Next Article in Journal
Rapid Alpha-Synuclein Toxicity in a Neural Cell Model and Its Rescue by a Stearoyl-CoA Desaturase Inhibitor
Next Article in Special Issue
Antibody-Drug Conjugates: The New Frontier of Chemotherapy
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular and Functional Analysis of Choline Transporters and Antitumor Effects of Choline Transporter-Like Protein 1 Inhibitors in Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
CD38 and Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibodies in AL Amyloidosis: Targeting Plasma Cells and beyond
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 15
10.3390/ijms21155192
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) as a Target for New Drug Development in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

by
Hanley N. Abramson
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(15), 5192; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155192
Submission received: 2 July 2020 / Revised: 19 July 2020 / Accepted: 20 July 2020 / Published: 22 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Monoclonal Antibodies and Their Functional Fragments in Research, Diagnosis and Therapy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
During the past two decades there has been a major shift in the choice of agents to treat multiple myeloma, whether newly diagnosed or in the relapsed/refractory stage. The introduction of new drug classes, such as proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators, and anti-CD38 and anti-SLAMF7 monoclonal antibodies, coupled with autologous stem cell transplantation, has approximately doubled the disease’s five-year survival rate. However, this positive news is tempered by the realization that these measures are not curative and patients eventually relapse and/or become resistant to the drug’s effects. Thus, there is a need to discover newer myeloma-driving molecular markers and develop innovative drugs designed to precisely regulate the actions of such putative targets. B cell maturation antigen (BCMA), which is found almost exclusively on the surfaces of malignant plasma cells to the exclusion of other cell types, including their normal counterparts, has emerged as a specific target of interest in this regard. Immunotherapeutic agents have been at the forefront of research designed to block BCMA activity. These agents encompass monoclonal antibodies, such as the drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin; bispecific T-cell engager strategies exemplified by AMG 420; and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapeutics that include idecabtagene vicleucel (bb2121) and JNJ-68284528.

1. Introduction

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological cancer characterized by clonal plasma cell proliferation in the bone marrow along with high levels of monoclonal immunoglobulins in the blood and/or urine. Ranking behind non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, MM is the second most common blood cancer and the 14th most prevalent cancer overall. It is estimated that in 2020 a total of 32,270 (54.3% male) new cases of the disease will be diagnosed and be responsible for 12,830 deaths in the U.S. [1]. Active MM, which is accompanied by a tetrad of symptoms, generally abbreviated CRAB—hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, and bone lesions—often is preceded by an asymptomatic phase known as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Progression from MGUS to MM, which carries a risk of about 1% per year [2], may also include another asymptomatic state known as smoldering myeloma [3]. The most recent pertinent guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of MM have been issued by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) [4].
The therapy of MM has seen remarkable progress over the past half century. Beginning in the mid-1960s and continuing for more than three decades, alkylating agents, principally melphalan and cyclophosphamide, often accompanied by corticosteroids, were considered standard therapy for the disease. Starting in the 1990s, treatment protocols for the disease were augmented by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). This established paradigm shifted dramatically starting in the late 1990s with the discovery of thalidomide′s immunomodulatory actions that conferred remarkable anti-myeloma properties on this formerly ignominious agent. This was followed by the mechanistically related lenalidomide in 2005 and later (2013) pomalidomide. Furthermore, the discovery of the anti-myeloma activity of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in 2003, subsequently followed by carfilzomib and ixazomib, provided substantive additions to the armamentarium available to fight the disease. In 2015, in another remarkable turn of events, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved two monoclonal antibodies (mAbs)—daratumumab and elotuzumab—for treating MM. Both target glycoproteins found on the surface of MM cells, CD38 and SLAMF7, respectively. Another anti-CD38 mAb, isatuximab-irfc, was approved by the FDA in 2020. Rounding out the currently FDA-approved treatment modalities for MM are the pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat (2015) and the nuclear export inhibitor selinexor (2019). The success of these therapeutic advances over the past four decades is attested to by the more than doubling of the disease’s five-year survival rate, from 24.5% in 1975–77 to 55.1% in 2010–2016 [5]. Nevertheless, MM remains largely incurable and relapse and refractoriness to treatment continue as major problems [4], spurring the search for newer molecular targets and discovery of drugs exquisitely designed to modulate the actions of these targets.

2. The BAFF/APRIL/BCMA Axis

B-cell activating factor (BAFF; BLyS; TALL-1) and APRIL (a proliferation-inducing ligand) are two homologous members of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily [6,7] that have received much recent attention for their roles in the pathology of lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and other autoimmune diseases [8,9]. There also is evidence that the production of both of these cytokines in the bone marrow microenvironment plays a key role in the viability and proliferation of myeloma cells [10]. Moreover, MM disease progression and prognosis have been linked with BAFF and APRIL serum levels [11]. Both BAFF and APRIL serve as ligands for two TNF receptor family members located on the myeloma cell surface—transmembrane activator and calcium modulator and cyclophilin ligand interactor (TACI) and B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA). In addition, BAFF binds to a third myeloma cell receptor, BAFF-R (Figure 1).
Two inhibitors of both BAFF and APRIL, atacicept and tabalumab, each have been studied in several immune-related conditions, including MM, but have failed to exhibit substantial efficacy in any trials [12,13]. Moreover, BION-1301, a humanized anti-APRIL antibody, that had been considered a possibility for clinical development in MM has been dropped from further consideration in myeloma due to failure to achieve objective responses in a phase I study (NCT03340883) [14].
However, the bulk of attention on the BAFF/APRIL/BCMA axis in MM has been focused on BCMA as a major target of interest, particularly in three immunotherapy fronts: as a mAb (both naked and drug-conjugated); as a component of the bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) strategy; and in conjunction with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy.

3. BCMA

BCMA (CD269; TNFRSF17), also a member of the TNF receptor superfamily, was first identified in the early 1990s [15,16,17,18]. Expression of this 184-amino acid glycoprotein plays a major role in B-cell maturation and differentiation into plasma cells [19]. Structurally, BCMA is comprised of three major domains: extracellular (amino acids 1–54, linked by disulfide bonds at positions 8–21, 24–37, and 28–41), transmembrane (amino acids 55–77), and cytoplasmic (amino acids 78–184). In normal human tissues, both BCMA protein and mRNA are found almost exclusively on plasma cells and are selectively overexpressed during plasmacyte malignant transformation, promoting tumor cell growth, survival, and drug resistance, primarily through activation of the NFκB, AKT, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), STAT3, and MAPK intracellular signal transduction cascades [20,21,22,23,24]. This consistent elevation and virtually sole confinement of BCMA on the surface of MM cells from both cell lines and patient samples has made BCMA a compelling target for drug discovery and development in MM [25,26]. In addition, several studies have provided substantial evidence pointing to the value of using membrane bound BCMA measurements not only as a biomarker for MM diagnosis and prognosis, but also as a possible predictor of response to treatment [27]. Moreover, the finding that BCMA is expressed at similar levels during the various stages of MM, from previously untreated to relapse, suggests that BCMA may be a valid therapeutic target throughout the course of the disease [28].
Blood levels of a soluble form of BCMA (sBCMA), the result of the shedding of BCMA from the plasma cell surface due to cleavage by γ-secretase [29], have been shown to be elevated in MM patients and are linked to inferior clinical outcomes [30]. sBCMA, which is comprised of the extracellular domain plus a portion of the transmembrane domain of BCMA [29], not only lowers the density of the target antigen but also provides a soluble decoy capable of limiting the efficacy of anti-BCMA agents currently under development. This potential hurdle has stimulated the search for γ-secretase inhibitors, which already have attained a prominent role in the quest for drugs to treat Alzheimer’s disease and a number of Notch-overexpressing cancers [31,32], as well as to enhance outcomes in BCMA-directed therapies [33,34].

4. Anti-BCMA Monoclonal Antibodies

A core feature of IgG antibodies is the presence of an abundance of fucosyl groups in the N-linked biantennary complex oligosaccharides found in the Fc region [35]. Removal of these groups has become a well-established strategy for enhancing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) through binding to FcγIIIa receptors on natural killer (NK) cells [36,37]. Two such afucosylated anti-BCMA antibodies are described below: the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) belantamab mafodotin and the naked antibody SEA-BCMA.
Belantamab mafodotin (GSK2857916) is an ADC, in which the antibody is coupled to the microtubule inhibitor monomethylauristatin F (MMAF) through a protease-resistant maleimidocaproyl linker [38]. Binding to the BCMA receptor disrupts BAFF and APRIL signaling to induce ADCC, while the conjugated component produces myeloma cell arrest at the G2/M checkpoint [39]. This immunoconjugate continues to be studied in relapsed and/or refractory MM (RRMM) patients in the DREAMM series of trials (see Table 1). The phase II DREAMM-2 study (NCT03525678) showed that this agent, which has been granted breakthrough therapy and priority review status for RRMM by the FDA, as well as PRIME designation from the European Medicines Agency, has an acceptable safety profile with corneal problems, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, attributed to the MMAF payload, cited as the most commonly observed adverse events. However, the objective response rate (ORR) was only 31% in the DREAMM-2 trial [40] compared to the results of an earlier exploratory study (NCT02064387, DREAMM-1) in which an ORR of 60% was found [41]. Recruitment is currently ongoing for a phase II trial (DREAMM-5; NCT04126200) [42] that includes, along with belantamab mafodotin, two T-cell co-stimulatory agonistic mAbs, GSK3174998 and GSK3359609, which target OX40 [43] and inducible co-stimulator (ICOS) [44,45], respectively. Additionally included in the DREAM-5 trial is a study of the γ-secretase inhibitor nirogacestat (PF-03084014), which blocks the shedding of BCMA from the plasma membrane surface, an approach that has been shown, as stated earlier, to improve effectiveness of anti-BCMA therapy [29]. The conjugate also is under investigation in combination with lenalidomide and bortezomib in a phase II study (NCT03544281; DREAMM-6) [46]. Finally, two phase III studies of belantamab mafodotin recently have been launched: one in combination with pomalidomide (NCT04162210; DREAMM-3) and the other with daratumumab plus bortezomib (NCT04246047; DREAMM-7).
Another afucosylated IgG1 mAb is the humanized antibody from Seattle Genetics known as SEA-BCMA, which has shown promising anti-myeloma activity in pre-clinical models [49] and is the subject of an ongoing phase I study in RRMM (NCT03582033) for which patients currently are being recruited. However, a myeloma-based clinical trial (NCT03266692) of SEA-BCMA in combination with the antibody-coupled T-cell receptor ACTR087 was terminated by the sponsor, following reports of serious adverse effects in an FDA-halted trial that employed ACTR087 and rituximab in a B-cell lymphoma study (NCT02776813) [50].
MEDI2228 is a fully human antibody conjugated to a dimeric minor-groove binding pyrrolobenzodiazepine payload (tesirine) via a protease-cleavable dipeptide (valine-alanine) linker [51]. The conjugate is rapidly internalized and trafficked to the lysosome where the warhead is released leading to DNA damage and subsequent apoptosis. Preclinical studies in mice demonstrated the strong anti-myeloma effects of MEDI2228 even in the presence of clinically significant levels of sBCMA [47,48]. A phase I clinical trial (NCT03489525) has been initiated to determine appropriate dosing of MEDI2228 in RRMM patients, although no data have been reported thus far. CC-99712 is another ADC (composition not available) that recently entered a clinical trial (NCT04036461) for RRMM but results have yet to be described.

5. T-Cell-Engaging Bispecific Antibodies

In recent years, T-cell-based antibody therapeutics have assumed an important role in the fight against a number of cancers, including MM. Two main areas of research have dominated this arena: T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies (T-BsAbs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies. Based on a concept originally advanced by Nisonoff in the early 1960s [52], T-BsAbs are predicated on the design of a dual-targeting antibody constructed so as to enable one arm initially to bind to the CD3 co-receptor complex on T -cells, while the other arm subsequently is directed to tumor cells via a tumor-associated antigen. The numerous variations on this basic strategy that facilitates recruitment of cytotoxic T-cells to tumor cells in order to effect lysis of the latter recently have been the subject of several extensive reviews [53,54,55,56,57,58]. The cytotoxicity induced by the immunological synapse thus created is due to T-cell release of two cytolytic-initiating proteins—perforin, which produces transmembrane pores in the tumor cell and granzyme B, which navigates through the created pores to initiate apoptosis in the tumor cells [59,60,61,62]. The strategy differs substantially from regular T-cell mediated cytotoxicity in a number of respects. For example, the need for antibody-presenting cells is circumvented, the formation of a major histocompatibility complex (MHC)/antigen complex is not required, and co-stimulatory molecules are not involved. Moreover, such constructs enable “off-the-shelf” use by obviating any requirement for ex vivo T-cell manipulation. Additionally, such constructs produce a polyclonal expansion of T memory cells as a result of persistent T-cell activation. The density of the tumor antigen, as well as the relative binding affinities of each arm for their respective targets and biodistribution, are among the key characteristics of T-BsAbs that impact each construct’s therapeutically relevant properties and which may be fine-tuned to optimize activity [63,64,65,66]. Table 2 lists the currently active clinical trials that include T-cell engaging bispecific antibodies for the treatment of RRMM.
Bi-specific T-cell engagers (BiTEs®), developed by Micromet in collaboration with Amgen, represent one type of T-BsAB in which the cross-link is provided by tandem single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) [63,78]. This innovative approach to cancer immunotherapy has borne fruit in the form of the CD3-CD19 cross-linking construct blinatumomab (Blincyto®) that was granted accelerated FDA approval in 2014 for use in Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell precursor acute lymphocytic leukemia (B-cell ALL), an indication that since has been expanded to include B-ALL patients with minimal residual disease (MRD) [79,80]. Blinatumomab, combined with ASCT, has been the subject of one RRMM-based trial (NCT03173430), which recently was terminated due to “slow patient accrual”. However, the bulk of myeloma-related work using BiTEs has been based on recombinant antibodies to two different epitopes designed to cross-link the CD3ζ chains on the surface of tumor-specific T-cells and the targeted myeloma-BCMA.
Two of the most important and frequently encountered adverse effects that accompany T-cell activating immunotherapies, including those based on T-BsAbs and CAR T-cell formats, are the cytokine release syndrome (CRS; cytokine storm) and neurotoxicity (CAR T-cell-related encephalopathy syndrome; CRES), both of which may be life-threatening [81,82,83]. Almost without exception, CRS is seen in varying degrees of severity in a percentage of participants in every trial of the immunotherapeutic agents described in this and the following section. For example, in an analysis of 15 trials of anti-CD19 or anti-BCMA CAR T-cell constructs, of a total of 977 patients, 62.3% (range: 11% to 100%) experienced some degree of CRS with 18.4% (range 0.8% to 46%) in grades 3 or 4 [82]. Comparisons such as this highlight the problem of assessing the risk of developing CRS and its severity with any specific immunotherapeutic regimen, being subject to influences such as the type of malignancy under study, the structure and target of the immunotherapeutic product involved, and the grading scales used [84].
In its most serious form, the syndrome, which also has been implicated as a serious contributor to the lethal effects of COVID-19 infections [85,86], bears resemblance to a severe inflammatory response. As the name implies, the syndrome has been attributed to the expression and release of various cytokines, most notably IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ [87]. Management of CRS includes corticosteroid infusions and the IL-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab, which has been approved for the treatment of CAR T-cell associated CRS [88,89]. However, there have been no randomized controlled studies comparing the efficacy of corticosteroids and tocilizumab in the management of CRS. The pathophysiology and management of CRES, which generally occurs within the first two weeks of therapy, have been reviewed by Neelapu [88]. As noted for a few of the products described in subsequent discussions, in some cases the CAR T-cells have been designed to contain a safety switch consisting of a transduced receptor, like CD20 or non-functional truncated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), that can be switched “off” through administration of an antagonist—in these cases, rituximab or cetuximab, respectively—to curtail CAR T-cell toxicity through ADCC and complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) [90,91]. Another type of safety switch is based on the dimerization of caspase-9 to activate apoptosis upon exposure to a synthetic dimerizing drug, such as remiducid [92,93,94,95].
AMG 420 (BI-836909), which has been granted fast-track status by the FDA, has shown favorable results in a trial (NCT02514239) of 42 RRMM patients with an overall ORR of 31%, including 70% (7/10) in patients receiving the maximum tolerated dose of 400 g/day. The most serious treatment-related adverse events noted in this study were infections and polyneuropathy. CRS, mostly grade 1, was observed in 38% of patients [67]. AMG 701, whose Fc domain has been engineered to produce a longer serum half-life compared to AMG 420, is currently the subject of a phase I trial (NCT03287908) as monotherapy for RRMM. A preclinical study [68] suggests that a follow-up trial of AMG 701 combined with an immunomodulator may be warranted. REGN5458 (NCT03761108) and REGN5459 (NCT04083534) are two BCMAxCD3 bispecific antibodies developed by Regeneron in partnership with Sanofi. Both are in phase I trials in RRMM patients, although to date preliminary data have been reported only for the former study [69].
Another BCMAxCD3 bispecific antibody teclistamab (JNJ-64007957) has been shown to be well-tolerated in a monkey model [70] and has been included in two clinical trials in RRMM—a phase I dose-escalation study (NCT03145181) and a phase I trial in combination with subcutaneous daratumumab (NCT04108195) plus the CD3xGPRC5D bispecific construct talquetamab. PF-06863135 (PF-3135), a BCMA-CD3 formatted BiTE derived from hinge-mutation engineering of an IgG2a backbone, is presently in a phase I trial (NCT03269136) for RRMM [71,72,73]. Another humanized IgG T-cell engager under clinical scrutiny is CC-93269 (NCT03486067), whose two arms bind in a 2 + 1 format—bivalently to BCMA and monovalently to CD3ε [74].
TNB-383B, under development by Tenebio in collaboration with Abbvie, differs from the other T-BsAbs currently being tested for anti-myeloma activity in that its structure consists of a single immunoglobulin light chain domain in addition to two variable heavy chains. The resulting BCMAxCD3 bispecific format possesses strong T-cell activation kinetics and a low-affinity anti-CD3 arm, resulting in reduced levels of cytokine release while retaining high cytotoxic activity, as demonstrated by studies conducted in vitro and in a mouse xenograft model [75]. TNB-383B, which was granted orphan drug status by the FDA in November 2019, currently is the subject of a phase I trial (NCT03933735) in RRMM [76]. There are a number of other bispecific antibodies that have shown promise for RRMM in preclinical studies. These include TNB-381M [96], FPA-151 [96], EM801 [28], and AP163 [97].
HPN217 provides an example of a tri-specific antibody format. Developed by Harpoon Therapeutics and the subject of a phase I/II trial for RRMM (NCT04184050), HPN217 is comprised of three binding domains in a single chain—an N-terminal BCMA-binding component, a C-terminal single-chain CD3ε TCR-binding portion; and a central domain that binds to human serum albumin. This product’s extended half-life, compared to bispecific formats, has been attributed to its smaller size and flexibility [77].
In addition to BCMAxCD3-based bispecific antibody formats, efforts have been made to develop BCMA-targeted constructs that bind to receptors on NK cells, which, like cytotoxic T-cells, mediate cytotoxicity through release of granzyme and perforin, as well as expression of various apoptosis-inducing ligands [98]. One such construct is a tri-specific product that binds CD16A on NK cells to both BCMA and CD200 on myeloma cells [26,99]. Another is Compass Therapeutics’ CTX-4419, which binds myeloma cell BCMA to both CD16A and p30 on NK cells and has shown some initial promise in preclinical work. Interestingly, NK CD16A engagement is not required for the tumor cell-killing properties of this product [100]. Similar properties have been reported for the related NK cell-engaging multispecific antibodies CTX-8573 [101] and AFM26 [102].

6. Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cells

6.1. Autologous CAR T-Cell Therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged in recent years to a position of prominence in the immunotherapy of cancer [103,104]. This form of adoptive cell transfer (ACT) is designed to convert patient-derived cytotoxic T-cells into specific killers of cancer cells through the use of recombinant DNA techniques by which a viral vector is constructed to express a chimeric receptor against an antigen found on cancer cells. The engineered T-cells are then reinfused into the patient with the intent of lethally attaching to the targeted malignant cells. The technique has been used with success in certain hematological cancers, particularly B-cell malignancies, although solid tumors remain a substantial challenge [105].
The first CAR T-cell products, approved by the FDA in 2017, were tisagenlecleucel (CTL019; Kymriah®) and axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; Yescart®), scFv constructs directed against the CD19 antigen, which is uniformly expressed on the surface of malignant B lymphocytes. The former was approved for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and the latter for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The two products differ in a number of respects, such as in the co-stimulatory domain engineered into its chimeric receptor: 4-1BB (CD137; to enhance memory persistence) in tisagenlecleucel and CD28 (to afford greater peak expansion) in axi-cel. In addition, tisagenlecleucel uses a lentiviral vector in the manufacturing process while axi-cel is retroviral-based [106,107,108,109,110,111].
Although ORRs in the range of 80% or higher have been observed in trials of CAR T-cells targeting CD19, durable remissions have been much more difficult to realize [112,113,114,115]. However, numerous studies have demonstrated the benefits of pre-ACT lymphodepletion, usually consisting of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, in several CAR T-cell-based trials in terms of improved T-cell peak expansion and persistence and clinical outcomes [116]. While lymphodepletion, first shown to be efficacious in malignant melanoma patients [117,118], provides transient tumor control while creating space for CAR T-cell expansion in the bone marrow, the mechanism underlying the improved efficacy putatively attributed to lymphodepletion is not known. Among the proposals advanced to explain the effect are enhanced levels of monocyte chemoattract protein-1 (MCP-1) [119]; elimination of sinks for homeostatic cytokines, such as interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-7, and IL-15 [120]; and downregulation of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in tumor cells [121].
Whereas CD19 has proven to be a very fruitful target for B-cell malignancies, this has not been the case when applied to MM. As a rule, CD19 is not typically expressed on malignant plasma cells, although it is present on their normal counterparts [122,123]. On the other hand, CD19 has been found to be highly expressed by plasma cells in the bone marrow of MGUS patients, leading to speculation that such cells might be myeloma stem cells [124,125]. However, a trial (NCT02135406) of tisagenlecleucel combined with ASCT produced only a poor clinical benefit in ten MM subjects [126]. Meanwhile, emphasis has shifted to BCMA as a major focus of myeloma-based studies applying the principles of CAR T-cell technology [127,128]. Several of these products, based on the BCMA target, are described below. Table 3 lists the currently active clinical trials that include anti-BCMA directed CAR T-cell constructs.
The first in-human study (NCT02215967) of an anti-BCMA CAR T-cell preparation in RRMM was conducted using a lentivirus engineered construct comprised of an anti-BCMA scFv, linked in tandem to a CD8 hinge, a transmembrane region, a co-stimulatory domain (CD28), and CD3ζ as the T-cell activator [156] (Figure 2). An ORR of 81% and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 31 weeks was reported for 16 patients who received a dose of 9 × 106 T-cells per kg, the highest dose used in the trial. The subjects in this study previously had undergone a median of 9.5 lines of therapy for MM [129].
Idecabtagene vicleucel (bb2121; Ide-cel) is an anti-BCMA scFv fused to the CD137 (4-1BB) co-stimulatory and CD3ζ signaling domains [157]. Following its designation by the FDA as a breakthrough therapy in 2017, bb2121 has been included in a series of phased trials designated KarMMa-1 through KarMMa-4 (NCT03361748 [131], NCT03601078, NCT03651128, and NCT04196491, respectively). Data on the first 33 RR myeloma patients (NCT02658929) [130] in the KarMMa-1 study revealed an ORR of 85%, including 15 patients with complete responses, although six of these subsequently relapsed. The median PFS in this study was 11.8 months. Moreover, 100% (16/16) of evaluable responders in this study with a partial response or better exhibited MRD negativity. Both grade 3 or 4 hematologic (primarily neutropenia) and neurotoxic (42%, all but one of grade 1 or 2) adverse effects were reported. CRS was noted in 76% of the patients. A press release from BMS and bluebird bio, the drug’s sponsors [132], reported data on the KarMMa-2 trial that included 128 evaluable RRMM patients, who were administered either 150, 300, or 450 × 106 CAR T-cells. A median PFS of 8.6 months was found and the toxicity profile was similar to that reported in the earlier phase. Based on these data, a Biologic License Application was submitted to the FDA in early 2020 [158].
A next-generation construct is bb21217, which employs the same lentiviral design as bb2121 but to which an extra PI3K inhibitor domain (bb007) has been added during ex vivo culturing. This production modification has been shown to significantly enhance CAR T-cell-based immunotherapy by enriching the final product’s population of memory-like T-cells, thereby augmenting T-cell durability and potency [159]. Currently, bb21217 is the subject of a phase I dose-escalation trial (NCT03274219) in RRMM patients. Adverse event data have been reported for 22 patients thus far in this trial—13 developed CRS while 5 experienced neurotoxicity and both toxicities were reported resolved. Clinical responses were observed in 15 of 18 evaluable patients, although 6 subsequently experienced relapse. Persistence of CAR T-cells was detected in six of the eight patients evaluated at six months, while two patients had detectable levels after 18 months [133].
JNJ-68284528 (LCAR-B38M; JNJ-4528) is unique among BCMA-targeted T-cell therapies in that it is directed against two BCMA epitopes (VH1 and VH2) to confer improved affinity for BCMA-expressing cells. Data on 57 patients, who had received an average of three prior therapies, in the phase I LEGEND-2 trial (NCT03090659) of JNJ-68284528 showed an ORR of 88% and PFS of 15 months. CRS, mostly grades 1 or 2, was seen in 83% of subjects [134,135,136]. Reported results from 21 evaluable RRMM patients in the CARTITUDE-1 phase Ib/II trial (NCT03548207) [137] were similar (91% ORR, no PFS given, CRS 88%) to those seen in the LEGEND-2 study. In 2019, as a result of these two trials the EMA accorded JNJ-68284528 PRIME status and the FDA provided this agent with the Breakthrough Therapy Designation. CARTITUDE-2 (NCT04133636) and CARTITUDE-4 (NCT04181827) are additional trials that have been initiated to further study the efficacy of JNJ-68284528 in RRMM patients. Significantly, the latter is a phase III investigation aimed at comparing this CAR-T product with standard triplet therapy.
P-BCMA-101, which received FDA Orphan Drug status in 2019, is a fully humanized anti-BCMA CAR T-cell product, in which a CD3ζ/4-1BB signaling domain is fused to a non-immunoglobulin Centyrin® scaffold. In comparison, such constructs are smaller than those patterned on immunoglobulins, have higher binding affinities, improved stability, reduced immunogenicity, and lower production cost. These qualities are attributed to use of transposon (piggy-BAC®)-based technology, instead of a viral vector, in the manufacturing process [160]. Moreover, pre-clinical work showed that the process yields a preponderance of T stem cell memory cells (Tscm), which offers a potential for therapeutic longevity [161]. A phase I trial (NCT03288493; PRIME) of P-BCMA-101, in 12 heavily pretreated RRMM patients, showed an ORR of 83% in 6 who were evaluated, 1 of whom experienced grade 2 CRS, although additional data more fully supporting the efficacy and safety of this agent have yet to appear [138]. However, according to the drug’s sponsor (Poseida Therapeutics), a 15 year follow-up study has been designed and implemented to explore these issues in depth (NCT03741127) [139]. These latter two trials of P-BCMA-101 also are noteworthy for their inclusion of remiducid as a safety switch apoptosis activator, acting through induction of caspase-9 [92,93,94,95].
JCARH125 and FCARH143 are two fully human svFv bicistronic constructs incorporating the 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain [162]. Both CARs use a lentiviral vector but differ in the method of production. Related to these is MCARH171, a gamma-retroviral engineered product that features a truncated EGFR safety system that can be activated by cetuximab when warranted to mitigate CAR T-cell toxicity [163]. Active clinical trials of these three CAR T-cell products are included in Table 3.
CT053 and CT103A are lentivirus vector-based BCMA-targeted CAR T-cell constructs containing a fully human scFv, a CD8α hinge, as well as transmembrane, 4-1BB co-stimulatory, and CD3ζ activation domains, currently under development by CARSgen Therapeutics. The FDA has granted CT053 the Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (RMAT) designation, based on the initial results of ongoing trials in China (NCT03975907) and the US (NCT03915184) in RRMM patients who previously had been treated with a median of four prior regimens [143,164]. CT103A is being studied in China for RRMM (Chinese Clinical Trial Register ChiCTR1800018137). An ORR of 100% was reported for the first 16 patients who received CT103A in a phase I trial [165].
Among other BCMA-targeted CAR T-cell platforms that recently have entered trials for RRMM are Arcelix’s CART-ddBCMA in which the scFv binding domain is replaced by a proprietary soluble protein antigen-receptor X-linker (sparX) (NCT04155749; 15 year study); Descartes-08, a CD8+ T-cell preparation whose co-stimulatory domain remains undisclosed (NCT03448978) [144]; and another CD3-4-1BB product referred to only as CART-BCMA (NCT02546167) [145,146,147].
Both CD19- and BCMA-targeted CAR T-cells have been used in combination in a few trials [150]; for example, NCT03455972 (newly diagnosed MM) [148] and NCT03196414 [149] (RRMM). Three additional trials that use variations on this combination protocol are NCT03549442, NCT03706547, and NCT03767725, although no results have yet been reported for these studies.
A significant departure from the standard scFv design pattern is seen in a BCMA-targeting CAR, designated as FHVH-BCMA-T (FHVH33-CD8BBZ), which contains a fully human heavy-chain-only binding domain (FHVH33). The construct, by eliminating linker-connected light chains, was predicted to reduce the risk of recipient immune responses [166]. The initial results of a trial (NCT03602612) of the drug in 12 patients who had previously received a median of 6 lines of anti-myeloma therapy, showed objective responses in 10 subjects. Although 11 of the 12 patients developed CRS, only 1 was considered grade 3 and that was resolved by tocilizumab [151].

6.2. Allogeneic CAR T-Cell Therapy

The generation of short-lived responses, coupled with high risk of CRS and other dose-limiting adverse effects, remains one of the drawbacks of autologously administered BCMA-targeted CAR T-cells in MM. In efforts to mitigate these issues, some CAR T-cell originators have turned their attention toward the potential development of “off-the-shelf” allogeneic products that use T-cells derived from healthy donors. One such example is ALLO-715 whose production process uses the proprietary Transcription Activator-like Effector Nuclease (TALENTM) in a site-specific BCMA gene-editing technique designed to limit T-cell receptor-mediated immune responses in the final product [152,153,154,167]. Following promising pre-clinical results in a murine model, ALLO-715 was advanced to a phase I trial (NCT04093596) for which patient recruitment has been initiated. ALLO-715 is noteworthy for its incorporation of a CD20-based mimotope as a rituximab-enabled safety switch, activation of which may be employed to specifically and efficiently eliminate CAR T-cells through ADCC and complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) [91,168] where required to relieve toxicity. This is the first anti-BCMA CAR T-cell product utilizing a CD20-based approach for this purpose. This trial also is noteworthy for its use of an anti-CD52 antibody, ALLO-647, as a selective lymphodepletion agent.
Another allogeneic BCMA-targeted CAR T-cell candidate under development for RRMM is PBCAR269A, a product of Precision BioSciences’ proprietary ARCUS® nuclease gene-editing platform, which is predicated on the homing endonuclease I-CreI scaffold [155,169]. In 2020, PBCAR269A was advanced to a myeloma-based phase I trial (NCT04171843) based on data presented recently on two other products in the company’s allogeneic CAR T-cell portfolio on other cancers: PBCAR0191 (NCT03666000) and PBCAR20A (NCT04030195), which target CD19 and CD20, respectively.
Finally, encouraging preclinical data recently have appeared that portends the possibility of engineering CARs that employ T-cell alternatives, such as NK cells [170,171], to generate novel systems targeting BCMA for future allogeneic product development in the quest for innovative anti-myeloma treatments.

7. Summary and Future Prospects

The armamentarium of available treatment modalities for MM, formerly restricted to alkylating agents and corticosteroids, has changed dramatically in the past two decades with the introduction of agents working by novel mechanisms, such as proteasome inhibition, immunomodulation, and CD38 blockade. The collective effect has been a remarkable improvement in the disease’s five-year survival rate. However, this success is tempered by the almost invariable relapse and refractoriness to treatment that eventually emerge. This has spurred an ongoing quest for innovative targets subject to control through new drug discovery efforts, especially in the relapsed/refractory setting. One such target is BCMA, whose virtually exclusive confinement to malignant plasma cells has attracted much attention as an immunotherapeutic point of attack in myeloma-based new drug development. In this there is some reason for optimism.
In support of that positive outlook is the BCMA-targeting ADC belantamab mafodotin (GSK2857916), the subject of two recently launched phase III trials wherein the drug is combined with either pomalidomide or daratumumab plus bortezomib. The results of these and other future trials will help determine the eventual role of ADCs in myeloma-based therapeutics. In addition to its comparative simplicity of manufacture and consequential cost-savings benefit, a significant advantage of this ADC over other BCMA-targeted immunotherapies is that it carries virtually no risk of potentially lethal CRS.
Although several T-cell engaging bispecific antibodies targeting BCMA have been developed for treating MM, to date none has been included in myeloma studies beyond early phase trials. The most advanced member of this group, the BiTE construct AMG 420, has shown some encouraging efficacy but suffers from the requirement for continuous intravenous infusion although intermittent dosing is being investigated [67]. The related BiTE product, AMG 701, with its extended half-life and potential for once-weekly dosing may offer a more suitable alternative for future large-scale development in this drug class [68]. Several additional T-cell engaging products with similarly favorable pharmacokinetics recently have entered RRMM trials.
Most of the current interest in the prospects for immunotherapy in RRMM lies in CAR T-cell technology. Since the successful 2017 introduction of two CD19-targeting CAR T-cell products for certain B-cell leukemias and lymphomas (tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel), there has been a flurry of activity geared toward the development of similar type constructs targeting BCMA. At this point, the two leading candidates appear to be Idecabtagene vicleucel (bb2121) and JNJ-68284528 (LCAR-B38M), both of which are in phase III trials. In the meantime, a number of products in this class continue to enter the pipeline each year and the flow shows no sign of abating. As the field continues to mature and engineering and manufacturing technologies evolve toward optimization and planning for future trials of these products moves forward, serious challenges need to be addressed if CAR T-cell technology is to take its place in the spectrum of accepted regimens available to treat MM, not only in the relapsed/refractory stage but perhaps eventually in earlier lines of therapy for the disease. Investigations aimed at informing dose levels compatible with maximizing response depth and durability while reducing adverse effects, especially CRS, continue apace. In addition, studies of additional efficacy determinants, such as kill-switch design and employment and the role, mode, and mechanism of lymphodepletion, will continue to determine the utility of CAR T-cell therapeutics in RRMM going forward. In the background looms the question of how the process can be made applicable to allogeneic products that offer off-the-shelf advantages, even as a few attempts to develop such products have begun to appear on the scene. The challenges ahead are formidable but the current level of activity in the myeloma-based CAR T-cell therapeutics arena augurs well for a promising future in which BCMA will continue to play a major role as a highly attractive target for conceptualizing new drug design and development, as well as a potential cure for this unrelenting disease.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020, 70, 7–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kyle, R.A.; Therneau, T.M.; Rajkumar, S.V.; Offord, J.R.; Larson, D.R.; Plevak, M.F.; Melton, L.J., 3rd. A long-term study of prognosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 346, 564–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kyle, R.A.; Remstein, E.D.; Therneau, T.M.; Dispenzieri, A.; Kurtin, P.J.; Hodnefield, J.M.; Larson, D.R.; Plevak, M.F.; Jelinek, D.F.; Fonseca, R.; et al. Clinical course and prognosis of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 356, 2582–2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kumar, S.K.; Callander, N.S.; Hillengass, J.; Liedtke, M.; Baljevic, M.; Campagnaro, E.; Castillo, J.J.; Chandler, J.C.; Cornell, R.F.; Costello, C.; et al. NCCN guidelines insights: Multiple myeloma, version 1.2020. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2019, 17, 1154–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. SEER Cancer Statistics Review (CSR) 1975–2017: Myeloma; National Cancer Institute: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2020.
  6. So, T.; Ishii, N. The TNF-TNFR family of co-signal molecules. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019, 1189, 53–84. [Google Scholar]
  7. Moore, P.A.; Belvedere, O.; Orr, A.; Pieri, K.; LaFleur, D.W.; Feng, P.; Soppet, D.; Charters, M.; Gentz, R.; Parmelee, D.; et al. BLyS: Member of the tumor necrosis factor family and B lymphocyte stimulator. Science 1999, 285, 260–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shabgah, A.G.; Shariati-Sarabi, Z.; Tavakkol-Afshari, J.; Mohammadi, M. The role of BAFF and APRIL in rheumatoid arthritis. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 17050–17063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Baert, L.; Manfroi, B.; Casez, O.; Sturm, N.; Huard, B. The role of APRIL—A proliferation inducing ligand—In autoimmune diseases and expectations from its targeting. J. Autoimmun. 2018, 95, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pan, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, N.; Li, J.; Ta, F.; Wei, W.; Yu, S.; Ai, L. Characteristics of BAFF and APRIL factor expression in multiple myeloma and clinical significance. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 14, 2657–2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hengeveld, P.J.; Kersten, M.J. B-cell activating factor in the pathophysiology of multiple myeloma: A target for therapy? Blood Cancer J. 2015, 5, e282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Raje, N.S.; Moreau, P.; Terpos, E.; Benboubker, L.; Grzasko, N.; Holstein, S.A.; Oriol, A.; Huang, S.Y.; Beksac, M.; Kuliczkowski, K.; et al. Phase 2 study of tabalumab, a human anti-B-cell activating factor antibody, with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with previously treated multiple myeloma. Br. J. Haematol. 2017, 176, 783–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rossi, J.F.; Moreaux, J.; Hose, D.; Requirand, G.; Rose, M.; Rouille, V.; Nestorov, I.; Mordenti, G.; Goldschmidt, H.; Ythier, A.; et al. Atacicept in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma or active Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia: A phase I study. Br. J. Cancer 2009, 101, 1051–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Bensinger, W.; Raptis, A.; Berenson, J.; Spira, A.; Nooka, A.; Chaudhry, M.; van Zandvoort, P.; Nair, N.; Lo, J.; Elassaiss-Schaap, J.; et al. Phase 1 study of safety and tolerability of BION-1301 in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, 8012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Laabi, Y.; Gras, M.P.; Brouet, J.C.; Berger, R.; Larsen, C.J.; Tsapis, A. The BCMA gene, preferentially expressed during B lymphoid maturation, is bidirectionally transcribed. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 1147–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kozlow, E.J.; Wilson, G.L.; Fox, C.H.; Kehrl, J.H. Subtractive cDNA cloning of a novel member of the Ig gene superfamily expressed at high levels in activated B lymphocytes. Blood 1993, 81, 454–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Zhou, L.J.; Schwarting, R.; Smith, H.M.; Tedder, T.F. A novel cell-surface molecule expressed by human interdigitating reticulum cells, Langerhans cells, and activated lymphocytes is a new member of the Ig superfamily. J. Immunol. 1992, 149, 735–742. [Google Scholar]
  18. Laabi, Y.; Gras, M.P.; Carbonnel, F.; Brouet, J.C.; Berger, R.; Larsen, C.J.; Tsapis, A. A new gene, BCM, on chromosome 16 is fused to the interleukin 2 gene by a t(4;16)(q26;p13) translocation in a malignant T cell lymphoma. EMBO J. 1992, 11, 3897–3904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. O’Connor, B.P.; Raman, V.S.; Erickson, L.D.; Cook, W.J.; Weaver, L.K.; Ahonen, C.; Lin, L.L.; Mantchev, G.T.; Bram, R.J.; Noelle, R.J. BCMA is essential for the survival of long-lived bone marrow plasma cells. J. Exp. Med. 2004, 199, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shen, X.; Guo, Y.; Qi, J.; Shi, W.; Wu, X.; Ju, S. Binding of B-cell maturation antigen to B-cell activating factor induces survival of multiple myeloma cells by activating Akt and JNK signaling pathways. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2016, 34, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Demchenko, Y.N.; Kuehl, W.M. A critical role for the NFkB pathway in multiple myeloma. Oncotarget 2010, 1, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chatterjee, M.; Jain, S.; Stuhmer, T.; Andrulis, M.; Ungethum, U.; Kuban, R.J.; Lorentz, H.; Bommert, K.; Topp, M.; Kramer, D.; et al. STAT3 and MAPK signaling maintain overexpression of heat shock proteins 90 alpha and beta in multiple myeloma cells, which critically contribute to tumor-cell survival. Blood 2007, 109, 720–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Lentzsch, S.; Chatterjee, M.; Gries, M.; Bommert, K.; Gollasch, H.; Dorken, B.; Bargou, R.C. PI3-K/AKT/FKHR and MAPK signaling cascades are redundantly stimulated by a variety of cytokines and contribute independently to proliferation and survival of multiple myeloma cells. Leukemia 2004, 18, 1883–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Chatterjee, M.; Stuhmer, T.; Herrmann, P.; Bommert, K.; Dorken, B.; Bargou, R.C. Combined disruption of both the MEK/ERK and the IL-6R/STAT3 pathways is required to induce apoptosis of multiple myeloma cells in the presence of bone marrow stromal cells. Blood 2004, 104, 3712–3721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Carpenter, R.O.; Evbuomwan, M.O.; Pittaluga, S.; Rose, J.J.; Raffeld, M.; Yang, S.; Gress, R.E.; Hakim, F.T.; Kochenderfer, J.N. B-cell maturation antigen is a promising target for adoptive T-cell therapy of multiple myeloma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 2048–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Cho, S.F.; Anderson, K.C.; Tai, Y.T. Targeting B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) in multiple myeloma: Potential uses of BCMA-based immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Shah, N.; Chari, A.; Scott, E.; Mezzi, K.; Usmani, S.Z. B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) in multiple myeloma: Rationale for targeting and current therapeutic approaches. Leukemia 2020, 34, 985–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Seckinger, A.; Delgado, J.A.; Moser, S.; Moreno, L.; Neuber, B.; Grab, A.; Lipp, S.; Merino, J.; Prosper, F.; Emde, M.; et al. Target expression, generation, preclinical activity, and pharmacokinetics of the BCMA-T cell bispecific antibody EM801 for multiple myeloma treatment. Cancer Cell 2017, 31, 396–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Laurent, S.A.; Hoffmann, F.S.; Kuhn, P.H.; Cheng, Q.; Chu, Y.; Schmidt-Supprian, M.; Hauck, S.M.; Schuh, E.; Krumbholz, M.; Rubsamen, H.; et al. Gamma-secretase directly sheds the survival receptor BCMA from plasma cells. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sanchez, E.; Li, M.; Kitto, A.; Li, J.; Wang, C.S.; Kirk, D.T.; Yellin, O.; Nichols, C.M.; Dreyer, M.P.; Ahles, C.P.; et al. Serum B-cell maturation antigen is elevated in multiple myeloma and correlates with disease status and survival. Br. J. Haematol. 2012, 158, 727–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Golde, T.E.; Koo, E.H.; Felsenstein, K.M.; Osborne, B.A.; Miele, L. Gamma-secretase inhibitors and modulators. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1828, 2898–2907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Yuan, X.; Wu, H.; Xu, H.; Xiong, H.; Chu, Q.; Yu, S.; Wu, G.S.; Wu, K. Notch signaling: An emerging therapeutic target for cancer treatment. Cancer Lett. 2015, 369, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Sanchez, E.; Gillespie, A.; Tang, G.; Ferros, M.; Harutyunyan, N.M.; Vardanyan, S.; Gottlieb, J.; Li, M.; Wang, C.S.; Chen, H.; et al. Soluble B-cell maturation antigen mediates tumor-induced immune deficiency in multiple myeloma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 3383–3397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Pont, M.J.; Hill, T.; Cole, G.O.; Abbott, J.J.; Kelliher, J.; Salter, A.I.; Hudecek, M.; Comstock, M.L.; Rajan, A.; Patel, B.K.R.; et al. Gamma-secretase inhibition increases efficacy of BCMA-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells in multiple myeloma. Blood 2019, 134, 1585–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zauner, G.; Selman, M.H.; Bondt, A.; Rombouts, Y.; Blank, D.; Deelder, A.M.; Wuhrer, M. Glycoproteomic analysis of antibodies. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2013, 12, 856–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Satoh, M.; Iida, S.; Shitara, K. Non-fucosylated therapeutic antibodies as next-generation therapeutic antibodies. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2006, 6, 1161–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mori, K.; Iida, S.; Yamane-Ohnuki, N.; Kanda, Y.; Kuni-Kamochi, R.; Nakano, R.; Imai-Nishiya, H.; Okazaki, A.; Shinkawa, T.; Natsume, A.; et al. Non-fucosylated therapeutic antibodies: The next generation of therapeutic antibodies. Cytotechnology 2007, 55, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Tai, Y.T.; Anderson, K.C. Targeting B-cell maturation antigen in multiple myeloma. Immunotherapy 2015, 7, 1187–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Tai, Y.T.; Mayes, P.A.; Acharya, C.; Zhong, M.Y.; Cea, M.; Cagnetta, A.; Craigen, J.; Yates, J.; Gliddon, L.; Fieles, W.; et al. Novel afucosylated anti-B cell maturation antigen-monomethyl auristatin F antibody-drug conjugate (GSK2857916) induces potent and selective anti-multiple myeloma activity. Blood 2014, 123, 3128–3138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lonial, S.; Lee, H.C.; Badros, A.; Trudel, S.; Nooka, A.K.; Chari, A.; Abdallah, A.O.; Callander, N.; Lendvai, N.; Sborov, D.; et al. Belantamab mafodotin for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (DREAMM-2): A two-arm, randomised, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019, 21, 207–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Trudel, S.; Lendvai, N.; Popat, R.; Voorhees, P.M.; Reeves, B.; Libby III, E.N.; Richardson, P.G.; Anderson, L.; Sutherland, H.; Yong, K.; et al. Deep and durable responses in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) treated with monotherapy GSK2857916, an antibody drug conjugate against B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA): Preliminary results from part 2 of study BMA117159. Blood 2017, 130, 741. [Google Scholar]
  42. Richardson, P.G.; Biswas, S.; Holkova, B.; Jackson, N.; Netherway, T.; Bao, W.; Ferron-Brady, G.; Yeakey, A.; Shelton, C.; Montes De Oca, R.; et al. Dreamm-5: Platform trial evaluating belantamab mafodotin (a BCMA-directed immuno-conjugate) in combination with novel agents in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Blood 2019, 134, 1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Infante, J.R.; Ahlers, C.M.; Hodi, F.S.; Postel-Vinay, S.; Schellens, J.H.M.; Heymach, J.; Autio, K.A.; Barnette, M.S.; Struemper, H.; Watmuff, M.; et al. ENGAGE-1: A first in human study of the OX40 agonist GSK3174998 alone and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 34, TPS3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Angevin, E.; Barnette, M.S.; Bauer, T.M.; Cho, D.C.; Ellis, C.E.; Gan, H.K.; Hansen, A.R.; Hoos, A.; Jewell, R.C.; Katz, J.; et al. INDUCE-1: A phase I open-label study of GSK3359609, an ICOS agonist antibody, administered alone and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 35, TPS3113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Han, X.; Vesely, M.D. Stimulating T cells against cancer with agonist immunostimulatory monoclonal antibodies. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2019, 342, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Nooka, A.K.; Stockerl-Goldstein, K.; Quach, H.; Forbes, A.; Mateos, M.V.; Khot, A.; Tan, A.; Abonour, R.; Chopra, B.; Rogers, R.; et al. DREAMM-6: Safety and tolerability of belantamab mafodotin in combination with bortezomib/dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). J. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 38, 8502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kinneer, K.; Flynn, M.; Thomas, S.B.; Meekin, J.; Varkey, R.; Xiao, X.; Zhong, H.; Breen, S.; Hynes, P.G.; Fleming, R.; et al. Preclinical assessment of an antibody-PBD conjugate that targets BCMA on multiple myeloma and myeloma progenitor cells. Leukemia 2019, 33, 766–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kinneer, K.; Meekin, J.; Varkey, R.; Xiao, X.; Zhong, H.; Breen, S.; Hurt, E.; Thomas, S.; Flynn, M.; Hynes, P.; et al. Preclinical evaluation of MEDI2228, a BCMA-targeting pyrrolobenzodiazepine-linked antibody drug conjugate for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Blood 2017, 130, 3153. [Google Scholar]
  49. Van Epps, H.; Anderson, M.; Yu, C.; Klussman, K.; Westendorf, L.; Carosino, C.; Manlove, L.; Cochran, J.; Neale, J.; Benjamin, D.; et al. SEA-BCMA: A highly active enhanced antibody for multiple myeloma. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 3833. [Google Scholar]
  50. Nikitorowicz-Buniak, J. FDA Safety Concerns Halt ACTR087 B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Clinical Trial. Available online: https://lymphomahub.com/medical-information/fda-safety-concerns-halt-actr087-b-cell-non-hodgkin-lymphoma-clinical-trial (accessed on 11 June 2020).
  51. Tiberghien, A.C.; Levy, J.N.; Masterson, L.A.; Patel, N.V.; Adams, L.R.; Corbett, S.; Williams, D.G.; Hartley, J.A.; Howard, P.W. Design and synthesis of tesirine, a clinical antibody-drug conjugate pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer payload. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 983–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Nisonoff, A.; Rivers, M.M. Recombination of a mixture of univalent antibody fragments of different specificity. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1961, 93, 460–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tai, Y.T.; Anderson, K.C. B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-based immunotherapy for multiple myeloma. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2019, 19, 1143–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wang, Q.; Chen, Y.; Park, J.; Liu, X.; Hu, Y.; Wang, T.; McFarland, K.; Betenbaugh, M.J. Design and production of bispecific antibodies. Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) 2019, 8, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Cohen, A.D.; Raje, N.; Fowler, J.A.; Mezzi, K.; Scott, E.C.; Dhodapkar, M.V. How to train your T cells: Overcoming immune dysfunction in multiple myeloma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 26, 1541–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Suurs, F.V.; Lub-de Hooge, M.N.; de Vries, E.G.E.; de Groot, D.J.A. A review of bispecific antibodies and antibody constructs in oncology and clinical challenges. Pharmacol. Ther. 2019, 201, 103–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ahamadi-Fesharaki, R.; Fateh, A.; Vaziri, F.; Solgi, G.; Siadat, S.D.; Mahboudi, F.; Rahimi-Jamnani, F. Single-chain variable fragment-based bispecific antibodies: Hitting two targets with one sophisticated arrow. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics 2019, 14, 38–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Wu, Z.; Cheung, N.V. T cell engaging bispecific antibody (T-BsAb): From technology to therapeutics. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018, 182, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Viardot, A.; Bargou, R. Bispecific antibodies in haematological malignancies. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2018, 65, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Offner, S.; Hofmeister, R.; Romaniuk, A.; Kufer, P.; Baeuerle, P.A. Induction of regular cytolytic T cell synapses by bispecific single-chain antibody constructs on MHC class I-negative tumor cells. Mol. Immunol. 2006, 43, 763–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Haas, C.; Krinner, E.; Brischwein, K.; Hoffmann, P.; Lutterbuse, R.; Schlereth, B.; Kufer, P.; Baeuerle, P.A. Mode of cytotoxic action of T cell-engaging BiTE antibody MT110. Immunobiology 2009, 214, 441–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Thiery, J.; Keefe, D.; Boulant, S.; Boucrot, E.; Walch, M.; Martinvalet, D.; Goping, I.S.; Bleackley, R.C.; Kirchhausen, T.; Lieberman, J. Perforin pores in the endosomal membrane trigger the release of endocytosed granzyme B into the cytosol of target cells. Nat. Immunol. 2011, 12, 770–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Baeuerle, P.A.; Reinhardt, C. Bispecific T-cell engaging antibodies for cancer therapy. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 4941–4944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Mazor, Y.; Sachsenmeier, K.F.; Yang, C.; Hansen, A.; Filderman, J.; Mulgrew, K.; Wu, H.; Dall’Acqua, W.F. Enhanced tumor-targeting selectivity by modulating bispecific antibody binding affinity and format valence. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Velders, M.P.; van Rhijn, C.M.; Oskam, E.; Fleuren, G.J.; Warnaar, S.O.; Litvinov, S.V. The impact of antigen density and antibody affinity on antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity: Relevance for immunotherapy of carcinomas. Br. J. Cancer 1998, 78, 478–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Mandikian, D.; Takahashi, N.; Lo, A.A.; Li, J.; Eastham-Anderson, J.; Slaga, D.; Ho, J.; Hristopoulos, M.; Clark, R.; Totpal, K.; et al. Relative target affinities of T-cell-dependent bispecific antibodies determine biodistribution in a solid tumor mouse model. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2018, 17, 776–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Topp, M.S.; Duell, J.; Zugmaier, G.; Attal, M.; Moreau, P.; Langer, C.; Krönke, J.; Facon, T.; Salnikov, A.V.; Lesley, R.; et al. Anti-B-cell maturation antigen BiTE molecule AMG 420 induces responses in multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 38, 775–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Cho, S.-F.; Lin, L.; Xing, L.; Wen, K.; Yu, T.; Wahl, J.; Matthes, K.; Munshi, N.; Anderson, K.C.; Arvedson, T.; et al. AMG 701, a half-life extended anti-BCMA BiTE®, potently induces T cell-redirected lysis of human multiple myeloma cells and can be combined with IMiDs to overcome the immunosuppressive bone marrow microenvironment. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019, 19, e54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Cooper, D.; Madduri, D.; Lentzsch, S.; Jagannath, S.; Li, J.; Boyapati, A.; Adriaens, L.; Chokshi, D.; Zhu, M.; Lowy, I.; et al. Safety and preliminary clinical activity of REGN5458, an anti-BCMA x anti-CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 2019, 134, 3176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Girgis, S.; Shetty, S.; Jiao, T.; Amuzie, C.; Weinstock, D.; Watson, R.G.; Ford, J.; Pillarisetti, K.; Baldwin, E.; Bellew, K. Exploratory pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and tolerability study of BCMAxCD3 in cynomolgus monkeys. Blood 2016, 128, 5668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Suzuki, S.; Annaka, H.; Konno, S.; Kumagai, I.; Asano, R. Engineering the hinge region of human IgG1 Fc-fused bispecific antibodies to improve fragmentation resistance. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 17253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Lesokhin, A.M.; Raje, N.; Gasparetto, C.J.; Walker, J.; Krupka, H.I.; Joh, T.; Taylor, C.T.; Jakubowiak, A.J. A phase I, open-label study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical activity of PF-06863135, a B-cell maturation antigen/CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory advanced multiple myeloma. Blood 2018, 132, 3229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Raje, N.S.; Jakubowiak, A.; Gasparetto, C.; Cornell, R.F.; Krupka, H.I.; Navarro, D.; Forgie, A.J.; Udata, C.; Basu, C.; Chou, J.; et al. Safety, clinical activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics from a phase I study of PF-06863135, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)–CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Blood 2019, 128, 1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Costa, L.J.; Wong, S.W.; Bermúdez, A.; de la Rubia, J.; Mateos, M.-V.; Ocio, E.M.; Rodríguez-Otero, P.; San-Miguel, J.; Li, S.; Sarmiento, R.; et al. First clinical study of the B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) 2+1 T cell engager (TCE) CC-93269 in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): Interim results of a phase 1 multicenter trial. Blood 2019, 134, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Trinklein, N.D.; Pham, D.; Schellenberger, U.; Buelow, B.; Boudreau, A.; Choudhry, P.; Clarke, S.C.; Dang, K.; Harris, K.E.; Iyer, S.; et al. Efficient tumor killing and minimal cytokine release with novel T-cell agonist bispecific antibodies. mAbs 2019, 11, 639–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Buelow, B.; D’Souza, A.; Rodriguez, C.; Vij, R.; Nath, R.; Snyder, M.; Pham, D.; Patel, A.; Iyer, S. A multicenter, phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation and expansion study of TNB-383B, a bispecific antibody targeting BCMA in subjects with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 2019, 134, 1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Law, C.L.; Aaron, W.; Austin, R.; Barath, M.; Callihan, E.; Evans, T.; Gamez Guerrero, M.; Hemmati, G.; Jones, A.; Kwant, K.; et al. Preclinical and nonclinical characterization of HPN217: A tri-Specific T cell activating construct (TriTAC) targeting B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Blood 2018, 132, 3225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Dahlen, E.; Veitonmaki, N.; Norlen, P. Bispecific antibodies in cancer immunotherapy. Ther. Adv. Vaccines Immunother. 2018, 6, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Sanford, M. Blinatumomab: First global approval. Drugs 2015, 75, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jen, E.Y.; Xu, Q.; Schetter, A.; Przepiorka, D.; Shen, Y.L.; Roscoe, D.; Sridhara, R.; Deisseroth, A.; Philip, R.; Farrell, A.T.; et al. FDA approval: Blinatumomab for patients with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia in morphologic remission with minimal residual disease. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 473–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Strohl, W.R.; Naso, M. Bispecific T-cell redirection versus chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells as approaches to kill cancer cells. Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) 2019, 8, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Shimabukuro-Vornhagen, A.; Godel, P.; Subklewe, M.; Stemmler, H.J.; Schlosser, H.A.; Schlaak, M.; Kochanek, M.; Boll, B.; von Bergwelt-Baildon, M.S. Cytokine release syndrome. J. Immunother. Cancer 2018, 6, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Kennedy, L.B.; Salama, A.K.S. A review of cancer immunotherapy toxicity. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020, 70, 86–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Brudno, J.N.; Kochenderfer, J.N. Recent advances in CAR T-cell toxicity: Mechanisms, manifestations and management. Blood Rev. 2019, 34, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Mehta, P.; McAuley, D.F.; Brown, M.; Sanchez, E.; Tattersall, R.S.; Manson, J.J. COVID-19: Consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 2020, 395, 1033–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Soy, M.; Keser, G.; Atagündüz, P.; Tabak, F.; Atagündüz, I.; Kayhan, S. Cytokine storm in COVID-19: Pathogenesis and overview of anti-inflammatory agents used in treatment. Clin. Rheumatol. 2020, 39, 2085–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Brudno, J.N.; Kochenderfer, J.N. Toxicities of chimeric antigen receptor T cells: Recognition and management. Blood 2016, 127, 3321–3330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Neelapu, S.S.; Tummala, S.; Kebriaei, P.; Wierda, W.; Gutierrez, C.; Locke, F.L.; Komanduri, K.V.; Lin, Y.; Jain, N.; Daver, N.; et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy—Assessment and management of toxicities. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 15, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Le, R.Q.; Li, L.; Yuan, W.; Shord, S.S.; Nie, L.; Habtemariam, B.A.; Przepiorka, D.; Farrell, A.T.; Pazdur, R. FDA approval summary: Tocilizumab for treatment of chimeric antigen receptor T cell-induced severe or life-threatening cytokine release syndrome. Oncologist 2018, 23, 943–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Yu, S.; Yi, M.; Qin, S.; Wu, K. Next generation chimeric antigen receptor T cells: Safety strategies to overcome toxicity. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Griffioen, M.; van Egmond, E.H.; Kester, M.G.; Willemze, R.; Falkenburg, J.H.; Heemskerk, M.H. Retroviral transfer of human CD20 as a suicide gene for adoptive T-cell therapy. Haematologica 2009, 94, 1316–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Diaconu, I.; Ballard, B.; Zhang, M.; Chen, Y.; West, J.; Dotti, G.; Savoldo, B. Inducible caspase-9 selectively modulates the toxicities of CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells. Mol. Ther. 2017, 25, 580–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Straathof, K.C.; Pulè, M.A.; Yotnda, P.; Dotti, G.; Vanin, E.F.; Brenner, M.K.; Heslop, H.E.; Spencer, D.M.; Rooney, C.M. An inducible caspase 9 safety switch for T-cell therapy. Blood 2005, 105, 4247–4254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Di Stasi, A.; Tey, S.K.; Dotti, G.; Fujita, Y.; Kennedy-Nasser, A.; Martinez, C.; Straathof, K.; Liu, E.; Durett, A.G.; Grilley, B.; et al. Inducible apoptosis as a safety switch for adoptive cell therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 1673–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Gargett, T.; Brown, M.P. The inducible caspase-9 suicide gene system as a “safety switch” to limit on-target, off-tumor toxicities of chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Front. Pharmacol. 2014, 5, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Nie, S.; Wang, Z.; Moscoso-Castro, M.; D’Souza, P.; Lei, C.; Xu, J.; Gu, J. Biology drives the discovery of bispecific antibodies as innovative therapeutics. Antib. Ther. 2020, 3, 18–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Li, Z.; Li, Q.; Zhang, G.; Ma, X.; Hu, X.; Ouyang, K.; Li, B.; Liu, Z. A novel bispecific BCMAxCD3 T cell-engaging antibody that treat multiple myeloma (MM) with minimal cytokine secretion. Ann. Oncol. 2019, 30, V808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Smyth, M.J.; Cretney, E.; Kelly, J.M.; Westwood, J.A.; Street, S.E.; Yagita, H.; Takeda, K.; van Dommelen, S.L.; Degli-Esposti, M.A.; Hayakawa, Y. Activation of NK cell cytotoxicity. Mol. Immunol. 2005, 42, 501–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Gantke, T.; Weichel, M.; Reusch, U.; Ellwanger, K.; Fucek, I.; Griep, R.; Molkenthin, V.; Kashala, O.; Treder, M. Trispecific antibodies for selective CD16A-directed NK-cell engagement in multiple myeloma. Blood 2016, 128, 4513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Draghi, M.; Schafer, J.L.; Nelson, A.; Frye, Z.; Oliphant, A.; Haserlat, S.; Lajoie, J.; Rogers, K.; Villinger, F.; Schmidt, M.; et al. Preclinical development of a first-in-class NKp30xBCMA NK cell engager for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 4972. [Google Scholar]
  101. Watkins-Yoon, J.; Guzman, W.; Oliphant, A.; Haserlat, S.; Leung, A.; Chottin, C.; Ophir, M.; Vekeria, J.; Nelson, A.P.; Frye, Z.; et al. CTX-8573, an innate-cell engager targeting BCMA, is a highly potent multispecific antibody for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Blood 2019, 134, 3182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ross, T.; Reusch, U.; Wingert, S.; Haneke, T.; Klausz, K.; Otte, A.K.; Schub, N.; Knackmuss, S.; Müller, T.; Ellwanger, K.; et al. Preclinical characterization of AFM26, a novel B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed tetravalent bispecific antibody for high affinity retargeting of NK cells against myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 35, 1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Roex, G.; Feys, T.; Beguin, Y.; Kerre, T.; Poire, X.; Lewalle, P.; Vandenberghe, P.; Bron, D.; Anguille, S. Chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell therapy for B-cell hematological malignancies: An update of the pivotal clinical trial data. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Rosenbaum, L. Tragedy, perseverance, and chance—The story of CAR-T therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 1313–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ruella, M.; June, C.H. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells for B cell neoplasms: Choose the right CAR for you. Curr. Hematol. Malig. Rep. 2016, 11, 368–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Radic, M. Armed and accurate: Engineering cytotoxic T cells for eradication of leukemia. BMC Biotechnol. 2012, 12, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Wall, D.A.; Krueger, J. Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy comes to clinical practice. Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27 (Suppl. 2), S115–S123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Badar, T.; Shah, N.N. Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Curr. Treat. Options Oncol. 2020, 21, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Locke, F.L.; Go, W.Y.; Neelapu, S.S. Development and use of the anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy axicabtagene ciloleucel in large B-cell lymphoma: A review. JAMA Oncol. 2019, 6, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Braendstrup, P.; Levine, B.L.; Ruella, M. The long road to the first FDA-approved gene therapy: Chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting CD19. Cytotherapy 2020, 22, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. van der Stegen, S.J.; Hamieh, M.; Sadelain, M. The pharmacology of second-generation chimeric antigen receptors. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015, 14, 499–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Neelapu, S.S.; Locke, F.L.; Bartlett, N.L.; Lekakis, L.J.; Miklos, D.B.; Jacobson, C.A.; Braunschweig, I.; Oluwole, O.O.; Siddiqi, T.; Lin, Y.; et al. Axicabtagene ciloleucel CAR T-cell therapy in refractory large B-cell lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 2531–2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Locke, F.L.; Ghobadi, A.; Jacobson, C.A.; Miklos, D.B.; Lekakis, L.J.; Oluwole, O.O.; Lin, Y.; Braunschweig, I.; Hill, B.T.; Timmerman, J.M.; et al. Long-term safety and activity of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B-cell lymphoma (ZUMA-1): A single-arm, multicentre, phase 1-2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019, 20, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Schuster, S.J.; Bishop, M.R.; Tam, C.S.; Waller, E.K.; Borchmann, P.; McGuirk, J.P.; Jäger, U.; Jaglowski, S.; Andreadis, C.; Westin, J.R.; et al. Tisagenlecleucel in adult relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Abramson, J.S.; Gordon, L.I.; Palomba, M.L.; Lunning, M.A.; Arnason, J.E.; Forero-Torres, A.; Wang, M.; Maloney, D.G.; Sehgal, A.; Andreadis, C.; et al. Updated safety and long term clinical outcomes in TRANSCEND NHL 001, pivotal trial of lisocabtagene maraleucel (JCAR017) in R/R aggressive NHL. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36, 7505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Muranski, P.; Boni, A.; Wrzesinski, C.; Citrin, D.E.; Rosenberg, S.A.; Childs, R.; Restifo, N.P. Increased intensity lymphodepletion and adoptive immunotherapy--how far can we go? Nat. Clin. Pract. Oncol. 2006, 3, 668–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Dudley, M.E.; Wunderlich, J.R.; Robbins, P.F.; Yang, J.C.; Hwu, P.; Schwartzentruber, D.J.; Topalian, S.L.; Sherry, R.; Restifo, N.P.; Hubicki, A.M.; et al. Cancer regression and autoimmunity in patients after clonal repopulation with antitumor lymphocytes. Science 2002, 298, 850–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Hughes, M.S.; Yu, Y.Y.; Dudley, M.E.; Zheng, Z.; Robbins, P.F.; Li, Y.; Wunderlich, J.; Hawley, R.G.; Moayeri, M.; Rosenberg, S.A.; et al. Transfer of a TCR gene derived from a patient with a marked antitumor response conveys highly active T-cell effector functions. Hum. Gene Ther. 2005, 16, 457–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Hirayama, A.V.; Gauthier, J.; Hay, K.A.; Voutsinas, J.M.; Wu, Q.; Gooley, T.; Li, D.; Cherian, S.; Chen, X.; Pender, B.S.; et al. The response to lymphodepletion impacts PFS in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with CD19 CAR T cells. Blood 2019, 133, 1876–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Gattinoni, L.; Finkelstein, S.E.; Klebanoff, C.A.; Antony, P.A.; Palmer, D.C.; Spiess, P.J.; Hwang, L.N.; Yu, Z.; Wrzesinski, C.; Heimann, D.M.; et al. Removal of homeostatic cytokine sinks by lymphodepletion enhances the efficacy of adoptively transferred tumor-specific CD8+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 202, 907–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ninomiya, S.; Narala, N.; Huye, L.; Yagyu, S.; Savoldo, B.; Dotti, G.; Heslop, H.E.; Brenner, M.K.; Rooney, C.M.; Ramos, C.A. Tumor indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) inhibits CD19-CAR T cells and is downregulated by lymphodepleting drugs. Blood 2015, 125, 3905–3916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Mateo, G.; Montalban, M.A.; Vidriales, M.B.; Lahuerta, J.J.; Mateos, M.V.; Gutierrez, N.; Rosinol, L.; Montejano, L.; Blade, J.; Martinez, R.; et al. Prognostic value of immunophenotyping in multiple myeloma: A study by the PETHEMA/GEM cooperative study groups on patients uniformly treated with high-dose therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 26, 2737–2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Cannizzo, E.; Carulli, G.; Del Vecchio, L.; Ottaviano, V.; Bellio, E.; Zenari, E.; Azzara, A.; Petrini, M.; Preffer, F. The role of CD19 and CD27 in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma by flow cytometry: A new statistical model. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2012, 137, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Zandecki, M.; Facon, T.; Bernardi, F.; Izydorczyk, V.; Dupond, L.; Francois, M.; Reade, R.; Iaru, T.; Bauters, F.; Cosson, A. CD19 and immunophenotype of bone marrow plasma cells in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. J. Clin. Pathol. 1995, 48, 548–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Feinberg, D.; Paul, B.; Kang, Y. The promise of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in multiple myeloma. Cell. Immunol. 2019, 345, 103964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Garfall, A.L.; Stadtmauer, E.A.; Hwang, W.T.; Lacey, S.F.; Melenhorst, J.J.; Krevvata, M.; Carroll, M.P.; Matsui, W.H.; Wang, Q.; Dhodapkar, M.V.; et al. Anti-CD19 CAR T cells with high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation for refractory multiple myeloma. JCI Insight 2018, 3, e120505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Hosen, N. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma. Int. J. Hematol. 2020, 111, 530–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Huang, H.; Wu, H.W.; Hu, Y.X. Current advances in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2020, 21, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Brudno, J.N.; Maric, I.; Hartman, S.D.; Rose, J.J.; Wang, M.; Lam, N.; Stetler-Stevenson, M.; Salem, D.; Yuan, C.; Pavletic, S.; et al. T cells genetically modified to express an anti-B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor cause remissions of poor-prognosis relapsed multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36, 2267–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Raje, N.; Berdeja, J.; Lin, Y.; Siegel, D.; Jagannath, S.; Madduri, D.; Liedtke, M.; Rosenblatt, J.; Maus, M.V.; Turka, A.; et al. Anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy bb2121 in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 1726–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Munshi, N.C.; Anderson, J.L.D.; Shah, N.; Jagannath, S.; Berdeja, J.G.; Lonial, S.; Raje, N.S.; DiCapua Siegel, D.S.; Lin, Y.; Oriol, A.; et al. Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel; bb2121), a BCMA-targeted CAR T-cell therapy, in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): Initial KarMMa results. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 38, 8503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Press Release (Brisol Myers Squibb, 6 December 2019). Available online: https://news.bms.com/press-release/corporatefinancial-news/bristol-myers-squibb-and-bluebird-bio-announce-positive-top-li (accessed on 12 June 2020).
  133. Berdeja, J.G.; Alsina, M.; Shah, N.D.; Siegel, D.S.; Jagannath, S.; Madduri, D.; Kaufman, J.L.; Munshi, N.C.; Rosenblatt, J.; Jasielec, J.K.; et al. Updated results from an ongoing phase 1 clinical study of bb21217 anti-Bcma CAR T cell therapy. Blood 2019, 134, 927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Xu, J.; Chen, L.J.; Yang, S.S.; Sun, Y.; Wu, W.; Liu, Y.F.; Xu, J.; Zhuang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Weng, X.Q.; et al. Exploratory trial of a biepitopic CAR T-targeting B cell maturation antigen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 9543–9551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Zhao, W.H.; Liu, J.; Wang, B.Y.; Chen, Y.X.; Cao, X.M.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.L.; Wang, F.X.; Zhang, P.Y.; Lei, B.; et al. A phase 1, open-label study of LCAR-B38M, a chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy directed against B cell maturation antigen, in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2018, 11, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Zhao, W.H.; Liu, J.; Wang, B.Y.; Chen, Y.X.; Cao, X.M.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.L.; Wang, F.X.; Zhang, P.Y.; Lei, B.; et al. Updated analysis of a phase 1, open-label study of LCAR-B38M, a chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy directed against B-cell maturation antigen, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 2018, 132, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Madduri, D.; Usmani, S.Z.; Jagannath, S.; Singh, I.; Zudaire, E.; Yeh, T.M.; Allred, A.J.; Banerjee, A.; Goldberg, J.D.; Schecter, J.M.; et al. Results from CARTITUDE-1: A phase 1b/2 study of JNJ-4528, a CAR-T cell therapy directed against B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM). Blood 2019, 134, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Gregory, T.; Cohen, A.D.; Costello, C.L.; Ali, S.A.; Berdeja, J.G.; Ostertag, E.M.; Martin, C.; Shedlock, D.J.; Resler, M.L.; Spear, M.A.; et al. Efficacy and safety of P-Bcma-101 CAR-T cells in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) multiple myeloma (MM). Blood 2018, 132, 1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Costello, C.L.; Gregory, T.K.; Ali, S.A.; Berdeja, J.G.; Patel, K.K.; Shah, N.D.; Ostertag, E.; Martin, C.; Ghoddusi, M.; Shedlock, D.J.; et al. Phase 2 study of the response and safety of P-Bcma-101 CAR-T cells in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) multiple myeloma (MM) (PRIME). Blood 2019, 134, 3184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Mailankody, S.; Ghosh, A.; Staehr, M.; Purdon, T.J.; Roshal, M.; Halton, E.; Diamonte, C.; Pineda, J.; Anant, P.; Bernal, Y.; et al. Clinical responses and pharmacokinetics of MCARH171, a human-derived BCMA targeted CAR T cell therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Final results of a phase I clinical trial. Blood 2018, 132, 959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Green, D.J.; Pont, M.; Sather, B.D.; Cowan, A.J.; Turtle, C.J.; Till, B.G.; Nagengast, A.M.; Libby, I.E.N.; Becker, P.S.; Coffey, D.G.; et al. Fully human Bcma targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cells administered in a defined composition demonstrate potency at low doses in advanced stage high risk multiple myeloma. Blood 2018, 132, 1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Mailankody, S.; Htut, M.; Lee, K.P.; Bensinger, W.; Devries, T.; Piasecki, J.; Ziyad, S.; Blake, M.; Byon, J.; Jakubowiak, A. JCARH125, anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Initial proof of concept results from a phase 1/2 multicenter study (EVOLVE). Blood 2018, 132, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Jiang, S.; Jin, J.; Hao, S.; Yang, M.; Chen, L.; Ruan, H.; Xiao, J.; Wang, W.; Li, Z.; Yu, K. Low dose of human scFv-derived BCMA-targeted CAR-T cells achieved fast response and high complete remission in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 2018, 132, 960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Lin, L.; Xing, L.; Cho, S.-F.; Wen, K.; Hsieh, P.; Kurtoglu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Stewart, C.A.; Anderson, K.C.; Tai, Y.-T. Preclinical evaluation of CD8+ anti-BCMA mRNA CAR T-cells for control of multiple myeloma. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019, 19, e169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Cohen, A.D.; Garfall, A.L.; Stadtmauer, E.A.; Melenhorst, J.J.; Lacey, S.F.; Lancaster, E.; Vogl, D.T.; Weiss, B.M.; Dengel, K.; Nelson, A.; et al. B cell maturation antigen-specific CAR T cells are clinically active in multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 129, 2210–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Bu, D.X.; Singh, R.; Choi, E.E.; Ruella, M.; Nunez-Cruz, S.; Mansfield, K.G.; Bennett, P.; Barton, N.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, J.; et al. Pre-clinical validation of B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) as a target for T cell immunotherapy of multiple myeloma. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 25764–25780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Cohen, A.D.; Garfall, A.L.; Stadtmauer, E.A.; Lacey, S.F.; Lancaster, E.; Vogl, D.T.; Dengel, K.; Ambrose, D.E.; Chen, F.; Plesa, G.; et al. B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART-BCMA) for multiple myeloma (MM): Initial safety and efficacy from a phase I study. Blood 2016, 128, 1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Shi, X.; Yan, L.; Shang, J.; Qu, S.; Kang, L.; Zhou, J.; Jin, S.; Yao, W.; Yao, Y.; Yan, S.; et al. Tandom autologous transplantation and combined infusion of CD19 and BCMA-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells for high risk MM: Initial safety and efficacy report from a clinical pilot study. Blood 2018, 132, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Yan, L.; Shang, J.; Kang, L.; Shi, X.; Zhou, J.; Jin, S.; Yao, W.; Yao, Y.; Chen, G.; Zhu, Z.; et al. Combined infusion of CD19 and BCMA-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells for RRMM: Initial safety and efficacy report from a clinical pilot study. Blood 2017, 130, 506. [Google Scholar]
  150. Timmers, M.; Roex, G.; Wang, Y.; Campillo-Davo, D.; Van Tendeloo, V.F.I.; Chu, Y.; Berneman, Z.N.; Luo, F.; Van Acker, H.H.; Anguille, S. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cell therapy in multiple myeloma: Beyond B cell maturation antigen. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Mikkilineni, L.; Manasanch, E.E.; Lam, N.; Vanasse, D.; Brudno, J.N.; Maric, I.; Rose, J.J.; Stetler-Stevenson, M.; Wang, H.W.; Yuan, C.M.; et al. T cells expressing an anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor with a fully-human heavy-chain-only antigen recognition domain induce remissions in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Blood 2019, 134, 3230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Sachdeva, M.; Busser, B.W.; Temburni, S.; Jahangiri, B.; Gautron, A.S.; Marechal, A.; Juillerat, A.; Williams, A.; Depil, S.; Duchateau, P.; et al. Repurposing endogenous immune pathways to tailor and control chimeric antigen receptor T cell functionality. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Gautron, A.S.; Juillerat, A.; Guyot, V.; Filhol, J.M.; Dessez, E.; Duclert, A.; Duchateau, P.; Poirot, L. Fine and predictable tuning of TALEN gene editing targeting for improved T cell adoptive immunotherapy. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2017, 9, 312–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Li, C.; Zhou, X.; Wang, J.; Hu, G.; Yang, Y.; Meng, L.; Hong, Z.; Chen, L.; Zhou, J. Clinical responses and pharmacokinetics of fully human BCMA targeting CAR T cell therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. In Proceedings of the 17th International Myeloma Workshop, Boston, MA, USA, 12–15 September 2019. OAB-033. [Google Scholar]
  155. Jurica, M.S.; Monnat, R.J., Jr.; Stoddard, B.L. DNA recognition and cleavage by the LAGLIDADG homing endonuclease I-CreI. Mol. Cell 1998, 2, 469–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Lin, Q.; Zhao, J.; Song, Y.; Liu, D. Recent updates on CAR T clinical trials for multiple myeloma. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  157. Friedman, K.M.; Garrett, T.E.; Evans, J.W.; Horton, H.M.; Latimer, H.J.; Seidel, S.L.; Horvath, C.J.; Morgan, R.A. Effective targeting of multiple B-cell maturation antigen-expressing hematological malignances by anti-B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor T Cells. Hum. Gene Ther. 2018, 29, 585–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  158. Press Release (Bristol Myers Squibb, 31 March 2020). Available online: https://news.bms.com/press-release/celltherapy/bristol-myers-squibb-and-bluebird-bio-announce-submission-biologics-licens (accessed on 12 June 2020).
  159. Zheng, W.; O’Hear, C.E.; Alli, R.; Basham, J.H.; Abdelsamed, H.A.; Palmer, L.E.; Jones, L.L.; Youngblood, B.; Geiger, T.L. PI3K orchestration of the in vivo persistence of chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells. Leukemia 2018, 32, 1157–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Goldberg, S.D.; Cardoso, R.M.; Lin, T.; Spinka-Doms, T.; Klein, D.; Jacobs, S.A.; Dudkin, V.; Gilliland, G.; O’Neil, K.T. Engineering a targeted delivery platform using Centyrins. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2016, 29, 563–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Gattinoni, L.; Speiser, D.E.; Lichterfeld, M.; Bonini, C. T memory stem cells in health and disease. Nat. Med. 2017, 23, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Sidana, S.; Shah, N. CAR T-cell therapy: Is it prime time in myeloma? Blood Adv. 2019, 3, 3473–3480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Wang, X.; Chang, W.C.; Wong, C.W.; Colcher, D.; Sherman, M.; Ostberg, J.R.; Forman, S.J.; Riddell, S.R.; Jensen, M.C. A transgene-encoded cell surface polypeptide for selection, in vivo tracking, and ablation of engineered cells. Blood 2011, 118, 1255–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Press Release (CARsgen Therapeutics Co. Ltd. 28 October 2019). Available online: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/carsgen-announces-investigational-car-t-therapy-ct053-granted-rmat-designation-by-the-us-fda-for-rr-multiple-myeloma-300945966.html (accessed on 18 June 2020).
  165. Li, C.; Wang, J.; Wang, D.; Hu, G.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, X.; Meng, L.; Hong, Z.; Chen, L.; Mao, X.; et al. Efficacy and safety of fully human BCMA targeting CAR T cell therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 2019, 134, 929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Lam, N.; Alabanza, L.; Trinklein, N.; Buelow, B.; Kochenderfer, J.N. T cells expressing anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptors with antigen recognition domains made up of only single human heavy chain variable domains specifically recognize BCMA and eradicate tumors in mice. Blood 2017, 130, 504. [Google Scholar]
  167. Sommer, C.; Bentley, T.; Sutton, J.; Heyen, J.; Valton, J.; Ni, Y.J.; Justewicz, D.; Van Blarcom, T.; Smith, J.; Leonard, M.; et al. Off-the-shelf AlloCAR T (TM) cells targeting BCMA for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019, 19, E24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Valton, J.; Guyot, V.; Boldajipour, B.; Sommer, C.; Pertel, T.; Juillerat, A.; Duclert, A.; Sasu, B.J.; Duchateau, P.; Poirot, L. A versatile safeguard for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapies. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Prieto, J.; Redondo, P.; Lopez-Mendez, B.; D’Abramo, M.; Merino, N.; Blanco, F.J.; Duchateau, P.; Montoya, G.; Molina, R. Understanding the indirect DNA read-out specificity of I-CreI meganuclease. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Maroto-Martin, E.; Encinas, J.; Garcia-Ortiz, A.; Ugalde, L.; Alonso, R.; Leivas, A.; Mari, L.P.; Garrido, V.; Martin-Antonio, B.; Sune, G.; et al. Generation of two new immunotherapeutic products with genetically modified NK cells. Comparison of clinically relevant CARS in multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2019, 104, 97. [Google Scholar]
  171. Martin, E.M.; Encinas, J.; Garcia-Ortiz, A.; Ugalde, L.; Fernandez, R.A.; Leivas, A.; Paciello, M.L.; Garrido, V.; Martin-Antonio, B.; Sune, G.; et al. Exploring NKG2D and BCMA-CAR NK-92 for adoptive cellular therapy to multiple myeloma. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019, 19, E24–E25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 21 05192 g001 550
Figure 1. BAFF/APRIL/BCMA Axis. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family members BAFF (B-cell activating factor) and APRIL (a proliferation-inducing ligand) are cytokines secreted in the bone marrow microenvironment that play key roles in B cell development, as well as in supporting the viability and proliferation of plasma cells in multiple myeloma. Both BAFF and APRIL serve as ligands for two receptors on the myeloma cell surface—transmembrane activator and calcium modulator and cyclophilin ligand interactor (TACI) and B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA). BAFF also binds to BAFF-R, another myeloma cell receptor. The receptor blockers shown, atacicept, tabalumab, and BION-1301, have been studied in MM patients but have failed to provide evidence of efficacy. On the other hand, inhibitors of BCMA have demonstrated great potential in the therapy of MM. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 1. BAFF/APRIL/BCMA Axis. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family members BAFF (B-cell activating factor) and APRIL (a proliferation-inducing ligand) are cytokines secreted in the bone marrow microenvironment that play key roles in B cell development, as well as in supporting the viability and proliferation of plasma cells in multiple myeloma. Both BAFF and APRIL serve as ligands for two receptors on the myeloma cell surface—transmembrane activator and calcium modulator and cyclophilin ligand interactor (TACI) and B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA). BAFF also binds to BAFF-R, another myeloma cell receptor. The receptor blockers shown, atacicept, tabalumab, and BION-1301, have been studied in MM patients but have failed to provide evidence of efficacy. On the other hand, inhibitors of BCMA have demonstrated great potential in the therapy of MM. Created with BioRender.com.
Ijms 21 05192 g001
Ijms 21 05192 g002 550
Figure 2. The schematic diagram of representative structures of BCMA-targeted chimeric antigen receptors (CAR). The BCMA CARs contain a single- chain of BCMA antibody variable fragment (ScFv), a transmembrane domain, a hinge region, a co-stimulation domain (4-1BB, CD28 or OX40), and a CD3ζ domain. Additional sequences (such as PI3K inhibitor) are added to enhance identification of CAR+ T cells. LCAR-B38M CAR contains two epitopes of BCMA scFv, VHH1 and VHH2. PI3K: phosphoinositol 3-kinase. Adapted from Lin et al. [156] with permission through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
Figure 2. The schematic diagram of representative structures of BCMA-targeted chimeric antigen receptors (CAR). The BCMA CARs contain a single- chain of BCMA antibody variable fragment (ScFv), a transmembrane domain, a hinge region, a co-stimulation domain (4-1BB, CD28 or OX40), and a CD3ζ domain. Additional sequences (such as PI3K inhibitor) are added to enhance identification of CAR+ T cells. LCAR-B38M CAR contains two epitopes of BCMA scFv, VHH1 and VHH2. PI3K: phosphoinositol 3-kinase. Adapted from Lin et al. [156] with permission through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
Ijms 21 05192 g002
Table
Table 1. Active trials of anti- B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) monoclonal antibodies and their drug conjugates in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
Table 1. Active trials of anti- B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) monoclonal antibodies and their drug conjugates in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
Trial ID [References]TreatmentPhaseEnrollmentTrial Title
NCT02064387 [41]Belantamab mafodotin (GSK2857916)I79A Phase I Open-label, Dose Escalation Study to Investigate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Immunogenicity and Clinical Activity of the Antibody Drug Conjugate GSK2857916 in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Other Advanced Hematologic Malignancies Expressing BCMA (DREAMM 1)
NCT03525678 [40]Belantamab mafodotin (GSK2857916)II221A Phase II, Open Label, Randomized, Two-Arm Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of the Antibody Drug Conjugate GSK2857916 in Participants With Multiple Myeloma Who Had 3 or More Prior Lines of Treatment, Are Refractory to a Proteasome Inhibitor and an Immunomodulatory Agent and Have Failed an Anti-CD38 Antibody (DREAMM 2)
NCT04162210Belantamab mafodotin
(GSK2857916) + Pom + low dose Dex		III380A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Single Agent Belantamab Mafodotin Compared to Pomalidomide Plus Low dose Dexamethasone (Pom/Dex) in Participants with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) (DREAMM 3)
NCT03848845Belantamab mafodotin
(GSK2857916) + Pemb		II40A Phase I/II Single Arm Open-Label Study to Explore Safety and Clinical Activity of GSK2857916 Administered in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma—DREAMM 4
NCT04126200 [42]Belantamab mafodotin (GSK2857916) + GSK3174998 +
GSK3359609 +
Nirogacestat		II464A Phase I/II, Randomized, Open-label Platform Study Utilizing a Master Protocol to Study Belantamab Mafodotin (GSK2857916) as Monotherapy and in Combination With Anti-Cancer Treatments in Participants with Relapsed/ Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)—DREAMM 5
NCT03544281 [46]Belantamab mafodotin (GSK2857916) + Len + Dex + BortII123A Phase I/II, Open-label, Dose Escalation and Expansion Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, and Clinical Activity of the Antibody-Drug Conjugate GSK2857916 Administered in Combination With Lenalidomide Plus Dexamethasone (Arm A), or Bortezomib Plus Dexamethasone (Arm B) in Participants With Relapsed / Refractory Multiple Myeloma—DREAMM 6
NCT04246047Belantamab mafodotin (GSK2857916) + Dara + Bort + DexIII478A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Belantamab Mafodotin, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (B-Vd) Compared With the Combination of Daratumumab, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (D-Vd) in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma—DREAMM 7
NCT03582033SEA-BCMA + DexI185A Phase 1 Study of SEA-BCMA in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
NCT03489525 [47,48]MEDI2228I106A Phase 1, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Immunogenicity, and Preliminary Efficacy of MEDI2228 in Subjects with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
NCT04036461CC-99712I120A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-label, Dose Finding Study of CC-99712, a BCMA Antibody-Drug Conjugate, in Subjects with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Abbreviations: Bort = bortezomib; Dara = daratumumab; Dex = dexamethasone; Len = lenalidomide; Pemb = pembrolizumab; Pom = pomalidomide.
Table
Table 2. Active trials of T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies in RRMM.
Table 2. Active trials of T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies in RRMM.
Trial ID [References]TreatmentPhaseEnrollmentTrial Title
NCT02514239 [67]AMG 420 (BI 836909)I43An Open Label, Phase I, Dose Escalation Study to Characterize the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous Doses of BI 836909 in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients
NCT03287908 [68]AMG 701I/II270A Phase 1/2 Open-label Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of AMG 701 in Subjects with Multiple Myeloma (ParadigMM-1B)
NCT03761108 [69]REGN5458I/II74Phase 1/2 FIH Study of REGN5458 (Anti-BCMA x Anti-CD3 Bispecific Antibody) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
NCT04083534REGN5459I/II56Phase 1/2 FIH Study of REGN5459 (Anti-BCMA x Anti-CD3 Bispecific Antibody) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
NCT03145181 [70]Teclistamab (JNJ-64007957)I160A Phase 1, First-in-Human, Open-Label, Dose Escalation Study of JNJ-64007957, a Humanized BCMA x CD3 DuoBody® Antibody in Subjects with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
NCT04108195Daratumumab + Talquetamab + Teclistamab (JNJ-64007957)I100A Phase 1b Study of Subcutaneous Daratumumab Regimens in Combination With Bispecific T Cell Redirection Antibodies for the Treatment of Subjects with Multiple Myeloma
NCT03269136 [71,72,73]PF-06863135I80A Phase I, Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic and Clinical Activity of Pf-06863135, a B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA)-CD3 Bispecific Antibody, In Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Advanced Multiple Myeloma (MM)
NCT03486067 [74]CC-93269I120A Phase 1, Open-label, Dose Finding Study of CC-93269, a BCMA X CD3 T Cell Engaging Antibody, in Subjects with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
NCT03933735 [75,76]TNB-383BI72A Multicenter, Phase 1, Open-label, Dose-escalation and Expansion Study of TNB-383B, a Bispecific Antibody Targeting BCMA in Subjects with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
NCT04184050 [77]HPN217I/II70A Phase 1/2 Open-label, Multicenter, Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of HPN217 in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Table
Table 3. Active trials of BCMA-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-Cells in RRMM.
Table 3. Active trials of BCMA-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-Cells in RRMM.
Trial ID [References]TreatmentPhaseEnrollmentTrial Title
NCT02215967 [129]Anti-BCMA-CAR T cells + Ctx + FluI30A Phase I Clinical Trial of T-Cells Targeting B-Cell Maturation Antigen for Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma
NCT03502577 [34]Anti-BCMA-CAR T cells + Ctx + Flu + LY3039478 (gamma-secretase inhibitor)I18A Phase I Study of B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA)-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in Combination With JSMD194, a Small Molecule Inhibitor of Gamma Secretase, in Patients With Relapsed or Persistent Multiple Myeloma
NCT02658929 [130]bb2121I67A Phase 1 Study of bb2121 in BCMA-Expressing Multiple Myeloma (CRB-401)
NCT03361748 [131]Idecabtagene vicleucel (bb2121)II149A Phase 2, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of bb2121 in Subjects with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma (KarMMa-1)
NCT03601078 [132]Idecabtagene vicleucel (bb2121)II181A Phase 2, Multicohort, Open-label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of bb2121 in Subjects With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma and in Subjects with Clinical High-Risk Multiple Myeloma (KarMMa-2)
NCT03651128Idecabtagene vicleucel (bb2121) + standard MM regimensIII381A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of bb2121 Versus Standard Regimens in Subjects with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) (KarMMa-3)
NCT04196491Idecabtagene vicleucel (bb2121) + Carf + Ctx + Flu + LenI60A Phase 1, Open-label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety of bb2121 in Subjects with High Risk, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (KarMMa-4)
NCT02786511Idecabtagene vicleucel (bb2121)--50Longterm Follow-up of Subjects Treated With bb2121
NCT03274219 [133]bb21217I74A Phase 1 Study of bb21217, an Anti-BCMA CAR T Cell Drug Product, in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myelom
NCT03090659 [134,135,136]JNJ-68284528 (LCAR-B38M)I/II100A Clinical Study of Legend Biotech BCMA-chimeric Antigen Receptor Technology in Treating Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Multiple Myeloma Patients (LEGEND-2)
NCT03548207 [137]JNJ-68284528 (LCAR-B38M)I/II118A Phase 1b-2, Open-Label Study of JNJ-68284528, A Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR-T) Therapy Directed Against BCMA in Subjects with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (CARTITUDE-1)
NCT04133636JNJ-68284528 (LCAR-B38M) + LenII80A Phase 2, Multicohort Open-Label Study of JNJ-68284528, a Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell (CAR-T) Therapy Directed Against BCMA in Subjects with Multiple Myeloma (CARTITUDE-2)
NCT04181827JNJ-68284528 (LCAR-B38M) + Pom + Bort + Dex + DaraIII400A Phase 3 Randomized Study Comparing JNJ-68284528, a Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell (CAR-T) Therapy Directed Against BCMA, Versus Pomalidomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (PVd) or Daratumumab, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (DPd) in Subjects with Relapsed and Lenalidomide-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (CARTITUDE-4)
NCT03288493 [138]P-BCMA-101 + RimiducidI/II220Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 1 Study to Assess the Safety of P BCMA-101 in Subjects with Relapsed / Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM) Followed by a Phase 2 Assessment of Response and Safety (PRIME)
NCT03741127 [139]P-BCMA-101 + RimiducidI100Open Label, Multicenter, Long-Term Follow-Up Study for Subjects Treated With P-BCMA-101
NCT03070327 [55,140]MCARH171 + Ctx + LenI20A Phase I Trial of B-cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) Targeted EGFRt/BCMA-41BBz Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) Modified T Cells With or Without Lenalidomide for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma (MM)
NCT03338972 [55,141]FCARH143 + Ctx + FluI25A Phase I Study of Adoptive Immunotherapy for Advanced B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA)+ Multiple Myeloma With Autologous CD4+ and CD8+ T Cells Engineered to Express a BCMA-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor
NCT03430011 [55,142]JCARH125I/II245An Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of JCARH125, BCMA-targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cells, in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
NCT03975907 [143]CT053I/II62An Open Label, Phase I/II Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Fully Human Anti-BCMA Chimeric Antibody Receptor Autologous T Cell (CAR T Infusion in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
NCT03915184 [143]CT053I70Open Label, Multi-center, Phase 1b/2 Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Autologous CAR BCMA T Cells (CT053) in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
NCT04155749CART-ddBCMAI12Master Protocol for the Phase 1 Study of Cell Therapies for the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma, Including Long-term Safety Follow-up
NCT03448978 [144]Descartes-08 + Ctx + FluI/II30Combined Phase I-Phase II Study of Autologous CD8+ T-cells Transiently Expressing a Chimeric Antigen Receptor Directed to B-Cell Maturation Antigen in Patients With Multiple Myeloma
NCT02546167 [145,146,147]CART-BCMAI25Pilot Study Of Redirected Autologous T Cells Engineered To Contain an Anti-BCMA scFv Coupled To TCRζ And 4-1BB Signaling Domains in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
NCT03455972 [148]CART-anti-CD19/BCMAI/II15Study of T Cells Targeting CD19/BCMA (CART-19/BCMA) for High Risk Multiple Myeloma Followed With Auto-HSCT
NCT03196414 [149]CART-anti-CD19/BCMAI/II10Study of T Cells Targeting CD138/BCMA/CD19/More Antigens (CART-138/BCMA/19/More) for Chemotherapy Refractory and Relapsed Multiple Myeloma
NCT03549442 [150]BCMA CART + huCART19I39Phase 1 Study of CART-BCMA With or Without huCART19 as Consolidation of Standard First or Second-Line Therapy for High-Risk Multiple Myeloma
NCT03706547 [150]Anti-CD19/BCMA CAR-T cellsI20Clinical Study of Anti-CD19/BCMA Bispecific Chimeric Antigen Receptors (CARs) T Cell Therapy for Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma
NCT03767725 [150]Anti-BCMA or/and Anti-CD19 CAR Autologous T CellsI10Phase I Trial Study of Anti-BCMA (B-cell Maturation Antigen) or/and Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells (CART Cell) Treatment for the Patient of Relapsed Multiple Myeloma
NCT03602612 [151]Anti-BCMA CAR T cells + Ctx + FluI42A Phase I Clinical Trial of T Cells Expressing a Novel Fully-human Anti-BCMA CAR for Treating Multiple Myeloma
NCT04093596 [152,153,154]ALLO-715 +
ALLO-647 + Ctx + Flu		I90A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase 1 Study of the Safety, Efficacy, and Cellular Kinetics/ Pharmacodynamics of ALLO-715 to Evaluate an Anti-BCMA Allogeneic CAR T Cell Therapy in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (UNIVERSAL)
NCT04171843 [155]PBCAR269A + Ctx + FluI/II48A Phase 1/2a, Open-label, Dose-escalation, Dose-expansion Study to Evaluate the Safety and Clinical Activity of PBCAR269A in Study Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Abbreviations: Bort = bortezomib; Carf = carfilzomib; Ctx = cyclophosphamide; Dara = daratumumab; Dex = dexamethasone; Flu = fludarabine; Len = lenalidomide; Pom = pomalidomide.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abramson, H.N. B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) as a Target for New Drug Development in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5192. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155192

AMA Style

Abramson HN. B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) as a Target for New Drug Development in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(15):5192. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155192

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abramson, Hanley N. 2020. "B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) as a Target for New Drug Development in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 15: 5192. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155192

APA Style

Abramson, H. N. (2020). B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) as a Target for New Drug Development in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(15), 5192. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155192

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop