Next Article in Journal
Exploring Free Energy Profiles of Enantioselective Organocatalytic Aldol Reactions under Full Solvent Influence
Next Article in Special Issue
Small Molecules of Marine Origin as Potential Anti-Glioma Agents
Previous Article in Journal
DFT Study on the Mechanism of Iron-Catalyzed Diazocarbonylation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Marine-Derived Compounds with Potential Use as Cosmeceuticals and Nutricosmetics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Marine-Derived Compounds and Prospects for Their Antifungal Application

by
Joana Cardoso
1,2,3,
Darlan Gonçalves Nakayama
1,
Emília Sousa
2,3,* and
Eugénia Pinto
1,3,*
1
Laboratório de Microbiologia, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
2
Laboratório de Química Orgânica e Farmacêutica, Departamento de Ciências Químicas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
3
CIIMAR—Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(24), 5856; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25245856
Submission received: 12 November 2020 / Revised: 3 December 2020 / Accepted: 10 December 2020 / Published: 11 December 2020

Abstract

:
The introduction of antifungals in clinical practice has an enormous impact on the provision of medical care, increasing the expectancy and quality of life mainly of immunocompromised patients. However, the emergence of pathogenic fungi that are resistant and multi-resistant to the existing antifungal therapy has culminated in fungal infections that are almost impossible to treat. Therefore, there is an urgent need to discover new strategies. The marine environment has proven to be a promising rich resource for the discovery and development of new antifungal compounds. Thus, this review summarizes more than one hundred marine natural products, or their derivatives, which are categorized according to their sources—sponges, bacteria, fungi, and sea cucumbers—as potential candidates as antifungal agents. In addition, this review focus on recent developments using marine antifungal compounds as new and effective approaches for the treatment of infections caused by resistant and multi-resistant pathogenic fungi and/or biofilm formation; other perspectives on antifungal marine products highlight new mechanisms of action, the combination of antifungal and non-antifungal agents, and the use of nanoparticles and anti-virulence therapy.

1. Introduction

Fungi are a ubiquitous group of organisms occurring in a wide variety of habitats and ecological niches. They can be found in various environments: tropical forests, grasslands, deserts, coastal areas, ocean deeps, seas, freshwaters, and polar regions [1,2,3,4,5]. They are essential for many ecosystems, being important decomposers that contribute to the degradation of organic matter, with a fundamental role in ecological and biogeochemical processes. It is evident that fungi have a great role for human society. Fungi are used in medicine industry to obtain important drugs such as antibiotics, immunosuppressant, vitamins, steroids, and alkaloids. Genetically modified fungi can also be used as bio-factories for the production of numerous enzymes with the most diverse biotechnological applications [6,7,8]. However, some fungi can harm human life, causing many infections that can be classified into superficial/subcutaneous (dermatophytosis, pityriasis versicolor, and sporotrichosis) and systemic mycoses (candidiasis, aspergillosis, and cryptococcosis). These can target any type of tissue or organ and causing, for example, bone, lung, and neurological injuries [9].
The discovery of antifungal agents has allowed significant advances in medical care enabling the control and cure of fungal infections, altering their natural evolution. However, the development of resistance to antifungals and the fungal infections growth in the immunocompromised population have contributed, in recent decades, to the increase in the appearance and severity of these infections, resulting in an important cause of hospital death [10]. Systemic fungal infections are particularly common in immunocompromised patients, which accommodate not only those infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) but also transplanted and cancer patients [11,12]. Although most infections appear superficially, i.e., on the skin, hair, nails or mucous membranes, some fungal species, under conditions of the fragility of the immune system, are capable of causing systemic infections that can lead to death [11]. Invasive fungal infections are considered a serious threat to public health, being responsible for about 1.5 million deaths per year with a mortality rate until 90%, which is associated with species belonging to Candida, Aspergillus, Cryptococcus, Pneumocystis, Mucor, and Rhizopus genera [10,11,12,13]. In the genus Candida, C. albicans is the main cause of fungal infections, accounting for between 50 and 70% of cases. However, recent epidemiological data have revealed an increase in species resistant to most or all classes of antifungals called Candida non-albicans. These species have emerged from primary (intrinsic) resistance mechanisms or the development of secondary (acquired) resistance through the inappropriate use of antifungal agents [14,15,16]. Regarding Aspergillus spp., a change in epidemiology has also been observed in the last two decades resulting from the selective pressure exerted by the indiscriminate use of antifungals and the increase in immunocompromised patients, with intensification in the identification of emerging Aspergillus non-fumigatus and cryptic species resistant to various classes of antifungals, particularly to azoles [16,17]. Due to the significant increase in the number of resistant and multi-resistant strains, particularly in Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., there is an urgent clinical need to discover and develop new antifungal agents to enable the renewal of the therapeutic arsenal and thus control the appearance of new resistances [11,12,18].
In the treatment of systemic mycoses, antifungals can be limited to four classes—polyenes, azoles, flucytosine, and echinocandins—in which they are distinguished by the mode of action (Figure 1), bioavailability, formulation, pharmacological interactions, and adverse effects [11,19].
Figure 2 represents the year of discovery and/or introduction to the market of the different antifungals. At the moment, no new class has been approved by the European Medicine Agency (EMA) or the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which poses a problem, because the current antifungals agents are not sufficiently active and safe, and they exhibit some toxicity and undesirable adverse effects [10,13]. The appearance of a second generation of azoles and, more recently, of echinocandins are two important milestones in the efficacy of antifungal therapy. The discovery of new antifungal agents has mainly been associated to the screening of large libraries of small molecules of natural, synthetic, or semi-synthetic products [10,11,13].
The development of antifungals agents is a very challenging strategy, since there are physiological similarities between fungal cells and human cells, being responsible for toxicity. The disinvestment of the pharmaceutical industry, which focuses mostly on other more profitable areas, and the lack of economic incentives are other factors that have led to a shortage of new antifungal agents. Therefore, the development of new antifungals has been gradual compared to the development of new antibacterial agents [10,11,13,20,21]. A new antifungal agent should have few pharmacological interactions, adequate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, fungicidal nature instead of fungistatic action, and a broad spectrum of activity against resistant and multi-resistant pathogenic fungi, preferably having a new mechanism of action that could reduce or prevent resistance and toxicity in the host. To discover such an agent, it is necessary to identify new fungal-specific targets that are essential for their fungal growth, and that the antifungal could be capable of eliminating fungal cells and not human cells [10,11,12]. Nevertheless, not all molecules that exhibit antifungal activity can be optimized for the development of new antifungal agents due to undesirable characteristics [12].
Marine biodiversity corresponds to the variety of organisms found in marine and oceanic ecosystems, comprising more than 250,000 species described and infinity of other species to be discovered yet. These organisms can live in environments of extreme variation in pressure, luminosity, salinity, and temperature, being able to produce secondary metabolites that help in their survival. These unique metabolites can constitute a vast source of beneficial bioactive products in human health. In the last five decades, more than 13,000 bioactive marine natural products have been identified presenting various biological activities such as antibacterial, antidiabetic, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer [22,23]. The prospecting for new antifungals of marine origin, different from those commercially available, with more effective pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties is already a reality, which will help in the treatment of human fungal diseases, mainly those caused by resistant and multi-resistant fungi.
From this point of view, this review will highlight new natural products isolated from diverse marine organisms and their antifungal activities, thus providing an overview of marine compounds with in vitro potential as antifungal agents. Recent and documented perspectives for potential applications of marine antifungal compounds will also be highlighted, including a new alternative target with a new mechanism of action, the interaction between antifungal and non-antifungal agents, and the use of nanoparticles and anti-virulence therapy, as a way to increase the activity of antifungals currently available, achieve the synergistic effect, and/or inhibit the formation of virulence factors, specifically of biofilms. These new strategies could enrich the pipeline of the treatment of fungal human infections and, consequently, resolve the limited number of therapeutic options related to the lack of new antifungals agents, obtain more diverse potential targets for action and solutions to combat the resistance acquired by many strains of pathogenic fungi.

2. Marine Natural Products as New Antifungal Candidates

Up to now, several compounds derived from secondary metabolites and isolated from marine organisms exhibited antifungal activity. Of all the marine organisms investigated, sponges are recognized as the main prolific source of secondary metabolites with antifungal properties, followed by bacteria and fungi. The chemical diversity of the bioactive compounds produced by these microorganisms is remarkable and, therefore, it can be considered essential for the discovery and development of new agents for the treatment and prevention of various fungal infections [24,25,26,27,28]. Sea cucumbers are also considered a rich source of bioactive and distinct secondary metabolites, of which triterpene glycosides (saponins) are evident. Since they have unique characteristics, involving great chemical diversity, low toxicity, high efficiency with few adverse effects, and a wide spectrum of antifungal activity, these natural products have gained a lot of attention, making them more favorable as leading compounds for the discovery of other new agents [29]. Thus, in the following sections, compounds with promising antifungal activity produced by marine microorganisms involving sponges, bacteria, fungi, and sea cucumbers will be highlighted.

2.1. Sponge-Derived Compounds

Aurantosides belong to a class of molecules produced by sponges of the genera Theonella, Homophymia, and Siliquariaspongia, which chemically present a tetramate ring with a mono- or dichlorinated long conjugated polyene chain and a N-glycosidic portion of one to three monosaccharides [30,31]. The study of the sponge Theonella swinhoei resulted in the extraction of three known aurantosides G–I (13) and a new aurantoside J (4) (Figure 3), which were tested for antifungal activity against C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and Fusarium solani. Compound 1 demonstrated moderate inhibition against all strains with MIC90 = 4–16 mg/L, and compound 3 was the only one that exhibited potent action with MIC90 values of 0.125–0.5 and 2 mg/L for Candida spp. and F. solani, respectively. Given the results obtained from compound 3, it was found that the three sugar chains attached to the tetramate ring by the nitrogen atom, as well as the C18 polyene chain, were important descriptors for inhibiting the growth of the five fungal strains [30].
Although there are many reports of aurantosides discovered on sponges of the genus Theonella, a new derivative of tetramic acid glycoside, called aurantoside K (5) (Figure 4), was isolated from a marine sponge of the Meophlus sp. This compound showed strong antifungal inhibition under a broad spectrum of pathogenic fungi: Amphotericin B (AmB)-resistant C. albicans and wild-type C. albicans with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 31.25 and 1.95 mg/L, respectively, and C. neoformans, A. niger, Rhizopus sporangia, Penicillium sp., and Sordaria sp. with zones of inhibition of 14, 28, 21, 31, and 29 mm, respectively at 100 μg/disc [31].
Three new linear polyketides called woodylides A–C (68) (Figure 5), collected on the Xisha islands in the China Sea from the sponge Plakortis simplex, were evaluated for their antifungal activity against C. albicans, C. neoformans, Nannizzia gypsea (formerly Microsporum gypseum), and Trichophyton rubrum, with AmB and fluconazole as positive controls. Compounds 6 and 8 exhibited moderate action with IC50 values of 3.67 and 10.85 mg/L against C. neoformans, respectively, unlike compound 7, which was not active. For the remaining fungi, compounds 6 and 8 showed weak activity and due to the lack of compound 7, it was not possible to test their antifungal inhibition [32].
The genus Theonella is associated with biologically active peptides with immense structural diversity. In this way, a polar active portion of the organic extract of the sponge Theonella swinhoei was studied, which provided the isolation of theonellamide G (9) (Figure 6). This new bicyclic glycopeptide showed potent antifungal activity against wild-type C. albicans and AmB-resistant C. albicans with IC50 values of 4.49 and 2.0 μM, respectively. For wild-type, AmB was used as a positive control with an IC50 = 1.48 μM [33].
Seven new formamido-diterpenes, cavernenes A–D (1013), kalihinenes E,F (14,15), and kalihipyran C (16), along with five known compounds, kalihipyran A (17), 15-formamidokalihinene (18), 10-formamido-kalihinene (19), and kalihinenes X,Y (20,21) (Figure 7), were isolated from the sponge Acanthella cavernosa. All compounds were tested for antifungal activity against C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, A. fumigatus, C. neoformans, N. gypsea, and T. rubrum. Ketoconazole was used as a positive control with MIC ≤ 0.25 mg/L for all the tested strains. Compound 18 inhibited the growth of N. gypsea and T. rubrum with MIC values of 8 and 32 mg/L, respectively, and compound 19 showed action against C. albicans, C. neoformans, N. gypsea, and T. rubrum at concentrations of 8, 8, 8, and 4 mg/L, respectively. Given the results obtained, it was found that the isonitrile group is relevant for antifungal activity [34].
Since 1982, with the discovery of the first aaptamine from the marine sponge Aaptos aaptos, several derivatives have been isolated from sponges belonging to the genera Suberites, Luffariella, Hymeniacidon, Suberea, and Xestospongia. Nevertheless, the genus Aaptos remains the main rich source of aaptamine alkaloids as bioactive secondary metabolites. Thus, numerous aaptamine derivatives with five new substances (2226) and three known substances (2729) (Figure 8) were extracted from the marine sponge Aaptos aaptos. All compounds, except 22 and 23 due to a lack of quantity, were tested for antifungal inhibition of C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, C. neoformans, N. gypsea, and T. rubrum, in which fluconazole was used as a positive control. Compound 28 inhibited the growth of all studied fungi, except C. glabrata, at concentrations of 32, 64, 32, 16, and 4 mg/L, respectively. Compound 29 showed a strong action against C. neoformans, N. gypsea, and T. rubrum with MIC values of 64, 32, and 8 mg/L, respectively. The remaining compounds showed weak antifungal activity considering the tested fungi (MIC > 64 mg/L) [35].
Until 2017, about 70 saponins were isolated from sponges, in which some of them, when submitted to different bioassays, revealed biological activities of great interest. The first study of the sponge Poecillastra compressa, by Bowebank in 1866, allowed finding seven new compounds, poecillastrosides A–G (3036) (Figure 9). Later, these steroidal glycosides were tested for their ability to inhibit the growth of the fungus A. fumigatus, in which only compounds 33 and 34 exhibited activity with MIC90 values of 6 and 24 mg/L, respectively, concluding that the carboxylic acid present in C-18 plays an essential role in antifungal action [36].
Preliminary studies with hydroalcoholic and organic extracts of the marine sponges Haliclona viscosa and Cinchyrella tarentina show potential antifungal activity against five phytopathogenic fungi: F. oxysporum f. sp. melonis, F. oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici, F. oxysporum f. sp. ciceris, Botrytis cinerea, and Penicillium digitatum [37]. Subsequently, a new derivative of sphingosine, called haliscosamine (37) (Figure 10), was isolated from Haliclona viscosa and showed significant in vitro activity against C. albicans (MIC90 = 0.4–0.8 mg/L), C. tropicalis (MIC90 = 0.4–0.8 mg/L), and C. neoformans (MIC90 = 0.2–0.4 mg/L) [38].
A sesquiterpenoid quinone, epi-ilimaquinone (38) (Figure 11), was isolated from the Fijian marine sponge, Hippospongia sp. This compound exhibited antifungal activity against AmB-resistant C. albicans (MIC = 125 mg/L), but it had no appreciable effect against C. albicans, C. neoformans, A. niger, Penicillium spp., Rhizopus sporangia, and Sordaria spp. [39].

2.2. Bacteria-Derived Compounds

Bioassay guided fractionation from culture broths of the marine bacterial strain closely related to Streptomyces zhaozhouensis CA-185989 resulted in the extraction of three new polycyclic tetramic acid macrolactams, isoikarugamycin (39), 28-N-methylikaguramycin (40), and 30-oxo-28-N-methylikaguramycin (41), and four known molecules, ikarugamycin (42), MKN-003B (43), 1H-indole-3-carboxaldehyde (44), and phenylethanoic acid (45) (Figure 12). Compounds 39, 40, and 42 showed potent antifungal activity against A. fumigatus, with MIC values in the range 4–8 mg/L, and against C. albicans, with MIC = 2–4 mg/L for compound 39 and MIC = 4 mg/L for compounds 40 and 42. The remaining compounds were not active when tested at a concentration of 64 mg/L. With the MIC values obtained for the compounds 39, 40, and 42, it was found that the ethyl group plays an essential role in the antifungal action in the family of polycyclic tetramate macrolactams, since the existence of a carbonyl group in the ethyl side chain at C-16 is associated with an increase in the MIC, even though the N-methylation of the nitrogen atom of the tetramic acid portion does not affect the activity [40].
Filamentous marine cyanobacteria are one of the sources of bioactive secondary metabolites that naturally gain a lot of popularity in the study of marine natural products. Currently, there are numerous compounds from strains of cyanobacteria, mainly from the genera Lyngbya, Oscillatoria, and Symploca [41]. Lobocyclamides A–C (4648) (Figure 13) are peptides isolated from Lyngbya confervoides that revealed significant activity against C. glabrata and C. albicans, in which the compounds 46 and 47 showed MIC values of 91 and 30–100 mg/L, respectively. The existence of mixtures consisting of compounds 46 and 47 (1:1) allowed investigating an important synergistic effect with great antifungal activity (MIC = 10–30 mg/L) compared to any of the pure isolated compounds [42].
A new polyketide compound, called forazoline A (49) (Figure 14), was isolated from Actinomadura spp., which was cultivated from the tunicate Ecteinascidia turbinata. Forazoline A exhibited potential antifungal effects in vitro (MIC < 16 mg/L) and in vivo against C. albicans. Furthermore, an in vitro combination treatment with forazoline A and AmB exhibited a synergistic antifungal effect, suggesting a parallel or complementary mechanism of action between these compounds [43].

2.3. Fungi-Derived Compounds

Macrolides are a class of polyketides often discovered in organisms of marine origin with an important antifungal role [44]. In the 13-membered macrolides, two new compounds, melearoride A,B (50,51), and five known compounds, PF1163A (52), B (53), D (54), H (55), and F (56) (Figure 15), were isolated from a strain of a marine-derived fungus, Penicillium meleagrinum var. viridiflavum. The evaluation of antifungal activity against C. albicans demonstrated the inhibition of fungal growth for 52, 53, 55, and 56 at concentrations of 1, 2, 16, and 8 mg/L, respectively, while for 50, 51, and 54, no activity at a concentration of 32 mg/L was observed. It was also found that the hydroxyethyl group was essential for the activity of 52 and 53, since they presented activity against C. albicans, unlike 50 and 51, which showed weak antifungal action. Since the fungus understudy is resistant to the azole class, tests were carried out with fluconazole, in which the results showed that all compounds, including those that did not show activity, exhibited a synergistic effect with this commercialized antifungal [45].
The chemical study of the tunicate-derived fungus Penicillium spp. CYE-87 resulted in the extraction of a new compound with the 1,4-diazepane skeleton, terretrione D (57), together with the five known ones, methyl-2-([2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]carbamoyl)acetate (58), tryptamine (59), indole-3-carbaldehyde (60), 3,6-diisobutylpyrazin-2(1H)-one (61), and terretrione C (62) (Figure 16). Of all the isolated compounds, only compounds 57 and 62 were moderately active against C. albicans with MIC = 32 mg/L [46].
Pimarane diterpenes are considered one of the secondary metabolites of great interest produced by the marine-derived fungus Eutypella, as they present a great structural variety and a wide range of pharmacological activities. Thus, Eutypella spp. D-1 was investigated in the Artic polar region, which subsequently led to the isolation of three new pimarane diterpene, eutypellenoids A–C (6365), and a known compound, eutypenoid C (66) (Figure 17). All compounds were tested for their antifungal activity against C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, C. neoformans, and N. gypsea, in which fluconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole were used as positive controls. Only the compound 63 revealed activity against Candida spp., with MIC values of 8, 16, 8, and 32 mg/L, respectively [47].
In the intertidal zones of the Yellow Sea in Qingdao, China, 141 strains of fungi were discovered from various marine plants, especially Alternaria sp. and Fusarium sp. Since these species are associated with metabolites with different biological activities, the selection of F. equiseti and Alternaria spp. from a screening of 31 identified strains led to the extraction of two new anthraquinone derivatives 67 and 68, and two perylenequinones, stemphyperlenol (69) and alterpeylenol (70) (Figure 18). The compounds were tested for antifungal activity against a wide spectrum of six pathogenic fungi: Alternaria alternata, Alternaria brassicicola, Phytophthora parasitica var. nicotianae, Diaporthe medusaea, A. niger, and Pestallozzia theae. Compounds 67 and 68 demonstrated moderate action under Pestallozzia theae with MIC = 31.3 mg/L, while compound 69 inhibited not only the growth of Pestallozzia theae, but also of Alternaria brassicicola with MIC values of 7.81 and 125 mg/L, respectively, in which they were identical to the positive control, carbendazim [48].
A new 4-hydroxy-2-pyridone alkaloids, didymellamide A (71) (Figure 19), was isolated from the marine fungus Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum. This compound was able to inhibit the growth of azole-resistant C. albicans J2-36 (MIC = 3.1 mg/L), azole-sensitive C. albicans J1-97 (MIC = 3.1 mg/L), C. glabrata J-92 (MIC = 3.1 mg/L), and C. neoformans Mpu-B (MIC = 1.6 mg/L). This study proposes that the didymellamide A hydroxamic acid fraction plays an important role in antifungal activity [49].
Two xanthones and structurally-related compounds, 7-epiaustdiol (72), 8-O-methylepiaustdiol (73), stemphyperylenol (74), skyrin (75), secalonic acid A (76), emodin (77), and norlichexanthone (78) (Figure 20), were isolated from the endophytic fungus Talaromyces spp. ZH-154, associated with mangrove plants, Kandelia candel (L.) Druce, collected in the South China Sea. All compounds were tested for antifungal inhibition against C. albicans, A. niger, and F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense, with nystatin used as a positive control. Compound 76 showed potent antifungal activity against all fungal strains tested. Notably, this compound showed inhibitory activity to A. niger with MIC = 6.25 mg/L, which is lower than nystatin (MIC = 25.0 mg/L) [50].
The dithiodiketopiperazine derivatives represent a unique class of secondary fungal metabolites that usually contain two methythio groups or a disulfide bridge, in which, normally, the sulfur atom is attached to a-positions of the cyclic dipeptide. The chemical investigation of the fungal strain Penicillium adametzioides AS-53, a fungus isolated from an unidentified sponge, made it possible to extract two new dithiodiketopiperazine derivatives, peniciadametizines A,B (79,80), and two known substances, brasiliamide A (81) and viridicatumtoxin (82) (Figure 21). Compounds 79 and 80 were evaluated against four plant pathogenic fungi: Alternaria brassicae, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, F. graminearum, and Gaeumannomyces spp. Both compounds demonstrated selective antifungal activity against Alternaria brassicae with MIC values of 4 and 32 mg/L, respectively, in comparison with AmB showing a MIC = 1.0 mg/L [51].
Fungi of the genus Pestalotiopsis are widely distributed around the world originating biologically active natural products. In the Xisha Islands of China, the fungal strain Pestalotiopsis heterocornis was discovered from the sponge Phakellia fusca, leading to the isolation of four new substances, pestaloisocoumarins A,B (83,84), isopolisin B (85), and pestalotiol A (86), which together with four known substances, gamahorin (87), pestalachloride B (88) and E (89), and a mixture of pestalalactone atropoisomers (90a/90b) (Figure 22), were submitted to antifungal activity evaluations against C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. neoformans, being the antifungal AmB used as control with MIC ≤ 2.0 mg/L for the tested strains. Isocoumarins 83, 84, and 87 showed significantly weak activity with MIC = 100 mg/L against most of the fungi tested. Compounds 88, 89, and 90a/90b were inactive at 100 mg/L [52].

2.4. Sea Cucumber-Derived Compounds

Four new compounds, variegatusides C–F (9194), were isolated together with three known triterpene glycosides, variegatusides A,B (95,96), and holothurin B (97) (Figure 23) from the sea cucumber Stichopus variegates Semper. The compounds were tested for antifungal activity against C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, C. pseudotropicalis, C. neoformans, and N. gypsea, with ketoconazole, fluconazole, and itraconazole as positive controls. All the compounds studied showed selective activities except for compounds 92 and 93, which revealed significant fungal growth inhibitory activities against the six species. Compound 92 exhibited activity with MIC80 values of 3.4, 3.4, 13.6, 3.4, 6.8, and 3.4 mg/L, respectively, while compound 93 showed MIC80 values of 25 mg/L for C. albicans and 12.5 mg/L for the remaining fungi [53].
Two triterpenoid glycosides, holothurin A (98) and echinoside A (99) (Figure 24), were isolated from sea cucumber holothurian Pearsonothuria graeffei from the Red Sea, Egypt. The partial crude and purified extract from sea cucumber containing mainly these compounds was screened for antifungal activity against three clinical isolates of C. albicans (Candida 580, Candida 581, and Candida MEO47228), and the purified fraction showed good antifungal activity (24 h LC50 = 10 mg/L) [54].
Table 1 puts in evidence the chemical classes, sources, MIC values, and spectra of activities of the most remarkable compounds. It is interesting to highlight the synergic effects shown by a mixture formed by compounds 46 and 47, compound 49 with AmB, and compounds 5056 with fluconazole, and the effects against multi-resistant strains of C. albicans. Curiously, several secondary metabolites belong to the chemical class of polyketides, making it possible to establish a common structure–activity relationship (SAR), and marine sources have proved to be quite diverse. The most interesting compound appears to be Aurantoside I (3), as it revealed an excellent growth inhibition of all tested strains (C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and F. solani). Of particular interest is the activity shown against F. solani, since this strain is highly pathogenic and resistant to most antifungals available on the market. As all the studied compounds (aurantosides G–J, 14) have a C18 polyene chain, the role of the sugar portion in the modulation of antifungal activity stands out.

3. Prospects for the Application of Marine Antifungal-Derived Compounds

The current therapeutic arsenal of antifungals leads to the rapid emergence of pathogenic fungi resistant and multi-resistant to antifungal agents, and consequently, it aggravates the treatment and/or prevention of fungal infections. Therefore, it is essential to look for new antifungal targets, as well as to explore new approaches. In this chapter, recent developments correlated with marine antifungal compounds will be presented as examples of new perspectives of application: new mechanisms of action, the combination of antifungal and non-antifungal agents, and the use of anti-virulence therapy and nanoparticles.

3.1. New Mechanisms of Action

Dolastatin 10 (100) (Figure 25) is a natural product isolated from the Indian Ocean from the sea hare Dolabella auricularia. At the moment, studies have shown that dolastatin 10 and its derivatives are essentially derived from the sea hare’s diet of marine cyanobacteria, in particular Symploca sp. [55]. This linear peptide of three unique amino acid units proved to be able to inhibit the microtubules assembly and tubulin-dependent guanosine triphosphate binding by interfering in the formation of tubulin and thus interrupting cell division by mitosis and inducing apoptosis. Dolastatin 10 (100) and four other analog peptides (101104) (Figure 25), obtained from 100 by structural modifications, showed specific fungicidal activity against ATCC strains and clinical isolates (including fluconazole-resistant strains) of C. neoformans with MIC50 = 0.195 mg/L and MIC90 = 0.39 mg/L [56,57].

3.2. Anti-Virulence Therapy

The growing number of pathogenic fungal strains that have become resistant to the conventionally used commercial antifungals constitute the main barrier in the treatment of these infections. Within this scenario, an innovative proposal for the effective control of the emergence and spread of fungal pathogens is the anti-virulence therapy. This strategy aims to selectively disarm the main virulence mechanisms of the pathogen. Among the advantages of using anti-virulence therapy, the following stand out: the development of new antifungal drugs that aim act at different targets and have new mechanisms of action; no interference with the host’s natural microbiota; and to exercise little selection pressure for drug resistance mutations, which has become a major drawback for C. albicans [58]. The filamentation process has been the main target of these studies, which were already validated at the genetic level, for the development of anti-virulence approaches in the treatment of candidiasis, even in immunocompromised patients. The search for specific inhibitors through the implementation of high-throughput screening, for subsequent in vitro and in vivo tests, has been the approach used in this pipeline for the development of new antifungal strategies.
Compounds sorbicillin (105) and 3-methyl-N-(2′-phenelethyl)-butyrylamide (106) (Figure 26), extracted from a crude extract of a deep-sea strain Streptomyces olivaceus SCSIO T05, demonstrated a potent ability to block the morphological transition (yeast-hyphae) reducing the formation of hyphae, the activity of adhesion to human cells (initial step for the formation of biofilm), and, consequently, the virulence of C. albicans. In addition, compound 106 showed a significant inhibitory effect in in vivo mouse oral mucosal models and in the expression levels of some specific promoters, such as HWP1, TEC1, ALS1, IFD6, and CSH1, which are associated with cell adhesion and the formation of hyphae. These preliminary results suggest that an anti-virulence strategy could potentially be used for the clinical treatment of candidiasis [59].
Another example of a marine natural product showing an antibiofilm effect is carboxymethyl chitosan. Chitin is the main structural component of the exoskeleton of marine invertebrates and the cell walls of fungi. Currently, the main commercial sources of this natural polysaccharide of great abundance and importance are shrimp and crab [60,61,62]. The partial deacetylation of chitin provides the formation of chitosan, which is a biocompatible, biodegradable, and non-toxic polymer widely studied for applications in the fields of biomedical, food, biotechnology, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals. Chitosan has attracted a lot of attention due essentially to its diverse biological activities, such as antimicrobial and antioxidant activity. It is known that in fungi, chitosan acts at the level of plasma membranes and cell walls, chelating traces metals and inhibiting messenger RNA (mRNA) synthesis. Chitosan has proven to be highly active against C. albicans, and therefore, it can be considered as a potential anti-candidiasis agent. However, chitosan has some limitations, namely the solubility in water associated with its structural rigidity that makes it impossible to be applied in systems that require greater solubility and drug release rate. The low solubility of chitosan can be improved by hydrophilic modifications, such as the carboxymethylation that originates the carboxymethyl chitosan (CMC) derivative [61,63,64]. In vitro studies have shown that CMC has a strong inhibitory effect on C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, and C. glabrata, presenting a more prominent antifungal activity than chitosan. In addition, it has been demonstrated that CMC can inhibit the growth of biofilm, so it has been used in the area of medicine to prevent the formation of biofilms occurred during fungal infections on the surface of implanted devices [65]. However, in vivo studies are needed to prove the antifungal action of the CMC coating on silicone medical prostheses [66]. It has also found that CMC can be used as a gauze coating material, since the diameter of growth inhibition of the gauze coated with CMC was 0.30 cm, which is distinctly different compared to the zone of inhibition produced by the gauze coated with chitosan (0.12 cm) [61,64].

3.3. Combination of Antifungal and Non-Antifungal Agents

A strategy to overcome the emergence of resistant and multi-resistant fungi is the combination of antifungal agents present on the market. However, antifungal combination therapy is associated with harmful effects. To circumvent the high costs, the serious adverse effects, and the contradictory results of the reported synergistic or antagonistic activity associated with many antifungal combinations, the combination of antifungal with non-antifungal agents stands out. A common example of this approach is the combined use of fluconazole with other classes of non-antifungals, such as antibacterials, heat shock protein 90 inhibitors, and calcineurin inhibitors. In vitro studies revealed that many of the combinations demonstrated a synergistic effect and an increased susceptibility to strains resistant to existing antifungals, mainly in C. albicans. Examples of possible combination of antifungals and marine-derived compounds are presented.

3.3.1. Combination with Efflux Pumps Inhibitors

One of the main potential mechanisms of the observed synergistic activity is presumed to comprise the blocking of fungal plasma membrane efflux pumps. The active pumping of antifungals from the intracellular to the extracellular medium through efflux pumps leads to a subsequent reduction in the intracellular antifungal concentration resulting in resistance. Thus, a viable strategy for overcoming antifungal resistance is to inhibit efflux pumps [67,68,69]. Unnarmicin A (107) and unnarmicin C (108) (Figure 27) are candidate inhibitors of the resistance mechanism, namely efflux pumps. These natural compounds (also from marine sources) showed a synergistic effect with fluconazole, which potentiated the antifungal activity against azole-resistant C. albicans, and thus can be considered as potential adjuvants in antifungal therapy. Thus, these results lead to the conclusion that marine inhibitors of efflux pumps are promising compounds and can be of help in reversing the problem of antifungal resistance [69,70].

3.3.2. Combination with Compounds that Induce the Reactive Oxygen Species Formation

Candida spp. are the main fungal pathogens responsible for infections in both the mucosa and deep tissues. The pathogenicity of these yeasts is attributed to certain virulence factors, and recent studies suggest that most invasive infections produced by Candida spp. are associated with the formation and growth of biofilms in host tissues and medical devices. Furthermore, biofilms are identified to have more antifungal resistance compared to planktonic cells, and therefore, they play an important role in the perpetuation of infections [71,72]. Currently, there are few antifungals, such as miconazole, AmB, and echinocandins, which are also effective against fungal biofilms. These antifungals, in addition to their demonstrated and main mechanism of action, also revealed ability to inhibit biofilms by stimulating reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in both planktonic and biofilm cells. Thus, a promising approach to control biofilm formation is the induction of ROS. Miconazole is capable of affecting C. albicans biofilms; nonetheless, for high concentrations, the presence of persistent cells resistant to the action of miconazole was observed due to the activity of superoxide dismutases with a consequent reduction of ROS [73,74,75]. Considering polyenes, AmB and AmB lipid formulations showed to be effective against mature C. albicans biofilms, and they had high activity in a model of central venous catheter in rabbits and mice. However, as seen with miconazole, the treatment of biofilms requires higher concentrations of AmB [75,76,77]. Finally, echinocandins (anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin) also showed activity against Candida biofilms; similar activity for biofilms and planktonic cells was reported, with caspofungin being the echinocandin most effective. However, so far, there are still no reports on the induction of ROS in fungal biofilms by this class [75,77,78]. Recently, new metabolites isolated from several sources showed as a specific or additional mechanism of action the accumulation of ROS and, subsequently, the induction of apoptosis in fungal pathogens. One example is the marine polyunsaturated fatty acids, which is a class newly identified with inhibitory action against biofilms formation from C. albicans and C. dubliniensis. In particular, stearidonic acid (18:4 n-3), eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5 n-3), and docosapentaenoic acid (22:5 n-3) were able to inhibit the mitochondrial activity of biofilms and affect the cell morphology of biofilms from both strains [75,79]. Fluconazole is an antifungal that is widely used in the treatment and prophylaxis of fungal infections that shows reduced ability to induce ROS; its combination with molecules capable of stimulating the ROS production could result in a synergistic effect. Although the induction of ROS and, eventually, the occurrence of apoptosis in fungal cells can be considered a very promising approach for the treatment and/or prevention of Candida biofilms, further studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between the mode of action and the presence of ROS [75].

3.4. Nanoparticles

Some current antifungal agents present major obstacles, such as hydrophobic character, toxicity, pharmacological interactions, low aqueous solubility, and low oral bioavailability, which limit their clinical benefits. Thus, the development of drug delivery systems is a promising strategy for improving the performance and safety profile of antifungals, maintaining or increasing their therapeutic efficacy, and overcoming many of these associated limitations. Of the many drug delivery systems currently under investigation, nanoparticles have emerged as an innovative way that is capable of minimizing undesirable adverse effects and overcoming many of the unfavorable properties of antifungals. Due to a wide range of advantageous and captivating characteristics, involving reduced size, variability, improved stability, multifunctionality, biocompatibility, directing target tissues, and the possibility of increasing the penetration of antifungal agents through the skin, nanocarriers were hypothesized to assist in the treatment of invasive fungal infections. Liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles, and nanostructured lipid carriers are some of the most studied lipid-based nanocarriers for the delivery of antifungals on the treatment of invasive mycoses in numerous clinical trials. A visible example of the application of nanoparticles as a tool for drug delivery systems is with AmB, where the use of formulations based on nanoparticles, such as AmB lipid complex, AmB colloidal dispersion, and liposomal AmB, demonstrated minimal or no toxicity, maintaining its broad-spectrum antifungal activity. However, the study of nanoformulations in the antifungal area has been very gradual, unlike in the field of cancer diagnosis and therapy, with AmB being almost the only commercially available antifungal in different nanoparticle formulations. This situation is mainly due to the divestment of the pharmaceutical industry and the lack of economic incentives, as the production of nanoparticles involves a high cost, due to the limitations of the nanoparticles themselves, such as low physical stability and pharmacokinetic/biodistribution profiles, and the poor correlation between in vitro and in vivo trials [80,81]. Studies revealed that conjugated systems of antifungals, such as azoles and AmB, and metallic nanoparticles, mainly prepared from metals such as Ag, Pt, Au, and Pd, have a synergistic action. This is the case of the combination of silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) with fluconazole and itraconazole. The use of a marine mangrove extract (Rhizophora mucronata) and silver nitrate allowed synthesizing nanoparticles that revealed an inhibitory and fungicidal effect, and when conjugated with fluconazole and itraconazole, it significantly increased the activity against C. albicans and A. fumigatus. Thus, it can be suggested that these formulations have a synergistic effect when associated with azoles [82]. Magnesium oxide nanoparticles (MgO-NPs), prepared from a marine brown algae Sargassum wighitii, were also found as effective agents against pathogenic fungi. In comparison with fluconazole (positive control), nanoparticles demonstrated a potent inhibition against A. fumigatus, A. niger, and F. solani, being A. fumigatus less susceptible [83]. Given their biocompatibility and stability in adverse conditions, these metal oxide nanoparticles have been applied for the relief of heart burns and the regeneration of bones and used as antitumor and antibacterial agents. Since seaweeds/marine algae are easily accessible and of great associated effectiveness, their use in the synthesis of nanoparticles has become an essential and predominant recent step. These results suggest that the use of marine-derived associated-nanoparticles systems may be a promising approach for the treatment of fungal infections.

4. Conclusions

This review focuses on new bioactive compounds from marine sources and new perspectives for their antifungal application. Currently, there are many challenges in the treatment and prevention of fungal infections due to the increase in the number of cases and the emergence of resistance (primary, secondary, and biofilm formation) to the few antifungal agents available in clinical practice. In addition, the unfavorable characteristics of current antifungals have led to the need to seek new treatment options.
Given that the marine environment represents a huge and still unexplored source of secondary metabolites with a wide structural variety and a wide range of pharmacological activities, natural products with potential in vitro antifungal activity isolated from numerous marine sources were addressed. In this review, it is worth highlighting a combination formed by compounds 46 and 47, compound 49 with AmB, and compounds 5056 with fluconazole, which exhibited a synergistic effect with greater antifungal action than any of the isolated compounds. Almost all of the compounds mentioned inhibited the growth of a diversity of fungal species, with special attention to compounds 1, 3, 5, 9, 19, 37, 39, 40, 42, 49, 52, 53, 55, 56, 63, 71, 76, and 92 that showed potent activity against strains of C. albicans. Although several promising marine natural products to antifungal agents have been found, their development has been progressive, as this is a very time-consuming process, and the amount of products derived in particular from sponges is limited due to cost and biodiversity, as well as the difficulty in synthesizing them chemically.
Understanding the pathogenic processes of fungi contributed to the discovery of new targets and, consequently, new inhibitors, making new targets a good alternative to develop new antifungals. However, this strategy remains challenging, because fungal cells share a high physiological similarity with human cells and, thus, several targets involved in the cell membrane and the biosynthesis of proteins or deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) are not specific to fungi. The inhibition of microtubule assembly is a new potential target and, consequently, it is a new mechanism of action used to combat the proliferation of fungi and infections. The results obtained suggest that the application of its inhibitor, such as dolastatin 10 (100), will be able to block the growth of even strains of resistant pathogenic fungi. However, it is necessary to continue to discover, evaluate, and optimize more promising inhibitors, although many antifungal targets with therapeutic potential have already been found and identified in clinical trials. Currently, studies focused on increasing the activity of antifungals, especially fluconazole, have revealed a combination therapy of antifungal and non-antifungal agents as an option to deal with the problems associated with the treatment of invasive fungal infections and antifungal resistance, and it may become a way to solve the limited therapeutic arsenal of antifungals. Although the mechanism of action of commercial antifungals has already been extensively investigated, some of these when combined with marine compounds that inhibit efflux pumps exhibit a synergistic effect. This situation proves to be another interesting strategy for combating antifungal resistance. On the other hand, the direction of the oxidative defense system of pathogenic fungi can also be a powerful tool for increasing the activity of antifungals currently available in therapy and allowing dosage reduction, given that ROS induction is correlated with fungicidal activity. In addition, ROS has been shown to be a promising application to overcome the formation of biofilms in the development of invasive fungal infections. Therefore, the discovery of compounds that can act by this mechanism, associated or not with the existing antifungals, can help in the fight against fungal infections related or not with biofilms. Chitosan is a polymer of great interest in antifungal therapy as a possible anti-candidiasis agent, given the potent activity revealed on C. albicans. A remarkable solution that improves the solubility in water of chitosan is derivatization by carboxymethylation as a hydrophilic modification to produce CMC. This derivative presents greater antifungal activity in comparison to chitosan, a broad spectrum of action in Candida spp., and the ability to interfere in the formation of biofilms. Although there are some effective antifungal agents, their therapeutic benefits are limited by high toxicity or undesirable physicochemical properties. The use of nanoparticle formulations such as antifungal delivery systems can overcome these limitations. Another innovative strategy for the effective control of the emergence and spread of fungal pathogens is the anti-virulence therapy, which aims to disarm the virulence mechanisms of the pathogen, with fungi filamentation being the main target of study. Preliminary results suggest that this application could potentially be used to treat certain forms of candidiasis; however, more studies must be carried out to prove their real effectiveness.

Author Contributions

E.P. and E.S. conceived and planned the project, organized, revised, and corrected the manuscript; J.C. and D.G.N. performed a literature search and prepared the draft of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by national funds through FCT—Foundation for Science and Technology within the scope of UIDB/04423/2020, UIDP/04423/2020 (Group of Natural Products and Medicinal Chemistry), and under the project PTDC/SAU-PUB/28736/2017 (reference POCI-01-0145-FEDER-028736), co-financed by COMPETE 2020, Portugal 2020 and the European Union through the ERDF and by FCT through national funds.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Berbee, M.L.; James, T.Y.; Strullu-Derrien, C. Early Diverging Fungi: Diversity and Impact at the Dawn of Terrestrial Life. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 71, 41–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Grossart, H.P.; Van den Wyngaert, S.; Kagami, M.; Wurzbacher, C.; Cunliffe, M.; Rojas-Jimenez, K. Fungi in aquatic ecosystems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 339–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Krauss, G.J.; Sole, M.; Krauss, G.; Schlosser, D.; Wesenberg, D.; Barlocher, F. Fungi in freshwaters: Ecology, physiology and biochemical potential. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 35, 620–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hassett, B.T.; Borrego, E.J.; Vonnahme, T.R.; Rama, T.; Kolomiets, M.V.; Gradinger, R. Arctic marine fungi: Biomass, functional genes, and putative ecological roles. ISME J. 2019, 13, 1484–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Sterflinger, K.; Tesei, D.; Zakharova, K. Fungi in hot and cold deserts with particular reference to microcolonial fungi. Fungal Ecol. 2012, 5, 453–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bennett, J.W. Mycotechnology: The role of fungi in biotechnology. J. Biotechnol. 1998, 66, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kavanagh, K. Fungi: Biology and Applications, 3rd ed.; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; ISBN 978-1-119-37432-9. [Google Scholar]
  8. Soares-Costa, A.; Nakayama, D.G.; Andrade Lde, F.; Catelli, L.F.; Bassi, A.P.; Ceccato-Antonini, S.R.; Henrique-Silva, F. Industrial PE-2 strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: From alcoholic fermentation to the production of recombinant proteins. New Biotechnol. 2014, 31, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Elabboubi, M.; Bennani, L.; Ainane, A.; Charaf, S.; Bouhadi, M.; Hamed, M.; Kouali, E.; Talbi, M.; Cherroud, S.; Tarik, A. Treatment of mycoses by essential oils: Mini Review. J. Anal. Sci. Appl. Biotechnol. 2019, 1, 35–40. [Google Scholar]
  10. Fuentefria, A.M.; Pippi, B.; Dalla Lana, D.F.; Donato, K.K.; de Andrade, S.F. Antifungals discovery: An insight into new strategies to combat antifungal resistance. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 66, 2–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Campoy, S.; Adrio, J.L. Antifungals. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2017, 133, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Van Daele, R.; Spriet, I.; Wauters, J.; Maertens, J.; Mercier, T.; Van Hecke, S.; Bruggemann, R. Antifungal drugs: What brings the future? Med. Mycol. 2019, 57, S328–S343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Denning, D.W.; Bromley, M.J. Infectious Disease. How to bolster the antifungal pipeline. Science 2015, 347, 1414–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Arendrup, M.C.; Patterson, T.F. Multidrug-Resistant Candida: Epidemiology, Molecular Mechanisms, and Treatment. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 216, S445–S451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Sanguinetti, M.; Posteraro, B.; Lass-Florl, C. Antifungal drug resistance among Candida species: Mechanisms and clinical impact. Mycoses 2015, 58, 2–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hadrich, I.; Ayadi, A. Epidemiology of antifungal susceptibility: Review of literature. J. Mycol. Med. 2018, 28, 574–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Pinto, E.; Monteiro, C.; Maia, M.; Faria, M.A.; Lopes, V.; Lameiras, C.; Pinheiro, D. Aspergillus Species and Antifungals Susceptibility in Clinical Setting in the North of Portugal: Cryptic Species and Emerging Azoles Resistance in A. fumigatus. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Fisher, M.C.; Hawkins, N.J.; Sanglard, D.; Gurr, S.J. Worldwide emergence of resistance to antifungal drugs challenges human health and food security. Science 2018, 360, 739–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Thompson, G.R.; Cadena, J.; Patterson, T.F. Overview of antifungal agents. Clin. Chest Med. 2009, 30, 203–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.; Casadevall, A.; Galgiani, J.N.; Odds, F.C.; Rex, J.H. An insight into the antifungal pipeline: Selected new molecules and beyond. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9, 719–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ngo, H.X.; Garneau-Tsodikova, S.; Green, K.D. A complex game of hide and seek: The search for new antifungals. Med. Chem. Comm. 2016, 7, 1285–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Choudhary, A.; Naughton, L.M.; Montánchez, I.; Dobson, A.D.W.; Rai, D.K. Current Status and Future Prospects of Marine Natural Products (MNPs) as Antimicrobials. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Corinaldesi, C.; Barone, G.; Marcellini, F.; Dell’Anno, A.; Danovaro, R. Marine Microbial-Derived Molecules and Their Potential Use in Cosmeceutical and Cosmetic Products. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. El-Hossary, E.M.; Cheng, C.; Hamed, M.M.; El-Sayed Hamed, A.N.; Ohlsen, K.; Hentschel, U.; Abdelmohsen, U.R. Antifungal potential of marine natural products. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 126, 631–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Xu, L.; Meng, W.; Cao, C.; Wang, J.; Shan, W.; Wang, Q. Antibacterial and Antifungal Compounds from Marine Fungi. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 3479–3513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alves, A.; Sousa, E.; Kijjoa, A.; Pinto, M. Marine-Derived Compounds with Potential Use as Cosmeceuticals and Nutricosmetics. Molecules 2020, 25, 2536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mehbub, M.F.; Lei, J.; Franco, C.; Zhang, W. Marine Sponge Derived Natural Products between 2001 and 2010: Trends and Opportunities for Discovery of Bioactives. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 4539–4577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Bhatnagar, I.; Kim, S.K. Immense Essence of Excellence: Marine Microbial Bioactive Compounds. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 2673–2701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Bahrami, Y.; Zhang, W.; MM Franco, C. Distribution of Saponins in the Sea Cucumber Holothuria lessoni; the Body Wall Versus the Viscera, and Their Biological Activities. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Angawi, R.F.; Bavestrello, G.; Calcinai, B.; Dien, H.A.; Donnarumma, G.; Tufano, M.A.; Paoletti, I.; Grimaldi, E.; Chianese, G.; Fattorusso, E.; et al. Aurantoside J: A New Tetramic Acid Glycoside from Theonella swinhoei. Insights into the Antifungal Potential of Aurantosides. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 2809–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kumar, R.; Subramani, R.; Feussner, K.D.; Aalbersberg, W. Aurantoside K, a New Antifungal Tetramic Acid Glycoside from a Fijian Marine Sponge of the Genus Melophlus. Mar. Drugs 2012, 10, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Yu, H.B.; Liu, X.F.; Xu, Y.; Gan, J.H.; Jiao, W.H.; Shen, Y.; Lin, H.W. Woodylides A-C, New Cytotoxic Linear Polyketides from the South China Sea Sponge Plakortis simplex. Mar. Drugs 2012, 10, 1027–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Youssef, D.T.A.; Shaala, L.A.; Mohamed, G.A.; Badr, J.M.; Bamanie, F.H.; Ibrahim, S.R.M. Theonellamide G, a Potent Antifungal and Cytotoxic Bicyclic Glycopeptide from the Red Sea Marine Sponge Theonella swinhoei. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 1911–1923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Xu, Y.; Lang, J.-H.; Jiao, W.-H.; Wang, R.-P.; Peng, Y.; Song, S.-J.; Zhang, B.-H.; Lin, H.-W. Formamido-diterpenes from the South China Sea Sponge Acanthella cavernosa. Mar. Drugs 2012, 10, 1445–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Yu, H.B.; Yang, F.; Sun, F.; Li, J.; Jiao, W.H.; Gan, J.H.; Hu, W.Z.; Lin, H.W. Aaptamine Derivatives with Antifungal and Anti-HIV-1 Activities from the South China Sea Sponge Aaptos aaptos. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 6003–6013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Calabro, K.; Kalahroodi, E.L.; Rodrigues, D.; Diaz, C.; Cruz, M.; Cautain, B.; Laville, R.; Reyes, F.; Perez, T.; Soussi, B.; et al. Poecillastrosides, Steroidal Saponins from the Mediterranean Deep-Sea Sponge Poecillastra compressa (Bowerbank, 1866). Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. El Amraoui, B.; El Wahidi, M.; Fassouane, A. In vitro screening of antifungal activity of marine sponge extracts against five phytopathogenic fungi. Springerplus 2014, 3, 629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. El-Amraoui, B.; Biard, J.F.; Fassouane, A. Haliscosamine: A new antifungal sphingosine derivative from the Moroccan marine sponge Haliclona viscosa. Springerplus 2013, 2, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kumar, R.; Subramani, R.; Aalbersberg, W. Three bioactive sesquiterpene quinones from the Fijian marine sponge of the genus Hippospongia. Nat. Prod. Res. 2013, 27, 1488–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lacret, R.; Oves-Costales, D.; Gomez, C.; Diaz, C.; de la Cruz, M.; Perez-Victoria, I.; Vicente, F.; Genilloud, O.; Reyes, F. New Ikarugamycin Derivatives with Antifungal and Antibacterial Properties from Streptomyces zhaozhouensis. Mar. Drugs 2014, 13, 128–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Mi, Y.; Zhang, J.; He, S.; Yan, X. New Peptides Isolated from Marine Cyanobacteria, an Overview over the Past Decade. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. MacMillan, J.B.; Ernst-Russell, M.A.; de Ropp, J.S.; Molinski, T.F. Lobocyclamides A-C, Lipopeptides from a Cryptic Cyanobacterial Mat Containing Lyngbya confervoides. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 8210–8215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wyche, T.P.; Piotrowski, J.S.; Hou, Y.; Braun, D.; Deshpande, R.; McIlwain, S.; Ong, I.M.; Myers, C.L.; Guzei, I.A.; Westler, W.M.; et al. Forazoline A: Marine-Derived Polyketide with Antifungal In Vivo Efficacy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53, 11583–11586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Karpiński, T.M. Marine Macrolides with Antibacterial and/or Antifungal Activity. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Okabe, M.; Sugita, T.; Kinoshita, K.; Koyama, K. Macrolides from a Marine-Derived Fungus, Penicillium meleagrinum var. viridiflavum, Showing Synergistic Effects with Fluconazole against Azole-Resistant Candida albicans. J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 1208–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shaala, L.A.; Youssef, D.T.A. Identification and Bioactivity of Compounds from the Fungus Penicillium sp. CYE-87 Isolated from a Marine Tunicate. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 1698–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Yu, H.B.; Wang, X.L.; Xu, W.H.; Zhang, Y.X.; Qian, Y.-S.; Zhang, J.P.; Lu, X.L.; Liu, X.Y. Eutypellenoids A-C, New Pimarane Diterpenes from the Arctic Fungus Eutypella sp. D-1. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Zhao, D.-L.; Wang, D.; Tian, X.-Y.; Cao, F.; Li, Y.-Q.; Zhang, C.-S. Anti-Phytopathogenic and Cytotoxic Activities of Crude Extracts and Secondary Metabolites of Marine-Derived Fungi. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Haga, A.; Tamoto, H.; Ishino, M.; Kimura, E.; Sugita, T.; Kinoshita, K.; Takahashi, K.; Shiro, M.; Koyama, K. Pyridone Alkaloids from a Marine-Derived Fungus, Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum, and Their Activities against Azole-Resistant Candida albicans. J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76, 750–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, F.; Cai, X.L.; Yang, H.; Xia, X.K.; Guo, Z.Y.; Yuan, J.; Li, M.F.; She, Z.G.; Lin, Y.C. The Bioactive Metabolites of the Mangrove Endophytic Fungus Talaromyces sp. ZH-154 Isolated from Kandelia candel (L.) Druce. Planta Med. 2010, 76, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Liu, Y.; Mándi, A.; Li, X.M.; Meng, L.H.; Kurtán, T.; Wang, B.G. Peniciadametizine A, a Dithiodiketopiperazine with a Unique Spiro[furan-2,7’-pyrazino [1,2-b] [1,2] oxazine] Skeleton, and a Related Analogue, Peniciadametizine B, from the Marine Sponge-Derived Fungus Penicillium adametzioides. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 3640–3652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Lei, H.; Lin, X.; Han, L.; Ma, J.; Ma, Q.; Zhong, J.; Liu, Y.; Sun, T.; Wang, J.; Huang, X. New Metabolites and Bioactive Chlorinated Benzophenone Derivatives Produced by a Marine-Derived Fungus Pestalotiopsis heterocornis. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Wang, X.H.; Zou, Z.R.; Yi, Y.H.; Han, H.; Li, L.; Pan, M.X. Variegatusides: New Non-Sulphated Triterpene Glycosides from the Sea Cucumber Stichopus variegates Semper. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 2004–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Khattab, R.A.; Elbandy, M.; Lawrence, A.; Paget, T.; Rae-Rho, J.; Binnaser, Y.S.; Ali, I. Extraction, Identification and Biological Activities of Saponins in Sea Cucumber Pearsonothuria graeffei. Combinatorial Chem. High. Throughput Screen 2018, 21, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Tidgewell, K.; Clark, B.R.; Gerwick, W.H. The Natural Products Chemistry of Cyanobacteria. In Comprehensive Natural Products II; Liu, H.-W., Mander, L., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2010; Volume 2, pp. 141–188. ISBN 978-140-108-045382-045388. [Google Scholar]
  56. Singh, P.; Yadav, R.; Pandey, S.; Bhunia, S.S. Past, Present, and Future of Antifungal Drug Development. In Topics in Medicinal Chemistry; Bernstein, P.R., Garner, A.L., Georg, G.I., Lowe, J.A., Meanwell, N.A., Saxena, A.K., Supuran, C.T., Zhang, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; Volume 29, pp. 125–167. ISBN 978-123-319-78254-78256. [Google Scholar]
  57. Pettit, R.K.; Pettit, G.R.; Hazen, K.C. Specific Activities of Dolastatin 10 and Peptide Derivatives against Cryptococcus neoformans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998, 42, 2961–2965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Vila, T.; Romo, J.A.; Pierce, C.G.; McHardy, S.F.; Saville, S.P.; Lopez-Ribot, J.L. Targeting Candida albicans filamentation for antifungal drug development. Virulence 2017, 8, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Meng, L.; Sun, C.; Zhang, C.; Song, S.; Sun, X.; Ju, J.; Deng, Y. Efficacy of Compounds Isolated from Streptomyces olivaceus against the Morphogenesis and Virulence of Candida albicans. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Younes, I.; Rinaudo, M. Chitin and Chitosan Preparation from Marine Sources. Structure, Properties and Applications. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 1133–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Shariatinia, Z. Carboxymethyl chitosan: Properties and biomedical applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 120, 1406–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Costa, E.; Silva, S.; Tavaria, F.; Pintado, M. Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activity of Chitosan on the Oral Pathogen Candida albicans. Pathogens 2014, 3, 908–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Inamdar, N.; Mourya, V.K.; Tiwari, A. Carboxymethyl Chitosan and Its Applications. Ad. Mat. Lett. 2010, 1, 11–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kurniasih, M.; Cahyati, T.; Dewi, R.S. Carboxymethyl chitosan as an antifungal agent on gauze. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 119, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zheng, Y.H.; Ma, Y.Y.; Ding, Y.; Chen, X.Q.; Gao, G.X. An insight into new strategies to combat antifungal drug resistance. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2018, 12, 3807–3816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Pu, Y.; Liu, A.; Zheng, Y.; Ye, B. In vitro damage of Candida albicans biofilms by chitosan. Exp. Ther. Med. 2014, 8, 929–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Lee, H.; Lee, D.G. Novel Approaches for Efficient Antifungal Drug Action. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 28, 1771–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Liu, S.; Hou, Y.; Chen, X.; Gao, Y.; Li, H.; Sun, S. Combination of fluconazole with non-antifungal agents: A promising approach to cope with resistant Candida albicans infections and insight into new antifungal agent discovery. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2014, 43, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Barbosa, F.; Pinto, E.; Kijjoa, A.; Pinto, M.; Sousa, E. Targeting Antimicrobial Drug Resistance with Marine Natural Products. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 56, 106005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Tanabe, K.; Lamping, E.; Adachi, K.; Takano, Y.; Kawabata, K.; Shizuri, Y.; Niimi, M.; Uehara, Y. Inhibition of fungal ABC transporters by unnarmicin A and unnarmicin C, novel cyclic peptides from marine bacterium. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 364, 990–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sardi, J.C.O.; Scorzoni, L.; Bernardi, T.; Fusco-Almeida, A.M.; Mendes Giannini, M.J.S. Candida species: Current epidemiology, pathogenicity, biofilm formation, natural antifungal products and new therapeutic options. J. Med. Microbiol. 2013, 62, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Pierce, C.G.; Srinivasan, A.; Ramasubramanian, A.K.; Lopez-Ribot, J.L. From Biology to Drug Development: New Approaches to Combat the Threat of Fungal Biofilms. Microbiol. Spectr. 2015, 3, 373–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Bink, A.; Vandenbosch, D.; Coenye, T.; Nelis, H.; Cammue, B.P.; Thevissen, K. Superoxide dismutases are involved in Candida albicans biofilm persistence against miconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 4033–4037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. De Cremer, K.; De Brucker, K.; Staes, I.; Peeters, A.; Van den Driessche, F.; Coenye, T.; Cammue, B.P.; Thevissen, K. Stimulation of superoxide production increases fungicidal action of miconazole against Candida albicans biofilms. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Delattin, N.; Cammue, B.P.; Thevissen, K. Reactive oxygen species-inducing antifungal agents and their activity against fungal biofilms. Future Med. Chem. 2014, 6, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. LaFleur, M.D.; Kumamoto, C.A.; Lewis, K. Candida albicans Biofilms Produce Antifungal-Tolerant Persister Cells. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 3839–3846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Kuhn, D.M.; George, T.; Chandra, J.; Mukherjee, P.K.; Ghannoum, M.A. Antifungal Susceptibility of Candida Biofilms: Unique Efficacy of Amphotericin B Lipid Formulations and Echinocandins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 1773–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Hao, B.; Cheng, S.; Clancy, C.J.; Nguyen, M.H. Caspofungin Kills Candida albicans by Causing both Cellular Apoptosis and Necrosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Thibane, V.S.; Kock, J.L.; Ells, R.; van Wyk, P.W.; Pohl, C.H. Effect of marine polyunsaturated fatty acids on biofilm formation of Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 2597–2604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Scorzoni, L.; de Paula, E.S.A.C.; Marcos, C.M.; Assato, P.A.; de Melo, W.C.; de Oliveira, H.C.; Costa-Orlandi, C.B.; Mendes-Giannini, M.J.; Fusco-Almeida, A.M. Antifungal Therapy: New Advances in the Understanding and Treatment of Mycosis. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Soliman, G.M. Nanoparticles as safe and effective delivery systems of antifungal agents: Achievements and challenges. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 523, 15–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Singh, M.; Kumar, M.; Kalaivani, R.; Manikandan, S.; Kumaraguru, A.K. Metallic silver nanoparticle: A therapeutic agent in combination with antifungal drug against human fungal pathogen. Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng. 2013, 36, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Pugazhendhi, A.; Prabhu, R.; Muruganantham, K.; Shanmuganathan, R.; Natarajan, S. Anticancer, antimicrobial and photocatalytic activities of green synthesized magnesium oxide nanoparticles (MgONPs) using aqueous extract of Sargassum wightii. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2019, 190, 86–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mechanism of action of antifungal classes.
Figure 1. Mechanism of action of antifungal classes.
Molecules 25 05856 g001
Figure 2. Historical evolution of antifungal agents.
Figure 2. Historical evolution of antifungal agents.
Molecules 25 05856 g002
Figure 3. Structure of aurantosides G–J (14).
Figure 3. Structure of aurantosides G–J (14).
Molecules 25 05856 g003
Figure 4. Structure of aurantoside K (5).
Figure 4. Structure of aurantoside K (5).
Molecules 25 05856 g004
Figure 5. Structures of woodylides A–C (68).
Figure 5. Structures of woodylides A–C (68).
Molecules 25 05856 g005
Figure 6. Structure of theonellamide G (9).
Figure 6. Structure of theonellamide G (9).
Molecules 25 05856 g006
Figure 7. Structures of compounds 1021.
Figure 7. Structures of compounds 1021.
Molecules 25 05856 g007
Figure 8. Structures of aaptamines (2229).
Figure 8. Structures of aaptamines (2229).
Molecules 25 05856 g008
Figure 9. Structures of poecillastrosides A–G (3036).
Figure 9. Structures of poecillastrosides A–G (3036).
Molecules 25 05856 g009
Figure 10. Structure of haliscosamine (37).
Figure 10. Structure of haliscosamine (37).
Molecules 25 05856 g010
Figure 11. Structure of epi-ilimaquinone (38).
Figure 11. Structure of epi-ilimaquinone (38).
Molecules 25 05856 g011
Figure 12. Structures of compounds 3945.
Figure 12. Structures of compounds 3945.
Molecules 25 05856 g012
Figure 13. Structures of compounds 4648.
Figure 13. Structures of compounds 4648.
Molecules 25 05856 g013
Figure 14. Structure of forazoline A (49).
Figure 14. Structure of forazoline A (49).
Molecules 25 05856 g014
Figure 15. Structures of 13-membered macrolides (5056).
Figure 15. Structures of 13-membered macrolides (5056).
Molecules 25 05856 g015
Figure 16. Structures of compounds 5762.
Figure 16. Structures of compounds 5762.
Molecules 25 05856 g016
Figure 17. Structures of pimarane diterpenes (6366).
Figure 17. Structures of pimarane diterpenes (6366).
Molecules 25 05856 g017
Figure 18. Structures of compounds 6770.
Figure 18. Structures of compounds 6770.
Molecules 25 05856 g018
Figure 19. Structure of didymellamide A (71).
Figure 19. Structure of didymellamide A (71).
Molecules 25 05856 g019
Figure 20. Structures of xanthones and structurally related compounds (7278).
Figure 20. Structures of xanthones and structurally related compounds (7278).
Molecules 25 05856 g020
Figure 21. Structures of dithiodiketopiperazine derivatives (7982).
Figure 21. Structures of dithiodiketopiperazine derivatives (7982).
Molecules 25 05856 g021
Figure 22. Structures of compounds 8390a/90b.
Figure 22. Structures of compounds 8390a/90b.
Molecules 25 05856 g022
Figure 23. Structures of compounds 9197.
Figure 23. Structures of compounds 9197.
Molecules 25 05856 g023
Figure 24. Structures of compounds 98 and 99.
Figure 24. Structures of compounds 98 and 99.
Molecules 25 05856 g024
Figure 25. Structures of dolastatin 10 (100) and analogues 101104.
Figure 25. Structures of dolastatin 10 (100) and analogues 101104.
Molecules 25 05856 g025
Figure 26. Structures of sorbicillin (105) and 3-methyl-N-(2′-phenelethyl)-butyrylamide (106).
Figure 26. Structures of sorbicillin (105) and 3-methyl-N-(2′-phenelethyl)-butyrylamide (106).
Molecules 25 05856 g026
Figure 27. Structures of efflux pumps inhibitors: unnarmicin A (107) and unnarmicin C (108).
Figure 27. Structures of efflux pumps inhibitors: unnarmicin A (107) and unnarmicin C (108).
Molecules 25 05856 g027
Table 1. The general characteristic of the marine natural products with antifungal activity.
Table 1. The general characteristic of the marine natural products with antifungal activity.
CompoundChemical ClassSourceActivityReferences
Aurantoside G (1)PeptideSponge Theonella swinhoeiC. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis
(MIC90 8, 8, 4, and 4 mg/L)
[30]
Aurantoside I (3)PeptideSponge Theonella swinhoeiC. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and F. solani
(MIC90 0.5, 0.125, 0.5, 0.5, and 2 mg/L)
[30]
Aurantoside K (5)PeptideSponge Meophlus sp.AmB-R and WT C. albicans (MIC 31.25 and 1.95 mg/L); C. neoformans, A. niger, Rhizopus sporangia, Penicillium sp., and Sordaria sp. (Ø inhibition 14, 28, 21, 31, and 29 mm)[31]
Woodylide A (6)PolyketideSponge Plakortis simplexC. neoformans (IC50 3.67 mg/L)
C. albicans, N. gypsea, and T. rubrum (MIC 32 mg/L)
[32]
Woodylide C (8)PolyketideSponge Plakortis simplexC. neoformans (IC50 10.85 mg/L); N. gypsea and T. rubrum (MIC 32 mg/L)[32]
Theonellamide G (9)PeptideSponge Theonella swinhoeiAmB-R and WT C. albicans (IC50 4.49 and 2.0 µM)[33]
15-Formamido-kalihinene (18)TerpeneSponge Acanthella cavernosaN. gypsea and T. rubrum (MIC 8 and 32 mg/L)[34]
10-Formamido-kalihinene (19)TerpeneSponge Acanthella cavernosaC. albicans, C. neoformans, N. gypsea, and T. rubrum (MIC 8, 8, 8, and 4 mg/L)[34]
Aaptamine (24)AlkaloidSponge Aaptos aaptosC. parapsilosis (MIC 32 mg/L)[35]
Aaptamine (25)AlkaloidSponge Aaptos aaptosN. gypsea (MIC 64 mg/L)[35]
Aaptamine (26)AlkaloidSponge Aaptos aaptosN. gypsea (MIC 64 mg/L)[35]
Aaptamine (27)AlkaloidSponge Aaptos aaptosN. gypsea (MIC 64 mg/L)[35]
Aaptamine (28)AlkaloidSponge Aaptos aaptosC. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. neoformans, N. gypsea, and T. rubrum
(MIC 32, 64, 32, 16, and 4 mg/L)
[35]
Aaptamine (29)AlkaloidSponge Aaptos aaptosC. neoformans, N. gypsea, and T. rubrum (MIC 64, 32, and 8 mg/L)[35]
Poecillastroside D (33)SteroidSponge Poecillastra compressaA. fumigatus (MIC90 6 mg/L)[36]
Poecillastroside E (34)SteroidSponge Poecillastra compressaA. fumigatus (MIC90 24 mg/L)[36]
Haliscosamine (37)PolyketideSponge Haliclona viscosaC. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. neoformans
(MIC90 0.4–0.8, 0.4–0.8, and 0.2–0.4 mg/L)
[38]
Epi-ilimaquinone (38)PolyketideSponge Hippospongia sp.AmB-R C. albicans (MIC 125 mg/L)[39]
Isoikarugamycin (39)PolyketideBacteria Streptomyces zhaozhouensisC. albicans and A. fumigatus (MIC 2–4 and 4–8 mg/L)[40]
28-N-methylikaguramycin (40)PolyketideBacteria Streptomyces zhaozhouensisC. albicans and A. fumigatus (MIC 4 and 4–8 mg/L)[40]
Ikarugamycin (42)PolyketideBacteria Streptomyces zhaozhouensisC. albicans and A. fumigatus (MIC 4 and 4–8 mg/L)[40]
Lobocyclamide A (46)PeptideCyanobacterium Lyngbya confervoidesC. albicans (MIC 91 mg/L)
Synergism with mixture of 46 and 47 against C. albicans (MIC 10–30 mg/L)
[42]
Lobocyclamide B (47)PeptideCyanobacterium Lyngbya confervoidesC. albicans (MIC 30-100 mg/L)
Synergism with mixture of 46 and 47 against C. albicans (MIC 10–30 mg/L)
[42]
Forazoline A (49)PolyketideBacteria Actinomadura spp.C. albicans (MIC < 16 mg/L); Synergism with AmB[43]
PF1163A (52)PolyketideFungus Penicillium meleagrinum var. viridiflavumAzole-resistant C. albicans (MIC 1 mg/L)
Synergism with fluconazole against the azole-resistant C. albicans
[45]
PF1163B (53)PolyketideFungus Penicillium meleagrinum var. viridiflavumAzole-resistant C. albicans (MIC 2 mg/L)
Synergism with fluconazole against the azole-resistant C. albicans
[45]
PF1163H (55)PolyketideFungus Penicillium meleagrinum var. viridiflavumAzole-resistant C. albicans (MIC 16 mg/L)
Synergism with fluconazole against the azole-resistant C. albicans
[45]
PF1163F (56)PolyketideFungus Penicillium meleagrinum var. viridiflavumAzole-resistant C. albicans (MIC 8 mg/L)
Synergism with fluconazole against the azole-resistant C. albicans
[45]
Terretrione D (57)AlkaloidFungus Penicillium sp. CYE-87C. albicans (Ø inhibition 17 mm and MIC 32 mg/L)[46]
Terretrione C (62)AlkaloidFungus Penicillium sp. CYE-87C. albicans (Ø inhibition 19 mm and MIC 32 mg/L)[46]
Eutypellenoid A (63)TerpeneFungus Eutypella sp. D-1C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis
(MIC 8, 16, 8, and 32 mg/L)
[47]
Anthraquinone (67)PolyketideFungus Fusarium equisetiPestallozzia theae (MIC 31.3 mg/L)[48]
Anthraquinone (68)PolyketideFungus Fusarium equisetiPestallozzia theae (MIC 31.3 mg/L)[48]
Stemphyperlenol (69)PolyketideFungus Alternaria sp.Pestallozzia theae and Alternaria brassicicola (MIC 7.81 and 125 mg/L)[48]
Didymellamide A (71)AlkaloidFungus Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearumAzole-resistant C. albicans J2-36, azole-sensitive C. albicans J1-97, C. glabrata J-92, and C. neoformans Mpu-B (MIC 3.1, 3.1, 3.1, and 1.6 mg/L)[49]
Secalonic acid A (76)PolyketideFungus Talaromyces sp. ZH-154C. albicans, A. niger and F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense
(MIC 6.25, 6.25, and 12.5 mg/L)
[50]
Peniciadametizine A (79)PolyketideFungus Penicillium adametzioides AS-53Alternaria brassicae (MIC 4.0 mg/L)[51]
Peniciadametizine B (80)PolyketideFungus Penicillium adametzioides AS-53Alternaria brassicae (MIC 32 mg/L)[51]
Pestaloisocoumarin A (83)LactoneFungus Pestalotiopsis heterocornisC. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. neoformans (MIC 100 mg/L)[52]
Pestaloisocoumarin B (84)LactoneFungus Pestalotiopsis heterocornisC. neoformans (MIC 100 mg/L)[52]
Gamahorin (87)LactoneFungus Pestalotiopsis heterocornisC. parapsilosis and C. neoformans (MIC 100 mg/L)[52]
Variegatuside D (92)TerpeneSea cucumber Stichopus variegatesC. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, C. pseudotropicalis, C. neoformans, and N. gypsea (MIC80 3.4, 3.4, 13.6, 3.4, 6.8, and 3.4 mg/L)[53]
Variegatuside E (93)TerpeneSea cucumber Stichopus variegatesC. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, C. pseudotropicalis, C. neoformans, and N. gypsea (MIC80 25, 12.5, 12.5, 12.5, 12.5, and 12.5 mg/L)[53]
Holothurin A (98)TerpeneSea cucumber Pearsontrhuria graeffeiC. albicans (24 h LC50 = 10 mg/L)[54]
Echinoside A (99)TerpeneSea cucumber Pearsontrhuria graeffeiC. albicans (24 h LC50 = 10 mg/L)[54]
MIC: Minimum inhibitory concentration; MIC80: Minimum concentration that inhibits 80% of the tested strains; MIC90: Minimum concentration that inhibits 90% of the tested strains; Ø inhibition: Diameter of inhibition; IC50: Half maximal inhibitory concentration; LC50: Concentration that causes the death of 50%. C. albicans: Candida albicans; C. glabrata: Candida glabrata; C. parapsilosis: Candida parapsilosis; C. tropicalis: Candida tropicalis; C. pseudotropicalis: Candida pseudotropicalis; AmB-R: Amphotericin B-resistant; WT: Wild-type; A. fumigatus: Aspergillus fumigatus; A. niger: Aspergillus niger; C. neoformans: Cryptococcus neoformans; N. gypsea: Nannizzia gypsea; F. solani: Fusarium solani; F. oxysporum: Fusarium oxysporum; T. rubrum: Trichophyton rubrum.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cardoso, J.; Nakayama, D.G.; Sousa, E.; Pinto, E. Marine-Derived Compounds and Prospects for Their Antifungal Application. Molecules 2020, 25, 5856. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25245856

AMA Style

Cardoso J, Nakayama DG, Sousa E, Pinto E. Marine-Derived Compounds and Prospects for Their Antifungal Application. Molecules. 2020; 25(24):5856. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25245856

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cardoso, Joana, Darlan Gonçalves Nakayama, Emília Sousa, and Eugénia Pinto. 2020. "Marine-Derived Compounds and Prospects for Their Antifungal Application" Molecules 25, no. 24: 5856. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25245856

APA Style

Cardoso, J., Nakayama, D. G., Sousa, E., & Pinto, E. (2020). Marine-Derived Compounds and Prospects for Their Antifungal Application. Molecules, 25(24), 5856. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25245856

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop