Next Article in Journal
Flavonoid Profile of the Genista tridentata L., a Species Used Traditionally to Treat Inflammatory Processes
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Different Green Extraction Methods and Solvents on Bioactive Components of Chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.) Flowers
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Candidate for Multitopic Probes for Ligand Discovery in Dynamic Combinatorial Chemistry
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 4
10.3390/molecules25040811
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis of Lactam-Bridged and Lipidated Cyclo-Peptides as Promising Anti-Phytopathogenic Agents

by
Aldrin V. Vasco
1,
Martina Brode
1,
Yanira Méndez
1,2,
Oscar Valdés
3,
Daniel G. Rivera
1,2,* and
Ludger A. Wessjohann
1,*
1
Department of Bioorganic Chemistry, Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Weinberg 3, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany
2
Center for Natural Products Research, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Havana, Zapata y G, Havana 10400, Cuba
3
Vicerrectoría de Investigación y Postgrado, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca 3460000, Chile
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(4), 811; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040811
Submission received: 11 November 2019 / Revised: 7 February 2020 / Accepted: 7 February 2020 / Published: 13 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Macrocycles in Drug Discovery)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Antimicrobial resistance to conventional antibiotics and the limited alternatives to combat plant-threatening pathogens are worldwide problems. Antibiotic lipopeptides exert remarkable membrane activity, which usually is not prone to fast resistance formation, and often show organism-type selectivity. Additional modes of action commonly complement the bioactivity profiles of such compounds. The present work describes a multicomponent-based methodology for the synthesis of cyclic polycationic lipopeptides with stabilized helical structures. The protocol comprises an on solid support Ugi-4-component macrocyclization in the presence of a lipidic isocyanide. Circular dichroism was employed to study the influence of both macrocyclization and lipidation on the amphiphilic helical structure in water and micellar media. First bioactivity studies against model phytopathogens demonstrated a positive effect of the lipidation on the antimicrobial activity.

1. Introduction

The continuous incidence of bacterial and fungal resistance has aroused great attention and re-sparked the interest in discovering or designing alternative antimicrobial substances that can be used for various applications including clinical uses as well as the preservation of food and dairy products [1,2,3]. Phytopathogenic microorganisms affect not only the yield of crop plants or stored foods (e.g., fruits) but also produce toxins, which have been described to be potentially harmful to the health of consumers and animals, including the induction of cancer, immunosuppression, and growth disorders [4,5,6]. Furthermore, the development of environmentally friendly and resistance-withstanding alternatives to the currently used pesticides remains one of the biggest challenges for plant scientists [7]. Polycationic antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are essential components in the innate immune system of all multicellular organisms [8,9,10]. Even when the mechanisms of action of AMPs are not fully understood, in most cases their biological effects are believed to involve membrane disruption of the target cells by either acting through a detergent-like disruption or by the formation of transient transmembrane pores [11,12,13].
An increasing amount of articles describing the use of AMPs as antimycotic agents—including phytopathogenic fungi—has been published in the last few years [3,7,14,15,16,17,18]. Due to the eukaryotic nature of fungal cells, it is not an easy task to develop antifungal (antimycotic) drugs which do not exhibit lytic activity against plant and human cells [19]. Antimicrobial peptides, including antimicrobial biosurfactants, have been reported to act as both narrow and broad-spectrum agents against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, or fungi [20]. Ligation of AMPs to lipidic chains has proved effective for the design of broad-spectrum antifungal peptides with a low hemolytic activity, which can be designed to exhibit their bioactivity in a pH-dependent manner [8]. Lipidation of the peptide chain is broadly present in nature and it is a structural feature of several biosurfactants such as the Surfactin [21], Iturin [22], and Fengycin [23] families. These families of Bacillus lipopeptides have shown antagonistic activities towards a wide range of phytopathogens including fungi, bacteria and oomycetes [15]. Lipopeptides are produced non-ribosomally in bacteria, yeasts and fungi, and can act either over specific targets or by disrupting the cellular membrane. Subsequently, this type of antimicrobials has the advantage that it takes several hundred generations at low concentrations to develop bacterial resistance, a reason why they are widely considered as potential alternatives to the growing problem of resistance to conventional (protein targeting) antibiotics [3,15].
Our group took advantage of the high efficiency and atom economy of multicomponent reactions (MCRs) for macrocyclization and simultaneous peptide ligation and modification [24,25], e.g., for lipidation [26,27,28], glycosylation [29], pegylation and labeling [30]. We have shown how MCRs can be useful for the design of cyclic lipopeptide analogs of naturally-occurring biosurfactants and cytotoxins [31]. In a recent report, we developed a solid-supported Ugi-based stapling protocol for the convenient functionalization of short helical peptides [30]. Contemporary stapling protocols—mostly based on alkene metathesis [32,33], lactam bridge formation [34,35,36], CuI-catalyzed alkyne-azide cycloaddition (click) [37], Lys-Nε- and Cys-S-arylations [38,39,40], and Cys-alkylation [41,42]—comprise the common stabilization methods for helical secondary structures by (side) chain-to-side chain tethering of two amino acids on the same face of an ideal helix, i.e., between amino acids at positions i→i + 4, i→i + 7, or i→i + 11 within the peptidic sequence. Likewise, the Ugi-based approach allows the helical stabilization by reacting side chains from Lys and Glu/Asp amino acids at i→i + 4 positions while incorporating the moiety arising from the isocyanide component as an additional functionalization at the resulting tertiary lactam bridge [30].
Herein we present the synthesis of two series of helical polycationic cyclic lipopeptides designed to possess a facial amphiphilic character. We envisioned that the introduction of a lipid moiety at the closing lactam bridge opposite to the polycationic face of the peptide—achievable through a Ugi-based multicomponent stapling approach—should stabilize the helical structure of these peptides and simultaneously enhance their amphiphilic character. To assess how these structural modifications can influence the bioactivity profile of polycationic lipopeptides, we sought to evaluate the activity of the compounds against three crop-affecting phytopathogens, which are also standard pathogens in industrial plant protection screenings.

2. Results and Discussion

To evaluate the suitability of the simultaneous macrocyclization and N-lipidation achievable by the Ugi-stapling methodology for the design of lactam-bridged N-lipidated peptides with antifungal activity, two sets of helical amphiphilic peptides were prepared. We aimed at evaluating how the lipidation at the lactam bridge affects the bioactivity of polycationic helical peptides as compared with their non-lipidated lactam-bridged analogs.

2.1. Synthesis of Peptides Based on the Ac-LAKLLKAKAKAD-NH2 Sequence

As a starting point for our study, we decided to design a peptide with 12 amino acids in its sequence—which is equivalent to three turns of an ideal α-helix—the facial amphiphilicity of which could arise from the distribution of cationic and lipophilic side chains at one vs. the other face of the helix, respectively. This design has previously proven effective to stabilize helical structures when Ugi-stapling between residues 5 and 9 is conducted [30]. Herein we intended to perform the cyclization at the N-terminus, envisioning that in this way the interaction of a lipid functionalization with the hydrophobic face of the helix would be higher and sterically less disturbing than when the stapling is situated in the middle of the sequence, resulting in a peptide with better hydrophobicity / amphiphilicity, which is important for membrane activity.
Resin-bound, fully-protected peptide 1 was prepared on solid support using a classical Fmoc/tBu strategy (Scheme 1A), with the sequential incorporation of the Fmoc-protected amino acids and final N-terminal acetylation. To achieve the cyclic peptides 2, 3 and 4, a third dimension of orthogonality was inserted by Alloc and Allyl ester-protected Lys and Asp at positions 8 and 12, respectively. This enables the selective deprotection of these side chains by treatment with tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0) and phenylsilane under a stream of nitrogen, thus leading to the resin-bound peptide 1. The unprotected side chains can then be employed in the desired on-resin macrocyclization protocol. In this way, cyclic peptide 4 was prepared from resin-bound peptide 1 by lactam-bridge formation in the presence of PyAOP as an activating agent. Even when a resin with relatively low loading was employed, 20% of dimerization product was observed in the crude peptide by UHPLC-MS analysis. The simultaneous cleavage from the resin and Boc/tBu side chain deprotections are achieved by treating the resin-bound peptide with the mixture TFA/water/TIS.
Similar to our recently reported on-resin stapling protocol [30], the Ugi macrocyclization was conducted in two consecutive synthetic steps from resin-bound peptide 1. The free amino group at Lys8 is converted to the corresponding imine by a transimination reaction with a mixture of pyrrolidine and paraformaldehyde. The macrocyclization is then accomplished by addition of the isocyanide component, which provides the desired functionalization at the N-position of the lactam bridge. Following this procedure, the synthesis of peptides 2 and 3 was conducted with the utilization of n-butyl and n-dodecyl isocyanide, respectively, in order to compare the influence of short and longer length aliphatic N-substitution on the biological activity. It should be noticed that no dimerization product was detected for any of the Ugi-cyclizations. The final yields after High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) purification can be considered as good, considering that the purity of the linear precursor resin-bound peptide 1 after Allyl/Alloc deprotection is around 83%. Full conversion of the linear peptide was achieved after 12 h, which is comparable to standard macrocyclization protocols [43,44].

2.2. Secondary Structure and Bioactivity

As depicted in the helical wheel representation of peptide 1 in Scheme 1B, an ideal helical conformation of this molecule shall present one face of the helix bearing three positively charged lysine side chains. We hypothesized that the cyclization of the peptide—known to induce the folding of peptides into helices—and the introduction of lipophilic substitutions opposite to the cationic side chains would fix the helical conformation and reinforce the facial amphiphilicity which could affect, eventually, the bioactivity.
The comparison of the CD spectra in phosphate buffer of peptides 1 and 4 evidences that the lactam bridging between residues 8 and 12 in peptide 4 leads to a transition from a random coil to a classical helical structure in water. Interestingly, compounds 2 and 3—bearing an Ugi-derived N-substituted lactam bridge and therefore combining cyclization and lipophilic functionalization—show a very different conformational behavior. While cyclic peptide 3 occurs in an α-helical conformation as inferred from the CD minima at 207 and 222 nm and the maximum at 190 nm, compound 2 shows a CD spectrum with a tendency to 310- helicity as evidenced in the lower intensity at 190 and 222 nm and the deep minimum around 200 nm as compared with 3. This tendency towards 310-helicity of Ugi-stapled peptides bearing three positive charges in close proximity has been observed previously by our group [27], and recent studies point out that it could be related to the occurrence of s-cis/s-trans isomerization only significantly happening in N-substituted lactam bridges (unpublished results). Altogether it seems that the Lys8-Asp12 cyclization contributes to nucleate helical conformations within this sequence, thereby ensuring the existence of three cationic lysines on one face of the molecule. While the non-functionalized lactam stapling ensures maximal helicity, the Ugi-derived N-substituted lactam bridge enables helix formation only when an increased amphiphilicity is achieved by insertion of a lipidic substituent. The CD spectra of the compounds in 25 mM sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)—commonly accepted to be a system mimicking the micellar environment of lipidic membranes [17]—shows an enhancement of helicity for peptides 3 and 4, while the lower intensity of the minimum at 221 nm indicates a higher tendency to a random-coil structure for peptide 2 as compared with phosphate buffer. More conspicuous is the relatively high helicity of the linear analog 1, which exhibits a helicity comparable to that of cyclic lipopeptide 3. It must be noticed that the SDS model is very distant from the real cell membrane environment in fungi, and this structural characterization should only be used to estimate the capacity of the molecules to adopt amphiphilic structures in membrane-like environments which have been described to be of great importance for the membranolytic activity of several AMPs [11].
The activity of the synthesized compounds was tested against the phytopathogenic ascomycetes Botrytis cinerea Pers. (BC; grey mold pathogen on many crops, including strawberries and wine grapes), Septoria tritici Desm. (ST; causing septoria leaf blotch of wheat), and the oomycete Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary (PI; causal agent of the late blight disease in potato and tomato) (Table 1). While linear peptide 1 does not show any significant bioactivity, the lactam bridge cyclization in compound 4 results in an only moderate activity against PI. In the case of the Ugi-cyclized peptides, compound 2—bearing an n-butyl N-substitution—shows a similar bioactivity as compound 4, both with only moderate activity against the oomycete pathogen. A better bioactivity profile shows peptide 3, whose n-dodecyl group through Ugi-stapling led to the best activity against ST and BC pathogens in this series of compounds.
Overall, there is no correlation between anti-phytopathogenic activity and the secondary structure within these molecules. However, there is indeed one between the activity and the presence of lipidation. Thus, while peptide 4 shows maximum helicity in both, phosphate buffer and micellar media, its activity is rather low and comparable to that of cyclic peptide 2, which shows deviations from α-helical conformation in phosphate buffer and less helicity in SDS. Even when the peptides seem to be able to adopt helical structures in water or micellar medium—and therefore possess the facial amphiphilicity known to favor antimicrobial activity—the lipidation of the skeleton seems to be the most crucial structural modification for the bioactivity. The latter can be rationalized in two ways: i) the lipidation reinforces the amphiphilicity of the molecule by increasing the lipophilicity opposite to the polycationic face of the helix, and ii) this lipophilicity reinforces the interaction of the molecule with the hydrophobic membranes of the phytopathogens, leading to a better membranolytic activity.

2.3. Synthesis of Cyclic Lipopeptides Based on the (LKKL)3 Sequence

To further assess the influence of the Ugi macrocyclizing lipidation over the antimicrobial activity of amphiphilic peptides, a second set of compounds was prepared following similar synthetic strategies as those described in Section 2.1. In this case, we chose to synthesize analogs of the sequence (LKKL)3 (peptide 6) which has been described to possess potent antimicrobial bioactivity against drug-resistant biofilms of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, with low hemolytic activity at micromolar concentration [45]. Furthermore, for analogs of this compound it has been reported that an N-terminal lipidation is capable of broadening the antimicrobial spectrum towards human-associated pathogenic fungi [8]. As depicted in Figure 1A, peptide 5 presents an idealized amphiphilic helical conformation, in which half of the amino acids possess cationic side chains while the rest are of hydrophobic nature (Figure 1A).
Nevertheless, the helical conformation of these peptides is only evidenced when the CD spectra are recorded in SDS solution, while in phosphate buffer the CDs correspond to those of random-coil structures (Figure 1C). As in the previous examples, the cyclic analog 6 bearing a lactam-bridge was prepared for comparison purposes. For this peptide, macrocyclization does not guarantee or support helicity of the molecule in phosphate buffer, and only a moderate helicity in micellar media, as a comparison with the linear analog shows.
In contrast to macrocyclization only, simultaneous cyclization and insertion of an n-octadecyl moiety via Ugi-stapling improves helix induction in phosphate buffer as evidenced by the CD spectrum of peptide 7 (Figure 1C). In this case, a longer lipidic chain capable to contrast the higher net positive charge of the molecule was employed. As in peptide 3, the introduction of the hydrophobic functionalization opposite to the polycationic face of the helix is expected to reinforce the facial amphiphilicity with the subsequent stabilization of the helical conformation. This stabilization could also be the result of intermolecular interactions due to the increased surfactant properties of the molecule when a lipidic chain is attached. This suspected intermolecular effect is corroborated by the fact that the micellar medium favors the helical conformations for the three compounds as shown in the CD spectra in Figure 1C-SDS. The Ugi macrocyclization for the synthesis of these cyclic lipopeptides is a very efficient synthetic approach as can be stated by the UHPLC-MS chromatogram of the crude lipopeptide after cleavage from the resin showing 71% purity (Figure 1D).
Among these three compounds, peptide 5 shows the highest activity against the phytopathogens ST and PI as shown in Figure 1B, and lower activity against BC. The conventional lactam-type cyclization of the skeleton as in compound 6 leads to a decrease of the bioactivity, with IC50 values being three times higher as for the linear analog. The latter is in correlation with the decrease in helicity in SDS solution observed in the CD spectrum, possibly due to some distortion due to intramolecular hydrogen-bonding interactions between the lactam bridge and one of the polycationic side chains. As compared with 6, the insertion of the Ugi lipidation at the lactam bridge in 7 enhances the activity against PI slightly and extends the spectrum of activity to the BC pathogen, very likely due to the advent of biosurfactant properties absent in 5 and 6.
Commonly, macrocyclization of linear bioactives can significantly increase or decrease activity, depending on which conformational space is stabilized by the process, a beneficial or detrimental one, respectively. Thus, in order to learn if the cyclization site could have an influence over the helicity or the bioactivity, peptides 8–10 were prepared (Figure 2A). We hypothesized that the introduction of the C18 lipid tail as Ugi-derived lactam N-substituent at one or the other face of the helix could reinforce but also disrupt the amphiphilic character. The CD analysis in phosphate buffer of cyclic lipopeptides 7–10 shown in Figure 2B strongly supports our hypothesis. Thus, in stapled lipopeptides 7 and 8 the helix nucleation by Ugi cyclization at the C-(Lys8-Glu12) or N-terminus (Lys1-Glu5), respectively, reinforces the amphiphilic character by placing the long lipid tail opposite to the highly cationic Lys-rich face. As a result, 7 and 8 display typical α-helical CD spectra in phosphate buffer (Figure 2B) which corroborates the correlation between amphiphilicity and helicity in this class of structures. In contrast, peptides 9—with the N-lipidation inserted into the polycationic face—and 10—with the N-lipidation at the interface of the hydrophobic and hydrophilic side—show a deviation from helicity towards a β-sheet-like CD. However, these differences disappear when the CD spectra are recorded in 25 mM aqueous SDS solution and, surprisingly, while peptide 9 exerts the highest helicity, some 310-helical behavior is observed for peptide 8.
As compared with 7, peptide 8 is less active against the three tested phytopathogens, indicating that not only the lipidation but also the directionality of the Ugi stapling is relevant for the bioactivity. Even when the last observation is in agreement with the diminished helicity of peptide 9 in SDS solution, the high helicity in micellar medium of peptide 9—in which the ideal amphiphilicity is broken by the insertion of the Ugi lipidation—is not reflected in its activity against the model phytopathogens. Overall, the bioactive profile of peptides 8–10 is quite similar and none of them shows significant activity against BC. Broad-spectrum antimicrobial peptides with imperfectly amphipathic nature and low structural dependence on the bioactivity have been previously described by Wimley and co-workers who have supported the hypothesis that the interfacial activity could be the main determinant of the antimicrobial activity of AMPs, governed by physico-chemical balance rather than the spatial arrangement of the hydrophobic and polar groups [20,46].
In summary, we have demonstrated how the Ugi-stapling methodology can be useful for the preparation of two series of antimicrobial macrocyclic lipopeptides in which the N-lipidation is inserted at the cyclizing lactam bridge. Compared with state-of-the-art cyclization methodologies, the high atom economy of this multicomponent cyclization stapling approach allows the uncomplicated and highly efficient access to helical peptides designed to possess a high facial amphiphilicity by the combination of polycationic side chains and Ugi-derived hydrophobic N-substitution. Furthermore, such a cyclo-lipidation methodology could be useful for the future design of helical AMPs with better pharmacological profiles, e.g., better proteolytic stability. The recorded CD spectra show a high propensity of the lipopeptides to stabilize helical structures in aqueous SDS solution, even when the N-substitution is situated at an unfavorable position. As compared with the non-lipidated analogs, the Ugi-derived lipidation of peptide 1 leads to increased bioactivity profiles against two model phytopathogenic fungi and one oomycete. In the case of the analogs of the (LKKL)3 sequence (peptide 5), the C-terminal cyclo-lipidation improves the bioactive profile with a significant enhancement in the bioactivity against Botrytis cinerea. Although no mode of action study was conducted, the retention of activity in peptides where the lipidation is inserted at a position disfavourable for good amphiphilicity can be seen as indicative of a non-specific disruption of the cell membrane due to lipid-enabled interfacial activity of the peptides. Overall we have shown a rapid, easy to perform and simultaneous macrocyclization-lipidation method which will allow researchers to produce antifungal macrocycle-stabilized lipopeptides and stabilized helix-peptides. With some SAR effort it should be possible to generate compounds in the 1 µM activity range, commonly seen as best activity value obtainable for AMPs with physicochemical (membrane) mode of action.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials and Equipment

All materials were purchased from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany), Carl Roth GmbH&Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany), VWR International GmbH (Darmstadt, Germany), Carbolution Chemicals GmbH (St. Ingbert, Germany), and Iris Biotech GmbH (Marktredwitz, Germany) and were used as received, unless otherwise noted. Analytical HPLC of peptides 1–3 and 7–10 was performed on a Waters Acquity UHPLC BEH C18 column (1.7 μm, 2.1 mm × 50 mm) using a Waters Acquity UHPLC system coupled to an LCQ Deca XP MAX (Thermo Scientific) mass spectrometer and the ESI IT mass spectra were recorded with a 4.0 kV spray voltage; sheath gas nitrogen; capillary temperature, 275 °C; capillary voltage, 30 V. The column was maintained at 40 °C. Alternatively, analytical HPLC of compounds 4–6 was conducted with the same column in a Waters Acquity UHPLC system equipped with a PDA and a QDa detector. In this case, UV spectra from 200–400 nm were recorded and the ESI mass spectra were recorded with a 1.5 kV spray voltage. Unless otherwise stated, a linear gradient from 5% to 90% of solvent B (0.1% (v/v) formic acid (FA) in acetonitrile) in solvent A (0.1% (v/v) formic acid (FA) in water) over 10 min at a flow rate of 0.15 mL min−1 was used. The mass spectra were evaluated by the Thermo software Xcalibur 2.0.7 and Empower 3 software. Preparative RP-HPLC of crude peptides was carried out with an Agilent 1260 Infinity series system equipped with two preparative pumps and one analytical quaternary pump, coupled to a MWD detector and an Agilent 6120 Quadrupole LC/MS detector using API-ES as ion source. Reverse phase YMC-ODS-A column (150 × 4.6 mm I.D., 5 μm particle size) and YMC-ODS-A (150 × 20 mm I.D., 5 μm particle size) columns were used for analytical and preparative scale respectively.
A TripleToF 6600-1 mass spectrometer (Sciex) was used for high-resolution mass spectrometry, which was equipped with an ESI-DuoSpray-Ion-Source (it operated in positive ion mode) and was controlled by Analyst 1.7.1 TF software (Sciex). The ESI source operation parameters were as follows: ion spray voltage: 5500 V, nebulizing gas: 60 p.s.i., source temperature: 450 °C, drying gas: 70 p.s.i., curtain gas: 35 p.s.i. Data acquisition was performed in the MS1-ToF mode, scanned from 100 to 1500 Da with an accumulation time of 50 ms.
Circular dichroism spectra were recorded on a Jasco J-815 spectropolarimeter equipped with a temperature controller at 20 °C. A total of 16 accumulations from 260 to185 nm at 50 nm/sec using 1 mm cuvettes were performed.
Additional information such as compound spectra and detailed bioactivity data are provided in the Supplementary Materials.

3.2. General Procedures

3.2.1. Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis

Coupling reactions were carried out automatically on an INTAVIS ResPepSL automated peptide synthesizer by a stepwise Fmoc/tBu strategy using a 5-fold excess of amino acid and PyBop and a 10-fold excess of NMM at R.T. for 15 min. Fmoc deprotection was achieved by treatment with 20% piperidine in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) solution. Washing steps, as well as peptide coupling reactions, were conducted using DMF as a solvent. A 50 µmol scale on TG-S-RAM (Iris Biotech) resin (217 mg, 0.23 mmol/mg) was utilized. Before bringing it into the synthesizer, the resin was swelled for 20 min in dichloromethane.

3.2.2. N-Terminus Acetylation

After the coupling of all amino acids, the resin is manually washed with DCM (3 × 1 min) and DMF (2 × 1 min) and reacted with 10 eq. of Ac2O/DIEA in 2 mL of DMF for 30 min [47]. The completeness of the reaction was confirmed through the Kaiser test [48] and the resin was manually washed with DCM (3 × 1 min).

3.2.3. Alloc/Allyl Ester Removal

The resin was washed with dry dichloromethane (2 × 2 min) under a stream of nitrogen. A solution of phenylsilane (20 eq.) in dry dichloromethane and tetrakis(triphenylphosphine) palladium(0) (0.2 eq.) were added to the resin under a continuous stream of nitrogen. The mixture was stirred or shaken in the dark for 10 min, and the procedure was repeated once more. [49] Finally, the resin was washed with 0.5% of sodium diethyldithiocarbamate trihydrate in DMF (5 × 2 min) and DCM (2 × 2 min).

3.2.4. Aminocatalysis-Mediated Ugi-4C Cyclization

The side chain deprotected resin-bound peptide was washed with THF (4×1 min) and treated with a suspension of paraformaldehyde (4 eq.) and pyrrolidine (4 eq.) in THF/MeOH (1:1) for 30 min. The excess of reagents was removed by washing the beads with THF (4 × 1min). The resin was then washed with DCM (4 × 1min) and DCM/TFE 1:1 solution (2 × 1min). A solution of the isocyanide (4 eq.) in 2 mL DCM/TFE 1:1 (or THF:MeOH 1:1 for relative polar isocyanides) was added to the resin and the suspension was stirred overnight (18 h) [30]. Completion was evaluated by ESI-MS or RP-HPLC monitoring after mini-cleavages. Afterwards, the resin was washed with DCM (3×1 min) and DMF (2 × 1 min). Finally, the resin was washed with DCM (5 × 2 min) and Et2O (3 × 1 min).

3.2.5. Cyclization by Peptide Coupling

PyAOP (4 equiv.) and DIPEA (6 equiv.) were dissolved in DMF and the solution was added to the resin-bound peptide similar to the described protocol from Amblard et al. for phosphonium-based activation [47]. The suspension was stirred for 12 h and then the resin was washed with DCM (3 × 1 min) and DMF (2 × 1 min).

3.2.6. Test Cleavage (Mini-Cleavage)

To evaluate the completion of the reaction, a small amount of the dry resin (less than 10 mg) was transferred to an Eppendorf vial and 400 µL of the cleavage cocktail (TFA/TIS/H2O 95:2.5:2.5) was added. The suspension was gently agitated during 45 min and afterwards the cleavage cocktail was concentrated under N2 flow and the remaining oil was precipitated by addition of 500 µL diethyl ether, similar to the protocol described by Spring and co-workers [50]. The suspension was centrifuged for 5 min after which the solid and liquid phases were separated by settling. The precipitated peptide was dissolved in a mixture ACN/H2O in order to be analyzed by HPLC.

3.2.7. Cleavage

The resin was treated with the cocktail TFA/TIS/H2O (95:2.5:2.5). The peptide was precipitated from cold diethyl ether, then taken up in 1:2 ACN/H2O and lyophilized [47].

3.3. Synthesis

Resin-bound Ac-LAKLLKAKAKAD (resin-bound peptide 1) Resin-bound peptide Ac-Leu-Ala-Lys(Boc)-Leu-Leu-Lys(Boc)-Ala-Lys-Ala-Lys(Boc)-Ala-Asp was synthesized in 50 µmol scale according to the protocols described [30]. The purity of the resin-bound peptide was evaluated through test cleavages as described above. Analytical UHPLC: Rt 4.54 min, >83% purity (crude). Analytical UHPLC: Rt 2.86 min, >98% purity; ESI-HRMS, calcd. for C60H114N17O153+: 437.6227 [M + 3H]3+; Found: m/z 437.6215 [M + 3H]3+.
Ac-(N-(2-(n-butylamino)-2-oxoethyl)-(cyclo-8,12))-[LAKLLKAKAKAD]-NH2 (2) The title compound was produced by on-resin cyclization in a 50 µmol scale from resin-bound peptide 1 according to the aminocatalysis-mediated Ugi macrocyclization protocol in the presence of n-butylisocyanide. Cleavage with TFA/H2O/TIS 95:2.5:2.5 for 2 h afforded the crude peptide (47.2 mg, 67% crude yield, 54% purity) as an amorphous white solid. An analytical sample was purified by semipreparative RP-HPLC for bioassays and CD. Analytical UHPLC: Rt 6.19 min, >94% purity. ESI-HRMS, calcd. for C66H123N18O153+: 469.3139 [M + 3H]3+ Found: m/z 469.3145 [M + 3H]3+.
Ac-(N-(2-(n-dodecylamino)-2-oxoethyl)-(cyclo-8,12))-[LAKLLKAKAKAD]-NH2 (3) The title compound was produced by on-resin cyclization in a 50 µmol scale from resin-bound peptide 1 according to the aminocatalysis-mediated Ugi macrocyclization protocol in the presence of n-dodecylisocyanide. Cleavage with TFA/H2O/TIS 95:2.5:2.5 for 2 h afforded the crude peptide (64.3 mg, 85% crude yield, 63% purity) as an amorphous white solid. An analytical sample was purified by semipreparative RP-HPLC for bioassays and CD. Analytical UHPLC: Rt 8.17 min, >91% purity. ESI-HRMS, calcd. for C74H139N18O153+: 506.6889 [M + 3H]3+ Found: m/z 506.6874 [M + 3H]3+.
Ac-(cyclo-8,12))-[LAKLLKAKAKAD]-NH2 (4) The title compound was produced by on-resin cyclization in a 50 µmol scale from resin-bound peptide 1 according to the cyclization by peptide coupling protocol. Cleavage with TFA/H2O/TIS 95:2.5:2.5 for 2 h afforded the crude peptide (48.9 mg, 81% crude yield, 37% purity) as an amorphous white solid. An analytical sample was purified by semipreparative RP-HPLC for bioassays and CD. Analytical UHPLC: Rt 3.92 min, >89% purity. ESI-HRMS, calcd. for C60H112N17O143+: 431.6192 [M + 3H]3+ Found: m/z 431.6180 [M + 3H]3+.
Ac-LKKLLKKLLKKL (5). The title compound was synthesized in 50 µmol according to the general procedure. The resulting product is cleaved from the resin to obtain after lyophilization the crude peptide (69.1 mg, 92% crude yield, 86% purity) as an amorphous white solid. An analytical sample was purified by semipreparative RP-HPLC for bioassays and CD. Analytical UHPLC: Rt 2.89 min, >98% purity; ESI-HRMS, calcd. for C74H147N19O134+: 377,5357 [M + 4H]4+; Found: m/z 377,5349 [M + 4H]4+.
Ac-(cyclo-8,12))-[LKKLLKKKLKKE]-NH2 (6) The title compound was produced by on-resin cyclization in a 50 µmol scale from resin-bound peptide Ac-LKKLLKKKLKKE-(TG-S-RAM) (all Lysines except Lys8 protected as Boc) according to the cyclization by peptide coupling protocol. Cleavage with TFA/H2O/TIS 95:2.5:2.5 for 2 h afforded the crude peptide (61.5 mg, 81% crude yield, 63% purity) as an amorphous white solid. An analytical sample was purified by semipreparative RP-HPLC for bioassays and CD. Analytical UHPLC: Rt 2.36 min, >93% purity. ESI-HRMS, calcd. for C73H142N20O144+: 380.7754 [M + 4H]4+ Found: m/z 380.7748 [M + 4H]4+.
Ac-(N-(2-(n-octadecylamino)-2-oxoethyl)-(cyclo-8,12))-[LKKLLKKKLKKE]-NH2 (7) The title compound was produced by on-resin cyclization in a 50 µmol scale from resin-bound peptide Ac-LKKLLKKKLKKE-(TG-S-RAM) (all Lysines except Lys8 protected as Boc) according to the aminocatalysis-mediated Ugi macrocyclization protocol in the presence of n-octadecylisocyanide. Cleavage with TFA/H2O/TIS 95:2.5:2.5 for 2 h afforded the crude peptide (68.1 mg, 76% crude yield, 71% purity) as an amorphous white solid. An analytical sample was purified by semipreparative RP-HPLC for bioassays and CD. Analytical UHPLC: Rt 6.61 min, >93% purity. ESI-HRMS, calcd. for C91H180N21O145+: 358.2804 [M + 5H]5+ Found: m/z 358.2780 [M + 5H]5+.
Ac-(N-(2-(n-octadecylamino)-2-oxoethyl)-(cyclo-1,5))-[KKKLEKKLLKKL]-NH2 (8) The title compound was produced by on-resin cyclization in a 50 µmol scale from resin-bound peptide Ac- KKKLEKKLLKK-(TG-S-RAM) (all Lysines except Lys1 protected as Boc) according to the aminocatalysis-mediated Ugi macrocyclization protocol in the presence of n-octadecylisocyanide. Cleavage with TFA/H2O/TIS 95:2.5:2.5 for 2 h afforded the crude peptide (65.2 mg, 73% crude yield, 69% purity) as an amorphous white solid. An analytical sample was purified by semipreparative RP-HPLC for bioassays and CD. Analytical UHPLC: Rt 6.48 min, >89% purity. ESI-HRMS, calcd. for C91H180N21O145+: 358.2804 [M + 5H]5+ Found: m/z 358.2777 [M + 5H]5+.
Ac-(N-(2-(n-octadecylamino)-2-oxoethyl)-(cyclo-3,7))-[LKKLLKELLKKL]-NH2 (9) The title compound was produced by on-resin cyclization in a 50 µmol scale from resin-bound peptide Ac- LKKLLKELLKKL-(TG-S-RAM) (all Lysines except Lys3 protected as Boc) according to the aminocatalysis-mediated Ugi macrocyclization protocol in the presence of n-octadecylisocyanide. Cleavage with TFA/H2O/TIS 95:2.5:2.5 for 2 h afforded the crude peptide (72.4 mg, 81% crude yield, 68% purity) as an amorphous white solid. An analytical sample was purified by semipreparative RP-HPLC for bioassays and CD. Analytical UHPLC: Rt 9.41 min, >90% purity. ESI-HRMS, calcd. for C93H179N19O154+: 450.5957 [M + 4H]4+ Found: m/z 450.5929 [M + 4H]4+.
Ac-(N-(2-(n-octadecylamino)-2-oxoethyl)-(cyclo-5,9))-[LKKLKKKLEKKL]-NH2 (10) The title compound was produced by on-resin cyclization in a 50 µmol scale from resin-bound peptide Ac- LKKLKKKLEKKL-(TG-S-RAM) (all Lysines except Lys5 protected as Boc) according to the aminocatalysis-mediated Ugi macrocyclization protocol in the presence of n-octadecylisocyanide. Cleavage with TFA/H2O/TIS 95:2.5:2.5 for 2 h afforded the crude peptide (66.8 mg, 75% crude yield, 77% purity) as an amorphous white solid. An analytical sample was purified by semipreparative RP-HPLC for bioassays and CD. Analytical UHPLC: Rt 6.67 min, >91% purity. ESI-HRMS, calcd. for C91H180N21O144+: 358.2804 [M + 5H]5+ Found: m/z 358.2780 [M + 5H]5+.

3.4. Anti-Phytopathogenic Bioassays

The compounds were tested in 96-well microtiter plate assays against the phytopathogenic ascomycetes Botrytis cinerea Pers. and Septoria tritici Desm. and the oomycete Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary according to the monitoring methods approved by the fungicide resistance action committee (FRAC) [51,52,53] with minor modifications as described by Otto et al. [54]. Compounds were examined at 125, 42, 14, 4.6 and 1.5 µM and when necessary additional experiments were performed with higher dilution steps. The mother solution solvent DMSO was used as negative control (max. concentration 2.5%), while Epoxiconazole and Terbinafine served as positive controls. Seven days after inoculation, pathogen growth was evaluated by measurement of the optical density (OD) at λ 405 nm with a TecanSpark microplate reader. Each experiment was carried out in triplicate. IC50-values were calculated from dose−response curves on the basis of a linear regression.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Figure S1–S11: UHPLC-MS chromatograms and HRMS spectra of peptides 1–11. Figure S12–S14: Inhibition of phytopathogenic growth by the macrocyclic lipopeptides.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.V.V., D.G.R. and L.A.W.; methodology, A.V.V., D.G.R. and L.A.W.; validation, A.V.V., M.B., Y.M. and O.V.; formal analysis, A.V.V. and M.B; investigation, A.V.V., M.B., Y.M. and O.V.; resources, L.A.W.; writing—first draft, A.V.V.; writing—review and editing, D.G.R., L.A.W.; visualization, A.V.V., D.G.R. and L.A.W.; supervision, D.G.R. and L.A.W..; project administration, L.A.W.; funding acquisition, L.A.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

AV is funded by a Doctoral fellowship of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), D.G.R. received a Georg Forster researcher fellowship from the Alexander von Humboldt -foundation.

Acknowledgments

Technical support (chemical and biological analytics) was provided by analytical, technical and scientific staff of IPB-NWC.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Laxminarayan, R.; Matsoso, P.; Pant, S.; Brower, C.; Røttingen, J.A.; Klugman, K.; Davies, S. Access to effective antimicrobials: A worldwide challenge. Lancet 2016, 387, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chellat, M.F.; Raguž, L.; Riedl, R. Targeting Antibiotic Resistance. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 6600–6626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jerala, R. Synthetic lipopeptides: A novel class of anti-infectives. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2007, 16, 1159–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wild, C.P.; Gong, Y.Y. Mycotoxins and human disease: A largely ignored global health issue. Carcinogenesis 2009, 31, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Martínez-de-Anda, A.; Valdivia, A.G.; Jaramillo-Juárez, F.; Reyes, J.L.; Ortiz, R.; Quezada, T.; de Luna, M.C.; Rodríguez, M.L. Effects of aflatoxin chronic intoxication in renal function of laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 1622–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khlangwiset, P.; Shephard, G.S.; Wu, F. Aflatoxins and growth impairment: A review. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2011, 41, 740–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zeitler, B.; Herrera Diaz, A.; Dangel, A.; Thellmann, M.; Meyer, H.; Sattler, M.; Lindermayr, C. De-Novo Design of Antimicrobial Peptides for Plant Protection. PLoS ONE 2013, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Makovitzki, A.; Shai, Y. pH-dependent antifungal lipopeptides and their plausible mode of action. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 9775–9784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hancock, R.E.W.; Sahl, H.G. Antimicrobial and host-defense peptides as new anti-infective therapeutic strategies. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 1551–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pasupuleti, M.; Schmidtchen, A.; Malmsten, M. Antimicrobial peptides: Key components of the innate immune system. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2012, 32, 143–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Schmidtchen, A.; Pasupuleti, M.; Malmsten, M. Effect of hydrophobic modifications in antimicrobial peptides. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 205, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Shai, Y. Mode of action of membrane active antimicrobial peptides. Biopolym. - Pept. Sci. Sect. 2002, 66, 236–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Brogden, K.A. Antimicrobial peptides: Pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Garibotto, F.M.; Garro, A.D.; Masman, M.F.; Rodríguez, A.M.; Luiten, P.G.M.; Raimondi, M.; Zacchino, S.A.; Somlai, C.; Penke, B.; Enriz, R.D. New small-size peptides possessing antifungal activity. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Meena, K.R.; Kanwar, S.S. Lipopeptides as the antifungal and antibacterial agents: Applications in food safety and therapeutics. Biomed Res. Int. 2015, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Mahindra, A.; Bagra, N.; Wangoo, N.; Khan, S.I.; Jacob, M.R.; Jain, R. Discovery of short peptides exhibiting high potency against Cryptococcus neoformans. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Grimaldi, M.; De Rosa, M.; Di Marino, S.; Scrima, M.; Posteraro, B.; Sanguinetti, M.; Fadda, G.; Soriente, A.; D’ursi, A.M. Synthesis of new antifungal peptides selective against Cryptococcus neoformans. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 7985–7990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Johnson, E.T.; Evans, K.O.; Dowd, P.F. Antifungal activity of a synthetic cationic peptide against the plant pathogens Colletotrichum graminicola and three Fusarium species. Plant Pathol. J. 2015, 31, 316–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Balkovec, J.M. Section review: Anti-infectives: Lipopeptide antifungal agents. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 1994, 3, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rathinakumar, R.; Walkenhorst, W.F.; Wimley, W.C. Broad-spectrum antimicrobial peptides by rational combinatorial design and high-throughput screening: The importance of interfacial activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 7609–7617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Arima, K.; Kakinuma, A.; Tamura, G. Surfactin, a crystalline peptidelipid surfactant produced by Bacillus subtilis: Isolation, characterization and its inhibition of fibrin clot formation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1968, 31, 488–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Delcambe, L.; Peypoux, F.; Besson, F.; Guinand, M.; Michel, G. Structure of iturin and iturin like substances. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1977, 5, 1122–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Vanittanakom, N.; Loeffler, W.; Koch, U.; Jung, G. Fengycin-A Novel Antifungal Lipopeptide Antibiotic Produced by Bacillus Subtilis F-29-3. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 1986, 39, 888–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Wessjohann, L.A.; Rivera, D.G.; Vercillo, O.E. Multiple Multicomponent Macrocyclization including Bifunctional Building Blocks (MiBs): A Strategic Development Towards Macrocycle Diversity. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 796–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wessjohann, L.A.; Neves Filho, R.A.; Puentes, A.A.; Morejon, M.C. Macrocycles from Multicomponent Reactions. In Multicomponent Reactions in Organic Synthesis; Zhu, J., Wang, Q., Wang, M.-X., Eds.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2015; pp. 231–264. ISBN 9783527678174. [Google Scholar]
  26. Morales, F.E.; Garay, H.E.; Muñoz, D.F.; Augusto, Y.E.; Otero-González, A.J.; Reyes Acosta, O.; Rivera, D.G. Aminocatalysis-mediated on-resin ugi reactions: Application in the solid-phase synthesis of n -substituted and tetrazolo lipopeptides and peptidosteroids. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 2728–2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rivera, D.G.; Vasco, A.V.; Echemendía, R.; Concepción, O.; Pérez, C.S.; Gavín, J.A.; Wessjohann, L.A. A Multicomponent Conjugation Strategy to Unique N-Steroidal Peptides: First Evidence of the Steroidal Nucleus as a β-Turn Inducer in Acyclic Peptides. Chem. A Eur. J. 2014, 20, 13150–13161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Morejón, M.C.; Laub, A.; Westermann, B.; Rivera, D.G.; Wessjohann, L.A. Solution- and Solid-Phase Macrocyclization of Peptides by the Ugi–Smiles Multicomponent Reaction: Synthesis of N -Aryl-Bridged Cyclic Lipopeptides. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 4096–4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ricardo, M.G.; Llanes, D.; Wessjohann, L.A.; Rivera, D.G. Introducing the Petasis Reaction for Late-Stage Multicomponent Diversification, Labeling, and Stapling of Peptides. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 2700–2704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vasco, A.V.; Méndez, Y.; Porzel, A.; Balbach, J.; Wessjohann, L.A.; Rivera, D.G. A Multicomponent Stapling Approach to Exocyclic Functionalized Helical Peptides: Adding Lipids, Sugars, PEGs, Labels, and Handles to the Lactam Bridge. Bioconjug. Chem. 2019, 30, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Morejón, M.C.; Laub, A.; Kaluđerović, G.N.; Puentes, A.R.; Hmedat, A.N.; Otero-González, A.J.; Rivera, D.G.; Wessjohann, L.A. A multicomponent macrocyclization strategy to natural product-like cyclic lipopeptides: Synthesis and anticancer evaluation of surfactin and mycosubtilin analogues. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 3628–3637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Schafmeister, C.E.; Po, J.; Verdine, G.L. An all-hydrocarbon cross-linking system for enhancing the helicity and metabolic stability of peptides [8]. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5891–5892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kim, Y.W.; Grossmann, T.N.; Verdine, G.L. Synthesis of all-hydrocarbon stapled ±-helical peptides by ring-closing olefin metathesis. Nat. Protoc. 2011, 6, 761–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Felix, A.M.; Heimer, E.P.; Wang, C.T.; Lambros, T.J.; Fournier, A.; Mowles, T.F.; Maines, S.; Campbell, R.M.; Wegrzynski, B.B.; Toome, V.; et al. Synthesis, biological activity and conformational analysis of cyclic GRF analogs. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1988, 32, 441–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Houston, M.E.; Gannon, C.L.; Kay, C.M.; Hodges, R.S. Lactam bridge stabilization of α-helical peptides: Ring size, orientation and positional effects. J. Pept. Sci. 1995, 1, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shepherd, N.E.; Hoang, H.N.; Abbenante, G.; Fairlie, D.P. Single turn peptide alpha helices with exceptional stability in water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2974–2983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sharma, K.; Kunciw, D.L.; Xu, W.; Wiedmann, M.M.; Wu, Y.; Sore, H.F.; Galloway, W.R.J.D.; Lau, Y.H.; Itzhaki, L.S.; Spring, D.R. CHAPTER 8. Double-click Stapled Peptides for Inhibiting Protein–Protein Interactions. In Cyclic Peptides: From Bioorganic Synthesis to Applications; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2017; pp. 164–187. ISBN 978-1-78262-528-5. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lautrette, G.; Touti, F.; Lee, H.G.; Dai, P.; Pentelute, B.L. Nitrogen Arylation for Macrocyclization of Unprotected Peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 8340–8343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Brown, S.P.; Smith, A.B. Peptide/protein stapling and unstapling: Introduction of s-tetrazine, photochemical release, and regeneration of the peptide/protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4034–4037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Spokoyny, A.M.; Zou, Y.; Ling, J.J.; Yu, H.; Lin, Y.S.; Pentelute, B.L. A perfluoroaryl-cysteine SNAr chemistry approach to unprotected peptide stapling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 5946–5949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Jo, H.; Meinhardt, N.; Wu, Y.; Kulkarni, S.; Hu, X.; Low, K.E.; Davies, P.L.; Degrado, W.F.; Greenbaum, D.C. Development of α-helical calpain probes by mimicking a natural protein-protein interaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 17704–17713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Timmerman, P.; Beld, J.; Puijk, W.C.; Meloen, R.H. Rapid and quantitative cyclization of multiple peptide loops onto synthetic scaffolds for structural mimicry of protein surfaces. ChemBioChem 2005, 6, 821–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. White, C.J.; Yudin, A.K. Contemporary strategies for peptide macrocyclization. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 509–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hill, T.A.; Shepherd, N.E.; Diness, F.; Fairlie, D.P. Constraining cyclic peptides to mimic protein structure motifs. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 13020–13041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Khara, J.S.; Obuobi, S.; Wang, Y.; Hamilton, M.S.; Robertson, B.D.; Newton, S.M.; Yang, Y.Y.; Langford, P.R.; Ee, P.L.R. Disruption of drug-resistant biofilms using de novo designed short α-helical antimicrobial peptides with idealized facial amphiphilicity. Acta Biomater. 2017, 57, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wimley, W.C. Describing the mechanism of antimicrobial peptide action with the interfacial activity model. ACS Chem. Biol. 2010, 5, 905–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Amblard, M.; Fehrentz, J.-A.; Martinez, J.; Subra, G. Fundamentals of Modern Peptide Synthesis. In Peptide Synthesis and Applications; Howl, J., Ed.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2005; pp. 3–24. ISBN 978-1-58829-317-6. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kaiser, E.; Colescott, R.L.; Bossinger, C.D.; Cook, P.I. Color test for detection of free terminal amino groups in the solid-phase synthesis of peptides. Anal. Biochem. 1970, 34, 595–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gomez-Martinez, P.; Dessolin, M.; Guibé, F.; Albericio, F. N -Alloc temporary protection in solid-phase peptide synthesis. The use of amine–borane complexes as allyl group scavengers. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 2871–2874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lau, Y.H.; Wu, Y.; De Andrade, P.; Galloway, W.R.J.D.; Spring, D.R. A two-component “double-click” approach to peptide stapling. Nat. Protoc. 2015, 10, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Stammler, G. Phytophthora infestans microtiter method with sporangia. Available online: https://www.frac.info/docs/default-source/monitoring-methods/approved-methods/phytin-microtiter-method-sporangia-basf-2006-v1.pdf?sfvrsn=4&sfvrsn=4. (accessed on 24 October 2005).
  52. Stammler, G.; Semar, M. Sensitivity of Mycosphaerella graminicola (anamorph: Septoria tritici) to DMI fungicides across Europe and impact on field performance. EPPO Bull. 2011, 41, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Stammler, G.; Speakman, J. Microtiter method to test the sensitivity of Botrytis cinerea to boscalid. J. Phytopathol. 2006, 154, 508–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Otto, A.; Laub, A.; Porzel, A.; Schmidt, J.; Wessjohann, L.; Westermann, B.; Arnold, N. Isolation and Total Synthesis of Albupeptins A-D: 11-Residue Peptaibols from the Fungus Gliocladium album. European J. Org. Chem. 2015, 2015, 7449–7459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are available from the authors (limited).
Molecules 25 00811 sch001 550
Scheme 1. (A) Synthesis of polycationic dodecapeptides based on the peptide Ac-LAKLLKAKAKAD-NH2. In parenthesis are the yields of crude products; an analytical sample was purified to >93% purity; (B) Helical wheel representation of peptide 1 showing the disposition of the amino acids to be selectively modified (Lys8 and Asp12), located—under helix formation—opposite to the positively charged lysins at positions 3, 6 and 10; (C) Circular Dichroism (CD) spectra of the synthesized peptides in 10 mM phosphate buffer and 25 mM SDS aqueous solutions.
Scheme 1. (A) Synthesis of polycationic dodecapeptides based on the peptide Ac-LAKLLKAKAKAD-NH2. In parenthesis are the yields of crude products; an analytical sample was purified to >93% purity; (B) Helical wheel representation of peptide 1 showing the disposition of the amino acids to be selectively modified (Lys8 and Asp12), located—under helix formation—opposite to the positively charged lysins at positions 3, 6 and 10; (C) Circular Dichroism (CD) spectra of the synthesized peptides in 10 mM phosphate buffer and 25 mM SDS aqueous solutions.
Molecules 25 00811 sch001
Molecules 25 00811 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) Helical wheel representation of the structure of peptides 5-7 designed to possess an ideal amphiphilic structure. In parenthesis the yields of crude products; an analytical sample was purified to >93% purity; (B) Bioactivity of the compounds against model phytopathogens; (C) CD spectra for the peptides in 10 mM phosphate buffer and 25 mM SDS aqueous solutions; (D) UHPLC-MS chromatogram of crude peptide 7.
Figure 1. (A) Helical wheel representation of the structure of peptides 5-7 designed to possess an ideal amphiphilic structure. In parenthesis the yields of crude products; an analytical sample was purified to >93% purity; (B) Bioactivity of the compounds against model phytopathogens; (C) CD spectra for the peptides in 10 mM phosphate buffer and 25 mM SDS aqueous solutions; (D) UHPLC-MS chromatogram of crude peptide 7.
Molecules 25 00811 g001
Molecules 25 00811 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) Helical wheel representation of the structure of peptides 9-11. In parenthesis the yields of crude products are given; an analytical sample was purified to >93% purity; (B) CD spectra for the peptides in 10 mM phosphate buffer and 25 mM SDS aqueous solutions, including the spectrum of 8 for comparison purposes;(C) Bioactivity of the compounds against model phytopathogens.
Figure 2. (A) Helical wheel representation of the structure of peptides 9-11. In parenthesis the yields of crude products are given; an analytical sample was purified to >93% purity; (B) CD spectra for the peptides in 10 mM phosphate buffer and 25 mM SDS aqueous solutions, including the spectrum of 8 for comparison purposes;(C) Bioactivity of the compounds against model phytopathogens.
Molecules 25 00811 g002
Table
Table 1. Half maximal inhibitory concentration (in µmol/L) of peptides 2–4 against model phytopathogens. (For more, detailed data see Supplementary Material)
Table 1. Half maximal inhibitory concentration (in µmol/L) of peptides 2–4 against model phytopathogens. (For more, detailed data see Supplementary Material)
PeptideSeptoria TriticiBotrytis CinereaPhytophthora Infestans
1>50>50>50
2>50>5026.2
35.99.814.3
4>50>5020.9

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vasco, A.V.; Brode, M.; Méndez, Y.; Valdés, O.; Rivera, D.G.; Wessjohann, L.A. Synthesis of Lactam-Bridged and Lipidated Cyclo-Peptides as Promising Anti-Phytopathogenic Agents. Molecules 2020, 25, 811. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040811

AMA Style

Vasco AV, Brode M, Méndez Y, Valdés O, Rivera DG, Wessjohann LA. Synthesis of Lactam-Bridged and Lipidated Cyclo-Peptides as Promising Anti-Phytopathogenic Agents. Molecules. 2020; 25(4):811. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040811

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vasco, Aldrin V., Martina Brode, Yanira Méndez, Oscar Valdés, Daniel G. Rivera, and Ludger A. Wessjohann. 2020. "Synthesis of Lactam-Bridged and Lipidated Cyclo-Peptides as Promising Anti-Phytopathogenic Agents" Molecules 25, no. 4: 811. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040811

APA Style

Vasco, A. V., Brode, M., Méndez, Y., Valdés, O., Rivera, D. G., & Wessjohann, L. A. (2020). Synthesis of Lactam-Bridged and Lipidated Cyclo-Peptides as Promising Anti-Phytopathogenic Agents. Molecules, 25(4), 811. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040811

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop