Next Article in Journal
Capric Acid Behaves Agonistic Effect on Calcitriol to Control Inflammatory Mediators in Colon Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Extracts and Flavonoids from Drosera rotundifolia L. on Ciliary Beat Frequency and Murine Airway Smooth Muscle
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Novel Utilization of Water Extract of Suaeda Salsa in the Pd/C Catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling Reaction

1
College of Pharmacy, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563003, China
2
Key Laboratory of Basic Pharmacology of Ministry of Education and Joint International Research Laboratory of Ethnomedicine of Ministry of Education, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China
3
Guizhou International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base for Medical Photo-Theranostics Technology and Innovative Drug Development, Zunyi 563003, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(19), 6623; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27196623
Submission received: 14 September 2022 / Revised: 1 October 2022 / Accepted: 3 October 2022 / Published: 6 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Green and Sustainable Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Using biomass-derived solvents in various organic reactions is challenging for the fine chemicals industry. We herein report a Pd/C catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura reaction in water extract of suaeda salsa (WES) without using external phosphine ligand, base, and organic solvent. The cross-coupling reactions were carried out in a basic WES medium with a broad substrate scope and wide functional group tolerance. Furthermore, the high purity of solid biaryl products can be obtained by column chromatography or filtration.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Green chemistry has demonstrated how fundamental scientific methodologies can protect the environment and human health in an economically safer way [1,2]. More researchers have focused on using sustainable technologies to manufacture fine chemicals and pharmaceuticals [3,4,5]. In this context, the development of greener or sustainable solvents, such as water [6], ionic liquids [7], supercritical fluids [8], and deep eutectic solvents [9], for organic reactions has attracted great attention. Recently, biomass-derived solvents as a novel green reaction medium have been successfully employed in many organic reactions, such as transition-metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions [10], Dakin reaction [11], Henry reaction [12], peptide synthesis [13], amides synthesis, and biodiesel synthesis [14]. Biaryl and heteroaryl are fundamental units of numerous natural products and advanced functional materials [15]. Palladium-catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura (S–M) cross-coupling reaction has been recognized as one of the most effective methods for preparing biaryl and heteroaryl compounds [16,17,18,19]. Over the past decade, some research results demonstrated that S–M reactions could be carried out by treated plant materials and bio-wastes, which bear the features of eco-friendliness, cost-effectiveness, and safety. In 2015, Saikia and co-workers [20] reported the Pd(OAc)2-catalyzed S–M reaction in the presence of WEB (water extract of banana peel) at room temperature. The substrates in the reaction system showed excellent conversion under base, ligand, and organic solvent-free conditions. Subsequently, WERSA [21] (water extract of rice straw ash) and ESP [22] (eggshell powder) for the ligand-free S–M coupling reaction at room temperature were reported by Sarma group. Later, Bora and co-workers employed the water extract of waste papaya bark ash [23] and eichhornia crassipes ash [24], respectively, in the S–M reaction, which provided in situ basic conditions generated by the metal ions from plant materials ash. Suaeda salsa is a genus of plants that is non-toxic and has a wide geographical distribution around the world, so it is a type of natural feedstock. However, the application of suaeda salsa in chemistry is still not reported. In this paper, we report a Pd/C catalyzed S–M reaction in water extract of suaeda salsa ash (WES). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report about using WES as a solvent for organic reaction.

2. Results and Discussion

The water extract of suaeda salsa (WES) was prepared by burning oven-dried suaeda salsa into ashes. After that, 10 g of the ash was suspended in 100 mL distilled water and stirred for 2 h at 100 °C. The suspension was then filtered, and a light-yellow colored extract was obtained (Figure 1a). We first investigated the effect of WES concentration on the S–M reaction. Therefore, the WES solution was evaporated to light yellow solid powder which was further used to prepare a series of solutions with different concentrations. The cross-coupling of 4-bromoacetophenone with phenylboronic acid was chosen as the model reaction to explore the optimized concentration of the WES solution. As shown in Figure 1b, the S–M reaction did not proceed without the WES solution. The cross-coupling product yield increased with the increase of WES concentration. The highest product yield of 87% was obtained when the concentration of WES was 23 mg/mL. However, the product yield decreased after further increasing the concentration of WES, indicating that the concentration strongly affects the reaction. Mechanistic studies of S–M reaction indicated that bases were required in the transmetallation step for the formation of PhB(OH)3− from PhB(OH)2, however, an excess of base could suppress the process of the S–M reaction, which is consistent with our observations [24,25,26]. We also tested the pH of each WES solution at different concentrations in the S–M reaction, which were in the range of 10.3~10.5, indicating a limited change of basicity in the WES solution. Therefore, the WES solution at a concentration of 23 mg/mL was selected as the solvent for the following study.
To illustrate the origin of the basicity and to analyze the species and concentrations of the remaining elements, the suaeda salsa ash was characterized by energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX), revealing an abundance of the K, Na, and O (Figure 2). This suggests the presence of alkaline oxides or carbonates, which account for the basicity of extract.
Several control examples were carried out to explore the differences of S–M reaction in WES media and commonly used alkaline aqueous solution system. The results were summarized in Scheme 1. The S–M reactions between different aryl halides and aryl boronic acids performed smoothly in WES, and the corresponding cross-coupling products 3a, 3b, and 3c were obtained in good yields. On the other hand, the same S–M reactions in water with inorganic or organic bases showed poor activity. This result indicates that the S–M reaction using WES was more efficient than the traditional S–M system using basic aqueous solution.
The cross-coupling reaction of 4-bromoacetophenone and phenylboronic acid in WES (23 mg/mL) was selected as a model reaction to optimize reaction conditions. The effect of the temperature was initially investigated, and a 94% yield of the cross-coupling product could be achieved at 100 °C (Table 1, entry 4). We were pleased to find that the model cross-coupling reaction still provided a 94% product yield when the loading of Pd/C decreased to 0.2 mol% (Table 1, entry 6). However, the product yield decreased significantly when the loading of Pd/C was lower than 0.2 mol% (Table 2, entry 7). Furthermore, other supported Pd catalysts were investigated, Pd/CaCO3 and Pd/BaSO4 showed almost identical catalytic activity (Table 2, entries 9 and 10), but Pd/Al2O3 gave a low product yield (Table 2, entry 8). Therefore, the optimized reaction conditions for this cross-coupling reaction are 0.2 mol% Pd/C, 3 mL WES at 100 °C.
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, the scope and functional-group tolerance of aryl bromides and arylboronic acids were explored in this protocol. As shown in Table 2, 4-bromobenzonitrile coupled efficiently with phenylboronic acid to afford a 94% yield of 3e through silica gel column chromatography (Table 2, entry 1). It is interesting to note that the starting materials were completely reacted, and no side product of biphenyl was observed after reaction. Since the product 3e is insoluble in water, we assumed that it might be possible to obtain 3e by filtration. Therefore, we performed the same cross-coupling reaction again. The mixture was filtered through a filter funnel after reaction. The filter cake was next washed three times with water to remove the water-soluble substances. Then, the filter cake was dissolved in ethyl acetate, followed by filtration of the solution again and the ethyl acetate was concentrated in a vacuum to obtain 3e in 92% yield with high purity (Table 2, entry 1). Therefore, in the following substrate extensions, we employed filtration for separate solid biaryl products. Aryl bromides containing an electron-withdrawing group showed good reactivity in this protocol (Table 2, entries 2–5), however, 4-bromobenzoic acid provided only a 36% yield of 3i due to acidity of carboxyl group (Table 2, entry 6). The cross-coupling of 1-bromo-4-methylbenzene and phenylboronic acid afforded 3k in 13% yield (Table 2, entry 8). Aryl bromides with a group at the para or meta position were also tested, and moderate to good product yields were observed (Table 2, entries 9–13). Arylboronic acids with various groups reacted smoothly with electron-poor or electron-rich aryl bromides to provide the corresponding cross-coupling products in good yields (Table 2, entries 14–25). However, o-tolylboronic acid showed low activity because of the steric effect (Table 2, entries 26 and 27). Other arylboron compounds were also explored, but only potassium trifluorophenyl gave 3e in 49% yield (Table 2, entry 29).
A variety of aryl/heteroaryl halides and boronic acids were tested to further explore the scope of the present protocol. To achieve better conversion of these substrates, we used 1 mol% Pd/C as the catalyst in the following study. As shown in Scheme 2, the cross-coupling reaction of 2-naphthaleneboronic acid with aryl bromides gave the desired products in good yield (Scheme 2, 3ab and 3ac). Arylboronic acids containing three methoxy groups provided the corresponding products 3ad in an 81% yield. 4-(Diphenylamino)phenylboronic acid coupled with 5-bromoisobenzofuran-1(3H)-one to give the corresponding product 3ae in a 62% yield. In addition, cross-coupling products of 3af and 3ag can be obtained in moderate yield. However, (3,4,5-trifluorophenyl)boronic acid coupled with 5-bromobenzo[d][1,3]dioxole to afford 3ah in only a 50% yield. Notably, this catalytic system is also tolerant of various heteroaryl bromides. The cross-coupling products 3ai-3ak can be obtained with a yield of 73–80%. 2-Acetyl-5-bromothiophene coupled with phenylboronic acid to provide 3al in an 85% yield. However, 2-brominethiophene as substrate only gave a 30% yield of 3am.
Valsartan (Diovan) is therapeutically useful in treating congestive heart failure and high blood pressure. 2-Cyano-4-methylbiphenyl is the core intermediate of valsartan, which can be prepared by S-M cross-coupling reaction [27]. Next, we explored the preparation of 2-cyano-4-methylbiphenyl in gram scale using WES as a reaction medium. As shown in Scheme 3, 2-bromobenzonitrile was coupled with p-tolylboronic acid in WES for 6 h in the presence of 1 mol% Pd/C and then 1.12 g 2-cyano-4-methylbiphenyl was obtained by column chromatography in a 72% yield.
In further experiments, the model reaction was carried out in gram scale to test the reusability of the Pd/C catalyst under optimized condition. After the first reaction cycle, the Pd/C catalyst was recovered by simple filtration, then washed with water and ethyl acetate, and eventually dried overnight for use in the next reaction cycle. For the first three reaction cycles, the yield of 3d dropped slightly. However, in the fifth cycle, only a 52% yield of 3d was obtained after 8 h, which was probably attributed to the loss of Pd species due to repeated filtration (Table 3, entry 5).

3. Experimental Section

3.1. General Remarks

All commercially available reagents (from Acros, Aldrich, Fluka, Energy Chemical) were used without further purification. 10 wt. % Pd/C was purchased from Energy Chemical (Palladium 10% on Carbon, ca. 50% water). All reactions were carried out under air. NMR spectra were recorded on a Brucker Advance II 400 spectrometer using TMS as internal standard (400 MHz for 1H NMR and 13C NMR). The isolated yield of products was obtained by short chromatography on a silica gel (200–300 mesh) column using petroleum ether (60–90 °C) and ethyl acetate, unless otherwise noted.

3.2. The Procedure for Preparing Water Extract of Suaeda Salsa

The suaeda salsa was dried overnight in an oven at 120 °C, then the dried suaeda salsa was burned to ash. After that, 10 g of the ash was suspended in 100 mL distilled water and stirred for 2 h at 100 °C. The suspension was filtered, and the light yellow colored solution was next concentrated to give a yellow solid substance, which was used to prepare suaeda salsa aqueous solution with a concentration of 23 mg/mL for Suzuki cross-coupling reactions.

3.3. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Biaryl and Heteroaryl Compounds

A mixture of aryl halide (0.5 mmol), arylboronic acid (0.525 mmol), 10 wt.% Pd/C (0.2–1 mol%), and WES solution (23 mg/mL, 3 mL) was stirred at 100 °C under air for the indicated time. After reaction, the mixture was cooled to room temperature. [a] The mixture was filtered and washed by water (10 mL) three times. The residue was dissolved in ethyl acetate (20 mL) and then filtered to remove the palladium carbon. Then, the ethyl acetate was collected and concentrated in vacuo to give the pure product. [b] The mixture was concentrated in vacuo and the product was isolated by short chromatography on a silica gel (200–300 mesh) column using petroleum ether and ethyl acetate.
4′-Fluoro-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-carbaldehyde (3a), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.06 (s, 1H), 7.96 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.72 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.65–7.56 (m, 3H), 7.18 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.8, 146.1, 135.1, 130.3, 129.0, 128.9, 127.5, 116.0, 115.8.
4′-Methylbiphenyl-4-carbonitrile (3b), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.68 (dd, J = 16.1, 7.3 Hz, 4H), 7.49 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.36–7.08 (m, 2H), 2.41 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 145.5, 138.7, 136.2, 132.5, 129.8, 127.4, 127.0, 119.0, 110.5, 21.1.
3,4,4′-Trimethoxy-1,1′-bipheny (3c). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.49 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.17–7.02 (m, 2H), 6.95 (dd, J = 14.4, 8.3 Hz, 3H), 3.94 (s, 3H), 3.92 (s, 3H), 3.85 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.8, 149.0, 148.1, 133.9, 133.6, 127.8, 118.9, 114.1, 111.4, 110.1, 55.9, 55.9, 55.3.
4-Acetylbiphenyl (3d), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.04 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.69 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.63 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.48 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.40 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 2.64 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.9, 145.9, 139.9, 135.9, 129.0, 129.0, 128.3, 127.4, 127.3, 26.8.
4-Carbonitrilebiphenyl (3e), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.73 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.69 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.59 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.46–7.39 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 145.8, 139.3, 132.7, 129.2, 128.7, 127.87, 127.3, 119.0, 111.0.
4-Nitrobiphenyl (3f), yellow solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.30 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 7.74 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.63 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.58–7.36 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 147.7, 138.9, 129.3, 129.0, 127.9, 127.5, 124.2.
4-Carbaldehydebiphenyl (3g), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.06 (s, 1H), 7.96 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.76 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.64 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 7.49 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 7.43 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.9, 147.18 139.7, 135.1, 130.2, 129.0, 128.4, 127.6, 127.3.
[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-ol (3h), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.55 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 7.49 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 4.88 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.1, 140.8, 134.1, 128.8, 128.5, 126.8, 115.7.
[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-carboxylic acid (3i), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 13.02 (s, 1H), 8.02 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.80 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.74 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 7.50 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 7.46–7.34 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 167.5, 144.7, 139.4, 130.3, 130.0, 129.5, 128.7, 127.3, 127.2.
4-Methoxy-1,1′-biphenyl (3j), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.56 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 4H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.32 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 3.87 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.2, 140.9, 133.9, 128.8, 128.2, 126.8, 126.7, 114.3, 55.4.
4-Methyl-1,1′-biphenyl (3k), colorless liquid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.57 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.49 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.24 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.39 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 141.1, 138.3, 137.0, 129.4, 128.7, 127.1, 126.9, 126.9, 21.11.
Biphenyl-3-carbonitrile (3l), colorless liquid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.85 (s, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (dt, J = 10.0, 4.9 Hz, 3H), 7.47 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.41 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 142.5, 138.9, 131.5, 130.7, 129.6, 129.2, 128.4, 127.1, 118.9, 113.0.
3-Nitro-1,1′-biphenyl (3m), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.46 (s, 1H), 8.20 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 1H), 7.92 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.64–7.59 (m, 3H), 7.50 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.66–7.58 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 142.8, 138.6, 133.0, 129.7, 129.1, 128.5, 127.1, 122.0, 121.9.
3-Methoxy-1,1′-biphenyl (3n), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.65 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.48 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.45–7.34 (m, 2H), 7.24 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (s, 1H), 6.95 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 0H), 3.89 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.9, 142.8, 141.1, 129.8, 128.8, 127.4, 127.2, 119.7, 112.9, 112.7, 55.3.
2-Carbonitrilebiphenyl (3o), colorless liquid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.77 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.57 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.55–7.37 (m, 5H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 145.4, 138.1, 133.7, 132.8, 130.0, 128.7, 128.7, 127.5, 118.7, 111.2.
2-Methoxy-1,1′-biphenyl (3p), colourless liquid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.52 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.38 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 7.29 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 3H), 7.01 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 3.76 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ156.46, 138.54, 130.88, 130.73, 129.53, 128.60, 127.96, 126.90, 120.82, 111.24, 77.34, 77.02, 76.70, 55.55.
4′-Fluoro-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-carbonitrile (3q), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.73 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.64 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.56 (dd, J = 8.0, 5.6 Hz, 2H), 7.18 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, cdcl3) δ 164.4, 161.9, 144.6, 135.3, 135.2, 132.6, 128.9, 128.9, 127.5, 118.8, 116.2, 116.0, 110.9.
4′-Methoxybiphenyl-4-carbonitrile (3r), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.69 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 7.64 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.54 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.01 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 3.87 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 160.1, 145.2, 132.5, 131.4, 128.3, 127.1, 119.0, 114.5, 110.0, 55.4.
3′,4′-Dimethoxy-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-carbonitrile (3s), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.67 (dd, J = 20.1, 7.6 Hz, 4H), 7.17 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (s, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 3.95 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ149.74, 149.42, 145.42, 132.54, 131.94, 127.27, 119.84, 119.02, 111.57, 110.22, 77.33, 77.01, 76.69, 56.01.
4′-Methyl-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-carbaldehyde (3t), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.05 (s, 1H), 7.94 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.74 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.55 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.29 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 2.42 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.9, 147.1, 138.5, 136.7, 134.9, 130.2, 129.7, 127.3, 127.1, 21.1.
4′-Methoxy-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-carbaldehyde (3u), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.03 (s, 1H), 7.92 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.71 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.59 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.01 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 3.87 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.8, 160.0, 146.7, 134.6, 132.0, 130.3, 128.4, 127.0, 114.4, 55.3.
4-Methoxy-4′-methyl-1,1′-biphenyl (3v), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.51 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.44 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.22 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.96 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 2.38 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.9, 137.9, 136.3, 133.7, 129.4, 127.9, 126.5, 114.1, 55.3, 21.0.
4,4′-Dimethoxy-1,1′-biphenyl (3w), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.48 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 4H), 6.96 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 4H), 3.84 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.6, 133.4, 127.7, 114.1, 55.3.
4-Fluoro-4′-methoxy-1,1′-biphenyl (3x), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.62–7.35 (m, 2H), 7.10 (t, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.97 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 3.85 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 163.2, 160.8, 159.0, 136.9, 136.9, 132.8, 128.2, 128.1, 128.0, 115.6, 115.4, 114.2, 55.3.
4-Chloro-4′-methoxy-1,1′-biphenyl (3y), brown solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, cdcl3) δ 7.51–7.44 (m, 4H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.98 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 3.85 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, cdcl3) δ 159.3, 139.2, 132.6, 132.4, 128.8, 127.9, 127.9, 114.2, 55.3.
2-Methoxy-2′-methylbiphenyl (3z), colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.34 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 7.29–7.09 (m, 5H), 7.06–6.91 (m, 2H), 3.76 (s, 3H), 2.14 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 156.5, 138.5, 136.8, 130.9, 130.7, 129.9, 129.5, 128.5, 127.2, 125.4, 120.4, 110.5, 55.3, 19.9.
2′-Methyl-[1,1′-biphenyl]-2-carbonitrile (3aa), colorless liquid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.73 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.39–7.24 (m, 4H), 7.21 (t, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 2.19 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 145.8, 138.0, 135.6, 132.8, 132.5, 130.4, 130.4, 129.4, 128.7, 127.5, 125.8, 118.1, 112.8, 19.9.
2,2′-Binaphthalene (3ab), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.16 (s, 2H), 7.94 (dd, J = 10.5, 8.2 Hz, 4H), 7.90–7.83 (m, 4H), 7.51 (ddd, J = 7.3, 6.0, 3.4 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.3, 133.7, 132.6, 128.4, 128.2, 127.6, 126.3, 126.0, 125.9, 125.7.
4-(4-(Naphthalen-2-yl)phenyl)morpholine (3ac), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.01 (s, 1H), 7.94–7.81 (m, 3H), 7.74 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.67 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.56–7.42 (m, J = 6.9, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 7.02 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 3.94–3.85 (m, 4H), 3.26–3.18 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 137.9, 133.7, 132.3, 128.3, 128.1, 128.0, 127.6, 126.2, 125.6, 125.2, 124.7, 116.1, 66.7, 49.4.
4-(3′,4′,5′-Trimethoxy-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yl)morpholine (3ad), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.54–7.41 (m, 2H), 6.97 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.72 (s, 2H), 3.93–3.85 (m, 13H), 3.23–3.14 (m, 4H). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.3, 137.5, 137.0, 136.8, 127.7, 115.7, 104.6, 103.8, 92.8, 66.7, 60.9, 56.1, 49.2.
5-(4-(Diphenylamino)phenyl)isobenzofuran-1(3H)-one (3ae), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.93 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (s, 1H), 7.51–7.44 (m, 2H), 7.28 (tt, J = 3.7, 1.9 Hz, 4H), 7.17–7.10 (m, 6H), 7.10–7.03 (m, 2H), 5.34 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 148.5, 147.4, 147.2, 146.8, 132.6, 129.4, 128.1, 127.7, 126.0, 124.9, 123.7.
2-(4-(Tert-butyl)phenyl)-9H-fluorene (3af), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.83 (dd, J = 15.7, 7.7 Hz, 3H), 7.64 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 3H), 7.58 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 3.97 (s, 2H), 1.42 (s, 9H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 150.1, 143.8, 143.4, 141.4, 140.6, 139.7, 138.5, 126.8, 126.6, 125.8, 125.7, 125.0, 123.6, 120.0, 119.9, 37.0, 34.5, 31.4.
2-(3,5-Dimethylphenyl)-9H-fluoren-9-one (3ag), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.85 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.70–7.61 (m, 2H), 7.53–7.43 (m, 3H), 7.27 (dd, J = 7.1, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (s, 3H), 7.00 (s, 1H), 2.37 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 193.9, 144.3, 142.9, 142.4, 139.6, 138.4, 134.7, 134.4, 133.0, 129.5, 128.8, 124.6, 124.3, 122.9, 120.5, 120.3, 21.38.
5-(3,4,5-Trifluorophenyl)benzo[d][1,3]dioxole (3ah), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.13–7.00 (m, 2H), 6.98–6.89 (m, 2H), 6.85 (dd, J = 7.3, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 6.00 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.6, 150.1, 148.3, 147.9, 140.1, 137.6, 137.0, 132.4, 120.5, 110.7, 108.7, 107.2, 101.4.
2-(P-tolyl)pyridine (3ai), yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.68 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, 1H), 7.90 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.78–7.64 (m, 2H), 7.28 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.24–7.14 (m, 1H), 2.41 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.4, 149.5, 138.9, 136.6, 136.5, 129.4, 126.7, 121.7, 120.2, 21.2.
2-Methoxy-6-(4-Methoxyphenyl)pyridine (3aj), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.01 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.59 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.97 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 6.63 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 4.03 (s, 3H), 3.86 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 163.6, 160.3, 154.4, 139.0, 131.7, 127.9, 113.9, 111.9, 108.2, 55.3, 53.1.
5-Methoxy-2-(4-Methoxyphenyl)pyridine (3ak), white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.34 (s, 1H), 7.74 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.98 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.80 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 3.97 (s, 3H), 3.85 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 163.1, 159.1, 144.4, 137.1, 130.4, 129.7, 127.7, 114.4, 110.6, 55.3, 53.4.
5-Acetyl-2-phenylthiophene (3al), yellow solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.70–7.62 (m, 3H), 7.40 (dt, J = 13.9, 7.0 Hz, 3H), 7.32 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H), 2.57 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.5, 152.7, 143.1, 133.4, 129.1, 126.2, 123.8, 26.5.
2-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)thiophene (3am), yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.25–7.14 (m, 3H), 7.11 (s, 1H), 7.08–7.02 (m, 1H), 6.88 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 3.94 (s, 3H), 3.91 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 149.1, 148.7, 144.4, 127.8, 127.5, 123.9, 122.3, 118.5, 111.4, 109.5, 55.9.
4′-Methyl-[1,1′-biphenyl]-2-carbonitrile (3an), white solid, 105–106 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.69 (q, J = 8.3 Hz, 4H), 7.49 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.34–7.27 (m, 2H), 2.41 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 145.5, 138.7, 136.2, 132.5, 129.8, 127.4, 127.0, 119.0, 110.5, 21.1.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have developed a simple, efficient, and biomass-based Suzuki–Miyuara reaction system without using organic solvents, promoters, and ligands. A wide range of aryl/heteroaryl bromides coupled with arylboronic acids to provide the corresponding products in good yields. In addition, most solid cross-coupling products can be easily isolated by filtration. To the best of our knowledge, suaeda salsa has not been reported as a reaction media in organic reactions. We expect the suaeda salsa will demonstrate more potential in organic chemistry in the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27196623/s1, Supplementary Materials file (1H and 13C NMR spectra).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and investigation, C.R. and H.Z.; validation, Z.C. and M.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, X.L.; writing—review and editing, J.G.; resources, Z.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 22267025, 82060626, 22065042); the Guizhou Science and Technology Foundation ZK[2021]038; the cultivation project plan of new seeding cultivation and innovation exploration special project of Zunyi Medical University; and the platform talents of Qiankehe (Grant/Award No. [2018] 5772-030).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in article or Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the prepared compounds are available from the authors

References

  1. Sheldon, R.A.; Brady, D. Green chemistry, biocatalysis, and the chemical industry of the future. ChemSusChem 2022, 15, e202102628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zimmerman, J.B.; Anastas, P.T.; Erythropel, H.C.; Leitner, W. Designing for a green chemistry future. Science 2020, 367, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lasso, J.D.; Castillo-Pazos, D.J.; Li, C.-J. Green chemistry meets medicinal chemistry: A perspective on modern metal-free late-stage functionalization reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 10955–10982. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Sabatini, M.T.; Boulton, L.T.; Sneddon, H.F.; Sheppard, T.D. A green chemistry perspective on catalytic amide bond formation. Nat. Catal. 2019, 2, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hooshmand, S.E.; Heidari, B.; Sedghi, R.; Varma, R.S. Recent advances in the Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction using efficient catalysts in eco-friendly media. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 381–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Simon, M.-O.; Li, C.-J. Green chemistry oriented organic synthesis in water. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 1415–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mohebat, R.; Yazdani-Elah-Abadi, A. Caffeine catalyzed green synthesis of novel benzo[a][1,3]oxazino[6,5-c]phenazines via a one-pot multi-component sequential protocol in a basic ionic liquid. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2017, 28, 1340–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fernandes, R.R.; Lasri, J.; da Silva, M.F.C.G.; Palavra, A.M.F.; da Silva, J.A.L.; da Silva, J.J.R.F.; Pombeiro, A.J.L. Oxadiazoline and Ketoimine Palladium(II) complexes as highly efficient catalysts for Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reactions in supercritical carbon dioxide. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 1153–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Peng, L.; Hu, Z.; Lu, Q.; Tang, Z.; Jiao, Y.; Xu, X. DESs: Green solvents for transition metal catalyzed organic reactions. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2019, 30, 2151–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lakshmidevi, J.; Appa, R.M.; Naidu, B.R.; Prasad, S.S.; Sarma, L.S.; Venkateswarlu, K. WEPA: A bio-derived medium for added base, π-acid and ligand free Ullmann coupling of aryl halides using Pd(OAc)2. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 12333–12336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saikia, B.; Borah, P. A new avenue to the Dakin reaction in H2O2–WERSA. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 105583–105586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Surneni, N.; Barua, N.C.; Saikia, B. Application of natural feedstock extract: The Henry reaction. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 2814–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Konwar, M.; Ali, A.A.; Sarma, D. A green protocol for peptide bond formation in WEB. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 2283–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Basumatary, S.; Nath, B.; Kalita, P. Application of agro-waste derived materials as heterogeneous base catalysts for biodiesel synthesis. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2018, 10, 043105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Beletskaya, I.P.; Alonso, F.; Tyurin, V. The Suzuki-Miyaura reaction after the Nobel prize. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 385, 137–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, C.; Li, X. Oxygen-promoted Suzuki–Miyaura reaction for efficient construction of biaryls. Chem. Rec. 2016, 16, 84–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Biffis, A.; Centomo, P.; Del Zotto, A.; Zecca, M. Pd Metal catalysts for cross-couplings and related reactions in the 21st Century: A Critical Review. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 2249–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, C.; Liu, C.; Li, X.-M.; Gao, Z.-M.; Jin, Z.-L. Oxygen-promoted Pd/C-catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura reaction of potassium aryltrifluoroborates. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2016, 27, 631–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mao, Z.; Gu, H.; Lin, X. Recent advances of Pd/C-catalyzed reactions. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Boruah, P.R.; Ali, A.A.; Saikia, B.; Sarma, D. A novel green protocol for ligand free Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reactions in WEB at room temperature. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 1442–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Boruah, P.R.; Ali, A.A.; Chetia, M.; Saikia, B.; Sarma, D. Pd(OAc)2 in WERSA: A novel green catalytic system for Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reactions at room temperature. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 11489–11492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Konwar, M.; Boruah, P.R.; Saikia, P.J.; Khupse, N.D.; Sarma, D. ESP-promoted Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling and peptide bond formation reactions in water at room temperature. ChemistrySelect 2017, 2, 4983–4987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sarmah, M.; Dewan, A.; Mondal, M.; Thakur, A.J.; Bora, U. Analysis of the water extract of waste papaya bark ash and its implications as an in situ base in the ligand-free recyclable Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reaction. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 28981–28985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sarmah, M.; Dewan, A.; Thakur, A.J.; Bora, U. Extraction of Base from Eichhornia crassipes and Its Implication in Palladium-Catalyzed Suzuki Cross-Coupling Reaction. ChemistrySelect 2017, 2, 7091–7095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lennox, A.J.J.; Lloyd-Jones, G.C. Transmetalation in the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling: The fork in the trail. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 7362–7370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Amatore, C.; Le Duc, G.; Jutand, A. Mechanism of Palladium-catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura reactions: Multiple and antagonistic roles of anionic “Bases” and their countercations. Chem.–Eur. J. 2013, 19, 10082–10093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liu, C.; Li, X.; Gao, Z.; Wang, X.; Jin, Z. In situ-generated nano-palladium-catalyzed ligand-free Suzuki–Miyaura reaction of potassium aryltrifluoroborates at room temperature. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 3954–3959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Preparation of water extract of suaeda salsa (WES); (b) Optimization of WES concentration for the S–M reaction.
Figure 1. (a) Preparation of water extract of suaeda salsa (WES); (b) Optimization of WES concentration for the S–M reaction.
Molecules 27 06623 g001
Figure 2. EDX spectrum of solid of WES.
Figure 2. EDX spectrum of solid of WES.
Molecules 27 06623 g002
Scheme 1. Comparison reaction between WES and other bases in water. Aryl bromide (0.5 mmol), arylboronic acid (0.525 mmol), 10 wt. % Pd/C (1 mol%), base (1 mmol), H2O (3 mL) or WES (3 mL), 2 h, isolated yield by column chromatography.
Scheme 1. Comparison reaction between WES and other bases in water. Aryl bromide (0.5 mmol), arylboronic acid (0.525 mmol), 10 wt. % Pd/C (1 mol%), base (1 mmol), H2O (3 mL) or WES (3 mL), 2 h, isolated yield by column chromatography.
Molecules 27 06623 sch001
Scheme 2. Substrate scope of Suzuki–Miyaura reaction in WES. Reaction condition: aryl/heteroaryl bromide (0.5 mmol), aryl/heteroaryl acid (0.525 mmol), 10 wt. % Pd/C (1 mol%), WES (3 mL), 100 °C, the product is obtained by column chromatography.
Scheme 2. Substrate scope of Suzuki–Miyaura reaction in WES. Reaction condition: aryl/heteroaryl bromide (0.5 mmol), aryl/heteroaryl acid (0.525 mmol), 10 wt. % Pd/C (1 mol%), WES (3 mL), 100 °C, the product is obtained by column chromatography.
Molecules 27 06623 sch002
Scheme 3. The synthesis of 2-cyano-4-methylbiphenyl by Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling in WES.
Scheme 3. The synthesis of 2-cyano-4-methylbiphenyl by Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling in WES.
Molecules 27 06623 sch003
Table 1. Optimization of the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction conditions
Table 1. Optimization of the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction conditions
Molecules 27 06623 i001
EntryPd CatalystLoading (mol%)Temperature (°C)Yield (%)
1Pd/C125trace
2Pd/C15017
3Pd/C18071
4Pd/C110094
5Pd/C0.510095
6Pd/C0.210094
7Pd/C0.110048
8Pd/Al2O30.210016
9Pd/CaCO30.210091
10Pd/BaSO40.210092
Reaction condition: 4-bromoacetophenone (0.5 mmol), phenylboronic acid (0.525 mmol), catalyst, WES (3 mL), under air, 1 h, isolated yield by column chromatography.
Table 2. The Suzuki–Miyaura reaction in aqueous extract of suaeda salsa a.
Table 2. The Suzuki–Miyaura reaction in aqueous extract of suaeda salsa a.
Molecules 27 06623 i002
EntryR1R2Time (h)NumberYield (%)
14-CNH13e92 a 94 b
24-NO2H13f89 a
34-CHOH23g91 a
44-COCH3H23d94 a
54-OHH13h87 a
64-COOHH83i36 a
74-OCH3H13j67 b
84-CH3H23k13 b
93-CNH13l90 b
103-NO2H23m82 b
113-OCH3H23n63 b
122-CNH13o88 b
132-OCH3H23p72 b
144-CN4-F13q88 a
154-CN4-OCH313r90 a
164-CN3,4-(OCH3)223s60 b
174-CN4-CH323b88 b
184-CHO4-CH313t92 a
194-CHO4-OCH313u90 a
204-CHO4-F23a82 b
214-OCH34-CH343v71 b
224-OCH34-OCH343w68 b
234-OCH33,4-(OCH3)243c85 b
244-F4-OCH323x72 b
254-Cl4-OCH323y70 b
262-OCH32-CH323z30 b
272-CN2-CH323aa36 b
284-CNH83etrace c
294-CNH43e49 d
304-CNH43etrace e
a Reaction condition: Aryl halide (0.5 mmol), arylboronic acid (0.525 mmol), 10 wt.% Pd/C (0.2 mol%), WES (3 mL), 100 °C, the product is obtained by filtration. b The product is obtained by column chromatography. c Phenylboronic acid pinacol ester instead of phenylboronic acid. d Potassium phenyltrifluoroborate instead of phenylboronic acid. e Phenylboronic acid MIDA ester instead of phenylboronic acid.
Table 3. Catalyst recovery of Suzuki–Miyaura reaction with Suaeda salsa extract as solution.
Table 3. Catalyst recovery of Suzuki–Miyaura reaction with Suaeda salsa extract as solution.
Molecules 27 06623 i003
EntryTime (h)Yield (%)
11.0 95
21.090
31.083
42.071
58.052
Reaction condition: 4-bromoacetophenone (6 mmol), phenylboronic acid (6.3 mmol), 10 wt. %Pd/C (1 mol%), WES (36 mL), under air, 1 h, isolated yield by column chromatography.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ren, C.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Z.; Gao, J.; Yang, M.; Yuan, Z.; Li, X. A Novel Utilization of Water Extract of Suaeda Salsa in the Pd/C Catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling Reaction. Molecules 2022, 27, 6623. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27196623

AMA Style

Ren C, Zhang H, Chen Z, Gao J, Yang M, Yuan Z, Li X. A Novel Utilization of Water Extract of Suaeda Salsa in the Pd/C Catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling Reaction. Molecules. 2022; 27(19):6623. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27196623

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ren, Changyue, Hang Zhang, Zhengjun Chen, Jie Gao, Mingyan Yang, Zeli Yuan, and Xinmin Li. 2022. "A Novel Utilization of Water Extract of Suaeda Salsa in the Pd/C Catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling Reaction" Molecules 27, no. 19: 6623. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27196623

APA Style

Ren, C., Zhang, H., Chen, Z., Gao, J., Yang, M., Yuan, Z., & Li, X. (2022). A Novel Utilization of Water Extract of Suaeda Salsa in the Pd/C Catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling Reaction. Molecules, 27(19), 6623. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27196623

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop