Next Article in Journal
Prototype Development of a Temperature-Sensitive High-Adhesion Medical Tape to Reduce Medical-Adhesive-Related Skin Injury and Improve Quality of Care
Next Article in Special Issue
Changes in Ovulation-Related Gene Expression during Induced Ovulation in the Amur Sturgeon (Acipenser schrenckii) Ovarian Follicles
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of the WAK Gene Family Reveals Genes for FHB Resistance in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Spermatozoan Metabolism as a Non-Traditional Model for the Study of Huntington’s Disease

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(13), 7163; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23137163
by Meghan Lawlor 1,†, Michal Zigo 1,†, Karl Kerns 1,2, In Ki Cho 3,4, Charles A. Easley IV 3,4 and Peter Sutovsky 1,5,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(13), 7163; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23137163
Submission received: 18 May 2022 / Revised: 22 June 2022 / Accepted: 27 June 2022 / Published: 28 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physiology of Gametes and Fertilization 2.0)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This review addresses the HD pathway in neuronal and sperm metabolism, including relevant gene and protein expression in both neurons and spermatozoa, indicated in the pathogenesis of HD.  This review also aims to explore the comparative role of zinc in both neuronal and sperm function.

 

Figures and tables are clear and explanatory. The bibliography is very extensive (189 references) and analyzes all the literature on the subject.

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for their positive feedback. We performed English syntax and spellcheck corrections where necessary to improve the comprehensibility of the MS. We have also expanded table 3 so it is more consistent with table 2.

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,
  I found this to be a very excellent work which provides a lot of valuable information. I have no specific objections except for one word "neurogenerative" used in the abstract and introduction (line 14 and 35). I would like to know if this is intentional or just a typo? If intentional I would like to know why? Especially since further on in the text the authors use the correct term "neurodegenerative" to refer to Huntington's disease (e.g. line 76 or 250).

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for their recognition and positive feedback. The word “neurogenerative” was indeed a typographical error. We corrected it in both the abstract and introduction. We also performed English syntax and spellcheck corrections where necessary to improve the comprehensibility of the MS. We have also expanded table 3 so it is more consistent with table 2.

Back to TopTop