Next Article in Journal
A Comparative Study of Ethanol and Citric Acid Solutions for Extracting Betalains and Total Phenolic Content from Freeze-Dried Beetroot Powder
Next Article in Special Issue
Rational Design, Synthesis, and Anti-Proliferative Evaluation of Novel 4-Aryl-3,4-Dihydro-2H-1,4-Benzoxazines
Previous Article in Journal
Plant Polyphenols and Their Potential Benefits on Cardiovascular Health: A Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 17
10.3390/molecules28176404
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Developing an Amide-Spacered Triterpenoid Rhodamine Hybrid of Nano-Molar Cytotoxicity Combined with Excellent Tumor Cell/Non-Tumor Cell Selectivity

by
Niels V. Heise
,
Toni C. Denner
,
Selina Becker
,
Sophie Hoenke
and
René Csuk
*
NF II, Organic Chemistry, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Kurt-Mothes-Str. 2, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(17), 6404; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28176404
Submission received: 14 July 2023 / Revised: 28 August 2023 / Accepted: 1 September 2023 / Published: 1 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exclusive Papers of the Editorial Board Members (EBMs): Advances in Bioorganic Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Asiatic acid, a pentacyclic triterpene, was converted into a series of piperazinyl, homopiperazinyl, and 1,5-diazocinyl spacered rhodamine conjugates, differing in the type of spacer and the substitution pattern on the rhodamine moiety of the hybrids. The compounds were tested for cytotoxic activity in SRB assays and compound 12, holding an EC50 of 0.8 nM, was the most cytotoxic compound of this series, but compound 18 (containing a ring expanded 1,5-diazocinyl moiety and n-propyl substituents on the rhodamine) was the most selective compound exhibiting a selectivity factor of almost 190 while retaining high cytotoxicity (EC50 = 1.9 nM, for A2780 ovarian carcinoma).

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Currently, a range of methodologies are being investigated for the targeted transportation of biologically active molecules and medicinal agents to mitochondria. One such approach involves the coupling of biologically active substances with cations from lipophilic compounds of modest molecular mass, which are predisposed to accumulation within mitochondria. This facilitation of entry into mitochondria is attributed to the heightened transmembrane potential relative to the cellular membrane potential. The facile traversal of these cationic entities through membranes has undergone comprehensive scrutiny and is explicable by the expansive hydrophobic surface and substantial ionic radius exhibited by these cations. Among the delocalized lipophilic cations that traverse the hydrophobic barriers of both plasma and mitochondrial membranes are Rhodamine-123, rhodacyanine MKT-077, dequalinium, triphenylphosphonium, guanidinium cations, and the recently uncovered cationic entity F16. Previous studies have shown acetylated conjugates of triterpene carboxylic acids with secondary cyclic amines and rhodamine B or rhodamine 101 in the low nano-molar concentration range are cytotoxic to several different human cancer cell lines [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Further studies revealed that these compounds act as mitocans [8]. Furthermore, conjugates of triterpenes with only one acetyl group in ring A (e.g., derived from oleanolic acid, ursolic acid, glycyrrhetinic acid, betulinic acid, or platanic acid, etc.) are highly cytotoxic but are surpassed in efficacy by those compounds with two or three acetyl groups, such as in maslinic acid [9], madecassic acid [10], tormentic acid [11], euscaphic acid [3], and corosolic acid [12], but also conjugates of asiatic acid [13]. Most recently, an asiatic acid rhodamine hybrid was established as an excellent cytotoxic agent holding cytotoxic activity in a sub-nanomolar concentration [13]. For these particular conjugates, the degree of cytotoxicity was contingent upon the nature of the spacer linked to the carboxyl group located on ring E. These conjugates, formed by combining asiatic acid with rhodamine B, exhibited notable cytotoxicity against human tumor cell lines while demonstrating a high degree of selectivity. Notably, a conjugate holding a homopiperazinyl spacer attached to a tri-acetylated asiatic acid skeleton along with rhodamine B displayed a remarkably low EC50 value of 0.8 nM against A2780 ovarian cancer cells. Additional experimentation involving staining revealed that this rhodamine B conjugate acted as a mitocan, inciting apoptosis [13].
Further assessments utilizing 3D spheroid models for colon and breast cancer indicated that these conjugates exhibited activity within the low nanomolar range, displaying the capacity to surmount resistance observed with standard chemotherapeutic agents commonly employed in clinical settings. Consequently, this hybrid engendered cytotoxic responses that were comparable to those elicited by chemotherapy in both sensitive and resistant tumor models. Investigations into mitochondrial function and ATP production stemming from glycolysis and respiration substantiated the characterization of these hybrids as mitocans. Furthermore, these analyses unveiled a rapid disruption of cellular energy metabolism as the principal mechanism of action, setting it apart from conventional chemotherapeutic drugs. This distinct mechanism accounts for such hybrids’ efficacy in overcoming resistance to chemotherapeutic agents [13].
In addition, a first trend was observed showing that those amide-spacered triterpenoid-rhodamine hybrids with two acetyl groups in ring A were more cytotoxic than those with only one acetyl group, and compounds with a 2α, 3β configuration of these acetyl groups were superior to those compounds holding acetyl groups at positions C-2 and C-3 in a different configuration [3]. Thus, the outcomes unveiled a heightened cytotoxicity exhibited by the asiatic acid conjugates in comparison with the analogous counterparts derived from oleanolic, ursolic, or maslinic acid. Remarkably, these effects surpassed the potency of previously documented derivatives originating from betulinic and glycyrrhetinic acid. These findings provide conclusive validation for our initial conjecture, signifying that not only the triterpene framework and the nature of the amide play a role, but the count of acetoxy groups and the specific linkage position of the rhodamine moiety profoundly influence both the cytotoxic potency and the preferential targeting of tumor cells.
It is well known that lipophilic cations exhibit diverse chemical architectures and encompass distinct mechanisms underlying mitochondrial toxicity. For instance, dequalinium chloride functions through the inhibition of NADH-ubiquinone reductase within the mitochondrial respiratory chain, thereby fostering excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and triggering the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT) pore. As mentioned above, the influence of rhodamine-123 manifests in the disruption of mitochondria’s bioenergetic functions, achieved via the inhibition of ATP synthase. The compound denoted as F16 elicits apoptosis by diminishing mitochondrial resistance to the initiation of the calcium-dependent MPT pore. This difference might also apply to substituted rhodamines. Hence, a clear indication as to whether rhodamine B conjugates are superior to those with a rhodamine 101 moiety has not yet been obtained [2]. More recently, it was discovered for piperazinyl-spacered rhodamine conjugates that the substitution pattern on the rhodamine skeleton exerts some effects onto the cytotoxicity of the compounds as well [3]. We have recently shown that the presence of a 1,5-diazacyclooctane spacer (which has a higher degree of molecular flexibility than a piperazinyl or homopiperazinyl residue) leads to hybrids with nanomolar cytotoxicity [4]. However, a systematic study further investigating the dependence of the observed cytotoxicity on the type of cyclic spacer in combination with spacers of different ring sizes is also missing. It has only been shown that the conjugates must contain lipophilic cations [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. While lipophilic cations derived from structurally simple ammonium salts showed only moderate cytotoxicity [22,23], diminished cytotoxicity was also observed for BODIPY conjugates [24], and also for hybrids holding a malachite green [25] scaffold. Conjugates holding an ethylenediamine spacer and a rhodamine B moiety were also inactive [6]. The latter compounds do not form cationic structures under physiological conditions but rather exist as neutral compounds [26]. However, whether the triterpene had an ursane or oleanane backbone does not seem to affect cytotoxicity, as shown by a comparison of analogous of maslinic acid and corosolic acid [3]. Previous research has failed to identify which spacer (piperazine, homopiperazine, or 1,5-diazacyclooctane) is best suited to active compounds with high cytotoxicity.

2. Results

From these premises, it was concluded that asiatic acid (1, Scheme 1) should be an ideal starting material for systematic studies. Asiatic acid holds three hydroxyl groups at positions C-2, C-3, and C-23; it is commercially available at reasonable prices. In addition, the two hydroxyl groups in ring A are configured 2α,3β.
Since the amide-bound spacer must be a secondary amine group, piperazine, homopiperazine (perhydro-1,4-diazepane), and the ring-extended analog octahydro-1,5-diazocine (a “bis-homopiperazine”) were selected. While the first two amines are commercially available, the latter is not commercially available but can be synthesized via various routes reported in the literature [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. Many different routes were tried, but in the end, only one proved to be truly feasible [37]. The tosylation of 1,3-propane-diamine (Scheme 1) and 1,3-propanediol with p-toluenesulfonyl chloride gave the corresponding di-tosylates. Their reaction with sodium methoxide in refluxing methanol afforded 1,5-bis(p-toluenesulfonyl)-1,5-diazacyclooctane in an 84% isolated yield. Its treatment with HBr (33% in glacial acetic acid) in the presence of an excess of thioanisole [37] afforded octahydro-1,5-diazocine as dihydromide in a 92% isolated yield. This meant that the third spacer to be used in this study was also now readily available and could be prepared in larger quantities.
A further problem arose in the selection of the differently substituted rhodamines. Whilst rhodamine B and rhodamine 101 are commercially available, this is not the case for the analogs that differ in the substituents on the two nitrogen substituents of the rhodamine. The syntheses of the alkyl-substituted rhodamines were carried out as previously reported [13]. Briefly, the reaction of 3-aminophenol with an excess of the corresponding alkyl halide and potassium carbonate in DMF at 100 °C for 3–8 h afforded 3-(dialkylamino)-phenols in a 50–70% yield. Their reaction with phthalic anhydride in the presence of aluminium chloride (catalytic amounts) at 200 °C followed by chromatography (silica gel, CHCl3/MeOH mixtures) afforded the rhodamines Rh1–Rh4 violet solids. Although the overall yields obtained for the rhodamines were low to moderate (but in excellent agreement with reported values), no attempts have been made to improve the yields. Significant product loss was observed during the purification of these compounds.
Thus, all the building blocks were now available. Asiatic acid (1) was acetylated (Scheme 1) as previously described, and tri-O-acetyl-asiatic acid (2) was obtained in a 97% yield [13]. The activation of 2 with oxalyl chloride afforded an intermediate acid chloride which was reacted with piperazine, homopiperazine, and its ring-expanded homolog, octahydro-1,5-diazocine, to give amides 3–5. The reaction with the rhodamines Rh1–Rh5 (previously activated with oxalyl chloride) gave the piperazine-derived conjugates 6–10, the homopiperazine derivatives 11–15, and the ring-expanded compounds 16–20. All conjugates exhibited their typical purple color, clearly demonstrating that they are present in a cationic form [6].
Sulforhodamine (SRB) assays were performed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of the compounds. First, the cytotoxicity of the different rhodamines was determined; the results of these assays are compiled in Table 1 and Table 2 and depicted in Figure 1.
Thereby methyl- and ethyl (=rhodamine B)-substituted rhodamines Rh1 and Rh2 were found to not be cytotoxic within the limits of the assay (EC50 > 30 μM) for all human tumor cell lines but also for non-malignant fibroblasts (NIH 3T3). Increased cytotoxicity, however, was observed for the rhodamines carrying propyl or butyl moieties. Thereby, the butyl-substituted rhodamine Rh4 was more cytotoxic than the propyl-substituted analog Rh3. Rh5 (=rhodamine 101) was about as cytotoxic as the propyl-substituted rhodamine Rh3.
As a result, the A2780 cell line (ovarian cancer) proved to be the most sensitive for the piperazinyl spacer compounds 6–10, with the lowest EC50 values determined ranging from 0.043 μM to 0.0049 μM. When compared with non-malignant NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, a selectivity factor (calculated as the ratio EC50, tumor cell/EC50, NIH 3T3) of 82 was observed, indicating that this compound is more cytotoxic to cancer cells than to non-malignant cells. In this series of compounds, the butyl-substituted rhodamine-conjugated asiatic acid hybrid 9 also proved to be the best for A375 (melanoma) and HT29 (colon adenocarcinoma) cells. A summary of SI values is depicted in Figure 2.
Interestingly, for the homopiperazinyl conjugates 11–15, the compounds that performed best were those holding a rhodamine B (Rh2) unit, and for A2780 cells, a low EC50 value of 0.8 nm was determined. The selectivity factor (relative to NIH 3T3) was about 81. A375, HT29, MCF7 (breast adenocarcinoma), and HeLa (cervix carcinoma) cells also responded well to this compound with low EC50 values between 0.0028 and 0.0177 μM.
Increasing the ring size of the spacer using the 1,5-diazocinyl spacer changed the dependence of cytotoxicity on the residue attached to the rhodamine core since the rhodamine B derivatives no longer performed best compared with the N, N-dipropyl substituted compound 18; therefore, for A2780 cells, an EC50 = 1.9 nM was determined, and an excellent selectivity factor of almost 190 was thereby observed.
Rhodamine 101 (Rh5) conjugates behaved—more or less—like the alkyl-substituted rhodamine conjugates, and the lowest EC50 values were again measured for A2780 cells, and thereby the lowest EC50 value was 0.004 μM (selectivity factor = 80).
In conclusion, all human tumor cell lines were shown to be very sensitive to the spacered asiatic acid-rhodamine hybrids, and a significant influence of the substitution pattern of the rhodamine onto the cytotoxic effect was observed. A similar behavior was observed for the influence of the amide spacer linking the triterpenoid skeleton and the rhodamine part. For example, for A2780 cells and propyl substituents, the EC50 decreased for the piperazinyl-spacered 8 (5.5 nM) to EC50 = 1.1 nM (for 13) but increased again slightly for 18 (EC50 = 1.9 nM). Although it is not possible to generalize which spacer/rhodamine combination performed best across all cell lines, it appears that homopiperazinyl and 1,5-diazocinyl derivatives are superior to those carrying a “simple” piperazinyl moiety. Our previous studies have shown that triterpenoic acid–rhodamine conjugates act as mitocans, shutting down mitochondrial ATP production [13]. This is in excellent agreement with the results of Modico-Napolitano et al. for rhodamine 123 [5]. These researchers showed that the mitochondrial ATPase is the primary biochemical target for rhodamine 123, but they also found that differences in both mitochondrial membrane potential and ATPase sensitivity contribute to selective cytotoxicity for certain cell types in vitro [4,5]. This also applies, for example, to compound 18 (Figure 3). The simultaneous incubation of A375 cells with 18 and MitoTracker green shows that 18 is also preferentially incorporated into the mitochondria.
Investigations employing 3D spheroid models as well as multi-resistant tumor cell lines (such as MDA-MB 231) will be carried out in due course to investigate the potential of these conjugates in more detail.

3. Conclusions

A series of piperazinyl-, homopiperazinyl-, and 1,5-diazocinyl-spacered rhodamine conjugates were prepared from asiatic acid, a naturally occurring pentacyclic triterpene. The hybrids were tested for cytotoxic activity in SRB assays with respect to different ring sizes of the spacer and to a different substitution pattern of the rhodamine scaffold. Therefore, compound 12 holding an EC50 of 0.8 nM was the most cytotoxic compound of this series but 18 with EC50 = 1.9 nM was the most selective compound exhibiting a selectivity factor of almost 190.

4. Experimental Section

Experimental equipment: as previously described [2,4] biological assays were performed as previously reported employing cell lines obtained from the Department of Oncology [Martin-Luther-University Halle Wittenberg; they were bought from ATCC [2,4,7]]. Rhodamine 101 B, as well as asiatic acid, were obtained from local vendors and used as received.
For the SRB assay and staining experiments: as previously described [2,4].

4.1. Synthesis of 1,5-Diazocinyl Dihydrobromide

This compound was prepared as described in the literature [4,37].

4.2. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Triterpenoic Amides 3–5 (GP A)

Compound 1 (1 eq.) was dissolved in dry DCM (10 mL), and oxalyl chloride (4 eq.), DMF (0.24 eq.) and NEt3 (0.24 eq.) were added. The mixture was stirred for 2 h at ambient temperature, the volatiles were removed in vacuo, and the residue was dissolved in dry DCM (10 mL). A solution of the piperazine, homopiperazine or 1,5-diazocinyl dihydromide (3 eq.) in dry DCM, NEt3 (1 eq.; 4 eq. when using 1,5-diazocinyl dihydromide) and DMAP (cat.) was added, and stirring was continued until completion of the reaction (as indicated by TLC). The solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the crude product was subjected to column chromatography to yield compounds 3–5.

4.3. General Procedure for Synthesis of Rhodamine B Conjugates 6–20 (GP B)

Rhodamine Rh1–Rh5 (1.5 eq.), oxalyl chloride (6 eq.), DMF (0.2 eq.), and NEt3 (0.2 eq.) in dry DCM (30 mL) were allowed to react as described above (GP A), the volatiles were removed, and the residue was dissolved in dry DCM (30 mL). To this solution, compounds 3–5 (1 eq.), NEt3 (1.5 eq.), and DMAP (cat.) were added. After stirring for 1 h, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the resulting solid was subjected to column chromatography to yield compounds 6–20, each as a purple solid.

4.4. Tri-O-Acetyl-Asiatic Acid [(2α,3β,4α) 2,3,23-Tris(acetyloxy)-urs-12-en-28-oic Acid] (2)

Acetylation of asiatic acid (1, 11.2 g, 21.8 mmol) in dry DCM (250 mL) with Ac2O (20.0 mL, 210 mmol) in the presence of NEt3 (26 mL, 180 mmol) and catal. DMAP for 24 h followed by usual aq. workup and chromatography (SiO2, hexanes/ethyl acetate, 7:3) gave 2 (97%) as a colorless solid; m.p. 160–162 °C (lit.: [13] 160–163 °C); α D 20 = +35.8° (c 0.25, CHCl3) [lit.: [13] α D 20 = +34.71° (c 0.35, CHCl3)]; RF = 0.29 (hexanes/ethyl acetate, 7:3); MS (ESI, MeOH): m/z = 615.2 (15% [M+H]+, 637.3 (100%, [M+Na]+).

4.5. (2α,3β,4α)28-Oxo-28-Piperazin-1-yl-urs-12-ene-2,3,23-Triyl Triacetate (3)

Following GP A, from 2 (200 mg, 0.32 mmol) and piperazine (85 mg, 0.97 mmol), 3 (190 mg, 86%) was obtained as a colorless solid; m.p. 158–160 °C (lit.: [13] 157–160 °C); α D 20 = +17.20° (c 0.31, CHCl3), [lit. [13] α D 20 = +17.48° (c 0.27, CHCl3)]; RF = 0.33 (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 9:1); MS (ESI, MeOH): m/z = 683.4 (100%, [M+H]+).

4.6. (2α,3β,4α)28-(1,4-Diazepan-1-yl)-28-oxo-urs-12-ene-2,3,23-Triyl Triacetate (4)

Following GP A, from 2 (500 mg, 0.81 mmol) and homopiperazine (210 mg, 2.43 mmol), 4 (445 mg, 79%) was obtained as a colorless solid; m.p. 185–187 °C (lit.: [13] 185.3–186.3 °C)); α D 20 = +14.5° (c 0.21, CHCl3), [lit.: [13] α D 20 = +14.38° (c 0.145, CHCl3)]; RF = 0.40 (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 9:1); MS (ESI, MeOH): m/z = 697.4 (100%, [M+H]+).

4.7. (2α,3β,4α)28-(1,5-Diazocin-1-yl)-28-oxo-urs-12-ene-2,3,23-Triyl Triacetate (5)

Following GP A, from 2 (400 mg, 0.80 mmol) and 1,5-diazocinyl dihydromide (660 mg, 2.4 mmol), 5 (390 mg, 68%) was obtained as a colorless solid; m.p. 187–190 °C (lit. [4] 188–191 °C); RF = 0.36 (CHCl3/MeOH, 9:1); α D 20 = −29.7° (c 0.02, CHCl3) [lit.: [4] α D 20 = -30.2° (c 0.015, CHCl3)]; MS (ESI, MeOH/CHCl3, 4:1): m/z = 711.2 (100%, [M+H+); analysis calcd for C42H66N2O7 (711.00): C 70.95, H 9.36, N 3.94; found: C 70.71, H 9.63, N 3.75.

4.8. (2α,3β,4α)-9-[2-{[4-(2,3,23-Tris(acetyloxy)-urs-12-en-28-oyl)-Piperazinyl]Carbonyl}Phenyl]-3,6-bis(Dimethylamino)-Xanthylium Chloride (6)

Following GB B, from 3 (150 mg, 0.22 mmol) followed by chromatography (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 9:1), 6 (140 mg, 59%) was obtained as a violet solid; m.p. = 248–250 °C; Rf = 0.62 (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 8:2); UV-Vis (MeOH): λmax (log ε) = 552 nm (4.71); IR (ATR): ν = 2923m, 2869w, 1737m, 1630m, 1592vs, 1534w, 1493m, 1457w, 1406m, 1365m, 1340s, 1231s, 1184vs, 1124m, 1042m, 1004m, 926m, 823m, 699m, 596w, 580w, 517w cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.71–7.60 (m, 2H, 44-H, 46-H), 7.55–7.48 (m, 1H, 47-H), 7.39–7.29 (m, 1H, 45-H), 7.28–7.22 (m, 2H, 51-H), 7.07–6.93 (m, 2H, 50-H), 6.86–6.77 (m, 2H, 53-H), 5.19–5.08 (m, 2H, 12-H, 2-H), 5.04 (d, J = 10.3 Hz, 1H, 3-H), 3.83 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1H, 24-Ha), 3.54 (d, J = 11.9 Hz, 1H, 24-Hb), 3.43–3.19 (m, 8H, 37-H, 38-H, 39-H, 40-H), 3.32 (s, 12H, 55-H, 56-H), 2.41–2.22 (m, 1H, 18-H), 2.05 (s, 3H, 32-H), 2.04–2.00 (m, 1H, 1-Ha), 1.99 (s, 3H, 34-H), 1.94 (s, 3H, 36-H), 1.93–1.85 (m, 3H, 11-H, 16-Ha), 1.71–1.63 (m, 2H, 16-Hb, 22-Ha), 1.60–1.54 (m, 1H, 9-H), 1.53–1.19 (m, 9H, 22-Hb, 21-Ha, 7-Ha, 6-H, 19-H, 5-H, 21-Hb, 7-Hb), 1.10 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H, 1-Hb), 1.04 (s, 4H, 25-H, 15-Ha), 1.02 (s, 4H, 27-H, 15-Hb), 0.89 (s, 4H, 20-H, 30-H), 0.85 (s, 3H, 23-H), 0.82–0.79 (m, 3H, 29-H), 0.63 (s, 3H, 26-H) ppm; 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 175.9 (C-28), 170.9 (C-35), 170.5 (C-31), 170.4 (C-33), 167.7 (C-41), 157.6 (C-54), 156.4 (C-48, C-52), 144.1 (C-13), 135.2 (C-43), 131.8 (C-51), 130.5 (C-42), 130.4 (C-46), 130.4 (C-44), 130.2 (C-45), 127.8 (C-47), 124.7 (C-12), 114.5 (C-50), 114.0 (C-49), 96.9 (C-53), 74.9 (C-3), 70.0 (C-2), 65.3 (C-24), 55.1 (C-18), 48.7 (C-17), 47.7 (C-9), 47.6 (C-5), 43.8 (C-1), 42.2 (C-37, C-38, C-39, C-40), 42.2 (C-14), 42.0 (C-4), 41.2 (C-55, C-56), 39.5 (C-19), 38.7 (C-20), 37.9 (C-8, C-10), 34.2 (C-22), 32.4 (C-7), 30.4 (C-21), 28.1 (C-15), 23.4 (C-11, C-16), 23.4 (C-27), 21.2 (C-36), 21.1 (C-30), 21.0 (C-34), 20.8 (C-32), 17.9 (C-6), 17.4 (C-29), 17.1 (C-25), 16.9 (C-26), 14.0 (C-23) ppm; MS (ESI, MeOH/CHCl3): m/z = 1052 (100%, [M-Cl]+); analysis calcd for C64H834N4O9Cl (1087.84): C 70.66, H 7.69, N 5.15; found: C 70.39, H 7.91, N 4.96.

4.9. (2α,3β,4α)-9-[2-{[4-(2,3,23-Tris(Acetyloxy)-urs-12-en-28-oyl)-Piperazinyl]Carbonyl}Phenyl]-3,6-Bis(Diethylamino)-Xanthylium Chloride) (7)

Following GP B, from 3 (70 mg, 0.10 mmol) and rhodamine B (72 mg, 0.15 mmol), 7 (93 mg, 80%) was obtained as a purple solid; m.p. 241–243 °C (lit.: [4] 244–246 °C); Rf = 0.28 (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 9:1); MS (ESI, MeOH): m/z = 1107.7 (100%, [M-Cl]+).

4.10. (2α,3β,4α)-9-[2-{[4-(2,3,23-Tris(Acetyloxy)-urs-12-en-28-oyl)-Piperazinyl]Carbonyl}Phenyl]-3,6-Bis(Dipropylamino)-Xanthylium Chloride (8)

Following GP B, from 3 (150 mg, 0.22 mmol) followed by chromatography (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH 9:1) gave 8 (150 mg, 57%) as a violet solid; m.p. 226–228 °C; Rf = 0.55 (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH 8:2); UV-Vis (MeOH): λmax (log ε) = 563 nm (4.72); IR (ATR): ν = 2926m, 2872w, 1739m, 1633m, 1589vs, 1545w, 1456m, 1410m, 1366m, 1336s, 1301w, 1230vs, 1178s, 1132m, 1100m, 1041m, 1004m, 962w, 940w, 918m, 825w, 758w, 597w, 576w, 506w cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.71–7.62 (m, 2H, 45-H, 46-H), 7.56–7.48 (m, 1H, 47-H), 7.37–7.32 (m, 1H, 44-H), 7.31–7.22 (m, 2H, 51-H), 7.01–6.94 (m, 2H, 50-H), 6.76–6.69 (m, 2H, 53-H), 5.19–5.09 (m, 2H, 12-H, 2-H), 5.06 (d, J = 10.3 Hz, 1H, 3-H), 3.83 (d, J = 11.8 Hz, 1H, 24-Ha), 3.56 (d, J = 11.9 Hz, 1H, 24-Hb), 3.49 (t, J = 7.9, 7.2 Hz, 8H, 55-H, 56-H), 3.46–3.24 (m, 8H, 37-H, 38-H, 39-H, 40-H), 2.39–2.30 (m, 1H, 18-H), 2.07 (s, 3H, 32-H), 2.05–2.01 (m, 1H, 1-Ha), 2.00 (s, 3H, 34-H), 1.96 (s, 3H, 36-H), 1.94–1.87 (m, 3H, 11-H, 16-Ha), 1.76–1.66 (m, 10H, 57-H, 59-H, 16-Hb, 22-Ha), 1.62–1.56 (m, 2H, 9-H, 22-Hb), 1.50–1.17 (m, 8H, 21-Ha, 7-Ha, 6-H, 19-H, 5-H, 21-Hb, 7-Hb), 1.12–1.08 (m, 2H, 1-Hb, 15-Ha), 1.05 (s, 3H, 25-H), 1.03 (s, 4H, 27-H, 15-Hb), 1.00 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 12H, 58-H), 0.92–0.90 (m, 4H, 20-H, 30-H), 0.86 (s, 3H, 23-H), 0.84–0.81 (m, 3H, 29-H), 0.67 (s, 3H, 26-H) ppm; 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 176.1 (C-28), 171.0 (C-35), 170.6 (C-31), 170.4 (C-33), 167.9 (C-41), 157.8 (C-54), 156.3 (C-48), 156.2 (C-52), 143.2 (C-13), 135.1 (C-43), 132.3 (C-51), 130.8 (C-42), 130.5 (C-44), 130.4 (C-45), 130.4 (C-46), 127.8 (C-47), 124.7 (C-12), 114.6 (C-50), 114.0 (C-49), 96.6 (C-53), 74.9 (C-3), 70.0 (C-2), 65.4 (C-24), 54.7 (C-18), 53.9 (C-55, C-56), 49.0 (C-17), 47.7 (C-9), 47.6 (C-5), 47.4 (C-37, C-38, C-39, C-40), 43.8 (C-1), 42.2 (C-14), 42.0 (C-4), 39.5, 39.3 (C-19), 38.7 (C-20), 37.9 (C-8, C-10), 34.3 (C-22), 32.6 (C-7), 30.5 (C-21), 28.1 (C-15), 23.4 (C-11, C-16), 23.4 (C-27), 21.3 (C-36), 21.2 (C-30), 21.0 (C-34), 20.9 (C-32), 20.7 (C-57, C-59), 18.0 (C-6), 17.4 (C-29), 17.1 (C-25), 17.0 (C-26), 14.0 (C-23), 11.4 (C-58, C-60) ppm; MS (ESI, MeOH): m/z = 1164.5 (100%, [M-Cl]+); analysis calcd for C72H99N4O9Cl (1200.03): C 72.06, H 8.32, N 4.67; found: C 71.85, H 8.53, N 4.40.

4.11. (2α,3β,4α)-9-[2-{[4-(2,3,23-Tris(Acetyloxy)-urs-12-en-28-oyl)-Piperazinyl]Carbonyl}Phenyl]-3,6-Bis(Dibutylamino)-Xanthylium Chloride (9)

Following GP B, from 3 (200 mg, 0.29 mmol) followed by chromatography (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 9:1), 9 (180 mg, 0.14 mmol, 49%) was obtained as a violet solid; m.p. 222–226 °C; Rf = 0.44 (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 8:2); UV-Vis (MeOH): λmax (log ε) = 567 nm (4.91); IR (ATR): ν = 2929m, 2870w, 1740m, 1633w, 1587vs, 1528w, 1506w, 1462m, 1429w, 1411s, 1394m, 1366m, 1340s, 1290m, 1219vs, 1188w, 1176s, 1133m, 1109m, 1042m, 1004m, 962w, 922m, 823w, 755w, 732w, 705w, 664w, 641w, 597w, 509w cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.69–7.64 (m, 2H, 45-H, 46-H), 7.55–7.50 (m, 1H, 47-H), 7.35–7.30 (m, 1H, 44-H), 7.28–7.21 (m, 2H, 51-H), 7.07–6.91 (m, 2H, 50-H), 6.70 (s, 2H, 53-H), 5.15 (s, 1H, 12-H), 5.13–5.09 (m, 1H, 2-H), 5.04 (d, J = 10.3 Hz, 1H, 3-H), 3.81 (d, J = 11.7 Hz, 1H, 24-Ha), 3.60–3.55 (m, 1H, 24-Hb), 3.54–3.48 (m, 8H, 55-H, 59-H), 3.39–3.24 (m, 8H, 37-H, 38-H, 39-H, 40-H), 2.37–2.29 (m, 1H, 18-H), 2.05 (s, 3H, 32-H), 2.04–2.01 (m, 1H, 1-Ha), 1.99 (s, 3H, 34-H), 1.94 (s, 3H, 36-H), 1.92–1.86 (m, 4H, 11-H, 16-H), 1.75–1.70 (m, 1H, 22-Ha), 1.69–1.62 (m, 8H, 56-H, 60-H), 1.60–1.55 (m, 1H, 9-H), 1.50–1.19 (m, 17H, 22-Hb, 21-Ha, 57-H, 61-H, 7-Ha, 6-H, 19-H, 5-H, 21-Hb, 7-Hb), 1.10 (d, J = 11.9 Hz, 1H, 1-Hb), 1.04 (s, 3H, 25-H), 1.02 (s, 5H, 27-H, 15-H), 0.96 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 12H, 58-H, 62-H), 0.93–0.92 (m, 1H, 20-H), 0.90 (s, 3H, 30-H), 0.85 (s, 3H, 23-H), 0.81 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H, 29-H), 0.66 (s, 3H, 26-H) ppm; 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 175.9 (C-28), 170.9 (C-35), 170.5 (C-31), 170.4 (C-33), 167.8 (C-41), 157.7 (C-54), 156.1 (C-48), 156.0 (C-52), 143.9 (C-13), 135.0 (C-43), 132.3 (C-51), 130.7 (C-42), 130.5 (C-44), 130.4 (C-46), 130.4 (C-45), 127.8 (C-47), 124.7 (C-12), 114.5 (C-50), 113.9 (C-49), 96.5 (C-53), 74.9 (C-3), 70.0 (C-2), 65.3 (C-24), 55.2 (C-18), 52.0 (C-55, C-59), 47.7 (C-9), 47.6 (C-5), 47.4 (C-37, C-38), 43.8 (C-1), 42.3 (C-39, C-40), 42.2 (C-14), 42.0 (C-4, C-17), 39.5 (C-19), 38.7 (C-20), 37.9 (C-8, C-10), 34.2 (C-22), 32.6 (C-7), 30.5 (C-21), 29.6 (C-56, C-60), 28.1 (C-15), 23.4 (C-11, C-16), 23.4 (C-27), 21.2 (C-30), 21.1 (C-36), 20.9 (C-34), 20.8 (C-32), 20.3 (C-57, C-61), 18.0 (C-6), 17.4 (C-29), 17.1 (C-25), 16.9 (C-26), 14.0 (C-23), 13.9 (C-58, C-62) ppm; MS (ESI, MeOH): m/z = 1219.4 (100%, [M-Cl]+); analysis calcd for C76H107N4O9Cl (1256.16): C 72.67, H 8.59, N 4.46; found: C 72.49, H 8.75, N 4.20.

4.12. (2α,3β,4α)-2,3,23-Triacetoxy-28-[3-(2,3,6,7,12,13,16,17-Octahydro-1H,5H,11H,15H-Pyrido[3.2.1-Ij]Pyrido[1″,2″,3″:1′,8′]Quinolino[6′,5′:5,6]Pyrano[2,3-F]Quinoline-4-Ium-9-Yl)Benzoyl]-Piperazin-1-Yl]-28-Oxo-Olean-12-Ene Chloride (10)

Following GP B, from 3 (150 mg, 0.22 mmol) followed by chromatography (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 9:1), 10 (144 mg, 55%) was obtained as a violet solid; m.p. 244–247 °C; Rf = 0.38 (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 8:2); UV-Vis (MeOH): λmax (log ε) = 581 nm (4.69); IR (ATR): ν = 2924m, 2867w, 1739s, 1630m, 1595s, 1546w, 1493m, 1458w, 1446w, 1364s, 1296s, 1233vs, 1196s, 1182s, 1097s, 1035s, 1004m, 962w, 773w, 735w, 641w, 622w, 598w, 422w cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.70–7.62 (m, 2H, 45-H, 46-H), 7.55–7.46 (m, 1H, 47-H), 7.30–7.27 (m, 1H, 44-H), 6.72–6.62 (m, 2H, 50-H), 5.19–5.15 (m, 1H, 12-H), 5.12 (td, J = 11.1, 4.5 Hz, 1H, 2-H), 5.05 (d, J = 10.3 Hz, 1H, 3-H), 3.83 (d, J = 11.7 Hz, 1H, 24-Ha), 3.69–3.21 (m, 17H, 24-Hb, 57-H, 58-H, 37-H, 38-H, 39-H, 40-H), 3.08–2.92 (m, 4H, 55-H), 2.78–2.60 (m, 4H, 60-H), 2.45–2.25 (m, 1H, 18-H), 2.14–2.08 (m, 4H, 56-H), 2.06 (s, 3H, 32-H), 2.04–2.01 (m, 1H, 1-Ha), 1.99 (s, 3H, 34-H), 1.95 (s, 3H, 36-H), 1.93–1.86 (m, 7H, 59-H, 11-H, 16-Ha), 1.74–1.64 (m, 2H, 22-Ha, 16-Hb), 1.62–1.50 (m, 2H, 9-H, 22-Hb), 1.46–1.14 (m, 8H, 21-Ha, 7-Ha, 6-H, 19-H, 5-H, 21-Hb, 7-Hb), 1.14–1.07 (m, 2H, 1-Hb, 15-Ha), 1.06 (s, 3H, 25-H), 1.03 (s, 4H, 27-H, 15-Hb), 0.96–0.92 (m, 1H, 20-H), 0.92–0.89 (m, 3H, 30-H), 0.86 (s, 3H, 29-H), 0.84–0.80 (m, 3H, 23-H), 0.67 (s, 3H, 26-H) ppm; 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 175.9 (C-28), 170.9 (C-35), 170.5 (C-31), 170.4 (C-33), 168.0 (C-41), 153.1 (C-54,C- 62), 152.1 (C-48), 151.3 (C-52, C-72), 143.9 (C-13), 134.9 (C-43), 131.8 (C-42), 130.8 (C-44), 130.3 (C-46), 129.9 (C-45), 127.6 (C-47), 126.7 (C-50, C-70), 124.8 (C-12), 123.7 (C-51, C-71), 113.3 (C-49, C-61), 105.5 (C-53, C-73), 74.9 (C-3), 70.0 (C-2), 65.3 (C-24), 55.2 (C-18), 51.1 (C-58, C-83), 50.6 (C-57, C-85), 49.0 (C-17), 47.7 (C-9), 47.6 (C-5), 43.8 (C-1), 42.2 (C-14), 42.2 (C-37, C-38, C-39, C-40), 42.0 (C-4), 39.5 (C-19), 38.7 (C-20), 37.9 (C-8, C-10), 34.3 (C-22), 32.6 (C-7), 30.5 (C-21), 28.1 (C-15), 27.7 (C-60, C-81), 23.5 (C-27), 23.4 (C-11, C-16), 21.3 (C-30), 21.1 (C-36), 21.0 (C-34), 20.8 (C-32), 20.7 (C-59, C-82), 20.0 (C-55, C-87), 19.8 (C-56, C-86), 18.0 (C-6), 17.4 (C-29), 17.1 (C-25), 16.9 (C-26), 14.0 (C-23) ppm; MS (ESI, MeOH/CHCl3): m/z = 1156.3 (100%, [M-Cl]+); analysis calcd for C68H78N4O5Cl (1040.47): C 78.50, H 8.43, N 5.36; found: C 78.34, H 8.59, N 5.24.

4.13. (2α,3β,4α)-9-[2-{[4-(2α,3β,23-Tris(Acetyloxy)-urs-12-en-28-oyl)-Homopiperazinyl]Carbonyl}Phenyl]-3,6-Bis(Dimethylamino)-Xanthylium Chloride (11)

Following GP B, from 4 (200 mg, 0.29 mmol) followed by chromatography (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 9:1), 11 (156 mg, 49%) was obtained as a violet solid; m.p. 258–260 °C Rf = 0.38 (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 8:2); UV-Vis (MeOH): λmax (log ε) = 553 nm (4.70); IR (ATR): ν = 2925m, 2870w, 1738m, 1592vs, 1534w, 1493m, 1406m, 1365m, 1341s, 1304w, 1231s, 1185s, 1135m, 1042m, 1032m, 963w, 926m, 823w, 700m, 602w, 580w, 516w cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.69–7.57 (m, 2H, 45-H, 47-H), 7.47–7.38 (m, 1H, 48-H), 7.34–7.28 (m, 1H, 46-H), 7.26–7.11 (m, 2H, 52-H), 7.02–6.72 (m, 4H, 54-H, 51-H), 5.23–5.09 (m, 2H, 12-H, 2-H), 5.05 (d, J = 10.3 Hz, 1H, 3-H), 3.82 (d, J = 11.7 Hz, 1H, 24-Ha), 3.55 (d, J = 11.9 Hz, 1H, 24-Hb), 3.51–2.79 (m, 22H, 56-H, 57-H, 37-H, 38-H, 39-H, 40-H, 41-H), 2.49–2.32 (m, 1H, 18-H), 2.05 (s, 3H, 32-H), 2.04–2.01 (m, 1H, 1-Ha), 1.99 (s, 3H, 34-H), 1.95 (s, 3H, 36-H), 1.94–1.82 (m, 3H, 11-H, 16-Ha), 1.82–1.62 (m, 2H, 16-Ha, 22-Ha), 1.63–1.54 (m, 1H, 9-H), 1.50–1.17 (m, 9H, 22-Hb, 21-Ha, 7-Ha, 6-H, 19-H, 5-H, 21-Hb, 7-Hb), 1.11 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H, 1-Hb), 1.05 (s, 3H, 25-H), 1.02 (s, 4H, 27-H, 15-Ha), 1.00–0.96 (m, 2H, 20-H, 15-Ha), 0.95–0.88 (m, 3H, 30-H), 0.85 (s, 6H, 23-H, 29-H), 0.69 (s, 3H, 26-H) ppm; 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 173.3 (C-28), 171.0 (C-35), 170.6 (C-31), 170.5 (C-33), 168.1 (C-42), 157.7 (C-55), 157.6 (C-49), 157.5 (C-53), 144.9 (C-13), 135.0 (C-44), 132.0 (C-52), 130.5 (C-43), 130.3 (C-47), 130.2 (C-45), 129.7 (C-46), 126.9 (C-48), 124.8 (C-12), 114.1 (C-51), 113.9 (C-50), 96.8 (C-54), 75.0 (C-3), 70.0 (C-2), 65.4 (C-24), 55.4 (C-18), 49.0 (C-17), 47.8 (C-9), 47.7 (C-5), 43.8 (C-1), 42.4 (C-14), 42.0 (C-4), 41.4 (C-37, C-38, C-39, C-40, C-41), 41.2 (C-56, C-57), 39.4 (C-19), 38.8 (C-20), 37.9 (C-8, C-10), 34.0 (C-22), 32.4 (C-7), 30.6 (C-21), 27.9 (C-15), 23.4 (C-27), 23.4 (C-11, C-16), 21.3 (C-30), 21.2 (C-36), 21.0 (C-34), 20.9 (C-32), 18.0 (C-6), 17.5 (C-29), 17.1 (C-25), 17.0 (C-26), 14.0 (C-23) ppm; MS (ESI, MeOH/CHCl3): m/z = 1065.5 (100%, [M-Cl]+); analysis calcd for C65H85N4O9Cl (1101.86): C 70.85, H 7.78, N 5.08; found: C 70.59, H 7.93, N 4.88.

4.14. (2α,3β,4α)-9-[2-{[4-(2α,3β,23-Tris(Acetyloxy)-urs-12-en-28-oyl)-Homopiperazinyl]Carbonyl}Phenyl]-3,6-Bis(Diethylamino)-Xanthylium Chloride (12)

Following GP B, from 4 (180 mg, 0.26 mmol) followed by chromatography (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 9:1), 12 (224 mg, 64%) was obtained as a violet solid; m.p. 253–257 °C (lit.:[4] 254–258 °C; Rf = 0.30 (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 8:1); MS (ESI, MeOH/CHCl3): m/z = 1121.4 (100%, [M-Cl]+).

4.15. (2α,3β,4α)-9-[2-{[4-(2α,3β,23-Tris(Acetyloxy)-urs-12-en-28-oyl)-Homopiperazinyl]Carbonyl}Phenyl]-3,6-Bis(Dipropylamino)-Xanthylium Chloride (13)

Following GP B, from 4 (200 mg, 0.29 mmol) followed by chromatography (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 9:1), 13 (224 mg, 64%) was obtained as a violet solid; m.p. 224–225 °C; Rf = 0.33 (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 8:2); UV-Vis (MeOH): λmax (log ε) = 566 nm (4.91); IR (ATR): ν = 2928m, 2873w, 1739m, 1627m, 1587vs, 1528w, 1507w, 1470m, 1412s, 1365m, 1337s, 1301m, 1230vs, 1177s, 1133m, 1100m, 1041m, 1032m, 997w, 963w, 939w, 919w, 824w, 780w, 757w, 597w, 575w, 507w cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.64–7.57 (m, 2H, 46-H, 47-H), 7.46–7.37 (m, 1H, 48-H), 7.30–7.15 (m, 3H, 45-H, 52-H), 6.78–6.67 (m, 2H, 54-H), 5.20–5.15 (m, 1H, 2-H), 5.12 (td, J = 11.0, 4.7 Hz, 2H, 12-H), 5.04 (d, J = 10.3 Hz, 1H, 3-H), 4.16–3.86 (m, 4H, 37-H, 38-H), 3.80 (d, J = 11.7 Hz, 1H, 24-Ha), 3.54 (d, J = 11.8 Hz, 1H, 24-Hb), 3.53–3.38 (m, 8H, 56-H, 59-H), 3.34–2.97 (m, 8H, 39-H, 40-H), 2.49–2.35 (m, 1H, 18-H), 2.05 (s, 3H, 32-H), 2.03–2.00 (m, 1H, 1-Ha), 1.98 (s, 3H, 34-H), 1.94 (s, 3H, 36-H), 1.93–1.83 (m, 3H, 11-H, 16-Ha), 1.79–1.65 (m, 10H, 57-H, 60-H, 16-Hb, 22-Ha), 1.62–1.53 (m, 1H, 22-Hb, 9-H), 1.42–1.18 (m, 10H, 21-Ha, 7-Ha, 6-H, 19-H, 5-H, 21-Hb, 7-Hb, 41-H), 1.10–1.07 (m, 1H, 1-Hb), 1.04 (s, 3H, 25-H), 1.01 (s, 4H, 27-H, 15-Ha), 1.00–0.96 (m, 13H, 58-H, 61-H, 20-H), 0.93–0.88 (m, 4H, 30-H, 15-Hb), 0.85 (s, 6H, 23-H, 29-H), 0.68 (s, 3H, 26-H) ppm; 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 176.6 (C-28), 170.9 (C-35), 170.5 (C-33), 170.4 (C-31), 168.1 (C-42), 157.8 (C-55), 156.3 (C-49), 156.2 (C-53), 142.6 (C-13), 136.0 (C-44), 132.6 (C-52), 130.7 (C-43), 130.2 (C-47), 130.2 (C-45), 129.7 (C-46), 126.9 (C-48), 124.6 (C-12), 114.9 (C-51), 113.8 (C-50), 96.6 (C-54), 77.4, 77.2, 76.9, 75.0 (C-3), 70.0 (C-2), 65.4 (C-24), 55.8 (C-18), 53.9 (C-56, C-59), 53.8 (C-37, C-38, C-39, C-40, C-41), 48.9 (C-17), 47.8 (C-9), 47.7 (C-5), 43.8 (C-1), 42.4 (C-14), 42.0 (C-4), 39.4 (C-19), 38.8 (C-20), 37.9 (C-8, C-10), 34.0 (C-22), 32.7 (C-7), 30.5 (C-21), 28.0 (C-15), 23.4 (C-11, C-16), 23.4 (C-27), 21.3 (C-30), 21.1 (C-36), 21.0 (C-34), 20.8 (C-32), 20.8 (C-57, C-60), 18.0 (C-6), 17.5 (C-29), 17.1 (C-25), 17.0 (C-26), 14.0 (C-23), 11.4 (C-58, C-61) ppm; MS (ESI, MeOH/CHCl3): m/z = 1178.4 (100%, [M-Cl]+); analysis calcd for C73H101N4O9Cl (1214.08): C 72.22, H 8.39, N 4.61; found: C 71.97, H 8.48, N 4.39.

4.16. (2α,3β,4α)-9-[2-{[4-(2α,3β,23-Tris(Acetyloxy)-urs-12-en-28-oyl)-Homopiperazinyl]Carbonyl}Phenyl]-3,6-Bis(Dibutylamino)-Xanthylium Chloride (14)

Following GP B, from 4 (284 mg, 0.4 mmol) followed by chromatography (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 9:1), 14 (2198 mg, 58%) was obtained as a violet solid; m.p. 210–213 °C; Rf = 0.36 (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 8:2); UV-Vis (MeOH): λmax (log ε) = 567 nm (4.94); IR (ATR): ν = 2927m, 2870w, 1741m, 1626w, 1588vs, 1528w, 1507w, 1462m, 1412s, 1394w, 1366m, 1339s, 1291m, 1220s, 1187s, 1177s, 1133m, 1109m, 1043m, 1033m, 963w, 921m, 823w, 756w, 704w, 597w cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.68–7.54 (m, 2H, 46-H, 47-H), 7.46–7.36 (m, 1H, 48-H), 7.29–7.25 (m, 2H, 45-H), 7.25–7.14 (m, 2H, 52-H), 7.09–6.98 (m, 2H, 51-H), 6.79–6.64 (m, 2H, 54-H), 5.18–5.15 (m, 1H, 12-H), 5.12 (td, J = 11.0, 4.7 Hz, 1H, 2-H), 5.03 (d, J = 10.3 Hz, 1H, 3-H), 4.26–2.89 (m, 20H, 24-H, 37-H, 38-H, 39-H, 40-H, 41-H, 56-H, 60-H), 2.49–2.33 (m, 1H, 18-H), 2.04 (s, 3H, 32-H), 2.03–2.00 (m, 1H, 1-Ha), 1.98 (s, 3H, 34-H), 1.94 (s, 3H, 36-H), 1.92–1.82 (m, 4H, 11-H, 16-H), 1.81–1.72 (m, 2H, 22-H), 1.71–1.61 (m, 8H, 57-H, 61-H), 1.61–1.54 (m, 1H, 9-H), 1.48–1.18 (m, 16H, 58-H, 62-H, 21-Ha, 7-Ha, 6-H, 19-H, 5-H, 21-Hb, 7-Hb), 1.12–1.07 (m, 1H, 1-Hb), 1.04 (m, 5H, 25-H, 15-H), 1.01 (s, 3H, 27-H), 0.96 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 13H, 59-H, 63-H, 20-H), 0.93–0.88 (m, 3H, 30-H), 0.84 (s, 6H, 23-H, 29-H), 0.68 (s, 3H, 26-H) ppm; 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 176.4 (C-28), 170.9 (C-35), 170.5 (C-31) 170.4 (C-33), 168.0 (C-42), 157.8 (C-55), 156.1 (C-49), 156.0 (C-53), 143.9 (C-13), 136.0 (C-44), 132.6 (C-52), 130.2 (C-43), 130.2 (C-45), 129.8 (C-47), 129.7 (C-46), 126.9 (C-48), 124.6 (C-12), 114.7 (C-51), 113.8 (C-50), 96.4 (C-54), 75.0 (C-3), 70.0 (C-2), 65.4 (C-24), 55.5 (C-18), 52.1 (C-37, C-38, C-39, C-40, C-41), 52.0 (C-56, C-60), 49.0 (C-17), 47.8 (C-9), 47.7 (C-5), 43.8 (C-1), 42.4 (C-14), 42.0 (C-4), 39.4 (C-19), 38.8 (C-20), 37.9 (C-8, C-10), 34.0 (C-22), 32.6 (C-7), 30.5 (C-21), 29.6 (C-57, C-62), 27.6 (C-15), 23.4 (C-11, C-16), 23.4 (C-27), 21.3 (C-30), 21.1 (C-36), 20.9 (C-34), 20.8 (C-32), 20.3 (C-58, C-63), 17.9 (C-6), 17.5 (C-29), 17.1 (C-25), 17.0 (C-26), 14.0 (C-23), 13.9 (C-59, C-64) ppm; MS (ESI, MeOH/CHCl3): m/z = 1234.3 (100%, [M-Cl]+); analysis calcd for C77H109N4O9Cl (1270.19): C 72.81, H 8.65, N 4.41; found: C 72.61, H 8.86, N 4.21.

4.17. (2α,3β,4α)-2,3,23-Triacetoxy-28-[3-(2,3,6,7,12,13,16,17-Octahydro-1H,5H,11H,15H-Pyrido[3.2.1-Ij]Pyrido[1″,2″,3″:1′,8′]Quinolino[6′,5′:5,6]Pyrano[2,3-F]Quinoline-4-Ium-9-Yl)Benzoyl]-1,4-Diazepan-1-Yl]-28-Oxo-Olean-12-Ene Chloride (15)

Following GP B, from 4 (115 mg, 0.17 mmol) followed by chromatography (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 9:1), 15 (104 mg, 0.1 mmol, 63%) was obtained as a violet solid; m.p. 287–289 °C; Rf = 0.19 (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 9:1); UV-Vis (MeOH): λmax (log ε) = 582 nm (4.82); IR (ATR): ν = 2924m, 2866w, 1738s, 1621m, 1595vs, 1545w, 1493m, 1458w, 1445w, 1435w, 1363s, 1294vs, 1232s, 1179vs, 1100s, 1034s, 962w, 743m, 640w, 623w, 598w, 420m cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.72–7.52 (m, 2H, 46-H, 47-H), 7.47–7.34 (m, 1H, 48-H), 7.25–7.20 (m, 1H, 45-H), 6.79–6.55 (m, 2H, 51-H), 5.22–5.17 (m, 1H, 12-H), 5.14 (td, J = 11.1, 4.5 Hz, 1H, 2-H), 5.05 (d, J = 10.3 Hz, 1H, 3-H), 4.50–3.89 (m, 4H, 37-H, 38-H), 3.82 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1H, 24-Ha), 3.69–3.15 (m, 13H, 24-Hb, 39-H, 40-H, 58-H, 59-H), 3.05–2.95 (m, 4H, 56-H), 2.80–2.63 (m, 4H, 61-H), 2.49–2.39 (m, 1H, 18-H), 2.15–2.08 (m, 4H, 57-H), 2.06 (s, 3H, 32-H), 2.04–2.02 (m, 1H, 1-Ha), 2.00 (s, 3H, 34-H), 1.96 (s, 3H, 36-H), 1.94–1.84 (m, 5H, 60-H, 11-Ha), 1.85–1.64 (m, 4H, 11-Hb, 16-H, 22-Ha), 1.63–1.56 (m, 2H, 9-H, 22-Hb), 1.51–1.14 (m, 10H, 21-Ha, 7-Ha, 6-H, 19-H, 5-H, 21-Hb, 7-Hb, 41-H), 1.14–1.08 (m, 1H, 1-Hb), 1.06 (s, 4H, 25-H, 15-Ha), 1.02 (s, 4H, 27-H, 15-Hb), 0.97–0.92 (m, 1H, 20-H), 0.92–0.88 (m, 3H, 30-H), 0.86 (s, 6H, 23-H, 29-H), 0.70 (s, 3H, 26-H) ppm; 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 175.5 (C-28), 170.8 (C-35), 170.4 (C-31), 170.3 (C-33), 168.0 (C-42), 152.9 (C-55), 151.9 (C-49), 151.3 (C-53), 143.8 (C-13), 135.0 (C-44), 131.8 (C-43), 130.4 (C-45), 129.6 (C-46), 129.5 (C-47), 126.7 (C-48), 126.6 (C-51), 124.7 (C-12), 123.7 (C-52), 113.4 (C-50), 105.1 (C-54), 74.9 (C-3), 69.9 (C-2), 65.3 (C-24), 55.6 (C-18), 51.0 (C-37, C-38, C-39, C-40), 51.0 (C-59), 50.6 (C-58), 48.9 (C-17), 47.7 (C-9), 47.6 (C-5), 43.7 (C-1), 42.0 (C-4), 41.9 (C-14), 39.4 (C-19), 38.7 (C-20), 37.8 (C-8, C-10), 34.3 (C-22), 32.5 (C-7), 30.5 (C-21), 29.7 (C-41), 27.6 (C-15), 27.6 (C-61), 23.4 (C-27), 23.3 (C-11, C-16), 21.2 (C-30), 21.0 (C-36), 20.9 (C-34), 20.7 (C-32), 20.6 (C-60), 19.9 (C-56), 19.7 (C-57), 17.8 (C-6), 17.4 (C-29), 17.3 (C-25), 17.0 (C-26), 13.9 (C-23) ppm; MS (ESI, MeOH/CHCl3): m/z = 1169.7 (100%, [M-Cl]+); analysis calcd for C69H89N4O5Cl (1054.49): C 78.59, H 8.51, N 5.31; found: C 78.22, H 8.79, N 5.06.

4.18. (2α,3β,4α)-9-[2-[{4-(2α,3β,23-Tris(Acetyloxy)-urs-12-en-28-oyl)-1,5-Diazocan-1-Yl]Carbonyl}Phenyl]-3,6-Bis(Dimethylamino)-Xanthylium Chloride (16)

Following GP B, from 5 (670 mg, 0.94 mmol) followed by chromatography (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 9:1), 16 (523 mg, 55%) was obtained as a violet solid; m.p. 224–226 °C; Rf = 0.50 (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 8:2); UV-Vis (MeOH): λmax (log ε) = 556 nm (4.72); IR (ATR): ν = 2922s, 2852m, 1741m, 1624w, 1593vs, 1534w, 1508w, 1493m, 1437w, 1407m, 1365m, 1343s, 1285w, 1231s, 1185vs, 1135m, 1085w, 1043m, 1033m, 925m, 820m, 757w, 699m, 518w, 492w cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.70–7.58 (m, 2H, 46-H, 48-H), 7.57–7.46 (m, 1H, 49-H), 7.37–7.27 (m, 3H, 47-H, 53-H), 7.06–6.87 (m, 2H, 52-H), 6.84–6.65 (m, 2H, 55-H), 5.23–5.17 (m, 1H, 12-H), 5.14 (td, J = 11.2, 5.3 Hz, 1H, 2-H), 5.06 (d, J = 10.3 Hz, 1H, 3-H), 3.82 (d, J = 11.8 Hz, 1H, 24-Ha), 3.56 (d, J = 11.9 Hz, 1H, 24-Hb), 3.52–2.83 (m, 8H, 37-H, 38-H, 41-H, 42-H), 3.40–3.29 (m, 12H, 57-H, 58-H), 2.48–2.38 (m, 1H, 18-H), 2.07 (s, 3H, 32-H), 2.05–2.02 (m, 1H, 1-Ha), 2.00 (s, 3H, 34-H), 1.96 (s, 3H, 36-H), 1.94–1.73 (m, 4H, 11-H, 16-H), 1.63–1.55 (m, 1H, 9-H), 1.54–1.14 (m, 15H, 21-Ha, 7-Ha, 22-Ha, 6-H, 39-H, 40-H, 19-H, 5-H, 22-Hb, 21-Hb, 7-Hb, 15-Ha), 1.10 (s, 2H, 1-Hb, 15-Hb), 1.08–1.02 (m, 6H, 25-H, 27-H), 1.01–0.95 (m, 1H, 20-H), 0.93–0.89 (m, 3H, 30-H), 0.86 (s, 3H, 23-H), 0.85–0.82 (m, 3H, 29-H), 0.72 (s, 3H, 26-H) ppm; 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 175.8 (C-28), 171.0 (C-35), 170.6 (C-31), 170.5 (C-33), 167.9 (C-43), 157.7 (C-56), 157.5 (C-54), 156.4 (C-50), 145.0 (C-13), 136.8 (C-45), 131.2 (C-53), 130.6 (C-44), 130.4 (C-46, C-48), 130.1 (C-47), 127.9 (C-49), 124.6 (C-12), 114.4 (C-52), 114.1 (C-51), 96.9 (C-55), 77.4, 77.2, 76.9, 76.9, 75.0 (C-3), 70.1 (C-2), 65.4 (C-24), 55.6 (C-18), 48.0 (C-17), 47.8 (C-9), 47.7 (C-5), 43.9 (C-1), 42.7 (C-37, C-38, C-41, C-42), 42.2 (C-14), 42.0 (C-4), 41.4 (C-57, C-58), 39.4 (C-19), 38.8 (C-20), 38.0 (C-8, C-10), 34.1 (C-22), 32.0 (C-7), 29.8 (C-21), 27.4 (C-15), 25.0, 23.4 (C-11, C-16), 23.4 (C-27), 22.8 (C-39, C-40), 21.2 (C-36), 21.0 (C-34), 20.9 (C-32), 18.0 (C-6), 17.5 (C-29), 17.2 (C-25), 17.0 (C-26), 14.0 (C-23) ppm; MS (ESI, MeOH/CHCl3): m/z = 1079.5 (100%, [M-Cl]+); analysis calcd for C66H87N4O9Cl (1115.89): C 71.04, H 7.86, N 5.02; found: C 70.86, H 8.03, N 4.77.

4.19. (2α,3β,4α)-9-[2-[{4-(2α,3β,23-Tris(Acetyloxy)-urs-12-en-28-oyl)-1,5-Diazocan-1-Yl]Carbonyl}Phenyl]-3,6-Bis(Diethylamino)-Xanthylium Chloride (17)

Following GP B, from 5 (300 mg, 0.4 mmol) followed by chromatography (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 9:1), 17 (188 mg, 60%) was obtained as a purple solid; m.p. 222–227 °C (lit: [4] 223–226 °C); Rf = 0.42 (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 9:1); MS (ESI, MeOH/CHCl3): m/z = 1036.3 (100%, [M-Cl]+); analysis calcd for C70H95N4O9Cl (1172.00): C 71.74, H 8.17, N 4.78; found: C 71.48, H 8.22, N 5.37.

4.20. (2α,3β,4α)-9-[2-[{4-(2α,3β,23-Tris(Acetyloxy)-urs-12-en-28-oyl)-1,5-Diazocan-1-Yl]Carbonyl}Phenyl]-3,6-Bis(Dipropylamino)-Xanthylium Chloride (18)

Following GP B, from 5 (500 mg, 0.7 mmol) followed by chromatography (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 9:1), 18 (612 mg, 68%) was obtained as a violet solid; m.p. 207–209 °C; Rf = 0.53 (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 8:2); UV-Vis (MeOH): λmax (log ε) = 564 nm (4.47); IR (ATR): ν = 2927m, 2873w, 1740s, 1696w, 1589s, 1528w, 1504w, 1457m, 1432w, 1412m, 1367m, 1338m, 1301w, 1230vs, 1194w, 1178m, 1133m, 1101w, 1042m, 1032m, 964w, 939w, 918w, 825w, 641w, 598w, 508w cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.70–7.57 (m, 2H, 47-H, 48-H), 7.57–7.47 (m, 1H, 49-H), 7.39–7.27 (m, 3H, 46-H, 53-H), 7.15–6.88 (m, 2H, 52-H), 6.79–6.62 (m, 2H, 55-H), 5.27–5.18 (m, 1H, 12-H), 5.14 (td, J = 11.2, 5.5 Hz, 1H, 2-H), 5.06 (d, J = 10.3 Hz, 1H, 3-H), 3.82 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1H, 24-Ha), 3.76–2.76 (m, 17H, 24-Hb, 57-H, 37-H, 38-H, 41-H, 42-H), 2.48–2.31 (m, 1H, 18-H), 2.07 (s, 3H, 32-H), 2.05–2.02 (m, 1H, 1-Ha), 2.00 (s, 3H, 34-H), 1.96 (s, 3H, 36-H), 1.95–1.84 (m, 4H, 11-H, 16-H), 1.81–1.65 (m, 8H, 58-H), 1.65–1.56 (m, 1H, 9-H), 1.56–1.22 (m, 14H, 22-H, 21-Ha, 7-Ha, 39-H, 40-H, 6-H, 19-H, 5-H, 21-Hb, 7-Hb), 1.15–1.10 (m, 1H, 1-Hb), 1.10–1.06 (m, 4H, 25-H, 15-Ha), 1.04 (s, 4H, 27-H, 15-Hb), 1.01 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 12H, 59-H), 0.97–0.94 (m, 1H, 20-H), 0.92 (s, 3H, 30-H), 0.88–0.85 (m, 3H, 23-H), 0.85 (s, 3H, 29-H), 0.77–0.69 (m, 3H, 26-H) ppm; 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 176.1 (C-28), 171.0 (C-35), 170.6 (C-33), 170.5 (C-31), 168.2 (C-43), 157.8 (C-56), 156.3 (C-50), 156.2 (C-54), 144.0 (C-13), 136.1 (C-45), 132.4 (C-53), 130.7 (C-44), 130.3 (C-48), 130.0 (C-46), 129.5 (C-47), 127.3 (C-49), 124.7 (C-12), 115.0 (C-52), 114.0 (C-51), 96.4 (C-55), 75.0 (C-3), 70.1 (C-2), 65.4 (C-24), 55.2 (C-18), 53.9 (C-37, C-38, C-41, C-42), 53.9 (C-57#, C-57), 49.2 (C-17), 47.8 (C-5), 47.7 (C-9), 43.9 (C-1), 42.0 (C-14), 42.0 (C-4), 39.5 (C-19), 39.5 (C-8), 38.8 (C-20), 38.0 (C-10), 34.0 (C-22), 32.7 (C-7), 30.7 (C-21), 29.8 (C-39, C-40), 28.3 (C-15), 23.5 (C-16), 23.5 (C-27), 23.4 (C-11), 21.4 (C-30), 21.2 (C-32), 21.0 (C-34), 20.9 (C-36), 20.9 (C-58#, C-58), 18.0 (C-6), 17.5 (C-29), 17.4 (C-25), 17.2 (C-26), 14.0 (C-23), 11.5 (C-59#, 59) ppm; MS (ESI, MeOH/CHCl3): m/z = 1191.3 (100%, [M-Cl]+); analysis calcd for C74H103N4O9Cl (1228.11): C 72.37, H 8.45, N 4.56; found: C 72.11, H 8.64, N 4.40.

4.21. (2α,3β,4α)-9-[2-[{4-(2α,3β,23-Tris(Acetyloxy)-urs-12-en-28-oyl)-1,5-Diazocan-1-Yl]Carbonyl}Phenyl]-3,6-Bis(Dibutylamino)-Xanthylium Chloride (19)

Following GP B, from 5 (400 mg, 0.56 mmol) followed by chromatography (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 9:1), 19 (520 mg, 70%) was obtained as a violet solid;.m.p. 215–218 °C; Rf = 0.43 (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 8:2); UV-Vis (MeOH): λmax (log ε) = 566 nm (4.79); IR (ATR): ν = 2930m, 2871w, 1741m, 1633w, 1589vs, 1528w, 1461m, 1412s, 1394w, 1367m, 1338s, 1292m, 1221vs, 1178s, 1133m, 1109m, 1043m, 964w, 921m, 825w, 757w, 597w cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.68–7.54 (m, 2H, 47-H, 48-H), 7.52–7.46 (m, 1H, 49-H), 7.31–7.18 (m, 3H, 53-H, 46-H), 7.04–6.76 (m, 2H, 52-H), 6.74–6.57 (m, 2H, 55-H), 5.19–5.14 (m, 1H, 12-H), 5.11 (td, J = 10.9, 4.9 Hz, 1H, 2-H), 5.03 (d, J = 10.3 Hz, 1H, 3-H), 3.79 (d, J = 11.7 Hz, 1H, 24-Ha), 3.67–2.76 (m, 17H, 24-Hb, 57-H, 37-H, 38-H, 41-H, 42-H), 2.41–2.33 (m, 1H, 18-H), 2.04 (s, 3H, 32-H), 2.02–1.99 (m, 1H, 1-Ha), 1.97 (s, 3H, 34-H), 1.93 (s, 3H, 36-H), 1.91–1.80 (m, 3H, 11-H, 16-Ha), 1.79–1.71 (m, 1H, 16-Hb), 1.69–1.59 (m, 8H, 58-H), 1.59–1.54 (m, 1H, 9-H), 1.50–1.16 (m, 19H, 59-H, 22-H, 7-Ha, 21-Ha, 6-H, 19-H, 39-H, 40-H, 5-H, 7-Hb, 21-Hb, 15-Ha), 1.09–1.05 (m, 2H, 1-Hb, 15-Hb), 1.03 (s, 3H, 25-H), 1.01 (s, 3H, 27-H), 0.95 (t, J = 6.1 Hz, 13H, 60-H, 20-H), 0.90–0.86 (m, 3H, 30-H), 0.83 (s, 3H, 23-H), 0.82–0.78 (m, 3H, 29-H), 0.69 (s, 3H, 26-H) ppm; 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 176.1 (C-28), 170.9 (C-35), 170.5 (C-31), 170.4 (C-33), 168.0 (C-43), 157.7 (C-56), 156.1 (C-50), 156.1 (C-54), 144.1 (C-13), 136.6 (C-45), 132.2 (C-53), 130.2 (C-48), 130.1 (C-46), 129.4 (C-44), 129.3 (C-47), 127.4 (C-49), 124.5 (C-12), 113.8 (C-52), 113.5 (C-51), 96.3 (C-55), 74.9 (C-3), 70.0 (C-2), 65.3 (C-24), 55.4 (C-18), 52.0 (C-57, C-57), 52.0 (C-37, C-38, C-41, C-42), 49.0 (C-17), 47.7 (C-9), 47.6 (C-5), 43.8 (C-1), 42.1 (C-14), 41.9 (C-4), 39.8 (C-39, C-40), 39.4 (C-19), 38.7 (C-20), 37.9 (C-10), 37.9 (C-8), 34.3 (C-22), 32.6 (C-7), 30.6 (C-21), 29.7 (C-58#, C-58), 28.1 (C-15), 23.4 (C-11, C-16), 23.3 (C-27), 21.3 (C-30), 21.1 (C-36), 20.9 (C-34), 20.8 (C-32), 20.2 (C-59#, C-59), 17.9 (C-6), 17.4 (C-29), 17.1 (C-25), 17.0 (C-26), 14.0 (C-23), 13.9 (C-60, 61) ppm; MS (ESI, MeOH/CHCl3): m/z = 1247.3 (100%, [M-Cl]+); analysis calcd for C78H111N4O9Cl (1284.22): C 72.95, H 8.71, N 4.36; found: C 72.70, H 8.96, N 4.17.

4.22. (2α,3β,4α)-2,3,23-Triacetoxy-28-[3-(2,3,6,7,12,13,16,17-Octahydro-1H,5H,11H,15H-Pyrido[3.2.1-Ij]Pyrido[1″,2″,3″:1′,8′]Quinolino[6′,5′:5,6]Pyrano[2,3-F]Quinoline-4-Ium-9-Yl)Benzoyl]-1,5-Diazocan-1-Yl]-28-Oxo-Olean-12-Ene Chloride (20)

Following GP B, from 5 (200 mg, 0.3 mmol) followed by chromatography (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 9:1), 20 (232 mg, 64%)was obtained as a violet solid; m.p. 194–196 °C (lit.: [4] 193–196 °C); Rf = 0.42 (SiO2, CHCl3/MeOH, 9:1); MS (ESI, MeOH/CHCl3): m/z = 1084.6 (100%, [M-Cl]+); analysis calcd for C70H91N4O5Cl (1068.52): C 78.69, H 8.58, N 5.24; found: C 78.32, H 8.86, N 5.09.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.C.; validation, R.C.; investigation: N.V.H., T.C.D., S.H., S.B., and R.C.; writing—original draft preparation, R.C. writing—review and editing, N.V.H., T.C.D., S.H., S.B., and R.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Th. Schmidt for numerous MS spectra as well as D. Ströhl, Y. Schiller, and S. Ludwig for NMR spectra. UV/Vis and IR spectra were recorded by M. Schneider who also performed the micro-analyses. The cell lines were provided by Th. Müller.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. Heise, N.; Hoenke, S.; Simon, V.; Deigner, H.P.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Csuk, R. Type and position of linkage govern the cytotoxicity of oleanolic acid rhodamine B hybrids. Steroids 2021, 172, 108876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Heise, N.V.; Major, D.; Hoenke, S.; Kozubek, M.; Serbian, I.; Csuk, R. Rhodamine 101 Conjugates of Triterpenoic Amides Are of Comparable Cytotoxicity as Their Rhodamine B Analogs. Molecules 2022, 27, 2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hoenke, S.; Serbian, I.; Deigner, H.P.; Csuk, R. Mitocanic Di- and Triterpenoid Rhodamine B Conjugates. Molecules 2020, 25, 5443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Heise, N.; Becker, S.; Mueller, T.; Bache, M.; Csuk, R.; Güttler, A. Mitochondria-targeting 1,5-diazacyclooctane-spacered triterpene rhodamine conjugates exhibit cytotoxicity at sub-nanomolar concentration against breast cancer cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Modica-Napolitano, J.S.; Aprille, R.R. Basis for the selective cytotoxicity of rhodamine 123. Cancer Res. 1987, 47, 4361–4365. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sommerwerk, S.; Heller, L.; Kerzig, C.; Kramell, A.E.; Csuk, R. Rhodamine B conjugates of triterpenoic acids are cytotoxic mitocans even at nanomolar concentrations. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 127, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wolfram, R.K.; Fischer, L.; Kluge, R.; Ströhl, D.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Csuk, R. Homopiperazine-rhodamine B adducts of triterpenoic acids are strong mitocans. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 155, 869–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dong, L.; Gopalan, V.; Holland, O.; Neuzil, J. Mitocans revisited: Mitochondrial targeting as efficient anti-cancer therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Heise, N.V.; Heisig, J.; Hoehlich, L.; Hoenke, S.; Csuk, R. Synthesis and cytotoxicity of diastereomeric benzylamides derived from maslinic acid, augustic acid and bredemolic acid. Results Chem. 2023, 5, 100805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kraft, O.; Hartmann, A.-K.; Hoenke, S.; Serbian, I.; Csuk, R. Madecassic Acid-A New Scaffold for Highly Cytotoxic Agents. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kraft, O.; Hoenke, S.; Csuk, R. A tormentic acid-homopiperazine-rhodamine B conjugate of single-digit nanomolar cytotoxicity and high selectivity for several human tumor cell lines. Eur. J. Med. Chem. Rep. 2022, 5, 100043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Heise, N.V.; Hoenke, S.; Serbian, I.; Csuk, R. An improved partial synthesis of corosolic acid and its conversion to highly cytotoxic mitocans. Eur. J. Med. Chem. Rep. 2022, 6, 100073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kraft, O.; Hartmann, A.-K.; Brandt, S.; Hoenke, S.; Heise, N.V.; Csuk, R.; Mueller, T. Asiatic acid as a leading structure for derivatives combining sub-nanomolar cytotoxicity, high selectivity, and the ability to overcome drug resistance in human preclinical tumor models. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2023, 250, 115189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dubinin, M.V.; Semenova, A.A.; Ilzorkina, A.I.; Penkov, N.V.; Nedopekina, D.A.; Sharapov, V.A.; Khoroshavina, E.I.; Davletshin, E.V.; Belosludtseva, N.V.; Spivak, A.Y.; et al. Mitochondria-targeted prooxidant effects of betulinic acid conjugated with delocalized lipophilic cation F16. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2021, 168, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dubinin, M.V.; Semenova, A.A.; Nedopekina, D.A.; Davletshin, E.V.; Spivak, A.Y.; Belosludtsev, K.N. Effect of F16-betulin conjugate on mitochondrial membranes and its role in cell death initiation. Membranes 2021, 11, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nedopekina, D.A.; Gubaidullin, R.R.; Odinokov, V.N.; Maximchik, P.V.; Zhivotovsky, B.; Bel’skii, Y.P.; Khazanov, V.A.; Manuylova, A.V.; Gogvadze, V.; Spivak, A.Y. Mitochondria-targeted betulinic and ursolic acid derivatives: Synthesis and anticancer activity. MedChemComm 2017, 8, 1934–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Spivak, A.Y.; Davletshin, E.V.; Gubaidullin, R.R.; Tukhbatullin, A.A.; Nedopekina, D.A. Synthesis of Bodipy-Labeled Fluorescent Betulinic Acid Derivatives with a Terminal Triphenylphosphonium Group on Side-Chain C-28. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2022, 58, 1062–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Spivak, A.Y.; Khalitova, R.R.; Gubaidullin, R.R.; Nedopekina, D.A. Synthesis and cytotoxic activity of monomeric and dimeric aminocarboxamides of betulinic and ursolic acids. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2021, 57, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Spivak, A.Y.; Khalitova, R.R.; Nedopekina, D.A.; Gubaidullin, R.R. Antimicrobial properties of amine- and guanidine-functionalized derivatives of betulinic, ursolic and oleanolic acids: Synthesis and structure/activity evaluation. Steroids 2020, 154, 108530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Spivak, A.Y.; Nedopekina, D.A.; Gubaidullin, R.R.; Davletshin, E.V.; Tukhbatullin, A.A.; D’Yakonov, V.A.; Yunusbaeva, M.M.; Dzhemileva, L.U.; Dzhemilev, U.M. Pentacyclic triterpene acid conjugated with mitochondria-targeting cation F16: Synthesis and evaluation of cytotoxic activities. Med. Chem. Res. 2021, 30, 940–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Spivak, A.Y.; Nedopekina, D.A.; Khalitova, R.R.; Gubaidullin, R.R.; Odinokov, V.N.; Bel’skii, Y.P.; Bel’skaya, N.V.; Khazanov, V.A. Triphenylphosphonium cations of betulinic acid derivatives: Synthesis and antitumor activity. Med. Chem. Res. 2017, 26, 518–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Biedermann, D.; Eigenrova, B.; Hajduch, M.; Sarek, J. Synthesis and evaluation of biological activity of the quaternary ammonium salts of lupane-, oleanane-, and ursane-type acids. Synthesis 2010, 2010, 3839–3848. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kataev, V.E.; Strobykina, I.Y.; Zakharova, L.Y. Quaternary ammonium derivatives of natural terpenoids. Synthesis and properties. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2014, 63, 1884–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Brandes, B.; Hoenke, S.; Fischer, L.; Csuk, R. Design, synthesis and cytotoxicity of BODIPY FL labelled triterpenoids. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 185, 111858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Friedrich, S.; Serbian, I.; Hoenke, S.; Wolfram, R.K.; Csuk, R. Synthesis and cytotoxic evaluation of malachite green derived oleanolic and ursolic acid piperazineamides. Med. Chem. Res. 2020, 29, 926–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. McHedlov-Petrosyan, N.O.; Fedorov, L.A.; Sokolovskii, S.A.; Surov, Y.N.; Salinas Maiorga, R. Structural transformations of rhodamines in solution. Izv. Akad. Nauk Ser. Khim. 1992, 3, 512–521. [Google Scholar]
  27. Alder, R.W.; Eastment, P.; Moss, R.E.; Sessions, R.B.; Stringfellow, M.A. Synthesis of medium-ring bicyclic bridgehead diamines from monocyclic diamines via α-aminoammonium ions. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 4148–4181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Audouze, K.; Oestergaard Nielsen, E.; Olsen, G.M.; Ahring, P.; Jorgensen, T.D.; Peters, D.; Liljefors, T.; Balle, T. New Ligands with Affinity for the α4β2 Subtype of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors. Synthesis, Receptor Binding, and 3D-QSAR Modeling. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 3159–3171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Boerjesson, L.; Welch, C.J. An alternative synthesis of cyclic aza compounds. Acta Chem. Scand. 1991, 45, 621–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Halfen, J.A.; Moore, H.L.; Fox, D.C. Synthetic Models of the Reduced Active Site of Superoxide Reductase. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 3935–3943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Majchrzak, M.; Kotelko, A.; Guryn, R. Octahydro-1,5- and octahydro-1,4-diazocine derivatives with expected pharmacological activity. I. Synthesis of N-alkyl derivatives of octahydro-1,5- and octahydro-1,4-diazocine. Acta Pol. Pharm. 1975, 32, 145–148. [Google Scholar]
  32. Margaretha, P. Synthesis of alkyl- and cycloalkylamines by reduction of nitrogen-based functional groups. Sci. Synth. 2009, 40, 119–156. [Google Scholar]
  33. Nagashima, S.; Sasaki, T.; Kamiguchi, S.; Chihara, T. Synthesis of common-sized heterocyclic compounds by intramolecular cyclization over halide cluster catalysts. Chem. Lett. 2015, 44, 764–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Norrehed, S.; Karlsson, C.; Light, M.E.; Thapper, A.; Huang, P.; Gogoll, A. Formation of persistent organic diradicals from N,N’-diphenyl-3,7-diazacyclooctanes. Monatsh. Chem. 2019, 150, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Stetter, H.; Spangenberger, H. Preparation of cyclic diamines of medium ring size by ring cleavage of bicyclic compounds. Chem. Ber. 1958, 91, 1982–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tsutsui, A.; Pradipta, A.R.; Saigitbatalova, E.; Kurbangalieva, A.; Tanaka, K. Exclusive formation of imino [4 + 4]cycloaddition products with biologically relevant amines: Plausible candidates for acrolein biomarkers and biofunctional modulators. MedChemComm 2015, 6, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chapman, J.H.; Owen, L.N.; Dithiols, I.V. Reaction of p-toluenesulfonates and methanesulfonates with potassium thiolacetate: A new method for the preparation of thiols. J. Chem. Soc. 1950, 579–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 28 06404 sch001
Scheme 1. Synthesis of starting material (rhodamines Rh1–Rh4; structure of Rh5) and compounds 2–20; reactions and conditions: (a) DMF, K2CO3; for R = Me (from MeI, 52%), for R = Et (from EtBr, 67%), for R = n-Prop (from n-Prop-Br, 61%), for R = n-Bu (from n-Bu-Br, 68%), 3–8 h, 21 °C; (b) phthalic anhydride, AlCl3 (cat.), 5–60 min, 200 °C: for R = Me 35%, R = Et 45%, R = n-Prop 42%, R = n-Bu 47%; (c) TosCl, H2N-(CH2)3-NH2, no solvent, 80 °C, 30 min, 83%; (d) TosCl, HO-(CH2)3-OH, pyridine, 0 °C, 30 min, 87%; (e) NaOMe, MeOH, DMF, 80 °C, 12 h, 84%; (f) HBr (33% in glacial acetic acid), 80 °C, 3 h, 92%; (g) Ac2O, DCM, NEt3, DMAP (cat.), 21 °C, 24 h, 97%; (h) DCM, (COCl)2, DMF (cat), NEt3; then piperazine (→ 3, 86%), homopiperazine (→ 4, 79%), or 1,5-diazocinyl dihydrobromide (→ 5, 68%); (i) Rh1–Rh5, (COCl)2, NEt3, DCM, DMF (cat.), 21 °C, 3 h, then 3–5, NEt3, DMAP (cat.), 1 h: 6 (59%), 7 (80%), 8 (57%), 9 (49%), 10 (55%), 11 (49%), 12 (57%), 13 (64%), 14 (58%), 15 (63%), 16 (55%), 17 (60%), 18 (68%), 19 (70%), 20 (64%).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of starting material (rhodamines Rh1–Rh4; structure of Rh5) and compounds 2–20; reactions and conditions: (a) DMF, K2CO3; for R = Me (from MeI, 52%), for R = Et (from EtBr, 67%), for R = n-Prop (from n-Prop-Br, 61%), for R = n-Bu (from n-Bu-Br, 68%), 3–8 h, 21 °C; (b) phthalic anhydride, AlCl3 (cat.), 5–60 min, 200 °C: for R = Me 35%, R = Et 45%, R = n-Prop 42%, R = n-Bu 47%; (c) TosCl, H2N-(CH2)3-NH2, no solvent, 80 °C, 30 min, 83%; (d) TosCl, HO-(CH2)3-OH, pyridine, 0 °C, 30 min, 87%; (e) NaOMe, MeOH, DMF, 80 °C, 12 h, 84%; (f) HBr (33% in glacial acetic acid), 80 °C, 3 h, 92%; (g) Ac2O, DCM, NEt3, DMAP (cat.), 21 °C, 24 h, 97%; (h) DCM, (COCl)2, DMF (cat), NEt3; then piperazine (→ 3, 86%), homopiperazine (→ 4, 79%), or 1,5-diazocinyl dihydrobromide (→ 5, 68%); (i) Rh1–Rh5, (COCl)2, NEt3, DCM, DMF (cat.), 21 °C, 3 h, then 3–5, NEt3, DMAP (cat.), 1 h: 6 (59%), 7 (80%), 8 (57%), 9 (49%), 10 (55%), 11 (49%), 12 (57%), 13 (64%), 14 (58%), 15 (63%), 16 (55%), 17 (60%), 18 (68%), 19 (70%), 20 (64%).
Molecules 28 06404 sch001
Molecules 28 06404 g001
Figure 1. Cytotoxicity of compounds 6–20 for different human tumor cell lines.
Figure 1. Cytotoxicity of compounds 6–20 for different human tumor cell lines.
Molecules 28 06404 g001
Molecules 28 06404 g002
Figure 2. Selectivity index (ratio EC50,malignantcellline/EC50non-malignantNIH3T3) for compounds 6–20.
Figure 2. Selectivity index (ratio EC50,malignantcellline/EC50non-malignantNIH3T3) for compounds 6–20.
Molecules 28 06404 g002
Molecules 28 06404 g003
Figure 3. Incubation of A375 cells (48 h) with Mito Tracker green and compound 18: (A): detection of Mito Tracker green; (B): detection of compound 18; (C): merged pictures (A,B); (D) control.
Figure 3. Incubation of A375 cells (48 h) with Mito Tracker green and compound 18: (A): detection of Mito Tracker green; (B): detection of compound 18; (C): merged pictures (A,B); (D) control.
Molecules 28 06404 g003
Table 1. Cytotoxicity of rhodamines Rh1–Rh5 (in μM) from SRB assays after 72 h of treatment: averaged from three independent experiments each in triplicate; confidence interval CI = 95%. Human tumor cell lines: A375 (melanoma), HT29 (colorectal carcinoma), MCF7 (breast adenocarcinoma), HeLa (cervical adenocarcinoma), A2780 (ovarian carcinoma), NIH 3T3 (non-malignant fibroblasts, murine); cut-off of the assay 30 μM; n.d. not determined; doxorubicin (DX) has been used as a positive standard.
Table 1. Cytotoxicity of rhodamines Rh1–Rh5 (in μM) from SRB assays after 72 h of treatment: averaged from three independent experiments each in triplicate; confidence interval CI = 95%. Human tumor cell lines: A375 (melanoma), HT29 (colorectal carcinoma), MCF7 (breast adenocarcinoma), HeLa (cervical adenocarcinoma), A2780 (ovarian carcinoma), NIH 3T3 (non-malignant fibroblasts, murine); cut-off of the assay 30 μM; n.d. not determined; doxorubicin (DX) has been used as a positive standard.
A375HT29MCF7A2780HeLaNIH 3T3
Rh1>30>30>30>30>30>30
Rh2>30>30>30>30>30>30
Rh38.2 ± 0.29.3 ± 0.46.4 ± 0.46.7 ± 0.78.0 ± 0.712.0 ± 0.7
Rh44.3 ± 0.14.9 ± 0.33.08 ± 0.063.4 ± 0.14.3 ± 0.34.3 ± 0.1
Rh511.2 ± 1.818.5 ± 1.88.2 ± 0.88.0 ± 1.511.8 ± 1.111.9 ± 1.3
DXn.d.0.9 ± 0.21.1 ± 0.30.02 ± 0.01n.d.11.9 ± 1.3
Table 2. Cytotoxicity of conjugates 6–20 (in μM) from SRB assays after 72 h of treatment: averaged from three independent experiments each in triplicate; confidence interval CI = 95%. Human tumor cell lines: A375 (melanoma), HT29 (colorectal carcinoma), MCF7 (breast adenocarcinoma), HeLa (cervical adenocarcinoma), A2780 (ovarian carcinoma), NIH 3T3 (non-malignant fibroblasts, murine); cut-off of the assay 30 μM; n.d. not determined; doxorubicin (DX) has been used as a positive standard.
Table 2. Cytotoxicity of conjugates 6–20 (in μM) from SRB assays after 72 h of treatment: averaged from three independent experiments each in triplicate; confidence interval CI = 95%. Human tumor cell lines: A375 (melanoma), HT29 (colorectal carcinoma), MCF7 (breast adenocarcinoma), HeLa (cervical adenocarcinoma), A2780 (ovarian carcinoma), NIH 3T3 (non-malignant fibroblasts, murine); cut-off of the assay 30 μM; n.d. not determined; doxorubicin (DX) has been used as a positive standard.
A375HT29MCF7A2780HeLaNIH 3T3
60.15 ± 0.0080.23 ± 0.080.15 ± 0.030.043 ± 0.0080.70 ± 0.20.55 ± 0.06
70.027 ± 0.0090.026 ± 0.0090.034 ± 0.0090.0056 ± 0.00060.20 ± 0.10.33 ± 0.08
80.032 ± 0.0030.031 ± 0.0070.034 ± 0.0050.0055 ± 0.00050.16 ± 0.050.44 ± 0.09
90.016 ± 0.0030.026 ± 0.0080.05 ± 0.010.0049 ± 0.00070.21 ± 0.050.40 ± 0.1
100.045 ± 0.0040.05 ± 0.020.05 ± 0.010.009 ± 0.0020.22 ± 0.050.25 ± 0.05
110.039 ± 0.0030.02 ± 0.010.028 ± 0.0050.0032 ± 0.00040.40 ± 0.10.30 ± 0.1
120.0028 ± 000050.0055 ± 0.00230.0071 ± 0.00210.0008 ± 0.00010.0177 ± 0.00490.0650 ± 0.0262
130.0039 ± 0.00060.006 ± 0.0010.010 ± 0.0010.0011 ± 0.00010.041 ± 0.0090.10 ± 0.05
140.014 ± 0.0010.025 ± 0.0050.049 ± 0.0060.0045 ± 0.00040.15 ± 0.050.20 ± 0.1
150.008 ± 0.0010.010 ± 0.0060.019 ± 0.0060.0031 ± 0.00050.08 ± 0.030.14 ± 0.05
160.07 ± 0.010.05 ± 0.020.05 ± 0.010.006 ± 0.0010.50 ± 0.20.40 ± 0.09
170.03 ± 0.010.03 ± 0.010.025 ± 0.020.007 ± 0.0020.06 ± 0.010.45 ± 0.02
180.0074 ± 0.00090.012 ± 0.0040.017 ± 0.0020.0019 ± 0.00020.07 ± 0.020.36 ± 0.05
190.03 ± 0.010.03 ± 0.010.04 ± 0.0050.006 ± 0.0020.17 ± 0.080.24 ± 0.08
200.02 ± 0.010.01 ± 0.0050.0039 ± 0.0020.004 ± 0.0010.11 ± 0.060.32 ± 0.02
DXn.d.0.9 ± 0.21.1 ± 0.30.02 ± 0.01n.d.11.9 ±1.3
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Heise, N.V.; Denner, T.C.; Becker, S.; Hoenke, S.; Csuk, R. Developing an Amide-Spacered Triterpenoid Rhodamine Hybrid of Nano-Molar Cytotoxicity Combined with Excellent Tumor Cell/Non-Tumor Cell Selectivity. Molecules 2023, 28, 6404. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28176404

AMA Style

Heise NV, Denner TC, Becker S, Hoenke S, Csuk R. Developing an Amide-Spacered Triterpenoid Rhodamine Hybrid of Nano-Molar Cytotoxicity Combined with Excellent Tumor Cell/Non-Tumor Cell Selectivity. Molecules. 2023; 28(17):6404. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28176404

Chicago/Turabian Style

Heise, Niels V., Toni C. Denner, Selina Becker, Sophie Hoenke, and René Csuk. 2023. "Developing an Amide-Spacered Triterpenoid Rhodamine Hybrid of Nano-Molar Cytotoxicity Combined with Excellent Tumor Cell/Non-Tumor Cell Selectivity" Molecules 28, no. 17: 6404. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28176404

APA Style

Heise, N. V., Denner, T. C., Becker, S., Hoenke, S., & Csuk, R. (2023). Developing an Amide-Spacered Triterpenoid Rhodamine Hybrid of Nano-Molar Cytotoxicity Combined with Excellent Tumor Cell/Non-Tumor Cell Selectivity. Molecules, 28(17), 6404. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28176404

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop