Next Article in Journal
G-Quadruplexes at Telomeres: Friend or Foe?
Next Article in Special Issue
Chitosan Oligosaccharides Coupling Inhibits Bacterial Biofilm-Related Antibiotic Resistance against Florfenicol
Previous Article in Journal
Opening up the Toolbox: Synthesis and Mechanisms of Phosphoramidates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vitamin C Enhances the Antibacterial Activity of Honey against Planktonic and Biofilm-Embedded Bacteria
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Lauryl Gallate Activity and Streptococcus mutans: Its Effects on Biofilm Formation, Acidogenicity and Gene Expression

1
Department of Physiology, Biochemistry, Microbiology and Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius 03101, Lithuania
2
Molecular Genetics and Virology Laboratory, Al-Qasemi Center of Excellence, Al-Qasemi Academic College, P.O. Box 124, Baka EL-Garbiah 30100, Israel
3
Institute for Medical Research, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya 2210001, Israel
4
Faculty of Medicine in the Galilee, Bar-Ilan University, Safed 1311502, Israel
5
The Institute of Applied Research-Galilee Society, P.O. Box 437, Shefa-Amr 20200, Israel
6
Faculty of Science, Al-Qasemi Academic College, P.O. Box 124, Baka EL-Garbiah 30100, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2020, 25(16), 3685; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25163685
Submission received: 27 June 2020 / Revised: 8 August 2020 / Accepted: 12 August 2020 / Published: 13 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiofilm Efficacy of Natural and Natural-Based Products)

Abstract

:
Streptococcus mutans bacterium is implicated in the pathogenesis of dental caries due to the production of biofilm and organic acids from dietary sucrose. Despite the availability of various means of prophylaxis, caries still has a high worldwide prevalence. Therefore, it is important to find new pharmaceuticals to inhibit S. mutans biofilm formation and acidogenicity. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the activity of lauryl gallate (dodecyl gallate) against S. mutans acidogenicity, the expression of biofilm-associated genes, and biofilm development on solid surfaces (polystyrene, glass). The biofilm quantities produced by S. mutans bacteria were assessed using colorimetric and optical profilometry techniques. Acidogenicity was evaluated by measuring the pH of the biofilm growth medium with microelectrode. Assessment of the expression of gene coding for glucan-binding protein B (gbpB), glucosyltranferases B, -C, -D (gtfB, -C, -D), and the F-ATPase β subunit of F1 protein (atpD) was carried out using a quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). The results demonstrate the capacity of lauryl gallate to significantly inhibit S. mutans acidogenicity and biofilm development on solid surfaces, in a dose-dependent manner, compared to untreated bacteria (p < 0.05). The highest activity of lauryl gallate occurred at a concentration of 98.98 µM, at which it suppressed biofilm formation by 100% and lowered pH levels by 98%. The effect of lauryl gallate treatment on gene expression changes, as demonstrated by our RT-qPCR data, was limited to the gtfD gene only, was a significant (48%) decrease in gene expression, obtained for the biofilm-producing bacteria, while a 300% increase in fold change for the same gene occurred in the planktonic cells. It is important to note that in previous studies we showed a broader effect of related derivatives. However, a similar magnitude of difference in effects between biofilm and planktonic cells for the atpD gene was obtained after treatment with octyl gallate and reverse magnitude for the same gene after treatment with ethyl gallate. Therefore, to ascertain the possible direct or indirect effects of lauryl gallate, as well as octyl gallate and ethyl gallate, more research is needed to examine the effects on the amount of enzymes and on the enzymatic activity of the products of the affected genes that are involved in the production and maintenance of biofilm by S. mutans.

1. Introduction

Streptococcus mutans is an important bacterial species of human oral microbiota that predominantly colonizes the hard tissue surfaces of teeth, causing dental caries through sucrose-dependent adhesion and consequent biofilm formation [1,2]. This mechanism involves the utilization of dietary sucrose by the S. mutans glucosyltransferases, GtfB, -C, and -D, to produce water-insoluble, partly soluble, and soluble glucan polymers, respectively [3,4]. Interactions between the synthesized polymers and the S. mutans glucan-binding proteins GbpA, -B, -C, and -D, lead to the accumulation and development of dental biofilm [5]. Moreover, sucrose is further fermented by S. mutans bacteria to produce lactic acid, thereby lowering the pH to values below 5.0 within the biofilm [6,7]. This results in rapid acidification of the dental biofilm, which is subsequently sustained by the proton-translocating F-type ATPase of S. mutans [7,8]. This multimeric enzyme consists of the membrane-inserted F0 protein and peripherally attached F1 protein complexes, possessing the main functionally active b and β subunits encoded by atpF and atpD genes, respectively [8]. The activity of F-type ATPase maintains steady acidogenicity in the biofilm, which in turn causes the dissolution of tooth enamel with the development of carious lesions (i.e., dental caries) [6,9].
Like other bacteria that adopt this strategy, the biofilm of S. mutans confers resistance to pharmaceutical molecules not through gene transfer or specific mutations, as in classical antibiotic resistance, but due to its structural and functional repertoire. Biofilm aggregates consist of an extracellular polymeric matrix of complex and variable composition that contains exopolysaccharides, extracellular DNA, and other secreted proteins that can form amyloid fibers [10]. This macromolecular assemblage collectively blocks access by antimicrobial molecules and the components of host immune systems to biofilm-encased bacteria, which, thus, are inaccessible and resistant to treatment [11,12,13,14]. Besides protecting against antimicrobial compounds, the biofilm encapsulates bacteria and maintains homeostasis by retaining water to preserve a state of steady internal physical and chemical conditions that enable the bacteria to survive [10,13]. As for S. mutans, biofilms thus play a crucial role in chronic infections such as dental plaque and caries, and seem to play a role in the oral colonization associated with the severity of periodontal disease [15]. Therefore, it is important to develop new pharmaceutical molecules that can act against this critical formation of cariogenic biofilm, as dental caries are still prevalent in all age groups worldwide [16].
In recent years, due to the natural and unavoidable phenomenon of biofilm resistance, the search for new antibacterial molecules has been ongoing, because it is of especial importance to human health [11,17,18]. Active phytochemicals derived from natural sources have recently been the focus of the search for new molecules that act against bacterial pathogens [19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Naturally occurring compounds in plants, as well as plant extracts, have been shown to exhibit anti-biofilm activity [24]. Among these natural compounds, epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), a major polyphenol in green tea (Camellia sinensis), also found in many other plants, has shown inhibitory effects against Streptococcus mutans [26]. In our previous studies, other natural derivatives of alkyl gallates that have been shown to significantly suppress S. mutans biofilm formation are methyl gallate (C1-MG) and ethyl gallate (C2-EG) [27,28], and we have demonstrated that an octyl gallate derivative (C8-OG) significantly diminished biofilm formation and suppressed the associated genes expressed in S. mutans [29]. Alkyl gallates with longer alkyl chains, e.g., the derivative lauryl gallate (dodecyl gallate), have yet to be investigated for these actions on biofilm formation and its related genes in S. mutans.
Lauryl gallate (C12-LG) is a natural plant triphenol, an N-alkyl ester derivative of gallic acid, that, like other derivatives (i.e., methyl, propyl, octyl gallates), is widely used as an antioxidant additive in food and in pharmaceutical and cosmetic products [30,31]. It protects cells against oxidative stresses caused by free radicals [30] and has been shown to have antiviral and antibacterial activity [32,33]. With its bulky polar head and single hydrophobic chain, lauryl gallate is likely to act on the superficial polar region and within the hydrophobic regions of bacterial membranes, modifying their fluidity, integrity, stability and bioactivity, and deactivating membrane proteins [34,35,36].
This study focused on the effects of lauryl gallate (C12-LG) against S. mutans biofilm formation on solid surfaces (polystyrene, glass) and on its acidogenicity and expression of biofilm-associated genes.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Antibacterial Activity of C12-LG on S. mutans

As shown in Table 1, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of C12-LG on S. mutans is 288.5 µM.

2.2. Inhibitory Effect of C12-LG Against the Formation of S. mutans Biofilm on Polystyrene Surfaces

An evaluation of biofilm biomass by colorimetric assay showed that C12-LG concentrations of 87.16, 90.12, 93.07, 96.03, and 98.98 µM inhibited S. mutans biofilm development on polystyrene surfaces in Todd Hewitt broth (THB) containing 1% sucrose (Figure 1). It is important to note that these biofilm-inhibiting concentrations fall below the identified MIC (i.e., 288.5 µM), indicating non-bactericidal activity for C12-LG. The suppressive effect of C12-LG against biofilm formation occurred in a dose-dependent manner. As shown in Figure 1, C12-LG concentrations from 90.12 to 98.98 µM significantly reduced S. mutans biofilm biomass on the polystyrene surfaces, in comparison to the biomass of the control bacteria (p < 0.05). It needs to be highlighted that the C12-LG concentration of 98.98 µM completely (i.e., by 100%) suppressed production of the biofilm biomass in comparison to that of the untreated bacteria. Moreover, DMSO alone, used at a concentration of 0.67%, had an insignificant effect against S. mutans biofilm development relative to that of the control bacteria (p > 0.05). Interestingly, the biofilm-inhibiting concentrations of C12-LG were in a quite narrow range, reflecting a similar finding for octyl gallate, that suppressive concentrations fell into a range from 97.4 to 100.24 µM [29]. However, this inhibitory effect of C12-LG occurred at lower concentrations than those of octyl gallate, and it was markedly greater than the activity of ethyl and methyl gallates, for which previously determined suppressive concentrations were in the ranges of 2.78–3.53 and 2.99–5.43 mM, respectively [27,28]. The results clearly indicate that the degree of the antibiofilm effect is positively correlated with the length of the alkyl chain in gallic acid esters, including lauryl gallate. Furthermore, in support of our findings, this type of suppressive activity, observed here in lauryl gallate, has also been noted by Zhang et al. [37] against another biofilm-forming pathogen, Streptococcus pneumoniae.

2.3. Inhibitory Effect of C12-LG Against the Formation of S. mutans Biofilm on Glass Surfaces

As seen in Figure 2B and Figure 3, the adhesion of S. mutans bacteria and consequent biofilm formation on the surfaces of the glass slide were strongly induced by the presence of 1% sucrose within the THB, as opposed to the adhesion of bacteria incubated in the absence of C12-LG and sucrose (Figure 2A). As regards the untreated bacteria, the values determined for the surface roughness (Rq) and thickness parameters were 0.1 ± 0.01 and 0.15 ± 0.01 μm, respectively. A DMSO concentration of 0.67% insignificantly reduced biofilm formation in comparison to that of the control bacteria (p > 0.05) (Figure 2C and Figure 3). In contrast, exposing S. mutans bacteria grown in the presence of 1% sucrose to C12-LG concentrations of 87.16, 90.12, 93.07, 96.03, and 98.98 µM led to a dose-dependent inhibition of biofilm development on glass surfaces (Figure 2D–H, and Figure 3). In this regard, all of the C12-LG concentrations significantly decreased the surface roughness parameter (Rq) of the biofilm (Figure 3A) and the biofilm thickness (Figure 3B) in comparison to those of the control bacteria (p < 0.05). Importantly, S. mutans biofilm formation on the glass surfaces was completely suppressed (100%) by a C12-LG concentration of 98.98 µM. These data are in agreement with results obtained in our recent studies [27,28,29], where it was found that other gallic acid esters (octyl, ethyl and methyl gallates) with shorter alkyl chain lengths also possess the capacity to inhibit S. mutans biofilm production on glass surfaces. However, in the present investigation, by using lower concentrations of lauryl gallate, we furnish strong evidence that longer alkyl chain lengths contribute to a stronger inhibitory activity of gallic acid esters against S. mutans biofilm formation on glass surfaces.

2.4. Inhibitory Effect of C12-LG Against the Acidogenicity of S. mutans Biofilm

The addition of 1% sucrose to THB and its subsequent breakdown by S. mutans bacteria caused a substantial acidogenicity of the biofilm grown in the absence of C12-LG, decreasing the pH levels of the biofilm growth medium by ~1.8-fold in the control group, compared to the pH levels in the blank group (Table 2). A DMSO concentration of 0.67% had no considerable effect on the acidogenicity of S. mutans biofilm, as shown in Table 2. In contrast, exposure of S. mutans bacteria to C12-LG concentrations ranging from 87.16 to 98.98 µM heightened the pH of the biofilm growth medium in a dose-dependent manner, approaching the pH levels of the blank group (Table 2). Moreover, it should be noted that all of the C12-LG concentrations significantly reduced the acidification of the biofilm in the treated S. mutans bacteria, relative to the untreated control bacteria (p < 0.05). The strongest effect of C12-LG occurred at a concentration of 98.98 µM, which lowered the pH level by 98%. Hence, lauryl gallate has the capacity to inhibit the production of organic acids (i.e., acidogenicity) in S. mutans biofilm. In contrast to the similar effects of octyl, ethyl and methyl gallates reported in our previous studies [27,28,29], lauryl gallate provided inhibitory activity against the acidogenicity of S. mutans biofilm at lower concentrations.

2.5. Gene Expression Analysis

To follow changes in gene expression, the two-step SYBR qRT-PCR was employed to determine relative changes in the expression of the gbpB, gtfB, gtfC, gtfD, and atpD genes involved in biofilm production, and 16SrRNA was used as the reference gene. For this purpose, seeded S. mutans cells producing biofilm and planktonic cells were treated with three concentrations of C12-LG (288.5, 144.2, and 77.1 µM), and untreated cells were used as a control. Since the C12-LG 1.0 and 0.5 MIC samples showed no growth, or a negligible amount of S. mutans, only the 0.25 MIC sample was used for the gene expression analysis. The results of the analysis are shown in terms of gene expression fold changes in Table 3 and graphically presented in Figure 4 and Figure 5. In Figure 4, the biofilm-producing cells treated with C12-LG at a concentration of 77.1 µM (labeled “lauryl” and equal to 25% of the MIC value) show a significant (48%) decrease in fold change only for the gtfD gene and slight non-significant changes for the other four genes (gbpB, gtfB, gtfC, and atpD). In contrast, Figure 5 shows that C12-LG treatment of the planktonic cells caused a 300% increase in fold changes in the same gene, gtfD, which was down-regulated in the biofilm-producing cells. Concomitantly, in the other four genes, no remarkable change was noticed. Although in our previous studies [27,28,29], we reported on the broader effects of other gallic acid derivatives on the same five genes, it is interesting that in the current study, the C12-LG effect on gene expression in those genes was limited to the gtfD gene only. It is also important to note that the gtfD gene encodes to glucosyltransferase, which produces soluble glucan polymers. In the future, more studies will be conducted to study the effects of lauryl gallate on additional genes involved in biofilm production, as well as on the amount of proteins they produce.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. The Source of Chemicals

Highly purified water was prepared with a Millipore Milli-Q Plus water purification system. Lauryl gallate, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and erythromycin were purchased from Sigma (Rehovot, Israel).

3.2. Test Bacterium and Culture Growth Conditions

The bacterium used in this study was Streptococcus mutans strain UA159 (ATCC No. 700610), obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). This bacterial strain was cryo-preserved in 10% skim milk (Difco; BD BioSciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) at −70 °C until testing. Cultivation of S. mutans bacteria was performed in Bacto Todd Hewitt broth (THB; BD BioSciences, NJ, USA) under anaerobic conditions (95% N2 and 5% CO2) at 37 °C for 18 h prior to starting the experiments. Evaluation of the culture purity was carried out using Mitis Salivarius agar (Difco; BD BioSciences, NJ, USA) and Columbia agar, with 7% sheep blood (E&O Laboratories, Bonnybridge, Scotland).

3.3. Microdilution Test for Determining the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

To determine the MIC value, the broth microdilution assay was applied using a twofold serial dilution of C12-LG solution in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth, as described elsewhere [27,38]. Each well contained 105 clone-forming units. The MIC value was defined as the lowest concentration that can inhibit the visible growth of bacteria in triplicate wells, following incubation at 37 °C for 24 h overnight. After the MIC value was visually determined, 20 µL of p-iodonitrotetrazolium violet (8 mg/mL in ethanol) were added to each well. The plate was incubated for another 30 min and inspected visually for any change in color from yellow to pink, which indicates a chemical reduction in dye due to bacterial growth. A twofold dilution of erythromycin was used as a positive control.

3.4. Experimental Procedures for S. mutans Biofilm Formation and Exposure to C12-LG

To determine the efficacy of C12-LG, S. mutans biofilm formation on polystyrene and glass surfaces was produced for the different experiments. Prior to starting the experiments, the optical density (OD) of the S. mutans culture was adapted to 0.2, which corresponded to 1.6 × 108 bacterial cells/mL, using a microplate-reader spectrophotometer set to 630 nm. Twenty-four-well, flat-bottomed, polystyrene cell culture plates (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany), containing THB with 1% sucrose, were used to produce the biofilm on polystyrene surfaces. A solution of lauryl gallate (C12-LG; Sigma-Aldrich, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) in pure dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) was added to the wells at final concentrations of 29.5 µg/mL (87.16 µM), 30.5 µg/mL (90.12 µM), 31.5 µg/mL (93.07 µM), 32.5 µg/mL (96.03 µM), and 33.5 µg/mL (98.98 µM). As the solvent for lauryl gallate, DMSO was added separately to the wells at the maximum concentration of DMSO that was used in the experiments, i.e., 0.67% (v/v). Sterile glass slides of 1-mm thickness, cut from standard microscope slides (76 × 26 mm; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and inserted vertically into the plate wells, were used to provide the glass surfaces for the biofilm. Subsequently, S. mutans bacteria were inoculated into the wells at a final dilution of 1:100, and all of the plates were incubated anaerobically (95% N2 and 5% CO2) at 37 °C for 24 h. Afterwards, the biofilm produced on the polystyrene surfaces was assessed by using the colorimetric technique, whereas the biofilm developed on the glass surfaces was evaluated by applying the optical profilometry technique. In the experimental procedures, plate wells without S. mutans bacteria were used as blank controls, and unexposed S. mutans bacteria served as experimental controls. For the colorimetric and optical profilometry techniques, a percentage of C12-LG inhibition against biofilm formation was calculated using the values of OD, surface roughness (Rq), and biofilm thickness parameters, according to the Equation (1):
C 12 - LG   inhibitory   %   = ( Parameter u n e x p o s e d   c o n t r o l   Parameter e x p o s u r e Parameter u n e x p o s e d   c o n t r o l ) × 100 %           .

3.5. Colorimetric Technique

The biofilm biomass produced by S. mutans bacteria on polystyrene surfaces was quantified using the colorimetric technique, as reported in our previous studies [27,28]. In brief, following the staining of the fixed and air-dried biofilm with a 0.01% crystal violet solution (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), the bound dye was released by applying a 33% acetic acid solution (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Then, the absorbance (i.e., OD) of the released dye solution from the samples was measured using a microplate-reader spectrophotometer set to 595 nm. Background staining was corrected for by subtracting the degree of staining in the blank wells and in the wells with unexposed bacteria grown in the absence of sucrose.

3.6. Optical Profilometry Technique

The quantities of biofilm formed by S. mutans bacteria on the glass surfaces were assessed by the optical profilometry technique, as described previously [27,28]. Briefly, the biofilm-covered and air-dried glass slides were evaluated applying a non-contact optical imaging profilometer Sensofar PLµ 2300 system (Terrassa, Spain), equipped with a 50× confocal objective spanning a view field of 253 × 190 μm. A total of six scanning measurements were carried out in order to evaluate the surface roughness, while five scanning measurements were conducted to assess the biofilm thickness per slide, halfway from the bottom to the top of the visible biofilm. Afterwards, the data for the scanned and measured samples were processed by using Gwyddion software (version 2.50, Department of Nanometrology, Czech Metrology Institute, Brno, Czech Republic; http://gwyddion.net) to compute the parameters for surface roughness and biofilm thickness. Calculation of the root mean square of the roughness (Rq) parameter was performed in order to quantify the slide surface roughness, which signified the adhesion of S. mutans bacteria. The height of an artificially produced vertical scratch on each bacteria-covered slide was measured to quantify the biofilm thickness, which is an indicator of the level of maturity of the S. mutans biofilm. The background for the parameters of surface roughness and biofilm thickness was corrected for by subtracting the Rq and thickness values of the blank glass slides, and those of the glass slides with unexposed bacteria grown in the absence of sucrose.

3.7. Assessment of the Biofilm Acidogenicity

The acidogenicity of S. mutans biofilm was evaluated using the procedures outlined in our recent study [27]. Measurement of the pH of the biofilm growth medium was performed by using a microelectrode InLab® Micro Pro ISM® connected to a bench-top pH meter, a SevenCompact S210-Bio (Mettler-Toledo GmbH, Greifensee, Switzerland). The microelectrode was calibrated with standard pH buffers (pH 4.01 and 7.00).

3.8. Analysis of Gene Expression

Overnight cultures of S. mutans grown in Luria–Bertani (LB) broth were diluted into a fresh LB medium of 1% sucrose to obtain a final concentration of 0.5 × 105 clone-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) and were equally distributed into 50-mL tubes (30 mL/tube). Lauryl gallate solution was added to the tubes at concentrations of 288.5, 144.2, and 77.1 µM. Cultures without lauryl gallate were used as a control. Cells were grown in three wells of a six-well plate at 5 mL per well (15 mL total), and the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Planktonic cells were collected separately and stored at −4 °C for further analysis. The attached cells (biofilm) were scraped from the wells and stored at −4 °C for RNA isolation.

3.9. RNA Isolation

Total RNA was extracted in the manner previously reported [29]. In short, planktonic cells maintained in liquid culture before and after treatment with C12-LG were transferred separately to new 50 mL tubes. Then, biofilm-producing cells were collected by scraping the bottom of the culture tubes and transferred to separate 50 mL tubes. After both the planktonic and biofilm-produing cells were centrifuged at 4800× g for 10 min, the bacterial pellets were washed three times with 500 µL of ice-cold phosphate buffer solution (PBS). The RNA was extracted after subjecting the cell pellets to three cycles of re-suspension in CTAB/PVP/BME solution, followed by deep freezing at −80 °C and thawing at room temperature. The lysed cells were subsequently processed as described previously [27]; however, after DNAse treatment with a TURBO DNA-free kit, a phenol/chloroform/IAA step was included, followed by two cycles of chloroform/IAA extractions. RNA was collected on Qiagen spin columns and eluted in 50 microliters of RNase-free water following the Qiagen protocol. The quantity and purity of the total RNA samples were assessed by ultraviolet spectroscopy with a DS-11 spectrophotometer (DeNovix, Inc., Wilmington, North Carolina, USA).

3.10. RT-qPCR for the Estimation of Biofilm-Associated Gene Expression Following C12-LG Treatment

One microgram of total RNA was subjected to cDNA synthesis using the random hexamer primer included in the qPCRBIO cDNA Synthesis Kit (PCR Biosystems, Ltd., London, England). The qPCR was performed using a Biorad CT030008 system (Biorad,) with SSo SyGreen Mix (Biorad Ltd., London, England). One µL of each cDNA sample was used in 20 µL of total reaction volume. The final primer concentration was 400 nM for both the forward and reverse primers, in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The cycling conditions were as follows: 30 s of initial denaturation at 95 °C, 40 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C and 30 s at 60 °C, and a final melting curve program. The primer sequences were as previously published [27].
Amplifications using total RNA that was not reverse-transcribed were performed to check for genomic DNA contamination, and no-template controls were included. The comparative ∆∆CT Livak method for qPCR data was applied as a standard procedure in the analysis of the relative gene expression data. The CT (cycle threshold) values were normalized to the reference gene 16S rRNA, and the difference in the ∆CT values (∆∆CT) between the samples of interest and the control samples was calculated [29].

3.11. Statistical Analysis

The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software, version 23.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), was applied to analyze the data collected from the colorimetric, profilometric, and pH measurements. The intergroup differences (i.e., between the unexposed control group and the exposed groups) were estimated by using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a post-hoc, least-significant difference test to compare the multiple means. The values are expressed as the mean ± standard error. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. To investigate gene expression, three independent experiments with two technical tests were conducted for each treatment (n = 6). The statistical analysis was performed using a one-way analysis of variance, followed by the Tukey–Kramer test, at a significance level of 0.05. The figures display the mean and standard deviations.

4. Conclusions

The accumulation of biofilm produced by Streptococcus mutans bacteria on hard tooth tissues remains one of the most prevalent oral diseases, so that the development of new antibiofilm agents is of critical importance. Our results show that exposure to C12-LG significantly diminished biofilm formation by S. mutans on solid surfaces and suppressed acidogenicity in a dose-dependent manner, compared to unexposed bacteria (p < 0.05). C12-LG concentration of 98.98 µM inhibited S. mutans biofilm development on solid surfaces by 100% and prevented any decrease in pH levels. The capability of C12-LG to inhibit biofilm formation and acidogenicity recommends it as an anticaries agent for oral formulations that aim to reduce the prevalence of dental caries. It is worth noting that the current available toxicological evidence indicates that gallic acid derivatives (ethyl gallate, propyl gallate, octyl gallate, and lauryl gallate) may be used safely as antioxidants. No toxic effects were observed at a dose level of 1000 mg/kg feed and toxic effects were found only at 3000 mg/kg feed or higher levels. The FAO/WHO Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) in 1976 “established an acceptable daily intake for man of 0.2 mg/kg body weight (as a sum of propyl, octyl and dodecyl gallates)” [39].
In the current study, we investigated the effects of C12-LG treatment on five important genes involved in biofilm production by S. mutans. The results show that biofilm-producing bacteria treated with C12-LG at a concentration of 77.1 µM show a significant (48%) decrease in fold change for the gtfD gene only, while no significant change was observed in the other four genes (gbpB, gtfB, gtfC, and atpD). However, in the planktonic cells, C12-LG treatment caused a 300% increase in fold change for the same gene, gtfD, which was down-regulated in the biofilm-producing cells. In the other four genes, no remarkable change was noted. Different expression changes of a similar magnitude between biofilm-producing and planktonic cells were shown in our previous studies [27,28,29] for the atpD gene after treatment with C8-OG. However, a reverse magnitude was shown for the same gene, atpD, after treatment with C2-EG. Nevertheless, our results show some expression change in genes involved in the production and maintenance of biofilm after treatment with gallic acid derivatives. However, to look for other possible effects of these derivatives, more studies are needed to ascertain the amount and enzymatic activities of the products of these genes.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed extensively to this work. V.G., T.K., M.B., and M.Z. ran the experiments and performed the analysis. V.G., T.K., M.B., M.Z., M.F., and A.R. interpreted the data and wrote up the conclusions. V.G., T.K., M.B., M.F., M.Z., and A.R. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. A.R. conceived the study and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Research Authority of Al-Qasemi Academic College, as well as by the Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Lithuania. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in, or financial conflict with, the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript, apart from those disclosed. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, H.; Ni, C.; Du, Z.; Yan, F. Human oral microbiota and its modulation for oral health. Biomed. Pharm. 2018, 99, 883–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Abranches, J.; Zeng, L.; Kajfasz, J.K.; Palmer, S.R.; Chakraborty, B.; Wen, Z.T.; Richards, V.P.; Brady, L.J.; Lemos, J.A. Biology of Oral Streptococci. Microbiol. Spectr. 2018, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lemos, J.A.; Palmer, S.R.; Zeng, L.; Wen, Z.T.; Kajfasz, J.K.; Freires, I.A.; Abranches, J.; Brady, L.J. The Biology of Streptococcus mutans. Microbiol. Spectr. 2019, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ooshima, T.; Matsumura, M.; Hoshino, T.; Kawabata, S.; Sobue, S.; Fujiwara, T. Contributions of three glycosyltransferases to sucrose-dependent adherence of Streptococcus mutans. J. Dent. Res. 2001, 80, 1672–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Matsumoto-Nakano, M. Role of Streptococcus mutans surface proteins for biofilm formation. Jpn Dent. Sci Rev. 2018, 54, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bedoya-Correa, C.M.; Rincon Rodriguez, R.J.; Parada-Sanchez, M.T. Genomic and phenotypic diversity of Streptococcus mutans. J. Oral Biosci. 2019, 61, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Baker, J.L.; Faustoferri, R.C.; Quivey, R.G., Jr. Acid-adaptive mechanisms of Streptococcus mutans-the more we know, the more we don’t. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 2017, 32, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Gong, Y.; Tian, X.L.; Sutherland, T.; Sisson, G.; Mai, J.; Ling, J.; Li, Y.H. Global transcriptional analysis of acid-inducible genes in Streptococcus mutans: Multiple two-component systems involved in acid adaptation. Microbiology 2009, 155, 3322–3332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Valm, A.M. The Structure of Dental Plaque Microbial Communities in the Transition from Health to Dental Caries and Periodontal Disease. J. Mol. Biol. 2019, 431, 2957–2969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Flemming, H.C.; Wingender, J. The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sharma, D.; Misba, L.; Khan, A.U. Antibiotics versus biofilm: An emerging battleground in microbial communities. Antimicrob Resist. Infect. Control. 2019, 8, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Flemming, H.C.; Wuertz, S. Bacteria and archaea on Earth and their abundance in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 247–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Flemming, H.C.; Wingender, J.; Szewzyk, U.; Steinberg, P.; Rice, S.A.; Kjelleberg, S. Biofilms: An emergent form of bacterial life. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 563–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Arciola, C.R.; Campoccia, D.; Montanaro, L. Implant infections: Adhesion, biofilm formation and immune evasion. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 397–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dani, S.; Prabhu, A.; Chaitra, K.R.; Desai, N.C.; Patil, S.R.; Rajeev, R. Assessment of Streptococcus mutans in healthy versus gingivitis and chronic periodontitis: A clinico-microbiological study. Contemp Clin. Dent. 2016, 7, 529–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Frencken, J.E.; Sharma, P.; Stenhouse, L.; Green, D.; Laverty, D.; Dietrich, T. Global epidemiology of dental caries and severe periodontitis—A comprehensive review. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2017, 44, S94–S105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Costerton, J.W.; Stewart, P.S.; Greenberg, E.P. Bacterial biofilms: A common cause of persistent infections. Science 1999, 284, 1318–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Stewart, P.S.; Costerton, J.W. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet 2001, 358, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Abu-Lafi, S.; Rayan, M.; Masalha, M.; Abu-Farich, B.; Al-Jaas, H.; Abu-Lafi, M.; Rayan, A. Phytochemical Composition and Biological Activities of Wild Scolymus maculatus L. Medicines (Basel) 2019, 6, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Masalha, M.; Abu-Lafi, S.; Abu-Farich, B.; Rayan, M.; Issa, N.; Zeidan, M.; Rayan, A. A New Approach for Indexing Honey for Its Heath/Medicinal Benefits: Visualization of the Concept by Indexing Based on Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities. Medicines (Basel) 2018, 5, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Masalha, M.; Rayan, M.; Adawi, A.; Abdallah, Z.; Rayan, A. Capturing antibacterial natural products with in silico techniques. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018, 18, 763–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Rayan, M.; Abdallah, Z.; Abu-Lafi, S.; Masalha, M.; Rayan, A. Indexing Natural Products for their Antifungal Activity by Filters-based Approach: Disclosure of Discriminative Properties. Curr. Comput. Aided Drug Des. 2019, 15, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rossiter, S.E.; Fletcher, M.H.; Wuest, W.M. Natural Products as Platforms to Overcome Antibiotic Resistance. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 12415–12474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Silva, L.N.; Zimmer, K.R.; Macedo, A.J.; Trentin, D.S. Plant Natural Products Targeting Bacterial Virulence Factors. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 9162–9236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Slobodnikova, L.; Fialova, S.; Rendekova, K.; Kovac, J.; Mucaji, P. Antibiofilm Activity of Plant Polyphenols. Molecules 2016, 21, 1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, C.Y.; Su, T.Y.; Wang, M.Y.; Yang, S.F.; Mar, K.; Hung, S.L. Inhibitory effects of tea catechin epigallocatechin-3-gallate against biofilms formed from Streptococcus mutans and a probiotic lactobacillus strain. Arch. Oral Biol. 2018, 94, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gabe, V.; Kacergius, T.; Abu-Lafi, S.; Kalesinskas, P.; Masalha, M.; Falah, M.; Abu-Farich, B.; Melninkaitis, A.; Zeidan, M.; Rayan, A. Inhibitory Effects of Ethyl Gallate on Streptococcus mutans Biofilm Formation by Optical Profilometry and Gene Expression Analysis. Molecules 2019, 24, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Kacergius, T.; Abu-Lafi, S.; Kirkliauskiene, A.; Gabe, V.; Adawi, A.; Rayan, M.; Qutob, M.; Stukas, R.; Utkus, A.; Zeidan, M.; et al. Inhibitory capacity of Rhus coriaria L. extract and its major component methyl gallate on Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation by optical profilometry: Potential applications for oral health. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 16, 949–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Gabe, V.; Kacergius, T.; Abu-Lafi, S.; Zeidan, M.; Abu-Farich, B.; Austys, D.; Masalha, M.; Rayan, A. Suppressive Effects of Octyl Gallate on Streptococcus mutans Biofilm Formation, Acidogenicity, and Gene Expression. Molecules 2019, 24, 3170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kubo, I.; Masuoka, N.; Xiao, P.; Haraguchi, H. Antioxidant activity of dodecyl gallate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 3533–3539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Savi, L.A.; Leal, P.C.; Vieira, T.O.; Rosso, R.; Nunes, R.J.; Yunes, R.A.; Creczynski-Pasa, T.B.; Barardi, C.R.; Simoes, C.M. Evaluation of anti-herpetic and antioxidant activities, and cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of synthetic alkyl-esters of gallic acid. Arzneimittelforschung 2005, 55, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hurtado, C.; Bustos, M.J.; Sabina, P.; Nogal, M.L.; Granja, A.G.; Gonzalez, M.E.; Gonzalez-Porque, P.; Revilla, Y.; Carrascosa, A.L. Antiviral activity of lauryl gallate against animal viruses. Antiviral 2008, 13, 909–917. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kubo, I.; Fujita, K.; Nihei, K.; Masuoka, N. Non-antibiotic antibacterial activity of dodecyl gallate. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2003, 11, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Saeki, K.; Yuo, A.; Isemura, M.; Abe, I.; Seki, T.; Noguchi, H. Apoptosis-inducing activity of lipid derivatives of gallic acid. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2000, 23, 1391–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Locatelli, C.; Filippin-Monteiro, F.B.; Creczynski-Pasa, T.B. Alkyl esters of gallic acid as anticancer agents: A review. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 60, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Laguerre, M.; Bayrasy, C.; Lecomte, J.; Chabi, B.; Decker, E.A.; Wrutniak-Cabello, C.; Cabello, G.; Villeneuve, P. How to boost antioxidants by lipophilization? Biochimie 2013, 95, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Xu, W.; Liu, Y.; Wang, W.; Wu, K.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X. Antibacterial effects of Traditional Chinese Medicine monomers against Streptococcus pneumoniae via inhibiting pneumococcal histidine kinase (VicK). Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Rayan, M.; Abu-Farich, B.; Basha, W.; Rayan, A.; Abu-Lafi, S. Correlation between antibacterial activity and free-radical scavenging: In-vitro evaluation of polar/non-polar extracts from 25 plants. Processes 2020, 8, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Van der Heijden, C.A.; Janssen, P.J.C.M.; Strik, J.J.T.W.A. Toxicology of gallates: A review and evaluation. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1986, 24, 1067–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compound lauryl fallate are available from Prof. Anwar Rayan.
Figure 1. Activity of DMSO and the different C12-LG concentrations against the production of S. mutans biofilm biomass on polystyrene surfaces after 24 h of incubation in THB with 1% sucrose. Values are presented as the mean ± standard error obtained from three independent experiments (n = 3–9). The values denoted by an asterisk (*) are significantly different from those for the control group (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Activity of DMSO and the different C12-LG concentrations against the production of S. mutans biofilm biomass on polystyrene surfaces after 24 h of incubation in THB with 1% sucrose. Values are presented as the mean ± standard error obtained from three independent experiments (n = 3–9). The values denoted by an asterisk (*) are significantly different from those for the control group (p < 0.05).
Molecules 25 03685 g001
Figure 2. Activity of DMSO and C12-LG against S. mutans biofilm development on the glass surfaces after 24 h of incubation in THB. Shown are profilometric images of the glass slide surfaces covered by bacteria incubated (A) in the absence of C12-LG and sucrose, (B) without C12-LG, in the presence of 1% sucrose, and (C) treated with 0.67% DMSO or C12-LG at concentrations of (D) 87.16 µM, (E) 90.12 µM, (F) 93.07 µM, (G) 96.03 µM, and (H) 98.98 µM. Magnification: ×50.
Figure 2. Activity of DMSO and C12-LG against S. mutans biofilm development on the glass surfaces after 24 h of incubation in THB. Shown are profilometric images of the glass slide surfaces covered by bacteria incubated (A) in the absence of C12-LG and sucrose, (B) without C12-LG, in the presence of 1% sucrose, and (C) treated with 0.67% DMSO or C12-LG at concentrations of (D) 87.16 µM, (E) 90.12 µM, (F) 93.07 µM, (G) 96.03 µM, and (H) 98.98 µM. Magnification: ×50.
Molecules 25 03685 g002
Figure 3. Activity of DMSO and the different C12-LG concentrations against biofilms produced by S. mutans on the glass surfaces after 24 h of incubation in THB with 1% sucrose. (A) The surface roughness parameter (Rq) of the biofilm on the glass slides and (B) the biofilm thickness. Values are presented as the mean ± standard error obtained from three independent experiments (n = 18 for biofilm roughness; n = 15 for biofilm thickness). The values denoted by an asterisk (*) are significantly different from those for the control group (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Activity of DMSO and the different C12-LG concentrations against biofilms produced by S. mutans on the glass surfaces after 24 h of incubation in THB with 1% sucrose. (A) The surface roughness parameter (Rq) of the biofilm on the glass slides and (B) the biofilm thickness. Values are presented as the mean ± standard error obtained from three independent experiments (n = 18 for biofilm roughness; n = 15 for biofilm thickness). The values denoted by an asterisk (*) are significantly different from those for the control group (p < 0.05).
Molecules 25 03685 g003
Figure 4. The effects of C12-LG treatment on the expression of five S. mutans genes involved in biofilm production. S. mutans cells were collected in the biofilm phase. C12-LG was applied at a 77.1 µM concentration (comparable to 1/4 of the MIC); its effect is shown in orange, while the bars in blue represent the values for the untreated biofilm-producing cells.
Figure 4. The effects of C12-LG treatment on the expression of five S. mutans genes involved in biofilm production. S. mutans cells were collected in the biofilm phase. C12-LG was applied at a 77.1 µM concentration (comparable to 1/4 of the MIC); its effect is shown in orange, while the bars in blue represent the values for the untreated biofilm-producing cells.
Molecules 25 03685 g004
Figure 5. C12-LG effects on the expression of five S. mutans genes that are involved in biofilm production. The S. mutans cells were collected from planktonic growth cell populations. C12-LG was applied at a 77.1 µM concentration (comparable to 1/4 of the MIC). Its effects are shown in orange, while the bars in blue represent the values for the untreated controls.
Figure 5. C12-LG effects on the expression of five S. mutans genes that are involved in biofilm production. The S. mutans cells were collected from planktonic growth cell populations. C12-LG was applied at a 77.1 µM concentration (comparable to 1/4 of the MIC). Its effects are shown in orange, while the bars in blue represent the values for the untreated controls.
Molecules 25 03685 g005
Table 1. Antibacterial activity of lauryl gallate (stock solution 100 mg/mL dissolved in pure dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)), erythromycin (positive control, stock solution 10 mg/mL dissolved in DMSO), and DMSO (solvent).
Table 1. Antibacterial activity of lauryl gallate (stock solution 100 mg/mL dissolved in pure dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)), erythromycin (positive control, stock solution 10 mg/mL dissolved in DMSO), and DMSO (solvent).
CompoundMIC
Lauryl gallate288.5 µM
Erythromycin6.54 µM
DMSO25% (v/v)
Table 2. Effects of DMSO and the different C12-LG concentrations on the pH levels of the S. mutans biofilm growth medium after 24 h of incubation in the presence of 1% sucrose.
Table 2. Effects of DMSO and the different C12-LG concentrations on the pH levels of the S. mutans biofilm growth medium after 24 h of incubation in the presence of 1% sucrose.
Experimental GrouppH
Blank7.36 ± 0.03 *
Control4.16 ± 0.01
DMSO (0.67%)4.18 ± 0.03
C12-LG (87.16 µM)4.55 ± 0.04 *
C12-LG (90.12 µM)4.75 ± 0.11 *
C12-LG (93.07 µM)5.94 ± 0.35 *
C12-LG (96.03 µM)6.32 ± 0.3 *
C12-LG (98.98 µM)7.23 ± 0.03 *
Values are presented as the mean ± standard error obtained from three independent experiments (n = 3–9). The values denoted by an asterisk (*) differ significantly from those of the control group (p < 0.05).
Table 3. C12-LG effects on the expression of five genes from planktonic S. mutans cells and biofilm S. mutans cells.
Table 3. C12-LG effects on the expression of five genes from planktonic S. mutans cells and biofilm S. mutans cells.
Planktonic S. mutans Gene Expression
gbpBgtfBgtfCgtfDatpD
Average Fold ChangeControl0.8120.0260.041.5750.219
Lauryl0.4290.0280.0344.780.041
SD fold changeControl0.1990.0030.0120.1910.049
Lauryl0.1390.0020.0050.7120.006
Biofilm S. mutans Gene Expression
gbpBgtfBgtfCgtfDatpD
Average Fold ChangeControl1.060.0370.02226.0260.127
Lauryl1.0250.8110.07612.6340.204
Standard DeviationControl0.0540.0150.0010.3560.048
Lauryl0.0980.2180.0090.3940.086

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gabe, V.; Zeidan, M.; Kacergius, T.; Bratchikov, M.; Falah, M.; Rayan, A. Lauryl Gallate Activity and Streptococcus mutans: Its Effects on Biofilm Formation, Acidogenicity and Gene Expression. Molecules 2020, 25, 3685. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25163685

AMA Style

Gabe V, Zeidan M, Kacergius T, Bratchikov M, Falah M, Rayan A. Lauryl Gallate Activity and Streptococcus mutans: Its Effects on Biofilm Formation, Acidogenicity and Gene Expression. Molecules. 2020; 25(16):3685. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25163685

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gabe, Vika, Mouhammad Zeidan, Tomas Kacergius, Maksim Bratchikov, Mizied Falah, and Anwar Rayan. 2020. "Lauryl Gallate Activity and Streptococcus mutans: Its Effects on Biofilm Formation, Acidogenicity and Gene Expression" Molecules 25, no. 16: 3685. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25163685

APA Style

Gabe, V., Zeidan, M., Kacergius, T., Bratchikov, M., Falah, M., & Rayan, A. (2020). Lauryl Gallate Activity and Streptococcus mutans: Its Effects on Biofilm Formation, Acidogenicity and Gene Expression. Molecules, 25(16), 3685. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25163685

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop