Next Article in Journal
Antioxidant, Pro-Survival and Pro-Regenerative Effects of Conditioned Medium from Wharton’s Jelly Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Developing Zebrafish Embryos
Previous Article in Journal
5-ALA Improves the Low Temperature Tolerance of Common Bean Seedlings through a Combination of Hormone Transduction Pathways and Chlorophyll Metabolism
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ceramide Risk Score in the Evaluation of Metabolic Syndrome: An Additional or Substitutive Biochemical Marker in the Clinical Practice?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 17
10.3390/ijms241713190
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

S. epidermidis Rescues Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor 2-Deficient Skin

by
Kana Masuda-Kuroki
,
Shahrzad Alimohammadi
and
Anna Di Nardo
*
Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(17), 13190; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713190
Submission received: 31 July 2023 / Revised: 19 August 2023 / Accepted: 23 August 2023 / Published: 25 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Insights into Sphingolipids)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Recent studies have identified a subtype of the S1P-receptor family called sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 (S1PR2), which plays a crucial role in maintaining the skin barrier. It has been observed that S1PR2 and Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) work together to regulate the skin barrier. However, the interaction between these two factors is still unclear. To investigate this, a study was conducted on healthy skin and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) using 3,4-Dibutoxy-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (SADBE) on the ears of S1pr2fl/fl and S1pr2fl/fl K14-Cre mice and using 1 × 106 CFU of S. epidermidis to examine its effects on the skin. The results showed that in S. epidermidis-conditioned ACD, the ear thickness of S1pr2fl/fl K14-Cre mice was lower than that of S1pr2fl/fl mice, and mRNA expressions of Il-1β and Cxcl2 of S1pr2fl/fl K14-Cre mice were lower than that of S1pr2fl/fl mice in ACD with S. epidermidis. Furthermore, the gene expression of Claudin-1 and Occludin in S1pr2fl/fl K14-Cre mice was higher than that of S1pr2fl/fl mice in ACD with S. epidermidis. The study concludes that S. epidermidis colonization improves the skin barrier and prevents ACD even when S1P signaling malfunctions.

1. Introduction

The epidermis is the body’s outermost layer, directly exposed to environmental stimuli. Therefore, the epidermis provides a barrier function against chemicals, pathogens, and mechanical stress to maintain normal biological processes. Sphingolipids are the essential lipid molecules that form cell membranes and are present in all eukaryotic cells [1]. Sphingolipids and their metabolites play crucial roles in cell signaling, cell survival and differentiation, and immune cell trafficking [2,3]. Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) is one of the sphingolipids derived from cell membranes and acts through G-protein coupled receptors called S1P receptors [4]. The S1P receptor family consists of five different subtypes, S1PR1-5, which reside in various cells and tissue [5], while keratinocytes are shown to express all five receptor types [6,7]. Our previous study found that S1PR2 has a crucial role in maintaining the skin barrier, showing that S1PR2 knockout mice presented a decreased expression of tight junction proteins such as occludin (OCLN) and claudin 1 (CLDN 1), as well as decreased filaggrin (FLG) and zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1), which are key constituents of the stratum corneum barrier [8]. However, it remains unclear whether S1PR2 found in epidermal keratinocytes, which mainly form the skin barrier, or found in cells other than keratinocytes, is responsible for this function.
Meanwhile, it is widely known that, in humans, a large variety of bacteria reside in the skin as commensal bacteria and Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis), specifically, induces skin ceramide production, which protects the skin and contributes to the maintenance of the skin barrier by secreting sphingomyelinase [9]. Therefore, S1PR2 and S. epidermis are both involved in controlling skin barrier maintenance. However, the nature of their interaction still needs to be determined.
Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is one of the most frequent skin inflammatory diseases caused by repeated allergen exposures. Our data show that the level of S1PR2 in the skin goes up during ACD, which suggests that this increase is a natural response to help repair the skin barrier. An efficient skin barrier is the principal protection against a variety of allergens and can prevent ACD formation [10]. Although a large variety of haptens in chemicals, dyes, drugs, and metals cause ACD, the only treatment option is the administration of corticosteroids and the avoidance of allergen exposures [11]. However, long-term topical corticosteroid treatments increase the risk of adverse effects, including cutaneous atrophy and telangiectasias [12]. This study focuses on the role of epidermal S1PR2 together with S. epidermidis in ACD, where the skin barrier is impaired. Our results show that S. epidermidis improves the skin barrier and suppresses the inflammation of ACD to compensate for S1PR2 deficiency in the skin.

2. Results

2.1. S1PR2 Expression Is the Most Upregulated among S1P Receptors in ACD

To determine if the expression of S1PR2 is altered in ACD, a genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed. We compared gene expressions of S1PR1-5 in ACD subjects and control subjects at the time points of 0 h, 7 h, 48 h, and 96 h after allergen exposure. Based on the results of GWAS, which was conducted on human skin gene repositories at the NIH (GDS 2935) [13], S1PR2 was highly expressed upon allergen exposures after 48 and 96 h in ACD lesions compared to the baseline and control subjects. S1PR3 and S1PR4 showed increased expressions after 96 h of exposure. S1PR3 expression was not significantly different between the ACD and control groups, but there was a significant difference in S1PR4 expression. The expression levels of both S1PR1 and S1PR5 remained constant at all time points. From the data presented, it can be inferred that S1PR2 in the skin has the strongest correlation with ACD in comparison to the other four S1PRs (Figure 1).

2.2. Murine Skin Expresses All Five S1pr1-5 Receptor Genes (In Vivo Study)

In order to confirm whether murine skin expresses all five S1P receptors, RT-qPCRs were performed using the total RNA of S1pr2fl/fl mouse ears. All five S1P receptor genes were expressed in the murine skin (Figure 2a).
In addition, to investigate whether S. epidermidis affects the gene expressions of S1P receptors, RT-qPCR was performed using the total RNA of S1pr2fl/fl and S1pr2fl/fl K14-Cre mouse ears with trypticase soy broth (TSB) or S. epidermidis application. An increase in the mRNA expression of S1pr1 was observed in S1pr2fl/fl K14-Cre mice treated with S. epidermidis, although no changes were observed in S1pr2fl/fl mice (Figure 2b,c). This indicates that in the absence of S1PR2, S. epidermidis induces S1PR1 to compensate for the S1P-S1PR signaling pathway.

2.3. S. epidermidis Reduces Ear Edema in ACD, Especially If S1PR2 Is Absent in the Epidermis

To see if S. epidermidis affects the inflammation of ACD, we treated 3,4-Dibutoxy-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione (SADBE)-induced ACD mouse models and non-ACD mice with S. epidermidis or TSB and measured ear thickness (Figure 3a). After the challenge, ACD mice presented high inflammation with scrunched ears, while vehicle-, TSB-, and S. epidermidis-treated group mice without ACD displayed normal-shaped ears in both S1pr2fl/fl and S1pr2fl/fl K14-Cre strains. However, S. epidermidis-treated S1pr2fl/fl ACD mice showed more folded ears compared to TSB-treated S1pr2fl/fl ACD mice. Additionally, S. epidermidis-treated S1pr2fl/fl K14-Cre ACD mice had less-folded ears than TSB-treated S1pr2fl/fl K14-Cre ACD mice (Figure 3b). Other than the folded ears, ACD mice revealed a significantly higher ear thickness than vehicle-, TSB-, and S. epidermidis-treated mice in both S1pr2fl/fl and S1pr2fl/fl K14-Cre strains. However, S. epidermidis-treated S1pr2fl/fl K14-Cre ACD mice showed significantly lower ear thickness than S. epidermidis-treated S1pr2fl/fl ACD mice (Figure 3c). These findings indicate that S1PR2 deletion in the epidermis aids S. epidermidis in reducing ear thickness in ACD; thus, in the absence of epidermal S1PR2 expression, S. epidermidis protects the skin from inflammation in ACD.

2.4. S. epidermidis Reduces Inflammatory Cytokine mRNA Expressions in ACD When S1PR2 Is Absent in the Epidermis

To determine whether S. epidermidis affects cytokine mRNA expression in ACD, total RNA was extracted from the ear skin of each group, followed by RT-qPCR analysis to determine mRNA expression levels of Il-1β, Cxcl1, Cxcl2, Tnf-α, and Il-6 (Figure 4a–e, Supplementary Figure S1), which are known to be increased in ACD [14,15,16,17]. S. epidermidis-treated S1pr2fl/fl ACD mice had significantly higher cytokine mRNA expression levels, including Il-1β, Cxcl1, and Cxcl2, compared to the vehicle-treated group (Figure 4a–c), but no significant difference in Tnf-α and Il-6 (Figure 4d,e). However, TSB-treated S1pr2fl/fl ACD had relatively higher cytokine expressions compared to the vehicle-treated group, but no significant difference was observed. These data indicate that S. epidermidis enhances rather than improves ACD in the presence of S1PR2. On the other hand, S. epidermidis-treated S1pr2fl/fl K14-Cre ACD mice had increased cytokine expression, such as of Il-1β and Cxcl1, compared to the vehicle-treated group, but the difference was less significant than in TSB-treated S1pr2fl/fl K14-Cre ACD mice (Figure 4a,b). Furthermore, S. epidermidis-treated S1pr2fl/fl K14-Cre ACD mice had significantly lower Il-1β and Cxcl2 mRNA expressions than S. epidermidis-treated S1pr2fl/fl ACD mice (Figure 4a,c). These indicate that S. epidermidis downregulates cytokine expression in ACD when S1PR2 is absent. Therefore, S1PR2 prevents S. epidermidis from suppressing skin inflammation in ACD.

2.5. S. epidermidis Rescues Tight Junction Expression in S1pr2fl/fl K14-Cre ACD Mice

As both S1PR2 and S. epidermidis have been reported to affect the skin barrier function [8,9,18], we investigated whether S1PR2 and S. epidermidis interaction affects the skin barrier function in ACD. According to a previous study [8], we measured mRNA expressions of Flg, Flg2, and corneodesmosin (Cdsn), which are components of the stratum corneum barrier, and Cldn1, Ocln, and Zo-1, which are components of the tight junction barrier (Figure 5a–e, Supplementary Figure S2). Similar to the previous study, S1pr2fl/fl K14-Cre mice showed significantly lower mRNA expressions of Cdsn and Zo-1 than S1pr2fl/fl mice with vehicle treatment on the intact skin (Figure 5c,f). On the other hand, no difference was observed in the mRNA expressions of all skin barrier proteins between TSB-treated S1pr2fl/fl ACD mice and TSB-treated S1pr2fl/fl K14-Cre ACD mice. However, S. epidermidis increased mRNA expressions of Cldn1 and Ocln in S1pr2fl/fl K14-Cre ACD mice but not in S. epidermidis-treated S1pr2fl/fl ACD mice. This indicates that S. epidermidis increases the tight junction protein expression in ACD of S1PR2 deficient skin. (Figure 5d,e). Taken together, S. epidermidis ameliorates ACD inflammation in S1PR2 deficient skin through tight junction recovery.

3. Discussion

The cell membrane is rich in sphingomyelin and sphingolipids, and these sphingolipids play an essential role in cell membrane function. S1P is a known intermediate metabolite produced during the degradation of these sphingolipids. In the early 1990s, it was discovered that S1P has diverse effects on different types of cells, including their differentiation, proliferation, motility, and morphology, as reported previously [19,20,21]. Subsequently, five specific G-protein-coupled receptors, S1P1-5, were identified [22,23,24,25,26]. Since then, S1P receptors have been studied in relation to pathological mechanisms in various tissues and diseases. In the field of dermatology, S1P receptors have been reported to affect various skin diseases, including wound [27], scleroderma [28], epidermolysis bullosa [29], infection [30,31], and inflammatory skin diseases such as atopic dermatitis [32,33,34,35,36] and psoriasis [37,38,39,40]. Recently, Reines et al. reported that the topical application of S1P and S1P modulator, FTY720, which binds to S1PR1 and has mixed agonist-antagonist effects on S1PR1 [41], but also binds to S1PR3-5 as well, attenuated ACD reaction via inhibiting dendritic cell migration [42]. However, the influence of S1PR2 in the epidermis and ACD remained to be elucidated. This study showed that deleting epidermal S1pr2 increased the expression of Il-1β and Cxcl1 in ACD. However, there was no significant increase in ear swelling in comparison to control mice. This suggests that epidermal S1pr2 deletion leads to increased inflammation in the epidermis but does not affect dermal edema.
A compromised skin barrier can increase the risk of developing ACD. This is because a damaged skin barrier allows allergens to penetrate more quickly into the skin, where they can trigger an immune response [43]. According to published studies, tight junction and stratum corneum protein gene expressions, including CLDN-1, OCLN, FLG-1, and FLG-2 in the skin of patients with severe ACD, are downregulated [44]. Additionally, patients deficient in the FLG gene develop contact dermatitis at lower allergen exposure than patients carrying the FLG wild-type gene [45]. Furthermore, tight junction repair helps alleviate ACD inflammation [46]. Therefore, to reduce the risk of ACD, various strategies for the use of emollient creams and moisturizers have been developed to protect the skin barrier function [47].
The skin barrier is mainly composed of stratum corneum and junctions of nucleated epidermis [48]. FLG is the most expressed protein to form the stratum corneum [49], and CDSN is a protein that forms corneodesmosome, which adheres corneocytes to each other [50]. The tight junction is one of the junctions of the nucleated epidermis, composed of OCLN, junctional adhesion molecules, CLDNs, and cytoplasmic scaffolding protein ZO [51,52]. Our previous study found that S1PR2 knockout mice have a decreased mRNA expression and production of skin barrier proteins, including FLG, CDSN, CLDN1, OCLN, and ZO-1 in shaved back skin. However, it remains to be examined whether S1PR2 in the epidermis or S1PR2 in other parts affect skin barrier maintenance [8]. In this study, we investigated the relationship between skin barrier function and S1PR2 in the epidermis, using murine auricle skin. Our results suggest that S1PR2 deletion decreased Cdsn and Zo-1 expression in the intact skin. However, S1PR2 deletion caused no significant difference in the skin barrier expressions in ACD mice (Figure 5, SABDE + TSB). This study suggests that the presence of S1PR2 in the epidermis is crucial for forming the skin barrier, although it does not significantly impact ACD.
Recently, a large number of studies have been conducted to study the relationship between the skin microbiome, skin commensal bacteria, to be more specific, and skin disorders. S. epidermidis, a type of human commensal bacteria, is shown to either improve or disrupt the skin barrier, depending on the skin condition [53]. Based on the published study, S. epidermidis contributes to skin barrier maintenance by secreting sphingomyelinases, which have an essential role in generating ceramides [9]. In addition, a randomized controlled trial showed that microbiome-supporting skincare contributes to increasing S. epidermidis and improves biophysical skin parameters [54]. This study also showed that S. epidermidis increases the mRNA expressions of stratum corneum skin barrier proteins in the steady state, supporting these reports (Figure 5, S. epi 12228). Some strains of S. epidermidis can downregulate skin barrier molecules such as FLG and induce proinflammatory cytokines associated with atopic dermatitis [18]. In our model, we did not notice significant changes in ACD skin (Figure 5a–d, SADBE + S. epi black column and SADBE + TSB). Moreover, an overabundance of S. epidermidis on atopic skin disrupts the skin barrier and induces skin damage and inflammation [55]. In addition, the excess colonization of S. epidermidis, which promotes protease production in the epidermis, is formed in Netherton’s syndrome, where the skin barrier function is impaired [56]. Recently, it has been reported that the effect on the skin barrier from S. epidermidis depends on the skin type; the S. epidermidis strain from healthy skin maintains the epidermal barrier, while the strain from atopic dermatitis decreases the epidermal barrier, using ATCC12228 and S. epidermidis strains isolated from hyper-sebaceous or atopic skin [57]. According to this study, S. epidermidis can help restore the tight junction barrier in ACD skin when S1PR2 is lacking. This implies that when S1PR2 is absent, S. epidermidis can aid in repairing the impaired skin barrier.
A potential explanation for the results of the study is that S. epidermis produces S1P through its sphingomyelinase activity [9] and that environmental stress stimuli such as allergen exposure activate sphingomyelinase [58]. Our study found that in the absence of S1PR2, S. epidermidis induces S1PR1 increase in the skin (Figure 2b,c). In the absence of S1PR2, elevated S1PR1, induced by S. epidermidis, compensates for the lack of S1PR2 signal and protects from allergen exposure that occurs in ACD. Recently, Yanagida et al. reported that cytoskeletal claudin and occludin decreased in the absence of S1PR1 [59] without S1PR2, so S1P may prioritize targeting S1PR1, which has a defensive impact against ACD, as reported previously [42].
In order to investigate the possible cross-talk mechanism between S1PR2 and S. epidermidis, further research is highly demanded. Additionally, it is necessary to perform experiments using different strains of S. epidermidis, including S. epidermidis 1457, S. epidermidis from healthy skin, and S. epidermidis from ACD skin, to confirm if all strains affect the skin barrier or only certain ones.
To summarize, our research suggests that S. epidermidis plays a beneficial role in restoring the skin barrier of damaged skin. This is achieved by restoring tight junctions when S1PR2 cannot compensate for the damage, as observed in human ACD and depicted in Figure 1. When S1PR2 is lost, the signaling of S1P-S1PR becomes opposed by other S1PRs, with S1PR1 being the most significant. For this reason, focusing on the interaction between S1PR2 and S. epidermidis may result in a remedy for ACD.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Reagents

Acetone and SADBE were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

4.2. Bacterial Culture

S. epidermidis (ATCC Catalog No. 12228) was acquired from ATCC. Bacterial stocks were frozen at −80 °C in trypticase soy broth (TSB, Catalog No. U363, Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA, USA) with 20% glycerol (Catalog No. G7893, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). To grow bacteria, 1 μL of bacterial stock was cultured in 2 mL of TSB for 15–16 h at 37 °C while shaking at 300 rpm with the lid of the culture tube loosely closed. For scale-up preparation, cultures were diluted in 1:100 with TSB and were cultured for 15–16 h more at 37 °C while shaking at 300 rpm without closing the lid completely. The cultured bacteria were measured as OD600 with a spectrophotometer UNICO 1100 (UNICO, Dayton, NJ, USA). OD600 = 1 was equal to 3 × 108 CFU/mL.

4.3. Mice

S1pr2fl/fl mice were gifted from Dr. Hla’s laboratory at Boston Children’s Hospital (MA, USA). K14-Cre-transgenic mice were gifted from Dr. Gallo’s laboratory at the University of California San Diego (CA, USA). Epidermis-specific S1PR2 knockout mice (S1pr2fl/fl K14-Cre) were generated by crossing S1pr2fl/fl mice with K14-Cre-transgenic mice of C57BL/6 background. Approximately 50% of the offspring were heterozygous for the loxP allele and heterozygous for the Cre transgene. They were then backcrossed with homozygous S1pr2fl/fl. Approximately 25% of the offspring were homozygous for the loxP allele of S1pr2 and heterozygous for the Cre transgene.
All mice were housed in the laboratory animal facility at the University of California San Diego in individual ventilated plastic cages and were provided food and water ad libitum under temperature-controlled conditions with a 12 h light/dark cycles. All animal protocols were reviewed and approved by University of California San Diego (IACUC approval number: s10288).

4.4. Development of Contact Dermatitis Mouse Models

Twelve-week-old mice were divided into five groups (n = 3): an acetone-treated control group as a vehicle control group, a TSB-treated group, the S. epidermidis-treated group, the SADBE/TSB-treated group, and the SADBE/S. epidermidis-treated group. To induce contact dermatitis, 1 cm2 of gluteal skin had hair removal performed via shaving and hair removal cream application on the day before sensitization. On days 0 and 1, 20 μL of 0.5% SADBE was dissolved in acetone and applied to the shaved gluteal skin once daily. On days 7 and 8, mice were challenged with the application of 20 μL of 0.5% SADBE in acetone to the left ear once a day. The vehicle-, TSB-, and S. epidermidis-treated groups were treated topically with 20 μL of acetone, or TSB, or 1 × 106 CFU/20 μL of S. epidermidis in TSB instead of SADBE on days 7 and 8. The SADBE/TSB-treated group was topically treated with 20 μL of TSB after SADBE application on days 7 and 8. The SADBE/S. epidermidis-treated group was topically treated with 1 × 106 CFU/20 μL of S. epidermidis in TSB. The ear thickness was measured on days 7, 8, and 11 using Kynup Digital Caliper (Deqing Liang Feng Electronic & Technology Co., Ltd., Zhejiang, China). The ear skin was collected for further analyses on day 11.

4.5. Real-Time RT-qPCR

Total mouse RNAs from mouse ear skin samples were isolated using a Quick RNA Miniprep Kit (Catalog No. R1055, Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA). At least 1 μg of total RNA was converted to cDNA with a High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Catalog No. 4368814, Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, on a T100™ Thermal Cycler (Catalog No. 1861096, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Real-time RT-qPCR was performed using TaqMan™ Fast Advanced Master Mix (Catalog No. 4444557, Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) or PowerUp™ SYBR™ Green Master Mix (Catalog No. A25742, Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) on Quant Studio™ 3 Real-Time PCR Systems (Catalog No. A28132, Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). The primers and the probes used for real-time RT-qPCR are listed in Supplementary Tables S1 and S2, respectively. The expression of target genes was normalized to Gapdh expression and analyzed with the 2−ΔΔct method [60].

4.6. Genome-Wide Association Studies

In all experiments, all groups had at least three subjects, and values were expressed as mean ± SD. The statistical significances of differences were determined with two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. p < 0.05 was considered significant (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001). Analyses were performed through the GraphPad Prism software version 7 (GraphPad Software, Boston, MA, USA).

4.7. Statistical Analysis

In all experiments, all samples were performed in triplicate, and values were expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical significances of differences were determined by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. p < 0.05 was considered significant. Analyses were performed through the GraphPad Prism software version 7 (GraphPad Software, Boston, MA, USA).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms241713190/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.D.N. and K.M.-K.; methodology, investigation, and analysis, K.M.-K.; writing—original draft preparation, K.M.-K.; writing—review and editing, S.A.; supervision and project administration, A.D.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the NIH National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases (NIAID), grant number 2R01AI093957, and the National Eczema Association (NEA), grant number ECRG133.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of California San Diego (protocol code S10288).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No novel datasets were generated in this study. Patient biopsy datasets are available at Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository (http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gds), published on 3 April 2007, with accession code GDS 2935.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Breslow, D.K.; Weissman, J.S. Membranes in balance: Mechanisms of sphingolipid homeostasis. Mol. Cell 2010, 40, 267–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pyne, S.; Pyne, N.J. Sphingosine 1-phosphate signalling in mammalian cells. Biochem. J. 2000, 349 Pt 2, 385–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rivera, J.; Proia, R.L.; Olivera, A. The alliance of sphingosine-1-phosphate and its receptors in immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 8, 753–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sanchez, T.; Hla, T. Structural and functional characteristics of S1P receptors. J. Cell. Biochem. 2004, 92, 913–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Obinata, H.; Hla, T. Sphingosine 1-phosphate and inflammation. Int. Immunol. 2019, 31, 617–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Vogler, R.; Sauer, B.; Kim, D.S.; Schäfer-Korting, M.; Kleuser, B. Sphingosine-1-phosphate and its potentially paradoxical effects on critical parameters of cutaneous wound healing. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2003, 120, 693–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Masuda-Kuroki, K.; Di Nardo, A. Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Signaling at the Skin Barrier Interface. Biology 2022, 11, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Igawa, S.; Ohzono, A.; Pham, P.; Wang, Z.; Nakatsuji, T.; Dokoshi, T.; Di Nardo, A. Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor 2 Is Central to Maintaining Epidermal Barrier Homeostasis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2021, 141, 1188–1197.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zheng, Y.; Hunt, R.L.; Villaruz, A.E.; Fisher, E.L.; Liu, R.; Liu, Q.; Cheung, G.Y.C.; Li, M.; Otto, M. Commensal Staphylococcus epidermidis contributes to skin barrier homeostasis by generating protective ceramides. Cell Host Microbe 2022, 30, 301–313.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Parrado, C.; Mercado-Saenz, S.; Perez-Davo, A.; Gilaberte, Y.; Gonzalez, S.; Juarranz, A. Environmental Stressors on Skin Aging. Mechanistic Insights. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tramontana, M.; Hansel, K.; Bianchi, L.; Sensini, C.; Malatesta, N.; Stingeni, L. Advancing the understanding of allergic contact dermatitis: From pathophysiology to novel therapeutic approaches. Front. Med. 2023, 10, 1184289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Brites, G.; Basso, J.; Miranda, M.; Miguel Neves, B.; Vitorino, C.; Cruz, M.T. Development of a new hydrogel for the prevention of allergic contact dermatitis. Int. J. Pharm. 2022, 628, 122265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pedersen, M.B.; Skov, L.; Menné, T.; Johansen, J.D.; Olsen, J. Gene expression time course in the human skin during elicitation of allergic contact dermatitis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2007, 127, 2585–2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Terui, H.; Kimura, Y.; Fujimura, C.; Aiba, S. The IL-1 promoter-driven luciferase reporter cell line THP-G1b can efficiently predict skin-sensitising chemicals. Arch. Toxicol. 2021, 95, 1647–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, W.; Ding, F.; Zhai, Y.; Tao, W.; Bi, J.; Fan, H.; Yin, N.; Wang, Z. IL-37 is protective in allergic contact dermatitis through mast cell inhibition. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020, 83, 106476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sakai, H.; Ishida, T.; Sato, K.; Mandokoro, K.; Yabe, S.; Sato, F.; Chiba, Y.; Kon, R.; Ikarashi, N.; Kamei, J. Interference of Skin Scratching Attenuates Accumulation of Neutrophils in Murine Allergic Contact Dermatitis Model. Inflammation 2019, 42, 2226–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Inan, S.; Torres-Huerta, A.; Jensen, L.E.; Dun, N.J.; Cowan, A. Nalbuphine, a kappa opioid receptor agonist and mu opioid receptor antagonist attenuates pruritus, decreases IL-31, and increases IL-10 in mice with contact dermatitis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 864, 172702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ochlich, D.; Rademacher, F.; Drerup, K.A.; Gläser, R.; Harder, J. The influence of the commensal skin bacterium Staphylococcus epidermidis on the epidermal barrier and inflammation: Implications for atopic dermatitis. Exp. Dermatol. 2023, 32, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, H.; Desai, N.N.; Olivera, A.; Seki, T.; Brooker, G.; Spiegel, S. Sphingosine-1-phosphate, a novel lipid, involved in cellular proliferation. J. Cell Biol. 1991, 114, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Olivera, A.; Spiegel, S. Sphingosine-1-phosphate as second messenger in cell proliferation induced by PDGF and FCS mitogens. Nature 1993, 365, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Spiegel, S. Sphingosine and sphingosine 1-phosphate in cellular proliferation: Relationship with protein kinase C and phosphatidic acid. J. Lipid Mediat. 1993, 8, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Lee, M.J.; Van Brocklyn, J.R.; Thangada, S.; Liu, C.H.; Hand, A.R.; Menzeleev, R.; Spiegel, S.; Hla, T. Sphingosine-1-phosphate as a ligand for the G protein-coupled receptor EDG-1. Science 1998, 279, 1552–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Okamoto, H.; Takuwa, N.; Gonda, K.; Okazaki, H.; Chang, K.; Yatomi, Y.; Shigematsu, H.; Takuwa, Y. EDG1 is a functional sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor that is linked via a Gi/o to multiple signaling pathways, including phospholipase C activation, Ca2+ mobilization, Ras-mitogen-activated protein kinase activation, and adenylate cyclase inhibition. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 27104–27110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gonda, K.; Okamoto, H.; Takuwa, N.; Yatomi, Y.; Okazaki, H.; Sakurai, T.; Kimura, S.; Sillard, R.; Harii, K.; Takuwa, Y. The novel sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor AGR16 is coupled via pertussis toxin-sensitive and -insensitive G-proteins to multiple signalling pathways. Biochem. J. 1999, 337 Pt 1, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Okamoto, H.; Takuwa, N.; Yatomi, Y.; Gonda, K.; Shigematsu, H.; Takuwa, Y. EDG3 is a functional receptor specific for sphingosine 1-phosphate and sphingosylphosphorylcholine with signaling characteristics distinct from EDG1 and AGR16. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999, 260, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Takuwa, Y. Subtype-specific differential regulation of Rho family G proteins and cell migration by the Edg family sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1582, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, D.; Qi, D.; Xu, Y.; Hu, C.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Q.; Shang, Z.; Zhang, G. The S1PR1 agonist SEW2871 promotes the survival of skin flap. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2021, 99, 1280–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kano, M.; Kobayashi, T.; Date, M.; Tennichi, M.; Hamaguchi, Y.; Strasser, D.S.; Takehara, K.; Matsushita, T. Attenuation of murine sclerodermatous models by the selective S1P(1) receptor modulator cenerimod. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Thieme, M.; Bieber, K.; Sezin, T.; Wannick, M.; Gupta, Y.; Kalies, K.; Ludwig, R.J.; Mousavi, S.; Zillikens, D.; Sadik, C.D. The Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Modulator Fingolimod Aggravates Murine Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2019, 139, 2381–2384.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, Z.; Lai, Y.; Bernard, J.J.; Macleod, D.T.; Cogen, A.L.; Moss, B.; Di Nardo, A. Skin mast cells protect mice against vaccinia virus by triggering mast cell receptor S1PR2 and releasing antimicrobial peptides. J. Immunol. 2012, 188, 345–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Igawa, S.; Choi, J.E.; Wang, Z.; Chang, Y.L.; Wu, C.C.; Werbel, T.; Ishida-Yamamoto, A.; Di Nardo, A. Human Keratinocytes Use Sphingosine 1-Phosphate and its Receptors to Communicate Staphylococcus aureus Invasion and Activate Host Defense. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2019, 139, 1743–1752.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yoon, S.B.; Lee, C.H.; Kim, H.Y.; Jeong, D.; Jeon, M.K.; Cho, S.A.; Kim, K.; Lee, T.; Yang, J.Y.; Gong, Y.D.; et al. A novel sphingosylphosphorylcholine and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 antagonist, KRO-105714, for alleviating atopic dermatitis. J. Inflamm. 2020, 17, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kang, J.; Lee, J.H.; Im, D.S. Topical Application of S1P(2) Antagonist JTE-013 Attenuates 2,4-Dinitrochlorobenzene-Induced Atopic Dermatitis in Mice. Biomol. Ther. 2020, 28, 537–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Park, S.J.; Im, D.S. Blockage of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 attenuates 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene-induced atopic dermatitis in mice. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2020, 41, 1487–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Gray, N.; Limberg, M.M.; Wiebe, D.; Weihrauch, T.; Langner, A.; Brandt, N.; Bräuer, A.U.; Raap, U. Differential Upregulation and Functional Activity of S1PR1 in Human Peripheral Blood Basophils of Atopic Patients. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 16117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Silverberg, J.I.; Bissonnette, R.; Kircik, L.; Murrell, D.F.; Selfridge, A.; Liu, K.; Ahluwalia, G.; Guttman-Yassky, E. Efficacy and safety of etrasimod, a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator, in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (ADVISE). J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2023, 37, 1366–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ji, M.; Xue, N.; Lai, F.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Y.; Jin, J.; Chen, X. Validating a Selective S1P(1) Receptor Modulator Syl930 for Psoriasis Treatment. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2018, 41, 592–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Schuster, C.; Huard, A.; Sirait-Fischer, E.; Dillmann, C.; Brüne, B.; Weigert, A. S1PR4-dependent CCL2 production promotes macrophage recruitment in a murine psoriasis model. Eur. J. Immunol. 2020, 50, 839–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. He, Y.; Yin, X.; Yan, J.; Li, X.; Sun, Q. The lncRNA H19/miR-766-3p/S1PR3 Axis Contributes to the Hyperproliferation of Keratinocytes and Skin Inflammation in Psoriasis via the AKT/mTOR Pathway. Mediat. Inflamm. 2021, 2021, 9991175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, L.; Wang, J.; Li, H.J.; Zhang, S.; Jin, M.Z.; Chen, S.T.; Sun, X.Y.; Zhou, Y.Q.; Lu, Y.; Yang, D.; et al. Sphingosine-1-Phosphate and Its Signal Modulators Alleviate Psoriasis-Like Dermatitis: Preclinical and Clinical Evidence and Possible Mechanisms. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 759276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kleuser, B.; Bäumer, W. Sphingosine 1-Phosphate as Essential Signaling Molecule in Inflammatory Skin Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Reines, I.; Kietzmann, M.; Mischke, R.; Tschernig, T.; Lüth, A.; Kleuser, B.; Bäumer, W. Topical application of sphingosine-1-phosphate and FTY720 attenuate allergic contact dermatitis reaction through inhibition of dendritic cell migration. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2009, 129, 1954–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mitamura, Y.; Ogulur, I.; Pat, Y.; Rinaldi, A.O.; Ardicli, O.; Cevhertas, L.; Brüggen, M.C.; Traidl-Hoffmann, C.; Akdis, M.; Akdis, C.A. Dysregulation of the epithelial barrier by environmental and other exogenous factors. Contact Dermat. 2021, 85, 615–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Meisser, S.S.; Altunbulakli, C.; Bandier, J.; Opstrup, M.S.; Castro-Giner, F.; Akdis, M.; Bonefeld, C.M.; Johansen, J.D.; Akdis, C.A. Skin barrier damage after exposure to paraphenylenediamine. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 145, 619–631.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Julander, A.; Liljedahl, E.R.; Korres de Paula, H.; Assarsson, E.; Engfeldt, M.; Littorin, M.; Shobana Anto, C.; Lidén, C.; Broberg, K. Nickel penetration into stratum corneum in FLG null carriers-A human experimental study. Contact Dermat. 2022, 87, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jia, Z.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Wei, P.; Li, L.; Wu, P.; Hong, M. Calycosin alleviates allergic contact dermatitis by repairing epithelial tight junctions via down-regulating HIF-1α. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2018, 22, 4507–4521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wen, S.; Sun, M.; Ye, L.; Yang, B.; Hu, L.; Man, M.Q. Topical Applications of a Novel Emollient Inhibit Inflammation in Murine Models of Acute Contact Dermatitis. Biomed. Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 5594646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Proksch, E.; Brandner, J.M.; Jensen, J.M. The skin: An indispensable barrier. Exp. Dermatol. 2008, 17, 1063–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lynley, A.M.; Dale, B.A. The characterization of human epidermal filaggrin. A histidine-rich, keratin filament-aggregating protein. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1983, 744, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lundström, A.; Serre, G.; Haftek, M.; Egelrud, T. Evidence for a role of corneodesmosin, a protein which may serve to modify desmosomes during cornification, in stratum corneum cell cohesion and desquamation. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 1994, 286, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vermette, D.; Hu, P.; Canarie, M.F.; Funaro, M.; Glover, J.; Pierce, R.W. Tight junction structure, function, and assessment in the critically ill: A systematic review. Intensive Care Med. Exp. 2018, 6, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Otani, T.; Nguyen, T.P.; Tokuda, S.; Sugihara, K.; Sugawara, T.; Furuse, K.; Miura, T.; Ebnet, K.; Furuse, M. Claudins and JAM-A coordinately regulate tight junction formation and epithelial polarity. J. Cell Biol. 2019, 218, 3372–3396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Brown, M.M.; Horswill, A.R. Staphylococcus epidermidis-Skin friend or foe? PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1009026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Santamaria, E.; Åkerström, U.; Berger-Picard, N.; Lataste, S.; Gillbro, J.M. Randomized comparative double-blind study assessing the difference between topically applied microbiome supporting skincare versus conventional skincare on the facial microbiome in correlation to biophysical skin parameters. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2023, 45, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Cau, L.; Williams, M.R.; Butcher, A.M.; Nakatsuji, T.; Kavanaugh, J.S.; Cheng, J.Y.; Shafiq, F.; Higbee, K.; Hata, T.R.; Horswill, A.R.; et al. Staphylococcus epidermidis protease EcpA can be a deleterious component of the skin microbiome in atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2021, 147, 955–966.e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Williams, M.R.; Cau, L.; Wang, Y.; Kaul, D.; Sanford, J.A.; Zaramela, L.S.; Khalil, S.; Butcher, A.M.; Zengler, K.; Horswill, A.R.; et al. Interplay of Staphylococcal and Host Proteases Promotes Skin Barrier Disruption in Netherton Syndrome. Cell Rep. 2020, 30, 2923–2933.e7. [Google Scholar]
  57. Landemaine, L.; Da Costa, G.; Fissier, E.; Francis, C.; Morand, S.; Verbeke, J.; Michel, M.L.; Briandet, R.; Sokol, H.; Gueniche, A.; et al. Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates from atopic or healthy skin have opposite effect on skin cells: Potential implication of the AHR pathway modulation. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1098160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yabu, T.; Shiba, H.; Shibasaki, Y.; Nakanishi, T.; Imamura, S.; Touhata, K.; Yamashita, M. Stress-induced ceramide generation and apoptosis via the phosphorylation and activation of nSMase1 by JNK signaling. Cell Death Differ. 2015, 22, 258–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yanagida, K.; Liu, C.H.; Faraco, G.; Galvani, S.; Smith, H.K.; Burg, N.; Anrather, J.; Sanchez, T.; Iadecola, C.; Hla, T. Size-selective opening of the blood-brain barrier by targeting endothelial sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 4531–4536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Luu-The, V.; Paquet, N.; Calvo, E.; Cumps, J. Improved real-time RT-PCR method for high-throughput measurements using second derivative calculation and double correction. Biotechniques 2005, 38, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 24 13190 g001
Figure 1. S1PR2 expression increases in contact dermatitis. Gene expressions of S1PR1 (a), S1PR2 (b), S1PR3 (c), S1PR4 (d), and S1PR5 (e) in the skin of control subjects (0 h, n = 3; 7 h, n = 5; 48 h, n = 4; 96 h, n = 4) and contact dermatitis subjects (0 h, n = 4; 7 h, n = 5; 48 h, n = 3; 96 h, n = 6) (GEO: GDS 2935) were analyzed. Data are expressed as means ± SD. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005; ns, not significant; S1PR1-5, Sphingosine 1-receptor1-5.
Figure 1. S1PR2 expression increases in contact dermatitis. Gene expressions of S1PR1 (a), S1PR2 (b), S1PR3 (c), S1PR4 (d), and S1PR5 (e) in the skin of control subjects (0 h, n = 3; 7 h, n = 5; 48 h, n = 4; 96 h, n = 4) and contact dermatitis subjects (0 h, n = 4; 7 h, n = 5; 48 h, n = 3; 96 h, n = 6) (GEO: GDS 2935) were analyzed. Data are expressed as means ± SD. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005; ns, not significant; S1PR1-5, Sphingosine 1-receptor1-5.
Ijms 24 13190 g001
Ijms 24 13190 g002
Figure 2. mRNA expressions of S1pr1-5 of murine auricle skin. Total RNA was obtained from S1pr2fl/fl mouse normal ear skin (a), S1pr2fl/fl mouse ear skin 96 h after TSB or S. epidermidis application (b), and S1pr2fl/fl K14-Cre mouse ear skin 96 h after TSB or S. epidermidis application (c). Expressions of five receptors for S1P (S1pr1-5) mRNA were measured with RT-qPCR and normalized to Gapdh mRNA expression level. Three mice were used per experimental group and triplicated technically during analysis. Data shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3) and are representative of two independent experiments with similar results. ****, p < 0.0001; ns, not significant; TSB, trypticase soy broth; S. epi, Staphylococcus epidermidis; Gapdh, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate.
Figure 2. mRNA expressions of S1pr1-5 of murine auricle skin. Total RNA was obtained from S1pr2fl/fl mouse normal ear skin (a), S1pr2fl/fl mouse ear skin 96 h after TSB or S. epidermidis application (b), and S1pr2fl/fl K14-Cre mouse ear skin 96 h after TSB or S. epidermidis application (c). Expressions of five receptors for S1P (S1pr1-5) mRNA were measured with RT-qPCR and normalized to Gapdh mRNA expression level. Three mice were used per experimental group and triplicated technically during analysis. Data shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3) and are representative of two independent experiments with similar results. ****, p < 0.0001; ns, not significant; TSB, trypticase soy broth; S. epi, Staphylococcus epidermidis; Gapdh, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate.
Ijms 24 13190 g002
Ijms 24 13190 g003
Figure 3. S. epidermidis ameliorates contact dermatitis inflammation in the S1pr2fl/fl K14−Cre murine auricle skin. (a) Experimental protocol explaining regimen for SADBE-induced ACD. Briefly, 12-week-old mice were treated with 20 μL of 0.5% SADBE dissolved in acetone on their shaved backs for two consecutive days. Five days after, the mice ear was topically challenged with 20 μL of vehicle (acetone), or TSB or 1 × 106 of S. epidermidis, or 0.5% SADBE/TSB, or 0.5% SADBE/1 × 106 of S. epidermidis, respectively. (b) Clinical manifestations of the representatives from each experimental group on day 11. (c) Ear thickness was measured on days 7, 8, and 11. The difference in ear thickness after the challenge from baseline was calculated and presented as a bar graph. Three mice were used per experimental group. Data shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3) and are representative of two independent experiments with similar results. Data are expressed as means ± SD. *, p < 0.05; ****, p < 0.0001 ns, not significant; ACD, allergic contact dermatitis; SADBE, 3,4-Dibutoxy-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione.
Figure 3. S. epidermidis ameliorates contact dermatitis inflammation in the S1pr2fl/fl K14−Cre murine auricle skin. (a) Experimental protocol explaining regimen for SADBE-induced ACD. Briefly, 12-week-old mice were treated with 20 μL of 0.5% SADBE dissolved in acetone on their shaved backs for two consecutive days. Five days after, the mice ear was topically challenged with 20 μL of vehicle (acetone), or TSB or 1 × 106 of S. epidermidis, or 0.5% SADBE/TSB, or 0.5% SADBE/1 × 106 of S. epidermidis, respectively. (b) Clinical manifestations of the representatives from each experimental group on day 11. (c) Ear thickness was measured on days 7, 8, and 11. The difference in ear thickness after the challenge from baseline was calculated and presented as a bar graph. Three mice were used per experimental group. Data shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3) and are representative of two independent experiments with similar results. Data are expressed as means ± SD. *, p < 0.05; ****, p < 0.0001 ns, not significant; ACD, allergic contact dermatitis; SADBE, 3,4-Dibutoxy-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione.
Ijms 24 13190 g003
Ijms 24 13190 g004
Figure 4. Expression of inflammatory cytokine genes in ACD mouse models and controls. mRNA expression of ACD-associated genes, Il-1β (a), Cxcl1 (b), Cxcl2 (c), Tnf-α (d), and Il-6 (e), was measured by RT-qPCR in ACD mouse models and control mice ear skin. Three mice were used per each experimental group and triplicated technically during RT-qPCR. Data shown are the mean ± SD and are representatives of two independent experiments with similar results. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005; ****, p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
Figure 4. Expression of inflammatory cytokine genes in ACD mouse models and controls. mRNA expression of ACD-associated genes, Il-1β (a), Cxcl1 (b), Cxcl2 (c), Tnf-α (d), and Il-6 (e), was measured by RT-qPCR in ACD mouse models and control mice ear skin. Three mice were used per each experimental group and triplicated technically during RT-qPCR. Data shown are the mean ± SD and are representatives of two independent experiments with similar results. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005; ****, p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
Ijms 24 13190 g004
Ijms 24 13190 g005
Figure 5. Expression of stratum corneum barrier and tight junction barrier genes in ACD mouse models and controls. mRNA expressions of Flg (a), Flg2 (b), Cdsn (c), Cldn1 (d), Ocln (e), and Zo-1 (f) were measured with RT-qPCR in ACD mouse models and control mice ear skin. Three mice were used per each experimental group and triplicated technically during RT-qPCR. Data shown are the mean ± SD and are representative of two independent experiments with similar results. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001; ns, not significant; Flg, filaggrin; Cdsn, corneodesmosin; Cldn1, claudin-1; Ocln, occludin, Zo-1, zonula occludens-1.
Figure 5. Expression of stratum corneum barrier and tight junction barrier genes in ACD mouse models and controls. mRNA expressions of Flg (a), Flg2 (b), Cdsn (c), Cldn1 (d), Ocln (e), and Zo-1 (f) were measured with RT-qPCR in ACD mouse models and control mice ear skin. Three mice were used per each experimental group and triplicated technically during RT-qPCR. Data shown are the mean ± SD and are representative of two independent experiments with similar results. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001; ns, not significant; Flg, filaggrin; Cdsn, corneodesmosin; Cldn1, claudin-1; Ocln, occludin, Zo-1, zonula occludens-1.
Ijms 24 13190 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Masuda-Kuroki, K.; Alimohammadi, S.; Di Nardo, A. S. epidermidis Rescues Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor 2-Deficient Skin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13190. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713190

AMA Style

Masuda-Kuroki K, Alimohammadi S, Di Nardo A. S. epidermidis Rescues Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor 2-Deficient Skin. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(17):13190. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713190

Chicago/Turabian Style

Masuda-Kuroki, Kana, Shahrzad Alimohammadi, and Anna Di Nardo. 2023. "S. epidermidis Rescues Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor 2-Deficient Skin" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 17: 13190. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713190

APA Style

Masuda-Kuroki, K., Alimohammadi, S., & Di Nardo, A. (2023). S. epidermidis Rescues Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor 2-Deficient Skin. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(17), 13190. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713190

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop