Next Article in Journal
Two B-Box Proteins, MaBBX20 and MaBBX51, Coordinate Light-Induced Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in Grape Hyacinth
Next Article in Special Issue
Molecular Regulation of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Dynamics—From Macromolecule to Small Molecules
Previous Article in Special Issue
Overexpression of EgrIAA20 from Eucalyptus grandis, a Non-Canonical Aux/IAA Gene, Specifically Decouples Lignification of the Different Cell-Types in Arabidopsis Secondary Xylem
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 10
10.3390/ijms23105677
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Sphingolipids at Plasmodesmata: Structural Components and Functional Modulators

by
Yingying Zhang
1,
Shuang Wang
2,
Lu Wang
2,
Xiaoyan Chang
2,
Yongxiao Fan
2,
Meiqing He
2 and
Dawei Yan
2,*
1
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticulture Technology, The Protected Horticulture Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Adaptation and Improvement, School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(10), 5677; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105677
Submission received: 26 April 2022 / Revised: 16 May 2022 / Accepted: 17 May 2022 / Published: 19 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Molecular Plant Sciences)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Plasmodesmata (PD) are plant-specific channels connecting adjacent cells to mediate intercellular communication of molecules essential for plant development and defense. The typical PD are organized by the close apposition of the plasma membrane (PM), the desmotubule derived from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and spoke-like elements linking the two membranes. The plasmodesmal PM (PD-PM) is characterized by the formation of unique microdomains enriched with sphingolipids, sterols, and specific proteins, identified by lipidomics and proteomics. These components modulate PD to adapt to the dynamic changes of developmental processes and environmental stimuli. In this review, we focus on highlighting the functions of sphingolipid species in plasmodesmata, including membrane microdomain organization, architecture transformation, callose deposition and permeability control, and signaling regulation. We also briefly discuss the difference between sphingolipids and sterols, and we propose potential unresolved questions that are of help for further understanding the correspondence between plasmodesmal structure and function.

1. Introduction

The plasmodesmata (PD) channels facilitate the symplastic exchange of small molecules including photoassimilates, proteins, RNAs, hormones, and small peptides [1,2,3]. These substances flow either selectively or freely between cells satisfying the nutrient and signaling requirements during plant development and defenses [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. The distribution and architecture of PD are adjusted according to diverse internal and external factors. The size of the largest molecule that can pass through PD is called the size exclusion limit (SEL) [10], which is regulated by the alteration of plasmodesmal composition, such as membrane lipid organization, PD-localized proteins, and the inducible accumulation of callose around PD [11,12,13]. Callose is a polysaccharide synthesized by callose synthase and degraded by β-1,3-glucanases. Its abundance is inversely correlated with the PD permeability and molecular trafficking efficiency through the channels [14,15]. The cytoskeleton is also involved in PD SEL regulation, as the disruption of actin or myosin leads to alteration of PD trafficking [16,17].
The typical structure of a PD pore consists of a cytoplasmic sleeve formed between the plasma membrane (PM) and a central desmotubule derived from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Microdomains composed of specific proteins and lipids are present in certain regions of the PD-PM. The “lipid raft” hypothesis proposes that nanodomain formation is promoted by the preferential association between sterols and sphingolipids creating a liquid-ordered phase within the membrane [18,19]. In a certain sense, PD are determined as a new type of membrane contact site acting as a platform for rapid molecule exchange via the cytoplasmic sleeve or fluid membrane system [20,21]. According to the morphological structure, PD can be divided into simple type and branched type (Y-, X-, V-, H-shaped) with central cavities [8,22]. In addition, the presence of cytoplasmic sleeve classifies PD as type I (no visible or a very narrow cytoplasmic sleeve) or type II (a clear cytoplasmic sleeve with visible tethering-like spokes) [23]. All these PD architectures are transformable during plant development accompanied by yet elusive changes in protein or lipid components.
Sphingolipids are essential for eukaryotic life due to their critical roles in various cellular and regulatory processes such as membrane organization, signaling, and protein sorting [24,25]. In plant cells, sphingolipids account for 40% of the PM lipid content, contributing to the cell surface activities [19,26,27]. Sphingolipids are formed by the combination of a molecule of fatty acid with a long chain base (LCB) and a head group. They are divided into different classes: ceramides (Cers), hydroxyceramides (hCers) with hydroxylated fatty acids, glucosylceramides (GlcCers) harboring a glucose head group, and glycosylinositolphosphoceramides (GIPCs) containing a head group composed of phosphoinositol with sugar residues (Figure 1). The fatty acid in complex sphingolipids often consists of a saturated or monounsaturated very-long-chain fatty acid (VLCFA) of 18 to 26 carbons in length, which can facilitate hydrophobicity, membrane leaflet interdigitation, and the gel phase transition. Notably, sphingolipids containing VLCFAs but not long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs) are reported to be critical for polar auxin transport and plant growth in Arabidopsis [28].
The sphingolipid metabolism in plants was well reviewed recently by Liu et al. [28]. The de novo biosynthesis of sphingolipids starts with the combining of serine with palmitoyl-CoA to produce 3-ketosphinganine by serine palmitoyl transferase (SPT), functioning as a heterodimer of LCB1 and LCB2 subunits interacting with small subunits (ssSPTs) that can increase SPT activity [29]. 3-Ketosphinganine is reduced to sphinganine (d18:0), the simplest LCB, by 3-ketodihydrosphingosine reductase [30,31]. d18:0 LCB is added a third hydroxyl group by sphingoid base hydroxylases to form t18:0 LCB [31]. Then, ceramide synthase LAG one homologs (LOHs) link d18:0 and t18:0 to a fatty acid chain to generate Cers [28]. In Arabidopsis, LOH1 and LOH3 preferentially participate in the synthesis of Cers with VLCFAs, while LOH2 is mainly responsible for the production of Cers carrying LCFAs [28,32]. Cers then undergo various modifications, such as hydroxylation, desaturation, and glycosylation, to produce complex sphingolipids [33]. They can also be phosphorated to ceramide 1-phosphates by ceramide kinase or degraded back to LCBs by ceramidase, probably to maintain ceramide homeostasis [34,35].
Cers and GlcCers in plants are synthesized in the ER and then transported to the Golgi where they are modified to product inositolphosphoceramides and glycosylinositolphosphoceramides (GIPCs) by inositolphosphorylceramide synthases, inositol phosphorylceramide glucuronosyltransferase1, GIPC mannosyl transferase 1, and glucosamine inositol phosphorylceramide transferase 1 [32,36,37]. After synthesis, sphingolipids may undergo intramembrane translocation, sorting, and intermembrane movement and finally localize to their targeting membranes [25] (Figure 2). In mammal cells, ceramides are transported from the ER to Golgi via ceramide transfer proteins or vesicles for the formation of complex sphingolipids, which are transported further to the PM via Golgi vesicles [38,39,40]. To date, however, very little is known about the process of sphingolipid translocation and the degradation of complex sphingolipids in plants. Arabidopsis ACCELERATED CELL DEATH 11 binds selectively to Cer, GlcCer, GIPC, and LCB and possesses the transfer activity for ceramide-1-phosphate and phytoceramide-1-phosphate [41,42]. Among the four glycolipid transfer proteins (GLTPs) in Arabidopsis, only GLTP1 can specifically transport GlcCer. GLTP2 binds to but does not transport GlcCer [43].
In this review, we summarize the progress uncovering the importance of plant sphingolipids at the plasmodesmal membrane and discuss their critical functions in plasmodesmata formation, architecture maintenance, permeability control, and signaling. However, the functional significance of sphingolipids for PD is still in the early stages of investigation. We also briefly propose the challenges and potential interesting questions. Exploring the roles and regulation mechanisms of sphingolipids may help further understand the relationship between plasmodesmal structure and function, as well as the work mode of PD. The potential findings, compared with the study of cell–cell junctions in animals, could even provide more knowledges about the various roles of sphingolipids and the evolution of cell–cell communication.

2. Sphingolipids Are Essential Components of Plasmodesmal Membrane

PD are seen as membrane structures as they are lined by the PM and an ER-derived desmotubule [46]. Due to the compartmentalization of PD-related function, the PM does not continue homogeneously through the whole PD channel. Currently, the elegant composition of PD remains unavailable probably due to the technical challenges in isolating a pure PD fraction, which always contains contamination from the PM or ER [11,44,47]. The use of detergent-insoluble membranes (DIMs) for biochemical characterization is questionable with regard to its consistency with the situation in vivo as the detergent treatment may lead to artificial aggregation of membrane lipids [11,48]. By optimizing the PD isolation procedure with detergent-free methods, Grison et al. obtained purified PD-enriched membrane fractions from Arabidopsis suspension cells without virtual contaminants from other membranes [11]. Compared with DIM fractions, their analysis revealed not only a similar lipid composition pattern but also different ratios of some lipid species [11].
Specialization of the PD fraction has been previously illustrated by the local enrichment of a specific set of membrane-associated proteins according to the published PD proteomes in Arabidopsis, Populus trichocarpa, and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) [49,50,51,52,53,54,55]. A ‘core PD proteome’ with 115 candidates from Arabidopsis was established but only 20 common candidates were identified as PD-localized proteins in the four published PD proteomes [8,52,56,57,58]. Furthermore, comparative lipidomic analysis by Grison et al. (Table 1) uncovered that the PD-PM domain is highly enriched by sterols and complex sphingolipids [11] (Figure 2). GlcCers and GIPCs, a group of highly glycosylated sphingolipids, are the two most abundant sphingolipid classes found in plant membranes. GIPCs were also the main sphingolipid classes detected in the lipid extraction from PD and PM [11]. Although the main VLCFAs detected in both the PM and the PD-enriched membrane fractions were 24:0 and h24:0, a characteristic of GIPC species in Arabidopsis, the PD-PM showed significant higher levels of these two classes than the PM per se [11,59]. Conversely, the PD fraction showed only about 60% enrichment of LCFA (C16-C18) versus VLCFAs (C20-C26), indicating the relative low number of glycerolipids compared with sphingolipids [11]. Moreover, the PD-PM has a higher proportion of saturated fatty acids than unsaturated fatty acids [11]. In addition to sphingolipids, phospholipids including phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylserine (PS), phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidic acid (PA), and phosphatidylglycerol (PG) were separated from both PD and PM fractions [11]. Notably, the PD fraction showed a higher degree of most of these phospholipids with monounsaturated and diunsaturated species but a lower degree of polyunsaturated species [11].
Another sphingolipid profile of purified PD and PM fractions by Liu et al. (Table 1) showed that the proportions of sphingolipid species containing C16:0, 18:0, 22:0, and 24:0 were higher, whereas C24:1, C26:0, and C26:1 were lower in the PD fraction. Among them, d18:0- and t18:0-containing C24:0 Cers, hCers, and GIPCs, but not GlcCers were enriched in the PD fraction [44]. However, the d18:1 and t18:1 LCB-based species were significantly less enriched in the PD fraction compared with the PM fraction, while the proportions of free LCBs were almost same in these two fractions [44] (Figure 2). These data indicate the potential important roles of d18:0- and t18:0-based sphingolipids in PD function. A supporting example is that the Arabidopsis mutant lacking both sphingolipid long-chain base 8 desaturases (SLDs) 1 and 2 that desaturate LCBs accumulated more d18:0 andt18:0 LCBs, Cers, hCers, GlcCers, and GIPCs in the PD fraction than the wildtype plants, showing decreased PD permeability in leaves [44]. Conversely, the levels of t18:0-based sphingolipids were lower in the PD fraction extracted from the SLD1 overexpression plants with increased PD conductivity [44].
To date, the composition of the ER-derived desmotubule membrane remains unclear, probably due to the lack of trustable isolation and validation methods. Given the synthesis of LCBs and Cers in ER, it would be an interesting question whether the desmotubule microdomains contain Cers or other sphingolipid species. Recently, the multiple C2 domains and transmembrane region proteins (MCTPs) have emerged as plasmodesmata-specific ER–PM tethers [58]. Their C-terminal transmembrane regions insert into the ER, and C2 domains bind to anionic lipids as PM docking sites [58]. The surface charges of the plasmodesmal PM are supposed to affect the internal membrane docking and, consequently, the cytoplasmic sleeve conductivity [58]. Notably, the component analysis of PD lipid composition is still not complete. New technologies and systematic analyses of the localization of all candidates remain necessary to build a more comprehensive map of PD-specific elements.

3. Sphingolipid Biosynthesis Modulates Plasmodesmal Ultrastructure

Sphingolipid biosynthesis is regulated by both key synthases and regulators [25,60,62,63]. Arabidopsis PHLOEM UNLOADING MODULATOR (PLM) encodes a novel protein involved in the sphingolipid biosynthetic pathway. The loss-of-function plm mutant displays a significant decrease in the levels of the trihydroxy LCBs, especially the t18:0 species, and a half reduction in the level of VLCFA-containing Cers, especially t18:0/t18:1 and C24:0/C24:1 Cers [60] (Table 1). On the other hand, the VLCFA-containing hCers and GlcCers are almost unaltered [60]. The sphingolipid profile results seem unique compared with the other reported sphingolipid biosynthetic mutants [37,45,60,61,63]. In plm mutants, the decrease in t18:0 does not lead to the reduction in t18:1 or any changes in phosphorated t18 LCBs; the decline in VLCFA-containing ceramides does not affect the number of LCFA-containing ceramide species [60]. PLM was proven not to be an IPCS or sphingomyelin synthase [60]. Moreover, the phylogenetic clustering indicates that PLM is plant-specific; it is proposed that PLM might function as a novel enzyme responsible for a new ceramide synthesis pathway, or it simply acts as a regulator, impairing PD architecture directly by altering PD-PM composition or indirectly by regulating PD-related signaling.
Although the sphingolipid profile was not determined using an isolated PD fraction, the absence of PLM resulted in significant changes in cellular sphingolipid levels and PD function. A fluorescent molecular movement assay showed that the loss of PLM enhances the post-SE unloading from the phloem-pole pericycle (PPP) to the endodermis due to the increased plasmodesmal conductivity of the interface between them [60]. A further study on the plasmodesmal ultrastructure found interestingly that the loss-of-function PLM mutant has no type II PD at the PPP–endodermal interface, while the wildtype Col-0 plants have an equal proportion of type I and type II PD [60]. A few intermediates, with no clear spokes but partial detachment between the two membranes, were detected in the plm mutant, providing evidence of unfinished architecture transformation [60]. In addition, although the plm mutant still had both simple and branched PD, there was no clear difference in their [60]. The compromised transition of PD from type I to type II, but not from simple to branched structures, implies the possible different mechanisms for determining these two morphogenetic processes. Given the function of PLM in sphingolipid homeostasis and the specific influence on the interface between PPP and endodermis, it is proven that VLCFA-containing sphingolipids are required for the formation and transition of PD, and it has been deduced that the requirement might be quite local.
Plasmodesmata also undergo a morphological change from simple to branched forms in some cases such as during the sink–source transition of Arabidopsis leaves [64]. A simple plasmodesma consisting of a single channel can be modified into a complex plasmodesma with the formation of multiple channels [65]. Until now, whether and how the cell wall-associated enzymes, signaling proteins, or sphingolipids contribute to this modification remain unclear. However, it is thought that the lipid organization in PD-PM microdomains has to be reconstructed. Thus, proteome or lipidome analysis of different types of isolated and purified PD can illuminate their precise distinct composition, as well as the underlying mechanism for their architecture modification.

4. Sphingolipid Metabolism Regulates Plasmodesmal Permeability

The cytoplasmic sleeve of PD has previously been well established as a continuum of symplasm between neighboring cells, and the SEL of the pores is believed to be dependent on the conductivity of the cytoplasmic sleeve [66]. Nicolas et al. then postulated a positive correlation between the spatial distribution of type I PD and enhanced trafficking [23]. Furthermore, Yan et al. provided evidence supporting this model by demonstrating that type I PD are more conductive than type II PD according to a study of plm mutants [60]. Therefore, sphingolipid biosynthesis modulates not only the PD architecture but also their conductivity, although the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. In addition, Nicolas et al. showed that type I PD are predominant in young root tissue, whereas type II PD are more numerous in older tissue [23]. It is, thus, worth testing the fluctuation of sphingolipid levels in different tissues and developmental stages.
As stated above, it is reasonable to propose that perturbation in sphingolipid metabolism is supposed to affect PD permeability. Seedlings treated with the inhibitors of sphingolipid metabolism, including myriocin, fumonisin B1 (FB1), dl-threo-1-phenyl-2-decanoylamino-3-morpholino-1-propanol hydrochloride (PDMP), and tricyclodecan-9-yl-xanthogenate (D609), resulted in a lower level of GlcCer and reduced PD permeability, whereas d-erythro-N,N-dimethylsphingosine (DMS) treatment enhanced the GlcCer contents and PD permeability [61]. Two glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins, β-1,3 glucanase2 (BG2) and PD callose-binding protein 1 (PDCB1), are mislocalized when treated by myriocin, FB1, PDMP, and D609 [61]. These results resemble the treatment by fenpropimorph, an inhibitor of sterol metabolism that affects lipid raft organization [11]. Conversely, the localization of examined PD markers was not affected when treated by DMS [61]. Accordingly, PD permeability was inversely associated with the callose deposition in these treatments. These findings suggest that sphingolipid metabolism can influence the PD permeability by modulating callose accumulation, and GlcCer level is relevant to the alteration of callose-mediated PD permeability.
PD-LOCATED PROTEIN 5 (PDLP5) is a plasmodesmal receptor-like protein localized at the central region of PD channels [67]. It positively regulates callose deposition but negatively controls PD permeability by stimulating downstream callose synthases (CalSs), for instance, CalS1 and CalS8, in Arabidopsis [68]. Recently, PDLP5 was found to be highly accumulated in the leaf epidermal cells of the sld1 sld2 double mutant, where trihydroxy LCB or phytosphinganine t18:0 was elevated and the plasmodesmatal permeability was compromised [44]. Interestingly, PDPL5 was able to specifically bind to phytosphinganine (t18:0) but not unsaturated t18:1 with high affinity [44]. However, another PDLP family member PDLP1, containing a similar motif pattern to PDLP5, did not interact with t18:0 [44]. A putative sphingolipid-binding motif present in the transmembrane domain (TMD) of PDLP5, homologous to the sphingomyelin-binding motif of mammalian p24 protein, might be responsible for the binding [44,69]. This specific interaction between t18:0- or t18:0-based Cers and TMD may confer the modification of PDLP5 localization at PD [44].
Taken together, sphingolipid biosynthesis can modulate plasmodesmal permeability through either callose-dependent or callose-independent pathways. The distinct localization or compartment of callose regulators or CalSs at the PD-PM might be one of the reasons. For example, PDLP5 is supposed to be localized at the central of PD channel and PDLP1 is distributed throughout the PD membrane [68], whereas PDCBs and PDBGs are thought to localize at the PD neck regions [7]. Further characterization of the interactions between sphingolipids and CalSs or callose-associated regulators may improve and perfect the exploration of these different molecular mechanisms.

5. Sphingolipids Facilitate Signaling at Plasmodesmata

In the PD proteomic analysis, certain receptor-like kinases and membrane-anchored proteins were identified, implying that the PD-PM may provide a platform for their proper localization and intercellular PD-relevant signaling [52,70]. They are supposed to participate in non-cell autonomous signaling or immune responses [71,72]. Their localization at PD might be to regulate molecular trafficking while receiving apoplastic signals. For example, Arabidopsis LYSIN MOTIF DOMAIN-CONTAINING GPI-ANCHORED PROTEIN 2 is a PD-located, GPI-anchored receptor protein that perceives chitin and triggers PD closure; yet, the perception and signaling differ from other chitin-triggered responses such as reactive oxygen species burst or mitogen-activated protein kinase activation [73]. CLAVATA1 (CLV1) and Arabidopsis CRINKLY4 (ACR4) are two PM-localized receptor kinases involved in the root meristem maintenance. They function together as dimers under the control of the signaling peptide CLAVATA3/EMBRYO SURROUNDING REGION 40, whereas only the higher-order CLV1/ACR4 receptor complexes are found at the PD-PM [71]. It is deduced that the special lipid environment of the PD-PM enhances the recruitment of ACR4 to PD, and the CLV1/ACR4 multiple complexes, thus, regulate the intercellular trafficking of signaling molecules that defines root stemness by fine-tuning the PD aperture [71]. Similarly, the PD-associated signaling components can also partition to non-PD membranes for dual functions under certain conditions. PDLP1, localized at PD and PM, relocates to the membrane around the fungal infection sites with callose accumulation [74]. It is not clear yet whether lipid species are involved in this relocation.
Although plant-specific GIPCs have been reported to be involved in protein anchoring, cell-surface recognition, and signaling molecule synthesis [25,75], the precise mechanisms are still not well demonstrated. The negatively charged GIPCs are structural homologs of animal gangliosides, which can regulate Ca2+ homeostasis [76]. Interestingly, a recent study proved that the negatively charged GIPCs bind directly to Na+ on the cell surface and, thus, sense salt to trigger Ca2+ influx in plants [77]. This GIPC-mediated salt sensing does not resemble any known sensory system found in other organisms and may need functional partners yet unknown [77]. A study on AtACER, a ceramidase, showed that its absence promotes an increase in ceramide content and salt stress sensitivity, while overexpressing plants exhibited enhanced salt tolerance [78]. Given that the PD-PM microdomains contain a large proportion of GIPCs, these findings may imply a novel potential mechanism for PD responses under salt stress.
In addition, sphingolipids have been found acting as signaling molecules and interplaying with other signals in response to both biotic and abiotic stresses [79]. LCBs and ceramides can act as second messengers in transduction pathways. During pathogen invasion, the recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns by hosts can activate SPT and the released microbial mycotoxins inhibit the LOH, resulting in the disruption of LCB and ceramide contents [45,80]. Overexpressing LOH2 exhibits enhanced salicylate (SA) production and the constitutive expression of hypersensitive genes, leading to programmed cell death in Arabidopsis [80]. Under drought stress, Arabidopsis leaves accumulate more GIPCs but not ceramides; exposure to low temperature results in a decrease in the 4-hydroxy-8-sphinganine (t18:1) and total LCB contents [81,82]. Plants maintain a tight regulation of the balance between free LCBs and their phosphorylated derivatives under stress conditions. For example, the accumulation of LCBs and ceramides induces PCD, while their corresponding LCBPs and ceramide-1-phosphates inhibit cell death [83]. Taken together, it is reasonable to speculate that the sphingolipid species composing PD may participate in the stress responses of plants broadly, either as sensors or as signal communicators.
The role of sphingolipids in the defense reaction dependent on SA was proven by the enhanced levels of salicylates and resistance to pathogens in the Arabidopsis double mutants of FATTY ACID HYDROXYLASE (FAH1 and FAH2) genes with depletion of complex sphingolipids [84,85], while saturated VLCFAs activated the ethylene biosynthesis and signaling pathway during cotton fiber development [85]. Furthermore, sphingolipid synthesis is also required for the membrane targeting of auxin carriers AUXIN RESISTANT 1 and PIN-FORMED 1 [28]. These studies imply the potential interactions among sphingolipids, phytohormones, and PD function.

6. Comparison of Sphingolipids and Sterols at Plasmodesmata

Sterols and sphingolipids are evolutionarily conserved lipid molecules acting as major plasma membrane components, and their collaboration is proposed to favor lipid microdomain formation. Similar to sphingolipids, sterols were also found to be significantly higher in PD when compared with the PM, but this enrichment seems to not show structural selectivity considering the almost similar proportion of different sterol classes within the PD-PM [11]. When treated by sterol inhibitors, plants show tissue-specific defects in callose deposition at PD. The localization of PDCB1 and PDBG2 at primary PD is altered upon the change in sterol composition [11], similar to the disruption of sphingolipid composition [61]. In cotton, suppressing SCP2D expression, a putative sterol carrier protein gene, led to reduced sterol contents, accumulated callose, and closed PDs at 5 through 25 days post anthesis [86]. Thus, the modification of both the sterol and the sphingolipid pools is able to interfere with callose production and, consequently, impairs the intercellular trafficking. However, the unaffected callose level in the plm mutant indicates the potential distinct influences on PD functionality resulting from the changes in different combinations of lipid classes at PD.
In addition to the well-known PD-localized proteins, remorin and tetraspanin, two kinds of membrane proteins that cluster in the sterol-dependent nanoscale domains of PM localize to the PD-PM microdomains [11,53,87,88]. Arabidopsis Remorin1.2 and 1.3 have been shown to be crucial for lipid order formation and membrane microdomain assembly, thus acting as regulators of PD aperture [13]. Tetraspanins have been reported to directly bind to cholesterol in mammalian cells [89]. Thus, whether remorins or tetraspanins bind to sterols at PD is an interesting question worthy of in-depth investigation. Sphingolipids and sterols are also supposed to interact with each other, contributing to the formation, maintenance, or compartmentalization of PD-PM microdomains, but direct evidence has not yet been reported.

7. Perspectives

Overall, sphingolipids, acting as key components of the plasmodesmal membrane system, participate in the regulation of plasmodesmal ultrastructure maintenance, callose deposition, signaling, and permeability control. Nevertheless, many unresolved questions are still waiting to be answered. For example, how are the sphingolipids transported to PD from their synthesis location? What signals regulate their transport when PD undergo architecture transformation? How are the specific PD-PM microdomains with a particular lipid composition established and maintained at PD and what is the diffusion barrier at the PD-PM? Do other PD-localized proteins bind to GIPC or other sphingolipids, even sterols, within the PD microdomains? In addition, sphingolipids are inevitable cellular constituents in signal transduction under biotic and abiotic stresses, such as cold, drought, salt, and microbe infection, and their biosynthesis and metabolism are altered while suffering these challenges. The influences on plasmodesmal functionality are, therefore, also worth studying during various defense responses. As proposed by González-Solís et al., the various Arabidopsis mutants of sphingolipid biosynthesis would be valuable resources to explore [90]. To generate a complete and accurate map of PD composition, the following methods or technologies should be further optimized: (1) PD isolation and purification for pure PD-PM, as well as PD–ER, PD–cell wall, and PD tethers; (2) multiple omics analysis for measuring the levels of numerous PD components; (3) protein or lipid labeling for validation in vivo and in vitro; (4) high-resolution microscopy for observation of PD structure and components in situ. In addition, an investigation of the precise interactions among different PD components can help us understand the comprehensive plasmodesmal organization and working mechanism.

Author Contributions

D.Y. and Y.Z. conceptualized the topic; Y.Z., S.W., L.W., X.C., Y.F. and D.Y. wrote the manuscript; M.H. created the figure. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (22ZR1455100) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32070192).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lucas, W.J. Plasmodesmata: Intercellular channels for macromolecular transport in plants. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1995, 7, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Otero, S.; Helariutta, Y.; Benitez-Alfonso, Y. Symplastic communication in organ formation and tissue patterning. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2016, 29, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Li, Z.P.; Paterlini, A.; Glavier, M.; Bayer, E.M. Intercellular trafficking via plasmodesmata: Molecular layers of complexity. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2021, 78, 799–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kim, I.; Zambryski, P.C. Cell-to-cell communication via plasmodesmata during Arabidopsis embryogenesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005, 8, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yadav, S.R.; Yan, D.; Sevilem, I.; Helariutta, Y. Plasmodesmata-mediated intercellular signaling during plant growth and development. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Lim, G.H.; Shine, M.B.; de Lorenzo, L.; Yu, K.; Cui, W.; Navarre, D.; Hunt, A.G.; Lee, J.Y.; Kachroo, A.; Kachroo, P. Plasmodesmata localizing proteins regulate transport and signaling during systemic acquired immunity in plants. Cell Host Microbe 2016, 19, 541–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Benitez-Alfonso, Y.; Faulkner, C.; Pendle, A.; Miyashima, S.; Helariutta, Y.; Maule, A. Symplastic intercellular connectivity regulates lateral root patterning. Dev. Cell 2013, 26, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Miras, M.; Pottier, M.; Schladt, T.M.; Ejike, J.O.; Redzich, L.; Frommer, W.B.; Kim, J.Y. Plasmodesmata and their role in assimilate translocation. J. Plant Physiol. 2022, 270, 153633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Paniagua, C.; Sinanaj, B.; Benitez-Alfonso, Y. Plasmodesmata and their role in the regulation of phloem unloading during fruit development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2021, 64, 102145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Oparka, K.J.; Cruz, S.S. THE GREAT ESCAPE: Phloem transport and unloading of macromolecules. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000, 51, 323–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Grison, M.S.; Brocard, L.; Fouillen, L.; Nicolas, W.; Wewer, V.; Dormann, P.; Nacir, H.; Benitez-Alfonso, Y.; Claverol, S.; Germain, V.; et al. Specific membrane lipid composition is important for plasmodesmata function in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 1228–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Iswanto, A.B.; Kim, J.Y. Lipid Raft, Regulator of plasmodesmal callose homeostasis. Plants 2017, 6, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Huang, D.; Sun, Y.; Ma, Z.; Ke, M.; Cui, Y.; Chen, Z.; Chen, C.; Ji, C.; Tran, T.M.; Yang, L.; et al. Salicylic acid-mediated plasmodesmal closure via Remorin-dependent lipid organization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 21274–21284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. De Storme, N.; Geelen, D. Callose homeostasis at plasmodesmata: Molecular regulators and developmental relevance. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Zavaliev, R.; Ueki, S.; Epel, B.L.; Citovsky, V. Biology of callose (beta-1,3-glucan) turnover at plasmodesmata. Protoplasma 2011, 248, 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Radford, J.E.; White, R.G. Inhibitors of myosin, but not actin, alter transport through Tradescantia plasmodesmata. Protoplasma 2011, 248, 205–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Diao, M.; Huang, S. An Update on the Role of the Actin Cytoskeleton in Plasmodesmata: A Focus on Formins. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 647123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pike, L.J. Rafts defined: A report on the keystone symposium on lipid rafts and cell function. J. Lipid Res. 2006, 47, 1597–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Simons, K.; Sampaio, J.L. Membrane organization and lipid rafts. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3, a004697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tilsner, J.; Nicolas, W.; Rosado, A.; Bayer, E.M. Staying Tight: Plasmodesmal membrane contact sites and the control of cell-to-cell connectivity in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2016, 67, 337–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, C.; Vanneste, S.; Chen, X. Review: Membrane tethers control plasmodesmal function and formation. Plant Sci. Int. J. Exp. Plant Biol. 2021, 304, 110800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Burch-Smith, T.M.; Stonebloom, S.; Xu, M.; Zambryski, P.C. Plasmodesmata during development: Re-examination of the importance of primary, secondary, and branched plasmodesmata structure versus function. Protoplasma 2011, 248, 61–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Nicolas, W.J.; Grison, M.S.; Trepout, S.; Gaston, A.; Fouche, M.; Cordelieres, F.P.; Oparka, K.; Tilsner, J.; Brocard, L.; Bayer, E.M. Architecture and permeability of post-cytokinesis plasmodesmata lacking cytoplasmic sleeves. Nat. Plants 2017, 3, 17082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Holthuis, J.C.; Pomorski, T.; Raggers, R.J.; Sprong, H.; Van Meer, G. The organizing potential of sphingolipids in intracellular membrane transport. Physiol. Rev. 2001, 81, 1689–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, N.J.; Hou, L.P.; Bao, J.J.; Wang, L.J.; Chen, X.Y. Sphingolipid metabolism, transport, and functions in plants: Recent progress and future perspectives. Plant Commun. 2021, 2, 100214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Huby, E.; Napier, J.A.; Baillieul, F.; Michaelson, L.V.; Dhondt-Cordelier, S. Sphingolipids: Towards an integrated view of metabolism during the plant stress response. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 659–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gomann, J.; Herrfurth, C.; Zienkiewicz, A.; Ischebeck, T.; Haslam, T.M.; Hornung, E.; Feussner, I. Sphingolipid long-chain base hydroxylation influences plant growth and callose deposition in Physcomitrium patens. New Phytol. 2021, 231, 297–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Markham, J.E.; Molino, D.; Gissot, L.; Bellec, Y.; Hematy, K.; Marion, J.; Belcram, K.; Palauqui, J.C.; Satiat-Jeunemaitre, B.; Faure, J.D. Sphingolipids containing very-long-chain fatty acids define a secretory pathway for specific polar plasma membrane protein targeting in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 2362–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kimberlin, A.N.; Majumder, S.; Han, G.; Chen, M.; Cahoon, R.E.; Stone, J.M.; Dunn, T.M.; Cahoon, E.B. Arabidopsis 56-amino acid serine palmitoyltransferase-interacting proteins stimulate sphingolipid synthesis, are essential, and affect mycotoxin sensitivity. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 4627–4639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Chao, D.Y.; Gable, K.; Chen, M.; Baxter, I.; Dietrich, C.R.; Cahoon, E.B.; Guerinot, M.L.; Lahner, B.; Lu, S.; Markham, J.E.; et al. Sphingolipids in the root play an important role in regulating the leaf ionome in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 1061–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Chen, M.; Han, G.; Dietrich, C.R.; Dunn, T.M.; Cahoon, E.B. The essential nature of sphingolipids in plants as revealed by the functional identification and characterization of the Arabidopsis LCB1 subunit of serine palmitoyltransferase. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 3576–3593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Luttgeharm, K.D.; Kimberlin, A.N.; Cahoon, E.B. Plant sphingolipid metabolism and function. Sub-Cell. Biochem. 2016, 86, 249–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Melser, S.; Batailler, B.; Peypelut, M.; Poujol, C.; Bellec, Y.; Wattelet-Boyer, V.; Maneta-Peyret, L.; Faure, J.D.; Moreau, P. Glucosylceramide biosynthesis is involved in Golgi morphology and protein secretion in plant cells. Traffic 2010, 11, 479–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, J.; Bi, F.C.; Yin, J.; Wu, J.X.; Rong, C.; Wu, J.L.; Yao, N. An Arabidopsis neutral ceramidase mutant ncer1 accumulates hydroxyceramides and is sensitive to oxidative stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Pata, M.O.; Wu, B.X.; Bielawski, J.; Xiong, T.C.; Hannun, Y.A.; Ng, C.K. Molecular cloning and characterization of OsCDase, a ceramidase enzyme from rice. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2008, 55, 1000–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Berkey, R.; Bendigeri, D.; Xiao, S. Sphingolipids and plant defense/disease: The “death” connection and beyond. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Wang, W.; Yang, X.; Tangchaiburana, S.; Ndeh, R.; Markham, J.E.; Tsegaye, Y.; Dunn, T.M.; Wang, G.L.; Bellizzi, M.; Parsons, J.F.; et al. An inositolphosphorylceramide synthase is involved in regulation of plant programmed cell death associated with defense in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 3163–3179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hanada, K. Serine palmitoyltransferase, a key enzyme of sphingolipid metabolism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2003, 1632, 16–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kawano, M.; Kumagai, K.; Nishijima, M.; Hanada, K. Efficient trafficking of ceramide from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi apparatus requires a VAMP-associated protein-interacting FFAT motif of CERT. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 30279–30288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kumagai, K.; Yasuda, S.; Okemoto, K.; Nishijima, M.; Kobayashi, S.; Hanada, K. CERT mediates intermembrane transfer of various molecular species of ceramides. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 6488–6495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Brodersen, P.; Petersen, M.; Pike, H.M.; Olszak, B.; Skov, S.; Odum, N.; Jorgensen, L.B.; Brown, R.E.; Mundy, J. Knockout of Arabidopsis accelerated-cell-death 11 encoding a sphingosine transfer protein causes activation of programmed cell death and defense. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 490–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Simanshu, D.K.; Zhai, X.; Munch, D.; Hofius, D.; Markham, J.E.; Bielawski, J.; Bielawska, A.; Malinina, L.; Molotkovsky, J.G.; Mundy, J.W.; et al. Arabidopsis accelerated cell death 11, ACD11, is a ceramide-1-phosphate transfer protein and intermediary regulator of phytoceramide levels. Cell Rep. 2014, 6, 388–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. West, G.; Viitanen, L.; Alm, C.; Mattjus, P.; Salminen, T.A.; Edqvist, J. Identification of a glycosphingolipid transfer protein GLTP1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS J. 2008, 275, 3421–3437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Liu, N.J.; Zhang, T.; Liu, Z.H.; Chen, X.; Guo, H.S.; Ju, B.H.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Li, G.Z.; Zhou, Q.H.; Qin, Y.M.; et al. Phytosphinganine affects plasmodesmata permeability via facilitating PDLP5-stimulated callose accumulation in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 128–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Siebers, M.; Brands, M.; Wewer, V.; Duan, Y.; Holzl, G.; Dormann, P. Lipids in plant-microbe interactions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1861, 1379–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tilney, L.G.; Cooke, T.J.; Connelly, P.S.; Tilney, M.S. The structure of plasmodesmata as revealed by plasmolysis, detergent extraction, and protease digestion. J. Cell Biol. 1991, 112, 739–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Fouillen, L.; Claverol, S.; Bayer, E.M.F.; Grison, M.S. Isolation of Plasmodesmata Membranes for Lipidomic and Proteomic Analysis. Methods Mol. Biol. 2022, 2457, 189–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Malinsky, J.; Opekarova, M.; Grossmann, G.; Tanner, W. Membrane microdomains, rafts, and detergent-resistant membranes in plants and fungi. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64, 501–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Levy, A.; Guenoune-Gelbart, D.; Epel, B.L. beta-1,3-Glucanases: Plasmodesmal gate keepers for intercellular communication. Plant Signal. Behav. 2007, 2, 404–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Thomas, C.L.; Bayer, E.M.; Ritzenthaler, C.; Fernandez-Calvino, L.; Maule, A.J. Specific targeting of a plasmodesmal protein affecting cell-to-cell communication. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6, e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Simpson, C.; Thomas, C.; Findlay, K.; Bayer, E.; Maule, A.J. An Arabidopsis GPI-anchor plasmodesmal neck protein with callose binding activity and potential to regulate cell-to-cell trafficking. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 581–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Fernandez-Calvino, L.; Faulkner, C.; Walshaw, J.; Saalbach, G.; Bayer, E.; Benitez-Alfonso, Y.; Maule, A. Arabidopsis plasmodesmal proteome. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e18880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Jo, Y.; Cho, W.K.; Rim, Y.; Moon, J.; Chen, X.Y.; Chu, H.; Kim, C.Y.; Park, Z.Y.; Lucas, W.J.; Kim, J.Y. Plasmodesmal receptor-like kinases identified through analysis of rice cell wall extracted proteins. Protoplasma 2011, 248, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Faulkner, C. Receptor-mediated signaling at plasmodesmata. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Han, X.; Huang, L.J.; Feng, D.; Jiang, W.; Miu, W.; Li, N. Plasmodesmata-Related Structural and Functional Proteins: The Long Sought-After Secrets of a Cytoplasmic Channel in Plant Cell Walls. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Kraner, M.E.; Muller, C.; Sonnewald, U. Comparative proteomic profiling of the choline transporter-like1 (CHER1) mutant provides insights into plasmodesmata composition of fully developed Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2017, 92, 696–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Leijon, F.; Melzer, M.; Zhou, Q.; Srivastava, V.; Bulone, V. Proteomic analysis of plasmodesmata from populus cell suspension cultures in relation with callose biosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Brault, M.L.; Petit, J.D.; Immel, F.; Nicolas, W.J.; Glavier, M.; Brocard, L.; Gaston, A.; Fouche, M.; Hawkins, T.J.; Crowet, J.M.; et al. Multiple C2 domains and transmembrane region proteins (MCTPs) tether membranes at plasmodesmata. EMBO Rep. 2019, 20, e47182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bure, C.; Cacas, J.L.; Wang, F.; Gaudin, K.; Domergue, F.; Mongrand, S.; Schmitter, J.M. Fast screening of highly glycosylated plant sphingolipids by tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. RCM 2011, 25, 3131–3145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yan, D.; Yadav, S.R.; Paterlini, A.; Nicolas, W.J.; Petit, J.D.; Brocard, L.; Belevich, I.; Grison, M.S.; Vaten, A.; Karami, L.; et al. Sphingolipid biosynthesis modulates plasmodesmal ultrastructure and phloem unloading. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 604–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Iswanto, A.B.B.; Shon, J.C.; Liu, K.H.; Vu, M.H.; Kumar, R.; Kim, J.Y. Sphingolipids modulate secretion of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored plasmodesmata proteins and callose deposition. Plant Physiol. 2020, 184, 407–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kimberlin, A.N.; Han, G.; Luttgeharm, K.D.; Chen, M.; Cahoon, R.E.; Stone, J.M.; Markham, J.E.; Dunn, T.M.; Cahoon, E.B. ORM expression alters sphingolipid homeostasis and differentially affects ceramide synthase activity. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 889–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Gonzalez-Solis, A.; Han, G.; Gan, L.; Li, Y.; Markham, J.E.; Cahoon, R.E.; Dunn, T.M.; Cahoon, E.B. Unregulated sphingolipid biosynthesis in gene-edited arabidopsis ORM mutants results in nonviable seeds with strongly reduced oil content. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 2474–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Oparka, K.J.; Roberts, A.G.; Boevink, P.; Santa Cruz, S.; Roberts, I.; Pradel, K.S.; Imlau, A.; Kotlizky, G.; Sauer, N.; Epel, B. Simple, but not branched, plasmodesmata allow the nonspecific trafficking of proteins in developing tobacco leaves. Cell 1999, 97, 743–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Faulkner, C.; Akman, O.E.; Bell, K.; Jeffree, C.; Oparka, K. Peeking into pit fields: A multiple twinning model of secondary plasmodesmata formation in tobacco. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 1504–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Brunkard, J.O.; Runkel, A.M.; Zambryski, P.C. The cytosol must flow: Intercellular transport through plasmodesmata. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2015, 35, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Lee, J.Y.; Wang, X.; Cui, W.; Sager, R.; Modla, S.; Czymmek, K.; Zybaliov, B.; van Wijk, K.; Zhang, C.; Lu, H.; et al. A plasmodesmata-localized protein mediates crosstalk between cell-to-cell communication and innate immunity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 3353–3373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Cui, W.; Lee, J.Y. Arabidopsis callose synthases CalS1/8 regulate plasmodesmal permeability during stress. Nat. Plants 2016, 2, 16034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Contreras, F.X.; Ernst, A.M.; Haberkant, P.; Bjorkholm, P.; Lindahl, E.; Gonen, B.; Tischer, C.; Elofsson, A.; von Heijne, G.; Thiele, C.; et al. Molecular recognition of a single sphingolipid species by a protein’s transmembrane domain. Nature 2012, 481, 525–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Lee, J.Y. Plasmodesmata: A signaling hub at the cellular boundary. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2015, 27, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Stahl, Y.; Grabowski, S.; Bleckmann, A.; Kuhnemuth, R.; Weidtkamp-Peters, S.; Pinto, K.G.; Kirschner, G.K.; Schmid, J.B.; Wink, R.H.; Hulsewede, A.; et al. Moderation of Arabidopsis root stemness by CLAVATA1 and ARABIDOPSIS CRINKLY4 receptor kinase complexes. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23, 362–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Vaddepalli, P.; Herrmann, A.; Fulton, L.; Oelschner, M.; Hillmer, S.; Stratil, T.F.; Fastner, A.; Hammes, U.Z.; Ott, T.; Robinson, D.G.; et al. The C2-domain protein QUIRKY and the receptor-like kinase STRUBBELIG localize to plasmodesmata and mediate tissue morphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 2014, 141, 4139–4148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Faulkner, C.; Petutschnig, E.; Benitez-Alfonso, Y.; Beck, M.; Robatzek, S.; Lipka, V.; Maule, A.J. LYM2-dependent chitin perception limits molecular flux via plasmodesmata. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 9166–9170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Caillaud, M.C.; Wirthmueller, L.; Sklenar, J.; Findlay, K.; Piquerez, S.J.; Jones, A.M.; Robatzek, S.; Jones, J.D.; Faulkner, C. The plasmodesmal protein PDLP1 localises to haustoria-associated membranes during downy mildew infection and regulates callose deposition. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Markham, J.E.; Lynch, D.V.; Napier, J.A.; Dunn, T.M.; Cahoon, E.B. Plant sphingolipids: Function follows form. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2013, 16, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ledeen, R.W.; Wu, G. The multi-tasked life of GM1 ganglioside, a true factotum of nature. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2015, 40, 407–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Jiang, Z.; Zhou, X.; Tao, M.; Yuan, F.; Liu, L.; Wu, F.; Wu, X.; Xiang, Y.; Niu, Y.; Liu, F.; et al. Plant cell-surface GIPC sphingolipids sense salt to trigger Ca(2+) influx. Nature 2019, 572, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wu, J.X.; Li, J.; Liu, Z.; Yin, J.; Chang, Z.Y.; Rong, C.; Wu, J.L.; Bi, F.C.; Yao, N. The Arabidopsis ceramidase AtACER functions in disease resistance and salt tolerance. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2015, 81, 767–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ali, U.; Li, H.; Wang, X.; Guo, L. Emerging roles of sphingolipid signaling in plant response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Mol. Plant 2018, 11, 1328–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Luttgeharm, K.D.; Chen, M.; Mehra, A.; Cahoon, R.E.; Markham, J.E.; Cahoon, E.B. Overexpression of Arabidopsis ceramide synthases differentially affects growth, sphingolipid metabolism, programmed cell death, and mycotoxin resistance. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 1108–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Tarazona, P.; Feussner, K.; Feussner, I. An enhanced plant lipidomics method based on multiplexed liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry reveals additional insights into cold- and drought-induced membrane remodeling. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2015, 84, 621–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Guillas, I.; Guellim, A.; Reze, N.; Baudouin, E. Long chain base changes triggered by a short exposure of Arabidopsis to low temperature are altered by AHb1 non-symbiotic haemoglobin overexpression. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 63, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Hou, Q.; Jin, J.; Zhou, H.; Novgorodov, S.A.; Bielawska, A.; Szulc, Z.M.; Hannun, Y.A.; Obeid, L.M.; Hsu, Y.T. Mitochondrially targeted ceramides preferentially promote autophagy, retard cell growth, and induce apoptosis. J. Lipid Res. 2011, 52, 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Konig, S.; Feussner, K.; Schwarz, M.; Kaever, A.; Iven, T.; Landesfeind, M.; Ternes, P.; Karlovsky, P.; Lipka, V.; Feussner, I. Arabidopsis mutants of sphingolipid fatty acid alpha-hydroxylases accumulate ceramides and salicylates. New Phytol. 2012, 196, 1086–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Qin, Y.M.; Hu, C.Y.; Pang, Y.; Kastaniotis, A.J.; Hiltunen, J.K.; Zhu, Y.X. Saturated very-long-chain fatty acids promote cotton fiber and Arabidopsis cell elongation by activating ethylene biosynthesis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 3692–3704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Zhang, Z.; Ruan, Y.L.; Zhou, N.; Wang, F.; Guan, X.; Fang, L.; Shang, X.; Guo, W.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, T. Suppressing a Putative Sterol Carrier Gene Reduces Plasmodesmal Permeability and Activates Sucrose Transporter Genes during Cotton Fiber Elongation. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 2027–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Raffaele, S.; Bayer, E.; Lafarge, D.; Cluzet, S.; German Retana, S.; Boubekeur, T.; Leborgne-Castel, N.; Carde, J.P.; Lherminier, J.; Noirot, E.; et al. Remorin, a solanaceae protein resident in membrane rafts and plasmodesmata, impairs potato virus X movement. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 1541–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Gui, J.; Liu, C.; Shen, J.; Li, L. Grain setting defect1, encoding a remorin protein, affects the grain setting in rice through regulating plasmodesmatal conductance. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 1463–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Charrin, S.; Manie, S.; Thiele, C.; Billard, M.; Gerlier, D.; Boucheix, C.; Rubinstein, E. A physical and functional link between cholesterol and tetraspanins. Eur. J. Immunol. 2003, 33, 2479–2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Gonzalez-Solis, A.; Cano-Ramirez, D.L.; Morales-Cedillo, F.; Tapia de Aquino, C.; Gavilanes-Ruiz, M. Arabidopsis mutants in sphingolipid synthesis as tools to understand the structure and function of membrane microdomains in plasmodesmata. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 23 05677 g001 550
Figure 1. A diagram of sphingolipid structure. LCBs present as saturated form (18:0) or desaturated form (18:1) with 2/3 OH (d/t) numbers. The fatty acid (FA) chain has various carbon numbers ≥16. Ceramide is the simplest sphingolipid form. Head group indicates the substituents that are combined with ceramides to form complex sphingolipids.
Figure 1. A diagram of sphingolipid structure. LCBs present as saturated form (18:0) or desaturated form (18:1) with 2/3 OH (d/t) numbers. The fatty acid (FA) chain has various carbon numbers ≥16. Ceramide is the simplest sphingolipid form. Head group indicates the substituents that are combined with ceramides to form complex sphingolipids.
Ijms 23 05677 g001
Ijms 23 05677 g002 550
Figure 2. A schematic diagram of plasmodesmata architecture and components. LCBs, Cers, hCers, and GlcCers are synthesized at the ER and transported to the Golgi, where GIPCs are produced. These sphingolipid species can be sorted and transported to their destination, including the PM and PD-PM. Specific proteins, sterols, and sphingolipids, especially the t18:0/VLCFA-contained sphingolipids, are enriched in the microdomains formed at the PD-PM (red segment). They may function by interacting with each other to regulate the PD structure, signaling, or permeability, such as the experimentally verified binding of PD-LOCATED PROTEIN 5 to phytosphinganine (t18:0) [44] and potential interactions between tetraspanins and sterols [45]. The composition of the special membrane of the desmotubule (purple segment) derived from the ER is still elusive. LCBs, long-chain bases. Cers, ceramides. hCers, hydroxyceramides. GlcCers, glucosylceramides. IPCs, inositolphosphoceramides. GIPCs, glycosylinositolphosphoceramides. ER, endoplasmic reticulum. PD, plasmodesmata. PM, plasma membrane. VLCFA, very-long-chain fatty acid.
Figure 2. A schematic diagram of plasmodesmata architecture and components. LCBs, Cers, hCers, and GlcCers are synthesized at the ER and transported to the Golgi, where GIPCs are produced. These sphingolipid species can be sorted and transported to their destination, including the PM and PD-PM. Specific proteins, sterols, and sphingolipids, especially the t18:0/VLCFA-contained sphingolipids, are enriched in the microdomains formed at the PD-PM (red segment). They may function by interacting with each other to regulate the PD structure, signaling, or permeability, such as the experimentally verified binding of PD-LOCATED PROTEIN 5 to phytosphinganine (t18:0) [44] and potential interactions between tetraspanins and sterols [45]. The composition of the special membrane of the desmotubule (purple segment) derived from the ER is still elusive. LCBs, long-chain bases. Cers, ceramides. hCers, hydroxyceramides. GlcCers, glucosylceramides. IPCs, inositolphosphoceramides. GIPCs, glycosylinositolphosphoceramides. ER, endoplasmic reticulum. PD, plasmodesmata. PM, plasma membrane. VLCFA, very-long-chain fatty acid.
Ijms 23 05677 g002
Table
Table 1. Plant sphingolipid profiles for plasmodesmata (PD) functional study.
Table 1. Plant sphingolipid profiles for plasmodesmata (PD) functional study.
MaterialPD IsolationMethodMajor ConclusionReference
Arabidopsis cultured suspension cellsYesLC-MS, GC-MS, Q-TOF-MSPD membranes contain more complex sphingolipids than PM[11]
Arabidopsis rootsNoHPLCSphingolipids containing VLCFA regulate plasmodesmal ultrastructure and permeability[60]
Arabidopsis leavesYesHPLCPD membranes contain higher amounts of t18:0 lipid species than PM[44]
Arabidopsis seedlingsNoLC-MSPerturbation in sphingolipid metabolism alters PD permeability and GlcHcers are important for GPI-anchored PD protein localization and PD permeability control[61]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, L.; Chang, X.; Fan, Y.; He, M.; Yan, D. Sphingolipids at Plasmodesmata: Structural Components and Functional Modulators. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5677. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105677

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Wang S, Wang L, Chang X, Fan Y, He M, Yan D. Sphingolipids at Plasmodesmata: Structural Components and Functional Modulators. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(10):5677. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105677

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yingying, Shuang Wang, Lu Wang, Xiaoyan Chang, Yongxiao Fan, Meiqing He, and Dawei Yan. 2022. "Sphingolipids at Plasmodesmata: Structural Components and Functional Modulators" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 10: 5677. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105677

APA Style

Zhang, Y., Wang, S., Wang, L., Chang, X., Fan, Y., He, M., & Yan, D. (2022). Sphingolipids at Plasmodesmata: Structural Components and Functional Modulators. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(10), 5677. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105677

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop