Next Article in Journal
Molecular Hydrogen as a Potential Clinically Applicable Radioprotective Agent
Next Article in Special Issue
Glia and Orofacial Pain: Progress and Future Directions
Previous Article in Journal
Artificial Intelligence in Bulk and Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing Data to Foster Precision Oncology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microglia and Inhibitory Circuitry in the Medullary Dorsal Horn: Laminar and Time-Dependent Changes in a Trigeminal Model of Neuropathic Pain

by
Nuria García-Magro
1,2,†,
Yasmina B. Martin
3,†,
Pilar Negredo
1,
Francisco Zafra
4 and
Carlos Avendaño
1,*
1
Department of Anatomy, Histology and Neuroscience, Medical School, Autónoma University of Madrid, 28029 Madrid, Spain
2
Ph.D. Programme in Neuroscience, Doctoral School, Autónoma University of Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
3
Departamento de Anatomía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28223 Madrid, Spain
4
Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this study.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(9), 4564; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094564
Submission received: 4 March 2021 / Revised: 22 April 2021 / Accepted: 22 April 2021 / Published: 27 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neurobiological Mechanisms of Orofacial Chronic Pain)

Abstract

:
Craniofacial neuropathic pain affects millions of people worldwide and is often difficult to treat. Two key mechanisms underlying this condition are a loss of the negative control exerted by inhibitory interneurons and an early microglial reaction. Basic features of these mechanisms, however, are still poorly understood. Using the chronic constriction injury of the infraorbital nerve (CCI-IoN) model of neuropathic pain in mice, we have examined the changes in the expression of GAD, the synthetic enzyme of GABA, and GlyT2, the membrane transporter of glycine, as well as the microgliosis that occur at early (5 days) and late (21 days) stages post-CCI in the medullary and upper spinal dorsal horn. Our results show that CCI-IoN induces a down-regulation of GAD at both postinjury survival times, uniformly across the superficial laminae. The expression of GlyT2 showed a more discrete and heterogeneous reduction due to the basal presence in lamina III of ‘patches’ of higher expression, interspersed within a less immunoreactive ‘matrix’, which showed a more substantial reduction in the expression of GlyT2. These patches coincided with foci lacking any perceptible microglial reaction, which stood out against a more diffuse area of strong microgliosis. These findings may provide clues to better understand the neural mechanisms underlying allodynia in neuropathic pain syndromes.

1. Introduction

Neuropathic pain in the craniofacial territory is associated with different pathologies, including trigeminal neuralgia, nerve entrapments and chemical, tumoral or viral neuropathies, which most often cause chronic and debilitating painful conditions that affect millions of people worldwide and are difficult to treat (International Classification of Headache Disorders 2018). Although still far from complete, the understanding of its complex pathophysiology has significantly advanced in recent years thanks to an effective dialogue between basic and clinical efforts, which is being instrumental to develop new and more effective therapies. As well as for other body regions, two key mechanisms underlie this kind of pain. Firstly, it is accompanied by a loss of the negative control that inhibitory interneurons normally exert on the transmission of nociceptive and non-nociceptive signals toward ascending pathways [1,2,3]. Consistently, the pharmacological blockade of this inhibition results in symptoms that resemble those present in neuropathic pain patients [4,5], whereas the administration of GABA-enhancing drugs or vectors, or GABA or Glycine transporter inhibitors reverse or block nerve injury-induced pain behavior [6,7,8,9,10]. And secondly, nerve injury provokes a swift microglial reaction in the terminal fields of primary afferents in the superficial laminae of the dorsal horn [11]. This reactive microglia releases BDNF, activating its high-affinity receptor TrkB, which enhances pain transmission by projection neurons in the superficial laminae of the dorsal horn through a variety of mechanisms [12,13,14,15,16,17].
Among the animal models that mimic chronic pain in the orofacial region, the chronic constriction injury of the infraorbital nerve (CCI-IoN) is probably the most widely used [18,19]. Neuropathic pain mechanisms in the trigeminal territory resemble those in spinal territories, but only to a degree, because of differences in the cellular composition and circuitries, cellular genomic signatures, the range of painful conditions specific to the face and head, and differential sensitivities to some pharmacological treatments [20,21,22,23,24]. Also, the few studies that report on the microgliosis that follows CCI-IoN, provide evidence of some differences between reactive microglia in trigeminal and spinal territories [25,26]. All in all, many cellular and molecular features of these mechanisms, however, are still incompletely defined. The present report was therefore aimed at further clarifying what spatial and temporal correlations, if any, exist between the reactive microgliosis and the expression of key molecules involved in the inhibitory regulation of neural transmission in the medullary dorsal horn in a model of trigeminal neuropathic pain.

2. Results

2.1. Behavior

Mice in the CCI-IoN group developed significant allodynia to mechanical stimulation with Von Frey filaments of either strength or air pulses by 14 postoperative days (dpo), and this increased at 21 dpo (Figure 1). On the contralateral side the response score increased in a few cases, without reaching statistical differences with controls (data not shown).

2.2. GAD-6 and GlyT2 Immunostaining

In controls, GAD-6 was strongly expressed as a homogeneous band in laminae I-II, and more moderately in laminae III-IV. GlyT2, in contrast, predominated in the inner part of lamina II and in irregular ‘patches’ within lamina III. The outer part of lamina II and laminae III and IV outside the ‘patches’ exhibited lower and more variable expression of this transporter (Figure 2). Neither GAD-6 nor GlyT2 significantly labeled cell bodies, confirming their affinity for axons and terminals [27,28].
Following CCI-IoN, GAD-6 expression significantly decreased in all laminae of the ipsilateral side by 5 dpo, and this decline continued at least until 21 dpo (Figure 2 and Figure 3). A parallel, but minor decrease was also observed in lamina III of the contralateral side compared to controls (Figure 3A). The frequency distribution curves of pixel intensities showed global reductions of immunofluorescence intensity (Figure 3A), and these reductions reached statistical significance, particularly at 21 dpo (Figure 4). The expression of GlyT-2 was also affected by CCI-IoN, but in a more complex manner (Figure 3B): at 5 dpo, GlyT-2 expression decreased only in lamina III, compared to controls and to the side contralateral to CCI-IoN; at 21 dpo, however, this reduction was significant in all laminae. The frequency distribution curves of pixel intensities, however, overlapped substantially, resulting in no statistical differences. Also, as will be described below, changes in GlyT2 expression varied in different domains of the spinal trigeminal nucleus (Sp5C).

2.3. Microglia

Iba-1 immunolabeled microglial cells distributed homogeneously, with relatively low density, across all layers of Sp5C in controls. Morphologically, these cells fit the description of ‘resting’ or ‘surveying’ microglia (Figure 5A,D; see [29]). Five days after CCI, a strong microgliosis was observed, consisting of a notable increase in cell number and intricacy of microglial processes. This reaction was more prominent in laminae I-II, and more moderate in laminae III-IV, and persisted, although in a diminished form, at 21 dpo (Figure 5B,C,E).
Densitometric measurements showed that the increased expression of Iba-1 in the side ipsilateral to the CCI differed significantly from both the contralateral side of the same cases, and the control cases. This difference decreased, but remained significant, at 21dpo (Figure 6).

2.4. Microgliosis and GlyT2 Expression

The microgliosis induced in the Sp5C by the CCI-IoN did not occur homogeneously across the nucleus. Rather, there was an unexpected spatial restriction of the reactive microglia to the sectors of the nucleus where the expression of GlyT2 was weaker, thus sparing the ‘patches’ that displayed a stronger immunofluorescence for the transporter (Figure 7). This phenomenon was consistently observed in the three cases where it was investigated (Figure 8).

3. Discussion

The general aim of the present study was to investigate well-defined molecular and cellular events underlying the general process of disinhibition that results from partial peripheral nerve injury, in a model of facial neuropathic pain. Applying CCI-IoN on mice, this study examines the evolution of the changes in expression of GAD, as a marker of GABAergic cells, GlyT2, as a marker of glycinergic axon terminals, and microglia, the glial cells that more rapidly respond to the nerve injury. The following major findings emerged: (1) Our results confirm that the constriction of the IoN reduces the expression of GAD and GlyT2, key markers of GABAergic and Glycinergic inhibitory mechanisms respectively, in the medullary dorsal horn. (2) Both markers differ in their laminar distribution pattern and temporal course of change after nerve injury. GAD expression predominates in laminae I-II, being relatively uniform across each lamina, decreases markedly 5 days after CCI-IoN, and decreases further by 21 days. GlyT2 expression, on the other hand, predominates in lamina III where it shows irregular ‘patches’ of strong expression within a ‘matrix’ of weaker expression. After CCI-IoN, GlyT2 decreases more markedly at 21 days postinjury, and in the GlyT2-poorer ‘matrix’. (3) CCI-Ion induces a dramatic microgliosis 5 days after lesion, which recedes substantially by 21 days, but still maintaining significantly higher levels against the contralateral side or naïve controls. (4) The simultaneous analysis of GlyT2 expression and microglial activation documents an unexpected spatial restriction of the reactive microglia to the sectors of the nucleus where the expression of GlyT2 was weaker, a heretofore undescribed relationship between these key elements of neuropathic pain.

3.1. Inhibitory Transmitters in Sp5C Are Affected by the CCI-IoN

Synaptic inhibition in the spinal or medullary dorsal horn has long been postulated [30] and eventually shown [31,32,33,34,35,36] to control the transmission of nociceptive impulses to higher brain centers. Key players in this inhibition are the local GABAergic and Glycinergic interneurons, which constitute one-third of all neurons in laminae I-IV of the Sp5C [37]. Peripheral nerve injury drives a loss of GABA and Glycinergic inhibition in both the spinal [1,4,5,31,35,38,39,40,41] and the medullary [2,42,43] dorsal horn.
Early reports suggested that the number of GABA-immunoreactive cells in the spinal dorsal horn started to decline by 2 weeks after a nerve transection and continued to reach a 30% loss by 4 weeks postsurgery [38]. GABA- or Glycine-immunoreactive neuron loss was later ruled out, at least 2 weeks after CCI of the sciatic nerve [44], therefore pointing to other mechanisms as more probable explanations of the nerve injury-induced neuropathic pain, such as decreased transmitter release or activity of these neurons, reduced capacity of GABA and glycine to generate inhibition [1,45,46], or potentiation of nearby postsynaptic NMDA receptors by ‘spillover’ of unrecaptured glycine at the synapse [47]. Our results support that CCI-IoN is followed by decreased GABAergic and Glycinergic neurotransmission, as revealed by reductions in the expression of GAD and GlyT2 respectively, which display singular spatial and temporal features.
As previously reported, GAD expression is strong in laminae I and II, and more moderate in deeper layers, without major irregularities across the mediolateral extent of each lamina [48,49,50]. The reduction of GAD (or GABA) expression triggered by partial peripheral nerve injuries is, accordingly, more pronounced in superficial laminae, and remains confined to the mediolateral sector innervated by the affected nerve [2,48,50]. Compared with our previous data [2] present results show a larger mediolateral extent of GAD reduction, which may be due to the slanted projection of the IoN on the caudal trigeminal nuclei, which invades more medial sectors at rostral levels of Sp5C, and recedes towards more lateral sectors at more caudal levels and upper cervical segments [51]. A similar topography was found at the same levels for GlyT2. The contralateral reduction of GAD in lamina III is compatible with the existence of a small contingent of crossed primary trigeminal afferents terminating in laminae III-V [52].
In contrast with the well agreed upon distribution of GAD and GABA in the spinal and medullary dorsal horn, the irregularities we observed in the expression of GlyT2 have not been reported before. Since the patch/matrix arrangement of this marker occurs both in naïve and in operated animals, it seems to reflect a constitutive property in the distribution of this transporter. Moreover, the antibody used against GlyT2 specifically stains synaptic boutons, and only weakly cell bodies and axons [28], which suggests that glycinergic innervation displays preferential domains on a ‘background’ of sparser, particularly in lamina III. Irregularities in GlyT2 distribution in the same lamina may be present as well in the spinal cord (see Figure 7 in [53]). It would be worth testing whether these domains match others of different cellular or molecular composition. Although most reports of the distribution and the expression of different molecules and cell populations fail to show obvious heterogeneities across each dorsal horn lamina, some exceptions may be found, such as the irregular grouping of the largely inhibitory parvalbumin-expressing interneurons [54] or of glycine receptors and gephyrin, a major scaffolding protein at inhibitory synapses [55,56].

3.2. Microglia Activation and Its Relationship with the Expression of Inhibitory Molecules

A strong association between reactive microglia and the GABA and Glycine inhibitory mechanisms is now established beyond doubt. CCI, as any other peripheral nerve injury, induces a rapid activation of microglia in the spinal or brain stem territories that received the affected primary afferents [43,57,58,59,60,61]. Although some authors proposed that neuropathic pain was primarily due to the downregulation of inhibitory transmission, with microglia activation being just a secondary phenomenon [40], other studies hold that nerve injury initiates a cascade of events involved in the development and maintenance of neuropathic pain [12,62,63]. Summarily (see [17,64], for recent reviews), microglia is activated by cytokines and chemokines released by injured peripheral nerve fibers, which increases the synthesis and membrane insertion of several purinergic receptors of the P2X ion-channel family. ATP released from primary afferents, the microglia itself, and local interneurons activates P2X4 receptors, resulting in the release within minutes of BDNF [65] which binds to its high-affinity receptor trkB. This occurs on lamina I nociceptive projection neurons, where it produces the downregulation of the neuronal potassium-chloride cotransporter KCC2, increasing the intracellular Cl and causing a reversal in the equilibrium potential of Cl. The subsequent reduction of the inhibition mediated by GABAA receptors has been involved in both the induction and the maintenance of neuropathic pain [66]. Together with this postsynaptic effect, BDNF also acts presynaptically on peptidergic primary afferents of laminae I and II and, when combined with nerve injury and sustained KCC2-dependent disinhibition, changes the subunit composition of presynaptic NMDA receptors, potentiating transmission from these afferents [67,68,69,70].
The temporal course of these events offers clues to better understand the mechanisms underlying neuropathic pain. Early reports of a disinhibition of neurons in the sensory cortex, attributable to a loss of local GABAergic control, could indicate a different time-course of events. Such disinhibition happened immediately after peripheral nerve injuries, leading to an expansion of receptive fields in the cerebral cortex [71,72,73]. A similar effect was also found in the dorsal column nuclei after applying local anesthesia to a digit or toe [74,75]. Should a likewise rapid phenomenon take place following pain-inducing nerve lesions, our findings could suggest that changes in GABA are the earliest mechanistic explanation of the disinhibition observed. However, while disinhibition rapidly affecting the structure of receptive fields has been mostly attributed to a loss of lateral GABAergic inhibition [76], the implication of GABA in deafferentation-driven disinhibition leading to pain involves other mechanisms. These include GABA becoming less hyperpolarizing (or even depolarizing) because of a shift in the chloride equilibrium potential of some nociceptive dorsal horn neurons [13,53], and the disinhibition of a chain of excitatory feed-forward connections throughout superficial dorsal horn laminae towards nociceptive-projection neurons [77]. From our results, however, and in contrast with GAD, the expression of GlyT2 is only moderately decreased at 7 days post CCI-IoN, and this reduction grows in the following weeks. The relatively delayed downregulation of GlyT2 notwithstanding, glycine neurotransmission is a necessary condition for pain to appear, since this fails to occur when glycinergic cells are molecularly silenced without preventing microglial activation [40,78].
It seems, then, that microglia is better positioned to play a key role in the events that take place shortly after nerve injury. These cells already show morphological signs of activation 12 h after spinal nerve ligation, and proliferate between 32 h and 7 days postsurgery [79]. Moreover, they probably migrate soon to the affected region, strongly attracted by ATP and other chemoattractans that are promptly released by injured terminals in the dorsal horn [80]. By 24 h after the same manipulation or CCI of a peripheral nerve (before allodynia is detected), microglia activation was observed, as identified by Iba-1 or OX-42 increased immunoreactivity [26,81,82,83]. A prominent early effect of nerve ligation is the increase of BDNF in the dorsal horn, that reaches significance by 12 h after lesion, peaks one day later, and progressively disappears at 14 (as determined by immunohistochemistry) or 28 days (determined by ELISA; [67]). BDNF was then proposed to be associated only with the initiation of neuropathic pain, while the persistence of pain at later stages (beyond the second day postinjury) would depend on the activation of presynaptic NMDA receptors, particularly in primary afferents. In neuropathic, but not naïve rats, these receptors quickly change their composition to express the 2B subunit and upon activation stimulate glutamate release from those fibers [67,68,84]. The identification of early and late molecular responders in the pathophysiological mechanisms of neuropathic pain is also consistent with the existence of an early-responding microglia, which would be activated only within the first few days after injury, and a late-responding microglia, which would be more prevalent between the first and the fourth postinjury weeks. Although both populations would be morphologically indistinguishable, they showed markedly divergent transcriptomic profiles, with hundreds of genes being differentially regulated [85,86]. A cross-talk between microglia and astrocytes, whereby the chemokine CCL2 is positively regulated in astrocytes [87] contributes to the maintenance of microglial activation, which is particularly relevant for the chronification of neuropathic pain.
Early studies suggested that microglia activation did not last more than 2–4 weeks, reverting then to a ‘resting’ phenotype. Our results also indicate that the strong microgliosis found 7 days post CCI-IoN persists, but to a much milder degree, by 21 days postinjury. More recently, however, activated microglia has been demonstrated up to 98 days after irreversible and more damaging spinal or peripheral nerve pain-provoking injuries [88,89,90,91]. Interestingly, the time course of microglia activation parallels that of changes in the expression of key molecules involved in the signalling and regulation through activated microglia, such as BDNF, KCC2, GABA, GAD65 (but not GAD67), p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, or transcription factors involved in the production of P2X4 receptors [1,17,67,92,93,94,95].
Finally, the intriguing finding of the patches of low microglial activation and high GlyT2 expression is difficult to explain. It is possible, nevertheless, that a variable topography and irregular degree of damage to the different fascicles of the IoN by the ligature result in uneven patterns of innervation by damaged afferents in the medullary dorsal horn. If so, foci of less affected innervation coinciding with areas of pre-existing stronger glycinergic innervation (the ‘patches’ in lamina III) would fail to create a sufficiently ‘attractive’ environment for microglia migration and activation. In any case, this is an unclarified line of investigation that would be worth pursuing.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Experimental Subjects

Fifteen young adult (2–3 months old) male C57BL/6 mice were used. They were group housed (4–6 animals/cage) in a 12 h light/dark cycle with access to food and water ad libitum. All protocols for animal procedures were approved in advance by the Ethical Committee of the Autónoma University of Madrid, in accordance with European Community’s Council Directive 2010/63/UE. The experimental design (Figure 9) was planned to minimize the suffering of the animals, and to keep their number to the minimum that was expected to provide reliable results.

4.2. Surgery and IoN Constriction

An infraorbital nerve constriction (CCI-IoN) was performed on the right side to induce a moderately painful condition resembling trigeminal neuralgia [18,96]). Under i.m. injection of Ketamine (Ketolar, 55 mg/kg, Pfizer; New York, NY, USA), Xylazine (Rompun, 15 mg/kg, Bayer; Leverkusen, Germany) and Atropine (0.2 g/kg), the IoN was exposed under the vibrissal pad and a single polypropylene monofilament (Surgipro 6.0, Covidien; Dublin, Ireland) ligature was loosely tied around the distal part of the nerve. As shown in rats, this procedure alters little, if at all, the circulation through the superficial epineural vasculature [2,97]). The skin wound was closed with interrupted silk sutures. Age-matched control mice were not operated. After recovery from surgery the operated animals’ motor, grooming or eating behavior did not differ from the controls. Because our previous experience in rats [2,43] and mice [29,96] showed no differences in mechanical responses to facial stimulation and microglial phenotype in the Sp5C between controls and sham-operated animals with simple facial skin incisions, no sham group was included.

4.3. Behavioral Testing

Testing for behavioral responses to mechanical stimulation of the whisker pad was performed according to the procedure described by Krzyzanowska et al. [96]. In short, the animals were habituated to the environment (a quiet room with red lighting) and the experimenter during 1 h daily. The experiments started the next day for three consecutive days before IoN surgery, to establish the baseline response score, and on postoperative days 5 and 21. The animals were partially restrained in a home-made device [96] that allowed them to expose and move freely the head and forelimbs, so that testing and response recording could easily be made, while producing low stress levels.
Testing started using, in this order, 0.008 g and 0.07 g von Frey hairs (North Coast Medical, Inc. Morgan Hill, CA, USA). Each hair was applied to the vibrissal pad until bent in 3 series of 5 pokes, starting randomly on the left or right sides, and changing sides after each series. The scores given to the responses followed previous description [96], ranging from 0.25 points to clear and brisk face withdrawal or aggression/biting of the probe to 1.5 points to repeated scratching of the face. For each animal, an overall “response score” was obtained by adding up the points separately for each testing time point. Following Von Frey testing, air-puff testing was done by delivering 20 ms pulses of air at 10 psi and 1 Hz through an 18 gauge metal tube with its tip perpendicular to, and about 1 cm distant from the whisker pad. Pulses were controlled by a pneumatic pump (Pico Spritzer II, General Valve Co., Fairfield, NJ, USA) activated by a pulse generator (Cibertec, Madrid, Spain). The same scoring criteria as in Von Frey testing were assigned to the responses observed in the animal.

4.4. Tissue Processing and Immunostaining

On the day after the last testing, the mice were deeply anesthetized (Dolethal, 50 mg/kg i.p., Vétoquinol; Madrid, Spain) and perfused through the ascending aorta with 0.9% NaCl (50 mL, 2 min), followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB; pH 7.4, 200 mL, 10 min, 10–12 °C). The brain stem was extracted and a block containing at least the rostral 2/3 of the Sp5C nucleus (including the first cervical spinal segment and the medulla up to the obex; [98]) was removed, postfixed in the same fixative overnight, and subsequently cryoprotected for 2 days in 30% sucrose in PB. Control animals were likewise treated in parallel.
The blocks selected were frozen and serially cut at 40 mm in the coronal plane using a sliding microtome (Leica SM2400, Leica Biosystems, Nussloch). All sections were processed free-floating. Sections were incubated for one night at 4 °C with a combination of three primary antibodies, rabbit anti-Iba1 (1:500; Wako, Richmond, VA, USA), mouse anti-GAD6 (1:50; Hybridoma Bank; Iowa City, IA, USA) and rat anti-GlyT2 (1:100; [99]). After several washes with saline PB (PBS), the sections were incubated for 2 h in the dark in a mixture of secondary antibodies: AlexaFluor 488 donkey-anti-rabbit (green), AlexaFluor 647 goat-anti-mouse (far-red) and AlexaFluor 546 goat-anti-rat (red). In addition, all nuclei were labeled with Bisbenzimide (Hoescht, Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA). Sections were then mounted on glass slides, dehydrated, defatted, and coverslipped with Fluoromount-G (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

4.5. Densitometry of Immunofluorescence

Confocal images covering the rostrocaudal extension of the TCC in both sides were acquired at 1024 × 1024 pixels from 5 sections of each animal with a TCS SP5 Spectral Leica confocal microscope (Leica; Wetzlar, Germany) using a 20 × dry objective. Image stacks and merged channel panels were obtained with Leica LAS AF software (Leica; Wetzlar, Germany). The images obtained were collapsed to create TIFF files with the projections of maximum intensity using the same final thickness of tissue analyzed for all series (5 microns). These images were converted to 8-bit grayscale using ImageJ image analysis software for Windows (Microsoft; Alburquerque, NM, USA). The image processing was identical for all of them, limiting itself to small adjustments in the grayscale and brightness to improve the visualization. Four regions of interest were delineated as broad as possible on the images that selected, respectively, the exterior of the tissue, the white matter forming the outer component of the spinal and medullary dorsal horn, laminae I-II, and lamina III. In each of them, a densitometric analysis of the immunoreactivity of GAD-6, GlyT2 and Iba-1 was performed, obtaining various optical density measurements using the ImageJ ‘Set Measurement’ routine. The data corresponding to the distribution of pixels in the gray scale were also obtained for each of the measurements. The gray values were taken to an Excel sheet where the histograms and corresponding curves were composed. These data were also used for further statistical analysis.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics (means and SEM or SD) were obtained using the Excel program (Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2010 for Windows 10). For statistical tests, SPSS software (v. 15; IBM, Armonk, North Castle, NY, USA) and GraphPad Prism software (v. 8.0; San Diego, CA, USA) were used. Histograms and graphs were generated with GraphPad Prism software (San Diego, CA, USA) and were retouched to improve image quality using CorelDraw X3 software (Corel; Ottawa, ON, Canada).
The mean densitometric data were analyzed and compared between sides using the Wilcoxon signed rank test using individual sections por pairwise comparisons. Intergroup, sidewise comparisons were assessed by the Mann-Whitney test, using hemispheres as sampling units. The distribution curves of pixels according to their luminance in the 8-bit gray scale were compared with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample D test [100]. In all cases the statistical significance was established at a p-value < 0.05 and was represented in the Figures by asterisks, for intergroup comparisons, or hash symbols, for between-side comparisons (*, #: p < 0.05; **, ##: p < 0.01).

Author Contributions

C.A., N.G.-M. and P.N. conceived and designed the study. N.G.-M. and Y.B.M. performed the experiments, collected the data and analyzed the results. C.A., Y.B.M. and N.G.-M. composed the Figures and wrote the manuscript. F.Z. contributed to the glycine transporter methodology and conceptualization. All authors participated in discussing, reviewing and editing the study, and have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been supported by “Ayudas a Proyectos de Investigación UFV2021-16” from Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, and Project “797011—Introducción Técnicas Estereológicas”, from the Fundación General de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Autonoma University of Madrid, in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and the European Community’s Council Directive 2010/63/UE, with permission number PROEX 054/18 (approval date 7 March 2018).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Enrique Núñez for his expert technical contribution to GlyT2 experiments. We also thank Dolores Morales, and the UAM-SIdI Service of Confocal Microscopy, where immunofluorescence imaging was performed.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Moore, K.A.; Kohno, T.; Karchewski, L.A.; Scholz, J.; Baba, H.; Woolf, C.J. Partial Peripheral Nerve Injury Promotes a Selective Loss of GABAergic Inhibition in the Superficial Dorsal Horn of the Spinal Cord. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22, 6724–6731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Martin, Y.B.; Malmierca, E.; Avendaño, C.; Nuñez, A. Neuronal disinhibition in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis in a model of chronic neuropathic pain. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2010, 32, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lee, K.Y.; Ratté, S.; Prescott, S.A. Excitatory neurons are more disinhibited than inhibitory neurons by chloride dysregulation in the spinal dorsal horn. eLife 2019, 8, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yaksh, T.L. Behavioral and autonomic correlates of the tactile evoked allodynia produced by spinal glycine inhibition: Effects of modulatory receptor systems and excitatory amino acid antagonists. Pain 1989, 37, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Baba, H.; Ji, R.R.; Kohno, T.; Moore, A.K.; Ataka, T.; Wakai, A.; Okamoto, M.; Woolf, C.J. Removal of GABAergic inhibition facilitates polysynaptic A fiber-mediated excitatory transmission to the superficial spinal dorsal horn. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2003, 24, 818–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hwang, J.H.; Yaksh, T.L. The effect of spinal GABA receptor agonists on tactile allodynia in a surgically-induced neuropathic pain model in the rat. Pain 1997, 70, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, J.; Kim, S.J.; Lee, H.; Chang, J.W. Effective neuropathic pain relief through sciatic nerve administration of GAD65-expressing rAAV2. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 388, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kataoka, K.; Hara, K.; Haranishi, Y.; Terada, T.; Sata, T. The Antinociceptive Effect of SNAP5114, a Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Transporter-3 Inhibitor, in Rat Experimental Pain Models. Anesth. Analg. 2013, 116, 1162–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Barthel, F.; Urban, A.; Schlösser, L.; Eulenburg, V.; Werdehausen, R.; Brandenburger, T.; Aragon, C.; Bauer, I.; Hermanns, H. Long-term Application of Glycine Transporter Inhibitors Acts Antineuropathic and Modulates Spinal N-methyl-d-aspartate Receptor Subunit NR-1 Expression in Rats. Anesthesiology 2014, 121, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Vandenberg, R.J.; Ryan, R.M.; Carland, J.E.; Imlach, W.L.; Christie, M.J. Glycine transport inhibitors for the treatment of pain. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2014, 35, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tsuda, M.; Inoue, K.; Salter, M.W. Neuropathic pain and spinal microglia: A big problem from molecules in ‘small’ glia. Trends Neurosci. 2005, 28, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tsuda, M.; Shigemoto-Mogami, Y.; Koizumi, S.; Mizokoshi, A.; Kohsaka, S.; Salter, M.W.; Inoue, K. P2X4 receptors induced in spinal microglia gate tactile allodynia after nerve injury. Nat. Cell Biol. 2003, 424, 778–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Coull, J.A.M.; Beggs, S.; Boudreau, D.; Boivin, D.; Tsuda, M.; Inoue, K.; Gravel, C.; Salter, M.W.; De Koninck, Y. BDNF from microglia causes the shift in neuronal anion gradient underlying neuropathic pain. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 438, 1017–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Keller, A.F.; Beggs, S.; Salter, M.W.; De Koninck, Y. Transformation of the Output of Spinal Lamina I Neurons After Nerve Injury and Microglia Stimulation Underlying Neuropathic Pain. Mol. Pain 2007, 3, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Trang, T.; Beggs, S.; Salter, M.W. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor from microglia: A molecular substrate for neuropathic pain. Neuron Glia Biol. 2011, 7, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ferrini, F.; De Koninck, Y. Microglia Control Neuronal Network Excitability via BDNF Signalling. Neural Plast. 2013, 2013, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Inoue, K.; Tsuda, M. Microglia in neuropathic pain: Cellular and molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2018, 19, 138–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Vos, B.P.; Strassman, A.M.; Maciewicz, R.J. Behavioral evidence of trigeminal neuropathic pain following chronic constriction injury to the rat’s infraorbital nerve. J. Neurosci. 1994, 14, 2708–2723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Krzyzanowska, A.; Avendaño, C. Behavioral testing in rodent models of orofacial neuropathic and inflammatory pain. Brain Behav. 2012, 2, 678–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bereiter, D.A.; Hirata, H.; Hu, J.W. Trigeminal subnucleus caudalis: Beyond homologies with the spinal dorsal horn. Pain 2000, 88, 221–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Watson, C.P.N. Management issues of neuropathic trigeminal pain from a medical perspective. J. Orofac. Pain 2004, 18, 366–373. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Aicher, S.A.; Hermes, S.M.; Whittier, K.L.; Hegarty, D.M. Descending projections from the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) to trigeminal and spinal dorsal horns are morphologically and neurochemically distinct. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 2012, 43, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kogelman, L.J.A.; Christensen, R.E.; Pedersen, S.H.; Bertalan, M.; Hansen, T.F.; Jansen-Olesen, I.; Olesen, J. Whole transcriptome expression of trigeminal ganglia compared to dorsal root ganglia in Rattus Norvegicus. Neuroscience 2017, 350, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Megat, S.; Ray, P.R.; Tavares-Ferreira, D.; Moy, J.K.; Sankaranarayanan, I.; Wanghzou, A.; Lou, T.F.; Barragan-Iglesias, P.; Campbell, Z.T.; Dussor, G.; et al. Differences between Dorsal Root and Trigeminal Ganglion Nociceptors in Mice Revealed by Translational Profiling. J. Neurosci. 2019, 39, 6829–6847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Latrémolière, A.; Mauborgne, A.; Masson, J.; Bourgoin, S.; Kayser, V.; Hamon, M.; Pohl, M. Differential Implication of Proinflammatory Cytokine Interleukin-6 in the Development of Cephalic versus Extracephalic Neuropathic Pain in Rats. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 8489–8501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Shibuta, K.; Suzuki, I.; Shinoda, M.; Tsuboi, Y.; Honda, K.; Shimizu, N.; Sessle, B.J.; Iwata, K. Organization of hyperactive microglial cells in trigeminal spinal subnucleus caudalis and upper cervical spinal cord associated with orofacial neuropathic pain. Brain Res. 2012, 1451, 74–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kaufman, D.L.; Houser, C.R.; Tobin, A.J. Two Forms of the gamma aminobutyric Acid Synthetic Enzyme Glutamate Decarboxylase Have Distinct Intraneuronal Distributions and Cofactor Interactions. J. Neurochem. 1991, 56, 720–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zafra, F.; Aragon, C.; Olivares, L.; Danbolt, N.; Gimenez, C.; Storm-Mathisen, J. Glycine transporters are differentially expressed among CNS cells. J. Neurosci. 1995, 15, 3952–3969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. García-Magro, N.; Martin, Y.B.; Palomino-Antolin, A.; Egea, J.; Negredo, P.; Avendaño, C. Multiple Morphometric Assessment of Microglial Cells in Deafferented Spinal Trigeminal Nucleus. Front. Neuroanat. 2020, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Melzack, R.; Wall, P.D. Pain Mechanisms: A New Theory. Science 1965, 150, 971–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sivilotti, L.; Woolf, C.J. The contribution of GABAA and glycine receptors to central sensitization: Disinhibition and touch-evoked allodynia in the spinal cord. J. Neurophysiol. 1994, 72, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sherman, S.E.; Loomis, C.W. Strychnine-sensitive modulation is selective for non-noxious somatosensory input in the spinal cord of the rat. Pain 1996, 66, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Takeda, M.; Tanimoto, T.; Matsumoto, S. Change in mechanical receptive field properties induced by GABA(A) receptor activation in the trigeminal spinal nucleus caudalis neurons in rats. Exp. Brain Res. 2000, 134, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lu, Y.; Perl, E.R. A Specific Inhibitory Pathway between Substantia Gelatinosa Neurons Receiving Direct C-Fiber Input. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 8752–8758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zeilhofer, H.U. The glycinergic control of spinal pain processing. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2005, 62, 2027–2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bardoni, R.; Takazawa, T.; Tong, C.-K.; Choudhury, P.; Scherrer, G.; MacDermott, A.B. Pre- and postsynaptic inhibitory control in the spinal cord dorsal horn. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2013, 1279, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Avendaño, C.; Machín, R.; Bermejo, P.E.; Lagares, A. Neuron numbers in the sensory trigeminal nuclei of the rat: A GABA- and glycine-immunocytochemical and stereological analysis. J. Comp. Neurol. 2005, 493, 538–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Castro-Lopes, J.; Tavares, I.; Coimbra, A. GABA decreases in the spinal cord dorsal horn after peripheral neurectomy. Brain Res. 1993, 620, 287–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Huang, W.; Simpson, R. Long-term intrathecal administration of glycine prevents mechanical hyperalgesia in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Neurol. Res. 2000, 22, 160–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Foster, E.; Wildner, H.; Tudeau, L.; Haueter, S.; Ralvenius, W.T.; Jegen, M.; Johannssen, H.; Hösli, L.; Haenraets, K.; Ghanem, A.; et al. Targeted Ablation, Silencing, and Activation Establish Glycinergic Dorsal Horn Neurons as Key Components of a Spinal Gate for Pain and Itch. Neuron 2015, 85, 1289–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Imlach, W.L.; Bhola, R.F.; Mohammadi, S.A.; Christie, M.J. Glycinergic dysfunction in a subpopulation of dorsal horn interneurons in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Dieb, W.; Hafidi, A. Mechanism of GABA involvement in post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain: Activation of neuronal circuitry composed of PKCγ interneurons and pERK1/2 expressing neurons. Eur. J. Pain 2014, 19, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. García-Magro, N.; Negredo, P.; Martin, Y.B.; Nuñez, Á.; Avendaño, C. Modulation of mechanosensory vibrissal responses in the trigeminocervical complex by stimulation of the greater occipital nerve in a rat model of trigeminal neuropathic pain. J. Headache Pain 2020, 21, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Polgár, E.; Hughes, I.D.; Riddell, S.J.; Maxwell, J.D.; Puskár, Z.; Todd, J.A. Selective loss of spinal GABAergic or glycinergic neurons is not necessary for development of thermal hyperalgesia in the chronic constriction injury model of neuropathic pain. Pain 2003, 104, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Price, T.J.; Cervero, F.; Gold, M.S.; Hammond, D.L.; Prescott, S.A. Chloride regulation in the pain pathway. Brain Res. Rev. 2009, 60, 149–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Todd, A.J. Plasticity of Inhibition in the Spinal Cord. Organotypic Models Drug Dev. 2015, 227, 171–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ahmadi, S.; Muth-Selbach, U.; Lauterbach, A.; Lipfert, P.; Neuhuber, W.L.; Zeilhofer, H.U. Facilitation of Spinal NMDA Receptor Currents by Spillover of Synaptically Released Glycine. Science 2003, 300, 2094–2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Eaton, M.J.; Plunkett, J.A.; Karmally, S.; Martinez, M.; Montanez, K. Changes in GAD- and GABA- immunoreactivity in the spinal dorsal horn after peripheral nerve injury and promotion of recovery by lumbar transplant of immortalized serotonergic precursors. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 1998, 16, 57–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mackie, M.; Hughes, D.; Maxwell, D.; Tillakaratne, N.; Todd, A. Distribution and colocalisation of glutamate decarboxylase isoforms in the rat spinal cord. Neuroscience 2003, 119, 461–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lorenzo, L.E.; Magnussen, C.; Bailey, A.L.; Louis, M.S.; De Koninck, Y.; Ribeiro-Da-Silva, A. Spatial and Temporal Pattern of Changes in the Number of GAD65-Immunoreactive Inhibitory Terminals in the Rat Superficial Dorsal Horn following Peripheral Nerve Injury. Mol. Pain 2014, 10, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Panneton, W.M.; Pan, B.; Gan, Q. Somatotopy in the Medullary Dorsal Horn as a Basis for Orofacial Reflex Behavior. Front. Neurol. 2017, 8, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Jacquin, M.F.; Chiaia, N.L.; Rhoadest, R.W. Trigeminal Projections to Contralateral Dorsal Horn: Central Extent, Peripheral Origins, and Plasticity. Somatosens. Mot. Res. 1990, 7, 153–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zeilhofer, H.U.; Wildner, H.; Yévenes, G.E. Fast Synaptic Inhibition in Spinal Sensory Processing and Pain Control. Physiol. Rev. 2012, 92, 193–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Petitjean, H.; Pawlowski, S.A.; Fraine, S.L.; Sharif, B.; Hamad, D.; Fatima, T.; Berg, J.; Brown, C.M.; Jan, L.-Y.; Ribeiro-Da-Silva, A.; et al. Dorsal Horn Parvalbumin Neurons Are Gate-Keepers of Touch-Evoked Pain after Nerve Injury. Cell Rep. 2015, 13, 1246–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Takazawa, T.; Choudhury, P.; Tong, C.-K.; Conway, C.M.; Scherrer, G.; Flood, P.D.; Mukai, J.; MacDermott, A.B. Inhibition Mediated by Glycinergic and GABAergic Receptors on Excitatory Neurons in Mouse Superficial Dorsal Horn Is Location-Specific but Modified by Inflammation. J. Neurosci. 2017, 37, 2336–2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Wang, H.C.; Cheng, K.I.; Chen, P.R.; Tseng, K.Y.; Kwan, A.L.; Chang, L.L. Glycine receptors expression in rat spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion in prostaglandin E2 intrathecal injection models. BMC Neurosci. 2018, 19, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Gilmore, S.A.; Skinner, R.D. Intraspinal non-neuronal cellular responses to peripheral nerve injury. Anat. Rec. Adv. Integr. Anat. Evol. Biol. 1979, 194, 369–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Cova, J.L.; Aldskogius, H.; Arvidsson, J.; Molander, C. Changes in microglial cell numbers in the spinal cord dorsal horn following brachial plexus transection in the adult rat. Exp. Brain Res. 1988, 73, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gehrmann, J.; Monaco, S.; Kreutzberg, G.W. Spinal cord microglial cells and DRG satellite cells rapidly respond to transection of the rat sciatic nerve. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 1991, 2, 181–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Eriksson, N.P.; Persson, J.K.E.; Svensson, M.; Arvidsson, J.; Molander, C.; Aldskogius, H. A quantitative analysis of the microglial cell reaction in central primary sensory projection territories following peripheral nerve injury in the adult rat. Exp. Brain Res. 1993, 96, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Melzer, P.; Zhang, M.-Z.; McKanna, J. Infraorbital nerve transection and whisker follicle removal in adult rats affect microglia and astrocytes in the trigeminal brainstem. A study with lipocortin1- and S100β-immunohistochemistry. Neuroscience 1997, 80, 459–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Inoue, K.; Tsuda, M. Microglia and neuropathic pain. Glia 2009, 57, 1469–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Calvo, M.; Bennett, D.L. The mechanisms of microgliosis and pain following peripheral nerve injury. Exp. Neurol. 2012, 234, 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zeilhofer, H.U.; Ganley, R. The Oxford Handbook of the Neurobiology of Pain; Wood, J.N., Ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  65. Trang, T.; Beggs, S.; Wan, X.; Salter, M.W. P2X4-Receptor-Mediated Synthesis and Release of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Microglia Is Dependent on Calcium and p38-Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Activation. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29, 3518–3528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Wang, X.; Ratnam, J.; Zou, B.; England, P.M.; Basbaum, A.I. TrkB Signaling Is Required for Both the Induction and Maintenance of Tissue and Nerve Injury-Induced Persistent Pain. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29, 5508–5515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Geng, S.-J.; Liao, F.-F.; Dang, W.-H.; Ding, X.; Liu, X.-D.; Cai, J.; Han, J.-S.; Wan, Y.; Xing, G.-G. Contribution of the spinal cord BDNF to the development of neuropathic pain by activation of the NR2B-containing NMDA receptors in rats with spinal nerve ligation. Exp. Neurol. 2010, 222, 256–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Yan, X.; Jiang, E.; Gao, M.; Weng, H.-R. Endogenous activation of presynaptic NMDA receptors enhances glutamate release from the primary afferents in the spinal dorsal horn in a rat model of neuropathic pain. J. Physiol. 2013, 591, 2001–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Chen, W.; Walwyn, W.; Ennes, H.S.; Kim, H.; McRoberts, J.A.; Marvizón, J.C.G. BDNF released during neuropathic pain potentiates NMDA receptors in primary afferent terminals. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2014, 39, 1439–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hildebrand, M.E.; Xu, J.; Dedek, A.; Li, Y.; Sengar, A.S.; Beggs, S.; Lombroso, P.J.; Salter, M.W. Potentiation of Synaptic GluN2B NMDAR Currents by Fyn Kinase Is Gated through BDNF-Mediated Disinhibition in Spinal Pain Processing. Cell Rep. 2016, 17, 2753–2765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Rasmusson, D.D.; Turnbull, B.G. Immediate effects of digit amputation on SI cortex in the raccoon: Unmasking of inhibitory fields. Brain Res. 1983, 288, 368–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hicks, T.; Dykes, R. Receptive field size for certain neurons in primary somatosensory cortex is determined by GABA-mediated intracortical inhibition. Brain Res. 1983, 274, 160–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Calford, M.B.; Tweedale, R. Acute changes in cutaneous receptive fields in primary somatosensory cortex after digit denervation in adult flying fox. J. Neurophysiol. 1991, 65, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pettit, M.J.; Schwark, H.D. Receptive field reorganization in dorsal column nuclei during temporary denervation. Science 1993, 262, 2054–2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Panetsos, F.; Nuñez, A.; Avendaño, C. Local anaesthesia induces immediate receptive field changes in nucleus gracilis and cortex. Neuroreport 1995, 7, 150–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Calford, M. Dynamic representational plasticity in sensory cortex. Neuroscience 2002, 111, 709–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Torsney, C. Disinhibition Opens the Gate to Pathological Pain Signaling in Superficial Neurokinin 1 Receptor-Expressing Neurons in Rat Spinal Cord. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26, 1833–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Winters, B.L.; Rawling, T.; Vandenberg, R.J.; Christie, M.J.; Bhola, R.F.; Imlach, W.L. Activity of novel lipid glycine transporter inhibitors on synaptic signalling in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2018, 175, 2337–2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Kohno, K.; Kitano, J.; Kohro, Y.; Tozaki-Saitoh, H.; Inoue, K.; Tsuda, M. Temporal Kinetics of Microgliosis in the Spinal Dorsal Horn after Peripheral Nerve Injury in Rodents. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2018, 41, 1096–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Kunori, S.; Matsumura, S.; Okuda-Ashitaka, E.; Katano, T.; Audoly, L.P.; Urade, Y.; Ito, S. A novel role of prostaglandin E2 in neuropathic pain. Glia 2010, 59, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Romero-Sandoval, A.; Chai, N.; Nutile-McMenemy, N.; DeLeo, J.A. A comparison of spinal Iba1 and GFAP expression in rodent models of acute and chronic pain. Brain Res. 2008, 1219, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Linl, S.C.; Yehl, J.H.; Chenl, C.L.; Choul, S.H.; Tsail, Y.J. Effects of local lidocaine treatment before and after median nerve injury on mechanical hypersensitivity and microglia activation in rat cuneate nucleus. Eur. J. Pain 2011, 15, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Xu, F.; Huang, J.; He, Z.; Chen, J.; Tang, X.; Song, Z.; Guo, Q.; Huang, C. Microglial polarization dynamics in dorsal spinal cord in the early stages following chronic sciatic nerve damage. Neurosci. Lett. 2016, 617, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Al-Khrasani, M.; Mohammadzadeh, A.; Balogh, M.; Király, K.; Barsi, S.; Hajnal, B.; Köles, L.; Zádori, Z.S.; Harsing, L.G. Glycine transporter inhibitors: A new avenue for managing neuropathic pain. Brain Res. Bull. 2019, 152, 143–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Jeong, H.; Na, Y.-J.; Lee, K.; Kim, Y.H.; Lee, Y.; Kang, M.; Jiang, B.-C.; Yeom, Y.I.; Wu, L.-J.; Gao, Y.-J.; et al. High-resolution transcriptome analysis reveals neuropathic pain gene-expression signatures in spinal microglia after nerve injury. Pain 2016, 157, 964–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Denk, F.; Crow, M.; Didangelos, A.; Lopes, D.M.; McMahon, S.B. Persistent Alterations in Microglial Enhancers in a Model of Chronic Pain. Cell Rep. 2016, 15, 1771–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Ji, R.-R.; Berta, T.; Nedergaard, M. Glia and pain: Is chronic pain a gliopathy? Pain 2013, 154, S10–S28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Coyle, D.E. Partial peripheral nerve injury leads to activation of astroglia and microglia which parallels the development of allodynic behavior. Glia 1998, 23, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Leinders, M.; Knaepen, L.; De Kock, M.; Sommer, C.; Hermans, E.; Deumens, R. Up-regulation of spinal microglial Iba-1 expression persists after resolution of neuropathic pain hypersensitivity. Neurosci. Lett. 2013, 554, 146–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Echeverry, S.; Shi, X.Q.; Yang, M.; Huang, H.; Wu, Y.; Lorenzo, L.E.; Perez-Sanchez, J.; Bonin, R.P.; De Koninck, Y.; Zhang, J. Spinal microglia are required for long-term maintenance of neuropathic pain. Pain 2017, 158, 1792–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kosaka, Y.; Yafuso, T.; Shimizu-Okabe, C.; Kim, J.; Kobayashi, S.; Okura, N.; Ando, H.; Okabe, A.; Takayama, C. Development and persistence of neuropathic pain through microglial activation and KCC2 decreasing after mouse tibial nerve injury. Brain Res. 2020, 1733, 146718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Jin, S.-X.; Zhuang, Z.-Y.; Woolf, C.J.; Ji, R.-R. p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Is Activated after a Spinal Nerve Ligation in Spinal Cord Microglia and Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons and Contributes to the Generation of Neuropathic Pain. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 4017–4022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Janssen, S.; Truin, M.; Van Kleef, M.; Joosten, E. Differential GABAergic disinhibition during the development of painful peripheral neuropathy. Neuroscience 2011, 184, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Wei, B.; Kumada, T.; Furukawa, T.; Inoue, K.; Watanabe, M.; Sato, K.; Fukuda, A. Pre- and post-synaptic switches of GABA actions associated with Cl− homeostatic changes are induced in the spinal nucleus of the trigeminal nerve in a rat model of trigeminal neuropathic pain. Neuroscience 2013, 228, 334–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Masuda, T.; Ozono, Y.; Mikuriya, S.; Kohro, Y.; Tozaki-Saitoh, H.; Iwatsuki, K.; Uneyama, H.; Ichikawa, R.; Salter, M.W.; Tsuda, M.; et al. Dorsal horn neurons release extracellular ATP in a VNUT-dependent manner that underlies neuropathic pain. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Krzyzanowska, A.; Pittolo, S.; Cabrerizo, M.; Sánchez-López, J.; Krishnasamy, S.; Venero, C.; Avendaño, C. Assessing nociceptive sensitivity in mouse models of inflammatory and neuropathic trigeminal pain. J. Neurosci. Methods 2011, 201, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Bennett, G.J.; Xie, Y.K. A peripheral mononeuropathy in rat that produces disorders of pain sensation like those seen in man. Pain 1988, 33, 87–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. García-Magro, N.; Martin, Y.B.; Negredo, P.; Avendaño, C. The greater occipital nerve and its spinal and brainstem afferent projections: A stereological and tract-tracing study in the rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 2018, 526, 3000–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Núñez, E.; Pérez-Siles, G.; Rodenstein, L.; Alonso-Torres, P.; Zafra, F.; Jimenez, E.; Aragón, C.; López-Corcuera, B. Subcellular Localization of the Neuronal Glycine Transporter GLYT2 in Brainstem. Traffic 2009, 10, 829–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kirkman, T.W. Statistics to Use. Available online: http://www.physics.csbsju.edu/stats/ (accessed on 28 December 2020).
Figure 1. Behavioral responses following CCI-IoN to stimulation of the whisker pad with 0.008 g or 0.07 g Von Frey filaments, or 10 psi air-puff pulses. The response score before surgery (PRE) represents the average of three consecutive testing days. At 14 and 21 postoperative days the response score differed significantly between operated (n = 6, right side, magenta circles) and control (n = 5, blue squares) cases. The latter included responses from both sides, because there were no left-right differences in these cases. Data represent means ± SEM. Significance is represented by *, ** and ***, corresponding to p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively (two-tailed Mann-Whitney test).
Figure 1. Behavioral responses following CCI-IoN to stimulation of the whisker pad with 0.008 g or 0.07 g Von Frey filaments, or 10 psi air-puff pulses. The response score before surgery (PRE) represents the average of three consecutive testing days. At 14 and 21 postoperative days the response score differed significantly between operated (n = 6, right side, magenta circles) and control (n = 5, blue squares) cases. The latter included responses from both sides, because there were no left-right differences in these cases. Data represent means ± SEM. Significance is represented by *, ** and ***, corresponding to p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively (two-tailed Mann-Whitney test).
Ijms 22 04564 g001
Figure 2. Coronal sections through the right Sp5C caudal to the obex showing immunofluorescence for GAD-6 (gray, top panels), and GlyT2 (red, bottom panels). GAD-6 expression fades in all laminae at 5 days post-operation (dpo; 5d), and decreases even further at 21 dpo, when the loss is more marked in the ventral 1/2 of the nucleus. Less obvious, but still noticeable is a heterogeneous decrease in GlyT2 expression, which affects mostly lamina II and, irregularly, lamina III in the ventral 1/2 of the nucleus (where afferents from the IoN dominate). Arrows point to some ‘patches’ with strong expression of GlyT2 in laminae III-IV, which persist after CCI-IoN. In control sections (C) short, white bars indicate the approximate boundaries between the trigeminal tract, laminae I-II, lamina III and lamina IV. These sections were among those used for densitometric measures. A Nissl-stained section (lower right corner) shows approximately the same level of Sp5C, with interlaminar boundaries marked by dashed lines. T, trigeminal tract. Scale bar = 500 µm.
Figure 2. Coronal sections through the right Sp5C caudal to the obex showing immunofluorescence for GAD-6 (gray, top panels), and GlyT2 (red, bottom panels). GAD-6 expression fades in all laminae at 5 days post-operation (dpo; 5d), and decreases even further at 21 dpo, when the loss is more marked in the ventral 1/2 of the nucleus. Less obvious, but still noticeable is a heterogeneous decrease in GlyT2 expression, which affects mostly lamina II and, irregularly, lamina III in the ventral 1/2 of the nucleus (where afferents from the IoN dominate). Arrows point to some ‘patches’ with strong expression of GlyT2 in laminae III-IV, which persist after CCI-IoN. In control sections (C) short, white bars indicate the approximate boundaries between the trigeminal tract, laminae I-II, lamina III and lamina IV. These sections were among those used for densitometric measures. A Nissl-stained section (lower right corner) shows approximately the same level of Sp5C, with interlaminar boundaries marked by dashed lines. T, trigeminal tract. Scale bar = 500 µm.
Ijms 22 04564 g002
Figure 3. Comparisons of densitometric measurements for GAD-6 (A) and GlyT2 (B) in laminae I-II (top panels) and III (bottom panels). Values for each molecule are represented as means ± SD of the normalized fluorescence intensity (histograms), and as the relative distribution of pixels in a grayscale between 0 (darkest) and 255 (brightest). Histograms show values for the contralateral (left, L) and ipsilateral (right, R) sides with respect to the CCI-IoN. Curves show values only for the right side in operated cases, and averages for R and L sides in control cases. C, controls; CCI 5d, operated animals, at 5 dpo; CCI 21d, operated animals, at 21 dpo. In histograms, * indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05) between groups, using hemispheres as sampling units (Mann-Whitney test, n = 4 in C and n = 6 in CCI-IoN cases). Differences between sides in each group were assessed by the Wilcoxon signed rank test using individual sections for pairwise comparisons (n = 12 in C and n = 18 in CCI-IoN cases; ## = p < 0.01). For statistical comparisons of pixel distributions, see Figure 4.
Figure 3. Comparisons of densitometric measurements for GAD-6 (A) and GlyT2 (B) in laminae I-II (top panels) and III (bottom panels). Values for each molecule are represented as means ± SD of the normalized fluorescence intensity (histograms), and as the relative distribution of pixels in a grayscale between 0 (darkest) and 255 (brightest). Histograms show values for the contralateral (left, L) and ipsilateral (right, R) sides with respect to the CCI-IoN. Curves show values only for the right side in operated cases, and averages for R and L sides in control cases. C, controls; CCI 5d, operated animals, at 5 dpo; CCI 21d, operated animals, at 21 dpo. In histograms, * indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05) between groups, using hemispheres as sampling units (Mann-Whitney test, n = 4 in C and n = 6 in CCI-IoN cases). Differences between sides in each group were assessed by the Wilcoxon signed rank test using individual sections for pairwise comparisons (n = 12 in C and n = 18 in CCI-IoN cases; ## = p < 0.01). For statistical comparisons of pixel distributions, see Figure 4.
Ijms 22 04564 g003
Figure 4. Results of the statistical comparisons (Kolmogorov-Smirnov D test, p-values) of densitometric curves for GAD-6 shown in Figure 2. Similar comparisons for GlyT2 did not show any significant difference between groups. N.S., not significant.
Figure 4. Results of the statistical comparisons (Kolmogorov-Smirnov D test, p-values) of densitometric curves for GAD-6 shown in Figure 2. Similar comparisons for GlyT2 did not show any significant difference between groups. N.S., not significant.
Ijms 22 04564 g004
Figure 5. Confocal images of coronal sections of the trigeminocervical complex (TCC) at a caudal level of Sp5C immunolabeled for Iba-1. In controls (A,D) microglial cells showed a homogeneous distribution, relative low density, and a typical morphology of a ‘resting’ or ‘surveying’ state. CCI-IoN induced a potent microgliosis at 5 dpo (B), which decreased but still persisted at 21 dpo (C). Activated microglia (E) was typically characterized by an increase in the number of cells, which exhibit heterogeneous shapes and sizes, predominating those with larger and irregular somata, and an increased number of processes, including thicker protoplasmic expansions. Scale bars = 500 μm (AC) and 10 μm (D,E).
Figure 5. Confocal images of coronal sections of the trigeminocervical complex (TCC) at a caudal level of Sp5C immunolabeled for Iba-1. In controls (A,D) microglial cells showed a homogeneous distribution, relative low density, and a typical morphology of a ‘resting’ or ‘surveying’ state. CCI-IoN induced a potent microgliosis at 5 dpo (B), which decreased but still persisted at 21 dpo (C). Activated microglia (E) was typically characterized by an increase in the number of cells, which exhibit heterogeneous shapes and sizes, predominating those with larger and irregular somata, and an increased number of processes, including thicker protoplasmic expansions. Scale bars = 500 μm (AC) and 10 μm (D,E).
Ijms 22 04564 g005
Figure 6. Comparisons of densitometric measurements for Iba-1 (A) in laminae I-II (top panels) and III (bottom panels). In histograms, * indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05) between groups, using hemispheres as sampling units (Mann-Whitney test, n = 4 in C and n = 6 in CCI-IoN cases). Differences between sides in each group were assessed by the Wilcoxon signed rank test using individual sections por pairwise comparisons (n = 12 in C and n = 18 in CCI-IoN cases; ## = p < 0.01). For statistical comparisons of pixel distributions, see Figure 4. The statistical comparisons (Kolmogorov-Smirnov D test) of densitometric curves are shown in (B).
Figure 6. Comparisons of densitometric measurements for Iba-1 (A) in laminae I-II (top panels) and III (bottom panels). In histograms, * indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05) between groups, using hemispheres as sampling units (Mann-Whitney test, n = 4 in C and n = 6 in CCI-IoN cases). Differences between sides in each group were assessed by the Wilcoxon signed rank test using individual sections por pairwise comparisons (n = 12 in C and n = 18 in CCI-IoN cases; ## = p < 0.01). For statistical comparisons of pixel distributions, see Figure 4. The statistical comparisons (Kolmogorov-Smirnov D test) of densitometric curves are shown in (B).
Ijms 22 04564 g006
Figure 7. Spatial correlation of microglial reaction to CCI-IoN with GlyT2 expression. The marked ipsilateral microgliosis at 5dpo (not shown) and 21dpo (right side, middle panel) was practically restricted to the zones of Sp5C exhibiting low expression of GlyT2, sparing the GlyT2-intense ‘patches’ in lamina III (arrows). Scale bar = 300 μm.
Figure 7. Spatial correlation of microglial reaction to CCI-IoN with GlyT2 expression. The marked ipsilateral microgliosis at 5dpo (not shown) and 21dpo (right side, middle panel) was practically restricted to the zones of Sp5C exhibiting low expression of GlyT2, sparing the GlyT2-intense ‘patches’ in lamina III (arrows). Scale bar = 300 μm.
Ijms 22 04564 g007
Figure 8. Dot plot of the immunofluorescence of Iba-1 (green) and GlyT2 (magenta) in lamina III of Sp5C from three CCI-IoN animals. Data represent mean values of 3 sections per case, separately for the GlyT2-strong ‘patches’ and the more moderately immunoreactive ‘non-patch’ zones. Scales are taken from grayscale densitometries with ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). The diagram shows different combined effects of the nerve injury on each zone: in ‘patches’ the change in Iba-1 immunofluorescence in the side ipsilateral to the CCI is practically nil with respect to the contralateral side, while in ‘non-patch’ or ‘matrix’ zones a pronounced increase is observed. GlyT2, on the other hand, decreases in both zones, apparently more noticeably so in the ‘non-patch’ zones.
Figure 8. Dot plot of the immunofluorescence of Iba-1 (green) and GlyT2 (magenta) in lamina III of Sp5C from three CCI-IoN animals. Data represent mean values of 3 sections per case, separately for the GlyT2-strong ‘patches’ and the more moderately immunoreactive ‘non-patch’ zones. Scales are taken from grayscale densitometries with ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). The diagram shows different combined effects of the nerve injury on each zone: in ‘patches’ the change in Iba-1 immunofluorescence in the side ipsilateral to the CCI is practically nil with respect to the contralateral side, while in ‘non-patch’ or ‘matrix’ zones a pronounced increase is observed. GlyT2, on the other hand, decreases in both zones, apparently more noticeably so in the ‘non-patch’ zones.
Ijms 22 04564 g008
Figure 9. Schematic diagram of the experimental protocol. T, behavioral testing; CCI-IoN, constriction of the IoN.
Figure 9. Schematic diagram of the experimental protocol. T, behavioral testing; CCI-IoN, constriction of the IoN.
Ijms 22 04564 g009
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

García-Magro, N.; Martin, Y.B.; Negredo, P.; Zafra, F.; Avendaño, C. Microglia and Inhibitory Circuitry in the Medullary Dorsal Horn: Laminar and Time-Dependent Changes in a Trigeminal Model of Neuropathic Pain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4564. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094564

AMA Style

García-Magro N, Martin YB, Negredo P, Zafra F, Avendaño C. Microglia and Inhibitory Circuitry in the Medullary Dorsal Horn: Laminar and Time-Dependent Changes in a Trigeminal Model of Neuropathic Pain. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(9):4564. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094564

Chicago/Turabian Style

García-Magro, Nuria, Yasmina B. Martin, Pilar Negredo, Francisco Zafra, and Carlos Avendaño. 2021. "Microglia and Inhibitory Circuitry in the Medullary Dorsal Horn: Laminar and Time-Dependent Changes in a Trigeminal Model of Neuropathic Pain" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 9: 4564. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094564

APA Style

García-Magro, N., Martin, Y. B., Negredo, P., Zafra, F., & Avendaño, C. (2021). Microglia and Inhibitory Circuitry in the Medullary Dorsal Horn: Laminar and Time-Dependent Changes in a Trigeminal Model of Neuropathic Pain. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(9), 4564. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094564

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop