Next Article in Journal
A Comparison Analysis of Four Different Drying Treatments on the Volatile Organic Compounds of Gardenia Flowers
Next Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Heat Treatment on the Photoactivity of Amine-Modified Titanium Dioxide in the Reduction of Carbon Dioxide
Previous Article in Journal
Computational Exploration of the Mechanism of Action of a Sorafenib-Containing Ruthenium Complex as an Anticancer Agent for Photoactivated Chemotherapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Boosting the Activation of Molecular Oxygen and the Degradation of Rhodamine B in Polar-Functional-Group-Modified g-C3N4
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

MgO Nanoparticles as a Promising Photocatalyst towards Rhodamine B and Rhodamine 6G Degradation

by
Maria-Anna Gatou
1,*,†,
Natalia Bovali
1,†,
Nefeli Lagopati
2,3 and
Evangelia A. Pavlatou
1,*
1
Laboratory of General Chemistry, School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Zografou Campus, 15772 Athens, Greece
2
Laboratory of Biology, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
3
Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2024, 29(18), 4299; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29184299
Submission received: 27 June 2024 / Revised: 6 September 2024 / Accepted: 10 September 2024 / Published: 11 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Photocatalytic Materials and Photocatalytic Reactions)

Abstract

:
The increasing global requirement for clean and safe drinking water has necessitated the development of efficient methods for the elimination of organic contaminants, especially dyes, from wastewater. This study reports the synthesis of magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles via a simple precipitation approach and their thorough characterization using various techniques, including XRD, FT-IR, XPS, TGA, DLS, and FESEM. Synthesized MgO nanoparticles’ photocatalytic effectiveness was evaluated towards rhodamine B and rhodamine 6G degradation under both UV and visible light irradiation. The results indicated that the MgO nanoparticles possess a face-centered cubic structure with enhanced crystallinity and purity, as well as an average crystallite size of approximately 3.20 nm. The nanoparticles demonstrated a significant BET surface area (52 m2/g) and a bandgap value equal to 5.27 eV. Photocatalytic experiments indicated complete degradation of rhodamine B dye under UV light within 180 min and 83.23% degradation under visible light. For rhodamine 6G, the degradation efficiency was 92.62% under UV light and 38.71% under visible light, thus verifying the MgO catalyst’s selectivity towards degradation of rhodamine B dye. Also, reusability of MgO was investigated for five experimental photocatalytic trials with very promising results, mainly against rhodamine B. Scavenging experiments confirmed that •OH radicals were the major reactive oxygen species involved in the photodegradation procedure, unraveling the molecular mechanism of the photocatalytic efficiency of MgO.

1. Introduction

The rising global need for clean and safe drinking water is a direct consequence of water pollution, which also leads to epidemics in various countries [1]. Contaminated water is a major cause of widespread waterborne diseases [2]. Organic pollutants, including dyes, contribute to health problems such as cancer in both humans and animals. Additionally, water pollution has been linked to higher mortality rates [3].
Even though organic water pollution occurs through various industrial sources, including textile, pharmaceutical, papermaking, leather, printing, cosmetics, and food processing, the textile industry constitutes a significant factor as it contributes to the generation of a vast quantity of dye-containing wastewater, since it is estimated that annually ≈700,000 tons of dyes are produced, while due to inefficiencies in the dyeing process, around 200,000 tons of dyes are released into water bodies during dyeing and finishing operations. Dyes possess an aromatic molecular structure attributed to hydrocarbons, such as C6H6, C6H5CH3, C14H10, C8H10, C10H8, etc. [4,5]. In addition, they contain auxochromes (-NH2, -Cl, -OH, -COOH, etc.), as well as chromophores (carbonyl, azo, nitroso, nitro, sulfur functional groups, etc.). Chromophores, which receive electrons, provide color, while auxochromes, which donate electrons, enhance the adhesion and solubility of color on substrates. Many dyes dissolve in water, and even at concentrations below 1 ppm, these dyes color industrial wastewater, which reduces sunlight penetration into water bodies. This affects oxygen levels, hinders photosynthesis, and disrupts the balance of eutrophication processes [6,7].
Among numerous dyes, rhodamine B (RhB) and rhodamine 6G (R6G), which are being extensively used, pose a pivotal threat to aquatic ecosystems and human health. Rhodamine B is an aminoxanthene anionic dye, and it is acknowledged for its mutagenic, noxious, chemically inert, and non-biodegradable properties, making it particularly hazardous. In particular, it causes acute and chronic toxicity, while its accumulation within the body may potentially induce harm to the liver, kidneys, reproductive system, and nervous system, as well as promote carcinogenesis. Moreover, it can lead to allergies or skin irritation upon contact and, when inhaled, may cause coughing, shortness of breath, and chest pain [8]. Rhodamine 6G, also called rhodamine 590, is part of the xanthenes family and is commonly used in drug synthesis and in producing dyes like fluorescein and eosin. This dye constitutes a cationic polar compound with a stable heterocyclic structure, notable for its enhanced visible light absorption and intense fluorescence [9]. Rhodamine 6G is extensively utilized in dyeing materials such as acrylic, nylon, silk, and wool, while it constitutes the preferred dye towards dye laser applications and hydraulic flow pattern visualization, where it is utilized as a fluorescent tracer [10]. Additionally, R6G frequently serves as a sensitizer [11]. Recently, there has been an increasing focus on integrating R6G into both inorganic and organic matrices for use in areas like solid-state laser technology, optoelectronics, and optical filters [12,13,14]. Previous studies of our research group focusing on the degradation of various pollutants and dyes, such as methylene blue, methyl orange, brilliant green, etc., have shown that rhodamine is a very stable pollutant and is considered a very reliable system for a photocatalytic study; thus, it is selected also for this study, in parallel with the use of rhodamine 6G [15].
Currently, a range of standard treatment approaches is utilized, involving chemical precipitation, separation, adsorption, coagulation, reverse osmosis, ion exchange, flocculation, activated carbon adsorption, incineration, filtration, biopolymeric hybrid membrane technology, and electrochemical oxidation [16,17]. Nonetheless, these techniques frequently lead to incomplete dye degradation, generating secondary pollutants that require additional treatment and potentially exacerbating pollution [18,19]. To address these issues, there is rising interest in advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), which use semiconducting materials as an alternative to conventional approaches [20], offering various benefits, such as lower equipment demands, non-selective oxidation, straightforward control, cost-efficiency, and organic dyes’ complete conversion into harmless byproducts like CO2, H2O, other inorganic compounds, and/or less toxic organic compounds that are environmentally safe [21,22]. A distinguishing aspect of AOPs is their ability to produce reactive agents such as •OH, which enable the rapid and non-selective oxidation of organic pollutants. Particularly interesting is the use of heterogeneous photocatalysis with oxide-based nanomaterials, which effectively removes water-soluble organic contaminants from water/wastewater upon exposure to light [23].
Overall, in photocatalytic degradation, suspended particles in a water solution act as photocatalysts when exposed to light. In this process, the photocatalyst, which is typically composed of semiconductors with distinct electronic band structures characterized by a band gap (Eg) separating the valence band (VB) and the conduction band (CB), plays a crucial role. The absorbance of photons, characterized by sufficient energy, leads to the generation of electron–hole (e-h+) pairs within the semiconductor particles. Subsequently, these carriers undergo charge separation, promoting reactive species’ production such as H2O, •OH, and 1O2. It is important to note that the recombination of e and h+ does not require their participation in chemical reactions. The oxidative agents catalyze organic pollutants’ decomposition on or near the catalysts’ surface, eventually converting them into harmless substances [24].
Metal oxide semiconductors such as TiO2, ZnO, CuO, Fe2O3, Mn2O3, ZrO2, Co3O4, and WO3 exhibit outstanding adsorption properties and serve as effective catalysts because of their high reactivity, enhanced sensitivity to light, large surface area per unit mass, cost-effectiveness, non-toxicity, and enhanced catalytic performance in dye degradation through photodegradation [25].
Magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles have attracted significant interest among metal oxide nanoparticles due to their excellent biocompatibility, non-toxicity, and strong stability under various conditions [26]. Additionally, the FDA considers MgO safe for human consumption [27]. MgO nanoparticles exhibit beneficial physicochemical properties, including increased ionic character, a significant specific surface area, unique crystal structures, and oxygen vacancies [28,29]. Nano-MgO particles can be fabricated utilizing a plethora of physicochemical techniques, such as sol–gel [30], microwave-assisted [31], solvothermal/hydrothermal [32], combustion [33], precipitation [34], environmentally friendly green synthesis [35], vapor deposition method [36], plasma irradiation [37], ultrasonic irradiation [38], etc. A variety of approaches have been employed to synthesize nano-MgO particles possessing decreased crystallite size and enhanced surface area, features that are acknowledged for augmenting photocatalytic performance towards organic dyes’ degradation upon irradiation [39,40] (Table 1). Among the utilized approaches, the precipitation method finds widespread application in synthesizing nanoparticles, as it is facile, cost-efficient, and useful for large-scale production [41].
In this study, MgO nanopowder was synthesized using a simple precipitation approach using Mg(NO3)2 (precursor) and NaOH as the precipitant. The physical characteristics of the nanopowder were comprehensively examined using techniques such as FESEM, XRD, FTIR, BET, DLS, and DRS. Following this, the photocatalytic efficiency of the material in degrading rhodamine B and rhodamine 6G was assessed under both UV and visible light, with a focus on its potential selectivity towards specific organic dyes. Additionally, the study aimed to elucidate the photocatalytic degradation mechanisms of the dyes under different light conditions, using scavengers during the experimental procedure to evaluate the oxidative potential of MgO nanoparticles that mediate the photocatalytic efficiency of this material.

2. Results

2.1. Characterization of MgO Powder

2.1.1. XRD Analysis

XRD was utilized in order to evaluate MgO powder’s crystallinity. The indexed peaks in the acquired pattern (Figure 1) are fully consistent with that of bulk MgO ((JCPDS) card no. 00-004-0829), certifying their monocrystallinity as well as face-centered cubic structure [48]. No additional impurity-related peak was spotted in the spectrum, within the detection limit of XRD, verifying the produced sample’s enhanced purity [49]. The formed peaks at two-theta (2θ) values, 36.85°, 42.83°, 61.20°, 74.58°, and 78.51°, are attributed to the (111), (200), (220), (311), and (222) (Miller indices) planes, respectively [50].
The as-produced MgO powder’s average crystallite size was determined through the Debye–Scherrer equation, its interplanar d-spacing according to Bragg’s Law Equation, and the crystallinity index (CI%), as previous studies have already analytically presented (Table 2 and Table 3) [51,52,53]. Bragg peak broadening (β) constitutes the composition of both the instrumental and sample-dependent effects. The instrumental peak width was corrected according to each diffraction peak of MgO material using the following equation (Equation (1)) [54]:
β 2 = β m e a s u r e d 2 β i n s t r u m e n t a l 2
The usual procedure towards instrumental broadening correction is determining the diffraction line breadth of a “coarse” material, such that broadening due to small crystallite size and lattice distortion is minimal. Thus, the “coarse” material chosen for reference was pure MgO (44–53 μm) and measured ten times in order to obtain statistical validity [55].
The value of the lattice constant was calculated using the following equation (Equation (2)), considering a cubic structure (a = b = c) (Table 2):
d = a h 2 + k 2 + l 2
Additionally, the Nelson–Riley function (Equation (3)) was utilized for estimating the lattice constant due to its more enhanced precision in estimating lattice parameters after eradicating 2θ systematic errors for high angle reflections.
F θ = 1 2 c o s 2 θ sin θ + c o s 2 θ θ
By extrapolating the lattice parameter’s straight line against an extrapolation function of θ to the value of 0 (Figure S1), the average lattice parameter (a) is determined. The acquired value aligns closely with the one reported in similar studies [56].
Thus, the lattice parameter (a) is measured equal to 4.2170 Å, which is marginally increased than the previously documented 4.2113 Å, according to the reference CIF (Crystallographic Information File) file [57]. Such a minor discrepancy in the lattice parameter is anticipated for nanoparticles possessing crystallite sizes in the tens of nanometers range.
In general, crystal imperfections and distortions lead to strain-induced broadening, which is expressed as ɛ ≈ βs/tan θ. A key aspect of Scherrer’s equation is its dependence on the diffraction angle θ. Unlike the Scherrer equation, which involves a 1/cos θ relationship, the Williamson–Hall approach shows variation with tan θ. This distinction is crucial because it enables the differentiation of reflection broadening when both small crystallite size and micro-strain co-exist. The following approaches consider that size and strain broadening are additive components of the total integral breadth of a Bragg peak [58]. The differing θ dependencies form the foundation for separating size and strain broadening in the W-H analysis. By combining the Scherrer equation with ɛ ≈ βs/tan θ, the following equations are obtained (Equations (4) and (5)):
β h k l = β s + β D
β h k l = k λ D cos θ + ( 4 ε tan θ )
where βs refers to the broadening due to small crystallite size and βD represents the broadening due to lattice distortions or micro-strain. The rearrangement of Equation (5) leads to the following equation (Equation (6)):
β h k l cos θ = k λ D + 4 ε sin θ
where βhkl constitutes the FWHM measured in radians, k equals to 0.9, λ corresponds to the wavelength of the X-rays (λ = 1.5406 Å), θ stands for the diffraction angle, D denotes the particle size, and ε constitutes the micro-strain [59]. Additionally, Equation (6) assumes that strain is uniform across all crystallographic directions, reflecting the isotropic nature of the crystal, where material properties do not vary based on the direction of measurement. A plot of βcos θ versus 4sin θ was made for the preferred orientation peaks of nano-MgO (Figure S2). In this plot, the slope corresponds to the strain, while the y-intercept indicates particle size. Typically, a negative slope indicates the presence of compressive micro-strain [60], whereas a positive slope suggests the possible presence of tensile micro-strain [59].
Based on the obtained results, the MgO powder presents a positive slope, thus affirming the existence of tensile micro-strain. In particular, the micro-strain within the sample was determined to be 2.16 × 103, indicating a small but noteworthy value, possibly attributed to the extremely small crystallite size of MgO, which was determined to be equal to 3.42 nm through the Williamson–Hall approach and equal to 3.23 nm applying the Scherrer approach. This small crystallite size prevents the relaxation of strain within the lattice [61]. Both for Scherrer and W-H calculations, zero shifts were accounted for by correcting 2θ.

2.1.2. FT-IR Analysis

In the FT-IR spectrum of the studied MgO powder (Figure 2), bands at 468.62, 863.95, 1432.85, and 3421.10 cm1 are illustrated.
In particular, the major band observed at ≈469 cm1 is attributed to Mg-O vibrations [62]. The bands observed at approximately 864 and 1433 cm1 are associated with carbonate species that are chemisorbed surficially on MgO [63], while the broad band depicted at 3421 cm1 corresponds to the O-H stretching, as well as bending vibrations of H2O molecules [62,63], possibly due to atmospheric humidity during the conduction of the powder’s measurement [64].

2.1.3. N2-Sorption Analysis

The N2-sorption isotherm of the MgO powder is depicted in Figure 3.
Based on the acquired data, the as-synthesized powder displays a type IV isotherm, characterized by a narrow hysteresis loop and the absence of a saturation plateau, suggesting mesopores and macropores existence. The pore size distribution as obtained from the desorption curve via the BJH approach is depicted in the inset in Figure 3. This distribution is broad, covering both the mesopore range (2–50 nm) and the macropore range (>50 nm), consistent with the N2-sorption isotherm findings [65,66,67]. The physical parameters are summarized in Table 4, including the BET surface area, micropore surface area, cumulative volume, as well as average pore diameter. The prepared MgO powder exhibits an increased BET surface area, correlating with the small crystallite size, as observed through the XRD analysis (Table 2).

2.1.4. XPS Analysis

XPS analysis was conducted to examine the prepared MgO powder’s surficial chemical composition. Figure 4 shows the wide survey spectrum of the as-synthesized powder. All peaks were expected due to the specific synthetic procedure that was employed. Figure S3a,b illustrates the detailed Mg2p XPS peak and the MgKLL X-ray-induced Auger spectrum (XAES). By adding the binding energy of Mg2p and the kinetic energy of MgKL23L23, the modified Auger parameter, which is an accurate method for chemical species characterization, is derived. The Mg2p binding energy was equal to 49.5 eV, and the modified Auger parameter was estimated as 1231.1 eV, both assigned to MgO [68]. Figure 5 indicates the deconvoluted O1s peak, which is a peak consisting of two components corresponding to oxides Mg-O (529.8 eV) and hydroxides Mg-OH (531.8 eV) [69]. The atomic percentage of Mg and O was calculated from the intensity (peak area) of the XPS peaks weighted with the corresponding relative sensitivity factors (RSF), taking into account the analyzer’s transmission characteristics, and was equal to 49.9% at. Mg and 50.1% at. O.

2.1.5. TGA Analysis

The thermal stability of the developed MgO powder was investigated through thermogravimetric analysis by assessing weight loss, as depicted in Figure 6. Thermal decomposition occurred across three stages within the temperature range of 30–692 °C. The first stage, from 30 to 160 °C, resulted in 3.59% weight loss due to the evaporation of H2O and a minor amount of adsorbed CO2, probably due to prolonged storage [70]. During the second stage, between 165 and 345 °C, a 6.55% weight loss was noted, attributed to the decomposition of traces of Mg(OH)2 that have not been converted to MgO during calcination and organic residues’ oxidation, yielding carbon dioxide and water vapor. The third stage, ranging from 525 to 692 °C, led to a 3.92% weight loss due to carbonate decomposition and oxidation of remaining organic compounds. Above 692 °C, there was negligible weight loss, implying stabilization of the crystalline solid phases (magnesium hydroxide), as well as the enhanced thermal robustness of the synthesized MgO powder [71].

2.1.6. Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) Analysis

A crucial approach for characterizing nanoparticles is dynamic light scattering (DLS), which provides critical information about the size distribution of colloidal samples. It offers the ability to distinguish whether the studied nanoparticles are polydispersed (variation in size) or monodispersed (uniformity in size). Additionally, DLS analysis is instrumental in detecting aggregation or agglomeration that directly influences stability, reactivity, as well as efficacy of the examined nanostructure [72].
In the present study, the dynamic light scattering measurements were performed at a pH equal to 6.81 ± 0.01. Figure S4a depicts the distribution of hydrodynamic radius as a function of scattered light intensity of the studied MgO powder. Based on the acquired results, the as-utilized synthetic procedure yielded MgO possessing particle sizes within the range 10–100 nm and possessing an average particle size equal to ≈27 nm. The acquired value indicated the successful production of relatively small nanoparticles that are advantageous for photocatalytic applications. In general, smaller nanoparticles tend to exhibit enhanced stability in suspension and reduced aggregation or settling over time [73]. Moreover, decreased particle sizes offer increased surface area-to-volume ratios, potentially enhancing photocatalytic effectiveness [74]. In addition, the PDI (polydispersity index) value of the as-prepared MgO was equal to 0.197, confirming the uniform distribution of particle sizes as well as a monodisperse nature (PDI in the range 0–0.4) [75] (Table 5).
Furthermore, the zeta potential unveils important aspects of nanoparticles’ stability and behavior within a colloidal system [76]. Typically, dispersion systems characterized by zeta potential values ranging from ±0 to ±10 mV are considered highly unstable, while those between ±10 and ±20 mV are deemed stable. Furthermore, zeta potential values from ±20 to ±30 mV indicate moderately stable dispersions, and values exceeding ±30 mV indicate extremely stable dispersions [77]. The zeta potential of the as-synthesized MgO nanoparticles was measured equal to −50.8 mV (Figure S4b, Table 5), indicating their stability within the colloidal system. An enhanced absolute zeta potential value, particularly negative as observed from the obtained data, promotes strong repulsion among particles, thereby preventing agglomeration or precipitation over time.

2.1.7. Diffuse Reflectance UV–Vis Spectroscopy (DRS) Analysis

Determining the energy band gap (Eg) is essential for studies involving photocatalysis. Figure S5a presents the diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) of the synthesized MgO powder.
To evaluate the powder’s reflectance, the Kubelka–Munk approach was utilized, as depicted in Figure S5a, following Equation (7) [78]:
F R = ( 1 R ) 2 2 R
where R constitutes the reflectance.
As illustrated in Figure S5a, the absorption edge of the as-studied powder is located at ≈213 nm. Figure S5b depicts the direct energy band gap of the studied powder using the Kubelka–Munk model against energy through the extrapolation of the linear part of the spectra (F(R)hv)1/2 vs. hv. The Eg was determined utilizing Tauc’s equation (Equation (8)):
a h v = A ( h v E g ) n
where h constitutes the Planck’s constant, v stands for the frequency, α corresponds to the absorption coefficient, and n = ½ [53].
The studied MgO powder exhibited a band gap value equal to 5.27 eV. This finding is consistent with previous research, where Eg values for nano-MgO ranging from 5.0 to 6.2 eV were reported [79]. Additionally, the obtained energy band gap value is decreased, compared to the 7.8 eV reported for bulk MgO [80]. The reduced Eg value of the examined MgO powder could be attributed to its small crystallite size, as energy band gap narrowing may occur in the nano-scale region due to the high surface area to volume ratio of the crystallites [79]. This aspect is regarded as beneficial for enhancing the overall photocatalytic effectiveness of the as-prepared MgO powder [81].

2.1.8. FESEM Analysis

The primary morphological characteristics of the synthesized MgO powder were assessed through FESEM observation, as illustrated in Figure 7.
Based on the obtained data, the observed nanoparticles display a combination of nearly spherical and hexagonal shapes, while they are also interconnected. This agglomeration might be attributed to electrostatic attraction, as well as polarity [82].

2.2. Photocatalytic Study of MgO Powder

2.2.1. Study of the Photocatalytic Effectiveness towards Rhodamine B (RhB) Degradation

The photocatalytic capability of the as-developed MgO powder was primarily assessed by evaluating its efficiency towards RhB degradation within an aqueous solution under both visible and UV light illumination. The trials were carried out at room temperature and pH = 6.71 ± 0.01. Figure 8a,b illustrates the photocatalytic performance of MgO powder upon UV and visible light irradiation, respectively. Control experiments included photolysis (RhB photolysis) and adsorption–desorption equilibrium (RhB dark) in the absence of irradiation but with constant stirring for the same duration as the photocatalytic trials. The findings revealed that ≈3% of RhB degraded under both visible and UV light exposure, indicating an extremely low degradation rate of RhB in the absence of the examined powder. Moreover, consistent results from the trials implemented under dark conditions confirmed the dye’s robustness [83].
According to the received data, during the photocatalytic experiments, the examined powder exhibited high efficiency, as it led to RhB’s complete degradation (100%) within 180 min upon UV light illumination, as well as 83.23 ± 0.83% under visible light exposure within the same 180 min timeframe. Additionally, Figure S6a,b illustrates the UV–visible spectra documented throughout the photocatalytic trials, which were used to track the dye’s degradation progress over time, analyze the underlying degradation mechanisms, and evaluate the photocatalytic performance of the powder. Generally, RhB degradation proceeds through two known pathways: (a) N-de-ethylation and (b) disruption of its conjugated structure. Pathway (a) is characterized by a blue shift in the absorption maximum, while the pathway (b) shows a gradual decrease in absorption without a significant blue shift [84]. The real-time UV–visible spectra obtained during the photocatalytic trials of the MgO powder under UV (Figure S6a) and visible light (Figure S6b) clearly demonstrate the involvement of the second pathway during RhB’s degradation.
For the confirmation of the results obtained from RhB’s photocatalytic degradation, further analysis was conducted via TOC measurements so as to determine the percentage of mineralization of the examined dye attained during the photocatalytic process. RhB’s mineralization percentage was estimated via Equation (9):
M i n e r a l i z a t i o n   % = 1 T O C f i n a l T O C i n i t i a l × 100
where TOCinitial refers to the medium’s initial total organic carbon concentration prior to photocatalytic trials, while TOCfinal denotes the medium’s total organic carbon concentration upon the completion of the photocatalytic procedure [85]. According to the TOC analysis, the MgO powder demonstrated almost total mineralization (98.83 ± 0.97%) of RhB dye upon UV light exposure, as well as an increased mineralization rate (80.04 ± 1.13%) under visible light illumination, thus validating the data acquired from RhB’s degradation study.

Study of RhB’s Photocatalytic Degradation Kinetics

Figure 9 indicates the outcomes derived from the investigation utilizing the pseudo-first-order kinetic model upon UV and visible light exposure, presenting a plot of −ln(C/C0) against time, as described by Equation (10) [86]:
l n C C 0 = k 1 t
where C0 and C are ascribed to the initial and reaction-time RhB concentrations, respectively, k1 constitutes the photocatalytic oxidation’s apparent rate constant (min−1), while t stands for the irradiation time. The apparent rate constants of the as-prepared MgO powder under both types of irradiation derive from the linearly fitted plot’s slope.
However, the photocatalytic kinetics can alternatively be described by the pseudo-second-order equation (Equation (11)) [53]:
t q t = 1 k 2 q e 2 + 1 q e t
where qt and qe constitute the amount of the pollutant adsorbed at time t and equilibrium, respectively (mg/g), and k2 corresponds to the rate constant (g/mg·min).
In contrast to the results observed with the pseudo-first-order kinetics (Figure 9), the R2 values acquired from the pseudo-second-order kinetic model (Figure S7) indicate a considerably decreased goodness of fit [53]. Table 6 details the kinetic parameters for the examined MgO powder.
In photocatalytic systems, rate constants are strongly influenced by crystallite size and specific surface area, both of which play critical roles in determining photocatalytic efficiency. A smaller crystallite size generally leads to a higher surface-to-volume ratio, which increases the number of active sites available for catalytic reactions, thereby enhancing overall performance [87]. However, this variability in surface area complicates direct comparisons between different photocatalysts, as larger specific surface areas may artificially boost rate constants by providing more reaction sites without necessarily improving the material’s intrinsic photocatalytic ability [88]. For instance, studies have shown that photocatalysts with larger surface areas often exhibit higher degradation efficiencies, due to increased dye adsorption (dye sensitization) rather than enhanced photocatalytic mechanisms [89]. As such, comparing photocatalysts with different specific surface areas may result in misleading conclusions about their relative efficiencies. In this study, the MgO nanoparticles demonstrated a surface area of 52 m2/g, which likely contributes to their observed photocatalytic performance.

Mechanism Study

During the photocatalytic oxidation procedure, several key oxidative species play a crucial role, including superoxide radicals (●O2), singlet oxygen (1O2), electrons (e), holes (h+), as well as hydroxyl radicals (●OH). In order to better understand the underlying photocatalytic mechanism, extensive studies were carried out to specify the active species. This involved a series of scavenging experiments in order to identify these specific species. In particular, p-benzoquinone (p-BQ, C6H4(=O)2, ≥98%, Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany), sodium azide (NaN3, ≥99.5%, Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany), silver nitrate (AgNO3, >99%, Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany), disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA-2Na, C10H14N2Na2O8●2H2O, ≥97%, Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany), and t-butanol (t-BuOH, (CH3)3COH, ≥99.5%, Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) were added to the RhB dye’s solution, in order to selectively capture the ●O2, 1O2, e, h+, and ●OH, respectively [90,91].
Derived from the outcomes depicted in Figure 10a,b, rhodamine B’s degradation effectiveness on the surface of the MgO powder endured a prominent reduction to 14.69 ± 1.03% and 13.23 ± 1.11% under UV and visible light illumination, respectively, upon adding t-BuOH into the photocatalytic reaction solution, thus confirming that the ●OH radicals had a major effect on RhB’s photocatalytic degradation in both irradiation conditions. On the contrary, ●O2, 1O2, as well as photogenerated e and h+, were not the principal reactive species participating in the process.
In accordance with the results of the scavenging experiments, a feasible mechanism is outlined (Figure 11). When MgO nanoparticles are exposed to light (UV or visible) in the VB and CB, electrons and holes are produced within the reaction medium. Then, these photogenerated e interact surficially with the photocatalyst, leading to the oxidation of O2 to •O2, while the photogenerated h+ tend to reduce -OH groups deriving from H2O molecules to •OH radicals. Subsequently, a reaction among •O2 and H2O leads to the generation of -OH and HOO• radicals, which in turn produce •OH radicals. These free radicals facilitate the decomposition of RhB dye into both gaseous and liquid oxidation byproducts such as CO2 and H2O. The following equations illustrate the procedure of radical generation and demonstrate that •OH radicals are predominantly in charge of RhB’s degradation (Equations (12)–(18)):
M g O + h v h V B + + e C B
H 2 O H + + O H
h V B + + O H O H
e C B + O 2 O 2
O 2 + H 2 O H O O + O H
H O O + O H 2 O H + O 2
O H + R h B o x i d a t i o n   b y p r o d u c t s + C O 2 + H 2 O

Reusability Study

Figure 12a,b demonstrates the reusability of the MgO nanopowder under both UV and visible light exposure across five successive photocatalytic cycles (catalyst loading = 5 mg, pH = 6.71 ± 0.01, initial concentration of RhB = 10 mg/L). After each degradation cycle, the photocatalyst underwent centrifugation and multiple washes with distilled H2O, followed by drying in a vacuum oven (70 °C, 24 h) in preparation for the next trial, with no further treatment [92]. The photocatalyst showed significant photostability under both light sources, as an approximate 5% (5.46 ± 0.83%) (Figure 12a) and a ≈7% (7.32 ± 1.01%) (Figure 12b) decrease in its photocatalytic efficiency was observed in the case of UV and visible light irradiation, respectively, after five consecutive cycles. These results verify the robustness of the examined photocatalyst throughout repeated photocatalytic trials.
Additionally, the studied powder was examined for its stability after five experimental cycles under the as-mentioned conditions through XRD (Figure S8). The analysis revealed that the MgO powder indicated insignificant changes in their crystalline phases, with only a slight increase in peaks’ intensity, proving that the examined photocatalyst maintained its structure after RhB’s degradation trials and exposure to air, presenting enhanced photochemical robustness. Moreover, the modest augmentation in peaks’ intensity may be attributed to crystallite size’s growth, because of the photoirradiation activation procedure [93].

2.2.2. Study of the Photocatalytic Effectiveness towards Rhodamine 6G (R6G) Degradation

MgO’s capability was also evaluated towards R6G’s (aqueous solution) photocatalytic degradation under the same irradiation conditions as the ones described in the case of rhodamine B. During R6G’s photocatalytic trials, temperature and pH conditions were set at 25 °C and 7.48 ± 0.01. Control trials were also conducted, including photolysis (R6G photolysis) and adsorption–desorption equilibrium (R6G dark) in the absence of light illumination upon continual stirring for the same duration as the photocatalysis procedure. The data acquired from these trials and for both irradiation types, verified the dye’s robustness, as ≈2% of R6G was degraded [86] (Figure 13).
Throughout the photocatalytic trials, the studied powder demonstrated enhanced effectiveness towards R6G degradation under UV light illumination, achieving a degradation rate equal to 92.62 ± 0.84% over 180 min, whereas a rate of the order of 38.71 ± 1.43% was attained upon visible light irradiation within the same period.
Based on the data derived from the photocatalytic effectiveness studies for RhB, as well as R6G, the MgO powder achieved 100% and 83.23 ± 0.83% RhB degradation upon UV and visible light irradiation within 180 min, respectively, while 92.62 ± 0.84% and 38.71 ± 1.43% of R6G was degraded in the same timeframe upon UV and visible light illumination, respectively. Consequently, the as-mentioned photocatalyst exhibits selective activity favoring RhB’s photocatalytic degradation, primarily in the case of visible light irradiation (Figure 14). This phenomenon might be attributed to the pH that was prevalent during the experimental procedure. According to other studies, rhodamine B can be effectively degraded in generally acidic conditions, while rhodamine 6G requires highly basic conditions [94]. In these series of experiments, pH was approximately 7 (in the case of rhodamine B, pH was 6.71, and for rhodamine 6G, pH was 7.48). It might be possible to obtain even more promising results for rhodamine 6G for a pH of around 10.
Figure S9a,b represents the real-time UV–visible spectra as received during the photocatalytic trials. In general, R6G dye contains a chromophore made up of benzene and xanthene rings, connected by ethylamine (CH3CH2NH2) as the auxochrome. The chromophore determines the dye’s color, while the auxochrome influences the color’s intensity. The photocatalytic degradation of R6G typically follows two main pathways: breaking the conjugated chromophores or N-deethylation of the auxochromes. Previous research has outlined that a shift to a shorter absorption wavelength (blue shift) indicates a degradation pathway via N-deethylation [95]. Based on the emerged spectra, the peak at 526 nm (absorption maximum), which is attributed to a xanthene compound [96], remains constant, presenting no significant blue or red shift, thus rendering the N-deethylation pathway less probable in R6G’s degradation.
TOC analysis was similarly conducted to assess the extent of R6G’s mineralization (Equation (9)) during photocatalysis, so as to affirm the validity of degradation experiments. The as-mentioned analysis indicated that the MgO powder achieved a more increased mineralization rate of R6G upon UV light illumination (90.03 ± 1.31% instead of 36.49 ± 1.14% in the case of visible light irradiation), thus validating the results obtained from the photocatalytic degradation study.

Study of R6G’s Photocatalytic Degradation Kinetics

Kinetic model studies upon UV and visible light illumination were conducted based on the pseudo-first-order (Equation (10) and Figure 15) and pseudo-second-order (Equation (11) and Figure S10) models.
In opposition to the pseudo-first-order model, the pseudo-second-order is characterized by inferior R2 values (Table 7). Consequently, it can be inferred that the photocatalytic degradation of R6G in the presence of the as-synthesized MgO powder upon both UV and visible light illumination is best elucidated by a pseudo-first-order reaction kinetic model.

Mechanism Study

Comprehensive studies were conducted to determine the active species involved by emphasizing validating R6G’s photocatalytic degradation mechanism. Similar to the approach outlined in the case of RhB dye, experimental trials were performed to scavenge and capture the entagled active species. Consequently, AgNO3, EDTA-2Na, p-BQ, NaN3, and t-BuOH were added to R6G’s aqueous solution to selectively trap, as well as specify e, h+, ●O2 radicals, 1O2, and ●OH radicals, respectively (Figure 16a,b).
According to the received data, R6G’s capability presented a notable reduction to 9.27 ± 1.23% and 5.43 ± 1.01% under UV and visible light photocatalysis, respectively, after introducting t-BuOH into the photocatalytic reaction solution, thus justifying that ●OH radicals played a crucial role on R6G’s degradation in both irradiation conditions. However, when visible light was utilized as the source of irradiation, less oxidative species like •O2 radicals and 1O2 indicated a slightly enhanced contribution to the degradation of R6G, possibly because under visible light the mechanism of self-sensitization was involved in the dye’s degradation [92]. Additionally, in both irradiation conditions, h+ had a minor effect on the degradation procedure, while the role of photogenerated e was negligible, proving the efficient e transfer from MgO’s surface towards the adsorbed molecules for the generation of reactive species [97].
As a result, taking also into account the as-received real-time UV–visible data, the suggested mechanism involves the cleavage of conjugated chromophores, where the predominant •OH radicals fragment R6G chromophore’s structural ring, leading to the effective dye’s degradation into mineralized by-products (CO2 and H2O).

Reusability Study

The reusability of the studied nano-MgO powder upon both UV and visible light illumination across five sequential photocatalytic cycles (catalyst loading = 5 mg, pH = 7.48 ± 0.01, R6G’s initial concentration equal to 10 mg/L) was assessed (Figure 17a,b) through the perpetual process as in the case of RhB. The examined photocatalyst presented notable photostability under both utilized light sources, achieving a ≈6% decrease in its photocatalytic efficiency upon UV (5.98 ± 0.54%) and visible (6.27 ± 0.71%) light irradiation after the completion of the reusability experimental trials.

3. Discussion

This study successfully synthesized MgO nanoparticles using a simple precipitation method and evaluated their photocatalytic efficiency in degrading rhodamine B (RhB) and rhodamine 6G (R6G) upon UV and visible light illumination. The characterization of MgO nanoparticles confirmed their crystallinity, purity, and favorable surface properties, which are crucial for photocatalytic applications.
The XRD analysis revealed that the synthesized MgO nanoparticles possess a pure face-centered cubic structure with high crystallinity that is known to enhance photocatalytic activity towards degradation of organic dyes, indicating successful synthesis without significant impurities. The average crystallite size, determined using the Debye–Scherrer equation, was approximately 3.23 nm, which is beneficial for enhancing photocatalytic activity due to the increased surface area-to-volume ratio.
FT-IR analysis further confirmed the presence of characteristic Mg-O vibrations and minor surface-adsorbed carbonate species, while the N2-sorption isotherms suggested a mesoporous and macroporous structure, which is advantageous for dye adsorption and subsequent degradation. The BET surface area of 52 m2/g supports the observed high photocatalytic activity.
The photocatalytic studies demonstrated that MgO nanoparticles exhibit excellent degradation capabilities for both RhB and R6G dyes. Under UV light, MgO achieved complete degradation of RhB within 180 min, while under visible light, it achieved 83.23% degradation. For R6G, the degradation efficiency was 92.62% under UV light and 38.71% under visible light, indicating a higher photocatalytic activity towards RhB under visible light. These results highlight the potential of MgO nanoparticles as effective photocatalysts for the degradation of organic dyes in wastewater.
The results align well with previous studies that have highlighted the effectiveness of metal oxide nanoparticles in photocatalytic applications. For instance, TiO2 and ZnO have been widely studied and reported to exhibit significant photocatalytic properties. However, MgO offers several advantages, including non-toxicity, biocompatibility, and a lower band gap, which enhances its activity under visible light.
The photocatalytic mechanism proposed in this study is consistent with the general principles observed in other semiconductor photocatalysts. Electron-hole pairs’ generation upon light irradiation and the subsequent production of ROS like •OH radicals play a crucial role in dyes’ degradation. The scavenging experiments confirmed that •OH radicals are the dominant species in the degradation process for both RhB and R6G, similar to findings in studies involving TiO2 and ZnO photocatalysts.
The findings of this study have significant implications for wastewater treatment, particularly in industries that discharge dye-contaminated effluents. The high photocatalytic efficiency of MgO nanoparticles under both UV and visible light suggests their potential application in real-world scenarios, where visible light comprises a major portion of the solar spectrum. This could lead to more sustainable and cost-effective wastewater treatment processes. Comparing the results obtained from previous studies, that had focused on the use of well-established photocatalysts, such as pure TiO2 and ZnO, it is clear that MgO powder could totally degrade rhodamine B upon a 3 h UV light irradiation, while ZnO [98] and TiO2 nanoparticles [99] needed less than 3 h for the same effect. Under visible light irradiation, MgO powder led to 83.23% degradation of rhodamine B, while ZnO nanoparticles could totally degrade rhodamine B in the same timeframe [98]. TiO2 is not so efficient under visible light irradiation (TiO2 Evonik P25 can degrade rhodamine B by 48% after 240 min) [100], and this is why it is widely doped for the enhancement of its photocatalytic performance under visible light irradiation. Regarding rhodamine 6G, MgO achieved 92.62% and 38.71% degradation after 3 h of UV and visible light illumination, respectively. According to Pino et al., when UV or visible light is applied for 90 min to irradiate a solution of rhodamine 6G in the presence of TiO2 Evonik P25, a degradation percentage of 22% is determined [14]. MgO led to a 35% degradation of rhodamine 6G after 90 min of visible light irradiation and ~70% under UV light irradiation, thus MgO is proven as an efficient photocatalyst of rhodamine 6G. ZnO degraded by 72% rhodamine 6G, under UV light irradiation for 120 min, according to Yudasari et al. [101]. In the same timeframe, MgO degraded by >85% rhodamine 6G. Also, according to Khoza et al., ZnO composites led to a 50% degradation of rhodamine 6G after 60 min of photoactivation with visible light, showing also excellent reusability after five cycles [102]. So, MgO seems to be a very promising photocatalyst against rhodamine B or rhodamine 6G, compared to TiO2 and ZnO.
Furthermore, the study highlights the importance of nanoparticle size, surface area, and the presence of active sites in enhancing photocatalytic activity. These insights can guide the design and synthesis of more efficient photocatalysts in the future.
Future research could focus on optimizing the synthesis process to further reduce the particle size and increase the surface area of MgO nanoparticles, thereby enhancing their photocatalytic efficiency. Additionally, exploring the doping of MgO with other metal ions could improve visible light’s absorption and enhance the generation of ROS.
Investigating the reusability and stability of MgO nanoparticles in long-term photocatalytic applications is also crucial. While this study demonstrated significant photostability over five cycles, extended research is required to grasp the mechanisms behind any noted deactivation and to develop strategies for regeneration.
Finally, extending the study to other types of organic pollutants and exploring the photocatalytic performance of MgO in real wastewater samples would provide a more comprehensive understanding of its potential applications in environmental remediation.
In conclusion, this study underscores the potential of MgO nanoparticles as efficient photocatalysts towards organic dye degradation, paving the way for their application in sustainable wastewater treatment technologies.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Synthesis of MgO Powder

The synthesis of MgO powder was conducted utilizing a facile precipitation approach, founded on the synthetic protocol of Karthikeyan and colleagues [103], upon some alterations. In particular, 6.4103 g of magnesium nitrate hexahydrate (Mg(NO3)2•6H2O, 99%, Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) were added in 100 mL of lab-distilled water. Subsequently, 100 mL of a 0.25 M sodium hydroxide solution (NaOH, 99.5%, Panreac Quimica SA, Barcelona, Spain) were poured dropwise into the aforementioned aqueous solution. The acquired mixture underwent continuous magnetic stirring for 4 h at 25 °C until the emergence of a white-colored suspension. The completion of the reaction procedure was indicated by the formation of a white precipitate, which was acquired through centrifugation and was subsequently triturated and purified via rinsing with double-distilled (18.2 MΩ·cm) water and centrifugation for eliminating potential impurities. Then, the obtained precipitate underwent drying at 80 °C for 6 h and was further calcinated at 500 °C (4 h), finally resulting in a white powder’s production (Figure 18). The reaction that took place during the synthetic procedure is outlined through the following equation (Equation (19)):
M g ( N O 3 ) 2 + N a O H M g ( O H ) 2 + N a N O 3 + H 2 O
Mg(OH)2 formed by the reaction of Mg(NO3)2 with NaOH when calcinated at 500 °C for 4 h results in the formation of MgO (Equation (20)) [104]:
M g ( O H ) 2 M g O + H 2 O

4.2. Characterization of MgO Nanopowder

FESEM analysis was utilized in order to assess the morphology of the MgO powder (FESEM, JSM-7401F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).
Regarding the XRD analysis, a Brucker D8 Advance (Brucker, Karlsruhe, Germany) X-ray diffractometer was utilized, implementing CuΚα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) (40 kV, 40 mA). The measurements were conducted at a 2-theta angle ranging from 20° to 90° (0.01°/1.0 s).
FTIR measurements were also performed, and spectra were acquired at 25 °C in the range from 400 cm−1 to 4000 cm−1 (resolution: 4 cm−1) through a FTIR JASCO4200 apparatus (Oklahoma City, OK, USA), possessing a Ge crystal.
The synthesized powder’s N2 adsorption was examined via a ChemBET 3000 instrument (Yumpu, Diepoldsau, Switzerland) to ascertain the BET specific area. Before each measurement, the MgO powder passed through a degassing process (80 °C, 24 h).
Thermogravimetric analysis was performed utilizing a Mettler Toledo TGA/DSC 1 HT apparatus (Mettler Toledo GmbH, Greifensee, Switzerland). Measurements were conducted under N2 flow (10 mL/min) in the range 30–1000 °C and a heating rate equal to 10 °C/min.
XPS analysis (Leybold SPECS LHS/EA10, Leybold GmbH, Cologne, Germany) was implemented in order to assess the examined powder’s surficial chemical states. An ultra-high vacuum chamber (P ≈ 5 × 10−10 mbar) equipped with a SPECS Phoibos 100 hemispherical electron analyzer (Berlin, Germany) with a delay line detector (DLD) and an unmonochromized dual-anode Mg/Al X-ray source were utilized for the measurements. A MgKα line at 1253.6 eV and an analyzer pass energy of 10 eV (giving a FWHM equal to 0.85 eV for the Ag 3d5/2 peak) were utilized. A fitting routine was used for analyzing the XPS core level spectra, leading to each spectrum’s decomposition into individual mixed Gaussian–Lorentzian peaks upon a Shirley background subtraction. Errors regarding peak areas were found equal to ≈10%, and the accuracy for binding energies’ assignments was approximately 0.1 eV. The samples, which were originally in powder form, were compressed into pellets for measurement. Analysis was conducted on a 3 mm diameter area, with the XPS spectra documented at 25 °C.
The hydrodynamic diameter, as well as the distribution of the powder’s particles in an aqueous dispersion, was assessed through dynamic light scattering (DLS) (Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS, Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK). The scattering intensity’s recording was achieved using a 633 nm laser and a 173° scattering angle.
Diffuse reflectance measurements for obtaining the Eg values were evaluated via a UV–vis spectrometer (Jasco UV/Vis/NIR V-770, Interlab, Athens, Greece) possessing an integrating sphere.
RhB’s and R6G’s mineralization percentage was evaluated by TOC analysis (TOC-LCSH/CSN, Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Columbia, MD, USA).

4.3. Photocatalytic Efficiency Study of MgO Nanopowder

The photocatalytic effectiveness of the as-prepared MgO powder upon both UV and visible light irradiation was initially evaluated towards the degradation of rhodamine B through the addition of 0.005 g of the powder in a 10 ppm aqueous solution (250 mL) of RhB (C28H31CIN2O3, ≥95%, Penta-Chemicals Unlimited, Prague, Czech Republic) at 25 °C and pH value equal to 6.71 ± 0.01. Before each photocatalytic experiment, the rhodamine B solution was saturated for 1 h via extra-pure O2 (99.999%) flow.
In addition, the assessment of the MgO’s photocatalytic activity was conducted under UV and visible light illumination towards rhodamine 6G (C28H31N2O3Cl, 99%, Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) degradation, using the same conditions as described in the case of rhodamine B with the only difference that the pH value of the dye’s solution was equal to 7.48 ± 0.01.
The photoreactor that was utilized for the photocatalytic experiments was equipped with four parallel lamps placed 10 cm above each sample’s surface [78]. Blacklight lamps (368 nm, 830 lumens, incident light flux: 0.184 μmol quanta/s, Sylvania, Wilmington, NC, USA) were employed as the UV irradiation source, while 15 W visible light lamps (900 lumens, 400 nm cutoff filter, incident light flux: 0.371 μmol quanta/s, OSRAM GmbH, Munich, Germany) comprised the visible light irradiation source. All the experiments were conducted at 25 °C [53,78].
The derived absorbance of the studied MgO powder was estimated at 554 nm [53] and 525 nm [105] for RhB and R6G, respectively, utilizing a spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Evolution 200, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The C/C0 ratio, where C is ascribed to RhB’s and R6G’s concentration after a certain time of photocatalysis and C0 corresponds to RhB and R6G initial concentration, was acquired indirectly by the evaluation of the measured absorption A (absorption at each time) to the initial absorption (Ainitial) [78].

5. Conclusions

In this study, magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles were synthesized using a simple precipitation method and characterized by various techniques, confirming their high purity, crystallinity, and appropriate physicochemical properties for photocatalytic applications. The MgO nanoparticles demonstrated significant photocatalytic efficiency in degrading rhodamine B (RhB) and rhodamine 6G (R6G) dyes under both UV and visible light irradiation. The nanoparticles exhibited complete degradation of RhB under UV light within 180 min and achieved notable degradation levels for R6G as well. The study’s findings underscore the potential of MgO nanoparticles as a promising photocatalyst, particularly for the selective degradation of hazardous dyes such as RhB, thereby contributing to the development of more effective wastewater treatment technologies. Additionally, the reusability of MgO nanoparticles across multiple trials further emphasizes their practical applicability, making them a viable candidate for large-scale environmental remediation efforts. Future research could focus on optimizing the synthesis process to enhance the photocatalytic performance of MgO nanoparticles under visible light and exploring their efficacy in degrading other persistent organic pollutants.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29184299/s1: Figure S1: Nelson–Riley plot of the synthesized MgO powder; Figure S2: Williamsons-Hall (W-H) plot of the as-studied MgO powder; Figure S3: (a) Mg2p peak and (b) XAES detailed region of Mg KLL of the MgO powder; Figure S4: (a) Size distribution diagram and (b) zeta potential diagram of the as-synthesized MgO powder; Figure S5: (a) F(R) reflectance plotted against wavelength for the MgO powder under study and (b) the Eg of the same powder; Figure S6: Real-time UV–visible spectra obtained upon (a) UV and (b) visible light induced photocatalytic degradation of RhB utilizing the as-synthesized MgO powder; Figure S7: Photocatalytic kinetic model studies for the studied MgO powder, following a pseudo-second-order model upon UV and visible light illumination; Figure S8: XRD patterns of MgO photocatalyst after the reusability studies; Figure S9: Real-time UV–visible spectra obtained upon (a) UV and (b) visible light induced photocatalytic degradation of R6G utilizing the as-synthesized MgO powder; Figure S10: Photocatalytic kinetic model studies for the examined MgO powder, following a pseudo-second-order model upon UV and visible light illumination.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.A.P.; methodology, E.A.P., M.-A.G. and N.B.; validation, E.A.P., M.-A.G. and N.B.; formal analysis, M.-A.G. and N.B.; investigation, M.-A.G. and N.B.; resources, E.A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.-A.G. and N.B.; writing—review and editing, M.-A.G., N.B., N.L. and E.A.P.; visualization, M.-A.G. and N.B.; supervision, E.A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Labrini Sygellou from Foundation of Research and Technology Hellas, Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences (Patras, Greece) for XPS analysis, as well as Christos Zotiadis from Laboratory of Polymer Technology, School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens (Greece) for TGA measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Jaspal, D.; Malviya, A. Composites for wastewater purification: A review. Chemosphere 2020, 246, 125788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sharma, V.K.; Jinadatha, C.; Lichtfouse, E. Environmental chemistry is most relevant to study coronavirus pandemics. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2020, 18, 993–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sarkar, S.; Banerjee, A.; Halder, U.; Biswas, R.; Bandopadhyay, R. Degradation of Synthetic Azo Dyes of Textile Industry: A Sustainable Approach Using Microbial Enzymes. Water Conserv. Sci. Eng. 2017, 2, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zare, E.N.; Motahari, A.; Sillanpää, M. Nanoadsorbents based on conducting polymer nanocomposites with main focus on polyaniline and its derivatives for removal of heavy metal ions/dyes: A review. Environ. Res. 2018, 162, 173–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tara, N.; Siddiqui, S.; Rathi, G.; Inamuddin, I.; Asiri, A.M. Nano-engineered adsorbent for removal of dyes from water: A review. Curr. Anal. Chem. 2019, 16, 14–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Saeed, M.; Khan, I.; Adeel, M.; Akram, N.; Muneer, M. Synthesis of a CoO–ZnO photocatalyst for enhanced visible-light assisted photodegradation of methylene blue. New J. Chem. 2022, 46, 2224–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kocijan, M.; Ćurković, L.; Vengust, D.; Radošević, T.; Shvalya, V.; Gonçalves, G.; Podlogar, M. Synergistic remediation of organic dye by titanium dioxide/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite. Molecules 2023, 28, 7326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ngoc, P.K.; Mac, T.K.; Nguyen, H.T.; Thanh, T.D.; Van Vinh, P.; Phan, B.T.; Duong, A.T.; Das, R. Superior organic dye removal by CoCr2O4 nanoparticles: Adsorption kinetics and isotherm. J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Devices 2022, 7, 100438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zehentbauer, F.M.; Moretto, C.; Stephen, R.; Thevar, T.; Gilchrist, J.R.; Pokrajac, D.; Richard, K.L.; Kiefer, J. Fluorescence spectroscopy of Rhodamine 6G: Concentration and solvent effects. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2014, 121, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tarud, F.; Aybar, M.; Pizarro, G.; Cienfuegos, R.; Pastén, P. Integrating fluorescent dye flow-curve testing and acoustic Doppler velocimetry profiling for in situ hydraulic evaluation and improvement of clarifier performance. Water Environ. Res. 2010, 82, 675–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, T.; Liu, G.; Zhao, J.; Hidaka, H.; Serpone, N. Photoassisted degradation of dye pollutants. v. self-photosensitized oxidative transformation of rhodamine b under visible light irradiation in aqueous TiO2 dispersions. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 5845–5851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vanamudan, A.; Pamidimukkala, P. Chitosan, nanoclay and chitosan-nanoclay composite as adsorbents for Rhodamine-6G and the resulting optical properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 74, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Barranco, A.; Groening, P. Fluorescent plasma nanocomposite thin films containing nonaggregated rhodamine 6G laser dye molecules. Langmuir 2006, 22, 6719–6722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pino, E.; Calderón, C.; Herrera, F.; Cifuentes, G.; Arteaga, G. Photocatalytic degradation of aqueous rhodamine 6G using supported TiO2 catalysts. a model for the removal of organic contaminants from aqueous samples. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kassalia, M.-E.; Nikolaou, Z.; Pavlatou, E.A. Photocatalytic testing protocol for N-Doped TiO2 nanostructured particles under visible light irradiation using the statistical Taguchi experimental design. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sansenya, T.; Masri, N.; Chankhanittha, T.; Senasu, T.; Piriyanon, J.; Mukdasai, S.; Nanan, S. Hydrothermal synthesis of ZnO photocatalyst for detoxification of anionic azo dyes and antibiotic. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2022, 160, 110353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Crini, G.; Lichtfouse, E. Advantages and disadvantages of techniques used for wastewater treatment. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2019, 17, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vaez, Z.; Javanbakht, V. Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic activity of ZSM-5/ZnO nanocomposite modified by Ag nanoparticles for methyl orange degradation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2020, 388, 112064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khataee, A.R.; Pons, M.N.; Zahraa, O. Photocatalytic degradation of three azo dyes using immobilized TiO2 nanoparticles on glass plates activated by UV light irradiation: Influence of dye molecular structure. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 168, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. John Peter, I.; Praveen, E.; Vignesh, G.; Nithiananthi, P. ZnO nanostructures with different morphology for enhanced photocatalytic activity. Mater. Res. Express 2017, 4, 124003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ameen, S.; Akhtar, M.S.; Seo, H.K.; Shin, H.S. Mineralization of rhodamine 6G dye over rose flower-like ZnO nanomaterials. Mater. Lett. 2013, 113, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, D.E.; Ren, L.Z.; Hao, X.Y.; Pan, B.B.; Wang, M.Y.; Ma, J.J.; Li, F.; Li, S.A.; Tong, Z.W. Synthesis and photocatalytic property of multilayered Co3O4. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 355, 547–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ani, I.J.; Akpan, U.G.; Olutoye, M.A.; Hameed, B.H. Photocatalytic degradation of pollutants in petroleum refinery wastewater by TiO2- and ZnO-based photocatalysts: Recent development. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 205, 930–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sinar Mashuri, S.I.; Ibrahim, M.L.; Kasim, M.F.; Mastuli, M.S.; Rashid, U.; Abdullah, A.H.; Islam, A.; Asikin Mijan, N.; Tan, Y.H.; Mansir, N.; et al. Photocatalysis for organic wastewater treatment: From the basis to current challenges for society. Catalysts 2020, 10, 1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kuruthukulangara, N.; Asharani, I.V. Photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B, a carcinogenic pollutant, by MgO nanoparticles. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2024, 160, 111873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Abdel-Aziz, M.M.; Emam, T.M.; Elsherbiny, E.A. Bioactivity of magnesium oxide nanoparticles synthesized from cell filtrate of endobacterium Burkholderia rinojensis against Fusarium oxysporum. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2020, 109, 110617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aničić, N.; Vukomanović, M.; Koklič, T.; Suvorov, D. Fewer defects in the surface slows the hydrolysis rate, decreases the ROS generation potential, and improves the non-ROS antimicrobial activity of MgO. Small 2018, 14, 1800205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Anand, K.V.; Anugraga, A.R.; Kannan, M.; Singaravelu, G.; Govindaraju, K. Bio-engineered magnesium oxide nanoparticles as nano-priming agent for enhancing seed germination and seedling vigour of green gram (Vigna radiata L.). Mater. Lett. 2020, 271, 127792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Verma, S.K.; Nisha, K.; Panda, P.K.; Patel, P.; Kumari, P.; Mallick, M.A.; Sarkar, B.; Das, B. Green synthesized MgO nanoparticles infer biocompatibility by reducing in vivo molecular nanotoxicity in embryonic zebrafish through arginine interaction elicited apoptosis. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 713, 136521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Baraket, L.; Ghorbel, A. Control preparation of aluminium chromium mixed oxides by sol-gel process. In Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis; Delmon, B., Jacobs, P.A., Maggi, R., Martens, J.A., Grange, P., Poncelet, G., Eds.; Preparation of Catalysts VII; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998; Volume 118, pp. 657–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Heo, Y.J.; Park, S.J. Facile synthesis of MgO-modified carbon adsorbents with microwave-assisted methods: Effect of MgO particles and porosities on CO2 capture. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Feng, S.H.; Li, G.H. Chapter 4—Hydrothermal and Solvothermal Syntheses. In Modern Inorganic Synthetic Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Xu, R., Xu, Y., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 73–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yeh, C.L. Combustion Synthesis: Principles and Applications. In Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rane, A.V.; Kanny, K.; Abitha, V.K.; Thomas, S. Methods for Synthesis of Nanoparticles and Fabrication of Nanocomposites. In Synthesis of Inorganic Nanomaterials; Mohan Bhagyaraj, S., Oluwafemi, O.S., Kalarikkal, N., Thomas, S., Eds.; Micro and Nano Technologies; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2018; pp. 121–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pal, G.; Rai, P.; Pandey, A. Green synthesis of nanoparticles: A greener approach for a cleaner future. In Green Synthesis, Characterization and Applications of Nanoparticles; Shukla, A.K., Iravani, S., Eds.; Micro and Nano Technologies; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lai, Y.F.; Chaudouët, P.; Charlot, F.; Matko, I.; Dubourdieu, C. Magnesium oxide nanowires synthesized by pulsed liquid-injection metal organic chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 022904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sirota, V.; Selemenev, V.; Kovaleva, M.; Pavlenko, I.; Mamunin, K.; Dokalov, V.; Prozorova, M. Synthesis of magnesium oxide nanopowder by thermal plasma using magnesium nitrate hexahydrate. Phys. Res. Int. 2016, 4, 6853405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gandhi, S.; Abiramipriya, P.; Pooja, N.; Jeyakumari, J.J.L.; Arasi, A.Y.; Dhanalakshmi, V.; Gopinathan, M.R.; Anbarasan, R. Synthesis and characterizations of nano-sized MgO and its nano composite with poly(vinyl alcohol). J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2011, 357, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bartley, J.K.; Xu, C.; Lloyd, R.; Enache, D.I.; Knight, D.W.; Hutchings, G.J. Simple method to synthesize high surface area magnesium oxide and its use as a heterogeneous base catalyst. Appl. Catal. B 2012, 128, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, H.; Hu, J.; Xie, J.; Wang, S.; Cao, Y. A solid-state chemical method for synthesizing MgO nanoparticles with superior adsorption properties. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 2011–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gatou, M.-A.; Skylla, E.; Dourou, P.; Pippa, N.; Gazouli, M.; Lagopati, N.; Pavlatou, E.A. Magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles: Synthetic strategies and biomedical applications. Crystals 2024, 14, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jeevanandam, J.; Chan, Y.S.; Danquah, M.K. Calcination-dependent morphology transformation of sol-gel-synthesized MgO nanoparticles. ChemistrySelect 2017, 2, 10393–10404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mirzaei, H.; Davoodnia, A. Microwave assisted sol-gel synthesis of MgO nanoparticles and their catalytic activity in the synthesis of hantzsch 1,4-dihydropyridines. Chin. J. Catal. 2012, 33, 1502–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wong, C.W.; Chan, Y.S.; Jeevanandam, J.; Pal, K.; Bechelany, M.; Abd Elkodous, M.; El-Sayyad, G.S. Response surface methodology optimization of mono-dispersed MgO nanoparticles fabricated by ultrasonic-assisted sol-gel method for outstanding antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities. J. Clust. Sci. 2020, 31, 367–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mashayekh-Salehi, A.; Moussavi, G.; Yaghmaeian, K. Preparation, characterization and catalytic activity of a novel mesoporous nanocrystalline MgO nanoparticle for ozonation of acetaminophen as an emerging water contaminant. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 310, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gajengi, A.L.; Sasaki, T.; Bhanage, B.M. Mechanistic aspects of formation of MgO nanoparticles under microwave irradiation and its catalytic application. Adv. Powder Technol. 2017, 28, 1185–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Najafi, A. A novel synthesis method of hierarchical mesoporous MgO nanoflakes employing carbon nanoparticles as the hard templates for photocatalytic degradation. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 5813–5818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. John Sushma, N.; Prathyusha, D.; Swathi, G.; Madhavi, T.; Deva Prasad Raju, B.; Mallikarjuna, K.; Kim, H.S. Facile approach to synthesize magnesium oxide nanoparticles by using Clitoria ternatea-characterization and in vitro antioxidant studies. Appl. Nanosci. 2016, 6, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Aljabali, A.A.A.; Obeid, M.A.; Bakshi, H.A.; Alshaer, W.; Ennab, R.M.; Al-Trad, B.; Al Khateeb, W.; Al-Batayneh, K.M.; Al-Kadash, A.; Alsotari, S.; et al. Synthesis, characterization, and assessment of anti-cancer potential of ZnO nanoparticles in an in vitro model of breast cancer. Molecules 2022, 27, 1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Almontasser, A.; Parveen, A.; Azam, A. Synthesis, Characterization and antibacterial activity of magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 577, 012051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Limón-Rocha, I.; Guzmán-González, C.A.; Anaya-Esparza, L.M.; Romero-Toledo, R.; Rico, J.L.; González-Vargas, O.A.; Pérez-Larios, A. Effect of the precursor on the synthesis of ZnO and its photocatalytic activity. Inorganics 2022, 10, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Levin, A.A.; Narykova, M.V.; Lihachev, A.I.; Kardashev, B.K.; Kadomtsev, A.G.; Brunkov, P.N.; Panfilov, A.G.; Prasolov, N.D.; Sultanov, M.M.; Kuryanov, V.N.; et al. Modification of the structural, microstructural, and elastoplastic properties of aluminum wires after operation. Metals 2021, 11, 1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gatou, M.-A.; Fiorentis, E.; Lagopati, N.; Pavlatou, E.A. Photodegradation of rhodamine B and phenol using TiO2/SiO2 composite nanoparticles: A comparative study. Water 2023, 15, 2773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rani, N.; Chahal, S.; Chauhan, A.S.; Kumar, P.; Shukla, R.; Singh, S.K. X-ray analysis of MgO nanoparticles by modified Scherer’s Williamson-Hall and size-strain method. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 12, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rosauer, E.A.; Handy, R.L. Crystallite-size determination of MgO by X-ray diffraction line broadening. Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci. 1961, 68, 357–371. Available online: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol68/iss1/53 (accessed on 10 August 2024).
  56. Savita, S.; Jain, M.; Manju, M.; Vij, A.; Thakur, A. Impact of annealing on the structural properties of MgO nanoparticles by XRD analysis and Rietveld refinement. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2093, 020024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Boiocchi, M.; Caucia, F.; Merli, M.; Prella, D.; Ungaretti, L. Crystal-chemical reasons for the immiscibility of periclase and wüstite under lithospheric P, T conditions. Eur. J. Mineral. 2001, 13, 871–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zak, A.K.; Majid, W.A.; Abrishami, M.E.; Yousefi, R. X-ray analysis of ZnO nanoparticles by Williamson-Hall and size-strain plot methods. Solid State Sci. 2011, 13, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tripathi, A.K.; Singh, M.K.; Mathpal, M.C.; Mishra, S.K.; Agarwal, A. Study of structural transformation in TiO2 nanoparticles and its optical properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 549, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Prabhu, R.R.; Abdul Khadar, M. Study of optical phonon modes of CdS nanoparticles using Raman spectroscopy. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2008, 31, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kurian, M.; Kunjachan, C. Investigation of size dependency on lattice strain of nanoceria particles synthesised by wet chemical methods. Int. Nano Lett. 2014, 4, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Khaleel, W.A.; Sadeq, S.A.; Alani, I.A.M.; Ahmed, M.H.M. Magnesium oxide (MgO) thin film as saturable absorber for passively mode locked erbium-doped fiber laser. Opt. Laser Technol. 2019, 115, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sutradhar, N.; Sinhamahapatra, A.; Pahari, S.K.; Pal, P.; Bajaj, H.C.; Mukhopadhyay, I.; Panda, A.B. Controlled synthesis of different morphologies of MgO and their use as solid base catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 12308–12316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kaningini, G.A.; Azizi, S.; Nyoni, H.; Mudau, F.N.; Mohale, K.C.; Maaza, M. Green synthesis and characterization of zinc oxide nanoparticles using bush tea (Athrixia phylicoides DC) natural extract: Assessment of the synthesis process. F1000Research 2021, 10, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Al-Arjan, W.S. Zinc oxide nanoparticles and their application in adsorption of toxic dye from aqueous solution. Polymers 2022, 14, 3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A.; Olivier, J.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Turcu, E.; Coromelci, C.G.; Harabagiu, V.; Ignat, M. Enhancing the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 for the degradation of Congo red dye by adjusting the ultrasonication regime applied in its synthesis procedure. Catalysts 2023, 13, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Khairallah, F.; Glisenti, A. XPS study of MgO nanopowders obtained by different preparation procedures. Surf. Sci. Spectra 2006, 13, 58–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ardizzone, S.; Bianchi, C.L.; Fadoni, M.; Vercelli, B. Magnesium salts and oxide: An XPS overview. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1997, 119, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Proniewicz, E.; Vijayan, A.M.; Surma, O.; Szkudlarek, A.; Molenda, M. Plant-assisted green synthesis of MgO nanoparticles as a sustainable material for bone regeneration: Spectroscopic properties. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 4242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Srivastava, V.; Sharma, Y.C.; Sillanpää, M. Green synthesis of magnesium oxide nanoflower and its application for the removal of divalent metallic species from synthetic wastewater. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 6702–6709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mourdikoudis, S.; Pallares, R.M.; Thanh, N.T. Characterization techniques for nanoparticles: Comparison and complementarity upon studying nanoparticle properties. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 12871–12934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bélteky, P.; Rónavári, A.; Zakupszky, D.; Boka, E.; Igaz, N.; Szerencsés, B.; Pfeiffer, I.; Vágvölgyi, C.; Kiricsi, M.; Kónya, Z. Are smaller nanoparticles always better? Understanding the biological effect of size-dependent silver nanoparticle aggregation under biorelevant conditions. Int. J. Nanomed. 2021, 16, 3021–3040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ramezani Farani, M.; Farsadrooh, M.; Zare, I.; Gholami, A.; Akhavan, O. Green synthesis of magnesium oxide nanoparticles and nanocomposites for photocatalytic antimicrobial, antibiofilm and antifungal applications. Catalysts 2023, 13, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Danaei, M.; Dehghankhold, M.; Ataei, S.; Hasanzadeh Davarani, F.; Javanmard, R.; Dokhani, A.; Khorasani, S.; Mozafari, M.R. Impact of particle size and polydispersity index on the clinical applications of lipidic nanocarrier systems. Pharmaceutics 2018, 10, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yuan, T.; Gao, L.; Zhan, W.; Dini, D. Effect of particle size and surface charge on nanoparticles diffusion in the brain white matter. Pharm. Res. 2022, 39, 767–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Sharma, S.K.; Gupta, S.M. Preparation and evaluation of stable nanofluids for heat transfer application: A review. Exp. Therm Fluid Sci. 2016, 79, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gatou, M.-A.; Kontoliou, K.; Volla, E.; Karachalios, K.; Raptopoulos, G.; Paraskevopoulou, P.; Lagopati, N.; Pavlatou, E.A. Optimization of ZnO nanoparticles’ synthesis via precipitation method applying Taguchi robust design. Catalysts 2023, 13, 1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kumar, A.; Kumar, J. On the synthesis and optical absorption studies of nano-size magnesium oxide powder. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2008, 69, 2764–2772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kurth, M.; Graat, P.C.J.; Mittemeijer, E.J. The oxidation kinetics of magnesium at low temperatures and low oxygen partial pressures. Thin Solid Films 2006, 500, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sun, M.; Fang, Y.; Sun, S.; Wang, Y. Surface co-modification of TiO2 with N doping and Ag loading for enhanced visible-light photoactivity. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 12272–12279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Nagappa, B.; Chandrappa, G.T. Mesoporous nanocrystalline magnesium oxide for environmental remediation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2007, 106, 212–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lagopati, N.; Kitsiou, P.; Kontos, A.; Venieratos, P.; Kotsopoulou, E.; Kontos, A.; Dionysiou, D.; Pispas, S.; Tsilibary, E.; Falaras, P. Photo-induced treatment of breast epithelial cancer cells using nanostructured titanium dioxide solution. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2010, 214, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Fu, H.; Pan, C.; Yao, W.; Zhu, Y. Visible-light-induced degradation of rhodamine B by nanosized Bi2WO6. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 22432–22439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Uribe-López, M.C.; Hidalgo-López, M.C.; López-González, R.; Frías-Márquez, D.M.; Núñez-Nogueira, G.; Hernández-Castillo, D.; Alvarez-Lemus, M.A. Photocatalytic activity of ZnO nanoparticles and the role of the synthesis method on their physical and chemical properties. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2021, 404, 112866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Dodoo-Arhin, D.; Asiedu, T.; Agyei-Tuffour, B.; Nyankson, E.; Obada, D.; Mwabora, J.M. Photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine dyes using zinc oxide nanoparticles. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 38, 809–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hu, C.; Lu, T.; Chen, F.; Zhang, R.; Lian, C.; Zheng, S.; Hu, Q.; Duo, S. Enhancement of photocatalytic performance of TiO2 produced by an alcohothermal approach through inclusion of water. Mater. Res. Bull. 2014, 53, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bhatkhande, D.S.; Pangarkar, V.G.; Beenackers, A.A.C.M. Photocatalytic degradation for environmental applications-a review. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2002, 77, 102–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kader, D.A.; Mohammed, S.J. Emerging developments in dye-sensitized metal oxide photocatalysis: Exploring the design, mechanisms, and organic synthesis applications. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 26484–26508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Trenczek-Zajac, A.; Synowiec, M.; Zakrzewska, K.; Zazakowny, K.; Kowalski, K.; Dziedzic, A.; Radecka, M. Scavenger-supported photocatalytic evidence of an extended type I electronic structure of the TiO2@Fe2O3 interface. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 38255–38269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Algethami, F.K.; Katouah, H.A.; Al-Omar, M.A.; Almehizia, A.A.; Amr, A.E.G.E.; Naglah, A.M.; Al-Shakliah, N.S.; Fetoh, M.E.; Youssef, H.M. Facile synthesis of magnesium oxide nanoparticles for studying their photocatalytic activities against orange G dye and biological activities against some bacterial and fungal strains. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2021, 31, 2150–2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Farhadian, N.; Akbarzadeh, R.; Pirsaheb, M.; Jen, T.C.; Fakhri, Y.; Asadi, A. Chitosan modified N, S-doped TiO2 and N, S-doped ZnO for visible light photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 132, 360–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Iskandar, F.; Nandiyanto, A.; Yun, K.; Hogan, C., Jr.; Okuyama, K.; Biswas, P. Enhanced photocatalytic performance of brookite TiO2 macroporous particles prepared by spray drying with colloidal templating. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 1408–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Mohod, A.V.; Momotko, M.; Shah, N.S.; Marchel, M.; Imran, M.; Kong, L.; Boczkaj, G. Degradation of Rhodamine dyes by Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs)-Focus on caviatation and photocatalysis—A critical review. Water Resour. Ind. 2023, 30, 100220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Chen, F.; Zhao, J.; Hidaka, H. Highly selective deethylation of rhodamine B: Adsorption and photooxidation pathways of the dye on the TiO2/SiO2 composite photocatalyst. Int. J. Photoenergy 2003, 5, 674957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Taniguchi, M.; Lindsey, J.S. Database of absorption and fluorescence spectra of> 300 common compounds for use in photochem CAD. J. Photochem. Photobiol. 2018, 94, 290–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Sudrajat, H.; Babel, S. Comparison and mechanism of photocatalytic activities of N-ZnO and N-ZrO2 for the degradation of rhodamine 6G. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 10177–10188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Gatou, M.-A.; Lagopati, N.; Vagena, I.-A.; Gazouli, M.; Pavlatou, E.A. ZnO nanoparticles from different precursors and their photocatalytic potential for biomedical use. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Ruíz-Santoyo, V.; Marañon-Ruiz, V.F.; Romero-Toledo, R.; González Vargas, O.A.; Pérez-Larios, A. Photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B and methylene orange using TiO2-ZrO2 as nanocomposite. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Tsoukleris, D.S.; Gatou, M.-A.; Lagopati, N.; Sygellou, L.; Christodouleas, D.C.; Falaras, P.; Pavlatou, E.A. Chemically modified TiO2 photocatalysts as an alternative disinfection approach for municipal wastewater treatment plant effluents. Water 2023, 15, 2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Yudasari, N.; Anugrahwidya, R.; Tahir, D.; Suliyanti, M.M.; Herbani, Y.; Imawan, C.; Khalil, M.; Djuhana, D. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine 6G (R6G) using ZnO–Ag nanoparticles synthesized by pulsed laser ablation in liquid (PLAL). J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 886, 161291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Phindile Khoza, P.; Nyokong, T. Visible light transformation of Rhodamine 6G using tetracarbazole zinc phthalocyanine when embedded in electrospun fibers and in the presence of ZnO and Ag particles. J. Coord. Chem. 2015, 68, 1117–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Karthikeyan, V.; Dhanapandian, S.; Manoharan, C. Characterization and antibacterial behavior of MgO-PEG nanoparticles synthesized via co-precipitation method. Int. Lett. Chem. Phys. Astron. 2016, 70, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Mehta, M.; Mukhopadhyay, M.; Christian, R.; Mistry, N. Synthesis and characterization of MgO nanocrystals using strong and weak bases. Powder Technol. 2012, 226, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Sugiarto, I.T.; Putri, K.Y. Analysis of dual peak emission from Rhodamine 6G organic dyes using photoluminescence. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2017, 817, 012047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD diffractogram of the as-prepared MgO powder.
Figure 1. XRD diffractogram of the as-prepared MgO powder.
Molecules 29 04299 g001
Figure 2. FT-IR spectrum of the synthesized MgO powder.
Figure 2. FT-IR spectrum of the synthesized MgO powder.
Molecules 29 04299 g002
Figure 3. N2-sorption diagram of the prepared MgO powder (sorption: black line; desorption: red line). The pore size distribution utilizing the BJH approach is indicated in the inset.
Figure 3. N2-sorption diagram of the prepared MgO powder (sorption: black line; desorption: red line). The pore size distribution utilizing the BJH approach is indicated in the inset.
Molecules 29 04299 g003
Figure 4. Wide survey XPS spectrum of the studied MgO powder.
Figure 4. Wide survey XPS spectrum of the studied MgO powder.
Molecules 29 04299 g004
Figure 5. Deconvoluted O1s peak of the synthesized MgO powder.
Figure 5. Deconvoluted O1s peak of the synthesized MgO powder.
Molecules 29 04299 g005
Figure 6. TGA spectrum of the as-prepared MgO powder.
Figure 6. TGA spectrum of the as-prepared MgO powder.
Molecules 29 04299 g006
Figure 7. Representative FESEM image of the examined MgO powder at ×100,000 magnification.
Figure 7. Representative FESEM image of the examined MgO powder at ×100,000 magnification.
Molecules 29 04299 g007
Figure 8. RhB’s degradation curve for the studied MgO powder vs. time upon (a) UV light exposure and (b) visible-light exposure. RhB’s photolysis and degradation under dark conditions are also included.
Figure 8. RhB’s degradation curve for the studied MgO powder vs. time upon (a) UV light exposure and (b) visible-light exposure. RhB’s photolysis and degradation under dark conditions are also included.
Molecules 29 04299 g008
Figure 9. Photocatalytic kinetic model studies for the studied MgO powder, based on a pseudo-first-order model upon UV and visible light illumination.
Figure 9. Photocatalytic kinetic model studies for the studied MgO powder, based on a pseudo-first-order model upon UV and visible light illumination.
Molecules 29 04299 g009
Figure 10. Scavenging trials for RhB’s degradation over MgO powder under (a) UV and (b) visible light exposure.
Figure 10. Scavenging trials for RhB’s degradation over MgO powder under (a) UV and (b) visible light exposure.
Molecules 29 04299 g010
Figure 11. Proposed photocatalytic mechanism of MgO powder towards RhB degradation under both UV and visible light exposure.
Figure 11. Proposed photocatalytic mechanism of MgO powder towards RhB degradation under both UV and visible light exposure.
Molecules 29 04299 g011
Figure 12. Reusability effectiveness of MgO powder after five experimental photocatalytic trials towards RhB degradation upon (a) UV and (b) visible light illumination.
Figure 12. Reusability effectiveness of MgO powder after five experimental photocatalytic trials towards RhB degradation upon (a) UV and (b) visible light illumination.
Molecules 29 04299 g012
Figure 13. Degradation curves of R6G for the studied MgO powder vs. time upon UV and visible light exposure. R6G’s photolysis and degradation under dark conditions are also included.
Figure 13. Degradation curves of R6G for the studied MgO powder vs. time upon UV and visible light exposure. R6G’s photolysis and degradation under dark conditions are also included.
Molecules 29 04299 g013
Figure 14. Selectivity of MgO photocatalyst.
Figure 14. Selectivity of MgO photocatalyst.
Molecules 29 04299 g014
Figure 15. Photocatalytic kinetic model studies for the examined MgO powder, based on a pseudo-first-order model upon UV and visible light illumination.
Figure 15. Photocatalytic kinetic model studies for the examined MgO powder, based on a pseudo-first-order model upon UV and visible light illumination.
Molecules 29 04299 g015
Figure 16. Scavenging trials for R6G’s degradation over MgO powder under (a) UV and (b) visible light exposure.
Figure 16. Scavenging trials for R6G’s degradation over MgO powder under (a) UV and (b) visible light exposure.
Molecules 29 04299 g016
Figure 17. Reusability effectiveness of MgO powder after five experimental photocatalytic trials towards R6G degradation upon (a) UV and (b) visible light illumination.
Figure 17. Reusability effectiveness of MgO powder after five experimental photocatalytic trials towards R6G degradation upon (a) UV and (b) visible light illumination.
Molecules 29 04299 g017
Figure 18. Schematic illustration for the synthetic procedure of MgO powder.
Figure 18. Schematic illustration for the synthetic procedure of MgO powder.
Molecules 29 04299 g018
Table 1. Comparison of various synthetic approaches towards MgO nanoparticles’ fabrication, regarding the average crystallite size and specific surface area.
Table 1. Comparison of various synthetic approaches towards MgO nanoparticles’ fabrication, regarding the average crystallite size and specific surface area.
Synthetic ApproachAverage Crystallite Size (nm)Specific Surface Area (m2/g)Reference
Sol–gel12–13-[42]
Microwave-assisted sol–gel9.5–10.5243.2[43]
Ultrasonic-assisted sol–gel19.2-[44]
Modified thermal/sol–gel23.6257.3[45]
Solid-state chemical10.5213[40]
Microwave irradiation1670[46]
Precipitation25216.9[47]
Table 2. Crystal lattice indices, average crystallite size, FWHM (Full Width at Half Maximum), and crystallinity index of the synthesized MgO powder.
Table 2. Crystal lattice indices, average crystallite size, FWHM (Full Width at Half Maximum), and crystallinity index of the synthesized MgO powder.
Sample IDCrystal Lattice Index
(a = b = c)
Average Crystallite Size
(D, nm) *
FWHMCI
(%)
abc
MgO4.21944.21944.21943.230.456280.49
* The (200) plane’s peak was used to estimate the crystallite size.
Table 3. d-Spacing calculations for MgO powder.
Table 3. d-Spacing calculations for MgO powder.
Bragg’s Angledhkl (Å)dhkl (nm)hkl
θ
36.8518.432.43720.2437111
42.8321.422.10970.2110200
61.2030.601.51320.1513220
74.5837.291.27140.1271311
78.5139.261.21730.1217222
Table 4. Data obtained via the BET approach. (a) Specific surface area estimated utilizing Brunauer–Emmett–Teller theory, (b) micropore surface area through t-plot analysis, based on the Harkins and Jura model, (c) cumulative volume of pores in the range 1.7 and 300 nm from N2-sorption data and the BJH desorption approach, and (d) average pore diameter, evaluated by the 4 V/σ approach (V was equated to the maximum volume of N2 adsorbed along the isotherm as P/Po → 1.0).
Table 4. Data obtained via the BET approach. (a) Specific surface area estimated utilizing Brunauer–Emmett–Teller theory, (b) micropore surface area through t-plot analysis, based on the Harkins and Jura model, (c) cumulative volume of pores in the range 1.7 and 300 nm from N2-sorption data and the BJH desorption approach, and (d) average pore diameter, evaluated by the 4 V/σ approach (V was equated to the maximum volume of N2 adsorbed along the isotherm as P/Po → 1.0).
Sample IDBET Surface Area
(m2/g)
Micropore Surface Area
(m2/g)
Cumulative Pore Volume
(cm3/g)
Average Pore Diameter
(nm)
MgO5220.321
Table 5. Size distribution and zeta potential data acquired from DLS measurements utilizing an aqueous dispersion solution of the examined MgO powder.
Table 5. Size distribution and zeta potential data acquired from DLS measurements utilizing an aqueous dispersion solution of the examined MgO powder.
Sample IDHydrodynamic Diameter (Dh)
(nm)
Zeta Potential
(mV)
PDI
MgO27.11 ± 0.93−50.8 ± 0.60.197 ± 0.093
Table 6. Kinetic parameters of the studied powder upon UV and visible light photocatalytic trials.
Table 6. Kinetic parameters of the studied powder upon UV and visible light photocatalytic trials.
Sample IDPseudo-First-Order Kinetic ModelPseudo-Second-Order Kinetic Model
k1 (min−1)R2k2 (g/mg·min)R2
MgO (visible)0.0020.97410.7470.778
MgO (UV)0.0120.9825.5450.906
Table 7. Kinetic parameters of the studied powder upon UV and visible light photocatalysis towards degradation of R6G dye.
Table 7. Kinetic parameters of the studied powder upon UV and visible light photocatalysis towards degradation of R6G dye.
Sample IDPseudo-First-Order Kinetic ModelPseudo-Second-Order Kinetic Model
k1 (min−1)R2k2 (g/mg·min)R2
MgO (visible)0.0020.9691.7720.911
MgO (UV)0.0140.9810.7560.907
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gatou, M.-A.; Bovali, N.; Lagopati, N.; Pavlatou, E.A. MgO Nanoparticles as a Promising Photocatalyst towards Rhodamine B and Rhodamine 6G Degradation. Molecules 2024, 29, 4299. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29184299

AMA Style

Gatou M-A, Bovali N, Lagopati N, Pavlatou EA. MgO Nanoparticles as a Promising Photocatalyst towards Rhodamine B and Rhodamine 6G Degradation. Molecules. 2024; 29(18):4299. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29184299

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gatou, Maria-Anna, Natalia Bovali, Nefeli Lagopati, and Evangelia A. Pavlatou. 2024. "MgO Nanoparticles as a Promising Photocatalyst towards Rhodamine B and Rhodamine 6G Degradation" Molecules 29, no. 18: 4299. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29184299

APA Style

Gatou, M. -A., Bovali, N., Lagopati, N., & Pavlatou, E. A. (2024). MgO Nanoparticles as a Promising Photocatalyst towards Rhodamine B and Rhodamine 6G Degradation. Molecules, 29(18), 4299. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29184299

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop