Next Article in Journal
Free Amino Acids and Volatile Aroma Compounds in Watermelon Rind, Flesh, and Three Rind-Flesh Juices
Previous Article in Journal
Antibacterial and Wound-Healing Activities of Statistically Optimized Nitrofurazone- and Lidocaine-Loaded Silica Microspheres by the Box–Behnken Design
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Asymmetric Epoxidation of Olefins with Sodium Percarbonate Catalyzed by Bis-amino-bis-pyridine Manganese Complexes

by
Varvara A. Drozd
,
Roman V. Ottenbacher
* and
Konstantin P. Bryliakov
*
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Pr. Lavrentieva 5, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(8), 2538; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27082538
Submission received: 25 March 2022 / Revised: 9 April 2022 / Accepted: 12 April 2022 / Published: 14 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Applied Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Asymmetric epoxidation of a series of olefinic substrates with sodium percarbonate oxidant in the presence of homogeneous catalysts based on Mn complexes with bis-amino-bis-pyridine ligands is reported. Sodium percarbonate is a readily available and environmentally benign oxidant that is studied in these reactions for the first time. The epoxidation proceeded with good to high yields (up to 100%) and high enantioselectivities (up to 99% ee) using as low as 0.2 mol. % catalyst loadings. The epoxidation protocol is suitable for various types of substrates, including unfunctionalized alkenes, α,β-unsaturated ketones, esters (cis- and trans-), and amides (cis- and trans-). The reaction mechanism is discussed.

1. Introduction

Chiral epoxides are useful building blocks in organic synthesis and essential synthetic targets [1,2,3]. The demand for synthetic methodologies of chiral epoxides preparation has been nourished by the biological activities exhibited by various natural products containing an epoxide unit and their applications as convenient (stable yet readily reactive) precursors to more complex chiral molecules [4,5,6]. The production of epoxides from the corresponding olefins by asymmetric epoxidation reaction in the presence of transition metal catalysts is considered the most efficient and versatile method [7,8,9,10,11]. In this realm, manganese(II) complexes with chiral N4 bis-amino-bis-pyridine and related ligands were established as highly enantioselective and efficient catalysts of olefins epoxidation with the environmentally benign oxidant hydrogen peroxide [12,13,14,15]. In the recent decade, the topic has been extensively studied by groups of Sun [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23], Costas [24,25,26,27], Bryliakov [12,28,29,30,31,32], and others [33,34,35]. Using hydrogen peroxide in these reactions is considered beneficial for several reasons: aqueous H2O2 is a safe, easy-to-handle oxidant with high active oxygen content (47%), which produces water as the only by-product. Nonetheless, it is known that hydrogen peroxide is prone to disproportionation in solutions containing transition metals like iron or manganese, which may significantly deteriorate the oxidant efficiency. Typically, this is partially sorted out via slow, syringe-pump oxidant addition. Other oxidants, including peracids, alkylhydroperoxides, and iodosylarenes, have also been utilized in bis-amino-bis-pyridine manganese complexes catalyzed epoxidation [31,36]. We present the use of sodium percarbonate as a convenient and environmentally benign solid oxidant for manganese catalyzed enantioselective epoxidation, which is added to the reaction mixture in portions. The corresponding epoxides of various olefins were obtained in good to quantitative yields with up to 99% ee.

2. Results and Discussion

The commercial bleaching agent sodium percarbonate (Na2CO3 1.5H2O2) is a white powder stable at room temperature [37]. It has no shock sensitivity and contains 15% of active oxygen. Previously, sodium percarbonate was utilized in various oxidation reactions, including oxidations of sulfides to sulfones, anilines to nitroarenes, and non-enantioselective epoxidations [37,38]. In order to find appropriate conditions for employing sodium percarbonate in manganese-catalyzed asymmetric epoxidation, we initially tested it in reaction with chalcone in the presence of catalyst 1 [30] (Figure 1).
The epoxidations with H2O2 in the presence of bis-amino-bis-pyridine manganese complexes usually require adding carboxylic acid as a co-catalytic additive [28,29]. Herewith, using acetic acid, AcOH, as an additive (14 equiv. vs. chalcone) and sodium percarbonate (2 equiv. vs. chalcone, added in one portion) as an oxidant resulted in a nearly quantitative formation of chalcone epoxide having 82% ee (Table 1, entry 1). To improve the enantioselectivity of the reaction, a more sterically demanding 2-ethylbuthanoic acid (EBA) [20,29] was probed (Table 1, entry 2). Indeed, the enantioselectivity increased up to 94% ee, albeit with a reduced conversion of 83%. Raising the amount of oxidant to 2.5 equiv. vs. substrate led to only a minor increase in epoxide yield (92%, Table 1, entry 3). Adding sodium percarbonate in three portions within 30 min intervals was revealed as the most practical protocol, furnishing nearly quantitative conversion of chalcone to the epoxide having 94% ee (Table 1, entry 4).
Having these optimized conditions in hand, we carried out the asymmetric epoxidation of a series of substrates (Figure 2) in the presence of Mn complex 1 (Table 2). The epoxidation of unfunctionalized alkenes 3be (Table 2, entries 1–4) afforded the corresponding epoxides with high yields (95–100%) and moderate to good enantioselectivity (51–79% ee). The epoxidation of 2,2-dimethyl-2H-chromene-6-carbonitrile 3f to the corresponding epoxide (a precursor for the antihypertensive agent levcromakalim [39]) was accomplished in 99% yield and 95% ee (Table 2, entry 5). Substrate 3g, bearing α,β-unsaturated ketone functionality, was epoxidized with moderate conversion under these conditions (47% yield, Table 2, entry 6). Nonetheless, the enantioselectivity was high (87% ee). The epoxidation of trans-α,β-unsaturated esters 3h and 3i demonstrated the dependence of asymmetric induction on the steric demand of alkyl substituents in the ester group (cf. 87% ee for –OiPr vs. 80% ee for –OMe, Table 2, entries 7,8), in full accordance with previous observations [30]. Highly enantioselective epoxidation (99% ee) of trans-enamide 3j was documented (Table 2, entry 9), although it required increased catalyst loading of 0.5 mol. % and was accomplished in moderate yield (60%). The same amount of the catalyst was enough to mediate the asymmetric epoxidation of cis-enamide 3m with 81% yield and 79% ee (Table 2, entry 12). The esters of cis-cinnamic acid 3k and 3l were converted to corresponding epoxides with high yields (100 and 96%, respectively); the enantioselectivity was higher for the bulkier –OiPr ester (94% ee, Table 2, entry 11), cf. 86% ee for the–OEt ester (Table 2, entry 10).
Based on earlier data [32], one could expect that increasing the electron-donating ability of the ligands of the Mn-based catalysts should enhance the epoxidation enantioselectivity. Indeed, catalyst 2 [30], bearing stronger electron-donating NMe2 groups at the pyridylmethyl moieties of the ligand (Figure 1), in all cases but 3j, showed higher enantioselectivities (Table 3), which improvement was most significant in the case of unfunctionalized alkenes 3be (Table 3, entries 2–5). For the epoxidation of trans-α,β-unsaturated esters 3h and 3i, the steric hindrance did not affect the asymmetric induction (86 and 87% ee, respectively, Table 3, entries 8, 9; cf. entries 6, 7 of Table 2). cis-Cinnamic acid derivatives 3k-m were epoxidized in high yields (84–98%) and enantioselectivities (82–95% ee, Table 3, entries 11–13). Olefins 3a, 3f, and 3j were converted to the corresponding epoxides almost quantitatively, with excellent enantioselectivity (95–97% ee, Table 3, entries 1, 6, 10).
It was reported previously [38] that sodium percarbonate is prone to deliver hydrogen peroxide in the reaction medium. The intermediate formation of peroxycarboxylic acid can be ruled out as far as under near-anhydrous conditions it is possible only from carboxylic acid anhydrides or chloroanhydrides rather than the acid itself [37]. Therefore, one can suggest that the slowly liberated H2O2 acts as a true oxidant. We have established that for bis-amino-bis-pyridine manganese complexes-catalyzed asymmetric epoxidation with H2O2, the addition of carboxylic acid is required to achieve reasonable conversions [29,30]. The latter is assumed to promote the heterolytic cleavage of the O-O bond in the (L)MnIIIOOH intermediate to generate the (L)MnV = O active species, responsible for the enantioselective oxygen transfer [30,31].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

All chemicals and solvents were purchased from Aldrich, Acros Organics, or Alfa Aesar and were used without additional purification unless noted otherwise. For catalytic epoxidation experiments, technical grade sodium percarbonate (Na2CO3 1.5H2O2) was used. Chiral Mn catalysts 1 and 2 were prepared as described [30] and were recrystallized from acetonitrile/diethyl ether. Substrates 3af were purchased and used without further purification; others were prepared as described [12,32].

3.2. Instrumentation

1H NMR spectra were measured on Bruker Avance 400 spectrometer at 400.13 MHz and on Bruker DPX-250 spectrometer at 250.13 MHz, respectively. Chemical shifts were internally referenced to the residual proton signal of CDCl3 (7.26 ppm) for 1H NMR spectra. The enantiomeric excess values of chiral epoxides were measured by HPLC (Shimadzu LC-20 chromatograph,) equipped with a set of chiral columns (Daicel) as described [12,30,32].

3.3. General Procedure for the Catalytic Epoxidation of Olefins with Sodium Percarbonate

In a typical experiment, substrate (100 μmol) and carboxylic acid (1.4 mmol) were added to the solution of the manganese catalyst (0.2 μmol) in CH3CN (0.4 mL), and the mixture was thermostated at −40 °C. Then, 200 μmol of mortar-grounded sodium percarbonate was added to the reaction mixture in 3 roughly equal portions, with 30 min intervals between the additions (66.7 μmol in each portion). The resulting mixture was stirred for 2 h at −40 °C (total reaction time: 3 h). The reaction was quenched with a saturated aqueous solution of Na2CO3, and the products were extracted with Et2O (3 × 4 mL). The solvent was evaporated, and the residue was analyzed by 1H NMR spectroscopy (Table S1, Figure S1, SI) to determine conversions and yields and by HPLC on chiral stationary phases (Table S2, Figure S2, SI) to measure the enantiomeric excess values of the chiral epoxides as previously described [12,30,32].

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that sodium percarbonate can be a convenient oxidant in the asymmetric epoxidation of olefins catalyzed by bis-amino-bis-pyridine manganese complexes. The epoxidation of various types of substrates, including unfunctionalized alkenes, α,β-unsaturated ketones, esters (cis- and trans-), and amides (cis- and trans-), proceeded with good to high yields (up to 100%) and high enantioselectivities (up to 99% ee) using as low as 0.2 mol. % of catalyst loadings. It is assumed that sodium percarbonate releases hydrogen peroxide in the catalytic epoxidation leading to the formation of the reputed manganese(V)-oxo oxygen transferring species. The advantage of the designed epoxidation protocol is the absence of necessity for syringe pump addition of the oxidant. We foresee further studies involving sodium percarbonate oxidant in other manganese catalyzed chemo- and stereoselective oxidations.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information (SI) can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27082538/s1, Table S1: 1H NMR data for the epoxides; Table S2: HPLC data for the epoxides; Figure S1: Selected examples of 1H NMR spectra of reaction mixtures; Figure S2: Selected examples of chiral HPLC chromatograms of reaction mixtures.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.P.B.; methodology, V.A.D. and R.V.O.; validation, V.A.D. and R.V.O.; formal analysis, V.A.D. and R.V.O.; investigation, V.A.D.; resources, R.V.O. and K.P.B.; writing—original draft preparation, R.V.O.; writing—review and editing, K.P.B.; visualization, R.V.O. and K.P.B.; supervision, R.V.O. and K.P.B.; project administration, K.P.B.; funding acquisition, K.P.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation project for the Boreskov Institute of Catalysis (#AAAA-A21-121011390008-4).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the access to the facilities of the shared research center, “National center of investigation of catalysts,” kindly provided by the Boreskov Institute of Catalysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds used in this paper are available from the authors.

References

  1. Matsumoto, K.; Katsuki, T. Asymmetric Oxidations and Related Reactions. In Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis, 3rd ed.; Ojima, I., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bryliakov, K.P. Environmentally Sustainable Catalytic asymmetric Oxidations; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dalpozzo, R.; Lattanzi, A.; Pellissier, H. Applications of Chiral Three-membered Rings for Total Synthesis: A Review. Curr. Org. Chem. 2017, 21, 1143–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Thibodeaux, C.J.; Chang, W.-C.; Liu, H.-W. Enzymatic Chemistry of Cyclopropane, Epoxide, and Aziridine Biosynthesis. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 1681–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ueberbacher, B.T.; Hall, M.; Faber, K. Electrophilic and nucleophilic enzymatic cascade reactions in biosynthesis. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2012, 29, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kolb, H.C.; Finn, M.G.; Sharpless, K.B. Click Chemistry: Diverse Chemical Function from a Few Good Reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2004–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Que, L., Jr.; Tolman, W.B. Biologically inspired oxidation catalysis. Nature 2008, 455, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. De Faveri, G.; Ilyashenko, G.; Watkinson, M. Recent advances in catalytic asymmetric epoxidation using the environmentally benign oxidant hydrogen peroxide and its derivatives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 1722–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Srour, H.; Le Maux, P.; Chevance, S.; Simonneaux, G. Metal Catalyzed Asymmetric Sulfoxidation, Epoxidation and Hydroxylation by Hydrogen Peroxide. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2013, 257, 3030–3050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Radhika, S.; Aneeja, T.; Philip, R.M.; Anilkumar, G. Recent advances and trends in the biomimetic iron-catalyzed asymmetric epoxidation. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2021, 35, e6217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bryliakov, K.P. Catalytic Asymmetric Oxygenations with the Environmentally Benign Oxidants H2O2 and O2. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 11406–11459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ottenbacher, R.V.; Talsi, E.P.; Bryliakov, K.P. Chiral Manganese Aminopyridine Complexes: The Versatile Catalysts of Chemo- and Stereoselective Oxidations with H2O2. Chem. Rec. 2018, 18, 78–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vicens, L.; Olivo, G.; Costas, M. Rational Design of Bioinspired Catalysts for Selective Oxidations. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 8611–8631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Philip, R.M.; Radhika, S.; Abdulla, C.M.A.; Anilkumar, G. Recent Trends and Prospects in Homogeneous Manganese-Catalysed Epoxidation. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2021, 363, 1272–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, J.; Jiang, Z.K.; Fukuzumi, S.; Nam, W.; Wang, B. Artificial nonheme iron and manganese oxygenases for enantioselective olefin epoxidation and alkane hydroxylation reactions. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 421, 213443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, M.; Wang, B.; Wang, S.; Xia, C.; Sun, W. Asymmetric Epoxidation of Olefins with Chiral Bioinspired Manganese Complexes. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3622–3625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, B.; Miao, C.; Wang, S.; Xia, C.; Sun, W. Manganese Catalysts with C1-Symmetric N4 Ligand for Enantioselective Epoxidation of Olefins. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 6750–6753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, B.; Miao, C.; Wang, S.; Kuhn, F.E.; Xia, C.; Sun, W. Non-heme manganese complexes of C1-symmetric N4 ligands: Synthesis, characterization and asymmetric epoxidations of α,β-enones. J. Organomet. Chem. 2012, 715, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shen, D.; Miao, C.; Wang, S.; Xia, C.; Sun, W. A Mononuclear Manganese Complex of a Tetradentate Nitrogen Ligand—Synthesis, Characterizations, and Application in the Asymmetric Epoxidation of Olefins. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 2014, 5777–5782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shen, D.; Qiu, B.; Xu, D.; Miao, C.; Xia, C.; Sun, W. Enantioselective Epoxidation of Olefins with H2O2 Catalyzed by Bioinspired Aminopyridine Manganese Complexes. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 372–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Du, J.; Miao, C.; Xia, C.; Lee, Y.-M.; Nam, W.; Sun, W. Mechanistic Insights into the Enantioselective Epoxidation of Olefins by Bioinspired Manganese Complexes: Role of Carboxylic Acid and Nature of Active Oxidant. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 4528–4538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lin, J.; Miao, C.; Wang, F.; Yang, P.; Sun, Q.; Sun, W. Effect of Ligand Topology on the Reactivity of Chiral Tetradentate Aminopyridine Manganese Complexes. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 11857–11863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tian, J.; Lin, J.; Zhang, J.; Xia, C.; Sun, W. Asymmetric Epoxidation of Olefins Catalyzed by Substituted Aminobenzimidazole Manganese Complexes Derived from L-Proline. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2022, 364, 593–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Garcia-Bosch, I.; Gomez, L.; Polo, A.; Ribas, X.; Costas, M. Stereoselective Epoxidation of Alkenes with Hydrogen Peroxide using a Bipyrrolidine-Based Family of Manganese Complexes. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cusso, O.; Garcia-Bosch, I.; Font, D.; Ribas, X.; Lloret-Fillol, J.; Costas, M. Highly Stereoselective Epoxidation with H2O2 Catalyzed by Electron-Rich Aminopyridine Manganese Catalysts. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 6158–6161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Claraso, C.; Vicens, L.; Polo, A.; Costas, M. Enantioselective Epoxidation of β,β-Disubstituted Enamides with a Manganese Catalyst and Aqueous Hydrogen Peroxide. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 2430–2435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vicens, L.; Olivo, G.; Costas, M. Remote Amino Acid Recognition Enables Effective Hydrogen Peroxide Activation at a Manganese Oxidation Catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202114932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ottenbacher, R.V.; Bryliakov, K.P.; Talsi, E.P. Non-Heme Manganese Complexes Catalyzed Asymmetric Epoxidation of Olefins by Peracetic Acid and Hydrogen Peroxide. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 885–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lyakin, O.Y.; Ottenbacher, R.V.; Bryliakov, K.P.; Talsi, E.P. Asymmetric Epoxidations with H2O2 on Fe and Mn Aminopyridine Catalysts: Probing the Nature of Active Species by Combined Electron Paramagnetic Resonance and Enantioselectivity Study. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 1196–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ottenbacher, R.V.; Samsonenko, D.G.; Talsi, E.P.; Bryliakov, K.P. Highly Enantioselective Bioinspired Epoxidation of Electron-Deficient Olefins with H2O2 on Aminopyridine Mn Catalysts. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 1599–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ottenbacher, R.V.; Samsonenko, D.G.; Talsi, E.P.; Bryliakov, K.P. Enantioselective Epoxidations of Olefins with Various Oxidants on Bioinspired Mn Complexes: Evidence for Different Mechanisms and Chiral Additive Amplification. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 979–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ottenbacher, R.V.; Kurganskiy, V.I.; Talsi, E.P.; Bryliakov, K.P. Manganese Catalyzed Enantioselective Epoxidation of α,β-Unsaturated Amides with H2O2. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2021, 363, 2778–2782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, X.; Gao, B.; Su, Y.; Huang, H. Enantioselective Epoxidation of Electron-Deficient Alkenes Catalyzed by Manganese Complexes with Chiral N4 Ligands Derived from Rigid Chiral Diamines. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017, 359, 2535–2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Maity, N.C.; Bera, P.K.; Ghosh, D.; Abdi, S.H.R.; Kureshy, R.I.; Khan, N.H.; Bajaj, H.C.; Suresh, E. Manganese complexes with non-porphyrin N4 ligands as recyclable catalyst for the asymmetric epoxidation of olefins. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dai, W.; Li, J.; Li, G.; Yang, H.; Wang, L.; Gao, S. Asymmetric Epoxidation of Alkenes Catalyzed by a Porphyrin-Inspired Manganese Complex. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 4138–4141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xu, D.; Sun, Q.; Lin, J.; Sun, W. Ligand regulation for manganese-catalyzed enantioselective epoxidation of olefins without acid. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 13101–13104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. McKillop, A.; Sanderson, W.R. Sodium perborate and sodium percarbonate: Cheap, safe and versatile oxidising agents for organic synthesis. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 6145–6166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ando, T.; Cork, D.G.; Kimura, T. “Sodium percarbonate” (SPC) as a hydrogen peroxide source for organic synthesis. Chem. Lett. 1986, 15, 665–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Page, P.C.B.; Buckley, B.R.; Heaney, H.; Blacker, A.J. Asymmetric Epoxidation of cis-Alkenes Mediated by Iminium Salts:  Highly Enantioselective Synthesis of Levcromakalim. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 375–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Manganese complexes used in this study. OTf = trifluoromethanesulfonate.
Figure 1. Manganese complexes used in this study. OTf = trifluoromethanesulfonate.
Molecules 27 02538 g001
Figure 2. Olefinic substrates studied in manganese catalyzed epoxidation with sodium percarbonate.
Figure 2. Olefinic substrates studied in manganese catalyzed epoxidation with sodium percarbonate.
Molecules 27 02538 g002
Table 1. Asymmetric epoxidation of chalcone with sodium percarbonate in the presence of catalyst 1 1.
Table 1. Asymmetric epoxidation of chalcone with sodium percarbonate in the presence of catalyst 1 1.
Molecules 27 02538 i001
EntryOxidant Equiv.AdditiveConversion/Yield, %ee, %
12.0AcOH99/9782
22.0EBA83/8194
32.5EBA94/9294
42.0 2EBA100/9794
1 Reaction conditions: −40 °C, [Mn]/[oxidant]/[chalcone]/[additive] = 0.2 μmol:200 μmol:100 μmol:1.4 mmol in CH3CN (0.4 mL), oxidant was added in one portion. 2 Oxidant was added in 3 portions within 30 min intervals.
Table 2. Asymmetric epoxidation of olefins with sodium percarbonate in the presence of 1 1.
Table 2. Asymmetric epoxidation of olefins with sodium percarbonate in the presence of 1 1.
Molecules 27 02538 i002
EntrySubstrateCat. Loadings, %Conversion/Yield, %ee, %
13b0.2100/10062
23c0.2100/9979
33d0.295/9563
43e0.298/8451
53f0.299/9995
6 23g0.247/4787
73h0.283/8380
83i0.283/8387
9 33j0.560/6099
103k0.2100/10086
113l0.296/9694
123m0.586/6979
1 Reaction conditions: −40 °C, [Mn]/[oxidant]/[substrate]/[additive] = 0.2 μmol:200 μmol:100 μmol:1.4 mmol in CH3CN (0.4 mL), oxidant was added in 3 portions within 30 min intervals. 2 Mixed CH3CN/CH2Cl2 (0.4 mL/0.4 mL) solvent was used. 3 Mixed CH3CN/CH2Cl2 (0.4 mL/0.6 mL) solvent was used.
Table 3. Asymmetric epoxidation of olefins with sodium percarbonate in the presence of 2 1.
Table 3. Asymmetric epoxidation of olefins with sodium percarbonate in the presence of 2 1.
Molecules 27 02538 i003
EntrySubstrateCat. Loadings, %Conversion/Yield, %ee, %
13a0.299/9696
23b0.275/7567
33c0.271/7182
43d0.2100/9871
53e0.2100/10060
63f0.2100/10095
7 23g0.277/7782
83h0.261/6186
93i0.246/4687
10 33j0.5100/10097
113k0.298/9884
123l0.284/8495
133m0.590/9082
1 Reaction conditions: −40 °C, [Mn]/[oxidant]/[substrate]/[additive] = 0.2 μmol:200 μmol:100 μmol:1.4 mmol in CH3CN (0.4 mL), oxidant was added in 3 portions within 30 min intervals. 2 Mixed CH3CN/CH2Cl2 (0.4 mL/0.4 mL) solvent was used. 3 Mixed CH3CN/CH2Cl2 (0.4 mL/0.6 mL) solvent was used.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Drozd, V.A.; Ottenbacher, R.V.; Bryliakov, K.P. Asymmetric Epoxidation of Olefins with Sodium Percarbonate Catalyzed by Bis-amino-bis-pyridine Manganese Complexes. Molecules 2022, 27, 2538. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27082538

AMA Style

Drozd VA, Ottenbacher RV, Bryliakov KP. Asymmetric Epoxidation of Olefins with Sodium Percarbonate Catalyzed by Bis-amino-bis-pyridine Manganese Complexes. Molecules. 2022; 27(8):2538. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27082538

Chicago/Turabian Style

Drozd, Varvara A., Roman V. Ottenbacher, and Konstantin P. Bryliakov. 2022. "Asymmetric Epoxidation of Olefins with Sodium Percarbonate Catalyzed by Bis-amino-bis-pyridine Manganese Complexes" Molecules 27, no. 8: 2538. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27082538

APA Style

Drozd, V. A., Ottenbacher, R. V., & Bryliakov, K. P. (2022). Asymmetric Epoxidation of Olefins with Sodium Percarbonate Catalyzed by Bis-amino-bis-pyridine Manganese Complexes. Molecules, 27(8), 2538. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27082538

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop