Next Article in Journal
Strategies for Neuroprotection in Multiple Sclerosis and the Role of Calcium
Next Article in Special Issue
Tenogenic Contribution to Skeletal Muscle Regeneration: The Secretome of Scleraxis Overexpressing Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhances Myogenic Differentiation In Vitro
Previous Article in Journal
Contributions of DNA Damage to Alzheimer’s Disease
Previous Article in Special Issue
In Vivo and In Vitro Mechanical Loading of Mouse Achilles Tendons and Tenocytes—A Pilot Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms21051664
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

EGR1 Transcription Factor is a Multifaceted Regulator of Matrix Production in Tendons and Other Connective Tissues

by
Emmanuelle Havis
and
Delphine Duprez
*
Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement, UMR7622, Institut Biologie Paris Seine, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Inserm U1156, F75005 Paris, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(5), 1664; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051664
Submission received: 5 February 2020 / Revised: 24 February 2020 / Accepted: 25 February 2020 / Published: 28 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Achilles Curse and Remedy: Tendon Diseases from Pathophysiology to Novel Therapeutic Approaches)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Although the transcription factor EGR1 is known as NGF1-A, TIS8, Krox24, zif/268, and ZENK, it still has many fewer names than biological functions. A broad range of signals induce Egr1 gene expression via numerous regulatory elements identified in the Egr1 promoter. EGR1 is also the target of multiple post-translational modifications, which modulate EGR1 transcriptional activity. Despite the myriad regulators of Egr1 transcription and translation, and the numerous biological functions identified for EGR1, the literature reveals a recurring theme of EGR1 transcriptional activity in connective tissues, regulating genes related to the extracellular matrix. Egr1 is expressed in different connective tissues, such as tendon (a dense connective tissue), cartilage and bone (supportive connective tissues), and adipose tissue (a loose connective tissue). Egr1 is involved in the development, homeostasis, and healing processes of these tissues, mainly via the regulation of extracellular matrix. In addition, Egr1 is often involved in the abnormal production of extracellular matrix in fibrotic conditions, and Egr1 deletion is seen as a target for therapeutic strategies to fight fibrotic conditions. This generic EGR1 function in matrix regulation has little-explored implications but is potentially important for tendon repair.

1. Tendon is a Proper Dense Regular Connective Tissue

Connective tissues support and link organs, and are composed of specialized fibroblasts derived from mesenchymal stem cells. A feature of connective tissues is the presence of extracellular matrix conferring specific biomechanical properties and functions, reviewed in [1]. Connective tissues include proper and supportive connective tissues, such as cartilage and bone. Proper connective tissues are further divided into two types: dense and soft/loose, reviewed in [2]. The dense connective tissues can also be divided into two subtypes: (1) the regular connective tissue, which refers to tendons/ligaments built with regular collagen fibers and (2) the irregular connective tissues embedding organs, composed of irregular collagen fibers, such as skeletal muscle connective tissue, pericardium, or peritoneum. Adipose tissue is a proper loose connective tissue mainly composed of adipocytes, included in a disorganized network of collagen fibers. Connective tissues contain fibroblasts described as interstitial cells producing extracellular matrix. However, fibroblasts display remarkable heterogeneity of molecular signatures and phenotypes across connective tissues, reviewed in [3] and fibroblast populations are still not well characterized. Fibroblast deregulation leads to fibrosis, assessed by excessive deposition and anarchic organization of extracellular matrix (ECM).
Tendon is a proper dense regular connective tissue that links muscle to bone and is involved in the transmission of forces generated by muscle contraction to bone. Tendon is a key component of the musculo-skeletal system, which allows body movement. Although tendon stem cells have been identified [4], the molecular identity of tendon cells is not well defined and the understanding of tendon biology lags behind that of other organs. Researchers in the tendon field eagerly await the analysis of tendon transcriptomic single-cell data to characterize tendon cell propulations. The main structural and functional component of the tendon is type I collagen. However, the presence of type I collagen is not specific to tendon since it is expressed in many other connective tissues such as bone and adipose tissue. Tendon specificity is given by the spatial organization of type I collagen fibrils paralel to the tendon axis. A multitude of matrix molecules are involved in collagen fibrillogenesis leading to the specific spatial organization of type I collagen in tendons, reviewed in [5,6]. To date, the bHLH transcription factor Scleraxis (SCX) and the transmembrane protein tenomodulin (TNMD) are recognized as matrix regulators in tendons during development, homeostasis, and repair, as reviewed in [7] for SCX and in [8] for TNMD. SCX is recognized to regulate Tnmd expression [9,10]. However, these two genes are not fully specific to tendons, since they are expressed in other connective tissues. Scx is also expressed in heart valves [11], muscle connective tissue [12], and fibroblasts of kidney, testis, and lung [13]. In addition to being expressed in tendon, Tnmd is also expressed in dermis, brain, and adipose tissue, reviewed in [8]. In addition to SCX, two other transcription factors have been shown to positively regulate the expression of Col1a and Col1a2 genes and type I fibril organization in tendons: the homeobox Mohawk (MKX) and the zinc finger transcription factor Early growth response gene 1 (EGR1). However, Mkx and Egr1 are also not specific to tendon, since they display numerous expression sites and have been shown to be involved in mutiple biological processes, reviewed in [14,15].
In this review, we will focus on the EGR1 transcription factor and its generic function as a regulator of gene transcription of extracellular matrix components in tendon, bone, and adipose tissue (Figure 1), both in physiological and pathological conditions.

2. Egr1 “Identity Card”

2.1. Multiple Names for a Single Gene

The Egr1 (Early growth response 1) gene was first identified as NGFI-A (Nerve Growth Factor Induced-A) because of its activation by NGF (nerve growth factor) in the neuronal rat cell line PC12 [16]. It was subsequently described in four different laboratories as a rapidly and transiently activated gene in various fibroblast cell lines. Serum addition or mitogen treatment with the tumor promoter TPA (tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate) on mouse fibroblasts led to a rapid and strong induction of an early growth response gene then named Egr1 [17,18]. Egr1 was also named TIS8 (TPA Inducible Sequence 8), because of its activation following TPA treatment in a murine 3T3 cell line [19]. After the identification of a zinc-finger-region similar to the Drosophila Krüppel segmentation gene in the Egr1 genomic sequence, the murine gene was called Krox24, for “Krüppel box 24” [20] or zif/268 in reference to three tandem zinc finger sequences [21]. Presentation of recorded bird songs to songbirds such as canaries and zebra finches induces Egr1 expression in their forebrains. In this case, Egr1 was referred to by the acronym ZENK [22]. The Egr1/EGR1 gene spans about 3.8 Kb and is located on chromosome 18 in mice and on chromosome 5 in humans. It is composed of two exons and one 700 bp intron. The first exon includes the first 99 amino acids of the protein and the second exon includes the three tandem zinc finger motifs [23]. The Egr1/EGR1 gene is highly conserved between mouse, rat, chicken, zebrafish, chimpanzee, dog, cow, and human.

2.2. Numerous Extracellular Signals Regulate Egr1 Expression via Diverse Intracellular Signalling Pathways

The analyses of 5′-upstream sequences of murine Egr1 and human EGR1 genes reveal the conserved presence of many regulatory elements, indicating that Egr1 expression is regulated in response to multiple stimuli. The seemingly endless list of extracellular stimuli inducing Egr1 transcription include hormones, growth factors, cytokines, UV, hypoxia, stress, and mechanical signals (Figure 2). The MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) signalling pathways has a central role downstream of these external stimuli to regulate Egr1 expression. Egr1 expression is activated by a variety of MAPK-inducing factors, including TNFs (tumor necrosis factors) in primary human fibroblasts and rat chondrocytes [24,25], different pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1, TNFα, and IL-17 in osteoblast-like cells [26], FGF21 in mouse adipose tissue [27], and the antimicrobial peptide LL-37 in adipose stem cells [28]. These secreted molecules activate the MAPK pathways, which leads to the recruitment of the SRF (serum response factor) transcription factor together with the ternary complex factor (TCF)/Ets family member ELK1 to the serum response elements (SRE) of Egr1 promoter [29]. The contribution of individual SRE in Egr1 transcriptional activation depends on cell types [30,31]. Interestingly, TGFβ upregulates Egr1 expression through a Smad-independent pathway in human fibroblasts, and activates the MEK1/2/ERK signalling cascade converging on ELK-1 to induce Egr1 expression [32]. The MKK7-JNK-cJun MAPK pathway can also activate mouse Egr1 expression through the formation of the AP1 complex [33]. AP1 complexes are heterodimeric transcription factors that bind to Tetracecanoyl Phorbol Acetate Response Elements, also called AP1 elements. AP1 complexes are composed of combination of proteins belonging to the c-Fos, c-Jun, activating transcription factor (ATF), and Jun dimerization protein families reviewed in [34]. cJun directly binds to the AP1 element of the Egr1 promoter but not to the SREs, meaning that cJun directly activates Egr1 expression via the AP1 site and indirectly via the SRE sites [33].
Analysis of deletions in the human EGR1 and mouse Egr1 promoters in fibroblasts revealed that AP1 and EGR1 binding sites played minor roles in its activation [35]. EGR1 binds to its own promoter in mouse fibroblasts [36]. This finding leads to the observation that the ubiquitously expressed transcription factor SP1 (specificity protein 1) binds to a consensus recognition sequence that partially overlaps with the EGR1 binding site (EBS) [36] and blocks EGR1 recruitment to EBS (Figure 2). Serum stimulation leads to Egr1 overexpression, which binds competitively with SP1 to EBS. This binding of EGR1 to its own promoter downregulates Egr1 expression [37], presumably through the MAPK pathways. In addition to MEK/ERK pathways, the cAMP/PKA/CREB pathway mediates Egr1 activation downstream of hormones or cytokines [38,39,40].
Egr1 expression is rapidly but transiently induced by insulin in 3T3-L1 adipose cell line and in mouse adipose tissue [41]. Insulin secretion induces a cascade of intracellular events in the adipocyte cell lineage [42] including the PI3K/Akt pathway responsible for glucose uptake and glycogenesis and the ERK1/2 MAPK pathway, which decreases insulin signalling [43,44]. Glucose stimulation induces a rise in cytoplasmic Ca2+ which is necessary for AP1, CRE, and SRE-mediated activation of Egr1 expression [45]. A high insulin and glucose concentration represses the phosphorylation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) in rat tenocytes, which prevents its positive role in Egr1 expression and alters tendon homeostasis [46].
Several stress signals, such as UV, hypoxia, and mechanical shear stress have been shown to activate Egr1/EGR1 transcription. UV irradiation activates Egr1 expression in multiple cell types, including mouse and human fibroblasts as well as human fibrosarcoma cells [47]. The UV-B effect on Egr1 expression is mediated through the activation and recruitment of the NFκB family member p65 to a NFκB binding site located on the Egr1 promoter [48]. Under hypoxic conditions, the hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF1α) binds to the EGR1 promoter in adipose stem cells isolated from obese patients, but not not in hASCs from healthy patients [49]. Hypoxia induces EGR1 upregulation in hASCs of diabetic patients either through the MAPK/ERK pathway or via the direct recruitment of HIF1α to the EGR1 promoter [49]. Fluid shear stress activation activates EGR1 transcription in human endothelial cells and epithelial cells [50].
In summary, Egr1 expression is regulated by a myriad of secreted molecules and stress factors through numerous regulatory elements located upstream of the Egr1 coding sequence.

2.3. EGR1 Protein: Structure and Transcriptional Activity

The EGR1 protein contains 533 and 543 amino acids in mice (Figure 3) and humans, respectively, with a predicted molecular weight of 58 kDa. However, EGR1 detection by Western-blot analysis shows an apparent molecular weight running from 80 to 100 kDa, presumably due to post-translational modifications [24,36,51]. EGR1 contains a highly conserved DNA-binding domain composed of three Cys2-His2 type zinc fingers [52]. These three zinc fingers recognize a consensus nine-base-pair segment of a G/C rich region of DNA (5′-GCG(C/G/T)GGGCG-3′), with each zinc finger spanning three nucleotides [36,52,53]. EGR1 also contains a bipartite nuclear localization domain, a strong activation domain, a weak activation domain, and an inhibitory domain [54] on which NAB1 and NAB2 (NGF1-A binding proteins) bind to repress transactivation by EGR1 [55,56]. According to EGR1 structure, EGR1 displays activator or repressor transcriptional activities [55,56,57].
The phosphorylation of the different EGR1 domains (Figure 3) is controlled by protein kinases and phosphatases [58]. Phosphorylation can either enhance or block EGR1 transcriptional activity. In fibrosarcoma, UV exposure leads to EGR1 phosphorylation by PKC (protein kinase C) and tyrosine kinases [59], conferring on EGR1 a protective and anti-apoptotic function [60]. In contrast, EGR1 phosphorylation by the protein kinase CKII has a negative effect on EGR1 DNA binding and transcriptional activities [61]. EGR1 can be acetylated (Figure 3) by the CBP/p300 complex [62]. In summary, EGR1 activates or represses specific genetic programs according to its “phosphorylation/acetylation pattern”.
EGR1 can be multi-ubiquitinated and thus degraded by the ubiquitin-dependant proteasome pathway [63]. The coordinated sumoylation (Figure 3) and ubiquitination of EGR1 by SUMO-1 (Small Ubiquitin like MOdifier 1) and UBC9 (ubiquitin conjugating enzyme 9) have been shown to be involved in EGF-induced EGR1 expression and stability in the human endothelial cell line ECV304 [64]. Redox (Reduction-Oxidation) reactions are involved in various vital cellular functions, such as aerobic cellular respiration, nucleic acid synthesis, and also for the production and elimination of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which includes superoxide, nitric oxide, hydroxyl radical, hydrogen peroxide, and hypochlorus acid. At high doses, ROS are toxic for the cell and the damage they cause was termed oxidative stress. Oxidative stress induces bone loss by stimulating osteoclastic bone resorption and inhibiting osteoblastic differentiation [65,66,67,68]. However, hydrogen peroxide at non-toxic doses increases the expression and DNA-binding activity of EGR1 in mouse and human osteoblastic cells without affecting their differentiation [69,70]. The DNA-binding properties of EGR1 are modulated by the redox state: EGR1 binding to the DNA depends on the presence of reducing agents, which are necessary for the correct conformation of the EGR1 zinc-finger region. Oxidized or metal-free EGR1 does not bind to DNA [71]. In the human osteoblastic HOBIT cell line, under non-toxic ROS doses, a DNA repair enzyme, the APE1 (apurinic/apyrimidic endonuclease 1) increases EGR1 binding to DNA with nuclear redox activity. EGR1 also upregulates APE1 gene expression, showing the existence of a positive-autoregulatory loop between APE1 and EGR1 proteins [70].
In summary, EGR1 displays diverse transcriptional activation or repression functions depending on its post-translational modification statues.

2.4. Egr1 Expression Profile In Vivo

Egr1 is expressed in numerous organs and cell types during development and adult life. However, Egr1 expression is not ubiquitous. In situ hybridization experiments performed on chicken and mouse embryos indicate a punctiform location of Egr1 transcripts in various tissues such as tendon, cartilage, bone, skeletal muscle, innervation, vessels, and dermis [72,73]. In developing tendons, Egr1 transcripts are not observed in all tendon cells, but in subregions, such as the myotendinous junction and around long tendons in mouse and chicken embryos [73,74]. In the adult, the mouse ENCODE transcriptome data set indicates that Egr1 is expressed in many if not all adult tissues, with high expression in cortex, mammary gland, ovary, and thymus [75]. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry experiments performed on adult mouse tissues show Egr1 expression in Achilles tendons [76], subcutaneous adipose tissue [77], hypertrophic cartilage [78,79], and bone [80,81].

3. EGR1 Roles in Connective Tissue Formation, Homeostasis and Healing

Consistent with the broad range of Egr1/EGR1 expression sites, EGR1 is involved in the formation and homeostasis of many organs. One powerful tool for addressing gene function is the use of knock-out mice. The Egr1 gene was inactivated in mice by homologous recombination with the insertion of the neomycin resistance cassette upstream of the EGR1 DNA-binding domain [82] and with the insertion of the LacZ coding sequence within the Egr1 5′ untranslated region added with a frameshift mutation upstream of the DNA-binding domain of Egr1 [83]. Both Egr1 mutant mouse lines were initially described with no overt phenotype during development or postnatal life [82,83]; with the exception of subtil pituitary and ovarian defects observed in the LacZ insertion mutant mice [83]. However, connective tissue defects were subsequently described in these Egr1 mutant mice, affecting tendon, cartilage, bone and adipose tissue formation and homeostasis. The analysis of Egr1 loss-of-function in mice has identified numerous EGR1 target genes in connective tissues (reported in Table 1). A striking point is that the target genes positively regulated by EGR1 are mainly components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) or linked to ECM regulation, while those negatively regulated by EGR1 are cartilage, bone, or adipose tissue differentiation markers (Table 1).

3.1. EGR1 Is a Potent Inducer of Extracellular Matrix Production in Tendons

3.1.1. EGR1 Function in Tendon Formation, Homeostasis, and Ageing

Several studies have addressed the role of EGR1 in tendon biology. In developing limb tendons, Egr1 is expressed close to the myotendinous junction and delineates the long tendons in mouse and chicken embryos [73,74]. The Egr1 mutant mice do not display a strong overt tendon phenotype; however, Egr1−/− mice show a significant decrease in the expression of the key tendon markers, Scx, Tnmd, and Col1a1 in addition to that of tendon-associated collagens in developing E18.5 limbs [73] and adult tail tendons and Achilles tendons [76]. Comparison of adult tail tendons in Egr1−/− versus Egr1+/+ mice shows a reduced number of collagen fibers in mutant mice. Tail and Achilles tendons have collagen fibrils with smaller diameter and impaired biomechanical properties in Egr1−/− compared to Egr1+/+ mice [76]. Conversely, Egr1 is sufficient to induce de novo expression of a large variety of tendon genes (including Scx and tendon-associated collagen genes) in ectopic contexts in chicken embryos [73]. The Egr1 gene is sufficient to induce ectopic Scx, Col1a1, Col3a1, Col5a1, and Col14a1 expression in the neural tube, an unrelated embryonic tissue derived form the ectoderm [73]. Consistently with the in vivo situation, EGR1 is sufficient to induce the expression of a large panel of tendon genes including, Scx and Tnmd, collagen associated-tendon genes (Col1a1, Col1a2 Col3a1, Col5a1, Col6a1, Col14a1), and tendon matrix-associated molecules (Tnc, Bgn, Dcn, and Fbn1) in mouse C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal stem cells [76]. EGR1 also promotes the formation of 3D-engineered tendon constructs made of C3H10T1/2 cells by increasing the expression of Scx, Tnmd, and Col1a genes [76,85]. Moreover, EGR1 induces tenogenic differentiation in rabbit tendon stem cells [97]. EGR1 mediates the promoting effect of the anti-miR124 on collagen production in human tendon-derived stem cells [98] and the promoting effect of ferulic acid on self-renewal ability of human tendon-derived stem cells [99]. Consistent with the positive regulation of Col1a gene transcription by EGR1 observed both in vivo and in vitro, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments show the recruitment of EGR1 to the tendon regulatory regions of the Col1a1 promoter in E18.5 limbs [73] and to Col1a1 and Col1a2 regulatory regions in adult Achilles tendons [76]. Lastly, Egr1 downregulation has been associated with a loss of the tenogenic differentiation potential in ageing human tendon progenitor cells, while Egr1 gain-of-function has the ability to rescue their tendon differentiation potential as assessed by the upregulation of Scx, Tnmd, Bgn, Dcn, and Col1a1 gene expression [84].

3.1.2. EGR1 Function in Tendon Healing

EGR1 has been shown to be required for the expression of the key tendon markers and tendon-related ECM genes during healing after tendon injury [76]. Tendon injury models where the tension is maintained (partial rupture) induce a massive increase of tendon gene expression [76,100], while tendon injury models where the tension is lost (total rupture) induce a loss of tendon gene expression [101,102]. Different models of tendon injury, where tension is maintained, lead to a massive increase of Egr1 expression after injury, in mouse or rat Achilles tendons [76,100] and rabbit flexor tendons [103]. In addition, needle-induced microlesions in healing rat Achilles tendons increase Egr1 expression [104]. The transcriptional response i.e., the increase of Scx, Tnmd, Col1a1, Col1a2, Col5a1, Col6a1, Col14a1, Tnc, and Dcn gene expression in response to longitudinal lesion along the tendon axis is drastically decreased in Egr1−/− Achilles tendons, showing that Egr1 is required for the injury-induced expression of tendon-related ECM genes and key tendon markers [76]. Moreover, EGR1-producing cells promote tendon repair in a rat model of Achilles tendon injury [76] and in a rabbit model of rotator cuff injury [97].
In summary, Egr1 appears to be required for the correct expression of matrix genes during tendon formation, homeostasis, and ageing in vitro and in vivo, but also during tendon healing. A recent discovery is that tendons are peripheral circadian clock tissues, reviewed in [105], in which collagen synthesis and homeostasis is under a circadian control [106]. Interestingly, the circadian clock is disturbed in Egr1−/− mice, associated with impaired locomotor activity and body temperature [107], suggesting that Egr1 could be involved in the circadian synthesis of tendon-associated collagens.

3.2. Egr1 Is a Mechanosensitive Gene in Tendon

Due to its function to transmit load from muscle contraction to the skeleton, tendon is a mecanosensitive tissue. Mechanical signals are necessary parameters involved in tendon development, homeostasis, and healing, reviewed in [108,109,110]. Mechanical tendon properties have been identified in developing embryonic tendons [111]. Muscle contractions are required for tendon development. In the absence of muscles or muscle contractions, head, axial, and limb tendons do not form; this muscle-dependency for tendon formation is observed in zebrafish, chicken, and mouse embryos, reviewed in [14]. TGFβ and FGF signalling pathways prevent tendon gene downregulation in paralyzed developping limbs in chicken embryos [112]. Since EGR1 has been shown to directly activate Tgfb2 transcription in mouse developping limbs [73], EGR1 is one possible mechanosensor protein downstream of mechanical forces and upstream of TGFβ signalling in developing limbs. Consistent with this mechanosensor function, Egr1 is activated by mechanical loading in 3D-engineered tendons made of human tendon cells [113] and equine tenocytes derived from induced-pluripotent stem cells [114]. Moreover, EGR1 regulates tendon gene expression downstream of mechanical signals in 3D-engineered tendons made of mouse mesenchymal cells [85,113]. Forced-EGR1 expression prevents the downregulation of the tendon genes, Scx, Tnmd, Col1a1, Col1a2, and Tgfb2 in 3D-engineered tendons after tension release [85]. Mechanical signals are also required for tendon homeostasis. Loss of mechanical loading induces tendon defects is reviewed in [108,115]. Botox (botuliniumtoxin A) injection into the gastrocnemius muscle of hindlimb induces a decrease of Egr1 transcription in addition to Scx, Col1a2, and Tgfb2 transcription in mouse Achilles tendons [85]. It is also recognized that the lack of mechanical stimulation is deleterious for tendon healing, while mechanical stimulation improves tendon healing in rats, mice, and humans [108,115]. Egr1 expression is increased within 15 min in response to loading during the healing process in injured rat tendons [100], indicating that Egr1 expression reflects a rapid transcriptional response following loading changes in healing tendons. The increase of Egr1 expression in injured Achilles tendons after mechanical loading is followed by an increase of tendon strength, indicating a beneficial role for Egr1 in tendon healing [100]. These observations confirm the mechanosensor role for EGR1 during tendon healing. Conversely, Egr1 expression is decreased in a mouse Achilles tendon injury model in reduced load conditions [85]. The Egr1 downregulation is concomitent with the downregulation of tendon genes Scx, Tnmd, Col1a1, Col1a2, but also that of Tgfb2 genes [85]. EGR1 rescue experiments in reduced load conditions and after tendon injury increase the expression of tendon-associated genes, including Scx, Tnmd, Col1a1, Col1a2, and Tgfb2 [85]. These observations suggest that Egr1 is sufficient to drive the tendon differentiation program in the absence of mechanical signals during the healing process in vivo.
Mechanical signals are the driving force for tendon cell differentiation in different contexts. Although the scheme is not complete, one attempt to hierarchize mechanical and molecular signals would be that mechanical signals activate molecular signals such as EGR1 transcription factor, which then in turn activate the expression of tendon genes such as Scx and Tnmd and Col1a genes (Figure 4). It has to be noticed that Tgfb2 transcription is also induced by EGR1 rescue experiments in unload conditions in a mouse model of Achilles tendon injury and 3D-engineered tendons [85]. This data, combined with the direct binding of EGR1 to Tgfb2 promoter regions in adult tendons [76], leads to the hypothesis that EGR1 activates Tgfb2 dowstream of mechanical signals, which in turn will activate tendon matrix genes (Figure 4). This is consistent with the recognized role of TGFβ signalling in the control of tendon adaptation to mechanical loading, reviewed in [116]. The link between EGR1 transcription factor and the YAP key mechanotransduction pathway [110] remains to be established.

3.3. EGR1 and Endochondral Bone Formation and Healing

Bone is a supportive connective tissue composed of cells, fibers, and a mineralized solid ground substance [117]. Egr1 expression is detected in several areas undergoing endochondral bone formation, such as hypertrophic cartilage [78,79] and periostal regions of the developping long bones [72,73]. Egr1 is a negative regulator of cartilage markers [92]. Egr1−/− mice display bone loss [80,118,119]. The bone loss upon Egr1 deletion is a consequence of an increased bone resorption, via the increased production of the colony stimulating factor-1 CSF-1/M-CSF known to positively regulate osteoclast differentiation [80]. Bone development and homeostasis is controlled by the interplay between bone-forming osteoblasts and bone-resorbing osteoclasts [120], and this equilibrium is lost in Egr1−/− mice. EGR1 is a negative regulator of the osteoclastogenic cytokine CSF-1 production by stromal cells. Phosphorylated-EGR1 (upon estrogen) blocks Csf1 gene transcription by preventing the binding of the transcriptional activator SP1 to the Csf1 promoter [80]. The failure of estrogen to rescue the CSF-1 production and consequent osteoclast formation in Egr1−/− in ovariectomized mice positiones Egr1 as a pivotal actor to mediate the anti-osteoclastogenic effect of estrogen [80,81].
Transcription factors that play a role in bone formation are expected to participate in bone healing after fracture since endochondral bone formation that occurs in embryos is recapitulated during bone healing. In a bone fracture mouse model, Egr1 deficiency leads to several bone defects including persistant fibrin accumulation in the fracture gap, abnormal callus ossification with enlarged areas of cartilaginous tissue, decreased expression levels of Bglap (Osteocalcin), and bone resorbtion markers that regulate extracellular matrix, including Acp5 (Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase) and Ctsk (Cathepsin K) genes [93,118]. This data confirms that EGR1 controls the balance between bone tissue formation and resorption during skeletal repair.

3.4. EGR1 Regulates Extracellular Matrix Production in Adipose Tissue

Adipose tissue is a loose connective tissue mainly composed of specialized white adipocytes, held in a framework of collagen fibers, which plays a fundamental role in fat storage, metabolic control, and thermoregulation [121]. Adipocytes are surrounded by an extracellular matrix, which serves as mechanical support and is mainly composed of collagens, fibronectin, and elastin [122]. Cells producing ECM in adipose tissue are not clearly indentified; however, it is recognized that collagens are mostly produced by adipocytes, but also by endothelial cells and adipose stem cells in normal conditions [123]. The molecular signature of subcutaneous white adipose tissue with Egr1 deletion identifies a downregulation of ECM genes, including Col1a1, Col1a2, Col3a1, Col5a1, Col5a2, Col14a1, Fn1, Dcn, and Post (Periostin) [77]. Egr1 deletion is also associated with a spontaneous browning of subcutaneous white adipose tissue in Egr1 mutant mice compared to wild-types [77]. The browning phenotype corresponds to the appearence of beige adipocytes within the white adipose tissue mainly by de novo differentiation of progenitors [124]. In contrast to white adipocytes, beige adipocytes dissipate excess energy through heat production by a large number of mitochondria, which exhibit uncoupling activity via the thermogenic protein UCP1 (uncoupling protein-1) [125]. Consistent with the browning phenotype, transcriptomic analysis in Egr1-deleted adipose tissue shows a concomitant downregulation of the white adipocyte marker, Lep (leptin) and upregulation of the key beige adipocyte marker Ucp1 [77]. Both positive (Lep) and negative (Ucp1) transcriptional regulations have been shown to occur via direct EGR1 recruitment to regulatory regions of these genes [41,77]. The browning process reduces the deleterious consequences of fat accumulation and is seen as possible mechanism to fight against obesity and to improve metabolic health [125]. Consistently, Egr1−/− mice are protected from high fat diet-induced obesity via an increase of energy expenditure [95]. Conversely to Egr1 loss-of-function in mice, Egr1 overexpression in C3H10T1/2 cells increases the transcription of matrix genes and prevents the beige adipocyte differentiation [77]. Overall, Egr1 deletion leads to a drastic loss of ECM genes associated with a browning phenotype in subcutaneous white adipose tissue in mice.
To summarize, Egr1 loss-of-function is associated with reduced ECM production in tendon (a dense connective tissue), bone (a supportive connective tissue), and adipose tissue (a loose connective tissue). Although the altered matrix genes upon Egr1 deletion appear to be similar in the different connective tissues, the reduced ECM production is deleterious for tendon and bone formation and homeostasis, while being beneficial for white adipose tissue to increase energy expenditure.

4. EGR1 Is a Fibrotic Factor

Fibroblast deregulation leads to fibrosis, a process attributed to anarchic deposition of extracellular matrix, in response to injury or in pathological conditions. Fibrosis is observed in almost any tissue in cases of organ dysfunction, but is also a key process in cancer, inflammation, and ageing. Myofibroblasts are the main cellular component of fibrosis. Myofibroblasts are non-muscle contractile cells responsible for the excessive synthesis, deposition, and remodelling of ECM proteins in fibrosis; for a recent review see [126]. A recognized molecular driver of fibrosis is the TGFβ signalling pathway. TGFβ drives the conversion of fibroblasts to myofibroblasts to induce the excessive deposition of collagen and inappropriate ECM during fibrosis, recently reviewed in [127]. Generic molecular markers for myofibroblasts are similar to markers for smooth muscle cells, such as Acta2 (smooth muscle actin), whose expression is regulated by TGFβ signalling [127]. Although myofibroblasts and TGFβ are recognized to be the respective cellular and molecular hallmarks of fibrosis, there is no comprehensive understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying fibrosis. As EGR1 is a potent regulator of matrix components in different contexts, EGR1 is seen as a fibrotic factor.

4.1. EGR1 and Fibrosis in Metabolic Diseases Linked to Adipose Tissue (Obesity and Diabetes)

Fibrosis in adipose tissue is considered a hallmark of metabolically dysfunctional adipose tissue and is associated with obesity and insulin resistance [86,122,128]. In pathological conditions such as obesity, the rapid expansion of adipose tissue causes hypoxia since neovascularization cannot keep up with rapid adipose tissue growth. Hypoxia is followed by the necrosis of adipocytes accompanied with the infiltration of inflammatory leucocytes and macrophages to remove the dead cells. In these pathological conditions, myofibroblasts associated with the inflammatory response, accumulate within the adipose tissue and cause ECM thickening, characteristic of fibrosis [121,129]. Adipose tissue fibrosis results from the imbalance between excess synthesis and impaired degradation of type I, III, and VI collagens [130]. Consistently, type I, III, and VI collagens are particularly abundant in adipose tissue of obese patients [131] and collagen content affects tensile strengh of adipose tissue [132]. Moreover, Col6a1 loss-of-function significantly reduces adipose tissue fibrosis in obese mice [122]. Egr1/EGR1 expression is increased in adipose tissue of obese Lep/Lep mice and patients [95], and of diabetic db/db mice and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients [133]. T2DM is associated with insulin resistance and the majority of T2DM patients are overweight or obese [129]. Egr1 gain-of-function in epididymal fat induces insulin resistance [133], while Egr1 loss-of-function improves the whole-body insulin sensitivity in diabetic mice [133]. One possible mechanism would be that insulin-induced EGR1 [41,133] directly inhibits Pnpla2 (ATGL, Adipose TriGlyceride Lipase) expression in adipocytes that leads to lipolysis inhibition and promote fat accumulation [94].
Egr1 overexpression is associated with metabolically dysfunctional adipose tissues. As Egr1 regulates matrix production in subcutaneous white adipose tissue and tendon, Egr1 is a credible regulator of inappropriate ECM production in metabolically dysfunctional adipose tissues. Consistent with this idea, Egr1 transcription is directly activated by insulin and HIF1α [49] via direct recruitment to Egr1 promoter. In addition, the insulin and HIF1α expression is increased in obese and T2DM mice and HIF1α regulates the expression of ECM genes such as Col1a1, Col3a1, and Col14a1 [86,87]. Egr1 is thus a good therapeutic target to counteract obesity and associated fibrosis since its loss-of-function reduces ECM production and stimulates the white fat browning process.
Interestingly, the tendon differentiation gene, Tmnd, involved in ECM regulation in tendons [8], is also involved in adipose tissue function. TNMD mRNA expression levels are strongly correlated with the body mass index. TNMD gene expression is significantly higher in obese subjects compared to lean subjects [134,135,136], while TNMD gene expression is downregulated in visceral adipose tissue during diet-induced weight loss [134]. Although EGR1 and TNMD genes share the same expression profile in white adipose tissues of obese patients, in contrast to EGR1, TNMD acts as a protective factor in visceral adipose tissue to alleviate insulin resistance in obesity [136].

4.2. Tendon Defects in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with high risk of tendinopathy or tendon tears, reviewed recently in [137,138]. Various T2DM rodent models, which cannot be dissociated from obese mouse models, display tendons with decreased collagen content, ECM disorganization, and impaired mechanical properties, reviewed in [138]. T2DM also impairs the healing process following tendon injury and amplifies the fibrotic process during healing, leading to scarred tendons. There is an increase of Col1a1 and Col3a1 expression in FDL tendons after injury associated with decreased mechanical properties in diet-induced obesity mice [88]. High glucose also affects tendon gene expression and cell behavior in tendon cell cultures, which induces changes in extracellular matrix [139]. Interestingly, Egr1 expression was also modified (associated with Mkx, Tgfb1, Col1a2, and Bgn expression alteration) in rat tendon cells cultured in high glucose for 14 days [46].

4.3. EGR1 Controls Fibrosis in Systemic Sclerosis

A classical fibrotic disease is systemic sclerosis, also known as scleroderma, which is a rare disease characterized by excessive collagen deposition resulting in fibrosis in different organs such as skin and lungs but also the diggestive track (esophagus, stomach, and intestine) and myocard [140,141]. Systemic sclerosis pathology also displays inflammation and vasculopathy components. Myofibroblasts are key cells of the physiopathology of systemic sclerosis [140]. TGFβ and Wnt signalling are recognized to play a fundamental role in the pathogenesis of fibrosis in systemic sclerosis, in particular in the differentiation process of activated myofibroblasts [141].
EGR1 transcription factor has been shown to be at the crossroad of the molecular processes leading to the TGFβ-dependent fibrosic process in systemic sclerosis, reviewed in [142,143]. EGR1 expression is increased in biopsies of fibrotic skin and lung from patients with systemic sclerosis [32]. In the mouse model of bleomycin-induced scleroderma, fibrosis is reduced in skin and lung of Egr1−/− mice, with decreased Col1a1 expression and αSMA+ fibroblasts in both tissues [89]. In human fibroblasts, EGR1 upregulates COL1A2 transcription downstream of TGFβ [91]. The high throughput analysis of EGR1-responsive genes in human primary fibroblasts identifies over 600 genes involved in extracellular matrix synthesis, wound healing, and TGFbeta signalling, but also in cell proliferation and vascular development [144]. This EGR1-responsive genes signature is enriched in skin biopsies from patients with systemic sclerosis compared to healthy controls [144]. The demonstrated involvement of EGR1 in this fibrotic disease identifies EGR1 as a pertinent target to control fibrosis in systemic sclerosis [142,143].

4.4. EGR1 Is at the Crossroad of the Molecular Pathways Involved in the Fibrotic Process in Animal Models for Organ Fibrosis

Classical animal models for fibrosis target idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, renal fibrosis, liver fibrosis, and heart fibrosis. EGR1 is frequently mentioned as being associated with the progression of fibrotic process in animal models and in the transcription of fibrotic genes in cellular models. Egr1 deletion is often described as being beneficial to fight fibrosis progression in animal models of organ fibrosis.
Lung fibrosis. EGR1 is involved in lung fibrosis downstream of IGFBP-5 (insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-5) to promote fibrotic gene transcription [145] and downstream of TGFβ1 to activate the transcription of the hyaluronan receptor CD44V6 (CD44 containing variable exon 6 (v6)) expression in lung fibroblasts in the context of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [146].
Renal fibrosis. In a mouse model of adenine-enriched diet induced tubulointerstitial nephritis leading to renal fibrosis, Egr1 is increased in kidney. Egr1−/− mice display reduced TGFbeta activity and reduced renal fibrotic zones and were protected from renal failure [147]. The miR181 was identified as an inhibitor of renal fibrosis via Egr1 inhibition, which suppressed the expression levels of alphaSMA (ACTA2), connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), collagen type I (COL1A1), and type III collagen (COL3A1) in NRK49F cells [90].
Liver fibrosis. Egr1 has been shown to contribute to liver fibrosis progression downstream of Elk-3 in CCl4-induced mouse liver fibrotic tissues and human liver cirrhotic tissues [148]. However, the beneficial effect of Egr1 deletion in the context of liver fibrosis is contradictory. In an acute acetaminophen-induced liver injury mouse model, the inhibition on ERK1/2-mediated Egr1 transcriptional activity attenuates hepatotoxicity, suggesting that inhibiting Egr1 is beneficial to protect against liver fibrosis observed in long-term application of acetaminophen [149]. By contrast, another study shows that livers of Egr1−/− mutant mice exhibit a more severe fibrotic response compared to those of wild-type mice under acetaminophen overdose [150]. The Egr1 function remains elusive in liver fibrosis.
Heart fibrosis. EGR1 has been shown to be involved in cardiovascular homeostasis and diseases. Notably, Egr1 transcription is activated in hypoxic and ischemic conditions in heart and in calcified heart valves [151,152]. The miR-150-5p retards the progression of myocardial fibrosis by targeting EGR1 [153].
As EGR1 is systematically mentioned as being involved in fibrosis progession in organ fibrosis animal models, Egr1 is seen as a putative target to fight fibrosis. A recent antifibrotic chemical component has been identified with the PPARγ agonist (pioglitazone) that inhibits TGF-β-driven fibrosis in animal models for pulmonary, renal, and cardiac fibrosis, reviewed in [154]. Interestingly, pioglitazone has been shown to repress Egr1 transcription and traduction in kidneys of TGF-β-driven renal fibrosis in mice [155] and in pancreas of a cerulein-induced acute pancreatitis mouse model [156].

4.5. EGR1 and Matrix Production in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis

Consistent with Egr1 expression in cartilage and bone, the Egr1 gene is reiteratively cited to be involved in chronic diseases that lead to articular cartilage degeneration, such as osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis [157]. The molecular cascade underlying the pathogenesis of these two joint diseases are not well understood. Osteoarthritis leads to cartilage degeneration, reviewed in [158], while rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune and inflamatory disease associated with an increase of synovial fibroblasts leading to joint degeneration [159]. TNFα levels are increased in the synovial fluid of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis [25] and reduce the expression of Col2a1, Acan (Aggrecan), and Hapln1 through EGR1 recruitment to their promoters [25]. Classical and global transcriptomic analysis identified high EGR1 expression in articular cartilage of patients with osteoarthritis [96,160,161] and in synovial tissues of rheumatoid arthritis patients [162,163,164]. Chondrocytes stimulation with interleukin-1β (IL-1) leads to the recruitment of EGR1 to Pparg promoter and downregulates its expression, preventing the protective effect of PPARγ in osteoarthritis [96]. Ectopic expression of EGR1 in articular cartilage aggravated the degradation of the cartilage matrix in mice [78]. The excess of EGR1 induced an increase of transcripts and protein of type I collagen in synovial fibroblasts from rheumatoid arthritis patients [165]. Egr1 represents a potential target for drug intervention in osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis.

4.6. EGR1 and Scarred Tendon

Abnormal tendon healing is frequent following tendon injury reviewed in [166,167]. Following accute rupture, tendons undergo a healing process involving the sequential and overlapping phases of inflamation, cell migration, cell proliferation, ECM production, and remodelling. These successive phases ultimately result in the production and spatial organization of type I collagen. However, the healing process is often incomplete in tendons, which leads to scar tendons that do not regain the mechanical properties of native tendons. The cellular basis of tendon fibrosis is not well understood and involves the contribution of intrinsic (tendon sheeths) and extrinsic (circulating cells) cell populations, recently rewiewed by [168]. The molecular basis underlying tendon fibrosis involves the main fibrotic signalling pathway, TGFβ [102], the transmenbrane protein TNMD [169], and the SCX transcription factor [170], which are also the main actors involved in tendon development [9,171,172]. Interestingly, SCX directly regulates the transcription of the Acta2 gene (a fibrotic marker) in cardiac fibrosis [173]. Although Egr1 is required for the correct transcriptional response in healing tendons [76], EGR1 function in the fibrotic response in tendon has not been established. However, given the EGR1 involvement in the fibrotic response in organs, EGR1 is very likely to be involved in tendon scarring.

5. Concluding Remarks

In addition to being involved in matrix production in normal conditions and fibrotic processes, EGR1 transcription factor has been associated with numerous cancers and has been shown to act as a tumor suppressor or a tumor promoter depending on cancer types, for reviews see [174,175]. The reason for this paradoxal/antagonistic EGR1 function depending on cancer types is not clear. Interestingly, EGR1 expression is correlated with prostate cancer progression and promotes prostate cancer metastases [176], which are associated with a massive increase of matrix [177]. Egr1 has been already targeted to prevent the progression of prostate cancer carcinoma [178]. Interestingly, there is no associated cancer in tendons. Giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath (GCTTS) very rarely impacts tendon proper [179]. One attractive hypothesis is that the tendon matrix environement regulated by EGR1 is protective against cancer.
In summary, the EGR1 transcription factor is a key checkpoint in the transcriptional response to external stimuli. Despite multiple regulatory elements in the Egr1 promoter, Egr1 has been repeatedly associated with matrix production in connective tissues in homeostatic and pathological conditions. Egr1 deletion is a good therapeutic option for reducing fibrosis in many tissues. One attractive hypothesis is that EGR1 has a generic function in the transcription of matrix genes. Based on a recent report of EGR1 function in the brain, in the epigenetic control of the methylome during development and upon neuronal activity [180], EGR1 could act on the methylome of matrix genes in tendons and other connective tissues.

Funding

This work was funded by Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Sorbonne Université.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Santos, A.; Lagares, D. Matrix Stiffness: The Conductor of Organ Fibrosis. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2018, 20, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nassari, S.; Duprez, D.; Fournier-Thibault, C. Non-myogenic Contribution to Muscle Development and Homeostasis: The Role of Connective Tissues. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2017, 5, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Hannan, R.T.; Peirce, S.M.; Barker, T.H. Fibroblasts: Diverse Cells Critical to Biomaterials Integration. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 4, 1223–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bi, Y.; Ehirchiou, D.; Kilts, T.M.; Inkson, C.A.; Embree, M.C.; Sonoyama, W.; Li, L.; Leet, A.I.; Seo, B.-M.; Zhang, L.; et al. Identification of tendon stem/progenitor cells and the role of the extracellular matrix in their niche. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 1219–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mienaltowski, M.J.; Birk, D.E. Structure, Physiology, and Biochemistry of Collagens. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2014, 802, 5–29. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kadler, K.E.; Holmes, D.F.; Trotter, J.A.; Chapman, J.A. Collagen fibril formation. Biochem. J. 1996, 316, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, A.H.; Lu, H.H.; Schweitzer, R. Molecular regulation of tendon cell fate during development. J. Orthop. Res. 2015, 33, 800–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dex, S.; Lin, D.; Shukunami, C.; Docheva, D. Tenogenic modulating insider factor: Systematic assessment on the functions of tenomodulin gene. Gene 2016, 587, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Murchison, N.D.; Price, B.A.; Conner, D.A.; Keene, D.R.; Olson, E.N.; Tabin, C.J.; Schweitzer, R. Regulation of tendon differentiation by scleraxis distinguishes force-transmitting tendons from muscle-anchoring tendons. Development 2007, 134, 2697–2708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Shukunami, C.; Takimoto, A.; Nishizaki, Y.; Yoshimoto, Y.; Tanaka, S.; Miura, S.; Watanabe, H.; Sakuma, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Kondoh, G.; et al. Scleraxis is a transcriptional activator that regulates the expression of Tenomodulin, a marker of mature tenocytes and ligamentocytes. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Levay, A.K.; Peacock, J.D.; Lu, Y.; Koch, M.; Hinton, R.B.; Kadler, K.E.; Lincoln, J. Scleraxis is required for cell lineage differentiation and extracellular matrix remodeling during murine heart valve formation in vivo. Circ. Res. 2008, 103, 948–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Mendias, C.L.; Gumucio, J.P.; Davis, M.E.; Bromley, C.W.; Davis, C.S.; Brooks, S.V. Transforming growth factor-beta induces skeletal muscle atrophy and fibrosis through the induction of atrogin-1 and scleraxis. Muscle Nerve 2012, 45, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Pryce, B.A.; Brent, A.E.; Murchison, N.D.; Tabin, C.J.; Schweitzer, R. Generation of transgenic tendon reporters, ScxGFP and ScxAP, using regulatory elements of the scleraxis gene. Dev. Dyn. Off. Publ. Am. Assoc. Anat. 2007, 236, 1677–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gaut, L.; Duprez, D. Tendon development and diseases. Dev. Biol. 2016, 5, 5–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Milet, C.; Duprez, D. The Mkx homeoprotein promotes tenogenesis in stem cells and improves tendon repair. Ann. Transl. Med. 2015, 3, S33. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Milbrandt, J. A nerve growth factor-induced gene encodes a possible transcriptional regulatory factor. Science 1987, 238, 797–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sukhatme, V.P.; Kartha, S.; Toback, F.G.; Taub, R.; Hoover, R.G.; Tsai-Morris, C.H. A novel early growth response gene rapidly induced by fibroblast, epithelial cell and lymphocyte mitogens. Oncogene Res. 1987, 1, 343–355. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sukhatme, V.P.; Cao, X.; Chang, L.C.; Tsai-Morris, C.H.; Stamenkovich, D.; Ferreira, P.C.P.; Cohen, D.R.; Edwards, S.A.; Shows, T.B.; Curran, T.; et al. A zinc finger-encoding gene coregulated with c-fos during growth and differentiation, and after cellular depolarization. Cell 1988, 53, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lim, R.W.; Varnum, B.C.; Herschman, H.R. Cloning of tetradecanoyl phorbol ester-induced “primary response” sequences and their expression in density-arrested Swiss 3T3 cells and a TPA non-proliferative variant. Oncogene 1987, 1, 263–270. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lemaire, P.; Relevant, O.; Bravo, R.; Charnay, P. Two mouse genes encoding potential transcription factors with identical DNA-binding domains are activated by growth factors in cultured cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 4691–4695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Christy, B.A.; Lau, L.F.; Nathans, D. A gene activated in mouse 3T3 cells by serum growth factors encodes a protein with “zinc finger” sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 7857–7861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Mello, C.V.; Vicario, D.S.; Clayton, D.F. Song presentation induces gene expression in the songbird forebrain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 6818–6822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Tsai-Morris, C.H.; Cao, X.M.; Sukhatme, V.P. 5′ flanking sequence and genomic structure of Egr-1, a murine mitogen inducible zinc finger encoding gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16, 8835–8846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Cao, X.; Guy, G.R.; Sukhatme, V.P.; Tan, Y.H. Regulation of the Egr-1 gene by tumor necrosis factor and interferons in primary human fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 1345–1349. [Google Scholar]
  25. Rockel, J.S.; Bernier, S.M.; Leask, A. Egr-1 inhibits the expression of extracellular matrix genes in chondrocytes by TNFα-induced MEK/ERK signalling. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2009, 11, R8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Granet, C.; Miossec, P. Combination of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1, TNF-α and IL-17 leads to enhanced expression and additional recruitment of AP-1 family members, Egr-1 and NF-κB in osteoblast-like cells. Cytokine 2004, 26, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Geng, L.; Liao, B.; Jin, L.; Huang, Z.; Triggle, C.R.; Ding, H.; Zhang, J.; Huang, Y.; Lin, Z.; Xu, A. Exercise Alleviates Obesity-Induced Metabolic Dysfunction via Enhancing FGF21 Sensitivity in Adipose Tissues. Cell Rep. 2019, 26, 2738–2752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Yang, Y.; Choi, H.; Seon, M.; Cho, D.; Bang, S.I. LL-37 stimulates the functions of adipose-derived stromal/stem cells via early growth response 1 and the MAPK pathway. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2016, 7, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Dalton, S.; Treisman, R. Characterization of SAP-1, a protein recruited by serum response factor to the c-fos serum response element. Cell 1992, 68, 597–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Christy, B.; Nathans, D. Functional serum response elements upstream of the growth factor-inducible gene zif268. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1989, 9, 4889–4895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. McMahon, S.B.; Monroe, J.G. A ternary complex factor-dependent mechanism mediates induction of egr-1 through selective serum response elements following antigen receptor cross-linking in B lymphocytes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995, 15, 1086–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Bhattacharyya, S.; Chen, S.J.; Wu, M.; Warner-Blankenship, M.; Ning, H.; Lakos, G.; Mori, Y.; Chang, E.; Nihijima, C.; Takehara, K.; et al. Smad-independent transforming growth factor-β regulation of early growth response-1 and sustained expression in fibrosis: Implications for scleroderma. Am. J. Pathol. 2008, 173, 1085–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Hoffmann, E.; Ashouri, J.; Wolter, S.; Doerrie, A.; Dittrich-Breiholz, O.; Schneider, H.; Wagner, E.F.; Troppmair, J.; Mackman, N.; Kracht, M. Transcriptional regulation of EGR-1 by the interleukin-1-JNK-MKK7-c-Jun pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 12120–12128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Hess, J.; Angel, P.; Schorpp-Kistner, M. AP-1 subunits: Quarrel and harmony among siblings. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117, 5965–5973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Aicher, W.K.; Sakamoto, K.M.; Hack, A.; Eibel, H. Analysis of functional elements in the human Egr-1 gene promoter. Rheumatol. Int. 1999, 18, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cao, X.M.; Koski, R.A.; Gashler, A.; McKiernan, M.; Morris, C.F.; Gaffney, R.; Hay, R.V.; Sukhatme, V.P. Identification and characterization of the Egr-1 gene product, a DNA-binding zinc finger protein induced by differentiation and growth signals. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1990, 10, 1931–1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Cao, X.; Mahendran, R.; Guy, G.R.; Tan, Y.H. Detection and characterization of cellular EGR-1 binding to its recognition site. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 16949–16957. [Google Scholar]
  38. Sheng, M.; McFadden, G.; Greenberg, M.E. Membrane depolarization and calcium induce c-fos transcription via phosphorylation of transcription factor CREB. Neuron 1990, 4, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vaccarino, F.M.; Hayward, M.D.; Le, H.N.; Hartigan, D.J.; Duman, R.S.; Nestler, E.J. Induction of immediate early genes by cyclic AMP in primary cultures of neurons from rat cerebral cortex. Mol. Brain Res. 1993, 19, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kang, J.H.; Kim, M.J.; Jang, H.I.; Koh, K.H.; Yum, K.S.; Rhie, D.J.; Shin, H.Y.; Sang, J.H.; Kim, M.S.; Jo, Y.H. Proximal cyclic AMP response element is essential for exendin-4 induction of rat EGR-1 gene. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007, 292, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Mohtar, O.; Ozdemir, C.; Roy, D.; Shantaram, D.; Emili, A.; Kandror, K.V. Egr1 mediates the effect of insulin on leptin transcription in adipocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 5784–5789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Saltiel, A.R.; Kahn, C.R. Insulin signalling and the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism. Nature 2001, 414, 799–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Biddinger, S.B.; Kahn, C.R. FROM MICE TO MEN: Insights into the Insulin Resistance Syndromes. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2006, 68, 123–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Franke, T.F.; Yang, S.I.; Chan, T.O.; Datta, K.; Kazlauskas, A.; Morrison, D.K.; Kaplan, D.R.; Tsichlis, P.N. The protein kinase encoded by the Akt proto-oncogene is a target of the PDGF-activated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Cell 1995, 81, 727–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Müller, I.; Lipp, P.; Thiel, G. Ca2+ signaling and gene transcription in glucose-stimulated insulinoma cells. Cell Calcium 2012, 52, 137–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wu, Y.F.; Wang, H.K.; Chang, H.W.; Sun, J.; Sun, J.S.; Chao, Y.H. High glucose alters tendon homeostasis through downregulation of the AMPK/Egr1 pathway. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Huang, R.P.; Yan, F.; Boynton, A.L. UV irradiation upregulates Egr-1 expression at transcription level. J. Cell. Biochem. 1999, 73, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Thyss, R.; Virolle, V.; Imbert, V.; Peyron, J.F.; Aberdam, D.; Virolle, T. NF-κB/Egr-1/Gadd45 are sequentially activated upon UVB irradiation to mediate epidermal cell death. EMBO J. 2005, 24, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Trinh, N.T.; Yamashita, T.; Ohneda, K.; Kimura, K.; Salazar, G.T.A.; Sato, F.; Ohneda, O. Increased Expression of EGR-1 in Diabetic Human Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Reduces Their Wound Healing Capacity. Stem Cells Dev. 2016, 25, 760–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Schwachtgen, J.L.; Houston, P.; Campbell, C.; Sukhatme, V.; Braddock, M. Fluid shear stress activation of egr-1 transcription in cultured human endothelial and epithelial cells is mediated via the extracellular signal-related kinase 1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. J. Clin. Invest. 1998, 101, 2540–2549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Yu, J.; Zhang, S.S.; Saito, K.; Williams, S.; Arimura, Y.; Ma, Y.; Ke, Y.; Baron, V.; Mercola, D.; Feng, G.S.; et al. PTEN regulation by Akt-EGR1-ARF-PTEN axis. EMBO J. 2009, 28, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Christy, B.; Nathans, D. DNA binding site of the growth factor-inducible protein Zif268. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 8737–8741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Lemaire, P.; Vesque, C.; Schmitt, J.; Stunnenberg, H.; Frank, R.; Charnay, P. The serum-inducible mouse gene Krox-24 encodes a sequence-specific transcriptional activator. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1990, 10, 3456–3467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Gashler, A.L.; Swaminathan, S.; Sukhatme, V.P. A novel repression module, an extensive activation domain, and a bipartite nuclear localization signal defined in the immediate-early transcription factor Egr-1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1993, 13, 4556–4571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Russo, M.W.; Sevetson, B.R.; Milbrandt, J. Identification of NAB1, a repressor of NGFI-A- and Krox20-mediated transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 6873–6877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Svaren, J.; Sevetson, B.R.; Apel, E.D.; Zimonjic, D.B.; Popescu, N.C.; Milbrandt, J. NAB2, a corepressor of NGFI-A (Egr-1) and Krox20, is induced by proliferative and differentiative stimuli. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996, 16, 3545–3553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Sevetson, B.R.; Svaren, J.; Milbrandt, J. A novel activation function for NAB proteins in EGR-dependent transcription of the luteinizing hormone β gene. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 9749–9757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Cao, X.; Mahendran, R.; Guy, G.R.; Tan, Y.H. Protein phosphatase inhibitors induce the sustained expression of the Egr- 1 gene and the hyperphosphorylation of its gene product. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 12991–12997. [Google Scholar]
  59. Huang, R.P.; Fan, Y.; DeBelle, I.; Ni, Z.; Matheny, W.; Adamson, E.D. Egr-1 inhibits apoptosis during the UV response: Correlation of cell survival with Egr-1 phosphorylation. Cell Death Differ. 1998, 5, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Huang, R.P.; Fan, Y.; Peng, A.; Zeng, Z.L.; Reed, J.C.; Adamson, E.D.; Boynton, A.L. Suppression of human fibrosarcoma cell growth by transcription factor, Egr-1, involves down-regulation of Bcl-2. Int. J. Cancer 1998, 77, 880–886. [Google Scholar]
  61. Jain, N.; Mahendran, R.; Philp, R.; Guy, G.R.; Tan, Y.H.; Cao, X. Casein kinase II associates with Egr-1 and acts as a negative modulator of its DNA binding and transcription activities in NIH 3T3 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 13530–13536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Yu, J.; De Belle, I.; Liang, H.; Adamson, E.D. Coactivating factors p300 and CBP are transcriptionally crossregulated by Egr1 in prostate cells, leading to divergent responses. Mol. Cell 2004, 15, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Bae, M.-H.; Jeong, C.-H.; Kim, S.-H.; Bae, M.-K.; Jeong, J.-W.; Ahn, M.-Y.; Bae, S.-K.; Kim, N.D.; Kim, C.W.; Kim, K.-R.; et al. Regulation of Egr-1 by association with the proteasome component C8. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1592, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Manente, A.G.; Pinton, G.; Tavian, D.; Lopez-Rodas, G.; Brunelli, E.; Moro, L. Coordinated sumoylation and ubiquitination modulate EGF induced EGR1 expression and stability. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, 25676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Bai, X.C.; Lu, D.; Bai, J.; Zheng, H.; Ke, Z.Y.; Li, X.M.; Luo, S.Q. Oxidative stress inhibits osteoblastic differentiation of bone cells by ERK and NF-κB. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 314, 197–207. [Google Scholar]
  66. Garrett, I.R.; Boyce, B.F.; Oreffo, R.O.C.; Bonewald, L.; Poser, J.; Mundy, G.R. Oxygen-derived free radicals stimulate osteoclastic bone resorption in rodent bone in vitro and in vivo. J. Clin. Invest. 1990, 85, 632–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Key, L.L.; Wolf, W.C.; Gundberg, C.M.; Ries, W.L. Superoxide and bone resorption. Bone 1994, 15, 431–436. [Google Scholar]
  68. Mody, N.; Parhami, F.; Sarafian, T.A.; Demer, L.L. Oxidative stress modulates osteoblastic differentiation of vascular and bone cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2001, 31, 509–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Nose, K.; Shibanuma, M.; Kikuchi, K.; Kageyama, H.; Sakiyama, S.; Kuroki, T. Transcriptional activation of early-response genes by hydrogen peroxide in a mouse osteoblastic cell line. Eur. J. Biochem. 1991, 201, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pines, A.; Bivi, N.; Romanello, M.; Damante, G.; Kelley, M.R.; Adamson, E.D.; D’Andrea, P.; Quadrifoglio, F.; Moro, L.; Tell, G. Cross-regulation between Egr-1 and APE/Ref-1 during early response to oxidative stress in the human osteoblastic HOBIT cell line: Evidence for an autoregulatory loop. Free Radic. Res. 2005, 39, 269–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Huang, R.P.; Adamson, E.D. Characterization of the DNA-Binding Properties of the Early Growth Response-1 (Egr-1) Transcription Factor: Evidence for Modulation by a Redox Mechanism. DNA Cell Biol. 1993, 12, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. McMahon, A.P.; Champion, J.E.; McMahon, J.A.; Sukhatme, V.P. Developmental expression of the putative transcription factor Egr-1 suggests that Egr-1 and c-fos are coregulated in some tissues. Development 1990, 108, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  73. Lejard, V.; Blais, F.; Guerquin, M.-J.; Bonnet, A.; Bonnin, M.-A.; Havis, E.; Malbouyres, M.; Bidaud, C.B.; Maro, G.; Gilardi-Hebenstreit, P.; et al. EGR1 and EGR2 involvement in vertebrate tendon differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 5855–5867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Orgeur, M.; Martens, M.; Leonte, G.; Nassari, S.; Bonnin, M.A.; Börno, S.T.; Timmermann, B.; Hecht, J.; Duprez, D.; Stricker, S. Genome-wide strategies identify downstream target genes of chick connective tissue-associated transcription factors. Development 2018, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Yue, F.; Cheng, Y.; Breschi, A.; Vierstra, J.; Wu, W.; Ryba, T.; Sandstrom, R.; Ma, Z.; Davis, C.; Pope, B.D.; et al. A comparative encyclopedia of DNA elements in the mouse genome. Nature 2014, 515, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Guerquin, M.-J.; Charvet, B.; Nourissat, G.; Havis, E.; Ronsin, O.; Bonnin, M.-A.; Ruggiu, M.; Olivera-Martinez, I.; Robert, N.; Lu, Y.; et al. Transcription factor EGR1 directs tendon differentiation and promotes tendon repair. J. Clin. Invest. 2013, 123, 3564–3576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Milet, C.; Bléher, M.; Allbright, K.; Orgeur, M.; Coulpier, F.; Duprez, D.; Havis, E. Egr1 deficiency induces browning of inguinal subcutaneous white adipose tissue in mice. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Sun, X.; Huang, H.; Pan, X.; Li, S.; Xie, Z.; Ma, Y.; Hu, B.; Wang, J.; Chen, Z.; Shi, P. EGR1 promotes the cartilage degeneration and hypertrophy by activating the Krüppel-like factor 5 and β-catenin signaling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Mol. basis Dis. 2019, 1865, 2490–2503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chen, Z.; Yue, S.X.; Zhou, G.; Greenfield, E.M.; Murakami, S. ERK1 and ERK2 regulate chondrocyte terminal differentiation during endochondral bone formation. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2015, 30, 765–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Srivastava, S.; Weitzmann, M.N.; Kimble, R.B.; Rizzo, M.; Zahner, M.; Milbrandt, J.; Ross, F.P.; Pacifici, R. Estrogen blocks M-CSF gene expression and osteoclast formation by regulating phosphorylation of Egr-1 and its interaction with Sp-1. J. Clin. Invest. 1998, 102, 1850–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Cenci, S.; Weitzmann, M.N.; Gentile, M.A.; Aisa, M.C.; Pacifici, R. M-CSF neutralization and Egr-1 deficiency prevent ovariectomy-induced bone loss. J. Clin. Invest. 2000, 105, 1279–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Lee, S.L.; Tourtellotte, L.C.; Wesselschmidt, R.L.; Milbrandt, J. Growth and differentiation proceeds normally in cells deficient in the immediate early gene NGFI-A. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 9971–9977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Topilko, P.; Schneider-Maunoury, S.; Levi, G.; Trembleau, A.; Gourdji, D.; Driancourt, M.A.; Rao, C.V.; Charnay, P. Multiple pituitary and ovarian defects in Krox-24 (NGFI-A, Egr-1)-targeted mice. Mol. Endocrinol. 1998, 12, 107–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Han, W.; Wang, B.; Liu, J.; Chen, L. The p16/miR-217/EGR1 pathway modulates age-related tenogenic differentiation in tendon stem/progenitor cells. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. (Shanghai) 2017, 49, 1015–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Gaut, L.; Robert, N.; Delalande, A.; Bonnin, M.A.; Pichon, C.; Duprez, D. EGR1 regulates transcription downstream of mechanical signals during tendon formation and healing. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Halberg, N.; Khan, T.; Trujillo, M.E.; Wernstedt-Asterholm, I.; Attie, A.D.; Sherwani, S.; Wang, Z.V.; Landskroner-Eiger, S.; Dineen, S.; Magalang, U.J.; et al. Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 Induces Fibrosis and Insulin Resistance in White Adipose Tissue. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009, 29, 4467–4483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Sun, K.; Halberg, N.; Khan, M.; Magalang, U.J.; Scherer, P.E. Selective Inhibition of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 Ameliorates Adipose Tissue Dysfunction. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2013, 33, 904–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Ackerman, J.E.; Geary, M.B.; Orner, C.A.; Bawany, F.; Loiselle, A.E. Obesity/Type II diabetes alters macrophage polarization resulting in a fibrotic tendon healing response. PLoS ONE 2017, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Wu, M.; Melichian, D.S.; De La Garza, M.; Gruner, K.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Barr, L.; Nair, A.; Shahrara, S.; Sporn, P.H.S.; Mustoe, T.A.; et al. Essential roles for early growth response transcription factor Egr-1 in tissue fibrosis and wound healing. Am. J. Pathol. 2009, 175, 1041–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Zhang, X.; Yang, Z.; Heng, Y.; Miao, C. MicroRNA-181 exerts an inhibitory role during renal fibrosis by targeting early growth response factor-1 and attenuating the expression of profibrotic markers. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019, 19, 3305–3313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Chen, S.J.; Ning, H.; Ishida, W.; Sodin-Semrl, S.; Takagawa, S.; Mori, Y.; Varga, J. The early-immediate gene EGR-1 is induced by transforming growth factor-β and mediates stimulation of collagen gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 21183–21197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Tan, L.; Peng, H.; Osaki, M.; Choy, B.K.; Auron, P.E.; Sandell, L.J.; Goldring, M.B. Egr-1 mediates transcriptional repression of COL2A1 promoter activity by interleukin-1β. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 17688–17700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Reumann, M.K.; Strachna, O.; Yagerman, S.; Torrecilla, D.; Kim, J.; Doty, S.B.; Lukashova, L.; Boskey, A.L.; Mayer-Kuckuk, P. Loss of transcription factor early growth response gene 1 results in impaired endochondral bone repair. Bone 2011, 49, 743–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Chakrabarti, P.; Kim, J.Y.; Singh, M.; Shin, Y.-K.; Kim, J.; Kumbrink, J.; Wu, Y.; Lee, M.-J.; Kirsch, K.H.; Fried, S.K.; et al. Insulin inhibits lipolysis in adipocytes via the evolutionarily conserved mTORC1-Egr1-ATGL-mediated pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2013, 33, 3659–3666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, T.; Guo, F.; Huang, S.; Chandalia, M.; Abate, N.; Fan, D.; Xin, H.-B.; Chen, Y.E.; et al. Dietary obesity-induced Egr-1 in adipocytes facilitates energy storage via suppression of FOXC2. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Nebbaki, S.-S.; El Mansouri, F.E.; Afif, H.; Kapoor, M.; Benderdour, M.; Duval, N.; Pelletier, J.-P.; Martel-Pelletier, J.; Fahmi, H. Egr-1 contributes to IL-1-mediated down-regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ expression in human osteoarthritic chondrocytes. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2012, 14, R69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Tao, X.; Liu, J.; Chen, L.; Zhou, Y.; Tang, K. EGR1 Induces Tenogenic Differentiation of Tendon Stem Cells and Promotes Rabbit Rotator Cuff Repair. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 35, 699–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wang, B.; Guo, J.; Feng, L.; Suen, C.-W.; Fu, W.-M.; Zhang, J.-F.; Li, G. MiR124 suppresses collagen formation of human tendon derived stem cells through targeting egr1. Exp. Cell Res. 2016, 347, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Qiu, S.; Sun, Y.; Xu, J.; Wen, G.; Yu, Y.; Wu, T.; Chai, Y. Ferulic acid improves self-renewal and differentiation of human tendon-derived stem cells by upregulating early growth response 1 through hypoxia. Genesis 2019, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Eliasson, P.; Andersson, T.; Hammerman, M.; Aspenberg, P. Primary gene response to mechanical loading in healing rat Achilles tendons. J. Appl. Physiol. 2013, 114, 1519–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Eliasson, P.; Andersson, T.; Aspenberg, P. Rat Achilles tendon healing: Mechanical loading and gene expression. J. Appl. Physiol. 2009, 107, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Maeda, T.; Sakabe, T.; Sunaga, A.; Sakai, K.; Rivera, A.L.; Keene, D.R.; Sasaki, T.; Stavnezer, E.; Iannotti, J.; Schweitzer, R.; et al. Conversion of mechanical force into TGF-β-mediated biochemical signals. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21, 933–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Derby, B.M.; Reichensperger, J.; Chambers, C.; Bueno, R.A.; Suchy, H.; Neumeister, M.W. Early growth response factor-1: Expression in a rabbit flexor tendon scar model. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2012, 129, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Hammerman, M.; Aspenberg, P.; Eliasson, P. Microtrauma stimulates rat Achilles tendon healing via an early gene expression pattern similar to mechanical loading. J. Appl. Physiol. 2014, 116, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Yeung, C.-Y.C.; Kadler, K.E. Chapter Eleven - Importance of the circadian clock in tendon development. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2019, 133, 309–342. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  106. Chang, J.; Garva, R.; Pickard, A.; Yeung, C.-Y.C.; Mallikarjun, V.; Swift, J.; Holmes, D.F.; Calverley, B.; Lu, Y.; Adamson, A.; et al. Circadian control of the secretory pathway maintains collagen homeostasis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2020, 22, 74–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Riedel, C.S.; Georg, B.; Jørgensen, H.L.; Hannibal, J.; Fahrenkrug, J. Mice Lacking EGR1 Have Impaired Clock Gene (BMAL1) Oscillation, Locomotor Activity, and Body Temperature. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2018, 64, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Magnusson, S.P.; Kjaer, M. The impact of loading, unloading, ageing and injury on the human tendon. J. Physiol. 2019, 597, 1283–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Schiele, N.R.; Marturano, J.E.; Kuo, C.K. Mechanical factors in embryonic tendon development: Potential cues for stem cell tenogenesis. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2013, 24, 834–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Arvind, V.; Huang, A.H. Mechanobiology of limb musculoskeletal development. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2017, 1409, 18–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Marturano, J.E.; Arena, J.D.; Schiller, Z.A.; Georgakoudi, I.; Kuo, C.K. Characterization of mechanical and biochemical properties of developing embryonic tendon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 6370–6375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Havis, E.; Bonnin, M.-A.; De Lima, J.E.; Charvet, B.; Milet, C.; Duprez, D. TGFβ and FGF promote tendon progenitor fate and act downstream of muscle contraction to regulate tendon differentiation during chick limb development. Development 2016, 143, 3839–3851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Herchenhan, A.; Dietrich-Zagonel, F.; Schjerling, P.; Kjær, M.; Eliasson, P. Early Growth Response Genes Increases Rapidly After Mechanical Overloading and Unloading in Tendon Constructs. J. Orthop. Res. 2019, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Yang, F.; Zhang, A.; Richardson, D.W. Regulation of the tenogenic gene expression in equine tenocyte-derived induced pluripotent stem cells by mechanical loading and Mohawk. Stem Cell Res. 2019, 39, 101489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Aspenberg, P. Stimulation of tendon repair: Mechanical loading, GDFs and platelets. A mini-review. Int. Orthop. 2007, 31, 783–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Gumucio, J.P.; Sugg, K.B.; Mendias, C.L. TGF-β Superfamily Signaling in Muscle and Tendon Adaptation to Resistance Exercise. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2015, 43, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Weatherholt, A.M.; Fuchs, R.K.; Warden, S.J. Specialized connective tissue: Bone, the structural framework of the upper extremity. J. Hand Ther. 2012, 25, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Reumann, M.K.; Strachna, O.; Lukashova, L.; Verdelis, K.; Donnelly, E.; Boskey, A.L.; Mayer-Kuckuk, P. Early growth response gene 1 regulates bone properties in mice. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2011, 89, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Lu, K.; Shi, T.-S.; Shen, S.-Y.; Lu, W.-L.; Wu, J.; Zhang, K.-J.; Zhu, X.-B.; Shi, Y.; Liu, X.-L.; Yu, F.; et al. Egr1 deficiency disrupts dynamic equilibrium of chondrocyte extracellular matrix through PPARγ/RUNX2 signaling pathways. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2018, 10, 1620–1632. [Google Scholar]
  120. Karsenty, G.; Wagner, E.F. Reaching a genetic and molecular understanding of skeletal development. Dev. Cell 2002, 2, 389–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Marcelin, G.; Clément, K. Adipose tissue fibrosis: An aggravating factor in obesity. Medecine/Sciences 2018, 34, 424–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Khan, T.; Muise, E.S.; Iyengar, P.; Wang, Z.V.; Chandalia, M.; Abate, N.; Zhang, B.B.; Bonaldo, P.; Chua, S.; Scherer, P.E. Metabolic Dysregulation and Adipose Tissue Fibrosis: Role of Collagen VI. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009, 29, 1575–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Ruiz-Ojeda, F.J.; Méndez-Gutiérrez, A.; Aguilera, C.M.; Plaza-Díaz, J. Extracellular matrix remodeling of adipose tissue in obesity and metabolic diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Wang, Q.A.; Tao, C.; Gupta, R.K.; Scherer, P.E. Tracking adipogenesis during white adipose tissue development, expansion and regeneration. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 1338–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Bartelt, A.; Heeren, J. Adipose tissue browning and metabolic health. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2014, 10, 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Hinz, B.; Lagares, D. Evasion of apoptosis by myofibroblasts: A hallmark of fibrotic diseases. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2020, 16, 11–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Vallée, A.; Lecarpentier, Y. TGF-β in fibrosis by acting as a conductor for contractile properties of myofibroblasts. Cell Biosci. 2019, 9, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Buechler, C.; Krautbauer, S.; Eisinger, K. Adipose tissue fibrosis. World J. Diabetes 2015, 6, 548–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Sun, K.; Tordjman, J.; Clément, K.; Scherer, P.E. Fibrosis and adipose tissue dysfunction. Cell Metab. 2013, 18, 470–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Sun, K.; Kusminski, C.M.; Scherer, P.E.; Sun, K.; Kusminski, C.M.; Scherer, P.E. Adipose tissue remodeling and obesity Find the latest version: Review series Adipose tissue remodeling and obesity. J. Clin. Invest. 2011, 121, 2094–2101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Divoux, A.; Clement, K. Architecture and the extracellular matrix: The still unappreciated components of the adipose tissue. Obes. Rev. 2011, 12, 494–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Lackey, D.E.; Burk, D.H.; Ali, M.R.; Mostaedi, R.; Smith, W.H.; Park, J.; Scherer, P.E.; Seay, S.A.; McCoin, C.S.; Bonaldo, P.; et al. Contributions of adipose tissue architectural and tensile properties toward defining healthy and unhealthy obesity. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 306, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Yu, X.; Shen, N.; Zhang, M.-L.; Pan, F.-Y.; Wang, C.; Jia, W.-P.; Liu, C.; Gao, Q.; Gao, X.; Xue, B.; et al. Egr-1 decreases adipocyte insulin sensitivity by tilting PI3K/Akt and MAPK signal balance in mice. EMBO J. 2011, 30, 3754–3765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Saiki, A.; Olsson, M.; Jernås, M.; Gummesson, A.; McTernan, P.G.; Andersson, J.; Jacobson, P.; Sjöholm, K.; Olsson, B.; Yamamura, S.; et al. Tenomodulin Is Highly Expressed in Adipose Tissue, Increased in Obesity, and Down-Regulated during Diet-Induced Weight Loss. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 94, 3987–3994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Aguilera, C.M.; Gomez-Llorente, C.; Tofe, I.; Gil-Campos, M.; Cañete, R.; Gil, Á. Genome-wide expression in visceral adipose tissue from obese prepubertal children. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 7723–7737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Senol-Cosar, O.; Flach, R.J.R.; DiStefano, M.; Chawla, A.; Nicoloro, S.; Straubhaar, J.; Hardy, O.T.; Noh, H.L.; Kim, J.K.; Wabitsch, M.; et al. Tenomodulin promotes human adipocyte differentiation and beneficial visceral adipose tissue expansion. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Ranger, T.A.; Wong, A.M.Y.; Cook, J.L.; Gaida, J.E. Is there an association between tendinopathy and diabetes mellitus? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Br. J. Sports Med. 2016, 50, 982–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Nichols, A.E.C.; Oh, I.; Loiselle, A.E. Effects of Type II Diabetes Mellitus on Tendon Homeostasis and Healing. J. Orthop. Res. 2019, 38, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Lin, Y.-C.; Li, Y.-J.; Rui, Y.-F.; Dai, G.-C.; Shi, L.; Xu, H.-L.; Ni, M.; Zhao, S.; Chen, H.; Wang, C.; et al. The effects of high glucose on tendon-derived stem cells: Implications of the pathogenesis of diabetic tendon disorders. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 17518–17528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Van Caam, A.; Vonk, M.; van den Hoogen, F.; van Lent, P.; van der Kraan, P. Unraveling SSc Pathophysiology; The Myofibroblast. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Korman, B. Evolving insights into the cellular and molecular pathogenesis of fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. Transl. Res. 2019, 209, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Bhattacharyya, S.; Wu, M.; Fang, F.; Tourtellotte, W.; Feghali-Bostwick, C.; Varga, J. Early growth response transcription factors: Key mediators of fibrosis and novel targets for anti-fibrotic therapy. Matrix Biol. 2011, 30, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Bhattacharyya, S.; Fang, F.; Tourtellotte, W.; Varga, J. Egr-1: New conductor for the tissue repair orchestra directs harmony (regeneration) or cacophony (fibrosis). J. Pathol. 2013, 229, 286–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Bhattacharyya, S.; Sargent, J.L.; Du, P.; Lin, S.; Tourtellotte, W.G.; Takehara, K.; Whitfield, M.L.; Varga, J. Egr-1 induces a profibrotic injury/repair gene program associated with systemic sclerosis. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Yasuoka, H.; Hsu, E.; Ruiz, X.D.; Steinman, R.A.; Choi, A.M.K.; Feghali-Bostwick, C.A. The fibrotic phenotype induced by IGFBP-5 is regulated by MAPK activation and egr-1-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Am. J. Pathol. 2009, 175, 605–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Ghatak, S.; Markwald, R.R.; Hascall, V.C.; Dowling, W.; Lottes, R.G.; Baatz, J.E.; Beeson, G.; Beeson, C.C.; Perrella, M.A.; Thannickal, V.J.; et al. Transforming growth factor β1 (TGF β1) regulates CD44V6 expression and activity through extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-induced EGR1 in pulmonary fibrogenic fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 10465–10489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Ho, L.C.; Sung, J.M.; Shen, Y.T.; Jheng, H.F.; Chen, S.H.; Tsai, P.J.; Tsai, Y.S. Egr-1 deficiency protects from renal inflammation and fibrosis. J. Mol. Med. 2016, 94, 933–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Li, T.Z.; Kim, S.M.; Hur, W.; Choi, J.E.; Kim, J.-H.; Hong, S.W.; Lee, E.B.; Lee, J.H.; Yoon, S.K. Elk-3 Contributes to the Progression of Liver Fibrosis by Regulating the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. Gut Liver 2017, 11, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Peng, W.-X.; Xiong, E.-M.; Ge, L.; Wan, Y.-Y.; Zhang, C.-L.; Du, F.-Y.; Xu, M.; Bhat, R.A.; Jin, J.; Gong, A.-H. Egr-1 promotes hypoxia-induced autophagy to enhance chemo-resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2016, 340, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Bai, Q.; Yan, H.; Sheng, Y.; Jin, Y.; Shi, L.; Ji, L.; Wang, Z. Long-term acetaminophen treatment induced liver fibrosis in mice and the involvement of Egr-1. Toxicology 2017, 382, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Gess, B.; Wolf, K.; Pfeifer, M.; Riegger, G.A.; Kurtz, A. In vivo carbon monoxide exposure and hypoxic hypoxia stimulate immediate early gene expression. Pflugers Arch. 1997, 434, 568–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Ghazvini-Boroujerdi, M.; Clark, J.; Narula, N.; Palmatory, E.; Connolly, J.M.; DeFelice, S.; Xu, J.; Jian, B.; Hazelwood, S.; Levy, R.J. Transcription factor Egr-1 in calcific aortic valve disease. J. Heart Valve Dis. 2004, 13, 894–903. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  153. Shen, J.; Xing, W.; Gong, F.; Wang, W.; Yan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, C.; Fu, S. MiR-150-5p retards the progression of myocardial fibrosis by targeting EGR1. Cell Cycle 2019, 18, 1335–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Kökény, G.; Calvier, L.; Legchenko, E.; Chouvarine, P.; Mózes, M.M.; Hansmann, G. PPARγ is a gatekeeper for extracellular matrix and vascular cell homeostasis: Beneficial role in pulmonary hypertension and renal/cardiac/pulmonary fibrosis. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2020, 29, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Németh, Á.; Mózes, M.M.; Calvier, L.; Hansmann, G.; Kökény, G. The PPARγ agonist pioglitazone prevents TGF-β induced renal fibrosis by repressing EGR-1 and STAT3. BMC Nephrol. 2019, 20, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Wan, H.; Yuan, Y.; Liu, J.; Chen, G. Pioglitazone, a PPAR-γ activator, attenuates the severity of cerulein-induced acute pancreatitis by modulating early growth response-1 transcription factor. Transl. Res. 2012, 160, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Li, G.; Han, N.; Li, Z.; Lu, Q. Identification of transcription regulatory relationships in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Clin. Rheumatol. 2013, 32, 609–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Kloppenburg, M.; Berenbaum, F. Osteoarthritis year in review 2019: Epidemiology and therapy. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Huber, L.C.; Distler, O.; Tarner, I.; Gay, R.E.; Gay, S.; Pap, T. Synovial fibroblasts: Key players in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2006, 45, 669–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Zhang, X.; Yuan, Z.; Cui, S. Identifying candidate genes involved in osteoarthritis through bioinformatics analysis. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2016, 34, 282–290. [Google Scholar]
  161. Feng, Z.; Lian, K.-J. Identification of genes and pathways associated with osteoarthritis by bioinformatics analyses. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2015, 19, 736–744. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  162. Grimbacher, B.; Aicher, W.K.; Peter, H.H.; Eibel, H. Measurement of transcription factor c-fos and EGR-1 mRNA transcription levels in synovial tissue by quantitative RT-PCR. Rheumatol. Int. 1997, 17, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Trabandt, A.; Aicher, W.K.; Gay, R.E.; Sukhatme, V.P.; Fassbender, H.G.; Gay, S. Spontaneous expression of immediately-early response genes c-fos and egr-1 in collagenase-producing rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts. Rheumatol. Int. 1992, 12, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Aicher, W.K.; Heer, A.H.; Trabandt, A.; Bridges Jr, S.L.; Schroeder Jr, H.W.; Stransky, G.; Gay, R.E.; Eibel, H.; Peter, H.H.; Siebenlist, U. Overexpression of zinc-finger transcription factor Z-225/Egr-1 in synoviocytes from rheumatoid arthritis patients. J. Immunol. 1994, 152, 5940–5948. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  165. Alexander, D.; Judex, M.; Meyringer, H.; Weis-Klemm, M.; Gay, B.; Müller-Ladner, U.; Aicher, W.K. Transcription factor Egr-1 activates collagen expression in immortalized fibroblasts or fibrosarcoma cells. Biol. Chem. 2002, 383, 1845–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Nourissat, G.; Berenbaum, F.; Duprez, D. Tendon injury: From biology to tendon repair. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2015, 11, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Docheva, D.; Müller, S.A.; Majewski, M.; Evans, C.H. Biologics for tendon repair. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2015, 84, 222–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Nichols, A.E.C.; Best, K.T.; Loiselle, A.E. The cellular basis of fibrotic tendon healing: Challenges and opportunities. Transl. Res. 2019, 209, 156–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Lin, D.; Alberton, P.; Caceres, M.D.; Volkmer, E.; Schieker, M.; Docheva, D. Tenomodulin is essential for prevention of adipocyte accumulation and fibrovascular scar formation during early tendon healing. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 8, e3116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Sakabe, T.; Sakai, K.; Maeda, T.; Sunaga, A.; Furuta, N.; Schweitzer, R.; Sasaki, T.; Sakai, T. Transcription factor scleraxis vitally contributes to progenitor lineage direction in wound healing of adult tendon in mice. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 5766–5780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  171. Pryce, B.A.; Watson, S.S.; Murchison, N.D.; Staverosky, J.A.; Dünker, N.; Schweitzer, R. Recruitment and maintenance of tendon progenitors by TGFbeta signaling are essential for tendon formation. Development 2009, 136, 1351–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  172. Docheva, D.; Hunziker, E.B.; Fässler, R.; Brandau, O. Tenomodulin is necessary for tenocyte proliferation and tendon maturation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 25, 699–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  173. Bagchi, R.A.; Roche, P.; Aroutiounova, N.; Espira, L.; Abrenica, B.; Schweitzer, R.; Czubryt, M.P. The transcription factor scleraxis is a critical regulator of cardiac fibroblast phenotype. BMC Biol. 2016, 14, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  174. Pagel, J.-I.; Deindl, E. Early growth response 1—a transcription factor in the crossfire of signal transduction cascades. Indian J. Biochem. Biophys. 2011, 48, 226–235. [Google Scholar]
  175. Magee, N.; Zhang, Y. Role of early growth response 1 in liver metabolism and liver cancer. Hepatoma Res. 2017, 3, 268–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  176. Li, L.; Ameri, A.H.; Wang, S.; Jansson, K.H.; Casey, O.M.; Yang, Q.; Beshiri, M.L.; Fang, L.; Lake, R.G.; Agarwal, S.; et al. EGR1 regulates angiogenic and osteoclastogenic factors in prostate cancer and promotes metastasis. Oncogene 2019, 38, 6241–6255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Penet, M.-F.; Kakkad, S.; Pathak, A.P.; Krishnamachary, B.; Mironchik, Y.; Raman, V.; Solaiyappan, M.; Bhujwalla, Z.M. Structure and Function of a Prostate Cancer Dissemination-Permissive Extracellular Matrix. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 2245–2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Gitenay, D.; Baron, V.T. Is EGR1 a potential target for prostate cancer therapy? Future Oncol. 2009, 5, 993–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  179. Zhao, Q.; Lu, H. Giant cell tumor of tendon sheath in the wrist that damaged the extensor indicis proprius tendon: A case report and literature review. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Sun, Z.; Xu, X.; He, J.; Murray, A.; Sun, M.-A.; Wei, X.; Wang, X.; McCoig, E.; Xie, E.; Jiang, X.; et al. EGR1 recruits TET1 to shape the brain methylome during development and upon neuronal activity. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 21 01664 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of two connective tissues: a dense regular connective tissue, the tendon (A), and a loose connective tissue, the adipose tissue (B). Left panels represent tendon (A) and adipose tissue (B). Arrows in left panels indicate the section levels in each tissue. Right panels show the cellular composition on sections of tendon (A) and adipose tissue (B).
Figure 1. Schematic representation of two connective tissues: a dense regular connective tissue, the tendon (A), and a loose connective tissue, the adipose tissue (B). Left panels represent tendon (A) and adipose tissue (B). Arrows in left panels indicate the section levels in each tissue. Right panels show the cellular composition on sections of tendon (A) and adipose tissue (B).
Ijms 21 01664 g001
Ijms 21 01664 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the external stimuli that regulate Egr1 transcription.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the external stimuli that regulate Egr1 transcription.
Ijms 21 01664 g002
Ijms 21 01664 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the post-translational modifications on EGR1 protein.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the post-translational modifications on EGR1 protein.
Ijms 21 01664 g003
Ijms 21 01664 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the position of Egr1/EGR1 in the molecular cascade downstream of mechanical signals involved in tendon gene expression.
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the position of Egr1/EGR1 in the molecular cascade downstream of mechanical signals involved in tendon gene expression.
Ijms 21 01664 g004
Table
Table 1. List of genes regulated by EGR1 in three connective tissues: tendon, bone, and adipose tissue.
Table 1. List of genes regulated by EGR1 in three connective tissues: tendon, bone, and adipose tissue.
Genes Regulated by EGR1
Gene Names
(Protein Names)		Activated (+) or
Repressed (−) by EGR1		ReferencesExpression in Connective Tissues
o		Physiological /Pathological Roles
in Connective Tissues
(I) Extracellular Proteins:
(1) Extra Cellular Matrix (ECM) Components
Acan
(Aggrecan)		−[25]Cartilage
Tendon		ECM component of cartilage negatively regulated by EGR1
Bgn
(Biglycan)		+[46,76,84]Tendon ECM component of tendon
Collagen fibrillogenesis
Col1a1 *
(1 chain of type I collagen)		+[73,76,77,84,85,86,87,88,89,90]Tendon
Bone
White adipose tissue 		Main ECM structural and functional component of tendons
ECM component of adipose tissue
Fibrosis
Col1a2 *
(2 chain of type I collagen)		+[46,76,77,85,91]Tendon
Bone
White adipose tissue 		Main ECM structural and functional component of tendons
ECM component of adipose tissue
Fibrosis
Col2a1 *
(1 chain of type II collagen)		−[25,92]CartilageMajor ECM component of cartilage negatively regulated by EGR1
Col3a1
(1 chain of type III collagen)		+[73,76,77,86,87,88,90]Tendon
White adipose tissue		ECM component of tendon and adipose tissue
Collagen fibrillogenesis
Fibrosis
Col5a1
(1 chain of type V collagen)		+[73,76,77]Tendon
White adipose tissue		ECM component of tendon and adipose tissue
Collagen fibrillogenesis
Col5a2
(chain of type V collagen)		+[77]Tendon
White adipose tissue		ECM component of tendon and adipose tissue
Collagen fibrillogenesis
Col6a1
(1 chain of type VI collagen)		+[76]Tendon
White adipose tissue		ECM component of tendon and adipose tissue
Fibrosis
Col14a1
(1 chain of type XIV collagen)		+[73,76,77]Tendon
White adipose tissue		ECM component of tendon and adipose tissue
Collagen fibrillogenesis
Dcn
(Decorin)		+[76,77,84]Tendon
White adipose tissue		ECM component of tendon and adipose tissue
Collagen fibrillogenesis
Fbn1
(Fibrillin 1)		+[76,77]Tendon
White adipose tissue		ECM component of tendon and adipose tissue
Collagen fibrillogenesis
Fn1
(Fibronectin)		+[77]Tendon
White adipose tissue		ECM component of tendon and adipose tissue
Matrix organizer
Collagen fibrillogenesis
Hapln1 *
(Hyaluronan and proteoglycan link protein 1)		−[25]Cartilage
Tendon		ECM component of cartilage negatively regulated by EGR1
Postn
(Periostin)		+[77]Tendon
Bone
White adipose tissue		ECM component of tendon, bone, and adipose tissue
Tnc
(Tenascin)		+[76]Tendon
White adipose tissue 		ECM component of tendon and adipose tissue
Collagen fibrillogenesis
(2) Secreted Proteins/Hormones
Bglap
(Osteocalcin)		+[93]BoneBone-derived hormone involved in bone mineralization
Regulation of glucose homeostasis
Csf1 *
(Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor, M-CSF)		−[80,81]Bone
Osteoclast precursors
Osteoclast proliferation and differentiation
Ctsk
(Cathepsin K)		+[77,93]Bone
Tendon
Adipose tissue		ECM remodelling enzyme involved in bone formation during skeletal repair
Lep *
(Leptin)		+[41,77]White adipose tissueHormone secreted by adipocytes involved in energy balance regulation
Tgfb2 *
(Transforming Growth Factor beta2, TGFbeta2)		+[73,76,85]Tendon
Tendon development, homeostasis, and repair
fibrosis
(II) Transmembrane Proteins
Tnmd
(Tenomodulin)		+[73,76,84,85]Tendon
White adipose tissue		Main tendon differentiation marker
Transmembrane glycoprotein involved in tendon formation, homeostasis, and repair
Increased in obese patients
(III) Cytoplasmic Proteins
Pnpla2 *
(Adipose Triglyceride Lipase, ATGL)		−[94]White adipose tissueEnzyme involved in adipose triglyceride lipolysis to mobilize triglyceride for energy production
Acp5
(Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase)		+[93]Bone
Metalloprotein enzyme involved in endochondral bone formation and repair
Ucp1 *
(Uncoupling protein 1)		−[77]White and brown adipose tissuesThermogenic protein expressed in brown adipose tissue
Upregulated in the context of white adipose tissue browning
(IV) Transcription Factors/Nuclear Proteins
Cebpb *
(CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Protein ß, C/EBPß)		−[77]White adipose tissue
Adipocyte differentiation
Overexpression induces osteopenia
Egr1 *
(Early Growth Response 1)		−[37]Tendon
Bone (hypertrophic cartilage)
White adipose tissue		Zinc finger transcription factor involved in tendon formation, homeostasis, and repair
Egr1 deletion induces bone loss
Egr1 deletion induces white fat browning
Fibrotic factor
Foxc2
(Forkhead box protein C2)		−[95]Adipose tissueIncreases insulin sensitivity and is down-egulated in type 2 diabetic patients
Mkx
(Mohawk)		+[46]TendonHomeobox protein involved in tendon formation and homeostasis
Pparg *
(Peroxysome Proliferator Activated Receptor PPAR)		−[96]Adipose tissue
Chondrocytes		Positive regulator of adipocyte differentiation
Negative regulator of osteocyte differentiation
Anti-fibrotic factor
Scx
(Scleraxis)		+[73,76,84,85]Tendon Main tendon marker
bHLH transcription factor involved in tendon development, homeostasis, and repair
Genes marked with * are directly regulated by EGR1.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Havis, E.; Duprez, D. EGR1 Transcription Factor is a Multifaceted Regulator of Matrix Production in Tendons and Other Connective Tissues. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1664. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051664

AMA Style

Havis E, Duprez D. EGR1 Transcription Factor is a Multifaceted Regulator of Matrix Production in Tendons and Other Connective Tissues. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(5):1664. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051664

Chicago/Turabian Style

Havis, Emmanuelle, and Delphine Duprez. 2020. "EGR1 Transcription Factor is a Multifaceted Regulator of Matrix Production in Tendons and Other Connective Tissues" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 5: 1664. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051664

APA Style

Havis, E., & Duprez, D. (2020). EGR1 Transcription Factor is a Multifaceted Regulator of Matrix Production in Tendons and Other Connective Tissues. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(5), 1664. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051664

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop