Next Article in Journal
Targeting Receptor Tyrosine Kinase VEGFR-2 in Hepatocellular Cancer: Rational Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of 1,2-Disubstituted Benzimidazoles
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of the Textural Parameters of Zeolite Beta in LDPE Catalytic Degradation: Thermogravimetric Analysis Coupled with FTIR Operando Studies
Previous Article in Journal
SNP Discrimination by Tolane-Modified Peptide Nucleic Acids: Application for the Detection of Drug Resistance in Pathogens
Previous Article in Special Issue
Magnetic Solid-Phase Extraction of Pyrethroid Pesticides from Environmental Water Samples Using Deep Eutectic Solvent-type Surfactant Modified Magnetic Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 4
10.3390/molecules25040771
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Preparation of Aluminosilicate Ferrierite Zeolite Nanosheets with Controllable Thickness in the Presence of a Sole Organic Structure Directing Agent

by
Hao Xu
1,
YuXia Yu
2,
LongFeng Zhu
2,*,
ChaoQun Bian
3,
HangLing Zhai
2,
JianYing Tong
1,
HuiZhen Wu
1 and
Chao Shen
1,*
1
College of Biology and Environmental Engineering, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou 310015, China
2
College of Biological, Chemical Sciences and Engineering, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314001, China
3
Pharmaceutical and Material Engineering School, Jinhua Polytechnic, Jinhua 321000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(4), 771; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040771
Submission received: 11 January 2020 / Revised: 6 February 2020 / Accepted: 8 February 2020 / Published: 11 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Zeolitic Microporous Materials and Their Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Preparation of aluminosilicate ferrierite (FER) zeolite nanosheets with controllable thickness in the presence of a sole organic ammonium is attractive, but still challenging. In this report, with the employment of N,N-diethyl-cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidinium (DMP) as both a structure directing agent and crystal growth inhibitor, aluminosilicate FER zeolite nanosheets, with a variety of crystal thicknesses, ranging from 6 to 200 nm, are successfully synthesized under hydrothermal conditions. Very interestingly, the amount of DMP in the starting gel is the key factor for crystal thickness control of aluminosilicate FER zeolite nanosheets. The obtained FER products, with different thicknesses, are well characterized by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), N2 sorption, thermogravimetric analysis (TG), inductively coupled plasma (ICP), and magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (MAS NMR) techniques. This simple strategy might provide a novel avenue for the synthesis of other zeolite nanosheets with controllable thickness.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Zeolites, especially aluminosilicate zeolites, have been widely applied in the fields of adsorption, separation, ion exchange, and catalysis due to their uniform micropore distribution, large surface areas, and highly thermal and hydrothermal stabilities [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Currently, from the viewpoint of the chemistry of zeolites synthesis, synthesizing the novel structures, developing the novel synthesis methodology, and controlling the morphology of zeolites are the main directions [9,10,11,12,13,14]. Among them, controlling the morphology of zeolites is a hot topic because of their improved properties in the process of application [15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. For example, Ryoo et al. synthesized single-unit-cell nanosheets of Zeolite Socony Mobil-5 (ZSM-5) zeolite, which would facilitate diffusion, and thus avoid coke deposition significantly during methanol-to-gasoline conversion [22]. Xiao et al. reported that SAPO-11 nanosheets, with a thickness of 10–20 nm, exhibited higher selectivity for the isomers in the hydroisomerization of n-dodecane [23]. Li et al. prepared mordenite (MOR) zeolite nanosheets with good catalytic performance in the dimethyl ether (DME) carbonylation due to the large amount of Brønsted acidic sites and fast mass transfer [24].
FER zeolite is a medium-pore zeolite containing 10-Membered Ring (10-MR) channels (0.42 × 0.54 nm) in the [001] direction and 8-MR channels (0.35 × 0.48 nm) in the [010] direction [25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Aluminosilicate FER zeolite, which is represented by ZSM-35, shows distinguished catalytic performances in many reactions, such as skeletal isomerization, high-olefin catalytic cracking, carbonylation of dimethyl ether, methanol to olefins, and NOx reduction [25,26,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40] To further enhance the catalytic performance, the preparation methods for aluminosilicate FER zeolites with controllable morphology and crystal sizes are particularly attractive. Corma et al. prepared FER nanocrystals with sizes of 10–20 nm using piperidine and surfactant as dual templates [25]. Meanwhile, FER nanoneedles with a diameter of 10 nm were developed by adding choline as an organic template [41]. Despite the fact that the diameter of the aluminosilicate FER zeolite crystals is very small in the above works, the crystal size could not be adjusted. Recently, Xu et al. reported on the preparation of sheet-like FER zeolite, with controllable thickness from 100 nm to 2 μm, using piperidine as a structure directing agent and cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) as crystal growth inhibitors in one synthesis system [42]. However, the thinnest FER zeolite crystal in this work is still too thick and the dual template method is complicated. At present, it is still a great challenge to control the different nanosheet thicknesses of aluminosilicate FER zeolite within the thickness of 100 nm using the facile synthesis method.
More recently, we reported a simple method for synthesizing ultrathin nanosheets of aluminosilicate FER zeolite with the thickness of 6–8 nm by using a sole small organic ammonium (N,N-diethyl-cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidinium, DMP). Very interestingly, the DMP molecules not only direct the FER zeolite structure, but also inhibit the growth of FER zeolite on [100] direction, according to the theoretical calculation [43]. Therefore, it might give an opportunity for controlling the nanosheet thickness of aluminosilicate FER zeolite just by changing the amount of DMP molecules in the same synthesis system.
In this work, we report the synthesis of FER zeolite nanosheets with controllable thickness using a sole organic ammonium as both a structure directing agent and crystal growth inhibitor. Very interestingly, by adjusting the amount of DMP in the starting gel, the thickness of FER nanosheets can be adjusted, ranging from 6 to 200 nm.

2. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of aluminosilicate FER zeolite nanosheets with the different amount of DMP in the starting gel. Each XRD pattern of FER sample shows typical peaks of FER zeolite structure. The peaks at 9.3° associated with the [200] reflection widen with the increasing amount of DMP in the starting gel (Table 1), suggesting thinner thickness of FER zeolite along the [100] direction, which has been further confirmed by the results of the SEM images (Figure 2). According to the results of the SEM images in Figure 2 and sample synthesis conditions in Table 1, the thickness of FER-0 nanosheets is approximately 100–200 nm, without the addition of DMP in the starting gel (Figure 2a). When a small amount of DMP was added (DMP/SiO2 = 0.015) into the starting gel, the thickness of FER-0.015 nanosheets turned to around 50–100 nm (Figure 2b). Increasing the DMP/SiO2 ratio to 0.030, the nanosheets of FER-0.030 become thinner (30–60 nm, Figure 2c). Further increasing the DMP/SiO2 ratio to 0.060, the thickness of FER-0.06 nanosheets is around 10–20 nm (Figure 2d). Finally, when the DMP/SiO2 ratio reaches 0.12, the thinnest aluminosilicate FER zeolite nanosheets (FER-0.12) with a thickness of 6–8 nm would be obtained (Figure 2e) [43]. In addition, the SiO2/Al2O3 ratios of the FER zeolite samples with different thicknesses are all around 16.0–17.0 (Table 1), even if the amount of DMP molecules added in the synthesis gel is different. The above results show that the DMP molecules would inhibit the crystal growth of the aluminosilicate FER nanosheets, and thus obtain the different thickness of FER nanosheets from 6 to 200 nm.
Figure 3 shows nitrogen sorption isotherms of the aluminosilicate H-FER zeolite nanosheet samples. The micropore volumes of these samples are the same (0.14 cm3/g), while the mesopore volumes of these samples are increased with the decreasing of the crystal thickness, as shown in Table 2. Moreover, the external surface area and the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) urface area are higher when the crystal thickness of the aluminosilicate FER zeolite nanosheet samples decrease. The higher external surface area and BET surface area means a higher exposure degree, which is in good agreement with that of the zeolite nanosheets.
Figure S1 shows the TGA curves of the as-synthesized aluminosilicate FER zeolite samples, exhibiting different weight loss associated with the decomposition of organic structure directing agent (OSDA) in the micropores of the FER zeolite samples. This result shows that the DMP molecules are the structure directing agent for directing the generation of aluminosilicate FER zeolite. Very interestingly, the weight loss of the samples is very consistent with the DMP amount in the synthesis process.
Figure 4A shows the 29Si magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (MAS NMR) spectra of the aluminosilicate FER zeolite samples. These samples exhibit peaks at around −114, −111, −109, −106, and −103 ppm, which can be reasonably assigned to Si(4Si) (−114, −111, and −109 ppm), Si(3Si) (−106 ppm), and Si(2Si) (−103 ppm) species, respectively. According to the spectra and the structural information in Table S1, the Si(4Si) and Si(2Si) species of the samples decrease along with the increasing amount of DMP in the process of synthesis, while the Si(3Si) species of the samples increases. This phenomenon might be the result from both the structure directing and growth inhibition effect of the DMP molecules. Figure 4B shows the 27Al MAS NMR spectra of the aluminosilicate FER zeolite samples. All of the samples give the one peak with the chemical shift at about 54 ppm associated with the tetrahedrally coordinated aluminum species in the FER zeolite framework. At the same time, there is no signal with the chemical shift at about zero ppm, suggesting the absence of extra-framework aluminum species in these samples. This result shows that the addition of different amounts of DMP molecules in the synthesis has no effect on the aluminum coordination of the samples.
The acidity of the aluminosilicate H-FER zeolite nanosheet samples is investigated by the NH3-TPD technique. The NH3-TPD curves in Figure S2 show that the samples with thinner crystal thickness have fewer acidic sites. This might be caused by the growth inhibition effect of the DMP molecules, which is in good agreement with the literature [42].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Starting Materials

Sodium metaaluminate (NaAlO2, AR, 99%, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), sodium hydroxide (NaOH, AR, 96%, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), colloidal silica (40 wt% SiO2 in water, Sigma-Aldrich Reagent Co., Ltd., MO, USA), cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidine (Sigma-Aldrich Reagent Co., Ltd., MO, USA), potassium bicarbonate (KHCO3, AR, 99.5%, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), iodoethane (99%, Aladdin Chemical Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), methanol (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), diethyl ether (AR, 99.5%, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), anion-exchange resin (Amberlite IRN-78, OH-form, Thermofisher Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., CA, USA), and ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3, AR, 99%, Beijing Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) were used without further purification. The deionized water was homemade.

3.2. Synthesis of OSDA

The iodide form of the OSDA, N,N-diethyl-cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidine iodide was synthesized by mixing cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidine, iodoethane, and KHCO3 in the methanol, followed by refluxing for 4 days. The excess of KHCO3 was removed, and then the solvent and the excess iodoethane was evaporated. Next, the product was washed with diethyl ether and converted to the hydroxide form using an anion exchange resin.

3.3. Synthesis of Aluminosilicate FER Zeolite Nanosheets

In a typical run for synthesizing aluminosilicate FER zeolite nanosheets without the addition of DMP molecules, 0.165 g of NaAlO2 and 0.254 g of NaOH was dissolved into deionized water. Then 2.95 g of colloidal silica (40 wt% SiO2 in water) was added and the mixture was stirred for 2 h. Next, 0.024 g of FER zeolite seeds was added. Finally, the mixture was transferred into a Teflon-lined autoclave oven and crystallized at 140 °C for 48 h under rotation conditions (50 rpm). After filtering, washing, and drying, the product was gained.
In a typical run for synthesizing aluminosilicate FER zeolite nanosheets with the use of DMP, 0.165 g of NaAlO2 and 0.254 g of NaOH was dissolved into deionized water. Next, a certain amount of DMP solution and 2.95 g of colloidal silica (40 wt% SiO2 in water) were added. After stirring for 2 h, the mixture was transferred into a Teflon-lined autoclave oven and crystallized at 140 °C for 48 h under rotation conditions (50 rpm). After filtering, washing, and drying, the products were gained.
The as-made form of the products were denoted as FER-x (x represent the ratio of DMP/SiO2 in the starting gel). The H-form of the samples (H-FER-x) were obtained by calcining and ion-exchanging the FER-x samples with the NH4NO3 solution.

3.4. Methods

X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns were measured with a Rigaku Ultimate VI X-ray diffractometer (40 kV, 40 mA) using CuKα (λ = 1.5406 Å) radiation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) experiments were performed on Hitachi SU-8010 electron microscopes. The N2 sorption isotherms at the temperature of liquid nitrogen were measured using Micromeritics ASAP 2020M and Tristar system. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) experiments were carried out on a Perkin-Elmer TGA 7 unit in air, at a heating rate of 10 °C/min, in the temperature range from room temperature to 800 °C. 29Si and 27Al MAS NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Infinity Plus 400 spectrometer. The sample composition was determined by inductively coupled plasma (ICP) with a Perkin-Elmer 3300DV emission spectrometer. The acidity of the samples was measured by the temperature-programmed-desorption of ammonia (NH3-TPD). The 50 mg of samples were placed in a quartz tube and pretreated in He flow at 600 °C for 30 min. Then the temperature was reduced to 150 °C. NH3 passed through the samples until it reached equilibrium for 30 min. When the baseline was stable, the signal of NH3 desorption was monitored by the thermal conductivity detector (TCD) in He flow at a heating rate of 20 °C/min from 150 to 650 °C.

4. Conclusions

In summary, aluminosilicate FER zeolite nanosheets with controllable thickness are successfully prepared with the use of a sole small organic ammonium (DMP). The addition of different amounts of DMP molecules in the starting gel is the key factor for successful control of the FER nanosheet crystal thickness. All of the nanosheets of the FER zeolite samples have good crystallinity, uniform morphology, large BET surface area, four-coordinated aluminum species, and abundant acidic sites. This simple synthesis strategy might be applied when it comes to preparing, and improving the performance, of other zeolite nanosheets with controllable thicknesses.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Figure S1: TGA curves of the (a) FER-0, (b) FER-0.015, (c) FER-0.03, (d) FER-0.06, and (e) FER-0.12 samples, respectively, Figure S2: NH3-TPD curves of the (a) H-FER-0, (b) H-FER-0.015, (c) H-FER-0.03, (d) H-FER-0.06, and (e) H-FER-0.12 samples, respectively, Table S1: Structural information on FER zeolite samples from 29Si NMR analysis.

Author Contributions

H.X. and L.Z. designed the experiments, performed the synthesis of zeolites, and wrote the paper. C.S., Y.Y., H.Z., and C.B. contributed to the characterization of the samples. J.T. and H.W. partially discussed the experimental results. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Talent Introduction Project of Zhejiang Shuren University (2019R022), the Zhejiang Province Commonweal Technique Research Project (LGG20B030003), the Hundred Youth Project of Jiaxing University (CD70619032), and the National Nature Science Foundation of China (21902065).

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of the Young and Middle-Aged Academic Team Project of Zhejiang Shuren University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dusselier, M.; Davis, M.E. Small-Pore Zeolites: Synthesis and Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 5265–5329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Moliner, M.; Martínez, C.; Corma, A. Synthesis Strategies for Preparing Useful Small Pore Zeolites and Zeotypes for Gas Separations and Catalysis. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 246–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shi, J.; Wang, Y.; Yang, W.; Tang, Y.; Xie, Z. Recent Advances of Pore System Construction in Zeolite-Catalyzed Chemical Industry Processes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 8877–8903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Davis, M.E.; Lobo, R.F. Zeolite and Molecular Sieve Synthesis. Chem. Mater. 1992, 4, 756–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jeon, M.Y.; Kim, D.; Kumar, P.; Lee, P.S.; Rangnekar, N.; Bai, P.; Shete, M.; Elyassi, B.; Lee, H.S.; Narasimharao, K.; et al. Ultra-Selective High-Flux Membranes from Directly Synthesized Zeolite Nanosheets. Nature 2017, 543, 690–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Awala, H.; Gilson, J.-P.; Retoux, R.; Boullay, P.; Goupil, J.-M.; Valtchev, V.; Mintova, S. Template-Free Nanosized Faujasite-Type Zeolites. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 447–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Boal, B.W.; Schmidt, J.E.; Deimund, M.A.; Deem, M.W.; Henling, L.M.; Brand, S.K.; Zones, S.I.; Davis, M.E. Facile Synthesis and Catalysis of Pure-Silica and Heteroatom LTA. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 7774–7779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Fickel, D.W.; D’Addio, E.; Lauterbach, J.A.; Lobo, R.F. The Ammonia Selective Catalytic Reduction Activity of Copper-Exchanged Small-Pore Zeolites. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2011, 102, 441–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Freyhardt, C.C.; Tsapatsis, M.; Lobo, R.F.; Balkus, K.J.; Davis, M.E. A High-Silica Zeolite with a 14-Tetrahedral-Atom Pore Opening. Nature 1996, 381, 295–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Corma, A.; Fornes, V.; Pergher, S.B.; Maesen, T.L.M.; Buglass, J.G. Delaminated Zeolite Precursors as Selective Acidic Catalysts. Nature 1998, 396, 353–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Park, W.; Yu, D.; Na, K.; Jelfs, K.E.; Slater, B.; Sakamoto, Y.; Ryoo, R. Hierarchically Structure-Directing Effect of Multi-Ammonium Surfactants for the Generation of MFI Zeolite Nanosheets. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 5131–5137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, Q.; Zhu, L.; Chu, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, J.; Xu, H.; Xu, J.; Deng, F.; Feng, Z.; et al. Sustainable Synthesis of Pure Silica Zeolites from a Combined Strategy of Zeolite Seeding and Alcohol Filling. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 12138–12142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wu, Q.; Wang, X.; Qi, G.; Guo, Q.; Pan, S.; Meng, X.; Xu, J.; Deng, F.; Fan, F.; Feng, Z.; et al. Sustainable Synthesis of Zeolites without Addition of Both Organotemplates and Solvents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 4019–4025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Xu, H.; Wu, Q.; Chu, Y.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, L.; Pan, S.; Zhang, C.; Zhu, L.; Deng, F.; Meng, X.; et al. Efficient Synthesis of Aluminosilicate RTH Zeolite with Good Catalytic Performances in NH3-SCR and MTO Reactions. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 8705–8711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, J.; Corma, A.; Yu, J. Synthesis of New Zeolite Structures. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 7112–7127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Gu, F.N.; Wei, F.; Yang, J.Y.; Lin, N.; Lin, W.G.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, J.H. New Strategy to Synthesis of Hierarchical Mesoporous Zeolites. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 2442–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Zhu, L.; Rigutto, M.; van der Made, A.; Yang, C.; Pan, S.; Wang, L.; Zhu, L.; Jin, Y.; et al. Highly Mesoporous Single-Crystalline Zeolite Beta Synthesized Using a Nonsurfactant Cationic Polymer as a Dual-Function Template. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 2503–2510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Grand, J.; Talapaneni, S.N.; Vicente, A.; Fernandez, C.; Dib, E.; Aleksandrov, H.A.; Vayssilov, G.N.; Retoux, R.; Boullay, P.; Gilson, J.-P.; et al. One-Pot Synthesis of Silanol-Free Nanosized MFI Zeolite. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 1010–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xu, D.; Ma, Y.; Jing, Z.; Han, L.; Singh, B.; Feng, J.; Shen, X.; Cao, F.; Oleynikov, P.; Sun, H.; et al. π–π Interaction of Aromatic Groups in Amphiphilic Molecules Directing for Single-Crystalline Mesostructured Zeolite Nanosheets. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xie, D.; McCusker, L.B.; Baerlocher, C.; Zones, S.I.; Wan, W.; Zou, X. SSZ-52, a Zeolite with an 18-Layer Aluminosilicate Framework Structure Related to That of the DeNOx Catalyst Cu-SSZ-13. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10519–10524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Smeets, S.; Xie, D.; McCusker, L.B.; Baerlocher, C.; Zones, S.I.; Thompson, J.A.; Lacheen, H.S.; Huang, H.-M. SSZ-45: A High-Silica Zeolite with Small Pore Openings, Large Cavities, and Unusual Adsorption Properties. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 3909–3913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Choi, M.; Na, K.; Kim, J.; Sakamoto, Y.; Terasaki, O.; Ryoo, R. Stable Single-Unit-Cell Nanosheets of Zeolite MFI as Active and Long-Lived Catalysts. Nature 2009, 461, 246–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, F.; Liu, Y.; Sun, Q.; Dai, Z.; Gies, H.; Wu, Q.; Pan, S.; Bian, C.; Tian, Z.; Meng, X.; et al. Design and Preparation of Efficient Hydroisomerization Catalysts by the Formation of Stable SAPO-11 Molecular Sieve Nanosheets with 10–20 nm Thickness and Partially Blocked Acidic Sites. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 4942–4945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liu, Y.; Zhao, N.; Xian, H.; Cheng, Q.; Tan, Y.; Tsubaki, N.; Li, X. Facilely Synthesized H-Mordenite Nanosheet Assembly for Carbonylation of Dimethyl Ether. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2015, 7, 8398–8403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Margarit, V.J.; Díaz-Rey, M.R.; Navarro, M.T.; Martínez, C.; Corma, A. Direct Synthesis of Nano-Ferrierite along the 10-Ring-Channel Direction Boosts Their Catalytic Behavior. Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 3517–3521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bonilla, A.; Baudouin, D.; Pérez-Ramírez, J. Desilication of Ferrierite Zeolite for Porosity Generation and Improved Effectiveness in Polyethylene Pyrolysis. J. Catal. 2009, 265, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pinar, A.B.; Gómez-Hortigüela, L.; McCusker, L.B.; Pérez-Pariente, J. Controlling the Aluminum Distribution in the Zeolite Ferrierite via the Organic Structure Directing Agent. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 3654–3661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Itabashi, K.; Kamimura, Y.; Iyoki, K.; Shimojima, A.; Okubo, T. A Working Hypothesis for Broadening Framework Types of Zeolites in Seed-Assisted Synthesis without Organic Structure-Directing Agent. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 11542–11549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Guo, G.; Long, Y.; Sun, Y. Synthesis of FER Type Zeolite with Tetrahydrofuran as the Template. Chem. Commun. 2000, 19, 1893–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wuamprakhon, P.; Wattanakit, C.; Warakulwit, C.; Yutthalekha, T.; Wannapakdee, W.; Ittisanronnachai, S.; Limtrakul, J. Direct Synthesis of Hierarchical Ferrierite Nanosheet Assemblies via an Organosilane Template Approach and Determination of Their Catalytic Activity. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2016, 219, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cheng, X.; Wang, J.; Guo, J.; He, H.; Long, Y. FER Zeolite Crystallized in THF-Na2O-SiO2-Al2O3-H2O Reactant System Containing Catalytic Amount of Organic Additives. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2009, 119, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Seo, G.; Jeong, H.S.; Jang, D.-L.; Cho, D.L.; Hong, S.B. The Role of Carbonaceous Deposits in the Skeletal Isomerization of 1-Butene over Ferrierite Zeolites. Catal. Lett. 1996, 41, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sulikowski, B.; Janas, J.; Haber, J.; Kubacka, A.; Wloch, E.; Olejniczak, Z. The Synergetic Effect of Cobalt and Indium in Ferrierite Catalysts for Selective Catalytic Reduction of Nitric Oxide with Methane. Chem. Commun. 1998, 24, 2755–2756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Guzmán-Vargas, A.; Delahay, G.; Bernard, C. Catalytic Decomposition of N2O and Catalytic Reduction of N2O and N2O + NO by NH3 in the Presence of O2 over Fe-Zeolite. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2003, 42, 369–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. María, A.A.; Victoriano, B.; César, J.; José, M.M.; Rafael, R.; Francisco, J.R.; Francisco, J. Catalytic Application of Zeolites in the Methanol Conversion to Hydrocarbons. Chem. Lett. 2002, 31, 672–673. [Google Scholar]
  36. Petersson, M.; Holma, T.; Andersson, B.; Jobson, E.; Palmqvist, A. Lean Hydrocarbon Selective Catalytic Reduction over Dual Pore System Zeolite Mixtures. J. Catal. 2005, 235, 114–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Catizzone, E.; Daele, S.V.; Bianco, M.; Di Michele, A.; Aloise, A.; Migliori, M.; Valtchev, V.; Giordano, G. Catalytic Application of Ferrierite Nanocrystals in Vapour-Phase Dehydration of Methanol to Dimethyl Ether. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2019, 243, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bastiani, R.; Lam, Y.L.; Henriques, C.A.; Teixeira da Silva, V. Application of Ferrierite Zeolite in High-Olefin Catalytic Cracking. Fuel 2013, 107, 680–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rachwalik, R.; Olejniczak, Z.; Jiao, J.; Huang, J.; Hunger, M.; Sulikowski, B. Isomerization of α-Pinene over Dealuminated Ferrierite-Type Zeolites. J. Catal. 2007, 252, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Feng, P.; Zhang, G.; Chen, X.; Zang, K.; Li, X.; Xu, L. Specific Zone within 8-Membered Ring Channel as Catalytic Center for Carbonylation of Dimethyl Ether and Methanol over FER Zeolite. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2018, 557, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jo, D.; Hong, S.B.; Camblor, M.A. Monomolecular Skeletal Isomerization of 1-Butene over Selective Zeolite Catalysts. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 2270–2274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Wang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Chu, W.; Zhao, D.; Chen, F.; Zhu, X.; Li, X.; Liu, S.; Xie, S.; Xu, L. Synthesis and Catalytic Application of FER Zeolites with Controllable Size. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 7573–7580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xu, H.; Chen, W.; Zhang, G.; Wei, P.; Wu, Q.; Zhu, L.; Meng, X.; Li, X.; Fei, J.; Han, S.; et al. Ultrathin Nanosheets of Aluminosilicate FER Zeolites Synthesized in the Presence of a Sole Small Organic Ammonium. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 16671–16676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.
Molecules 25 00771 g001 550
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the (a) FER-0, (b) FER-0.015, (c) FER-0.03, (d) FER-0.06, and (e) FER-0.12 samples, respectively.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the (a) FER-0, (b) FER-0.015, (c) FER-0.03, (d) FER-0.06, and (e) FER-0.12 samples, respectively.
Molecules 25 00771 g001
Molecules 25 00771 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) Low-magnification and (B) high-magnification SEM images of the (a) FER-0, (b) FER-0.015, (c) FER-0.03, (d) FER-0.06 and (e) FER-0.12 samples, respectively.
Figure 2. (A) Low-magnification and (B) high-magnification SEM images of the (a) FER-0, (b) FER-0.015, (c) FER-0.03, (d) FER-0.06 and (e) FER-0.12 samples, respectively.
Molecules 25 00771 g002
Molecules 25 00771 g003 550
Figure 3. N2 sorption isotherms of the (a) H-FER-0, (b) H-FER-0.015, (c) H-FER-0.03, (d) H-FER-0.06, and (e) H-FER-0.12 samples, respectively.
Figure 3. N2 sorption isotherms of the (a) H-FER-0, (b) H-FER-0.015, (c) H-FER-0.03, (d) H-FER-0.06, and (e) H-FER-0.12 samples, respectively.
Molecules 25 00771 g003
Molecules 25 00771 g004 550
Figure 4. (A) 29Si magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (MAS NMR) and (B) 27Al MAS NMR spectra of (a) FER-0, (b) FER-0.015, (c) FER-0.03, (d) FER-0.06, and (e) FER-0.12 samples, respectively.
Figure 4. (A) 29Si magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (MAS NMR) and (B) 27Al MAS NMR spectra of (a) FER-0, (b) FER-0.015, (c) FER-0.03, (d) FER-0.06, and (e) FER-0.12 samples, respectively.
Molecules 25 00771 g004
Table
Table 1. Synthesis of nanosheets of FER zeolite under various conditions.
Table 1. Synthesis of nanosheets of FER zeolite under various conditions.
RunSiO2/Al2O3Na2O/SiO2DMP/SiO2Seeds/SiO2ProductsThickness/nmSiO2/Al2O3 of the Product
128.00.2000.02FER-0100–20017.0
228.00.200.0150FER-0.01550–10016.6
328.00.200.0300FER-0.0330–6016.3
428.00.200.0600FER-0.0610–2016.5
528.00.200.120FER-0.126–816.0
Table
Table 2. Textural parameters of the aluminosilicate FER zeolite samples.
Table 2. Textural parameters of the aluminosilicate FER zeolite samples.
SampleSBET (m2/g)Smicro (m2/g)Sext (m2/g)Vtot (cm3/g)Vmicro (cm3/g)Vmeso (cm3/g)
H-FER-0326303230.230.140.09
H-FER-0.125355319360.290.140.15
H-FER-0.25367327400.350.140.21
H-FER-0.5377318590.390.140.25
H-FER-1.03912861050.790.140.65

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, H.; Yu, Y.; Zhu, L.; Bian, C.; Zhai, H.; Tong, J.; Wu, H.; Shen, C. Preparation of Aluminosilicate Ferrierite Zeolite Nanosheets with Controllable Thickness in the Presence of a Sole Organic Structure Directing Agent. Molecules 2020, 25, 771. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040771

AMA Style

Xu H, Yu Y, Zhu L, Bian C, Zhai H, Tong J, Wu H, Shen C. Preparation of Aluminosilicate Ferrierite Zeolite Nanosheets with Controllable Thickness in the Presence of a Sole Organic Structure Directing Agent. Molecules. 2020; 25(4):771. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040771

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Hao, YuXia Yu, LongFeng Zhu, ChaoQun Bian, HangLing Zhai, JianYing Tong, HuiZhen Wu, and Chao Shen. 2020. "Preparation of Aluminosilicate Ferrierite Zeolite Nanosheets with Controllable Thickness in the Presence of a Sole Organic Structure Directing Agent" Molecules 25, no. 4: 771. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040771

APA Style

Xu, H., Yu, Y., Zhu, L., Bian, C., Zhai, H., Tong, J., Wu, H., & Shen, C. (2020). Preparation of Aluminosilicate Ferrierite Zeolite Nanosheets with Controllable Thickness in the Presence of a Sole Organic Structure Directing Agent. Molecules, 25(4), 771. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040771

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop