Next Article in Journal
The Novel Role of PGC1α in Bone Metabolism
Next Article in Special Issue
Bis-Pyrene Photo-Switch Open- and Closed-Form Differently Bind to ds-DNA, ds-RNA and Serum Albumin and Reveal Light-Induced Bioactivity
Previous Article in Journal
Broadly Antiviral Activities of TAP1 through Activating the TBK1-IRF3-Mediated Type I Interferon Production
Previous Article in Special Issue
DNA Methylation Signatures of Bone Metabolism in Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis Aging-Related Diseases: An Updated Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Investigation of the NF-X1 Gene Family in Populus trichocarpa Expression Profiles during Development and Stress

Sichuan Province Key Laboratory of Ecological Forestry Engineering on the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(9), 4664; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094664
Submission received: 13 April 2021 / Revised: 25 April 2021 / Accepted: 26 April 2021 / Published: 28 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Molecular Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
Poplar are planted extensively in reforestation and afforestation. However, their successful establishment largely depends on the environmental conditions of the newly established plantation and their resistance to abiotic as well as biotic stresses. NF-X1, a widespread transcription factor in plants, plays an irreplaceable role in plant growth, development, and stress tolerance. Although the whole genome sequence of Populus trichocarpa has been published for a long time, little is known about the NF-X1 genes in poplar, especially those related to drought stress, mechanical damage, insect feeding, and hormone response at the whole genome level. In this study, whole genome analysis of the poplar NF-X1 family was performed, and 4 PtrNF-X1 genes were identified. Then, bioinformatics analysis and qRT-PCR were applied to analyze the gene structure, phylogeny, chromosomal localization, gene replication, Cis-elements, and expression patterns of PtrNF-X1 genes. Sequence analysis revealed that one-quarter of the PtrNF-X1 genes did not contain introns. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that all NF-X1 genes were split into three subfamilies. The number of two pairs of segmented replication genes were detected in poplars. Cis-acting element analysis identified a large number of elements of growth and development and stress-related elements on the promoters of different NF-X1 members. In addition, some PtrNF-X1 could be significantly induced by polyethylene glycol (PEG) and abscisic acid (ABA), thus revealing their potential role in regulating stress response. Comprehensive analysis is helpful in selecting candidate NF-X1 genes for the follow-up study of the biological function, and molecular genetic progress of stress resistance in forest trees provides genetic resources.

1. Introduction

The survival, growth, and reproduction of plants are adversely affected by a broad range of biotic and abiotic stresses [1,2]. Biotic stresses include insects, mites, harmful bacteria, herbivores, human activities, and so on [3,4]. Abiotic stresses also pose significant threats to plants, including pole-end temperatures, water deficiency or excess, high salinity, oxidative stress, ultraviolet B (UV-B) light, and chemical contaminants [5,6,7]. During the long-term evolution, plants respond to such unfavorable environmental variables via growth, developmental, cellular, molecular, physiological, and biochemical pathways [8]. In addition, osmotic stress is the main signal of abiotic stress in plants [9,10], including drought, salt, cold and heat, etc. Meanwhile, a network of transcription factors (TFs) can regulate the stress-responsive genes, whose expression control the above responses [11].
TFs account for about 7% of the coding sequence in plant genome, such as 6.2% in Arabidopsis thaliana and 6.4% in poplar [12]. Furthermore, TFs can interact with cis-acting elements in the promoter region of stress response genes to activate the entire gene network of signal cascade [13,14,15]. Moreover, TFs play an indispensable role in the transcription regulation of genes, which means TFs play a key part in the process of transforming stress signal sense into stress response gene expression [16,17]. To be specific, as signal molecules, hormones such as ABA, ethylene (ET), and gibberellic acid (GA) can mediate signaling pathways, which mostly rely on TFs for regulating plant responses to stress [18,19,20].
NF-X1, as one of the most important transcription factors, occurs in virtually all eukaryotes, such as Caenorhabditis elegans, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Drosophila, Human, and Arabidopsis thaliana [21]. NF-X1 was first discovered in 1994 and has been identified as a protein that binds to the promoter (X-Box motif) of the CLASS II MHC (major histocompatibility complex) gene, inhibiting its expression [22]. The NF-X1 gene of Drosophila melanogaster, named Shuttle craft (SCT), plays a material role in embryonic development by fine-tuning the orientation or spatial maintenance of the migratory SNb and ISN nerve roots in the central nervous system (CNS) [23]. Yeast FAP1, a homologous gene of NF-X1, inhibits the cytotoxic effects of rapamycin by competing with rapamycin for binding to the peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP12. In humans, NF-X1 can activate telomerase activity in an effort to inhibit cell senescence caused by the HPV-16 (the most carcinogenic subtype of human papillomavirus) [24,25]. More importantly, it also plays a critical role in the regulation of plant alarm reaction. AtNF-XL1 and AtNF-XL2 proteins in Arabidopsis, two members of the NF-X1 family, are distinguished by NF-X1 type zinc fingers, which possibly participate in DNA binding action, and PHD (plant homeodomain) finger motifs, which possibly take part in protein interactions [26]. The AtNF-XL1 protein can promote the physiological status of plants and boost their growth and survival under salt stress and may also be involved in regulatory processes that protect photosynthesis [26]. Meanwhile, NF-X1 TFs protein in wheat regulates the differential expression of genes to resist leaf rust pathogen-mediated infection, among which the highest and lowest expression levels are TaNF-X1-3 and TaNF-X1-2, separately [27]. NF-XL1 was demonstrated to be involved in seed longevity and seed coat permeability [28]. In general, NF-X1 plays an indispensable role in plant growth, development, and response to stress. The genomes of model plants (such as rice, Arabidopsis, poplar, etc.) can reveal the function of plant genes [29,30]. Meanwhile, comparative genomics is used to study the NF-X1 gene and to compare its genome structure to understand its function and expression mechanism.
Due to rapid growth, wide distribution, and high adaptability, P. trichocarpa has been widely used as a timber stand, avenue tree, and shelterbelt. Meanwhile, P. trichocarpa, as a momentous model species for woody plant research with woody perennial growth habits, is endowed with relatively upper ecological, economic, and cultural significance [31,32,33]. Presently, most of the studies on NF-X1 transcription factors are focused on humans and bacteria. There are few functional studies on NF-X1 transcription factors for biological and abiotic stress in poplar trees. Four putative NF-X1 genes in P. trichocarpa were studied from the aspects of molecular structure, phylogeny, chromosomal localization, and expression pattern (under ABA, PEG, and MeJA (Jasmine acid methyl ester) treatment). These results provide a solid foundation for further analyses of the functions and molecular evolution of NF-X1 genes in poplar and, in particular, for improving the stress resistance of poplar by genetic manipulation.

2. Results

2.1. Identification and Analysis of NF-X1 in A. thaliana, Oryza sativa, and P. trichocarpa

The eight putative NF-X1 genes were identified in the published A. thaliana, O. sativa, and P. trichocarpa reference genomes [34] and were successively named AtNF-X1-1 to AtNF-X1-2, OsNF-X1-1 to OsNF-X1-2, and PtrNF-X1-1 to PtrNF-X1-4 according to their genome locations. In order to clearly understand the characteristics of the NF-X1 family in poplar, we analyzed the Pfam ID, the length of the gDNA (genomic DNA), the length of the transcriptional sequence, the length of the CDS (coding sequence), the position of the conserved domain, the length of amino acid (AA), the protein molecular weight (MW), the grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY), and the isoelectric point (PI) of these genes as well as the best homologs in Arabidopsis thaliana (Table 1).
It was clearly found that all the eight genes had the same Pfam ID, indicating that they contained the same conserved domain. Among the eight NF-X1 proteins, PtrNF-X1-1 had the minimum protein with 358 amino acids (AA), while the maximum was AtNF-X1-1 (1188 AA). The MW of the proteins ranged approximately from 39.77 to 130.72 kDa, the GRAVY of the proteins was approximately −0.616 (PtrNF-X1-2) ~ −0.099 (PtrNF-X1-1), and PI were 8.24 (PtrNF-X1-3) ~ 8.87 (OsNF-X1-1). OsNF-X1-1, PtrNF-X1-1, PtrNF-X1-2, and AtNF-X1-2 had high homology, while OsNF-X1-2, PtrNF-X1-3, and PtrNF-X1-4 had high homology with AtNF-X1-1. In general, the identification of molecular characteristics of NF-X1 will be helpful for the study of its specific biological functions.

2.2. Evolutionary and Phylogenetic Analysis of the NF-X1 Family

In order to better know the evolution and differentiation of NF-X1 family proteins among species, 138 NF-X1 amino acid sequences from 52 species were applied to construct an unrooted phylogenetic tree (Figure 1a). These sequences were divided into three groups (I, II, III). Among them, class I and II had the most members, including 134 members and accounting for 97.10% of the deduced NF-X1 protein. At the same time, NF-X1 proteins from A. thaliana, O. sativa, and P. trichocarpa were evenly distributed in I and II.
In order to further explore the origin and evolution of NF-X1 genes, we searched for NF-X1 genes from 52 species from aquatic plants to terrestrial plants (Figure 1b). Notably, the three species with the greatest number of NF-X1 genes were Glycine max (9), Theobroma cacao (8), and Citrus sinensis (6). Salix purpurea, a member of the salicaceae family, contained five NF-X1 proteins, which were adjacent to the PtrNF-X1 protein.

2.3. Gene Structure, Conserved Domain, and Motif

In order to explore the evolutionary relationship among different kinds of the NF-X1 gene family more clearly, an unrooted phylogenetic tree was constructed using NF-X1 proteins from A. thaliana, O. sativa, and P. trichocarpa (Figure 2a), and their genes structure, protein conserved motif, and conserved structure were compared. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the NF-X1 proteins were clustered in the two branches. PtrNF-X1-3, PtrNF-X1-4, AtNF-X1-1, and OsNF-X1-2 belonged to the same class II, while PtrNF-X1-1, OsNF-X1-1, AtNF-X1-2, and PtrNF-X1-2 clustered in class I. In class II, except for PtrNF-X1-4, there was only one intron, and the other three genes had no intron. However, in class I, except for PtrNF-X1-1 with 2 introns, the other 3 genes had 12 introns. Surprisingly, only the PtrNF-X1-1 gene had no UTR region (Figure 2b).
In general, genes with high similarity in amino acid sequences in the same family may have similar biological functions. In addition, we identified eight conserved domains in the NF-X1 protein sequence by using CDD and SMART software, and they all shared one or more NF-X1-zinc-finger domain (Figure 2c and Table S3), which may endow them with similar biological functions. At the same time, 10 conserved motifs were identified in the NF-X1 protein sequence by MEME software (Figure 2d). Amino acid sequence encode and Sq-Logo of the Motif are displayed in Table S4. Among them, two motifs (3 and 7) were discovered to be related to the N-terminal domain, four motifs (9, 8, 5, 6) were related to the intermediate NF-X1-zinc-finger domain, and four motifs (10, 2, 4, 1) were related to the C-terminal R3-H domain. Moreover, PtrNF-X1-1 contained one motif (8).

2.4. Analysis of Chromosomal Location and Gene Duplication

To further understand the evolution and differentiation of NF-X1 family genes, we analyzed the chromosomal distribution, synteny, and evolution of 4 NF-X1 genes in poplar. The PtrNF-X1 is distributed on chromosome 8, 10, 12, and 15 (Figure 3). The higher sequence similarity between repetitive gene pairs indicates that they may be involved in the regulation of analogical biological processes. The formation of this duplication gene pair mainly included tandem and segmental duplication events [30]. Furthermore, we found by using the MCScanX method that four genes (PtrNF-X1-1/2 and PtrNF-X1-3/4) formed two segmental duplication events (Table S5). These results suggest that PtrNF-X1 was likely to be caused by gene replication, while the segmental replication events mainly catalyzed the evolution of the NF-X1 gene in poplar.
To further analyze the evolution of the NF-X1 gene in the plants, we first confirmed the location of the NF-X1 gene on the chromosomes of A. thaliana, O. sativa, and P. trichocarpa (Figure 4a) and constructed comparative syntenic maps of poplar and two typical plants (Figure 4b). According to the syntenic maps, two pairs of paralogous genes were found between P. trichocarpa and A. thaliana, and one pair of paralogous genes was found between P. trichocarpa and O. sativa (Figure 4b and Table S6). Surprisingly, PtrNF-X1-1 was found to be associated with synonym gene pair (especially between poplar and Arabidopsis and between poplar and rice NF-X1 genes), suggesting that this gene might play a critical role in the evolutionary process of the NF-X1 gene family.

2.5. Cis-Elements Analysis of the PtrNF-X1

To further determine the expression pattern of PtrNF-X1, the promoter fragment (~2000 bp) upstream of the transcription starting site was isolated from P. trichocarpa genomic DNA. First, the cis-elements of the PtrNF-X1 promoter were analyzed by PlantCARE database (Figure 5 and Table S7). A series of cis-acting elements were identified as being involved in development, including seed-specific regulation, endosperm expression, gibberellin responsiveness element, and auxin responsiveness element, and all of these indicated the crucial role of cis-acting elements in poplar developments of PtrNF-X1.
In addition, there were also some stress or stress-related elements in the promoter region, including MeJA responsiveness, salicylic acid responsiveness, abscisic acid responsiveness, drought inducibility, defense and stress responsiveness, anoxic specific inducibility element, low-temperature responsiveness, and anaerobic induction, which meant PtrNF-X1 might also respond to stress. For example, all PtrNF-X1 gene promoters contained at least two elements of abscisic acid (ABA) responsiveness (Table S8), indicating that most of the NF-X1 gene was involved in ABA signal transduction. In addition, PtrNF-X1-1 had multiple elements related to adversity, including two elements of MeJA-responsiveness, two elements of salicylic acid responsiveness, three elements of abscisic acid responsiveness, and two elements of drought-inducibility (Table S8), suggesting that PtrNF-X1-1 may respond to both biotic and abiotic stress.

2.6. Expression Level of Poplar NF-X1 Genes with RNA-seq

So as to explore the role of the NF-X1 gene in the growth and development of poplar, we analyzed the tissue expression patterns of four PtrNF-X1 genes in the transcriptomic dataset. First, we constructed a heat map of dual clustering (sample and gene) to reveal the expression profile of these genes in 15 tissues of poplar (Figure 6a and Table S9). Oddly enough, there is no good rule in the expression of four NF-X1 genes in different tissues and development of poplar. For example, through RNA-seq analysis, PtrNF-X1-1 was significantly upregulated in bud-pre-chilling and twigs-non-girdled, but significantly downregulated in leaves-non-girdled. At the same time, PtrNF-X1-3 was dramatically upregulated in leaves-non-girdled and leaves-mature, PtrNF-X1-2 was upregulated in leaves-non-girdled and bud-dormant, and PtrNF-X1-4 was significantly upregulated in cambium-phloem-dormant, compared with other tissues.
In order to further understand the role of the PtrNF-X1 gene in poplar response to pressures, we mapped the expression configurations of four PtrNF-X1 genes in drought, beetle-damaged, and mechanical-damage through the uploaded transcriptome dataset (Figure 6b and Table S10). According to the heat map, PtrNF-X1-2 in leaves was markedly induced by drought stress, and PtrNF-X1-1 in root was markedly induced by drought stress. However, the expression of PtrNF-X1-3/4 was significantly inhibited under drought stress and the stress of insect biting and mechanical injury. These results will be helpful for our future research on gene function.

2.7. Expression Profile of PtrNF-X1 Genes in Different Plant Tissues and in Response to Different Treatments

In order to verify the reliability of the tissue expression of NF-X1 genes in the transcriptome, four NF-X1 (PtrNF-X1-1/2/3/4) genes were selected for RT-qPCR detection (Figure 7a). Consistent with the previous results, PtrNF-X1-1 and PtrNF-X1-2 had similar tissue expression patterns. PtrNF-X1/2 in young leaf and root were upregulated significantly. In addition, PtrNF-X1-2 was significantly induced in phloem. At the same time, PtrNF-X1-3/4 was significantly upregulated in adult leaf and young leaf, while PtrNF-X1-3 was significantly downregulated in root.
To deeply validate whether the abundance of NF-X1 genes were affected by abiotic stress and hormone treatment, four NF-X1 genes were carefully chosen for qRT-PCR assay to analyze their expression profiles in answer to PEG, ABA, and MeJA treatment (Figure 7b–d). In general, each treatment may significantly induce and inhibit NF-X1 genes in poplar. For PEG treatment, only PtrNF-X1-2 was significantly induced, while PtrNF-X1-1/3/4 was significantly inhibited. For ABA treatment, PtrNF-X1-2 was significantly induced, while PtrNF-X1-3/4 was significantly inhibited. Meanwhile, PtrNF-X1-1 was induced at 1 and 6 h, while inhibited at 9 and 12 h. Furthermore, for MeJA treatment, PtrNF-X1-1/4 was significantly inhibited, while PtrNF-X1-2 had no response. Simultaneously, PtrNF-X1-3 was significantly upregulated at 1 h MeJA treatment, but significantly inhibited at 9 h.

3. Discussion

Biotic and abiotic stresses will directly lead to a decline in agricultural and forestry productivity, forming a critical danger to the world’s energy, biosphere balance, and security [1,35,36]. Transcription factors play an indispensable role in regulating plant growth and development and plant response to stress [29,37]. NF-X1, as a widespread transcription factor in plants, plays an irreplaceable role in plant growth, development, and stress tolerance [28]. With the development of whole genome sequencing, more and more NF-X1 TFs have been identified in virtually all eukaryotes, such as Caenorhabditis elegans, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Drosophila, Human, and Arabidopsis thaliana [21]. However, the NF-X1 family in the woody model plant poplar has not been deeply understood.
In this study, four NF-X1 genes were identified in poplar, and the characteristics of all the products after replication, transcription, and translation of this gene family were analyzed, as well as was the complete construction of their systematic evolution and expression model. Referencing previous gene family studies [38], the NF-X1 genes in poplars were named as PtrNF-X1-1 to PtrNF-X1-4 according to their chromosomal locations (Table 1 and Figure 4a). The model plants Arabidopsis thaliana, rice, and poplar were applied to the comparative genomics of the NF-X1 family.
With the exception of PtrNF-X1-1, all NF-X1 proteins have conserved domains (Table 1 and Figure 2c), which may endow them with similar biological functions. It has been reported that the loss of protein structure will lead to different functions of genes [30]. Since PtrNF-X1-1 has only one NF-X1-zinc-finger domain (Figure 2c), the length of gDNA and the number of motifs in the protein are significantly lower than other genes (Figure 2b,d). In class I, except for PtrNF-X1-4, which has only one intron, the other three genes had no intron (Figure 2b). The research has demonstrated that introns play necessary roles in the regulation of gene transcriptome [39]. In order to respond quickly to stress, organisms themselves need to stimulate genes quickly, and the gene structure with few or no introns will contribute to the formation of mRNA [40]. In many plants, NF-X1 genes respond quickly to stress [27].
In order to further determine the origin and evolution of NF-X1 genes, we constructed an evolutionary tree from 52 plants and divided it into three sections. Concordant with the above results (Figure 2a), PtrNF-X1 protein was found in group I and II (Figure 1a). PtrNF-X1-2 and AtNF-X1-2 are highly similar in gene structure, conserved protein structure, and motif (Figure 2), so they have high homology (Figure 1), revealing that sequence homology is directly related to biological function. The phylogenetic tree analysis of family genes can clearly describe the evolutionary process of genes [41]. Because poplar and willow belong to the same department [38,42], the five NF-X1 proteins from Salix purpurea were adjacent to the PtrNF-X1 proteins. Surprisingly, only two genes were found in A. thaliana and O. sativa, indicating that the number of NF-X1 was independent from the genome size of the species (Figure 1b). Notably, the three species with the highest distribution of NF-X1 were Glycine max (9), Theobroma cacao (8), and Citrus sinensis (6). Concurrently, two gene pairs were found between Arabidopsis and poplar, while one gene pair was found between rice and poplar (Figure 4b), indicating that the differentiation and replication of the NF-X1 gene in poplar may be later than that in Arabidopsis and rice.
The increase of gene family members and the mechanism of genome evolution mainly depend on gene replication events, including tandem replication and segmented replication [43]. In this research, a total of two pairs of segmented replication genes was found in poplar, indicating that segmental repeats mainly contribute to the evolution of PtrNF-X1 genes in poplar (Figure 3). Previous gene family studies have shown that segmental repeats genes may have similar functions and expression patterns [39,44]. For example, PtrNF-X1-3/4 shows a downward trend under the threat of adversity (Figure 6). Similar expression levels indicate the similar function and structure of segmented replication NF-X1 in poplar.
The expression pattern of the NF-X1 gene in diverse tissues has been depicted in numerous species [26,28,45]. Due to the difference in the number of NF-X1 contained in different species, there is no uniform gene expression profile of the NF-X1 gene in plants. According to the RNA-seq data of poplar, PtrNF-X1-3 preferentially expressed in leaves and PtrNF-X1-4 was significantly upregulated in cambium-phloem-dormant (Figure 6a). Consistent with the RNA-seq data, fluorescence quantitative PCR results also showed that the PtrNF-X1-4 was expressed preferentially in phloem compared with other tissues (Figure 7a). In summary, there is no obvious rule in the expression of four NF-X1 genes in different tissues and development of poplar.
The expression level of the NF-X1 gene in plants is closely related to stress and mainly responds to salt stress and biotic defense [26,28]. Through transcriptome dataset analysis, some NF-X1 genes in poplar were significantly induced (PtrNF-X1-1/2) and inhibited (PtrNF-X1-3/4) by drought. A similar trend was obtained by RT-qPCR, and ABA treatments significantly upregulated the expression of PtrNF-X1-1/2 (Figure 7c). Through analyzing the promoters of these two genes, we found that there were multiple elements of abscisic acid responsiveness in this promoter (Figure 5 and Table S8). Moreover, many excellent reviews have indicated that the ABA signaling pathway is the core pathway for regulating plant response to stress [11,46]. Similarly, ABA signaling is involved in stress responses to drought stress, beetle damage, and mechanical damage in poplars (Figure 7c). In summary, the expression level of NF-X1 under PEG and ABA treatment was selected to reflect the transcription level of NF-X1 in poplar drought stress, beetle damage, and mechanical damage.
In addition, NF-X1 TFs protein in wheat regulates the different expression of genes for resisting leaf rust pathogen-mediated infection [27]. Furthermore, transcriptome verified that PtrNF-X1-1/4 was significantly inhibited under damage and mechanical damage of poplar beetle (Figure 6b). MeJA is involved in the signal transduction of insect bites and mechanical damage to plants [47,48]. Moreover, elements of MeJA-responsiveness were identified on the promoter of PtrNF-X1-1/3. Simultaneously, RT-qPCR detected that PtrNF-X1-3 was also significantly induced by MeJA, while PtrNF-X1-1/4 was significantly inhibited under MeJA treatment (Figure 7d). Furthermore, PtrNF-X1-3 and PtrNF-X1-4 have similar gene structures and protein domains (Figure 2b,c), and are clustered into class II (Figure 1), giving them similar expression patterns (under PEG, ABA, and MeJA treatment) (Figure 7). Compared with the expression profiles described by RNA-seq data, the patterns of qRT-PCR expression are not exactly the same. The differences in expression may be caused by a variety of reasons. In general, the discoveries afford perceptions to the latent functional role of PtrNF-X1 genes in poplar. Comprehensive analysis is useful for selecting candidate PtrNF-X1 genes for further functional description, and genetic modification of stress resistance in forest trees provides genetic resources.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Retrieval of NF-X1 Genes in A. thaliana, O. sativa, and P. trichocarpa

The extraction and identification of poplar family members referred to the published papers [49]. The genome data of A. thaliana (Athaliana_447_TAIR10.fa.gz), O. sativa (Osativa_323_v7.0.fa.gz), and P. trichocarpa (Ptrichocarpa_533_v4.0.fa.gz) were obtained from the Phytozome database (https://genome.jgi.doe.gov/portal/pages, accessed on 16 January 2021). In addition, BLASTP and HMMER software were used to identify 8 NF-X1 proteins with conserved structures in Arabidopsis (2), rice (2), and poplar (4). The redundant sequences were manually discarded. Furthermore, the conservative structure, molecular weights, isoelectric points, and hydrophilicity analysis of the identified NF-X1 were carried out by SMART, ExPASy server, InterProand, and Protein GRAVY software (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/, accessed on 16 January 2021).

4.2. Evolutionary Relationships of NF-X1 Genes

A total of 138 NF-X1 proteins from Amaranthus hypochondriacus, Amborella trichopoda, Ananas comosus, Aquilegia coerulea, Arabidopsis thaliana, Boechera stricta, Brachypodium distachyon, Brachypodium stacei, Capsella rubella, Carica papaya, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Citrus clementina, Citrus sinensis, Coccomyxa subellipsoidea, Daucus carota, Eucalyptus grandis, Eutrema salsugineum, Fragaria vesca, Glycine max, Gossypium raimondii, Linum usitatissimum, Malus domestica, Manihot esculenta, Marchantia polymorpha, Medicago truncatula, Mimulus guttatus, Musa acuminata, Oropetium thomaeum, Oryza sativa subsp. Japonica, Panicum hallii, Panicum virgatum, Phaseolus vulgaris, Physcomitrella patens, Populus euphratica, Populus trichocarpa, Prunus persica, Salix purpurea, Setaria italica, Setaria viridis, Sisymbrium irio, Solanum lycopersicum, Solanum tuberosum, Sorghum bicolor, Sphagnum fallax, Spirodela polyrhiza, Theobroma cacao, Trifolium pratense, Triticum aestivum, Vitis vinifera, Volvox carteri, Zea mays, and Zostera marina were obtained from the Phytozome database [34]. They all have NF-X1-zinc-finger conserved domains. The amino acids of all NF-X1 target sequences were analyzed by ClustalX and then the phylogenetic tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining (NJ) method using MEGA7.0 software. The accession numbers and names of the genes are all shown in Table S2.

4.3. Analysis of Gene Structure, Protein Structure, and Motifs

As these three model plants can all be searched for well-patched and complete genomic data [30,38], rice, Arabidopsis, and Populus trichocarpa were selected for the study of gene structure, protein structure, and motifs. The Gene Structure Display Server (http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/, accessed on 16 January 2021) was used to analyze the introns, exons, and UTR regions of the NF-X1 gene in Arabidopsis (2), rice (2), and poplar (4). The conserved motifs and domains of candidate NF-X1 proteins were identified by MEME (https://meme-suite.org/meme/tools/meme, accessed on 16 January 2021) program and CDD database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/bwrpsb/bwrpsb.cgi?, accessed on 16 January 2021), respectively. Finally, the conserved motifs and structures of all NF-X1 proteins in poplar were drawn by TBtools software (https://github.com/CJ-Chen/TBtools, accessed on 16 January 2021). The specific parameter setting that was used is referred to in the published papers [50].

4.4. Chromosomal Locations and Gene Duplication

The chromosomal positions of NF-X1 were collected from the Phytozome database [34]. The MCScanX software was applied to analyze NF-X1 gene duplication events [51]. The TBtools software was used to display the locations and the collinearity of NF-X1 genes.

4.5. Analysis of Cis-Regulatory Elements

The promoter sequences (2000 bp upstream from the start codon) of NF-X1 were analyzed online by Plant-CARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 16 January 2021) database [52], and all cis-regulatory elements related to hormones and stress were identified.

4.6. Transcriptomic Data Sets to Analyze the Expression Patterns of PtrNF-X1

In order to discuss gene expression profiles of PtrNF-X1, the publicly available transcriptomic data were obtained from the popgenie (https://popgenie.org/, accessed on 16 January 2021) database [53]. In this study, transcriptome data were collected from stress (drought, mechanical damage, insect beetle damage) and 15 different tissues (non-girdled twigs, dormant flowers, expanded flowers, mature leaves, expanding flowers, whole-sucker suckers, mature petiole, prechilling buds, dormant buds, freshly expanded leaves, non-girdled leaves, girdled leaves, mature seeds, young expanding leaves, and dormant cambium phloem) during the growth and development of P. trichocarpa. The relative expression of PtrNF-X1 was displayed as a heat map generated from TBtools software [50].

4.7. Plant Materials and Treatments

One-year-old Populus trichocarpa seedlings were planted in a plastic plot (16.0 h light; 20–25 °C; 70% air humidity at Wenjiang, Chengdu, China (30°70 N, 103°85 E, 537.11 m above sea level)). Because of its clear and complete genome, Populus trichocarpa was used as a woody model plant to study the gene function of poplar [54]. The previously published papers have shown that PEG and ABA treatments have been used to investigate gene responses to abiotic stresses in plants [55,56,57,58]. The 60-day-old seedlings were treated with PEG, ABA, and MeJA. There were at least 5 biological repeats in the gradient of each treatment. For each treatment, please refer to previously published papers with appropriate revisions [29,30]. For PEG treatments, similarly grown seedlings of P. trichocarpa (40–50 cm high, with 30–35 leaves) were subjected to a 15% PEG6000 solution for 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 h. For phytohormone analysis, similarly grown seedlings of P. trichocarpa were treated with a solution containing 100 μM ABA (Sigma, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and MeJA (Sigma, Santa Clara, CA, USA), respectively, for 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 h. At the time point of various treatments, the leaves were separated from the plant, rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and deposited in an ultra-low temperature freezer (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA).
For the sampling of poplar tissues and organs, please refer to a previously published paper [29]. In the absence of any stress, plant tissues and organs were sampled, and each plant tissue and organ had at least 5 biological replicates. Finally, we simultaneously collected different organs and tissues of 2-month-old P. trichocarpa, including young leaves, mature leaves, old leaves, xylem, phloem, and roots and immediately immersed them in liquid nitrogen.

4.8. RNA Extraction and Quantitative Real-Time (qRT-PCR) Analysis

Total RNA was prepared using the plant total RNA extraction kit (Aidlab, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and cDNA was reverse-transcribed from 2 μg of total RNA with the Tiangen Fast Quant RT Kit (Tiangen Biotech Co. Ltd., Beijing, China). For qRT-PCR, we refer to the previous experimental operation [35]. According to the target gene fragment, Primer Premier 6.0 was used to design primers online, and all primers are presented in Table S1. At least 20 replicates per experiment (5 biological reproductions ×4 technical reproductions) were performed.

5. Conclusions

Herein, whole genome analysis of the poplar NF-X1 family was accomplished, and four PtrNF-X1 genes were identified. Then, bioinformatics and qRT-PCR were applied to analyze the gene structure, phylogeny, chromosomal localization, gene replication, cis-elements, and expression patterns of PtrNF-X1. Finally, we found that NF-X1 genes were expressed preferably in leaf and root, and some genes could be significantly induced by PEG, ABA, and MeJA, showing that this gene (PtrNF-X1-1/2/3) plays a crucial part in the stress resistance of poplars. This research will contribute to the further exploration of the function of NF-X1 genes in poplar.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms22094664/s1.

Author Contributions

F.H., Y.-J.S., J.-X.M., K.-J.Z., X.-L.C., F.Z., L.-H.C., H.-B.Y., Q.Z., J.-L.H., and X.-Q.W. conceived and performed the original research project. F.H., Y.-J.S., and Q.Z. performed the experiments. F.H., Y.-J.S., and X.-Q.W. designed the experiments and analyzed the data. F.H. refined the project and wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors. F.Z. and X.-Q.W. supervised the experiments and revised the writing. X.-Q.W. provided the funding for the research project. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Fund of China (No. 31870645) and by Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2021YFYZ0032). Furthermore, we appreciate the China Scholarship Council for supporting this research.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in a supplementary file.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest in the study. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Zhou, J.M.; Zhang, Y. Plant Immunity: Danger Perception and Signaling. Cell 2020, 181, 978–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wu, H.; Li, B.; Iwakawa, H.O.; Pan, Y.; Tang, X.; Ling-Hu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Sheng, S.; Feng, L.; Zhang, H.; et al. Plant 22-nt siRNAs mediate translational repression and stress adaptation. Nature 2020, 581, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mauch-Mani, B.; Baccelli, I.; Luna, E.; Flors, V. Defense Priming: An Adaptive Part of Induced Resistance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2017, 68, 485–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Sun, Y.; Zhu, Y.X.; Balint-Kurti, P.J.; Wang, G.F. Fine-Tuning Immunity: Players and Regulators for Plant NLRs. Trends Plant Sci. 2020, 25, 695–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Xing, H.; Fu, X.; Yang, C.; Tang, X.; Guo, L.; Li, C.; Xu, C.; Luo, K. Genome-wide investigation of pentatricopeptide repeat gene family in poplar and their expression analysis in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Filichkin, S.A.; Hamilton, M.; Dharmawardhana, P.D.; Singh, S.K.; Sullivan, C.; Ben-Hur, A.; Reddy, A.S.N.; Jaiswal, P. Abiotic Stresses Modulate Landscape of Poplar Transcriptome via Alternative Splicing, Differential Intron Retention, and Isoform Ratio Switching. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Liang, T.; Shi, C.; Peng, Y.; Tan, H.; Xin, P.; Yang, Y.; Wang, F.; Li, X.; Chu, J.; Huang, J.; et al. Brassinosteroid-Activated BRI1-EMS-SUPPRESSOR 1 Inhibits Flavonoid Biosynthesis and Coordinates Growth and UV-B Stress Responses in Plants. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 3224–3239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Guo, M.; Liu, J.H.; Ma, X.; Luo, D.X.; Gong, Z.H.; Lu, M.H. The Plant Heat Stress Transcription Factors (HSFs): Structure, Regulation, and Function in Response to Abiotic Stresses. Front. Plant Sci 2016, 7, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Lozano-Juste, J.; Alrefaei, A.F.; Rodriguez, P.L. Plant Osmotic Stress Signaling: MAPKKKs Meet SnRK2s. Trends Plant Sci. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lin, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, X.; Hsu, C.C.; Du, Y.; Sang, T.; Zhu, C.; Wang, Y.; Satheesh, V.; et al. A RAF-SnRK2 kinase cascade mediates early osmotic stress signaling in higher plants. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Zhu, J.K. Abiotic Stress Signaling and Responses in Plants. Cell 2016, 167, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Jin, J.P.; Tian, F.; Yang, D.C.; Meng, Y.Q.; Kong, L.; Luo, J.C.; Gao, G. PlantTFDB 4.0: Toward a central hub for transcription factors and regulatory interactions in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D1040–D1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Udvardi, M.K.; Kakar, K.; Wandrey, M.; Montanari, O.; Murray, J.; Andriankaja, A.; Zhang, J.-Y.; Benedito, V.; Hofer, J.M.I.; Chueng, F.; et al. Legume Transcription Factors: Global Regulators of Plant Development and Response to the Environment. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144, 538–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Akhtar, M.; Jaiswal, A.; Taj, G.; Jaiswal, J.P.; Qureshi, M.I.; Singh, N.K. DREB1/CBF transcription factors: Their structure, function and role in abiotic stress tolerance in plants. J. Genet. 2012, 91, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. He, H.; Dong, Q.; Shao, Y.; Jiang, H.; Zhu, S.; Cheng, B.; Xiang, Y. Genome-wide survey and characterization of the WRKY gene family in Populus trichocarpa. Plant Cell Rep. 2012, 31, 1199–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Dai, W.; Wang, M.; Gong, X.; Liu, J.H. The transcription factor FcWRKY40 of Fortunella crassifolia functions positively in salt tolerance through modulation of ion homeostasis and proline biosynthesis by directly regulating SOS2 and P5CS1 homologs. New Phytol. 2018, 219, 972–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Chen, K.; Song, M.; Guo, Y.; Liu, L.; Xue, H.; Dai, H.; Zhang, Z. MdMYB46 could enhance salt and osmotic stress tolerance in apple by directly activating stress-responsive signals. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Li, J.; Guo, X.; Zhang, M.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Yin, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Xiong, H.; Zhang, H.; et al. OsERF71 confers drought tolerance via modulating ABA signaling and proline biosynthesis. Plant Sci. 2018, 270, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Verma, V.; Ravindran, P.; Kumar, P.P. Plant hormone-mediated regulation of stress responses. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Gibbs, D.J.; Conde, J.V.; Berckhan, S.; Prasad, G.; Mendiondo, G.M.; Holdsworth, M.J. Group VII Ethylene Response Factors Coordinate Oxygen and Nitric Oxide Signal Transduction and Stress Responses in Plants. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mussig, C.; Schroder, F.; Usadel, B.; Lisso, J. Structure and putative function of NFX1-like proteins in plants. Plant Biol. 2010, 12, 381–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Song, Z.; Krishna, S.; Thanos, D.; Strominger, J.L.; Ono, S.J. A Novel Cysteine-rich Sequence-specific DNA-binding Protein Interacts with the Conserved X-box Motif of the Human Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Genes Via a Repeated Cys-His Domain and Functions as a Transcriptional Repressor. J. Exp. Med. 1994, 180, 1763–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Stroumbakis, N.D.; Li, Z.; Tolias, P.P. A Homolog of Human Transcription Factor NF-X1 Encoded by the Drosophila shuttle craft Gene Is Required in the Embryonic Central Nervous System. Am. Soc. Microbiol. 1996, 16, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Smith, J.S.; Lindsay, L.; Hoots, B.; Keys, J.; Franceschi, S.; Winer, R.; Clifford, G.M. Human papillomavirus type distribution in invasive cervical cancer and high-grade cervical lesions: A meta-analysis update. Int. J. Cancer 2007, 121, 621–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Felix, A.; Alemany, L.; Tous, S.; de Sanjose, S.; Bosch, F.X. HPV distribution in cervical cancer in Portugal. A retrospective study from 1928 to 2005. Papillomavirus Res. 2016, 2, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Lisso, J.; Altmann, T.; Mussig, C. The AtNFXL1 gene encodes a NF-X1 type zinc finger protein required for growth under salt stress. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 4851–4856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Satapathy, L.; Mukhopadhyay, K. Transcriptome-wide analysis of NFX1 transcription factors in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and their leaf rust responsive expression profiling. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 8, 60–65. [Google Scholar]
  28. Righetti, K.; Vu, J.L.; Pelletier, S.; Vu, B.L.; Glaab, E.; Lalanne, D.; Pasha, A.; Patel, R.V.; Provart, N.J.; Verdier, J.; et al. Inference of Longevity-Related Genes from a Robust Coexpression Network of Seed Maturation Identifies Regulators Linking Seed Storability to Biotic Defense-Related Pathways. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 2692–2708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. He, F.; Li, H.G.; Wang, J.J.; Su, Y.; Wang, H.L.; Feng, C.H.; Yang, Y.; Niu, M.X.; Liu, C.; Yin, W.; et al. PeSTZ1, a C2H2-type zinc finger transcription factor from Populus euphratica, enhances freezing tolerance through modulation of ROS scavenging by directly regulating PeAPX2. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Xie, T.; Chen, C.; Li, C.; Liu, J.; Liu, C.; He, Y. Genome-wide investigation of WRKY gene family in pineapple: Evolution and expression profiles during development and stress. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Jansson, S.; Douglas, C.J. Populus: A model system for plant biology. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2007, 58, 435–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wei, M.; Xu, X.; Li, C. Identification and expression of CAMTA genes in Populus trichocarpa under biotic and abiotic stress. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Zhuang, J.; Cai, B.; Peng, R.H.; Zhu, B.; Jin, X.F.; Xue, Y.; Gao, F.; Fu, X.Y.; Tian, Y.S.; Zhao, W.; et al. Genome-wide analysis of the AP2/ERF gene family in Populus trichocarpa. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 371, 468–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Goodstein, D.M.; Shu, S.; Howson, R.; Neupane, R.; Hayes, R.D.; Fazo, J.; Mitros, T.; Dirks, W.; Hellsten, U.; Putnam, N.; et al. Phytozome: A comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, D1178–D1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. He, F.; Niu, M.X.; Feng, C.H.; Li, H.G.; Su, Y.; Su, W.L.; Pang, H.; Yang, Y.; Yu, X.; Wang, H.L.; et al. PeSTZ1 confers salt stress tolerance by scavenging the accumulation of ROS through regulating the expression of PeZAT12 and PeAPX2 in Populus. Tree Physiol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhao, C.; Zhang, H.; Song, C.; Zhu, J.-K.; Shabala, S. Mechanisms of Plant Responses and Adaptation to Soil Salinity. Innovation 2020, 1, 100017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yang, Y.; Li, H.G.; Wang, J.; Wang, H.L.; He, F.; Su, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, C.H.; Niu, M.; Li, Z.; et al. PeABF3 Enhances Drought Tolerance via Promoting ABA-induced Stomatal Closure by directly Regulating PeADF5 in Poplar. J. Exp. Bot. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wang, D.; Meng, S.; Su, W.; Bao, Y.; Lu, Y.; Yin, W.; Liu, C.; Xia, X. Genome-Wide Analysis of Multiple Organellar RNA Editing Factor Family in Poplar Reveals Evolution and Roles in Drought Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Zhao, P.; Wang, D.; Wang, R.; Kong, N.; Zhang, C.; Yang, C.; Wu, W.; Ma, H.; Chen, Q. Genome-wide analysis of the potato Hsp20 gene family: Identification, genomic organization and expression profiles in response to heat stress. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, L.; Zhou, D.; Hu, H.; Li, W.; Hu, Y.; Xie, J.; Huang, S.; Wang, W. Genome-wide characterization of a SRO gene family involved in response to biotic and abiotic stresses in banana (Musa spp.). BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Moturu, T.R.; Thula, S.; Singh, R.K.; Nodzynski, T.; Varekova, R.S.; Friml, J.; Simon, S. Molecular evolution and diversification of the SMXL gene family. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 2367–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Li, M.; Wang, R.; Liu, Z.; Wu, X.; Wang, J. Genome-wide identification and analysis of the WUSCHEL-related homeobox (WOX) gene family in allotetraploid Brassica napus reveals changes in WOX genes during polyploidization. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Cheng, C.; Wang, Y.; Chai, F.; Li, S.; Xin, H.; Liang, Z. Genome-wide identification and characterization of the 14-3-3 family in Vitis vinifera L. during berry development and cold- and heat-stress response. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Kaur, S.; Dhugga, K.S.; Beech, R.; Singh, J. Genome-wide analysis of the cellulose synthase-like (Csl) gene family in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Asano, T.; Masuda, D.; Yasuda, M.; Nakashita, H.; Kudo, T.; Kimura, M.; Yamaguchi, K.; Nishiuchi, T. AtNFXL1, an Arabidopsis homologue of the human transcription factor NF-X1, functions as a negative regulator of the trichothecene phytotoxin-induced defense response. Plant J. 2008, 53, 450–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hewage, K.A.H.; Yang, J.F.; Wang, D.; Hao, G.F.; Yang, G.F.; Zhu, J.K. Chemical Manipulation of Abscisic Acid Signaling: A New Approach to Abiotic and Biotic Stress Management in Agriculture. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 2001265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Aziz, E.; Batool, R.; Akhtar, W.; Rehman, S.; Gregersen, P.L.; Mahmood, T. Expression analysis of the polyphenol oxidase gene in response to signaling molecules, herbivory and wounding in antisense transgenic tobacco plants. 3 Biotech 2019, 9, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, C.; Li, D.; Li, J.; Shao, F.; Lu, S. Characterization of the polyphenol oxidase gene family reveals a novel microRNA involved in posttranscriptional regulation of PPOs in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. An, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Han, X.; Shen, C.; Wang, S.; Liu, C.; Yin, W.; Xia, X. The GATA transcription factor GNC plays an important role in photosynthesis and growth in poplar. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 1969–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Wang, Y.; Tang, H.; Debarry, J.D.; Tan, X.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Lee, T.H.; Jin, H.; Marler, B.; Guo, H.; et al. MCScanX: A toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Lescot, M.; Dehais, P.; Thijs, G.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; Van de Peer, Y.; Rouze, P.; Rombauts, S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Sundell, D.; Mannapperuma, C.; Netotea, S.; Delhomme, N.; Lin, Y.C.; Sjodin, A.; Van de Peer, Y.; Jansson, S.; Hvidsten, T.R.; Street, N.R. The Plant Genome Integrative Explorer Resource: PlantGenIE.org. New Phytol. 2015, 208, 1149–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Tuskan, G.A.; Difazio, S.; Jansson, S.; Bohlmann, J.; Grigoriev, I.; Hellsten, U.; Putnam, N.; Ralph, S.; Rombauts, S.; Salamov, A.; et al. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 2006, 313, 1596–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. He, F.; Wang, H.L.; Li, H.G.; Su, Y.; Li, S.; Yang, Y.; Feng, C.H.; Yin, W.; Xia, X. PeCHYR1, a ubiquitin E3 ligase from Populus euphratica, enhances drought tolerance via ABA-induced stomatal closure by ROS production in Populus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Lim, C.W.; Baek, W.; Lee, S.C. The Pepper RING-Type E3 Ligase CaAIRF1 Regulates ABA and Drought Signaling via CaADIP1 Protein Phosphatase Degradation. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 2323–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Li, J.; Li, Y.; Yin, Z.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, M.; Guo, X.; Ye, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Xiong, H.; Zhang, Z.; et al. OsASR5 enhances drought tolerance through a stomatal closure pathway associated with ABA and H2 O2 signalling in rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Duan, M.; Zhang, R.; Zhu, F.; Zhang, Z.; Gou, L.; Wen, J.; Dong, J.; Wang, T. A Lipid-Anchored NAC Transcription Factor Is Translocated into the Nucleus and Activates Glyoxalase I Expression during Drought Stress. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 1748–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Evolutionary and phylogenetic analysis of the NF-X1 family in diverse plant species. (a) The phylogenetic tree of NF-X1 proteins in 52 plant species. The arcs of different colors and I, II, III represent different classes of NF-X1 domains. The red, green and blue characters represent the NF-X1 domains from poplar, rice and Arabidopsis, respectively. (b) Comparisons of NF-X1 proteins number across 52 species of plant.
Figure 1. Evolutionary and phylogenetic analysis of the NF-X1 family in diverse plant species. (a) The phylogenetic tree of NF-X1 proteins in 52 plant species. The arcs of different colors and I, II, III represent different classes of NF-X1 domains. The red, green and blue characters represent the NF-X1 domains from poplar, rice and Arabidopsis, respectively. (b) Comparisons of NF-X1 proteins number across 52 species of plant.
Ijms 22 04664 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic, gene structure, conserved protein structure, and motif analyses of NF-X1 gene from A. thaliana, O. sativa, and P. trichocarpa. (a) Phylogenetic tree composed of total length amino acid sequences from NF-X1 proteins. (b) Exon–intron structure analysis of NF-X1 genes. Blue boxes represent UTR regions; yellow boxes indicate exons; black lines represent introns. (c) Conserved protein domain analysis of NF-X1 proteins. (d) Motif distribution of NF-X1 members. The length of each pattern is displayed proportionally.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic, gene structure, conserved protein structure, and motif analyses of NF-X1 gene from A. thaliana, O. sativa, and P. trichocarpa. (a) Phylogenetic tree composed of total length amino acid sequences from NF-X1 proteins. (b) Exon–intron structure analysis of NF-X1 genes. Blue boxes represent UTR regions; yellow boxes indicate exons; black lines represent introns. (c) Conserved protein domain analysis of NF-X1 proteins. (d) Motif distribution of NF-X1 members. The length of each pattern is displayed proportionally.
Ijms 22 04664 g002
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of NF-X1 gene distribution and inter-chromosomal relationships in P. trichocarpa chromosomes. The gray lines represent all synteny blocks in the chromosome of P. trichocarpa. Red and blue lines show duplicated NF-X1 gene pairs in P. trichocarpa. The chromosome number is shown in the middle of the arc square. The length of each arc corresponds to the length of the chromosome (Mb).
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of NF-X1 gene distribution and inter-chromosomal relationships in P. trichocarpa chromosomes. The gray lines represent all synteny blocks in the chromosome of P. trichocarpa. Red and blue lines show duplicated NF-X1 gene pairs in P. trichocarpa. The chromosome number is shown in the middle of the arc square. The length of each arc corresponds to the length of the chromosome (Mb).
Ijms 22 04664 g003
Figure 4. Synteny analysis of NF-X1 genes. (a) Locations of NF-X1 family genes on the chromosomes of A. thaliana, O. sativa, and P. trichocarpa. (b) Synteny analysis of NF-X1 genes between poplar and the other two model plants. Gray lines in the background represent the co-linear blocks in poplar and other model plant genomes, while the red lines emphasize the syntenic NF-X1 gene pairs.
Figure 4. Synteny analysis of NF-X1 genes. (a) Locations of NF-X1 family genes on the chromosomes of A. thaliana, O. sativa, and P. trichocarpa. (b) Synteny analysis of NF-X1 genes between poplar and the other two model plants. Gray lines in the background represent the co-linear blocks in poplar and other model plant genomes, while the red lines emphasize the syntenic NF-X1 gene pairs.
Ijms 22 04664 g004
Figure 5. Cis-elements analysis of PtrNF-X1. The relative locations of stress and growth related cis-elements in PtrNF-X1 promoter region. Different colors represent different cis-acting elements, and their position corresponds to the corresponding position of the promoter.
Figure 5. Cis-elements analysis of PtrNF-X1. The relative locations of stress and growth related cis-elements in PtrNF-X1 promoter region. Different colors represent different cis-acting elements, and their position corresponds to the corresponding position of the promoter.
Ijms 22 04664 g005
Figure 6. Expression profile of PtrNF-X1 gene under development and stress. (a) Heat maps showing the expression levels of four PtrNF-X1 gene in different tissues at different developmental stages based on transcriptome data. (b) Heat maps of the expression levels of four PtrNF-X1 genes in drought, beetle damage, and mechanical damage. The color bar represents the range of maximum and minimum values of relative expressions in the heat map. Value = log2 (fold change).
Figure 6. Expression profile of PtrNF-X1 gene under development and stress. (a) Heat maps showing the expression levels of four PtrNF-X1 gene in different tissues at different developmental stages based on transcriptome data. (b) Heat maps of the expression levels of four PtrNF-X1 genes in drought, beetle damage, and mechanical damage. The color bar represents the range of maximum and minimum values of relative expressions in the heat map. Value = log2 (fold change).
Ijms 22 04664 g006
Figure 7. RT-qPCR analysis of the expression profile of PtrNF-X1 gene. (a) Transcript-level analysis of PtrNF-X1 in various tissues. YL, young leaf; AL, adult leaf; OL, old leaf; P, phloem; X, xylem; R, root. Transcript levels of PtrNF-X1 were measured by RT-qPCR in response to PEG treatment (b), ABA treatment (c), and MeJA treatment (d). Values are means + SE (n = 20). Asterisks represent significant differences: * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01.
Figure 7. RT-qPCR analysis of the expression profile of PtrNF-X1 gene. (a) Transcript-level analysis of PtrNF-X1 in various tissues. YL, young leaf; AL, adult leaf; OL, old leaf; P, phloem; X, xylem; R, root. Transcript levels of PtrNF-X1 were measured by RT-qPCR in response to PEG treatment (b), ABA treatment (c), and MeJA treatment (d). Values are means + SE (n = 20). Asterisks represent significant differences: * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01.
Ijms 22 04664 g007
Table 1. Summary of NF-X1 in A. thaliana, O. sativa, and P. trichocarpa. AA, amino acid; MW, molecular weight (kDa); GRAVY: grand average of hydropathicity; PI: theoretical isoelectric point.
Table 1. Summary of NF-X1 in A. thaliana, O. sativa, and P. trichocarpa. AA, amino acid; MW, molecular weight (kDa); GRAVY: grand average of hydropathicity; PI: theoretical isoelectric point.
NameGene Model IDDescriptionPfam IDgDNATranscriptCDSDomainsAAMWGRAVYPIHomologs in Arabidopsis
AtNF-X1-1AT1G10170.1NF-X1 family proteinPF0142238973897356758-134/86-215/222-279/312-373/380-428/448-489/503-550/562-622/601-653/658-705/711-766/749-798/888-9631188130.72−0.6018.54/
AtNF-X1-2AT5G05660.1NF-X1 family proteinPF0142246172908264382-149/183-231/237-285/290-330/344-393/397-445/424-472/631-67288098.88−0.6058.73/
OsNF-X1-1LOC_Os01g06550.1NF-X1 family proteinPF01422548232252730109-160/252-300/305-345/359-408/412-460/439-487/659-700/723-77491099.56−0.4328.87AT5G05660.1(AtNF-X1-2)
OsNF-X1-2LOC_Os06g14190.1NF-X1 family proteinPF014223559355928861-54/87-150/157-205/221-264/279-327/374-426/431-479/484-510962103.89−0.3468.34AT1G10170.1(AtNF-X1-1)
PtrNF-X1-1Potri.008G068500.1NF-X1 family proteinPF01422155710771077228-27235839.77−0.0998.67AT5G05660.1(AtNF-X1-2)
PtrNF-X1-2Potri.010G188700.1NF-X1 family proteinPF0142271283237267390-157/190-238/244-284/299-340/351-400/404-452/431-479/641-682/705-75689199.75−0.6168.81AT5G05660.1(AtNF-X1-2)
PtrNF-X1-3Potri.012G043700.1NF-X1 family proteinPF01422/PF01424378637863327122-179/212-273/280-328/344-387/402-450/460-519/498-541/555-603/608-663/646-695/781-8541109119.81−0.4298.24AT1G10170.1(AtNF-X1-1)
PtrNF-X1-4Potri.015G034500.1NF-X1 family proteinPF01422403539203231122-179/212-273/280-328344-387/402-450/524-572/615-664/750-823/858-9151077116.40−0.3758.55AT1G10170.1(AtNF-X1-1)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, F.; Shi, Y.-J.; Mi, J.-X.; Zhao, K.-J.; Cui, X.-L.; Chen, L.-H.; Yang, H.-B.; Zhang, F.; Zhao, Q.; Huang, J.-L.; et al. Genome-Wide Investigation of the NF-X1 Gene Family in Populus trichocarpa Expression Profiles during Development and Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4664. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094664

AMA Style

He F, Shi Y-J, Mi J-X, Zhao K-J, Cui X-L, Chen L-H, Yang H-B, Zhang F, Zhao Q, Huang J-L, et al. Genome-Wide Investigation of the NF-X1 Gene Family in Populus trichocarpa Expression Profiles during Development and Stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(9):4664. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094664

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Fang, Yu-Jie Shi, Jia-Xuan Mi, Kuang-Ji Zhao, Xing-Lei Cui, Liang-Hua Chen, Han-Bo Yang, Fan Zhang, Qian Zhao, Jin-Liang Huang, and et al. 2021. "Genome-Wide Investigation of the NF-X1 Gene Family in Populus trichocarpa Expression Profiles during Development and Stress" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 9: 4664. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094664

APA Style

He, F., Shi, Y. -J., Mi, J. -X., Zhao, K. -J., Cui, X. -L., Chen, L. -H., Yang, H. -B., Zhang, F., Zhao, Q., Huang, J. -L., & Wan, X. -Q. (2021). Genome-Wide Investigation of the NF-X1 Gene Family in Populus trichocarpa Expression Profiles during Development and Stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(9), 4664. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094664

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop