile conditions. 10 μL of resazurin was then added to each well and the plates incubated for another 2 h. Then the plates were read with a Spectramax Gemini XS microplate fluorometer (Molecular Devices Cooperation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) using an excitation wavelength of 536 nm and an emission wavelength of 588 nm. The IC50 values were calculated by linear regression and 4-parameter logistic regression from the sigmoidal dose inhibition curves using SoftmaxPro software (Molecular Devices Cooperation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and Microsoft Excel. Podophyllotoxin (Sigma P4405) was used as control. All assays were performed in two independent replicates at least.

4. Conclusions

In total, eleven compounds (1, 2, and 5–13) have been reported here for the first time from Haplophyllum species and the Rutaceae family. It is interesting to note that, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the presence of the saponin class in the respective plant species and family. The antiprotozoal activity of these compounds, plus the two stereoisomeric tetrahydrofuran lignans fragransin B2 (3) and fragransin B1 (4), was determined against L. donovani amastigotes, P. falciparum, and T. b. rhodesiense bloodstream forms, along with their cytotoxicity to rat myoblast L6 cells. Nectandrin B (2) exhibited the highest activity against L. donovani axenic amastigotes (IC50 4.5 µM) and the highest selectivity index (SI 25.5). The lignan 3,3′-dimethoxy-4,4′-dihydroxylignan-9-ol (10) was the most active against P. falciparum (IC50 9.3 µM; SI 13.7). The steroidal saponins (11–13) showed activity with IC50 ˂ 8 µg/mL across all parasites; however, they were the least selective (SI ˂ 2). The promising activity of nectandrin B against axenic L. donovani amastigotes was not reproduced when tested against intracellular amastigotes, possibly due to lack of penetration or stability of nectandrin B in macrophages. Nevertheless, the specific antileishmanial activity of nectandrin B could serve as the starting point for the identification of a new antileishmanial drug target.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/25/12/2825/s1, Figure S1: UV (A) and ECD (B) spectra for compound 9 in MeOH (0.07 mg/mL), Figure S2: UV (A) and ECD (B) spectra for compound 10 in MeOH (0.05 mg/mL), Figure S3: HSQC-DEPT spectrum of the mixture of compounds 11 (in red and black) and 12 (in blue and black) (500 MHz, DMSO), Figure S4: HMBC spectrum of the mixture of compounds 11 and 12 (500 MHz, DMSO), Figure S5: HSQC-DEPT spectrum of the mixture of compounds 11 and 13 (labelled in red, a prime was added for signals differing from 11) (500 MHz, DMSO), Figure S6: HMBC spectrum of the mixture of compounds 11 and 13 (500 MHz, DMSO), Table S1: 1H and 13C NMR Spectroscopic Data for Compounds 1 and 2 (DMSO-d6; 500.13 MHz for 1H and 125.77 for 13C NMR; δ in ppm), Table S2: 1H and 13C NMR Spectroscopic Data for Compounds 5–8 (DMSO-d6; 500.13 MHz for 1H and 125.77 for 13C NMR; δ in ppm), Table S3: 1H and 13C NMR Spectroscopic Data for Compounds 9 and 10 (DMSO-d6; 500.13 MHz for 1H and 125.77 for 13C NMR; δ in ppm), Table S4: 1H and 13C NMR Spectroscopic Data for Compounds 11–13 (DMSO-d6; 600.18 MHz for 1H and 125.77 for 13C NMR; δ in ppm).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B.M., O.D., M.K., S.K., P.M. and M.H.; methodology, M.K., S.K., P.M. and M.H.; formal analysis, A.B.M., O.D. and S.H.; investigation, A.B.M., O.D., M.K., S.H., A.M., S.A.A. and W.K.O.; resources, W.K.O., A.M., P.M and M.H; writing—original draft preparation, A.B.M., O.D., M.K. and A.M.; writing—review and editing, A.B.M., O.D., M.K., S.H., W.K.O., A.M., S.A.A., S.K., P.M. and M.H.; supervision, P.M., M.H. and S.K.; funding acquisition, P.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by fellowships to A.B.M of the Amt für Ausbildungsbeiträge of the Canton Basel-Stadt and the Emilia Guggenheim-Schnurr Foundation.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Monica Cal, Romina Rocchetti and Sonja Keller for help with antiparasitic drug testing, Orlando Fertig for the sugar analysis, and professors Suad Sulaiman and Marcel Tanner for their mentorship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results”.

References

  1. Hotez, P.J.; Alvarado, M.; Basáñez, M.-G.; Bolliger, I.; Bourne, R.; Boussinesq, M.; Brooker, S.J.; Brown, A.S.; Buckle, G.; Budke, C.M.; et al. The global burden of disease study 2010: Interpretation and implications for the neglected tropical diseases. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e2865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Murray, C.J.; Vos, T.; Lozano, R.; Naghavi, M.; Flaxman, A.D.; Michaud, C.; Ezzati, M.; Shibuya, K.; Salomon, J.A.; Abdalla, S. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012, 380, 2197–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alves, F.; Bilbe, G.; Blesson, S.; Goyal, V.; Monnerat, S.; Mowbray, C.; Ouattara, G.M.; Pécoul, B.; Rijal, S.; Rode, J. Recent development of visceral leishmaniasis treatments: Successes, pitfalls, and perspectives. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 31, e00048-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Balasegaram, M.; Ritmeijer, K.; Lima, M.A.; Burza, S.; Ortiz Genovese, G.; Milani, B.; Gaspani, S.; Potet, J.; Chappuis, F. Liposomal amphotericin B as a treatment for human leishmaniasis. Expert Opin. Emerg. Drugs 2012, 17, 493–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. WHO|Leishmaniasis in High-Burden Countries: An Epidemiological Update Based on Data Reported in 2014. Available online: http://www.who.int/leishmaniasis/resources/who_wer9122/en/ (accessed on 12 May 2020).
  6. Kato, K.C.; Morais-Teixeira, E.; Reis, P.G.; Silva-Barcellos, N.M.; Salaün, P.; Campos, P.P.; Dias Corrêa-Junior, J.; Rabello, A.; Demicheli, C.; Frézard, F. Hepatotoxicity of pentavalent antimonial drug: Possible role of residual Sb(III) and protective effect of ascorbic acid. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Molyneux, D.H.; Savioli, L.; Engels, D. Neglected tropical diseases: Progress towards addressing the chronic pandemic. Lancet Lond. Engl. 2017, 389, 312–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Burza, S.; Croft, S.L.; Boelaert, M. Leishmaniasis. Lancet Lond. Engl. 2018, 392, 951–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mahmoud, A.B.; Mäser, P.; Kaiser, M.; Hamburger, M.; Khalid, S. Mining Sudanese Medicinal Plants for Antiprotozoal Agents. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hamdi, A.; Majouli, K.; Abdelhamid, A.; Marzouk, B.; Belghith, H.; Chraief, I.; Bouraoui, A.; Marzouk, Z.; Heyden, Y.V. Pharmacological activities of the organic extracts and fatty acid composition of the petroleum ether extract from Haplophyllum tuberculatum leaves. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 216, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Eissa, T.F.; González-Burgos, E.; Carretero, M.E.; Gómez-Serranillos, M.P. Biological activity of HPLC-characterized ethanol extract from the aerial parts of Haplophyllum tuberculatum. Pharm. Biol. 2014, 52, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Al-Burtamani, S.K.S.; Fatope, M.O.; Marwah, R.G.; Onifade, A.K.; Al-Saidi, S.H. Chemical composition, antibacterial and antifungal activities of the essential oil of Haplophyllum tuberculatum from Oman. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 96, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Al-Rehaily, A.J.; Al-Howiriny, T.A.; Ahmad, M.S.; Al-Yahya, M.A.; El-Feraly, F.S.; Hufford, C.D.; McPhail, A.T. Alkaloids from Haplophyllum tuberculatum. Phytochemistry 2001, 57, 597–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hamdi, A.; Viane, J.; Mahjoub, M.A.; Majouli, K.; Gad, M.H.H.; Kharbach, M.; Demeyer, K.; Marzouk, Z.; Heyden, Y.V. Polyphenolic contents, antioxidant activities and UPLC-ESI-MS analysis of Haplophyllum tuberculatum A. Juss leaves extracts. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 106, 1071–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hemmati, S.; Seradj, H. Justicidin B: A Promising Bioactive Lignan. Mol. Basel Switz. 2016, 21, 820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. El-Tahir, A.; Satti, G.M.; Khalid, S.A. Antiplasmodial activity of selected sudanese medicinal plants with emphasis on Acacia nilotica. Phytother. Res. PTR 1999, 13, 474–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khalid, S.A.; Farouk, A.; Geary, T.G.; Jensen, J.B. Potential antimalarial candidates from African plants: An in vitro approach using Plasmodium falciparum. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1986, 15, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hamdi, A.; Bero, J.; Beaufay, C.; Flamini, G.; Marzouk, Z.; Vander Heyden, Y.; Quetin-Leclercq, J. In vitro antileishmanial and cytotoxicity activities of essential oils from Haplophyllum tuberculatum A. Juss leaves, stems and aerial parts. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 18, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gertsch, J.; Tobler, R.T.; Brun, R.; Sticher, O.; Heilmann, J. Antifungal, antiprotozoal, cytotoxic and piscicidal properties of Justicidin B and a new arylnaphthalide lignan from Phyllanthus piscatorum. Planta Med. 2003, 69, 420–424. [Google Scholar]
  20. Potterat, O.; Hamburger, M. Combined use of extract libraries and HPLC-based activity profiling for lead discovery: Potential, challenges, and practical considerations. Planta Med. 2014, 80, 1171–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Nguyen, P.H.; Le, T.V.T.; Kang, H.W.; Chae, J.; Kim, S.K.; Kwon, K.; Seo, D.B.; Lee, S.J.; Oh, W.K. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activators from Myristica fragrans (nutmeg) and their anti-obesity effect. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 4128–4131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hattori, M.; Hada, S.; KAWATA, Y.; TEZUKA, Y.; KIKUCHI, T.; NAMBA, T. New 2, 5-bis-aryl-3, 4-dimethyltetrahydrofuran lignans from the aril of Myristica fragrans. Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo) 1987, 35, 3315–3322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nakano, Y.; Nasu, M.; Kano, M.; Kameoka, H.; Okuyama, T.; Nishizawa, M.; Ikeya, Y. Lignans from guaiac resin decrease nitric oxide production in interleukin 1β-treated hepatocytes. J. Nat. Med. 2017, 71, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chen, C.-Y.; Chang, F.-R.; Yen, H.-F.; Wu, Y.-C. Amides from stems of Annona cherimola. Phytochemistry 1998, 49, 1443–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. King, R.R.; Calhoun, L.A. Characterization of cross-linked hydroxycinnamic acid amides isolated from potato common scab lesions. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 2468–2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Iwasa, K.; Takahashi, T.; Nishiyama, Y.; Moriyasu, M.; Sugiura, M.; Takeuchi, A.; Tode, C.; Tokuda, H.; Takeda, K. Online structural elucidation of alkaloids and other constituents in crude extracts and cultured cells of Nandina domestica by combination of LC-MS/MS, LC-NMR, and LC-CD analyses. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 1376–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Maciel, J.K.S.; Chaves, O.S.; Brito Filho, S.G.; Teles, Y.C.F.; Fernandes, M.G.; Assis, T.S.; Fernandes, P.D.; de Andrade, A.P.; Felix, L.P.; Silva, T.M.S.; et al. New Alcamide and Anti-oxidant Activity of Pilosocereus gounellei A. Weber ex K. Schum. Bly. ex Rowl. (Cactaceae). Mol. Basel Switz. 2015, 21, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Liu, Y.; Yu, H.-Y.; Wang, Y.-M.; Tian, T.; Wu, W.-M.; Zhou, M.; Meng, X.-G.; Ruan, H.-L. Neuroprotective Lignans from the Fruits of Schisandra bicolor var. tuberculata. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 1117–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Agrawal, P.K.; Jain, D.C.; Pathak, A.K. NMR spectroscopy of steroidal sapogenins and steroidal saponins: An update. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1995, 33, 923–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nuevo, M.; Cooper, G.; Sandford, S.A. Deoxyribose and deoxysugar derivatives from photoprocessed astrophysical ice analogues and comparison to meteorites. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Farid, H.; Haslinger, E.; Kunert, O.; Wegner, C.; Hamburger, M. New steroidal glycosides from Balanites aegyptiaca. Helv. Chim. Acta 2002, 85, 1019–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pettit, G.R.; Doubek, D.L.; Herald, D.L.; Numata, A.; Takahasi, C.; Fujiki, R.; Miyamoto, T. Isolation and structure of cytostatic steroidal saponins from the African medicinal plant Balanites aegyptica. J. Nat. Prod. 1991, 54, 1491–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rédei, D.; Kúsz, N.; Jedlinszki, N.; Blazsó, G.; Zupkó, I.; Hohmann, J. Bioactivity-Guided Investigation of the Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Hippophae rhamnoides Fruits. Planta Med. 2018, 84, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Khalid, S.A.; Waterman, P.G. Alkaloid, lignan and flavonoid constituents of Haplophyllum tuberculatum from Sudan. Planta Med. 1981, 43, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sheriha, G.M.; Amer, K.M.A. Lignans of haplophyllum tuberculatum. Phytochemistry 1984, 23, 151–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Martin-Tanguy, J.; Cabanne, F.; Perdrizet, E.; Martin, C. The distribution of hydroxycinnamic acid amides in flowering plants. Phytochemistry 1978, 17, 1927–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yang, Y.-L.; Chang, F.-R.; Wu, Y.-C. Annosqualine: A novel alkaloid from the stems of Annona squamosa. Helv. Chim. Acta 2004, 87, 1392–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lajide, L.; Escoubas, P.; Mizutani, J. Termite antifeedant activity in Xylopia aethiopica. Phytochemistry 1995, 40, 1105–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lin, I.J.; Yeh, H.C.; Cham, T.M.; Chen, C.Y. A new butanolide from the leaves of Cinnamomum reticulatum. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2011, 47, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tanaka, H.; Nakamura, T.; Ichino, K.; Ito, K. A phenolic amide from Actinodaphne longifolia. Phytochemistry 1989, 28, 2516–2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hussain, S.F.; Gözler, B.; Shamma, M.; Gözler, T. Feruloyltyramine from Hypecoum. Phytochemistry 1980, 21, 2979–2980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sakakibara, I.; Katsuhara, T.; Ikeya, Y.; Hayashi, K.; Mitsuhashi, H. Cannabisin A, an arylnaphthalene lignanamide from fruits of Cannabis sativa. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 3013–3016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Munoz, O.; Piovano, M.; Garbarino, J.; Hellwing, V.; Breitmaier, E. Tropane alkaloids from Schizanthus litoralis. Phytochemistry 1996, 43, 709–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tian, J.-L.; Liang, X.; Gao, P.-Y.; Li, D.-Q.; Sun, Q.; Li, L.-Z.; Song, S.-J. Two new alkaloids from Portulaca oleracea and their cytotoxic activities. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2014, 16, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Jiang, M.; Zhang, W.; Yang, X.; Xiu, F.; Xu, H.; Ying, X.; Stien, D. An isoindole alkaloid from Portulaca oleracea L. Nat. Prod. Res. 2018, 32, 2431–2436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wu, T.-S.; Shi, L.-S.; Kuo, S.-C. Alkaloids and other constituents from Tribulus terrestris. Phytochemistry 1999, 50, 1411–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Raj, M.K.; Balachandran, C.; Duraipandiyan, V.; Agastian, P.; Ignacimuthu, S.; Vijayakumar, A. Isolation of terrestribisamide from Peltophorum pterocarpum (DC.) Baker ex. K. Heyne and its antimicrobial, antioxidant, and cytotoxic activities. Med. Chem. Res. 2013, 22, 3823–3830. [Google Scholar]
  48. Choi, S.W.; Lee, S.K.; Kim, E.O.; Oh, J.H.; Yoon, K.S.; Parris, N.; Hicks, K.B.; Moreau, R.A. Antioxidant and antimelanogenic activities of polyamine conjugates from corn bran and related hydroxycinnamic acids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 3920–3925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Liu, H.-W.; Nakanishi, K. The structures of balanitins, potent molluscicides isolated from Balanites aegyptiaca. Tetrahedron 1982, 38, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rizk, M.Z.; Metwally, N.S.; Hamed, M.A.; Mohamed, A.M. Correlation between steroid sex hormones, egg laying capacity and cercarial shedding in Biomphalaria alexandrina snails after treatment with Haplophyllum tuberculatum. Exp. Parasitol. 2012, 132, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. da Silva Filho, A.A.; Costa, E.S.; Cunha, W.R.; e Silva, M.L.A.; Nanayakkara, N.P.D.; Bastos, J.K. In vitro antileishmanial and antimalarial activities of tetrahydrofuran lignans isolated from Nectandra megapotamica (Lauraceae). Phytother. Res. PTR 2008, 22, 1307–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. de Oliveira, R.B.; Vaz, A.; Alves, R.O.; Liarte, D.B.; Donnici, C.L.; Romanha, A.J.; Zani, C.L. Arylfurans as potential Trypanosoma cruzi trypanothione reductase inhibitors. Memórias Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2006, 101, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Tovar, J.; Wilkinson, S.; Mottram, J.C.; Fairlamb, A.H. Evidence that trypanothione reductase is an essential enzyme in Leishmania by targeted replacement of the tryA gene locus. Mol. Microbiol. 1998, 29, 653–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Khan, M.O.F. Trypanothione reductase: A viable chemotherapeutic target for antitrypanosomal and antileishmanial drug design. Drug Target Insights 2007, 2, 117739280700200000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, L.P.; Ji, Z.Z. Synthesis, antiinflammatory and anticancer activity of cinnamic acids, their derivatives and analogues. Yao Xue Xue Bao 1992, 27, 817–823. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Ramos-Nino, M.E.; Clifford, M.N.; Adams, M.R. Quantitative structure activity relationship for the effect of benzoic acids, cinnamic acids and benzaldehydes on Listeria monocytogenes. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1996, 80, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pedersen, H.A.; Steffensen, S.K.; Christophersen, C.; Mortensen, A.G.; Jørgensen, L.N.; Niveyro, S.; De Troiani, R.M.; Rodríguez-Enríquez, R.J.; Barba-de la Rosa, A.P.; Fomsgaard, I.S. Synthesis and quantitation of six phenolic amides in Amaranthus spp. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 6306–6311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Natella, F.; Nardini, M.; Di Felice, M.; Scaccini, C. Benzoic and cinnamic acid derivatives as antioxidants: Structure—Activity relation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 1453–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Potterat, O.; Hamburger, M. Concepts and technologies for tracking bioactive compounds in natural product extracts: Generation of libraries, and hyphenation of analytical processes with bioassays. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2013, 30, 546–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cunningham, I. New culture medium for maintenance of tsetse tissues and growth of trypanosomatids. J. Protozool. 1977, 24, 325–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Desjardins, R.E.; Canfield, C.J.; Haynes, J.D.; Chulay, J.D. Quantitative assessment of antimalarial activity in vitro by a semiautomated microdilution technique. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1979, 16, 710–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Ponnudurai, T.; Leeuwenberg, A.D.; Meuwissen, J.H. Chloroquine sensitivity of isolates of Plasmodium falciparum adapted to in vitro culture. Trop. Geogr. Med. 1981, 33, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Baltz, T.; Baltz, D.; Giroud, C.; Crockett, J. Cultivation in a semi-defined medium of animal infective forms of Trypanosoma brucei, T. equiperdum, T. evansi, T. rhodesiense and T. gambiense. EMBO J. 1985, 4, 1273–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Räz, B.; Iten, M.; Grether-Bühler, Y.; Kaminsky, R.; Brun, R. The Alamar Blue assay to determine drug sensitivity of African trypanosomes (T.b. rhodesiense and T.b. gambiense) in vitro. Acta Trop. 1997, 68, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Huber, W.; Koella, J.C. A comparison of three methods of estimating EC50 in studies of drug resistance of malaria parasites. Acta Trop. 1993, 55, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ahmed, S.A.; Gogal, R.M.; Walsh, J.E. A new rapid and simple non-radioactive assay to monitor and determine the proliferation of lymphocytes: An alternative to [3H]thymidine incorporation assay. J. Immunol. Methods 1994, 170, 211–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Molecules 25 02825 g001 550
Figure 1. HPLC-based activity profiling of the chloroform fraction against axenic amastigotes of L. donovani. The ESIMS (base peak chromatogram in positive ion mode) from a separation of 300 μg of fraction is shown. For each microfraction the activity is expressed as percent growth inhibition in comparison to untreated cultures (grey bars). Bold numbers in the chromatogram refer to compounds 1, 2, and 5–10.
Figure 1. HPLC-based activity profiling of the chloroform fraction against axenic amastigotes of L. donovani. The ESIMS (base peak chromatogram in positive ion mode) from a separation of 300 μg of fraction is shown. For each microfraction the activity is expressed as percent growth inhibition in comparison to untreated cultures (grey bars). Bold numbers in the chromatogram refer to compounds 1, 2, and 5–10.
Molecules 25 02825 g001
Molecules 25 02825 g002 550
Figure 2. HPLC-based activity profiling of the water fraction against axenic amastigotes of L. donovani. The ESIMS (base peak chromatogram in positive ion mode) from a separation of 300 μg of fraction is shown. For each microfraction the activity is expressed as percent growth inhibition in comparison to untreated cultures (grey bars). Bold numbers in the chromatogram refer to compounds 11–13.
Figure 2. HPLC-based activity profiling of the water fraction against axenic amastigotes of L. donovani. The ESIMS (base peak chromatogram in positive ion mode) from a separation of 300 μg of fraction is shown. For each microfraction the activity is expressed as percent growth inhibition in comparison to untreated cultures (grey bars). Bold numbers in the chromatogram refer to compounds 11–13.
Molecules 25 02825 g002
Molecules 25 02825 g003 550
Figure 3. Chemical Structures of tetrahydrofuroguaiacin B (1), nectandrin B (2), fragransin B2 (3), fragransin B1 (4), dihydro-feruloyltyramine (5), (E)-N-feruloyltyramine (6), furoguaiaoxidin (7), N,N′-diferuloylputrescine (8), 7′-ethoxy-feruloyltyramine (9), and 3,3′-dimethoxy-4,4′-dihydroxylignan-9-ol (10).
Figure 3. Chemical Structures of tetrahydrofuroguaiacin B (1), nectandrin B (2), fragransin B2 (3), fragransin B1 (4), dihydro-feruloyltyramine (5), (E)-N-feruloyltyramine (6), furoguaiaoxidin (7), N,N′-diferuloylputrescine (8), 7′-ethoxy-feruloyltyramine (9), and 3,3′-dimethoxy-4,4′-dihydroxylignan-9-ol (10).
Molecules 25 02825 g003
Molecules 25 02825 g004 550
Figure 4. Chemical structures of (3S,20S,22R,25S)-spirost-5-en-3-yl-(β-d-xylopyranosyl-(1→3)-β-d-glucopyranosyl-(1→4) [α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)]-β-d-glucopyranoside (11), (3S,20S,22R,25S)- spirost-5-en-3-yl-(β-d-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→3)-β-d-glucopyranosyl-(1→4)[α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)]-β-d-glucopyranoside (12), and (3S,20S,22R,25R)-spirost-5-en-3-yl-(β-d-xylopyranosyl-(1→3)-β-d-glucopyranosyl-(1→4)[α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)]-β-d-glucopyranoside (13).
Figure 4. Chemical structures of (3S,20S,22R,25S)-spirost-5-en-3-yl-(β-d-xylopyranosyl-(1→3)-β-d-glucopyranosyl-(1→4) [α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)]-β-d-glucopyranoside (11), (3S,20S,22R,25S)- spirost-5-en-3-yl-(β-d-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→3)-β-d-glucopyranosyl-(1→4)[α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)]-β-d-glucopyranoside (12), and (3S,20S,22R,25R)-spirost-5-en-3-yl-(β-d-xylopyranosyl-(1→3)-β-d-glucopyranosyl-(1→4)[α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)]-β-d-glucopyranoside (13).
Molecules 25 02825 g004
Table
Table 1. In vitro Activity of compounds 1−10 against L. donovani (MHOM-ET-67/L82) axenic amastigotes, P. falciparum (NF54), T. b. rhodesiense (STIB 900), and cytotoxicity in L6 Cells.
Table 1. In vitro Activity of compounds 1−10 against L. donovani (MHOM-ET-67/L82) axenic amastigotes, P. falciparum (NF54), T. b. rhodesiense (STIB 900), and cytotoxicity in L6 Cells.
CompoundL. donovaniP. falciparumT. b. rhodesienseL6 Cells
No.IC50 a (µM)SI bIC50 a (µM)SI bIC50 a (µM)SI b
122.6 ± 6.54.253.1 ± 2.01.859.4 ± 2.51.695.2 ± 9.3
24.5 ± 1.025.59.5 ± 0.112.148.3 ± 1.32.4115.0 ± 2.6
336.0 ± 7.34.736.1 ± 1.04.747.5 ± 4.53.62001 ± 47.0
429.2 ± 6.04.817.4 ± 2.18.040.7 ± 0.43.4163.0 ± 4.5
5141.3 ± 1.9n.d158.7n.d206.0 ± 66.7n.d˃317.5
699.4 ± 9.32.568.4 ± 3.83.6120.9 ± 36.92.0246.8 ± 3.7
7136.5 ± 1.5n.d48.1 ± 10.9n.d114.0 ± 0.0n.d˃280.9
897.0 ± 0.91.530.6 ± 8.34.818.9 ± 8.47.8146.5 ± 18.8
969.6 ± 4.63.030.4 ± 8.06.872.7 ± 30.42.9207.8 ± 21.6
1055.3 ± 3.02.39.3 ± 1.313.727.5 ± 8.44.6127.6 ± 3.9
Positive control0.5 d 0.01 e 0.01 c 0.03 f
a The IC50s are mean values from at least two independent replicates ± absolute deviation. b Selectivity index (SI): IC50 in L6 cells divided by IC50 in the titled parasitic strain; c melarsoprol; d miltefosine; e chloroquine; f podophyllotoxin; n.d: not determined.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mahmoud, A.B.; Danton, O.; Kaiser, M.; Han, S.; Moreno, A.; Abd Algaffar, S.; Khalid, S.; Oh, W.K.; Hamburger, M.; Mäser, P. Lignans, Amides, and Saponins from Haplophyllum tuberculatum and Their Antiprotozoal Activity. Molecules 2020, 25, 2825. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122825

AMA Style

Mahmoud AB, Danton O, Kaiser M, Han S, Moreno A, Abd Algaffar S, Khalid S, Oh WK, Hamburger M, Mäser P. Lignans, Amides, and Saponins from Haplophyllum tuberculatum and Their Antiprotozoal Activity. Molecules. 2020; 25(12):2825. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122825

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mahmoud, Abdelhalim Babiker, Ombeline Danton, Marcel Kaiser, Sohee Han, Aitor Moreno, Shereen Abd Algaffar, Sami Khalid, Won Keun Oh, Matthias Hamburger, and Pascal Mäser. 2020. "Lignans, Amides, and Saponins from Haplophyllum tuberculatum and Their Antiprotozoal Activity" Molecules 25, no. 12: 2825. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122825

APA Style

Mahmoud, A. B., Danton, O., Kaiser, M., Han, S., Moreno, A., Abd Algaffar, S., Khalid, S., Oh, W. K., Hamburger, M., & Mäser, P. (2020). Lignans, Amides, and Saponins from Haplophyllum tuberculatum and Their Antiprotozoal Activity. Molecules, 25(12), 2825. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122825

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop