Next Article in Journal
One-Pot Three-Component Synthesis of Novel Diethyl((2-oxo-1,2-dihydroquinolin-3-yl)(arylamino)methyl)phosphonate as Potential Anticancer Agents
Next Article in Special Issue
A Nonlinear Model for Gene-Based Gene-Environment Interaction
Previous Article in Journal
Prototype and Chimera-Type Galectins in Placentas with Spontaneous and Recurrent Miscarriages
Previous Article in Special Issue
The AaDREB1 Transcription Factor from the Cold-Tolerant Plant Adonis amurensis Enhances Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Transgenic Plant
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Over-Expression of GmGIa-Regulated Soybean miR172a Confers Early Flowering in Transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana

Key Laboratory of Soybean Biology in Chinese Education Ministry (Northeastern Key Laboratory of Soybean Biology and Genetics & Breeding in Chinese Ministry of Agriculture), Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17(5), 645; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17050645
Submission received: 18 January 2016 / Revised: 19 April 2016 / Accepted: 22 April 2016 / Published: 29 April 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gene–Environment Interactions)

Abstract

:
Flowering is a pivotal event in the life cycle of plants. miR172 has been widely confirmed to play critical roles in flowering time control by regulating its target gene expression in Arabidopsis. However, the role of its counterpart in soybean remains largely unclear. In the present study, we found that the gma-miR172a was regulated by a GIGANTEA ortholog, GmGIa, in soybean through miRNA metabolism. The expression analysis revealed that gma-miR172a has a pattern of diurnal rhythm expression and its abundance increased rapidly as plants grew until the initiation of flowering phase in soybean. One target gene of gma-miR172a, Glyma03g33470, was predicted and verified using a modified RLM 5′-RACE (RNA ligase-mediated rapid amplification of 5′ cDNA ends) assay. Overexpression of gma-miR172a exhibited an early flowering phenotype and the expression of FT, AP1 and LFY were simultaneously increased in gma-miR172a-transgenic Arabidopsis plants, suggesting that the early flowering phenotype was associated with up-regulation of these genes. The overexpression of the gma-miR172a-resistant version of Glyma03g33470 weakened early flowering phenotype in the toe1 mutant of Arabidopsis. Taken together, our results suggested that gma-miR172a played an important role in GmGIa-mediated flowering by repressing Glyma03g33470, which in turn increased the expression of FT, AP1 and LFY to promote flowering in soybean.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The timing of the switch from vegetative to reproductive growth is critical for the success of plant reproduction. Flowering time is regulated by coordinated interactions between various endogenous signals and environmental cues [1,2,3]. Genetic and molecular analyses had revealed that four major pathways regulate this transition: the endogenous factors include autonomous and the gibberellin pathways, while the photoperiod and vernalization pathways respond to environmental cues [4,5,6,7]. These pathways are generally controlled by multiple genes and are influenced by the environment.
Recently, microRNAs (miRNAs), a class of small non-coding RNA molecules ranging from 18 to 24 nucleotides in length, have been identified as the key regulators of gene expression in both plants and animals [3]. Some non-coding RNAs have shown to play important roles in plant for controlling flowering time by regulating the expression of key players in flowering time. Among numerous miRNAs, several miRNA families have been confirmed to play important roles in controlling flowering, serving either to inhibit or to promote reproduction. The main players are the miR156, miR159 and miR172 families. In addition, the miR319, miR390 and miR399 families also play a role in the control of flowering time [8,9,10,11].
Overexpression of miR156 reduces the level of target SPL genes and causes a late-flowering phenotype [12,13]. A recent study also found that the miRNA156-SPL3 module regulates ambient temperature-responsive flowering via FT in Arabidopsis [14]. When miR159 was overexpressed, plants flowering time was delayed in SD condition with decreased levels of MYB33 and LFY in Arabidopsis [15]. miR172 is one of the earliest microRNAs isolated by small RNA sequencing in Arabidopsis [16] and later found in ferns, gymnosperms and the flowering plants, but not in lycopods and moss [17,18]. In Arabidopsis, miR172 serves as a negative regulator of AP2 to specify floral organ identity and also acts as a repressor of the AP2-like genes, the Target of EAT 1 (TOE1) and SCHLAFMU TZE (SMZ) to promote early flowering [19,20,21]. A progressive increase of miR172 level promotes the juvenile-to-adult transition in maize [3]. Over-expression of miR172 causes the loss of spikelet determinacy and floral organ abnormalities in rice [22]. In soybean, the overexpression of miR172c increases soybean nodule numbers, whereas diminishes endogenous activity of miR172c, resulting in reduced nodulation [23]. However, the roles of soybean miR172 and its AP2-like targets on flowering time are currently unclear.
We also investigated a novel physiological function of gma-miR172a in soybean. The analyses of the expression pattern and 5′RACE showed that Glyma03g33470 was a target gene of gma-miR172a, and the ectopic overexpression of gma-miR172a in Arabidopsis (Col-0) accelerated flowering both in long day and short day conditions. The results of qRT-PCR analysis indicated that the overexpression of gma-miR172a altered the transcriptional profiles of the genes that were involved in flowering control. In addition, toe1 mutant plants of Arabidopsis could restore its earlier flowering phenotype partially by the expression of Glyma03g33470.

2. Results

2.1. Identification and Analysis of gma-miR172a and Glyma03g33470 Sequences

The miR172 family of soybean (gma-miR172) was encoded by twelve genomic loci (gma-miR172a to gma-miR172l) based on miRBase version 21.0 (Available at: http://www.mirbase.org) and the precursors of the different members varied (Supplementary Materials Figure S1), but the mature sequences were highly similar. According to the difference of mature sequence, the members of gma-miR172 were divided into eight categories (Table 1). Eight potential AP2-Like target genes of soybean gma-miR172 were obtained from PMRD database (Available at: http://bioinformatics.cau.edu.cn/PMRD/) (Supplementary Materials Table S1). 5′ rapid amplification of the cDNA ends (5′RACE) was used to determine whether these putative targets were cleaved by gma-miR172 with RNA isolated from 20 DAE (Day after emergence) leaves. Among these target genes, PCR bands with the distinct and expected sizes were observed for the Glyma03g33470 (Supplementary Materials Figure S2). Cloning and DNA sequencing of this amplified product with the 5′ end of the cleavage products to the designated position, the degradation segment of Glyma03g33470 was obtained and the cleavage sites were between the 10th and 11th nucleotides complementary to gma-miR172a (Figure 1A), similar to the other species [19,22,24]. The results indicated that Glyma03g33470 was the target gene of miR172 in soybean.
The cDNA sequence of the predicted target gene Glyma03g33470 was 2238 bp with an open reading frame of 1380 bp and was predicted to encode 459 amino acids, with a predicted molecular mass of 50.27 kDa and a predicted pI (isoelectric point) of 6.27. Phylogenic analysis of the protein sequences revealed that Glyma03g33470 shared high amino acid sequence identity with TOE1 of Arabidopsis (Figure 1B). The putative target gene of soybean miR172, Glyma03g33470, shared high peptide identities with AP2 and TOE genes and contained two AP2 domains, similar to the previous reports on TOE1 in Arabidopsis [25]. Each AP2 domain possessed two completely conserved sequence motifs: YRG motif and RAYD motif (Figure 1C).

2.2. Temporal and Spatial Expression Patterns of gma-miR172 and Their Target Genes in Soybean

To determine how the gma-miR172 was expressed during soybean development, the expression levels of mature sequences of gma-miR172a/b, gma-miR172c, gma-miR172d/e, gma-miR172f, gma-miR172g, gma-miR172/h/i/j, gma-miR172k and gma-miR172l were analyzed by qRT-PCR. The results showed that gma-miR172f, gma-miR172g and gma-miR172h/i/j could not be detected in young seedlings and all the other five gma-miR172 members could be expressed in a low level at initial stage, gma-miR172d/e and gma-miR172k increased slightly subsequently, but the RNA abundance of gma-miR172a/b and gma-miR172c increased rapidly throughout the entire vegetative phase and peaked at 28 DAE (a flower bud appeared approximately on the 30th day) in the initiation of flowering phase, then gradually decreased during the reproductive phase under SDs (Figure 2A). Interestingly, the abundance of gma-miR172a was apparently higher than the other four members during the lifecycle (Figure 2A). Therefore, it was inferred that gma-miR172a might play a more important role in flowering time control than the other members. The expression level of Glyma03g33470 was also analyzed by qRT-PCR using the primer pairs spanning the miR172 cleavage sites and its mRNA abundance also exhibited a temporal specificity expression pattern during the growth and development stage of soybean. The expression level was quite high in young seedlings, gradually declined as the plants grew and was lowest at 13 DAE. Then, the transcript level became elevated during the flowering phase and declined again during the late reproductive phase under SD (Figure 2B). Under LD (long day) conditions, the expression patterns of gma-miR172a and Glyma03g33470 were similar to those under SD (short day) conditions and gma-miR172a with the highest accumulation at the initiation of flowering phase (Flower bud appeared in 42th day approximately) (Figure 2C,D).
To obtain further insights into how gma-miR172a regulates Glyma03g33470, the transcript levels of mature gma-miR172a and Glyma03g33470 were compared in plant tissues. The expression of gma-miR172a was lower in stems, whereas, its expression was much higher in floral buds (Figure 2E). In contrast to gma-miR172a, the transcript abundance of Glyma03g33470 was lower in floral buds and higher in stems (Figure 2F).

2.3. Diurnal Rhythm of gma-miR172a and Glyma03g33470

In order to know if the expressions of gma-miR172a and Glyma03g33470 have diurnal rhythm, trifoliate leaves (20 DAE) were sampled every 4 h. The expression level of gma-miR172a was higher under LD conditions than SD conditions, as well as Glyma03g33470 (Figure 3A,B). gma-miR172a exhibited a diurnal rhythm both under SD and LD conditions. The gene expression reached a peak at 16 h after dawn under SD and the expression peak was postponed for about 4 h under LD conditions (Figure 3A). The expression level of Glyma03g33470 decreased gradually after dawn and reached the minimum at 12 h, then increased slightly under LD, but the relative levels were constantly low under SD (Figure 3B), suggesting that the expression of Glyma03g33470 did not follow the diurnal rhythm pattern.

2.4. Over-Expression of gma-miR172a Results in Earlier Flowering in Transgenic Arabidopsis

In order to verify the function of gma-miR172a in the flowering time control, the gma-miR172a precursor was genetically transformed into Arabidopsis thaliana under the regulation of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter. The precursor and mature sequences of gma-miR172a were all increased in transgenic lines compared to wild type (Figure 4A). TOE1 was also down-regulated (Figure 4B). The flowering phenotype of the plants both under LDs and SDs were examined by counting the numbers of the total leaves at bolting and the days from germination to bolting. As showed in Figure 4C–E, the gma-miR172a-transgenic lines had 9–10 leaves and spent an average of 19–20 vegetative growth days to flowering under LDs, rather than WT plants that had 12 leaves and spent 24 growth days to the flowering time. Under SD, the gma-miR172a lines had 16–17 leaves and spent an average of 29–31 vegetative growth days to the flowering time, whereas WT plants had 23 leaves and spent an average of 40 vegetative growth days to the flowering time (Figure 4C–E). The results demonstrated that the over-expression of gma-miR172a resulted in earlier flowering in transgenic Arabidopsis.

2.5. Up-Regulation of FT, AP1 and LFY in gma-miR172a-Transgenic Plants

As gma-miR172a-transgenic plants showed an earlier flowering phenotype, the expression levels of flowering time-related genes (including FLC, CO, SOC1, FT, LFY and AP1) in gma-miR172a-transgenic plants were further investigated to determine how gma-miR172a affects flowering time. The results showed that FT and floral homeotic genes, such as AP1 and LFY, obviously increased in the transgenic plants compared to WT plants. The expression of CO, FLC and the other genes functioning in the autonomous pathway was unaltered compared to WT (Figure 5), indicating that gma-miR172a exerted its role by inducing FT through a genetic pathway, rather than the autonomous pathway.

2.6. toe1 Mutant Plants Restores Earlier Flowering Phenotype by the Expression of Glyma03g33470

It has been shown that Arabidopsis toe1 mutant exhibits early flowering phenotype compared to WT plant [19,25]. To further investigate whether the regulation of Glyma03g33470 by gma-miR172a plays a role in controlling flowering, a version of Glyma03g33470 mRNA (rGlyma03g33470) that carried silent mutations in the gma-miR172 complementary sites was introduced into toe1 mutant plants to render the mRNA resistant to miR172-directed cleavage (Figure 6A). This complemented line was called toe1/35S::rGlyma03g33470.
As shown in Figure 6B,C, the toe1/35S::rGlyma03g33470 plants flowered a little earlier compared with the WT plant, but still later than toe1 mutant. Moreover, rosette leaf number and total leaf number of toe1/35S::rGlyma03g33470 plants were between WT and toe1 mutant plant (Figure 6D). These data suggested that toe1 plants could restored its earlier flowering phenotype partially through the expression of rGlyma03g33470.

2.7. GmGIa Regulates gma-miR172a through miRNA Metabolism in Soybean

It has been shown that GI regulates miR172 processing rather than the transcription of the miR172 in Arabidopsis [25]. GmGIa is the classical maturity locus E2, which has multiple functions involved in the circadian clock and flowering [26,27]. In order to determine whether GI affects the expression of gma-miR172a and Glyma03g33470, the expression levels of Glyma03g33470, precursor and mature sequences of gma-miR172a in GmGIa-overexpression (GmGIa-ox) and WT soybean were examined under LD conditions. Our results showed that there was no difference in the expression levels of pre-gma-miR172a and Glyma03g33470 between the GmGIa-ox and WT. However, the mature sequence of gma-miR172a was up-regulated by GmGIa (Figure 7A).
Dicer-like1 (DCL1) and SERRATE (SE) are key genes that encoding miRNA processing enzymes [28]. In the present study, the amino acid sequence of Arabidopsis AtDCL1 and AtSE was used as a query in the Phytozome database (Available at: http://www.phytozome.net) to search for homologs in the soybean genome and identified Glyma19g45060, Glyma04g15990 as GmDCL1 and GmSE gene respectively. The expression levels of GmDCL1 and GmSE in GmGIa-ox and WT soybean were detected. As expected, their expression levels were obviously increased in the GmGIa-ox soybean (Figure 7B). In conclusion, it is likely that GmGI also regulates miR172 maturation (processing) in soybean rather than miR172 transcription.

3. Discussion

Recently, many studies have revealed that miRNAs plays a crucial role in gene expression regulation and is involved in flowering time control [29,30]. With the development of high-throughput sequencing (next-generation sequencing, NGS) technology, a large number of miRNAs related to flowering and flower development have been identified and studied in several important species, such as trifoliate orange [31], rice [32], hickory [33], xanthoceras sorbifolia [34], poplar [35], and radish [36].
Soybean is an important grain and economic crop around the world. As a typical short-day plant, it has been studied widely by many researchers. Appropriate flowering time is a key factor in order to gain higher yields in soybean. However, the molecular regulation mechanism of the flowering response in soybean remains unclear. In our previous studies, we found that the expression levels of some members of gma-miR172 could be induced by a shorter day. gma-miR172 together with its targets are likely regulated by day length in soybean and play an important role in flowering time control [37].
There are 12 members (miR172a–l) in the soybean miR172 family and they are predicted to target some important AP2-like genes, as shown in Table S1. In our study, we found that the relative expression levels of gma-miR172a/b, gma-miR172c, gma-miR172d/e and gma-miR172k in soybean are increased as plants grow up to the flowering stage but the expression levels of other members couldn’t be detected in soybean due to the significant differences between the mature sequences. Interestingly, the abundance of gma-miR172a was apparently higher than the other four members during the lifecycle. Furthermore, the 5′RACE assays indicated that miR172a directed Glyma03g33470 mRNA cleavage in soybean and Glyma03g33470 also showed differential expression patterns in different tissues and developmental stages.
miR172 was confirmed to participate in the flowering control pathway in many plants but we did not find that miR172 had a diurnal rhythm expression pattern in Arabidopsis [25]. However, our study showed that the expression level of gma-miR172a could be affected by day length and had a diurnal rhythm expression pattern under LD or SD conditions (Figure 3). In addition, Zhao found that GI didn’t affect the expression level of GmTOE4a in soybean [24], but it could affect the relative level of mature miR172 in Arabidopsis [25]. In our study, the expression levels of Glyma03g3347 and the precursor, mature sequences of gma-miR172a in GmGIa-overexpression (GmGIa-ox) soybean were examined under LD conditions. We found that although no significant difference in the mRNA abundance of pre-gma-miR172a and Glyma03g33470 was detected between the GmGIa-ox and WT, the mature sequence of gma-miR172a was up-regulated by GmGIa. DCL1 and SE are the key enzymes in the miRNA synthesis pathway. Therefore, the expression levels of homologs for DCL1 and SE in soybean were compared in GmGIa-ox and WT. The results demonstrated that the expression levels obviously increased in the GmGIa-ox soybean, implying that gma-miR172a was affected by GmGI through miRNA metabolism in soybean (Figure 7).
In order to further characterize the function of gma-miR172a, gma-mIR172a transgenic Arabidopsis was generated. gma-mIR172a conferred early flowering phenotype in transgenic plants, and decreased the total leaf number compared to WT plants. In addition, the relative mRNA abundance of flowering-related genes (FT, LFY and AP1) was increased in gma-miR172a transgenic plants. The expression of Glyma03g33470 in toe1 mutant led to the complementation of the early flowering mutation. miR172 played a negative regulation of AP2. It could specify floral organ identity in Arabidopsis [19,38] but in the present study, no difference in floral organ between transgenic Arabidopsis and WT plants was found, inferring that there may be a different regulation mode between Arabidopsis and soybean.
Together, the present results demonstrated that a molecular regulation mechanism of gma-miR172a and Glyma03g3347, played critical roles in the pathway of GmGIa-mediated flowering time control in soybean (Figure 8). GmGI promotes miR172 metabolism and represses Glyma03g3347. Furthermore, the relative mRNA, abundance of FT, LFY and AP1 were also significantly increased due to the over-expression of gma-miR172a, conferring the early flowering phenotype in transgenic lines.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

In this study, Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0) was used for wild-type control plants and genetic transformation. Seeds of the toe1 mutant (SALK_069677c) were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC, Columbus, OH, USA). Soybean Research Institute of Northeast Agricultural University (Harbin, China) provided the pure seeds of cultivar “DongNong 42” and GmGIa-overexpression (transgenic soybean that over expressing GmGIa) soybean.
Seeds of gma-miR172a-overexpression, toe1 mutant, toe1 complemented line and WT Arabidopsis were surface sterilized with 10 percent hypochlorite, then placed on MS agar medium and stratified at 4 °C for 72 h before being placed at room temperature (22 °C). Subsequently, the ten-day-old seedlings were transferred into 1:1 vermiculite: turfy-soil, cultured under LDs (16 h/8 h light/dark), or SDs (8 h/16 h light/dark).
For expression pattern analysis of gma-miR172 and Glyma03g3347, the seeds of “DongNong 42” were grown under LDs and SDs in the greenhouse. At the 20th day after emergence, fresh and fully unfolding trifoliate leaves for RNA extraction were sampled from three individual plants. Collection of the leaf samples were started at dawn and sampled every 4 h during a total of 48 h for diurnal rhythm expression pattern analysis. To analyse the time course-dependent expression pattern, the fresh leaves from four individual plants were sampled for RNA extraction at 4 h after dawn both under LDs and SDs and sampled repeatedly every five days from 3 to 33 DAE for SDs and from 3 to 48 DAE for LDs. For the tissue-specific expression analysis, the different tissues, including root, stem, trifoliate leaves, flower bud and flowers from soybean were sampled. Tissue materials in each analysis were harvested and stored at −80 °C for RNA isolation.

4.2. Real Time RT-PCR Analyses

Tissue materials were harvested as previously mentioned. TRizol reagent (Tiangen, Beijing, China) was used to extract total RNA from the tissues of soybean and Arabidopsis. A miRcute miRNA first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Tiangen) was used to perform first-strand cDNA synthesis of gma-miR172. QuantScript RT Kit (Tiangen) was used to perform cDNA synthesis of other genes. The corresponding mature miRNA sequence was applied as sense primers and antisense adaptor primers were provided in the SYBR Green PCR Master Mix Reagent (miRcute miRNA qPCR Detection Kit, Tiangen). A Chromo4 Real-Time PCR System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used for performing the Real-time quantitative RT-PCR. Relative abundance of mRNA and miRNA were determined by qRT-PCR according to the method of 2−ΔΔCt based on Ct values [39]. Actin4 gene was used as an endogenous control for soybean and Actin8 gene was used for an endogenous control in Arabidopsis. The sense primer for qRT-PCR of mature gma-miR172a was 5′-AGAATCTTGATGATGCTGCAT-3′. The primers used in real time RT-PCR analyses, including Actin4, Actin8, Glyma03g33470 and flowering control genes were shown in Table 2.

4.3. RACE Mapping of miRNA Target Cleavage Sites

PMRD database (Available at: http://bioinformatics.cau.edu.cn/PMRD/) provided the putative target genes of gma-miR172a. A modified 5′ RLM-RACE assay was used to validate the internal cleavage site in these putative targets with the Marathon® cDNA Amplification Kit (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA). 20 DAE leaves grown under SD conditions were used for total RNA extraction. Then the total RNA was used to synthesize cDNA with a 5′ adaptor. According to the manufacturer’s protocol (Clontech), nested PCR was used to amplify the cDNA samples. For carrying out the initial PCR, AP1 (adaptor primer 1 was provided in the kit) and the gene-specific outer primer (Table 2) was used. AP2 and the gene-specific inner primer (Table 2) were used for carrying out the nested PCR with 1 μL of the initial PCR reaction products. Then final PCR bands with the distinct and expected sizes were gel purified and cloned to a pGM-T vector (Tiangen) and eight positive clones were used for sequencing.

4.4. Gene Constructs and Generation of Transgenic Arabidopsis Plants

For constructing the gma-miR172a-overexpression vector, a 159 bp precursor sequence of gma-miR172a cloned from “DongNong 42” was inserted into the pGM-T cloned vector for sequencing. The construct was then recombined into the binary vector pCAMBIA3301. The recombined vector pCAMBIAgma-miR172a-3301 was introduced into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 which was used to transform Arabidopsis using the vacuum infiltration method. rGlyma03g33470 rendering the mRNA resistant to gma-miR172a-directed cleavage was constructed by overlapping PCR and the full cDNA was inserted into the clone vector pGM-T, then recombined into the binary vector pCAMBIA3301. The recombined vector pCAMBIA rGlyma03g33470-3301 was introduced into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 which was used to transform Arabidopsis toe1 mutant using the vacuum infiltration method. Primers for gene constructs and overlapping PCR were listed in Table 2.
The screened transgenic lines with phosphinothricin-resistance were further confirmed by using PCR amplification. PCR results showed that the resistance of T2 transgenic seeds to phosphinothricin was 3:1, and there were no character segregation in T3 transgenic seeds (Supplementary Materials Figure S3), so T3 transgenic seeds were chosen for further study.

4.5. Flowering Time Measurements

To measure flowering time, WT (Col-0), toe1 mutant, toe1 recover and gma-miR172a-overexpression transgenic plants were all surface sterilized with 10 percent hypochlorite, then placed on MS agar medium and stratified at 4 °C for 72 h before being placed at room temperature (22 °C). Ten-day-old seedlings were transferred to 1:1 of vermiculite and turfy-soil, grown under LDs (16 h light) or SDs (8 h light) conditions. Flowering times were measured by the number of days from germination to bolting with at least 20 plants. The total leaves number at bolting was also measured.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

All the results shown in this study were the mean of three independent experiments ± standard deviation. The data were subjected to Student’s t test analysis using SPSS statistical software 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/17/5/645/s1.

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted in Soybean Research & Development Center (CARS), and financially supported by National Core Soybean Genetic Engineering Project (2016ZX08004002), National Natural Science Foundation (31201228, 31271748), the Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014M551205), National Supporting Project (2014BAD22B00), Foundation of Heilongjiang Educational Committee (12541015), Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Science Foundation (LBH-Z12050), National 863 Project (2013AA102602), 948 project (2015-Z53), the Young Talents Project of Northeast Agricultural University (14QC26) and Provincial/National Education Ministry for the team of soybean molecular design.

Author Contributions

Yong-Guang Li and Wen-Bin Li conceived and designed the study. Tao Wang, Ming-Yang Sun, Xue-Song Wang performed the experiments. Tao Wang wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huijser, P.; Schmid, M. The control of developmental phase transitions in plants. Development 2011, 138, 4117–4129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mouradov, A.; Cremer, F.; Coupland, G. Control of flowering time: Interacting pathways as a basis for diversity. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 111–130. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yamaguchi, A.; Abe, M. Regulation of reproductive development by non-coding RNA in Arabidopsis: To flower or not to flower. J. Plant Res. 2012, 125, 693–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fan, T.; Li, X.; Yang, W.; Xia, K.; Ouyang, J.; Zhang, M. Rice osa-miR171c mediates phase change from vegetative to reproductive development and shoot apical meristem maintenance by repressing four OsHAM transcription factors. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0125833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Adams, S.; Allen, T.; Whitelam, G.C. Interaction between the light quality and flowering time pathways in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2009, 60, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Schiessl, S.; Iniguez-Luy, F.; Qian, W.; Snowdon, R.J. Diverse regulatory factors associate with flowering time and yield responses in winter-type Brassica napus. BMC Genom. 2015, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Shim, J.S.; Imaizumi, T. Circadian clock and photoperiodic response in Arabidopsis: From seasonal flowering to redox homeostasis. Biochemistry 2015, 54, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Jones-Rhoades, M.; Bartel, D.P.; Bartel, B. MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 19–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kim, W.; Ahn, H.J.; Chiou, T.J.; Ahn, J.H. The role of the miR399-PHO2 module in the regulation of flowering time in response to different ambient temperatures in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Cells 2011, 32, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Rubio-Somoza, I.; Weigel, D. MicroRNA networks and developmental plasticity in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Jin, D.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, M. MicroRNAs and their crosstalks in plant development. J. Genet. Genom. 2013, 40, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Schwab, R.; Palatnik, J.F.; Riester, M.; Schommer, C.; Schmid, M.; Weigel, D. Specific effects of microRNAs on the plant transcriptome. Dev. Cell 2005, 8, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wu, G.; Poethig, R.S. Temporal regulation of shoot development in Arabidopsis thaliana by miR156 and its target SPL3. Development 2006, 133, 3539–3547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kim, J.J.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, W.; Jung, H.S.; Huijser, P.; Ahn, J.H. The microRNA156-SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE3 module regulates ambient temperature-responsive flowering via FLOWERING LOCUS T in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159, 461–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Achard, P.; Herr, A.; Baulcombe, D.C.; Harberd, N.P. Modulation of floral development by a gibberellin-regulated microRNA. Development 2004, 131, 3357–3365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Park, W.; Li, J.; Song, R.; Messing, J.; Chen, X. CARPEL FACTORY, a Dicer homolog, and HEN1, a novel protein, act in microRNA metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Biol. 2002, 3, 1484–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Axtell, M.J.; Bartel, D.P. Antiquity of microRNAs and their targets in land plants. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 1658–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhu, Q.H.; Helliwell, C.A. Regulation of flowering time and floral patterning by miR172. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 487–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Aukerman, M.J.; Sakai, H. Regulation of flowering time and floral organ identity by a microRNA and its APETALA2-like target genes. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 2730–2741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zhang, B.; Wang, L.; Zeng, L.; Zhang, C.; Ma, H. Arabidopsis TOE proteins convey a photoperiodic signal to antagonize CONSTANS and regulate flowering time. Genes Dev. 2015, 29, 975–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Mathieu, J.; Yant, L.J.; Mürdter, F.; Küttner, F.; Schmid, M. Repression of flowering by the miR172 target SMZ. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7, e1000148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhu, Q.H.; Upadhyaya, N.M.; Gubler, F.; Helliwell, C.A. Over-expression of miR172 causes loss of spikelet determinacy and floral organ abnormalities in rice (Oryza sativa). BMC Plant Biol. 2009, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Zou, Y.; Chen, L.; Cai, Z.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, F.; Tian, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Ferguson, B.J.; et al. Soybean miR172c targets the repressive AP2 transcription factor NNC1 to activate ENOD40 expression and regulate nodule initiation. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 4782–4801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhao, X.; Cao, D.; Huang, Z.; Wang, J.; Lu, S.; Xu, Y.; Liu, B.; Kong, F.; Yuan, X. Dual functions of GmTOE4a in the regulation of photoperiod-mediated flowering and plant morphology in soybean. Plant Mol. Biol. 2015, 88, 343–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jung, J.H.; Seo, Y.H.; Seo, P.J.; Reyes, J.L.; Yun, J.; Chua, N.H.; Park, C.M. The GIGANTEA-regulated microRNA172 mediates photoperiodic flowering independent of CONSTANS in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 2736–2748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, F.; Zhang, X.; Hu, R.; Wu, F.; Ma, J.; Meng, Y.; Fu, Y. Identification and molecular characterization of FKF1 and GI homologous genes in soybean. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e79036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Watanabe, S.; Xia, Z.; Hideshima, R.; Tsubokura, Y.; Sato, S.; Yamanaka, N.; Takahashi, R.; Anai, T.; Tabata, S.; Kitamura, K.; et al. A map-based cloning strategy employing a residual heterozygous line reveals that the GIGANTEA gene is involved in soybean maturity and flowering. Genetics 2011, 188, 395–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Voinnet, O. Origin, biogenesis, and activity of plant microRNAs. Cell 2009, 136, 669–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Spanudakis, E.; Jackson, S. The role of microRNAs in the control of flowering time. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 365–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Srikanth, A.; Schmid, M. Regulation of flowering time: All roads lead to Rome. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2011, 68, 2013–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Sun, L.M.; Ai, X.Y.; Li, W.Y.; Guo, W.W.; Deng, X.X.; Hu, C.G.; Zhang, J.Z. Identification and comparative profiling of miRNAs in an early flowering mutant of trifoliate orange and its wild type by genome-wide deep sequencing. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e43760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chen, Z.X.; Li, F.L.; Yang, S.N.; Dong, Y.B.; Yuan, Q.H.; Wang, F.; Li, W.M.; Jiang, Y.; Jia, S.R.; Pei, X.W. Identification and functional analysis of flowering related microRNAs in common wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.). PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, Z.J.; Huang, J.Q.; Huang, Y.J.; Li, Z.; Zheng, B.S. Discovery and profiling of novel and conserved microRNAs during flower development in Carya cathayensis via deep sequencing. Planta 2012, 236, 613–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ao, Y.; Wang, Y.W.; Chen, W.; Wang, T.; Yu, H.Y.; Zhang, Z.X. Identification and comparative profiling of microRNAs in wild-type Xanthoceras sorbifolia and its double flower mutant. Genes Genom. 2012, 34, 561–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Song, Y.; Ma, K.; Ci, D.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, D. Sexual dimorphism floral microRNA profiling and target gene expression in andromonoecious poplar. PLoS ONE 2013, 7, e43760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nie, S.; Xu, L.; Wang, Y.; Huang, D.; Muleke, E.M.; Sun, X.; Wang, R.; Xie, Y.; Gong, Y.; Liu, L. Identification of bolting-related microRNAs and their targets reveals complex miRNA-mediated flowering-time regulatory networks in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Sci. Rep. 2015, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Li, W.B.; Wang, P.P.; Li, Y.G.; Zhang, K.X.; Ding, F.Q.; Nie, T.K.; Yang, X.; Lv, Q.X.; Zhao, L. Identification of microRNAs in response to different day lengths in soybean using high-throughput sequencing and qRT-PCR. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0132621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Chen, X. A microRNA as a translational repressor of APETALA2 in Arabidopsis flower development. Science 2004, 303, 2022–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the the 2−ΔΔCt method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Identification and analysis of gma-miR172a and Glyma03g33470 sequences. (A) Cleavage sites of Glyma03g33470 mediated by gma-miR172. The miR172-mediated cleavage sites were identified by 5′RACE in the predicted targets. Arrow indicated the cleavage site. The number on the top of sequence alignment represented the frequency of clones corresponding to cleavage site; (B) The Glyma03g33470 homologs of soybean among AP2-Like genes in Arabidopsis were shown by phylogenetic analysis. Phylogenetic tree was constructed using the software MEGA 5.0 through the method of neighbor joining; (C) Multiple alignments of the amino acid sequences encoded by Glyma03g33470 and known AP2-Like genes in Arabidopsis. The two AP2/ERF domains were indicated by the line on the top of sequences. Conserved YRG and RAYD sequence motifs in AP2 domain were denoted by the red frame. Blue, homology 100%; pink, homology >=75%; light blue, homology >=50%.
Figure 1. Identification and analysis of gma-miR172a and Glyma03g33470 sequences. (A) Cleavage sites of Glyma03g33470 mediated by gma-miR172. The miR172-mediated cleavage sites were identified by 5′RACE in the predicted targets. Arrow indicated the cleavage site. The number on the top of sequence alignment represented the frequency of clones corresponding to cleavage site; (B) The Glyma03g33470 homologs of soybean among AP2-Like genes in Arabidopsis were shown by phylogenetic analysis. Phylogenetic tree was constructed using the software MEGA 5.0 through the method of neighbor joining; (C) Multiple alignments of the amino acid sequences encoded by Glyma03g33470 and known AP2-Like genes in Arabidopsis. The two AP2/ERF domains were indicated by the line on the top of sequences. Conserved YRG and RAYD sequence motifs in AP2 domain were denoted by the red frame. Blue, homology 100%; pink, homology >=75%; light blue, homology >=50%.
Ijms 17 00645 g001
Figure 2. The relative expression levels of gma-miR172 and Glyma03g33470 in soybean. (AD) Expression levels of gma-miR172 and Glyma03g33470 during the development of soybean under SD (short day) (A,B) and LD (long day) (C,D) conditions. The leaf samples for RNA extraction were harvested every five days during 3–33 DAE under SD and 3–48 DAE under LD conditions; (E,F) Tissue-specific expression of gma-miR172a (E) and Glyma03g33470 (F) under SD conditions. Relative mRNA abundance was determined by qRT-PCR according to method of 2−ΔΔCt based on Ct values and the Actin4 gene was used as an endogenous control. All relative expression levels are compared to Actin = 1. Data shown were the mean of three independent repeated experiments ± standard deviation.
Figure 2. The relative expression levels of gma-miR172 and Glyma03g33470 in soybean. (AD) Expression levels of gma-miR172 and Glyma03g33470 during the development of soybean under SD (short day) (A,B) and LD (long day) (C,D) conditions. The leaf samples for RNA extraction were harvested every five days during 3–33 DAE under SD and 3–48 DAE under LD conditions; (E,F) Tissue-specific expression of gma-miR172a (E) and Glyma03g33470 (F) under SD conditions. Relative mRNA abundance was determined by qRT-PCR according to method of 2−ΔΔCt based on Ct values and the Actin4 gene was used as an endogenous control. All relative expression levels are compared to Actin = 1. Data shown were the mean of three independent repeated experiments ± standard deviation.
Ijms 17 00645 g002
Figure 3. The diurnal rhythm of gma-miR172a and Glyma03g33470 gene expression. (A) gma-miR172a diurnal expression under SDs and LDs; (B) Expression pattern of Glyma03g33470 under SDs and LDs. The leaf samples for RNA extraction were collected every 4 h during a total of 48 h. White bars represented light and black bars represented dark phases. Relative mRNA abundance was determined by qRT-PCR and the Actin4 gene was used as an endogenous control. Data shown were the mean of three independent repeated experiments ± standard deviation.
Figure 3. The diurnal rhythm of gma-miR172a and Glyma03g33470 gene expression. (A) gma-miR172a diurnal expression under SDs and LDs; (B) Expression pattern of Glyma03g33470 under SDs and LDs. The leaf samples for RNA extraction were collected every 4 h during a total of 48 h. White bars represented light and black bars represented dark phases. Relative mRNA abundance was determined by qRT-PCR and the Actin4 gene was used as an endogenous control. Data shown were the mean of three independent repeated experiments ± standard deviation.
Ijms 17 00645 g003
Figure 4. gma-miR172a conferred early flowering in transgenic Arabidopsis (A,B) Relative expression levels of the mature, precursor gma-miR172a and AtTOE1 in gma-miR172a-transgenic plant lines were determined by qRT-PCR. Actin8 gene was used as an endogenous control; (C) Flowering phenotype of gma-miR172a plants under both LD and SD conditions. Photographs were taken of plants after growing in soil for four weeks; (D) Days to flowering of WT and gma-miR172a transgenic plants under both LD and SD conditions; (E) The average number of total leaves in gma-miR172a-transgenic and WT plants at bolting time under both LD and SD conditions. Number of leaves from 20 individual plants at bolting was used for counting and averaging. Significant difference among WT and three gma-miR172a-transgenic lines were indicated by asterisks (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).
Figure 4. gma-miR172a conferred early flowering in transgenic Arabidopsis (A,B) Relative expression levels of the mature, precursor gma-miR172a and AtTOE1 in gma-miR172a-transgenic plant lines were determined by qRT-PCR. Actin8 gene was used as an endogenous control; (C) Flowering phenotype of gma-miR172a plants under both LD and SD conditions. Photographs were taken of plants after growing in soil for four weeks; (D) Days to flowering of WT and gma-miR172a transgenic plants under both LD and SD conditions; (E) The average number of total leaves in gma-miR172a-transgenic and WT plants at bolting time under both LD and SD conditions. Number of leaves from 20 individual plants at bolting was used for counting and averaging. Significant difference among WT and three gma-miR172a-transgenic lines were indicated by asterisks (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).
Ijms 17 00645 g004
Figure 5. Relative mRNA abundance of flowering-time related genes (A) FT; (B) AP1; (C) LFY; (D) CO; (E) FLC; (F) SOC1 in gma-miR172a transgenic and WT plants by qRT-PCR. The leaf samples for total RNA extraction were harvested at ZT (Zeitgeber time) 4 from 10-day-old plants grown under LD conditions. The Actin8 gene was used as an endogenous control. Data shown were the mean of three independent repeated experiments ± standard deviation, a significant difference between gma-miR172a transgenic and WT plants was indicated by asterisks (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).
Figure 5. Relative mRNA abundance of flowering-time related genes (A) FT; (B) AP1; (C) LFY; (D) CO; (E) FLC; (F) SOC1 in gma-miR172a transgenic and WT plants by qRT-PCR. The leaf samples for total RNA extraction were harvested at ZT (Zeitgeber time) 4 from 10-day-old plants grown under LD conditions. The Actin8 gene was used as an endogenous control. Data shown were the mean of three independent repeated experiments ± standard deviation, a significant difference between gma-miR172a transgenic and WT plants was indicated by asterisks (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).
Ijms 17 00645 g005
Figure 6. toe1 plants restores its earlier flowering phenotype by the expression of Glyma03g33470 under both LD and SD conditions. (A) rGlyma03g33470 rendering the mRNA resistant to gma-miR172a-directed cleavage. Red frame indicated the replaced nucleotide; (B) Flowering phenotype of toe1, toe1/35S::rGlyma03g33470 and WT plants. Photographs were taken of plants after growing in soil for four weeks; (C) Days to flowering of toe1, toe1/35S::rGlyma03g33470 and WT plants; (D) Average total leaf numbers of toe1, toe1/35S::rGlyma03g33470 and WT plants at the bolting both under LD and SD conditions. Number of total leaves from 20 individual plants at bolting was used for counting and averaging.
Figure 6. toe1 plants restores its earlier flowering phenotype by the expression of Glyma03g33470 under both LD and SD conditions. (A) rGlyma03g33470 rendering the mRNA resistant to gma-miR172a-directed cleavage. Red frame indicated the replaced nucleotide; (B) Flowering phenotype of toe1, toe1/35S::rGlyma03g33470 and WT plants. Photographs were taken of plants after growing in soil for four weeks; (C) Days to flowering of toe1, toe1/35S::rGlyma03g33470 and WT plants; (D) Average total leaf numbers of toe1, toe1/35S::rGlyma03g33470 and WT plants at the bolting both under LD and SD conditions. Number of total leaves from 20 individual plants at bolting was used for counting and averaging.
Ijms 17 00645 g006
Figure 7. Regulation of gma-miR172a and Glyma03g33470 by GmGIa. (A) qR-TPCR analysis of Glyma03g33470, the precursor, and mature sequences of gma-miR172a expression levels in GmGIa-ox and WT soybean leaves; (B) qRT-PCR analysis of GmDCL1 (Glyma19g45060), GmSE (Glyma04g15990) expression levels in GmGIa-ox and WT soybean leaves. The Actin4 gene was used as an endogenous control. Data shown were the mean of three independent repeated experiments ± standard deviation, a significant difference compared to the corresponding controls was indicated by asterisks (** p < 0.01).
Figure 7. Regulation of gma-miR172a and Glyma03g33470 by GmGIa. (A) qR-TPCR analysis of Glyma03g33470, the precursor, and mature sequences of gma-miR172a expression levels in GmGIa-ox and WT soybean leaves; (B) qRT-PCR analysis of GmDCL1 (Glyma19g45060), GmSE (Glyma04g15990) expression levels in GmGIa-ox and WT soybean leaves. The Actin4 gene was used as an endogenous control. Data shown were the mean of three independent repeated experiments ± standard deviation, a significant difference compared to the corresponding controls was indicated by asterisks (** p < 0.01).
Ijms 17 00645 g007
Figure 8. Proposed regulatory pathway of gma-miR172a involved in the flowering time control. Arrows represented the up-regulation expression of the gene; T-shaped represented the down-regulation expression of the gene.
Figure 8. Proposed regulatory pathway of gma-miR172a involved in the flowering time control. Arrows represented the up-regulation expression of the gene; T-shaped represented the down-regulation expression of the gene.
Ijms 17 00645 g008
Table 1. Members of miR172 family in soybean and their mature sequences.
Table 1. Members of miR172 family in soybean and their mature sequences.
LocusMature Sequence
gma-miR172a/bAGAAUCUUGAUGAUGCUGCAU
gma-miR172cGGAAUCUUGAUGAUGCUGCAG
gma-miR172d/eGGAAUCUUGAUGAUGCUGCAGCAG
gma-miR172fAGAAUCUUGAUGAUGCUGCA
gma-miR172gGCAGCACCAUCAAGAUUCAC
gma-miR172h/i/jGCAGCAGCAUCAAGAUUCACA
gma-miR172kUGAAUCUUGAUGAUGCUGCAU
gma-miR172lGGAAUCUUGAUGAUGCUGCAU
Table 2. Primers used.
Table 2. Primers used.
Primer NamesPrimer Sequences (5′–3′)
Adaptor primer 15′-CCATCCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGC-3′
Adaptor primer 25′-ACTCACTATAGGGCTCGAGCGGC-3′
Outer primer5′-GTGGCGACTAACTAACGGAAGCAAAG-3′
Inner primer5′-TCACAACTATGACCCACAA-3′
overlapping PCR-F5′-GAAGATCTCCCAGCAACGGGAGTGGTATGA-3′
overlapping PCR-Rm5′-ATCCAGTAGATGCTGCAGTAGAGAAGG-3′
overlapping PCR-Fm5′-ATCTACTGGATTCCCTTCAACAATAAT-3′
overlapping PCR-R5′-GGGTAACCGTGGCGACTAACTAACGGAAGCAAAG-3′
qGmACTIN4-F5′-GTGTCAGCCATACTGTCCCCATTT-3′
qGmACTIN4-R5′-GTTTCAAGCTCTTGCTCGTAATCA-3′
AtACTIN8-F5′-CGTCCCTGCCCTTTGTACAC-3′
AtACTIN8-R5′-CGAACACTTCACCGGATCATT-3′
gma-miR172a-F5′-AGATCTGTGAAGTCGTTTATGGCTGAT-3′
gma-miR172a-R5′-GGTAACCTTAACAGTCGTTATTTGCGG-3′
qGmDCL1-F5′-AAATGCGGACCTACCAAA-3′
qGmDCL1-R5′-TCAAAGCGAATAACGACA -3′
qGmSE-F5′-CTCACTGGGTGGTTGGTT-3′
qGmSE-R5′-GATACATCCCTCGGCTCA-3′
qGlyma03g33470-F5′-GCTTCTCCGTAGCATCTGG-3′
qGlyma03g33470-R5′-GTGGAGGAATGTCATGTTTG-3′
AtFLC-F5′-GCTCTTCTCGTCGTCTCC-3′
AtFLC-R5′-GTTCGGTCTTCTTGGCTC-3′
AtCO-F5′-AAGGTGATAAGGATGCCAAGGAG-3′
AtCO-R5′-GGAGCCATATTTGATATTGAACTGA-3′
AtSOC1-F5′-TCAGAACTTGGGCTACTC-3′
AtSOC1-R5′-TTCTCGTCGTCTCCGCCTCC-3′
AtAP1-F5′-TAAGCACATCCGCACTAG-3′
AtAP1-R5′-TTCTTGATACAGACCACCC-3′
AtFT-F5′-TGGTGGAGAAGACCTCAGGAAC-3′
AtFT-R5′-TGCCAAGCTGTCGAAACAATAT-3′
AtLFY-F5′-TGTGAACATCGCTTGTCGTC-3′
AtLFY-R5′-TAATACCGCCAACTAAAGCC-3′

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, T.; Sun, M.-Y.; Wang, X.-S.; Li, W.-B.; Li, Y.-G. Over-Expression of GmGIa-Regulated Soybean miR172a Confers Early Flowering in Transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 645. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17050645

AMA Style

Wang T, Sun M-Y, Wang X-S, Li W-B, Li Y-G. Over-Expression of GmGIa-Regulated Soybean miR172a Confers Early Flowering in Transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016; 17(5):645. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17050645

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Tao, Ming-Yang Sun, Xue-Song Wang, Wen-Bin Li, and Yong-Guang Li. 2016. "Over-Expression of GmGIa-Regulated Soybean miR172a Confers Early Flowering in Transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17, no. 5: 645. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17050645

APA Style

Wang, T., Sun, M. -Y., Wang, X. -S., Li, W. -B., & Li, Y. -G. (2016). Over-Expression of GmGIa-Regulated Soybean miR172a Confers Early Flowering in Transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17(5), 645. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17050645

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop