Next Article in Journal
A Novel Synthetic Compound (E)-5-((4-oxo-4H-chromen-3-yl)methyleneamino)-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carbonitrile Inhibits TNFα-Induced MMP9 Expression via EGR-1 Downregulation in MDA-MB-231 Human Breast Cancer Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Neuroimmune Response in Natural Preclinical Scrapie after Dexamethasone Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Lipid Biomarkers as Predictors of Diastolic Dysfunction in Diabetes with Poor Glycemic Control
Previous Article in Special Issue
Maternal Immune Activation Induces Neuroinflammation and Cortical Synaptic Deficits in the Adolescent Rat Offspring
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Vesicular Transport of Encapsulated microRNA between Glial and Neuronal Cells

by
Walter J. Lukiw
1,2,3,4,* and
Aileen I. Pogue
5
1
Departments of Neurology, Neuroscience and Ophthalmology, Neuroscience Center and Department of Ophthalmology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
2
LSU Neuroscience Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
3
Department of Ophthalmology, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
4
Department of Neurology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
5
Alchem Biotech Research, Toronto, ON M5S1A8, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(14), 5078; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21145078
Submission received: 27 June 2020 / Revised: 9 July 2020 / Accepted: 15 July 2020 / Published: 18 July 2020

Abstract

:
Exosomes (EXs) and extracellular microvesicles (EMVs) represent a diverse assortment of plasma membrane-derived nanovesicles, 30–1000 nm in diameter, released by all cell lineages of the central nervous system (CNS). They are examples of a very active and dynamic form of extracellular communication and the conveyance of biological information transfer essential to maintain homeostatic neurological functions and contain complex molecular cargoes representative of the cytoplasm of their cells of origin. These molecular cargoes include various mixtures of proteins, lipids, proteolipids, cytokines, chemokines, carbohydrates, microRNAs (miRNA) and messenger RNAs (mRNA) and other components, including end-stage neurotoxic and pathogenic metabolic products, such as amyloid beta (Aβ) peptides. Brain microglia, for example, respond to both acute CNS injuries and degenerative diseases with complex reactions via the induction of a pro-inflammatory phenotype, and secrete EXs and EMVs enriched in selective pathogenic microRNAs (miRNAs) such as miRNA-34a, miRNA-125b, miRNA-146a, miRNA-155, and others that are known to promote neuro-inflammation, induce complement activation, disrupt innate–immune signaling and deregulate the expression of neuron-specific phosphoproteins involved in neurotropism and synaptic signaling. This communication will review our current understanding of the trafficking of miRNA-containing EXs and EMVs from astrocytes and “activated pro-inflammatory” microglia to target neurons in neurodegenerative diseases with an emphasis on Alzheimer’s disease wherever possible.

Graphical Abstract

1. Microvesicle Signaling in Neurodegeneration

Overview

Exosomes (EX) and Extracellular Microvesicles (EMV)

The exosome (EX) and extracellular microvesicle (EMV), sometimes referred to collectively as extracellular microparticles (MP) or extracellular organelles, are lipid-bilayer membrane encapsulated, nanosized particles 30–1000 nm in diameter that play essential roles: (i) in intercellular communication and tissue homeostasis by transporting diverse classes of biologically active molecules between cells of glial and neuronal origins (and probably vice versa; glial cells include microglial cells, astroglia and astrocytes); (ii) in maintaining the crosstalk between neurons and glia and neural cells with the peripheral nervous system (PNS) and systemic circulation; (iii) in synaptic plasticity, neuroprotection, neuroregeneration, maintenance of the neuronal–glial interface, and the dissemination of potentially neuropathological molecules (Colombo et al., 2014 [1]; Choi et al., 2015 [2]; Tabata 2015 [3]; Xu et al., 2018 [4]; Stahl et al., 2019 [5]; Arbo et al., 2020 [6]; Barnes and Somerville 2020 [7]; Birgisdottir and Johansen 2020 [8]; Song et al., 2020 [9]). As such, each EX or EMV carry their own lipidome, proteome, lipoproteome, and/or transcriptome as an individually packaged organelle destined for independent extracellular targeting. Other classes of much larger apoptosis-related extracellular bodies 1–5 μm in diameter, sometimes called “apoptotic bodies”, involved in brain cell and tissue degradation have been recently reviewed in depth and will not be dealt with further in this communication (van Niel et al., 2018 [10]; Stahl et al., 2019 [5]; Rodriguez-Quijada and Dahl 2020 [11]).
Exosomes (EXs): (i) were first characterized about ~40 years ago as a heterogeneous group of cell cytoplasm-derived intracellular micro-particles (MPs) of endosomal origin (also known as ectosomes, shedding vesicles, microvesicles or EMVs); (ii) are variable in their content and morphology, ranging in size from about ~30 to ~100 nm in diameter; (iii) are released by a variety of central nervous system (CNS) cells whose function was originally described as a cytological basis for intercellular signaling and communication (Trams et al. 1981 [12]; Columbo et al., 2014 [13]; Jiang et al., 2019 [14]; Mathews and Levy 2019 [15]; Arbo et al., 2020 [6]; Martins et al., 2020 [16]). EXs originated as intracellular endosomes containing intraluminal vesicles (ILV) that fuse with the plasma membrane and empty their plasma membrane-encapsulated cargo. ILVs are released once extracellular bodies become exosomes (Mathews and Levy 2019 [15]; Arbo et al., 2020 [6]). Extracellular microvesicles (EMVs), 100–1000 nm in diameter, are lipid-bilayer membrane bound spheres and are typically released from the exterior plasma membrane of astrocytes and activated microglia, directly from the outward blebbing of the plasma membrane, and carry intracellular contents from their cells of origin. These include various complex mixtures of proteins, lipids, proteolipids, carbohydrates, miRNAs, mRNAs, cytokines, chemokines and end-stage metabolic products, including neurotoxic 42 amino acid amyloid-beta (Aβ42) peptides. In fact, the beta amyloid precursor protein (βAPP)-processing enzymes, gamma- and beta-secretase, that give rise to Aβ42 peptides have been found in abundance in both EXs and EMVs, and may represent part of an Aβ42 peptide clearance mechanism throughout the brain (Arbo et al., 2020 [6]; Webers et al., 2020 [17]). Similarly, the accrual in EXs of the trans-active response DNA-binding proteolipid of 43 kDa (TDP-43), a neurotoxic and pathological hallmark for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal degeneration (FTD), may be part of a critical shuttling pathway for the clearance of TDP-43 from diseased brain cells (Iguchi et al., 2016) [18]. Astrocyte-derived EMVs, in addition, have been shown to encapsulate and subsequently release various neuroprotective and neurorestorative factors, including fibroblast growth factor-2, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), apolipoprotein-D, heat shock proteins (HSP), synapsin-1 (SYN1) and glutamate transporters, to their extracellular targets which include neurons (Stahl et al., 2019 [5]; Leidal and Debnath 2020 [19]; Upadhya et al., 2020 [20]). Some of these EMV cargoes, such as end-stage oxidized metabolic products and excesses of cytokines and chemokines, may be pathogenic and promote the spread of pro-inflammatory signaling and inflammatory neurodegeneration (Prada et al., 2018 [21]; Serpente et al., 2020 [22]; Vanherle et al., 2020 [4]; Figure 1). Pharmacologically-based intervention strategies restraining the release of EMVs by activated astrocytes, activated microglia or modulating their cargoes may be a useful therapeutic approach and beneficial for treating inflammatory neurodegenerative diseases (Mao et al., 2015 [23]; Mathieu et al., 2019 [24]; Arbo et al., 2020 [6]; Seyedrazizadeh et al., 2020 [25]; Upadhya et al., 2020 [20]). As most EMVs pass freely across the blood–brain barrier into systemic circulation, the detection of astrocyte-specific biomarkers in different neurological conditions may be additionally useful for monitoring disease progression, remission and/or therapeutic efficacy (Mao et al., 2015 [23]; Urbanelli et al., 2016 [26]; Federici et al., 2020 [27]; Groot and Lee 2020 [28]; Stahl et al., 2019 [5]; Upadhya et al., 2020 [20]; Vanherle et al., 2020 [4]).
Interestingly, EX, MP and EMV releases are common features of many diverse cell types in many different kinds of organisms, from prokaryotes to eukaryotes, and their formation and release have been widely documented in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis, species of the family Brassicaceae such as Arabidopsis thaliana, Protists, protozoa such as Amoeba proteus and slime molds such as Dictyostelium discoideum, nematodes such as Caenorhabditis, and up the evolutionary scale to a wide range of mammals including humans. The biogenesis, secretion and the release of EXs, MPs and/or EMVs into the extracellular space or external environment for the purpose of mediating intercellular communication or transmitting DNA- or RNA-encoded genetic information between different cell types and the environment is therefore a very ancient and conserved evolutionary process (Columbo et al., 2014 [13]; Arbo et al., 2020 [6]). From what is currently known, the EXs, MPs and/or EMVs of all prokaryotes and eukaryotes examined so far all carry small non-coding RNAs (sncRNAs), microRNA-like and/or microRNAs, as a fundamental system for the extracellular exchange and/or transmission of genetic information and there is the intriguing potential here for interspecies signaling and communication (Pogue et al. 2014 [33]; Cong et al., 2018 [34]; Avsar et al., 2020 [35]).
EXs and EMVs: (i) are released under normal physiological conditions, but are also discharged from parent cells upon cellular activation, hypoxia and/or hyperoxia, senescence, apoptosis and disease via a paracrine- and endocrine-type type action to their target cells; (ii) represent one of the major biological mechanisms for genetic exchange, immune signaling and the spread of inflammation and disease between cells of the host; (iii) EX and EMV trafficking in the mammalian CNS is a particularly robust, active and dynamic process (Valadi et al., 2007 [26]; Hunter et al., 2008 [36]; Deng et al., 2018 [34]; Stahl et al., 2019 [9]; Arbo et al., 2020 [6]; Hou et al., 2020 [37]). The human brain and retina, CNS, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), neurovasculature, as well as the systemic circulation, are particularly rich sources of EXs, MPs and EMVs, suggesting that they are significant components of a highly active multi-component extracellular signaling and communication system (Trotta et al., 2018 [38]; Seyedrazizadeh et al., 2020 [39]; Song et al., 2020 [40]). Indeed, the magnitude of EX and ECV cargoes and the complexity of their content of multiple mediators make them a more formidable form of intercellular communication than the transfer of individual molecules, and the extracellular transfer of EX- or ECV-derived vesicular cargoes to neurons and other cell types may in fact permanently alter or modulate the phenotype of target cells (Stahl et al., 2019 [9]; Vanherle et al., 2020 [4]).

2. Extracellular Trafficking of EX and EMV Cargo

The biogenesis of EXs and EMVs, and the triggers for their release from parent cells, are complex biological processes that eventually require the navigation of these vesicles through the extracellular matrix to their extracellular targets which may be near or distant (Barnes and Somerville 2020 [7]; Birgisdottir and Johansen 2020 [41]; BriteS 2020 [42]; Jadli et al., 2020 [43]). Protein interaction maps have indicated that EX and EMV biolipid boundary membranes have a tendency to interact with discrete extracellular “node” proteins involving surface ligands and delivery receptors, indicating an “extracellular directional strategy” for vesicular sorting and translocation over both short and long distances (Choi et al., 2015 [44]; Leidal and Debnath 2020 [45]). Many of these directional pathways and sorting mechanisms remain incompletely understood. EX and EMV targets may be either locally or distally located within the CNS or, after the passage of vesicles from the CNS into the systemic circulation, vesicular cargoes may target extra-neural cell receptors throughout the CNS (Barbagallo et al., 2020 [46]; Serpente et al., 2020 [11]).
The dynamics and observed variability of EXs and EMVs in vesicle size, morphology and cargo further indicates: (i) that these vesicular organelles consist of a unique repertoire of cytoplasmic components representing cellular, molecular and genetic information that is a direct reflection of the unique biological condition of the parent cell’s cytoplasm at the time of vesicular release; (ii) that these microparticles play important roles as enveloped proteolipids, a nucleic acid-enriched “information packet” in a complex extracellular communication network; (iii) that EXs and EMVs may reprogram recipient, adjacent cells and/or distant tissues as CNS-resident cells involved in immune-surveillance and the maintenance of normal cellular homeostasis, while also contributing to neuropathology during disease; (iv) that the molecular content and rates of production and secretion of EXs and EMVs vary greatly depending on the cell-type and physiological state of the cells of vesicular origin (van Niel et al., 2018 [47]; Mathieu et al., 2019 [15]; Brites 2020 [42]; Leidal and Debnath 2020 [45]). Attesting to the importance of EXs and EMVs in neurocellular and CNS functions, it is remarkable that the genetic and pharmacological inhibition or content modification of EX or EMV secretion from astrocytes has been found to play a role in the induction of amyloidogenesis, inflammation status and disease progression in several transgenic models of murine neurodegeneration, including the aging, amyloid-overexpressing 5xFAD mouse model (Dinkins et al., 2016 [48]; Barnes and Somerville 2020 [7]; Leidal and Debnath 2020 [45]).

3. Selective microRNAs in EXs and EMVs

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are soluble, amphipathic, single-stranded non-coding RNAs (sncRNAs) 18- to 25-ribonucleotides (nt) in length whose RNA sequences have been very highly selected. Some miRNAs, such as the neurologically relevant miRNA-378, are very highly conserved, and their core ribonucleotide sequence has remained virtually unchanged in plants (Atropa belladonna) and higher animals (Homo sapiens) over many billions of years of evolution (Arabidopsis thaliana–Homo sapiens divergence ~ 1.5 billion years; Pogue et al., 2014 [32]; Cong et al., 2018 [1]; Zhao et al., 2018 [49]; Avsar et al., 2020 [35]). Abundant data now indicates that miRNAs: (i) are the smallest known gene information-carrying nucleic acids yet discovered; (ii) are important posttranscriptional and epigenetic regulators of mRNA abundance, speciation and complexity in aging, development, neurological health and disease processes; (iii) play pivotal roles in the initiation, development and propagation of many human CNS disorders including progressive terminal cancers and lethal, age-related neurological syndromes with an inflammatory component; (iv) are loaded into both EXs and EMVs and are a typical component of their vesicular cargoes(Lukiw et al., 1990 [50]; Lukiw 2012a [51]; Lukiw 2012b [52]; Zhao et al., 2015 [53]; Hosaka et al., 2019 [54]; Slota et al., 2019 [55]; Swarbrick et al., 2019 [5]; Barbagallo et al., 2020 [46]; Briand et al., 2020 [8]; Li et al., 2020 [19]).
To date about 2650 microRNAs have been characterized in Homo sapiens while only about 25–30 individual miRNA species, or fewer, are abundant and easily detected in the human brain and retina (Clement et al., 2016 [2]; Hammond 2016 [28]; manuscript in preparation). Interestingly, a small subgroup of at least seven brain- and retina-enriched miRNAs—including the miRNA-7/Let-7a cluster, miRNA-9, the miRNA-23a/27a cluster, miRNA-34a, miRNA-125b, miRNA-146a, miRNA-155 and others—have been shown to be inducible via the pro-inflammatory transcription factor NF-kB (p50/p65) complex due to the presence of multiple high affinity NF-kB (p50/p65) recognition features in the majority of their immediate promoters (Lukiw 2012a [51]; Lukiw 2012b [52]; Hammond 2016 [28]). The up-regulation of these seven miRNAs can account for the down-regulation of the expression of many AD-relevant genes, including complement factor H (CFH), the interleukin-1 receptor associated kinase-4 (IRAK-4), the ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2A (UBE2A), the signal transduction “Wingless and Int-1” Wnt signaling complex, the triggering receptor expressed in myeloid cells (TREM2), the inhibitor-of-NF-kB signaling protein complex (IkBKG), the synaptic proteins synapsin-1 and synapsin-2 (SYN1 and SYN-2), 15-lipoxygenase (15-LOX), the vitamin D receptor (VDR), the 12-pass integral membrane spanning tetraspanin-12 protein complex (TSPAN-12) and several others that have highly interactive roles in innate immunity, cytokine (IL-1β) signaling, the clearance of end-stage metabolic products, synaptic failure, neurotropism and amyloidogenesis, and an up-regulation of NF-kB (p50/p650) regulated gene expression (Lukiw et al., 1990 [50]; Lukiw 2012a [51]; Lukiw 2012b [52]; Zhao et al., 2016 [56]; Wang et al., 2019 [57]; summarized in Figure 1 in Pogue and Lukiw 2018 [33]). Importantly, NF-kB (p50/p65) is rapidly induced by a large number of reactive-oxygen species (ROS)-inducing neurochemical and biophysical signals inducing those associated with viral and bacterial infections, ionizing radiation, cytokines and chemokines, Aβ42 peptides and hypoxia, and the neurogenetic coupling of the ROS-sensitive NF-kB (p50/p65) to the up-regulation of these NF-kB (p50/p65) sensitive miRNAs is a very tightly coupled and rapid genetic event (Hill et al., 2015 [30]; Alexandrov et al., 2019 [58]; Zhao and Lukiw 2018 [59]).
The discovery of the important role of miRNAs in the regulation of the transcriptome of a cell was made about ~15 years ago and was shortly followed by the first reports of altered miRNA abundance, speciation and complexity in the limbic system of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brains (Lukiw 2007 [60]) This included a significant up-regulation of what are now known as “pro-inflammatory miRNAs”, including miRNA-34a, miRNA-125b, miRNA-146a, miRNA-155 and others in the parenchyma of the temporal lobe neocortex (Lukiw 2007 [60]; Valadi et al., 2007 [26]; Hunter et al., 2008 [36]; Sethi and Lukiw 2009 [22]; Zhao et al., 2015 [61]; Hammond 2016 [28]). The first reports of EXs and EMVs being loaded with ribonucleic acid cargoes, such as specific miRNAs and mRNAs, first came about ~12 years ago: (i) from the microarray analysis of mast cells involved in innate and adaptive immunity, autoimmunity, and inflammation (Valadi et al., 2007 [26]); (ii) from studies of specific miRNAs, mRNAs and angiogenic proteins in glioblastoma and neuroblastoma tumor cells that have released EXs and EMVs (Skog et al., 2008 [25]; Columbo et al., 2014 [13]; Briand et al., 2020 [8]). These extruded vesicles were subsequently observed to be taken up by normal host brain microvascular endothelial cells, thereby inducing carcinogenic type phenotypic change in these brain cells, stimulating tumor invasion, proliferation and cancer spread mediated by endothelial cells of the neurovasculature (Hunter et al., 2008 [36]; Skog et al., 2008 [25]). Very recently, evidence has been provided showing that EXs and EMVs derived from miRNA-containing natural killer (NK) cells contribute to immunological surveillance and their provision of specific miRNAs may be the first-line of defense in the regulation of tumor cell growth, cytotoxicity and metastasis diffusion in the CNS (Briand et al., 2020 [8]; Federici et al., 2020 [62]). As discussed more fully below, it has recently been shown that brain EXs and EMVs released from diseased astrocytes and “activated microglia” carry specific miRNA-enriched cargoes, enriched in miRNA-34a and miRNA-125b for example, that contribute to neuropathological spreading and the exacerbation of neuropathological processes in AD, ALS, Parkinson’s disease (PD), Huntington’s disease (HD), stroke and other neuro-inflammatory degenerative conditions. This indicates a definitive role for EX and EMV miRNA cargoes in neurological disease processes with an inflammatory component which may have considerable diagnostic, prognostic and/or therapeutic value (Prada et al., 2018 [63]; Mathieu et al., 2019 [15]; Ghaffari et al., 2020 [27]; Li et al., 2020 [19]; Serpente et al., 2020 [11]; Upadhya et al., 2020 [64]). Because brain cells can release EXs and EMVs which can pass from the brain and CNS into the blood, brain-derived vesicles isolated from the systemic circulation may be of use to monitor diseases operating in the CNS, thus improving clinical diagnoses and prognoses (Barbagallo et al., 2020 [46]). This may also be of use in analyzing the efficacy of pharmaceuticals and/or therapeutic interventions being used to intervene in the AD process via the analysis of EXs and EMVs in blood plasma (Cha et al., 2019 [65]; Barbagallo et al., 2020 [46]).

4. EMV and miRNA Cargoes in the Spreading of Inflammatory Neurodegeneration

Accumulating evidence continues to implicate secreted miRNAs, including EX and EMV-encapsulated miRNAs, in the pathogenic spreading of progressive, age-related and incapacitating neurodegenerative diseases with an uncontrolled or deregulated inflammatory component and synaptic deficits. These include Alzheimer’s disease (AD), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), Huntington’s disease (HD), prion disease (PrD), multiple sclerosis (MS), Japanese and viral-induced encephalitis and many related amyloidopathies, tauopathies and synucleinopathies (Mcachlan et al., 1988 [24]; Zhao et al., 2016 [66]; Palpagama et al., 2019 [67]; Slota and Booth 2019 [55]; Wang et al., 2019 [57]; Fan et al., 2020 [68]; Groot and Lee, 2020 [69]; Lukiw 2020 [70]). From extensive research reports, it seems most likely that, in inflammatory neurodegenerative disease, the up-regulation of single miRNAs is much less important than increases in small families of pathological miRNAs in driving disease progression (Zhao et al., 2015 [61]; Lukiw 2020 [70]). While the alterations in the abundance of select miRNAs may be disease-specific, others such as miRNA-125b, miRNA-146a and miRNA-155 appear to be up-regulated during many of these neurological disorders and play highly integrated pathological roles. For example, an increase of miRNA-146a and miRNA-155 is observed in AD and AMD. Both miRNA-146a and miRNA-155 target the 3′ untranslated region (3′-UTR) of the complement factor H (CFH) mRNA in overlapping binding sites leading to a highly effective down-regulation in the expression of CFH and runaway loss-of-complement control, markedly increased pro-inflammatory signaling thereby contributing mechanistically to both AD and AMD inflammatory neuropathology (Hill et al., 2015 [30]; Fan et al., 2020 [68]).
Importantly, the modification of miRNA expression to more homeostatic levels via anti-miRNA or anti-NF-kB strategies may be a useful therapeutic strategy to successfully address multiple aspects of neuropathological inflammation (Hammond 2015 [28]; Zhao et al., 2016 [66]; Ghaffari et al., 2020 [27]). CNS-derived EXs and EMVs that contain NF-kB-sensitive, pro-inflammatory miRNAs and other molecular biomarkers from the cells of their parental origin are known to cross the blood–brain barrier into the systemic circulation and may be reflective of the biochemical status for various neurodegenerative diseases. There are practical challenges associated with the methodology of the extraction and characterization of CNS-derived blood, CSF and tissue EXs and EMVs, and subsequent analysis of their miRNAs and other intra-vesicular cargoes, however the methodologies for EX and EMV isolation and categorization are constantly improving (Hornung et al., 2020 [71]; Serpente et al., 2020 [11]).
As previously discussed, EXs or EMVs and their miRNA cargoes may be shed into the extracellular environment under physiologically homeostatic or pathological conditions, either constitutively, or upon activation via acute injury (Kandiyil et al., 2019 [72]), hypoxia, hypoxia-induced oxidative stress and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by multiple mechanisms (Deng et al., 2018 [34]), by senescence or “lingering death” (Urbanelli et al., 2016 [20]), by pro-inflammatory mediators (including inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and Aβ peptides), by factors in the systemic circulation such as thrombin and thrombotic factors (Hunter et al., 2019 [73]), by components of the purinergic pathways (Ludwig et al., 2020 [74]) and microbial or viral virulence factors, including bacterial exotoxins and lipopolysaccharide (LPS; Mao et al., 2015 [75]; Lukiw et al., 2018 [76]; Alexandrov et al., 2019 [58]). As observed in cancer, inflammatory bowel diseases and neurodegenerative diseases, including AD and ALS, exosomes can carry adenosine receptors and other components of purinergic pathways, and the production and release of some EXs or EMVs may be induced by the stimulation of purinergic receptors by purine receptor agonists and reduced by purine receptor antagonists (Hosaka et al., 2019 [54]; Ludwig et al., 2020 [74]).

5. Unanswered Questions

Several important unanswered questions remain in our understanding of the generation and characterization of intraluminal vesicles (ILV), microparticles (MP), exosomes (EX) and extracellular microvesicles (EMV), the nature of their vesicular cargoes and miRNA composition. These include: (i) the signals and pathways essential for stimulation and the origin of their formation, as well as the mechanism of their release from many different cell types in the CNS and their proficiency for modulating functions of target cells; (ii) the molecular-genetic injury and/or environmental factors which stimulate their release for this evolutionarily-conserved type of information communication system amongst astrocytes, microglia and neurons; (iii) their increased production and release during the initiation and spread of progressive age-related inflammatory neurodegeneration; (iv) the actual molecular contents, stoichiometry and packaging of the contents in the vesicles themselves; (v) the magnitude and signaling impact of their plasma membrane-packaged vesicular cargo; (vi) the regulation of their trafficking and targeting to neuronal cells via plasma membrane-mediated cell-surface reception mechanisms; (vii) the lipidomic, proteomic and transcriptomic profiles of these vesicles and what miRNA and/or mRNA encoded information these vesicles may be carrying; (viii) whether or not EXs and/or EMVs can transfer their miRNA-enriched intraluminal cargoes to other cell types and/or to other species; (ix) the role of circular RNA (circRNA) which have been shown in some cases to act as natural “anti-miRNA sponges” of specific miRNA activities (Lukiw 2013 [77]; Zhao et al., 2016 [78]; Fakhoury 2018 [53]; Pogue and Lukiw., 2018 [33]; Zhao and Lukiw, 2018 [59]; Avsar et al., 2020 [35]; Groot and Lee 2020 [69]; Hou et al., 2020 [37]; Li et al., 2020 [19]; Ma et al., 2020 [79]; Serpente et al., 2020 [11]). A single microvesicle, for example, may carry a cargo consisting of a complex cocktail of multiple proteins, proteolipids, cytokines, chemokines, carbohydrates, miRNAs, mRNAs, circRNAs and/or other nucleic acid signals as well as neurotrophic and amyloidogenic factors together representing novel, unique and discrete “information packets” for the structural and functional support of target cells, and acting as unique mediators of intercellular information transfer.

6. Concluding Remarks

The neurobiology of EX and EMV genesis, release, translocation and uptake by target cells, and their containment of select miRNA populations enriched in the CNS, indicate that they are significant components of a highly dynamic system of intercellular communication via extracellular translocation and targeting in brain cell health, aging and disease. Multiple independent studies indicate that while vesicle-mediated intercellular signaling is important in the homeostatic maintenance of brain cell functions, they have a substantial role in the proliferation of injury, cancer and inflammatory neurodegeneration signaling, as is observed in the AD brain. Many of the details of the mechanisms by which EXs and EMVs and their miRNA cargoes are generated and released by the activation of astrocytes and microglia and their trafficking to target brain cells, primarily neurons, remain to be further clarified. A greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying EX and EMV biogenesis, cargo selection and loading, vesicle release, translocation exterior to the cells of origin and targeting to adjacent or distant neural cells remains critical for unlocking the immense neurobiological and therapeutic potential for these ubiquitous organelles. Not only could an increased understanding of EX and EMV systems and their containment of miRNAs in the brain be useful in the treatment of CNS injuries and progressive age-related inflammatory neurodegeneration, but may also prove useful as delivery vehicles for therapeutic miRNAs, anti-miRNAs and both bioactive and neuroactive pharmaceuticals.

Author Contributions

W.J.L. and A.I.P. compiled and distilled the results from all laboratory experiments and those of many collaborators both domestic and international, and performed literature searches of recent peer-reviewed publications in the microRNA area of neurobiological research; W.J.L. wrote the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported through an unrestricted grant to the LSU Eye Center from Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB), the Louisiana Biotechnology Research Network (LBRN) and NIH grants NEI EY006311, NIA AG18031, and NIA AG038834 (WJL).

Acknowledgments

The research in this article was presented in part at the Society for Neuroscience (SFN) Annual Meeting, Chicago IL USA, November 2019. Sincere thanks are extended to L Cong, F Culicchia, C Eicken, K Navel, W Poon, T Bond, E Head, Y Zhao and the late JM Hill and PN Alexandrov for helpful discussions in this research area, for short postmortem interval (PMI) human brain and retinal tissues or extracts, for initial bioinformatics and data interpretation, and to D Guillot for expert technical assistance and medical artwork. We would like to further thank the following brain and tissue banks for access to high quality post-mortem tissues and valuable analytical advice: the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Bethesda MD USA; the Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland OR, USA; the Southern Eye Bank, Metairie LA, USA; the University of California (UCI) MIND Institute, Irvine CA, USA; and the many neuropathologists, physicians, and researchers in the US and Canada who have provided high quality, short PMI human brain tissue fractions for scientific analysis. Research on microRNAs, ethnobiology, botanical neurotoxins, pro-inflammatory and pathogenic signaling in the Lukiw laboratory involving the microbiome, the innate–immune response, amyloidogenesis, synaptogenesis, and neuro-inflammation in AD, prion and in other human neurological- and plant-viroid-based diseases was supported through an unrestricted grant to the LSU Eye Center from Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB), the Louisiana Biotechnology Research Network (LBRN) and NIH grants NEI EY006311, NIA AG18031, and NIA AG038834 (WJL). The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Aging, the National Center for Research Resources, or the National Institutes of Health.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that this research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Colombo, M.; Raposo, G.; Théry, C. Biogenesis, Secretion, and Intercellular Interactions of Exosomes and Other Extracellular Vesicles. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Boil. 2014, 30, 255–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Choi, D.; Kim, D.-K.; Kim, Y.-K.; Gho, Y.S. Proteomics of extracellular vesicles: Exosomes and ectosomes. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2014, 34, 474–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Swarbrick, S.; Wragg, N.; Ghosh, S.; Stolzing, A. Systematic Review of miRNA as Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2019, 56, 6156–6167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Xu, J.; Feng, Y.; Jeyaram, A.; Jay, S.M.; Zou, L.; Chao, W. Circulating Plasma Extracellular Vesicles from Septic Mice Induce Inflammation via MicroRNA- and TLR7-Dependent Mechanisms. J. Immunol. 2018, 201, 3392–3400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ståhl, A.-L.; Johansson, K.; Mossberg, M.; Kahn, R.; Karpman, D. Exosomes and microvesicles in normal physiology, pathophysiology, and renal diseases. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2017, 34, 11–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Arbo, B.D.; Cechinel, L.; Palazzo, R.; Siqueira, I. Endosomal dysfunction impacts extracellular vesicle release: Central role in Aβ pathology. Ageing Res. Rev. 2020, 58, 101006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Barbagallo, C.; Mostile, G.; Baglieri, G.; Giunta, F.; Luca, A.; Raciti, L.; Zappia, M.; Purrello, M.; Ragusa, M.; Nicoletti, A. Specific Signatures of Serum miRNAs as Potential Biomarkers to Discriminate Clinically Similar Neurodegenerative and Vascular-Related Diseases. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2019, 40, 531–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Birgisdottir, Å.B.; Johansen, T. Autophagy and endocytosis – interconnections and interdependencies. J. Cell Sci. 2020, 133, jcs228114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Song, Z.; Xu, Y.; Deng, W.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, H.; Yu, P.; Qu, Y.; Zhao, W.; Han, Y.; Qin, C. Brain Derived Exosomes Are a Double-Edged Sword in Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2020, 13, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Van Niel, G.; D’Angelo, G.; Raposo, G. Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Boil. 2018, 19, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rodriguez-Quijada, C.; Dahl, J.B. Non-contact microfluidic mechanical property measurements of single apoptotic bodies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)—Gen. Subj. 2020, 129657, 129657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tabata, H. Diverse subtypes of astrocytes and their development during corticogenesis. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2015, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Clement, C.; Hill, J.M.; Dua, P.; Culicchia, F.; Lukiw, W.J. Analysis of RNA from Alzheimer’s Disease Post-mortem Brain Tissues. Mol. Neurobiol. 2015, 53, 1322–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Jadli, A.S.; Ballasy, N.; Edalat, P.; Patel, V.B. Inside(sight) of tiny communicator: Exosome biogenesis, secretion, and uptake. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2020, 467, 77–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mathews, P.; Levy, E. Exosome Production Is Key to Neuronal Endosomal Pathway Integrity in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2019, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Martins, T.S.; Trindade, D.; Vaz, M.; Campelo, I.; Almeida, M.; Trigo, G.; Silva, O.A.; Henriques, A.G. Diagnostic and therapeutic potential of exosomes in Alzheimer’s disease [published online ahead of print. J. Neurochem. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, M.; Qin, L.; Tang, B. MicroRNAs in Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hunter, M.P.; Ismail, N.; Zhang, X.; Aguda, B.D.; Lee, E.J.; Yu, L.; Xiao, T.; Schafer, J.; Lee, M.-L.T.; Schmittgen, T.D.; et al. Detection of microRNA Expression in Human Peripheral Blood Microvesicles. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e3694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Leidal, A.M.; Debnath, J. Unraveling the mechanisms that specify molecules for secretion in extracellular vesicles. Methods 2020, 177, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Upadhya, R.; Zingg, W.; Shetty, S.; Shetty, A.K. Astrocyte-derived extracellular vesicles: Neuroreparative properties and role in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders. J. Control Release 2020, 323, 225–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Prada, I.; Gabrielli, M.; Turola, E.; Iorio, A.; D’Arrigo, G.; Parolisi, R.; De Luca, M.; Pacifici, M.; Bastoni, M.; Lombardi, M.; et al. Glia-to-neuron transfer of miRNAs via extracellular vesicles: A new mechanism underlying inflammation-induced synaptic alterations. Acta Neuropathol. 2018, 135, 529–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Serpente, M.; Fenoglio, C.; D’Anca, M.; Arcaro, M.; Sorrentino, F.; Visconte, C.; Arighi, A.; Fumagalli, G.; Porretti, L.; Cattaneo, A.; et al. MiRNA Profiling in Plasma Neural-Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles from Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease. Cells 2020, 9, 1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mao, S.; Sun, Q.; Xiao, H.; Zhang, C.; Li, L. Secreted miR-34a in astrocytic shedding vesicles enhanced the vulnerability of dopaminergic neurons to neurotoxins by targeting Bcl-2. Protein Cell 2015, 6, 529–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Mathieu LMartin-Jaular GLavieu, C. Thery Specificities of secretion and uptake of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles for cell-to-cell communication. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 21, 9–17. [Google Scholar]
  25. Seyedrazizadeh, S.-Z.; Poosti, S.; Nazari, A.; Alikhani, M.; Shekari, F.; Pakdel, F.; Shahpasand, K.; Satarian, L.; Baharvand, H. Extracellular vesicles derived from human ES-MSCs protect retinal ganglion cells and preserve retinal function in a rodent model of optic nerve injury. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2020, 11, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Urbanelli, L.; Buratta, S.; Sagini, K.; Tancini, B.; Emiliani, C. Extracellular Vesicles as New Players in Cellular Senescence. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Federici, C.; Shahaj, E.; Cecchetti, S.; Camerini, S.; Casella, M.; Iessi, E.; Camisaschi, C.; Paolino, G.; Calvieri, S.; Ferro, S.; et al. Natural-Killer-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Immune Sensors and Interactors. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Groot, M.; Lee, H. Sorting Mechanisms for MicroRNAs into Extracellular Vesicles and Their Associated Diseases. Cells 2020, 9, 1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Angelopoulou, E.; Paudel, Y.N.; Shaikh, M.F.; Piperi, C. Flotillin: A Promising Biomarker for Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Pers. Med. 2020, 10, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hornung, S.; Dutta, S.; Bitan, G. CNS-Derived Blood Exosomes as a Promising Source of Biomarkers: Opportunities and Challenges. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2020, 13, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Palpagama, T.H.; Waldvogel, H.J.; Faull, R.L.M.; Kwakowsky, A. The Role of Microglia and Astrocytes in Huntington’s Disease. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2019, 12, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Peng, C.; Trojanowski, J.Q.; Lee, V.M.Y. Protein transmission in neurodegenerative disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2020, 16, 199–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pogue, A.I.; Hill, J.M.; Lukiw, W.J. MicroRNA (miRNA): Sequence and stability, viroid-like properties, and disease association in the CNS. Brain Res. 2014, 1584, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Cong, L.; Zhao, Y.; Pogue, A.I.; Lukiw, W.J. Role of microRNA (miRNA) and Viroids in Lethal Diseases of Plants and Animals. Potential Contribution to Human Neurodegenerative Disorders. Biochem. (Moscow) 2018, 83, 1018–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Arena, A.; Iyer, A.; Perluigi, M.; Aronica, E. Developmental expression and dysregulation of miR146a and miR155 in Down’s syndrome and mouse models of Down’s syndrome and Alzheimer’s disease. Free. Radic. Boil. Med. 2017, 108, S73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hunter, L.W.; Jayachandran, M.; Miller, V.M. Sex differences in the expression of cell adhesion molecules on microvesicles derived from cultured human brain microvascular endothelial cells treated with inflammatory and thrombotic stimuli. Boil. Sex Differ. 2019, 10, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hosaka, T.; Yamashita, T.; Tamaoka, A.; Kwak, S. Extracellular RNAs as Biomarkers of Sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Other Neurodegenerative Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Trams, E.G.; Lauter, C.J.; Salem, J.N.; Heine, U. Exfoliation of membrane ecto-enzymes in the form of micro-vesicles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA-Biomembr.) 1981, 645, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sethi, P.; Lukiw, W.J. Micro-RNA abundance and stability in human brain: Specific alterations in Alzheimer’s disease temporal lobe neocortex. Neurosci. Lett. 2009, 459, 100–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Slota, J.A.; Booth, S.A. MicroRNAs in Neuroinflammation: Implications in Disease Pathogenesis, Biomarker Discovery and Therapeutic Applications. Non-Coding RNA 2019, 5, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Barnes, B.J.; Somerville, C.C. Modulating Cytokine Production via Select Packaging and Secretion From Extracellular Vesicles. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Briand, J.; Garnier, D.; Nadaradjane, A.; Clément-Colmou, K.; Potiron, V.; Supiot, S.; Bougras-Cartron, G.; Frenel, J.-S.; Heymann, D.; Vallette, F.M.; et al. Radiotherapy-induced overexpression of exosomal miRNA-378a-3p in cancer cells limits natural killer cells cytotoxicity. Epigenomics 2020, 12, 397–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Iguchi, Y.; Eid, L.; Parent, M.; Soucy, G.; Bareil, C.; Riku, Y.; Kawai, K.; Takagi, S.; Yoshida, M.; Katsuno, M.; et al. Exosome secretion is a key pathway for clearance of pathological TDP-43. Brain 2016, 139, 3187–3201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Cha, D.J.; Mengel, D.; Mustapic, M.; Liu, W.; Selkoe, D.J.; Kapogiannis, D.; Galasko, D.; Rissman, R.A.; Bennett, D.A.; Walsh, D.M. miR-212 and miR-132 Are Downregulated in Neurally Derived Plasma Exosomes of Alzheimer’s Patients. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Kandiyil, N.; MacSweeney, S.T.; Heptinstall, S.; May, J.; Fox, S.C.; Auer, D. Circulating Microparticles in Patients with Symptomatic Carotid Disease Are Related to Embolic Plaque Activity and Recent Cerebral Ischaemia. Cerebrovasc. Dis. Extra 2019, 9, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Azambuja, J.H.; Ludwig, N.; Braganhol, E.; Whiteside, T.L. Inhibition of the Adenosinergic Pathway in Cancer Rejuvenates Innate and Adaptive Immunity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Valadi, H.; Ekström, K.; Bossios, A.; Sjöstrand, M.; Lee, J.J.; O Lötvall, J. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nature 2007, 9, 654–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Deng, F.; Wang, S.; Xu, R.; Yu, W.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L. Endothelial microvesicles in hypoxic hypoxia diseases. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2018, 22, 3708–3718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhao, Y.; Cong, L.; Lukiw, W.J. Plant and Animal microRNAs (miRNAs) and Their Potential for Inter-kingdom Communication. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2017, 38, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ludwig, N.; Azambuja, J.H.; Rao, A.; Gillespie, D.G.; Jackson, E.K.; Whiteside, T.L. Adenosine receptors regulate exosome production. Purinergic Signal. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lukiw, W.J.; Wong, L.; McLachlan, D.R. Cytoskeletal Messenger RNA Stability in Human Neocortex: Studies in Normal Aging and in Alzheimer’s Disease. Int. J. Neurosci. 1990, 55, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lukiw, W.J. NF-кB-regulated micro RNAs (miRNAs) in primary human brain cells. Exp. Neurol. 2012, 235, 484–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Dinkins, M.B.; Enasko, J.; Hernandez, C.; Wang, G.; Kong, J.; Helwa, I.; Liu, Y.; Terry, A.V.; Bieberich, E. Neutral Sphingomyelinase-2 Deficiency Ameliorates Alzheimer’s Disease Pathology and Improves Cognition in the 5XFAD Mouse. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 8653–8667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Hill, J.M.; Clement, C.; Zhao, Y.; Lukiw, W.J. Induction of the pro-inflammatory NF-kB-sensitive miRNA-146a by human neurotrophic viruses. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Skog, J.; Würdinger, T.; Van Rijn, S.; Meijer, D.H.; Gainche, L., Jr.; Curry, W.T.; Carter, B.S.; Krichevsky, A.M.; Breakefield, X.O.; Sena-Esteves, M.; et al. Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers. Nature 2008, 10, 1470–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhao, Y.; Jaber, V.; Lukiw, W.J. Over-Expressed Pathogenic miRNAs in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and Prion Disease (PrD) Drive Deficits in TREM2-Mediated Aβ42 Peptide Clearance. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2016, 8, 811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Vanherle, S.; Haidar, M.; Irobi, J.; Bogie, J.F.; Hendriks, J.J.; Jfj, B.; Jja, H. Extracellular vesicle-associated lipids in central nervous system disorders. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Alexandrov, P.; Zhai, Y.; Li, W.; Lukiw, W.J. Lipopolysaccharide-stimulated, NF-kB-, miRNA-146a- and miRNA-155-mediated molecular-genetic communication between the human gastrointestinal tract microbiome and the brain. Folia Neuropathol. 2019, 57, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhao, Y.; Lukiw, W.J. Bacteroidetes Neurotoxins and Inflammatory Neurodegeneration. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018, 55, 9100–9107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Longhi, M.S.; Moss, A.C.; Jiang, Z.G.; Robson, S.C. Purinergic signaling during intestinal inflammation. J. Mol. Med. 2017, 95, 915–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhao, Y.; Pogue, A.I.; Lukiw, W.J. MicroRNA (miRNA) Signaling in the Human CNS in Sporadic Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)-Novel and Unique Pathological Features. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 30105–30116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Fan, W.; Liang, C.; Ou, M.; Zou, T.; Sun, F.; Zhou, H.; Cui, L. MicroRNA-146a is a wide-reaching neuroinflammatory regulator and potential treatment target in neurological diseases. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Pogue, A.I.; Lukiw, W.J. Up-regulated Pro-inflammatory MicroRNAs (miRNAs) in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD). Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018, 38, 1021–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Trotta, T.; Panaro, M.A.; Cianciulli, A.; Mori, G.; Di Benedetto, A.; Porro, C. Microglia-derived extracellular vesicles in Alzheimer’s Disease: A double-edged sword. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2018, 148, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Brites, D. Regulatory function of microRNAs in microglia. Glia 2020, 68, 1631–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhao, Y.; Alexandrov, P.N.; Lukiw, W.J. Anti-microRNAs as Novel Therapeutic Agents in the Clinical Management of Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2016, 10, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. McLachlan, D.; Lukiw, W.; Wong, L.; Bergeron, C.; Bech-Hansen, N. Selective messenger RNA reduction in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Brain Res. 1988, 3, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Fakhoury, M. Microglia and Astrocytes in Alzheimer’s Disease: Implications for Therapy. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2018, 16, 508–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ghaffari, M.; Sanadgol, N.; Abdollahi, M. A Systematic Review of Current Progresses in The Nucleic Acid-Based Therapies for Neurodegeneration with Implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Mini-Reviews Med. Chem. 2020, 20, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lukiw, W.J.; Cong, L.; Jaber, V.; Zhao, Y. Microbiome-Derived Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) Selectively Inhibits Neurofilament Light Chain (NF-L) Gene Expression in Human Neuronal-Glial (HNG) Cells in Primary Culture. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2018, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Hammond, S.M. An overview of microRNAs. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2015, 87, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Jiang, L.; Dong, H.; Cao, H.; Ji, X.; Luan, S.; Liu, J. Exosomes in Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease. Med Sci. Monit. 2019, 25, 3329–3335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Hou, B.-R.; Jiang, C.; Wang, Z.-N.; Ren, H.-J. Exosome-mediated crosstalk between microglia and neural stem cells in the repair of brain injury. Neural Regen. Res. 2020, 15, 1023–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Li, F.; Xie, X.-Y.; Sui, X.-F.; Wang, P.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, J.-B. Profile of Pathogenic Proteins and MicroRNAs in Plasma-derived Extracellular Vesicles in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Pilot Study. Neuroscience 2020, 432, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ma, Y.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, Z. CircRNAs: A new perspective of biomarkers in the nervous system. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 128, 110251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Lukiw, W.J. Circular RNA (circRNA) in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Front. Genet. 2013, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Lukiw, W.J. NF-κB-regulated, proinflammatory miRNAs in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 2012, 4, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Zhao, Y.; Alexandrov, P.N.; Jaber, V.; Lukiw, W.J. Deficiency in the Ubiquitin Conjugating Enzyme UBE2A in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is Linked to Deficits in a Natural Circular miRNA-7 Sponge (circRNA; ciRS-7). Genes 2016, 7, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Lukiw, W.J. microRNA-146a signaling in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and prion disease (PrD). Front. Neurol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Highly schematized representation of (A) the release of exosomes (EXs) and (B) the release and uptake of extracellular microvesicles (EMVs) in neural cells of the human central nervous system (CNS); both types of vesicular transport systems have been observed to operate in the brain between astroglial cells and neurons; (A) exosomes—when mature intracellular endosomes (also known as multi-vesicular bodies) containing intraluminal vesicles (ILVs; black outlined green spheres) fuse with the plasma membrane and empty their plasma membrane-encapsulated cargo, ILVs are released and, from being extracellular, they become exosomes (EX); these 30–100 nm diameter spheres contain various mixtures of proteins, lipids, proteolipids, cytokines, chemokines, microRNAs (miRNA), messenger RNAs (mRNA) and end-stage neurotoxic metabolic products, including 42 amino acid amyloid-beta (Aβ42) peptides, tau proteins and/or the lipid raft associated flotillin (Angelopoulou et al. 2020 [29]; Hornung et al., 2020 [30]); EXs appear to play a central role in the spread of Aβ42 pathology and amyloidogenesis (Mathews and Levy 2019 [15]; Arbo et al., 2020 [6]; Peng et al., 2020 [31]); (B) extracellular microvesicles (EMVs)—the exterior plasma membrane of activated microglia (AM) can release (R) 100–1000 nm diameter EMVs directly from the outward blebbing of the plasma membrane of microglias and astrocytes and carry intracellular contents from their cells of origin; this includes various complex mixtures of proteins, lipids, proteolipids, miRNAs, mRNAs, end-stage metabolic products and cytokines and chemokines; together these EMV contents may be pathogenic and cause the spread of pro-inflammatory signaling and inflammatory neurodegeneration (Prada et al., 2018 [21]; Serpente et al., 2020 [22]; Vanherle et al., 2020 [4]). Microvesicular trafficking and the extracellular microvesicle uptake (U) by neurons (N) via directed translocation mechanisms (dashed black lines with black arrowheads) may occur via the direct fusion of the EMV membrane with the neuronal cell plasma membrane or by endocytosis (Stahl et al., 2019 [5]; Arbo et al., 2020 [6]; Hornung et al., 2020 [30]; Peng et al., 2020 [32]; Song et al., 2020 [9]; Upadhya et al., 2020 [20]).
Figure 1. Highly schematized representation of (A) the release of exosomes (EXs) and (B) the release and uptake of extracellular microvesicles (EMVs) in neural cells of the human central nervous system (CNS); both types of vesicular transport systems have been observed to operate in the brain between astroglial cells and neurons; (A) exosomes—when mature intracellular endosomes (also known as multi-vesicular bodies) containing intraluminal vesicles (ILVs; black outlined green spheres) fuse with the plasma membrane and empty their plasma membrane-encapsulated cargo, ILVs are released and, from being extracellular, they become exosomes (EX); these 30–100 nm diameter spheres contain various mixtures of proteins, lipids, proteolipids, cytokines, chemokines, microRNAs (miRNA), messenger RNAs (mRNA) and end-stage neurotoxic metabolic products, including 42 amino acid amyloid-beta (Aβ42) peptides, tau proteins and/or the lipid raft associated flotillin (Angelopoulou et al. 2020 [29]; Hornung et al., 2020 [30]); EXs appear to play a central role in the spread of Aβ42 pathology and amyloidogenesis (Mathews and Levy 2019 [15]; Arbo et al., 2020 [6]; Peng et al., 2020 [31]); (B) extracellular microvesicles (EMVs)—the exterior plasma membrane of activated microglia (AM) can release (R) 100–1000 nm diameter EMVs directly from the outward blebbing of the plasma membrane of microglias and astrocytes and carry intracellular contents from their cells of origin; this includes various complex mixtures of proteins, lipids, proteolipids, miRNAs, mRNAs, end-stage metabolic products and cytokines and chemokines; together these EMV contents may be pathogenic and cause the spread of pro-inflammatory signaling and inflammatory neurodegeneration (Prada et al., 2018 [21]; Serpente et al., 2020 [22]; Vanherle et al., 2020 [4]). Microvesicular trafficking and the extracellular microvesicle uptake (U) by neurons (N) via directed translocation mechanisms (dashed black lines with black arrowheads) may occur via the direct fusion of the EMV membrane with the neuronal cell plasma membrane or by endocytosis (Stahl et al., 2019 [5]; Arbo et al., 2020 [6]; Hornung et al., 2020 [30]; Peng et al., 2020 [32]; Song et al., 2020 [9]; Upadhya et al., 2020 [20]).
Ijms 21 05078 g001

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lukiw, W.J.; Pogue, A.I. Vesicular Transport of Encapsulated microRNA between Glial and Neuronal Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5078. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21145078

AMA Style

Lukiw WJ, Pogue AI. Vesicular Transport of Encapsulated microRNA between Glial and Neuronal Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(14):5078. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21145078

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lukiw, Walter J., and Aileen I. Pogue. 2020. "Vesicular Transport of Encapsulated microRNA between Glial and Neuronal Cells" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 14: 5078. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21145078

APA Style

Lukiw, W. J., & Pogue, A. I. (2020). Vesicular Transport of Encapsulated microRNA between Glial and Neuronal Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(14), 5078. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21145078

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop