Next Article in Journal
Metastasising Fibroblasts Show an HDAC6-Dependent Increase in Migration Speed and Loss of Directionality Linked to Major Changes in the Vimentin Interactome
Next Article in Special Issue
Global N6-Methyladenosine Profiling Revealed the Tissue-Specific Epitranscriptomic Regulation of Rice Responses to Salt Stress
Previous Article in Journal
The G Protein-Coupled Serotonin 1A Receptor Augments Protein Kinase Cε-Mediated Neurogenesis in Neonatal Mouse Hippocampus—PKCε-Mediated Signaling in the Early Hippocampus
Previous Article in Special Issue
Screening of Differentially Expressed Genes and Localization Analysis of Female Gametophyte at the Free Nuclear Mitosis Stage in Pinus tabuliformis Carr.
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 4
10.3390/ijms23041960
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of the Regulatory Genes of UV-B-Induced Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in Pepper Fruit

by
Yihao Wang
1,2,
Sujun Liu
1,2,
Haoran Wang
1,2,
Yingxue Zhang
1,2,
Wenjie Li
1,2,
Jinkui Liu
1,2,
Qing Cheng
1,2,
Liang Sun
1,2,3,* and
Huolin Shen
1,2,3,*
1
Beijing Key Laboratory of Growth and Developmental Regulation for Protected Vegetable Crops, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
2
Department of Vegetable Science, College of Horticulture, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan Xi Lu, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China
3
Sanya Institute, China Agricultural University, Science and Technology City, Yazhou Bay, Sanya 572025, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(4), 1960; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23041960
Submission received: 30 December 2021 / Revised: 30 January 2022 / Accepted: 3 February 2022 / Published: 10 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Recent Advances in Plant Molecular Science in China 2021)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fruit peels of certain pepper (Capsicum annum L.) varieties accumulate a large amount of anthocyanins and exhibit purple color under medium-wave ultraviolet (UV-B) conditions, which severely impacts the commodity value of peppers. However, the regulatory mechanism of the above process has not been well studied so far. To explore which key genes are involved in this regulatory mechanism, pepper variety 19Q6100, the fruit peels of which turn purple under UV-B conditions, was investigated in this study. Transcription factors with expression levels significantly impacted by UV-B were identified by RNA-seq. Those genes may be involved in the regulation of UV-B-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis. Yeast one-hybrid results revealed that seven transcription factors, CabHLH143, CaMYB113, CabHLH137, CaMYBG, CaWRKY41, CaWRKY44 and CaWRKY53 directly bound to the putative promotor regions of the structural genes in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway. CaMYB113 was found to interact with CabHLH143 and CaHY5 by yeast two-hybrid assay, and those three genes may participate collaboratively in UV-B-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis in pepper fruit. Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) indicated that fruit peels of CaMYB113-silenced plants were unable to turn purple under UV-B conditions. These findings could deepen our understanding of UV-B-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis in pepper.

1. Introduction

Anthocyanins are important secondary metabolites in plants and participate in the coloration of leaves, corolla and fruit [1]. They also play diverse biological roles in the life cycle of plants. For example, anthocyanins could protect plants from the harm of plenty of abiotic stresses, such as ultraviolet (UV) radiation, low temperature and drought [2,3,4]. Additionally, they can also attract insects and animals to pollinate and spread seeds [5,6].
The anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway, a branch of the flavonoid pathway, has been well studied previously, and most of the gene-encoding enzymes in the key step of anthocyanin biosynthesis have been investigated in many plant species [7,8]. Flavonoid biosynthesis starts with phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) and 4-coumaryl:CoA ligase (4CL). Anthocyanin early biosynthetic genes (EBGs), including Chalcone Synthase (CHS), Chalcone Isomerase (CHI) and Flavanone 3-Hydroxylase (F3H), are also involved in the common flavonoid biosynthesis pathway. Anthocyanin late biosynthetic genes (LBGs), including Flavonoid 3’5’-Hydroxylase (F3’5’H), Dihydroflavonol4-Reductase (DFR), Anthocyanidin Synthase (ANS) and UDP-Glucose: Flavonoid3-O-Glucosyltransferase (UFGT), are necessary for the accumulation of anthocyanins and some special flavonoids [9,10]. EBGs and LBGs are also called anthocyanin structural genes, most of which are regulated by MYB transcription factors (TFs), basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) TFs and WD-repeat proteins, which form an MYB/bHLH/WD40 (MBW) complex. This complex plays a central role in the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis [11,12,13]. The regulatory relationship between MBW complex and LBGs has been well studied in many plant species, such as petunia [14,15], eggplant [16] and nectarine [17]. In addition to the members of the MBW complex, some other types of TF have also been identified to control the biosynthesis of anthocyanin, such as NAC, WRKY and zinc finger protein [18,19,20].
The biosynthesis and accumulation of anthocyanins is often affected by external environmental signals, such as light, temperature and drought [21]. Light is the main energy source and information signal that regulates plant growth and development and is also one of the most important environmental factors, essential for anthocyanin biosynthesis in various organs of plants [9,22]. Different wavelengths of light have different effects on the accumulation of anthocyanins. Compared with visible light, UV light has more obvious and profound effects on anthocyanin biosynthesis [23]. For instance, peach fruit was able accumulate plenty of anthocyanins under UV-A and UV-B conditions [24]. Strawberries treated with UV-C significantly increased their antioxidant capacity and anthocyanin content [25]. In apples, pears and tomatoes, anthocyanin content in the peel of the fruit was significantly increased by UV-B radiation [26,27,28].
Higher plants have specific photoreceptors to receive light signals of different wavelengths. UV Resistance Locus 8 (UVR8) is one such photoreceptor, specifically receiving UV-B light signals [29]. The UVR8 photoreceptor forms a monomer UVR8 after receiving a UV-B signal and competitively binds to the substrate binding site of COP1, thereby inhibiting the activity of its E3 ubiquitin ligase on the target protein, such as HY5, regulating the expression of downstream transcription factors and anthocyanin structural genes to enhance the accumulation of anthocyanin [30,31,32]. HY5 not only plays an important role in the regulation of UV-B-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis but also participates in the regulation pathways of anthocyanin biosynthesis, which are induced by other light signals [26,33,34,35]. In Arabidopsis, HY5 binds directly to members of the MBW complex, mostly MYB TFs, such as AtMYB12 and AtMYB75, to promote their expression and regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis [36,37].
In pepper, silencing of CaMYB via virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) led to the downregulation of the expression of structural genes and caused a decrease in anthocyanin accumulation [38,39]. CaMYBA, a gene that regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis in purple flowers, leaves, and immature fruits of pepper, is located on chromosome 10 [40]. CaANT1, CaANT2, CaAN1 and CaTTG1 participated in the accumulation of anthocyanin in pepper through formation of a new MMBW transcription complex [41]. However, most current research on anthocyanin biosynthesis in pepper mainly focuses on the materials that naturally bear purple fruit, with little focus on the study of light-induced purple fruit. Due to the above reasons, the regulatory mechanism of UV-B-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis is still unclear.
In this study, fruits of 19Q6100 were used as material, of which some part of the peel could accumulate anthocyanin when exposed to natural sunlight. Transcription factors that were significantly differentially expressed between purple and green peels were identified by RNA-seq. The interaction among CaMYB113, CabHLH143 and CaHY5, as well as the interaction between the abovementioned three TFs and anthocyanin structural genes, was verified by yeast one-hybrid (Y1H) and yeast two-hybrid (Y2H). The function of CaMYB113 in UV-B-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis in pepper was discovered. Results of this work could deepen our understanding of the regulatory mechanism of anthocyanin biosynthesis in pepper and provide useful information for the future study of UV-B-induced anthocyanin accumulation in fruit peels of other species.

2. Results

2.1. Anthocyanin Content and Expression of Anthocyanin Biosynthesis Genes Were Induced by UV-B in the Peel of 19Q6100

A natural pepper mutant of which the sun-facing side of the mature green fruit accumulates anthocyanin in the peel was discovered in our experimental field. A stable inbred line 19Q6100 was then generated via selfing. The sun-facing side of 19Q6100 fruit was purple, while the shaded side was still green (Figure 1A). In order to clarify what kind of light could induce the accumulation of anthocyanin in the peel, mature green fruits of 19Q6100 were grown under different wavelengths of light. The fruit peel under red/blue light for 5 days did not turn purple (Figure 1D,E), while the fruit peel treated with red/blue + UV-B for 5 days turned purple (Figure 1F,G), suggesting that UV-B light may be the key factor that induces the accumulation of anthocyanin in the peels of peppers. Later, anthocyanin content was measured in purple and green parts of the red/blue + UV-B-treated fruits. As shown in Figure 1B, the anthocyanin level was significantly higher in the purple part than that in the green part. For further confirmation of the accumulation of anthocyanin, the expression of genes encoding the key enzymes involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis was investigated. As expected, expression of all of the anthocyanin structural genes was significantly induced in the purple peels, except for CHI (Figure 1C). Therefore, it can be presumed that some of the upstream regulatory genes may be induced by UV-B light.

2.2. Transcriptome Analysis of Purple and Green Peels of UV-B-Treated Fruits

RNA-seq was performed to investigate the transcriptome changes caused by UV-B. The purple and green peels of the UV-B-treated fruits were sampled and sequenced (Figure 2A). The ratios of the mapped reads vary from 86.40% to 93.74% in all samples (Supplementary Table S1). The correlation coefficients (R2) between the biological replicates were 0.935 (Green peel-1 vs. Green peel-2), 0.932 (Green peel-1 vs. Green peel-3), 0.883 (Green peel-2 vs. Green peel-3), 0.922 (Purple peel-1 vs. Purple peel-2), 0.933 (Purple peel-1 vs. Purple peel-3) and 0.954 (Purple peel-2 vs. Purple peel-3) (Supplementary Table S2). Fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKMs) were calculated, and a total of 108 DEGs were identified between the purple and green peels, among which 71 and 37 genes were up- and downregulated, respectively, in the purple peel (Supplementary Table S3). Gene ontology (GO) analysis revealed that DEGs were significantly enriched in the “cellular process” and “metabolic process” with respect to biological process, “cell part” and “cell” with respect to cellular components and “binding” and “catalytic activity” with respect to molecular function (Figure 2B).

2.3. Transcription Factors and Structural Genes Involved in UV-B-Induced Anthocyanin Biosynthesis

To further illustrate the changes caused by UV-B at the transcription level, 9 transcription factors (TFs), 5 structural genes and 4 light responses were identified among the 108 DEGs (Figure 2C). Expression patterns of some of the abovementioned genes were further confirmed via qRT-PCR (Supplementary Figure S1). Based on the expression patterns, TFs and light responses could be roughly divided into three types: (I) expressed only in the purple parts of peels, including CIB1, WRKY44 and PHYE; (II) expressed at higher levels in the purple peels, including MYBG, MYB113, bHLH143, MYB94, WRKY41, bHLH137, UVR8, WRKY53 and MYB6; (III) expressed at higher levels in the green peel, such as MYB3 (Figure 2C). With regards to the structural genes involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis, CHS, F3′5′H, DFR, ANS and UFGT were all more highly expressed in the purple parts of the peels (Figure 2C), suggesting upstream regulators (most probably TFs) may exist in the purple peels in response to UV-B exposure.

2.4. Interactions between TFs and Anthocyanin Biosynthesis Structural Genes

In order to verify whether the selected TFs participated in the regulation of UV-B-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis, 50–2000 bp upstream of the transcription start site of anthocyanin structural genes and coding regions of TFs were analyzed. As shown in Supplementary Table S4, MYB113, WRKY53, MYB6, MYBG and MYB3 were recorded in the database and predicted to bind with promoters of anthocyanin biosynthesis structural genes. In order to verify the interactions that were predicted in silico, Y1H was performed between the TFs and anthocyanin biosynthesis structural genes. In the pre-experiment, 40 mM/L and 60 mM/L of 3-Amino-1,2,4-triazole (hereafter 3-AT) were confirmed to be sufficient to inhibit the self-activation of PLacZi-DFRpro and PLacZi-ANSpro, respectively (Figure 3A). From the Y1H results, it can be concluded that CabHLH143, CaWRKY41 and CabHLH137 were able to bind to the promoter of CaDFR; CabHLH143, CaMYB113, CaMYBG, CaWRKY44 and CaWRKY53 were able to bind to the promoter of CaANS (Figure 3B).

2.5. CaMYB113 Directly Bound to CabHLH143 and CaHY5

To explore the interaction among the TFs, in silico predictions were performed via AraPPINet (https://netbio.sjtu.edu.cn/arappinet/) (accessed on 20 August 2021). As shown in Supplementary Table S5, bHLH137, MYBG, MYB113, WRKY53, MYB3 and MYB94 were predicted to have interactions with other TFs. There are some TFs, such as bHLH137, MYB113, WRKY53, MYB3 and MYB94, that may interact with HY5, a bZIP transcription factor, which plays a key role in the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis. However, HY5 was not significantly differentially expressed between the purple and the green peels (Figure 2C). In order to confirm the interactions mentioned above, Y2H was conducted. Results showed that CaMYB113 directly interacted with CaHY5 (Figure 4A,C). As to the interaction between CaMYB113 and CabHLH143, since CabHLH143 can be self-activated (Figure 4A), different concentrations of 3-AT were added to the media, and 30 mM was found to be the minimum effective dose (Figure 4B). Then, the interaction between CaMYB113 and CabHLH143 was confirmed (Figure 4C).

2.6. Function Analysis of CaMYB113 by VIGS

Since CaMYB113 bound to the promoter regions of two anthocyanin structural genes and, at the same time, directly interacted with two TFs, further function analysis was performed by VIGS. Photobleaching was observed in the fruits of the positive control (TRV2::PDS + TRV1) 80 days after the injection, indicating that the VIGS system worked well (Figure 5A). Then, CaMYB113-VIGS and the negative control were treated with UV-B light for 5 days. After that, purple color was only discovered on the light-facing side of the negative control (TRV2 + TRV1) but not on the CaMYB113-VIGS fruits (Figure 5B–E). Consistent with the above observations, anthocyanin was significantly accumulated in the light-facing side of the negative control fruits but not in the same part of the CaMYB113-VIGS fruits (Figure 5F). qRT-PCR results showed that the expression of CaMYB113 was significantly induced by UV-B treatment on the light-facing side of negative control fruits but stayed at low levels in that of the CaMYB113-VIGS fruits (Figure 5G). Later, more qRT-PCR analyses were performed to test the expression changes of the genes involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis. As shown in Figure 5H–N, although a significant increase in bHLH143 expression was observed on the light-facing side of the CaMYB113-VIGS fruits, silencing of CaMYB113 still significantly inhibited the upregulation of the expression of CHS, CHI, F3’5’H, DFR, ANS, UFGT and bHLH143, which was induced by UV-B, suggesting that CaMYB113 may be a key regulator involved in controlling UV-B-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis.

3. Discussion

3.1. UV-B Effectively Induced Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in the Peel of 19Q6100 Fruit

Fruit color is an important trait for horticultural produce, including peppers. As to the pepper varieties collected and sold at the mature green stage, the green color of the peel determines the final price of the commodity. However, the sun-facing side of the fruit peel of some varieties accumulates anthocyanin. This trait severely impacts the value of the commodity, as well as the income of the pepper growers. Although the abovementioned trait is important for the pepper industry, very few studies have focused on this issue. In contrast, many researchers have made efforts to disclose the mechanism of consistently purple fruits at the mature green stage [38,40,41,42]. In this study, a natural mutant was discovered in our experimental field, which bears fruits that partially turn purple when exposed to sunlight. Light is an important environmental factor that regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis. Moreover, ultraviolet light has been proven to have more profound effects and significantly increase anthocyanin contents in apple, tomato, peach and strawberry fruit [23,24,25,26,43]. Therefore, through treatments with different wavelengths of light, UV-B was confirmed to effectively induce the partial purple peel phenomenon in the fruit of 19Q6100, an inbred line derived from the mutant mentioned above. The UV-B-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway was clarified, starting with the reception of UV-B by the UVR8 photoreceptor. After that, UVR8 interacts with COP1 and reduces the antagonistic effect of COP1 on HY5, which leads to the upregulation of the expression of HY5 [44]. HY5, on one hand, may directly bind to the promoters of anthocyanin structural genes and promote the accumulation of anthocyanins; on the other hand, it may bind to the promoters of MYBs, which could later regulate the expression of other TFs, as well as the expression of anthocyanin structural genes [26,36,45]. In this study, UVR8 was discovered to be significantly differentially expressed between the light-facing and the shaded side of the fruit, according to transcriptome analysis. Although a similar phenomenon was not observed for the HY5 gene, we found that it had the same expression trend as UVR8, according to qPCR (Supplementary Figure S1). We speculated that since expression of HY5 was only analyzed at one point in time, the change in expression can simply be ignored.

3.2. Upstream Regulators May Be Involved in UV-B-Induced Anthocyanin Accumulation in 19Q6100 Fruit

Transcriptome analysis revealed that the activity of many anthocyanin biosynthesis structural genes was significantly increased in the purple peel, based on which it can be presumed that upstream regulators may be involved in this regulation. Therefore, some anthocyanin-related transcription factor genes were identified among the DEGs, including CaMYB113, CabHLH137, CabHLH143, CaMYB6, CaMYB3, CaMYB94, CaMYBG, CaWRKY41, CaWRKY44 and CaWRKY53. Previously studies reported that MYB6 was involved in the promotion of anthocyanin and pro-anthocyanidin biosynthesis in Populus tomentosa [46], and MYB3 was a transcriptional repressor of anthocyanin biosynthesis in citrus fruit [47]. WRKY44 was able to strongly activate the promoters of the F3’H and F3’5’H genes in kiwifruit [48]. WRKY41 in Brassica napus had a similar role with AtWRKY41 in regulating anthocyanin biosynthesis when overexpressed in A. thaliana [49]. Consistent with these results, in this study, Y1H confirmed that seven of the abovementioned TFs bound to the promoters of anthocyanin biosynthesis structural genes: CaMYB113, CabHLH137, CabHLH143, CaMYBG, CaWRKY41, CaWRKY44 and CaWRKY53. This suggests that these seven TFs may be upstream regulators of anthocyanin biosynthesis.

3.3. The HY5-CaMYB113-CabHLH143 Pathway

Among the seven TFs, CaMYB113 interacted with both anthocyanin biosynthesis structural genes and other transcription factors. CaMYB113 is a homolog of AtMYB113 that has been reported to be involved in the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in many plant species [11,13,50,51]. Meanwhile, this TF is also a member of the MBW complex. In pepper, CaMYB113 was reported to underly a locus on chr10 that controls the consistent purple trait of the mature green fruit [40]. In this study, CaMYB113 was found not only to bind to the promoters of the downstream anthocyanin structural genes, ANS, but also interacted with CaHY5 and CabHLH143 at the protein level, suggesting CaMYB113 may be a key regulator of UV-B-induced anthocyanin accumulation. Moreover, silencing of CaMYB113 led to the inhibition of UV-B-induced anthocyanin accumulation, as well as the related gene expression, which further confirmed the importance of this TF in the process. CabHLH143 is a member of the bHLH transcription factor family. However, interactions and functions of this TF have not been well studied in Arabidopsis and other model plants. In this study, CabHLH143 was differentially expressed between the purple and green peels. Meanwhile, Y1H and Y2H indicated that this TF interacted with CaMYB113, as well as two anthocyanin biosynthesis genes, CaDFR and CaANS, indicating an important role of CabHLH143 in the regulation of UV-B-induced anthocyanin accumulation.
In the anthocyanin studies, the MBW transcriptional complex was considered to be a critical regulator that determines anthocyanin biosynthesis. Many kinds of environmental and developmental signals, such as light, temperature and endogenous hormones, regulate the formation and activation of the MBW complex. In this study, a protein–protein interaction was detected between CaMYB113 and CabHLH143, which seemed to form an MYB complex with an unknown WD TF and, ultimately, a response to UV-B via interaction with HY5.
An HY5-CaMYB113-CabHLH143 pathway may exist in the UV-B-induced anthocyanin accumulation process in the fruit peel of 19Q6100 that not only connects the upstream UVR8-COP1-HY5 UV-B signal-transduction pathway but also links the downstream TFs and anthocyanin structural genes, ultimately regulating UV-B-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis and accumulation (Figure 6).

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

The C. annuum inbred line “19Q6100” was used as the material in this study, provided by College of Horticulture, China Agricultural University. From the seedling stage to the fruiting stage, the pepper plants were put in a growth chamber under conditions of 27 °C, under red-blue light for 16 h and 16 °C, darkness for 8 h, respectively. During the mature green period of fruits, the control group continued to grow under red-blue light, and one side of the fruit could be illuminated by the light source without being blocked. For the treatment group, UV-B light (40 μW/cm2) was added on the base of the control group. Samples of fruit treated for at least 5 days with mixed purple and green peels were selected for anthocyanin determination, RNA extraction and qPCR analysis. Three biological replicates were performed for each sample.

4.2. Anthocyanin Extraction and Determination

Anthocyanin extraction and determination was conducted as previously described [52]. In short, 1 g fresh weight (FW) of fruit peel was transferred into a tube filled with 4.3 mL of extraction solution (1-propanol/HCl/distilled water, 18/1/81, v/v/v). The tubes were placed in boiling water for 6 min, then incubated overnight at room temperature in the dark. Another 3.7 mL of extraction solution was added to the mixture, then centrifuged at 1000× g for 5 min. After the supernatant was filtered by a 0.45 μm filter (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), the OD values of A535 and A650 were read by spectrophotometer, and the anthocyanin content in the extract was quantified (A535-A650) per gram FW. Three biological replicates were performed for each analysis.

4.3. RNA Extraction, cDNA Synthesis and Real-Time PCR Analysis

Samples were collected from the purple and green peels of the same fruits and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Three biological replicates were performed for each sample, and each replicate peel was collected from 3 different plants. Total RNA was extracted from samples using the quick RNA isolation kit (Huayueyang, Beijing, China) and following the manufacturer’s protocols. cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg RNA using HiScript® III 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). Primers used for the qRT-PCR were designed online on the NCBI website (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/) (accessed on 15 October 2021) and are shown in Supplementary Table S6. qRT-PCR was performed with a ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) on an ABI 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) under the following conditions: 95 °C for 30 s, 40 cycles at 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 30 s. A pepper gene, UBI (Capana06g002873), was used as the reference. The 2−ΔΔCt method was used to calculated relative expression of each gene [53]. Three biological replicates and three technical replicates were performed for each sample.

4.4. RNA-Seq Analysis

Purple and green peels from the same fruits were collected as samples for RNA-seq. Fruit peels were carefully cut off with a scalpel, then quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. Transcriptome libraries were constructed using an NEBNext® UltraTM RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (NEB, San Diego, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocols. Three biological replicates were performed for RNA transcriptome analyses. Then, the library was sequenced on an Illumina Hiseq 4000 platform, and 150 bp paired-end reads were generated.
Adapter, ploy-N, and low-quality reads were removed from raw data by QC before downstream analyses. After read filtering, the Q20, Q30 and GC contents of the clean data were calculated to ensure downstream analyses were based on high-quality clean data. Clean reads were mapped to reference gene and reference genome by TopHat2 [54]. The transcript levels for genes were calculated and transformed to fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKMs) by Cuffquant and Cuffnorm (v2.2.1). DEGs were identified based on a comparison of FPKMs between different samples under the thresholds of false discovery rate ≤ 0.001, p-value ≤ 0.01 and absolute Log2 fold change value ≥ 1 using the DESeq2 R package [55]. Gene Ontology (GO) classification and functional enrichment were analyzed using TBtools [56].
The RNA-Seq raw sequence data are deposited in the Short Read Archive (SRA) of NCBI and are available with accession number PRJNA790487.

4.5. Yeast One-Hybrid Assay

In order to investigate whether the transcription factors bound to the promoters of anthocyanin biosynthesis structural genes which were analysis was conducted by JASPAR (https://jaspar.genereg.net/) (accessed on 20 August 2021) [57]. 50–2000 bp upstream of the transcriptional start site of anthocyanin structural genes were amplified and inserted into the vector PLacZi as bait sequences. The coding regions of the transcription factors were amplified and inserted into the vector PB42AD as prey protein. Primers used for amplified and plasmid construction are listed in Supplementary Table S6. The specified combinations of constructs were co-transformed into yeast strain EGY48. The minimal inhibitory concentration of 3-Amino-1,2,4-triazole(3-AT) was detected by the empty pB42AD vector plus PLacZi promoters. After 3 days of transformation, 3 yeast clones grown on the SD/-Trp-Ura (SD-TU) medium supplemented of each combination were picked and diluted proportionally to different concentrations, and the culture was inoculated on SD-TU medium at 30 °C for 3 days.

4.6. Yeast Two-Hybrid Assay

Y2H studies were performed as reported, with some modifications [58]. Predictions of the interactions between TFs were performed by AraPPINet (https://netbio.sjtu.edu.cn/arappinet/) (accessed on 20 August 2021) [59]. The coding regions of the targets, including MYB113, bHLH143, HY5, were amplified and inserted into pGADT7 and pGBKT7 vectors, respectively. Primers used for amplified and plasmid construction are listed in Supplementary Table S6. The constructs were co-transformed into yeast strain Y2HGold with the different combinations and then cultured on SD/-Leu-Trp (SD-LT) medium supplemented at 28 °C for 2–3 days. The minimal inhibitory concentration of 3-AT was detected by the empty pGADT7 vector plus pGBKT7-TFs, then transferred to combinations and diluted proportionally to different concentrations onto SD/-Leu-Trp-His-Ade with 4 mg/mL X-α-gal to determine the interactions between bait and prey proteins.

4.7. VIGS

Taking ‘Zunla 2.0′ genome as reference, the specific coding regions of the CaMYB113 gene were confirmed for VIGS vector construction by the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) on SGN (https://vigs.solgenomics.net/) (accessed on 11 September 2021) and used for silencing analysis [60]. A ~150 bp fragment of the coding region of CaMYB113 was inserted into the TRV2 vector by double-enzyme digestion to construct the TRV2::CaMYB113 vector. Additionally, TRV2::CaPDS, as a positive control vector, was constructed by inserting a fragment of ~100 bp of the coding region of CaPDS gene into TRV2. The two enzyme-restriction sites were XbaI and BamHI. Primers used for amplified and plasmid construction are listed in Supplementary Table S6. The constructed TRV2 vectors and TRV1 vector were transformed into A. tumefaciens (strain GV3101). Resuspending TRV1 with TRV2::CaMYB113, TRV2 (as a negative control) and TRV2::CaPDS in liquid induction medium and mixing at 1:1 ratio, OD600 = 1.0, respectively. After resuspension liquid was placed in darkness for 8 h, seedlings of 19Q6100 pepper plants at the two-leaf stage were injected. The injected seedlings were grown in a growth chamber at 22 ± 2 °C and 16 h of light/8 h of darkness, and relative humidity was controlled in the range of 80 ± 5%.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we used 19Q6100 as material, of which some part of the peel could accumulate anthocyanin by in response to UV-B exposure. A total of 108 DEGs were identified at transcriptomic levels. Y1H results suggested that CabHLH143, CaMYB113, CaMYBG, CaWRKY44, CaWRKY53, CaWRKY41 and CabHLH137 were able bind to the promoter of anthocyanin structural genes. The interactions among CaMYB113, CabHLH143 and CaHY5 were verified by Y2H. The function of CaMYB113 in UV-B-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis in pepper was discovered. Based on our results, we propose a hypothetical model of UV-B-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis in pepper fruit (Figure 6). This study could deepen our understanding of the regulatory mechanism of anthocyanin biosynthesis in pepper and also provide useful information for the future study of UV-B-induced anthocyanin accumulation in fruit peel of other species.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23041960/s1.

Author Contributions

Y.W. performed most of the experiments, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript; S.L. and H.W. performed VIGS and assisted with Y2H; Y.Z. and J.L. performed the sampling and light processing; Q.C. and W.L. assisted with data analysis; L.S. modified the manuscript; H.S. designed and directed the entire study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by Beijing Fruit Vegetables Innovation Team of Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System (BAIC01-2021), Science and Technology City Administration of Sanya Yazhou Bay (SYND-2021-19) and the Construction of Beijing Science and Technology Innovation and Service Capacity in Top Subjects (CEFF-PXM2019_014207_000032).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

RNA-Seq raw sequence data were deposited in the Short Read Archive (SRA) of NCBI and are available with accession number PRJNA790487 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA790487) (accessed on 18 December 2021).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Petroni, K.; Tonelli, C. Recent advances on the regulation of anthocyanin synthesis in reproductive organs. Plant Sci. 2011, 181, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nakabayashi, R.; Yonekura-Sakakibara, K.; Urano, K.; Suzuki, M.; Yamada, Y.; Nishizawa, T.; Matsuda, F.; Kojima, M.; Sakakibara, H.; Shinozaki, K. Enhancement of oxidative and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis by overaccumulation of antioxidant flavonoids. Plant J. 2014, 77, 367–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gould, K.S.; Dudle, D.A.; Neufeld, H.S. Why some stems are red: Cauline anthocyanins shield photosystem II against high light stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 2707–2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Olsen, K.; Slimestad, R.; Lea, U.; Brede, C.; Løvdal, T.; Ruoff, P.; Verheul, M.; Lillo, C. Temperature and nitrogen effects on regulators and products of the flavonoid pathway: Experimental and kinetic model studies. Plant Cell Envion. 2009, 32, 286–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Howe, G.; Jander, G. Plant immunity to insect herbivores. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 41–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Shang, Y.; Venail, J.; Mackay, S.; Bailey, P.C.; Schwinn, K.E.; Jameson, P.E.; Cathie, R.M.; Davies, K.M. The molecular basis for venation patterning of pigmentation and its effect on pollinator attraction in flowers of Antirrhinum. New Phytol. 2011, 189, 602–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Winkel-Shirley, B. Flavonoid biosynthesis. A colorful model for genetics, biochemistry, cell biology, and biotechnology. Plant Physiol. 2001, 126, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Koes, R.; Verweij, W.; Quattrocchio, F. Flavonoids: A colorful model for the regulation and evolution of biochemical pathways. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Jaakola, L. New insights into the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in fruits. Trends Plant Sci. 2013, 18, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Hichri, I.; Barrieu, F.; Bogs, J.; Kappel, C.; Delrot, S.; Lauvergeat, V. Recent advances in the transcriptional regulation of the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 2465–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Gonzalez, A.; Zhao, M.; Leavitt, J.; Lloyd, A. Regulation of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway by the TTG1/bHLH/Myb transcriptional complex in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant J. 2008, 53, 814–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Albert, N.; Davies, K.; Lewis, D.; Zhang, H.; Montefiori, M.; Brendolise, C.; Boase, M.; Ngo, H.; Jameson, P.; Schwinn, K. A conserved network of transcriptional activators and repressors regulates anthocyanin pigmentation in eudicots. Plant Cell. 2014, 26, 962–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Liu, Y.; Lin-Wang, K.; Espley, R.; Wang, L.; Yang, H.; Yu, B.; Dare, A.; Varkonyi-Gasic, E.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; et al. Functional diversification of the potato R2R3 MYB anthocyanin activators AN1, MYBA1, and MYB113 and their interaction with basic helix-loop-helix cofactors. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 2159–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Spelt, C.; Quattrocchio, F.; Mol, J.; Koes, R. anthocyanin1 of petunia encodes a basic helix-loop-helix protein that directly activates transcription of structural anthocyanin genes. Plant Cell. 2000, 12, 1619–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Quattrocchio, F.; Verweij, W.; Kroon, A.; Spelt, C.; Mol, J.; Koes, R. PH4 of Petunia is an R2R3 MYB protein that activates vacuolar acidification through interactions with basic-helix-loop-helix transcription factors of the anthocyanin pathway. Plant Cell. 2006, 18, 1274–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Stommel, J.R.; Dumm, J.M. Coordinated Regulation of Biosynthetic and Regulatory Genes Coincides with Anthocyanin Accumulation in Developing Eggplant Fruit. J. Am. Soc. Horitc. Sci. 2015, 140, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ravaglia, D.; Espley, R.V.; Henry-Kirk, R.A.; Andreotti, C.; Ziosi, V.; Hellens, R.P.; Costa, G.; Allan, A.C. Transcriptional regulation of flavonoid biosynthesis in nectarine (Prunus persica) by a set of R2R3 MYB transcription factors. BMC Plant Biol. 2013, 13, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hu, J.; Fang, H.; Wang, J.; Yue, X.; Su, M.; Mao, Z.; Zou, Q.; Jiang, H.; Guo, Z.; Yu, L.; et al. Ultraviolet B-induced MdWRKY72 expression promotes anthocyanin synthesis in apple. Plant Sci. 2020, 292, 110377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mahmood, K.; Xu, Z.; El-Kereamy, A.; Casaretto, J.; Rothstein, S. The Arabidopsis Transcription Factor ANAC032 Represses Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in Response to High Sucrose and Oxidative and Abiotic Stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shi, H.; Liu, G.; Wei, Y.; Chan, Z. The zinc-finger transcription factor ZAT6 is essential for hydrogen peroxide induction of anthocyanin synthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2018, 97, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guo, J.; Han, W.; Wang, M. Ultraviolet and environmental stresses involved in the induction and regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis: A review. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 7, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. van Gelderen, K.; Kang, C.; Pierik, R. Light Signaling, Root Development, and Plasticity. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 1049–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Zoratti, L.; Karppinen, K.; Luengo Escobar, A.; Häggman, H.; Jaakola, L. Light-controlled flavonoid biosynthesis in fruits. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhao, Y.; Min, T.; Chen, M.; Wang, H.; Zhu, C.; Jin, R.; Allan, A.; Lin-Wang, K.; Xu, C. The Photomorphogenic Transcription Factor PpHY5 Regulates Anthocyanin Accumulation in Response to UVA and UVB Irradiation. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 603178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, D.; Luo, Z.; Mou, W.; Wang, Y.; Ying, T.; Mao, L. ABA and UV-C effects on quality, antioxidant capacity and anthocyanin contents of strawberry fruit (Fragaria ananassa Duch.). Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2014, 90, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Henry-Kirk, R.; Plunkett, B.; Hall, M.; McGhie, T.; Allan, A.; Wargent, J.; Espley, R. Solar UV light regulates flavonoid metabolism in apple (Malus x domestica). Plant Cell Envion. 2018, 41, 675–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Qian, M.; Zhang, D.; Yue, X.; Wang, S.; Li, X.; Teng, Y. Analysis of different pigmentation patterns in ‘Mantianhong’ (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) and ‘Cascade’ (Pyrus communis L.) under bagging treatment and postharvest UV-B/visible irradiation conditions. Sci. Hortic. 2013, 151, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Catola, S.; Castagna, A.; Santin, M.; Calvenzani, V.; Petroni, K.; Mazzucato, A.; Ranieri, A. The dominant allele Aft induces a shift from flavonol to anthocyanin production in response to UV-B radiation in tomato fruit. Planta 2017, 246, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Qian, C.; Chen, Z.; Liu, Q.; Mao, W.; Chen, Y.; Tian, W.; Liu, Y.; Han, J.; Ouyang, X.; Huang, X. Coordinated Transcriptional Regulation by the UV-B Photoreceptor and Multiple Transcription Factors for Plant UV-B Responses. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 777–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Podolec, R.; Demarsy, E.; Ulm, R. Perception and Signaling of Ultraviolet-B Radiation in Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2021, 72, 793–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qiu, Z.; Wang, H.; Li, D.; Yu, B.; Hui, Q.; Yan, S.; Huang, Z.; Cui, X.; Cao, B. Identification of Candidate HY5-Dependent and -Independent Regulators of Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in Tomato. Plant Cell Physiol. 2019, 60, 643–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. An, J.; Qu, F.; Yao, J.; Wang, X.; You, C.; Wang, X.; Hao, Y. Erratum: The bZIP transcription factor MdHY5 regulates anthocyanin accumulation and nitrate assimilation in apple. Hortic. Res. 2017, 4, 17056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Lian, H.; Xu, P.; He, S.; Wu, J.; Pan, J.; Wang, W.; Xu, F.; Wang, S.; Pan, J.; Huang, J.; et al. Photoexcited CRYPTOCHROME 1 Interacts Directly with G-Protein β Subunit AGB1 to Regulate the DNA-Binding Activity of HY5 and Photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2018, 11, 1248–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Liu, C.; Chi, C.; Jin, L.; Zhu, J.; Yu, J.; Zhou, Y. The bZip transcription factor HY5 mediates CRY1a-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis in tomato. Plant Cell Envion. 2018, 41, 1762–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bursch, K.; Niemann, E.; Nelson, D.; Johansson, H. Karrikins control seedling photomorphogenesis and anthocyanin biosynthesis through a HY5-BBX transcriptional module. Plant J. 2021, 107, 1346–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Shin, D.; Choi, M.; Kim, K.; Bang, G.; Cho, M.; Choi, S.; Choi, G.; Park, Y. HY5 regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis by inducing the transcriptional activation of the MYB75/PAP1 transcription factor in Arabidopsis. FEBS Lett. 2013, 587, 1543–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Stracke, R.; Favory, J.; Gruber, H.; Bartelniewoehner, L.; Bartels, S.; Binkert, M.; Funk, M.; Weisshaar, B.; Ulm, R. The Arabidopsis bZIP transcription factor HY5 regulates expression of the PFG1/MYB12 gene in response to light and ultraviolet-B radiation. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 88–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Aguilar-Barragán, A.; Ochoa-Alejo, N. Virus-induced silencing of MYB and WD40 transcription factor genes affects the accumulation of anthocyanins in chilli pepper fruit. Bio. Plant. 2014, 58, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhen, Z.; Li, D.W.; Jin, J.H.; Yin, Y.X.; Zhang, H.X.; Chai, W.G.; Gong, Z.H. VIGS approach reveals the modulation of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes by CaMYB in chili pepper leaves. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Borovsky, Y.; Oren-Shamir, M.; Ovadia, R.; Jong, W.D.; Paran, I. The A locus that controls anthocyanin accumulation in pepper encodes a MYB transcription factor homologous to Anthocyanin2 of Petunia. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2004, 109, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tang, B.; Li, L.; Hu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Tan, T.; Jia, Y.; Xie, Q.; Chen, G. Anthocyanin Accumulation and Transcriptional Regulation of Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in Purple Pepper. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2020, 68, 12152–12163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, J.; Ai, X.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Q.; Li, T.; Wu, L.; Sun, L.; Shen, H. Fine mapping of the Ca3GT gene controlling anthocyanin biosynthesis in mature unripe fruit of Capsicum annuum L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2020, 133, 2729–2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Castagna, A.; Dall’Asta, C.; Chiavaro, E.; Galaverna, G.; Ranieri, A. Effect of Post-harvest UV-B Irradiation on Polyphenol Profile and Antioxidant Activity in Flesh and Peel of Tomato Fruits. Food Bioprocess Tech. 2014, 7, 2241–2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Lau, O.; Deng, X. The photomorphogenic repressors COP1 and DET1: 20 years later. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 584–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kubasek, W.; Shirley, B.; McKillop, A.; Goodman, H.; Briggs, W.; Ausubel, F. Regulation of Flavonoid Biosynthetic Genes in Germinating Arabidopsis Seedlings. Plant Cell. 1992, 4, 1229–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, L.; Lu, W.; Ran, L.; Dou, L.; Yao, S.; Hu, J.; Fan, D.; Li, C.; Luo, K. R2R3-MYB transcription factor MYB6 promotes anthocyanin and proanthocyanidin biosynthesis but inhibits secondary cell wall formation in Populus tomentosa. Plant J. 2019, 99, 733–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Huang, D.; Tang, Z.; Fu, J.; Yuan, Y.; Deng, X.; Xu, Q. CsMYB3 and CsRuby1 form an ‘Activator-and-Repressor’ Loop for the Regulation of Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in Citrus. Plant Cell Physiol. 2020, 61, 318–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Peng, Y.; Thrimawithana, A.; Cooney, J.; Jensen, D.; Espley, R.; Allan, A. The proanthocyanin-related transcription factors MYBC1 and WRKY44 regulate branch points in the kiwifruit anthocyanin pathway. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 141–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Duan, S.; Wang, J.; Gao, C.; Jin, C.; Li, D.; Peng, D.; Du, G.; Li, Y.; Chen, M. Functional characterization of a heterologously expressed Brassica napus WRKY41-1 transcription factor in regulating anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci. 2018, 268, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Song, X.; Yang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Chang, X.; Xian, L.; Zhang, J. Genome-wide identification of Pistacia R2R3-MYB gene family and function characterization of PcMYB113 during autumn leaf coloration in Pistacia chinensis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 192, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, Y.; Fang, Z.; Ye, X.; Pan, S. Identification of candidate genes involved in anthocyanin accumulation in the peel of jaboticaba (Myrciaria cauliflora) fruits by transcriptomic analysis. Gene 2018, 676, 202–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Qiu, Z.; Wang, X.; Gao, J.; Guo, Y.; Huang, Z.; Du, Y. The Tomato Hoffman’s Anthocyaninless Gene Encodes a bHLH Transcription Factor Involved in Anthocyanin Biosynthesis That Is Developmentally Regulated and Induced by Low Temperatures. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0151067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D.L. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-DDCt method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kim, D.; Pertea, G.; Trapnell, C.; Pimentel, H.; Kelley, R.; Salzberg, S. TopHat2: Accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the p resence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013, 14, R36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Anders, S.H.; Huber, W. Differential Expression of RNA-Seq Data at the Gene Level—The DESeqPackage. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Differential-expression-of-RNA-Seq-data-at-the-gene-Anders-Huber/81c42bdf29edd0035b237375e2270f5a31762147 (accessed on 10 April 2019).
  56. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.; Frank, M.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. JASPAR. Available online: https://jaspar.genereg.net/ (accessed on 20 August 2021).
  58. Wang, X.; An, J.; Liu, X.; Su, L.; You, C.; Hao, Y. The Nitrate-Responsive Protein MdBT2 Regulates Anthocyanin Biosynthesis by Interacting with the MdMYB1 Transcription Factor. Plant Physiol. 2018, 178, 890–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. AraPPINet. Available online: https://netbio.sjtu.edu.cn/arappinet/ (accessed on 20 August 2021).
  60. SGN. Available online: https://vigs.solgenomics.net/ (accessed on 11 September 2021).
Ijms 23 01960 g001 550
Figure 1. Analysis of anthocyanin contents, light response and expression of anthocyanin structural genes induced by UV-B in 19Q6100 pepper fruit. (A) Phenotype of UV-B-induced pepper fruit peels. (B) Anthocyanin contents in purple zone and green zone of pepper fruit peels after UV-B exposure. Numerical values are presented as means (± SE) from three independent biological replicates. (C) Relative expression of anthocyanin structural genes between purple zone and green zone of pepper fruit peels. Statistically significant differences between purple zone and green zone are indicated by Student’s t-test. (** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05). (D,E) Growth condition of pepper fruits before treatment and under red/blue light for 5 days, respectively. (F,G) Growth conditions of pepper fruits before treatment and under red/blue + UV-B light, respectively, for 5 days.
Figure 1. Analysis of anthocyanin contents, light response and expression of anthocyanin structural genes induced by UV-B in 19Q6100 pepper fruit. (A) Phenotype of UV-B-induced pepper fruit peels. (B) Anthocyanin contents in purple zone and green zone of pepper fruit peels after UV-B exposure. Numerical values are presented as means (± SE) from three independent biological replicates. (C) Relative expression of anthocyanin structural genes between purple zone and green zone of pepper fruit peels. Statistically significant differences between purple zone and green zone are indicated by Student’s t-test. (** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05). (D,E) Growth condition of pepper fruits before treatment and under red/blue light for 5 days, respectively. (F,G) Growth conditions of pepper fruits before treatment and under red/blue + UV-B light, respectively, for 5 days.
Ijms 23 01960 g001
Ijms 23 01960 g002 550
Figure 2. Transcriptome analysis between purple area and green area of pepper fruit. (A) Sampling site of pepper fruit for RNA-seq. (B) GO pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes. (C) FPKM analysis of anthocyanin-biosynthesis-related regulatory genes and anthocyanin structural genes among differentially expressed genes between purple area and green area. The color scale from green to red indicates the value of log2FPKM.
Figure 2. Transcriptome analysis between purple area and green area of pepper fruit. (A) Sampling site of pepper fruit for RNA-seq. (B) GO pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes. (C) FPKM analysis of anthocyanin-biosynthesis-related regulatory genes and anthocyanin structural genes among differentially expressed genes between purple area and green area. The color scale from green to red indicates the value of log2FPKM.
Ijms 23 01960 g002
Ijms 23 01960 g003 550
Figure 3. CabHLH143, CaWRKY41 and CabHLH137 interacted with the promoter of CaDFR, and CabHLH143, CaMYB113, CaMYBG, CaWRKY44 and CaWRKY53 interacted with the promoter of CaANS. (A) Growth conditions of PLacZi-DFRpro + PB42AD and PLacZi-ANSpro + PB42AD on SD/-Trp and growth conditions on SD/-Trp-Ura of different concentrations of 3-AT. (B) The interaction between CaDFR and anthocyanin-biosynthesis-related TFs and between CaANS and anthocyanin-biosynthesis-related TFs in yeast cells, respectively. Four black squares of SD-Trp-Ura (from left to right) represent four dilution concentrations. There are basically three replicates for each concentration of each combination.
Figure 3. CabHLH143, CaWRKY41 and CabHLH137 interacted with the promoter of CaDFR, and CabHLH143, CaMYB113, CaMYBG, CaWRKY44 and CaWRKY53 interacted with the promoter of CaANS. (A) Growth conditions of PLacZi-DFRpro + PB42AD and PLacZi-ANSpro + PB42AD on SD/-Trp and growth conditions on SD/-Trp-Ura of different concentrations of 3-AT. (B) The interaction between CaDFR and anthocyanin-biosynthesis-related TFs and between CaANS and anthocyanin-biosynthesis-related TFs in yeast cells, respectively. Four black squares of SD-Trp-Ura (from left to right) represent four dilution concentrations. There are basically three replicates for each concentration of each combination.
Ijms 23 01960 g003
Ijms 23 01960 g004 550
Figure 4. CaMYB113 interacted with CaHY5 and CabHLH143. (A) pGBKT7-bHLH143 has self-activation on SD/-Trp-Leu-His-Ade, and pGBKT7-HY5 does not. (B) Growth conditions of pGBKT7-bHLH143 + pGADT7 on SD/-Trp-Leu-His-Ade with different concentrations of 3-AT. (C) CaMYB113 interacts with CabHLH143 and CaHY5 in yeast cells. The minimum concentration of 3-AT required to inhibit self-activation of pGBKT7-bHLH143 is 30 mM/L. Four black squares represent four dilution concentrations. There are three replicates for each concentration of each combination.
Figure 4. CaMYB113 interacted with CaHY5 and CabHLH143. (A) pGBKT7-bHLH143 has self-activation on SD/-Trp-Leu-His-Ade, and pGBKT7-HY5 does not. (B) Growth conditions of pGBKT7-bHLH143 + pGADT7 on SD/-Trp-Leu-His-Ade with different concentrations of 3-AT. (C) CaMYB113 interacts with CabHLH143 and CaHY5 in yeast cells. The minimum concentration of 3-AT required to inhibit self-activation of pGBKT7-bHLH143 is 30 mM/L. Four black squares represent four dilution concentrations. There are three replicates for each concentration of each combination.
Ijms 23 01960 g004
Ijms 23 01960 g005 550
Figure 5. Analysis of VIGS of the CaMYB113 gene. (A) White vertical stripes appear on the pepper fruit peel inoculated with TRV2-PDS. (B,C) Phenotype of pepper fruits inoculated with TRV2 as controls before treatment and UV-B-induced for 5 days. (D,E) Phenotype of pepper fruits inoculated with TRV2-CaMYB113 before treatment and UV-B-induced for 5 days. (F) Anthocyanin contents in fruit peels between TRV2-inoculated and TRV2-CaMYB113-inoculated plants UV-B-induced for 5 days. Numerical values are presented as means (± SE) from three independent biological replicates. (G–N) Relative expression of CaMYB113, CabHLH143 and anthocyanin structural genes in fruit peels of TRV2-inoculated and TRV2-CaMYB113-inoculated plants before treatment and UV-B-induced for 5 days, respectively. Statistically significant differences between purple zone and green zone determined by Student’s t-test. (** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Analysis of VIGS of the CaMYB113 gene. (A) White vertical stripes appear on the pepper fruit peel inoculated with TRV2-PDS. (B,C) Phenotype of pepper fruits inoculated with TRV2 as controls before treatment and UV-B-induced for 5 days. (D,E) Phenotype of pepper fruits inoculated with TRV2-CaMYB113 before treatment and UV-B-induced for 5 days. (F) Anthocyanin contents in fruit peels between TRV2-inoculated and TRV2-CaMYB113-inoculated plants UV-B-induced for 5 days. Numerical values are presented as means (± SE) from three independent biological replicates. (G–N) Relative expression of CaMYB113, CabHLH143 and anthocyanin structural genes in fruit peels of TRV2-inoculated and TRV2-CaMYB113-inoculated plants before treatment and UV-B-induced for 5 days, respectively. Statistically significant differences between purple zone and green zone determined by Student’s t-test. (** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05).
Ijms 23 01960 g005
Ijms 23 01960 g006 550
Figure 6. A hypothetical model of UV-B-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis in pepper fruit. A UV-B signal activates the UVR8 receptor-forming monomer, which binds to the COP1 protein and releases HY5. HY5 not only binds directly to the anthocyanin structural genes but also upregulates the expression of CaMYB113. CaMYB113 and CabHLH143 may regulate the expression of several anthocyanin structural genes by forming a complex. The above processes ultimately promote the accumulation of anthocyanins. In addition, some TFs that may be involved in the regulation of anthocyanin structural genes still need to be studied in depth. (The solid line represents the results of this study, and the dotted line represents those of previously reported studies.).
Figure 6. A hypothetical model of UV-B-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis in pepper fruit. A UV-B signal activates the UVR8 receptor-forming monomer, which binds to the COP1 protein and releases HY5. HY5 not only binds directly to the anthocyanin structural genes but also upregulates the expression of CaMYB113. CaMYB113 and CabHLH143 may regulate the expression of several anthocyanin structural genes by forming a complex. The above processes ultimately promote the accumulation of anthocyanins. In addition, some TFs that may be involved in the regulation of anthocyanin structural genes still need to be studied in depth. (The solid line represents the results of this study, and the dotted line represents those of previously reported studies.).
Ijms 23 01960 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, W.; Liu, J.; Cheng, Q.; Sun, L.; Shen, H. Identification of the Regulatory Genes of UV-B-Induced Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in Pepper Fruit. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23041960

AMA Style

Wang Y, Liu S, Wang H, Zhang Y, Li W, Liu J, Cheng Q, Sun L, Shen H. Identification of the Regulatory Genes of UV-B-Induced Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in Pepper Fruit. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(4):1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23041960

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yihao, Sujun Liu, Haoran Wang, Yingxue Zhang, Wenjie Li, Jinkui Liu, Qing Cheng, Liang Sun, and Huolin Shen. 2022. "Identification of the Regulatory Genes of UV-B-Induced Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in Pepper Fruit" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 4: 1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23041960

APA Style

Wang, Y., Liu, S., Wang, H., Zhang, Y., Li, W., Liu, J., Cheng, Q., Sun, L., & Shen, H. (2022). Identification of the Regulatory Genes of UV-B-Induced Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in Pepper Fruit. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(4), 1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23041960

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop