Next Article in Journal
Chaperone Hsp70 (HSPA1) Is Involved in the Molecular Mechanisms of Sleep Cycle Integration
Next Article in Special Issue
Natural Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Hyperaccumulation and Hypertolerance towards Heavy Metals
Previous Article in Journal
Bone Marrow Niches of Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Physiological and Gene Expression Responses of Six Annual Ryegrass Cultivars to Cobalt, Lead, and Nickel Stresses
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

MAPK Cascades and Transcriptional Factors: Regulation of Heavy Metal Tolerance in Plants

1
State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
2
Forestry Faculty, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
3
Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding of Zhejiang Province, The Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou 311400, China
4
Institute of Virology and Biotechnology, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China
5
Key Laboratory of Three Gorges Regional Plant Genetic and Germplasm Enhancement (CTGU), Biotechnology Research Center, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to the work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(8), 4463; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084463
Submission received: 20 March 2022 / Revised: 15 April 2022 / Accepted: 16 April 2022 / Published: 18 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heavy Metals Accumulation, Toxicity and Detoxification in Plants 2.0)

Abstract

:
In nature, heavy metal (HM) stress is one of the most destructive abiotic stresses for plants. Heavy metals produce toxicity by targeting key molecules and important processes in plant cells. The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade transfers the signals perceived by cell membrane surface receptors to cells through phosphorylation and dephosphorylation and targets various effector proteins or transcriptional factors so as to result in the stress response. Signal molecules such as plant hormones, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and nitric oxide (NO) can activate the MAPK cascade through differentially expressed genes, the activation of the antioxidant system and synergistic crosstalk between different signal molecules in order to regulate plant responses to HMs. Transcriptional factors, located downstream of MAPK, are key factors in regulating plant responses to heavy metals and improving plant heavy metal tolerance and accumulation. Thus, understanding how HMs activate the expression of the genes related to the MAPK cascade pathway and then phosphorylate those transcriptional factors may allow us to develop a regulation network to increase our knowledge of HMs tolerance and accumulation. This review highlighted MAPK pathway activation and responses under HMs and mainly focused on the specificity of MAPK activation mediated by ROS, NO and plant hormones. Here, we also described the signaling pathways and their interactions under heavy metal stresses. Moreover, the process of MAPK phosphorylation and the response of downstream transcriptional factors exhibited the importance of regulating targets. It was conducive to analyzing the molecular mechanisms underlying heavy metal accumulation and tolerance.

1. Introduction

Among a variety of soil pollutants, heavy metal pollution is a key worldwide environmental issue. Heavy metals (HMs) cannot be decomposed and will be available in the soil permanently. Heavy metals usually exist in the environment and interact with plants and human systems. The toxicity of HMs in the environment is the product of natural and human actions [1]. HMs are inorganic and non-biodegradable pollutants which are not easy to metabolize. Therefore, their concentrations in soil are increasing significantly [2]. In the surrounding environment, accidental biomagnification and bioaccumulation of heavy metals have become a predicament for all organisms, including plants [3].
A variety of heavy metals in the soil are absorbed by plants. These heavy metals may or may not be necessary for the normal growth of plants [4]. When the growth and development of plants are constantly stressed by heavy metals, their biological systems are irreversibly damaged, resulting in reductions in plant yield and productivity [5]. Therefore, plants respond to and adapt to these environmental challenges through a series of physiological and biochemical changes. This process involves a series of complex signal pathways [6,7]. Essentially, stress sources can induce intracellular signal perception through external signals (calcium or miRNA) [8]. On this basis, the signals sensed by cell membrane surface receptors are amplified step-by-step through phosphorylation and dephosphorylation and transmitted to cells [9]. In cells, signals can activate specific effector proteins, such as kinases, enzymes or transcriptional factors, in the cytoplasm or nucleus and regulate the expression of specific genes [10].
Heavy metal stress signals of different intermediate molecules activate different transcriptional factors, resulting in the expression of different antioxidant enzymes [11]. Among them, protein phosphorylation is an important signal transduction mode in plants, which is catalyzed by mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). MAPKs are just some of the most principal and highly conserved signaling molecules in eukaryotes. They function downstream of the sensor/receptor to coordinate cellular responses for normal growth and development of the organism [12]. MAPKs can be easily identified based on sequence similarity and the signature TXY activation motif and enable the transmission of signals generated by ligand–receptor interactions with downstream substrates [13].
There are various MAPK pathways in cells. Each pathway is interrelated and independent and plays a major role in cell signal transmission. In plants, the MAPK cascade is intertwined with other signal transduction pathways to form a molecular interaction network [14]. Diverse cellular functions in plants, including growth, development, biological and abiotic stress responses, are regulated by this network. For instance, MAPK in plants can target and regulate bZIP, MYB, MYC and WRKY transcriptional factors under stress conditions [15]. However, considerable progress has been achieved in understanding the mechanism of action of the MAPK cascade in plant innate immunity. Upon Rhizoctonia cerealis infection, strongly upregulated TaMKK5 activates TaMPK3, and the phosphorylated TaMPK3 interacts with and phosphorylates TaERF3 [16]. However, it is seldom reported that the MAPK signal is induced and activated by downstream transcriptional factors under heavy metal stress. The roots are the plant’s main organ for uptake of heavy metal from the soil [17]. When the roots perceive heavy metal stress, they immediately trigger the signal transduction system and mediate the transcriptional regulation of related genes in the plants. Conserved MAPK signaling pathways are known to regulate cell growth and death, differentiation, the cell cycle and stress responses. MAPK is a series of phosphorylation steps from MAPKKKs (MKK kinases), via MAPKKs (MAPK kinases), to MAPK [18]. Its main function is to phosphorylate related transcriptional factors. Subsequently, transcriptional factors can induce metal response gene expression by binding specific cis-regulatory elements. Each hierarchy of the MAPK cascade is encoded by a small gene family, and multiple members can function redundantly in an MAPK cascade [19]. Plant MAPKs are usually located in the cytoplasm and/or nucleus, although they may also be transferred from the cytoplasm to the nucleus in some cases [20].
It is essential to understand the progress of signal transduction and regulation pathways in plants under heavy metal stress. Thus, we focused on the molecular mechanisms of heavy metals entering plant cells to produce reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide and plant hormones and activate the MAPK cascade signal pathway. In addition, the downstream transcriptional factors responding to genes of the MAPK cascade are also summarized (Figure 1). This review provides more comprehensive background knowledge of plants under heavy metal stress and new insights into the molecular mechanisms of transcriptional factors in heavy metal tolerance and accumulation.

2. MAPK Was Directly Activated under Heavy Metal Stress

As a cell signaling enzyme, MAPK regulates a variety of biological processes in eukaryotes [21]. MAPK pathways are very developed and complex and are usually induced to deal with biological and abiotic stress.
In plants, heavy metal stress initiates a variety of signal pathways, including the MAPK cascade (Table 1). In Broussonetia papyrifera roots, under cadmium (Cd) stress over time, MAPK transcripts were downregulated at 3 hours but upregulated at 6 h [22]. Moreover, OsMPK3 and OsMPK6 overexpression lines increased the transcription level of the stress response genes encoding superoxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase, glutamine synthase and aldehyde oxidase under arsenic stress and drought stress [23]. Furthermore, the SlMAPK3 gene of the tomato was significantly induced under Cd2+ treatment. The overexpression of SlMAPK3 significantly increased leaf chlorophyll content, root biomass accumulation and root activity in transgenic plants, demonstrating that SlMAPK3 enhanced Cd tolerance [24].

3. Different Signal Molecules Activate MAPK Pathway under Heavy Metal Stresses

The MAPK cascade can interact with signal molecules such as plant hormones, active ROS and NO. The crosstalk between ABA, auxin, MAPK signaling and the cell cycle in Cd-stressed rice seedlings has also been described [38]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, exposure to excess Cd or copper (Cu) led to the activation of NADPH oxidases, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) overproduction and MAPK cascades [39]. In addition, the roots of soybean seedlings treated with 25 mg·L−1 Cd showed increased NO production and the upregulation of the MAKPK2 transcription level [40].

3.1. ROS

It is well known that reactive oxygen species in plants are induced by heavy metals; thereby, ROS, as signal molecules, lead to the activation of MAPK kinases [41]. Two important MAPK cascades (MEKK1-MKK4/5-MPK3/6 and MEKK1-MKK2-MPK4/6) act downstream of ROS, which were found to participate in both abiotic and biotic stresses [25,26]. As a redox active metal, a certain concentration of Cu2+ directly induces the formation of ROS. When Alfalfa seedlings were exposed to excessive Cu2+, ROS accumulated and activated four different mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs): SIMK, MMK2, MMK3 and SAMK [27]. Except for Cu2+, Cd stress was able to activate ZmMPK3-1 and ZmMPK6-1 via ROS induction in maize roots [29]. Moreover, the activities of MPK3 and MPK6 increased significantly in Cd-treated Arabidopsis seedlings, whereas this increase disappeared in the plants pretreated with the ROS scavenger glutathione (GSH). The above results fully indicate that Cu2+- or Cd2+-induced ROS accumulation in plants activate MAPK cascade [28].
H2O2, as a product of oxidative stress, is involved in amplifying the functions of signal molecules. MAPK can also be activated by H2O2 to maintain intracellular homeostasis [42]. Furthermore, the overexpression of downstream MAPK may also be a signaling transmission mechanism after sensing H2O2 [43]. These signaling components contain at least three specific phosphorylated kinases (MAPK2, MAPK3 and MAPK6), which can be observed in all living cells. Moreover, excessive Cu led to the activation of NADPH and the excessive production of H2O2, thereby inducing the MAPK cascade in Arabidopsis roots [39]. All these results indicate that the MAPK cascade activated by ROS molecules can play an important role under different metal stresses.

3.2. NO

NO is involved in plant growth and development and regulates heavy metal responses in plants [31]. In HM treated plants, the interaction between the NO signal and the MAPK cascade has long been known [32]. Application of NO to Arabidopsis roots can rapidly activate protein kinases with MAPK properties [30]. When two-week-old Arabidopsis was exposed to 100 µM CdCl2 for 24 h, Cd2+-induced NO production was investigated with the NO-sensitive fluorescent probe DAF-FM diacetate. Moreover, Cd2+-induced MAPK and caspase-3-like activities were inhibited in the presence of the NO-specific scavenger (cPTIO). These results prove that NO can quickly activate protein kinases with MAPK characteristics in Arabidopsis roots [33]. On the contrary, the caspase-3-like activity was significantly inhibited in mpk6 mutants after Cd2+ treatment, and the tolerance of Arabidopsis mpk6 mutants to Cd2+ and NO concentrations was also reduced [34].
In addition, this seriously affects the growth of rice seedlings and promotes the production of ROS and NO in rice roots after excessive Ar exposure. Subsequently, MAPK and MPK were activated in rice leaves and roots, respectively [35].

3.3. Plant Hormones

A number of phytohormones such as salicylic acid (SA), abscisic acid (ABA), auxin (IAA) and ethylene (ET) participated in important stress-related and developmental plant processes. The MAPKs homolog AtMPK3 and AtMPK6 of Arabidopsis are mainly involved in some environmental and hormonal responses [36]. As a homolog of AtMPK6, SIPK of tobacco has been proved to be a protein kinase induced by SA, which can be activated under environmental stresses [37]. Upon exposure to Cd, ABA could partially compensate the inhibitory effect of Cd on rice root growth, reduce auxin accumulation and affect the distribution of auxin. Moreover, the key genes of auxin signal transduction, including YUCCA, PIN, ARF and IAA, are negatively regulated by MAPK [38]. Moreover, ET and MAPK signal pathway–related genes were induced in soybean seedlings with Cd treatment. Subsequently, promoter sequence analysis showed that multiple regulatory motifs sensitive to ET and other plant hormones were found in MAPKK2 [32].

4. Transcriptional Factors Regulate Heavy Metal Tolerance

MAPKs can phosphorylate various transcriptional factors in different abiotic stresses [44,45]. Transcriptional factors contain many phosphorylation sites and can regulate heavy metal stress by controlling the expression of downstream genes (Table 2). They also function as a central component in the regulatory networks of heavy metal detoxification and tolerance. Currently, many transcriptional factors with regard to heavy metal detoxification and tolerance have been found in plants. Among them, transcriptional factors such as basic leucine zipper (bZIP), heat shock transcription factor (HSF), WRKY, myeloblastosis protein (MYB) and ethylene-responsive transcription factor (ERF) have been known to play important roles in regulating heavy metal detoxification and tolerance in plants (Figure 1).

4.1. bZIP

bZIPs, a large family of transcriptional factors in plants, are involved in a variety of biological processes and environmental challenges. A total of 135 bZIP-encoding genes were discovered by analyzing the whole genome and transcriptome of radish (Raphanus Sativus). Specifically, RsbZIP010 exhibited downregulated expression under a variety of heavy metal stresses, such as Cd, Cr and lead (Pb) stresses [46]. In the Glycyrrhiza uralensis genome, 66 members of the GubZIP gene family were identified using a series of bioinformatics methods based on the hidden Markov model (HMM). Among them, 45 and 51 GubZIP genes were differentially expressed genes in roots and leaves under 0.02 g·kg−1 Cd stress, respectively [47].
Recently, LOC_Os02g52780, an ABA-dependent stress-related gene that belongs to the bZIP transcription factor family, was found by mapping QTL using 120 rice recombinant inbred lines and further testified to Cd accumulation in rice grains. The significant difference in the expression of the LOC_Os02g52780 gene between parents indicates that they are related to the tolerance of rice to Cd stress, which may affect Cd accumulation in rice grains [48]. TGA (TGACG motif-binding factor) factor in Arabidopsis is a member of a subfamily of bZIP transcription regulators and is involved in the induction of pathogenic phase- and resistance-related genes [49]. When Arabidopsis responded to chromium (Cr6+) stress, bZIP transcription factor TGA3 enhanced transcription of L-cysteine desulfhydrase (LCD) through a calcium (Ca2+)/calmodulin2 (CaM2)-mediated pathway and then promoted the generation of hydrogen sulfide (H2S), whereas H2S can trigger various defense responses and help reduce accumulation of HMs in plants [50]. In heavy metal accumulator Brassica juncea, the TGA3 homologous gene BjCdR15 is upregulated in plants with Cd treatment for 6 h, indicating that BjCdR15 transcription factor plays an irreplaceable role in regulating the absorption and long-distance transport of Cd. Western analysis showed that the abundance of AtPCS1 protein increased significantly in Cd-treated plant shoots. Moreover, its overexpression confers tolerance and accumulation of Cd in A. thaliana and tobacco due to the regulation of the synthesis of phytochelatin synthase and the expression of several metal transporters [51]. BnbZIP3 from Boehmeria nivea positively regulates heavy metal tolerance. On the contrary, BnbZIP2 shows higher sensitivity to drought and heavy metal Cd stress during seed germination [52]. Additionally, bZIP transcription factor also interacts with other transcriptional factors (TFs) or mediates the downstream TFs to regulate Cd uptake. For example, bZIP transcription factor ABSCISIC ACID-INSENSITIVE5 (ABI5) interacts with MYB49 and represses its function by preventing its binding to the downstream genes bHLH38, bHLH101, HIPP22 and HIPP44, resulting in the inactivation of IRT1 and a reduction in Cd uptake in A. thaliana [53]. In the zinc deficiency reaction in A. thaliana, two members of group F in the bZIP transcriptional factors, bZIP19 and bZIP23, can bind zinc (Zn) ions to the zinc sensor motif and play the function of a central regulator [54,55].

4.2. MYB

MYB proteins are key regulators controlling development, metabolism and responses to biotic and abiotic stresses [83]. In rice, OsMYB45 positively regulates Cd stress, and its mutant exhibited lower catalase (CAT) activity and higher concentrations of H2O2 in the leaves compared with the wild-type [56]. SbMYB15, from a succulent halophyte Salicornia brachiata Roxb, is an important heavy metal response gene. Overexpression of SbMYB15 in transgenic tobacco can reduce the absorption of heavy metal ions Cd and nickel (Ni) and improve the scavenging activities of the antioxidative enzymes (CAT and SOD) [57]. AtMYB4 regulates Cd tolerance by enhancing protection against oxidative damage and increases expression of PCS1 and MT1C [58]. Furthermore, JrMYB2 from Juglans regia is considered to be an upstream regulator of JrVHAG1 that improves CdCl2 tolerance in plants. Under Cd treatment, the heterologous overexpression of JrVHAG1 in A. thaliana showed a significant increase in fresh weight and primary root length and higher activities of SOD and POD compared with the wild-type [59].
As is a toxic metalloid in plants, usually in combination with sulfur and metals, and can be found in two inorganic forms, arsenite [As (III)] and arsenate [As (V)] [84]. Rice R2R3 MYB transcription factor OsARM1 (ARSENITE-RESPONSIVE MYB1) regulates the absorption of As (III) and root-to-stem transport by regulating the As-associated transporters (OsLsi1, OsLsi2 and OsLsi6) [61]. In Arabidopsis, AtMYB40 negatively regulated the expression of PHT1;1 (Pi transporter) and positively regulated the expression of PCS1, ABCC1 and ABCC2, which acts as a central regulator conferring plant As (V) tolerance and reducing As (V) uptake [62].
In addition to Cd and As, MYB transcriptional factors are also involved in the homeostasis or absorption of essential elements such as Zn and iron (Fe). MYB72 is involved in metal homeostasis in Arabidopsis, and its knockout mutant was more sensitive to excess Zn or Fe deficiency compared to the wild-type [60]. Moreover, DwMYB2 from the orchid can enhance Fe absorption as a regulator. In DwMYB2-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants, the Fe content in roots is two-fold higher compared to that in wild-type roots, while the reverse is true in shoots. This difference in Fe content between roots and shoots indicated that the translocation of iron from root to shoot in transgenic plants was regulated by DwMYB2 [63].

4.3. WRKY

WRKY proteins, composed of a WRKY domain (WRKYGQK) and a zinc finger motif, can generally recognize the cis-acting W-box elements (TTGACC/T) of downstream genes. WRKY genes were found in many plant genome databases. A total of 126 WRKY genes have been found in the radish genome database. RT-qPCR analysis showed that 36 RsWRKY genes changed significantly under one or more heavy metal stresses. Specifically, 24 and 20 RsWRKY transcripts were induced under Cd and Pb treatments, respectively [64]. In soybean, 29 Cd-responsive WRKY genes were retrieved through the comprehensive transcriptome analysis of soybean under Cd stress. The overexpression of GmWRKY142 in A. thaliana and soybean decreased Cd uptake and positively regulated Cd tolerance. Further analysis indicated GmWRKY142 activated the transcription of AtCDT1 (Digitaria ciliaris cadmium tolerance 1), GmCDT1-1 and GmCDT1-2 by directly binding to the W-box element in their promoters; however, CDT1 rich in cysteine (Cys) proteins are important chelators of Cd [68]. Besides, AtWRKY6 controls As (V) uptake through the regulation of Pi transporters while simultaneously restricting arsenate-induced transposon activation [70].
WRKY can enhance plant Cd tolerance or maintain the balance of metal ions by regulating downstream functional genes. AtWRKY12 negatively regulates Cd tolerance in Arabidopsis though directly binding to the W-box of the promoter in GSH1 and indirectly repressing phytochelatin synthesis–related gene expression [65]. Another WRKY transcription factor AtWRKY13 enhances plant Cd tolerance by directly upregulating an ABC transporter PDR8 [66] and promoting D-cysteine desulfhydrase and hydrogen sulfide production in Arabidopsis [67]. Additionally, AtWRKY47 regulates genes responsible for cell wall modification (e.g., XTH17, ELP), which can maintain aluminum (Al) balance in ectoplasts and symplasts and improves Al tolerance [69].

4.4. HSF

Heat shock transcription factor is well known for responding to external heat stress. The member of class A has also been reported to be involved in the heavy metal stress response. A total of 22 Hsf members were identified in Cd/Zn/Pb hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii and phylogenetically clustered into three classes, SaHsfA, SaHsfB and SaHsfC. In detail, 18 SaHsfs were responsive to Cd stress [71]. The expression levels of SaHsfA4c transcripts and proteins in all tissues were induced by Cd. Concurrently, it can upregulate ROS-related genes and HSPs, resulting in lower levels of ROS accumulation after Cd stress in transgenic Arabidopsis and non-hyperaccumulation ecotype S. alfredii [72]. HsfA4a in wheat and rice, all belonging to class A4a Hsfs, can confer Cd tolerance by upregulating metallothionine gene expression [73]. Transcriptome analysis of Cd-treated switchgrass roots showed that HSF/HSP was involved in the process of normal protein conformation reconstruction and intracellular homeostasis under Cd stress. Overexpression of an HSP gene in Arabidopsis significantly improved the tolerance of plants to Cd [74]. Transcription factor heat shock factor A1a (HsfA1a) can induce melatonin biosynthesis to some extent and endow tomato plants with Cd tolerance [75]. Moreover, PuHSFA4a from Populus ussuriensis regulates the target genes PuGSTU17 and PuPLA to activate the antioxidant system and root development, thereby promoting excess-Zn tolerance in roots [76]. Therefore, the members of class HsfA enhance heavy metal tolerance by regulating the expression of key genes such as heavy metal chelators or antioxidants.

4.5. Other TFs

In addition to bZIP, MYB, WRKY and HSF, other transcription factor families also regulate the heavy metal response. In Aegilops markgrafii, overexpression of AemNAC2 in wheat led to reduced Cd concentrations, thus contributing to Cd tolerance [77]. Vigna umbellata NAC-type TF, VuNAR1, confers Al resistance by regulating cell wall pectin metabolism [78]. Cd induces the expression of a C2H2 zinc-finger transcription factor, ZAT6, which could directly target GSH1 expression, thereby triggering Cd-activated PC synthesis in Arabidopsis [79]. Basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) transcriptional factors AtbHLH104, AtbHLH38 and AtbHLH39 positively regulate genes involved in heavy metal absorption and detoxification [80,81]. There is also a complex regulation network between these transcriptional factors. For example, the ABA-mediated ABI5-MYB49-HIPP regulatory network repressed Cd uptake in Arabidopsis [76]. In Phaseolus vulgaris, ethylene responsive factors PvERF15 and metal response element-binding transcription factor (MTF) PvMTF-1 form a Cd-stress transcriptional pathway [82].

5. Conclusions

The MAPK cascade pathway is known to play an important role in plant growth, development and resistance to stress. For example, drought stress activates the MAPK cascade, phosphorylates selected targets and controls the activities of phospholipase, microtubule associated protein, cytoskeleton protein, kinase and other transcriptional factors in response to drought stress. A novel GhMAP3K15-GhMKK4-GhMPK6-GhWRKY59 phosphorylation loop that regulates the GhDREB2-mediated and ABA-independent drought responses in cotton has been identified [85,86]. However, in comparison with other abiotic stresses, there is little information about the MAPK cascade phosphorylating transcriptional factors in plant responses to heavy metals. Heavy metals have the characteristics of strong biological toxicity and rapid migration. They can lead to plant nutritional defects, inhibition of chlorophyll synthesis, reduction of photosynthesis, oxidative stress and, finally, inhibit plant growth and even result in death [87]. Plant roots sense heavy metal stress, trigger signal transduction and then cause a series of changes in physiological state and microstructure. Plant responses to HMs are regulated by the differential expression of genes, the enhancement of antioxidant-system activity and by the synergistic crosstalk between signal molecules. In depth understanding of the plants’ heavy metal stress perception, signal transduction and response processes are the prerequisites for plants to maintain stability under stress conditions [88]. The perception of heavy metal stress can trigger a variety of signal molecules in plants, such as NO, hormones, ROS, etc. These signaling molecules may activate the MAPK cascade. The kinase signal from upstream transmits to the downstream receptor and activates transcriptional factors, such as bZIP, HSF, MYB, WRKY, etc. These transcriptional factors promote the absorption, transport, isolation and detoxification of HMs by regulating downstream functional genes. These cascade responses involve complex and ordered mechanisms of the synergistic intracellular and extracellular regulation of homeostasis which is designed to translate extracellular stimuli into intracellular responses. Improving the chances of plant survival in heavy metal environments requires the activation of multiple defense responses.
At present, the research on plant response to heavy metal stress has been carried out continuously. Although many signaling molecules are involved in plant responses to HM exposure, the exact nature of signal transduction is still unclear, as are the interactions between signal molecules and the functions of target proteins. In addition, there are still some gaps in our knowledge regarding the regulatory circuits of stress responses required for the protection of plant reproductive development. Therefore, it is necessary to explore a variety of ways to understand the tolerance and accumulation mechanisms of plants to HMs. In future studies, the key genes involved in HM accumulation should be further determined. At the molecular level, it is of great significance to clarify the interactions of signal transduction and signal cascades in plants with heavy metal exposure.

Author Contributions

S.L. drafted and revised the manuscript and drew the diagrams.; Z.L., W.Q., M.Y., Z.H. and H.L. revised part of the manuscript; X.H. supervised the whole process and conceived the paper; and X.H. and R.Z. contributed to the revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31872168) and the Zhejiang Science and Technology Major Program on Agricultural New Variety Breeding (2021C02070-1).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

HMheavy metal
MAPKmitogen-activated protein kinases
MAPKKKMAPKK kinase
MAPKKMAPK kinase
ROSactive oxygen
H2O2hydrogen peroxide
SAsalicylic acid
ABAabscisic acid
IAAauxin
ETethylene
bZIPbasic leucine zipper
HSFheat shock transcription factor
MYBmyeloblastosis protein
ERFethylene-responsive transcription factor
bHLHBasic helix–loop–helix
WRKYWRKYGQK domain
TFstranscriptional factors
H2Shydrogen sulfide

References

  1. Kosakivska, I.V.; Babenko, L.M.; Romanenko, K.O.; Korotka, I.Y.; Potters, G. Molecular mechanisms of plant adaptive responses to heavy metals stress. Cell Biol. Int. 2021, 45, 258–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ebrahimi, M.; Khalili, N.; Razi, S.; Keshavarz-Fathi, M.; Khalili, N.; Rezaei, N. Effects of lead and cadmium on the immune system and cancer progression. J. Environ. Health Sci. 2020, 18, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ali, S.; Abbas, Z.; Seleiman, M.F.; Rizwan, M.; Kalderis, D. Glycine betaine accumulation, significance and interests for heavy metal tolerance in plants. Plants 2020, 9, 896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hasan, N.; Choudhary, S.; Naaz, N.; Sharma, N. The mechanism of heavy metal elements in various biological process and its deteriorate effects on the productivity of different crop plants. Int. J. Waste Resour. 2021, 11, 403. [Google Scholar]
  5. Husen, A. The Harsh Environment and Resilient Plants: An Overview. In Harsh Environ. Plant Resil; Husen, A., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  6. Haak, D.C.; Fukao, T.; Grene, R.; Hua, Z.; Ivanov, R.; Perrella, G.; Li, S. Multilevel regulation of abiotic stress responses in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kumar, K.; Raina, S.K.; Sultan, S.M. Arabidopsis MAPK signaling pathways and their cross talks in abiotic stress response. J. Plant Biochem. Biot. 2020, 29, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ding, Y.F.; Ding, L.H.; Xia, Y.J.; Wang, F.J.; Zhu, C. Emerging Roles of microRNAs in plant heavy metal tolerance and homeostasis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 1958–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mondal, S.; Pramanik, K.; Ghosh, S.K.; Pal, P.; Ghosh, P.K.; Ghosh, A.; Maiti, T.K. Molecular insight into arsenic uptake, transport, phytotoxicity, and defense responses in plants: A critical review. Planta 2022, 255, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hao, S.H.; Wang, Y.R.; Yan, Y.X.; Liu, Y.H.; Wang, J.Y.; Chen, S. A review on plant responses to salt stress and their mechanisms of salt resistance. Horticulturae 2021, 6, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kaur, R.; Das, S.; Bansal, S.; Singh, G.; Sardar, S.; Dhar, H.; Ram, H. Heavy metal stress in rice: Uptake, transport, signaling, and tolerance mechanisms. Physiol. Plant 2021, 173, 430–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sharma, D.; Verma, N.; Pandey, C.; Verma, D.; Bhagat, P.K.; Noryang, S.; Tayyeba, S.; Banerjee, G.; Sinha, A.K. MAP Kinase as Regulators for Stress Responses in Plants: An Overview. In Protein Kinases and Stress Signaling in Plants; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  13. Komis, G.; Šamajová, O.; Ovečka, M.; Šamaj, J. Cell and developmental biology of plant mitogen-activated protein kinases. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2018, 69, 237–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sharma, S.S.; Kumar, V.; Dietz, K.J. Emerging trends in metalloid-dependent signaling in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2021, 26, 452–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Andreasson, E.; Ellis, B. Convergence and specificity in the Arabidopsis MAPK nexus. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, K.; Shao, Z.; Guo, F.; Wang, K.; Zhang, Z. The mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase TaMKK5 mediates immunity via the TaMKK5–TaMPK3–TaERF3 module. Plant Physiol. 2021, 187, 2323–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xue, W.X.; Jiang, Y.; Shang, X.S.; Zou, J.H. Characterisation of early responses in lead accumulation and localization of Salix babylonica L. roots. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jonak, C.; Ökrész, L.; Bögre, L.; Hirt, H. Complexity, cross talk and integration of plant MAP kinase signalling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2002, 5, 415–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, M.M.; Zhang, S.Q. Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in plant signaling. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2022, 64, 301–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bigeard, J.; Hirt, H. Nuclear signaling of plant MAPKs. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. He, X.; Wang, C.; Wang, H.; Li, L.; Wang, C. The function of MAPK cascades in response to various stresses in horticultural plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, Z.G.; Dong, M.; Peng, X.Y.; Ku, W.Z.; Zhao, Y.L.; Yang, G.Y. New insight into the molecular basis of cadmium stress responses of wild paper mulberry plant by transcriptome analysis. Ecotox. Environ. Safe 2019, 171, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pandey, C.; Gopal, B.; Krishna, S.A. Differential expression of mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) and stress-related genes in rice overexpressing MPK3 and MPK6 under abiotic stress. Int. J. Plant Environ. 2020, 6, 264–269. [Google Scholar]
  24. Muhammad, T.; Zhang, J.; Ma, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, Y. Overexpression of a mitogen-activated protein kinase SlMAPK3 positively regulates tomato tolerance to cadmium and drought stress. Molecules 2019, 24, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Asai, T.; Tena, G.; Plotnikova, J.; Willmann, M.R.; Chiu, W.L.; Gomez-Gomez, L.; Boller, T.M.; Ausubel, F.; Sheen, J. MAP kinase signaling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Nature 2002, 415, 977–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jalmi, S.K.; Sinha, A.K. ROS mediated MAPK signaling in abiotic and biotic stress-striking similarities and differences. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Jonak, C.; Nakagami, H.; Hirt, H. Heavy metal stress. activation of distinct mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways by copper and cadmium. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136, 3276–3283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Liu, X.M.; Kim, K.E.; Kim, K.C.; Xuan, C.N.; Han, H.J.; Mi, S.J.; Kim, H.S.; Sun, H.K.; Park, H.C.; Yun, D.J. Cadmium activates Arabidopsis MPK3 and MPK6 via accumulation of reactive oxygen species. Phytochemistry 2010, 71, 614–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, Y.K.; Liu, L.X.; Qi, J.H.; Dang, P.Y.; Xia, T.S. Cadmium activates ZmMPK3-1 and ZmMPK6-1 via induction of reactive oxygen species in maize roots. Biochem. Bioph. Res. Commun. 2019, 516, 747–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Capone, R.; Tiwari, B.S.; Levine, A. Rapid transmission of oxidative and nitrosative stress signals from roots to shoots in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2004, 42, 425–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Bot, P.; Mun, B.G.; Imran, Q.M.; Hussain, A.; Lee, S.U.; Loake, G.; Yun, B.W. Differential expression of AtWAKL10 in response to nitric oxide suggests a putative role in biotic and abiotic stress responses. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chmielowska-Bąk, J.; Gzyl, J.; Rucińska-Sobkowiak, R.; Arasimowicz-Jelonek, M.; Deckert, J. The new insights into cadmium sensing. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 245. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ye, Y.; Li, Z.; Xing, D. Nitric oxide promotes MPK6-mediated caspase-3-like activation in cadmium-induced Arabidopsis thaliana programmed cell death. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jin, C.W.; Mao, Q.Q.; Luo, B.F.; Lin, X.Y.; Du, S.T. Mutation of mpk6 enhances cadmium tolerance in Arabidopsis plants by alleviating oxidative stress. Plant Soil. 2013, 371, 387–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rao, K.P.; Vani, G.; Kumar, K.; Wankhede, D.P.; Misra, M.; Gupta, M.; Sinha, A.K. Arsenic stress activates MAP kinase in rice roots and leaves. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2011, 506, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Khan, S.; Iqbal, N.; Deeba, F.; Jabeen, R. Mitogen activated protein kinase: Function and responses to different stresses in plants. Pak. J. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2020, 1, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sanja, M.; Tatjana, P.B.; Roland, G.; Vazquez, K.R.; Thomas, R. Imposed glutathione-mediated redox switch modulates the tobacco wound-induced protein kinase and salicylic acid-induced protein kinase activation state and impacts on defence against Pseudomonas Syringae. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 1935–1950. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhao, F.Y.; Wang, K.; Zhang, S.Y.; Ren, J.; Liu, T.; Wang, X. Crosstalk between ABA, auxin, MAPK signaling, and the cell cycle in cadmium-stressed rice seedlings. Acta Physiol. Plant 2014, 36, 1879–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Opdenakker, K.; Remans, T.; Keunen, E.; Vangronsveld, J.; Cuypers, A. Exposure of Arabidopsis thaliana to Cd or Cu excess leads to oxidative stress mediated alterations in MAPKinase transcript levels. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2012, 83, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chmielowska-Bak, J.; Lefèvre, I.; Lutts, S.; Deckert, J. Short term signaling responses in roots of young soybean seedlings exposed to cadmium stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 170, 1585–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Torres, M.; Forman, H.J. Redox signaling and the MAP kinase pathways. BioFactors 2003, 17, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nazir, F.; Fariduddin, Q.; Khan, T.A. Hydrogen peroxide as a signaling molecule in plants and its crosstalk with other plant growth regulators under heavy metal stress. Chemosphere 2020, 252, 126486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Colcombet, J.; Hirt, H. Arabidopsis MAPKs, a complex signaling network involved in multiple biological processes. Biochem. J. 2008, 413, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Li, G.J.; Meng, X.Z.; Wang, R.G.; Mao, G.H.; Han, L.; Liu, Y.D.; Zhang, S.Q. Dual-level regulation of ACC synthase activity by MPK3/MPK6 cascade and its downstream WRKY transcription factor during ethylene induction in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mao, G.H.; Meng, X.Z.; Liu, Y.D.; Zheng, Z.Y.; Chen, Z.X.; Zhang, S.Q. Phosphorylation of a WRKY transcription factor by two pathogen-responsive MAPKs drives phytoalexin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 1639–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Fan, L.X.; Xu, L.; Wang, Y.; Tang, M.J.; Liu, L.W. Genome-and transcriptome-wide characterization of bZIP gene family identifies potential members involved in abiotic stress response and anthocyanin biosynthesis in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Han, Y.X.; Hou, Z.N.; He, Q.L.; Zhang, X.M.; Yan, K.J.; Han, R.L.; Liang, Z.S. Genome-wide characterization and expression analysis of bZIP gene family under abiotic stress in Glycyrrhiza uralensis. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 754237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pan, C.Y.; Ye, H.F.; Zhou, W.Y.; Wan, S.; Li, M.J.; Lu, M.; Li, S.F.; Zhu, X.D.; Wang, Y.X.; Rao, Y.C. QTL mapping of candidate genes involved in Cd accumulation in rice grain. Chin. Bull. Bot. 2021, 56, 8. [Google Scholar]
  49. Wolfgang, D.L.; Snoek, B.L.; Berend, S.; Christoph, W. The Arabidopsis bZIP transcription factor family—An update. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2018, 45, 36–49. [Google Scholar]
  50. Fang, H.H.; Liu, Z.Q.; Long, Y.P.; Liang, Y.L.; Jin, Z.P.; Pei, Y.X. The Ca2+/calmodulin2-binding transcription factor TGA3 elevates LCD expression and H2S production to bolster Cr6+ tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2017, 91, 1038–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Farinati, S.; Dalcorso, G.; Varotto, S.; Furini, A. The Brassica juncea BjCdR15, an ortholog of Arabidopsis TGA3, is a regulator of cadmium uptake, transport and accumulation in shoots and confers cadmium tolerance in transgenic plants. New Phytol. 2010, 185, 964–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Huang, C.J.; Zhou, J.H.; Jie, Y.C.; Xing, H.C.; Zhong, Y.L.; Yu, W.L.; She, W.; Ma, Y.S.; Liu, Z.H.; Zhang, Y. A ramie bZIP transcription factor BnbZIP2 is involved in drought, salt, and heavy metal stress response. DNA Cell Biol. 2016, 35, 776–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, P.; Wang, R.L.; Ju, Q.; Li, W.Q.; Tran, L.S.P.; Xu, J. The R2R3-MYB transcription factor MYB49 regulates cadmium accumulation. Plant Physiol. 2019, 180, 01380–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lilay, G.H.; Persson, D.P.; Castro, P.H.; Liao, F.; Assuno, A. ArabidopsisbZIP19 and bZIP23 act as zinc sensors to control plant zinc status. Nat. Plants 2021, 7, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lilay, G.H.; Castro, P.H.; Campilho, A.; Assunção, A.G. The Arabidopsis bZIP19 and bZIP23 activity requires zinc deficiency-insight on regulation from complementation lines. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hu, S.B.; Yu, Y.; Chen, Q.H.; Mu, G.M.; Shen, Z.G.; Zheng, L.Q. OsMYB45 plays an important role in rice resistance to cadmium stress. Plant Sci. 2017, 264, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sapara, K.K.; Khedia, J.; Agarwal, P.; Gangapur, D.R.; Agarwal, P.K. SbMYB15 transcription factor mitigates cadmium and nickel stress in transgenic tobacco by limiting uptake and modulating antioxidative defence system. Funct. Plant Biol. 2019, 46, 702–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Agarwal, P.; Mitra, M.; Banerjee, S.; Roy, S. MYB4 transcription factor, a member of R2R3-subfamily of MYB domain protein, regulates cadmium tolerance via enhanced protection against oxidative damage and increases expression of PCS1 and MT1C in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2020, 297, 110501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Xu, Z.G.; Ge, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, Y.L.; Yang, G.Y. The walnut JrVHAG1 gene is involved in cadmium stress response through ABA-signal pathway and MYB transcription regulation. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Van de Mortel, J.E.; Schat, H.; Moerland, P.D.; Van Themaat, E.V.L.; Van Der Ent, S.J.O.E.R.D.; Blankestijn, H.; Ghandilyan, A.; Tsiatsiani, S.; Aarts, M.G. Expression differences for genes involved in lignin, glutathione and sulphate metabolism in response to cadmium in Arabidopsis thaliana and the related Zn/Cd-hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 31, 301–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, F.Z.; Chen, M.X.; Yu, L.J.; Xie, L.J.; Yuan, L.B.; Qi, H.; Xiao, M.; Guo, W.; Zhe, C.; Yi, K. OsARM1, an R2R3 MYB transcription factor, is involved in regulation of the response to Arsenic stress in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Chen, Y.; Wang, H.Y.; Chen, Y.F. The transcription factor MYB40 is a central regulator in arsenic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Commun. 2021, 2, 100234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chen, Y.H.; Wu, X.M.; Ling, H.Q.; Yang, W.C. Transgenic expression of DwMYB2 impairs iron transport from root to shoot in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell Res. 2006, 16, 830–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Karanja, B.K.; Fan, L.; Xu, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, X.; Tang, M.; Wang, R.; Zhang, F.; Muleke, E.M.; Liu, L. Genome-wide characterization of the WRKY gene family in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) reveals its critical functions under different abiotic stresses. Plant Cell Rep. 2017, 36, 1757–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Han, Y.Y.; Fan, T.T.; Zhu, X.Y.; Wu, X.; Ouyang, J.; Jiang, L.; Cao, S.Q. WRKY12 represses GSH1 expression to negatively regulate cadmium tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2019, 99, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sheng, Y.B.; Yan, X.X.; Huang, Y.Y.; Han, Y.; Zhang, C.; Ren, Y.B.; Fan, T.T.; Xiao, F.M.; Liu, Y.S.; Cao, S.Q. The WRKY transcription factor, WRKY13, activates PDR8 expression to positively regulate cadmium tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2019, 42, 891–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhang, Q.; Cai, W.; Ji, T.T.; Ye, L.; Lu, Y.T.; Yuan, T.T. WRKY13 enhances cadmium tolerance by promoting D-CYSTEINE DESULFHYDRASE and hydrogen sulfide production. Plant Physiol. 2020, 183, 345–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cai, Z.D.; Xian, P.Q.; Wang, H.; Lin, R.B.; Lian, T.X.; Cheng, Y.B.; Ma, Q.B.; Nian, H. Transcription factor GmWRKY142 confers cadmium resistance by up-regulating the cadmium tolerance 1-like genes. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Li, C.X.; Yan, J.Y.; Ren, J.Y.; Sun, L.; Xu, C.; Li, G.X.; Ding, Z.J.; Zheng, S.J. A WRKY transcription factor confers aluminum tolerance via regulation of cell wall modifying genes. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 1176–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Castrillo, G.; Sanchez-Bermejo, E.; de Lorenzo, L.; Crevillen, P.; Fraile-Escanciano, A.; Tc, M.; Mouriz, A.; Catarecha, P.; Sobrino-Plata, J.; Olsson, S. WRKY6 transcription factor restricts arsenate uptake and transposon activation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 2944–2957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Chen, S.S.; Jiang, J.; Han, X.J.; Zhang, Y.X.; Zhuo, R.Y. Identification, expression analysis of the Hsf family, and characterization of class A4 in Sedum alfredii Hance under cadmium stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Chen, S.S.; Yu, M.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Z.C.; Zhang, Y.X.; Liu, M.Y.; Qiao, G.R.; Wu, L.H.; Han, X.J. SaHsfA4c from Sedum alfredii Hance enhances cadmium tolerance by regulating ROS-scavenger activities and heat shock proteins expression. Front. Plant Sci 2020, 11, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Shim, D.; Hwang, J.U.; Lee, J.; Lee, S.; Choi, Y.; An, G.; Martinoia, E.; Lee, Y. Orthologs of the class A4 heat shock transcription factor HsfA4a confer cadmium tolerance in wheat and rice. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 4031–4043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Gang, S.; Yuan, S.; Wen, X.; Xie, Z.; Lou, L.; Hu, B.; Cai, Q.; Xu, B. Transcriptome analysis of Cd-treated switchgrass root revealed novel transcripts and the importance of HSF/HSP network in switchgrass Cd tolerance. Plant Cell Rep. 2018, 37, 1485–1497. [Google Scholar]
  75. Cai, S.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Y.P.; Qi, Z.Y.; Li, M.Q.; Ahammed, G.J.; Xia, X.J.; Shi, K.; Zhou, Y.H.; Reiter, R.J. HsfA1a upregulates melatonin biosynthesis to confer cadmium tolerance in tomato plants. J. Pineal. Res. 2017, 62, e12387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Zhang, H.Z.; Yang, J.L.; Li, W.L.; Chen, Y.X.; Lu, H.; Zhao, S.C.; Li, D.D.; Wei, M.; Li, C.H. PuHSFA4a enhances tolerance to excess Zn by regulating ROS production and root development in Populus. Plant Physiol. 2019, 180, 1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Du, X.; He, F.; Zhu, B.; Ren, M.J.; Tang, H. NAC transcription factors from Aegilops markgrafii reduce cadmium concentration in transgenic wheat. Plant Soil 2020, 449, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lou, H.Q.; Fan, W.; Jin, J.F.; Xu, J.M.; Chen, W.W.; Yang, J.L.; Zheng, S.J. A NAC-type transcription factor confers aluminium resistance by regulating cell wall-associated receptor kinase 1 and cell wall pectin. Plant Cell Environ. 2020, 43, 463–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chen, J.; Yang, L.B.; Yan, X.X.; Liu, Y.L.; Wang, R.; Fan, T.T.; Ren, Y.B.; Tang, X.F.; Xiao, F.M.; Liu, Y.S. Zinc-finger transcription factor ZAT6 positively regulates cadmium tolerance through the Glutathione-Dependent pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 707–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Yao, X.; Cai, Y.R.; Yu, D.Q.; Liang, G. bHLH104 confers tolerance to cadmium stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2018, 60, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wu, H.L.; Chen, C.L.; Du, J.; Liu, H.F.; Cui, Y.; Zhang, Y.; He, Y.J.; Wang, Y.Q.; Chu, C.C.; Feng, Z.Y. Co-overexpression FIT with AtbHLH38 or AtbHLH39 in Arabidopsis-enhanced cadmium tolerance via increased cadmium sequestration in roots and improved iron homeostasis of shoots. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158, 790–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Lin, T.T.; Yang, W.M.; Lu, W.; Wang, Y.; Qi, X.T. Transcription factors PvERF15 and PvMTF-1 form a cadmium stress transcriptional pathway. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Dubos, C.; Stracke, R.; Grotewold, E.; Weisshaar, B.; Martin, C.; Lepiniec, L. MYB transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Li, N.N.; Wang, J.C.; Song, W.Y. Arsenic uptake and translocation in plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Mahmood, T.; Khalid, S.; Abdullah, M.; Ahmed, Z.; Shah, M.; Ghafoor, A.; Du, X. Insights into drought stress signaling in plants and the molecular genetic basis of cotton drought tolerance. Cells 2019, 9, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Li, F.; Li, M.; Wang, P.; Cox, K.J.; Duan, L.; Dever, J.K.; Shan, L.; Li, Z.; He, P. Regulation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) drought responses by mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascade-mediated phosphorylation of GhWRKY59. New Phytol. 2017, 215, 1462–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Shahid, M.A.; Balal, R.M.; Khan, N.; Zotarelli, L.; Liu, G.D.; Sarkhosh, A.; Fernandez-Zapata, J.C.; Martinez, N.J.; Garcia-Sanchez, F. Selenium impedes cadmium and arsenic toxicity in potato by modulating carbohydrate and nitrogen metabolism. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 180, 588–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Neeta, L.; Mohan, B.S.; Prem, L.B. Biological parts for engineering abiotic stress tolerance in plants. BioDesign Res. 2022, 2022, 41. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. MAPK cascade and transcriptional factors in response to heavy metal stresses in plants. Heavy metal exposure triggers multiple signaling pathways such as NO, ROS and phytohormones. These signals interact and activate the MAPK cascade. Subsequently, MAPK cascade phosphorylates and activates related transcriptional factors including bZIP, WRKY, MYB, HSF and other transcriptional factors, which further induce the expression of defense genes, metal transporter genes, PCs, MTs, antioxidant related genes, etc. Finally, heavy metal tolerance or accumulation is enhanced in plants.
Figure 1. MAPK cascade and transcriptional factors in response to heavy metal stresses in plants. Heavy metal exposure triggers multiple signaling pathways such as NO, ROS and phytohormones. These signals interact and activate the MAPK cascade. Subsequently, MAPK cascade phosphorylates and activates related transcriptional factors including bZIP, WRKY, MYB, HSF and other transcriptional factors, which further induce the expression of defense genes, metal transporter genes, PCs, MTs, antioxidant related genes, etc. Finally, heavy metal tolerance or accumulation is enhanced in plants.
Ijms 23 04463 g001
Table 1. Different signal molecules activate MAPK pathway under heavy metal stresses.
Table 1. Different signal molecules activate MAPK pathway under heavy metal stresses.
SignalsHeavy MetalPlantMAPKReference
ROS-Arabidopsis thalianaMEKK1-MKK4/5-MPK3/6[25]
-Arabidopsis thalianaMEKK1-MKK2-MPK4/6[26]
Cu, CdMedicago sativaSIMK, MMK2, MMK3 and SAMK[27]
CuArabidopsis thalianaMAPK[28]
CdZea maysZmMPK3-1/ZmMPK6-1[29]
CdArabidopsis thalianaMPK3 and MPK6[30]
NO-Arabidopsis thalianaAtWAKL10[31]
- MAPK[32]
CdArabidopsis thalianaMAPK[33]
CdArabidopsis thalianaMPK6[34]
ArOryza sativaMAPK/MPK[35]
Hormone
Arabidopsis thalianaAtMPK3/AtMPK6[36]
SA-Nicotiana tabacumSIPK[37]
ABA/IAACdOryza sativaMAPK[38]
ETCdGlycine maxMAPK/MAPKK2[32]
Table 2. Transcriptional factors in response to heavy metal stresses.
Table 2. Transcriptional factors in response to heavy metal stresses.
FamilyGenesHeavy MetalsFunctionNumber of Phosphorylation SitesReference
bZIPRsbZIP010Cd, Cr and PbRsbZIP010 exhibited downregulated expression under Cd, Cr and Pb stresses. [46]
GubZIPCdGubZIPs were expressed specifically in different tissues under cadmium stress [47]
LOC_Os02g52780/OsbZIP23CdLOC_Os02g52780 related to the tolerance of rice to Cd stress and affected Cd accumulation in rice grains.39[48]
BjCdR15CrTGA3 elevates LCD expression and H2S production to bolster Cr6+ tolerance in Arabidopsis.35[49,50,51]
BnbZIP2 BnbZIP3CdOver expression of BnbZIP2 exhibited more sensitivity to drought and heavy metal Cd stress.0/44[52]
ABI5CdABI5 interacts with MYB49 and prevented its binding to the downstream genes, resulting in inactivation of IRT1 and reduced Cd uptake. 46[53]
bZIP19,23ZnZinc sensors to control plant zinc status.25/17[54,55]
MYBOsMYB45CdUnder Cd stress, OsMYB45 is highly expressed. Mutation of OsMYB45 resulted in hypersensitivity to Cd treatment.37[56]
SbMYB15Cd, NiOverexpression of SbMYB15 conferred. Cadmium and nickel tolerance in transgenic tobacco45[57]
AtMYB4CdMYB4 regulates Cd-tolerance via the coordinated activity of improved anti-oxidant defense systems and through the enhanced expression of PCS1 and MT1C under Cd-stress in Arabidopsis.40[58]
JrMYB2CdJrMYB2 acts as an upstream regulator of JrVHAG1 to improve CdCl2 stress tolerance stress tolerance. [59]
AtMYB72Zn, FeThe Arabidopsis MYB72 knockout mutant was more sensitive to excess Zn or Fe deficiency than wild-type.43[60]
OsARM1AsOsARM1 regulates arsenic absorption and root-to-shoot translocation. 19[61]
AtMYB40AsAtMYB40 enhances plant As (V) tolerance and reduces As(V) uptake.28[62]
DwMYB2FeThe translocation of iron from root to shoot is affected by the DwMYB2. 39[63]
WRKYRsWRKYCdRsWRKY transcripts were significantly elevated under Cd and Pb treatments. [64]
AtWRKY12CdWRKY12 represses GSH1 expression to negatively regulates cadmium
tolerance in Arabidopsis.
31[65]
AtWRKY13CdActivates PDR8 expression to positively
regulate cadmium tolerance in Arabidopsis.
49[66]
AtWRKY13CdWRKY13 activation of DCD during cadmium stress.49[67]
GmWRKY142CdGmWRKY142 confers cadmium resistance by upregulating the cadmium tolerance 1-like genes.54[68]
AtWRKY47AlA WRKY transcription factor confers aluminum tolerance via regulation of cell wall modifying genes.63[69]
AtWRKY6AsWRKY6 transcription factor restricts arsenate uptake and transposon activation in Arabidopsis.66[70]
HSFSaHsfA4cCdThe expression of SaHsfA4c was induced by cadmium and enhanced Cd tolerance by ROS -scavenger activities and shock proteins expression.39[71,72]
TaHsfA4a
OsHsfA4a
CdHsfA4a of wheat and rice confers Cd tolerance by upregulating MT gene expression.46[73]
PvBip1CdHSF/HSP participates in the reconstruction of protein conformation and improves intracellular homeostasis to increase cadmium tolerance.64[74]
HSF1ACdHsfA1a upregulates melatonin biosynthesis to confer cadmium tolerance in tomato plants.55[75]
PuHSFA4aZnPuHSFA4 activates the antioxidant system and root development–related genes and directly targets PuGSTU17 and PuPLA.39[76]
OthersAemNAC2CdOverexpression of AemNAC2 led to reduced cadmium concentration. 52[77]
VuNAR1AlVuNAR1 regulates Al resistance by regulating cell wall pectin metabolism via directly binding to the promoter of WAK1 and inducing its expression.24[78]
ZAT6CdZAT6 coordinately activates PC synthesis–related gene expression and directly targets GSH1 to positively regulate Cd accumulation and tolerance in Arabidopsis.40[79]
AtbHLH104
AtbHLH38
AtbHLH39
CdAtbHLHs positively regulates genes involved in heavy metal absorption and detoxification.27/27/35[80,81]
HIPP22CdMYB49 binds to the promoter regions of the HIPP22 and HIPP44, resulting in upregulation Cd accumulation.14[76]
PvERF15CdPvERF15 and PvMTF-1 form a cadmium-stress transcriptional pathway.44[82]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, S.; Han, X.; Lu, Z.; Qiu, W.; Yu, M.; Li, H.; He, Z.; Zhuo, R. MAPK Cascades and Transcriptional Factors: Regulation of Heavy Metal Tolerance in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4463. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084463

AMA Style

Li S, Han X, Lu Z, Qiu W, Yu M, Li H, He Z, Zhuo R. MAPK Cascades and Transcriptional Factors: Regulation of Heavy Metal Tolerance in Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(8):4463. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084463

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Shaocui, Xiaojiao Han, Zhuchou Lu, Wenmin Qiu, Miao Yu, Haiying Li, Zhengquan He, and Renying Zhuo. 2022. "MAPK Cascades and Transcriptional Factors: Regulation of Heavy Metal Tolerance in Plants" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 8: 4463. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084463

APA Style

Li, S., Han, X., Lu, Z., Qiu, W., Yu, M., Li, H., He, Z., & Zhuo, R. (2022). MAPK Cascades and Transcriptional Factors: Regulation of Heavy Metal Tolerance in Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(8), 4463. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084463

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop