Next Article in Journal
Beneficial Effects of Melatonin Combined with Exercise on Endogenous Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells Proliferation after Spinal Cord Injury
Previous Article in Journal
Int6/eIF3e Is Essential for Proliferation and Survival of Human Glioblastoma Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Changing Microspatial Patterns of Sulfate-Reducing Microorganisms (SRM) during Cycling of Marine Stromatolite Mats
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 15
Issue 2
10.3390/ijms15022191
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Three-Dimensional Stratification of Bacterial Biofilm Populations in a Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor for Nitritation-Anammox

by
Robert Almstrand
1,†,
Frank Persson
2,
Holger Daims
3,
Maria Ekenberg
4,
Magnus Christensson
4,
Britt-Marie Wilén
2,
Fred Sörensson
1 and
Malte Hermansson
1,*
1
Department of Chemistry & Molecular Biology, Microbiology, University of Gothenburg, Box 462, Göteborg SE-405 30, Sweden
2
Water Environment Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg SE-412 96, Sweden
3
Division of Microbial Ecology, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria
4
AnoxKaldnes AB, Klosterängsvägen 11A, Lund SE-226 47, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Present address: Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, 1500 Illinois Street, Golden, CO 80401-1887, USA;
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15(2), 2191-2206; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15022191
Submission received: 23 December 2013 / Revised: 10 January 2014 / Accepted: 14 January 2014 / Published: 29 January 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofilms: Extracellular Bastions of Bacteria)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs) are increasingly used for nitrogen removal with nitritation-anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) processes in wastewater treatment. Carriers provide protected surfaces where ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and anammox bacteria form complex biofilms. However, the knowledge about the organization of microbial communities in MBBR biofilms is sparse. We used new cryosectioning and imaging methods for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to study the structure of biofilms retrieved from carriers in a nitritation-anammox MBBR. The dimensions of the carrier compartments and the biofilm cryosections after FISH showed good correlation, indicating little disturbance of biofilm samples by the treatment. FISH showed that Nitrosomonas europaea/eutropha-related cells dominated the AOB and Candidatus Brocadia fulgida-related cells dominated the anammox guild. New carriers were initially colonized by AOB, followed by anammox bacteria proliferating in the deeper biofilm layers, probably in anaerobic microhabitats created by AOB activity. Mature biofilms showed a pronounced three-dimensional stratification where AOB dominated closer to the biofilm-water interface, whereas anammox were dominant deeper into the carrier space and towards the walls. Our results suggest that current mathematical models may be oversimplifying these three-dimensional systems and unless the multidimensionality of these systems is considered, models may result in suboptimal design of MBBR carriers.

1. Introduction

Nitrogen removal with anaerobic ammonium oxidizing (anammox) bacteria is an emerging technology for treatment of high strength wastewater. In the process, aerobic ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) oxidize half of the ammonia to nitrite, which is used by anammox bacteria as electron acceptor for oxidizing the remaining ammonia to dinitrogen gas. In the more common full-scale configurations, the processes of nitritation and anammox occur in the same reactor [1]. The AOB and anammox bacteria can reside in suspended microbial assemblages as sludge and/or granules [2], or in biofilms attached to substrata [3]. One prerequisite for nitritation-anammox is the presence of both oxic and anoxic environments for AOB and anammox bacteria, respectively. This can be attained by alternating the environmental conditions in time, such as in a sequencing batch reactor [2]. In continuous reactors on the other hand, the microbial groups need to be separated in space, with anammox bacteria residing in anoxic zones of the microbial aggregates, provided by the oxygen demanding activities of AOB. In microbial granules, distinct patterns of stratification have been predicted by modelling and observed with microbiological methods, with AOB being located in the outer aerobic zone near the water interface and with anammox bacteria in the inner anoxic parts [4–8]. For nitritation-anammox biofilms on fixed substrata, the observed localization of microorganisms has been less straightforward. In several reactors, a seemingly scattered distribution of AOB and anammox bacteria has been observed [3,9–11], while in other reactors the distribution of microorganisms has been more orderly structured [12–14], indicating that the factors determining biofilm architecture are complex. Furthermore, there is a need for quantitative image analysis to reveal the actual distribution patterns of the biofilm microorganisms. For moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs), which are used today in full-scale nitritation-anammox [15,16], a recent investigation has indicated a more orderly biofilm structure [17], but detailed analysis of biofilm establishment and stratification is still lacking for these systems. One probable reason for this is the challenge to retreive and analyze undisrupted biofilms from the protected carrier compartments. Furthermore, biofilm modeling is a useful tool [18,19] to improve the efficiency of nitritation-anammox MBBRs. For these models a detailed knowledge about the distribution of microorganisms is fundamental.
In this study, we have utilized a cryosectioning approach for the retrieval and study of intact biofilm of different age from protected compartments of carriers residing in a nitritation-anammox MBBR. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) was used to identify the AOB and anammox populations. By combining FISH-CLSM with a newly developed digital image analysis method [20], the three-dimensional stratification of AOB and anammox bacteria in intact biofilms was determined and quantified. Differences between young and mature biofilms in terms of established AOB and anammox populations and biofilm structure were investigated. Finally, image analysis of total carrier compartment i.e., “wall-to-wall” biofilms, allowed an assessment of problems with biofilm retrieval and shrinkage from dehydration and cryo-embedding, which has often been suggested as a serious draw-back of these biofilm research methods.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Reactor Conditions

The nitritation-anammox MBBR was operated for three years. Our study covers 167 days at the end of the reactor runtime, from addition of new carriers to the final sampling. Reactor conditions during this period are summarized in Table 1. Since only trace amounts of organic carbon was added to the synthetic wastewater, and even though AOB in the biofilm could be a source for organic carbon per se [21,22], it is unlikely that denitrification would account for any significant nitrogen removal. The ratio of nitrate production to ammonia removal was 12%, which is close to the stoichiometric value for anammox bacteria of 11%, indicating that aerobic nitrite oxidation was not important [23].

2.2. Biofilm Retrieval and Sectioning

Cryo-embedding, followed by freezing and removal of the carrier plastic material enabled the retrieval of biofilm from within individual carrier compartments (for carrier details see Table S1). As shown in Figure S1, the cryosectioned biofilm maintained the square shape in the x, y dimensions. The deepest analyzed cryosections (i.e., in the z dimension, going into the carrier compartment) originated from at least 800 μm (Figure 1b). This corresponds to 80% and 53% of the maximum depth of the 2 and 3 mm carriers, respectively. Deeper layers can be analyzed, but long (in the z dimension) frozen biofilm structures can easily break. Previous studies [24,25] have observed that cryo-embedding and dehydration introduce severe distortion, such as shrinkage, to biofilm structure. Since the assembled micrograph squares represent a “wall-to-wall” x, y section of the biofilm (Figure 1a), and the fact that these were of the same dimension as the actual carrier compartment (Figure S1), we suggest that for these and similar types of biofilms, significant shrinkage is not introduced by the applied cryosectioning and hybridization protocols.

2.3. Bacterial Community Composition

A large FISH screening (Table S2) showed that the reactor community was made up of AOB in microcolonies and dense clusters of cells related to the Nitrosomonas europaea/eutropha lineage (cluster 7), hybridizing with the probe Nse1472. This was not unexpected considering the comparatively high ammonium concentrations in the reactor (average 314 mg N L−1). N. europaea/eutropha-related cells are generally encountered in systems with elevated ammonium concentrations [26] and may be regarded as AOB r-strategists with a comparatively high growth rate [27,28]. Simultaneous probe hybridization with Pla46 (targeting the order Planctomycetales), AMX820 (targeting the genera Ca. Brocadia and Ca. Kuenenia) and Bfu613 (targeting Ca. Brocadia fulgida) indicated that the anammox cells were related to Ca. Brocadia fulgida. Ca. Brocadia-like cells were also dominating the anammox population on biofilm carriers in a laboratory scale CANON reactor fed with concentrated anaerobic digestion reject water [29] and are possibly r-strategists among anammox bacteria [30]. Furthermore, filamentous cells targeted by probe CF319a (phylum Bacteroidetes among others), were rather evenly distributed, possibly providing structural support for the biofilm, as suggested earlier [31]. Very few NOB cells were present, as targeted by the probes for Nitrobacter, Nitrospira and Nitrotoga (Table S2), which was in accordance with the low aerobic nitrite oxidation (see above).

2.4. Biofilm Establishment on New Carriers

Anammox cells were almost completely absent from the relatively thin biofilms on the carriers incubated for five and a half months (Figure 2c,d). A few anammox microcolonies were found, usually in the compartment corners beneath biofilm dominated by approximately 80% of N. europaea/eutropha. Considering the DO concentration in the reactor (on average 3.6 mg L−1, Table 1), the results suggest a sequential colonization with initial formation of an AOB biofilm that with time created anaerobic microenvironments suitable for anammox bacteria in the deepest parts of the biofilm. It is likely that these environments first arose in the carrier corners, since the mature biofilms were thicker in the corners (336 ± 22 μm, average ± SD) than on the compartment sides (235 ± 19 μm). Thus, migration of intact AOB and anammox biofilm clusters alone cannot explain establishment of anammox on new carriers since AOB first needed to provide the anaerobic microenvironment. It has previously been shown that the desired stratification of AOB and anammox bacteria occurred only if anammox bacteria were established prior to AOB [13]. However, such orderly development was not necessary for stratification to develop here. The discovery of very few anammox bacteria after five and a half months suggests that the development took considerable time. Much faster establishment of anammox bacteria has been detected in anoxic reactors where AOB are not necessary to create anoxic microenvironments [32].

2.5. Biofilm Structure

As mentioned above, the biofilm was in general thicker in the corners than on the sides of the compartments. Biomass density, defined as the signal area of the Eub338 probe mix as a fraction of total compartment area (Figure S2), increased significantly with depth down to 400 μm (R2 = 0.4219, n = 17, α = 0.05). Thicker biofilms generally have a higher nitrogen removal, but modeling suggests improvements above a thickness of 750 μm to be small [33]. At more shallow depths (in the z dimension) erosion and detachment due to the shear forces, rather than electron donor or acceptor concentrations, may have controlled biofilm biomass. It was concluded that nitrifying biofilms on carriers fixed in a flow chamber generally showed enhanced erosion rather than growth when the flow rate increased, despite being supplied with more oxygen and substrate [19]. However, the relationship between carrier movement and the effect of flow velocity on biofilms in MBBRs is still uncertain [34].
The overall vertical distribution in the mature biofilms showed a significant decrease of AOB with carrier compartment depth (z dimension) (R2 = 0.80, n = 41, α = 0.01; Figure 1b). Similar to AOB, anammox cells grew in characteristic clusters or microcolonies of varying size and shape (Figure 2a,b), but instead increased significantly in relative abundance with depth from 180 μm down to 400 μm (R2 = 0.66, n = 17, α = 0.01; Figure 1b). In the horizontal (x, y) dimension AOB dominated in the center parts and anammox in the peripheral part, close to the carrier walls (Figure 3). The least variation in relative population abundance was closer to the walls, such as for anammox in the 0–100 μm section (Figure 3c). Here erosion effects would be less severe compared with the center section where the variation of AOB was quite large between different compartments (Figure 3g). The combination of FISH, CLSM and new image analysis approaches enabled, for the first time, a detailed investigation of the three-dimensional distribution of AOB and anammox bacteria in MBBR biofilms. A uniquely detailed picture emerged, where the distinct stratification of AOB and anammox bacteria agrees well with the general pattern observed in granular biomass [4–6]. The decrease in relative abundance of AOB with carrier depth (the z dimension) is possibly caused by oxygen limitation in the deeper parts, whereas anammox bacteria increased down to 400 μm depth, below which the abundance leveled out or even decreased. This distribution pattern suggests different functional properties of the microbial communities at different depths of the biofilm in the carrier, where the outer regions contain mainly aerobic nitrite producers whereas the inner regions contain mainly anaerobic nitrite consumers. This kind of information is particularly valuable for understanding the function of MBBRs, since the continuous movement of the carriers in the reactors cause uncertainties about the flux of substrate and electron acceptors to the biofilm [34] and impede microelectrode in situ analysis of the gradients of substrate and electron acceptors near and in the biofilms [19].

3. Experimental Procedures

3.1. Reactor Conditions

A laboratory scale (7.5 liter) MBBR reactor with biofilm carriers (Minichip, AnoxKaldnes, Lund, Sweden) fed with synthetic wastewater (see Supplementary Information) was operated for three years. The reactor conditions and process performance are shown in Table 1.

3.2. Biofilm Sampling and Preparation

Characteristics of the biofilm carriers are listed in Table S1. New carriers were added to the reactor on December 17th 2008. Carriers were sampled for initial biofilm screening on May 4th, 2009. On June 2nd 2009, carriers containing young (5.5 months old) or mature (>18 months old) biofilms were sampled from the reactor. The carriers were immediately fixed in 4% ice-cold paraformaldehyde (PFA; pH 7.2) on ice for at least 8 h. After fixation, the carriers were submerged in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2) for at least 20 min and thereafter cut in halves and stored in 1:1 (PBS:EtOH) at −20 °C until further use.
For screening of biofilm community composition the biofilm was brushed off from fixed halves of biofilm carriers, fixed again and homogenized [35].
For intact biofilm analyses fixed halves of biofilm carriers were embedded in Tissue-Tek® O.C.T.™ Compound (Sakura Finetek Europe B.V., Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands), placed in a closed and parafilm-sealed Petri dish (Sarstedt, Helsingborg, Sweden) and incubated overnight at +4 °C. Centrifuge tubes (15 mL) were cut, placed upside down and filled to the brim with OCT compound. Incubated biofilm carriers were placed on top and covered with OCT and put in a liquid nitrogen fume chamber for approximately 60 min, until frozen solid. Tubes were fixed firmly in a vice and the carriers were removed, thereby exposing solid biofilm squares on top of the tubes (Figure 1a) which were sealed with a covering layer of OCT, frozen and stored in −70 °C. Sectioning of the biofilm from 15 compartments into 10 μm thick slices was performed in a cryotome operating at −20 °C. The produced sections were collected on SuperFrost® Plus Gold microscope slides (Menzel GmbH & KG, Braunschweig, Germany) and stored in −20 °C.

3.3. Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization

Screening for AOB, NOB and anammox populations was performed on homogenized biofilms, sampled on 14 May 2009, using FISH [35].
On cryosectioned samples for intact biofilm analyses, OCT was removed by a 10 min submersion in 50% EtOH. Additional fixation, to ensure that all cells in the biofilm would be accessible to the fluorescent probes and FISH, was performed as described earlier [36,37]. The fluorescent probes and unlabeled competitors were obtained from Thermo Electron (Interactiva Division, Ulm, Germany) or MWG Biotech (Ebersberg, Germany). The probes were 5′ labeled with Cy3, Cy5, fluorescein or Alexa488. Hybridization was carried out at 46 °C for 2 (homogenized biofilm) or 4 h (cryosectioned biofilm), followed by washing at 48 °C for 10 min. Finally, the slides were rinsed in milli-Q water, air dried and mounted in Citifluor AF1 (Citifluor, London, UK). Each of the specific probes (Table S2) was hybridized together with the Eub338 probe mix for quantification of the relative probe signal.

3.4. Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy

Confocal micrographs were acquired using a Bio-Rad Radiance 2000 MP microscope (Bio-Rad, Hemel Hempstead, UK) with a Nikon Plan Fluor 40×/1.40 oil objective, a Red diode laser (638 nm), a He/Ne laser (543 nm), and an Argon laser (488 nm). Images for analysis of biofilm structure were collected with the bundled software LaserSharp 2000 as 8-bit images of 1024 × 1024 pixels (resolution: 3.30 pixels/μm), and Kalman filtration (n = 3). For quantification of biofilm populations in homogenized samples, 8-bit images of 512 × 512 pixels (resolution: 1.65 pixels/μm), Kalman filtration (n = 2) were acquired. The biovolume fractions were measured in 21 microscope fields from each replicate by acquiring three images from different planes in the z dimension for each randomly selected x and y position, as previously described [38].

3.5. Digital Image Analysis

For biofilm structure analysis, the acquired images from each section were assembled manually using Photoshop CS4 extended (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA) to obtain complete coverage of the carrier compartment biofilm in each image (i.e., “wall-to-wall” images). Here biofilm dimensions were measured to estimate shrinkage of the biofilm during cryosectioning, and biofilm thickness was measured (for details, see Supplementary Information). The biofilm images were then exported to the daime software version 2.0 [39] for measurements of the biovolume fractions of probe targeted bacteria in both homogenized and cryosectioned biofilm samples, and for measurements of the stratification in cryosectioned biofilms using the recently developed “Slicer” tool [20].

4. Conclusions

The applied cryosectioning and FISH protocols permitted retrieval and microscopy of intact biofilm from the MBBR carrier compartments with little biofilm distortion.
FISH data showed that N. europaea/eutropha-related organisms were the dominant AOB and that Ca. Brocadia fulgida-related organisms were the predominant anammox bacteria, suggesting a sequential colonization pattern of newly introduced carriers. Initial dominance of AOB was followed after about five and a half months by the establishment of anammox cells, probably as a result of formation of local anoxic micro-habitats by AOB.
By the use of novel digital image analysis tools and statistical analyses, substantial three-dimensional stratification of the mature biofilm was observed. In the z-dimension, the relative abundance of AOB decreased rapidly with depth, possibly due to oxygen limitation in the deeper parts of the carrier. In contrast, anammox bacteria increased in relative abundance down to a depth of 400 μm. A distinct horizontal (x, y), non-random distribution pattern was also observed, with AOB generally being most abundant in the center and anammox bacteria closer to the walls of the carrier compartments. We conclude that a true three-dimensional biofilm stratification can be expected in MBBR carrier systems, which should be taken into account when modeling and optimizing reactor performance and in the design of new MBBR carriers.

Supplementary Information

1. Reactor Medium

The synthetic reactor media consisted of the following per 100 L: 240 g NaHCO3, 120 g NH4Cl, 0.3 g pepton, 0.56 g KH2PO4, 70 mL 2M NaOH, 40 mL micro-nutrient solution consisting of (in g/L): 4.8 MgSO4·7H2O; 1.6 MnCl2·2H2O; 5.8 CaCl2·2H2O; 0.48 CoCl2·6H2O; 0.24 NiCl2·6H2O; 0.26 ZnCl2; 0.10 CuSO4·5H2O; 1.44 FeCl2·4H2O; 0.0005 BH3O3; 0.0022 Na2MoO4·2H2O; 0.00114 Na2SeO3·5H2O; 0.0014 Na3WO3·2H2O.

2. Measurement of Biofilm Carrier Compartment Size

The biofilm carrier compartment dimensions were measured using brightfield microscopy and an eyepiece grid. The area was measured at the surface, halfway to the center and at the center, i.e., the point farthest from the carrier surface. Note that due to the production method the carrier area decreases with depth down to the mid-point of the carrier. That is, the total carrier compartment, from one carrier surface to the other, has a slight “waist” at the center.

3. Digital Image Analysis of Biofilms

3.1. Estimation of Biofilm Shrinkage

For estimation of biofilm shrinkage due to the cryosectioning and FISH protocols, the sides and diagonals of each assembled biofilm square were measured on the Eub338mix images, using the ruler tool in Photoshop (CS4 extended; Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA). The dimensions were plotted and compared to the dimensions of the carrier compartments as determined by microscopy (see section 2 above).

3.2. Estimation of Mature Biofilm Thickness

For estimation of the mature biofilm thickness, 8 measurements, one from each side and corner of each Eub338mix image were recorded in Photoshop CS4. Obvious biofilm channels were ignored in the measurements.

3.3. Estimation of Biovolume Fraction of Populations

For estimation of the biovolume fraction of each population, an intensity threshold was set manually for each image, using the threshold function in Photoshop CS4. The resulting binary (black and white) images of probe-labeled biomass were exported as 16 megapixel TIFs to the digital image analysis software daime [39], where a noise reduction step was performed (“Noise reduction” function, number of non-zero neighbor pixels: 1). Due to the large size of the images, image resolution was reduced to 1 megapixel before measuring biovolume fractions. Following 2D segmentation of the binary images autofluorescent objects present in both the Nse1472 and Bfu613 images were removed. The biovolume fraction was calculated for each image after an additional step of artefact elimination [with the daime artifact rejection tool using a 50% congruency threshold and final congruency requirement between the specific probes and the biofilm reference (EUB338mix) of at least 90%]. Images of homogenized biofilm were analyzed through initial intensity thresholding (cutoff: 30), followed by RATS-L segmentation, followed by artifact elimination and calculation of the biovolume fraction of each specific probe-target population as part of the Eub388 probe mix with a >90% requirement for total congruency. The horizontal “wall-to-wall” population distribution was analyzed using the multidirectional Slicer tool in daime 2.0 [20], creating 100 μm thick virtual slices and applying a baseline smoothing of 20%. Relative population abundances were estimated for each virtual slice as described above.
Table
Table S1. Characteristics of biofilm carriers. *
Table S1. Characteristics of biofilm carriers. *
Carrier specificsType 1 1Type 2 1
Depth of carrier compartments (i.e., z dimension in figures)2 mm3 mm
Diameter of the carrier30 mm30 mm
Protected surface area per carrier2.73 × 10−3 m24.10 × 10−3 m2
Number of square compartments325325
*Minichip, AnoxKaldnes, Lund, Sweden.
1Two different carrier variants were used.
Table
Table S2. Oligonucleotide probes used for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in this study.
Table S2. Oligonucleotide probes used for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in this study.
Probe name 1TargetSequence (5′–3′)FA 2 [%]
Eub338 3Most BacteriaGCT GCC TCC CGT AGG AGT0–50
Amx820Anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing bacteria, Candidatus “Brocadia anammoxidans” and Candidatus “Kuenenia stuttgartiensis”AAA ACC CCT CTA CTT AGT GCC C40
Apr820Candidatus Anammoxoglobus propionicusAAA CCC CTC TAC CGA GTG CCC40
Ban162Candidatus Brocadia anammoxidansCGG TAG CCC CAA TTG CTT40
BS820Candidatus Scalindua wagneri, Candidatus Scalindua sorokiniiTAA TTC CCT CTA CTT AGT GCC C20
Bfu613Candidatus Brocadia fulgidaGGA TGC CGT TCT TCC GTT AAG CGG30
Sca1309Genus Candidatus ScalinduaTGG AGG CGA ATT TCA GCC TCC5
Scabr1114Candidatus Scalindua brodaeCCC GCT GGT AAC TAA AAA CAA G20
Pla46PlanctomycetalesGAC TTG CAT GCC TAA TCC30
Nso1225Most beta-proteobacterial AOBCGC CAT TGT ATT ACG TGT GA35
Nse1472Nitrosomonas europea, N. halophila, N. eutropha, Kraftisried-Isolat Nm103ACC CCA GTC ATG ACC CCC50
Ntspa662 4Genus NitrospiraGGA ATT CCG CGC TCC TCT35
Ntspa1151Sublineage II of the genus NitrospiraTTC TCC TGG GCA GTC TCT CC35–40
Ntspa1431Sublineage I of the genus NitrospiraTTG GCT TGG GCG ACT TCA35
Ntg840Nitrotoga arcticaCTA AGG AAG TCT CCT CCC10–20
Nit3 4Genus NitrobacterCCT GTG CTC CAT GCT CCG40
NmIINitrosomonas communis lineageTTA AGA CAC GTT CCG ATG TA35
Alf968Alphaproteobacteria, except of RickettsialesGGT AAG GTT CTG CGC GTT20
CF319aMost Flavobacteria, some Bacteroidetes, some SphingobacteriaTGG TCC GTG TCT CAG TAC35
Gam42a 4GammaproteobacteriaGCC TTC CCA CAT CGT TT35
1For probe specifications, see ProbeBase ( http://www.microbial-ecology.net/probebase/) [40];
2FA = Formamide;
3Used in a mix together with Eub338 II, III and IV; and
4Used together with an unlabeled oligonucleotide competitor as indicated in the reference.
  • Figure S1:

    Scatter plot of area versus depth (z) for the assembled confocal micrographs (open circles) and Microchip compartment area as determined by light microscopy (closed circles). N.B. due to the production method the carrier area decreases with depth down to the mid-point of the carrier. That is, the total carrier compartment, from one carrier surface to the other, has a slight “waist” at the center. The area of the confocal micrographs was measured in the biofilm reference (Eub338) channel. Error bars = 95% confidence interval.

  • Figure S2:

    Scatter plot of total biomass areal density fraction vs. depth into the carrier. Each data point corresponds to the percentage coverage of the Eub338 probe mix, as determined by FISH, of the community in an assembled “wall-to-wall” micrograph from the indicated depth in the mature biofilm.

    • Acknowledgments

    We acknowledge financial support from The Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (Formas, contract no. 214-2004-1678, 243-2008-131 and 2010-2259, 211-2010-140); The Royal Society of Sciences and Letters in Gothenburg (Kungliga Vetenskaps- och Vitterhetssamhället i Göteborg); Göteborgs universitets donationsfonder (contract B432 28/06); and Adlerbertska forskningsfonden (contract B432 835/07). We would like to thank the technical staff at AnoxKaldnes for sampling assistance and pilot plant maintenance. We also thank Alma Masić for valuable suggestions and discussions.

    Conflicts of Interest

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.
    • Author ContributionsM.H., M.C., R.A., F.S. initiated the project. M.H., R.A., F.S. designed the experiment and R.A., M.E., M.C. carried out the laboratory work. RA did biofilm retrieval and preparation, microscopy and image analyses, R.A., H.D., M.H., F.P., F.S. analyzed data and R.A., F.P., M.H., H.D,. B.M.W. wrote the manuscript.

    References

    1. Vlaeminck, S.E.; de Clippeleir, H.; Verstraete, W. Microbial resource management of one-stage partial nitritation/anammox. Microb. Biotechnol 2012, 5, 433–448. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
    2. Sliekers, A.O.; Derwort, N.; Gomez, J.L.C.; Strous, M.; Kuenen, J.G.; Jetten, M.S.M. Completely autotrophic nitrogen removal over nitrite in one single reactor. Water Res 2002, 36, 2475–2482. [Google Scholar]
    3. Pynaert, K.; Smets, B.F.; Wyffels, S.; Beheydt, D.; Siciliano, S.D.; Verstraete, W. Characterization of an autotrophic nitrogen-removing biofilm from a highly loaded lab-scale rotating biological contactor. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 2003, 69, 3626–3635. [Google Scholar]
    4. Vlaeminck, S.E.; Terada, A.; Smets, B.F.; de Clippeleir, H.; Schaubroeck, T.; Bolca, S.; Demeestere, L.; Mast, J.; Boon, N.; Carballa, M.; Verstraete, W. Aggregate size and architecture determine microbial activity balance for one-stage partial nitritation and anammox. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 2010, 76, 900–909. [Google Scholar]
    5. Vazquez-Padin, J.; Mosquera-Corral, A.; Campos, J.L.; Mendez, R.; Revsbech, N.P. Microbial community distribution and activity dynamics of granular biomass in a canon reactor. Water. Res 2010, 44, 4359–4370. [Google Scholar]
    6. Winkler, M.K.H.; Kleerebezem, R.; Kuenen, J.G.; Yang, J.J.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. Segregation of biomass in cyclic anaerobic/aerobic granular sludge allows the enrichment of anaerobic ammonium oxidizing bacteria at low temperatures. Environ. Sci. Technol 2011, 45, 7330–7337. [Google Scholar]
    7. Ni, B.J.; Chen, Y.P.; Liu, S.Y.; Fang, F.; Xie, W.M.; Yu, H.Q. Modeling a granule-based anaerobic ammonium oxidizing (anammox) process. Biotechnol. Bioeng 2009, 103, 490–499. [Google Scholar]
    8. Volcke, E.I.P.; Picioreanu, C.; de Baets, B.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. The granule size distribution in an anammox-based granular sludge reactor affects the conversion-implications for modeling. Biotechnol. Bioeng 2012, 109, 1629–1636. [Google Scholar]
    9. Vlaeminck, S.E.; Terada, A.; Smets, B.F.; van der Linden, D.; Boon, N.; Verstraete, W.; Carballa, M. Nitrogen removal from digested black water by one-stage partial nitritation and anammox. Environ. Sci. Technol 2009, 43, 5035–5041. [Google Scholar]
    10. Qiao, S.; Nishiyama, T.; Fujii, T.; Bhatti, Z.; Furukawa, K. Rapid startup and high rate nitrogen removal from anaerobic sludge digester liquor using a snap process. Biodegradation 2012, 23, 157–164. [Google Scholar]
    11. Liu, T.; Li, D.; Zeng, H.; Li, X.; Liang, Y.; Chang, X.; Zhang, J. Distribution and genetic diversity of functional microorganisms in different canon reactors. Bioresour. Technol 2012, 123, 574–580. [Google Scholar]
    12. Chen, H.; Liu, S.; Yang, F.; Xue, Y.; Wang, T. The development of simultaneous partial nitrification, anammox and denitrification (snad) process in a single reactor for nitrogen removal. Bioresour. Technol 2009, 100, 1548–1554. [Google Scholar]
    13. Cho, S.; Fujii, N.; Lee, T.; Okabe, S. Development of a simultaneous partial nitrification and anaerobic ammonia oxidation process in a single reactor. Bioresour. Technol 2011, 102, 652–659. [Google Scholar]
    14. Tsushima, I.; Ogasawara, Y.; Kindaichi, T.; Satoh, H.; Okabe, S. Development of high-rate anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing (anammox) biofilm reactors. Water Res 2007, 41, 1623–1634. [Google Scholar]
    15. Plaza, E.; Stridh, S.; Örnmark, J.; Kanders, L.; Trela, J. Swedish experiences of the deammonification process in a biofilm system. Proceedings of WEF-IWA Conference on Nutrient Recovery and Management, Miami, FL, USA, 9–12 January 2011.
    16. Christensson, M.; Ekström, S.; Andersson Chan, A.; Le Vaillant, E.; Lemaire, R. Experience from start-ups of the first anita mox plants. Water Sci. Technol 2013, 67, 2677–2684. [Google Scholar]
    17. Persson, F.; Sultana, R.; Suarez, M.; Hermansson, M.; Plaza, E.; Wilén, B.-M. Structure and composition of biofilm communities in a moving bed biofilm reactor for nitritation-anammox at low temperatures. Bioresour. Technol 2014, 154, 267–273. [Google Scholar]
    18. Alpkvist, E.; Bengtsson, J.; Overgaard, N.C.; Christensson, M.; Heyden, A. Simulation of nitrification of municipal wastewater in a Moving Bed™ biofilm process: A bottom-up approach based on a 2D-continuum model for growth and detachment. Water Sci. Technol 2007, 55, 247–255. [Google Scholar]
    19. Masic, A.; Bengtsson, J.; Christensson, M. Measuring and modeling the oxygen profile in a nitrifying moving bed biofilm reactor. Math. Biosci 2010, 227, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
    20. Almstrand, R.; Daims, H.; Persson, F.; Sorensson, F.; Hermansson, M. New methods for analysis of spatial distribution and coaggregation of microbial populations in complex biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 2013, 79, 5978–5987. [Google Scholar]
    21. Kindaichi, T.; Ito, T.; Okabe, S. Ecophysiological interaction between nitrifying bacteria and heterotrophic bacteria in autotrophic nitrifying biofilms as determined by microautoradiography-fluorescence in situ hybridization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 2004, 70, 1641–1650. [Google Scholar]
    22. Okabe, H.; Kindaichi, T.; Nakamura, K.; Ito, T. Eco-physiology of autotrophic nitrifying biofilms. Water Sci. Technol 2005, 52, 225–232. [Google Scholar]
    23. Strous, M.; Heijnen, J.J.; Kuenen, J.G.; Jetten, M.S.M. The sequencing batch reactor as a powerful tool for the study of slowly growing anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing microorganisms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 1998, 50, 589–596. [Google Scholar]
    24. De Beer, D.; Stoodley, P.; Roe, F.; Lewandowski, Z. Effects of biofilm structures on oxygen distribution and mass transport. Biotechnol. Bioeng 1994, 43, 1131–1138. [Google Scholar]
    25. Daims, H.; Wagner, M. In situ techniques and digital image analysis methods for quantifying spatial localization patterns of nitrifiers and other microorganisms in biofilm and flocs. Method Enzymol 2011, 496, 185–215. [Google Scholar]
    26. Juretschko, S.; Timmermann, G.; Schmid, M.; Schleifer, K.H.; Pommerening-Roser, A.; Koops, H.P.; Wagner, M. Combined molecular and conventional analyses of nitrifying bacterium diversity in activated sludge: Nitrosococcus mobilis and nitrospira-like bacteria as dominant populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 1998, 64, 3042–3051. [Google Scholar]
    27. Koops, H.P.; Pommerening-Roser, A. Distribution and ecophysiology of the nitrifying bacteria emphasizing cultured species. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol 2001, 37, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
    28. Bollmann, A.; Bar-Gilissen, M.J.; Laanbroek, H.J. Growth at low ammonium concentrations and starvation response as potential factors involved in niche differentiation among ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 2002, 68, 4751–4757. [Google Scholar]
    29. Park, H.; Rosenthal, A.; Jezek, R.; Ramalingam, K.; Fillos, J.; Chandran, K. Impact of inocula and growth mode on the molecular microbial ecology of anaerobic ammonia oxidation (anammox) bioreactor communities. Water Res 2010, 44, 5005–5013. [Google Scholar]
    30. Van der Star, W.R.; Miclea, A.I.; van Dongen, U.G.; Muyzer, G.; Picioreanu, C.; van Loosdrecht, M.C. The membrane bioreactor: A novel tool to grow anammox bacteria as free cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng 2008, 101, 286–294. [Google Scholar]
    31. Egli, K.; Bosshard, F.; Werlen, C.; Lais, P.; Siegrist, H.; Zehnder, A.J.B.; van der Meer, J.R. Microbial composition and structure of a rotating biological contactor biofilm treating ammonium-rich wastewater without organic carbon. Microb. Ecol 2003, 45, 419–432. [Google Scholar]
    32. Isaka, K.; Date, Y.; Sumino, T.; Yoshie, S.; Tsuneda, S. Growth characteristic of anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing bacteria in an anaerobic biological filtrated reactor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 2006, 70, 47–52. [Google Scholar]
    33. Terada, A.; Lackner, S.; Tsuneda, S.; Smets, B.F. Redox-stratification controlled biofilm (rescobi) for completely autotrophic nitrogen removal: The effect of co- versus counter-diffusion on reactor performance. Biotechnol. Bioeng 2007, 97, 40–51. [Google Scholar]
    34. McQuarrie, J.P.; Boltz, J.P. Moving bed biofilm reactor technology: Process applications, design, and performance. Water Environ. Res 2011, 83, 560–575. [Google Scholar]
    35. Almstrand, R.; Lydmark, P.; Sorensson, F.; Hermansson, M. Nitrification potential and population dynamics of nitrifying bacterial biofilms in response to controlled shifts of ammonium concentrations in wastewater trickling filters. Bioresour. Technol 2011, 102, 7685–7691. [Google Scholar]
    36. Lydmark, P.; Lind, M.; Sorensson, F.; Hermansson, M. Vertical distribution of nitrifying populations in bacterial biofilms from a full-scale nitrifying trickling filter. Environ. Microbiol 2006, 8, 2036–2049. [Google Scholar]
    37. Manz, W.; Amann, R.; Ludwig, W.; Wagner, M.; Schleifer, K.H. Phylogenetic oligodeoxynucleotide probes for the major subclasses of proteobacteria: Problems and solutions. Syst. Appl. Microbiol 1992, 15, 593–600. [Google Scholar]
    38. Almstrand, R.; Lydmark, P.; Lindgren, P.E.; Sorensson, F.; Hermansson, M. Dynamics of specific ammonia-oxidizing bacterial populations and nitrification in response to controlled shifts of ammonium concentrations in wastewater. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 2013, 97, 2183–2191. [Google Scholar]
    39. Daims, H.; Lucker, S.; Wagner, M. Daime, a novel image analysis program for microbial ecology and biofilm research. Environ. Microbiol 2006, 8, 200–213. [Google Scholar]
    40. Loy, A.; Horn, M.; Wagner, M. Probebase: An online resource for rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. Nucl. Acids Res 2003, 31, 514–516. [Google Scholar]
    Ijms 15 02191f1 1024
    Figure 1. Overview of sample retrieval and analysis. Biofilm carriers containing either young (A1) or mature biofilm (A2,3) were cryo-embedded and frozen; After removal of the carrier, biofilm from carrier compartments was frozen solid and associated with the O.C.T. compound (A4); Cryosectioning of the biofilm was followed by FISH and CLSM analysis of biofilm stratification in the x, y and z dimensions (A5); and vertical (z) distribution from one of the compartments is exemplified in (B), anammox (open circles), AOB (closed circles).
    Figure 1. Overview of sample retrieval and analysis. Biofilm carriers containing either young (A1) or mature biofilm (A2,3) were cryo-embedded and frozen; After removal of the carrier, biofilm from carrier compartments was frozen solid and associated with the O.C.T. compound (A4); Cryosectioning of the biofilm was followed by FISH and CLSM analysis of biofilm stratification in the x, y and z dimensions (A5); and vertical (z) distribution from one of the compartments is exemplified in (B), anammox (open circles), AOB (closed circles).
    Ijms 15 02191f1
    Ijms 15 02191f2 1024
    Figure 2. Assembled FISH “wall-to-wall” micrographs of biofilm from the biofilm carrier compartments. (A) Mature biofilm from 230 μm depth; (B) Mature biofilm from 500 μm depth; (C) Young biofilm from 250 μm depth; and (D) Young biofilm from 490 μm depth. In yellow, AOB cells hybridized with probe Nse1472. In cyan, anammox cells hybridized with probe Bfu613. In green, cells hybridized with the Eub338 (I–IV) probe mix only. Scale bar = 200 μm.
    Figure 2. Assembled FISH “wall-to-wall” micrographs of biofilm from the biofilm carrier compartments. (A) Mature biofilm from 230 μm depth; (B) Mature biofilm from 500 μm depth; (C) Young biofilm from 250 μm depth; and (D) Young biofilm from 490 μm depth. In yellow, AOB cells hybridized with probe Nse1472. In cyan, anammox cells hybridized with probe Bfu613. In green, cells hybridized with the Eub338 (I–IV) probe mix only. Scale bar = 200 μm.
    Ijms 15 02191f2
    Ijms 15 02191f3 1024
    Figure 3. Assembled FISH “wall-to-wall” micrographs of biofilm from the biofilm carrier compartments in the x, y dimension. (A) Example of the multidirectional slicing procedure, where each colored area represents a 100 μm thick region of the biofilm from a particular distance from the compartment wall; (B) Schematic representation of the 100 μm thick slices, showing average biovolume fractions throughout all depths (z) of AOB and anammox bacteria in the carrier compartments. Average ± 95% confidence intervals, n = 41 (n = 37 for slice 400–500 μm); and (C–G) Biovolume fractions of anammox bacteria (open circles) and AOB (solid circles) in the concentric areas (colored “slices”) at different depths (z) in the carrier compartments. The designations (C–G) refer to the concentric areas at different distance from the compartment wall, as depicted in (B).
    Figure 3. Assembled FISH “wall-to-wall” micrographs of biofilm from the biofilm carrier compartments in the x, y dimension. (A) Example of the multidirectional slicing procedure, where each colored area represents a 100 μm thick region of the biofilm from a particular distance from the compartment wall; (B) Schematic representation of the 100 μm thick slices, showing average biovolume fractions throughout all depths (z) of AOB and anammox bacteria in the carrier compartments. Average ± 95% confidence intervals, n = 41 (n = 37 for slice 400–500 μm); and (C–G) Biovolume fractions of anammox bacteria (open circles) and AOB (solid circles) in the concentric areas (colored “slices”) at different depths (z) in the carrier compartments. The designations (C–G) refer to the concentric areas at different distance from the compartment wall, as depicted in (B).
    Ijms 15 02191f3
    Table
    Table 1. Reactor conditions and effluent concentrations during the experimental period. Average values and standard deviation (SD). The influent (synthetic wastewater) contained 314 mg N L−1 as ammonium. HRT = hydraulic retention time; DO = dissolved oxygen.
    Table 1. Reactor conditions and effluent concentrations during the experimental period. Average values and standard deviation (SD). The influent (synthetic wastewater) contained 314 mg N L−1 as ammonium. HRT = hydraulic retention time; DO = dissolved oxygen.
    Flow (L h−1)HRT (h)Temp (°C)pHDO (mg L−1)NH4+ (mg N L−1)NO2− (mg N L−1)NO3− (mg N L−1)N removal
    Average1.26.328.37.83.671142566%
    S.D.0.20.72.90.30.540131214%

    Share and Cite

    MDPI and ACS Style

    Almstrand, R.; Persson, F.; Daims, H.; Ekenberg, M.; Christensson, M.; Wilén, B.-M.; Sörensson, F.; Hermansson, M. Three-Dimensional Stratification of Bacterial Biofilm Populations in a Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor for Nitritation-Anammox. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 2191-2206. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15022191

    AMA Style

    Almstrand R, Persson F, Daims H, Ekenberg M, Christensson M, Wilén B-M, Sörensson F, Hermansson M. Three-Dimensional Stratification of Bacterial Biofilm Populations in a Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor for Nitritation-Anammox. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2014; 15(2):2191-2206. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15022191

    Chicago/Turabian Style

    Almstrand, Robert, Frank Persson, Holger Daims, Maria Ekenberg, Magnus Christensson, Britt-Marie Wilén, Fred Sörensson, and Malte Hermansson. 2014. "Three-Dimensional Stratification of Bacterial Biofilm Populations in a Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor for Nitritation-Anammox" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15, no. 2: 2191-2206. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15022191

    APA Style

    Almstrand, R., Persson, F., Daims, H., Ekenberg, M., Christensson, M., Wilén, B. -M., Sörensson, F., & Hermansson, M. (2014). Three-Dimensional Stratification of Bacterial Biofilm Populations in a Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor for Nitritation-Anammox. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 15(2), 2191-2206. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15022191

    Article Metrics

    Back to TopTop