Next Article in Journal
Cytogenetic and Molecular Marker Analyses of a Novel Wheat–Psathyrostachys huashanica 7Ns Disomic Addition Line with Powdery Mildew Resistance
Previous Article in Journal
Editorial of Special Issue “Roles of Inflammasomes and Methyltransferases in Inflammation”
Previous Article in Special Issue
Crassolide Induces G2/M Cell Cycle Arrest, Apoptosis, and Autophagy in Human Lung Cancer Cells via ROS-Mediated ER Stress Pathways
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Marine Compounds for Melanoma Treatment and Prevention

1
Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Viale F. Stagno d’Alcontres 31, 98166 Messina, Italy
2
Department of Ecosustainable Marine Biotechnology, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Via Acton 55, 80133 Napoli, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(18), 10284; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810284
Submission received: 15 July 2022 / Revised: 11 August 2022 / Accepted: 1 September 2022 / Published: 7 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antitumor and Anti-infective Agents from Marine Organisms)

Abstract

:
Melanoma is considered a multifactorial disease etiologically divided into melanomas related to sun exposure and those that are not, but also based on their mutational signatures, anatomic site, and epidemiology. The incidence of melanoma skin cancer has been increasing over the past decades with 132,000 cases occurring globally each year. Marine organisms have been shown to be an excellent source of natural compounds with possible bioactivities for human health applications. In this review, we report marine compounds from micro- and macro-organisms with activities in vitro and in vivo against melanoma, including the compound Marizomib, isolated from a marine bacterium, currently in phase III clinical trials for melanoma. When available, we also report active concentrations, cellular targets and mechanisms of action of the mentioned molecules. In addition, compounds used for UV protection and melanoma prevention from marine sources are discussed. This paper gives an overview of promising marine molecules which can be studied more deeply before clinical trials in the near future.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Around 70% of the planet’s surface is covered by water [1] and marine environments have been shown to be characterized by a huge biological and chemical diversity. Over the past 50 years, approximately 38,662 marine natural products (MNPs) have been reported from marine species (https://marinlit.rsc.org/; accessed on 19 May 2022). Considering the increasing number of human diseases and antibiotic resistant infections, the scientific community has moved its attention to marine biodiversity to find new potential drugs. This interest is confirmed by the increasing numbers of scientific publications on marine natural products. Looking for “marine natural products” in the public database PubMed, there are 13,073 resulting publications, with an increasing trend over the years (Figure 1a). Looking for “melanoma” and “marine natural products” in the public database PubMed, the same trend is observed (accessed on 14 May 2022; Figure 1b).
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the incidence of melanoma skin cancer has been increasing over the past decades with 132,000 cases occurring globally each year (https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/radiation-ultraviolet-(uv)-radiation-and-skin-cancer; accessed on 16 May 2022). More solar UV radiation is reaching the Earth’s surface due to ozone level depletion, and the WHO reports an estimation of an additional 300,000 non-melanoma and 4500 melanoma skin cancer cases for each 10% decrease in ozone levels, resulting in a health and socio-economic problem [2].
A study published in 2020 in the International Journal of Cancer reported that 91% of all melanomas in United States and 97% in Hawaii were dependent on UV radiation, and first of all the sun radiation. Melanomas are also caused by genetic predisposition ad other phenotypic factors such as fair skin and many moles [3]. Another study published in 2020 in Nature Genetics, based on 37,000 melanoma cases in different world populations, demonstrated that there was an interaction of genetic predisposition and UV ray damage [4] (https://www.airc.it/cancro/prevenzione-tumore/il-sole/rischi-del-sole, accessed on 1 August 2022).
As reported by the National Cancer Institute (https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/melan.html; accessed on 16 May 2022), estimated new cases in 2022 are 99,780, with 7650 estimated deaths. According to the “Melanoma Tumors” section of the 4th edition of the WHO classification of skin tumors [5,6], melanomas are divided into those related to sun exposure and those that are not. As for sun-related melanomas, there are superficial spreading melanomas, lentigo maligna and desmoplastic melanomas. Non-solar malanomas are acral melanomas, melanomas in congenital nevi, melanomas in blue nevi, Spitz melanomas, mucosal melanomas and uveal melanomas. For epidemiology, clinical features, histopathology and differential diagnosis of each typology, please see the review by Elder and co-workers [5]. At the time of the diagnosis, the patients are generally treated by surgical excision of the primary tumor [2]. Unfortunately, very often patients develop metastases [7].
Melanoma is considered a multi-factorial disease, and the most well-known contributing factors are genetic susceptibility, familiar history and external stimuli, mainly sun exposure (due to its genotoxic effect) and a history of sunburn, as well as artificial UV exposure with tanning beds or psoralen-UVA radiation photochemotherapy [2,8,9,10]. The highest risk is often associated with histories of sunburn in childhood [11].

2. Marine Microorganisms

2.1. Bacteria

In 2012, Yang and collaborators isolated 131 strains of actinomycetes from deep waters, collected from a depth of 800 m in Sagami Bay, Japan. They selected the AKA32 strain as a producer of cytotoxic compounds against murine cancer cells. They isolated three compounds from AKA32: the aromatic polychete akazamicin, actino-furanone C and N-formilan-tranilic acid. All three compounds showed cytotoxicity against the murine cell line of melanoma B16 with IC50 values of 1.7 μM, 1.2 μM and 25 μM, respectively [12]. In 2019, Schneider et al. [13], discovered that two bacterial isolates from the Barents Sea, belonging to the genus Algibacter, produced extracts with antibacterial and anticancer activity. They saw that both extracts had the same active ingredient identified as lipid 430. The effects of lipid 430 were tested against three human cell lines, melanoma A2058 cell line, HT29 colon cancer cell line and MRC5 lung fibroblast cell line. The compound was tested at concentrations of 233 μM, 175 μM, 116 μM, 58 μM, 23 μM and 12 μM. For the melanoma cell line a dose-dependent cytotoxic effect was observed, with IC50 175 μM but there was no significant effect against the normal cell MRC5 [13]. In another work [14], anticancer and antimalarial assay were performed on a Streptomyces species (S.4) isolated from the marine sponge Xestospongia muta collected from Florida Keys. Active extracts from four Streptomyces isolates (S.1, S.2, S.3, S.4) were identified. The two extracts S.1 and S.2 have been found to have anti-proliferative activity with an IC50 of 2 µg/mL and 3.5 µg/mL, respectively, while the two extracts S.3 and S.4 showed antimalarial activity with an IC50 of between 2.5 µg/mL and 5 µg/mL for S.3 and an IC50 of 10 µg/mL for S.4. The S.3 extract showed both antiproliferative activity with an IC50 of 3.4 µg/mL and antimalarial activity with an IC50 of about 4 µg/mL. In particular, in the S.1 and S.2 extracts, the cytotoxic compounds nonactin, monactin, dynactin, and toyocamycin were found, and identified as responsible for the anti-proliferative activity. The compounds nonactin, monactin and dynactin were found to inhibit the proliferation of A2058 melanoma cells with IC50 of 0.26 µM, 0.02 µM and 0.02 µM, respectively, A2780 ovarian -cancer cells with IC50 of 0.2 µM, 0.02 µM and 0.02 µM, respectively, and H553-T non-small cell lung cancer cells with IC50 of 0.1 µM, 0.01 µM and 0.01 µM, respectively. Furthermore, the compounds monactin and dynactin showed some selectivity in melanomas; in fact, they were 6.5–13 times more active against the A2058 melanoma line than the A2780 ovarian cancer cell line [14]. Myxobacteria, has recently been recognized as a potential source of new secondary metabolites such as polyketides and ribosomal-free peptides, as well as their hybrid compounds [15,16]. Myxobacteria of marine origin are particularly attractive [17] because their gene sequences of polyketide synthase are unique. From a marine myxobacteria, Enhygromyxa sp. three new compounds were isolated: enigromic acid, deoxy-enigrolides A and deoxy-enigrolides B. Of these, enhygromic acid showed cytotoxicity against melanoma B16 cells with IC50 of 46 μM, comparable to that of the chemotherapy agent paclitaxel (57 μM), but it did not show activity against Hela-S3 cell (IC50 > 30 μM) [18].
Phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA) has been produced, purified and characterized by the marine bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa GS-33 [19]. This compound showed a potent dose-dependent anticancer activity on SK-MEL-2 melanoma cells with a GI50 (growth inhibition of 50%) of 2.30 μg/mL (since a GI50 value of 10 μg/mL is considered to demonstrate anticancer activity in the case of pure compounds [20]). PCA has also been shown to have a protective effect against UV-B rays in evaluating its role in the enhancement of SPF (sun protection factor). The SPF of the PCA solution in ethanol at concentration 25 ppm, 50 ppm and 100 ppm were 1.43, 2.55 and 4.73, respectively. The addition of PCA (25 ppm, 50 ppm and 100 ppm) in the solution of two commercial sunscreens caused a synergistic increase of 10–30% in their SPF [19]. Two new lyso-ornithine lipids have recently been isolated from an arctic marine bacterium belonging to the genus Lacinutrix isolated from the sponge Halichondria sp. collected in the Barents Sea. The bacterial extract was fractionated into six fractions of which cytotoxic and antibacterial activities were tested at a concentration of 50 µg/mL. Fraction 5 was active against the Gram-positive bacteria Streptococcus agalactiae, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus. Two lyso-ornithine lipids were found in this fraction. The cytotoxicity of these two lyso-ornithine lipids was evaluated against the human melanoma line A2058 at a concentration of 10 µM, 25 µM, 50 µM, 100 µM and 150 µM. A certain cytotoxic activity has been observed for one of the two lipids against the melanoma cell line A2058, with a cellular survival of 23% at 50 µM and a cell survival of about 0% at 100 µM and 150 µM, while the other lipid showed no activity against melanoma cells. The isolated compounds were tested on the normal lung-fibroblast MRC-5 cells and neither of them were active against normal cells [21].

2.2. Fungi

In 2014, Zhang et al. [22] isolated a derivative of sansalvamide A, the H-10, from the marine fungus belonging to the genus Fusarum. H-10 is a cyclic depsi-peptide that has shown a dose-dependent antiproliferative effect on B16 murine melanoma cells. The latter, treated with 50 µM of H-10, underwent morphological changes typical of the apoptotic process [22]. An alkaloid isolated in 2015, Penicitrinine A, from the marine fungus Penicilium citrinum was tested on A735 human malignant melanoma cells. Twenty-three tumor cell lines were treated with increasing concentrations of penicitrinine A for 48h, and the treatment showed inhibition of proliferation. The most sensitive cell lines were those of malignant melanoma A735 with an IC50 of 20.12 µM. They then evaluated with the Real-Time Cell Analysis (RTCA) test the inhibition of the specific proliferation of A735 and showed that this inhibition was related to the induction of apoptosis because, following treatment with 5 µM, 10 µM, 20 µM penicitrinine A, the cells began to shrink, round and fractionate, typical signs of apoptosis. The phenomenon was further confirmed by the staining test Annexin V-PI. The authors concluded that this alkaloid could favor the inhibition of the metastatic process in cancer cells [23].
Very recently, another compound Chlovalicin B was isolated from the marine fungus Digiratispora marina, taken from driftwood harvested in Vannoya in Norway in 2010 [24]. This compound exhibited mild cytotoxic activity against human A2058 melanoma cells with approximately 50% survival at 50 µM. No activity was observed against human normal lung fibroblasts MRC-5 at 50 µM, while mild activity was also seen in mouse melanoma cells B16 with an IC50 of 37 µM. The latter data may indicate that chlovalicins affect a common molecular target in melanoma cells [25]. In 2021, Jenssen et al. [26] discovered and isolated a new secondary metabolite, lulworthinone, from a slow-growing marine mushroom extract belonging to the Lulworthiaceae family. The compound was tested on A2058 melanoma cells, HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells and normal lung fibroblast MRC-5 cells to evaluate its antiproliferative activity at concentrations ranging from 6.25 µg/mL to 100 µg/mL. The antiproliferative activity was observed against all cell lines tested. At concentrations of 20 µg/mL, 15 µg/mL, and 12.5 µg/mL the lulworthinone did not display toxic effect, with 100% cell survival. In the same year, Fan et al. [27], tested the fungal crude extract of Pyrenochaetopsis sp. FVE-001 on different tumor cell lines. This is an endophytic fungus isolated from thallus of brown seaweed Fucus vesiculosus. Three new compounds have been isolated from this fungus: pyrenosetin A, pyrenosetin B and pyrenosetin C, as well as a fourth compound already known, phomasetin. These three pyrenosetins show unique structures of decalinoylspyrotetramic acid characterized by a trans-decalinic ring, a spiro system fused with a carbonyl unit (cyclopentanone) and a terminal part of tetramic acid. The first two both showed antitumor activity, although pyrenosetin A had higher antitumor activity and lower cellular toxicity then pyrenosetin B. The third compound, pyrenosetin C, showed a low IC50 in A375 cells, being inactive [27]. The natural bioactive products with trans-decalinic ring are common in fungi (e.g., Fusarium, Penicillium and Alternaria) [28]. The crude extracts were tested at a concentration of 100 µg/mL on 5 human tumor cell lines: HT29, A374, A549, HCT116, MDA-MB231 in addition to the HaCaT immortalized human keratinocyte line used as a control. Regarding results on the human melanoma cell line A375, the pyrenosetic A had an antitumor activity with an IC50 of 2.8 µM, pyrenosetic B also showed an antitumor activity with an IC50 of 6.3 µM, while pyrenosetic C and phomasetin had lower IC50 values of 140.3 µM and 37.3 µM, respectively. Toxicity was evaluated on HaCaT cells, where they noted that the IC50 of pyrenosetic A, pyrenosetic C and phomasetin compounds on the normal cells, were similar to those of melanoma cells, indicating that the compounds are not selectively toxic. On the other hand, the pyrenosetic B showed a lower toxicity value on HaCaT with IC50 of 35.0 µM, indicating a slightly better selectivity than the other three metabolites of around 5.6 (value calculated by dividing the IC50 against HaCaT cells by the IC50 against melanoma cells A375).

2.3. Microalgae

Although the use of microalgae is very promising, in some cases a problem is that the rigid cell walls of microalgae need to be destroyed for the extraction of their bioactive compounds. Jabeen et al. [29], have evaluated the effect of enzymatic destruction of cell walls with cellulase and lysozyme, which was shown to be more advantageous than other conventional pre-treatment techniques, on the anti-tumor activity of microalgal extracts. They have evaluated the anticancer effect of the extract in the common cancer cell lines including the melanoma cell line MDA MB-435. The samples treated with lysozyme performed slightly better than cellulase-treatment on MDA MB-435 tumor cells [29]. However, other methods are also used for cell breakage, such as the use of sonication [30,31,32,33].
Oxylipins are metabolites derived from the lipid peroxidation [34]. The oxylipins 13-HOTE and 15-HEPE, derived from the microalga Chlamydomonas debaryana and Nannochloropsis gaditana, respectively, have been investigated for their activity on melanoma cancer cell line UACC-62. They showed high cytotoxicity on UACC-62 cells with IC50 values of 71.9 ± 3.6 μM for 13-HOTE and 53.9 ± 6.4 μM for 15-HEPE. In particular, the oxylipin treatment decreased the level of ATP in UACC-62 in a dose-dependent manner. These effects were magnified when oxylipins were combined with the glycolysis inhibitor 2-DG [35]. Lauritano and collaborators [30] found that raw extracts of the diatom Skeletonema marinoi (clone FE60) were active against A2058 melanoma cells when tested at 25–100 μg/mL. In particular, they cultivated the algae in replete medium and phosphate and nitrogen starvation, and found that only the pellets deriving from the nitrogen-starvation condition showed anti-melanoma activity, suggesting that in this condition the algae were able to produce, or produce more of, an amount of potential bioactive compound/s. At the same time, the nitrogen-starvation derived extracts were not toxic on normal human lung fibroblast MRC-5 or human hepatocellular liver carcinoma HepG2. Riccio et al. [31] also found activity against A2058 melanoma cells by raw extracts and fractions of the flagellate Isochrysis galbana cultured for 6 or 12 days, mainly at 100 μg/mL. However, some fractions also showed activity on MRC-5 cells.
The anticancer effect of the Amphidinol 22 isolated from the dinoflagellate Amphidinium carterae has been tested on the human skin melanoma cell line A2058. To test the antitumor activity, a MTT assay was conducted. The compound showed cytotoxicity with an IC50 of 16.4 µM [36]. Other Amphidinium spp. compounds have been previously reported to have an antitumor activity, such as the cytotoxic macrolides amphinolide G and amphinolide H. These two compounds exhibited extremely strong cytotoxic activities on KB human epidermoid carcinoma cells with IC50 values of 0.0059 and 0.00052 µg/mL, respectively [37]. In a work of 2019 [38], four new cytotoxic compounds have been characterized, three of them members of the macrolide amphidinolide family. Amphidinolides (AMPs) and related compounds are a diverse class of more than 40 macrolides with extremely high cytotoxicity against several carcinoma cell lines [39,40,41]. These were produced by symbiotic unicellular microalgae of the genus Amphidinium. The four new compounds, isolated from the invertebrate Stragulum bicolor, are: 5-membered macrolide amphidinolide PX1 (AMP-PX1), amphidinolide PX2 (AMP-PX2), amphidinolide PX3 (AMP-PX3) and the linear polyketide stragulin A. These compounds were tested between 8 µM to 8 nM against the A2058 cells derived from the metastatic site (lymphonode). Among these, the linear polyketide stragulin A was strongly and selectively active on the highly invasive melanoma cell lines A2058, with an IC50 of 0.18 µM after 48 h of treatment [38]. Water soluble polysaccharides have been isolated and purified from the biomass of the green alga Parachlorella kessleri HY1, and their immunomodulatory activities were evaluated on splenocytes from homogenized spleens of healthy and melanoma bearing C57Bl/6 mice. The polysaccharide tested with immuno-spot assay increased the production of INF-γ in the melanoma cells [42]. In another study, the sulpho-glycolipidic fraction of the red microalgae Porphiridium cruentum has been tested [43]. This fraction had large amounts of palmitic acid (26.1%), arachidonic acid (C20: 4ω-6, 36.8%), and eicopentaenoic (C20:5ω-3, 16.6%) acids, and noticeable amounts of 16:1n-9 fatty acid (10.5%). These could have a chemotherapeutic or chemoprotective potential, because they inhibited the growth of human malignant melanoma cells M4 Beu. They clearly showed a strong efficacy of the sulpho-glycolipidic fraction on all tested cell-lines, as demonstrated by IC50 values for growth inhibition in the range of 20–46 µg/mL. The sulpho-glycolipidic fraction inhibited growth-rates of both cytotoxic and cytostatic effects and blocked the cell cycle at a step corresponding to a transient increase of cell metabolism [43]. Another compound that showed anticancer activity on different human cutaneous melanoma cell lines is euplotin C, a secondary metabolite isolated from the marine ciliate Euplotes crassus [44]. At molecular levels, inhibition of ERK (extracellular signal-regulated kinase) and Akt (protein kinase B) pathway was shown to be induced in melanoma A375 cells by euplotin C. In particular, ERK 1/2 and Akt signaling pathways are often aberrantly activated in melanoma, inducing a complex network involved in melanoma cell proliferation and metastasis formation [44,45,46].
Euplotins are a group of compounds isolated from the marine ciliate Euplotes crassus. Subsequently, Carpi et al. [47] observed that euplotin C exerted cytotoxic effects on human melanoma cells A375, MeWo and 501Mel with an efficacy on these cells 30 times stronger than on normal cells’ HDF. Furthermore, euplotin C down-regulated the levels of B-Raf, ERK1/2 and p-Akt, promoting apoptosis by activating the ryanodine promoter (RyR) [48], and suppressed cell migration by inhibiting the ERK and AKT pathways [49]. Therefore, the authors suggested that euplotin C could be used in the treatment of melanoma as a selective activator of RyR, thus inducing apoptosis [47]. Finally, marine derived carbohydrates have potential skin health benefits. The skin barrier function of microalgae extract was assessed in anti-melanoma in vitro and in vivo studies [50]. These carbohydrates have been previously reported in the review by Kim et al. in 2018 [51].
Compounds with activity against melanoma isolated from bacteria, fungi and microalgae reported in the current review are summarized in Table 1.

3. Marine Macro-Organisms

Marine macro-organisms are a rich and precious source of anticancer active compounds. Many have been studied in several in vivo/in vitro/ex vivo experiments providing many compounds (listed in Table 2) with great in vitro/in vivo efficacy as anti-melanoma compounds. Each of them showed particular features as discussed below.

3.1. Macroalgae

Spatane diterpenes from the marine brown alga Stoechospermum marginatum have been deeply investigated for their capability to selectively induce apoptosis in melanoma cells [53,54]. In more detail, spatane diterpenes induced apoptosis in in vitro experiments on melanoma murine cell lines [53,54] and also efficiently suppressed tumor development in vivo C57BL/6 mice engrafted with B16F10 melanoma cell line without apparent toxicity [54]. According to their findings, Spatane diterpenes stimulated the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) leading to change in the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio and disruption of the inner mitochondrial transmembrane potential, cytochrome c redistribution, and activation of the caspase-mediated apoptotic pathway [54]. Moreover, they induced cell cycle arrest in “S-phase” and also caused apoptosis by disrupting the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway [54].
Fucoidan CF isolated from the alga Chordaria flagelliformis is a compound known to have anti-melanoma activity [55]. A combination of in vivo/ex vivo/in vitro experiments on murine animal model and melanoma cell lines elucidated the mechanism of action [55]. In particular, it has been demonstrated that Fucoidan CF stimulates the innate immune system via stimulation of CD11c integrins [55]. Fucoxanthin, found in the alga Undaria pinnatifida, showed specific in vitro cytotoxicity versus melanoma MALME-3M [56]. In vivo studies and further investigations are needed to explain the mechanism of action and validate the efficacy of this peculiar alga’s fucoxanthin as a candidate for melanoma therapy. Fucoxanthin derived from another alga, Ishige okamurae, has been used to unravel the molecular mechanisms of fucoxanthin’s protection, both in in vitro melanoma cell lines (B16F10 cells) and in vivo in Balb/c mice engrafted with B16F10 cells [51]. Apoptosis and cell cycle arrest during the G0/G1 phase were induced in B16F10 cells by fucoxanthin. Bcl-xL and IAP (inhibitor of apoptosis proteins) were down-regulated leading to the activation of caspase-9, caspase-3, and PARP [51]. Intraperitoneal fucoxanthin administration in Balb/c mice implanted with B16F10 cells considerably confirmed its in vivo anti-tumor efficacy [51]. Fucoxanthin (FX) derived from ethanol extracts of the brown alga Fucus evanescens was tested on human melanoma (SKMEL-28) cell lines [57]. Its antitumor efficacy was evaluated confirming inhibition in the growth of human melanoma cells perfectly in line with the previous above-mentioned studies [57]. One of the pharmacological effects of fucoxanthin is its anti-cancer action as an anti-metastatic action [58]. The anti-metastatic action of fucoxanthin, isolated from the brown alga Saccharina japonica has been demonstrated in in vitro experiments in B16F10 melanoma cell lines [58]. This effect could be due to the reduced expression of molecules involved in migration, invasion and adhesion: CD44, CXCR4 (CXC chemokine receptor-4) and MMP9 [58]. Fucoxanthin significantly reduced cell migration and decreased tumor nodules in experimental lung metastasis in an in vivo assay [58].
Two sulfated polysaccharide fractions (L.s.-1.0 and L.s.-P), obtained from the brown seaweed Saccharina latissima, were studied for possible activity against melanoma [59]. Mice subcutaneously inoculated with B16F10 cells were treated with both L.s.-1.0 and L.s.-P fraction. Hemoglobin content, the number of tumor-associated blood vessels, and tumor growth were significantly decreased, confirming the antiangiogenic and anticancer properties of these compounds [59]. In vitro studies analyzed the ability to prevent the proliferation of tumor cells of fucose-containing sulfated polysaccharides (FCSPs) from brown macroalgae Sargassum henslowianum (FSAR) and Fucus vesiculosus (FVES) to unravel the underlying apoptosis-inducing mechanisms [49]. Both FCSPs—FSAR and FVES—decreased the proliferation of melanoma cells and promoted apoptosis by FCSP’ mediated activation of caspase-3 [49]. Ale and colleagues also tested crude fucoidan isolated from Sargassum sp. (MTA) and Fucus vesiculosus (SIG) an in vivo melanoma murine model. They demonstrated that crude fucoidan increased natural killer cell activity in mice in vivo and had bioactive effects on melanoma model cells in vitro [60]. Polysaccharide fractions (SPPs), SPP-0.3, SPP-0.5, SPP-0.7, SPP-1, and SPP-2, purified from brown alga Sargassum pallidum, have been tested for their anticancer and immune-enhancing effects [61]. Chemical composition has been characterized using infrared spectroscopy [61] determining for each fraction the ratio of total saccharides, monosaccharide composition, and sulfated contents. Anti-tumor experiments showed that all SPPs lead to cancer cell death and have high anticancer activity against B16 melanoma cell lines [61]. SPP-0.7 was the most active against B16 cells (at 25 μg/mL) and as immune-enhancing fraction, and selected for further purification, which showed that it is a homogeneous polysaccharide. Its mechanism of action was further investigated showing that it can significantly induce cell apoptosis, cytokine secretion, and cellular stress response. It increased serum cytokines interleukin-6 and interleukin-1 beta, inducible nitric oxide synthase and tumor necrosis factor-α [61].

3.2. Sponges

Monanchocidin-A is a novel compound derived from sponges closely related to Monanchora species [62]. It has been tested in vitro using the NCI-60 Human Tumor Cell Lines Screen to investigate its potential anti-cancer activity. The NCI-60 screen provided 60 cell cancer lines to evaluate the dose-response created by a particular drug, thus comparing and selecting compounds that are most selectively for cancer lines (https://dtp.cancer.gov/discovery_development/nci-60/; accessed on 14 July 2022). The melanoma cell lines used for the screening were LOX IMVI, MALME-3M, M14, MDA-MB-435, SK-MEL-2, SK-MEL-28, SK-MEL-5, UACC257, and UACC-62 [62]. This research demonstrated Monanchocidin-A anticancer potential, indicating a peculiar activity against melanoma cell lines [62]. Further investigations are needed to understand the mechanism of action of this compound in melanoma cancer cells.
The anticancer properties of bengamides, sponge-derived natural chemicals that have been identified as inhibitors of methionine aminopeptidases (MetAPs), have been extensively studied for their anticancer activity [63,64,65]. The inhibition of methionine aminopeptidases (MetAPs) leads to cell cycle arrest [66]. Starting from this evidence, Wenzel and colleagues set up a method to produce, and enhance bengamides’ characteristics from the terrestrial myxobacterium Myxococcus virescens [16]. The efficacy of derived and modified versions of bengamides was tested in a murine animal model affected by an early stage B16 melanoma [16]. The greatest safe dose antitumor activity in vivo was 60 mg/kg [16]. The anti-melanoma activity was significant, but moderate when compared with Docetaxel, used as a reference to test in vivo efficacy [16]. Despite antitumor efficacy being limited, the approach proved the benefits of combining genetic engineering and synthetic techniques for the cost-effective manufacture of optimized bengamides [16].
Jaspine-B is a pro-apoptotic compound, isolated from the marine sponge Jaspis sp. extract, identified for its ability to selectively kill in vitro experiment murine B16 and human SK-Mel28 melanoma cells [67]. The pro-apoptotic mechanism of action of Jaspine-B was exerted via inhibition of sphingomyelin synthase with disruption in ceramide metabolism that in turn leads to cell death [67]. Ascophyllan sulfated polysaccharide from brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum [68] has been found to inhibit the migration and adhesion of B16 melanoma cells by reducing the expression of N-cadherin and enhancing the expression of E-cadherin [69]. The exerted mechanism of action is due to the inhibition of the expression of matrix metalloprotease-9 (MMP9), thus affecting its secretion and the extracellular matrix environment. This peculiar activity has been proved in the in vivo murine melanoma model B16, where treated animals showed significantly reduced metastasis compared to the control group [69].
Halichondrin-B, is a potent cytotoxin isolated in the 1980s from two marine sponges: Halichondria okadai and Lissodendoryx sp. [70], with great cytotoxicity in the B-16 melanoma cancer cell line. An analogue of Halicondrin-B, eribulin mesylate, has been FDA approved (as Halaven®) in 2010 for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer who have previously received at least two chemotherapeutic regimens for the treatment of metastatic disease, and in 2016, for the treatment of inoperable liposarcoma for patients who received prior chemotherapy that contained an anthracycline drug (from https://techtransfer.cancer.gov/aboutttc/successstories/eribulin-mesylate; accessed on 3 August 2022).
Cytotoxic bioassays were performed on arenosclerins A-C and haliclona-cyclamine-E, two novel tetracyclic alkyl-piperidine alkaloids isolated from the marine sponge Arenosclera brasiliensis [71]. The above-mentioned alkaloids have been reported to have cytotoxic action against B16 melanoma cancer cell lines at doses ranging from 1.5 to 7.0 mg/mL, showing that they had significant melanoma toxic activity [71].

3.3. Mollusks, Cnidarians and Echinoderms

A group of marine compounds, belonging to the family of lamellar alkaloids, have been isolated from the mollusk Lamellaria sp. and found, for the first time, to induce cancer death [72]. Ballot et al. tested lamellarin D on HBL skin melanoma cells showing that this compound induced senescence by arresting them in the G2 phase of the cellular cycle. The growth arrest due to senescence, induced by lamellarin D, is due to its effect on DNA Topoisomerase I [73].
Holothuria parva, popularly known as the sea cucumber, is an important aquatic marine organism with a variety of active pharmacological compounds. Sea cucumber compounds have been proven to have anticancer properties via inducing the pro-apoptotic pathway [74]. One of the primary factors that contribute to drug resistance in melanoma is a deficiency in apoptosis [75]. The specific toxicity and apoptotic effect of three sea cucumber extracts at different concentrations (250, 500, and 1000 mg/mL) on skin mitochondria isolated from melanoma mice animal models were proved to both increase the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria only in the melanoma group [74]. Further investigation is needed to identify the potentially bioactive chemicals discovered in H. parva to confirm the selective pro-apoptotic melanoma effects. Sarcophine, (+)-7,8-dihydroxydeepoxysarcophine and Sarcophytolide, natural compounds derived from the Red Sea soft coral Sarcophyton glaucum, were tested for their possible inhibitory effects on the growth of murine-derived melanoma B16F10 cells [76]. Sarcophine and (+)-7,8-dihydroxydeepoxysarcophine selectively reduced melanoma cell growth after 48 h and 72 h treatment at concentrations which did not show cytotoxicity on monkey kidney CV-1 cells. The proposed mechanism of action for these compounds is the inhibition of de novo DNA synthesis and the increased PARP activity leading to cell death [76]. These features give a potential role for these compounds as melanoma anticancer drugs [76].

3.4. Tunicates

Recently, the antimicrobial peptides turgencin-A and turgencin-B, as well as their oxidized counterparts, were isolated from the Arctic maritime colonial ascidian Synoicum turgens by Hansen and colleagues [77]. Turgencin-A showed stronger cytotoxicity activity than Turgenicin-B in melanoma cell line A2058 with IC50 of 1.4 μM [77]. Cytotoxic activity was evaluated using AqueousOne cytotoxic reagent (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) [77]. Ecteinascidin-743 (ET743) is a new antitumor agent derived from Ecteinascidia turbinata, a Caribbean tunicate [78]. It exhibits strong cytotoxic and antitumor properties due to its alkylating properties [79]. Jimeno and colleagues proved in vitro the specific DNA minor groove’s guanine-specific alkylating feature of ET743 [79]. The antitumor efficacy of ET743 was then assessed in human melanoma tumor xenografts. ET743 (0.1 mg/kg) was extremely active in the chemo-sensitive melanoma MEXF 989 and tumor regression was detected in the first week after the start of treatment [80]. Palmerolide-A was identified from the tunicate Synoicum adareanum isolated from the Antarctic area. It has been shown to inhibit V-ATPase resulting in strong and specific cytotoxicity on melanoma cell line UACC-66 [81]. Many years later (2020), Murray and colleagues investigated the Synoicum adareanum microbiome composition to increase knowledge of the palmerolide-A biosynthetic pathway [82] and opened a new perspective on this precious marine natural product (MNP). Further in vivo investigations are needed to confirm Palmerolide-A as a potential candidate for melanoma treatment.
Thiaplidiaquinones A and B, marine meroterpenoid alkaloids derived by Aplidium conicum, have been investigated for their anti-tumoral properties [83] and the mechanism of cell death has been elucidated [83]. The natural products were found to be modest inducers of ROS but the dioxo-thiazine regio-isomer of thiaplidiaquinone A and a synthetic precursor of thiaplidiaquinone B were discovered to be moderately powerful inducers of ROS [83]. In addition, in vitro experiments on NCI sub-panel selectivity for melanoma cell lines demonstrated that the synthetic dioxo-thiazine regio-isomer of thiaplidiaquinone A is more effective in inhibiting melanoma cell growth compared with their natural products [83], emphasizing the crucial role that natural product total synthesis may play in new drug discovery. Compounds with anti-melanoma activity from marine macro-organisms are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2. Marine macro-organism derived compounds or extracts with activity in vitro or in vivo against melanoma. Pre-clinical studies showing marine-derived compounds with anti-melanoma activity in vitro/in vivo, mechanism of action (when known), marine organisms and experimental conditions are reported for each compound. Extract (ex); N/A (Not Available); Inhibitory concentration of 50% (IC50); growth inhibition of 50% (IG50); Lethal Concentration (LC50); Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K); Protein-kinase B (Akt); C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4); Matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9); Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP); Vacuolar-type ATPase (V-ATPase); every four days (q4d).
Table 2. Marine macro-organism derived compounds or extracts with activity in vitro or in vivo against melanoma. Pre-clinical studies showing marine-derived compounds with anti-melanoma activity in vitro/in vivo, mechanism of action (when known), marine organisms and experimental conditions are reported for each compound. Extract (ex); N/A (Not Available); Inhibitory concentration of 50% (IC50); growth inhibition of 50% (IG50); Lethal Concentration (LC50); Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K); Protein-kinase B (Akt); C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4); Matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9); Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP); Vacuolar-type ATPase (V-ATPase); every four days (q4d).
CompoundMarine OrganismIn Vitro/In VivoIC50/GI50/LC50 or Tested ConcentrationAdministrationMechanism of ActionRef.
Macroalgae
AscophyllanAscophyllum NodosumIn vivo mel animal model B1625 mg/kgIntraperitoneal
Injection
Inhibition of matrix metallo-protease-9[69]
Spatane diterpinoidsStoechospermum marginatumIn vitro on melanoma cell lines:B16F10
In vivo animal model C57BL/6 grafted with B16F10 melanoma cell line
IC50 3.95 μM
4, 10, 15 mg/Kg
In cell culture media
Intraperitoneal
injection
Apoptosis via activation of the caspase-mediated apoptotic pathway and PI3K/Akt pathway[54]
Fucoidan CFChordaria flagelliformisIn vivo/ex vivo murine model grafted with B16 melanoma cell line0.01 mg/mouseIntravenous injectionStimulation of the innate immune system via CD11c integrins[55]
Fucoxanthin containing extractsUndaria pinnatifidaMelanoma cell line Malme-3MIC50 (48 h) 27.96 ± 1.36 μM
IC50 (72 h) 17.33 ± 2.65 μM
In cell culture mediaN/A[56]
Fucoxanthin (FX)Fucus evanescensHuman melanoma SKMEL-28 cell lineIC50 114 μMIn cell culture mediaInhibition of the growth of human cell melanoma[57]
FucoxanthinIshige okamuraeB16F10 melanoma cell line30 μMIn cell culture mediaCD44,
CXCR4 and
MMP9 reduction
[58]
L.s.-1.0 fr.
(O-sulfated mannoglucuronofucans)
L.s.-P fr.
(sulfated polysaccharides)
Saccharina latissimaB6 mice inoculated with B16F10 melanoma cell line50 mg/kgIntraperitoneal injectionAnti-angiogenesis[59]
FSAR(fucoidanfr)
FVES(fucoidan fr)
Crude Fucoidan
Sargassum henslowianum
Fucusvesiculosus
B16 melanoma cell line
C57BL/6JJCL mice
0.2–0.8 mg/mL
50 mg/kg body wt
In cell culture media
In vivo injection
Apoptosis mediated by activation of caspase-3[49,60]
Polysaccharide fractions (SPPs)Sargassum pallidumB16 melanoma cell line25, 100, and 400 μg/mLIn cell culture mediaimmune stimulation[61]
Sponges
Monanchocidin-AMonanchora sp.In vitro on melanoma cell lines:
-LOX IMVI
-MALME-3M
-M14
-MDA-MB435
-SK-MEL-2
-SK-MEL-28
-SK-MEL-5
-UACC257
-UACC-62
GI50 0.022 μM
GI50 0.095 μM
GI50 0.018 μM
GI50 0.023 μM
GI50 0.13 μM
GI50 0.063 μM
GI50 0.034 μM
GI50 0.035 μM
GI50 0.024 μM
In cell culture mediaN/A[62]
BengamidesMyxococcus virescensB16 melanoma murine model60 mg/kgMice injectionInhibition of methionine amino peptidases [66][16]
Jaspine-BJaspis sp.In vitro on melanoma cell lines:
Human SK-Mel28;
Murine B16
IC50 0.5 μMIn cell culture mediaCell death via inhibition of sphingomyelin synthase[67]
Halichondrin BHalicondria okadai
Lissodendoryx sp.
In vitro on B-16 melanoma cancer cellsIC50 0.09 ng/mLIn cell culture mediaN/A[70]
Arenosclerin-A
Arenosclerin-C
Haliclonacyclamine E
Arenosclera brasiliensisIn vitro on B16 melanoma cell line1.5–7.0 mg/mLIn cell culture mediaN/A[71]
Mollusks, Cnidarians and
Ehinoderms
Lamellarin DLamellaria sp. HBL skin melanoma cells5 μMIn cell culture mediaArresting cells in the G2 phase of the cellular cycle due to its effect on DNA Topoisomerase I[73]
Metanolic, ex
Diethyl ether ex
n-hexane ex
Holothuria parvaIn vitro/Ex vivo250, 500, and 1000 μg/mLIn cell culture mediaPro-apoptotic[74]
Sarcophine
(+)-7α,8β
dihydroxydeepoxysarcophine
Sarcophyton glaucumB16F10 melanoma cell line500 μMIn cell culture mediaInhibit DNA synthesis and PARP activity[76]
Tunicates
Turgencin-ASynoicum turgensIn vitro on melanoma cell lines:
A2058
IC50 1.4 μMIn cell culture mediaN/A[77]
Ecteinascidin-74Ecteinascidia turbinataEx vivoq4d x 3—0.2, 0.1, 0.05 mg/kgIntravenousDouble-strand breaks (DBSs)
[84,85]
[80]
Palmerolide-ASynoicum adareanumIn vitro on melanoma cell line:
UACC-66
LC50 0.018 μMIn cell culture mediaInhibition of V-ATPase[81]
Thiaplidiaquinones A and BAplidium conicumIn Vitro on NCI panel10 μMIn cell culture mediaPro-apoptosis[83]

4. Prevention of Damage Induced by UV Solar Radiation

Inflammation induced by UVB rays and the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) are involved in the development of melanoma; in fact, UV radiation is an environmental carcinogen that in high doses can cause damage to the skin and induce cancer [5] (Figure 2). UVB increases the cutaneous activity of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), the first enzyme in the polyamine biosynthesis pathway. This may cause excessive proliferation and clonal expansion of the cells initiated, leading to tumorigenesis [86,87].
Marine organisms have developed a wide variety of adaptive strategies to obviate the effects of UV radiation and the best known photoprotective response is the production or accumulation of compounds that absorb UV. Among these compounds are myco-sporine-like amino acids (MAA), scytonemin, 3-hydroxyquinurenine, melanin, various secondary metabolites and fluorescent pigments [83,84,85]. The MAAs are commonly known as ‘‘microbial sunscreens’’ [88,89]. MAAs have the ability to absorb light between 309 and 362 nm by dissipating radiation in the form of heat without producing reactive oxygen species (ROS) [90]. MAAs have been found in a large variety of marine organisms, including bacteria, cyanobacteria [91,92], fungi [93] and microalgae [94].The MAA content varies seasonally, peaking in the summer, in the various organisms [95]. They have many advantages, as they protect cells from mutations caused by UVR rays and free radicals and are effective antioxidant molecules [92]. Thanks to their multiple roles, MAAs are well regarded for applications in the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries as natural sunscreens, cell proliferation activators, anticancer agents, anti-photoaging molecules and skin renewal stimulators [96]. An example of a product containing MAA and marketed as Helioguard® 365 sunscreen, is porphyra-334 from the red alga Porphyra umbilicalis associated with shinorine, which has protective properties against the loss of cellular vitality and DNA damage induced by UVA rays [97,98]. Helionori® sunscreen is another product containing MAAs, palitin, porphyria-334 (Figure 3) and shinorine as active ingredients, extracted from Porphyra umbilicalis, which protects from UV-A rays, preserving the membrane lipids of keratinocytes and fibroblasts, in addition to DNA protection [98,99].
Scytonemin is a pigment produced mainly by cyanobacteria [101,102]; thanks to its multiple roles as UV sunscreen and antioxidant with strong radical scavenging activity, it is a very interesting natural product for the formulation of sunscreens destined for the market [103,104]. It also exhibits antiproliferative and anti-inflammatory activities in human fibroblasts and endothelial cells [101,105,106]. Scytonemin inhibits a serine/threonine kinase, named Polo-like Kinase 1, which plays a key role in regulating the G2/M transition in the cell cycle [106]. Carotenoids are also excellent allies for the prevention of diseases due to UV solar radiation and have applications in the healthcare and nutraceutical industry, for skin protection, anti-aging and as sunscreens, as they are powerful antioxidants and scavenging agents [107,108,109]. Microalgae are known as a valuable source of carotenoids [110]. An example of the most innovative skin care products from microalgae is Dermochlorella® by CODIF Recherche et Nature (Brittany, France), an extract from the green microalgae Chlorella vulgaris containing oligopeptides that increase skin firmness and tone (http://www.codif-tn.com/en?s=dermochlorella; accessed on 11 July 2022) [109].
Among the various pigments currently used in cosmetics produced by marine organisms, such as macro and microalgae, there is fucoxanthin (FX) which is able to counteract the oxidative stress caused by UVR [87,98,111,112,113]. Its photoprotective action is more effective when it is used in topical preparation [87]. For example, UV solar radiation exposure can cause hyper-pigmentary disturbances (HD). A common example of HD are freckles, which are real skin lesions and indicators of risk for skin cancer (melanoma and non-melanoma). HDs are the consequence of increased production of pro-melanogenic factors and altered expression or activity of melanocyte receptors [87,114]. There are many studies showing that FX is an excellent candidate for the treatment and prevention of HDs. In guinea pigs irradiated for 14 days with incremental UVB doses, FX applied after UVB irradiation in form of food (10 mg/kg) or ointment (50 µL of white petrolatum containing 0.01–1% of FX) blocked cellular melanogenesis for six to ten days after the last irradiation session [115]. Another work showed that the application of a 0.5% FX Vaseline-based cream on day five after four days of UVB chronic irradiation (1 h per day, 2.7 J/cm2) on female ddY strain mice efficiently cured the sunburn [116]. A 2020 study showed that FX enhanced the antioxidant properties of a standard sunscreen containing avobenzone and ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate in a reconstructed skin model [117].
α-tocopherol is the most biologically active form of vitamin E, found in the thylakoid membranes of photosynthetic organisms, where it counteracts the effects of ROS by removing oxidized substrates or by blocking the lipid peroxidation chains initiated by ROS [118]. α-tocopherol has been shown to reduce inflammation and act as an antioxidant by reducing UV and ROS-induced damage in human and mouse skin cells [119,120,121,122,123]. α-tocopherol is produced by many marine organisms: it has been found in the microalga Dunaliella salina (where it represented 37.5–46.9 mg/100 g dry weight) [124], in Chondrus yendoi (9.34 mg/100 g), Sargasso fusiforme (3.56 mg/100g) and Sargassum horneri (3.65 mg/100 g) [125].
The application of marine natural products has been shown to be effective in reducing inflammation and oxidative stress [120]. For example, natural products such as 5β-scymnol and CO(2)-supercritical fluid extract (CO(2)-SFE) of mussel oil contain antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties and they can help reduce the harmful effects of UV solar radiation [126]. In fact, a study was conducted to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effect of these compounds on normal cells derived from human epidermal melanocytes (HEM) in relation to α-tocopherol. HEM cells were irradiated with UVB and treated with IL-1 alpha. When α-tocopherol, CO(2)-SFE mussel oil, and 5β-scymnol were added, TNF-α levels decreased, respectively, by 53%, 65% and 76%, which was not observed in malignant melanoma cells MM96L. The pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α has been shown to be involved in the progression of melanoma through the inhibition of apoptosis [127,128]. Therefore, these compounds can be used in the prevention of inflammation-induced damage of normal melanocytes. Both UVA and UVB can trigger oxidative responses that may persist after the end of exposure to UV radiation sources [129]. DNA oxidative damage caused by melanin sensibility to UVA radiation is involved in melanogenesis [130] (Figure 4). UV radiation is known to trigger multiple signaling cascades such as mitogen-activated protein kinase P38 (MAPK), terminal kinase c-Jun (JNK), extracellular kinase regulated by signal 1/2 (ERK1/2) and nuclear factor pathways κB (NFκB) in the skin cells [126,131,132,133]. A strategy to mediate the effects of UV radiation on the skin can act on these pathways. As reported by Sample and He [134], research studies have shown that sunscreen is often ineffective at reducing melanoma risk; hence, melanoma prevention can be improved by further research and trials of sunscreen products, as well as optimization of their design.

5. Discussion

Malignant melanoma is among the most dangerous tumors due to its high probability of metastasizing and its increasing incidence year after year [136]. Currently, 75% of skin cancer deaths are due to melanoma [137]. There are three types of skin tumors: Melanoma, Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) and Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC). BCC and SCC are not fatal and can be treated surgically. Melanoma skin cancer develops when the melanocytes (cells that normally make melanin pigment) start to grow out of control. Melanomas are fatal and the victims are eight times greater in number than those with non-melanoma skin cancers, because it is much more likely to spread to other parts of the body if not treated early. Melanomas are etiologically divided into melanomas related to sun exposure and those which are not, but also based on their mutational signatures, anatomic site, and epidemiology [138]. Bobos, in a review of 2021, gives an overview of the latest news concerning the histopathologic classification of various types of skin cancer [139]. What is similar between the various types of melanoma is the final stage of development which consists in the formation of local and/or distant metastases [139].
Understanding more deeply the molecular mechanism of action that leads to the onset of melanoma may allow the identification of possible molecular targets. There are already eight molecular subtypes of melanoma identified [140], thanks to the study of the different types of molecular anomalies. Knowing the molecular mechanism underlying the onset of melanoma can also make it easier to identify and discriminate the natural substances that can act in a specific way on these molecular targets, which implies the possibility of developing targeted therapies.
Prolonged and incorrect exposure to UV rays is one of the main causes of the onset of melanoma. Sun exposure without sunscreen, sun exposure in the hottest hours, sunburn and underestimating the harmfulness of UV rays, even when it is cloudy, are behaviors that can lead to an increased risk of skin cancer. Not everyone is genetically predisposed to tan; this is due to the presence of two different types of melanin which are expressed with varying percentages in each individual [141]. A darker complexion is characterized by increased production of the eumelanin pigment (brown/black) which gives a brown color and protects against UV damage [141]. A fair complexion is determined by the increased production of the pheomelanin pigment (red/yellow) which is responsible for the redness of the skin and does not protect from UV rays [141]. For this reason, individuals with fair complexions are more prone to skin cancers than individuals with a dark complexion, but this does not exclude that latter, who are not immune from damages caused by UV rays. In some countries, there is a misconception that more tanned or colored skin is a sign of good health and beauty [142]. It is therefore essential also to focus on the production of creams with specific SPFs for each skin type, suitable for skin protection and the prevention of skin tumors.
Melanoma has also been found in marine species. For instance, Sweet and co-workers [143] found melanosis and melanoma in wild populations of the coral trout Plectropomus leopardus, which is a commercially important marine fish. The presence of melanoma not only in humans suggests new potential market sectors for compounds with anti-melanoma activity, not only for human application but also, for instance, for the aquaculture sector.
Marine organisms are a rich source of bioactive compounds that have been shown to exert various bioactivities, including anticancer, anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties. To date, there are 14 marine derived drugs on the market, and several in clinical trials I, II and III, having great potential to increase the number of natural marine products in clinical use [136]. Among these, Marizomib (Salinosporamide A; NPI-0052) is currently in clinical trial III for melanoma treatment. It is a beta-lactone-gamma lactam, first isolated from a marine bacterium of the genus Salinospora [144] (https://www.midwestern.edu/departments/marinepharmacology/clinical-pipeline; accessed on 13 July 2022). The molecular target of Salinosporamide A (Figure 4) is 20S proteasome. Millward et al. [145] tested Marizomib, with or without combination with vorinostat on low metastatic cell lines (including SB2, DM4 and TXM13), intermediate metastatic cell lines (including Mel526, Me1624, Me1888, Me1938 and MeWo) and highly metastatic cell lines (including WM2664, WM293, WM793, WM35, A375SM, A375 and C8161). They observed that the combination Marizomib and vorinostat had the strongest activity on highly metastatic melanoma cell lines. In the current review, we report compounds deriving from marine micro- and macro-organisms with activity on melanoma cells. The most active, considering the lowest active concentrations, are Actinofuranone C from AKA32 strain of actinomycetes Nonomuraea sp. with an IC50 of 1.2 μM and Monanchocidin-A, isolated from the sponge Monanchora sp. with activity on M14 melanoma cell line with GI50 of 0.018 μM.
Considering the increasing market demand for new drugs against drug-resistant pathologies, and the search for compounds with reduced side effects, the attention of researchers is increasingly focused on natural substances and/or modification/conjugation of natural lead compounds in order to direct specific cell lines and cellular targets. According to the database MarinLit (https://marinlit.rsc.org/; accessed on 3 August 2022), which is specifically dedicated to marine natural products research, there are actually 38,990 marine compounds and about 38,713 published articles. According to the World Register of Marine Species (WORMS; https://www.marinespcies.org/news.php?p=show&id=4099, accessed on 3 August 2022), currently 228,450 species are known and every day new species are discovered and described. In addition to great biodiversity in terms of species, the oceans are characterized by huge chemical diversity and it was shown that approximately 70% of structural scaffolds identified at sea are only found in marine organisms, without any terrestrial counterpart [146,147]. Extreme environments, such as deep and cold, are less explored compared to more accessible sites and worth further investigation for new species and chemicals [148]. Marine microorganisms, being easy to handle, are considered an eco-sustainable and eco-friendly source of bioactive compounds for marine biotechnology [149]. In fact, almost 60% of new marine natural products today derive from microorganisms [2,150]. Marine microorganisms have also attracted great attention because they have developed metabolic and physiological capacities that guarantee their survival in extreme habitats and offer the potential to produce compounds with possible pharmacological activity [151,152]. In addition, for cultivable microorganisms, such as fungi, bacteria and microalgae, there also is the possibility of inducing the production of bioactive compounds by applying stressful exposure, such as changing culturing parameters (light, nutrient, temperature and others). This approach, known as “one strain–many compounds” or OSMAC, allows easier identification of new bioactive molecules [153]. For this reason, strategies to increase the probability of discovering new bioactive compounds, consist in searching less explored places [154,155,156], such as deep and cold waters, or focusing on cultivable species and inducing the production of other metabolites. Overall, the data reported in this review show that marine organisms may produce various chemical structures with activities against different melanoma cell lines, but also in in vivo models. The molecular mechanisms activated can be variable, ranging from immune-activation to apoptosis induction. In addition, for several compounds the mechanism of action is not completely clarified yet and, hence, are worth additional investigation in order to proceed with clinical trials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.L.; writing—original draft preparation, E.M., A.C. and C.L.; writing—review and editing, E.M., A.C. and C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the project “Antitumor Drugs and Vaccines from the Sea (ADViSE)” (CUP B43D18000240007–SURF 17061BP000000011; PG/2018/0494374) funded by POR Campania FESR 2014–2020 “Technology Platform for Therapeutic Strategies against Cancer”, Actions 1.1.2 and 1.2.2.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Servier Medical Art (SMART) website (https://smart.servier.com/; accessed on 5 May 2022) by Servier and the Integration and Application Network (ian.umces.edu/media-library; accessed on the 6 July 2022) for elements in the graphical abstract and Figure 2. Chemical structures in the graphical abstract are from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/11347535#section=2D-Structure&fullscreen=true and https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Porphyra-334#section=2D-Structure&fullscreen=true. Anita Capalbo was supported by a research grant within the project “Antitumor Drugs and Vaccines from the Sea (ADViSE)” (CUP B43D18000240007–SURF 17061BP000000011; P.G./2018/0494374) funded by POR Campania FESR 2014–2020 “Technology Platform for Therapeutic Strategies against Cancer”-Actions 1.1.2 and 1.2.2.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schneider, S.H.; Mastrandrea, M.D. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Climate and Weather, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2011; ISBN 978-0-19-976532-4. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rastrelli, M.; Tropea, S.; Rossi, C.R.; Alaibac, M. Melanoma: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Classification. In Vivo 2014, 28, 1005–1011. [Google Scholar]
  3. Islami, F.; Sauer, A.G.; Miller, K.D.; Fedewa, S.A.; Minihan, A.K.; Geller, A.C.; Lichtenfeld, J.L.; Jemal, A. Cutaneous Melanomas Attributable to Ultraviolet Radiation Exposure by State. Int. J. Cancer 2020, 147, 1385–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Landi, M.T.; Bishop, D.T.; MacGregor, S.; Machiela, M.J.; Stratigos, A.J.; Ghiorzo, P.; Brossard, M.; Calista, D.; Choi, J.; Fargnoli, M.C.; et al. Genome-Wide Association Meta-Analyses Combining Multiple Risk Phenotypes Provide Insights into the Genetic Architecture of Cutaneous Melanoma Susceptibility. Nat. Genet. 2020, 52, 494–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Elder, D.E.; Bastian, B.C.; Cree, I.A.; Massi, D.; Scolyer, R.A. The 2018 World Health Organization Classification of Cutaneous, Mucosal, and Uveal Melanoma: Detailed Analysis of 9 Distinct Subtypes Defined by Their Evolutionary Pathway. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2020, 144, 500–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Organisation Mondiale de la Santé; Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer (Eds.) World health organization classification of tumours. In WHO Classification of Skin Tumours, 4th ed.; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2018; ISBN 978-92-832-2440-2. [Google Scholar]
  7. Duncan, L.M. The Classification of Cutaneous Melanoma. Hematol./Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 2009, 23, 501–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. The International Agency for Research on Cancer Working Group on Artificial Ultraviolet (UV) Light and Skin Cancer. The Association of Use of Sunbeds with Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma and Other Skin Cancers: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Cancer 2006, 120, 1116–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Stern, R.S. The Risk of Melanoma in Association with Long-Term Exposure to PUVA. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2001, 44, 755–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Apalla, Z.; Lallas, A.; Sotiriou, E.; Lazaridou, E.; Ioannides, D. Epidemiological Trends in Skin Cancer. Dermatol. Pract. Concept. 2017, 7, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Elwood, J.M.; Jopson, J. Melanoma and Sun Exposure: An Overview of Published Studies. Int. J. Cancer 1997, 73, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yang, T.; Yamada, K.; Zhou, T.; Harunari, E.; Igarashi, Y.; Terahara, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Imada, C. Akazamicin, a Cytotoxic Aromatic Polyketide from Marine-Derived Nonomuraea sp. J. Antibiot. 2019, 72, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Schneider, Y.K.-H.; Hansen, K.Ø.; Isaksson, J.; Ullsten, S.; Hansen, E.H.; Hammer Andersen, J. Anti-Bacterial Effect and Cytotoxicity Assessment of Lipid 430 Isolated from Algibacter sp. Molecules 2019, 24, 3991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Harinantenaina Rakotondraibe, L.; Rasolomampianina, R.; Park, H.-Y.; Li, J.; Slebodnik, C.; Brodie, P.J.; Blasiak, L.C.; Hill, R.; TenDyke, K.; Shen, Y.; et al. Antiproliferative and Antiplasmodial Compounds from Selected Streptomyces Species. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 5646–5649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Weissman, K.J.; Müller, R. A Brief Tour of Myxobacterial Secondary Metabolism. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 2121–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wenzel, S.C.; Hoffmann, H.; Zhang, J.; Debussche, L.; Haag-Richter, S.; Kurz, M.; Nardi, F.; Lukat, P.; Kochems, I.; Tietgen, H.; et al. Production of the Bengamide Class of Marine Natural Products in Myxobacteria: Biosynthesis and Structure–Activity Relationships. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 15560–15564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dávila-Céspedes, A.; Hufendiek, P.; Crüsemann, M.; Schäberle, T.F.; König, G.M. Marine-Derived Myxobacteria of the Suborder Nannocystineae: An Underexplored Source of Structurally Intriguing and Biologically Active Metabolites. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2016, 12, 969–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tomura, T.; Nagashima, S.; Yamazaki, S.; Iizuka, T.; Fudou, R.; Ojika, M. An Unusual Diterpene—Enhygromic Acid and Deoxyenhygrolides from a Marine Myxobacterium, Enhygromyxa sp. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Patil, S.; Paradeshi, J.; Chaudhari, B. Anti-Melanoma and UV-B Protective Effect of Microbial Pigment Produced by Marine Pseudomonas aeruginosa GS-33. Nat. Prod. Res. 2016, 30, 2835–2839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Tabassum, S.; Khan, R.A.; Arjmand, F.; Sen, S.; Kayal, J.; Juvekar, A.S.; Zingde, S.M. Synthesis and Characterization of Glycoconjugate Tin(IV) Complexes: In Vitro DNA Binding Studies, Cytotoxicity, and Cell Death. J. Organomet. Chem. 2011, 696, 1600–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kristoffersen, V.; Jenssen, M.; Jawad, H.R.; Isaksson, J.; Hansen, E.H.; Rämä, T.; Hansen, K.Ø.; Andersen, J.H. Two Novel Lyso-Ornithine Lipids Isolated from an Arctic Marine Lacinutrix sp. Bacterium. Molecules 2021, 26, 5295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, G.; Liu, S.; Liu, Y.; Wang, F.; Ren, J.; Gu, J.; Zhou, K.; Shan, B. A Novel Cyclic Pentapeptide, H-10, Inhibits B16 Cancer Cell Growth and Induces Cell Apoptosis. Oncol. Lett. 2014, 8, 248–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liu, Q.-Y.; Zhou, T.; Zhao, Y.-Y.; Chen, L.; Gong, M.-W.; Xia, Q.-W.; Ying, M.-G.; Zheng, Q.-H.; Zhang, Q.-Q. Antitumor Effects and Related Mechanisms of Penicitrinine A, a Novel Alkaloid with a Unique Spiro Skeleton from the Marine Fungus Penicillium citrinum. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 4733–4753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jenssen, M.; Kristoffersen, V.; Motiram-Corral, K.; Isaksson, J.; Rämä, T.; Andersen, J.H.; Hansen, E.H.; Hansen, K.Ø. Chlovalicin B, a Chlorinated Sesquiterpene Isolated from the Marine Mushroom Digitatispora marina. Molecules 2021, 26, 7560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, Y.; Sheikh, M.S. Melanoma: Molecular Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Management. Mol. Cell. Pharmacol. 2014, 6, 228. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Jenssen, M.; Rainsford, P.; Juskewitz, E.; Andersen, J.H.; Hansen, E.H.; Isaksson, J.; Rämä, T.; Hansen, K.Ø. Lulworthinone, a New Dimeric Naphthopyrone From a Marine Fungus in the Family Lulworthiaceae with Antibacterial Activity against Clinical Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 730740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fan, B.; Dewapriya, P.; Li, F.; Blümel, M.; Tasdemir, D. Pyrenosetins A–C, New Decalinoylspirotetramic Acid Derivatives Isolated by Bioactivity-Based Molecular Networking from the Seaweed-Derived Fungus Pyrenochaetopsis sp. FVE-001. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Li, G.; Kusari, S.; Spiteller, M. Natural Products Containing ‘Decalin’ Motif in Microorganisms. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31, 1175–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Jabeen, A.; Reeder, B.; Hisaindee, S.; Ashraf, S.; Darmaki, N.A.; Battah, S.; Al-Zuhair, S. Effect of Enzymatic Pre-Treatment of Microalgae Extracts on Their Anti-Tumor Activity. Biomed. J. 2017, 40, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lauritano, C.; Andersen, J.H.; Hansen, E.; Albrigtsen, M.; Escalera, L.; Esposito, F.; Helland, K.; Hanssen, K.Ø.; Romano, G.; Ianora, A. Bioactivity Screening of Microalgae for Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, Anticancer, Anti-Diabetes, and Antibacterial Activities. Front. Mar. Sci. 2016, 3, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Riccio, G.; Martinez, K.A.; Ianora, A.; Lauritano, C. De Novo Transcriptome of the Flagellate Isochrysis galbana Identifies Genes Involved in the Metabolism of Antiproliferative Metabolites. Biology 2022, 11, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Martínez, K.A.; Saide, A.; Crespo, G.; Martín, J.; Romano, G.; Reyes, F.; Lauritano, C.; Ianora, A. Promising Antiproliferative Compound from the Green Microalga Dunaliella tertiolecta against Human Cancer Cells. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 778108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lauritano, C.; Helland, K.; Riccio, G.; Andersen, J.H.; Ianora, A.; Hansen, E.H. Lysophosphatidylcholines and Chlorophyll-Derived Molecules from the Diatom Cylindrotheca closterium with Anti-Inflammatory Activity. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Pohl, C.; Kock, J. Oxidized Fatty Acids as Inter-Kingdom Signaling Molecules. Molecules 2014, 19, 1273–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kobayashi, J.; Kubota, T. Bioactive Metabolites from Marine Dinoflagellates. In Comprehensive Natural Products II; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 263–325. ISBN 978-0-08-045382-8. [Google Scholar]
  36. Martínez, K.A.; Lauritano, C.; Druka, D.; Romano, G.; Grohmann, T.; Jaspars, M.; Martín, J.; Díaz, C.; Cautain, B.; de la Cruz, M.; et al. Amphidinol 22, a New Cytotoxic and Antifungal Amphidinol from the Dinoflagellate Amphidinium carterae. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kobayashi, J.; Shigemori, H.; Ishibashi, M.; Yamasu, T.; Hirota, H.; Sasaki, T. Amphidinolides G and H: New Potent Cytotoxic Macrolides from the Cultured Symbiotic Dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 5221–5224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nuzzo, G.; Gomes, B.; Gallo, C.; Amodeo, P.; Sansone, C.; Pessoa, O.; Manzo, E.; Vitale, R.; Ianora, A.; Santos, E.; et al. Potent Cytotoxic Analogs of Amphidinolides from the Atlantic Octocoral Stragulum bicolor. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kobayashi, J.; Ishibashi, M. Bioactive Metabolites of Symbiotic Marine Microorganisms. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 1753–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ávila-Román, J.; García-Gil, S.; Rodríguez-Luna, A.; Motilva, V.; Talero, E. Anti-Inflammatory and Anticancer Effects of Microalgal Carotenoids. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kobayashi, J.; Tsuda, M. Amphidinolides, Bioactive Macrolides from Symbiotic Marine Dinoflagellates. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2004, 21, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Sushytskyi, L.; Lukáč, P.; Synytsya, A.; Bleha, R.; Rajsiglová, L.; Capek, P.; Pohl, R.; Vannucci, L.; Čopíková, J.; Kaštánek, P. Immunoactive Polysaccharides Produced by Heterotrophic Mutant of Green Microalga Parachlorella kessleri HY1 (Chlorellaceae). Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 246, 116588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bergé, J.P.; Debiton, E.; Dumay, J.; Durand, P.; Barthomeuf, C. In Vitro Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Proliferative Activity of Sulfolipids from the Red Alga Porphyridium cruentum. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 6227–6232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Carpi, S.; Polini, B.; Poli, G.; Alcantara Barata, G.; Fogli, S.; Romanini, A.; Tuccinardi, T.; Guella, G.; Frontini, F.; Nieri, P.; et al. Anticancer Activity of Euplotin C, Isolated from the Marine Ciliate Euplotes crassus, against Human Melanoma Cells. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Steelman, L.S.; Chappell, W.H.; Abrams, S.L.; Kempf, C.R.; Long, J.; Laidler, P.; Mijatovic, S.; Maksimovic-Ivanic, D.; Stivala, F.; Mazzarino, M.C.; et al. Roles of the Raf/MEK/ERK and PI3K/PTEN/Akt/MTOR Pathways in Controlling Growth and Sensitivity to Therapy-Implications for Cancer and Aging. Aging 2011, 3, 192–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yajima, I.; Kumasaka, M.Y.; Thang, N.D.; Goto, Y.; Takeda, K.; Yamanoshita, O.; Iida, M.; Ohgami, N.; Tamura, H.; Kawamoto, Y.; et al. RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/PTEN/AKT Signaling in Malignant Melanoma Progression and Therapy. Dermatol. Res. Pract. 2012, 2012, 354191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Carpi, S.; Kawahigashi, Y.; Longo, R.; Weiner, M. From Vertex Operator Algebras to Conformal Nets and Back. Mem. AMS 2018, 254, 1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cervia, D.; Martini, D.; Garcia-Gil, M.; Di Giuseppe, G.; Guella, G.; Dini, F.; Bagnoli, P. Cytotoxic Effects and Apoptotic Signalling Mechanisms of the Sesquiterpenoid Euplotin C, a Secondary Metabolite of the Marine Ciliate Euplotes crassus, in Tumour Cells. Apoptosis 2006, 11, 829–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ale, M.T.; Maruyama, H.; Tamauchi, H.; Mikkelsen, J.D.; Meyer, A.S. Fucose-Containing Sulfated Polysaccharides from Brown Seaweeds Inhibit Proliferation of Melanoma Cells and Induce Apoptosis by Activation of Caspase-3 In Vitro. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 2605–2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Grether-Beck, S.; Mühlberg, K.; Brenden, H.; Felsner, I.; Brynjólfsdóttir, Á.; Einarsson, S.; Krutmann, J. Bioactive Molecules from the Blue Lagoon: In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment of Silica Mud and Microalgae Extracts for Their Effects on Skin Barrier Function and Prevention of Skin Ageing. Exp. Dermatol. 2008, 17, 771–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kim, K.-N.; Ahn, G.; Heo, S.-J.; Kang, S.-M.; Kang, M.-C.; Yang, H.-M.; Kim, D.; Roh, S.W.; Kim, S.-K.; Jeon, B.-T.; et al. Inhibition of Tumor Growth In Vitro and In Vivo by Fucoxanthin against Melanoma B16F10 Cells. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2013, 35, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ávila-Román, J.; Talero, E.; de Los Reyes, C.; Zubía, E.; Motilva, V.; García-Mauriño, S. Cytotoxic Activity of Microalgal-Derived Oxylipins against Human Cancer Cell Lines and Their Impact on ATP Levels. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2016, 11, 1871–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Chinnababu, B.; Purushotham Reddy, S.; Sankara Rao, P.; Loka Reddy, V.; Sudheer Kumar, B.; Rao, J.V.; Prakasham, R.S.; Suresh Babu, K. Isolation, Semi-Synthesis and Bio-Evaluation of Spatane Derivatives from the Brown Algae Stoechospermum marginatum. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 2479–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Velatooru, L.R.; Baggu, C.B.; Janapala, V.R. Spatane Diterpinoid from the Brown Algae, Stoechospermum marginatum Induces Apoptosis via ROS Induced Mitochondrial Mediated Caspase Dependent Pathway in Murine B16F10 Melanoma Cells: Spatane diterpinoid induces apoptosis. Mol. Carcinog. 2016, 55, 2222–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Anisimova, N.Y.; Ustyuzhanina, N.E.; Donenko, F.V.; Bilan, M.I.; Ushakova, N.A.; Usov, A.I.; Nifantiev, N.E.; Kiselevskiy, M.V. Influence of Fucoidans and Their Derivatives on Antitumor and Phagocytic Activity of Human Blood Leucocytes. Biochem. Mosc. 2015, 80, 925–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, S.; Li, Y.; White, W.; Lu, J. Extracts from New Zealand Undaria pinnatifida Containing Fucoxanthin as Potential Functional Biomaterials against Cancer In Vitro. J. Funct. Biomater. 2014, 5, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Imbs, T.I.; Ermakova, S.P.; Fedoreyev, S.A.; Anastyuk, S.D.; Zvyagintseva, T.N. Isolation of Fucoxanthin and Highly Unsaturated Monogalactosyldiacylglycerol from Brown Alga Fucus evanescens C Agardh and In Vitro Investigation of Their Antitumor Activity. Mar. Biotechnol. 2013, 15, 606–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Chung, T.-W.; Choi, H.-J.; Lee, J.-Y.; Jeong, H.-S.; Kim, C.-H.; Joo, M.; Choi, J.-Y.; Han, C.-W.; Kim, S.-Y.; Choi, J.-S.; et al. Marine Algal Fucoxanthin Inhibits the Metastatic Potential of Cancer Cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 439, 580–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Croci, D.O.; Cumashi, A.; Ushakova, N.A.; Preobrazhenskaya, M.E.; Piccoli, A.; Totani, L.; Ustyuzhanina, N.E.; Bilan, M.I.; Usov, A.I.; Grachev, A.A.; et al. Fucans, but Not Fucomannoglucuronans, Determine the Biological Activities of Sulfated Polysaccharides from Laminaria saccharina Brown Seaweed. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ale, M.T.; Maruyama, H.; Tamauchi, H.; Mikkelsen, J.D.; Meyer, A.S. Fucoidan from Sargassum sp. and Fucus vesiculosus Reduces Cell Viability of Lung Carcinoma and Melanoma Cells In Vitro and Activates Natural Killer Cells in Mice In Vivo. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2011, 49, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gao, Y.; Li, Y.; Niu, Y.; Ju, H.; Chen, R.; Li, B.; Song, X.; Song, L. Chemical Characterization, Antitumor, and Immune-Enhancing Activities of Polysaccharide from Sargassum pallidum. Molecules 2021, 26, 7559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Gogineni, V.; Oh, J.; Waters, A.L.; Kelly, M.; Stone, R.; Hamann, M.T. Monanchocidin A from Subarctic Sponges of the Genus Monanchora and Their Promising Selectivity against Melanoma in Vitro. Front. Mar. Sci. 2020, 7, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs over the 30 Years from 1981 to 2010. J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 311–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Bauer, A.; Brönstrup, M. Industrial Natural Product Chemistry for Drug Discovery and Development. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31, 35–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Butler, M.S.; Robertson, A.A.B.; Cooper, M.A. Natural Product and Natural Product Derived Drugs in Clinical Trials. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31, 1612–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Towbin, H.; Bair, K.W.; DeCaprio, J.A.; Eck, M.J.; Kim, S.; Kinder, F.R.; Morollo, A.; Mueller, D.R.; Schindler, P.; Song, H.K.; et al. Proteomics-Based Target Identification. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 52964–52971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Salma, Y.; Lafont, E.; Therville, N.; Carpentier, S.; Bonnafé, M.-J.; Levade, T.; Génisson, Y.; Andrieu-Abadie, N. The Natural Marine Anhydrophytosphingosine, Jaspine B, Induces Apoptosis in Melanoma Cells by Interfering with Ceramide Metabolism. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2009, 78, 477–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Jiang, Z.; Okimura, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Oda, T. The Potent Activity of Sulfated Polysaccharide, Ascophyllan, Isolated from Ascophyllum nodosum to Induce Nitric Oxide and Cytokine Production from Mouse Macrophage RAW264.7 Cells: Comparison between Ascophyllan and Fucoidan. Nitric Oxide 2011, 25, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Abu, R.; Jiang, Z.; Ueno, M.; Isaka, S.; Nakazono, S.; Okimura, T.; Cho, K.; Yamaguchi, K.; Kim, D.; Oda, T. Anti-Metastatic Effects of the Sulfated Polysaccharide Ascophyllan Isolated from Ascophyllum nodosum on B16 Melanoma. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 458, 727–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hirata, Y.; Uemura, D. Halichondrins—Antitumor Polyether Macrolides from a Marine Sponge. Pure Appl. Chem. 1986, 58, 701–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Torres, Y.R.; Berlinck, R.G.S.; Nascimento, G.G.F.; Fortier, S.C.; Pessoa, C.; de Moraes, M.O. Antibacterial Activity against Resistant Bacteria and Cytotoxicity of Four Alkaloid Toxins Isolated from the Marine Sponge Arenosclera brasiliensis. Toxicon 2002, 40, 885–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Andersen, R.J.; Faulkner, D.J.; He, C.H.; Van Duyne, G.D.; Clardy, J. Metabolites of the Marine Prosobranch Mollusk Lamellaria sp. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 5492–5495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ballot, C.; Martoriati, A.; Jendoubi, M.; Buche, S.; Formstecher, P.; Mortier, L.; Kluza, J.; Marchetti, P. Another Facet to the Anticancer Response to Lamellarin D: Induction of Cellular Senescence through Inhibition of Topoisomerase I and Intracellular Ros Production. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 779–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Arast, Y.; Seyed Razi, N.; Nazemi, M.; Seydi, E.; Pourahmad, J. Non-Polar Compounds of Persian Gulf Sea Cucumber Holothuria parva Selectively Induce Toxicity on Skin Mitochondria Isolated from Animal Model of Melanoma. Cutan. Ocul. Toxicol. 2018, 37, 218–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Grossman, D.; Altieri, D.C. Drug Resistance in Melanoma: Mechanisms, Apoptosis, and New Potential Therapeutic Targets. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2001, 20, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Szymanski, P.T.; Ahmed, S.A.; Radwan, M.M.; Khalifa, S.I.; Fahmy, H. Evaluation of the Anti-Melanoma Activities of Sarcophine, (+)-7α,8β-Dihydroxydeepoxysarcophine and Sarcophytolide from the Red Sea Soft Coral Sarcophyton glaucum. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2014, 9, 1934578X1400900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hansen, I.K.Ø.; Isaksson, J.; Poth, A.G.; Hansen, K.Ø.; Andersen, A.J.C.; Richard, C.S.M.; Blencke, H.-M.; Stensvåg, K.; Craik, D.J.; Haug, T. Isolation and Characterization of Antimicrobial Peptides with Unusual Disulfide Connectivity from the Colonial Ascidian Synoicum turgens. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Rinehart, K.L.; Holt, T.G.; Fregeau, N.L.; Stroh, J.G.; Keifer, P.A.; Sun, F.; Li, L.H.; Martin, D.G. Ecteinascidins 729, 743, 745, 759A, 759B, and 770: Potent Antitumor Agents from the Caribbean Tunicate Ecteinascidia turbinata. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 4512–4515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jimeno, J.; Faircloth, G.; Sousa-Faro, J.M.F.; Scheuer, P.; Rinehart, K. New Marine Derived Anticancer Therapeutics—A Journey from the Sea to Clinical Trials. Mar. Drugs 2004, 2, 14–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hendriks, H.R.; Fiebig, H.H.; Giavazzi, R.; Langdon, S.P.; Jimeno, J.M.; Faircloth, G.T. High Antitumour Activity of ET743 against Human Tumour Xenografts from Melanoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung and Ovarian Cancer. Ann. Oncol. 1999, 10, 1233–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Diyabalanage, T.; Amsler, C.D.; McClintock, J.B.; Baker, B.J. Palmerolide A, a Cytotoxic Macrolide from the Antarctic Tunicate Synoicum adareanum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5630–5631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Murray, A.E.; Avalon, N.E.; Bishop, L.; Davenport, K.W.; Delage, E.; Dichosa, A.E.K.; Eveillard, D.; Higham, M.L.; Kokkaliari, S.; Lo, C.-C.; et al. Uncovering the Core Microbiome and Distribution of Palmerolide in Synoicum adareanum Across the Anvers Island Archipelago, Antarctica. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Harper, J.; Khalil, I.; Shaw, L.; Bourguet-Kondracki, M.-L.; Dubois, J.; Valentin, A.; Barker, D.; Copp, B. Structure-Activity Relationships of the Bioactive Thiazinoquinone Marine Natural Products Thiaplidiaquinones A and B. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 5102–5110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Pommier, Y.; Kohlhagen, G.; Bailly, C.; Waring, M.; Mazumder, A.; Kohn, K.W. DNA Sequence- and Structure-Selective Alkylation of Guanine N2 in the DNA Minor Groove by Ecteinascidin 743, a Potent Antitumor Compound from the Caribbean Tunicate Ecteinascidia turbinata. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 13303–13309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Simoens, C.; Korst, A.E.C.; De Pooter, C.M.J.; Lambrechts, H.A.J.; Pattyn, G.G.O.; Faircloth, G.T.; Lardon, F.; Vermorken, J.B. In Vitro Interaction between Ecteinascidin 743 (ET-743) and Radiation, in Relation to Its Cell Cycle Effects. Br. J. Cancer 2003, 89, 2305–2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Tang, X.; Kim, A.L.; Feith, D.J.; Pegg, A.E.; Russo, J.; Zhang, H.; Aszterbaum, M.; Kopelovich, L.; Epstein, E.H.; Bickers, D.R.; et al. Ornithine Decarboxylase Is a Target for Chemoprevention of Basal and Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Ptch1+/− Mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2004, 113, 867–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Catanzaro, E.; Bishayee, A.; Fimognari, C. On a Beam of Light: Photoprotective Activities of the Marine Carotenoids Astaxanthin and Fucoxanthin in Suppression of Inflammation and Cancer. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Starcevic, A.; Akthar, S.; Dunlap, W.C.; Shick, J.M.; Hranueli, D.; Cullum, J.; Long, P.F. Enzymes of the Shikimic Acid Pathway Encoded in the Genome of a Basal Metazoan, Nematostella vectensis, Have Microbial Origins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 2533–2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Banaszak, A.T.; Barba Santos, M.G.; LaJeunesse, T.C.; Lesser, M.P. The Distribution of Mycosporine-like Amino Acids (MAAs) and the Phylogenetic Identity of Symbiotic Dinoflagellates in Cnidarian Hosts from the Mexican Caribbean. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2006, 337, 131–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Bandaranayake, W.M. Mycosporines: Are They Nature’s Sunscreens? Nat. Prod. Rep. 1998, 15, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Shibata, K. Pigments and a UV-Absorbing Substance in Corals and a Blue-Green Alga Living in the Great Barrier Reef. Plant Cell Physiol. 1969, 10, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Wada, N.; Sakamoto, T.; Matsugo, S. Mycosporine-Like Amino Acids and Their Derivatives as Natural Antioxidants. Antioxidants 2015, 4, 603–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Bernillon, J.; Bouillant, M.-L.; Pittet, J.-L.; Favre-Bonvin, J.; Arpin, N. Mycosporine Glutamine and Related Mycosporines in the Fungus Pyronema omphalodes. Phytochemistry 1984, 23, 1083–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Llewellyn, C.A.; Airs, R.L. Distribution and Abundance of MAAs in 33 Species of Microalgae across 13 Classes. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 1273–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Michalek-Wagner, K. Seasonal and Sex-Specific Variations in Levels of Photo-Protecting Mycosporine-like Amino Acids (MAAs) in Soft Corals. Mar. Biol. 2001, 139, 651–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Chrapusta, E.; Kaminski, A.; Duchnik, K.; Bober, B.; Adamski, M.; Bialczyk, J. Mycosporine-Like Amino Acids: Potential Health and Beauty Ingredients. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Cardozo, K.H.M.; Guaratini, T.; Barros, M.P.; Falcão, V.R.; Tonon, A.P.; Lopes, N.P.; Campos, S.; Torres, M.A.; Souza, A.O.; Colepicolo, P.; et al. Metabolites from Algae with Economical Impact. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2007, 146, 60–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Stoyneva-Gärtner, M.; Uzunov, B.; Gärtner, G. Enigmatic Microalgae from Aeroterrestrial and Extreme Habitats in Cosmetics: The Potential of the Untapped Natural Sources. Cosmetics 2020, 7, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Singh, A.; Čížková, M.; Bišová, K.; Vítová, M. Exploring Mycosporine-Like Amino Acids (MAAs) as Safe and Natural Protective Agents against UV-Induced Skin Damage. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubChem Compound Summary for CID 6857486, Porphyra-334. 2022. Available online: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/porphyra-334 (accessed on 13 July 2022).
  101. Rastogi, R.P.; Sinha, R.P. Biotechnological and Industrial Significance of Cyanobacterial Secondary Metabolites. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27, 521–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Siezen, R.J. Microbial Sunscreens: Genomics Update. Microb. Biotechnol. 2011, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Mourelle, M.; Gómez, C.; Legido, J. The Potential Use of Marine Microalgae and Cyanobacteria in Cosmetics and Thalassotherapy. Cosmetics 2017, 4, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Matsui, K.; Nazifi, E.; Hirai, Y.; Wada, N.; Matsugo, S.; Sakamoto, T. The Cyanobacterial UV-Absorbing Pigment Scytonemin Displays Radical-Scavenging Activity. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 58, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. De Freitas Coêlho, D.; Tundisi, L.L.; Cerqueira, K.S.; da Silva Rodrigues, J.R.; Mazzola, P.G.; Tambourgi, E.B.; de Souza, R.R. Microalgae: Cultivation Aspects and Bioactive Compounds. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2019, 62, e19180343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Stevenson, C.S.; Capper, E.A.; Roshak, A.K.; Marquez, B.; Eichman, C.; Jackson, J.R.; Mattern, M.; Gerwick, W.H.; Jacobs, R.S.; Marshall, L.A. The Identification and Characterization of the Marine Natural Product Scytonemin as a Novel Antiproliferative Pharmacophore. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002, 303, 858–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Jahan, A.; Ahmad, I.Z.; Fatima, N.; Ansari, V.A.; Akhtar, J. Algal Bioactive Compounds in the Cosmeceutical Industry: A Review. Phycologia 2017, 56, 410–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Alparslan, L.; Şekeroğlu, N.; Kijjoa, A. The Potential of Marine Resources in Cosmetics. Curr. Perspect. Med. Aromat. Plants (CUPMAP) 2018, 1, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Stoyneva-Gärtner, M.; Stoykova, P.; Uzunov, B.; Dincheva, I.; Atanassov, I.; Draganova, P.; Borisova, C.; Gärtner, G. Carotenoids in Five Aeroterrestrial Strains from Vischeria/Eustigmatos Group: Updating the Pigment Pattern of Eustigmatophyceae. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2019, 33, 250–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Galasso, C.; Corinaldesi, C.; Sansone, C. Carotenoids from Marine Organisms: Biological Functions and Industrial Applications. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Sathasivam, R.; Ki, J.-S. A Review of the Biological Activities of Microalgal Carotenoids and Their Potential Use in Healthcare and Cosmetic Industries. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Thomas, N.; Kim, S.-K. Beneficial Effects of Marine Algal Compounds in Cosmeceuticals. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 146–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Wijesinghe, W.A.J.P.; Jeon, Y.-J. Biological Activities and Potential Cosmeceutical Applications of Bioactive Components from Brown Seaweeds: A Review. Phytochem. Rev. 2011, 10, 431–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Bastonini, E.; Kovacs, D.; Picardo, M. Skin Pigmentation and Pigmentary Disorders: Focus on Epidermal/Dermal Cross-Talk. Ann. Dermatol. 2016, 28, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Shimoda, H.; Tanaka, J.; Shan, S.-J.; Maoka, T. Anti-Pigmentary Activity of Fucoxanthin and Its Influence on Skin MRNA Expression of Melanogenic Molecules. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2010, 62, 1137–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Matsui, M.; Tanaka, K.; Higashiguchi, N.; Okawa, H.; Yamada, Y.; Tanaka, K.; Taira, S.; Aoyama, T.; Takanishi, M.; Natsume, C.; et al. Protective and Therapeutic Effects of Fucoxanthin against Sunburn Caused by UV Irradiation. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2016, 132, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Tavares, R.S.N.; Kawakami, C.M.; de Castro Pereira, K.; do Amaral, G.T.; Benevenuto, C.G.; Maria-Engler, S.S.; Colepicolo, P.; Debonsi, H.M.; Gaspar, L.R. Fucoxanthin for Topical Administration, a Phototoxic vs. Photoprotective Potential in a Tiered Strategy Assessed by In Vitro Methods. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Fryer, M.J. Evidence for the photoprotective effects of vitamin E. Photochem. Photobiol. 1993, 58, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Chen, W.; Barthelman, M.; Martinez, J.; Alberts, D.; Gensler, H.L. Inhibition of Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimer Formation in Epidermal P53 Gene of UV-irradiated Mice by A-tocopherol. Nutr. Cancer 1997, 29, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Sharma, S.D.; Meeran, S.M.; Katiyar, S.K. Dietary Grape Seed Proanthocyanidins Inhibit UVB-Induced Oxidative Stress and Activation of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases and Nuclear Factor-ΚB Signaling in in Vivo SKH-1 Hairless Mice. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2007, 6, 995–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Xing, Y.-X.; Li, P.; Miao, Y.-X.; Du, W.; Wang, C.-B. Involvement of ROS/ASMase/JNK Signalling Pathway in Inhibiting UVA-Induced Apoptosis of HaCaT Cells by Polypeptide from Chlamys farreri. Free. Radic. Res. 2008, 42, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Mantena, S.K.; Katiyar, S.K. Grape Seed Proanthocyanidins Inhibit UV-Radiation-Induced Oxidative Stress and Activation of MAPK and NF-ΚB Signaling in Human Epidermal Keratinocytes. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2006, 40, 1603–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Cao, C.; Wan, S.; Jiang, Q.; Amaral, A.; Lu, S.; Hu, G.; Bi, Z.; Kouttab, N.; Chu, W.; Wan, Y. All-Trans Retinoic Acid Attenuates Ultraviolet Radiation-Induced down-Regulation of Aquaporin-3 and Water Permeability in Human Keratinocytes. J. Cell. Physiol. 2008, 215, 506–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Sandgruber, F.; Gielsdorf, A.; Baur, A.C.; Schenz, B.; Müller, S.M.; Schwerdtle, T.; Stangl, G.I.; Griehl, C.; Lorkowski, S.; Dawczynski, C. Variability in Macro- and Micronutrients of 15 Commercially Available Microalgae Powders. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Susanto, E.; Fahmi, A.S.; Hosokawa, M.; Miyashita, K. Variation in Lipid Components from 15 Species of Tropical and Temperate Seaweeds. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Muthusamy, V.; Hodges, L.D.; Macrides, T.A.; Boyle, G.M.; Piva, T.J. Effect of Novel Marine Nutraceuticals on IL-1α-Mediated TNF-α Release from UVB-Irradiated Human Melanocyte-Derived Cells. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2011, 2011, 728645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Gray-Schopfer, V.C.; Karasarides, M.; Hayward, R.; Marais, R. Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Blocks Apoptosis in Melanoma Cells When BRAF Signaling Is Inhibited. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Ivanov, V.N.; Ronai, Z. Down-Regulation of Tumor Necrosis Factor α Expression by Activating Transcription Factor 2 Increases UVC-Induced Apoptosis of Late-Stage Melanoma Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 14079–14089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Cadet, J.; Douki, T.; Ravanat, J.-L. Oxidatively Generated Damage to Cellular DNA by UVB and UVA Radiation. Photochem. Photobiol. 2015, 91, 140–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Brenner, M.; Hearing, V.J. The Protective Role of Melanin against UV Damage in Human Skin. Photochem. Photobiol. 2008, 84, 539–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Huynh, T.T.; Chan, K.S.; Piva, T.J. Effect of Ultraviolet Radiation on the Expression of Pp38MAPK and Furin in Human Keratinocyte-Derived Cell Lines. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 2009, 25, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Leng, H.; Luo, X.; Ma, L.; Kang, K.; Zheng, Z. Reversal of Ultraviolet B-Induced Immunosuppression by Inhibition of the Extracellular Signal-Regulated Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 2009, 25, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Bivik, C.; Öllinger, K. JNK Mediates UVB-Induced Apoptosis Upstream Lysosomal Membrane Permeabilization and Bcl-2 Family Proteins. Apoptosis 2008, 13, 1111–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Sample, A.; He, Y.-Y. Mechanisms and Prevention of UV-Induced Melanoma. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 2018, 34, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubChem Compound Summary for CID 11347535, Marizomib. 2022. Available online: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/11347535 (accessed on 13 July 2022).
  136. Waters, A.L.; Hill, R.T.; Place, A.R.; Hamann, M.T. The Expanding Role of Marine Microbes in Pharmaceutical Development. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2010, 21, 780–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Testa, U.; Castelli, G.; Pelosi, E. Melanoma: Genetic Abnormalities, Tumor Progression, Clonal Evolution and Tumor Initiating Cells. Med. Sci. 2017, 5, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Liu-Smith, F.; Jia, J.; Zheng, Y. UV-Induced Molecular Signaling Differences in Melanoma and Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer. In Ultraviolet Light in Human Health, Diseases and Environment; Ahmad, S.I., Ed.; Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 996, pp. 27–40. ISBN 978-3-319-56016-8. [Google Scholar]
  139. Bobos, M. Histopathologic Classification and Prognostic Factors of Melanoma: A 2021 Update. Ital. J. Dermatol. Venereol. 2021, 156, 300–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Vidwans, S.J.; Flaherty, K.T.; Fisher, D.E.; Tenenbaum, J.M.; Travers, M.D.; Shrager, J. A Melanoma Molecular Disease Model. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e18257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Ito, S.; Wakamatsu, K.; Sarna, T. Photodegradation of Eumelanin and Pheomelanin and Its Pathophysiological Implications. Photochem. Photobiol. 2018, 94, 409–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Raimondi, S.; Suppa, M.; Gandini, S. Melanoma Epidemiology and Sun Exposure. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2020, 100, adv00136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Sweet, M.; Kirkham, N.; Bendall, M.; Currey, L.; Bythell, J.; Heupel, M. Evidence of Melanoma in Wild Marine Fish Populations. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Potts, B.C.; Albitar, M.X.; Anderson, K.C.; Baritaki, S.; Berkers, C.; Bonavida, B.; Chandra, J.; Chauhan, D.; Cusack, J.C.; Fenical, W.; et al. Marizomib, a Proteasome Inhibitor for All Seasons: Preclinical Profile and a Framework for Clinical Trials. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2011, 11, 254–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Millward, M.; Price, T.; Townsend, A.; Sweeney, C.; Spencer, A.; Sukumaran, S.; Longenecker, A.; Lee, L.; Lay, A.; Sharma, G.; et al. Phase 1 Clinical Trial of the Novel Proteasome Inhibitor Marizomib with the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Vorinostat in Patients with Melanoma, Pancreatic and Lung Cancer Based on in Vitro Assessments of the Combination. Investig. New Drugs 2012, 30, 2303–2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Kong, D.-X.; Jiang, Y.-Y.; Zhang, H.-Y. Marine Natural Products as Sources of Novel Scaffolds: Achievement and Concern. Drug Discov. Today 2010, 15, 884–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Spainhour, C.B. Natural Products. In Drug Discovery Handbook; Gad, S.C., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005; pp. 11–72. ISBN 978-0-471-72878-8. [Google Scholar]
  148. Saide, A.; Lauritano, C.; Ianora, A. A Treasure of Bioactive Compounds from the Deep Sea. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Saide, A.; Martínez, K.A.; Ianora, A.; Lauritano, C. Unlocking the Health Potential of Microalgae as Sustainable Sources of Bioactive Compounds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Fenical, W. Marine Microbial Natural Products: The Evolution of a New Field of Science. J. Antibiot. 2020, 73, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Rangel, M.; de Barcellos Falkenberg, M. An Overview of the Marine Natural Products in Clinical Trials and on the Market. J. Coast. Life Med. 2015, 3, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Blunt, J.W.; Copp, B.R.; Munro, M.H.G.; Northcote, P.T.; Prinsep, M.R. Marine Natural Products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2006, 23, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Bode, H.B.; Bethe, B.; Höfs, R.; Zeeck, A. Big Effects from Small Changes: Possible Ways to Explore Nature’s Chemical Diversity. ChemBioChem 2002, 3, 619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Sayed, A.M.; Hassan, M.H.A.; Alhadrami, H.A.; Hassan, H.M.; Goodfellow, M.; Rateb, M.E. Extreme Environments: Microbiology Leading to Specialized Metabolites. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 128, 630–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Wilson, Z.E.; Brimble, M.A. Molecules Derived from the Extremes of Life. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2009, 26, 44–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Wilson, Z.E.; Brimble, M.A. Molecules Derived from the Extremes of Life: A Decade Later. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2021, 38, 24–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. PubMed search results 2011–2021 by using as filters (a) the words “marine natural products” and (b) “melanoma“ and “marine natural products” in “all fields” query box.
Figure 1. PubMed search results 2011–2021 by using as filters (a) the words “marine natural products” and (b) “melanoma“ and “marine natural products” in “all fields” query box.
Ijms 23 10284 g001
Figure 2. Effects of UV light exposure.
Figure 2. Effects of UV light exposure.
Ijms 23 10284 g002
Figure 3. Chemical structure (a) 2D and (b) 3D of Porphyra-334 (PubChem Identifier: CID 6857486) from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Porphyra-334#section=2D-Structure&fullscreen=true and https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Porphyra-334#section=3D-Conformer&fullscreen=true, respectively (accessed on 13 July 2022) [100].
Figure 3. Chemical structure (a) 2D and (b) 3D of Porphyra-334 (PubChem Identifier: CID 6857486) from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Porphyra-334#section=2D-Structure&fullscreen=true and https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Porphyra-334#section=3D-Conformer&fullscreen=true, respectively (accessed on 13 July 2022) [100].
Ijms 23 10284 g003
Figure 4. Chemical structure (a) 2D and (b) 3D of Marizomib (PubChem Identifier: CID 11347535) from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/11347535#section=2D-Structure&fullscreen=true and https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/11347535#section=3D-Conformer&fullscreen=true, respectively (accessed on 13 July 2022) [135].
Figure 4. Chemical structure (a) 2D and (b) 3D of Marizomib (PubChem Identifier: CID 11347535) from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/11347535#section=2D-Structure&fullscreen=true and https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/11347535#section=3D-Conformer&fullscreen=true, respectively (accessed on 13 July 2022) [135].
Ijms 23 10284 g004
Table 1. Marine microorganism derived compounds or extracts with activity in vitro or in vivo against melanoma. Pre-clinical studies showing marine-derived compounds with anti-melanoma activity in vitro/in vivo, mechanism of action (when known), marine organisms and experimental conditions are reported for each compound. Inhibitory concentration of 50% (IC50); growth inhibition of 50% (IG50); extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK1/2); Phosphorylated protein-kinase B (p-Akt); adenosine triphosphate (ATP); Ryanodine promoter (RyR); Not available (N/A); B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2); bcl-2-like protein 4 (Bax).
Table 1. Marine microorganism derived compounds or extracts with activity in vitro or in vivo against melanoma. Pre-clinical studies showing marine-derived compounds with anti-melanoma activity in vitro/in vivo, mechanism of action (when known), marine organisms and experimental conditions are reported for each compound. Inhibitory concentration of 50% (IC50); growth inhibition of 50% (IG50); extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK1/2); Phosphorylated protein-kinase B (p-Akt); adenosine triphosphate (ATP); Ryanodine promoter (RyR); Not available (N/A); B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2); bcl-2-like protein 4 (Bax).
CompoundMarine OrganismIn Vitro/In VivoIC50/GI50/LC50 or Tested ConcentrationAdministrationMechanism of ActionRef.
Bacteria
Aromatic polychete akazamicin
Actinofuranone C
N-formilantranilic acid
AKA32 strain of actinomycetes Nonomuraea sp.In vitro on melanoma cell B16IC50 1.7 μM
IC50 1.2 μM
IC50 25 μM,
In cell-culture mediaN/A[12]
Lipid 430Genus AlgibacterIn vitro on melanoma cell A2058IC50 175 μMIn cell-culture mediaInhibition of cell proliferation[13]
Enigromic acid
Deoxyenigrolides A
Deoxyenigrolides B
Mixobacteria Enhygromyxa sp.In vitro on melanoma cell B16IC50 46 μMIn cell-culture mediaN/A[18]
Phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA)Pseudomonas aeruginosa GS-33.In vitro SK-MEL-2 melanoma cellsGI50 of 2.30 μg/mL since GI50 value of 10 μg/mLIn cell-culture mediaReduced cell density
Induction of apoptosis
[19]
Lyso-ornithine lipidsGenus LacinutrixIn vitro on melanoma cells A205850 µM, 100 µM, 150 µMIn cell-culture mediaN/A[21]
Fungi
H-10Genus FusarumIn vitro in melanoma model H1050 µMIn cell-culture mediaInduction of the apoptosis of cells via a mitochondrial pathway.
Increased activity of caspases 3.
Inhibition of cell growth.
[22]
Penicitrinine APenicilium citrinumIn vitro on melanoma cells A735IC50 20.12 µMIn cell-culture mediaInduction of apoptosis by decreasing of the expression of Bcl-2 and increasing of the expression of Bax.
Anti-metastatic effects.
Inhibition of proliferation
[23]
Chlovalicin BDigiratispora marinaIn vitro on melanoma cells A2058IC50 37 µMIn cell-culture mediaN/A[24]
LulworthinoneLulworthiaceae familyIn vitro on melanoma cells A2058From 6.25 µg/mL to 100 µg/mLIn cell-culture mediaInhibition of cell proliferation.[25]
Pyrenosetin A
Pyrenosetin B
Pyrenosetin C
Phomasetin
crude extract of Pyrenochaetopsis sp. FVE-001In vitro on melanoma cells A375IC50 2.8 µM
IC50 6.3 µM
IC50 140.3 µM
IC50 37.3 µM.
In cell-culture mediaN/A[27]
Microalgae
Oxylipin 13-HOTEChlamydomonas debaryanaIn vitro on melanoma cancer cell line UACC-62IC50 71.9 ± 3.6 μMIn cell-culture mediaDecreased the level of ATP in UACC-62 in dose-dependent manner[52]
Oxylipin 15-HEPENannochloropsis gaditanaIn vitro on mela-noma cancer cell line UACC-62IC50 53.9 ± 6.4 μMIn cell-culture mediaDecreased the level of ATP in UACC-62 in dose-dependent manner[52]
Raw extractsSkeletonema marinoi (clone FE60)In vitro on melanoma A2058 cells25-100 μg/mLIn cell-culture mediaN/A[30]
Raw extracts and fractionsIsochrysis galbanaIn vitro on melanoma A2058 cells100 μg/mLIn cell-culture mediaN/A[31]
Amphidinol 22Amphidinium carteraeIn vitro on melanoma cells A2058IC50 16.4 μMIn cell-culture mediaN/A[36]
Linear polyketide stragulin Agenus Amphidinium/Stragulum bicolorIn vitro on melanoma cell A2058 derived from metastatic site.IC50 0.18 µMIn cell-culture mediaN/A[37]
Euplotin CEuplotes crassusIn vitro on melanoma cells A2058N/AIn the cell-culture mediaDown-regulation of the levels of B-Raf, ERK1/2 and p-Akt, promotion of the apoptosis by activation of the RyR[44]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Montuori, E.; Capalbo, A.; Lauritano, C. Marine Compounds for Melanoma Treatment and Prevention. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10284. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810284

AMA Style

Montuori E, Capalbo A, Lauritano C. Marine Compounds for Melanoma Treatment and Prevention. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(18):10284. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810284

Chicago/Turabian Style

Montuori, Eleonora, Anita Capalbo, and Chiara Lauritano. 2022. "Marine Compounds for Melanoma Treatment and Prevention" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 18: 10284. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810284

APA Style

Montuori, E., Capalbo, A., & Lauritano, C. (2022). Marine Compounds for Melanoma Treatment and Prevention. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(18), 10284. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810284

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop