Next Article in Journal
CD73 Overexpression in Podocytes: A Novel Marker of Podocyte Injury in Human Kidney Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of New Tricyclic 1,2-Thiazine Derivatives with Anti-Inflammatory Activity
Previous Article in Journal
Resveratrol Is a Natural Inhibitor of Human Intestinal Mast Cell Activation and Phosphorylation of Mitochondrial ERK1/2 and STAT3
Previous Article in Special Issue
Novel (+)-Neoisopulegol-Based O-Benzyl Derivatives as Antimicrobial Agents
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 14
10.3390/ijms22147641
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Btk Inhibitors: A Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Delivery Perspective

by
Chiara Brullo
,
Carla Villa
,
Bruno Tasso
,
Eleonora Russo
*,† and
Andrea Spallarossa
*,†
Department of Pharmacy, University of Genova, Viale Benedetto XV, 3, 16132 Genova, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors equally contributed to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(14), 7641; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147641
Submission received: 16 June 2021 / Revised: 12 July 2021 / Accepted: 15 July 2021 / Published: 16 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drug Design, Synthesis and Delivery)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In the past few years, Bruton’s tyrosine Kinase (Btk) has emerged as new target in medicinal chemistry. Since approval of ibrutinib in 2013 for treatment of different hematological cancers (as leukemias and lymphomas), two other irreversible Btk inhibitors have been launched on the market. In the attempt to overcome irreversible Btk inhibitor limitations, reversible compounds have been developed and are currently under evaluation. In recent years, many Btk inhibitors have been patented and reported in the literature. In this review, we summarized the (ir)reversible Btk inhibitors recently developed and studied clinical trials and preclinical investigations for malignancies, chronic inflammation conditions and SARS-CoV-2 infection, covering advances in the field of medicinal chemistry. Furthermore, the nanoformulations studied to increase ibrutinib bioavailability are reported.

1. Introduction

Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (Btk), also known as agammaglobulinemia tyrosine kinase (TK), is a member of the Tec kinase family, initially identified as a defective protein in human X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA) in 1993 by Vetrie and coworkers [1,2]. Btk is a cytoplasmic non-receptor TK expressed in all cells of the hematopoietic lineage, particularly B cells, mast cells and macrophages; on the contrary, it is not present in T cells, NK cells and plasma cells [3]. This protein plays an essential role in B cell lymphopoiesis, being important for development, maturation and differentiation of immature B-cell and also for proliferation and survival of B-cells themselves [4,5].
Btk is a fundamental component of different B cell receptors (BCR) and it acts as a modulator of several intracellular signals by a variety of cell surface molecules, including PI3K, MAPK and NF-κB pathways (Figure 1); in this way, it regulates activation, proliferation and differentiation to antibody-producing plasma cells [6,7]. Consequently, Btk inhibition leads to the interruption of many down-stream cell signaling pathways related to the development of B cell malignancies (e.g., different types of leukemias and lymphomas) [8] and autoimmune diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, RA, and multiple sclerosis, MS) [9].
Thus, Btk represents an important target in the drug development field, with 24 Btk inhibitors (BtkIs) currently under clinical evaluation as anti-tumor agents against chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), B-cell malignancies and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in different countries (i.e., USA, China and Poland) [10].

2. Btk Structure

As reported in Figure 1, Btk consists of five regions: the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, the Tec homology (TH) domain, the Src homology (SH3) domain, the SH2 domain and the C-terminal region with kinase activity [11,12,13]. The PH domain mediates protein–phospholipid and protein–protein interactions. The TH domain is formed by two proline-rich regions (PRR) and is involved in autoregulation, whereas SH2 and SH3 domains bind phosphorylated tyrosine residues and PRR, respectively. In the SH3 domain, a fundamental autophosphorylated site (Y223 residue) is present. Finally, the C-terminal part contains the catalytic kinase domain embedding Y551 residue responsible for initial Btk activation [14]. In the catalytic domain, Cys481 residue represents the site of covalent binding of the most studied BtkIs.
In detail, Btk is activated by spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk), in turn activated by BCR [14]. Upon activation, Btk can phosphorylate Y753 and Y759 residues of PLCβ2, leading to stimulation and production of IP3, DAG and PKCβ. The levels of calcium increase and the MAPK/ERK path is triggered, affecting the transcriptional expression of genes involved in proliferation, survival and cytokine secretion. Simultaneously, Btk could activate Akt/Nf-kB signaling pathways [15,16]. Moreover, activated Btk is a mediator of pro-inflammatory signals, as inflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL-1b), strictly associated with the inflammatory response [17].

3. Btk Inhibitors

Structural information about the kinase is fundamental for optimal inhibitor design. If the protein structure shows great plasticity, distinct ligands might induce different states of the kinase, as observed in multiple crystal structures in various conformations.
The X-ray crystal structures of active and inactive Btk kinase bound to several inhibitors have been determined (PDB codes: 5P9J, 5P9H, 5P9M, 5P9L, 4OTF, 5P9F and 5P9G) [6]. The different ligands proved to induce different states of the kinase, providing interesting information and insights on Btk structure and function.
According to their mechanism of action and binding mode, BtkIs can be classified into two types: (i) irreversible inhibitors characterized by a Michael acceptor moiety able to form a covalent bond with the conserved Cys481 residue in the ATP binding site; or (ii) reversible inhibitors that bind to a specific pocket in the SH3 domain through weak, reversible interactions (e.g., hydrogen bonds or hydrophobic interactions). In detail, they access the specific SH3 pocket of Btk, inducing an inactive conformation of the kinase.
The majority of currently approved BtkIs are irreversible inhibitors (Table 1) [18]. However, the onset of resistant mutants (especially to ibrutinib, the first drug launched on the market) has reduced their use [19,20]. In particular, the isosteric replacement of Cys481 into a serine residue decreases the reactivity of Btk variant towards ibrutinib and the other covalent inhibitors with a reduction in compound potency. As an example, ibrutinib showed a sixfold reduction in potency against C481S mutant (IC50 = 4.6 nM) [21]. Furthermore, other site mutations involving both Cys481 (e.g., C481R, C481F, C481Y) [21,22] and the gatekeeper residue Thr474 (T474I, T474S and T474M) [23] have been recently evidenced. Although ibrutinib can still bind noncovalently to C481S mutant, its reversible mechanism of action does not guarantee therapeutic efficacy in patients with this mutation [24,25].
In this regard, non-covalent inhibitors that do not interact with Cys481 could inhibit C481R, T474I and T474M mutants and represent an interesting therapeutic option [21]. Moreover, to date, the use of reversible inhibitors seems to be more effective in treating autoimmune diseases such as RA, different types of MS, chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [26,27].
More recently, some proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) molecules have been reported as a new therapeutic approach to reduce Btk activity [28].

3.1. Approved Btk Inhibitors

The three BtkIs currently approved for clinical use are ibrutinib ((S)-1-(3-(4-amino-3-(4-phenoxyphenyl)-1H-pyrazolo [3,4-d]pyrimidin-1-yl)piperidin-1-yl)prop-2-en-1-one (Imbruvica®, Pharmacyclics LLC, Sunnyvale, CA, USA); acalabrutinib (4-((3S)-8-amino-3-((R)-1-(but-2-ynoyl)pyrrolidin-2-yl)-3,8a-dihydroimidazo[1,5-a]pyrazin-1-yl)-N-(pyridin-2-yl)benzamide (Calquence®, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Gaithersburg, DE, USA); and zanubrutinib (7-(1-acryloylpiperidin-4-yl)-2-(4-phenoxyphenyl)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydropyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine-3-carboxamide (Brukinsa®, BeiGene USA, Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA) (Figure 2A) [29]. As highlighted in Figure 2, these compounds share some structural similarity, although they are characterized by different pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine, dihydroimidazo[1,5-a]pyrazine and tetrahydropyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine scaffolds. In addition, ibrutinib and zanubrutinib present a common 4-phenoxyphenyl substituent at position 3 of the pyrazole nucleus and a piperidin-1-yl-prop-2-en-1-one chain, very similar to that of acalabrutinib. Furthermore, ibrutinib and acalabrutinib display a free amino group on the heteroaromatic core nucleus. On the basis of the crystallographic data available, ibrutinib and zanubrutinib share similar bioactive conformations within the wild-type Btk binding site (Figure 2B) [30,31]. Therefore, beside the covalent bond with Cys481, the two complexes are mainly stabilized by similar interactions which include the cation-π contact between the phenoxyphenyl ring and Lys430 side chain and the hydrogen bonds with Met477 and Glu475 backbones (Figure 2C,D). It is clearly demonstrated that covalent interaction is not required to generate a potent Btk inhibitor, but with the ability to trap the enzyme in a covalent dead end complex, covalent irreversible BtkIs have a great potency [21].
Ibrutinib (also named PCI-32765) is a first-in-class Btk inhibitor. After the failure of LFM-A13 in 1999 [32], ibrutinib was initially chosen for preclinical development of in vivo models of RA in 2007 [14]. In 2010, Honigberg and coworkers reported the efficacy of this compound in B-cell lymphoma [33] and subsequently, in 2013, it was approved by the FDA for the treatment of CLL, SLL, Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) and relapsed/refractory MCL. In 2017, the compound received approval also for cGVHD patients after failure of one or more lines of systemic therapy (Table 1) [34]. Selectivity is an important factor influencing the long-term safety of a drug, but it is impossible to predict every off-target protein that a covalent inhibitor may bind. In addition to Btk, ibrutinib also inhibits other kinases that possess Cys481-like residues including Blk, Bmx, Egfr, ErbB2, ErbB4, Itk, Tec, Txk and Jak [33]. Interestingly, ibrutinib also potently inhibits kinases that lack a reactive cysteine, such as Csk, Fgr, Lck, Brk, Hck, Yes1, Frk, Ret, Flt3, Abl, Fyn, Lyn and Src [33]. A recent proteomic study showed that ibrutinib could also covalently react with non-kinase proteins in cells [35]. To overcome ibrutinib off-target side effects (i.e., skin and dermatological problems [36], bleeding, infection [37], headache and atrial fibrillation) and the emerging resistances [24,38,39], some selective second-generation BtkIs were developed.
Acalabrutinib (ACP-196, Figure 2A) is a novel second-generation Btk inhibitor, designed by Acerta Pharma [40,41]. It was approved in 2017 and is currently indicated for patients with relapsed/refractory MCL as well as CLL/SLL (Table 1). Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111, Figure 2A) was developed by BeiGene in 2012 [42] as a potential candidate due to its high potency, selectivity, in vitro pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in an OCI-LY10 DLBCL xenograft model [31]. It was approved in 2019 for patients with MCL who have received at least one prior therapy, becoming the first Chinese-origin drug that won a grand slam tournament in FDA history.
Although ibrutinib, acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib are irreversible inhibitors able to covalently bind cysteine 481 in the ATP binding pocket of Btk, their activity on the enzyme is quite different (IC50 values = 1.5, 5.1 and 0.5 nM for ibrutinib, acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib, respectively). Moreover, as previously reported, all three compounds are not selective for Btk, showing inhibition in the low nanomolar range of other type of intracellular (e.g., Tec, Itk Blk, Jak) and receptor (e.g., epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR) tyrosine kinases. The lack of specificity is probably associated with rash and severe diarrhea [43]. In particular, acalabrutinib represents the most selective compound [44], being inactive on Itk, EGFR, ERBB2, Blk and Jak3. Zanubrutinib and acalabrutinib are less active than ibrutinib against Tec and Itk [45] and therefore show less platelet disfunction and bleeding problems [46] and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity [47]. In addition, thrombus formation was significantly inhibited in platelets treated with ibrutinib, whereas no impact on thrombus formation was identified upon treatment with acalabrutinib that therefore displays an improved safety profile with minimal adverse effects compared with ibrutinib [48]. Very recently, Fancher and coworkers reported an interesting study on drug–drug and drug–food interactions associated with ibrutinib, acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib, providing recommendations for their usage, particularly on dosage, in clinical use [29]. The therapeutic indications, dosage and the total number of clinical trials of ibrutinib, acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib are reported in Table 1. The majority of clinical trials are focused on diseases for which these compounds have been approved, but in the past few years, these molecules have been evaluated for their immunomodulation activity (as previously reported), with cGVHD and more recently COVID-19 being the principal objects of BtkI application.
For cGVHD, a condition that might occur after an allogeneic transplant, the most studied compound is ibrutinib, with nine clinical trials carried out (one completed, five in recruitment, two active studies not recruiting, one enrolling by invitation, Table 1). In detail, ibrutinib has been evaluated in association with rituximab (NCT03689894 and NCT04235036) and corticosteroids (NCT02959944) and in a comparative study with ruxolitinib (NCT03112603). Additionally, two clinical trials (NCT04198922 and NCT04716075; Table 1) are currently recruiting participants for the evaluation of acalabrutinib for the treatment of cGVHD.
Despite the evidence of the beneficial effect in MS of anti-inflammatory agents [9,49], currently no clinical trials regarding the use of irreversible BtkIs in this pathology are reported.
Considering systemic hyper-inflammation, cytokine storm induced by COVID-19 infection and the active role in macrophage function at NF-kB pathways of Btk, in 2020, some clinical studies on hospitalized COVID-19 patients have been carried out on BtkIs [50]. To date, two clinical trials are reported for ibrutinib, three for acalabrutinib (two of them completed) and one for zanubrutinib (Table 1). Although all these data support the potential use of BtkIs in the COVID-19 treatment, the potential increased risk of secondary infections or impaired humoral immunity in patients should be considered; indeed, opportunistic infections (particularly pneumonia) are commonly reported in treated BtkI patients [37]. In detail, data from the CALAVI phase II trials (NCT04497948) for acalabrutinib in hospitalized COVID-19 patients did not meet the primary efficacy endpoints and, on the base of these results, this study has been prematurely terminated [51].

Drug Delivery of Ibrutinib

Nanotechnologies represent an effective approach to overcome the pharmacokinetic issues associated with small molecules (e.g., poor water solubility, limited oral bioavailability, large distribution volume) and the administration of a single nanoparticle (NP) containing several drugs proved to be more effective than the administration of several NPs each containing one compound [52,53].
The poor water solubility of ibrutinib limits its absorption and bioavailability, negatively effecting the drug’s therapeutic effect. Recently, to improve its efficacy in cancer therapy, different nanoformulations of ibrutinib have been developed, including gold and polymeric NPs or aqueous nanosuspension for oral administration.
One of the first studies regarding ibrutinib delivery was focused on the innovative approach of targeting cancer cells with an increased cholesterol demand [54]. Gold nanoparticles functionalized with apolipoprotein A-I and a phospholipid bilayer (HDL NPs) were able to reduce cellular cholesterol uptake in B-cell lymphoma and synergize with inhibitors of downstream B-cell receptor signaling, including ibrutinib. The study demonstrated that the ABC lymphoma cell lines are more resistant to the reduction in cholesterol by HDL NPs, but the combination of these nanoparticles with ibrutinib (5 nM) significantly reduced total cellular cholesterol. The obtained data confirmed that cellular cholesterol depletion induces apoptosis in lymphoma cells and provided a rational approach to target cholesterol metabolism in other cancer types that are cholesterol-dependent.
Sanchez-Coronilla and coworkers [55] presented a theoretical study with ibrutinib conjugated with cysteine/methyl-cysteine and gold surface. In particular, the interaction of the drug with a gold surface was studied to explore the possibility to use gold NPs as an ibrutinib delivery system. Based on the obtained results, the authors concluded that gold NPs could represent a valuable delivery system for ibrutinib that can interact with gold through the nitrogen atoms of the pyrimidine ring and the amino group. Interestingly, the ibrutinib acrylamide group would not be involved in the interaction with the gold surface and therefore can react with the Cys481 side chain, thus inhibiting the Btk enzyme.
Additionally, several polymeric NPs emerged to be very promising in enhancing ibrutinib action. Peng and coworkers [56] reported the preparation of cellulose derivative NPs obtained by conjugating 2,3-dialdehyde cellulose (DAC) with oleylamine and aminoethyl rhodamine (AERhB) via Schiff base bonds. AERhB was used as a model compound representative of amine-containing anticancer drugs, such as ibrutinib. Two kinds of NPs (namely, DAC-50% oleylamine/50% AERhB and DAC-75% oleylamine/25% AERhB), were used for the drug release studies under both physiological (pH = 7.4) and acid (pH = 5.0 and pH = 4.0) conditions to mimic the existing environment in cancerous tissues. After 48 h at 37 °C, the determined release percentages were 23.3%, 64.9% and 84.8% at pH 7.4, 5.0 and 4.0, respectively. These results indicated that the release of the model drug was predominantly driven by acid-induced degradation of the Schiff base linkages.
Qui and coworkers [57] described the preparation of self-assembled nanocomplexes constituted by sialic acid conjugated with stearic acid, ibrutinib and egg phosphatidylglycerol. The efficiency of this system in targeting macrophages and its efficacy in inhibiting tumor progression were investigated in vitro and in vivo. The results indicated that the nanocomplex exhibited high efficiency in targeting tumor-associated macrophages, inhibiting Btk activation and Th2 tumorigenic cytokine release, reducing angiogenesis and suppressing tumor growth. The authors claimed that the developed nanocomplexes could be a promising strategy for ibrutinib delivery with minimal systemic side effects.
Noteworthy, two papers reported ibrutinib formulations for oral administration. In particular, an aqueous nanosuspension containing ibrutinib and pluronic F-127 as stabilizing agent was optimized through a three-level, three-factor, Box–Behnken design [58]. The technological properties of the obtained nanosuspension (i.e., particle size between 278.6 and 453.2 nm, stability of freeze-drying formulation up to 6 months and controlled drug release) as well as the in vivo pharmacokinetic were properly defined. A second investigation considered the oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) NPs (PLGA-NPs) loaded with ibrutinib [59]. In details, PLGA is a polymer used for its biocompatibility, biodegradability and tunable physicochemical and formulation characteristics. After administration, it is transformed in lactic acid and glycolic acid, which are endogenous materials that do not cause immunogenic reactions. In this study, PLGA-NPs composed by 75% lactic acid and 25% glycolic acid (75:25) have been used to grant a slower degradation of the nanoparticles and a consequent sustained drug release. The authors observed 4.2-fold enhancements in the oral bioavailability of ibrutinib-loaded PLGA-NPs in comparison with an ibrutinib suspension, which could be attributed to better absorption and higher exposure of the nanoformulation.

3.2. BtkIs under Clinical Investigation

In recent years, many molecules able to block Btk, both irreversibly and reversibly, have been patented and reported in the literature. In the past ten years [6,26,60], different chemical scaffolds (e.g., pyrimidines, 2,4-diaminopyrimidines, 1,3,5-triazines and condensed structures as pyrazolo-pyrimidines, pyrazolo-pyridines, pyrrolo-pyrimidines, pyrrolo-triazines, imidazo-pyrazines, imidazo-pyrimidines, imidazo-quinoxalines and purines) have been deeply investigated. In this review, we summarized the recently developed (ir)reversible BtkIs studied in clinical trials, covering recent advances in the field of medicinal chemistry.

3.2.1. Irreversible BtkIs

Spebrutinib [61], evobrutinib [62], olmutinib [63], tirabrutinib [64], elsubrutinib (ABBV-105) [65,66] and tolebrutinib (SAR 442168) [67] are irreversible BtkIs currently under clinical investigations (Figure 3, Table 2). These compounds share an α,β-unsaturated carbonyl moiety (essential for covalent bonds) and an aromatic ring (preferentially a pyrimidine nucleus), free or fused with other five-member cycles (Figure 3). Furthermore, with the sole exception of elsubrutinib, these derivatives are basic compounds that inhibit Btk at nanomolar concentrations (IC50 values of 0.5 nM, 37.9 nM, 1.0 nM and 2.2 nM for spebrutinib, evobrutinib, olmutinib and tirabrutinib, respectively) [26]. In March 2020, tirabrutinib was approved in Japan (at the dosage of 480 mg orally) for the treatment of recurrent or refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma and now is also under study for the treatment of WM, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma and a number of autoimmune disorders (chronic lymphocytic leukemia, B cell lymphoma, Sjogren’s syndrome, pemphigus and RA) [68]. Olmutinib also inhibits in irreversible mode EGFR, a member of Tec family kinases (including Jak3, EGFR, Her2, Her4 and Blk) sharing with Btk a reactive cysteine residue (namely, Cys797) [69]. TG-1701 (TG Therapeutics), TAS5315 (Taiho Pharmaceutical) and M7583 (TL-895, EMD Serono) are irreversible BtkIs (molecular structures not disclosed) currently in clinical trials for B-cell malignancies (NCT03671590), RA (NCT03605251) and MCL (NCT02825836), respectively. In particular, TAS5315 is a pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine derivative currently in a phase II clinical trial for RA treatment [70]. In addition, DTRMWXHS-12 (also named DTRM-12, formula not disclosed) is a pyrazolo-pyrimidine derivative [71,72] acting as Btk irreversible inhibitor and currently under three phase I clinical trials for different types of leukemia (as CLL) and lymphoma (as MCL) (Table 2). The presence of reactive Michael acceptor groups in the above mentioned irreversible BtkIs led to undesired side effects such as allergic reactions, fever, lymphadenopathy, edema and albuminuria due to off-target inhibition [73].

3.2.2. Reversible BtkIs

Noncovalent BtkIs offer several advantages over existing covalent inhibitors. Whereas covalent inhibitors loose potency against Cys481 mutants, some noncovalent inhibitors retain potent inhibition against C481S and C481R Btk variants, providing a potentially effective treatment option to ibrutinib-resistant or naïve patients [21]. Furthermore, reversible inhibitors provide a lower risk of toxicity compared to irreversible compounds and for these reasons some of them (i.e., fenebrutinib, vacabrutinib, BMS-986142, BIIB068, CT-1530, AC0058 and SHR1459) are under clinical investigations for long-term drug administration in the treatment of autoimmune diseases, especially RA (Table 2).
In the past ten years, a plethora of reversible BtkIs have been patented [6,26,61]; for example, Genentech corporation generated over 1000 noncovalent BtkIs covering a broad range of chemical substructures and physicochemical properties [21]. Substantial efforts have been made over the years to further develop reversible inhibitors, but unfortunately, none of the studied compounds have yielded significant breakthroughs [6,74,75]. The most recent and relevant reversible BtkIs are reported in Figure 4.
In particular, fenebrutinib is a potent Btk inhibitor (IC50 = 0.5 nM) endowed with good selectivity, favorable pharmacokinetic profile and efficacy against Btk C4815 mutant, [76,77,78], whereas vacabrutinib potently inhibits Btk and Itk [79,80]. Fenebrutinib is currently under clinical evaluation in eight trials (i.e., NCT03693625, NCT03596632, NCT04586023, NCT04586010, NCT04544449, NCT01991184, NCT03137069, NCT02908100) focused in particular on autoimmune conditions, whereas the NCT03037645 trial assessed vacabrutinib activity in different hematological tumors (Table 2).
Pirimidinone derivative BMS-986142 (Figure 4) is currently under clinical studies for its activity in RA (NCT02880670, NCT02456844, NCT02762123, NCT02832180, NCT02638948) and Sjögren’s Syndrome (NCT02843659). Moreover, a clinical study (NCT02257151) on healthy adults has been completed.
RN-486 displayed IC50 values of 4 nM, 43 nM and 64 nM for Btk, Slk and Tec, respectively [6,81,82]. Currently, this compound is in preclinical investigation for RA. Unfortunately, RN-486 as well as GDC-0834, developed from compound CGI-1746 and under study for arthritis treatment, evidenced poor stability and pharmacokinetic profiles [83,84].
BIIB068 demonstrated good kinome selectivity (IC50 = 1 nM for Btk) and good overall drug-like properties for oral dosing; it was well tolerated across preclinical species at pharmacologically relevant doses with good ADME properties and achieved >90% inhibition of Btk phosphorylation in humans [85,86]. BIIB068 seems to be effective in SLE disease (clinical study NCT02829541).
GNE-431 is a new and interesting molecule, able to inhibit C481R, T474I and T474M mutants [21,87], representing the first example of “Pan-Btk” inhibitors. In detail, GNE-431 showed IC50 = 3.2 nM against wild-type Btk and similar potency against C481S mutant (IC50 = 2.5 nM) [21]. To date, no clinical studies are reported for this compound. The widespread activity of GNE-431 against Btk mutants (namely, C481S, C481R, T474I and T474M) has been structurally rationalized by docking simulations [21]. The ligand would assume an extended conformation being oriented orthogonally in comparison with ibrutinib. The hexahydropyrazino[1,2-a]indol-1(2H)-one moiety of GNE-431 would be inserted in the H3 subpocket (a unique site in Btk) and its imidazopyridazine core would be able to interact with hydrophobic gatekeeper residues at position 474. Furthermore, GNE-431 would poorly interact with residue at position 481 and its binding mode would be marginally affected by the different steric requirements of residues at position 474.
Many other molecules are under clinical and preclinical studies (APQ531, SHR1459, CT-1530, AC0058), but their chemical structures are not disclosed.

3.2.3. Emerging Reversible Covalent BtkIs

One approach for the discovery of next-generation BtkIs with high potency, enhanced selectivity profiles, reduced off-target effects as well as tunable residence times, is the design of compounds able to form reversible covalent bonds with Cys481 residue and temporarily inactivate the enzyme.
PRN1008 (rilzabrutinib; Figure 5, Table 2) is in early clinical studies for RA treatment [88,89]. PRN-1008 is a potent, selective and reversible covalent inhibitor of Btk (IC50 = 3.1 nM), inhibiting the kinase by forming a covalent bond with the Cys481 residue [90]. In vivo, PRN-1008 demonstrated enduring pharmacodynamic effects [6] and suppressed collagen-induced arthritis in rats in a dose-dependent manner. These data support the continued development of PRN-1008 as a therapeutic agent for RA. In addition, in 2017, Principia Biopharma announced that PRN-1008 had been designated as orphan drug in the USA for the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris, significantly reducing prednisone use and its related risks, and might become an important treatment option for this devastating disease [6].
Bradshaw and coworkers [91], using a structure-based design, developed a series of reversible, covalent Btk inhibitors related to PRN1008. These compounds embed a reversible cyanoacrylamide-based electrophile attached to a pyrazolo-pyrimidine scaffold via an amine containing heterocycle linker (piperidine or pyrrolidine). The cyanoacrylamide functionality is capped with various branched-alkyl groups with different steric and electronic properties. The nature of the capping groups affects the residence time of the reversible inhibitors. Compound 1 (Figure 5) was identified as a promising lead compound with sustained Btk occupancy. In the crystal structure of Btk-1 complex (PDB code 4YHF) [91], the ligand is covalently bonded to Cys481 and the amino-pyrrolopyrimidine portion forms hydrogen bonds with Thr474, Glu475 and Met477 (Figure 5B). Interestingly, the tert-butyl group shield the proton attached to Cα, thus preventing the breakage of the thioether bond with Cys481.
To enhance solubility and oral bioavailability of compound 1, a series of methylpyrrolidine-containing compounds was further developed as reversible, covalent BtkIs. Compound 2 (Figure 5) exhibited an increased residence time, but dissociated rapidly and quantitatively upon Btk turnover, proteolysis, resynthesis and interaction with cellular binding partners. Additionally, derivative 2 emerged to be as effective as the irreversible covalent inhibitor ibrutinib in decreasing tumor cell invasiveness and blocking Btk activity [90,91].
This interesting new class of molecules combines the advantages of both reversible and irreversible binding mechanisms and shares a pyrrolopyrimidine scaffold that blocks the Btk active site through hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions and a reactive, modified cyanoacrylamide electrophile, able to form a tunable covalent bond with the exposed Cys481 residue.

4. Conclusions

In recent years, Btk has emerged as a new target in medicinal chemistry and many BtkIs have been patented and reported in the literature. To date, only three irreversible BtkIs have been launched on the market to treat different types of leukemias and lymphomas, whereas reversible BtkIs are under clinical investigations for long-term drug administration in the treatment of autoimmune diseases, especially RA and MS. Furthermore, these compounds also find application in the treatment of cGVHD, autoimmune inflammation that might occur after an allogeneic transplant and for which currently there are no effective and resolving therapies. Most notable is the application of approved BtkIs in systemic hyper-inflammation and cytokine storm induced by COVID-19 infection, whose effectiveness is still under evaluation. Unfortunately, the onset of resistance to irreversible inhibitors (in particular ibrutinib) and of off-target side effects, in particular skin and dermatological problems, prompted the search for selective second-generation BtkIs with a lower risk of toxicity compared to irreversible compounds. Nanoformulations of ibrutinib (including gold, polymeric NPs and aqueous nanosuspension) showed improved efficacy in cancer therapy, reduced toxicity and ameliorated absorption and bioavailability, thus representing valid help in overcoming resistance and side effects onset of the irreversible BtkIs in clinical use. In addition, the design of compounds able to form reversible covalent bonds with Cys481 residue and temporarily inactivate the enzyme seems to be an innovative and interesting approach. In particular, tunable BTK irreversible inhibitors represent a promising class of compounds with reduced side effects. Additionally, tunable BTKIs would allow the use of this kinase inhibitors in non-oncologic therapeutic areas which require chronic treatment such as auto-immune disorders (i.e., RA, SLE and cGVHD). For all these reasons, despite the presence in the literature of many reviews and articles, the study on the Btk functions and therapeutic applications, as well as the discovery of new Btk inhibitors and innovative formulations of approved compounds, is still very fruitful and of great interest to both the academic community and the pharmaceutical industry.

Author Contributions

C.B., E.R. and A.S. wrote parts of the original text. C.V. and B.T. revised the manuscript and assisted in figure design and drawing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AERhBAminoethyl rhodamine
BCRB cell receptor
BtkBruton’s kinase
BtkIsBtk inhibitors
cGVHDChronic graft versus host disease
CLLChronic lymphocytic leukemia
COVID-19Coronavirus Disease 19
DAC2,3-dialdehyde cellulose
EGFREpidermal growth factor receptor
MCLMantle cell lymphoma
MSMultiple sclerosis
MSRRRelapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
MZLMarginal zone lymphoma
NPNanoparticles
NSCLNon-Small Cell Lung Cancer
PHPleckstrin homology domain
PROTACProteolysis targeting chimera
PRRProline-rich regions
RARheumatoid arthritis
RMSRelapsing Multiple Sclerosis
SH2/SH3Src homology 2/3 domain
SLESystemic Lupus Erythematosus
SLLSmall lymphocytic lymphoma
SykSpleen tyrosine kinase
THTec homology domain
TKTyrosine kinase
WMWaldenström’s macroglobulinemia
XLAX-linked agammaglobulinemia

References

  1. Vetrie, D.; Vorechovsky, I.; Sideras, P.; Holland, J.; Davies, A.; Flinter, F.; Hammarström, L.; Kinnon, C.; Levinsky, R.; Bobrow, M.; et al. The gene involved in X-linked agammaglobulinaemia is a member of the src family of protein-tyrosine kinases. Nature 1993, 361, 226–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Buggy, J.J.; Elias, L. Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and its role in B-cell malignancy. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 31, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Byrd, J.C.; Furman, R.R.; Coutre, S.E.; Flinn, I.W.; Burger, J.A.; Blum, K.A.; Grant, B.; Sharman, J.P.; Coleman, M.; Wierda, W.G.; et al. Targeting BTK with ibrutinib in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hendriks, R.W.; de Bruijn, M.F.; Maas, A.; Dingjan, G.M.; Karis, A.; Grosveld, F. Inactivation of Btk by insertion of lacZ reveals defects in B cell development only past the pre-B cell stage. Embo. J. 1996, 15, 4862–4872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kil, L.P.; de Bruijn, M.J.; van Nimwegen, M.; Corneth, O.B.J.; Piet van Hamburg, J.; Dingjan, G.M.; Thaiss, F.; Rimmelzwaan, G.F.; Elewaut, D.; Delsing, D.; et al. Btk levels set the threshold for B-cell activation and negative selection of autoreactive B cells in mice. Blood 2012, 119, 3744–3756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Liang, C.; Tian, D.; Ren, X.; Ding, S.; Jia, M.; Xin, M.; Thareja, S. The development of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors from 2012-2017: A mini-review. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 151, 315–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dingjan, G.M.; Middendorp, S.; Dahlenborg, K.; Maas, A.; Grosveld, F.; Hendriks, R.W. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase regulates the activation of gene rearrangements at the lambda light chain locus in precursor B cells in the mouse. J. Exp. Med. 2001, 193, 1169–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ysebaerta, L.; Michallet, A.S. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Lessons learned from bench-to-bedside (first) studies. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2014, 26, 463–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Carnero Contentti, E.; Correale, J. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A promising emerging treatment option for multiple sclerosis. Expert Opin. Emerg. Drugs 2020, 25, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wen, T.; Wang, J.; Shi, Y.; Qian, H.; Liu, P. Inhibitors targeting Bruton’s tyrosine kinase in cancers: Drug development advances. Leukemia 2020, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, B.; Deng, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yu, K.; Wang, A.; Liang, Q.; Wang, W.; Chen, C.; Wu, H.; Hu, C.; et al. Structure-activity relationship investigation for benzonaphthyridinone derivatives as novel potent Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) irreversible inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 137, 545–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yoon, Y. Small chemicals with inhibitory effects on PtdIns(3,4,5)P 3 bindingof Btk PH domain. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 24, 2334–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jiang, Z.; Liang, Z.; Shen, B.; Hu, G. Computational analysis of the binding specificities of PH domains. Biol. Med. Res. Int. 2015, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Pan, Z.; Scheerens, H.; Li, S.J.; Schultz, B.E.; Sprengeler, P.A.; Burrill, L.C.; Mendonca, R.V.; Sweeney, M.D.; Scott, K.C.; Grothaus, P.G.; et al. Discovery of selective irreversible inhibitors for Bruton’s tyrosine kinase. ChemMedChem 2007, 2, 58–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Simar, P.S.; Floris, D.; Rudi, W.H. Role of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase in B cells and malignancies. Mol. Cancer 2018, 17, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zuo, Y.; Pan, Z. Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase. In Cancer II; Topics in Medicinal Chemistry; Waring, M.J., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; Volume 28, pp. 75–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Burger, J.A.; Wiestner, A. Targeting B cell receptor signalling in cancer: Preclinical and clinical advances. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2018, 18, 148–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wang, X.; Wong, J.; Sevinsky, C.J.; Kokabee, L.; Khan, F.; Sun, Y.; Conklin, D.S. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors prevent therapeutic escape in breast cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2016, 15, 2198–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Roskoski, R., Jr. Properties of FDA-approved small molecule protein kinase inhibitors: A 2020 update. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 152, 104609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Harris, C.M.; Foley, S.E.; Goedken, E.R.; Michalak, M.; Murdock, S.; Wilson, N.S. Merits and Pitfalls in the Characterization of Covalent Inhibitors of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase. SLAS Discov. 2018, 23, 1040–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Johnson, A.R.; Kohli, P.B.; Katewa, A.; Gogol, E.; Belmont, L.D.; Choy, R.; Penuel, E.; Burton, L.; Eigenbrot, C.; Yu, C.; et al. Battling btk mutants with non covalent inhibitors that overcome Cys481 and Thyr474 mutation. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016, 11, 2897–2907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, L.; Shi, B.; Wan, X.; Xiang, H. Strategies to overcome resistance mutations of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib. Future Med. Chem. 2018, 10, 343–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Maddocks, K.J.; Ruppert, A.S.; Lozanski, G.; Heerema, N.A.; Zhao, W.; Abruzzo, L.; Lozanski, A.; Davis, M.; Gordon, A.; Smith, L.L.; et al. Etiology of Ibrutinib Therapy Discontinuation and Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. JAMA Oncol. 2015, 1, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Woyach, J.A.; Furman, R.R.; Liu, T.M.; Ozer, H.G.; Zapatka, M.; Ruppert, A.S.; Xue, L.; Li, D.H.H.; Steggerda, S.M.; Versele, M.; et al. Resistance Mechanisms for the Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Ibrutinib. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 2286–2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Furman, R.R.; Cheng, S.; Lu, P.; Setty, M.; Perez, A.R.; Guo, A.; Racchumi, J.; Xu, G.; Wu, H.; Ma, J.; et al. Ibrutinib Resistance in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 2352–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Feng, Y.; Duan, W.; Cu, X.; Xin, M. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors in treating cancer: A patent review. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2019, 29, 217–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Norman, P. Investigational Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2016, 25, 891–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tinworth, C.P.; Lithgow, H.; Dittus, L.; Bassi, Z.I.; Hughes, S.E.; Muelbaier, M.; Dai, H.; Smith, I.E.D.; Kerr, W.J.; Burley, G.A.; et al. PROTAC-Mediated Degradation of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Is Inhibited by Covalent Binding. ACS Chem. Biol. 2019, 14, 342–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Fancher, K.M.; Pappacena, J.J. Drug interactions with Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Clinical implications and management. Cancer Chemother. Pharm. 2020, 86, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bender, A.T.; Gardberg, A.; Pereira, A.; Johnson, T.; Wu, Y.; Grenningloh, R.; Head, J.; Morandi, F.; Haselmayer, P.; Liu-Bujalski, L. Ability of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors to sequester Y551 and prevent phosphorylation determines potency for inhibition of Fc receptor but not B-cell receptor signaling. Mol. Pharmacol. 2017, 91, 208–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Guo, Y.; Liu, Y.; Hu, N.; Yu, D.; Zhou, C.; Shi, G.; Zhang, B.; Wei, M.; Liu, J.; Luo, L.; et al. Discovery of Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111), A novel, potent, And selective covalent inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 7923–7940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mahajan, S.; Ghosh, S.; Sudbeck, E.A.; Zheng, Y.; Downs, S.; Hupke, M.; Uckun, F.M. Rational design and synthesis of a novel anti-leukemic agent targeting Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK), LFM-A13 [alpha-cyano-beta-hydroxy-beta-methyl-N-(2, 5-dibromophenyl)propenamide]. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 9587–9599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Honigberg, L.A.; Smith, A.M.; Sirisawad, M.; Verner, E.; Loury, D.; Chang, B.; Li, S.; Pan, Z.; Thamm, D.H.; Miller, R.A.; et al. The Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor PCI-32765 blocks B-cell activation and is efficacious in models of autoimmune disease and B-cell malignancy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 13075–13080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Schutt, S.D.; Fu, J.; Nguyen, H.; Bastian, D.; Heinrichs, J.; Wu, Y.; Liu, C.; Mcdonald, D.G.; Pidala, J.; Yu, X.Z. Inhibition of BTK and ITK with ibrutinib is effective in the prevention of chronic graft-versus-host disease in mice. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0137641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Lanning, B.R.; Whitby, L.R.; Dix, M.M.; Douhan, J.; Gilbert, A.M.; Hett, E.C.; Johnson, T.O.; Joslyn, C.; Kath, J.C.; Niessen, S.; et al. A road map toevaluate the proteome-wide selectivity of covalent kinase inhibitors. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10, 760–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Sibaud, V.; Beylot-Barry, M.; Protin, C.; Vigarios, E.; Recher, C.; Ysebaert, L. Dermatological Toxicities of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 2020, 21, 799–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tillman, B.F.; Pauff, J.M.; Satyanarayana, G.; Talbott, M.; Warner, J.L. Systematic review of infectious events with the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Eur. J. Haematol. 2018, 100, 325–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wilson, W.H.; Young, R.M.; Schmitz, R.; Yang, Y.; Pittaluga, S.; Wright, G.; Lih, C.J.; Williams, M.P.; Shaffer, A.L.; Gerecitano, J.; et al. Targeting B cell receptor signaling with ibrutinib in diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 922–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Xu, L.; Tsakmaklis, N.; Yang, G.; Chen, J.G.; Liu, X.; Demos, M.; Kofides, A.; Patterson, C.J.; Meid, K.; Gustine, J.; et al. Acquired mutations associated with ibrutinib resistance in Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. Blood 2017, 129, 2519–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Cunha-Bang, C.; Niemann, C.U. Targeting Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Across B-Cell Malignancies. Drugs 2018, 78, 1653–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Harrington, B.K.; Gardner, H.L.; Izumi, R.; Hamdy, A.; Rothbaum, W.; Coombes, K.R.; Covey, T.; Kaptein, A.; Gulrajani, M.; Van Lith, B.; et al. Preclinical Evaluation of the Novel BTK Inhibitor Acalabrutinib in Canine Models of B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e159607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Syed, Y.Y. Zanubrutinib: First approval. Drugs 2020, 80, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lynch, T.J.; Kim, E.S.; Eaby, B.; Garey, J.; West, D.P.; Lacouture, M.E. Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor-associated cutaneous toxicities: An evolving paradigm in clinical management. Oncologist 2007, 12, 610–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kaptein, A.; de Bruin, G.; Emmelot-van Hoek, M.; van de Kar, B.; de Jong, A.; Gulrajani, M.; Demont, D.; Covey, T.; Mittag, D.; Barf, T. Potency and selectivity of BTK inhibitors in clinical development for B-Cell malignancies. Blood 2018, 132, 1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Flinsenberg, T.W.H.; Tromedjo, C.C.; Hu, N.; Liu, Y.; Guo, Y.; Thia, K.Y.T.; Noori, T.; Song, X.; Yeang, H.X.A.; Tantalo, D.G.; et al. Differential effects of BTK inhibitors ibrutinib and zanubrutinib on NK cell effector function in patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Haematologica 2020, 105, 76–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Barf, T.; Covey, T.; Izumi, R.; van de Kar, B.; Gulrajani, M.; van Lith, B.; van Hoek, M.; de Zwart, E.; Mittag, D.; Demont, D.; et al. Acalabrutinib (ACP-196): A covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor with a differentiated selectivity and in vivo potency profile. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2017, 363, 240–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Rajasekaran, N.; Sadaram, M.; Hebb, J.; Sagiv-Barfi, I.; Ambulkar, S.; Rajapaksa, A.; Chang, S.; Chester, C.; Waller, E.; Lai Wang, L.; et al. Three BTK-specific inhibitors, in contrast to ibrutinib, do not antagonize rituximab-dependent NK-cell mediated cytotoxicity. Blood 2014, 124, 3118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Herman, S.E.M.; Sun, X.; Mcauley, E.M.; Hsieh, M.M.; Pittaluga, S.; Raffeld, M.; Liu, D.; Keyvanfar, K.; Chapman, C.M.; Chen, J. Modeling tumorehost interactions of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in xenografted mice to study tumor biology and evaluate targeted therapy. Leukemia 2013, 27, 2311–2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Torke, S.; Webera, M.S. Inhibition of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase as a novel therapeutic approach in multiple sclerosis. Expert Opin Investig. Drugs 2020, 29, 1143–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chong, E.A.; Roeker, L.E.; Shadman, M.; Davids, M.S.; Schuster, S.J.; Mato, A.R. BTK Inhibitors in Cancer Patients with COVID-19: The Winner Will be the One Who Controls That Chaos (Napoleon Bonaparte). Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 26, 3514–3516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Acalabrutinib Study with Best Supportive Care in Participants Hospitalized with COVID-19. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04497948 (accessed on 16 June 2021).
  52. Svenson, S. What nanomedicine in the clinic right now really forms nanoparticles? WIREs Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2014, 6, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Torchilin, V. Multifunctional and stimuli-sensitive pharmaceutical nanocarriers. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2009, 71, 431–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Rink, J.S.; Yang, S.; Cen, O.; Taxter, T.; McMahon, K.M.; Misener, S.; Behdad, A.; Longnecker, R.; Gordon, L.I.; Thaxton, C.S. Rational targeting of cellular cholesterol in diffuse large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) enabled by functional lipoprotein nanoparticles: A therapeutic strategy dependent on cell of origin. Mol. Pharm. 2017, 14, 4042–4051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sanchez-Coronilla, A.; Martin, E.I.; Fernandez-de-Cordova, F.J.; Prado-Gotor, R.; Hidalgo, J. Theoretical study on the interactions between ibrutinib and gold nanoparticles for being used as drug delivery in the chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 316, 113878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Peng, X.; Liu, P.; Pang, B.; Yao, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, K. Facile fabrication of pH-responsive nanoparticles from cellulose derivatives via Schiff base formation for controlled release. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 216, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Qiu, Q.; Li, C.; Zhang, H.; Hu, L.; Yan, X.; Zheng, H.; Liu, M.; Liu, M.; Liu, M.; Liu, X. Targeted delivery of ibrutinib to tumor-associated macrophages by sialic acid-stearic acid conjugate modified nanocomplexes for cancer immunotherapy. Acta Biomater. 2019, 92, 184–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Rangaraj, N.; Pailla, S.R.; Chowta, P.; Sampathi, S. Fabrication of ibrutinib nanosuspension by quality by design approach: Intended for enhanced oral bioavailability and diminished fast fed variability. AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech. 2019, 20, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Alshetaili, A.S.; Ansari, M.J.; Anwer, K.; Ganaie, M.A.; Iqbal, M.; Alshahrani, S.M.; Alalaiwe, A.S.; Alsulays, B.B.; Alshehri, S.; Sultan, A.S. Enhanced oral bioavailability of ibrutinib encapsulated poly (lactic-co- glycolic acid) nanoparticles: Pharmacokinetic evaluation in rats. Curr. Pharm. Anal. 2019, 15, 661–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gao, C.; Chen, F.; Wang, H. Patent analysis of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib. Guoji Yaoxue Yanjiu Zazhi 2020, 47, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chen, W.; Loury, D.J.; Mody, T.D. Preparation of N-{3-[2-(phenylamino)pyrimidin-4-ylamino]phenyl} Amides as Inhibitors of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase. WO 2013173518 A1, 21 November 2013. [Google Scholar]
  62. Hodous, B.L.; Liu-Bujalski, L.; Jones, R.; Bankston, D.; Johnson, T.L.; Mochalkin, I.; Nguyen, N.; Qiu, H.; Goutopoulos, A.; Brugger, N. Compositions and Methods for the Production of Pyrimidine and Pyridine Compounds with Btk Inhibitory Activity. WO 2012170976 A2, 13 December 2012. [Google Scholar]
  63. Wang, Y.; Li, H. Preparation of Fused Pyrimidine Compound as Protein Kinase Inhibitor. WO 2017092523 A1, 8 June 2017. [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhao, X.; Xin, M.; Wang, Y.; Huang, W.; Jin, Q.; Tang, F.; Wu, G.; Zhao, Y.; Xiang, H. Discovery of thieno[3,2-c]pyridin-4-amines as novel Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 6059–6068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bonafoux, D.; Davis, H.M.; Frank, K.E.; Friedman, M.M.; Herold, J.M.; Hoemann, M.Z.; Huntley, R.; Osuma, A.; Sheppard, G.; Somal, G.K.; et al. Preparation of Heterocycle Carboxamides as Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase (Btk) Inhibitors. WO 2014210255 A1, 31 December 2014. [Google Scholar]
  66. Goess, C.; Harris, C.M.; Murdock, S.; McCarthy, R.W.; Sampson, E.; Twomey, R.; Mathieu, S.; Mario, R.; Perham, M.; Goedken, E.R.; et al. ABBV-105, A selective and irreversible inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase, Is efficacious in multiple preclinical models of inflammation. Mod. Rheumatol. 2019, 29, 510–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cai, X.; Qian, C.; He, Q.; Huang, Y.; Ma, Z.; Qin, S.; Ye, C.; Zhong, X. Preparation of Dihydroimidazopyridine Derivatives for Treatment of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Related Diseases. CN 105753863 A, 13 July 2016. [Google Scholar]
  68. Dhillon, S. Tirabrutinib: First approval. Drugs 2020, 80, 835–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kim, E.S. Olmutinib: First global approval. Drugs 2016, 76, 1153–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liu, B.; Shun, Y.T.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, C. Preparation of 4-amino-3-(alkylethynyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine Derivatives Useful as BTK Inhibitors. CN 107344940 A, 14 November 2017. [Google Scholar]
  71. Mato, A.R.; Schuster, S.J.; Foss, F.M.; Isufi, I.; Ding, W.; Brander, D.M.; Sitlinger, A.; Tun, H.W.; Moustafa, M.A.; Kennard, K.; et al. A Phase Ia/Ib Study Exploring the Synthetic Lethality of the Orally Administered Novel BTK Inhibitor, Dtrmwxhs-12 (DTRM-12), in Combination with Everolimus and Pomalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL, DLBCL or Other B-Cell Lymphomas. Blood 2019, 134, 810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. He, W. Preparation of Fluorinated Pyrazolopyrimidine Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors, Their Drug Combinations and Their Pharmaceutical Compositions and Their Use for Treatment of Cancer and Autoimmune Diseases. US 20160324878 A1, 10 November 2016. [Google Scholar]
  73. Liu, Q.; Sabnis, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, T.; Buhrlage, S.J.; Jones, L.H.; Gray, N.S. Developing irreversible inhibitors of the protein. kinase cysteinome. Chem. Biol. 2013, 20, 146–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Burger, J.A. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors in clinical trials. Curr. Hematol. Malig. Rep. 2014, 9, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Spaargaren, M.; de Rooij, M.F.; Kater, A.P.; Eldering, E. BTK inhibitors in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A glimpse to the future. Oncogene 2015, 34, 2426–2436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Crawford, J.J.; Ortwine, D.F.; Wei, B.; Young, W.B. Heteroarylpyridone and Azapyridone Compounds as Inhibitors of BTK Activity and Their Preparation. WO 2013067274 A1, 10 May 2013. [Google Scholar]
  77. Thompson, P.A.; Burger, J.A. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors: First and second generation agents for patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL). Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2018, 27, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Hopkins, B.T.; Conlon, P.; Chan, T.R.; Jenkins, T.J.; Cai, X.; Humora, M.; Shi, X.; Miller, R.A.; Thompson, A. Preparation of Pyrimidinyl Bipiperidine Compounds as Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Useful in Treatment of Disease. WO 2013185084 A1, 12 December 2013. [Google Scholar]
  79. Batt, D.G.; Bertrand, M.B.; Delucca, G.; Galella, M.A.; Ko, S.S.; Langevine, C.M.; Liu, Q.; Shi, Q.; Srivastava, A.S.; Anurag, S.; et al. Substituted Carbazolecarboxamide Derivatives as Btk Inhibitors and Their Preparation and Use for the Treatment of Disease. USA 20140378475 A1, 25 December 2014. [Google Scholar]
  80. Watterson, S.H.; De Lucca, G.V.; Shi, Q.; Langevine, C.M.; Liu, Q.; Batt, D.G.; Beaudoin, B.M.; Gong, H.; Dai, J.; Yip, S.; et al. Discovery of 6-Fluoro-5-(R)-(3-(S)-(8-fluoro-1-methyl-2,4-dioxo-1,2-dihydroquinazolin-3(4H)-yl)-2-methylphenyl)-2-(S)-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazole-8-carboxamide (BMS-986142): A Reversible Inhibitor of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Conformationally Constrained by Two Locked Atropisomers. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 9173–9200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Berthel, S.; Firooznia, F.; Fishlock, D.; Hong, J.B.; Lou, Y.; Lucas, M.; Owens, T.D.; Sarma, K.; Sweeney, Z.K.; Taygerly, J.P.G. Preparation of 5-phenyl-1H-pyridin-2-one, 6-phenyl-2H-pyridazin-3-one, and 5-phenyl-1H-pyrazin-2-one Derivatives as Inhibitors of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase. USA 20100222325 A1, 2 September 2010. [Google Scholar]
  82. Lou, Y.; Han, X.; Kuglstatter, A.; Kondru, R.K.; Sweeney, Z.K.; Soth, M.; McIntosh, J.; Litman, R.; Suh, J.; Kocer, B.; et al. Structure-based drug design of RN486, a potent and selective Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 512–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Liu, L.; Halladay, J.S.; Shin, Y.; Wong, S.; Coraggio, M.; La, H.; Baumgardner, M.; Le, H.; Gopaul, S.; Boggs, J.; et al. Significant species difference in amide hydrolysis of GDC-0834, a novel potent and selective Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2011, 39, 1840–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Young, W.B.; Barbosa, J.; Blomgren, P.; Bremer, M.C.; Crawford, J.J.; Dambach, D.; Gallion, S.; Hymowitz, S.G.; Kropf, J.E.; Lee, S.H.; et al. Potent and selective Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Discovery of GDC-0834. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 1333–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Hopkins, B.T.; Ma, B.; Chan, T.R.; Sun, L.; Zhang, L.; Kumaravel, G.; Lyssikatos, J.P.; Koch, K.; Miao, H. Preparation of Pyrazolylaminopyrimidinylbenzylthiazolecarboxamide Derivatives and Analogs for Use as Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. WO 2015089337 A1, 18 June 2015. [Google Scholar]
  86. Ma, B.; Bohnert, T.; Otipoby, K.L.; Tien, E.; Arefayene, M.; Bai, J.; Bajrami, B.; Bame, E.; Chan, T.R.; Humora, M.; et al. Discovery of BIIB068: A Selective, Potent, Reversible Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as an Orally Efficacious Agent for Autoimmune Diseases. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 12526–12541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Crawford, J.J.; Ortwine, D.F.; Young, W.B. Bicyclic Piperazine Compounds as BTK Inhibitors and Their Preparation. WO 2013067260 A1, 10 May 2013. [Google Scholar]
  88. Smith, F.; Krishnarajah, J.; Nunn, P.A.; Hill, R.J.; Karr, D.; Tam, D.; Masjedizadeh, M.; Gourlay, S.G. SAT0232 a phase 1 clinical trial of PRN1008, an oral, reversible, covalent BTK inhibitor demonstrates clinical safety and therapeutic levels of BTK occupancy without sustained systemic exposure. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2015, 74, 742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Smith, P.F.; Krishnarajah, J.; Nunn, P.A.; Hill, R.J.; Karr, D.; Tam, D.; Masjedizadeh, M.; Funk, J.O.; Gourlay, S.G. A phase I trial of PRN1008, a novel reversible covalent inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase, in healthy volunteers. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2017, 83, 2367–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Owens, T.; Verner, E. Preparation of Pyrazolopyrimidine Compounds as Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Treating Cancer, Autoimmune Disorders, and Inflammation. WO 2014039899 A1, 13 March 2014. [Google Scholar]
  91. Bradshaw, J.M.; McFarland, J.M.; Paavilainen, V.O.; Bisconte, A.; Tam, D.; Phan, V.T.; Romanov, S.; Finkle, D.; Shu, J.; Patel, V.; et al. Prolonged and tunable residence time using reversible covalent kinase inhibitors. Nature Chem. Biol. 2015, 11, 525–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 22 07641 g001 550
Figure 1. Btk structure and its down-stream signaling pathways.
Figure 1. Btk structure and its down-stream signaling pathways.
Ijms 22 07641 g001
Ijms 22 07641 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) Chemical structure of ibrutinib, acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib. The shared subportions are evidenced. (B) Superposition of Btk crystallized with ibrutinib (green, PDB code 5P9J) and zanubrutinib (orange, PDB code 6J6M). (C) Ligplot of the Btk–ibrutinib complex. (D) Ligplot of the Btk–zanubrutinib complex.
Figure 2. (A) Chemical structure of ibrutinib, acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib. The shared subportions are evidenced. (B) Superposition of Btk crystallized with ibrutinib (green, PDB code 5P9J) and zanubrutinib (orange, PDB code 6J6M). (C) Ligplot of the Btk–ibrutinib complex. (D) Ligplot of the Btk–zanubrutinib complex.
Ijms 22 07641 g002
Ijms 22 07641 g003 550
Figure 3. Irreversible BtkIs under clinical investigation.
Figure 3. Irreversible BtkIs under clinical investigation.
Ijms 22 07641 g003
Ijms 22 07641 g004 550
Figure 4. Reversible BtkIs under clinical investigation.
Figure 4. Reversible BtkIs under clinical investigation.
Ijms 22 07641 g004
Ijms 22 07641 g005 550
Figure 5. (A) Chemical structures of reversible covalent BtkIs PRN1008, 1 and 2. (B) Ligplot of the Btk-1 crystallographic complex.
Figure 5. (A) Chemical structures of reversible covalent BtkIs PRN1008, 1 and 2. (B) Ligplot of the Btk-1 crystallographic complex.
Ijms 22 07641 g005
Table
Table 1. Dosage, clinical trials and treated diseases of approved BtkIs.
Table 1. Dosage, clinical trials and treated diseases of approved BtkIs.
DrugDosageDiseasesNumber of Clinical Trials
TotalGVHDCOVID-19
Ibrutinib420 mg/day (CLL/SLL, WM)
560 mg/day (MCL, MZL)		CLL/SLL
WM
MZL
MCL
cGVHD		3589 (1 completed, 5 in recruitment, 2 actives not recruiting, 1 enrolling by invitation)2 (NCT04375397 in recruitment; NCT04665115 not recruiting)
Acalabrutinib100 mg b.i.d.CLL/SLL
MCL		992 (NCT04198922, NCT04716075, in recruitment)3 (NCT04497948 terminated,
NCT04380688 completed,
NCT04346199 active not recruitment)
Zanubrutinib160 mg b.i.d.MCL49none1 (NCT04382586 in recruitment)
Table
Table 2. BtkIs under clinical investigation, number of clinical trials and treated diseases.
Table 2. BtkIs under clinical investigation, number of clinical trials and treated diseases.
CompoundNo. of Clinical TrialsTreated Diseases
Spebrutinib8 (7 completed, 1 active, not in recruitment)B Cell Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, CLL, WM, RA
Evobrutinib15 (4 in recruitment, the others completed or terminated)MS, MSRR, RMS, RA, SLE
Olmutinib8 (completed or terminated)Different adenocarcinoma, NSCL, RA
Tirabrutinib9CLL, SLL, Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, WM, RA, Sjogren’s Syndrome
Elsubrutinib2, in recruitmentSLE
Tolebrutinib7 (2 completed)RMS, primary and secondary progressive MS
Fenebrutinib8 (3 completed)Urticaria, SLE, RMS, progressive MS, Lymphocytic Leukemia, lymphoma
Vacabrutinib1 (terminated)SLL, CLL
PRN1008 (Rilzabrutinib)5 (1 completed)RA, Immune Thrombocytopenia, Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura, Pemphigus vulgaris
BMS-9861427 (all terminated or completed)RA, Sjögren’s Syndrome
CT-15301Lymphoma, different autoimmune diseases
TG-17011 (recruiting)Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, CLL
AC00582 (1 completed)SLE
SHR14597 (2 completed)Lymphoma, different autoimmune diseases
RN-486Preclinical investigation
BIIB0681 (completed)SLE
DTRMWXHS-124 (2 completed, 1 in recruitment, 1 active not recruiting)CLL and different leukemia and lymphoma
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Brullo, C.; Villa, C.; Tasso, B.; Russo, E.; Spallarossa, A. Btk Inhibitors: A Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Delivery Perspective. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7641. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147641

AMA Style

Brullo C, Villa C, Tasso B, Russo E, Spallarossa A. Btk Inhibitors: A Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Delivery Perspective. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(14):7641. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147641

Chicago/Turabian Style

Brullo, Chiara, Carla Villa, Bruno Tasso, Eleonora Russo, and Andrea Spallarossa. 2021. "Btk Inhibitors: A Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Delivery Perspective" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 14: 7641. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147641

APA Style

Brullo, C., Villa, C., Tasso, B., Russo, E., & Spallarossa, A. (2021). Btk Inhibitors: A Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Delivery Perspective. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(14), 7641. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147641

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop