Next Article in Journal
Design, Synthesis and Antitumor Activity of Quercetin Derivatives Containing a Quinoline Moiety
Next Article in Special Issue
New Copper Complexes with N,O-Donor Ligands Based on Pyrazole Moieties Supported by 3-Substituted Acetylacetone Scaffolds
Previous Article in Journal
Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid Analogs with Heteroaryl Amide Group and Different Chain Length: Synthesis and Effect on Histone Deacetylase
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Characterization of Iridium(III) Complexes with Substituted Phenylimidazo(4,5-f)1,10-phenanthroline Ancillary Ligands and Their Application in LEC Devices
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 1
10.3390/molecules29010239
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Luminescent Behavior of Zn(II) and Mn(II) Halide Derivatives of 4-Phenyldinaphtho[2,1-d:1′,2′-f][1,3,2]dioxaphosphepine 4-Oxide and Single-Crystal X-ray Structure Determination of the Ligand

by
Valentina Ferraro
1,
Jesús Castro
2 and
Marco Bortoluzzi
1,*
1
Dipartimento di Scienze Molecolari e Nanosistemi, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, 30172 Mestre, VE, Italy
2
Departamento de Química Inorgánica, Facultade de Química, Edificio de Ciencias Experimentais, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Galicia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(1), 239; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29010239
Submission received: 5 December 2023 / Revised: 14 December 2023 / Accepted: 18 December 2023 / Published: 1 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Coordination Chemistry of Metal Complexes)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The two enantiomers of chiral phosphonate 4-phenyldinaphtho[2,1-d:1′,2′-f][1,3,2]dioxaphosphepine 4-oxide, O=PPh(BINOL), were synthesized from the proper 1,1′-bi-2-naphtol (BINOL) enantiomer and characterized. The structure of the (S)-enantiomer was elucidated by means of single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The reaction with anhydrous ZnBr2 afforded complexes having the general formula [ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] that showed intense fluorescence centered in the near-UV region rationalized on the basis of TD-DFT calculations. The corresponding Mn(II) complexes with the general formula [MnX2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] (X = Cl, Br) exhibited dual emission upon excitation with UV light, with the relative intensity of the bands dependent upon the choice of the halide. The highest energy transition is comparable with that of the Zn(II) complex, while the lowest energy emission falls in the red region of the spectrum and is characterized by lifetimes in the hundreds of microseconds range. Although the emission at lower energy can also be achieved by direct excitation of the metal center, the luminescence decay curves suggest that the band in the red range is possibly derived from BINOL-centered excited states populated by intersystem crossing.

1. Introduction

The enantiomers of 1,1′-bi-2-naphtol (BINOL) and related species play a key role in asymmetric organic synthesis and catalysis [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. A recent noticeable example is constituted by the integration of chiral BINOL-phosphoric acid and Cu(II)-porphyrin modules into a single framework, able to promote the asymmetric α-benzylation of aldehydes via visible-light-induced photothermal conversion [14]. Actual advanced applications of BINOL-based compounds include supramolecular enantiorecognition, which is also based on luminescence measurements, and the development of materials with chiral optical properties [15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Recent examples in this field are chiroptical switches constituted by tetrahedral boron BINOL derivatives containing fluorene- or dibenzosuberenone-substituted pyridinylhydrazone moieties that exhibit noticeable chiroptical changes after visible light irradiation [22].
Even though several BINOL derivatives of synthetic and technological interest contain trivalent or pentavalent phosphorus, such as phosphonites and phosphoric acid derivatives, the chiral phosphonate 4-phenyldinaphtho[2,1-d:1′,2′-f][1,3,2]dioxaphosphepine 4-oxide, O=PPh(BINOL), was subjected to quite limited investigation. Its synthesis, first reported in 1990, was based on the reaction between BINOL and phenylphosphonic dichloride in benzene in the presence of triethylamine as a base. The compound and related species were investigated as possible new organophosphorus pesticides and insecticides [23]. According to a 2023 Chinese patent [24], the same product can be obtained from BINOL and diethyl phenylphosphonate in the presence of trifluoromethylsulfonic anhydride, dimethyl sulfoxide, and tetrabutylammonium bromide. The synthesis of P-stereogenic 2′-hydroxy-[1,1′-binaphthalen]-2-yl alkyl(phenyl)phosphinates from O=PPh(BINOL) was achieved by reacting this species with Grignard reagents, methylmagnesium bromide, and isopropylmagnesium bromide, in particular [25].
Compounds containing the [O=P]-donor moiety proved to be a viable choice to isolate luminescent Mn(II) complexes, sometimes behaving as multifunctional materials [26,27,28,29,30,31]. Another interesting metal center to be combined with [O=P]-donor ligands for optics is zinc. For instance, non-linear optical properties were observed for [ZnCl2(O=PPh3)2] [32], and Zn(II) halide complexes with N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-P-indol-1-ylphosphonic diamide showed intense green phosphorescence [33]. Given our interest in the preparation of luminescent metal complexes with phosphonates and cyclic organophosphorus compounds [34,35,36,37], we synthesized the two enantiomers of O=PPh(BINOL), and we started investigating the luminescent properties of the related Zn(II) and Mn(II) halide complexes. The preliminary results, together with the single-crystal X-ray structure determination of (S)-O=PPh(BINOL), are provided in this communication.

2. Results and Discussion

The two O=PPh(BINOL) enantiomers were isolated in good yield and purity by reacting the BINOL enantiomers with O=PPhCl2 in the presence of triethylamine as a proton scavenger (Scheme 1). The formation of the desired products was confirmed by elemental analysis data and NMR spectroscopy. The 1H NMR spectra, comprised between 8.2 and 7.0 ppm, are coherent with the presence of 17 aromatic protons. Despite the superposition of some resonances, most of the doublets related to the hydrogen atoms in the 3, 3′, 4, 4′, 5, 5′, and 8, 8′ positions of the BINOL fragment can be distinguished. The 13C{1H} NMR spectra confirm the lack of equivalence of the two naphthyl rings in O=PPh(BINOL), which show 15 CH and 9 Cipso resonances, with some coupled with the 31P nucleus. The 31P{1H} NMR spectra are composed of a single sharp signal around 27 ppm. Selected NMR spectra are provided as Supplementary Materials Figures S1–S4. The νP=O stretching is tentatively assigned to the strong band at 1280 cm−1 also on the basis of the comparison with the related Zn(II) complex described below.
The values of specific rotation [α]20D measured in acetone for the two enantiomers are −326 for (R)-O=PPh(BINOL) and +326 for (S)-O=PPh(BINOL), which are much higher than those measured for the enantiomers of free BINOL under the same experimental conditions (±30), an effect attributable to the more rigid structure generated by the formation of the {C4O2P} ring. It is worth noting that the specific rotation is inverted, moving from a BINOL enantiomer to the related O=PPh(BINOL) enantiomer.
Crystals of (S)-O=PPh(BINOL) suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction were collected from dichloromethane/diethyl ether solutions. A picture of the structure is provided in Figure 1. Crystal data and structure refinement are summarized in the Supplementary Materials Table S1, while selected bond lengths and angles are reported in the caption of Figure 1. The chiral BINOL derivative crystallizes in P212121, one of the so-called Söhncke space groups. The Flack parameter was refined to a value of −0.004(14) confirming the absolute structure [38]. The environment of the phosphorus atom is tetrahedral, with angles ranging from 102.37(7) to 117.13(8)°; the former corresponds to the O-P-O angle in the seven-membered ring of the dioxaphosphepine. The P-O and P-C distances are in accordance with the nature of the bonds, with the double P=O bond being about 0.14 Å shorter than the single P-O bonds. The P-C bond length, 1.777(2) Å, is, as expected, longer than that found in the P(III) compound 8-phenyldinaphtho[2,1-d:1′,2′-f][1,3,2]dioxaphosphepine [39].
The two naphthalene rings (10 membered) form a dihedral angle of 59.88(5)°. The 7-membered ring is, as expected, highly puckered, with a boat conformation with torsion angles as denoted in Figure 2 [40]. The root mean square deviation for this ring from the best plane is 0.3757 Å. The oxygen atoms are the most deviated, with one of them 0.557(1) Å over and the other 0.532(1) Å below the best plane. This plane and the benzene ring form a dihedral angle of 76.25(6)°, which is different from the quasi-perpendicular disposition, which is equal to 90.4(3)° and found in the P(III) dioxaphosphepine compound [39].
O=PPh(BINOL) behaves as a ligand towards Zn(II), and the reaction between O=PPh(BINOL) and anhydrous ZnBr2 allows the isolation of complexes having the general formula [ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] in yields above 70%. Unfortunately, all the attempts to grow single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction failed. The proposed formula is, however, supported by elemental analysis data and NMR spectroscopy. The 1H NMR spectra, as expected, independent upon the choice of the O=PPh(BINOL) enantiomer, show only resonances in the 8.5–6.5 ppm range related to the phenyl and BINOL moieties, which are shifted and broadened compared to the free ligands. On the other hand, a single resonance around 28 ppm is observable in the 31P{1H} NMR spectra, which is broadened in comparison to O=PPh(BINOL). Selected spectra are reported in Figures S5 and S6. As a further confirmation, the IR spectra closely resemble those of the free ligands, as observable in Figure S7. The only noticeable change affects the band centered at 1280 cm−1 in the free ligands, which was, for this reason, assigned to the νP=O stretching [41]. The complex is thermally stable up to about 150 °C, then decomposition with mass loss occurs. The related TGA curve is reported in Figure S8.
Dichloromethane solutions of the two enantiomers of [ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] absorb radiation for wavelengths below 340 nm, as observable, for instance, in Figure 3. SOC-corrected TD-DFT calculations at the C-PCM/r2SCAN-3c level (dichloromethane as a continuous medium) predict the most intense absorption at 358 nm, with an underestimation of the energy of around 5%. According to the hole-electron distribution [42], the absorption appears to be essentially related to the presence of the BINOL fragment, and the same consideration is also valid for further bands predicted at longer wavelengths, between 359 and 385 nm, with much lower intensities. In all cases, the participation of triplet configurations is negligible. As observable in Figure 4, the character of the transition changes from ligand-centered for the main absorption to interligand charge transfer for the bands predicted at lower energy.
The [α]20D values measured in acetone are ±252, positive for (S,S)-[ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] and negative for (R,R)-[ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2]. Such a result indicates the scarce influence of the coordination on the specific rotation since the [α]20D values are roughly proportional to the molar quantity of O=PPh(BINOL) in solution.
The luminescence of dichloromethane solutions of the complexes is hardly appreciable to the human eye. Resolved emission spectra (see, for example, Figure S9) were collected only using quite-opened slits and long acquisition times. On the other hand, the luminescence is easily detectable in the solid state. Solid samples of [ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] show only an emission band centered at 370 nm after excitation with UV light (Figure 3), coherent with the PL spectra collected in solution and attributed to a fluorescent decay on the basis of the luminescence lifetime, equal to 8 ns. The luminescence quantum yield is 81%. The main luminescence data are summarized in Table 1. Based on the previously described TD-DFT calculations, it can be tentatively supposed that the luminescence exhibited by [ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] could be ascribed to the population of excited singlet states having an interligand charge transfer nature. Such a hypothesis was confirmed by optimization at the C-PCM/B97-3c level for the lowest energy singlet excited state of [ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2], with subsequent simulation of the transitions at the C-PCM/r2SCAN-3c level. The hole-electron distribution, shown in Figure 5, agrees with an interligand charge transfer associated with S1→S0 radiative decay. The geometry variations between the singlet ground state and the first singlet excited state are quite limited, with the RMSD being 0.223 Å (see also Figure 5).
The synthetic procedure was extended to the preparation of Mn(II) derivatives by replacing ZnBr2 with Mn(II) halides. Complexes having the general formula [MnX2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] (X = Cl, Br) were isolated with yields higher than 70%. Elemental analyses agree with the proposed general formula. The experimental magnetic moments are in line with the theoretical 5.9 BM expected for high-spin d5 derivatives of first-row transition elements. The IR spectra, shown in Figure S10, are strictly similar to those of [ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2], confirming the slight lowering of the νP=O stretching caused by the coordination. The 31P{1H} NMR spectra of the [MnX2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] complexes are broadened by paramagnetic relaxation, particularly for the bromo-derivative; however, a single resonance centered in the 27–28 ppm range was detected, which is in line with the value reported for [ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2]. The nuclearity of the Mn(II) complexes cannot be unambiguously defined since all the attempts to grow single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were unsuccessful. The thermal behavior of [MnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] is strictly comparable with that of the analogous Zn(II) bromo-derivative with decomposition around 150 °C. On the other hand, despite the melting point in the same temperature range (160 °C), the chloro-complex [MnCl2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] did not exhibit meaningful mass loss for temperatures below 300 °C (Figure S8).
As previously described for the Zn(II) enantiomers, the specific rotation values appear dependent upon the molar quantity of the chiral phosphonate in solution without meaningful influence of the Mn-O bonds. [α]20D is ±282 for (S,S)- and (R,R)-[MnCl2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] and ±248 for (R,R)- and (S,S)-[MnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2].
As for the Zn(II) complex, the luminescence measurements were limited to the solid state (Table 1). The PL spectra of [MnX2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] (Figure 6) are composed of two different bands: one centered in the UV region and similar to that already described for [ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] (λmax = 380 nm), while the other centered between 641 and 653 nm, with FWHM values in the 2500–2600 cm−1 range. No emission in the green region attributable to the Mn(II) 4T1(4G)→6A1(6S) transition in a tetrahedral environment was detected. The PLE spectra (Figure 6) reveal that the lowest energy emission can be achieved with UV light shorter than 380 nm, but also using wavelengths in the 410–500 nm range. The higher energy bands in the PLE spectra are almost in part associated with the excitation of the coordinated O=PPh(BINOL) ligands, while those at lower energy are in line with direct Mn(II) excitation [43,44].
It is worth noting that the relative intensity of Mn(II) excitation compared to the ligands′ excitation depends upon the choice of the halide due to the increased spin-orbit coupling moving from X = Cl to X = Br that relaxes the selection rules for the metal-centered transitions [45]. The relative intensity of the PL bands is also dependent upon the nature of the halide, since the emission in the red range is relatively more intense for the enantiomers of [MnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] (Figure 6). The increased spin-orbit coupling appears to also be involved in this case, favoring the population of lower-energy excited states by intersystem crossing. The relative increase of the emission at a lower energy has, as a consequence, a noticeable reduction of the luminescence quantum yield, which drops from 48% for [MnCl2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] to 14% for [MnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2]. Such an outcome was expected on the basis of the energy gap law [46], but it also suggests that the localization of the lower energy excited state could be in molecular regions where the electronic-vibrational coupling is favorable, such as the coordinated phosphonates.
The band in the red range is not present in the PL spectrum of [ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2]; it is also absent in the PL spectrum of the free ligand collected at room temperature (Figure S11). Emissions in the yellow-red range can be associated with radiative decay from Mn(II) excited states in complexes with a coordination number greater than four, for instance, five-coordinated [47,48,49,50], but also with phosphorescence from ligand-centered excited states populated by intersystem crossing [51,52]. The fact that the red emission could also be achieved by direct Mn(II) excitation does not allow an unambiguous discrimination since the excited states of the metal center could populate low-lying ligand-centered excited states. TD-DFT calculations on [ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] in the triplet state configuration indicate the possibility of a triplet→singlet BINOL-centered emission in the red range with λemission calculated at 607 nm. The hole-electron distribution related to the transition is shown in Figure S12. The energy gap between the optimized geometries of [ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] in triplet and singlet states is identical to the one obtained between the geometries of [MnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] in octet and sextet states (55.7 kcal mol−1); thus, the same transition appears possible also for the Mn(II) complexes. The role of the BINOL fragments in the octet configuration is highlighted by the spin density plots shown in Figure S12. It is, however, worth noting that DFT calculations on the tetrahedral mononuclear [MnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] and on the dimer [MnBr(μ-Br){O=PPh(BINOL)}2]2, where the metal center is five-coordinated, indicate that the formation of the latter species is possible. The energy variation (electronic energy + nuclear repulsion) for the dimerization is negative by about −25.7 kcal mol−1. Despite the reduction in molecularity, the estimated Gibbs energy variation is slightly negative, being about −2.3 kcal mol−1 (Figure S13).
The localization of the emitting states can be tentatively supposed from the luminescence decay curves of [MnCl2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] and [MnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2]. As observable in Figure 6, the decays are quite similar, with average lifetimes (τav) of 422 μs for [MnCl2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] and 335 μs for [MnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2]. The bi-exponential fit of the curves reveals the presence of a common component (τ1), equal to 220 μs (58%) for X = Cl and to 216 μs (62%) for X = Br. The second component (τ2) is equal to 700 μs (42%) for X = Cl and 530 μs (38%) for X = Br. The presence of bi-exponential decay could be associated with the superimposition of different emission bands, but such a hypothesis appears unlikely considering the shape and FWHM values of the emissions in the red range. The bi-exponential decays are thus tentatively ascribed to solid-state effects in the samples. In every case, the scarce influence of the nature of the halide on the lifetime is more in line with a ligand-centered process involving the BINOL fragments than a metal-centered one. It appears, therefore, that the main role of Mn(II) is to favor intersystem crossing among phosphonate-centered excited states, probably due to the intermediate population of Mn(II) excited levels. The influence of the coordinated halides on the luminescence quantum yield can be thus interpreted considering that the acceleration of the intersystem crossing given by the presence of the bromo-ligands favors the population of the lower energy long-lived excited state. The low quantum yield is caused by the efficient vibrational decay in this state.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Materials and Methods

Commercial solvents (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were purified, as described in the literature [53]. Anhydrous MX2 halides (M = Mn, X = Cl, Br; M = Zn, X = Br) were purchased from Alfa Aesar (Ward Hill, MA, USA) and Merck. The enantiomers of BINOL and the other organic reactants were Merck products. All the syntheses were carried out under an inert atmosphere, working in a MBraun Labstar glove-box with a MB 10 G gas purifier (Garching, Germany) filled with N2 and equipped for organic and inorganic syntheses.
Elemental analyses (C, H) were carried out using an Elementar Unicube microanalyzer (Langenselbold, Germany). The halide content was determined using Mohr’s method [54].
Magnetic susceptibilities were measured on solid samples at 298 K using an MK1 magnetic susceptibility balance (Sherwood Scientific Ltd., Cambridge, UK, magnetic field strength 3.5 kGauss) and corrected for diamagnetic contribution using tabulated Pascal’s constants [55].
Melting points were registered using a FALC 360 D instrument equipped with a camera. Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) were carried out under am N2 atmosphere with a Perkin-Elmer TGA 4000 instrument (Waltham, MA, USA). The heating rate was set at 20 °C min−1 from 40 °C up to 500 °C.
IR spectra were collected in the 4000–400 cm−1 range using a Perkin-Elmer Spectrum One spectrophotometer. Mono- and bidimensional nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were collected employing a Bruker Avance 400 instrument (Billerica, MA, USA) operating at 400.13 MHz of 1H resonance. 1H NMR spectra are referred to as the partially non-deuterated fraction of the solvent, itself referred to as tetramethylsilane. 31P{1H} NMR resonances refer to 85% H3PO4 in water. 13C{1H} NMR spectra are quoted with respect to the signal of the solvent, itself referred to as tetramethylsilane.

3.2. Synthesis of 4-Phenyldinaphtho[2,1-d:1′,2′-f][1,3,2]dioxaphosphepine 4-Oxide, O=PPh(BINOL)

The two enantiomers of O=PPh(BINOL) were obtained following a modified literature procedure [23]. In a typical preparation, a solution containing 5.0 mmol (1.432 g) of (R)- or (S)-BINOL and 0.7 mL of phenylphosphonic dichloride (0.975 g, 5.0 mmol) in dry toluene (30 mL) was prepared under an inert atmosphere, and then 1.4 mL of triethylamine (10.0 mmol) were slowly added. The mixture was then refluxed for 8 h and subsequently stirred overnight. The by-product triethylammonium chloride was separated by centrifugation, then the solution was filtered on cotton, and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The addition of diethyl ether (10 mL) caused the separation of a white solid that was filtered, washed with 5 mL of diethyl ether, and dried under vacuum. Yields: (R)-O=PPh(BINOL), 80% (1.633 g); (S)-O=PPh(BINOL), 77% (1.577 g).
Characterization of O=PPh(BINOL). Anal. Calcd for C26H17O3P (408.39 g mol−1, %): C, 76.47; H, 4.20. Found for (R)-O=PPh(BINOL) (%): C, 76.16; H, 4.22. Found for (S)-O=PPh(BINOL) (%): C, 76.28; H, 4.22. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 K, both enantiomers): δ 8.10 (d, 1H, JHH = 8.8 Hz, BINOL), 8.01 (d, 1H, JHH = 8.2 Hz, BINOL), 7.96 (d, 1H, JHH = 8.3 Hz, BINOL), 7.87 (d, 1H, JHH = 8.8 Hz, BINOL), 7.69 (d, 1H, JHH = 8.8 Hz, BINOL), 7.68–7.57 (m, 3H, BINOL+Ph), 7.56–7.50 (m, 2H, BINOL+Ph), 7.49 (d, 1H, JHH = 9.0 Hz, BINOL), 7.44–7.30 (m, 5H, BINOL+Ph), 7.04 (dd, 1H, JHH = 8.8 Hz, JHH = 0.7 Hz, BINOL). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 300 K, both enantiomers): δ 147.60 (d, JCP = 10.2 Hz, Cipso), 145.83 (d, JCP = 9.6 Hz, Cipso), 133.56 (d, JCP = 3.0 Hz, CH), 132.52 (s, CH), 132.49 (d, JCP = 1.4 Hz, Cipso), 132.45 (d, JCP = 1.6 Hz, Cipso), 132.42 (s, CH), 131.94 (d, JCP = 1.1 Hz, Cipso), 131.56 (d, JCP = 1.1 Hz, Cipso), 131.37 (d, JCP = 1.1 Hz, CH), 130.72 (s, CH), 128.58 (s, CH), 128.52 (s, CH), 128.48 (s, CH), 128.37 (s, CH), 127.32 (s, CH), 127.01 (s, CH), 126.73 (s, CH), 125.76 (s, CH), 124.85 (d, JCP = 186.9 Hz, Cipso), 121.89 (d, JCP = 2.6 Hz, Cipso), 121.75 (d, JCP = 2.0 Hz, Cipso), 121.28 (d, JCP = 2.2 Hz, CH), 120.89 (d, JCP = 3.3 Hz, CH). 31P{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 300 K, both enantiomers) δ 27.1 (FWHM = 2 Hz). IR (cm−1, both enantiomers): 3110–3020 m/w (aromatic νC-H), 1620–1510 m (aromatic νC-C), 1325 m (νC-O), 1280 (νP=O).

3.3. Synthesis of [MX2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] (M = Zn, X = Br; M = Mn, X = Cl, Br)

In a typical preparation, 2.0 mmol (0.817 g) of (R)- or (S)-O=PPh(BINOL) were reacted overnight under an inert atmosphere with 1.0 mmol of the proper anhydrous MX2 precursor in freshly distilled ethanol (20 mL) at room temperature. After the removal of the solvent under reduced pressure, the residue was dissolved in the minimum amount of dichloromethane, and the solution was cleared by centrifugation. After evaporation, diethyl ether (10 mL) was added, and the products were collected as white powders after filtration, washed with 5 mL of diethyl ether, and dried under vacuum. Yields: (R,R)-[ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2], 71% (0.740 g); (S,S)-[ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2], 73% (0.761 g); (R,R)-[MnCl2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2], 76% (0.716 g); (S,S)-[MnCl2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2], 74% (0.697 g); (R,R)-[MnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2], 80% (0.825 g); (S,S)-[MnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2], 77% (0.794 g).
Characterization of [ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2]. Anal. Calcd for C52H34Br2O6P2Zn (1041.97 g mol−1, %): C, 59.94; H, 3.29; Br, 15.34. Found for (R,R)-[ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] (%): C, 59.70; H, 3.31; Br, 15.28. Found for (S,S)-[ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] (%): C, 59.75; H, 3.30; Br, 15.40. M.p. (°C, both enantiomers): 150. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 K, both enantiomers): δ 8.07 (d, 1H, JHH = 7.4 Hz, BINOL), 7.96 (t, 2H, JHH = 8.4 Hz, aromatic), 7.90–7.76 (m, 2H, aromatic), 7.64 (m, br, 2H, aromatic), 7.60–7.44 (m, 4H, aromatic), 7.42–7.28 (m, 5H, aromatic), 6.95 (d, 1H, JHH = 8.8 Hz, BINOL). 31P{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 300 K, both enantiomers) δ 28.0 (FWHM = 90 Hz). IR (cm−1, both enantiomers): 3060–2970 m/w (aromatic νC-H), 1620–1440 m (aromatic νC-C), 1325 m (νC-O), 1280–1240 m (νP=O).
Characterization of [MnCl2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2]. Anal. Calcd for C52H34Cl2MnO6P2 (942.61 g mol−1, %): C, 66.26; H, 3.64; Cl, 7.52. Found for (R,R)-[MnCl2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] (%): C, 65.99; H, 3.67; Cl, 7.49. Found for (S,S)-[MnCl2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] (%): C, 66.29; H, 3.65; Cl, 7.48. M.p. (°C, both enantiomers): 160. χMcorr (c.g.s.u., both enantiomers): 1.39·10−2. 31P{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 300 K, both enantiomers) δ 27.2 (FWHM = 200 Hz). IR (cm−1, both enantiomers): 3057 w (aromatic νC-H), 1620–1439 w (aromatic νC-C), 1326 m (νC-O), 1258 m (νP=O).
Characterization of [MnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2]. Anal. Calcd for C52H34Br2MnO6P2 (1031.52 g mol−1, %): C, 60.55; H, 3.32; Br, 15.49. Found for (R,R)-[MnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] (%): C, 60.31; H, 3.33; Br, 15.43. Found for (S,S)-[MnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] (%): C, 60.35; H, 3.33; Br, 15.45. M.p. (°C, both enantiomers): 150. χMcorr (c.g.s.u., both enantiomers): 1.45·10−2. 31P{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 300 K, both enantiomers) δ around 28 (FWHM ≈ 5000 Hz). IR (cm−1, both enantiomers): 3057 w (aromatic νC-H), 1620–1439 w (aromatic νC-C), 1325 m (νC-O), 1256 m (νP=O).

3.4. Optical Measurements

Absorption spectra were recorded with a Yoke 6000Plus double-beam spectrophotometer (Fengxian, China). Specific rotation [α]20D was measured for acetone solutions using an Exacta+Optech (Modena, Italy) Polarimeter model PL1 LED (λ = 589.3 nm).
Photoluminescence emission (PL) and excitation (PLE) spectra as well as lifetime decay curves were registered on solid samples at room temperature using a Horiba Jobin Yvon (Kyoto, Japan) Fluorolog-3 spectrofluorometer. Air-tight quartz sample holders were used and filled in the glove box to avoid interactions of the air-sensible complexes with moisture. A continuous wave xenon arc lamp was used as the source, and the excitation wavelength was selected using a double Czerny–Turner monochromator. Suitable long-pass filters were placed in front of the acquisition systems. The detector was composed of a single Horiba (Kyoto, Japan) iHR 320 monochromator and a Hamamatsu (Shizuoka, Japan) R928 photomultiplier tube. The excitation and emission spectra were corrected for the instrumental functions. Time-resolved analyses were performed in multi-channel scaling mode (MCS) or time-correlated single photon counting mode (TCSPC) employing Horiba SpectraLED and NanoLED pulsed sources. The room-temperature photoluminescence quantum yields (Φ) at the solid state were measured employing an OceanOptics (Orlando, FL, USA) HR4000CG UV–vis–NIR detector, fiber-coupled to an integrating sphere connected to OceanOptics UV LED continuous sources. The values are reported as the average of three measurements.

3.5. Crystal Structure Determination

The crystallographic data were collected at CACTI (Universidade de Vigo) at 100 K (CryoStream 800) using a Bruker D8 Venture Photon II CMOS detector (Billerica, MA, USA) and Mo-Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) generated by an Incoatec high brilliance IμS microsource (Geesthacht, Germany). APEX3 version 2019-11-0 [56] was used for collecting frames of data, indexing reflections, and the determination of lattice parameters; SAINT version 8.40B [56] for integration of the intensity of reflections; and SADABS version 2016/2 [56] for scaling and empirical absorption correction. The crystallographic treatment was performed using the Oscail program [57] and solved using the SHELXT version 2018/2 program [58]. The structure was subsequently refined by full-matrix least-squares methods based on F2 using the SHELXL version 2018/3 program [59]. Non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. Hydrogen atoms were calculated on the basis of a riding model and refined with isotropic displacement parameters. Other details concerning crystal data and structural refinement are given in Supplementary Materials Table S1. CCDC 2298339 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif (accessed on 17 December 2023). PLATON (version 140423) [60] was used to obtain some geometrical parameters from the CIF file.

3.6. Computational Details

Geometry optimizations and TD-DFT calculations [61] were carried out without symmetry constraints using the r2-SCAN-3c method [62], based on the meta-GGA r2SCAN functional [63] combined with a tailor-made triple-ζ Gaussian atomic orbital basis set with refitted D4 and geometrical counter-poise corrections for London-dispersion and basis set superposition error [64,65,66]. Further calculations were performed with the GGA-based B97-3c method [67], particularly for the geometry optimization of excited singlet states. The C-PCM implicit solvation model was added to all the calculations, considering dichloromethane as a continuous medium [68,69]. Calculations were carried out using ORCA 5.0.3 [70,71], and the output files were analyzed with Multiwfn, version 3.8 [72]. The cartesian coordinates of the DFT-optimized structures are provided in Supplementary Materials Table S2.

4. Conclusions

The BINOL-based phosphonates here investigated were revealed to be suitable O-donor ligands for first-row d-block divalent metal centers such as Mn(II) and Zn(II). The Zn(II) complex exhibited noticeable photoluminescence centered in the near-UV and was attributed to fluorescence from excited states localized on the BINOL fragments.
The replacement of Zn(II) with Mn(II) causes a noticeable change in the emission features, an influence associated in primis with easier intersystem crossing processes. Luminescence in the red region with lifetimes in the hundreds of seconds range is superimposed on the ligand-centered fluorescence. The choice of the halide affects the ratios of the bands in the PL and PLE spectra, while the luminescence lifetimes are roughly the same, moving from the chloro- to the bromo-complex. Such an outcome suggests that the observed emissions at longer wavelengths could be attributed to ligand-centered excited states populated by intersystem crossing.
The chiroptical behavior of the new compounds requires further deepening planned for the future, for instance, by measuring the circular dichroism and the circularly polarized luminescence. Moreover, the research on BINOL-based phosphonate complexes will be prosecuted by trying to isolate other coordination compounds with O=PPh(BINOL) as ligand.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29010239/s1, Figure S1: 1H NMR spectrum of (S)-O=PPh(BINOL); Figure S2: 31P{1H} NMR spectrum of (S)-O=PPh(BINOL); Figure S3: 13C{1H} NMR spectrum of (S)-O=PPh(BINOL); Figure S4: 1H-13C HSQC NMR spectrum of (S)-O=PPh(BINOL); Figure S5: 1H NMR spectrum of (S,S)-[ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2]; Figure S6: 31P{1H} NMR spectrum of (S,S)-[ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2]; Figure S7: IR spectra of (S)-O=PPh(BINOL) and (S,S)-[ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2]; Figure S8: TGA curves of the [MX2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] complexes; Figure S9: PL spectrum of [Zn{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] in CH2Cl2; Figure S10: IR spectra of (S,S)-[MnCl2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] and (S,S)-[MnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2]; Figure S11: PL spectra of solid O=PPh(BINOL); Figure S12: DFT optimized geometries of [ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] and of [MnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] with Gibbs energy differences, hole and electron distributions, and spin density surfaces; Figure S13: DFT optimized geometries of [MnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] and [MnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2]2 with Gibbs energy difference. Table S1: Crystal data and structure refinement for (S)-O=PPh(BINOL); Table S2: Cartesian coordinates of the DFT-optimized structures.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B. and V.F.; methodology, M.B., V.F. and J.C.; validation, M.B., V.F. and J.C.; formal analysis, M.B., V.F. and J.C.; investigation, M.B., V.F. and J.C.; resources, M.B., V.F. and J.C.; data curation, M.B., V.F. and J.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.B.; writing—review and editing, M.B., V.F. and J.C.; visualization, M.B. and J.C.; supervision, M.B.; project administration, M.B.; funding acquisition, M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Bando Spin 2018, D. R. 1065/2018, prot. 67416. This work is part of the “Network 4 Energy Sustainable Transition—NEST” project (MIUR project code PE000021, Concession Degree No. 1561 of 11 October 2022), in the framework of the NextGenerationEu PNRR plan (CUP C93C22005230007).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

CACTI (University of Vigo) and CINECA (Bologna) are respectively acknowledged for X-ray data collection and the availability of high-performance computer resources (class C projects COLUMN21, COLUMN22, and INLIGHT). We sincerely thank Fabrizio Fabris (Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia) for the fruitful discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Brunel, J.M. BINOL: A Versatile Chiral Reagent. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 857–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chen, Y.; Yekta, S.; Yudin, A.K. Modified BINOL Ligands in Asymmetric Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 3155–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Parmar, D.; Sugiono, E.; Raja, S.; Rueping, M. Complete Field Guide to Asymmetric BINOL-Phosphate Derived Brønsted Acid and Metal Catalysis: History and Classification by Mode of Activation; Brønsted Acidity, Hydrogen Bonding, Ion Pairing, and Metal Phosphates. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 9047–9153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Aspinall, H.C. Chiral Lanthanide Complexes: Coordination Chemistry and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 1807–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Van Leeuwen, P.W.N.M.; Kamer, P.C.J.; Claver, C.; Pàmies, O.; Diéguez, M. Phosphite-Containing Ligands for Asymmetric Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 2077–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kshatriya, R. Recent Advancement in H8–BINOL Catalyzed Asymmetric Methodologies. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 17381–17406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Da Silva, E.M.; Vidal, H.D.A.; Januário, M.A.P.; Corrêa, A.G. Advances in the Asymmetric Synthesis of BINOL Derivatives. Molecules 2023, 28, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jurczak, J.; Niedbała, P.; Tyszka-Gumkowska, A. The Synthesis and Application of BINOL Derivatives as Effective Building Blocks for Catalysts Employed in Enantioselective Synthesis. In Chiral Building Blocks in Asymmetric Synthesis: Synthesis and Applications; Wojaczyńska, E., Wojaczyński, J., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2022; pp. 523–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Labelle, A.; Arndtsen, B.A. Chiral BINOL-based borate counterions: From cautionary tale on anion stability to enantioselective Cu-catalyzed cyclopropanation. Chem. Commun. 2023, 59, 728–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Solinas, M.; Meadows, R.E.; Wilson, C.; Blake, A.J.; Woodward, S. Efficient Synthesis of 2-Methyl Derivatives of 1,1′-Bi(2-naphthol) and 1,1′-Bi(2-phenols). Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 2007, 1613–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hatano, M.; Yamakawa, K.; Kawai, T.; Horibe, T.; Ishihara, K. Enantioselective Cyanosilylation of Ketones with Lithium(I) Dicyanotrimethylsilicate(IV) Catalyzed by a Chiral Lithium(I) Phosphoryl Phenoxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 4021–4025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Schlemminger, I.; Lutzen, A.; Willecke, A.; Maison, W.; Koch, R.; Saak, W.; Martens, J. Highly diastereoselective hydrophosphonylation of cyclic imines using BINOL as source of chirality. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 7285–7288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Teichert, J.F.; Feringa, B.L. Phosphoramidites: Privileged Ligands in Asymmetric Catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 2486–2528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ma, H.-C.; Sun, Y.-N.; Chen, G.-J.; Dong, Y.-B. A BINOL-phosphoric acid and metalloporphyrin derived chiral covalent organic framework for enantioselective α-benzylation of aldehydes. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13, 1906–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, Y.; Yu, W.; Li, H.; Zheng, W.; Cheng, Y. Induced CPL-Active Materials Based on Chiral Supramolecular Co-Assemblies. Chem. Eur. J. 2023, 29, e202204039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Feng, H.; Pu, J.; Wang, S.; Jiang, S.; Yang, W.; Cao, D.; Feng, Y.-S. High solid-state CPL active materials based on chiral BINOL-dicyanodistyrylbenzene. Dye. Pigment. 2023, 217, 111422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tauchi, D.; Koida, T.; Nojima, Y.; Hasegawa, M.; Mazaki, Y.; Inagaki, A.; Sugiura, K.-I.; Nagaya, Y.; Tsubaki, K.; Shiga, T.; et al. Aggregation-induced circularly polarized phosphorescence of Pt(II) complexes with an axially chiral BINOL ligand. Chem. Commun. 2023, 59, 4004–4007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Liu, C.; Yuan, C.; Shi, G.; Jia, K.; Liu, J.; Wang, K.-P.; Chen, S.; Hu, Z.-Q. Chiral binol-[4]helicene hybrids: Strong solid-state organic emitters with aggregation-enhanced emission and chiroptical properties. Dye. Pigment. 2023, 210, 110992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Valverde-González, A.; Borrallo-Aniceto, M.C.; Pintado-Sierra, M.; Sánchez, F.; Arnanz, A.; Boronat, M.; Iglesias, M. BINOL-Containing Chiral Porous Polymers as Platforms for Enantiorecognition. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 53936–53946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chaudhary, P.; Yadav, G.D.; Singh, S. A simple protocol for determination of enantiopurity of amines using BINOL derivatives as chiral solvating agents via 1H- and 19F-NMR spectroscopic analysis. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 25457–25464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yu, F.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, H.; Wang, X. Recent advances of BINOL-based sensors for enantioselective fluorescence recognition. Analyst 2020, 145, 6769–6812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Van Vliet, S.; Alachouzos, G.; de Vries, F.; Pfeifer, L.; Feringa, B.L. Visible light activated BINOL-derived chiroptical switches based on boron integrated hydrazone complexes. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13, 9713–9718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bull, E.O.J.; Naidu, M.S.R.; Nagaraju, C. In search of new organophosphorus pesticides and insecticides. I: Synthesis and anticholinesterase properties of 4-(substituted phenoxy)-dinaphtho[2,1-d:1′,2′-f] [1,3,2]dioxaphosphepin-4-oxides. Indian J. Chem. 1990, 29B, 688–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, B.; Yue, H.; Shi, D.; Duan, B. An Arylphosphonate Compound and Preparation Method Thereof. CN116425794A, 14 July 2023. [Google Scholar]
  25. Maekawa, Y.; Kuwabara, K.; Sugiyama, A.; Iwata, K.; Maruyama, T.; Murai, T. Synthesis of P-Stereogenic Phosphinates via an Axis-to-Center Chirality Transfer by the Reaction of Phosphonates Having a Binaphthyloxy Group with Grignard Reagents. Chem. Lett. 2017, 46, 1068–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tang, Y.-Y.; Wang, Z.-X.; Li, P.-F.; You, Y.-M.; Stroppa, A.; Xiong, R.-G. Brilliant triboluminescence in a potential organic–inorganic hybrid ferroelectric: (Ph3PO)2MnBr2. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2017, 4, 154–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huang, X.; Qin, Y.; She, P.; Meng, H.; Liu, S.; Zhao, Q. Functionalized triphenylphosphine oxide-based manganese(II) complexes for luminescent printing. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 8831–8836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chen, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zheng, F.-K.; Liu, Z.-F.; Wang, S.-H.; Wu, A.-Q.; Guo, G.-C. Intense photo- and tribo-luminescence of three tetrahedral manganese(II) dihalides with chelating bidentate phosphine oxide ligand. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 3289–3294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Artem’ev, A.V.; Davydova, M.P.; Berezin, A.S.; Sukhikh, T.S.; Samsonenko, D.G. Photo- and triboluminescent robust 1D polymers made of Mn(II) halides and meta-carborane based bis(phosphine oxide). Inorg. Chem. Front. 2021, 8, 2261–2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Artem’ev, A.V.; Davydova, M.P.; Rakhmanova, M.I.; Bagryanskaya, I.Y.; Pishchur, D.P. A family of Mn(II) complexes exhibiting strong photo- and triboluminescence as well as polymorphic luminescence. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2021, 8, 3767–3774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qin, Y.; Tao, P.; Gao, L.; She, P.; Liu, S.; Li, X.; Li, F.; Wang, H.; Zhao, Q.; Miao, Y.; et al. Designing Highly Efficient Phosphorescent Neutral Tetrahedral Manganese(II) Complexes for Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1801160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, L.; Wang, Z.-P.; Tian, G.-R.; Song, X.-Y.; Sun, S.-X. Growth and properties of dichloro bis(triphenylphosphine oxide) zinc(II), a novel nonlinear optical crystal. J. Cryst. Growth 2008, 310, 1202–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ferraro, V.; Baggio, F.; Castro, J.; Bortoluzzi, M. Green Phosphorescent Zn(II) Halide Complexes with N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-P-indol-1-ylphosphonic Diamide as Ligand. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 2022, e202200119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bortoluzzi, M.; Castro, J.; Di Vera, A.; Palù, A.; Ferraro, V. Manganese(II) bromo- and iodo-complexes with phosphoramidate and phosphonate ligands: Synthesis, characterization and photoluminescence. New J. Chem. 2021, 45, 12871–12878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bortoluzzi, M.; Gobbo, A. 1,3-Dimethyl-2-phenyl-1,3-diazaphospholidine-2-oxide as ligand for the preparation of luminescent lanthanide complexes. J. Coord. Chem. 2019, 72, 1524–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bortoluzzi, M.; Castro, J.; Gobbo, A.; Ferraro, V.; Pietrobon, L.; Antoniutti, S. Tetrahedral photoluminescent manganese(II) halide complexes with 1,3-dimethyl-2-phenyl-1,3-diazaphospholidine-2-oxide as a ligand. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 571–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ferraro, V.; Castro, J.; Agostinis, L.; Bortoluzzi, M. Dual-emitting Mn(II) and Zn(II) halide complexes with 9,10-dihydro-9-oxa-10-phosphaphenanthrene-10-oxide as ligand. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2023, 545, 121285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Parsons, S. Determination of absolute configuration using X-ray diffraction. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2017, 28, 1304–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tani, K.; Yamagata, T.; Nagata, K. (±)8-Phenyldinaphtho[2,1-d:1′,2′-f][1,3,2]dioxaphosphepine. Acta Crystallogr. 1994, C50, 1274–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pérez, J.; García, J.; Pérez, E.; Serrano, J.L.; Kessler, M. Type conformations and pseudorotation interconversion path-way between conformations: A tool to study medium size (5–9 atoms) rings. J. Mol. Struct. 2012, 1027, 186–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sinha, S.P.; Pallanen, T.T.; Pakkanen, T.A.; Niinistö, L. Preparation, spectral properties and the crystal structure of the pentacoordinated trichlorobis(hexamethylphosphoramide)-indium (III) complex. Polyhedron 1982, 1, 355–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, Z.; Lu, T.; Chen, Q. An sp-hybridized all-carboatomic ring, cyclo[18]carbon: Electronic structure, electronic spectrum, and optical nonlinearity. Carbon 2020, 165, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Qin, Y.; She, P.; Huang, X.; Huang, W.; Zhao, Q. Luminescent manganese(II) complexes: Synthesis, properties and optoelectronic applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 416, 213331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tao, P.; Liu, S.-J.; Wong, W.-J. Phosphorescent manganese(II) complexes and their emerging applications. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2020, 8, 2000985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wrighton, M.; Ginley, D. Excited state decay of tetrahalomanganese(II) complexes. Chem. Phys. 1974, 4, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Englman, R.; Jortner, J. The energy gap law for non-radiative decay in large molecules. J. Lumin. 1970, 1–2, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, Z.-X.; Li, P.-F.; Liao, W.-Q.; Tang, Y.; Ye, H.-Y.; Zhang, Y. Structure-Triggered High Quantum Yield Luminescence and Switchable Dielectric Properties in Manganese(II) Based Hybrid Compounds. Chem. Asian J. 2016, 11, 981–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Artem’ev, A.V.; Davydova, M.P.; Berezin, A.S.; Brel, V.K.; Morgalyuk, V.P.; Bagryanskaya, I.; Samsonenko, D.G. Luminescence of the Mn2+ ion in non-Oh and Td coordination environments: The missing case of square pyramid. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 16448–16456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xu, L.-J.; Yang, M.; Chen, Z.-N. Luminescent Vapochromism Due to a Change of the Ligand Field in a One-Dimensional Manganese(II) Coordination Polymer. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 9175–9181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Meng, H.; Zhu, W.; Li, F.; Huang, X.; Qin, Y.; Liu, S.; Yang, Y.; Huang, W.; Zhao, Q. Highly emissive and stable five-coordinated manganese(II) complex for X-ray imaging. Laser Photonics Rev. 2021, 15, 2100309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bortoluzzi, M.; Castro, J.; Ferraro, V. Dual emission from Mn(II) complexes with carbazolyl-substituted phosphoramides. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2022, 536, 120896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bortoluzzi, M.; Ferraro, V.; Castro, J. Synthesis and photoluminescence of manganese(II) naphtylphosphonic diamide complexes. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 3132–3136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Armarego, W.L.F.; Chai, C.L.L. Purification of Laboratory Chemicals, 5th ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: London, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  54. Pietrzyk, D.J.; Frank, C.W. Analytical Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  55. Bain, G.A.; Berry, J.F. Diamagnetic corrections and Pascal’s constants. J. Chem. Educ. 2008, 85, 532–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. APEX3, SMART, SAINT; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2015.
  57. McArdle, P. Oscail, a program package for small-molecule single-crystal crystallography with crystal morphology prediction and molecular modelling. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2017, 50, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT—Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. 2015, A71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. 2015, C71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Spek, A.L. checkCIF validation ALERTS: What they mean and how to respond. Acta Crystallogr. 2020, E76, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ullrich, C.A. Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  62. Grimme, S.; Hansen, A.; Ehlert, S.; Mewes, J.-M. r2SCAN-3c: A “Swiss army knife” composite electronic-structure method. J. Chem. Phys. 2021, 154, 064103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Furness, J.W.; Kaplan, A.D.; Ning, J.; Perdew, J.P.; Sun, J. Accurate and Numerically Efficient r2SCAN Meta-Generalized Gradient Approximation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 8208–8215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kruse, H.; Grimme, S. A geometrical correction for the inter- and intra-molecular basis set superposition error in Hartree-Fock and density functional theory calculations for large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 2012, 136, 154101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Caldeweyher, E.; Bannwarth, C.; Grimme, S. Extension of the D3 dispersion coefficient model. J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 147, 034112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Caldeweyher, E.; Ehlert, S.; Hansen, A.; Neugebauer, H.; Spicher, S.; Bannwarth, C.; Grimme, S. A generally applicable atomic-charge dependent London dispersion correction. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 150, 154122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Brandenburg, J.G.; Bannwarth, C.; Hansen, A.; Grimme, S. B97-3c: A revised low-cost variant of the B97-D density functional method. J. Chem. Phys. 2018, 148, 064104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Cossi, M.; Rega, N.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V. Energies, structures, and electronic properties of molecules in solution with the C-PCM solvation model. J. Comput. Chem. 2003, 24, 669–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Barone, V.; Cossi, M. Quantum calculation of molecular energies and energy gradients in solution by a conductor solvent model. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 1995–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Neese, F. The ORCA program system. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012, 2, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Neese, F. Software update: The ORCA program system-Version 5.0. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2022, 12, e1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lu, T.; Chen, F. Multiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 2012, 33, 580–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 29 00239 sch001
Scheme 1. Synthesis of (R)- and (S)-O=PPh(BINOL).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of (R)- and (S)-O=PPh(BINOL).
Molecules 29 00239 sch001
Molecules 29 00239 g001
Figure 1. Single-crystal X-ray structure of (S)-O=PPh(BINOL). Selected bond lengths [Å]: P(1)-O(1) 1.4619(13), P(1)-O(2) 1.6028(12), P(1)-O(3) 1.5985(12), P(1)-C(31) 1.7770(17), O(2)-C(11) 1.407(2), O(3)-C(21) 1.4047(19), C(11)-C(12) 1.378(2), C(21)-C(22) 1.376(2), C(12)-C(22) 1.486(2). Selected angles [°]: O(1)-P(1)-O(2) 117.13(8), O(1)-P(1)-O(3) 109.81(7), O(3)-P(1)-O(2) 102.79(6), O(1)-P(1)-C(31) 114.91(8), O(3)-P(1)-C(31) 108.85(7), O(2)-P(1)-C(31) 102.37(7), C(11)-O(2)-P(1) 118.18(10), C(21)-O(3)-P(1) 119.07(10).
Figure 1. Single-crystal X-ray structure of (S)-O=PPh(BINOL). Selected bond lengths [Å]: P(1)-O(1) 1.4619(13), P(1)-O(2) 1.6028(12), P(1)-O(3) 1.5985(12), P(1)-C(31) 1.7770(17), O(2)-C(11) 1.407(2), O(3)-C(21) 1.4047(19), C(11)-C(12) 1.378(2), C(21)-C(22) 1.376(2), C(12)-C(22) 1.486(2). Selected angles [°]: O(1)-P(1)-O(2) 117.13(8), O(1)-P(1)-O(3) 109.81(7), O(3)-P(1)-O(2) 102.79(6), O(1)-P(1)-C(31) 114.91(8), O(3)-P(1)-C(31) 108.85(7), O(2)-P(1)-C(31) 102.37(7), C(11)-O(2)-P(1) 118.18(10), C(21)-O(3)-P(1) 119.07(10).
Molecules 29 00239 g001
Molecules 29 00239 g002
Figure 2. {PO2C4} 7-membered ring of (S)-O=PPh(BINOL) with torsion angles (°).
Figure 2. {PO2C4} 7-membered ring of (S)-O=PPh(BINOL) with torsion angles (°).
Molecules 29 00239 g002
Molecules 29 00239 g003
Figure 3. Normalized absorption (ABS, CH2Cl2 solution, r.t.), emission (PL, solid, r.t., λexcitation = 260 nm), and excitation (PLE, solid, r.t., λemission = 410 nm) spectra of (S,S)-[ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] at room temperature. Luminescence decay curve (solid, r.t., λexcitation = 373 nm, λemission = 410 nm) of (S,S)-[ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2].
Figure 3. Normalized absorption (ABS, CH2Cl2 solution, r.t.), emission (PL, solid, r.t., λexcitation = 260 nm), and excitation (PLE, solid, r.t., λemission = 410 nm) spectra of (S,S)-[ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] at room temperature. Luminescence decay curve (solid, r.t., λexcitation = 373 nm, λemission = 410 nm) of (S,S)-[ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2].
Molecules 29 00239 g003
Molecules 29 00239 g004
Figure 4. TD-DFT simulated spectrum (C-PCM/r2SCAN-3c) of [ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] with hole (light blue) and electron (green) distributions for selected transitions. Color map: Zn, green; Br, dark red; O, red; P, orange; C, grey. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Surface isovalue = 0.001 a.u.
Figure 4. TD-DFT simulated spectrum (C-PCM/r2SCAN-3c) of [ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] with hole (light blue) and electron (green) distributions for selected transitions. Color map: Zn, green; Br, dark red; O, red; P, orange; C, grey. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Surface isovalue = 0.001 a.u.
Molecules 29 00239 g004
Molecules 29 00239 g005
Figure 5. (A) TD-DFT optimized (C-PCM/B97-3c) first excited singlet state of [ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] with hole (light blue) and electron (green) distributions for the S1←S0 transition (C-PCM-r2SCAN-3c). Fluorescence is the reverse process. Color map: Zn, green; Br, dark red; O, red; P, orange; C, grey. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Surface isovalue = 0.001 a.u. (B) Best superposition of the ground singlet geometry (blue tones) and the first excited singlet geometry (red tones) of [ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2].
Figure 5. (A) TD-DFT optimized (C-PCM/B97-3c) first excited singlet state of [ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] with hole (light blue) and electron (green) distributions for the S1←S0 transition (C-PCM-r2SCAN-3c). Fluorescence is the reverse process. Color map: Zn, green; Br, dark red; O, red; P, orange; C, grey. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Surface isovalue = 0.001 a.u. (B) Best superposition of the ground singlet geometry (blue tones) and the first excited singlet geometry (red tones) of [ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2].
Molecules 29 00239 g005
Molecules 29 00239 g006
Figure 6. Normalized emission (PL, solid, r.t., λexcitation = 310 nm, solid lines) and excitation (PLE, solid, r.t., λemission = 650 nm, dotted lines) spectra of (S,S)-[MnX2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] (X = Cl, Br) at room temperature. Luminescence decay curves (solid, r.t., λexcitation = 290 nm, λemission = 640 nm) of (S,S)-[MnX2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] (X = Cl, Br).
Figure 6. Normalized emission (PL, solid, r.t., λexcitation = 310 nm, solid lines) and excitation (PLE, solid, r.t., λemission = 650 nm, dotted lines) spectra of (S,S)-[MnX2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] (X = Cl, Br) at room temperature. Luminescence decay curves (solid, r.t., λexcitation = 290 nm, λemission = 640 nm) of (S,S)-[MnX2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] (X = Cl, Br).
Molecules 29 00239 g006
Table 1. Luminescence data for the [MX2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] complexes (M = Zn, X = Br; M = Mn, X = Cl, Br; both enantiomers). Solid samples, r.t.
Table 1. Luminescence data for the [MX2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2] complexes (M = Zn, X = Br; M = Mn, X = Cl, Br; both enantiomers). Solid samples, r.t.
ComplexPL Max
(nm)		PLE
(nm)		τΦ
(%)
[ZnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2]370320, <3008 ns81
[MnCl2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2]380, 653410–500, <400220 μs (58%), 700 μs (42%)48
[MnBr2{O=PPh(BINOL)}2]380, 641410–500, <400216 μs (62%), 530 μs (38%)14
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ferraro, V.; Castro, J.; Bortoluzzi, M. Luminescent Behavior of Zn(II) and Mn(II) Halide Derivatives of 4-Phenyldinaphtho[2,1-d:1′,2′-f][1,3,2]dioxaphosphepine 4-Oxide and Single-Crystal X-ray Structure Determination of the Ligand. Molecules 2024, 29, 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29010239

AMA Style

Ferraro V, Castro J, Bortoluzzi M. Luminescent Behavior of Zn(II) and Mn(II) Halide Derivatives of 4-Phenyldinaphtho[2,1-d:1′,2′-f][1,3,2]dioxaphosphepine 4-Oxide and Single-Crystal X-ray Structure Determination of the Ligand. Molecules. 2024; 29(1):239. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29010239

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ferraro, Valentina, Jesús Castro, and Marco Bortoluzzi. 2024. "Luminescent Behavior of Zn(II) and Mn(II) Halide Derivatives of 4-Phenyldinaphtho[2,1-d:1′,2′-f][1,3,2]dioxaphosphepine 4-Oxide and Single-Crystal X-ray Structure Determination of the Ligand" Molecules 29, no. 1: 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29010239

APA Style

Ferraro, V., Castro, J., & Bortoluzzi, M. (2024). Luminescent Behavior of Zn(II) and Mn(II) Halide Derivatives of 4-Phenyldinaphtho[2,1-d:1′,2′-f][1,3,2]dioxaphosphepine 4-Oxide and Single-Crystal X-ray Structure Determination of the Ligand. Molecules, 29(1), 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29010239

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop