Next Article in Journal
Degree of Coupling in Microwave-Heating Polar-Molecule Reactions
Next Article in Special Issue
Pillararene-Based Supramolecular Polymers for Cancer Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Ruthenium(II) N-Heterocyclic Carbene Complexes as Enzymatic Inhibitory Agents with Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, Antiparasitical and Antiproliferative Activity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in Supramolecular-Macrocycle-Based Nanomaterials in Cancer Treatment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 3
10.3390/molecules28031360
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Porous Framework Materials for Bioimaging and Cancer Therapy

by
Meng Jin
1,
Yingying Zhao
1,
Zong-Jie Guan
1 and
Yu Fang
1,2,*
1
State Key Laboratory for Chemo/Bio-Sensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
2
Innovation Institute of Industrial Design and Machine Intelligence, Quanzhou-Hunan University, Quanzhou 362801, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(3), 1360; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031360
Submission received: 2 January 2023 / Revised: 20 January 2023 / Accepted: 26 January 2023 / Published: 31 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Supramolecular Cancer Nanotheranostics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cancer remains one of the most pressing diseases in the world. Traditional treatments, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy still show certain limitations. Recently, numerous cancer treatments have been proposed in combination with novel materials, such as photothermal therapy, chemodynamic therapy, immunotherapy, and a combination of therapeutic approaches. These new methods have shown significant advantages in reducing side effects and synergistically enhancing anti-cancer efficacy. In addition to the above approaches, early diagnosis and in situ monitoring of lesion areas are also important for reducing side effects and improving the success rate of cancer therapy. This depends on the decent use of bioimaging technology. In this review, we mainly summarize the recent advances in porous framework materials for bioimaging and cancer therapy. In addition, we present future challenges relating to bioimaging and cancer therapy based on porous framework materials.

1. Introduction

Cancer, one of the major causes resulting in human death, has caused significant economic losses and serious health problems every year [1]. Great efforts have been made in improving cancer treatment conditions, however, the total number of cancer deaths remains high per year [2]. Currently, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy are the three main traditional methods for cancer treatment [3]. Nevertheless, these methods have some limitations such as severe side effects and recurrence [4]. In addition to the above traditional treatments, several new cancer treatment methods based on nanomaterials have emerged in recent years [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12], including the use of special nanomaterials as platforms for targeted drug delivery [6], therapeutic diagnostic for cancer.
Photothermal therapy (PTT) [13,14], chemodynamic therapy (CDT) [15,16], immunotherapy [17,18,19], and a combination of two or more therapies can reduce the risk of side effects and enhance anti-cancer efficacy [20,21,22,23,24]. The detection of characteristic cancer markers and bioimaging in cancer therapy are important components of current cancer treatment [25,26,27]. In addition, early diagnosis of malignancies based on clinical aspects and in situ monitoring of lesion areas play a key role in reducing the side effects. This highly depends on the contrast agent and the decent use of bioimaging techniques [28]. Since the high spatiotemporal resolution of imaging technology, bioimaging has been proven to be an effective tool for the visualization of biological specimens [29]. Moreover, the visual detection of cells and tissues favors the understanding of the mechanism of diseases [30]. Early diseases can be detected and characterized with appropriate molecular probes or contrast agents [31]. The combination of porous framework materials with bioimaging shows great promise in developing more efficient medical bioimaging systems [32,33,34].
Herein, we present the recent advances in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43], covalent organic frameworks (COFs) [44,45,46,47,48,49], and porous coordination cages (PCCs) [50,51,52] for cancer therapy, mainly in bioimaging, and treatments using photothermal therapy, thermodynamic therapy, or a combination of different therapies in cancer therapy (Scheme 1). We highlight the applications of porous framework materials for bioimaging and cancer therapy in this article (Table 1). In addition, we share our point of view on the limitations and future directional aspects regarding porous framework-based nanomaterials in cancer therapy.

2. Porous Framework Materials in Bioimaging

As an emerging field, bioimaging is defined as the visualization of biological processes through various probes with modern advanced instrumentations. To date, supramolecular porous framework materials have been extensively investigated in various bioimaging, including fluorescence imaging (FL), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and multimodal imaging [28,30,32,85,86,87,88]. Among them, fluorescence imaging has shown higher sensitivity, simpler operating functions, and faster imaging characteristics, and is gaining attention in tumor identification and real-time navigation surgery clinics [3]. Thus, porous frame materials are widely used in fluorescence imaging, including near-infrared biological imaging, upconversion fluorescence imaging, and single/two-photon fluorescence biological imaging (Table 1). Furthermore, nanodiagnostics and therapeutics based on porous framework materials can enable effective and precise diagnosis and treatment of various diseases [89].

2.1. MOF in Bioimaging

MOFs have good biocompatibility, drug loading, and biodegradability, which is beneficial to live cell imaging. Also, nanoscale MOF can be easily endocytosed by cells, offering the possibility of cellular imaging [85]. By combining other fluorescent materials, such as organic fluorescent dyes and carbon quantum dots, the ability of MOF to absorb excitation photons can be enhanced, therefore, improving its imaging performance [85,90,91,92]. Another method is to functionalize the surface of MOF and fabricate modified MOF materials to encapsulate drugs [54]. Functional MOF-based contrast agents are beneficial to achieve enhanced fluorescence and targeted localization. As a result, the effect of targeted imaging can be obtained.
The wavelength of the second near-infrared region (NIR-II) is located in the range of 1000–1700 nm, enabling a lesser photon scattering and weaker tissue self-fluorescence, which can greatly improve the detection depth, resolution and sensitivity of fluorescence imaging [93]. Thus, NIR-II region fluorescence imaging is a large-depth, high-resolution optical in vivo imaging tool. Liang et al. [53] reported a strategy for obtaining Ln-based MOFs (Ln-BTC-MOFs, BTC = 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate as ligand; Ln = Yb3+, Nd3+, Er3+) featuring NIR-II/IIb emitting and high luminescence efficiency that can be used for bioimaging. They achieved a significant improvement in NIR-II emission by doping the NIR cyanine dye (IR-3C) into Ln-BTC-MOFs, which enhanced the absorption of excitation photons (Figure 1). More importantly, the Er-BTC-IR@A modified by amphiphilic molecules exhibits strong near-infrared emission in the aqueous phase and has good biocompatibility, making it suitable for real biological applications. High-resolution NIR-IIb luminescence imaging of lymph, blood vessels, and spine was successfully achieved after intravenous injection of Er-BTC-IR@A in mice. This study serves as an inspiration for the development of MOFs in near-infrared imaging and will stimulate more applications of MOF in NIR-II fluorescence imaging.
Qiao et al. [54] successfully developed a novel targeted drug delivery vector MILB@LR for the effective treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) (Figure 2). MILB was further functionalized with a lipid bilayer composed of part of the RVG29 peptide, that is, MILB@LR. Due to the excellent modifiability of MOF, its surface structure can be precisely tuned to highly mimic surface functions of natural rabies virus (RABV) and bullet morphology. Using MOF as a contrast agent, the modified MILB@LR can pass through the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and reach the brain tumor cells, achieving the effect of targeted brain tumor cell imaging. MILB@LR has good stability and biocompatibility and exhibits excellent BBB penetration and tumor targeting to the brain. This material could be a prospective nanocarrier for the high-efficiency delivery of therapeutic drugs for tumors and other diseases, and this work opens up avenues for the biomedical drug delivery of nanomaterials.
High-order multiphoton excitation fluorescence (H-MPEF) materials typically exhibit nonlinearity and NIR-II excitation, which has the advantages of high sensitivity, strong penetration depth, and low phototoxicity [94]. Therefore, these materials have great potential in tumor diagnosis and treatment. Recently, the Li group [55] prepared a Zirconium-based MOF (ZrTc) using 4,4′- (thiazole[5,4-d]thiazole-2,5-diyl)dibenzoic acid (Tc) as the multiphoton active unit. Functional modification of ZrTc surface by ligand interaction to obtain ZTIG (Galactose-modified ZrTc) with good stability and tumor cell-specific targeting ability. The ordered ligand arrangement in ZrTc effectively avoids fluorescence quenching caused by π–π stacking, and the charge transfer from the organic ligand to the metal node can further improve electron delocalization, thus, improving its performance. In addition, ZTIG exhibits cancer cell-specific targeting ability through coordination effects between Zr clusters and O atoms. More importantly, its fluorescence imaging with high spatial resolution and deep tissue penetration can be achieved under light excitation in the near-infrared region II, making it a potential material for cancer diagnosis. This work represents the first reported MOF-based H-MPEF material for fluorescence imaging with conceptual applications in cancer diagnosis and therapy.
Recent years have witnessed rapid development in the applications of MOFs in bioimaging. Outstanding features of MOFs, such as porous morphology, high porosity, adjustable building blocks, targeting ability, and biological stability, have contributed to their progress in bioimaging.

2.2. COF in Bioimaging

COFs have been increasingly used in bioanalysis and nanomedicine in recent years due to their porous structure and ultra-high specific surface area, as well as excellent photostability and non-cytotoxicity [64,87]. The precise structure of COFs can be determined by powder x-ray diffraction (XRD), although obtaining their single crystal structure remains extremely difficult. The extended long-range ordered structures of COFs endow them with excellent broad-spectrum light absorption, suggestive of great potential in collecting and quenching fluorescence from a variety of dyes. Moreover, modified COF materials, in which functional nanomolecules serve as probes and the COFs themselves are used for fluorescence imaging, facilitate localization detection by tracking the location of the probes [62]. This is of great significance for accurate analysis. Some COFs are directly bound to fluorescent probes, whose fluorescence imaging effect can be enhanced using a two-photon fluorescence imaging technique [61].
In 2019, Zeng et al. [61] prepared a benzothiadiazole-based covalent organic framework through a simple solvothermal method. This COF (TPI-COF) can promote two-photon induction (TPI), exhibiting efficient TPI fluorescence emission. They further established a Balb/c mouse 4T1 tumor xenograft model to verify the feasibility of TPI-COF in vivo. Two-photon fluorescence imaging of mice after intravenous injection of TPI-COF, measured by two-photon electrophysiological microscopy (Figure 3A). A distinct punctate fluorescence signal was observed in the tumor tissue under 810 nm TPI (Figure 3B). Figure 3C,D shows that the maximum detectable depth of TPI-COF is up to about 150 μm. It uncovered the potential of TPI-COF as a two-photon probe in studying biological cells and tissues. This study will provide direction for future biomedical applications of near-infrared TPI-COFs.
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) plays a crucial role in the physiology of the human body. Abnormal levels of H2S in cells are associated with major diseases such as cancer, which makes it a potential target for cancer therapy [95]. In 2018, Zhang et al. [62] proposed to first create a hybrid COF-based probe and extended an effective anti-interference strategy based on it. As a proof-of-concept, they chose 4-amino-1,8-naphthalimide derivative (NPHS) as two-photon fluorescent probes, which have a large two-photon absorption cross-section. Then, they fabricated a COF nanoprobe with two-photon fluorescence by p-toluenesulfonic acid-mediated solvothermal method, TpASH-NPHS, for targeting hydrogen sulfide as a model analyte. Compared with the small molecule probes, the TpASH-NPHS COF exhibits high H2S selectivity and low cytotoxicity and can be used for fluorescence imaging in deep tumor tissues. In addition, the assay process is not compromised by casual interactions with endogenous enzymes, which is verified by preliminary results in a mouse model of cirrhosis. Such fluorescent COF nanoprobes hold great prospects in terms of bioimaging and nanomedicine research.
The spatial distribution of different biomarkers in cancer cells varies, and monitoring the expression and localization of different biomarkers in living cells can improve cancer diagnosis. In 2021, the Tang group [63] fabricated a COF-based tricolor fluorescent nanoprobe (COF@survivin/MUC1) by a freezing method and applied it to the simultaneous imaging of biomarkers with different distributions in living cells (Figure 4). COF@survivin/MUC1 is composed of COF nanoparticles adsorbing a Cy5-labeled aptamer MUC1 and a TAMRA-labeled survivin mRNA antisense oligonucleotide. In contrast to the existing nanoprobes, the intrinsic fluorescence of this material can monitor the distribution of nanoprobes inside and outside the cell. Accordingly, biomarkers with different spatial distributions were successfully visualized using nanoprobes. This work provides new insights into bioimaging and biomarker detection based on COF nanoprobes.
Overall, COF possesses several significant advantages in biomedical applications. First, the large pore volume of COFs enables high drug and probes loading capacity; second, their reversible covalent bonds enable a better biodegradability range; third, the high π electron density of COFs provides excellent performance for bioimaging.

2.3. PCC in Bioimaging

In recent years, remarkable development has been achieved in the synthesis and structure determination of PCCs. They have also attracted attention as molecular containers for biomedical applications such as drug delivery, bioimaging, and cancer therapy. However, reports on the applications of PCCs in bioimaging remain rare, and the main focus is on enhancing fluorescence imaging by utilizing the fluorescence properties of ligand groups [66]. Porous organic cages (POCs), which are similar to PCCs but do not contain metals, are also a potential material for bioimaging [67].
In 2019, the Zhao group [68] reported an assembly consisting of structurally stable Zirconium(IV)-based coordination cages and aggregation-induced emission (AIE) molecular rotors (Figure 5A). Then it was applied to bioimaging in vitro. The results show that the fluorescence emission intensity of the cage can be effectively controlled by limiting the kinetic behavior of the AIE molecular rotor. Since coordination cages have excellent chemical stability in aqueous solution and the molecular rotor features good AIE properties, they can be employed as novel fluorescent probes to image living cells in vitro.
There are also some cases of POCs being used in biomedicine. For example, POCs can be used as effective imaging agents to enhance fluorescence imaging and have low cytotoxicity. Zhao et al. [66] used a POC with AIE activity and a stimulus-responsive capability to realize bioimaging (Figure 5B). Notably, the imine bonds in the coordination unit are completely transformed into amine bonds under mild conditions, which greatly improves its hydrophilicity and the efficiency of living cell imaging. Dana Al Kelabi et al. [67] reported a reciprocal heterotrimeric organic cage with biological activity and mitochondrial targeting. They demonstrated that a biocompatible organic cage (OC1) can be employed as a mitochondria-targeted fluorescent probe with high cell permeability and impressive photostability. Notably, its stability and fluorescence are better than some commercial materials. These examples demonstrate the potential of POCs with good biocompatibility in biomedicine, although their real-world applications remain challenging.
As two discrete porous framework materials, PCCs and POCs hold great promise for bioimaging due to their good solubility and excellent fluorescence tunability.

3. Porous Framework Materials for Cancer Therapy

MOFs, COFs, and PCCs can integrate different nanoparticles or biomolecules into their frameworks due to their size tunability and structural diversity. It is beneficial to improve the loading efficiency of guest molecules and contributes to the formation of nanocarriers with excellent biocompatibility, water solubility, and biodegradability [50]. Therefore, they can be applied to customizable therapeutic diagnostic platforms for cancer therapy, including photodynamic therapy (PDT), photothermal therapy (PTT), chemodynamic therapy (CDT), and combination therapy (Table 1).

3.1. MOF in Cancer Therapy

It is well known that MOF materials are extensively used in PTT, PDT, CDT, and combination therapy. The functionalization of MOFs enables them to effectively target cancer cells [69]. Encapsulation of photosensitizer (Ps) into MOFs can avoid the aggregation of Ps and improve the ability of the composite to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) upon light irradiation. Such a composite material can be used for PDT [70]. Moreover, Fe-MOFs loaded with organic materials are usually used for CDT, which can induce iron death in tumor cells [76]. Composite materials such as NPs@MOFs [96] and biomolecules@MOF [97] are also excellent candidates for cancer treatment.
The therapeutic effect of PDT mainly depends on the ability of the Ps to generate ROS upon light irradiation. The Li group [69] synthesized a two-photon-active metal−organic framework PCN-58-Ps by a click reaction. Then a functionalized PCN-58-Ps-HA was obtained by capping PCN-58-Ps with hyaluronic acid (HA) through a coordination effect (Figure 6A), whose pore channels effectively prevented Ps aggregation. They found that the ROS generation of PCN-58-Ps is related to the inter-systemic crossover (ISC) of Ps and the linker-to-cluster charge transfer (LCCT) of PCN-58. Upon the NIR laser irradiation at 910 nm, PCN-58-Ps-HA with two-photon activity enables generate abundant ROS (1O2 and O2•-), which is a key factor for cell apoptosis.
Lin et al. [70] constructed a Hf-QC nanoscale metal−organic framework (nMOF) based on Hf12 and 2″,3′-dinitro-[1,1′:4′,1″;4″,1‴-quaterphenyl]-4,4‴-dicarboxylate (QC), and then encapsulated zinc-phthalocyanine (ZnP) into the pores of the rigid Hf-QC backbone to prepare ZnP@Hf-QC. Such a composite material avoids ZnP aggregation-induced excited state bursts and significantly enhances ROS generation upon light irradiation (Figure 6B). Importantly, its mediated PDT has better biocompatibility. Experimental results proved that ultra-high tumor growth inhibition and cure rates in mouse colon cancer models can be achieved, with excellent anti-tumor efficacy.
Monotherapy for tumor treatment has poor clinical efficacy due to the limitation of response conditions and the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria. Therefore, the construction of CDT- and PTT-based combination therapy is of great social significance.
Shen et al. [76] reported a nano-sized MOF containing piperlongumine (PL) modified by polydopamine (PDA) and new indocyanine green (IR820), that is, MP@PI. They found that MOF and PL were utilized as the iron source and H2O2 source, respectively, for CDT. Moreover, MOF and PL can promote iron death in tumor cells, which further leads to ROS production, lipid peroxide (LPO) accumulation, and glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) downregulation. The nano-platform, assisted by PTT, was used to induce an in-vivo immune response, enabling synergistic anti-tumor effects in-vitro and in-vivo.
The combination of MOFs and functional materials has led to the creation of novel multifunctional composites for cancer therapy. They have also shown great potential in targeted and multimodal therapy for improving cancer treatment efficiency [98].

3.2. COF in Cancer Therapy

COFs are generally composed of aromatic molecules, which make their absorption spectra lie mainly in the high-energy range of 320–450 nm [99]. In addition, organic backbones bearing electron-donating structural units (donors) and electron-accepting structural units (acceptors) are usually developed as photothermal agents for PTT.
The donor and acceptor in COF materials convert the absorbed light energy into heat energy through the occurrence of photo-induced electron transfer, which means that the COF material acts as a photothermal agent releasing heat through non-radiative relaxation, thus, leading to tumor ablation. The maximum absorption wavelength of COFs can be modulated by optimizing the structure of the donor to be suitable for cancer therapy [78]. The biocompatibility of COFs can also be improved by wrapping polysaccharides on their surface [79]. COFs can be excellent carriers of hydrophobic drugs by adjusting their pore size [100].
The Xie group [77] synthesized a novel COF with adjustable size and strong colloidal stability through Schiff base reaction in acetone at room temperature, which is constructed by electron-deficient thiophene isoindigo and electron-rich triphenylamine (TPAT COF). TPAT COF exhibits broad absorption even in the NIR-II due to the intramolecular charge transfer effect combined with the extension of the π–π conjugated backbone of the COF (Figure 7). Moreover, this COF possesses a high photothermal conversion efficiency (PCE) under 808 nm laser irradiation, allowing it to exhibit a significant cancer cell-killing effect.
Based on the same donor-acceptor strategy, the Jing group [78] also obtained a series of size-controlled COFs by Schiff base reaction under mild conditions. Interestingly, the COFs modified by 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[methoxy (polyethylene glycol)] (MPEG 2000-DSPE) show excellent colloidal stability and biocompatibility in water (Figure 8A). Moreover, these COFs exhibit a broad absorption spectrum with a maximum absorption wavelength that can be tuned by optimizing the structure of the donor and can even cover the NIR-II biological window for effective tumor growth inhibition under laser irradiation.
Tang et al. [79] use electron-rich 4,4′,4″,4‴-[porphyrin-5,10,15,20-tetrayl]tetraaniline (TAPP) and electron-deficient 4,4′-[benzothiadiazole-4,7-diyl]- dibenzaldehyde (BDA) to construct TB-COF. Remarkable photo-induced electron transfer (PET) occurs between the donor and acceptor in TB-COF under laser irradiation, which converts the absorbed light energy into heat energy, leading to tumor ablation. Its photothermal conversion efficiency is comparable with that of the commonly used PTT material (Figure 8B). In addition, wrapping a layer of HA on the surface of TB-COF (TPA-COF-HA) greatly improves its biocompatibility and enables tumor targeting, thus, enhancing therapeutic efficacy and drug safety.
The COFs contain both donors and acceptors, allowing charge-transfer jumps to occur at lower energies, greatly improving their optical properties and, thus, enabling effective photothermal treatment of tumors under laser irradiation [101].

3.3. PCC in Cancer Therapy

PCCs can also be used in PDT treatment due to their excellent ability to produce highly reactive singlet oxygen (1O2) [102]. On the one hand, Ps can be introduced to construct cages to promote the production of ROS [84]. On the other hand, doping heavy atoms into PCCs can produce high-yield ROS for PDT enhancement [103].
In cancer therapy, single molecule nanoparticles (SMNPs) can combine both imaging and therapeutic capabilities and show unparalleled advantages. Therefore, Chen’s group [83] used a template-directed strategy to synthesize a porphyrin nanocage, which is further constructed to porSMNPs by post-polyethylene glycol chain modification. Such functionalized porSMNPs can be employed as a therapeutic diagnostic platform to monitor the whole process of drug metabolism using radioactive 64Cu-labeled imaging. In addition, the cage-like structure significantly improves the photosensitization of porSMNPs by inhibiting π–π stacking interactions of Ps, which in turn enhances the antitumor performance in PDT.
Su et al. [84] prepared a photoactive highly ordered cubic [Pd4Ir8]16+ cage (MOC-53), which is composed of eight Ir(III)-based Ps and four Pd-based receptors (Figure 9). Such cage material was used as an efficient mitochondria-targeting single- and two-photon PDT reagent. MOC-53 has excellent 1O2 production efficiency, cellular uptake ability, and specific mitochondrial targeting capacity, leading to effective cancer cell death.
It is urgent to develop PCCs with good light absorption as ideal Ps that can not only target mitochondria to create an energy crisis but also generate a high yield of ROS leading to apoptosis and, thus, improve the efficacy of photodynamic therapy [104].

4. Conclusions, Challenges, and Perspectives

Great advances have been achieved in the synthesis and various applications of porous framework materials (i.e., MOFs, COFs, and PCCs) over the past two decades, including catalysis, biomedicine, and sense. Here we summarize the progress and advantages of these materials in bioimaging and cancer treatment. For example, the optical properties of porous framework materials can be easily modulated by controlling their component and structure to achieve excellent performance on bioimaging. The use of porous framework materials for bioimaging can, to a certain extent, solve the problem of cancer diagnosis at the primary stage. More importantly, their precise structure favors the investigation of the “structure-performance relationship”. Furthermore, their porosity is a unique advantage in improving drug-carrying capacity, showing promising potential in cancer treatment.
Even so, it is still at an early stage of development for their application in cancer therapy. There are still several important issues that need to be solved regarding fundamental research and medical applications of porous materials. First, current research in this field mainly focused on the uptake of nanomaterials in cells and tumors, rather than their metabolism and whereabouts. It is important to elucidate the in-vitro and in-vivo metabolic pathways of porous framework materials. This requires rapid degradation and in-vivo clearance of porous framework materials. Second, the biological toxicity of nanomaterials also needs to be evaluated in a long-term and more in-depth manner. The more stable nanomaterials are, the more difficult they may be to degrade, which has implications for their high biosafety. Third, it is still difficult to fully understand the effect of structure on performance in bioimaging and cancer therapy. Finally, activation of the immune response through porous framework materials has still not achieved satisfactory results in cancer therapy.
Therefore, future efforts should focus on the rational structural design of porous framework materials involving the selection of metal ions and ligands with hypotoxicity, and their stability in biological environments. In addition, more functions applicable to the tumor microenvironment, such as efficient drug tracking, should be added to the design. Since the fluorescence properties of most materials are readily influenced in the biological environment, it is necessary to design and develop excellent fluorescent materials with good stability suitable for in vivo imaging as probes.
As discrete porous materials, PCCs typically contain metal, vertex ligands, and plane ligands, and possess a unique geometric structure (e.g., tetrahedron and octahedron). Numerous porous coordination cages have been synthesized up to now, and their cavity size, solubility, and topology are readily tuned by ligands. In particular, PCCs with the same topology but different metals provide an ideal platform for investigating the role of the components on performance. In addition, functionalizing vertex ligands to construct water-soluble PCCs would be a promising direction to achieve biological applications. More importantly, the fluorescence properties of PCCs can be fine-tuned by modifying plane ligands or metal species to improve their performance in biological imaging. However, the unsatisfactory stability of PCCs limits their practical application to some extent. It is a promising direction to explore ultra-stable PCCs through a chelation assembly strategy.
Traditional therapies such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy primarily attack cells indiscriminately. In contrast, techniques including PTT and PDT are largely site-specific but sometimes not as effective. Consequently, it deserves to combine new strategies based on porous framework materials with traditional methods for achieving better performance in cancer treatment, and the future effort will focus on the eradication of cancer cells to reduce the risk of recurrence.
Despite various challenges with respect to porous framework materials for cancer therapy, it is believed that nanomedicine cancer therapy based on these materials is a promising growth area.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.F.; methodology, Y.F.; investigation, M.J. and Y.Z.; resources, M.J. and Y.Z.; data curation, Z.-J.G. and Y.F.; writing—original draft preparation, M.J. and Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, Z.-J.G. and Y.F.; visualization, M.J., Y.Z., Z.-J.G. and Y.F.; supervision, Z.-J.G. and Y.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by NSFC (21501133), and the China Hunan Provincial Science & Technology Department (2020RC3020 and 2021JJ20021).

Institutional Review Board Statement

No applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

No applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, H.; Zhang, W.; Zhu, G.; Xie, J.; Chen, X. Rethinking cancer nanotheranostics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 17024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Shi, J.; Kantoff, P.W.; Wooster, R.; Farokhzad, O.C. Cancer nanomedicine: Progress, challenges and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2017, 17, 20–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Guan, Q.; Zhou, L.L.; Li, W.Y.; Li, Y.A.; Dong, Y.B. Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs) for Cancer Therapeutics. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 26, 5583–5591. [Google Scholar]
  4. Behranvand, N.; Nasri, F.; Zolfaghari Emameh, R.; Khani, P.; Hosseini, A.; Garssen, J.; Falak, R. Chemotherapy: A double-edged sword in cancer treatment. Cancer Immunol. Immun. 2022, 71, 507–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ashrafizadeh, M.; Zarrabi, A.; Karimi-Maleh, H.; Taheriazam, A.; Mirzaei, S.; Hashemi, M.; Hushmandi, K.; Makvandi, P.; Nazarzadeh Zare, E.; Sharifi, E.; et al. (Nano)platforms in bladder cancer therapy: Challenges and opportunities. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2023, 8, e10353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lee, N.-H.; You, S.; Taghizadeh, A.; Taghizadeh, M.; Kim, H.S. Cell Membrane-Cloaked Nanotherapeutics for Targeted Drug Delivery. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, J.-Q.; Zhao, R.-X.; Yang, F.-M.; Qi, X.-T.; Ye, P.-K.; Xie, M. An erythrocyte membrane-camouflaged biomimetic nanoplatform for enhanced chemo-photothermal therapy of breast cancer. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022, 10, 2047–2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, Y.; Wang, T.; Ren, Y.; Li, S.; Fu, J.; Shi, J. Study on biomimetic nano tumor targeted delivery system for chemotherapy-laser immunotherapy. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2022, 176, 133–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Radhakrishnan, D.; Mohanan, S.; Choi, G.; Choy, J.-H.; Tiburcius, S.; Trinh, H.T.; Bolan, S.; Verrills, N.; Tanwar, P.; Karakoti, A.; et al. The emergence of nanoporous materials in lung cancer therapy. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mat. 2022, 23, 225–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sondhi, P.; Lingden, D.; Bhattarai, J.K.; Demchenko, A.V.; Stine, K.J. Applications of Nanoporous Gold in Therapy, Drug Delivery, and Diagnostics. Metals 2023, 13, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Singh, N.; Son, S.; An, J.; Kim, I.; Choi, M.; Kong, N.; Tao, W.; Kim, J.S. Nanoscale porous organic polymers for drug delivery and advanced cancer theranostics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 12883–12896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Brouillard, A.; Deshpande, N.; Kulkarni, A.A. Engineered Multifunctional Nano- and Biological Materials for Cancer Immunotherapy. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021, 10, 2001680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kumari, S.; Sharma, N.; Sahi, S.V. Advances in Cancer Therapeutics: Conventional Thermal Therapy to Nanotechnology-Based Photothermal Therapy. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, S.; Pan, X.; Liu, H. Two-Dimensional Nanomaterials for Photothermal Therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 5890–5900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zeng, R.; He, T.; Lu, L.; Li, K.; Luo, Z.; Cai, K. Ultra-thin metal–organic framework nanosheets for chemo-photodynamic synergistic therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 4143–4153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yang, Y.; Liu, Z. Chemiluminescent Nanosystems for Imaging Cancer Chemodynamic Therapy. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 6, 2127–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Berraondo, P.; Labiano, S.; Minute, L.; Etxeberria, I.; Vasquez, M.; Sanchez-Arraez, A.; Teijeira, A.; Melero, I. Cellular immunotherapies for cancer. OncoImmunology 2017, 6, e1306619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Del Paggio, J.C. Cancer immunotherapy and the value of cure. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 15, 268–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Agache, I.; Zemelka-Wiącek, M.; Shamji, M.H.; Jutel, M. Immunotherapy: State-of-the-art review of therapies and theratypes. J. Allergy Clin. 2022, 150, 1279–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ng, C.W.; Li, J.; Pu, K. Phototherapy-Synergized Cancer Immunotherapy: Recent Progresses in Phototherapy-Synergized Cancer Immunotherapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1870327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Zhang, Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, H.; Wang, T.; Pan, H.; Ji, W.; Chang, J. A synergistic cancer immunotherapy nano-system for preventing tumor growth. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 380, 122472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Colli, L.M.; Machiela, M.J.; Zhang, H.; Myers, T.A.; Jessop, L.; Delattre, O.; Yu, K.; Chanock, S.J. Landscape of Combination Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy to Improve Cancer Management. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 3666–3671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Pinto da Silva, L.; Magalhães, C.M.; Núñez-Montenegro, A.; Ferreira, P.J.O.; Duarte, D.; Rodríguez-Borges, J.E.; Vale, N.; Esteves da Silva, J.C.G. Study of the Combination of Self-Activating Photodynamic Therapy and Chemotherapy for Cancer Treatment. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. He, Y.; Hua Liu, S.; Yin, J.; Yoon, J. Sonodynamic and chemodynamic therapy based on organic/organometallic sensitizers. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 429, 213610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Gao, X.; Niu, X.; Wang, W.; Wu, Q.; Yuan, Z. Fluorescence-enhanced covalent organic framework nanosystem for tumor imaging and photothermal therapy. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 10429–10438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ibrahim, J.; Peeters, M.; Van Camp, G.; Op de Beeck, K. Methylation biomarkers for early cancer detection and diagnosis: Current and future perspectives. Eur. J. Cancer 2022, 178, 91–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hlaváček, A.; Farka, Z.; Mickert, M.J.; Kostiv, U.; Brandmeier, J.C.; Horák, D.; Skládal, P.; Foret, F.; Gorris, H.H. Bioconjugates of photon-upconversion nanoparticles for cancer biomarker detection and imaging. Nat. Protoc. 2022, 17, 1028–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nazari, M.; Saljooghi, A.S.; Ramezani, M.; Alibolandi, M.; Mirzaei, M. Current status and future prospects of nanoscale metal–organic frameworks in bioimaging. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022, 10, 8824–8851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shaikh, S.; Wang, Y.; ur Rehman, F.; Jiang, H.; Wang, X. Phosphorescent Ir (III) complexes as cellular staining agents for biomedical molecular imaging. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 416, 213344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shaikh, S.; Younis, M.; Yuan, L. Functionalized DNA nanostructures for bioimaging. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 469, 214648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lin, J.; Chen, X.; Huang, P. Graphene-based nanomaterials for bioimaging. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016, 105, 242–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Zhao, Y.; Jiang, X.; Liu, X.; Liu, X.; Liu, Z.; Liu, X. Application of photo-responsive metal-organic framework in cancer therapy and bioimaging. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 31986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhu, H.; Wang, Y.; Wei, T.; Zhao, X.; Li, F.; Li, Y.; Wang, F.; Cai, Y.; Jin, J. KAT8/MOF-Mediated Anti-Cancer Mechanism of Gemcitabine in Human Bladder Cancer Cells. Biomol. Ther. 2021, 29, 184–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhou, J.; Rao, L.; Yu, G.; Cook, T.R.; Chen, X.; Huang, F. Supramolecular cancer nanotheranostics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 2839–2891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Saeb, M.R.; Rabiee, N.; Mozafari, M.; Verpoort, F.; Voskressensky, L.G.; Luque, R. Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) for Cancer Therapy. Materials 2021, 14, 7277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wu, M.X.; Yang, Y.W. Metal-Organic Framework (MOF)-Based Drug/Cargo Delivery and Cancer Therapy. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sun, S.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, J.; Pei, R. Lanthanide-based MOFs: Synthesis approaches and applications in cancer diagnosis and therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022, 10, 9535–9564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Su, J.; Jing, P.; Jiang, K.; Du, J. Recent advances in porous MOFs and their hybrids for photothermal cancer therapy. Dalton Trans. 2022, 51, 8938–8944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hu, X.; Li, R.; Wu, W.; Fang, K.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Chen, M.; Dong, C.; Shi, S. A Fe(III)-porphyrin-oxaliplatin(IV) nanoplatform for enhanced ferroptosis and combined therapy. J. Control. Release 2022, 348, 660–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lian, X.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Fang, Y.; Zhao, R.; Joseph, E.; Li, J.; Pellois, J.P.; Zhou, H.C. Enzyme-MOF Nanoreactor Activates Nontoxic Paracetamol for Cancer Therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 5725–5730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sun, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, D.; Chen, Y.-P.; Wang, F.; Li, L.; Liu, T.-F.; Yang, H.; Song, J.; Cao, R. Building Block Symmetry Relegation Induces Mesopore and Abundant Open-Metal Sites in Metal–Organic Frameworks for Cancer Therapy. CCS Chem. 2022, 4, 996–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bahari, D.; Babamiri, B.; Moradi, K.; Salimi, A.; Hallaj, R. Graphdiyne nanosheet as a novel sensing platform for self-enhanced electrochemiluminescence of MOF enriched ruthenium (II) in the presence of dual co-reactants for detection of tumor marker. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 195, 113657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, H.; Zhu, Q.-L.; Zou, R.; Xu, Q. Metal-Organic Frameworks for Energy Applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 2, 52–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Gao, P.; Wang, M.; Chen, Y.; Pan, W.; Zhou, P.; Wan, X.; Li, N.; Tang, B. A COF-based nanoplatform for highly efficient cancer diagnosis, photodynamic therapy and prognosis. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 6882–6888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wan, X.; Yin, J.; Yan, Q.; Hu, H.; Zheng, T.; Chai, Y.; Pan, W.; Gao, Y.; Li, N.; Tang, B. Sustained-release nanocapsule based on a 3D COF for long-term enzyme prodrug therapy of cancer. Chem. Commun. 2022, 58, 5877–5880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Huo, T.; Yang, Y.; Qian, M.; Jiang, H.; Du, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xie, Y.; Huang, R. Versatile hollow COF nanospheres via manipulating transferrin corona for precise glioma-targeted drug delivery. Biomaterials 2020, 260, 120305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gao, P.; Shen, X.; Liu, X.; Chen, Y.; Pan, W.; Li, N.; Tang, B. Nucleic Acid-Gated Covalent Organic Frameworks for Cancer-Specific Imaging and Drug Release. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 11751–11757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gao, P.; Shen, X.; Liu, X.; Cui, B.; Wang, M.; Wan, X.; Li, N.; Tang, B. Covalent Organic Framework-Derived Carbonous Nanoprobes for Cancer Cell Imaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 41498–41506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Diercks, C.S.; Yaghi, O.M. The atom, the molecule, and the covalent organic framework. Science 2017, 355, eaal1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fang, Y.; Lian, X.; Huang, Y.; Fu, G.; Xiao, Z.; Wang, Q.; Nan, B.; Pellois, J.P.; Zhou, H.C. Investigating Subcellular Compartment Targeting Effect of Porous Coordination Cages for Enhancing Cancer Nanotherapy. Small 2018, 14, e1802709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhu, C.Y.; Pan, M.; Su, C.Y. Metal-Organic Cages for Biomedical Applications. Isr. J. Chem. 2018, 59, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liang, Y.; Fang, Y.; Cui, Y.; Zhou, H. A stable biocompatible porous coordination cage promotes in vivo liver tumor inhibition. Nano Res. 2021, 14, 3407–3415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liang, T.; Guo, Z.; He, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, C.; Li, Z.; Liu, Z. Cyanine-Doped Lanthanide Metal-Organic Frameworks for Near-Infrared II Bioimaging. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, e2104561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Qiao, C.; Zhang, R.; Wang, Y.; Jia, Q.; Wang, X.; Yang, Z.; Xue, T.; Ji, R.; Cui, X.; Wang, Z. Rabies Virus-Inspired Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) for Targeted Imaging and Chemotherapy of Glioma. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 16982–16988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, B.; Lu, X.; Tian, Y.; Li, D. Embedding Multiphoton Active Units within Metal–Organic Frameworks for Turning on High-Order Multiphoton Excited Fluorescence for Bioimaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202206755. [Google Scholar]
  56. Hamideh, R.A.; Akbari, B.; Fathi, P.; Misra, S.K.; Sutrisno, A.; Lam, F.; Pan, D. Biodegradable MRI Visible Drug Eluting Stent Reinforced by Metal Organic Frameworks. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2020, 9, 2000136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Fan, Z.; Liu, H.; Xue, Y.; Lin, J.; Fu, Y.; Xia, Z.; Pan, D.; Zhang, J.; Qiao, K.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Reversing cold tumors to hot: An immunoadjuvant-functionalized metal-organic framework for multimodal imaging-guided synergistic photo-immunotherapy. Bioact. Mater. 2021, 6, 312–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhao, J.; Yin, F.; Ji, L.; Wang, C.; Shi, C.; Liu, X.; Yang, H.; Wang, X.; Kong, L. Development of a Tau-Targeted Drug Delivery System Using a Multifunctional Nanoscale Metal–Organic Framework for Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 44447–44458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hu, X.; Lu, Y.; Zhou, L.; Chen, L.; Yao, T.; Liang, S.; Han, J.; Dong, C.; Shi, S. Post-synthesis strategy to integrate porphyrinic metal–organic frameworks with CuS NPs for synergistic enhanced photo-therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 935–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhu, Y.; Xin, N.; Qiao, Z.; Chen, S.; Zeng, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, D.; Sun, J.; Fan, H. Bioactive MOFs Based Theranostic Agent for Highly Effective Combination of Multimodal Imaging and Chemo-Phototherapy. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2020, 9, 2000205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zeng, J.Y.; Wang, X.S.; Xie, B.R.; Li, M.J.; Zhang, X.Z. Covalent Organic Framework for Improving Near-Infrared Light Induced Fluorescence Imaging through Two-Photon Induction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 10087–10094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, P.; Zhou, F.; Zhang, C.; Yin, S.Y.; Teng, L.; Chen, L.; Hu, X.X.; Liu, H.W.; Yin, X.; Zhang, X.B. Ultrathin two-dimensional covalent organic framework nanoprobe for interference-resistant two-photon fluorescence bioimaging. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 8402–8408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Gao, P.; Wei, R.; Chen, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Pan, W.; Li, N.; Tang, B. Multicolor Covalent Organic Framework-DNA Nanoprobe for Fluorescence Imaging of Biomarkers with Different Locations in Living Cells. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 13734–13741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sun, P.; Hai, J.; Sun, S.; Lu, S.; Liu, S.; Liu, H.; Chen, F.; Wang, B. Aqueous stable Pd nanoparticles/covalent organic framework nanocomposite: An efficient nanoenzyme for colorimetric detection and multicolor imaging of cancer cells. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 825–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Das, G.; Benyettou, F.; Sharama, S.K.; Prakasam, T.; Gándara, F.; de la Peña-O’Shea, V.A.; Saleh, N.i.; Pasricha, R.; Jagannathan, R.; Olson, M.A.; et al. Covalent organic nanosheets for bioimaging. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 8382–8387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Dong, J.; Pan, Y.; Yang, K.; Yuan, Y.D.; Wee, V.; Xu, S.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, J.; Liu, B.; Zhao, D. Enhanced Biological Imaging via Aggregation-Induced Emission Active Porous Organic Cages. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 2355–2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Al Kelabi, D.; Dey, A.; Alimi, L.O.; Piwonski, H.; Habuchi, S.; Khashab, N.M. Photostable polymorphic organic cages for targeted live cell imaging. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13, 7341–7346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dong, J.; Pan, Y.; Wang, H.; Yang, K.; Liu, L.; Qiao, Z.; Yuan, Y.D.; Peh, S.B.; Zhang, J.; Shi, L.; et al. Self-Assembly of Highly Stable Zirconium(IV) Coordination Cages with Aggregation Induced Emission Molecular Rotors for Live-Cell Imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 10151–10159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Li, B.; Cao, H.; Zheng, J.; Ni, B.; Lu, X.; Tian, X.; Tian, Y.; Li, D. Click Modification of a Metal-Organic Framework for Two-Photon Photodynamic Therapy with Near-Infrared Excitation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 9739–9747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Luo, T.; Nash, G.T.; Xu, Z.; Jiang, X.; Liu, J.; Lin, W. Nanoscale Metal-Organic Framework Confines Zinc-Phthalocyanine Photosensitizers for Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 13519–13524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cai, X.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, L.; Hu, M.; Wu, Z.; Liu, L.; Zhu, W.; Pei, R. Synthesis of Au@MOF core–shell hybrids for enhanced photodynamic/photothermal therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 6646–6657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Wang, C.; Xue, F.; Wang, M.; An, L.; Wu, D.; Tian, Q. 2D Cu-Bipyridine MOF Nanosheet as an Agent for Colon Cancer Therapy: A Three-in-One Approach for Enhancing Chemodynamic Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 38604–38616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Zheng, X.; Wang, L.; Guan, Y.; Pei, Q.; Jiang, J.; Xie, Z. Integration of metal-organic framework with a photoactive porous-organic polymer for interface enhanced phototherapy. Biomaterials 2020, 235, 119792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhao, Y.; Wang, J.; Cai, X.; Ding, P.; Lv, H.; Pei, R. Metal–Organic Frameworks with Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy: Synthesis, Erythrocyte Membrane Camouflage, and Aptamer-Targeted Aggregation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 23697–23706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wang, X.; Chen, Q.; Lu, C. Aptamer-Functionalized Iron-Based Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs) for Synergistic Cascade Cancer Chemotherapy and Chemodynamic Therapy. Molecules 2022, 27, 4247. [Google Scholar]
  76. Deng, H.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Y.; Yang, J.; Wei, Y.; Ma, S.; Shen, Q. Chemodynamic and Photothermal Combination Therapy Based on Dual-Modified Metal-Organic Framework for Inducing Tumor Ferroptosis/Pyroptosis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 24089–24101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Xia, R.; Li, C.; Yuan, X.; Wu, Q.; Jiang, B.; Xie, Z. Facile Preparation of a Thienoisoindigo-Based Nanoscale Covalent Organic Framework with Robust Photothermal Activity for Cancer Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 19129–19138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Xia, R.; Zheng, X.; Li, C.; Yuan, X.; Wang, J.; Xie, Z.; Jing, X. Nanoscale Covalent Organic Frameworks with Donor-Acceptor Structure for Enhanced Photothermal Ablation of Tumors. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 7638–7648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wan, X.; Zhang, J.; Zuo, K.; Zhang, H.; Hu, H.; Pan, W.; Gao, Y.; Li, N.; Tang, B. A donor-acceptor covalent organic framework as the promising construct for photothermal therapy. Sci. China Mater. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, S.-B.; Chen, Z.-X.; Gao, F.; Zhang, C.; Zou, M.-Z.; Ye, J.-J.; Zeng, X.; Zhang, X.-Z. Remodeling extracellular matrix based on functional covalent organic framework to enhance tumor photodynamic therapy. Biomaterials 2020, 234, 119772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, P.; Zhou, F.; Guan, K.; Wang, Y.; Fu, X.; Yang, Y.; Yin, X.; Song, G.; Zhang, X.-B.; Tan, W. In vivo therapeutic response monitoring by a self-reporting upconverting covalent organic framework nanoplatform. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 1299–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Gan, S.; Tong, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, J.; Hu, Y.; Yuan, A. Covalent Organic Framework-Supported Molecularly Dispersed Near-Infrared Dyes Boost Immunogenic Phototherapy against Tumors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1902757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yu, G.; Cen, T.Y.; He, Z.; Wang, S.P.; Wang, Z.; Ying, X.W.; Li, S.; Jacobson, O.; Wang, S.; Wang, L.; et al. Porphyrin Nanocage-Embedded Single-Molecular Nanoparticles for Cancer Nanotheranostics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 8799–8803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Liu, Y.Y.; Yu, H.J.; Wang, Y.P.; Li, C.J.; Wang, X.F.; Ye, C.G.; Yao, H.L.; Pan, M.; Su, C.Y. A photoactive Ir–Pd bimetallic cage with high singlet oxygen yield for efficient one/two-photon activated photodynamic therapy. Mater. Chem. Front. 2022, 6, 948–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Liu, M.; Ren, X.; Meng, X.; Li, H. Metal-Organic Frameworks-Based Fluorescent Nanocomposites for Bioimaging in Living Cells and in vivo. Chin. J. Chem. 2021, 39, 473–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sava Gallis, D.F.; Butler, K.S.; Rohwer, L.E.S.; McBride, A.A.; Vincent, G.; Chong, C.V.; Pearce, C.J.; Luk, T.S. Biocompatible MOFs with high absolute quantum yield for bioimaging in the second near infrared window. CrystEngComm 2018, 20, 5919–5924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mal, A.; Ding, H.; Li, M.; Li, W.; Wang, C. Covalent Organic Frameworks with Nanopores for Biological Applications: A Review. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 13972–13984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sohrabi, H.; Javanbakht, S.; Oroojalian, F.; Rouhani, F.; Shaabani, A.; Majidi, M.R.; Hashemzaei, M.; Hanifehpour, Y.; Mokhtarzadeh, A.; Morsali, A. Nanoscale Metal-Organic Frameworks: Recent developments in synthesis, modifications and bioimaging applications. Chemosphere 2021, 281, 130717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Xie, B.; Ding, Y.-F.; Shui, M.; Yue, L.; Gao, C.; Wyman, I.W.; Wang, R. Supramolecular biomaterials for bio-imaging and imaging-guided therapy. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2022, 49, 1200–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yan, D.; Lou, Y.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Cai, Y.; Guo, Z.; Zhan, H.; Chen, B. Dye-Modified Metal–Organic Framework as a Recyclable Luminescent Sensor for Nicotine Determination in Urine Solution and Living Cell. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 47253–47258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gao, X.; Cui, R.; Song, L.; Liu, Z. Hollow structural metal–organic frameworks exhibit high drug loading capacity, targeted delivery and magnetic resonance/optical multimodal imaging. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 17291–17297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Chen, H.; Wang, J.; Shan, D.; Chen, J.; Zhang, S.; Lu, X. Dual-Emitting Fluorescent Metal–Organic Framework Nanocomposites as a Broad-Range pH Sensor for Fluorescence Imaging. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 7056–7063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Zebibula, A.; Alifu, N.; Xia, L.; Sun, C.; Yu, X.; Xue, D.; Liu, L.; Li, G.; Qian, J. Ultrastable and Biocompatible NIR-II Quantum Dots for Functional Bioimaging. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1703451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Li, J.; Li, B.; Yao, X.; Duan, W.; Zhang, W.; Tian, Y.; Li, D. In Situ Coordination and Confinement of Two-Photon Active Unit Within Metal–Organic Frameworks for High-Order Multiphoton-Excited Fluorescent Performance. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 61, 19282–19288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wang, H.-S. Metal–organic frameworks for biosensing and bioimaging applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 349, 139–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. He, L.; Ni, Q.; Mu, J.; Fan, W.; Liu, L.; Wang, Z.; Li, L.; Tang, W.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, Y.; et al. Solvent-Assisted Self-Assembly of a Metal–Organic Framework Based Biocatalyst for Cascade Reaction Driven Photodynamic Therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 6822–6832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Alsaiari, S.K.; Patil, S.; Alyami, M.; Alamoudi, K.O.; Aleisa, F.A.; Merzaban, J.S.; Li, M.; Khashab, N.M. Endosomal Escape and Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Machinery Enabled by Nanoscale Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 143–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Liu, J.; Huang, J.; Zhang, L.; Lei, J. Multifunctional metal–organic framework heterostructures for enhanced cancer therapy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 1188–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Bessinger, D.; Ascherl, L.; Auras, F.; Bein, T. Spectrally Switchable Photodetection with Near-Infrared-Absorbing Covalent Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 12035–12042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Xu, J.; Yang, C.; Bi, S.; Wang, W.; He, Y.; Wu, D.; Liang, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhang, F. Vinylene-Linked Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs) with Symmetry-Tuned Polarity and Photocatalytic Activity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 23845–23853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Bessinger, D.; Muggli, K.; Beetz, M.; Auras, F.; Bein, T. Fast-Switching Vis–IR Electrochromic Covalent Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 7351–7357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Rangasamy, S.; Ju, H.; Um, S.; Oh, D.-C.; Song, J.M. Mitochondria and DNA Targeting of 5,10,15,20-Tetrakis(7-sulfonatobenzo[b]thiophene) Porphyrin-Induced Photodynamic Therapy via Intrinsic and Extrinsic Apoptotic Cell Death. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 6864–6874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Zhai, T.; Wang, C.; Cui, L.; Du, J.; Zhou, Z.; Yang, H.; Yang, S. Hollow Bimetallic Complex Nanoparticles for Trimodality Imaging and Photodynamic Therapy In Vivo. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 37470–37476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Sepehrpour, H.; Fu, W.; Sun, Y.; Stang, P.J. Biomedically Relevant Self-Assembled Metallacycles and Metallacages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 14005–14020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 28 01360 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Porous framework materials in bioimaging and cancer therapy.
Scheme 1. Porous framework materials in bioimaging and cancer therapy.
Molecules 28 01360 sch001
Molecules 28 01360 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the fabrication of Ln-BTC-MOFs with strong NIR-II emission by a cyanine dye doping process. Reprinted with permission from [53]. Copyright 2022 John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the fabrication of Ln-BTC-MOFs with strong NIR-II emission by a cyanine dye doping process. Reprinted with permission from [53]. Copyright 2022 John Wiley and Sons.
Molecules 28 01360 g001
Molecules 28 01360 g002 550
Figure 2. Manufacture of MILB@LR and a comprehensive simulation strategy on RABV to enhance BBB infiltration and chemotherapy for glioma. Reprinted with permission from [54]. Copyright 2020 John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 2. Manufacture of MILB@LR and a comprehensive simulation strategy on RABV to enhance BBB infiltration and chemotherapy for glioma. Reprinted with permission from [54]. Copyright 2020 John Wiley and Sons.
Molecules 28 01360 g002
Molecules 28 01360 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) Schematic diagram of TPI-COF for in vivo tumor imaging. (B) The two-photon induced fluorescence imaging study of TPI-COF in Balb/c mice model with 4T1 tumor xenograft (B1, PBS group; B2, TPI-COF group). (C) The two-photon fluorescence intensity of TPI-COF at different tumor tissue depths. (D) The two-photon fluorescence imaging of TPI-COF at different tumor tissue depths. Reprinted with permission from [61]. Copyright 2019 John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 3. (A) Schematic diagram of TPI-COF for in vivo tumor imaging. (B) The two-photon induced fluorescence imaging study of TPI-COF in Balb/c mice model with 4T1 tumor xenograft (B1, PBS group; B2, TPI-COF group). (C) The two-photon fluorescence intensity of TPI-COF at different tumor tissue depths. (D) The two-photon fluorescence imaging of TPI-COF at different tumor tissue depths. Reprinted with permission from [61]. Copyright 2019 John Wiley and Sons.
Molecules 28 01360 g003
Molecules 28 01360 g004 550
Figure 4. Synthesis of COF and the multicolor nanoprobe, and its schematic application in cell imaging. Reprinted with permission from [63]. Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society.
Figure 4. Synthesis of COF and the multicolor nanoprobe, and its schematic application in cell imaging. Reprinted with permission from [63]. Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 28 01360 g004
Molecules 28 01360 g005 550
Figure 5. (A) Schematic diagram of the application of self-assembly of a highly stable Zirconium(IV) coordination cages containing AIE molecular rotors for live cell imaging (red color groups: the AIE molecular rotors). (B) AIE-active POCs with hydrophilic and stimuli-responsive properties for bioimaging enhancement. Reprinted with permission from [68]. Copyright 2020 John Wiley and Sons. Reprinted with permission from [66]. Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.
Figure 5. (A) Schematic diagram of the application of self-assembly of a highly stable Zirconium(IV) coordination cages containing AIE molecular rotors for live cell imaging (red color groups: the AIE molecular rotors). (B) AIE-active POCs with hydrophilic and stimuli-responsive properties for bioimaging enhancement. Reprinted with permission from [68]. Copyright 2020 John Wiley and Sons. Reprinted with permission from [66]. Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 28 01360 g005
Molecules 28 01360 g006 550
Figure 6. (A) Preparation of PCN-58-Ps-HA and highlighting of photo-induced ROS generation and two-photon fluorescence imaging-guided PDT. (B) Structural composition of ZnP@Hf-QC: a 3D framework of Hf12 SBUs and QC bridging ligands and ZnP PSs confined in the pore space. ZnP@Hf-QC efficiently produced 1O2 under light irradiation at 700 nm. Reprinted with permission from [69,70]. Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society.
Figure 6. (A) Preparation of PCN-58-Ps-HA and highlighting of photo-induced ROS generation and two-photon fluorescence imaging-guided PDT. (B) Structural composition of ZnP@Hf-QC: a 3D framework of Hf12 SBUs and QC bridging ligands and ZnP PSs confined in the pore space. ZnP@Hf-QC efficiently produced 1O2 under light irradiation at 700 nm. Reprinted with permission from [69,70]. Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 28 01360 g006
Molecules 28 01360 g007 550
Figure 7. Schematic diagram of the synthesis of TPAT COF and its photothermal application to tumors. Reprinted with permission from ref [77]. Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.
Figure 7. Schematic diagram of the synthesis of TPAT COF and its photothermal application to tumors. Reprinted with permission from ref [77]. Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 28 01360 g007
Molecules 28 01360 g008 550
Figure 8. (A) Schematic synthesis of D-A structured COFs. (B) Schematic design and preparation of TB-COF-HA for PTT. Reprinted with permission from [78]. Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society. Reprinted with permission from [79]. Copyright 2022 Springer Nature.
Figure 8. (A) Schematic synthesis of D-A structured COFs. (B) Schematic design and preparation of TB-COF-HA for PTT. Reprinted with permission from [78]. Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society. Reprinted with permission from [79]. Copyright 2022 Springer Nature.
Molecules 28 01360 g008
Molecules 28 01360 g009 550
Figure 9. (A) Synthesis of MOC-53. (B,C) Schematic diagram of the PDT effect of MOC-53 on a tumor-bearing mouse under 810 nm light irritation. Reprinted with permission from [84]. Copyright 2022 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 9. (A) Synthesis of MOC-53. (B,C) Schematic diagram of the PDT effect of MOC-53 on a tumor-bearing mouse under 810 nm light irritation. Reprinted with permission from [84]. Copyright 2022 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Molecules 28 01360 g009
Table
Table 1. Recent advances in porous framework materials for bioimaging and cancer therapy.
Table 1. Recent advances in porous framework materials for bioimaging and cancer therapy.
ApplicationsPorous Framework MaterialsMain FunctionsRef.
BioimagingNIR-Ⅱ imagingMOFsLn-BTC-MOF (Ln = Yb3+, Nd3+, Er3+)enhanced the absorption of excitation photons[53]
fluorescence imagingMIL-Feas a contrast agent[54]
NIR-Ⅱ imagingZrTc; ZrTclactivated H-MPEF performance[55]
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)MIL-101(Fe)high spatial resolution and deep penetration[56]
multimode bioimaging ICG-CpG@MOFcomprehensive diagnostic information[57]
MRIFe-MIL-88B-NH2-NOTA-DMK6240/MBenhance tau targeting[58]
fluorescence imagingPCN-CuS-FA-ICGfacile diffusion of 1O2 and prevention of PS self-quenching[59]
MRIFDGI NPscould effectively accumulate FDG (Fe-DOX@Gd-MOF) NPs at the tumor site [60]
two-photon fluorescence imagingCOFsTPI-COFimproves the delocalization of π electrons, and leads to a high dipole value and fluorescent activity[61]
two-photon fluorescence imagingTpASH-NPHSminimize cellular autofluorescence, reduce tissue injury and increase tissue penetration depth[62]
fluorescence imagingCOF@survivin/MUC1employed a freezing method to improve the DNA loading density and ensure detection performance[63]
Multicolor
imaging		Pd NPs/CMC−
COF-LZU1		produce obvious changes in both color and fluorescence[64]
bioimaging TTA-DFP CONspossess tunable optical characteristics[65]
fluorescence imagingPCCsZr6L3 coordination cagegood aggregation-induced emission (AIE) properties[66]
fluorescence imagingTPE-cagegood aggregation-induced emission (AIE) properties[67]
fluorescence imagingPOC-OC1high biocompatibility, cell permeability, and mitochondrial targetability[68]
Cancer
therapy		PDTMOFsPCN-58-Ps-HAgenerates abundant reactive oxygen species (ROS)[69]
PDTZnP@Hf-QCsignificantly enhances ROS generation upon light irradiation[70]
PDT Au@MOFleads to ROS production[71]
CDTCu(bpy)2(OTf)2facilitates Fenton-like reactions[72]
PTT+PDTHUC-PEGleads to ROS production[73]
CDT+PDTFeTCPP/Fe2O3 MOFleads to ROS and ·OH production[74]
Chemotherapy+CDTTA-MOFleads to ·OH production and facilitates Fenton reactions[75]
CDT+PTTMP@PIpromote iron death and leads to ROS production[76]
PTTCOFsTPAT COFpossesses a high photothermal conversion efficiency (PCE) under 808 nm[77]
PTTDPPN COFpossess potent photothermal activity under laser irradiation[78]
PTTTB-COFthe donor and acceptor under laser irradiation and convert the absorbed light energy into heat energy[79]
PDTPCPPleads to ROS production[80]
PDTUCCOFsleads to ROS production[81]
IPT (immunogenic photo-therapy)ICG@COF-1@
PDA		enhanced photodynamic and photothermal therapy[82]
PDTPCCsporSMNPsinhibit π–π stacking interactions of photosensitizers and enhance the antitumor performance[83]
PDT MOC-53excellent 1O2 production efficiency, cellular uptake ability, and specific mitochondrial targeting capacity[84]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jin, M.; Zhao, Y.; Guan, Z.-J.; Fang, Y. Porous Framework Materials for Bioimaging and Cancer Therapy. Molecules 2023, 28, 1360. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031360

AMA Style

Jin M, Zhao Y, Guan Z-J, Fang Y. Porous Framework Materials for Bioimaging and Cancer Therapy. Molecules. 2023; 28(3):1360. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031360

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jin, Meng, Yingying Zhao, Zong-Jie Guan, and Yu Fang. 2023. "Porous Framework Materials for Bioimaging and Cancer Therapy" Molecules 28, no. 3: 1360. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031360

APA Style

Jin, M., Zhao, Y., Guan, Z. -J., & Fang, Y. (2023). Porous Framework Materials for Bioimaging and Cancer Therapy. Molecules, 28(3), 1360. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031360

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop