Next Article in Journal
Development of Substrate Degradation Enzyme Therapy for Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA Murine Model
Previous Article in Journal
Mutual Enhancement of Opioid and Adrenergic Receptors by Combinations of Opioids and Adrenergic Ligands Is Reflected in Molecular Complementarity of Ligands: Drug Development Possibilities
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 17
10.3390/ijms20174138
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phylogenetically Defined Isoforms of Listeria monocytogenes Invasion Factor InlB Differently Activate Intracellular Signaling Pathways and Interact with the Receptor gC1q-R

by
Yaroslava Chalenko
1,2,
Egor Kalinin
1,
Victor Marchenkov
3,
Elena Sysolyatina
1,4,
Alexey Surin
3,5,
Konstantin Sobyanin
1 and
Svetlana Ermolaeva
1,2,4,*
1
Laboratory of Ecology of Pathogenic Bacteria, Gamaleya Research Center of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Moscow 123098, Russia
2
Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, Nizhny Novgorod Research Veterinary Institute–Branch of Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology, Nizhny Novgorod 603022, Russia
3
Laboratory of Protein Physics, Institute for Protein Research RAS, Puschino 142290, Russia
4
Laboratory of Active Media, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudnyi 141701, Russia
5
Pushchino Branch, Shemyakin–Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Pushchino142290, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(17), 4138; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20174138
Submission received: 19 July 2019 / Revised: 10 August 2019 / Accepted: 15 August 2019 / Published: 24 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Microbiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The pathogenic Gram-positive bacterium Listeria monocytogenes has been evolving into a few phylogenetic lineages. Phylogenetically defined substitutions were described in the L. monocytogenes virulence factor InlB, which mediates active invasion into mammalian cells via interactions with surface receptors c-Met and gC1q-R. InlB internalin domain (idInlB) is central to interactions with c-Met. Here we compared activity of purified recombinant idInlB isoforms characteristic for L. monocytogenes phylogenetic lineage I and II. Size exclusion chromatography and intrinsic fluorescence were used to characterize idInlBs. Western blotting was used to study activation of c-Met-dependent MAPK- and PI3K/Akt-pathways. Solid-phase microplate binding and competition assay was used to quantify interactions with gCq1-R. Isogenic recombinant L. monocytogenes strains were used to elucidate the input of idInlB isoforms in HEp-2 cell invasion. Physicochemical parameters of idInlB isoforms were similar but not identical. Kinetics of Erk1/2 and Akt phosphorylation in response to purified idInlBs was lineage specific. Lineage I but not lineage II idInlB specifically bound gC1q-R. Antibody against gC1q-R amino acids 221–249 inhibited invasion of L. monocytogenes carrying lineage I but not lineage II idInlB. Taken together, obtained results suggested that phylogenetically defined substitutions in idInlB provide functional distinctions and might be involved in phylogenetically determined differences in virulence potential.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Listeria monocytogenes is a Gram-positive bacterium, which causes a severe foodborne disease, listeriosis [1]. Listeriosis manifests by sepsis, abortion, meningitis and meningoencephalitis. Listeriosis primarily affects elderly people and immunocompromised persons although the disease can also develop in healthy individuals [2,3,4]. Pregnant women represent one more group of risk, and perinatal listeriosis has severe consequences for fetus viability [5,6,7]. L. monocytogenes is a facultative intracellular pathogen. L. monocytogenes virulence is based on the ability to infect non-professional phagocytes such as epithelial and endothelial cells, hepatocytes, splenocytes, trophoblasts, etc. [8,9,10].
The species L. monocytogenes divides into four phylogenetic lineages, 13 serovars and multiple clonal complexes with different pathogenicity potential [11,12,13]. Lineage I strains are responsible for the majority of outbreaks and at least half of sporadic cases of listeriosis in humans and animals [14,15,16,17]. Lineage II strains are responsible for the majority of other listeriosis cases in humans and are overrepresented among animal and food isolates [14,18,19]. Strains of lineages III and IV are rare among human and animal isolates [20,21,22].
Most strains, regardless of which line they belong to, carry major virulence factors including Listeriolysin O, phospholipases, the transcriptional regulator PrfA encoded by the pathogenicity island LIPI-I and invasion factors of the internalin family InlA and InlB encoded by the inlAB operon [18,22,23,24,25]. These and a few other factors provide the intracellular phase in the L. monocytogenes life cycle [2,8,9]. The higher virulence potential of lineage I strains was suggested to be due to additional virulence factors that provide success in the course of infection of the macroorganism, such as Listeriolysin S, which is a bacteriocin from epidemic lineage I strains that targets the gut microbiota [26]. On the other hand, phylogenetically defined isoforms of major virulence factors might be another tool that is responsible for differences in the virulence potential of L. monocytogenes phylogenetic lineages. Point mutations inactivating the haemolysin Listeriolysin O (LLO) or the master-regulator PrfA were described that result in appearance of low virulent strains [25,27,28,29]. Premature stop codon in the inlA gene that result in appearance of truncated forms of the invasion factor InlA and decreased virulence are common among lineage II serovar 1/2a food isolates [28,29,30].
The virulence factor InlB mediates active invasion into many cell types [31]. Phylogenetically determined variations are characteristic for InlB as well for other virulence-associated proteins. Evolutionary analysis showed significant evidence for positive selection and recombination in the inlB gene [32]. Recently, we described distinct InlB isoforms characteristic for L. monocytogenes strains of the I and II phylogenetic lineages [33,34,35]. At least seven conservative lineage-specific amino acid substitutions were described in the internalin domain of InlB (idInlB, see below) [35]. Noticeable association with clonal complexes was observed for idInlB isoforms described in lineage I strains [33]. In lineage II strains, an idInlB isoform was revealed that is widely distributed among distinct clonal complexes. This isoform designated as idInlB14 was described in strains belonging to clonal complexes CC7, CC8, CC14, CC19, CC20, and some others [33,34]. Being placed in the same genetic background, InlB isoforms differently affected L. monocytogenes virulence in mice [35,36]. These data suggest that natural InlB isoforms could have some differences in their functionality.
InlB specifically interacts with the tyrosine kinase c-Met that results in activation of c-Met-controlled signaling pathways including MAPK-, PI3K/Akt- and STAT-controlled cascades [37,38,39]. Besides c-Met, InlB binds C1q-binding receptor gC1q-R and surface glycosaminoglycans [40,41]. InlB belongs to the so-called internalin family of proteins that are characterized by the internalin domain (id) composed of the LRR (for leucine rich repeat) domain flanked by N-cap and immunoglobulin (Ig) -like domains [42,43]. The 321 amino acid InlB internalin domain (idInlB) is the minimal InlB part that interacts with and activates the tyrosine kinase c-Met [42,43,44,45]. The C-terminal GW-domains are required for InlB presentation on the bacterial surface and interact with gC1q-R and surface glycosaminoglycans [46,47].
gC1q-R known as well as p32 (or p33) is a multi-compartmental and multi-functional protein interacting with a wide range of ligands of endogenous and exogenous origin [48]. Surface presented gC1q-R has been reported to recognize and bind a number of functional antigens of viral and bacterial origin providing microbial attachment and/or entry [41,49,50,51]. Data on interactions of InlB with gC1q-R protein are controversial. On one side, a role of gC1q-R in InlB-mediated cell invasion is supported by competition experiments and experiments on adaptation of InlB-ignoring guinea pig cells to L. monocytogenes invasion by introduction of human gC1q-R [41]. On the other side, gC1q-R interactions with InlB C-terminal GW (for a conserved Gly-Trp (GW) dipeptide) domains stimulate release of InlB from bacterial surface and antagonize c-Met signaling induced by internalin domain/c-Met interactions [40,47].
Here we compared lineage I and lineage II idInlB variants. We demonstrated that while physicochemical properties of idInlB isoforms differed unessentially, they diverged noticeably in their potential to stimulate c-Met controlled signaling processes. Moreover, we demonstrated that idInlB found in strains of the clone complex CC1 of the I phylogenetic lineage interacted with gC1-qR while idInlB isoforms found in strains of the II phylogenetic lineage did not. Interactions between CC1 lineage I idInlB and gC1q-R were critical for L. monocytogenes invasion into human epithelial HEp-2 cells.

2. Results

2.1. Physicochemical Properties of Idinlb Isoforms

A total of three InlB internalin domain (idInlB; amino acids 36–321) isoforms were included into the study (Figure 1a). One of them was specific for lineage I strains, and two others were specific for lineage II strains. The lineage I specific idInlB isoform designated as idInlB9 [35] was described in highly virulent strains of the epidemic clone ECI, clonal complex CC1, and cloned from the EC1 strain VIMHA015 (ST1, CC1) [52]. Among lineage II isoforms, the first designated as idInlB13 [35] was cloned from the type strain EGDe (CC9) [53] and the second designated as idInlB14 [35] was cloned from the human isolate VIMHA034 (CC7). Two lineage II forms were taken because the variant idInlB13 from the type strain EGDe is the best described and used in a number of studies [45,53] while idInlB14 is the most frequent among serovar 1/2a L. monocytogenes strains isolated from wild animals, clinical samples and other sources [33,34,54]. Moreover, a difference in their impact on virulence has been shown previously [35,36,55]. Amino acid substitutions which differentiate the variants are shown in the Figure 1a. idInlB13 and idInlB14 differed by four substitutions in positions 41, 49, 117 and 132. Eleven substitutions differed lineage I and lineage II variants (shown in bold at Figure 1a).
The purified proteins were compared by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and intrinsic fluorescence. The SEC profiles of all variants included a major peak with the elution times corresponding to monomeric state of the proteins (Figure 1b). The higher quantum yield of fluorescence at 340 nm was observed for idInlB9 while peak intensities were comparable for idInlB13 and idInlB14. A slight shift in peak time position was observed for idInlB13 comparatively to other variants (elution times 39,28 < 39,48 = 39,48 min for idInlB13, idInlB9 and idInlB14, respectively).
To further assess protein conformation, intrinsic fluorescence spectra were taken. idInlB9 demonstrated the highest relative fluorescence. In contrast with the data above, fluorescence of idInlB14 and idInlB13 was different with idInlB14 demonstrating the lowest quantum yield. Moreover, the second peak was observed for idInlB14 with maximum at 440 nm. There is no amino acid with emission at this wavelength. Retraction of peak 2 showed that fluorescence of idInlB14 was very similar in shape to of other proteins although lower in intensity (Figure 1c).

2.2. Kinetics of Activation of MAPK and PI3K Signaling Pathways by idInlBs was Different foridInlB Isoforms

Next, we compared kinetics of phosphorylation of Erk1/2 and Akt kinases in HEp-2 epithelial cells treated with idInlBs. The Erk1/2 and Akt kinases represent the MAPK- and PI3K-controlled pathways, which are central signaling cascades triggered by c-Met ligand binding. We found noticeably different dynamics of phosphorylation of both Erk1/2 and Akt depending on what idInlB variant was applied (Figure 2). Both lineage II idInlB13 and idInlB14 caused a similar kinetics of phospho-Erk1/2 and phospho-Akt appearance at all time points but at 5 min. In contrast, addition of lineage I idInlB9 provided a different kinetics of Erk1/2 and Akt phosphorylation. Lineage II idInlBs caused phosphorylation of Erk1/2 kinase for more than 40 min while addition of lineage I idInlB9 caused Erk1/2 phosphorylation for not more than 30 min. In contrast, phosphorylation of Akt kinase was more prolonged upon addition of idIinlB9. Effect of lineage II idInlBs on Akt phosphorylation was less pronounced both in intensity and duration. During the first minutes after addition, idInlB14 caused noticeably different effectiveness of Erk1/2 and Akt phosphorylation compared to both other variants. For idInlB9 and idInlB13 maximal accumulation of phospho-Erk1/2 and phospho-Akt was observed 5 min post protein additions, while both phosphorylated kinases noticeably increased between 5 and 10 min post idInlB14 addition.

2.3. idInlBs Isoforms Interacted with gCq1-R In Vitro in a Lineage-Specific Manner

To address whether idInlBs interacted directly with gC1q-R, we developed an ELISA assay to compare interactions between idInlB isoforms and gC1q-R. All idInlB variants interacted with gC1q-R in vitro although the specificity of interactions appeared to be different. When taken in the concentration of 0.4 µg/mL, lineage I specific idInlB9 bound gC1q-R proteins better than both lineage II idInlBs (Figure 3a). At concentrations higher than 0.4 µg/mL effectiveness of gC1q-R binding was similar for all isoforms.
To check whether interactions between idInlBs and gC1q-R were specific, a competitions assay was performed. idInlB14 (lineage II) was used in this assay because both lineage II idInlBs behaved similarly in the binding assay. idInlB14 was compared with lineage I specific idInlB9. Both idInlB were taken in concentration of 0.4 μg/mL. Antibodies protected the central region of human gC1q-R (amino acids 76–104) and protected the C-terminal region of gC1q-R (amino acids 221–249) were used to block idInlB binding. Binding of idInlB9 was partly blocked by the antibody developed against the central region of human gC1q-R (by a factor of 1.6, p < 0.01; Figure 3b) and to a lesser extent by the antibody against the C-terminal region of gC1q-R (by a factor 1.25, p < 0.05). Binding of idInlB14 was independent of antibodies.

2.4. gC1q-R Antibodies Specifically Inhibited Lineage I idInlB- but not Lineage II idInlB-Driven Invasion into HEp-2 Cells

To check how specific binding to gCq1-R could affect InlB-driven cell invasion, we performed “gentamicin invasion assay” using human epithelial HEp-2 cells and isogenic recombinant L. monocytogenes strains. The strains were constructed on the basis of the strain EGDeΔinlB lacking the inlB gene (kindly provided by Prof. J. Vazquez-Boland) and expressed full size InlB variants that differed in idInlB only. Other InlB parts including the signal peptide, B-repeat and GW-domains as well as the promotor region controlling inlB gene expression were the same and taken from the strain EGDe [35]. Both full size InlBs, InlB9 (carrying idInlB9) and InlB14 (carrying idInlB14) improved invasion of the parental strain EGDeΔinlB (Figure 4a). To evaluate an impact of interactions between InlB variants and gC1q-R on bacterial invasion, HEp-2 cells were pre-treated with gC1q-R specific antibodies. Besides antibodies tested in vitro, the polyclonal antibody developed against the whole gC1q-R protein was used. For the L. monocytogenes strain EGDeΔinlB::inlB9, pre-treatment with antibodies against whole gC1q-R, its central part (amino acids 76–104) and its C-terminal part (amino acids 221–249) reduces invasion efficiency 2-, 13- and 153- fold, respectively (p << 0.05, Figure 4b). The last antibody specific to the C-terminal amino acids 221–249 totally inhibited invasion. It diminished invasion efficiency almost to the level of the strain EGDeΔinlB (0.000051 ± 0.000023 vs. 0.000025 ± 0.000013 for strain EGDeΔinlB::inlB9 in the presence of the antibody and strain EGDeΔinlB, respectively, p = 0.27). Antibodies provided different effects on invasion of the strain EGDeΔinlB::inlB14. Antibodies against the gC1q-R central part (amino acids 76–104) did not affect invasion (p = 0.329). In contrast, antibodies against the whole protein and the C-terminal part (amino acids 221–249) improved invasion in 1.9 and 1.3-times (p < 0.05).

3. Discussion

Here we demonstrated that phylogenetically defined isoforms of the L. monocytogenes invasion factor InlB internalin domain (idInlB) noticeably differed in their functional properties. Three idInlB isoforms were compared. The idInlB9 variant is characteristic for highly virulent CC1 strains of the phylogenetic lineage I [33]. In general, lineage I-specific idInlB isoforms demonstrated a tight association with clonal complexes. The idinlB9, idinlB1 and idinlB8 isoforms were shown to be characteristic for clonal complexes CC1, CC2 and CC3, respectively [33,35]. Five and one amino acid substitutions differ idInlB9 and idInlB1, and idinlB9 and idinlB8, respectively [35]. All three listed clonal complexes are strongly associated with strains of clinical origin [18]. The idilnB9 isoform was chosen because (i) the epidemiological significance of CC1 is well-known, and CC1 strains caused outbreaks in many countries including Russia; (ii) CC1 but not CC2 or CC3 strains are predominant in cases of neurological infection in ruminants suggesting that CC1-specific virulence features provide the high virulence for different hosts; (iii) idInlB9 is most divergent from lineage II idInlB isoforms [16,18,33,35]. In total, 11 amino acid substitutions were distinct for idinlB9 and lineage II idInlB isoforms used in this study. Previous studies showed that seven of these 11 substitutions are conservative distinctions between lineage I and lineage II strains [35]. Lineage II idInlB13 is characteristic for the type strain EGDe and CC9 strains that are strongly associated with a food origin and minor among clinical isolates, idInlB14 is found in a wide range of lineage II strains belonging to the serovar 1/2a and different clonal complexes (CC7, CC8, CC14, CC19,CC 20, CC21, CC155, CC177 and some others) [18,33,34]. Four amino acids differentiated idInlB13 and idlnB14 isoforms.
Polymorphism of virulence factors is well-established in pathogenic bacteria. In previous years, experimental evidence has accumulated on functional differences that provide a role for phylogenetically defined isoforms of virulence factors in development of highly virulent clones of different bacterial species. Isoforms of the Salmonella enterica SpvD protease, which negatively regulates the NF-κB signaling pathway, differ by substitutions in the position 161 [56,57]. The SpvDGly161(SpvD with Gly at the position 161) variant characteristic for the Enteritidis serovar was shown to more potently inhibit NF-κB-mediated immune responses in cells in vitro than the SpvDArg161 (SpvD with Arg at the position 161) variant characteristic for the serovar Typhimurium. Introduction of the SpvDGly161 variant in the Typhimurium strain increased its virulence in mice [57]. Staphylococcus aureus Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) toxin has two isoforms, R and H with different geographic distribution [58,59]. Most methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains distributed in USA belong to the R groups. The molecular model was suggested that H-R substitution might have functional implications that result in better fitness for the R variant, thus contributing to the successful spread and high virulence of the USA300 strain [58]. The epidemic highly virulent Yersinia pestis strains possessed only the PlaT259 isoform of the plasminogen activator Pla while PlaI259 isoform is spread among Y. pestis isolates with limited virulence [60,61]. Computational and experimental analysis demonstrated that the Pla isoform found in Y. pestis epidemic strains is more functionally efficient than that of the low virulent strains [61,62],
In line with these results, our data demonstrated that phylogenetically defined substitutions in the L. monocytogenes invasion factor InlB were implemented in functional differences between idInlB isoforms. Lineage I and lineage II specific idInlB isoforms differentially activated c-Met-dependent MAPK- and PI3K/Akt- signaling pathways and interacted with gC1q-R protein.
The most evident difference between idInlB isoforms was a different potential for interactions with the gC1q-R receptor, the multifunctional mammalian protein presenting in different compartments including the cell surface. In a solid-phase microplate binding assay, gC1q-R bound CC1-specific idInlB9 better than lineage II specific idInlB13 and idInlB14. However, when ligands were taken in excess gC1q-R bound both lineage I and lineage II idInlBs. gC1q-R is a highly acidic, rather “sticky” protein that interacts with multiple ligands of cellular, protozoan, bacterial and viral origin [41,48,49,51,63]. Trying to exclude unspecific interactions between gC1q-R and idInlBs we applied an in vitro competition assay. Antibodies specific to the central and C-terminal parts partly inhibited interactions of gC1q-R with idInlB9 but not with idInlB14.
The in vivo invasion assay was in line with in vitro results. Isogenic L. monocytogenes strains expressing recombinant full length InlB were used. Recombinant InlBs differed in idInlB only while they carried the same signal peptide and GW-domains. The competition invasion assay demonstrated that a polyclonal antibody to amino acids 221–249 at the C-terminal part of the human gC1q-R totally repressed idInlB9-driven invasion into human epithelial HEp-2 cells decreasing it 150-fold, but did not affect invasion driven by lineage II specific idInlB14. Invasion in the presence of another antibody specific to amino acids 76–104 at the central gC1q-R part was partly inhibited for lineage I but not lineage II carrying L. monocytogenes. Interestingly, that polyclonal antibodies developed against the whole gC1q-R protein decreased invasion efficiency of idInlB9-carrying strain only two-fold suggesting site-specific interactions of gC1q-R with idInlB9. The important for interactions region 221–249 is located in the larger gC1qR segment encoded by residues 159–282 which also contains the site for HCV core protein [63]. In contrast to idInlB9, idInlB14-driven L. monocytogenes invasion that was not inhibited specifically by antibodies against gC1q-R. Statistically significant 1.9-fold increase in efficiency of idInlB14-driven invasion was provided by application of the polyclonal antibodies to gC1q-R. This effect might be prescribed to inhibition of interactions between gC1q-R and GW-domains of the full length InlB as it was shown previously [47]. These interactions were suggested to affect GW-domain dependent InlB binding to the bacterial surface that negatively affects L. monocytogenes invasion [47].
Obtained results suggested that interactions of idInlB with gC1q-R are important for virulence of CC1 strains but seem to be of less importance for lineage II L. monocytogenes strains. The importance of interactions with gC1q-R for lineage I strains belonging to other clonal complexes should be checked. gC1q-R is a multifaceted protein that is particularly involved in control of cytoskeleton rearrangements during lamellipodia and filopodia formation [64]. This function might be important for the role of interactions between gC1q-R and idInlB in L. monocytogenes active cell invasion. Results obtained in this work are in line with our previous results demonstrating differences in lamellipodia and filopodia formation induced by different idInlB isoforms in HEp-2 cells [65]. The known role of InlB as not only an invasion factor but also as a endocytosis activating factor [66] provides a direction for further studies on functional roles of its phylogenetically defined variability.
Overall, obtained results demonstrated differences in functional activities of phylogenetically defined idInlB isoforms. These differences are in line with previously obtained data that demonstrated that isogenic recombinant L. monocytogenes strains expressing full length InlB variants differed by idInlB only have different virulence for mice [36]. Taken together, these observations suggested that idInlB isoforms might provide different effects on L. monocytogenes virulence, that in turn might be one of foundations of the different virulence potential of L. monocytogenes phylogenetic lineages and/or distinct clonal groups.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

Escherichia coli expressing strains BL21::pET28b(+)::InlBallele9, BL21::pET28b(+)::InlBallele13 and pET28b(+)::InlBallele14 were used [52]. Shortly, the strains were obtained by cloning the idInlB (amino acids 36–321) encoding inlB gene fragment from the L. monocytogenes strains VIMHA015 (serovar 4b, clinical isolate) for BL21::pET28b(+)::InlBallele9, EGDe (serovar 1/2a, type strain) for BL21::pET28b(+)::InlBallele13, and VIMHA034 (serovar 1/2a, clinical isolate) for BL21::pET28b(+)::InlBallele14 into the pET28b(+) vector (Novagen®, a brand of EMD Biosciences, Inc., an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). The idInlB proteins are referred as idInlB9 (for the protein produced by the BL21::pET28b(+)::InlBallele9 strain), idInlB13 (for BL21::pET28b(+)::InlBallele13), and idInlB14 (for BL21::pET28b(+)::InlBallele14). Allele numbering was given in accordance with [33,34].
Construction of isogenic recombinant L. monocytogenes strains on the basis of the strain EGDeΔinlB lacking the inlB gene (the strains were generously provided by Prof. J. A. Vazquez-Boland, Univ. Edinburgh) was described previously [35]. Shortly, idInlB (amino acids 36–321) encoding inlB gene fragments like those that were used for construction of E. coli expressing strains, were incorporated into the vector pInlAB made on the basis of the shuttle vector pTRKH2 [67] by introduction of the promoter of inlAB operon, an inlA gene fragment ending a signal peptide required for protein secretion, and inlB gene fragment encoding the B-repeat and GW-domains all fragments from the L. monocytogenes strain EGDe, Lineage II [53]. Introduction of the idInlB encoding gene fragment restored the full length inlB gene. The strains carrying idInlB9 and idInlB14 were designated EGDeΔinlB::inlB9 and EGDeΔinlB::inlB14, respectively [35]. The recombinant proteins InlB9 and InlB14 carried lineage-specific idInlB domains while they shared the same N-terminal signal peptide and the C-terminal B-repeat and GW-domains.
Plasmid-carrying E. coli strains were grown on the LB agar or broth medium (Sigma-Aldridge, St. Louis, MS, USA), supplemented with Km (100 µ mL−1). Recombinant L. monocytogenes was grown on the BHI agar or broth medium (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) supplemented with Em (10 µ mL−1).

4.2. Protein Purification

The proteins with the total length of 330 aa were purified via a His-tag with Dynabeads (Invitrogen®, the brand of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) ), subjected to dialysis with Slide-A-Lyzer™ MINI unit (Thermo Fisher Scientific,) against the Na-phosphate buffer (50 mM Na-phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl), and stored at +4 °C at the concentration of 1.5 mg/mL.

4.3. Cell Culture and Growth Conditions

Human epithelial HEp-2 cells obtained from the collection of Gamaleya Research Center were grown in a DMEM medium (PANEKO, Moscow, Russia) with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco®, the brand of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C.

4.4. Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC)

SEC was carried out in a PBS buffer on a Superdex 200 10/300 GL (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Uppsala, Sweden) column attached to a ProStar HPLC chromatograph (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Elution was performed at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. The elution was monitored by fluorescence emission at 340 nm when excitation light wavelength was set to 280 nm.

4.5. Fluorescence Spectra

Fluorescence spectra were measured in a square quartz cuvette 3 × 3 mm with a Cary Eclipse spectrofluorometer (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) at protein concentration in a PBS buffer 0.03 mg/mL. Excitation wavelength was 280 nm, and both excitation and emission slits were set to a bandwidth 10 nm.

4.6. Immunoblotting

idInlB9 or idInlB14 was added to HEp-2 cells grown as described above up to a concentration of 100 ng/mL. At time points described in the text, cells were resuspended in 100 µL RIPA buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Sigma Aldrich). Cell lysates were boiled for 10 min, separated on 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membrane (Amersham, the brand of GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL USA)). Phospho-Erk1/2 and phospho-Akt were visualized with primary antibodies PA5-37828 and 44-621G, respectively (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and secondary HRP-labelled ab97085 antibodies (Abcam PLC, Cambridge CB2 0AX UK). The optical density of each band was measured using TotalLab 1.10 software and presented graphically in arbitrary units.

4.7. Solid-Phase Microplate Binding and Competition Assay

The ability of various idInlB bind gC1q-R protein was assessed by solid-phase ELISA using microtiter plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #15041). The assay was performed according to manufacturer instructions. Briefly, after pre-treatment with 2% glutaraldehyde in PBS, pH 5.0, and washing with TTBS (20 mM TrisHCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20), triplicate wells were coated (overnight at +4 °C) with 100 μL C1QBP Recombinant Human Protein (Invitrogen, #11874H08E25), 4 µg/mL in 0.1 M sodium carbonate buffer, pH 9.4. The unbound proteins were aspirated, the wells were washed with TTBS and the unreacted sites were blocked by SuperBlockTM Blocking Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #37515) supplemented with 0.05% Tween-20 at room temperature for 1 h. To block C1QBP His-Tags, plates were incubated with 6x-His Tag Monoclonal Antibody (4E3D10H2/E3; Thermo Fisher Scientific # MA1-135) for 1 h. When competition assay was performed, gC1q-R specific polyclonal antibodies were added at the same stage. Two antibodies were used: #PA5-14989 specific to amino acids 76–104 from the central region of human gC1q-R, and # PA5-14988 specific to amino acids 221–249 from the C-terminal region of human GC1qR (both antibodies from Thermo Fisher Scientific). The unbound antibodies were washed away, and purified idInlB proteins diluted in a Blocking Buffer in concentrations (0–40 µg/mL) were added and plates were incubated at room temperature for 1 h. Bound idInlB was revealed with 6x-His Tag Polyclonal Antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific #PA1-983B) that interacted with idInlB His-Tags and HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies Anti-Rabbit IgG H&L (HRP) (Abcam pre-adsorbed; # ab97085). HRP activity was stained with 1-Step Ultra TMB-ELISA substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #34028). The absorption was measured at λ = 450 nm. The washing stages between the reactions were performed three times with TTBS.

4.8. Invasion Assay

Invasion assay was performed as described in [35]. Briefly, 70% HEp-2 cell monolay was infected with mid-exponential bacteria (MOI 100:1, bacteria:cells). After 1 h incubation, the monolay was washed with PBS and gentamicin (Fluka, the brand of Thermo Fisher Scientific) was added up to a concentration of 100 µg/mL. One-hour later, cells were washed with PBS and lysed with 1% Triton X-100 (Sigma). Decimal dilutions of cell lysates were plated on BHI. Colonies were counted 24 h later. In some experiments, gC1q-R specific antibodies (#PA5-14989; #PA5-14988; or #PA5-55318 developed against recombinant protein corresponding to human gC1q-R; all antibodies from Thermo Fisher Scientific) were added up to concentration 4 µg/mL 1 h before bacterial infection. Invasion efficiency was calculated as a ratio of intracellular bacteria to the bacteria applied to cells. Relative invasion efficiency was calculated as a percentage of invasion efficiency relative to invasion of bacteria in absence of antibodies.

4.9. Statistics

All experiments were performed using duplicate or triplicate samples and repeated at least three times. To evaluate the data obtained in vitro, the mean values and SD were calculated with Excel software (Microsoft Office 2010). The paired t-test included in the same software was used for assessment of statistical significance. Two-group comparisons were conducted using the Student’s t-test. A value of p < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.S. and S.E.; methodology, Y.C., A.S.; validation, Y.C., E.K., E.S. and V.M.; formal analysis, S.E.; investigation, A.S.; data curation, K.S.; writing—original draft preparation, K.S.; writing—review and editing, S.E.; visualization, V.M. and E.K.; project administration, Y.C.; funding acquisition, K.S.

Funding

This research was funded by Russian Science Foundation, grant number 18-75-00024.

Acknowledgments

Authors thank J. Vazquez-Boland, Univ. Edinburgh for the gift of the strain EGDeΔinlB and T. Klaenhammer, North Carolina State University for the gift of the vector pTRKH2.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

CCClonal complex
idInternalin domain
idInlBInlB internalin domain
SECSize-exclusive chromatography
STSequence type

References

  1. De Noordhout, C.M.; Devleesschauwer, B.; Angulo, F.J.; Verbeke, G.; Haagsma, J.; Kirk, M.; Havelaar, A.; Speybroeck, N. The global burden of listeriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2014, 14, 1073–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vázquez-Boland, J.A.; Kuhn, M.; Berche, P.; Chakraborty, T.; Domínguez-Bernal, G.; Goebel, W.; González-Zorn, B.; Wehland, J.; Kreft, J. Listeria pathogenesis and molecular virulence determinants. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001, 14, 584–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Allerberger, F.; Wagner, M. Listeriosis: A resurgent foodborne infection. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2010, 16, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Charlier, C.; Perrodeau, É.; Leclercq, A.; Cazenave, B.; Pilmis, B.; Henry, B.; Lopes, A.; Maury, M.M.; Moura, A.; Goffinet, F.; et al. Clinical features and prognostic factors of listeriosis: the MONALISA national prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 510–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mylonakis, E.; Paliou, M.; Hohmann, E.L.; Calderwood, S.B.; Wing, E.J. Listeriosis during pregnancy: A case series and review of 222 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 2002, 81, 260–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Vázquez-Boland, J.A.; Krypotou, E.; Scortti, M. Listeria Placental Infection. MBio 2017, 8, e00949-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Girard, D.; Leclercq, A.; Laurent, E.; Lecuit, M.; De Valk, H.; Goulet, V. Pregnancy-related listeriosis in France, 1984 to 2011, With a focus on 606 cases from 1999 to 2011. Eurosurveillance 2014, 19, 20909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Pizarro-Cerdá, J.; Kühbacher, A.; Cossart, P. Entry of listeria monocytogenes in mammalian epithelial cells: An updated view. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2012, 2, a010009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pizarro-Cerdá, J.; Cossart, P. Microbe Profile: Listeria monocytogenes: a paradigm among intracellular bacterial pathogens. Microbiology 2019, 165, 719–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lecuit, M. Understanding how Listeria monocytogenes targets and crosses host barriers. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2005, 11, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Nightingale, K.K.; Windham, K.; Wiedmann, M. Evolution and molecular phylogeny of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from human and animal listeriosis cases and foods. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 5537–5551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rasmussen, O.F.; Skouboe, P.; Dons, L.; Rosen, L.; Olsen, J.E. Listeria monocytogenes exists in at least three evolutionary lines: Evidence from flagellin, invasive associated protein and listeriolysin O genes. Microbiology 1995, 141, 2053–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Orsi, R.H.; de Bakker, H.C.; Wiedmann, M. Listeria monocytogenes lineages: Genomics, evolution, ecology, and phenotypic characteristics. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2011, 301, 79–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gray, M.J.; Zadoks, R.N.; Fortes, E.D.; Dogan, B.; Cai, S.; Chen, Y.; Scott, V.N.; Gombas, D.E.; Boor, K.J.; Wiedmann, M. Listeria monocytogenes isolates from foods and humans form distinct but overlapping populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 5833–5841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hong, E.; Doumith, M.; Duperrier, S.; Giovannacci, I.; Morvan, A.; Glaser, P.; Buchrieser, C.; Jacquet, C.; Martin, P. Genetic diversity of Listeria monocytogenes recovered from infected persons and pork, seafood and dairy products on retail sale in France during 2000 and 2001. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 114, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Dreyer, M.; Aguilar-Bultet, L.; Rupp, S.; Guldimann, C.; Stephan, R.; Schock, A.; Otter, A.; Schüpbach, G.; Brisse, S.; Lecuit, M.; et al. Listeria monocytogenes sequence type 1 is predominant in ruminant rhombencephalitis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Jennison, A.V.; Masson, J.J.; Fang, N.X.; Graham, R.M.; Bradbury, M.I.; Fegan, N.; Gobius, K.S.; Graham, T.M.; Guglielmino, C.J.; Brown, J.L.; et al. Analysis of the Listeria monocytogenes population structure among isolates from 1931 to 2015 in Australia. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Maury, M.M.; Tsai, Y.H.; Charlier, C.; Touchon, M.; Chenal-Francisque, V.; Leclercq, A.; Criscuolo, A.; Gaultier, C.; Roussel, S.; Brisabois, A.; et al. Uncovering Listeria monocytogenes hypervirulence by harnessing its biodiversity. Nat. Genet. 2017, 49, 970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hilliard, A.; Leong, D.; O’Callaghan, A.; Culligan, E.P.; Morgan, C.A.; Delappe, N.; Hill, C.; Jordan, K.; Cormican, M.; Gahan, C.G.M. Genomic characterization of listeria monocytogenes isolates associated with clinical listeriosis and the food production environment in Ireland. Genes (Basel) 2018, 9, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, D.; Lawrence, M.L.; Gorski, L.; Mandrell, R.E.; Ainsworth, A.J.; Austin, F.W. Listeria monocytogenes serotype 4b strains belonging to lineages I and III possess distinct molecular features. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 214–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Roberts, A.; Nightingale, K.; Jeffers, G.; Fortes, E.; Kongo, J.M.; Wiedmann, M. Genetic and phenotypic characterization of Listeria monocytogenes lineage III. Microbiology 2006, 152, 685–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Tsai, Y.H.L.; Maron, S.B.; McGann, P.; Nightingale, K.K.; Wiedmann, M.; Orsi, R.H. Recombination and positive selection contributed to the evolution of Listeria monocytogenes lineages III and IV, two distinct and well supported uncommon L. monocytogenes lineages. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2011, 11, 1881–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Moura, A.; Criscuolo, A.; Pouseele, H.; Maury, M.M.; Leclercq, A.; Tarr, C.; Björkman, J.T.; Dallman, T.; Reimer, A.; Enouf, V.; et al. Whole genome-based population biology and epidemiological surveillance of Listeria monocytogenes. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 2, 16185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kuenne, C.; Billion, A.; Mraheil, M.A.; Strittmatter, A.; Daniel, R.; Goesmann, A.; Barbuddhe, S.; Hain, T.; Chakraborty, T. Reassessment of the Listeria monocytogenes pan-genome reveals dynamic integration hotspots and mobile genetic elements as major components of the accessory genome. BMC Genomics 2013, 14, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Maury, M.M.; Chenal-Francisque, V.; Bracq-Dieye, H.; Han, L.; Leclercq, A.; Vales, G.; Moura, A.; Gouin, E.; Scortti, M.; Disson, O.; et al. Spontaneous loss of virulence in natural populations of Listeria monocytogenes. Infect. Immun. 2017, 85, e00541-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Quereda, J.J.; Dussurget, O.; Nahori, M.-A.; Ghozlane, A.; Volant, S.; Dillies, M.-A.; Regnault, B.; Kennedy, S.; Mondot, S.; Villoing, B.; et al. Bacteriocin from epidemic Listeria strains alters the host intestinal microbiota to favor infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 5706–5711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chiba, S.; Nagai, T.; Hayashi, T.; Baba, Y.; Nagai, S.; Koyasu, S. Listerial invasion protein internalin B promotes entry into ileal Peyer’s patches in vivo. Microbiol. Immunol. 2011, 55, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Jacquet, C.; Doumith, M.; Gordon, J.I.; Martin, P.M.V.; Cossart, P.; Lecuit, M. A Molecular Marker for Evaluating the Pathogenic Potential of Foodborne Listeria monocytogenes. J. Infect. Dis. 2004, 189, 2094–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nightingale, K.K.; Ivy, R.A.; Ho, A.J.; Fortes, E.D.; Njaa, B.L.; Peters, R.M.; Wiedmann, M. inlA premature stop codons are common among Listeria monocytogenes isolates from foods and yield virulence-attenuated strains that confer protection against fully virulent strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 6570–6583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ferreira da Silva, M.; Ferreira, V.; Magalhães, R.; Almeida, G.; Alves, A.; Teixeira, P. Detection of premature stop codons leading to truncated internalin A among food and clinical strains of Listeria monocytogenes. Food Microbiol. 2017, 63, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bierne, H.; Cossart, P. InlB, a surface protein of Listeria monocytogenes that behaves as an invasin and a growth factor. J. Cell Sci. 2002, 115, 3357–3367. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Tsai, Y.H.L.; Orsi, R.H.; Nightingale, K.K.; Wiedmann, M. Listeria monocytogenes internalins are highly diverse and evolved by recombination and positive selection. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2006, 6, 378–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Adgamov, R.; Zaytseva, E.; Thiberge, J.-M.; Brisse, S.; Ermolaeva, S. Genetically Related Listeria Monocytogenes Strains Isolated from Lethal Human Cases and Wild Animals; Caliskan, M., Ed.; InTech Open: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  34. Voronina, O.L.; Ryzhova, N.N.; Kunda, M.S.; Kurnaeva, M.A.; Semenov, A.N.; Aksenova, E.I.; Egorova, I.Y.; Kolbasov, D.V.; Ermolaeva, S.A.; Gintsburg, A.L. Diversity and Pathogenic Potential of Listeria monocytogenes Isolated from Environmental Sources in the Russian Federation. Int. J. Mod. Eng. Res. 2015, 5, 5–15. [Google Scholar]
  35. Sobyanin, K.; Sysolyatina, E.; Krivozubov, M.; Chalenko, Y.; Karyagina, A.; Ermolaeva, S. Naturally occurring InlB variants that support intragastric Listeria monocytogenes infection in mice. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2017, 364, fnx011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sobyanin, K.A.; Sysolyatina, E.V.; Chalenko, Y.M.; Kalinin, E.V.; Ermolaeva, S.A. Route of Injection Affects the Impact of InlB Internalin Domain Variants on Severity of Listeria monocytogenes Infection in Mice. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 2101575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Shen, Y.; Naujokas, M.; Park, M.; Ireton, K. InIB-dependent internalization of Listeria is mediated by the Met receptor tyrosine kinase. Cell 2000, 103, 501–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, N.; Xiang, G.S.; Dokainish, H.; Ireton, K.; Elferink, L.A. The Listeria protein internalin B mimics hepatocyte growth factor-induced receptor trafficking. Traffic 2005, 6, 459–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Gessain, G.; Disson, O.; Lecuit, M. PI3-kinase activation is critical for host barrier permissiveness to Listeria monocytogenes. Med. Sci. (Paris) 2016, 212, 165–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Banerjee, M.; Copp, J.; Vuga, D.; Marino, M.; Chapman, T.; Van Der Geer, P.; Ghosh, P. GW domains of the Listena monocytogenes invasion protein InlB are required for potentiation of Met activation. Mol. Microbiol. 2004, 52, 257–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Braun, L. gC1q-R/p32, a C1q-binding protein, is a receptor for the InlB invasion protein of Listeria monocytogenes. EMBO J. 2000, 19, 1458–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Copp, J.; Marino, M.; Banerjee, M.; Ghosh, P.; Van der Geer, P. Multiple regions of internalin B contribute to its ability to turn on the Ras-mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 7783–7789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Freiberg, A.; Machner, M.P.; Pfeil, W.; Schubert, W.D.; Heinz, D.W.; Seckler, R. Folding and stability of the leucine-rich repeat domain of internalin B from Listeria monocytogenes. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 337, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ferraris, D.M.; Gherardi, E.; Di, Y.; Heinz, D.W.; Niemann, H.H. Ligand-Mediated Dimerization of the Met Receptor Tyrosine Kinase by the Bacterial Invasion Protein InlB. J. Mol. Biol. 2010, 395, 522–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Niemann, H.H.; Jäger, V.; Butler, P.J.G.; van den Heuvel, J.; Schmidt, S.; Ferraris, D.; Gherardi, E.; Heinz, D.W. Structure of the Human Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Met in Complex with the Listeria Invasion Protein InlB. Cell 2007, 130, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Jonquières, R.; Pizarro-Cerdá, J.; Cossart, P. Synergy between the N- and C-terminal domains of InlB for efficient invasion of non-phagocytic cells by Listeria monocytogenes. Mol. Microbiol. 2001, 42, 955–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Marino, M.; Banerjee, M.; Jonquières, R.; Cossart, P.; Ghosh, P. GW domains of the Listeria monocytogenes invasion protein InlB are SH3-like and mediate binding to host ligands. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 5623–5634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Ghebrehiwet, B.; Peerschke, E.I.B. cC1q-R (calreticulin) and gC1q-R/p33: Ubiquitously expressed multi-ligand binding cellular proteins involved in inflammation and infection. Proc. Mol. Immunol. 2004, 41, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Biswas, A.K.; Hafiz, A.; Banerjee, B.; Kim, K.S.; Datta, K.; Chitnis, C.E. Plasmodium falciparum uses gC1qR/HABP1/p32 as a receptor to bind to vascular endothelium and for platelet-mediated clumping. PLoS Pathog. 2007, 3, 1271–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Ghebrehiwet, B.; Tantral, L.; Titmus, M.A.; Panessa-Warren, B.J.; Tortora, G.T.; Wong, S.S.; Warren, J.B. The exosporium of B. cereus contains a binding site for gC1qR/p33: Implication in spore attachment and/or entry. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2007, 598, 181–197. [Google Scholar]
  51. Choi, Y.; Kwon, Y.C.; Kim, S.I.; Park, J.M.; Lee, K.H.; Ahn, B.Y. A hantavirus causing hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome requires gC1qR/p32 for efficient cell binding and infection. Virology 2008, 381, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Ragon, M.; Wirth, T.; Hollandt, F.; Lavenir, R.; Lecuit, M.; Le Monnier, A.; Brisse, S. A new perspective on Listeria monocytogenes evolution. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Glaser, P.; Frangeul, L.; Buchrieser, C.; Rusniok, C.; Amend, A.; Baquero, F.; Berche, P.; Bloecker, H.; Brandt, P.; Chakraborty, T.; et al. Comparative genomics of Listeria species. Science 2001, 294, 849–852. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Zaytseva, E.; Ermolaeva, S.; Somov, G.P. Low genetic diversity and epidemiological significance of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from wild animals in the far east of Russia. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2007, 7, 736–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Témoin, S.; Roche, S.M.; Grépinet, O.; Fardini, Y.; Velge, P. Multiple point mutations in virulence genes explain the low virulence of Listeria monocytogenes field strains. Microbiology 2008, 154, 939–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Bauerfeind, R.; Barth, S.; Weiß, R.; Baljer, G. Sequence polymorphism of the Salmonella plasmid virulence factor D (SpvD) in Salmonella enterica isolates of animal origin. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on the Epidemiology and Control of Salmonella and other Food Borne Pathogens in Pork; Iowa State University Digital Press : Iowa City, Iowa, 2001; Volume 157, pp. 604–613. [Google Scholar]
  57. Grabe, G.J.; Zhang, Y.; Przydacz, M.; Rolhion, N.; Yang, Y.; Pruneda, J.N.; Komander, D.; Holden, D.W.; Hare, S.A. The Salmonella effector SpvD is a cysteine hydrolase with a serovar-specific polymorphism influencing catalytic activity, suppression of immune responses, and bacterial virulence. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 25853–25863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. O’Hara, F.P.; Guex, N.; Word, J.M.; Miller, L.A.; Becker, J.A.; Walsh, S.L.; Scangarella, N.E.; West, J.M.; Shawar, R.M.; Amrine-Madsen, H. A Geographic Variant of the Staphylococcus aureus Panton-Valentine Leukocidin Toxin and the Origin of Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus USA300. J. Infect. Dis. 2008, 197, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dumitrescu, O.; Tristan, A.; Meugnier, H.; Bes, M.; Gouy, M.; Etienne, J.; Lina, G.; Vandenesch, F. Polymorphism of the Staphylococcus aureus Panton-Valentine Leukocidin Genes and Its Possible Link with the Fitness of Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus. J. Infect. Dis. 2008, 198, 792–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Zhou, D.; Han, Y.; Song, Y.; Huang, P.; Yang, R. Comparative and evolutionary genomics of Yersinia pestis. Microbes Infect. 2004, 6, 1226–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dentovskaya, S.V.; Platonov, M.E.; Svetoch, T.E.; Kopylov, P.K.; Kombarova, T.I.; Ivanov, S.A.; Shaikhutdinova, R.Z.; Kolombet, L.V.; Chauhan, S.; Ablamunits, V.G.; et al. Two isoforms of Yersinia pestis plasminogen activator Pla: Intraspecies distribution, intrinsic disorder propensity, and contribution to virulence. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0168089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Haiko, J.; Kukkonen, M.; Ravantti, J.J.; Westerlund-Wikström, B.; Korhonen, T.K. The single substitution I259T, conserved in the plasminogen activator Pla of pandemic Yersinia pestis branches, enhances fibrinolytic activity. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 191, 4758–4766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pednekar, L.; Pathan, A.A.; Paudyal, B.; Tsolaki, A.G.; Kaur, A.; Abozaid, S.M.; Kouser, L.; Khan, H.A.; Peerschke, E.I.; Shamji, M.H.; et al. Analysis of the Interaction between globular head modules of human C1q and its candidate receptor gC1qR. Front. Immunol. 2016, 7, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kim, K.B.; Yi, J.S.; Nguyen, N.; Lee, J.H.; Kwon, Y.C.; Ahn, B.Y.; Cho, H.; Kim, Y.K.; Yoo, H.J.; Lee, J.S.; et al. Cell-surface receptor for complement component C1q (gC1qR) is a key regulator for lamellipodia formation and cancer metastasis. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 23093–23101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chalenko, Y.M.; Sysolyatina, E.V.; Kalinin, E.V.; Sobyanin, K.A.; Ermolaeva, S.A. Natural variants of Listeria monocytogenes internalin B with different ability to stimulate cell proliferation and cytoskeleton rearrangement in HEp-2 cells. Mol. Genet. Microbiol. Virol. 2017, 32, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pentecost, M.; Kumaran, J.; Ghosh, P.; Amieva, M.R. Listeria monocytogenes internalin B activates junctional endocytosis to accelerate intestinal invasion. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. O’Sullivan, D.J.; Klaenhammer, T.R. High- and low-copy-number Lactococcus shuttle cloning vectors with features for clone screening. Gene 1993, 137, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 20 04138 g001a 550Ijms 20 04138 g001b 550
Figure 1. Physicochemical characteristics of idInlB isoforms: (a) Amino acid substitutions. The idInlB13 sequence was taken as a basis. Substitutions between lineages I and II idInlBs are shown in bold. LRR for leucine rich repear; (b) size exclusion chromatography (SEC) of purified idInlBs; (c) fluorescence spectra of purified idInlBs. For idInlB14, original and retracted spectra are shown (see text for details).
Figure 1. Physicochemical characteristics of idInlB isoforms: (a) Amino acid substitutions. The idInlB13 sequence was taken as a basis. Substitutions between lineages I and II idInlBs are shown in bold. LRR for leucine rich repear; (b) size exclusion chromatography (SEC) of purified idInlBs; (c) fluorescence spectra of purified idInlBs. For idInlB14, original and retracted spectra are shown (see text for details).
Ijms 20 04138 g001aIjms 20 04138 g001b
Ijms 20 04138 g002 550
Figure 2. Kinetics of Erk1/2 and Akt phosphorylation in the presence of idInlBs. A total of 100 ng/mL idInlBs were added to HEp-2 cells. Cells were lysed at pointed time points and probed with anti-phospho-Erk1/2 and anti-phospho-Akt antibodies. The curves show digitized data from three independent experiments. * p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Kinetics of Erk1/2 and Akt phosphorylation in the presence of idInlBs. A total of 100 ng/mL idInlBs were added to HEp-2 cells. Cells were lysed at pointed time points and probed with anti-phospho-Erk1/2 and anti-phospho-Akt antibodies. The curves show digitized data from three independent experiments. * p < 0.05.
Ijms 20 04138 g002
Ijms 20 04138 g003 550
Figure 3. In vitro study of interactions between idInlBs and gC1q-R using solid-phase microplate binding and competition assay. Microtiter plate wells were coated with recombinant human gC1q-R. Purified idInlBs were added. ELISA assay was performed with His-tag-specific polyclonal antibodies and HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies. (a) Saturation curve demonstrating binding of three idInlB isoforms to gC1q-R; purified idInlBs were added in concentrations 0–40 µg/mL: circles-idInlB9, triangles-idInlB13, squares-idInlB14; (b) a competition assay; polyclonal antibodies developed against oligopeptides specific for central (amino acids 76–104) and C-terminal (amino acids 221–249) parts of gC1q-R were added at concentration of 4 µg/mL 1 h before idInlBs were added in concentration 0.4 µg/mL. BSA was used as a negative control, and idInlBs without antibodies were used as positive controls. Mean ± SD from three experiments made in triplicate are shown; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. Statistical significance of competition experiments relative to a corresponding positive control is shown.
Figure 3. In vitro study of interactions between idInlBs and gC1q-R using solid-phase microplate binding and competition assay. Microtiter plate wells were coated with recombinant human gC1q-R. Purified idInlBs were added. ELISA assay was performed with His-tag-specific polyclonal antibodies and HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies. (a) Saturation curve demonstrating binding of three idInlB isoforms to gC1q-R; purified idInlBs were added in concentrations 0–40 µg/mL: circles-idInlB9, triangles-idInlB13, squares-idInlB14; (b) a competition assay; polyclonal antibodies developed against oligopeptides specific for central (amino acids 76–104) and C-terminal (amino acids 221–249) parts of gC1q-R were added at concentration of 4 µg/mL 1 h before idInlBs were added in concentration 0.4 µg/mL. BSA was used as a negative control, and idInlBs without antibodies were used as positive controls. Mean ± SD from three experiments made in triplicate are shown; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. Statistical significance of competition experiments relative to a corresponding positive control is shown.
Ijms 20 04138 g003
Ijms 20 04138 g004a 550Ijms 20 04138 g004b 550
Figure 4. Invasion efficiency of idInlB9- but not idInlB14-carrying L. monocytogenes was gC1q-R dependent. Gentamicin invasion assay was performed as described in the materials and methods sections. Isogenic strains EGDeΔinlB (parental strain lacking the inlB gene); EGDeΔinlB::InlB9 and EGDeΔinlB::InlB14 were used to infect human HEp-2 epithelial cells with MOI 100:1 (bacteria:cells). (a) Invasion efficiency of isogenic strains; invasion efficiency was calculated as a ratio of intracellular bacteria to bacteria used for infection; (b) inhibition assay; polyclonal antibody against the whole gC1q-R protein or polyclonal antibodies developed against oligopeptides specific for central (amino acids 76–104) and C-terminal (amino acids 221–249) parts of gC1q-R were added in concentration of 4 µg/mL 1 h before isogenic recombinant L. monocytogenes strains EGDeΔinlB::InlB9 and EGDeΔinlB::InlB14 were added; relative invasion efficiency is shown that was calculated as a percentage of invasion efficiency relative to a positive control (invasion efficiency of a strain EGDeΔinlB::InlB9 or EGDeΔinlB::InlB14 without any antibodies). Results represent mean ± SD from three experiments made in duplicate; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. Statistical significance of competition experiments relative to a correspondent positive control is shown.
Figure 4. Invasion efficiency of idInlB9- but not idInlB14-carrying L. monocytogenes was gC1q-R dependent. Gentamicin invasion assay was performed as described in the materials and methods sections. Isogenic strains EGDeΔinlB (parental strain lacking the inlB gene); EGDeΔinlB::InlB9 and EGDeΔinlB::InlB14 were used to infect human HEp-2 epithelial cells with MOI 100:1 (bacteria:cells). (a) Invasion efficiency of isogenic strains; invasion efficiency was calculated as a ratio of intracellular bacteria to bacteria used for infection; (b) inhibition assay; polyclonal antibody against the whole gC1q-R protein or polyclonal antibodies developed against oligopeptides specific for central (amino acids 76–104) and C-terminal (amino acids 221–249) parts of gC1q-R were added in concentration of 4 µg/mL 1 h before isogenic recombinant L. monocytogenes strains EGDeΔinlB::InlB9 and EGDeΔinlB::InlB14 were added; relative invasion efficiency is shown that was calculated as a percentage of invasion efficiency relative to a positive control (invasion efficiency of a strain EGDeΔinlB::InlB9 or EGDeΔinlB::InlB14 without any antibodies). Results represent mean ± SD from three experiments made in duplicate; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. Statistical significance of competition experiments relative to a correspondent positive control is shown.
Ijms 20 04138 g004aIjms 20 04138 g004b

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chalenko, Y.; Kalinin, E.; Marchenkov, V.; Sysolyatina, E.; Surin, A.; Sobyanin, K.; Ermolaeva, S. Phylogenetically Defined Isoforms of Listeria monocytogenes Invasion Factor InlB Differently Activate Intracellular Signaling Pathways and Interact with the Receptor gC1q-R. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4138. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20174138

AMA Style

Chalenko Y, Kalinin E, Marchenkov V, Sysolyatina E, Surin A, Sobyanin K, Ermolaeva S. Phylogenetically Defined Isoforms of Listeria monocytogenes Invasion Factor InlB Differently Activate Intracellular Signaling Pathways and Interact with the Receptor gC1q-R. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(17):4138. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20174138

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chalenko, Yaroslava, Egor Kalinin, Victor Marchenkov, Elena Sysolyatina, Alexey Surin, Konstantin Sobyanin, and Svetlana Ermolaeva. 2019. "Phylogenetically Defined Isoforms of Listeria monocytogenes Invasion Factor InlB Differently Activate Intracellular Signaling Pathways and Interact with the Receptor gC1q-R" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 17: 4138. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20174138

APA Style

Chalenko, Y., Kalinin, E., Marchenkov, V., Sysolyatina, E., Surin, A., Sobyanin, K., & Ermolaeva, S. (2019). Phylogenetically Defined Isoforms of Listeria monocytogenes Invasion Factor InlB Differently Activate Intracellular Signaling Pathways and Interact with the Receptor gC1q-R. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(17), 4138. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20174138

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop