Next Article in Journal
Chemical Consequences of XUV/X-ray Laser-Matter Interactions
Previous Article in Journal
Compression Behavior and Vibrational Properties of New Energetic Material LLM-105 Analyzed Using the Dispersion-Corrected Density Functional Theory
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 22
10.3390/molecules26226832
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Well-Orientation Strategy Biosynthesis of Cefuroxime-Silver Nanoantibiotic for Reinforced Biodentine™ and Its Dental Application against Streptococcus mutans

by
Sanaa M. F. Gad El-Rab
1,2,*,
Amal A. Ashour
3,
Sakeenabi Basha
4,
Amal Ahmed Alyamani
1,
Nayef H. Felemban
5 and
Enas Tawfik Enan
6,7
1
Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Taif University, Taif 21974, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut 71516, Egypt
3
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, Oral Pathology Division, Faculty of Dentistry, Taif University, Taif 26571, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Taif University, Taif 26571, Saudi Arabia
5
Preventive Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Taif University, Taif 26571, Saudi Arabia
6
Dental Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, Taif University, Taif 26571, Saudi Arabia
7
Dental Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35511, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(22), 6832; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226832
Submission received: 27 September 2021 / Revised: 5 November 2021 / Accepted: 8 November 2021 / Published: 12 November 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Dental caries results from the bacterial pathogen Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and is the maximum critical reason for caries formation. Consequently, the present study aims to evaluate the antibacterial activity of a newly synthesized nanoantibiotic–Biodentine formulation. The silver nanoparticles (ROE-AgNPs) were biosynthesized from the usage of Rosmarinus officinalis L. extract (ROE) and conjugated with cefuroxime to form Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs. Using Biodentine™ (BIOD), five groups of dental materials were prepared, in which Group A included conventional BIOD, Group B included BIOD with ROE-AgNPs, Groups C and D included BIOD with Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs at concentrations of 0.5% and 1.5% cefuroxime, respectively, and Group E included BIOD with 1.5% cefuroxime. The synthesized ROE-AgNPs or Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs were characterized for conjugating efficiency, morphology, particle size, and in vitro release. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the cefuroxime, ROE-AgNPs, and Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs were additionally evaluated against cefuroxime resistant S. mutans, which furthered antibacterial efficacy of the five groups of dental materials. The UV-Visible spectrum showed the ROE-AgNPs or Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs peaks and their formation displayed through transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern, and Fourier transforms infrared (FTIR) analysis. The end result of Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs showed conjugating efficiency up to 79%. Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs displayed the highest antibacterial efficacy against S. mutans as compared to cefuroxime or ROE-AgNPs alone. Moreover, the MIC of ROE-AgNPs and Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs was detected against S. mutans to be 25 and 8.5 μg/mL, respectively. Consequently, Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs displayed that a decrease in the MIC reached to more than three-fold less than MIC of ROE-AgNPs on the tested strain. Moreover, Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs/BIOD was employed as a novel dental material that showed maximum antimicrobial activity. Groups C and D of novel materials showed inhibitory zones of 19 and 26 mm, respectively, against S. mutans and showed high antimicrobial rates of 85.78% and 91.17%, respectively. These data reinforce the utility of conjugating cefuroxime with ROE-AgNPs to retrieve its efficiency against resistant S. mutant. Moreover, the nanoantibiotic delivered an advantageous antibacterial effect to BIOD, and this may open the door for future conjugation therapy of dental materials against bacteria that cause dental caries.

1. Introduction

S. mutans has been demonstrated as a causative bacterium for dental caries, as it ferments carbohydrates to organic acids. These acids cause a lower pH, leading to increased enamel solubility that is manifested in the form of dental caries [1]. Moreover, nanoscale characters can be used for targeted therapeutic delivery and dental applications. Nanoparticle-conjugated biomaterials had been applied in various dentistry and biomedical fields because of their mended biological functionalities and physicochemical and mechanical properties [2]. There are many types of dental material, but BIOD is a must-have product when it comes to vital pulp therapy and the treatment of deep caries. BIOD is among the most recent tricalcium silicate cements that has high biocompatibility and bioactive properties, allowing its application as a permanent substitution of dentin. The material provides a high marginal sealing ability and protection of the pulp tissue through induction of reparative dentin formation [3]. BIOD can be applied without dentin surface preparation, etching, or bonding, as it bonds to tooth structure through micromechanical retention to the dentinal tubules. Previous investigations revealed that the cement can be applied in injured pulp tissue because of its bioactive nature, which enables it to stimulate odontoblasts differentiation [4]. The unique properties of the cement allow its wide use for pulp capping, pulpotomy, and endodontic treatment, with results that are comparable to those of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) [5]. Different in vitro and in vivo research confirmed that BIOD is efficient in restorative and pediatric dentistry and in endodontics, as it has strong mechanical properties [6,7,8].
The motive for restorative dental materials that have antimicrobial features has stimulated the introduction of materials containing various antibacterial agents. Amalgam, zirconia, gold alloy, titanium alloy, dental ceramic, and dental resin have been applied as dental restorative materials. These materials are applied for treating dental caries or filling tooth cavities, although the addition of antibiotics to BIOD might also additionally enhance its antibacterial efficacy [9].
Cefuroxime (Figure 1) is similar to cefaclor in that it is consider a second generation cephalosporin. Cephalosporin antibiotics have similar actions to penicillin derivatives, similar to ampicillin, which is used as an alternative to penicillin in patients with allergic reactions and when erythromycin is contraindicated [10]. Cefuroxime appears to be an efficacious bactericidal by affecting the synthesis of the cell wall in bacteria [11] and is used because of its stability with metallic nanoparticles [12,13,14]. Cefuroxime demonstrated that cephalosporin is one of the most effective antibiotics against S. mutans isolates [15].
Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are exceptionally explored as they are easy to synthesize and are one of the used noble metallic nanoparticles in fields such as catalysis, bio-nano materials, and medicine because of their long-term antibacterial activity and low bacterial resistance in addition to high thermal stability and a high surface area to-volume-ratio [16,17]. Previously, the authors have proven that the usage of plant extracts serve as a low-cost and time-efficient method for biosynthesis of well-characterized AgNPs on a small to large scale [18,19,20]. The cultivated Rosmarinus officinalis L. (R. officinalis L.) has been extensively applied in traditional medicine. Ghaedi et al. [20] confirmed that the polyphenol and proteins compounds of ROE act as reducing components to form size-controlled ROE-AgNPs. The mechanism of action of AgNPs is unknown, and the suggested mechanisms have been primarily based on their nano-size, which enables the AgNPs to penetrate the microbial cell wall/cell membranes by sulfur-containing proteins or thiol groups, damaging the microbial DNA and leading to cell death [16,17]. Studies have additionally proven that AgNPs conjugate the efficacy of antibiotics against various microbes [21,22]. Researchers have studied the AgNPs applications in several areas regarding antimicrobial efficacy of AgNPs and conjugating effects, especially its application in conjugation with dental biomaterials [23,24,25]. In vitro research has recorded that the addition of metallic nanoparticles into dental materials inhibits oral bacteria growth [23,24,26].
Despite its unique properties as a restorative material, the ability of BIOD to prevent secondary caries is questionable. The present study aims to evaluate the antibacterial activity of a newly synthesized nanoantibiotic-Biodentine formulation against resistant S. mutans that cause dental caries.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Materials

The current study was performed using one dental cement as shown in Table 1 [27], Biodentine™ (Septodont, Saint Maur des Fosses, France), and two antimicrobial agents, ROE-AgNPs, and cefuroxime (VETRANAL®, analytical standard, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). Accordingly, the two agents were added to the BIOD powder in different combinations (Cefuroxime/BIOD, ROE-AgNPs/BIOD, Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs/BIOD) before mixing with the liquid.

2.2. Biosynthesis of ROE-AgNPs with Its Conjugation to Cefuroxime and Determination of Conjugation Efficiency

The fresh leaves of R. officinalis L. plant from Taif region were collected and washed with sterilized distilled water, and aqueous extract was prepared (10 g/100 mL H2O) at 80 °C to obtain reducing and stabilizing agents. Moreover, the ROE was centrifuged and filtered through filter paper (Whatman no. 1, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). Consequently, the filtrate was used immediately for the synthesis of ROE-AgNPs. Fifty milliliters of 1 mM AgNO3 (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) was mixed with 25 mL of ROE on a magnetic stirrer. The thorough mixing of the reaction mixture was ensured at temperature 80 °C, pH 8 for 2 h, after which it was allowed to settle at room temperature. Accordingly, the change in color to dark brown from using ROE indicated ROE-AgNPs formation [6,7]. ROE-AgNPs were freeze-dried at −60 °C for 24 h at a pressure of 0.011 mbar.
The Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs were prepared by mixing cefuroxime with ROE-AgNPs as powders (1:1 mg/mL and 3:1 mg/mL, in a solution of phosphate buffer pH 7.4), followed by incubation overnight, and in the final step, Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs were centrifuged at 15,000× g for 10 min [28]. Moreover, dialysis of Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs against the deionized water was performed using a 10 kDa membrane of cellulose overnight to remove any un-reacted substances. Moreover, the Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs were freeze-dried at −60 °C for 24 h at a pressure of 0.011 mbar. The sample was stored to further characterization. Conjugation efficiency of cefuroxime with ROE-AgNPs was calculated spectrophotometrically at 274 nm wavelength [29] according to the following equation: conjugating efficiency of Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs (%) = (total amount of cefuroxime − free cefuroxime in the supernatant/total amount of cefuroxime) × 100.

2.3. Characterization of ROE-AgNPs and Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs

Characterization of ROE-AgNPs and Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs was performed using the following methods:

2.3.1. UV-Visible Spectrum

UV–Vis spectrometer (Shimadzu UV-1650 pc spectrophotometer, Tokyo, Japan) was used to record absorbance in the range of 250–700 nm to monitor the rate of cefuroxime, ROE-AgNPs and Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs formation.

2.3.2. Transmission Electron Microscopy

The TEM analysis of ROE-AgNPs and Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs sample was performed using the TEM model JEOL 100CX II (Tokyo, Japan) with an accelerating voltage of 100 kV (Assiut Electron Microscope Unit, Assiut, Egypt). Consequently, each nano-sample of TEM analysis was prepared by placing a drop of the suspension onto carbon-coated copper grids and allowing it to dry on the grid for 4 min. The shape and size of ROE-AgNPs and Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs were determined from a TEM micrograph [30,31].

2.3.3. X-ray Diffraction Analysis

The ROE-AgNPs and Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs nature and size were determined using Shimadzu XRD (Shimadzu XD-3A, Tokyo, Japan). The radiation used was Cu Kα (0.154 nm) at 35 nm with a scanning rate of 2°/min and 40 kV. The nanoparticle size was determined using the formula of Debye–Scherrer [32].

2.3.4. Fourier Transforms Infrared Analysis (FT-IR)

FT-IR was determined using a spectrometer (Shimadzu IR-470, Tokyo, Japan) over 4000–500 cm−1 [22].

2.4. Preparation of Specimens and Grouping

The disc-shaped BIOD specimens were intended for the current research using a split Teflon mold (3 mm in height and 6 mm in diameter) [33,34]. The powder and liquid components of the cement were portioned and mixed according to the manufacturer’s instructions, placed in the molds, allowed to sit for 24 h, and then were removed from the mold and were sterilized using ultraviolet radiation for 30 min. The prepared specimens (n = 150) were classified into 5 main groups (30 specimens each) as shown in Table 2:
Then, each of the main groups was tested for antimicrobial efficacy against S. mutans at three-time intervals of 1 day, 1 week, and 3 weeks. All samples of five groups were performed in five replicates, and the test was repeated two separate times.

2.5. Determination of Drug Release

To measure the cefuroxime release from Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs/BIOD, the samples were immersed into 5 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at pH 7.4 and incubated at 37 °C for up to 96 days. A UV-Vis spectroscopy (Shimadzu UV-1650 pc spectrophotometer, Tokyo, Japan) was used to determine the concentration of cefuroxime in release medium using a constructed calibration curve. The cefuroxime release (%) was obtained by the equation: C (%) = B/A × 100, where C is the cefuroxime release (%), B is the total amount of cefuroxime released in the solution, and A is the amount of the loaded cefuroxime in Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs/BIOD samples.

2.6. Bacteria and Growth Conditions

S. mutans bacterial strains was taken from our previous study by Enan et al. [35]. This strain was an ESBL-producing bacteria strain that displayed complete resistance to cefuroxime. Before applying the antibacterial test, fresh inoculum of S. mutans was prepared in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) medium (Oxoid Ltd., London, UK), adjusted with the help of BHI to the famous standard (i.e., 1.5 × 108 CFU/mL), and the culture was incubated for 18 h at 37 ± 2 °C.

2.7. Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of Cefuroxime, ROE-AgNPs, or Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs

To determine the MIC and MBC, the broth micro-dilution method recommended by Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) was used [36]. The MIC evaluation was performed on a 96-well plate. Two hundred microliters of cefuroxime (128 mg/mL), ROE-AgNPs (75 mg/mL) or Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs (64 mg/mL) was inoculated into the 6 wells in column 1. One hundred microliters of Mueller Hinton broth (MHB) (Oxoid Ltd., London, UK) was placed into the wells in each row. Thereafter, 100 μL of cefuroxime, ROE-AgNPs, or Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs solution was taken from column 1 and was serially diluted along the row until column number 10. Thereafter, 5 μL of the bacterial cultures (1.5 × 108) was inoculated into each well containing the MHB medium except column number 10, which was considered blank. Moreover, phenol red dye (2 mg/mL) was prepared, and 50 µL of dye was added to each well to evaluate the viability of bacteria. The plate of the 96-well was incubated and the red color of bacterial cell viability was detected after an incubation time of 24 h at 37 °C. Any color change was observed. No color indicated no bacterial growth, while red color indicated bacterial growth. The minimum concentration of each sample at which no growth or no color was observed was considered as the MIC value. However, after inoculation of 5 μL from each well on the surface of the agar medium plates, MBC was evaluated. The incubation of bacterial culture plates was obtained at 37 °C for 24 h. Finally, the MBC of cefuroxime, ORE-AgNPs, or Cefuroxime-ORE-AgNPs was defined as the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial agent killing the majority (99.99%) of bacterial inoculums. Since the MIC of cefuroxime, ORE-AgNPs, or Cefuroxime-ORE-AgNPs is the ability of inhibitory status, it is possible that if the antimicrobial agent is removed, the bacteria will begin to grow again.

2.8. Assessing the Antimicrobial Activity

The antimicrobial efficacy of each BIOD specimen disk of each group against S. mutans was displayed according to the Kirby–Bauer method [37] under growth conditions using Mueller Hinton agar (MHA) (Oxoid Ltd., London, UK). Each specimen disk of each group was placed on the MHA medium that was inoculated with S. mutans. The clear zone of inhibition around the specimen discs was determined. All samples of each group were performed in triplicate, and the test was repeated five separate times.

2.9. Determination of Antibacterial Rate Using Colony-Forming Units (CFU)

Each specimen of the group (A, B, C, D and E) was placed in a 15 mm diameter glass bottle with a flat bottom surface and incubated in 0.5 mL of bacterial S. mutans suspension of 1 × 106 cells/mL in 20 mL growth medium (MHB) for 24 h at 37 °C. Each 100 µL of the sample was placed on an MHA plate, separately, and was spread and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The antibacterial activity of each specimen was expressed as the CFUs in different incubation times. In addition, the bactericidal ratio (as antibacterial activity) was calculated as the following equation: AR = (CS − TS)/CS × 100, where AR is an antibacterial rate (%), CS is the average colonies number in the control sample (CFU/sample), and TS is the average colonies number in the testing samples (CFU/sample). The control sample, 0.5 mL bacterial suspension of 1 × 106 cells/mL in broth medium, was incubated without specimens. Each colonization test was run in triplicate and repeated five separate times.

2.10. Formation of Biofilm and Anti-Biofilm Activity of BIOD Material

The anti-biofilm activity of BIOD specimens and biofilm formation of S. mutans were analyzed according to the method of Souza et al. [38], with some modifications. In brief, each specimen of the BIOD groups was placed in 24-well plates containing S. mutans inoculum, with 2 mL of BHI-B and 5% Sucrose. The 24-well plates were subsequently incubated at 37 ± 2 °C under anaerobic conditions for 3 d to form mature biofilms. After incubation, each BIOD sample was washed gently with distilled water. SEM of each BIOD sample with S. mutans biofilm was fixed in fixation solutions of SEM analysis [39]. For SEM, samples of BIOD were placed on stainless-steel holders, sputter-coated with a thin layer of gold, and examined by JOEL SEM (JSM-5400LV, Tokyo, Japan at Electron Microscope Unit, Assiut, Egypt). SEM examinations of BIOD samples were analyzed. Five specimens were examined for each BIOD group.

2.11. Statistical Analysis

The difference in mean was assessed using ANOVA, followed by Tukey post hoc analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided, and the significance level was set at p < 0.05. Analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science version 17 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Biosynthesis of ROE-AgNPs with Its Conjugation to Cefuroxime and Determination of Conjugation Efficiency

Herein, ROE-AgNPs have been biosynthesized by reducing AgNO3 to ROE-AgNPs using ROE. The formation of ROE-AgNPs in the medium was indicated by a change in color from pale yellow to dark brown after 2 h at pH 8 due to reducing and stabilizing agents in ROE. In addition, cefuroxime was conjugated to ROE-AgNPs to form Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs nanoantibiotics. In the present study, the conjugating efficiency of Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs was detected to be 79.86%.

3.2. Characterization of ROE-AgNPs and Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs

3.2.1. UV–Vis Spectroscopy of ROE-AgNPs

As shown in Figure 2I, UV-Vis spectroscopy of ROE-AgNPs showed a peak of 400 nm, and cefuroxime showed a peak of 274 nm, while Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs nanoantibiotic showed peaks at 400 and 274 nm for ROEAgNPs and pure cefuroxime, respectively.

3.2.2. Transmission Electron Microscopy

The TEM particle shape and size analysis of ROE-AgNPs and Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs showed a formation of spherical particles to oval-shaped nanoparticles (Figure 2(IIA,B)). Moreover, the average size of ROE-AgNPs and Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs was estimated to be 8.7 ± 0.57–15.9 ± 1.15 nm and 14.2 ± 0.8–23.3 ± 1.3 nm, respectively.

3.2.3. X-ray Diffraction Analysis

The XRD pattern of ROE-AgNPs (Figure 2(IIIA)) and Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs (Figure 2(IIIB)) showed four major peaks at 2θ values of 32.08°, 46.09°, 67.06°, and 76.3°, 32.26°, 46.18°, 67.3°, and 76.66°. These characteristic peaks may be attributed to reflection planes (111), (200), (220), (300), and (311) of face-centered cubic crystalline (FCC) structures of pure Ag0 (Figure 1III). The sharpness, strong intensity, and narrow width of ROE-AgNPs diffraction peaks in the XRD pattern (Figure 2(IIIA)) indicated that the synthesized ROE-AgNPs is well crystallized, while broad peaks of Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs in the XRD pattern (Figure 2(IIIB)) showed a rise in its size because of the attachment of cefuroxime. According to the Debye–Scherrer analysis, the particle size of ROE-AgNPs and Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs was calculated to be 8.2–16 and 13.9–24 nm, respectively.

3.2.4. Fourier Transforms Infrared Analysis

The FTIR was used for characterization of the R. officinalis L., ROE-AgNPs, Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs, and cefuroxime. Absorbance bands were observed in the region from 4000 to 500 cm−1 (Figure 2IV). FTIR spectrum of ROE appeared as major absorption peaks at 3400, 2860, 1620, 1360, 1080, and 597 cm−1 that revealed to stretching peaks of O-H, -CH, stretch C=O, N-H amine, -C-O-C- and -C=C-H, respectively (Figure 2(IVA)).
FTIR spectrum of ROE-AgNPs appeared as major absorption peaks at 3330, 2860, 1590, 1360, 1080, and 597 cm−1 that revealed stretching peaks of O-H, -CH, C=O, N-H amine, -C-O-C and -C=C-H, respectively (Figure 2(IVB)). In R. officinalis L., -OH and -NH of phenolics and proteins were involved in the formation of ROE-AgNPs through reducing Ag+ to Ag0 (Figure 2(IVB)). The groups at 3330, 2860, 1080 cm−1 were associated with the structure of saponin (-OH, -C-H-, and -C-O-C-), respectively, and indicates the presence of residue saponin on the surface of the ROE-AgNPs (Figure 2(IVB)).
Cefuroxime in Figure 2 (IVC) can be interpreted as peaks stretching of (COO−) at 1640 and 1390 cm−1 respectively, (-NH) bending vibration at 1540 cm−1 and the band of (-NH) stretching at 3350 cm−1. A peak at 1778 cm−1 confirms the presence of a carbonyl group (-C=O) of β lactam stretching in standard cefuroxime.
Upon mixing cefuroxime with ROE-AgNPs (Figure 2(IVD)), the peaks of the carboxylic group in cefuroxime shifted from 1620 to 1681 cm−1. This end result suggests that the carboxylic group of cefuroxime binds with the NH+ group of ROE-AgNPs to form an amide group of Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs.

3.3. Determination of Drug Release

Figure 3 shows that the cefuroxime release (%) from Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs/BIOD, group C and D revealed a two-step release: The fast first-step release, which is the release of cefuroxime (%) from Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs/BIOD, in which groups C and D reached to 24% and 19% within the first 10 days. The slow second-step release reached almost to 56% and 45%, respectively, after 96 days. The release of cefuroxime (%) was calculated using an external standard linear curve of cefuroxime.

3.4. MIC and MBC of Cefuroxime, ROE-AgNPs, or Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs

Table 3 shows the MIC and MBC of the solutions against S. mutans. Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs (1:3) showed MIC (8.5 µg/mL) and MBC (16 µg/mL) followed by ROE-AgNPs, which showed MIC (25 µg/mL) and MBC (35 µg/mL), while cefuroxime showed MIC (32 µg/mL) and MBC (57 µg/mL). The difference was statistically significant between Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs and ROE-AgNPs or cefuroxime alone. The decrease of MIC in Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs was three-fold compared to the MIC of ROE-AgNPs.

3.5. Assessing the Antimicrobial Activity

Table 4 shows the antimicrobial activity of five groups of biomaterials against S. mutans. Group D showed the highest inhibition zone (26 mm) as compared to group C (19 mm), and group B (15 mm) and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001). BIOD and Cefuroxime/BIOD failed to show any antimicrobial activity against S. mutans. The present study showed the maximum inhibitory zone of group D against S. mutans, with a range of 26 mm at the first 24 h period to 17 mm at the three weeks period.

3.6. Determination of Antibacterial Rate Using Colony-Forming Units (CFU)

In Figure 4, CFU in the B group is lower than that detected in groups A and E. However, at the same time, the CFU in C and D groups series decreased significantly. The CFU was in the order of group D < group C < group B< group A ≤ group E after 24 h of incubation.
As shown in Figure 5 and Table 5, the highest antibacterial rates of 85.78% and 91.17% were observed against S. mutans in groups C and D, respectively. The order of the antibacterial rate for group D > group C > group B > group A ≥ group E was observed in Table 5 and Figure 5.

3.7. Formation of Biofilm and Anti-Biofilm Activity of BIOD Material

The antibiofilm efficiency of BIOD specimens against S. mutans is displayed in Figure 6. In a sample of group B (Figure 6III), slight changes in anti-biofilm efficacy and cell morphology were seen as compared to groups A and E (Figure 6I,II) that appeared as an aggregated and clumped cell biomass with normal bacterial cell morphology. In group D (Figure 6IV), the highest anti-biofilm efficiency and changes of cell morphology were seen in addition to the lack of S. mutans biofilm adhesion.

4. Discussion

Herein, ROE-AgNPs were synthesized using ROE and were conjugated with cefuroxime to form a nanoantibiotic that combined with BIOD to form the novel dental material Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs/BIOD. When Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs/BIOD antibacterial properties were compared with ROE-AgNPs alone against S. mutans, it proved to be stronger. Based on our results, the current study confirmed the success of biosynthesis of ROE-AgNPs from ROE. The color changed to dark brown due to reducing and stabilizing agents such as proteins and phenolic and saponin components of ROE, and this change confirmed the formation of ROE-AgNPs [20]. The change in color was due to surface plasmon resonance (SPR) of ROE-AgNPs. When electric fields of light are directed to ROE-AgNPs, the surface plasmons become excited and begin to resonate. The SPR of ROE-AgNPs authorizes a strong absorption of the incidence light while also allowing some scattering of light; these can be measured using a UV-Vis Spectrometer [40]. In addition, the conjugating efficiency of Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs was high, and this indicates that cefuroxime is not lost during preparation and that a lesser amount is needed for therapeutic application [41,42]. The UV-Vis spectroscopy confirmed the formation of ROE-AgNPs and Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs at the absorption band of about 400–420 nm due to SPR in ROE-AgNPs [21,40] while it confirmed the presence of a peak at 274 nm for pure cefuroxime. The size of the ROE-AgNPs and Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs were in line with the study conducted by Silva et al. [43]. The XRD pattern of ROE-AgNPs and Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs showed four major peaks at 2θ values. The strong intensity, narrow width, and sharpness of ROE-AgNPs diffraction peaks in the XRD pattern signalized that the ROE-AgNPs are well crystallized, while broad peaks of Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs in the XRD pattern suggested that there was a raise in ROE-AgNPs size owing to the attachment of cefuroxime. The XRD result is in line with that of the recently reported work [42].
FTIR spectra of ROE confirmed the presence of major absorption peaks that revealed a stretching peak of -OH and -NH related to phenolics and proteins in addition to flavonoids and saponins (-OH, -C-H-, and -C-O-C-) [20]. These components were involved in the formation of ROE-AgNPs by reducing Ag+ to Ag0 [20,43]. Cefuroxime can be interpreted as peaks stretching of (COO−1), (-NH) bending vibration, and the band of (-NH) stretching [44].
Upon mixing cefuroxime with ROE-AgNPs, the amide C=O group formed. This was confirmed by the shifting of (-NH) peak of ROE-AgNPs toward longer wave numbers that were previously reported by Hameed et al. [14]. This may be due to the conjugation of a carboxylic group in cefuroxime with the amine group of ROE-AgNPs to form an amide group of Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs as well as the presence of a carbonyl group (-C=O) of β lactam stretching [40,41].

4.1. In-Vitro Drug Release

Overall, the cefuroxime released from Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs/BIOD, group C and D discovered a two-step release: a fast release was displayed at first, approximately 19% and 24%, respectively for 10 days, and this fast release highly depended on the strength of the cefuroxime attachment, and the beginning rapid release enabled a therapeutic dose. In the second step, a prolonged and gradual release profile was observed for the next 96 days. In this prolonged and slow step, the release could be related to Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs trapped in the BIOD matrix, and the following long-term release kept this dose during a long period of time that became 56% and 45% of the whole amount, which was obtained from the samples from groups C and D, respectively [45].

4.2. Antimicrobial Activity

The MIC and MBC of the Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs, ROE-AgNPs, and cefuroxime solutions were detected against S. mutans. The difference of MIC and MBC were statistically significant in the case of Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs as compared to ROE-AgNPs or cefuroxime alone. The decrease of MIC in Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs was three-fold compared to MIC of ROE-AgNPs. In addition, the present study showed a high maximum inhibitory zone of Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs against S. mutans compared to ROE-AgNPs or cefuroxime alone. The small size of ROE-AgNPs provides them a greater surface area for maximum cefuroxime conjugation as well as high accessibility for resistant bacteria. This is in agreement with the previous studies, which explained that the addition of AgNPs to antibiotics enhances the antibacterial efficacy of clinically approved drugs [22].
Moreover, the CFU in groups C and D of the Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs sample series decreased significantly. This may be attributed to the fact that bacterial suspension in the culture medium was directly exposed to Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs/BIOD in samples C and D, and that ROE-AgNPs worked as a drug delivery system, which promotes the internalization of the adsorbed cefuroxime, followed by its release. In addition, the various mechanisms of actions of ROE-AgNPs and ionic silver occurred, significantly enhancing S. mutans cell death [21,46]. Recently, various drug-conjugated nanoparticles were developed against resistant microbes [21,42].
The order of the antibacterial rate for group D > group C > group B > group A ≥ group E was confirmed. Group C and D ensured 85.78% and 91.17% inhibition of S. mutant, respectively. This may be attributed to the fact that the addition of ROE-AgNPs enhanced the antibacterial efficacy of cefuroxime and may explain the superior antimicrobial efficacy for BIOD [21,22] compared to the literature studies [47]. In addition, R. officinalis L. was chosen because it effectively reduces bacterial plaque as recorded by Valones et al. [48]. Additionally, R. officinalis L. decreases the viability of the biofilm of oral bacteria [49].
Biofilm formation in relation with dental materials was detected in various dental studies such as biofilm formation related to light-curing conditions and finishing and polishing procedures [50,51,52]. Moreover, the biofilm extracellular matrix was difficult to treat by antimicrobial agents. In our study, the antibiofilm efficiency in group D significantly displayed the highest efficacy due to the presence of Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs in BIOD cement. Mohamed et al. [53] confirmed the anti-biofilm activity of AgNPs alone and in combination with antibiotics. Moreover, the adherence of bacteria was considered to be an important step in the infection [41]. In group D, bacterial suspension in the culture medium was directly exposed to group D. This led to the prevention of bacterial adhesion and the killing of a bacterium, with the subsequent reduction in CFU count [54]. Additionally, Vazquez-Garcia et al. [47] reported that the addition of AgNPs increased antibacterial efficacy for calcium silicate cements (which is similar to BIOD) and favored the mechanical and physicochemical properties of the dental materials.
Currently, the cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs/BIOD are successfully formed and exhibit high antimicrobial activity against resistant S. mutans. It appears as superior antimicrobial efficacy when compared to other forms (Cefuroxime/BIOD or ROE-AgNPs/BIOD), and this finding adds novelty and significance of the study that can be applied in the dental field to prevent secondary caries. In the future, we will study the antimicrobial activity of this novel material in vivo.

5. Conclusions

To conclude the results of the present study, the R. officinalis L. extract is a potential natural product for the green biosynthesis of ROE-AgNPs by reduction of silver salts using reducing agents such as phenolics and proteins in addition to flavonoids and saponins present in ROE and for forming ROE-AgNPs. When cefuroxime was conjugated with ROE-AgNPs, it was revived, and it formed Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs, which mixed with Biodentine™ to form a novel nanobiomaterial. This material has superior antimicrobial activity against resistant S. mutant. Finally, this novel bio-material holds the potential to increase the antimicrobial efficacy against resistant S. mutans and will result in the development of cost-effective dental materials for controlling bacterial infections and dental caries in the future.

Author Contributions

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, S.M.F.G.E.-R.; methodology, S.M.F.G.E.-R. and E.T.E.; formal analysis, S.M.F.G.E.-R. and S.B.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M.F.G.E.-R., A.A.A. (Amal A. Ashour), S.B., A.A.A. (Amal Ahmed Alyamani), N.H.F. and E.T.E.; writing—review and editing, S.M.F.G.E.-R., A.A.A. (Amal A. Ashour), S.B., A.A.A. (Amal Ahmed Alyamani), N.H.F. and E.T.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by Deanship of Scientific Research, Taif University (research project No. 1/439/6084), Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to Deanship of Scientific Research, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia for financial support under the research project number (1/439/6084).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the Rosmarinus officinalis L. extract are available from the authors.

References

  1. Hui, S.H.H.; Ariffin, Z.; Alam, M.K. In-Vitro Study of Antibacterial Properties of Endodontic Sealers and Medications towards Streptococcus mutans and Enterococcus faecalis. Int. Med. J. 1994, 20, 493–495. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jung, Y.; Yoon, J.-Y.; Patel, K.D.; Lee, H.-H.; Ma, L.; Kim, J.; Lee, J.-H.; Shin, J. Biological Effects of Tricalcium Silicate Nanoparticle-Containing Cement on Stem Cells from Human Exfoliated Deciduous Teeth. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Attik, G.N.; Villat, C.; Hallay, F.; Pradelle-Plasse, N.; Bonnet, H.; Moreau, K. In vitro biocompatibility of a dentine substitute cement on human MG63 osteoblasts cells: BiodentineTM versus MTA (1). Int. Endod. J. 2014, 47, 1133–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zanini, M.; Sautier, J.M.; Berdal, A.; Simon, S. Biodentine Induces Immortalized Murine Pulp Cell Differentiation into Odontoblast-like Cells and Stimulates Biomineralization. J. Endod. 2012, 38, 1220–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Niranjani, K.; Prasad, M.G.; Vasa, A.A.; Divya, G.; Thakur, M.S.; Saujanya, K. Clinical evaluation of success of primary teeth pulpotomy using mineral trioxide aggregate®, laser and BiodentineTM—An in vivo study. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2015, 9, ZC35–ZC37. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Tran, X.V.; Gorin, C.; Willig, C.; Baroukh, B.; Pellat, B.; Decup, F. Effect of a calcium-silicate based restorative cement on pulp repair. J. Dent. Res. 2012, 91, 1166–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hashem, D.; Mannocci, F.; Patel, S.; Manoharan, A.; Brown, J.E.; Watson, T.F.; Banerjee, A. Clinical and radiographic assessment of the efficacy of calcium silicate indirect pulp capping: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J. Dent. Res. 2015, 94, 562–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Rajasekharan, S.; Martens, L.C.; Vandenbulcke, J.; Jacquet, W.; Bottenberg, P.; Cauwels, R. Efficacy of three different pulpotomy agents in primary molars: A randomized control trial. Int. Endod. J. 2017, 50, 215–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nikhil, V.; Madan, M.; Suri, N.; Agarwal, C. Effect of addition of 2% chlorhexidine or 10% doxycycline on antimicrobial activity of biodentine. J. Conserv. Dent. 2014, 17, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Oberoi, S.S.; Dhingra, C.; Sharma, G.; Sardana, D. Antibiotics in dental practice: How justifed are we. Int. Dent. J. 2015, 65, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Panigrahi, A.K. Relationship between Inventory Management and Profitability: An Empirical Analysis of Indian Cement Companies. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Manag. Rev. 2013, 2, 107–120. [Google Scholar]
  12. Abo-Shama, U.H.; El-Gendy, H.; Mousa, W.S.; A Hamouda, R.; E Yousuf, W.; Hetta, H.F.; E Abdeen, E. Synergistic and Antagonistic Effects of Metal Nanoparticles in Combination with Antibiotics Against Some Reference Strains of Pathogenic Microorganisms. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020, 13, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Hussain, M.; Nafady, A.; Sherazi, S.T.; Shah, M.R.; Alsalme, A.; Kalhoro, M.S.; Mahesar, S.A.; Siddiqui, S. Cefuroxime derived copper nanoparticles and their application as a colorimetric sensor for trace level detection of picric acid. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 82882–82889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hameed, A.; Fatima, S.; Rahman, F.U.; Yoon, T.-H.; Azam, A.; Khan, S.; Khan, A.; Islam, N.U. Synergistic enzyme inhibition effect of cefuroxime by conjugation with gold and silver. New J. Chem. 2014, 38, 1641–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. A Al-Shamahy, H.; Al-Shami, I.Z.; Al-Hamzi, M.A.; Abdul Majeed, A.L.A. Efficacy of some Antibiotics against Streptococcus Mutans Associated with Tooth decay in Children and their Mothers. Online J. Dent. Oral. Health 2019, 2, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Monowar, T.; Rahman, S.; Bhore, S.J.; Raju, G.; Sathasivam, K.V. Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized by Using the Endophytic Bacterium Pantoea ananatis are Promising Antimicrobial Agents against Multidrug Resistant Bacteria. Molecules 2018, 23, 3220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Jaiswal, S.; Mishra, P. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of curcumin-silver nanoparticles with improved stability and selective toxicity to bacteria over mammalian cells. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2017, 207, 39–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vijayaraghavan, K.; Nalini, S.P.K. Biotemplates in the green synthesis of silver nanoparticles. Biotechnol. J. 2010, 5, 1098–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sharma, V.K.; Yngard, R.A.; Lin, Y. Silver nanoparticles: Green synthesis and their antimicrobial activities. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 145, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ghaedi, M.; Yousefinejad, M.; Safarpoor, M.; Khafri, H.Z.; Purkait, M.K. Rosmarinus officinalis leaf extract mediated green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and investigation of its antimicrobial properties. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 31, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Halawani, E.M.; Hassan, A.M.; El-Rab, S.M.G. Nanoformulation of Biogenic Cefotaxime-Conjugated-Silver Nanoparticles for Enhanced Antibacterial Efficacy Against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria and Anticancer Studies. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 1889–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Kaur, A.; Kumar, R. Enhanced bactericidal efficacy of polymer stabilized silver nanoparticles in conjugation with different classes of antibiotics. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 1095–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kasraei, S.; Sami, L.; Hendi, S.; Alikhani, M.Y.; Rezaei-Soufi, L.; Khamverdi, Z. Antibacterial properties of composite resins incorporating silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus. Restor. Dent. Endod. 2014, 39, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Azarsina, M.; Kasraei, S.; Yousefi-Mashouf, R.; Dehghani, N.; Shirinzad, M. The Antibacterial Properties of Composite Resin Containing Nanosilver against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2013, 14, 1014–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dias, H.B.; Bernardi, M.I.B.; Marangoni, V.S.; Bernardi, A.C.D.A.; Rastelli, A.N.D.S.; Hernandes, A.C. Synthesis, characterization and application of Ag doped ZnO nanoparticles in a composite resin. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 96, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Panpaliya, N.P.; Dahake, P.T.; Kale, Y.J.; Dadpe, M.V.; Kendre, S.B.; Siddiqi, A.G.; Maggavi, U.R. In vitro evaluation of antimicrobial property of silver nanoparticles and chlorhexidine against five different oral pathogenic bacteria. Saudi Dent. J. 2019, 31, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Deveci, C.; Tuzuner, T.; Cinar, C.; E Odabas, M.; Buruk, C.K. Short-term antibacterial activity and compressive strength of biodentine containing chlorhexidine/cetirimide mixtures. Niger. J. Clin. Pract. 2019, 22, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Harshiny, M.; Matheswaran, M.; Arthanareeswaran, G.; Kumaran, S.; Rajasree, S. Enhancement of antibacterial properties of silver nanoparticles–ceftriaxone conjugate through Mukia maderaspatana leaf extract mediated synthesis. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 121, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vavia, P.; Chaudhari, S.; Karnik, A.; Adhikary, A.; Tandale, R. Simultaneous UV spectrophotometric method for the estimation of cefuroxime axetil and probenecid from solid dosage forms. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2006, 68, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gad El-Rab, S.M.F.; Abo-Amer, A.E.; Asiri, A.M. Biogenic Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles and Its Potential Use as Antimicrobial Agent against Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens. Curr. Microbiol. 2020, 77, 1767–1779. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hussein-Al-Ali, S.H.; El Zowalaty, M.E.; Hussein, M.Z.; Ismail, M.; Webster, T.J. Synthesis, characterization, controlled release, and antibacterial studies of a novel streptomycin chitosan magnetic nanoantibiotic. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 549–557. [Google Scholar]
  32. Dubey, S.P.; Lahtinen, M.; Sillanpää, M. Tansy fruit mediated greener synthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles. Process. Biochem. 2010, 45, 1065–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mittal, S.; Soni, H.; Sharma, D.K.; Mittal, K.; Pathania, V.; Sharma, S. Comparative evaluation of the antibacterial and physical properties of conventional glass ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine and antibiotics. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2015, 5, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Caufield, P.W.; Schön, C.N.; Saraithong, P.; Li, Y.; Argimón, S. Oral Lactobacilli and dental caries: A model for niche adaptation in humans. J. Dent. Res. 2015, 94, 110S–118S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Enan, E.T.; A Ashour, A.; Basha, S.; Felemban, N.H.; Gad El-Rab, S.M.F. Antimicrobial activity of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles, amoxicillin, and glass-ionomer cement against Streptococcus mutans and Staphylococcus aureus. Nanotechnology 2021, 32, 215101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically: Approved Standard, 9th ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  37. Hudzicki, J. Kirby-Bauer Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Test Protocol-2009; ASM Microbe Library; American Society for Microbiology: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  38. Souza, J.C.M.; Mota, R.R.C.; Sordi, M.B.; Passoni, B.B.; Benfatti, C.A.M.; Magini, R.S. Biofilm formation on different materials used in oral rehabilitation Braz. Dent. J. 2016, 27, 141–147. [Google Scholar]
  39. Fadl-Allah, S.F.; Montaser, A.A. Gad El-Rab, S.M.F. Biocorrosion control of electroless Ni-Zn-P coating based on carbon steel by the pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2016, 11, 5490–5506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Singh, H.; Du, J.; Singh, P.; Yi, T.H. Ecofriendly synthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles by Euphrasia officinalis leaf extract and its biomedical applications. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2017, 46, 1163–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Shakera, M.; Shaaban, M.I. Formulation of carbapenems loaded gold nanoparticles to combat multi-antibiotic bacterial resistance: In vitro antibacterial study. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 525, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gad El-Rab, S.M.F.; Halawani, E.M.; Hassan, A.M. Formulation of Ceftriaxone Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles and Their Medical Applications against Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Producing Bacteria and Breast Cancer. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 28, 1563–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Silva, H.F.O.; Lima, K.M.G.; Cardoso, M.B.; Oliveira, J.F.A.; Melo, M.C.N.; Sant’Anna, C.; Eugênio, M.; Gasparotto, L.H.S. Doxycycline conjugated with polyvinylpyrrolidone-encapsulated silver nanoparticles: A polymer’s malevolent touch against Escherichia coli. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 66886–66893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fierascu, R.C.; Bunghez, I.R.; Somoghi, R.; Fierascu, I.; Mariana Ion, R. Characterization of silver nanoparticles obtained by using Rosmarinus officinalis extract and their antioxidant activity. Rev. Roum. Chim. 2014, 59, 213–218. [Google Scholar]
  45. Salehi, G.; Behnamghader, A.; Pazouki, M.; Mozafari, M. Metronidazole-loaded glass ionomer dental cements. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2020, 17, 1985–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Brasil, M.; Filgueiras, A.; Campos, M.; Neves, M.; Eugênio, M.; Sena, L.; Sant’Anna, C.; Da Silva, V.; Diniz, C.; Sant’Ana, A. Synergism in the Antibacterial Action of Ternary Mixtures Involving Silver Nanoparticles, Chitosan and Antibiotics. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2018, 29, 2016–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Garcia, F.A.V.; Tanomaru-Filho, M.; Chávez-Andrade, G.; Bosso-Martelo, R.; Basso-Bernardi, M.I.; Guerreiro-Tanomaru, J.M. Effect of Silver Nanoparticles on Physicochemical and Antibacterial Properties of Calcium Silicate Cements. Braz. Dent. J. 2016, 27, 508–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Valones, M.A.A.; Silva, I.C.G.; Gueiros, L.A.M.; Leão, J.C., Jr.; Carvalho, A.A.T.; Caldas, A.F. Clinical Assessment of Rosemary-based Toothpaste (Rosmarinus officinalis Linn.): A Randomized Controlled Double-blind Study. Braz. Dent. J. 2019, 30, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. de Oliveira, J.R.; de Jesus, D.; de Oliveira, L.D. Rosmarinus officinalis L. (rosemary) extract decreases the biofilms viability of oral health interest. Braz. Dent. Sci. 2017, 20, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ionescu, A.C.; Cazzaniga, G.; Ottobelli, M.; Ferracane, J.L.; Paolone, G.; Brambilla, E. In vitro biofilm formation on resin-based composites cured under different surface conditions. J. Dent. 2018, 77, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cazzaniga, G.; Ottobelli, M.; Ionescu, A.; Paolone, G.; Gherlone, E.; Ferracane, J.L.; Brambilla, E. In vitro biofilm formation on resin-based composites after different finishing and polishing procedures. J. Dent. 2017, 67, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Marigo, L.; Nocca, G.; Fiorenzano, G.; Callà, C.; Castagnola, R.; Cordaro, M.; Paolone, G.; Sauro, S. Influences of Different Air-Inhibition Coatings on Monomer Release, Microhardness, and Color Stability of Two Composite Materials. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 4240264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Mohamed, M.S.; Mostafa, H.M.; Mohamed, S.H.; El-Moez, S.I.A.; Kamel, Z. Combination of Silver Nanoparticles and Vancomycin to Overcome Antibiotic Resistance in Planktonic/Biofilm Cell from Clinical and Animal Source. Microb. Drug Resist. 2020, 26, 1410–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Niu, X.; Sun, L.; Zhang, X.; Sun, Y.; Wang, J. Fabrication and antibacterial properties of cefuroxime-loaded TiO2 nanotubes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 2947–2955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 26 06832 g001 550
Figure 1. Cefuroxime structure.
Figure 1. Cefuroxime structure.
Molecules 26 06832 g001
Molecules 26 06832 g002 550
Figure 2. (I) Biosynthesis of AgNPs. Notes: UV-Vis spectra of ROE-AgNPs (A) conjugated with cefuroxime (B) to form Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs (C). (II) TEM images of the ROE-AgNPs synthesized using R. officinalis extract (A) and Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs (B). (III) XRD patterns of the synthesized ROE-AgNPs (A) and Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs (B); “*” reveal to residual materials and the numbers in brackets represent the planes of Ag face-centered cubic crystal structures. (IV) FTIR spectra of R. officinalis extract (A), the synthesized ROE-AgNPs (B), Cefuroxime (C), and Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs (D).
Figure 2. (I) Biosynthesis of AgNPs. Notes: UV-Vis spectra of ROE-AgNPs (A) conjugated with cefuroxime (B) to form Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs (C). (II) TEM images of the ROE-AgNPs synthesized using R. officinalis extract (A) and Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs (B). (III) XRD patterns of the synthesized ROE-AgNPs (A) and Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs (B); “*” reveal to residual materials and the numbers in brackets represent the planes of Ag face-centered cubic crystal structures. (IV) FTIR spectra of R. officinalis extract (A), the synthesized ROE-AgNPs (B), Cefuroxime (C), and Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs (D).
Molecules 26 06832 g002
Molecules 26 06832 g003 550
Figure 3. (I) External standard linear curve of cefuroxime with limit of detection (LOD = 0.198298). (II) In vitro drug release profile Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs/BIOD. Group (C) C—99% BIOD with 1% Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs nanontibiotic, (1:1) and Group (D) D—98% BIOD with 2% Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs nanontibiotic (1:3).
Figure 3. (I) External standard linear curve of cefuroxime with limit of detection (LOD = 0.198298). (II) In vitro drug release profile Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs/BIOD. Group (C) C—99% BIOD with 1% Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs nanontibiotic, (1:1) and Group (D) D—98% BIOD with 2% Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs nanontibiotic (1:3).
Molecules 26 06832 g003
Molecules 26 06832 g004 550
Figure 4. CFU of S. mutans cultivated with different samples: (A) Group A BIOD; (B) Group B—0.5% ROE-AgNPs with 99.5% BIOD; Group (C) C—99% BIOD with 1% Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs nanontibiotic (1:1); Group (D) D—98% BIOD with 2% Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs nanontibiotic (1:3); Group (E) E—98.5% BIOD with 1.5% cefuroxime.
Figure 4. CFU of S. mutans cultivated with different samples: (A) Group A BIOD; (B) Group B—0.5% ROE-AgNPs with 99.5% BIOD; Group (C) C—99% BIOD with 1% Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs nanontibiotic (1:1); Group (D) D—98% BIOD with 2% Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs nanontibiotic (1:3); Group (E) E—98.5% BIOD with 1.5% cefuroxime.
Molecules 26 06832 g004
Molecules 26 06832 g005 550
Figure 5. Antibacterial rate (R) of specimens against S. mutans. R (%), antibacterial rate. (A) Group A BIOD; (B) Group B—0.5% ROE-AgNPs with 99.5% BIOD; Group (C) C—99% BIOD with 1% Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs nanontibiotic (1:1); Group (D) D—98% BIOD with 2% Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs nanontibiotic (1:3); Group (E) E—98.5% BIOD with 1.5% cefuroxime.
Figure 5. Antibacterial rate (R) of specimens against S. mutans. R (%), antibacterial rate. (A) Group A BIOD; (B) Group B—0.5% ROE-AgNPs with 99.5% BIOD; Group (C) C—99% BIOD with 1% Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs nanontibiotic (1:1); Group (D) D—98% BIOD with 2% Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs nanontibiotic (1:3); Group (E) E—98.5% BIOD with 1.5% cefuroxime.
Molecules 26 06832 g005
Molecules 26 06832 g006 550
Figure 6. SEM micrographs of the bacteria S. mutans after 24 h of incubation time. The micrographs were made on (I) Group A—BIOD; (II) Group E—98.5% BIOD with 1.5% cefuroxime; (III) Group B—99.5% BIOD with 0.5% ROE-AgNPs; (IV) D—98% BIOD with 2% Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs nanontibiotic (1:3).
Figure 6. SEM micrographs of the bacteria S. mutans after 24 h of incubation time. The micrographs were made on (I) Group A—BIOD; (II) Group E—98.5% BIOD with 1.5% cefuroxime; (III) Group B—99.5% BIOD with 0.5% ROE-AgNPs; (IV) D—98% BIOD with 2% Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs nanontibiotic (1:3).
Molecules 26 06832 g006
Table
Table 1. Detail of the Biodentine™ material.
Table 1. Detail of the Biodentine™ material.
PowderLiquid
Tricalcium silicate, dicalcium silicate, calcium carbonate and oxide, iron oxide, and zirconium oxideCalcium chloride and hydro soluble polymer
(Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fosses Cedex, France)
Table
Table 2. Proportion of the experimental materials added to Conventional BIOD cement.
Table 2. Proportion of the experimental materials added to Conventional BIOD cement.
Group NameAbbreviation Components
Group A (control)BIODconventional BIOD without any addition.
Group BROE-AgNPs/BIOD(99.5% BIOD with 0.5% ROE-AgNPs, w/w).
Group C0.5% Cefuroxime-0.5% ROE-AgNPs/BIOD(99% BIOD with 1% Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs (1:1), w/w).
Group D1.5% Cefuroxime-0.5% ROE-AgNPs/BIOD(98% BIOD with 2% Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs (1:3), w/w).
Group ECefuroxime/BIOD(98.5% BIOD with 1.5% Cefuroxime, w/w).
Table
Table 3. Minimum inhibitory concentration of the solutions against S. mutant.
Table 3. Minimum inhibitory concentration of the solutions against S. mutant.
ProductMICANOVA
F Value		ANOVA
p Value		Tukey Post HocMBC (µg/mL)ANOVA
F Value		ANOVA
p Value		Tukey Post Hoc
Cefuroxime a0.27 ± 5.3 mg/mL21.320.0001c < a, b
b < a		0.57 ± 7.3 mg/mL15.420.03c < b, a
b < a
AgNPs b25 ± 2.0 µg/mL35 ± 1.1 µg/mL
Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs c8.5 ± 1.3 µg/mL16 ± 0.8 µg/mL
a—Cefuroxime, b—ROE-AgNPs, c—Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs.
Table
Table 4. Antimicrobial efficiency of biomaterial against S. mutans.
Table 4. Antimicrobial efficiency of biomaterial against S. mutans.
Samples (Groups) Inhibition Zone (mm)ANOVA
F Value		ANOVA
p Value		Tukey Post Hoc
1 Day2 Weeks3 Weeks
a. Group A877NANANA
b. Group B15 ± 2.5112 ± 1.5210 ± 0.57 8.71 0.03 1 day > 2 and 3rd week
c. Group C19 ± 1.1515 ± 0.5713 ± 1.00 9.36 0.02 1 day > 2 and 3rd week
d. Group D26 ± 1.5222 ± 1.5217 ± 1.15 15.24 0.001 1 day > 2 and 3rd week
e. Group E877NANANA
ANOVA F Value 19.72 13.27 17.19
ANOVA p Value 0.0001 0.001 0.001
Tukey post Hocd < c, b
c < b		d < c, b
c < b		d < c, b
c < b
Group A BIOD; (B) Group B—0.5% ROE-AgNPs with 99.5% BIOD; Group (C) C—99% BIOD with 1% Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs nanontibiotic (1:1); Group (D) D—98% BIOD with 2% Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs nanontibiotic (1:3); Group (E) E—98.5% BIOD with 1.5% cefuroxime.
Table
Table 5. Antibacterial rate (AR) of specimens against S. mutans.
Table 5. Antibacterial rate (AR) of specimens against S. mutans.
SamplesAR (%)
A1.7 ± 0.10
B45.07 ± 1.22
C85.78 ± 0.92
D91.17 ± 1.12
E1.8 ± 0.110
F Value ANOVA19.34
p value ANOVA0.001
Tukey post HocD < B, C
C < B
AR (%), antibacterial rate. Group A BIOD; (B) Group B—0.5% ROE-AgNPs with 99.5% BIOD; Group (C) C—99% BIOD with 1% Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs nanontibiotic (1:1); Group (D) D—98% BIOD with 2% Cefuroxime-ROE-AgNPs nanontibiotic (1:3); Group (E) E—98.5% BIOD with 1.5% cefuroxime.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gad El-Rab, S.M.F.; Ashour, A.A.; Basha, S.; Alyamani, A.A.; Felemban, N.H.; Enan, E.T. Well-Orientation Strategy Biosynthesis of Cefuroxime-Silver Nanoantibiotic for Reinforced Biodentine™ and Its Dental Application against Streptococcus mutans. Molecules 2021, 26, 6832. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226832

AMA Style

Gad El-Rab SMF, Ashour AA, Basha S, Alyamani AA, Felemban NH, Enan ET. Well-Orientation Strategy Biosynthesis of Cefuroxime-Silver Nanoantibiotic for Reinforced Biodentine™ and Its Dental Application against Streptococcus mutans. Molecules. 2021; 26(22):6832. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226832

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gad El-Rab, Sanaa M. F., Amal A. Ashour, Sakeenabi Basha, Amal Ahmed Alyamani, Nayef H. Felemban, and Enas Tawfik Enan. 2021. "Well-Orientation Strategy Biosynthesis of Cefuroxime-Silver Nanoantibiotic for Reinforced Biodentine™ and Its Dental Application against Streptococcus mutans" Molecules 26, no. 22: 6832. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226832

APA Style

Gad El-Rab, S. M. F., Ashour, A. A., Basha, S., Alyamani, A. A., Felemban, N. H., & Enan, E. T. (2021). Well-Orientation Strategy Biosynthesis of Cefuroxime-Silver Nanoantibiotic for Reinforced Biodentine™ and Its Dental Application against Streptococcus mutans. Molecules, 26(22), 6832. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226832

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop