Next Article in Journal
Groundbreaking Anticancer Activity of Highly Diversified Oxadiazole Scaffolds
Next Article in Special Issue
Medical Genetics, Genomics and Bioinformatics Aid in Understanding Molecular Mechanisms of Human Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
Substrate Specificity and Structural Modeling of Human Carboxypeptidase Z: A Unique Protease with a Frizzled-Like Domain
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Model for Stacking Monomers in Filamentous Actin from Skeletal Muscles of Oryctolagus cuniculus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bioinformatic Reconstruction and Analysis of Gene Networks Related to Glucose Variability in Diabetes and Its Complications

by
Olga V. Saik
1,2,* and
Vadim V. Klimontov
1
1
Laboratory of Endocrinology, Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Lymphology—Branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (RICEL—Branch of IC&G SB RAS), 630060 Novosibirsk, Russia
2
Laboratory of Computer Proteomics, Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ICG SB RAS), 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(22), 8691; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228691
Submission received: 14 October 2020 / Revised: 6 November 2020 / Accepted: 16 November 2020 / Published: 18 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Medical Genetics, Genomics and Bioinformatics – 2020)

Abstract

:
Glucose variability (GV) has been recognized recently as a promoter of complications and therapeutic targets in diabetes. The aim of this study was to reconstruct and analyze gene networks related to GV in diabetes and its complications. For network analysis, we used the ANDSystem that provides automatic network reconstruction and analysis based on text mining. The network of GV consisted of 37 genes/proteins associated with both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Cardiovascular system, pancreas, adipose and muscle tissues, gastrointestinal tract, and kidney were recognized as the loci with the highest expression of GV-related genes. According to Gene Ontology enrichment analysis, these genes are associated with insulin secretion, glucose metabolism, glycogen biosynthesis, gluconeogenesis, MAPK and JAK-STAT cascades, protein kinase B signaling, cell proliferation, nitric oxide biosynthesis, etc. GV-related genes were found to occupy central positions in the networks of diabetes complications (cardiovascular disease, diabetic nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy) and were associated with response to hypoxia. Gene prioritization analysis identified new gene candidates (THBS1, FN1, HSP90AA1, EGFR, MAPK1, STAT3, TP53, EGF, GSK3B, and PTEN) potentially involved in GV. The results expand the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the GV phenomenon in diabetes and provide molecular markers and therapeutic targets for future research.

1. Introduction

The concept of blood glucose variability (GV) attracts increasing attention in both basic and clinical science. Maintenance of GV within normal values is provided by a complex regulatory molecular-genetic network, which remains not fully understood. Many patients with diabetes have increased GV, which might be a major therapeutic challenge [1,2]. The highest GV is observed in insulin-treated type 1 and type 2 diabetic subjects. However, the initial increase in GV can be revealed in persons with impaired glucose tolerance [3].
A growing body of evidences indicates a role of GV in development of diabetic vascular complications and clinically important outcomes. In the observational Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy (FinnDiane) Study, long-term GV, defined by variability of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), was independently associated with progression of renal disease and cardiovascular events in patients with type 1 diabetes [4]. In the ADVANCE (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron MR Controlled Evaluation) clinical trial visit-to-visit, GV was associated with both macro- and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetic subjects [5]. It has been shown that in patients with type 2 diabetes, increased GV predicts a decline in renal function [6], proliferative diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema [7], accelerated progression of coronary atherosclerosis [8], left ventricular adverse remodeling after myocardial infarction [9], major cardiovascular events, cardiovascular, and all-cause death [10]. The relationship between GV and mortality was described in the Verona Diabetes Study: in elderly type 2 diabetic subjects, the coefficient of variation of fasting plasma glucose turned out to be an independent predictor of total, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality [11]. In the trial comparing cardiovascular safety of insulin degludec vs. insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of cardiovascular events (DEVOTE), higher day-to-day fasting GV was associated with all-cause mortality and severe hypoglycemia [12]. The studies with continuous glucose monitoring recognized GV as a risk factor for hypoglycemia in type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetic subjects [13,14].
At present, molecular mechanisms of deteriorating effect of high GV on the targeted organs are not fully understood. The data of experimental and clinical studies suggest that GV influence could be mediated through oxidative stress [15,16,17] and chronic low-grade inflammation [18,19]. It was shown that oscillating glucose produces more deleterious effects on endothelial function than constantly high glucose [15], and it enhances apoptosis of endothelial cells [16]. High glucose levels affect transcriptomic profile of many cells, including endothelial, mesangial, and pancreatic ones [20,21,22]. Many genes exhibit epigenetic changes under hyperglycemic condition [22]. It was demonstrated that transient high glucose induces persistent histone modifications, DNA methylation, changes in the number of 5-methylcytosines and 5-hydroxymethylcytosines in genomic DNA, and other modifications which alter the gene expression even after normalization of glucose level [23,24]. This mechanism is important for understanding the phenomenon of metabolic memory, which determines the long-term metabolic and pathogenic effects of hyperglycemia. Glucose-induced changes in mRNAs expression profiles are considered as another contributor to metabolic memory [20].
The complexity of the metabolic changes induced by glucose fluctuations, as well as a variety of glucose homeostasis regulators, is the rationale for an application of integrative network bioinformatics analysis to evaluate the molecular aspects of GV. The reconstruction and analysis of gene networks is a widely used approach for studying the mechanisms of complex biological processes and multifactorial diseases [25,26]. Specifically, this approach was applied for identification of key genes and pathways involved in pathogenesis of diabetes and its complications [27,28,29,30]. However, to our knowledge, GV-related networks have not been reconstructed and analyzed yet.
In recent years, artificial intelligence has provided new opportunities for data analysis in medical genomics [31]. Among them, the methods of automated retrieval of information from unstructured textual data (text mining) might be particularly helpful when complex processes involving genes, proteins, and phenotypes are considered [32]. In our study, we aimed to reconstruct and analyze gene networks related to GV in diabetes and its complications with the use of text-mining-based approach. For research purposes, we applied ANDSystem, which provides an automatic reconstruction and analysis of the networks based on the text mining of PubMed abstracts. The ANDSystem knowledge base contains about 30 million facts concerning genetic regulation, gene associations with diseases, protein-protein interactions, catalytic reactions, transport pathways, etc., extracted from more than 28 million PubMed abstracts [33,34].

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Reconstruction and Analysis of the Networks Associated with Hyperglycemia and Hypoglycemia

At the first step, molecular networks related to hyperglycemia (Figure S1, Table S1) and hypoglycemia (Figure S2, Table S2) were reconstructed using the ANDSystem [33,34]. The gene network of hyperglycemia included 209 genes/proteins and 5818 interactions between them. The gene network of hypoglycemia included 128 genes/proteins and 2467 interactions. At the intersection of these gene networks, we identified 37 genes/proteins. These molecules were associated with both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, being highly connected with each other in the gene network (Table S3, Figure 1). It can be assumed that these genes and proteins are most closely related to enhanced GV, which is characterized by the transition from hyperglycemia to hypoglycemia and vice versa. In what follows, we will call such genes as GV-related ones.
Ten GV-related genes showed the largest number of connections with other molecules in the network (Table 1). Among these molecules, as expected, there are insulin (INS) and glucagon (GCG), two principal regulators of blood glucose level in humans, as well as other hormones that affect glucose metabolism directly or indirectly, including leptin (LEP), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), somatostatin (SST), adiponectin (ADIPOQ), prolactin (PRL), ghrelin (GHRL), glucagon like peptide 1 receptor (GLP1R), proopiomelanocortin (POMC), amylin (IAPP), adrenomedullin (ADM), angiotensin II (AGT), secretin (SCT), and pancreatic polypeptide (PPY). The network includes genes encoding proinflammatory cytokines (IL6, IL1B, TNF), growth factors (FGF2, IGF2), molecules involved in the orchestration of insulin secretion and signaling (GCK, KCNJ11, ABCC8, INSR, FLNA), transcriptional factors (HNF1A, FOS, ZGLP1), neurotransmitter (NPY), enzymes (DPP4, AKR1B1, ST3GAL4, MAP4K2, RAPGEF5), and binding proteins (ALB, IGFBP3, TAPBP).
Thus, the network associated with GV includes a variety of molecular components. Hormones constitute a significant part of this network. This is consistent with the well-known fact that maintenance of glycemic fluctuations within the physiological limits is controlled by fine and well-balanced hormonal regulation. Circadian rhythms in secretion of growth hormone, melatonin, prolactin, cortisol, leptin, and ghrelin are highly correlated with sleep and can contribute to the intra-day glycemic fluctuations [35,36,37].
Among non-hormonal factors, interleukin-6 (IL6) showed the highest number of connections in the GV-related network. Circadian rhythm in IL-6 secretion with an elevation in day-time hours was described [38]. As IL-6 modulates glucose disposal and insulin sensitivity [39], one could speculate it can affect intraday GV. On the other hand, excessive glucose fluctuations can increase IL-6 production. In cultured human endothelial cells, an intermittent increase in glucose levels caused a more pronounced increase in IL6 expression than a consistently high glucose [40]. The association between GV and plasma level of IL-6 has been shown in individuals with metabolic syndrome [41]. In patients with type 1 diabetes, an increase in the IL-6 levels was observed after a two-hour episode of hypoglycemia [42]. Hyperglycemia, following hypoglycemia, caused a further increase in IL-6 concentration [18].
The genes associated with insulin secretion and signaling turned out to be important nodes of the GV network. In humans, mutations in these genes (GCK, HNF1A, ABCC8, and KCNJ11) are causes of monogenic forms of diabetes known as maturity-onset diabetes of the young [43]. An increased GV was reported in patients with diabetes caused by mutations in the HNF1A [44] and ABCC8 [45]. Mutations in the insulin receptor gene (INSR) are associated with insulin resistance and hyperglycaemia and can lead to hyperinsulinemic hypoglycaemia in adults and children [46,47]. The GCK, KCNJ11, ABCC8, and INSR were identified as genetic variants associated with type 2 diabetes and/or glycemic traits in genome-wide association studies [48]. However, the contribution of the polymorphisms of these genes to GV in healthy individuals and patients with diabetes has not been studied yet. The role of a number of molecules, identified as the network components, in GV phenomenon remains to be clarified.
At the next step, we performed the comparisons of expression patterns of GV-related genes in different tissues with the use of Bgee [49]. The greatest expression of GV-related genes was observed in the cardiovascular system, followed by pancreas, adipose and muscle tissues, gastrointestinal tract, and kidney; retina and nerves demonstrated a less maximal expression score (Table S4). This fact gives further support to notion that GV could be the unifying link between impairment of insulin synthesis and signaling, glucose metabolism, and diabetic vascular complications.
Table 2 demonstrates the results of the Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis by DAVID service [50], aimed at revealing the overrepresented biological processes for GV-related genes. In addition to the regulation of insulin secretion and different aspects of glucose metabolism, this analysis revealed some signaling pathways considered as the cornerstones in regulation of cellular metabolism (mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade, protein kinase B signaling, JAK-STAT cascade, regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylation), cell cycle (regulation of mitotic nuclear division and cell proliferation), and cell-cell signaling. Positive regulation of nitric oxide biosynthetic process was identified among overrepresented processes.
It turned out that the biological processes identified as overrepresented are closely related to oxidative stress, glycation, endothelial dysfunction, and other processes that are considered as important players in the development of diabetes complications. In particular, oxidative stress can directly alter glucose homeostasis [51] and it itself is triggered by hyperglycemia [52]. The intensity of glycation is proportional to glucose concentration and depends on glucose metabolism [53,54]. MAPK cascade and nitric oxide biosynthesis are known as principal pathways in the biology of endothelial cells [55,56].
These data support the notion that GV-related genes could play an important role in pathogenesis of diabetic complications. We tested this assumption at the next stage of our work.

2.2. The Role of GV-Related Genes in the Networks of Diabetes Complications

The ANDSystem was used to construct gene networks associated with diabetic complications: cardiovascular disease (Figure S3, Table S5), diabetic nephropathy (Figure S4, Table S6), diabetic retinopathy (Figure S5, Table S7), and diabetic neuropathy (Figure S6, Table S8). For each of these gene networks, the role of GV-related genes was assessed by analyzing the betweenness centrality coefficients of the network participants (Table 3). Betweenness centrality reflects the number of shortest pathways between all pairs of genes in the analyzed gene network that go through a given gene. It describes the functional importance of a gene in a gene network.
Analysis shows that GV-related genes are significantly overrepresented in all networks of diabetes complications. In addition, the centrality of the GV-related genes was, on average, significantly higher than the average centrality of all participants of the considered gene networks (Table 3). These data support the key role of GV-related genes in the molecular orchestra of diabetes complications.
In order to find out what biological processes involved in pathogenesis of diabetic complications are triggered by glycemic fluctuations, the following analysis was carried out. Among the participants of the gene networks of diabetes complications, we selected those that were directly regulated by GV-related genes, according to ANDSystem. Thus, we identified 141 genes in the network of cardiovascular diseases, 219 genes in the network of diabetic nephropathy, 132 genes in the network of diabetic retinopathy, and 44 genes in the network of diabetic neuropathy. Further, using the DAVID service [50], the GO biological processes overrepresented for these genes were identified (Table S9).
It was found that the response to hypoxia was overrepresented in all four sets of genes, and in all cases, it was among the top ten most significantly overrepresented biological processes. This suggests an important role of hypoxia as a mediator between GV and diabetes complications. Diabetes is characterized by altered oxygen deprivation signaling in the targeted organs, including the vasculature and kidney. Cellular response to hypoxia is controlled by hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF), a transcriptional regulator. The HIF family is considered as a master regulator of endothelial biology with rising interest in the field of diabetes-driven atherosclerosis [57]. It is postulated that a shift in the balance of HIF-1α and HIF-2α promotes proinflammatory and profibrotic pathways in glomerular and renal tubular cells [58]. A growing body of research indicates HIF-1α and its target genes as the contributors to the retinal neovascularization in diabetic retinopathy [59]. In obesity and type 2 diabetes, inflammation and hypoxia of adipose tissue may play an important role in the development of insulin resistance [60]. In its turn, intermittent hypoxia, which is used to improve the adaptation to hypoxia, reduced blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes [61]. These data are in agreement with our findings indicating the response to hypoxia as an important mechanism linking GV and chronic diabetic complications.
Other 15 biological processes were revealed to be overrepresented simultaneously for three sets of genes important for cardiovascular disease, diabetic nephropathy, and diabetic retinopathy (Table 4). They are involved in the inflammatory response, platelet function, angiogenesis, regulation of blood pressure, and nitric oxide biosynthesis. These processes, along with endothelial dysfunction, are considered as the cornerstones in the pathogenesis of diabetic vascular complications [62].
Molecular pathways, implicated in the regulation of cell cycle, proliferation, and cell-cell signaling, have been recognized among significantly overrepresented biological processes related to GV and complications. Among them, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1 and 2 cascade should be mentioned. ERK cascade plays a crucial role in multiple cellular processes, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, adhesion, migration, and survival [63]. Glucose can activate ERK1/2 in beta-cells, contributing to an increase in mitogenesis [64]. Moreover, activation of ERK is a component of insulin signaling. Accordingly, the targeting of the ERK cascade is considered as a potential treatment for insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes [65]. The activation of ERK1/2 is involved in pathogenesis of cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction; recent studies showed the role of ERK in development of diabetic cardiomyopathy [66]. High glucose increases ERK phosphorylation in mesangial cells, promoting the synthesis of extracellular matrix, a key event in diabetic kidney disease [67].
Thus, it was revealed that GV-related genes occupy central positions in the gene networks of diabetes complications. The response to hypoxia, low-grade inflammation, abnormalities of angiogenesis and platelets function, disturbances in the regulation of blood pressure and vasodilatation, as well as alterations of cellular signaling pathways, could link GV with the development of diabetic complications.

2.3. Identification of New Candidate Genes in the GV Network

At the first step of this study, we identified by the ANDSystem the set of genes that are directly associated with both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, attributed them to GV. The Pathway Wizard tool of the ANDSystem allows one to identify indirect interactions between objects in the gene networks that pass through genes-intermediaries. Using this opportunity, it was possible to find genes/proteins for which there is no evidence on a direct connection with hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, but there are indications of indirect relationships with glucose abnormalities through genes-intermediaries. As genes-intermediaries, we considered the GV-related genes described in the first section of this article. The genes/proteins that were associated with genes-intermediaries, we considered as candidate genes potentially involved in GV network. The analysis identified 334 such candidate genes. Further, in order to rank candidates and determine the most promising ones, gene prioritization was carried out using the ToppGene system [68]. The GV-related genes were used as a training set.
The results of prioritization could be found in Table S10. The top ten most-priority genes are shown in Table 5. These genes are important for cell-cell interactions (THBS1, FN1), intracellular signal transmission (MAPK1, STAT3, TP53), stress response (HSP90AA1, TP53, GSK3B, PTEN), cell proliferation and differentiation (MAPK1, TP53, EGFR, EGF), apoptosis (STAT3, TP53, GSK3B), and glucose metabolism (GSK3B).
The THBS1 gene received the highest priority. This gene encodes an adhesive glycoprotein thrombospondin 1 (THSP1), which regulates cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. THSP1 is an important player in the regulation of adhesion, mobility, and growth of endothelial cells; it has important regulatory function in angiogenesis, inflammation, and tissue remodeling also [69]. Patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease have increased THSP1 levels in plasma [70]. The enhanced expression of THBS1 was observed in mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. In cultured fibroblasts, high glucose increased expression of THBS1 [71]. Being involved in atherosclerosis, inflammation, ischemia/reperfusion injury, cardiac hypertrophy, and heart failure, THBS1 plays a significant role in the development of cardiovascular diseases [72]. In diabetic complications, this molecule is considered to be a key inductor of fibrosis [73].
Figure 2 shows the network of interactions between the THBS1 and GV-related genes. It was demonstrated that THBS1 is able to bind to CD36, a transporter and sensor of free fatty acids. Binding of CD36 to THBS1 initiates anti-angiogenic signals, induction of endothelial cell apoptosis, and the inhibition of angiogenesis [74]. THBS1 differentially regulates the release of IL-6 and IL-10 by human monocytes [75]. Both hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia increased serum concentrations of IL-6 [76,77], while hyperglycemia down-regulated IL-10 mRNA levels [78]. THBS1 modulates epidermal growth factor 1 (EGR1) function [79]. At the same time, up-regulation of THBS1 is mediated by EGR1 [80]. Hyperglycemia is responsible for EGR1 activation, acetylation, and its prolonged expression [81].
Fibronectin is a component of the extracellular matrix, accumulating in the retinal and glomerular basement membranes and mesangial matrix in diabetic retinopathy and diabetic kidney disease [82,83]. High ambient glucose increases fibronectin production in human mesangial cells [84] and retinal pigment epithelial cells [85]. In mesangial cells, the effect was mediated via THSP and TGF-beta [84].
Heat shock protein 90α (Hsp90α), encoded by the HSP90AA1 gene, is the stress-inducible isoform of the molecular chaperone Hsp90. The expression of HSP90AA1 increases in some forms of cancer [86]. Previously, HSP90AA1 was recognized by bioinformatic analysis as a node in a protein-protein interaction network in diabetic nephropathy [87]. However, the exact role of Hsp90α in diabetes and its complications remains to be clarified.
Both EGF and EGFR, encoding epidermal growth factor (EGF) and its receptor respectively, were present in the list of gene-intermediates. In diabetes, EGF/EGFR system was discussed primarily as a promoter of wound healing [88]. Recently it was demonstrated that EGF signal is involved in diabetes-induced vascular dysfunction, remodeling, and transcriptome dysregulation associated with renal involvement [89]. In patients with type 2 diabetes, soluble EGFR correlates with fasting blood glucose, insulin resistance, and glycated hemoglobin HbA1c [90]. Interestingly, EGFR can regulate the transcription of proopiomelanocortin [91], a hypothalamic appetite regulator and ACTH precursor modulated by glucose level [92]. Both EGFR and TP53 regulate expression of IGFBP3 [93,94], which level is reduced in response to hyperglycemia [95].
Mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 (MAPK1), also known as ERK2, is a molecular target of metformin, a principal antihyperglycemic agent [96]. MAPK1 is one of the essential molecules implicated in canonical insulin signaling, an important modulator of protein synthesis [96]. In the liver, MAPK1 is involved in regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism required for physiological metabolic adaptation [97]. In mice on a high-fat/high-sucrose diet, MAPK1 knockout promoted insulin resistance and impairment of glucose tolerance [98].
Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) is a principal modulator of β-cell survival and function [99]. It is involved in the regulation of hepatic insulin sensitivity and gluconeogenesis [100]. The excessive STAT3 signaling contributes to skeletal muscle insulin resistance [101]. Recent data indicated the role of STAT3 signaling in high-glucose-induced podocyte injury [102], tubular cell dysfunction [103], and diabetic retinopathy [104].
Tumor protein p53 (TP53), a tumor suppressor, was recently identified as a metabolic regulator. In the liver, TP53 improves insulin sensitivity via inhibition of MAPKs and NF-κB pathways [105]. The protein regulates the function of glucose transporters affecting their transcription and translocation. It negatively regulates glycolysis and positively regulates gluconeogenesis [106]. In the beta cells, TP53 mediates gluco- and lipotoxicity and induces apoptosis [106]. In patients with type 2 diabetes, the level of TP53 increased with the age, duration of diabetes, and waist-to-hip ratio [107].
Glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK3B) is a serine/threonine protein kinase that is involved in glycogen metabolism, regulation of gene transcription, cytoskeleton organization, cell cycle, and apoptosis. The enzyme inhibits glycogen synthase and decreases glycogen storage in skeletal muscles and, to a lesser extent, in the liver; it also deteriorates glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity. Insulin inactivates GSK3B via protein kinase B (Akt) [108]. It was demonstrated that GSK3B modulates inflammatory response in the islets [109]. Women with gestational diabetes had increased GSK3B activity in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue, where the enzyme promoted the inflammatory response [110]. Blood glucose fluctuations suppressed the expression of phosphorylated GSK3B and contributed to cardiac fibrosis in a model of diabetic cardiomyopathy [111].
Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is essential for both cellular growth and metabolism. PTEN counteracts insulin signaling via PI3K/Akt pathway and reduces insulin sensitivity in mouse adipose tissue, liver, and β-cells [112]. In humans, mutations in PTEN gene increase the risks of obesity and cancer, but decrease the risk of type 2 diabetes [113]. Recent experimental studies indicate the role of PTEN in β-cell function and apoptosis [99], hyperglycemia-induced angiogenesis suppression [114], and development of diabetic nephropathy [115].
As an indirect confirmation of the relevance of performed gene prioritization, we checked the co-occurrence of the candidate gene together with the terms denoting GV in full-text PubMed Central articles. We used information from full-text articles to test our prioritization because ANDSystem stores the information gathered from the abstracts, but not full-text articles. For each candidate gene, using the hypergeometric distribution, the likelihood of meeting the name of this gene, together with the terms denoting GV in full-text of PubMed Central articles, was estimated (Table S11). At the next step, the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was calculated between the prioritization rank of a gene and the probability to discover the gene in articles together with the terms describing GV by chance. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.3 and the statistical significance of the correlation was 1.6 × 10−8. This indirectly confirms the adequacy of the gene prioritization. It means that the top candidate genes are promising for experimental verification of their relationship with GV.
For further verification of obtained results, we used transcriptomic data stored in GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/info/), the largest open repository of experiments in the field of gene expression. We were able to find only one study (GEO ID: GSE40779) related to glucose fluctuations in diabetes. In this study, carried out in Rattus norvegicus, non-coding RNA profile was assessed in the heart under glucose fluctuations compared to sustained hyperglycemia [116]. It was found that the expression of 20 of 350 scanned miRNAs significantly differed between diabetic hearts and diabetic hearts with glucose fluctuations [116]. We have conducted the search for the target genes of these 20 differentially expressed miRNAs in the miRTarBase database [117]. For 16 differentially expressed miRNAs, 69 target genes in Rattus norvegicus have been found. Four miRNAs (rno-miR-136, rno-miR-296*, rno-miR-326, and rno-miR-30c-2*) had no target genes in miRTarBase. At the next step, human orthologous genes were found for these 69 target genes using the NCBI Orthologs service (Table S12). Next, we matched these genes with those we identified as the candidate genes most likely associated with GV.
It turned out that five genes, namely PTEN, TNFRSF1A, CCND1, TLR2, and RELA, which we proposed as the candidate genes for experimental verification, are targets of microRNAs differentially expressed in the GSE40779 experiment. According to the hypergeometric distribution, the probability of observing this for random reasons is low (p-value = 0.006). In addition, all of these five genes were among the top 100 candidate genes with highest priority predicted by us, which, according to the hypergeometric distribution, is unlikely by chance (p-value = 0.002). Moreover, three of five discussed genes were among the top 50 candidate genes with highest priority, which is also unlikely to be observed for random reasons (p-value = 0.03), and the PTEN was among the top ten most-priority candidates. This indirectly confirms the results of our bioinformatics analysis.

2.4. Study Limitations and Future Remarks

Our study is not without limitations. Taking into account the lack of the data on the molecular aspects of GV itself, we identified GV-related genes as those associated with both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Consequently, some molecular aspects of physiological glucose fluctuations might not be recognized. Future reconstruction and analysis of tissue-specific gene networks may also be important. As the ANDSystem operates with PubMed data only, some relevant information could have been missed. Our study is a hypothesis-generating one. The role of newly identified candidate genes, as well as some molecular pathways and biological processes, needs further experimental verification.

3. Materials and Methods

Associative gene networks were built using the ANDSystem version: 20.0413b646 (ICG SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia) [33,34,118]. The computer tool ANDSystem was developed for automatic reconstruction of associative molecular-genetic networks describing the mechanisms of diseases and other complex phenotypic traits. It utilizes text mining, an automatic knowledge extraction from the texts of scientific publications. Previously, the ANDSystem was used to identify candidate genes associated with comorbidity of asthma and tuberculosis [119], preeclampsia, diabetes and obesity [120], primary open-angle glaucoma [121], asthma and hypertension [122], and lymphedema [123].
Comparative analysis of the expression of GV-related genes in the tissues was carried out by the “Expression comparison” function (https://bgee.org/?page=expression_comparison) provided on the website of Bgee resource [49].
Gene Ontology enrichment analysis was performed using the DAVID service version: 6.8 (LHRI, Frederick, MD, USA) [50] with the following parameters: organism—“Homo sapiens”, Gene_Ontology—“GOTERM_BP_DIRECT”. Gene Ontology biological processes were considered as overrepresented if the p-values with false discovery rate (FDR) correction were less than 0.05.
The calculation of betweenness centrality coefficients for the gene network participants was made by the Statistics function in the Analysis section of the ANDSystem [35].
The identification of candidate genes potentially involved in the regulation of GV was carried out using the Pathway Wizard tool of ANDSystem [118]. The parameter “Pathway length” was set equal to 4. “Object 1” was hypoglycemia, “Object 2”, “Object 3” and “Object 4”—any human gene/protein, “Object 5”—hyperglycemia. For the interactions “Object 1—“Object 2” and “Object 4”—“Object 5” the following “Interaction property” was set: “Direction”—any; all databases in the “Database filter” section; all types of interactions in the section “Interaction type filter”. For the interactions “Object 2”—“Object 3” the following “Interaction property” was set: “Direction”—“Right to left”; all databases in the “Database filter” section; all types of interactions in the section “Interaction type filter”, except “association”, “coexpression”, “expression”, “interaction”, “involvement”. For the interactions “Object 3”—“Object 4” the following “Interaction property” was set: “Direction”—“Left to right”; all databases in the “Database filter” section; all types of interactions in the “Interaction type filter” section, except for “association”, “coexpression”, “expression”, “interaction”, “involvement”. Genes presented at the “Object 3” were considered as the candidate genes.
The prioritization of candidate genes was carried out using the ToppGene system (BMI CCHMC, Cincinnati, OH, USA) [68]. A list of GV-related genes was used as a training set. The candidate gene list was used as a test set. The parameters in the “Training parameters” section have been set: “all Feature”.
The information about the function of the candidate gene products was obtained from the NCBI Gene database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/).
The evaluation of the co-occurrence of the candidate gene together with the terms denoting GV in full-text PubMed Central articles was carried out as follows. All articles mentioning GV were found in PubMed Central interface (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/) by the query: “glucose variability” OR “glycemic variability” OR “glycemia variability” OR “glucose fluctuations” OR “glycemic fluctuations” OR “sugar fluctuations” OR “glucose fluctuation” OR “glycemic fluctuation” OR “sugar fluctuation” OR “glucose excursions” OR “glycemic excursions” OR “unstable blood glucose” OR “fluctuating blood glucose”. For each candidate gene, all articles in PubMed Central mentioning this gene were counted. All articles in which the candidate gene name and a list of terms denoting GV occurred simultaneously were counted. Further, using these numbers, statistical significance of the co-occurrence of names of genes-candidates and GV was assessed. For this, a hypergeometric distribution, implemented in the hypergeom.sf function of the scipy.stats package [124] of the Python programming language, was used. The false discovery rate (FDR) correction (https://www.sdmproject.com/utilities/?show=FDR) for the multiple comparisons was carried out using the “Signed Differential Mapping” tool [125].
The correlation between the rank of a candidate gene and the probability of meeting the name of this gene together with terms denoting glycemic variability in full-text articles of PubMed Central was estimated using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. For this, the stats.spearmanr function of the scipy.stats package [124] of the Python programming language was utilized.
Search for Series of experiments of gene expression was performed in GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/info/) by query: “a phrase denoting GV” AND (diabetic OR diabetes). The following phrases one by one have been used as “a phrase denoting GV”: “glucose variability”, “glycemic variability”, “glycemia variability”, “glucose fluctuations”, “glycemic fluctuations”, “sugar fluctuations”, “glucose fluctuation”, “glycemic fluctuation”, “sugar fluctuation”, “glucose excursions”, “glycaemia excursions”, “unstable blood glucose”, “fluctuating blood glucose”. The open experimental data used in our work [116] have the GEO ID: GSE40779 and are available by the link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE40779. The target genes of differentially expressed miRNAs were extracted from the miRTarBase database [117]. Human genes that are orthologous of Rattus norvegicus genes, targeted by differentially expressed miRNAs, were found using the NCBI Orthologs service (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/kis/info/how-are-orthologs-calculated/). Assessment of the statistical significance of the enrichment of candidate-gene list by genes, targeted by differentially expressed miRNAs, was performed using a hypergeometric distribution. For this purpose, we used the hypergeom.sf function of the scipy.stats package [124] of the Python programming language.

4. Conclusions

The identification of the molecular effects of GV in diabetes and its complications is a new challenge for Endocrinology and Molecular Medicine. In this study, we have performed for the first time the reconstruction and analysis of the GV-related network, using the bioinformatics analysis and text mining of publications indexed in PubMed. Firstly, we had constructed the network of GV, which included 37 genes/proteins related to both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. In this network, we have identified the genes of hormones regulating glucose metabolism, proinflammatory cytokines, growth factors, regulators of insulin secretion and signaling, transcriptional factors, and other molecules. The cardiovascular system, pancreas, adipose and muscle tissues, gastrointestinal tract, and kidney were recognized as the loci with the highest expression of GV-related genes. We have identified regulation of insulin secretion, glucose homeostasis, as well as some signaling pathways, which are involved in the regulation of cellular metabolism (MAPK cascade, protein kinase B signaling, JAK-STAT cascade, regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylation), cell cycle (regulation of mitotic nuclear division and cell proliferation), and cell-cell signaling among biological processes that are most actively regulated by GV-related genes. We have shown that GV-related genes are central to the networks of diabetic complications, including cardiovascular disease, diabetic nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy. Finally, we have identified new candidate genes (THBS1, FN1, HSP90AA1, EGFR, MAPK1, STAT3, TP53, EGF, GSK3B, and PTEN), promising for experimental verification of their role in the GV phenomenon. The obtained results provide further possibilities for the identification of new molecular markers and therapeutic targets in diabetes and its complications.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/22/8691/s1. Figure S1: View of the gene network of hyperglycemia reconstructed using the ANDSystem. Figure S2: View of the gene network of hypoglycemia reconstructed using the ANDSystem. Figure S3: View of the gene network, associated with cardiovascular disease, reconstructed using the ANDSystem. Figure S4: View of the gene network, associated with diabetic nephropathy, reconstructed using the ANDSystem. Figure S5: View of the gene network, associated with diabetic retinopathy, reconstructed using the ANDSystem. Figure S6: View of the gene network, associated with diabetic neuropathy, reconstructed using the ANDSystem. Table S1: Interactions between participants of the gene network associated with hyperglycemia. Table S2: Interactions between participants of the gene network associated with hypoglycemia. Table S3: gene network associated with glycemic variability. Table S4: Bgee expression analysis. Table S5: Interactions between participants of the gene networks associated with cardiovascular disease. Table S6: Interactions between participants of the gene networks associated with diabetic nephropathy. Table S7: Interactions between participants of the gene networks associated with diabetic retinopathy. Table S8: Interactions between participants of the gene networks associated with diabetic neuropathy. Table S9: GO enrichment analysis for glycemic variability genes found in diabetes complications. Table S10: ToppGene prioritization results. Table S11: co-occurrence of candidates with glycemic variability in PubMed Central. Table S12: analysis of differentially expressed miRNAs from GSE40779 experiment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.V.K. and O.V.S; methodology, V.V.K. and O.V.S.; investigation, V.V.K. and O.V.S.; writing—original draft preparation, V.V.K. and O.V.S.; writing—review and editing, V.V.K. and O.V.S.; visualization, O.V.S.; supervision, V.V.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Grant of Russian Science Foundation (20-15-00057).

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Vladimir Ivanisenko (ICG SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia) and Pavel Demenkov (ICG SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia) for the advices concerning bioinformatics approaches valuable for the performed analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

FDRFalse discovery rate
EGFEpidermal growth factor
ERKExtracellular signal-regulated kinase
GOGene ontology
GSK3BGlycogen synthase kinase 3 beta
GVGlucose variability
HIFHypoxia-inducible factor
Hsp90αHeat shock protein 90α
IDIdentification number
MAPKMitogen-activated protein kinase
PTENPhosphatase and tensin homolog
miRNAsmicroRNAs
STAT3Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3
THSP1Thrombospondin 1

References

  1. Wilmot, E.G.; Choudhary, P.; Leelarathna, L.; Baxter, M. Glycaemic variability: The under-recognized therapeutic target in type 1 diabetes care. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2019, 21, 2599–2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ceriello, A.; Monnier, L.; Owens, D. Glycaemic variability in diabetes: Clinical and therapeutic implications. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019, 7, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Longato, E.; Acciaroli, G.; Facchinetti, A.; Maran, A.; Sparacino, G. Simple Linear Support Vector Machine Classifier Can Distinguish Impaired Glucose Tolerance Versus Type 2 Diabetes Using a Reduced Set of CGM-Based Glycemic Variability Indices. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2020, 14, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wadén, J.; Forsblom, C.; Thorn, L.M.; Gordin, D.; Saraheimo, M.; Groop, P.H. Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy Study Group. A1C variability predicts incident cardiovascular events, microalbuminuria, and overt diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2009, 58, 2649–2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Hirakawa, Y.; Arima, H.; Zoungas, S.; Ninomiya, T.; Cooper, M.; Hamet, P.; Mancia, G.; Poulter, N.; Harrap, S.; Woodward, M.; et al. Impact of visit-to-visit glycemic variability on the risks of macrovascular and microvascular events and all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes: The ADVANCE trial. Diabetes Care 2014, 37, 2359–2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Wang, C.; Song, J.; Ma, Z.; Yang, W.; Li, C.; Zhang, X.; Hou, X.; Sun, Y.; Lin, P.; Liang, K.; et al. Fluctuation between fasting and 2-H postload glucose state is associated with chronic kidney disease in previously diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients with HbA1c ≥7%. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e102941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hsieh, Y.T.; Hsieh, M.C. Fasting plasma glucose variability is an independent risk factor for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema in type 2 diabetes: An 8-year prospective cohort study. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2020, 48, 470–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, S.; Tang, X.; Luo, Y.; Wu, B.; Huang, Z.; Li, Z.; Peng, L.; Ling, Y.; Zhu, J.; Zhong, J.; et al. Impact of long-term glucose variability on coronary atherosclerosis progression in patients with type 2 diabetes: A 2.3 year follow-up study. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2020, 19, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, C.D.; Shen, Y.; Ding, F.H.; Yang, Z.K.; Hu, J.; Shen, W.F.; Zhang, R.Y.; Lu, L.; Wang, X.Q. Visit-to-visit fasting plasma glucose variability is associated with left ventricular adverse remodeling in diabetic patients with STEMI. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2020, 19, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cardoso, C.R.L.; Leite, N.C.; Moram, C.B.M.; Salles, G.F. Long-term visit-to-visit glycemic variability as predictor of micro- and macrovascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes: The Rio de Janeiro Type 2 Diabetes Cohort Study. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2018, 17, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Muggeo, M.; Zoppini, G.; Bonora, E.; Brun, E.; Bonadonna, R.C.; Moghetti, P.; Verlato, G. Fasting plasma glucose variability predicts 10-year survival of type 2 diabetic patients: The Verona Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 2000, 23, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Zinman, B.; Marso, S.P.; Poulter, N.R.; Emerson, S.S.; Pieber, T.R.; Pratley, R.E.; Lange, M.; Brown-Frandsen, K.; Moses, A.; Ocampo Francisco, A.M.; et al. DEVOTE Study Group. Day-to-day fasting glycaemic variability in DEVOTE: Associations with severe hypoglycaemia and cardiovascular outcomes (DEVOTE 2). Diabetologia 2018, 61, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Klimontov, V.V.; Myakina, N.E. Glucose variability indices predict the episodes of nocturnal hypoglycemia in elderly type 2 diabetic patients treated with insulin. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 2017, 11, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gómez, A.M.; Henao, D.C.; Imitola Madero, A.; Taboada, L.B.; Cruz, V.; Robledo Gómez, M.A.; Rondón, M.; Muñoz-Velandia, O.; García-Jaramillo, M.; León Vargas, F.M. Defining High Glycemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes: Comparison of Multiple Indexes to Identify Patients at Risk of Hypoglycemia. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2019, 21, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ceriello, A.; Esposito, K.; Piconi, L.; Ihnat, M.A.; Thorpe, J.E.; Testa, R.; Boemi, M.; Giugliano, D. Oscillating glucose is more deleterious to endothelial function and oxidative stress than mean glucose in normal and type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes 2008, 57, 1349–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Liu, T.S.; Pei, Y.H.; Peng, Y.P.; Chen, J.; Jiang, S.S.; Gong, J.B. Oscillating high glucose enhances oxidative stress and apoptosis in human coronary artery endothelial cells. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2014, 37, 645–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Momozono, A.; Kodera, Y.; Sasaki, S.; Nakagawa, Y.; Konno, R.; Shichiri, M. Oxidised Met147 of human serum albumin is a biomarker of oxidative stress, reflecting glycaemic fluctuations and hypoglycaemia in diabetes. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ceriello, A.; Novials, A.; Ortega, E.; Canivell, S.; La Sala, L.; Pujadas, G.; Esposito, K.; Giugliano, D.; Genovese, S. Glucagon-like peptide 1 reduces endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and oxidative stress induced by both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2013, 36, 2346–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Klimontov, V.V.; Tyan, N.V.; Fazullina, O.N.; Myakina, N.E.; Orlov, N.B.; Konenkov, V.I. Acute-phase serum proteins and adipocytokines in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Relationships with body composition and blood glucose fluctuations. Ter. Arkh. 2016, 88, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jin, G.; Wang, Q.; Pei, X.; Li, X.; Hu, X.; Xu, E.; Li, M. mRNAs expression profiles of high glucose-induced memory in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2019, 12, 1249–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Brunskill, E.W.; Potter, S.S. Changes in the gene expression programs of renal mesangial cells during diabetic nephropathy. BMC Nephrol. 2012, 13, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Hall, E.; Nitert, M.D.; Volkov, P.; Malmgren, S.; Mulder, H.; Bacos, K.; Ling, C. The effects of high glucose exposure on global gene expression and DNA methylation in human pancreatic islets. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2018, 472, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. El-Osta, A.; Brasacchio, D.; Yao, D.; Pocai, A.; Jones, P.L.; Roeder, R.G.; Cooper, M.E.; Brownlee, M. Transient high glucose causes persistent epigenetic changes and altered gene expression during subsequent normoglycemia. J. Exp. Med. 2008, 205, 2409–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yunlei, D.; Qiuling, F.; Xu, W.; Qianwen, Z.; Xu, C.; Li, X.; Lining, W. Transient High-Glucose Stimulation Induces Persistent Inflammatory Factor Secretion from Rat Glomerular Mesangial Cells via an Epigenetic Mechanism. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 49, 1747–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Heng, B.C.; Aubel, D.; Fussenegger, M. Prosthetic gene networks as an alternative to standard pharmacotherapies for metabolic disorders. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2015, 35, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Conte, F.; Fiscon, G.; Licursi, V.; Bizzarri, D.; D’Antò, T.; Farina, L.; Paci, P. A paradigm shift in medicine: A comprehensive review of network-based approaches. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 2020, 1863, 194416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fernández-Tajes, J.; Gaulton, K.J.; van de Bunt, M.; Torres, J.; Thurner, M.; Mahajan, A.; Gloyn, A.L.; Lage, K.; McCarthy, M.I. Developing a network view of type 2 diabetes risk pathways through integration of genetic, genomic and functional data. Genome Med. 2019, 11, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Geng, X.D.; Wang, W.W.; Feng, Z.; Liu, R.; Cheng, X.L.; Shen, W.J.; Dong, Z.Y.; Cai, G.Y.; Chen, X.M.; Hong, Q.; et al. Identification of key genes and pathways in diabetic nephropathy by bioinformatics analysis. J. Diabetes Investig. 2019, 10, 972–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lu, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, G.; Lu, H. Identification of potential markers for type 2 diabetes mellitus via bioinformatics analysis. Mol. Med. Rep. 2020, 22, 1868–1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, H.; Cheng, Y.; Yan, Z.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J. Mining the proliferative diabetic retinopathy-associated genes and pathways by integrated bioinformatic analysis. Int. Ophthalmol. 2020, 40, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dias, R.; Torkamani, A. Artificial intelligence in clinical and genomic diagnostics. Genome Med. 2019, 11, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Rebholz-Schuhmann, D.; Oellrich, A.; Hoehndorf, R. Text-mining solutions for biomedical research: Enabling integrative biology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13, 829–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ivanisenko, V.A.; Saik, O.V.; Ivanisenko, N.V.; Tiys, E.S.; Ivanisenko, T.V.; Demenkov, P.S.; Kolchanov, N.A. ANDSystem: An Associative Network Discovery System for automated literature mining in the field of biology. BMC Syst. Biol. 2015, 9, S2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Ivanisenko, V.A.; Demenkov, P.S.; Ivanisenko, T.V.; Mishchenko, E.L.; Saik, O.V. A new version of the ANDSystem tool for automatic extraction of knowledge from scientific publications with expanded functionality for reconstruction of associative gene networks by considering tissue-specific gene expression. BMC Bioinform. 2019, 20, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kim, T.W.; Jeong, J.H.; Hong, S.C. The impact of sleep and circadian disturbance on hormones and metabolism. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2015, 2015, 591729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Howes, O.D.; Smith, S.; Gaughran, F.P.; Amiel, S.A.; Murray, R.M.; Pilowsky, L.S. The relationship between prolactin levels and glucose homeostasis in antipsychotic treated schizophrenic patients. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2006, 26, 629–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Wang, T.; Lu, J.; Xu, Y.; Li, M.; Sun, J.; Zhang, J.; Xu, B.; Xu, M.; Chen, Y.; Bi, Y.; et al. Circulating prolactin associates with diabetes and impaired glucose regulation: A population-based study. Diabetes Care 2013, 36, 1974–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Lissoni, P.; Rovelli, F.; Brivio, F.; Brivio, O.; Fumagalli, L. Circadian secretions of IL-2, IL-12, IL-6 and IL-10 in relation to the light/dark rhythm of the pineal hormone melatonin in healthy humans. Nat. Immun. 1998, 16, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Carey, A.L.; Febbraio, M.A. Interleukin-6 and insulin sensitivity: Friend or foe? Diabetologia 2004, 47, 1135–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Piconi, L.; Quagliaro, L.; Assaloni, R.; Da Ros, R.; Maier, A.; Zuodar, G.; Ceriello, A. Constant and intermittent high glucose enhances endothelial cell apoptosis through mitochondrial superoxide overproduction. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2006, 22, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Buscemi, S.; Verga, S.; Cottone, S.; Azzolina, V.; Buscemi, B.; Gioia, D.; Cerasola, G. Glycaemic variability and inflammation in subjects with metabolic syndrome. Acta Diabetol. 2009, 46, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ceriello, A.; Novials, A.; Ortega, E.; Canivell, S.; La Sala, L.; Pujadas, G.; Bucciarelli, L.; Rondinelli, M.; Genovese, S. Vitamin C further improves the protective effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 on acute hypoglycemia-induced oxidative stress, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2013, 36, 4104–4108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Aarthy, R.; Aston-Mourney, K.; Mikocka-Walus, A.; Radha, V.; Amutha, A.; Anjana, R.M.; Unnikrishnan, R.; Mohan, V. Clinical features, complications and treatment of rarer forms of maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY)—A review. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2020, 107640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Christensen, A.S.; Hædersdal, S.; Støy, J.; Storgaard, H.; Kampmann, U.; Forman, J.L.; Seghieri, M.; Holst, J.J.; Hansen, T.; Knop, F.K.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of Glimepiride With or Without Linagliptin Treatment in Patients With HNF1A Diabetes (Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young Type 3): A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Trial (GLIMLINA). Diabetes Care 2020, 43, 2025–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ovsyannikova, A.K.; Rymar, O.D.; Shakhtshneider, E.V.; Klimontov, V.V.; Koroleva, E.A.; Myakina, N.E.; Voevoda, M.I. ABCC8-Related Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY12): Clinical Features and Treatment Perspective. Diabetes Ther. 2016, 7, 591–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Takeuchi, T.; Ishigaki, Y.; Hirota, Y.; Hasegawa, Y.; Yorifuji, T.; Kadowaki, H.; Akamizu, T.; Ogawa, W.; Katagiri, H. Clinical characteristics of insulin resistance syndromes: A nationwide survey in Japan. J. Diabetes Investig. 2020, 11, 603–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Sethi, A.; Foulds, N.; Ehtisham, S.; Ahmed, S.H.; Houghton, J.; Colclough, K.; Didi, M.; Flanagan, S.E.; Senniappan, S. Heterozygous Insulin Receptor (INSR) Mutation associated with Neonatal Hyperinsulinemic Hypoglycaemia and Familial Diabetes Mellitus: Case Series. J. Clin. Res. Pediatr. Endocrinol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Billings, L.K.; Florez, J.C. The genetics of type 2 diabetes: What have we learned from GWAS? Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2010, 1212, 59–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bastian, F.B.; Roux, J.; Niknejad, A.; Comte, A.; Costa, S.S.F.; De Farias, T.M.; Moretti, S.; Parmentier, G.; De Laval, V.R.; Rosikiewicz, M.; et al. The Bgee suite: Integrated curated expression atlas and comparative transcriptomics in animals. BioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sherman, B.T.; Lempicki, R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Salmon, A.B. Oxidative stress in the etiology of age-associated decline in glucose metabolism. Longev. Healthspan 2012, 1, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Ceriello, A. Oxidative stress and glycemic regulation. Metabolism 2000, 49, 27–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Younus, H.; Anwar, S. Prevention of non-enzymatic glycosylation (glycation): Implication in the treatment of diabetic complication. Int. J. Health Sci. 2016, 10, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Singh, V.P.; Bali, A.; Singh, N.; Jaggi, A.S. Advanced glycation end products and diabetic complications. Korean, J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2014, 18, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Corre, I.; Paris, F.; Huot, J. The p38 pathway, a major pleiotropic cascade that transduces stress and metastatic signals in endothelial cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 55684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Meza, C.A.; La Favor, J.D.; Kim, D.H.; Hickner, R.C. Endothelial Dysfunction: Is There a Hyperglycemia-Induced Imbalance of NOX and NOS? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Pirri, D.; Fragiadaki, M.; Evans, P.C. Diabetic atherosclerosis: Is there a role for the hypoxia-inducible factors? BioSci. Rep. 2020, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Packer, M. Mechanisms Leading to Differential Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Signaling in the Diabetic Kidney: Modulation by SGLT2 Inhibitors and Hypoxia Mimetics. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, H.Y.; Yuan, Y.; Fu, Y.H.; Wang, Y.; Gao, X.Y. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α: A promising therapeutic target for vasculopathy in diabetic retinopathy. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 159, 104924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ichiki, T.; Sunagawa, K. Novel roles of hypoxia response system in glucose metabolism and obesity. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2014, 24, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Duennwald, T.; Gatterer, H.; Groop, P.H.; Burtscher, M.; Bernardi, L. Effects of a single bout of interval hypoxia on cardiorespiratory control and blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2013, 36, 2183–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Kaur, R.; Kaur, M.; Singh, J. Endothelial dysfunction and platelet hyperactivity in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Molecular insights and therapeutic strategies. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2018, 17, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Pouysségur, J.; Lenormand, P. ERK1 and ERK2 map kinases: Specific roles or functional redundancy? Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2016, 4, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Briaud, I.; Lingohr, M.K.; Dickson, L.M.; Wrede, C.E.; Rhodes, C.J. Differential activation mechanisms of Erk-1/2 and p70(S6K) by glucose in pancreatic beta-cells. Diabetes 2003, 52, 974–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Ozaki, K.I.; Awazu, M.; Tamiya, M.; Iwasaki, Y.; Harada, A.; Kugisaki, S.; Tanimura, S.; Kohno, M. Targeting the ERK signaling pathway as a potential treatment for insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 310, E643–E651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Xu, Z.; Sun, J.; Tong, Q.; Lin, Q.; Qian, L.; Park, Y.; Zheng, Y. The Role of ERK1/2 in the Development of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Li, X.; Wang, L.; Ma, H. Betaine alleviates high glucose induced mesangial cell proliferation by inhibiting cell proliferation and extracellular matrix deposition via the AKT/ERK1/2/p38 MAPK pathway. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019, 20, 1754–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chen, J.; Aronow, B.J.; Jegga, A.G. Disease candidate gene identification and prioritization using protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Zhao, C.; Isenberg, J.S.; Popel, A.S. Human expression patterns: Qualitative and quantitative analysis of thrombospondin-1 under physiological and pathological conditions. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2018, 22, 2086–2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Choi, K.Y.; Kim, D.B.; Kim, M.J.; Kwon, B.J.; Chang, S.Y.; Jang, S.W.; Cho, E.J.; Rho, T.H.; Kim, J.H. Higher plasma thrombospondin-1 levels in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Korean Circ. J. 2012, 42, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. James, L.R.; Le, C.; Doherty, H.; Kim, H.S.; Maeda, N. Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) expression modulates response to high glucose. PLoS ONE. 2013, 8, e70441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Zhang, K.; Li, M.; Yin, L.; Fu, G.; Liu, Z. Role of thrombospondin 1 and thrombospondin 2 in cardiovascular diseases (Review). Int. J. Mol. Med. 2020, 45, 1275–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Xu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Xu, Y. Thrombospondin-1: A Key Protein That Induces Fibrosis in Diabetic Complications. J. Diabetes Res. 2020, 2020, 8043135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Osz, K.; Ross, M.; Petrik, J. The thrombospondin-1 receptor CD36 is an important mediator of ovarian angiogenesis and folliculogenesis. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2014, 12, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Yamauchi, Y.; Kuroki, M.; Imakiire, T.; Abe, H.; Uchida, H.; Beppu, R.; Yamashita, Y.; Kuroki, M.; Shirakusa, T. Thrombospondin-1 differentially regulates release of IL-6 and IL-10 by human monocytic cell line U937. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 290, 1551–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Wasmuth, H.E.; Kunz, D.; Graf, J.; Stanzel, S.; Purucker, E.A.; Koch, A.; Gartung, C.; Heintz, B.; Gressner, A.M.; Matern, S.; et al. Hyperglycemia at admission to the intensive care unit is associated with elevated serum concentrations of interleukin-6 and reduced ex vivo secretion of tumor necrosis factor-α. Crit. Care Med. 2004, 32, 1109–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Dotson, S.; Freeman, R.; Failing, H.J.; Adler, G.K. Hypoglycemia increases serum interleukin-6 levels in healthy men and women. Diabetes Care 2008, 31, 1222–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Jayaguru, P.; Joaquin, M.; Mohr, S. Interleukin-10, a Potent Counter Regulator of the Hyperglycemia-Induced Pro-Inflammatory Interleukin-1 Signaling in Müller Cells. Investig. Ophthal. Vis. Sci. 2013, 54, 3691. [Google Scholar]
  79. Amodeo, V.; Bazan, V.; Fanale, D.; Insalaco, L.; Caruso, S.; Cicero, G.; Bronte, G.; Rolfo, C.; Santini, D.; Russo, A. Effects of anti-miR-182 on TSP-1 expression in human colon cancer cells: There is a sense in antisense? Exp. Opin. Ther. Targets 2013, 17, 1249–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Yamashiro, Y.; Thang, B.Q.; Shin, S.J.; Lino, C.A.; Nakamura, T.; Kim, J.; Sugiyama, K.; Tokunaga, C.; Sakamoto, H.; Osaka, M.; et al. Role of thrombospondin-1 in mechanotransduction and development of thoracic aortic aneurysm in mouse and humans. Circ. Res. 2018, 123, 660–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Vedantham, S.; Thiagarajan, D.; Ananthakrishnan, R.; Wang, L.; Rosario, R.; Zou, Y.S.; Goldberg, I.; Yan, S.F.; Schmidt, A.M.; Ramasamy, R. Aldose reductase drives hyperacetylation of Egr-1 in hyperglycemia and consequent upregulation of proinflammatory and prothrombotic signals. Diabetes 2014, 63, 761–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Ban, C.R.; Twigg, S.M. Fibrosis in diabetes complications: Pathogenic mechanisms and circulating and urinary markers. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2008, 4, 575–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Miller, C.G.; Budoff, G.; Prenner, J.L.; Schwarzbauer, J.E. Minireview: Fibronectin in retinal disease. Exp. Biol. Med. 2017, 242, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Tada, H.; Isogai, S. The fibronectin production is increased by thrombospondin via activation of TGF-beta in cultured human mesangial cells. Nephron 1998, 79, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Qin, D.; Jiang, Y.R.; Meng, Z. Gremlin in the Vitreous of Patients with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy and the Downregulation of Gremlin in Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells. J. Diabetes Res. 2020, 2020, 9238742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Zuehlke, A.D.; Beebe, K.; Neckers, L.; Prince, T. Regulation and function of the human HSP90AA1 gene. Gene 2015, 570, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Fu, F.; Wei, X.; Liu, J.; Mi, N. Bioinformatic analysis of specific genes in diabetic nephropathy. Ren. Fail. 2015, 37, 1219–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Qi, M.; Zhou, Q.; Zeng, W.; Wu, L.; Zhao, S.; Chen, W.; Luo, C.; Shen, M.; Zhang, J.; Tang, C.E. Growth factors in the pathogenesis of diabetic foot ulcers. Front. BioSci. 2018, 23, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Stern, C.; Schreier, B.; Nolze, A.; Rabe, S.; Mildenberger, S.; Gekle, M. Knockout of vascular smooth muscle EGF receptor in a mouse model prevents obesity-induced vascular dysfunction and renal damage in vivo. Diabetologia 2020, 63, 2218–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kyohara, M.; Shirakawa, J.; Okuyama, T.; Togashi, Y.; Inoue, R.; Li, J.; Miyashita, D.; Terauchi, Y. Soluble EGFR, a hepatokine, and adipsin, an adipokine, are biomarkers correlated with distinct aspects of insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes subjects. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2020, 12, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Liu, X.; Feng, M.; Dai, C.; Bao, X.; Deng, K.; Yao, Y.; Wang, R. Expression of EGFR in Pituitary Corticotroph Adenomas and Its Relationship with Tumor Behavior. Front. Endocr. 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Chen, H.; Simar, D.; Morris, M.J. Maternal obesity impairs brain glucose metabolism and neural response to hyperglycemia in male rat offspring. J. Neurochem. 2014, 129, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Takaoka, M.; Harada, H.; Andl, C.D.; Oyama, K.; Naomoto, Y.; Dempsey, K.L.; Klein-Szanto, A.J.; El-Deiry, W.S.; Grimberg, A.; Nakagawa, H. Epidermal growth factor receptor regulates aberrant expression of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 7711–7723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Hanafusa, T.; Shinji, T.; Shiraha, H.; Nouso, K.; Iwasaki, Y.; Yumoto, E.; Ono, T.; Koide, N. Functional promoter upstream p53 regulatory sequence of IGFBP3 that is silenced by tumor specific methylation. BMC Cancer 2005, 5, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Zhang, L.; Zhan, Q.; Zhan, S.; Kashanchi, F.; Fornace, A.J., Jr.; Seth, P.; Helman, L.J. p53 regulates human insulin-like growth factor II gene expression through active P4 promoter in rhabdomyosarcoma cells. DNA Cell Biol. 1998, 17, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kupreeva, M.; Diane, A.; Lehner, R.; Watts, R.; Ghosh, M.; Proctor, S.; Vine, D. Effect of metformin and flutamide on insulin, lipogenic and androgen-estrogen signaling, and cardiometabolic risk in a PCOS-prone metabolic syndrome rodent model. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 316, E16–E33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lawan, A.; Bennett, A.M. Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Regulation in Hepatic Metabolism. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 28, 868–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kujiraoka, T.; Satoh, Y.; Ayaori, M.; Shiraishi, Y.; Arai-Nakaya, Y.; Hakuno, D.; Yada, H.; Kuwada, N.; Endo, S.; Isoda, K.; et al. Hepatic extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 suppresses endoplasmic reticulum stress and protects from oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2013, 2, e000361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Weng, Q.; Zhao, M.; Zheng, J.; Yang, L.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Yang, B.; Richard Lu, Q.; et al. STAT3 dictates β-cell apoptosis by modulating PTEN in streptozocin-induced hyperglycemia. Cell Death Differ. 2020, 27, 130–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Inoue, H.; Ogawa, W.; Ozaki, M.; Haga, S.; Matsumoto, M.; Furukawa, K.; Hashimoto, N.; Kido, Y.; Mori, T.; Sakaue, H.; et al. Role of STAT-3 in regulation of hepatic gluconeogenic genes and carbohydrate metabolism in vivo. Nat. Med. 2004, 10, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Mashili, F.; Chibalin, A.V.; Krook, A.; Zierath, J.R. Constitutive STAT3 phosphorylation contributes to skeletal muscle insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2013, 62, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Jiang, L.; Cui, H.; Ding, J. Smad3 signalling affects high glucose-induced podocyte injury via regulation of the cytoskeletal protein transgelin. Nephrology 2020, 25, 659–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Zheng, C.; Huang, L.; Luo, W.; Yu, W.; Hu, X.; Guan, X.; Cai, Y.; Zou, C.; Yin, H.; Xu, Z.; et al. Inhibition of STAT3 in tubular epithelial cells prevents kidney fibrosis and nephropathy in STZ-induced diabetic mice. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Wang, Y.; Zhai, W.L.; Yang, Y.W. Association between NDRG2/IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway and diabetic retinopathy in rats. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020, 24, 3476–3484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Geng, S.; Zhu, W.; Wang, S.; Xie, C.; Li, X.; Wu, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Meng, Y.; et al. P53 modulates hepatic insulin sensitivity through NF-κB and p38/ERK MAPK pathways. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 495, 2139–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Kung, C.P.; Murphy, M.E. The role of the p53 tumor suppressor in metabolism and diabetes. J. Endocrinol. 2016, 231, R61–R75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Sliwinska, A.; Kasznicki, J.; Kosmalski, M.; Mikolajczyk, M.; Rogalska, A.; Przybylowska, K.; Majsterek, I.; Drzewoski, J. Tumour protein 53 is linked with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Indian J. Med. Res. 2017, 146, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. MacAulay, K.; Woodgett, J.R. Targeting glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets. 2008, 12, 1265–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Pitasi, C.L.; Liu, J.; Gausserès, B.; Pommier, G.; Delangre, E.; Armanet, M.; Cattan, P.; Mégarbane, B.; Hanak, A.S.; Maouche, K.; et al. Implication of glycogen synthase kinase 3 in diabetes-associated islet inflammation. J. Endocrinol. 2020, 244, 133–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lappas, M. GSK3β is increased in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle from women with gestational diabetes where it regulates the inflammatory response. PLoS ONE. 2014, 9, e115854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Ying, C.; Liu, T.; Ling, H.; Cheng, M.; Zhou, X.; Wang, S.; Mao, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhang, R.; Li, W. Glucose variability aggravates cardiac fibrosis by altering AKT signalling path. Diab. Vasc. Dis. Res. 2017, 14, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Chen, C.Y.; Chen, J.; He, L.; Stiles, B.L. PTEN: Tumor Suppressor and Metabolic Regulator. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Pal, A.; Barber, T.M.; Van de Bunt, M.; Rudge, S.A.; Zhang, Q.; Lachlan, K.L.; Cooper, N.S.; Linden, H.; Levy, J.C.; Wakelam, M.J.; et al. PTEN mutations as a cause of constitutive insulin sensitivity and obesity. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 1002–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Gao, J.R.; Qin, X.J.; Fang, Z.H.; Li-Shan Han, L.P.; Hui-Jiang Guo, M.F.; Jiang, N.N. To Explore the Pathogenesis of Vascular Lesion of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Based on the PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathway. J. Diabetes Res. 2019, 2019, 4650906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Khokhar, M.; Roy, D.; Modi, A.; Agarwal, R.; Yadav, D.; Purohit, P.; Sharma, P. Perspectives on the role of PTEN in diabetic nephropathy: An update. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2020, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Saito, S.; Thuc, L.C.; Teshima, Y.; Nakada, C.; Nishio, S.; Kondo, H.; Fukui, A.; Abe, I.; Ebata, Y.; Saikawa, T.; et al. Glucose fluctuations aggravate cardiac susceptibility to ischemia/reperfusion injury by modulating microRNAs expression. Circ. J. 2016, 80, 186–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Huang, H.Y.; Lin, Y.C.D.; Li, J.; Huang, K.Y.; Shrestha, S.; Hong, H.C.; Tang, Y.; Chen, Y.G.; Jin, C.N.; Yu, Y.; et al. miRTarBase 2020: Updates to the experimentally validated microRNA–target interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, D148–D154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Demenkov, P.S.; Ivanisenko, T.V.; Kolchanov, N.A.; Ivanisenko, V.A. ANDVisio: A new tool for graphic visualization and analysis of literature mined associative gene networks in the ANDSystem. Silico Biol. 2012, 11, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Bragina, E.Y.; Tiys, E.S.; Freidin, M.B.; Koneva, L.A.; Demenkov, P.S.; Ivanisenko, V.A.; Kolchanov, N.A.; Puzyrev, V.P. Insights into pathophysiology of dystropy through the analysis of gene networks: An example of bronchial asthma and tuberculosis. Immunogenetics 2014, 66, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Glotov, A.S.; Tiys, E.S.; Vashukova, E.S.; Pakin, V.S.; Demenkov, P.S.; Saik, O.V.; Ivanisenko, T.V.; Arzhanova, O.N.; Mozgovaya, E.V.; Zainulina, M.S.; et al. Molecular association of pathogenetic contributors to pre-eclampsia (pre-eclampsia associome). BMC Syst. Biol. 2015, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  121. Saik, O.V.; Konovalova, N.A.; Demenkov, P.S.; Ivanisenko, T.V.; Petrovskiy, E.D.; Ivanisenko, N.V.; Ivanoshchuk, D.E.; Ponomareva, M.N.; Konovalova, O.S.; Lavrik, I.N.; et al. Molecular associations of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma with potential comorbid diseases (POAG-associome). Biotecnol. Apl. 2016, 33, 3201–3206. [Google Scholar]
  122. Saik, O.V.; Demenkov, P.S.; Ivanisenko, T.V.; Bragina, E.Y.; Freidin, M.B.; Goncharova, I.A.; Dosenko, V.E.; Zolotareva, O.I.; Hofestaedt, R.; Lavrik, I.N.; et al. Novel candidate genes important for asthma and hypertension comorbidity revealed from associative gene networks. BMC Med. Genom. 2018, 11, 61–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Saik, O.V.; Nimaev, V.V.; Usmonov, D.B.; Demenkov, P.S.; Ivanisenko, T.V.; Lavrik, I.N.; Ivanisenko, V.A. Prioritization of genes involved in endothelial cell apoptosis by their implication in lymphedema using an analysis of associative gene networks with ANDSystem. BMC Med. Genom. 2019, 12, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Virtanen, P.; Gommers, R.; Oliphant, T.E.; Haberland, M.; Reddy, T.; Cournapeau, D.; Burovski, E.; Peterson, P.; Weckesser, W.; Bright, J.; et al. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 2020, 17, 261–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Radua, J.; Mataix-Cols, D. Meta-analytic methods for neuroimaging data explained. Biol. Mood Anxiety Disord. 2012, 2, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. A network of the interactions of genes and proteins associated with both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia (glucose variability (GV))-related genes), reconstructed by the ANDSystem.
Figure 1. A network of the interactions of genes and proteins associated with both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia (glucose variability (GV))-related genes), reconstructed by the ANDSystem.
Ijms 21 08691 g001
Figure 2. Regulatory network of interactions between THBS1 and GV-related genes.
Figure 2. Regulatory network of interactions between THBS1 and GV-related genes.
Ijms 21 08691 g002
Table 1. The genes demonstrating the largest number of connections in the gene network of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia.
Table 1. The genes demonstrating the largest number of connections in the gene network of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia.
Gene SymbolGene ProductNumber of Connections
INSinsulin59
IL6interleukin 644
ALBalbumin37
GCGglucagon33
LEPleptin30
IGF1insulin-like growth factor 129
SSTsomatostatin29
IL1Binterleukin 1 beta28
ADIPOQadiponectin, C1Q, and collagen domain containing28
PRLprolactin27
Table 2. Gene Ontology biological processes overrepresented (p-values with false discovery rate (FDR) correction < 0.05) for a group of GV-related genes, identified with the DAVID service.
Table 2. Gene Ontology biological processes overrepresented (p-values with false discovery rate (FDR) correction < 0.05) for a group of GV-related genes, identified with the DAVID service.
Gene Ontology Biological ProcessesGene Ontology IDp-Values with FDR Correction
Regulation of insulin secretionGO:00507961.38 × 10−9
Glucose homeostasisGO:00425932.06 × 10−6
Positive regulation of MAPK cascadeGO:00434102.31 × 10−5
Positive regulation of protein kinase B signalingGO:00518972.88 × 10−5
Positive regulation of glycogen biosynthetic processGO:00457253.24 × 10−5
Positive regulation of mitotic nuclear divisionGO:00458403.49 × 10−4
Glucose metabolic processGO:00060063.92 × 10−4
Positive regulation of nitric oxide biosynthetic processGO:00454293 × 10−4
Negative regulation of gluconeogenesisGO:00457214 × 10−4
Positive regulation of cell proliferationGO:00082842.8 × 10−3
Cellular protein metabolic processGO:00442674.5 × 10−3
Positive regulation of smooth muscle cell proliferationGO:00486616.2 × 10−3
Positive regulation of JAK-STAT cascadeGO:00464276.6 × 10−3
Cell-cell signalingGO:00072671.08 × 10−2
Positive regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationGO:00507311.9 × 10−2
Positive regulation of glucose importGO:00463261.94 × 10−2
Table 3. Characterization of gene networks of the diabetes complications, taking into account the coefficients of betweenness centrality of their participants.
Table 3. Characterization of gene networks of the diabetes complications, taking into account the coefficients of betweenness centrality of their participants.
ParameterGene Network
Cardiovascular DiseaseDiabetic NephropathyDiabetic RetinopathyDiabetic Neuropathy
Number of participants30049931995
Number of interactions413782524381439
Number of genes associated with GV in the gene network15161811
Statistical significance of the overrepresentation of genes associated with GV among all participants of the gene network2.5 × 10−142.9 × 10−125.1 × 10−189.2 × 10−15
Average betweenness centrality coefficient for all participant of the network361.54595.32362.0298.5
Average betweenness centrality coefficient for the genes associated with GV2764.764108.821958.24397.94
Significance of difference between the coefficient of betweenness centrality of genes associated with GV and all genes in the network3.9 × 10−82.7 × 10−71.3 × 10−61.8 × 10−4
Table 4. GO biological processes overrepresented (p-values with FDR correction < 0.05) for genes that are regulated by GV-related genes and participate in the gene networks of cardiovascular disease, diabetic nephropathy, and diabetic retinopathy.
Table 4. GO biological processes overrepresented (p-values with FDR correction < 0.05) for genes that are regulated by GV-related genes and participate in the gene networks of cardiovascular disease, diabetic nephropathy, and diabetic retinopathy.
Gene Ontology Biological ProcessesGene Ontology IDp-Value of Overrepresentation in Cardiovascular Disease Networkp-Value of Overrepresentation in Diabetic Nephropathy Networkp-Value of Overrepresentation in Diabetic Retinopathy Network
Inflammatory responseGO:00069541.25 × 10−96.39 × 10−161.99 × 10−7
Regulation of blood pressureGO:00082173.29 × 10−101.88 × 10−53.06 × 10−6
Positive regulation of angiogenesisGO:00457667.09 × 10−55.60 × 10−62.25 × 10−11
Positive regulation of nitric oxide biosynthetic processGO:00454291.13 × 10−71.23 × 10−42.18 × 10−6
Response to lipopolysaccharideGO:00324962.15 × 10−47.50 × 10−78.35 × 10−7
AgingGO:00075682.29 × 10−45.88 × 10−126.94 × 10−8
Positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascadeGO:00703744.15 × 10−42.24 × 10−101.86 × 10−6
AngiogenesisGO:00015256.24 × 10−49.51 × 10−63.74 × 10−6
Response to drugGO:00424932.7 × 10−35.30 × 10−124.23 × 10−10
Cell-cell signalingGO:00072672.5 × 10−33.85 × 10−41.99 × 10−5
Positive regulation of cell proliferationGO:00082843 × 10−37.56 × 10−106.29 × 10−6
Platelet degranulationGO:00025764 × 10−33.42 × 10−111.29 × 10−5
Positive regulation of gene expressionGO:00106283.4 × 10−35.89 × 10−42.95 × 10−5
Positive regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signalingGO:00140681.9 × 10−32.67 × 10−41.94 × 10−2
Leukocyte migrationGO:00509001.41 × 10−21.11 × 10−48.6 × 10−3
Table 5. Top ten candidate genes potentially related to GV.
Table 5. Top ten candidate genes potentially related to GV.
RankGene SymbolGene ProductGene product Characteristics According to NCBI Gene Database
1THBS1Thrombospondin 1Glycoprotein, a component of extracellular matrix, which mediates intercellular interactions and plays a role in platelet aggregation, angiogenesis, and oncogenesis.
2FN1Fibronectin 1Glycoprotein, a component of extracellular matrix, is involved in the cell adhesion, wound healing, blood coagulation, and tumor metastasis.
3HSP90AA1Heat shock protein 90 alpha family class A member 1Chaperone promoting proper folding of target proteins during cell stress.
4EGFREpidermal growth factor receptorReceptor for members of the epidermal growth factor family. It is located on the cell surface and promotes cell proliferation.
5MAPK1Mitogen-activated protein kinase 1MAP kinase that acts as a trigger for a variety of biochemical signals, being involved in cell proliferation, differentiation, and development.
6STAT3Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3Signal transducer and activator of transcription in response to cytokines and growth factors. It mediates the expression of many genes in response to cellular stimuli and plays a key role in cell growth, apoptosis, and immune processes.
7TP53Tumor protein p53Tumor suppressor protein that responds to various cellular stresses and regulates the expression of target genes. It causes a stop of the cell cycle, apoptosis, DNA repair, and metabolic changes. Mutations in this gene are associated with different human cancers.
8EGFEpidermal growth factorEpidermal growth factor, which acts as a mitogenic factor by binding to a cell surface epidermal growth factor receptor. It plays an important role in the growth, proliferation, and differentiation of many cell types.
9GSK3BGlycogen synthase kinase 3 betaSerine-threonine kinase, a member of the glycogen synthase kinase subfamily, regulates glucose homeostasis and is involved in energy metabolism, inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and apoptosis.
10PTENPhosphatase and tensin homologPhosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-triphosphate-3-phosphatase, a tumor suppressor. It inhibits AKT/PKB signaling pathway.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Saik, O.V.; Klimontov, V.V. Bioinformatic Reconstruction and Analysis of Gene Networks Related to Glucose Variability in Diabetes and Its Complications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8691. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228691

AMA Style

Saik OV, Klimontov VV. Bioinformatic Reconstruction and Analysis of Gene Networks Related to Glucose Variability in Diabetes and Its Complications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(22):8691. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228691

Chicago/Turabian Style

Saik, Olga V., and Vadim V. Klimontov. 2020. "Bioinformatic Reconstruction and Analysis of Gene Networks Related to Glucose Variability in Diabetes and Its Complications" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 22: 8691. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228691

APA Style

Saik, O. V., & Klimontov, V. V. (2020). Bioinformatic Reconstruction and Analysis of Gene Networks Related to Glucose Variability in Diabetes and Its Complications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(22), 8691. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228691

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop