Next Article in Journal
Antioxidant Activity and Toxicity of Fullerenols via Bioluminescence Signaling: Role of Oxygen Substituents
Next Article in Special Issue
Gold Nanoparticle Enhanced Proton Therapy: Monte Carlo Modeling of Reactive Species’ Distributions Around a Gold Nanoparticle and the Effects of Nanoparticle Proximity and Clustering
Previous Article in Journal
Inflammatory and Molecular Pathways in Heart Failure—Ischemia, HFpEF and Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 9
10.3390/ijms20092323
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Review of Therapeutic Applications of Radiolabeled Functional Nanomaterials

by
Jongho Jeon
Department of Applied Chemistry, School of Applied Chemical Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(9), 2323; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092323
Submission received: 30 April 2019 / Revised: 8 May 2019 / Accepted: 9 May 2019 / Published: 10 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanoparticle-Based Radiosensitization)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In the last two decades, various nanomaterials have attracted increasing attention in medical science owing to their unique physical and chemical characteristics. Incorporating radionuclides into conventionally used nanomaterials can confer useful additional properties compared to the original material. Therefore, various radionuclides have been used to synthesize functional nanomaterials for biomedical applications. In particular, several α- or β-emitter-labeled organic and inorganic nanoparticles have been extensively investigated for efficient and targeted cancer treatment. This article reviews recent progress in cancer therapy using radiolabeled nanomaterials including inorganic, polymeric, and carbon-based materials and liposomes. We first provide an overview of radiolabeling methods for preparing anticancer agents that have been investigated recently in preclinical studies. Next, we discuss the therapeutic applications and effectiveness of α- or β-emitter-incorporated nanomaterials in animal models and the emerging possibilities of these nanomaterials in cancer therapy.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Recent advances in nanotechnology and materials science have inspired the development of a wide range of organic and inorganic nanomaterials for applications in preclinical studies and clinical trials. The unique characteristics of nanomaterials can enable targeted drug delivery, accurate diagnosis, and effective treatment of diseases such as cancers [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Radioisotopes are a crucial component in nanomedicine. Radiolabeling is a well-established and useful technique for quantitative in vivo assessment of the biological uptake and pharmacokinetics of synthetic nanomaterials [8,9,10,11]. Several γ-ray-emitting radionuclides including positron emitters (β+ decay) have been extensively used for developing nanomaterial-based diagnostic agents for positron emission tomography (PET) or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) [12,13,14,15]. These radiolabeled materials can be used to visualize tumor tissues in living subjects as well as other important biological phenomena. In recent years, therapeutic radionuclides (α- and β-emitters) have also been used in clinical applications, and some of these trials have shown significant impacts on tumor treatment [16,17,18,19,20]. Therefore, there is increasing interest in using a combination of therapeutic radioisotopes and nanosized materials for developing promising candidates for new radiopharmaceuticals. Radioisotope-incorporated nanomaterials show favorable properties in vivo compared to bare radionuclides. One major advantage of radiolabeled nanomaterials is their potential ability to contain multivalent radioactive elements in a single carrier [21,22,23]. In general, only one or few radionuclides can be labeled with a typically used biomolecule (e.g., antibodies, peptides) or small-molecule drug. However, multivalent incorporation of radionuclides in a nanoparticle enables transporting numerous α- or β-emitters to cancer cells. Moreover, nanomaterials can be designed to conjugate with various functional molecules such as chemotherapeutic drugs, contrast agents, or cancer-targeting molecules (e.g., antibodies, peptides, and small-molecule ligands) [24,25,26]. This strategy allows the preparation of versatile functional probes that are highly useful in preclinical research including combination therapy or theranostic applications (Figure 1). Another advantage is that the enhanced permeability and retention effect of nanomaterials may induce the accumulation of radioisotopes in tumor tissue, making nanomaterials promising for cancer treatment [27,28].
This paper presents a comprehensive review of existing works on radiolabeled functional nanomaterials for cancer therapy. The first section focuses on synthetic aspects for incorporating radionuclides (α-/β-emitters) into nanomaterials. Next, recent studies on therapeutic applications of functional probes, such as targeted therapy and theranostic approaches in animal models, are discussed. Various nanomaterials investigated thus far and biomedical results of these studies are briefly described. Finally, future prospects and the emerging possibility of therapeutic radiolabeled nanomaterials are discussed.

2. Radiolabeling Methods

The stability of the therapeutic agent is a key factor in the successful implementation of radiolabeled nanomaterials for cancer therapy. Radionuclides should remain stable in nanomaterials, and the nanomaterials should maintain their integrity in biological environments and not be toxic to living subjects. Otherwise, released radioisotopes or nanomaterials could have significant adverse effects on normal tissues. Therefore, stable incorporation of radioisotopes is crucial for nanomaterial-mediated anticancer therapy. Radiolabeling can be performed using four different methods (Figure 2). The first method is the use of a chelating agent. Chelation is generally quite efficient for labeling α- and β-ray-emitting metal radioisotopes (e.g., 67Cu, 90Y, 177Lu, and 225Ac) on nanomaterials. However, an α-emitter and its daughters can be released from the chelator owing to the high recoil energy upon alpha decay, and they could cause considerable harm [29,30]. To deal with recoil, several nanocarriers—such as liposomes, carbon nanotubes, and multilayered inorganic particles—that can immobilize daughter radionuclides have been applied to prepare radiolabeled materials. In some studies, therapeutic radioisotopes were simply incorporated into nanoparticles comprising nonradioactive atoms (e.g., 198Au in gold nanoparticles, 166Ho in holmium nanoparticles). These methods were used for stable encapsulation of radionuclides. Alternatively, direct sorption of α-emitters (e.g., 223Ra and 211At) onto the surface of or inside nanomaterials was investigated by using the specific affinity of radioactive elements toward nanomaterials. Finally, radioactive iodine (131I), a commonly used β-emitter in clinical applications, can be attached to a phenol group on nanomaterials by oxidation followed by electrophilic substitution. The labeling method used ultimately depends on the research materials and purpose.

3. Beta-ray-Emitting Radioisotopes

A few β-ray-emitting radioisotopes, owing to their good availability and relatively low production cost, have been used for preparing radiolabeled nanomaterials for efficient cancer therapy. In general, β-particles have mean penetration depth of sub-millimeter range, and therefore, they can penetrate multiple tumor cells and show therapeutic effects. Table 1 shows the physical properties of commonly used β-ray-emitting radioisotopes.

3.1. Radioactive Iodine (131I)

131I (t1/2 = 8.02 days, Eβ of 0.607 MeV) is one of the most frequently used β-particle-emitting radioisotopes in nuclear medicine. For several decades, radioactive sodium iodide ([131I]NaI) has been used for treating thyroid cancer [31,32]. 131I-labeled metaiodobenzylguanidine (131I-MIBG), another important radiopharmaceutical, is used for treating neuroblastoma and pheochromocytoma [33]. Owing to the increased demand for 131I in clinical practice, it is produced in large quantities and is normally available commercially. 131I also shows promise for molecular imaging studies using SPECT because it produces γ-ray emissions during decay. Radiolabeling of 131I in molecules typically involves electrophilic aromatic substitution of phenolic or trialkylstannylated substrates using an oxidant (e.g., chloramine T and iodogen); this normally affords high radiochemical yields. However, the deiodination of the resulting labeled product can often cause undesired accumulation of radionuclides in some organs such as the thyroid and stomach [34,35,36,37,38]. Therefore, it is essential to fabricate stable and multifunctional nanocarriers for efficient delivery of radioactive iodine to target tumor tissues. Table 2 shows 131I-labeled nanomaterials and their applications in vivo.
Several studies have investigated radioactive-iodine-labeled functional nanomaterials for cancer treatment. Liu et al. used albumin nanoparticles containing paclitaxel (PTX), a potent chemotherapeutic drug [40]. They assembled PTX with 131I-labeled human serum albumin (131I-HSA) to produce 131I-HSA-PTX nanoparticles. This material showed prolonged blood circulation time, specific tumor uptake, and high intratumor penetration ability. The combined therapeutic effects (chemo- and radiotherapy) of 131I-HSA-PTX were found to be highly effective in the 4T1 cancer xenograft model compared to radiotherapy- and chemotherapy-alone groups. In addition, nuclear images obtained using a γ-camera clearly revealed the in vivo behavior of nanoparticles and tumor localization. PTX and 131I-labeled copper sulfide nanoparticle (CuS NP)-loaded microspheres were also investigated for combination treatment of cancer cells [41]. The multifunctional therapeutic agent demonstrated highly effective combined photothermal (CuS NPs), chemo- (PTX), and radiotherapy (131I) of W256/B tumors in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. This material allowed noninvasive multimodal SPECT/photoacoustic imaging and showed the biodistribution of the injected agent and quantitative information about therapeutic effects. Nanosized reduced graphene oxide (RGO) has also been used for combination therapy [44]. Oxidized radioactive iodine could simply be incorporated into RGO to obtain the radiolabeled therapeutic agent (131I-RGO). RGO showed strong near-infrared absorbance and induced effective photothermal heating of tumor cells. The photothermal and radiotherapeutic effect of 131I-RGO resulted in effective elimination of tumors in an animal model. Liu et al. used polypyrrole (PPy) nanomaterial for tumor-targeted photothermal and radiotherapy of cancer [45]. To achieve enhanced tumor targeting ability, 131I-labeled transferrin (Tf), a tumor-targeting protein, was used as a capping agent of PPy. The resulting 131I-incorporated PPy showed enhanced in vivo tumor uptake and excellent therapeutic efficacy in the U87MG tumor xenograft model.
Recently, a simple one-step procedure was reported for preparing tumor therapeutic particles [46]. In this study, an aqueous solution of [131I]NaI was added to a mixed solution containing silver nitrate and ascorbic acid at ambient temperature to obtain 131I-doped silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) with high radiolabeling yield (98%). Interestingly, encapsulated radioactive iodine was stably retained inside the silver nanomaterial and showed good in vitro stability in mouse serum. The biodistribution results showed high tumor uptake values post intravenous (35.4%) and intratumoral injection (63.8%). These results indicated that 131I-doped AgNPs were a promising radiopharmaceutical. Several other nanomaterials including 131I-labeled dendrimers and polymers were also investigated for cancer treatment in vivo [42,43,47,48,49,50]. The radiolabeling procedure and therapeutic applications are similar to those in the abovementioned reports.

3.2. β-ray-Emitting Radioactive Metals

In general, metal radioisotopes can be labeled with a target material by using well-established bifunctional chelators. However, in some cases, an encapsulation method was used for preparing radiolabeled nanocarriers (e.g., 166Ho, 198Au). Table 3 lists radiometal-labeled nanomaterials and their biological applications. Radiometal-incorporated materials have also been used for various combination treatments of cancers.
Ytterium-90 (90Y) emits high radiation energy (2.280 MeV), and its average and maximum penetration depth in soft tissue are ~2.5 mm and 11 mm, respectively. 90Y has a physical half-life of 2.67 days that allow various radiotherapy applications using cancer-targeting peptides, antibodies, and resin microspheres [74]. 90Y-labeled nanomaterials have been used in some preclinical studies. A lipid nanoparticle containing a chemotherapeutic drug (doxorubicin) was labeled with 90Y for therapy of carcinoma cell line CNE1 in an animal model [51]. After the radiolabeled lipid particles were functionalized with folic acid, they were used for combined chemo- and radiotherapy. In this study, tumor growth was suppressed significantly compared to that in control groups. Another organic nanoparticle comprising N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide (HPMA) was labeled with 90Y using DOTA and then used for radiotherapy of a prostate tumor (DU145 cells) model [53]. This study used gold-nanorod-mediated hyperthermia, and the combined treatment provided much higher therapeutic efficacy. Inorganic magnetic nanoparticles were labeled with 90Y for bimodal photothermal and radiotherapy in animal models [54,55]. The carboxylic acid groups on the nanoparticle surface efficiently immobilized the radionuclide and the radiolabeled nanomaterials showed high in vitro and in vivo stability; this may enable further potential applications for cancer treatment.
Lutetium-177 (177Lu, t1/2 = 6.73 days) produces β-particles with Eβ of 0.5 MeV. The emission of low-energy gamma photons enables SPECT imaging of cancer cells and the biological distribution of radiolabeled products [75]. Reilly et al. reported 177Lu-labeled gold nanoparticles (177Lu-AuNPs) modified with a monoclonal antibody (panitumumab) for targeted therapy of EGFR-positive breast cancer [76]. This nanoprobe effectively suppressed the survival rate of cancer cells. The nanoparticle-based radiation treatment was also used in an in vivo theranostic study [56]. Radiolabeled AuNPs were injected intratumorally in animals bearing breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-648). Gold-nanoseed-mediated brachytherapy was highly effective at arresting tumor growth and increasing the survival rate of animal models. This research group also reported that 177Lu-AuNPs conjugated with trastuzumab can successfully be applied to local radiation therapy of HER2-positive breast cancer (MDA-MB-361 cells) [57]. A similar strategy was used for preparing nanomaterials modified with tumor-targeting peptides. Tyr3-octreotate [58] and cyclic RGD [59] were attached to 177Lu-AuNPs, and these probes were used for efficient radiation treatment of C6 gliomas tumor and HeLa cells, respectively. 177Lu-labeled PAMAM dendrimers were prepared by using a bifunctional DOTA-like ligand with pyridine-N-oxide [60]. The radiolabeled organic particles showed high in vitro stability and reasonable excretion kinetics in healthy animals, suggesting their promise as a radiopharmaceutical.
Rhenium-188 (188Re, t1/2 = 17.0 h) produces β-particles with Eβ of 2.12 MeV, which can be produced by a commercially available W-188/Re-188 generator [77]. The advantage of this generator is that it produces both β- and γ-radiation components (0.155 MeV); therefore, the behavior of the labeled pharmaceutical can be monitored using SPECT. As the coordination chemistry of technetium (Tc) and rhenium (Re) is similar, conventionally used chelators for 99mTc can be applied to the labeling of 188Re [78]. The lipophilic ligand dithiobenzoate coordinated 188Re complex was loaded in the core of lipid nanoparticles, and 12G5 antibody was conjugated to this probe for targeting U87MG cells in vivo [61]. Tumors were seen to regress significantly with radiotherapy and the 188Re-loaded nanocarrier enhanced the survival rate of the disease models. Similar radiolabeled lipid nanocapsules were also used for treating a human glioblastoma model [79]. Ting et al. reported 188Re and doxorubicin incorporated liposomes for bimodal therapy of colorectal adenocarcinoma (HT-29 cells) [62]. Although this probe has no targeting molecules, it showed high tumor/background ratio. Furthermore, SPECT images clearly visualized tumor cells and the biodistribution of the therapeutic agent. Similar radiolabeled liposomes have been evaluated in different cancer models [80,81]. Combined cancer therapy was also investigated by using 188Re-labeled magnetic nanoparticles (modified by human serum albumin) [63,82]. The chemotherapeutic agent Cisplatin was loaded to this probe and folic acid was used as a targeting ligand for treating human ovarian cancer. Trimodal (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hyperthermia) tumor treatment significantly increased the apoptotic rates of SKOV3 cells in animal models compared to control groups.
Gold-198 (198Au, t1/2 = 2.70 days) has beta decay energy of 0.960 MeV. Its average penetration depth in tissue is sufficient to provide therapeutic effects to destroy tumor cells. 198Au, owing to its favorable physicochemical properties, has attracted interest for the radiotherapy of several cancer cells [83]. 198Au radionuclide can be produced by the neutron irradiation of commercially available natural gold (197Au). In 2010, Jung et al. reported silica-coated AuNPs using neutrons in a nuclear reactor to convert non-radioactive gold to the 198Au radioisotope [65]. The structural integrity and stability of these core–shell particles were not affected under radiation, indicating that the product can be a useful radiotracer. Radioactive chloroauric acid (H198AuCl4) was also produced by the neutron irradiation of a gold source. The radioactive nanomaterial was synthesized by mixing H198AuCl4 and a reducing agent in the presence of a carrier (nonradioactive) NaAuCl4 solution to obtain 198Au-incorporated radioactive nanoparticles. Katti et al. developed a series of useful radioactive AuNPs functionalized by tumor-targeting agents including small molecules [66,67], peptide [68], and gum arabic glycoprotein [69,84,85]. These nanoparticles showed potent therapeutic efficacy for treating prostate tumor. For example, epigallocatechin-gallate-modified radioactive AuNPs significantly inhibited PC-3 xenograft tumor growth (80% reduction of tumor volume after 28 days of administration) in vivo compared to control groups [66].
Other β-emitting metal radioisotopes including 64Cu [70,86] and 67Ga [87] have also been used for synthesizing functional nanomaterials for in vivo applications. The therapeutic effect of these radiolabeled probes was evaluated in tumor xenografts. Notably, radioactive holmium (166Ho) was incorporated into several materials such as chitosan complex [88], acetylacetone nanoparticle [71,72], and iron garnet nanoparticle [73] to develop new therapeutic agents.

4. Alpha-ray-Emitting Radioisotopes

For several decades, α-emitters have been investigated for preclinical and clinical applications (Table 4). The key advantages of these radionuclides over β-emitters are the high levels of linear energy transfer and short penetration range in soft tissue (50–100 μm) [89]. Energy deposition occurs in a very small tissue volume with high relative biological effectiveness. Furthermore, the therapeutic effects of α-particles do not depend on hypoxia or cell cycles, making them more attractive for radionuclide therapy [90]. In particular, α-particle therapy requires highly stable attachment to carrier molecules to minimize the nonspecific radiation of healthy tissues by released radionuclides. Table 4 shows the physical properties of some α-emitters investigated in biomedical studies. Among these, short-half-life radioisotopes such as 212Bi (t1/2 = 60 min), 213Bi (t1/2 = 46 min), and 226Th (t1/2 = 30 min) are not suitable for cancer treatment. In recent years, 211At, 223Ra, and 225Ac were primarily used for preparing anticancer nanomaterials (Table 5).
Astatine-211 (211At) is a halogen radionuclide with a long enough half-life (7.2 h) to conduct radiochemical procedures. Its α-particle emission is associated with 100% of 211At decays, and 211At activity distributions can be quantified by SPECT because the decay branch involves electron capture decay (211At → 211Po) [112]. Because of its favorable physical properties, 211At is considered highly useful for cancer treatment. Various 211At-labeled antibodies have long been investigated for targeted alpha therapy (TAT) [113]. However, in vivo deastatination of 211At-labeled molecules, a notable problem, resulted in accumulation of free radioisotopes in specific organs including the thyroid. A theoretical study revealed that the C-At bond is not stable in the presence of oxidants and is weaker than its corresponding C-I bond [114]. Therefore, such dehalogenation should be considered for realizing effective therapeutic strategies. In 2017, 211At-labeled AuNPs were reported for TAT of cancer cells [91]. Iodine anion is known to have high affinity on the surface of AuNPs [115,116,117,118]. Considering this unique chemical property of halogen species, astatine, the heaviest halogen atom, is assumed to form stronger bonds with AuNPs than iodide ions. Simply mixing 211At with peptide-conjugated AuNPs under ambient conditions induced rapid chemisorption of radionuclides on the surface of nanomaterials. 211At-labeled AuNPs were quite stable in biological fluids and showed a potent cytotoxic effect in vitro on glioma cells. Recently, the same research group reported trastuzumab-modified AuNPs labeled with 211At (211At-AuNP-trastuzumab) for local treatment of breast cancer. 211At-AuNP-trastuzumab was effectively internalized and deposited near the nucleus of SKOV-3 cancer cells, and it showed higher cytotoxicity than nontargeted nanoprobes [92]. Silver-based nanomaterials [93,94] also show high affinity for astatine, and such 211At-labeled products were prepared by a sorption method. In another approach, 211AtCl3 was stably trapped inside single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) by noncovalent interaction (van der Waals forces), suggesting that carbon-based nanomaterials can also be used as 211At carriers [95].
Actinium-225 (225Ac, t1/2 = 10 days) is a parent α-particle emitter in a decay scheme and produces a series of daughter α-particles. 225Ac-labeled molecules have shown high efficacy for radiotherapy of cancers in basic research and clinical applications [119]. In particular, the development of 225Ac-labeled radiopharmaceuticals has attracted increasing attention because of recent impressive results for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting enzyme inhibitors. The 225Ac-labeled small-molecule PSMA-targeting ligand showed better therapeutic effects than the corresponding β-emitter-labeled tracers [120,121,122]. As mentioned above, an α-emitter and its daughter radionuclides should remain stable at the target site for specific treatment of cancer cells in vivo. The use of well-known metal chelating agents such as DOTA, DTPA, and their analogs provided an efficient procedure for 225Ac-labeling. However, the release of daughter radionuclides such as 211Fr and 213Bi from the chelator can pose severe and nonspecific toxic effects in living systems [123,124]. Among various delivery systems, lanthanide phosphate (LaPO4) was investigated to retain sequestered daughters in the nanomaterials [96]. In this study, 225Ac-doped LaPO4 nanoparticles were synthesized by a simple fabrication process, and the surface of this material was conjugated with a monoclonal antibody for targeting in the lungs. The biodistribution study revealed that >80% of 213Bi is detected within the nanomaterial at the target region in animals after 120 h of administration, and these results were visualized by SPECT/CT. Similar multilayered LaPO4 materials incorporating 225Ac were prepared to develop efficient α-emitter-doped therapeutic agents. This material can successfully sequester the daughter 213Bi, and it showed significant reduction of EMT-6 tumor cells in the lungs [97,98]. Several studies have investigated the efficient encapsulation of α-particles in liposome nanoparticles. In 2004, Sofou et al. investigated several 225Ac-entrapped engineered liposomes to develop potent therapeutic agents [99]. In this study, zwitterionic and larger liposomes showed better retention (>88% over 30 days) of daughter radionuclides. The same research group also reported 225Ac-containing liposomes that were further conjugated with targeting molecules including monoclonal antibodies and aptamer for TAT [101,102,103]. For example, J591-antibody-conjugated liposome showed specific targeting ability and potent cytotoxicity to PSMA-expressing tumors (human LNCap and rat Mat-Lu cells) [103]. Carbon nanomaterials are also being studied as therapeutic cargoes of 225Ac. In 2013, Scheinberg et al. reported an efficient strategy for pretargeted therapy of cancer cells [106]. An anti-CD20-MORF was injected initially to target tumor cells in an animal model, and then, 225Ac-labeled SWCNT modified with a morpholino oligonucleotide sequence complementary to the sequence of anti-CD20-MORF was administered. Improved therapeutic effects were obtained by this two-step strategy. Because of the rapid renal clearance of the untargeted radiolabeled SWCNT, radioisotope toxicity was mitigated in living subjects. Ruggiero et al. reported a functionalized SWCNT covalently attached with the tumor targeting antibody E4G10 and a bifunctional chelator [107]. The radiolabeled SWCNT was applied to a xenograft model of LS174T, a human colon adenocarcinoma, and showed shrinkage of tumor volume and improved median survival rates (30%) compared to controls (0%) at 30 days after administration of the cancer-targeted material. 225Ac encapsulation within a nanocarrier can be another method to prepare a stable therapeutic agent. Through sonication, 225Ac was efficiently loaded in SWCNT (>95%) in the presence of Gd3+ metal ions to afford 225Ac@Gadonanotubes (225Ac@CNTs) [108]. This material showed high stability in human serum, suggesting that 225Ac@CNTs can be a useful anticancer agent for delivering high concentrations of 225Ac.
Radium-223 (223Ra) has also attracted much interest as a promising therapeutic radionuclide. Unlike other α-emitters, 223Ra can simply be produced from the 227Ac(t1/2 = 21.8 years)/223Ra generator [125]. The release of daughter nuclides from 223Ra is not a serious concern compared to 225Ac because most of the radiation energy of daughter α-particles decays within a few minutes. Owing to its favorable properties and therapeutic efficacy, radium dichloride ([223Ra]RaCl2) received the first marketing approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of bone metastases from prostate cancer [126]. However, Ra2+ does not form a stable complex with conventionally used bifunctional chelators, similar to most alkali earth metals [127]. This unsatisfactory stability of radium radionuclides hampered the application of 223Ra in TAT. To overcome these limitations and develop a new class of radiotherapeutic agents, several inorganic nanomaterials such as zeolites [109,110], iron oxide nanoparticles [111], and hydroxyapatite particles [112] have been used for stable incorporation of radium. 223Ra was efficiently labeled with these materials by a sorption mechanism. Bilewicz et al. reported that the sodium form of A-type nanozeolite (NaA) could strongly bind with radium cations and its decay products [109]. The radiolabeling of a cancer-targeting peptide-conjugated NaA was performed by exchanging Na+ for Ra2+. The conjugate showed good in vitro stability (>90% retention over 6 days) and high cytotoxic effect toward glioma cells.

5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Various radiolabeled nanomaterials are being investigated for cancer treatment. This article reviewed the preparation methods of these materials and their results in biological applications. Nanomaterials can be designed to possess high loading capacity of therapeutic radioisotopes and to incorporate multivalent cancer-targeting molecules. These functional carriers can control the pharmacokinetics of radionuclides, and they show superior therapeutic effects. Furthermore, various useful molecules such as chemotherapeutic drugs and contrast agents can be loaded in the same materials to conduct combination treatments and theranostic studies. One of the most significant challenges associated with radionuclide therapy is the nonspecific radiation arising in normal tissues from unbonded radioisotopes. Therefore, stable incorporation of α-/β-emitters in nanostructures and accurate delivery to target tumor sites is a prerequisite for effective cancer treatment and mitigation of toxicity.
As discussed previously, therapeutic β-emitting radioisotopes are found in various organic, inorganic, and hybrid forms of nanomaterials. In most cases, radiolabeling is conducted by using a bifunctional chelator (for metal radioisotopes) or by forming covalent bonds (for radioactive iodine). In particular, a few β-emitter-labeled nanomaterials have been used in multimodal therapy to overcome the limitation of single-mode therapy. Indeed, several combination therapy strategies showed remarkable synergistic effects. Moreover, some therapeutic radioisotopes such as 131I, 177Lu, and 188Re also emit γ-rays, and thus, their incorporation provides a useful theranostic platform. These successful results and the good availability of β-emitters may enable the development of versatile nanoplatforms for effective theranostic studies. Compared to β-emitting medical radioisotopes, only a few research groups have investigated α-particle-incorporated nanomaterials because of their higher production cost and lower availability (e.g., limited production facility). Because typically-used chelating agents or labeling procedures normally cannot sequester the α-emitter and its decay products, the encapsulation of radionuclides within nanostructures (e.g., lipid nanoparticles, multilayered materials) or adsorption methods (e.g., inorganic nanomaterials) was considered preferable for obtaining stable therapeutic agents. These methods can reduce the detachment of the α-emitter and increase the retention rate of daughter radionuclides at tumor sites. Although nanomaterials have shown promising results for cancer treatment, some important issues regarding long-term toxicity and efficient clearance of radiolabeled materials from the body should be addressed for the successful translation of this technique into clinical applications. Therefore, more studies should focus on synthesizing radiolabeled nanomaterials having better radiochemical stability and desirable pharmacokinetic and excretion profiles to minimize radiation exposure in normal tissues. The improvement of optimized radiochemical procedures and extensive validation of the efficacy and toxicity of radiolabeled functional nanomaterials in various animal disease models will lead to the development of useful therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. Considering the current achievements as well as high potential of α- and β-emitters, the ongoing preclinical study will continue to play an important role in the advancement of therapeutic technology.

Author Contributions

J.J. wrote and edited the review paper.

Funding

This work was supported by the research grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (grant number: 2017M2A2A6A01070858).

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Ha Eun Shim and Chang Heon Lee for their contribution of literature survey.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Smith, B.R.; Gambhir, S.S. Nanomaterials for in vivo imaging. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 901–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lim, E.K.; Kim, T.; Paik, S.; Haam, S.; Huh, Y.M.; Lee, K. Nanomaterials for Theranostics: Recent Advances and Future Challenges. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 327–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mohammadi, M.R.; Nojoomi, A.; Mozafari, M.; Dubnika, A.; Inayathullaha, M.; Rajadas, J. Nanomaterials engineering for drug delivery: A hybridization approach. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 3995–4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nazir, S.; Hussain, T.; Ayub, A.; Rashid, U.; MacRobert, A.J. Nanomaterials in combating cancer: Therapeutic applications and developments. Nanomedicine 2014, 10, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lee, S.H.; Jun, B.H. Silver Nanoparticles: Synthesis and Application for Nanomedicine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kang, H.; Jeong, S.; Jo, A.; Chang, H.; Yang, J.K.; Jeong, C.; Kyeong, S.; Lee, Y.W.; Samanta, A.; Maiti, K.K.; et al. Ultrasensitive NIR-SERRS Probes with Multiplexed Ratiometric Quantification for In Vivo Antibody Leads Validation. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2018, 7, 1700870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pham, X.H.; Hahm, E.; Kim, T.H.; Kim, H.M.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, Y.S.; Jeong, D.H.; Jun, B.H. Enzyme-catalyzed Ag Growth on Au Nanoparticle-assembled Structure for Highly Sensitive Colorimetric Immunoassay. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 6290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lee, C.H.; Shim, H.E.; Song, L.; Moon, H.G.; Lee, K.; Yang, J.E.; Song, H.Y.; Choi, Y.J.; Choi, D.S.; Jeon, J. Efficient and stable radiolabeling of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon assemblies: In vivo imaging of diesel exhaust particulates in mice. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 447–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Shim, H.E.; Lee, J.Y.; Lee, C.H.; Mushtaq, S.; Song, H.Y.; Song, L.; Choi, S.J.; Lee, K.; Jeon, J. Quantification of inhaled aerosol particles composed of toxic household disinfectant using radioanalytical method. Chemosphere 2018, 207, 649–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Mao, L.; Hu, M.; Pan, B.; Xie, Y.; Petersen, E.J. Biodistribution and toxicity of radio-labeled few layer graphene in mice after intratracheal instillation. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2016, 13, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, B.; Yang, J.; Huang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Peng, C.; Zhang, Y.; He, Y.; Shi, J.; Li, W.; Hu, J.; et al. Biodistribution and pulmonary toxicity of intratracheal instilled graphene oxide in mice. NPG Asia Mater. 2013, 5, e44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Goel, S.; England, C.G.; Chen, F.; Cai, W. Positron emission tomography and nanotechnology: A dynamic duo for cancer theranostics. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2017, 113, 157–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Sun, X.; Cai, W.; Chen, X. Positron emission tomography imaging using radiolabeled inorganic nanomaterials. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chen, D.; Dougherty, C.A.; Yang, D.; Wu, H.; Hong, H. Radioactive Nanomaterials for Multimodality Imaging. Tomography 2016, 2, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Lamb, J.; Holland, J.P. Advanced Methods for Radiolabeling Multimodality Nanomedicines for SPECT/MRI and PET/MRI. J. Nucl. Med. 2018, 59, 382–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. McDevitt, M.R.; Sgouros, G.; Sofou, S. Targeted and nontargeted α-particle therapies. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2018, 20, 73–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Farzin, L.; Sheibani, S.; Moassesi, M.E.; Shamsipur, M. An overview of nanoscale radionuclides and radiolabeled nanomaterials commonly used for nuclear molecular imaging and therapeutic functions. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2019, 107, 251–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lu, W.; Hong, H.; Cai, W. Radio-nanomaterials for biomedical applications: State of the art. Eur. J. Nanomed. 2016, 8, 151–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, F.; Ehlerding, E.B.; Cai, W. Theranostic nanoparticles. J. Nucl. Med. 2014, 55, 1919–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kharisov, B.I.; Kharissova, O.V.; Berdonosov, S.S. Radioactive nanoparticles and their main applications: Recent advances. Recent Pat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 8, 79–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cutler, C.S.; Hennkens, H.M.; Sisay, N.; Huclier-Markai, S.; Jurisson, S.S. Radiometals for combined imaging and therapy. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 858–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lee, S.B.; Lee, S.W.; Jeong, S.Y.; Yoon, G.; Cho, S.J.; Kim, S.K.; Lee, I.K.; Ahn, B.C.; Lee, J.; Jeon, Y.H. Engineering of Radioiodine-Labeled Gold Core–shell Nanoparticles As Efficient Nuclear Medicine Imaging Agents for Trafficking of Dendritic Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 8480–8489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lee, S.B.; Ahn, S.B.; Lee, S.W.; Jeong, S.Y.; Yoon, G.; Ahn, B.C.; Kim, E.M.; Jeong, H.J.; Lee, J.; Lim, D.K.; et al. Radionuclide-embedded gold nanoparticles for enhanced dendritic cell-based cancer immunotherapy, sensitive and quantitative tracking of dendritic cells with PET and Cerenkov luminescence. NPG Asia Mater. 2016, 8, e281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kim, D.; Shin, K.; Kwon, S.G.; Hyeon, T. Synthesis and Biomedical Applications of Multifunctional Nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1802309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gurunathan, S.; Kang, M.H.; Qasim, M.; Kim, J.H. Nanoparticle-Mediated Combination Therapy: Two-in-One Approach for Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sanvicens, N.; Marco, M.P. Multifunctional nanoparticles-properties and prospects for their use in human medicine. Trends Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Greish, K. Enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect for anticancer nanomedicine drug targeting. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 624, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Stylianopoulos, T. EPR-effect: Utilizing size-dependent nanoparticle delivery to solid tumors. Ther. Deliv. 2013, 4, 421–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. De Kruijff, R.M.; Wolterbeek, H.T.; Denkova, A.G. A Critical Review of Alpha Radionuclide Therapy-How to Deal with Recoiling Daughters? Pharmaceuticals 2015, 8, 321–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kozempel, J.; Mokhodoeva, O.; Vlk, M. Progress in Targeted Alpha-Particle Therapy. What We Learned about Recoils Release from In Vivo Generators. Molecules 2018, 23, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hong, C.M.; Ahn, B.C. Redifferentiation of Radioiodine Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer for Reapplication of I-131 Therapy. Front. Endocrinol. 2017, 8, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Becker, D.V.; Sawin, C.T. Radioiodine and thyroid disease: The beginning. Semin. Nucl. Med. 1996, 26, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. George, S.L.; Falzone, N.; Chittenden, S.; Kirk, S.J.; Lancaster, D.; Vaidya, S.J.; Mandeville, H.; Saran, F.; Pearson, A.D.; Du, Y.; et al. Individualized 131I-mIBG therapy in the management of refractory and relapsed neuroblastoma. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2016, 37, 466–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jeon, J.; Kang, J.A.; Shim, H.E.; Nam, Y.R.; Yoon, S.; Kim, H.R.; Lee, D.E.; Park, S.H. Efficient method for iodine radioisotope labeling of cyclooctyne-containing molecules using strain-promoted copper-free click reaction. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 3303–3308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Choi, M.H.; Shim, H.E.; Nam, Y.R.; Kim, H.R.; Kang, J.A.; Lee, D.E.; Park, S.H.; Choi, D.S.; Jang, B.S.; Jeon, J. Synthesis and evaluation of an 125I-labeled azide prosthetic group for efficient and bioorthogonal radiolabeling of cyclooctyne-group containing molecules using copper-free click reaction. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 875–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mushtaq, S.; Jeon, J.; Shaheen, A.; Jang, B.S.; Park, S.H. Critical analysis of radioiodination techniques for micro and macro organic molecules. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2016, 309, 859–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Choi, M.H.; Shim, H.E.; Yun, S.J.; Kim, H.R.; Mushtaq, S.; Lee, C.H.; Park, S.H.; Choi, D.S.; Lee, D.E.; Byun, E.B.; et al. Highly efficient method for 125I-radiolabeling of biomolecules using inverse-electron-demand Diels-Alder reaction. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2016, 24, 2589–2594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shim, H.E.; Mushtaq, S.; Song, L.; Lee, C.H.; Lee, H.; Jeon, J. Development of a new thiol-reactive prosthetic group for site-specific labeling of biomolecules with radioactive iodine. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 28, 2875–2878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ji, A.; Zhang, Y.; Lv, G.; Lin, J.; Qi, N.; Ji, F.; Du, M. 131I radiolabeled immune albumin nanospheres loaded with doxorubicin for in vivo combinatorial therapy. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2017, 61, 362–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tian, L.; Chen, Q.; Yi, X.; Wang, G.; Chen, J.; Ning, P.; Yang, K.; Liu, Z. Radionuclide I-131 Labeled Albumin-Paclitaxel Nanoparticles for Synergistic Combined Chemo-radioisotope Therapy of Cancer. Theranostics 2017, 7, 614–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Liu, Q.; Qian, Y.; Li, P.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Z.; Liu, J.; Sun, X.; Fulham, M.; Feng, D.; Chen, Z.; et al. The combined therapeutic effects of 131iodine-labeled multifunctional copper sulfide-loaded microspheres in treating breast cancer. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2018, 8, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhu, J.; Zhao, L.; Cheng, Y.; Xiong, Z.; Tang, Y.; Shen, M.; Zhao, J.; Shi, X. Radionuclide 131I-labeled multifunctional dendrimers for targeted SPECT imaging and radiotherapy of tumors. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 18169–18178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhao, L.; Zhu, J.; Cheng, Y.; Xiong, Z.; Tang, Y.; Guo, L.; Shi, X.; Zhao, J. Chlorotoxin-Conjugated Multifunctional Dendrimers Labeled with Radionuclide 131I for Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging and Radiotherapy of Gliomas. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 19798–19808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, L.; Zhong, X.; Yi, X.; Huang, M.; Ning, P.; Liu, T.; Ge, C.; Chai, Z.; Liu, Z.; Yang, K. Radionuclide 131I labeled reduced graphene oxide for nuclear imaging guided combined radio- and photothermal therapy of cancer. Biomaterials 2015, 66, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Song, X.; Liang, C.; Feng, L.; Yang, K.; Liu, Z. Iodine-131-labeled, transferrin-capped polypyrrole nanoparticles for tumor-targeted synergistic photothermal-radioisotope therapy. Biomater. Sci. 2017, 5, 1828–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sakr, T.M.; Khowessah, O.M.; Motaleb, M.A.; Abd El-Bary, A.; El-Kolaly, M.T.; Swidan, M.M. I-131 doping of silver nanoparticles platform for tumor theranosis guided drug delivery. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 122, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, W.; Liu, Z.; Li, C.; Li, N.; Fang, L.; Chang, J.; Tan, J. Radionuclide therapy using ¹³¹I-labeled anti-epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted nanoparticles suppresses cancer cell growth caused by EGFR overexpression. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 142, 619–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ming, H.; Fang, L.; Gao, J.; Li, C.; Ji, Y.; Shen, Y.; Hu, Y.; Li, N.; Chang, J.; Li, W.; et al. Antitumor Effect of Nanoparticle 131I-Labeled Arginine-Glycine-Aspartate-Bovine Serum Albumin-Polycaprolactone in Lung Cancer. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2017, 208, 1116–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Avcıbaşı, U.; Demiroğlu, H.; Ediz, M.; Akalın, H.A.; Özçalışkan, E.; Şenay, H.; Türkcan, C.; Özcan, Y.; Akgöl, S.; Avcıbaşı, N. Radiolabeling of new generation magnetic poly(HEMA-MAPA) nanoparticles with 131I and preliminary investigation of its radiopharmaceutical potential using albino Wistar rats. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2013, 56, 708–716. [Google Scholar]
  50. Cheng, Y.; Zhu, J.; Zhao, L.; Xiong, Z.; Tang, Y.; Liu, C.; Guo, L.; Qiao, W.; Shi, X.; Zhao, J. 131I-labeled multifunctional dendrimers modified with BmK CT for targeted SPECT imaging and radiotherapy of gliomas. Nanomedicine 2016, 11, 1253–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, Y.; Yu, X.M.; Sun, R.J.; Pan, X.L. Folate-Functionalized Lipid Nanoemulsion to Deliver Chemo-Radiotherapeutics Together for the Effective Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2017, 18, 1374–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Li, L.; Wartchow, C.A.; Danthi, S.N.; Shen, Z.; Dechene, N.; Pease, J.; Choi, H.S.; Doede, T.; Chu, P.; Ning, S.; et al. A novel antiangiogenesis therapy using an integrin antagonist or anti-Flk-1 antibody coated 90Y-labeled nanoparticles. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2004, 58, 1215–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Buckway, B.; Frazier, N.; Gormley, A.J.; Ray, A.; Ghandehari, H. Gold nanorod-mediated hyperthermia enhances the efficacy of HPMA copolymer-90Y conjugates in treatment of prostate tumors. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2014, 41, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Radović, M.; Calatayud, M.P.; Goya, G.F.; Ibarra, M.R.; Antić, B.; Spasojević, V.; Nikolić, N.; Janković, D.; Mirković, M.; Vranješ-Đurić, S. Preparation and in vivo evaluation of multifunctional ⁹⁰Y-labeled magnetic nanoparticles designed for cancer therapy. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2015, 103, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Radović, M.; Vranješ-Đurić, S.; Nikolić, N.; Janković, D.; Goya, G.F.; Torres, T.E.; Calatayud, M.P.; Bruvera, I.J.; Ibarra, M.R.; Spasojević, V.; et al. Development and evaluation of 90Y-labeled albumin microspheres loaded with magnetite nanoparticles for possible applications in cancer therapy. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 24017–24025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yook, S.; Cai, Z.; Lu, Y.; Winnik, M.A.; Pignol, J.P.; Reilly, R.M. Intratumorally Injected 177Lu-Labeled Gold Nanoparticles: Gold Nanoseed Brachytherapy with Application for Neoadjuvant Treatment of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 2016, 57, 936–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cai, Z.; Yook, S.; Lu, Y.; Bergstrom, D.; Winnik, M.A.; Pignol, J.P.; Reilly, R.M. Local Radiation Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Using Trastuzumab-Modified Gold Nanoparticles Labeled with 177Lu. Pharm. Res. 2017, 34, 579–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Azorín-Vega, E.P.; Zambrano-Ramírez, O.D.; Rojas-Calderón, E.L.; Ocampo-García, B.E.; Ferro-Flores, G. Tumoral fibrosis effect on the radiation absorbed dose of 177Lu-Tyr3-octreotate and 177Lu-Tyr3-octreotate conjugated to gold nanoparticles. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2015, 100, 96–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Vilchis-Juárez, A.; Ferro-Flores, G.; Santos-Cuevas, C.; Morales-Avila, E.; Ocampo-García, B.; Díaz-Nieto, L.; Luna-Gutiérrez, M.; Jiménez-Mancilla, N.; Pedraza-López, M.; Gómez-Oliván, L. Molecular targeting radiotherapy with cyclo-RGDFK(C) peptides conjugated to 177Lu-labeled gold nanoparticles in tumor-bearing mice. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2014, 10, 393–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Laznickova, A.; Biricova, V.; Laznicek, M.; Hermann, P. Mono(pyridine-N-oxide) DOTA analog and its G1/G4-PAMAM dendrimer conjugates labeled with 177Lu: Radiolabeling and biodistribution studies. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2014, 84, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Séhédic, D.; Chourpa, I.; Tétaud, C.; Griveau, A.; Loussouarn, C.; Avril, S.; Legendre, C.; Lepareur, N.; Wion, D.; Hindré, F.; et al. Locoregional Confinement and Major Clinical Benefit of 188Re-Loaded CXCR4-Targeted Nanocarriers in an Orthotopic Human to Mouse Model of Glioblastoma. Theranostics 2017, 7, 4517–4536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chen, M.H.; Chang, C.H.; Chang, Y.J.; Chen, L.C.; Yu, C.Y.; Wu, Y.H.; Lee, W.C.; Yeh, C.H.; Lin, F.H.; Lee, T.W.; et al. MicroSPECT/CT imaging and pharmacokinetics of 188Re-(DXR)-liposome in human colorectal adenocarcinoma-bearing mice. Anticancer Res. 2010, 30, 65–72. [Google Scholar]
  63. Tang, Q.S.; Chen, D.Z.; Xue, W.Q.; Xiang, J.Y.; Gong, Y.C.; Zhang, L.; Guo, C.Q. Preparation and biodistribution of 188Re-labeled folate conjugated human serum albumin magnetic cisplatin nanoparticles (188Re-folate-CDDP/HSA MNPs) in vivo. Int. J. Nanomedicine 2011, 6, 3077–3085. [Google Scholar]
  64. Cui, W.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, X.; Shen, Y.M. Synthesis and 188Re radiolabelling of dendrimer polyamide amine (PAMAM) folic acid conjugate. Med. Chem. 2012, 8, 727–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Jung, S.H.; Kim, K.I.; Ryu, J.H.; Choi, S.H.; Kim, J.B.; Moon, J.H.; Jin, J.H. Preparation of radioactive core–shell type 198Au@SiO2 nanoparticles as a radiotracer for industrial process applications. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2010, 68, 1025–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Shukla, R.; Chanda, N.; Zambre, A.; Upendran, A.; Katti, K.; Kulkarni, R.R.; Nune, S.K.; Casteel, S.W.; Smith, C.J.; Vimal, J.; et al. Laminin receptor specific therapeutic gold nanoparticles (198AuNP-EGCg) show efficacy in treating prostate cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 12426–12431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Al-Yasiri, A.Y.; Khoobchandani, M.; Cutler, C.S.; Watkinson, L.; Carmack, T.; Smith, C.J.; Kuchuk, M.; Loyalka, S.K.; Lugão, A.B.; Katti, K.V. Mangiferin functionalized radioactive gold nanoparticles (MGF-198AuNPs) in prostate tumor therapy: Green nanotechnology for production, in vivo tumor retention and evaluation of therapeutic efficacy. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 14561–14571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chanda, N.; Kattumuri, V.; Shukla, R.; Zambre, A.; Katti, K.; Upendran, A.; Kulkarni, R.R.; Kan, P.; Fent, G.M.; Casteel, S.W.; et al. Bombesin functionalized gold nanoparticles show in vitro and in vivo cancer receptor specificity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 8760–8765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chanda, N.; Kan, P.; Watkinson, L.D.; Shukla, R.; Zambre, A.; Carmack, T.L.; Engelbrecht, H.; Lever, J.R.; Katti, K.; Fent, G.M.; et al. Radioactive gold nanoparticles in cancer therapy: Therapeutic efficacy studies of GA-198AuNP nanoconstruct in prostate tumor-bearing mice. Nanomedicine 2010, 6, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhou, M.; Zhao, J.; Tian, M.; Song, S.; Zhang, R.; Gupta, S.; Tan, D.; Shen, H.; Ferrari, M.; Li, C. Radio-photothermal therapy mediated by a single compartment nanoplatform depletes tumor initiating cells and reduces lung metastasis in the orthotopic 4T1 breast tumor model. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 19438–19447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Bult, W.; Varkevisser, R.; Soulimani, F.; Seevinck, P.R.; de Leeuw, H.; Bakker, C.J.; Luijten, P.R.; van Het Schip, A.D.; Hennink, W.E.; Nijsen, J.F. Holmium nanoparticles: Preparation and in vitro characterization of a new device for radioablation of solid malignancies. Pharm. Res. 2010, 27, 2205–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bult, W.; de Leeuw, H.; Steinebach, O.M.; van der Bom, M.J.; Wolterbeek, H.T.; Heeren, R.M.; Bakker, C.J.; van Het Schip, A.D.; Hennink, W.E.; Nijsen, J.F. Radioactive holmium acetylacetonate microspheres for interstitial microbrachytherapy: An in vitro and in vivo stability study. Pharm. Res. 2012, 29, 827–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Munaweera, I.; Levesque-Bishop, D.; Shi, Y.; Di Pasqua, A.J.; Balkus, K.J. Radiotherapeutic bandage based on electrospun polyacrylonitrile containing holmium-166 iron garnet nanoparticles for the treatment of skin cancer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 22250–22256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wright, C.L.; Zhang, J.; Tweedle, M.F.; Knopp, M.V.; Hall, N.C. Theranostic Imaging of Yttrium-90. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Dash, A.; Pillai, M.R.A.; Knapp, F.F., Jr. Production of 177Lu for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy: Available Options. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2015, 49, 85–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yook, S.; Cai, Z.; Lu, Y.; Winnik, M.A.; Pignol, J.P.; Reilly, R.M. Radiation Nanomedicine for EGFR-Positive Breast Cancer: Panitumumab-Modified Gold Nanoparticles Complexed to the β-Particle-Emitter, 177Lu. Mol. Pharm. 2015, 12, 3963–3972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Pillai, M.R.; Dash, A.; Knapp, F.F., Jr. Rhenium-188: Availability from the 188W/188Re generator and status of current applications. Curr. Radiopharm. 2012, 5, 228–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bolzati, C.; Carta, D.; Salvarese, N.; Refosco, F. Chelating systems for 99mTc/188Re in the development of radiolabeled peptide pharmaceuticals. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2012, 12, 428–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cikankowitz, A.; Clavreul, A.; Tétaud, C.; Lemaire, L.; Rousseau, A.; Lepareur, N.; Dabli, D.; Bouchet, F.; Garcion, E.; Menei, P.; et al. Characterization of the distribution, retention, and efficacy of internal radiation of 188Re-lipid nanocapsules in an immunocompromised human glioblastoma model. J. Neurooncol. 2017, 131, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Huang, F.Y.; Lee, T.W.; Chang, C.H.; Chen, L.C.; Hsu, W.H.; Chang, C.W.; Lo, J.M. Evaluation of 188Re-labeled PEGylated nanoliposome as a radionuclide therapeutic agent in an orthotopic glioma-bearing rat model. Int. J. Nanomedicine 2015, 10, 463–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lin, L.T.; Chang, C.Y.; Chang, C.H.; Wang, H.E.; Chiou, S.H.; Liu, R.S.; Lee, T.W.; Lee, Y.J. Involvement of let-7 microRNA for the therapeutic effects of Rhenium-188-embedded liposomal nanoparticles on orthotopic human head and neck cancer model. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 65782–65796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Tang, Q.; Chen, D. Study of the therapeutic effect of 188Re labeled folate targeting albumin nanoparticle coupled with cis-diamminedichloroplatinum cisplatin on human ovarian cancer. Biomed. Mater. Eng. 2014, 24, 711–722. [Google Scholar]
  83. Black, K.C.; Wang, Y.; Luehmann, H.P.; Cai, X.; Xing, W.; Pang, B.; Zhao, Y.; Cutler, C.S.; Wang, L.V.; Liu, Y.; et al. Radioactive 198Au-doped nanostructures with different shapes for in vivo analyses of their biodistribution, tumor uptake, and intratumoral distribution. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 4385–4394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kannan, R.; Zambre, A.; Chanda, N.; Kulkarni, R.; Shukla, R.; Katti, K.; Upendran, A.; Cutler, C.; Boote, E.; Katti, K.V. Functionalized radioactive gold nanoparticles in tumor therapy. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2012, 4, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Axiak-Bechtel, S.M.; Upendran, A.; Lattimer, J.C.; Kelsey, J.; Cutler, C.S.; Selting, K.A.; Bryan, J.N.; Henry, C.J.; Boote, E.; Tate, D.J.; et al. Gum arabic-coated radioactive gold nanoparticles cause no short-term local or systemic toxicity in the clinically relevant canine model of prostate cancer. Int. J. Nanomedicine 2014, 9, 5001–5011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Song, S.; Xiong, C.; Zhou, M.; Lu, W.; Huang, Q.; Ku, G.; Zhao, J.; Flores, L.G., Jr.; Ni, Y.; Li, C. Small-animal PET of tumor damage induced by photothermal ablation with 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin. J. Nucl. Med. 2011, 52, 792–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hosseini-Salekdeh, S.L.; Jalilian, A.R.; Yousefnia, H.; Shafaii, K.; Pouladian, M.; Mahmoudi, M. Evaluation of radiogallium-labeled, folate-embedded superparamagnetic nanoparticles in fibrosarcoma-bearing mice. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2012, 8, 204–208. [Google Scholar]
  88. Kim, J.K.; Han, K.H.; Lee, J.T.; Paik, Y.H.; Ahn, S.H.; Lee, J.D.; Lee, K.S.; Chon, C.Y.; Moon, Y.M. Long-term clinical outcome of phase IIb clinical trial of percutaneous injection with holmium-166/chitosan complex (Milican) for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Poty, S.; Francesconi, L.C.; McDevitt, M.R.; Morris, M.J.; Lewis, J.S. α-Emitters for Radiotherapy: From Basic Radiochemistry to Clinical Studies-Part 1. J. Nucl. Med. 2018, 59, 878–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zalusky, M.R.; Reardon, D.A.; Pozi, E.; Vaidyanathan, G.; Binger, D.D. Targeted α-particle radiotherapy with 211At-labeled monoclonal antibodies. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2007, 34, 779–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Dziawer, Ł.; Koźmiński, P.; Męczyńska-Wielgosz, S.; Pruszyński, M.; Łyczko, M.; Wąs, B.; Celichowski, G.; Grobelny, J.; Jastrzębski, J.; Bilewicz, A. Gold nanoparticle bioconjugates labelled with 211At for targeted alpha therapy. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 41024–41032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Dziawer, Ł.; Majkowska-Pilip, A.; Gaweł, D.; Godlewska, M.; Pruszyński, M.; Jastrzębski, J.; Wąs, B.; Bilewicz, A. Trastuzumab-modified gold nanoparticles labeled with 211At as a prospective tool for local treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kučka, J.; Hrubý, M.; Koňák, Č.; Kozempel, J.; Lebeda, O. Astatination of nanoparticles containing silver as possible carriers of 211At. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2006, 64, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Cedrowska, E.; Łyczko, M.; Piotrowska, A.; Bilewicz, A.; Stolarz, A.; Trzcińska, A.; Szkliniarz, K.; Wąs, B. Silver impregnated nanoparticles of titanium dioxide as carriers for 211At. Radiochim. Acta 2016, 104, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Hartman, K.B.; Hamlin, D.K.; Wilbur, D.S.; Wilson, L.J. 211AtCl@US-tube nanocapsules: A new concept in radiotherapeutic agent design. Small 2007, 3, 1496–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Woodward, J.; Kennel, S.J.; Stuckey, A.; Osborne, D.; Wall, J.; Rondinone, A.J.; Standaert, R.F.; Mirzadeh, S. LaPO4 nanoparticles doped with actinium-225 that partially sequester daughter radionuclides. Bioconjugate Chem. 2011, 22, 766–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. McLaughlin, M.F.; Woodward, J.; Boll, R.A.; Wall, J.S.; Rondinone, A.J.; Kennel, S.J.; Mirzadeh, S.; Robertson, J.D. Gold Coated Lanthanide Phosphate Nanoparticles for Targeted Alpha Generator Radiotherapy. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. McLaughlin, M.F.; Robertson, D.; Pevsner, P.H.; Wall, J.S.; Mirzadeh, S.; Kennel, S.J. LnPO4 nanoparticles doped with Ac-225 and sequestered daughters for targeted alpha therapy. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2014, 29, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Sofou, S.; Thomas, J.L.; Lin, H.Y.; McDevitt, M.R.; Scheinberg, D.A.; Sgouros, G. Engineered liposomes for potential alpha-particle therapy of metastatic cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 2004, 45, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  100. Henriksen, G.; Schoultz, B.W.; Michaelsen, T.E.; Roland, Ø.S.; Larsen, R.H. Sterically stabilized liposomes as a carrier for alpha-emitting radium and actinium radionuclides. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2004, 31, 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Sofou, S.; Kappel, B.J.; Jaggi, J.S.; McDevitt, M.R.; Scheinberg, D.A.; Sgouros, G. Enhanced retention of the alpha-particle-emitting daughters of Actinium-225 by liposome carriers. Bioconjugate Chem. 2007, 18, 2061–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Chang, M.Y.; Seideman, J.; Sofou, S. Enhanced loading efficiency and retention of 225Ac in rigid liposomes for potential targeted therapy of micrometastases. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008, 19, 1274–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Bandekar, A.; Zhu, C.; Jindal, R.; Bruchertseifer, F.; Morgenstern, A.; Sofou, S. Anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen liposomes loaded with 225Ac for potential targeted antivascular α-particle therapy of cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 2014, 55, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. De Kruijff, R.M.; van der Meer, A.J.G.M.; Windmeijer, C.A.A.; Kouwenberg, J.J.M.; Morgenstern, A.; Bruchertseifer, F.; Sminia, P.; Denkova, A.G. The therapeutic potential of polymersomes loaded with 225Ac evaluated in 2D and 3D in vitro glioma models. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2018, 127, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Cędrowska, E.; Pruszynski, M.; Majkowska-Pilip, A.; Męczyńska-Wielgosz, S.; Bruchertseifer, F.; Morgenstern, A.; Bilewicz, A. Functionalized TiO2 nanoparticles labelled with 225Ac for targeted alpha radionuclide therapy. J. Nanopart. Res. 2018, 20, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Mulvey, J.J.; Villa, C.H.; McDevitt, M.R.; Escorcia, F.E.; Casey, E.; Scheinberg, D.A. Self-assembly of carbon nanotubes and antibodies on tumours for targeted amplified delivery. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 763–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Ruggiero, A.; Villa, C.H.; Holland, J.P.; Sprinkle, S.R.; May, C.; Lewis, J.S.; Scheinberg, D.A.; McDevitt, M.R. Imaging and treating tumor vasculature with targeted radiolabeled carbon nanotubes. Int. J. Nanomedicine 2010, 5, 783–802. [Google Scholar]
  108. Matson, M.L.; Villa, C.H.; Ananta, J.S.; Law, J.J.; Scheinberg, D.A.; Wilson, L.J. Encapsulation of α-Particle-Emitting 225Ac3+ Ions Within Carbon Nanotubes. J. Nucl. Med. 2015, 56, 897–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Piotrowska, A.; Męczyńska-Wielgosz, S.; Majkowska-Pilip, A.; Koźmiński, P.; Wójciuk, G.; Cędrowska, E.; Bruchertseifer, F.; Morgenstern, A.; Kruszewski, M.; Bilewicz, A. Nanozeolite bioconjugates labeled with 223Ra for targeted alpha therapy. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2017, 47, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Piotrowska, A.; Leszczuk, E.; Bruchertseifer, F.; Morgenstern, A.; Bilewicz, A. Functionalized NaA nanozeolites labeled with 224,225Ra for targeted alpha therapy. J. Nanopart. Res. 2013, 15, 2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Mokhodoeva, O.; Vlk, M.; Málková, E.; Kukleva, E.; Mičolová, P.; Štamberg, K.; Šlouf, M.; Dzhenloda, R.; Kozempel, J. Study of 223Ra uptake mechanism by Fe3O4 nanoparticles: Towards new prospective theranostic SPIONs. J. Nanopart. Res. 2016, 18, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Vasiliev, A.N.; Severin, A.; Lapshina, E.; Chernykh, E.; Ermolaev, S.; Kalmykov, S. Hydroxyapatite particles as carriers for 223Ra. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2011, 311, 1503–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Dekempeneer, Y.; Keyaerts, M.; Krasniqi, A.; Puttemans, J.; Muyldermans, S.; Lahoutte, T.; D’huyvetter, M.; Devoogdt, N. Targeted alpha therapy using short-lived alpha-particles and the promise of nanobodies as targeting vehicle. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2016, 16, 1035–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Teze, D.; Sergentu, D.C.; Kalichuk, V.; Barbet, J.; Deniaud, D.; Galland, N.; Maurice, R.; Montavon, G. Targeted radionuclide therapy with astatine-211: Oxidative dehalogenation of astatobenzoate conjugates. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Kim, Y.H.; Jeon, J.; Hong, S.H.; Rhim, W.K.; Lee, Y.S.; Youn, H.; Chung, J.K.; Lee, M.C.; Lee, D.S.; Kang, K.W.; et al. Tumor targeting and imaging using cyclic RGD-PEGylated gold nanoparticle probes with directly conjugated iodine-125. Small 2011, 7, 2052–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Choi, M.H.; Shim, H.E.; Yun, S.J.; Park, S.H.; Choi, D.S.; Jang, B.S.; Choi, Y.J.; Jeon, J. Gold-nanoparticle-immobilized desalting columns for highly efficient and specific removal of radioactive iodine in aqueous media. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 29227–29231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Mushtaq, S.; Yun, S.J.; Yang, J.E.; Jeong, S.W.; Shim, H.E.; Choi, M.H.; Park, S.H.; Choi, Y.J.; Jeon, J. Efficient and selective removal of radioactive iodine anions using engineered nanocomposite membranes. Environ. Sci. Nano 2017, 4, 2157–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Choi, M.H.; Jeong, S.W.; Shim, H.E.; Yun, S.J.; Mushtaq, S.; Choi, D.S.; Jang, B.S.; Yang, J.E.; Choi, Y.J.; Jeon, J. Efficient bioremediation of radioactive iodine using biogenic gold nanomaterial-containing radiation-resistant bacterium, Deinococcus radiodurans R1. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 3937–3940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Scheinberg, D.A.; McDevitt, M.R. Actinium-225 in targeted alpha-particle therapeutic applications. Curr. Radiopharm. 2011, 4, 306–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Sathekge, M.; Bruchertseifer, F.; Knoesen, O.; Reyneke, F.; Lawal, I.; Lengana, T.; Davis, C.; Mahapane, J.; Corbett, C.; Vorster, M.; et al. 225Ac-PSMA-617 in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced prostate cancer: A pilot study. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2019, 46, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Chakravarty, R.; Siamof, C.M.; Dash, A.; Cai, W. Targeted α-therapy of prostate cancer using radiolabeled PSMA inhibitors: A game changer in nuclear medicine. Am. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2018, 8, 247–267. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  122. Kratochwil, C.; Bruchertseifer, F.; Giesel, F.L.; Weis, M.; Verburg, F.A.; Mottaghy, F.; Kopka, K.; Apostolidis, C.; Haberkorn, U.; Morgenstern, A. 225Ac-PSMA-617 for PSMA-Targeted α-Radiation Therapy of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 2016, 57, 1941–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Edem, P.E.; Fonslet, J.; Kjær, A.; Herth, M.; Severin, G. In Vivo Radionuclide Generators for Diagnostics and Therapy. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2016, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Borchardt, P.E.; Yuan, R.R.; Miederer, M.; McDevitt, M.R.; Scheinberg, D.A. Targeted actinium-225 in vivo generators for therapy of ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 5084–5090. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  125. Abou, D.S.; Pickett, J.; Mattson, J.E.; Thorek, D.L.J. A Radium-223 microgenerator from cyclotron-produced trace Actinium-227. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2017, 119, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Colletti, P.M. New treatment option: 223Ra chloride, the first approved unsealed α-emitting radiopharmaceutical. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2013, 38, 724–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Henriksen, G.; Hoff, P.; Larsen, R.H. Evaluation of potential chelating agents for radium. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2002, 56, 667–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 20 02323 g001 550
Figure 1. Multifunctional nanomaterials for therapeutic study.
Figure 1. Multifunctional nanomaterials for therapeutic study.
Ijms 20 02323 g001
Ijms 20 02323 g002 550
Figure 2. Incorporation of therapeutic radionuclides into the nanocarrier by (a) chelation, (b) entrapment, (c) sorption, and (d) covalent bonding.
Figure 2. Incorporation of therapeutic radionuclides into the nanocarrier by (a) chelation, (b) entrapment, (c) sorption, and (d) covalent bonding.
Ijms 20 02323 g002
Table
Table 1. Physical properties of β-particles for medical applications
Table 1. Physical properties of β-particles for medical applications
RadioisotopeDecay ProductDecay Half-LifeMean Penetration Range in Tissue (mm)Decay Energy (MeVmax)
131I131Xe8.02 days0.40.607
67Cu67Zn2.60 days0.190.578
90Y90Zr2.67 days2.52.280
166Ho166Er1.12 days0.841.855
177Lu177Hf6.73 days0.160.498
186Re186Os3.72 days0.431.070
188Re188Os17.0 h0.982.120
198Au198Hg2.70 days0.380.960
Table
Table 2. 131I-labeled functional nanomaterials
Table 2. 131I-labeled functional nanomaterials
NanomaterialLabeling MethodFunctionsAnimal ModelRef
Albumin nanosphereCovalent bondingAnti-AFP Mab (targeting), Doxorubicin (chemotherapy)HepG2 cells (Balb/c mouse)[39]
Albumin-paclitaxel nanoparticleCovalent bondingPaclitaxel (chemotherapy), SPECT imaging4T1 cells (nude mouse)[40]
CuS-nanoparticle-loaded microsphereCovalent bondingCuS nanoparticles (photothermal therapy), paclitaxel (chemotherapy), SPECT imagingW256/B cells (SD rat)[41]
PAMAM (G5)Covalent bondingFolic acid (targeting), SPECT imagingC6-HFAR cells (Balb/c mouse)[42]
PAMAM (G5)Covalent bondingChlorotoxin (targeting), SPECT imagingC6 cells (Balb/c mouse)[43]
RGO aCovalent bondingRGO (photothermal therapy), SPECT imaging4T1 cells (Balb/c mouse) [44]
Polypyrrole nanoparticleCovalent bondingTransferrin (targeting), polypyrrole (photothermal therapy), SPECT imagingU87MG cells (nude mouse)[45]
AgNP bEntrapment WI-38 cells (Swiss albino mouse)[46]
BSA-poly(ε-caprolactone) assemblyCovalent bondingCetuximab (targeting)NCI-H1972 cells (Balb/c mouse)[47]
BSA-poly(ε-caprolactone) assemblyCovalent bondingRGD peptide (targeting), SPECT imagingNCI-H460 cells (Athymic mouse)[48]
Poly(HEMA-MAPA) nanoparticleCovalent bondingSPECT imagingHealthy rats[49]
a Reduced graphene oxide; b Silver nanoparticles
Table
Table 3. β-ray-emitting radiometal-labeled functional nanomaterials
Table 3. β-ray-emitting radiometal-labeled functional nanomaterials
IsotopeNanomaterialLabeling MethodFunctionsAnimal ModelRef
90YLipid nanoparticleChelationDoxorubicin (chemotherapy), folate (targeting)CNE-1 cells (BALB/c mouse)[51]
Lipid nanoparticleChelationAnti-FLK Mab (targeting)K1735-M2 and CT-26 cells (BALB/c mouse)[52]
HPMA copolymer nanoparticleChelation DU-145 cells (nude mouse)[53]
Fe3O4 nanoparticleChelationFe3O4 nanoparticle (photothermal therapy)Healthy Wistar rats[54,55]
177LuAuNPsChelationPanitumumab (targeting), SPECT imagingMDA-MB-468 cells (CD-1 mouse)[56]
AuNPsChelationTrastuzumab (targeting)DMA-MB-361 cells (NOD/SCID mouse)[57]
AuNPsChelationTyr3-octreotate (targeting)HeLa cells (in vitro)[58]
AuNPsChelationCyclic RGD peptide (targeting)C6 gliomas cells (nude mouse)[59]
PAMAM (G1 and G4)Chelation-Healthy Wistar rat[60]
188ReLipid nanoparticleEntrapment12G5 mAB (targeting)U87MG cells (SCID mouse)[61]
Lipid nanoparticleEntrapmentDoxorubicin (chemotherapy), SPECT imagingHT-29 cells (nude mouse)[62]
Magnetic nanoparticleChelationFolic acid (targeting), cisplatin (chemotherapy), magnetic nanoparticle (photothermal therapy)SKOV3 cells (BALB/c mouse)[63]
PAMAM (G5)ChelationFolic acid (targeting)-[64]
198AuSiO2 a AuNPsEntrapment--[65]
AuNPsEntrapmentEpigallocatechin-gallate (targeting)PC-3 cells (SCID mouse)[66]
AuNPsEntrapmentMangiferin (targeting)PC-3 cells (SCID mouse)[67]
AuNPsEntrapmentBBN peptide (targeting)PC-3 cells (SCID mouse)[68]
AuNPsEntrapmentGum Arabic glycoprotein (targeting)PC-3 cells (SCID mouse)[69]
64CuCuS nanoparticleEntrapmentCuS nanoparticles (photothermal therapy), PET imagingBT-474 cells (nude mouse)[70]
166HoHolmium acetylacetone nanoparticleChelation- -[71,72]
Holmium iron garnet nanoparticleEntrapmentRadiotherapeutic bandages-[73]
a Gold nanoparticles.
Table
Table 4. Physical properties of α-emitters for biomedical applications
Table 4. Physical properties of α-emitters for biomedical applications
RadioisotopeAlpha DecayDecay Half-LifeDecay Energy (MeVmax)
211At211At → 207Bi7.2 h5.87
211Po → 207Pb0.516 s7.45
212Bi212Bi → 208Tl61 min5.87
212Po → 208Pb0.3 μs8.79
213Bi213Bi → 209Tl46 min6.05
213Po → 209Pb4.2 μs8.38
223Ra223Ra → 219Rn11.43 days5.78
219Ra → 215Po3.96 s6.88
215Po → 211Pb1.78 ms7.53
211Bi → 207Tl2.14 min6.62
211Po → 207Pb516 ms7.59
225Ac225Ac → 221Fr10.0 days5.83
221Fr → 217At4.8 min6.34
217At → 213Bi32.3 ms7.07
213Bi → 209Tl45.6 min6.05
213Po → 209Pb4.2 μs8.38
Table
Table 5. Representative studies on α-particle therapy using functional nanomaterials
Table 5. Representative studies on α-particle therapy using functional nanomaterials
IsotopeNanomaterialLabeling MethodFunctionsAnimal ModelRef
211AtAuNPsSorptionSubstance P (5–11) (targeting)T98G cells (in vitro)[91]
AuNPsSorptionTrastuzumab (targeting)SKOV-3 cells (in vitro)[92]
AgNPsSorption--[93]
Ag/TiO2 nanoparticlesSorption--[94]
SWCNT aEntrapment--[95]
225AcLaPO4 nanoparticleEntrapmentmAb 201b antibody (targeting), SPECT imagingHealthy BALB/c mouse[96]
Multilayered LnPO4 nanoparticleEntrapmentmAb 201b antibody (targeting), SPECT imagingHealthy BALB/c mouse[97]
EMT-6 cells (BALB/c mouse)[98]
LiposomeEntrapment--[99]
LiposomeEntrapmentFolate conjugated F(ab)’ (targeting)OvCar-3 cells (in vitro)[100]
LiposomeEntrapmentTrastuzumab (targeting)SKOV3-NMP2 cells (in vitro)[101,102]
LiposomeEntrapmentJ591 antibody and A10 PSMA aptamer (targeting)LNCap and Mat-Lu cells (in vitro)[103]
PolymersomeEntrapment-U87 cells (in vitro)[104]
TiO2 nanoparticleSorptionSubstrate P (5–11) (targeting)T98G cells (in vitro)[105]
SWCNTChelationMorpholino oligonucleotide sequence (targeting)LS174T cells (BALB/c mice)[106]
SWCNTChelationAntibody E4G10 (targeting)LS174T cells (BALB/c mice)[107]
SWCNTEntrapment [108]
223RaNanozeoliteSorptionSubstance P (5–11) (targeting)T98G cells (in vitro)[109,110]
Fe3O4 nanoparticleSorption--[111]
Hydroxyapatite particlesSorption--[112]
a Single-walled carbon nanotube.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jeon, J. Review of Therapeutic Applications of Radiolabeled Functional Nanomaterials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092323

AMA Style

Jeon J. Review of Therapeutic Applications of Radiolabeled Functional Nanomaterials. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(9):2323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092323

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jeon, Jongho. 2019. "Review of Therapeutic Applications of Radiolabeled Functional Nanomaterials" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 9: 2323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092323

APA Style

Jeon, J. (2019). Review of Therapeutic Applications of Radiolabeled Functional Nanomaterials. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(9), 2323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092323

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop