Next Article in Journal
CoNiCrMo Particles, but Not TiAlV Particles, Activate the NLRP3 Inflammasome in Periprosthetic Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Arbuscular-Mycorrhizal Symbiosis in Medicago Regulated by the Transcription Factor MtbHLHm1;1 and the Ammonium Facilitator Protein MtAMF1;3
Previous Article in Journal
Data-Independent Acquisition Proteomics Reveals the Effects of Red and Blue Light on the Growth and Development of Moso Bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) Seedlings
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 6
10.3390/ijms24065107
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Phenotypes and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Root Response to Phosphate Deprivation in Plants

by
Meiyan Ren
1,
Yong Li
1,
Jianshu Zhu
1,
Keju Zhao
1,
Zhongchang Wu
1 and
Chuanzao Mao
1,2,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2
Hainan Institute, Zhejiang University, Yazhou Bay Science and Technology City, Sanya 572100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(6), 5107; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065107
Submission received: 1 February 2023 / Revised: 21 February 2023 / Accepted: 28 February 2023 / Published: 7 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phosphorus Signaling and Utilization in Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Phosphorus (P) is an essential macronutrient for plant growth. The roots are the main organ for nutrient and water absorption in plants, and they adapt to low-P soils by altering their architecture for enhancing absorption of inorganic phosphate (Pi). This review summarizes the physiological and molecular mechanisms underlying the developmental responses of roots to Pi starvation, including the primary root, lateral root, root hair, and root growth angle, in the dicot model plant Arabidopsis thaliana and the monocot model plant rice (Oryza sativa). The importance of different root traits and genes for breeding P-efficient roots in rice varieties for Pi-deficient soils are also discussed, which we hope will benefit the genetic improvement of Pi uptake, Pi-use efficiency, and crop yields.

1. Introduction

Phosphorus (P), an essential macronutrient for plant growth, plays a central role in a variety of vital processes, including energy generation, photosynthesis, glycolysis, respiration, and nucleic acid and membrane lipid biosynthesis [1,2]. Inorganic phosphate (Pi) is the predominant form of P that can be absorbed directly by plants [3]. Due to its low mobility and high fixation rate, the availability of Pi in soils is very low, although the total P content in most soils is high. The low-Pi availability in soils and the imminent scarcity of the non-renewable Pi rock make Pi deficiency a major limitation on crop production [4]. Improving crop Pi uptake and Pi-use efficiency will be an important component of any comprehensive strategy to achieve sustainable P use. Roots, the primary organ by which plants sense and explore Pi, have a dominant influence on Pi uptake and plant yield [5,6]. Many papers have reviewed the changes in root architecture in response to Pi limitation in the dicotyledonous model plant Arabidopsis thaliana; however, few have reviewed the root architecture response to Pi limitation in monocotyledonous plants. Rice (Oryza sativa) is one of the most important food crops in the world; developing varieties with Pi-efficient root system under low P is a valid approach to enhance low Pi tolerance and yield in rice; thus, understanding the mechanisms of root remodeling under Pi deficiency in this species is of great importance. Increasing studies indicate that Arabidopsis and rice have different root architectures and regulatory mechanisms in response to Pi deprivation; however, the similarities and differences in the phenotype and molecular mechanism of root response to Pi deficiency between Arabidopsis and rice are still unclear. This review compares the conserved and divergent aspects of the root response to Pi deprivation in Arabidopsis and rice with a focus on the integrated physiological and molecular mechanisms, which we hope will benefit the genetic improvement of crop Pi efficiency.

2. Root Response to Pi Deficiency in Arabidopsis and Rice

2.1. Root Morphology of Arabidopsis and Rice

Arabidopsis has a taproot system, which consists of a single thick primary root (PR) and multiple lateral roots (LRs), all of which have surface area-enhancing root hairs (RHs) [7]. The PR originates from the embryo, while LRs emerge from the PR and other LRs through LR primordia that initiate from pericycle founder cells [8]. RHs are differentiated, initiated, and elongated from RH-destined epidermal H-cells located on the PR and LRs and play roles in absorbing nutrients and water, as well as anchoring the root into the soil [8,9]. LRs tend to grow from the PR at a specific angle, named the root growth angle (RGA), allowing the roots to explore the soil nutrients and water more effectively [10]. The RGA is an important component of the Arabidopsis root system, regulating and optimizing its radial spread.
In contrast to Arabidopsis, rice bears a fibrous root system consisting of a PR and multiple crown roots (CRs, or adventitious roots), LRs, and RHs. CRs are shoot-borne roots that initiate from parenchyma cells at the base of the stem [11]. LRs in rice are generated on the PR and the CRs. RHs emerge from the PR, CRs, and LRs, accounting for a large portion of the root surface area [12]. Unlike in Arabidopsis, the rice PR is only important at the early stage of seedling development, after which its anchoring role is gradually taken on by the CRs. The RGA is an important component of the root system in rice, just as it is in Arabidopsis, functioning to ensure roots are properly distributed in the soil to explore the soil nutrient and water resources [13]. The RGA in rice mainly depends on the angle between the CRs and the direction of gravity, although the angle between the LRs and the CRs also contributes to the overall RGA. In Arabidopsis, the RGA mainly depends on the angle between the LRs and the direction of gravity (or the PR).

2.2. Root Response to Pi Deprivation in Arabidopsis and Rice

In most studies in Arabidopsis, Pi deficiency inhibits PR growth and enhances LR and RH growth to increase the total root surface area [14]. Under Pi deprivation, the reduction of cell elongation in the PR elongation zone is followed by defects in the stem cells and the progressive exhaustion of meristematic cells in its meristematic region, resulting in the growth inhibition of the PR [15]. Further studies indicated that iron (Fe) plays an important role in the Pi-dependent inhibition of PR growth. The degree of PR inhibition in Arabidopsis was positively correlated with the levels of Fe, and this Fe-dependent inhibition could be abolished in a Pi-limited medium by adding Fe scavengers [16]. Later, Müller et al. reported that the Fe3+-dependent accumulation of callose in the apoplast of the stem cell niche contributed to the loss of stem cells and the resulting meristematic cell exhaustion [17]. Mora-Macías et al. further indicated that malate-dependent Fe accumulation in the apoplast triggers the Pi-dependent differentiation of meristematic cells in the root apical meristem [18]. In addition, Zheng et al. reported that blue light is not only required but also sufficient to inhibit PR growth through a blue-light-mediated photo-Fenton reaction that converts Fe3+ to Fe2+ under Pi deficiency [19]. Interestingly, a recent study found that the degree of PR inhibition induced by Pi deficiency is not linked to the level of Fe accumulated in the root apical meristem or the elongation zone [20]. Taken together, these findings show that Fe accumulation is a critical checkpoint in the inhibition of PR growth under Pi deprivation.
By contrast, hormones play irreplaceable roles in altering LR and RH growth and the RGA in response to Pi starvation [21,22]; for example, the Pi deficiency–induced LR growth in wild-type Arabidopsis was not observed in strigolactone (SL)-deficient mutants [23]. Low Pi resulted in larger RGAs for the LRs in Arabidopsis in an auxin-dependent manner [24]. Auxin also promotes RH growth in Pi-limited Arabidopsis roots [25]. In addition, sucrose also participates in the root development response to Pi starvation [26,27]. Due to limited space, we will not discuss it here as it has been well documented in the reviews [26,27].
Compared with Arabidopsis, the Pi starvation response in rice is quite diverse and complicated. In hydroponic systems, rice plants showed either an enhanced or unaffected PR growth under Pi-deficient conditions, depending on the genetic background [28]; however, some studies contrastingly reported that slight Pi deficiency promotes root growth, while mild and severe Pi deficiency suppresses root growth in this crop [14]. Similarly, an increase or no change in LR elongation is reported in hydroponic culture among different rice varieties grown under low P [28,29]. Using a sand culture system, which mimics realistic soil Pi availability, Vejchasarn et al. showed that low Pi reduced LR density and length but increased RH length and density in all 15 tested rice varieties [30]. Interestingly, Nestler et al. reported that rice plants grown in low-Pi soil produced shorter RHs than those grown in Pi-sufficient soil [31]. In addition, a recent study indicated that Pi deficiency induced a shallower root system in rice by modifying root gravitropism in the soil [32].
To date, the root morphology and architectural response to Pi deficiency are relatively clear in Arabidopsis under controlled growth conditions, while it is still ambiguous in rice. The complex interactions between the growth conditions and genetic variability make it difficult to study the root architectural response under low-Pi soil conditions. With the development of modern technology, the precise study of root morphology and the architectural response to Pi deficiency in the soil should quickly progress.

3. Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Root Response to Pi Deficiency

3.1. Molecular Mechanisms Underlying PR (and CR in Rice) Growth under Pi Deprivation in Arabidopsis and Rice

3.1.1. Fe Accumulation Is Responsible for Inhibiting PR Growth under Pi Deficiency

The molecular mechanisms underlying the Pi deprivation-mediated inhibition of PR growth in Arabidopsis are relatively clear. Fe accumulation is known to impact PR growth; for example, malate-dependent Fe accumulation contributes to the inhibition of PR growth under Pi deficiency in Arabidopsis [33]. Based on forward genetics, a series of genes involved in this process were identified through screening mutants with longer or shorter roots than the wild type under Pi-deficient conditions. The low phosphate root 1 (lpr1) mutant had a wild-type phenotype under Pi-replete conditions but displayed less inhibited PR growth and reduced Fe3+ accumulation in the root apoplast under Pi-limited conditions [34]. Further study indicated that AtLPR1 belongs to a multicopper oxidase family, possessing ferroxidase activities that convert Fe2+ to Fe3+ in the apoplast [17,34]. AtLPR2, a close paralog of AtLPR1 in Arabidopsis, also functions as a ferroxidase but plays a less important role in Pi deficiency–induced PR inhibition than AtLPR1 [35]. The phosphate deficiency response 2 (pdr2) mutant over-accumulated Fe3+ in the root apoplast, causing an enhanced inhibition of PR growth under low-Pi conditions [36]. AtPDR2 encodes a P5-type ATPase, which is thought to control AtLPR1 biogenesis or AtLPR1-reactant Fe availability in the apoplast [36].
Later, ALUMINUM-ACTIVATED MALATE TRANSPORTER 1 (AtALMT1) was reported to regulate the rapid inhibition of cell elongation in the transition zone in response to low-Pi availability by exuding malate [33,37]. The zinc-finger transcription factor SENSITIVE TO PROTON RHIZOTOXICITY 1 (AtSTOP1) acts as the master regulator for the Pi deficiency-mediated inhibition of PR growth by accumulating in the nucleus and directly upregulating the expression of AtALMT1 under low-Pi conditions [33,38]. ALUMINUM SENSIRIVE 3 (AtALS3), encoding the transmembrane domain of a putative ABC (ABC-binding cassette) transporter, and SENSITIVE TO AL RHIZOTOXICITY 1 (AtSTAR1), encoding the nucleotide-binding domain of the same ABC transporter, have also been reported to be involved in PR inhibition under Pi deficiency [39]. The atals3 and atstar1 mutants showed an enhanced accumulation of Fe in the root apoplast, which resulted in their hypersensitive PR inhibition phenotypes under Pi deficiency [39]. AtALS3 and AtSTAR1 form a typical ABC transporter protein complex. Under Pi-deficient conditions, the activity of this AtALS3/AtSTAR1 transporter was reduced, promoting the accumulation of AtSTOP1 in the nucleus and, thereby, increasing the expression of AtALMT1 to inhibit the growth of the PR [20]. A recent study found that low Pi triggers the uptake of ammonium, causing the rapid acidification of the root surface. This rhizosphere acidification triggers the accumulation of AtSTOP1 in the nucleus, which then triggers the AtALMT1-mediated excretion of malate to start the root developmental responses [40]. In addition, Fe2+/3+ were reported to directly increase the accumulation of AtSTOP1 in the nucleus by inhibiting its proteasomal degradation in a pH-dependent manner [41]. A possible mechanism by which low Pi inhibits PR growth in Arabidopsis, proposed by Dong Liu [14], is that P deficiency results in a low pH and the accumulation of Fe, which stimulates AtSTOP1 accumulation in the nucleus and upregulates the expression of AtALMT1. This, in turn, promotes the excretion of malate into the root apoplast, where the malate–Fe3+ complex is formed when AtLPR1 is functional. The low-pH environment and blue light together promote the conversion of malate–Fe3+ into Fe2+ via a photo-Fenton reaction, after which Fe2+ reacts with H2O2 to produce hydroxyl radicals and Fe3+ via a Fenton reaction. This Fe redox cycle causes the continual production of hydroxyl radicals, which inhibit PR growth [14].
Recently, more genes have been found to be involved in this AtSTOP1–AtALMT1 signaling network; for example, AtSIZ1 (SAP and Miz 1), encoding a SUMO E3 ligase, negatively regulates AtSTOP1 signaling and the expression of AtALMT1 [42,43]. In addition, the transcription factor AtWRKY33 has been reported to function as a negative regulator for Pi deficiency-inhibited PR growth by regulating the expression of AtALMT1 and subsequent Fe3+ accumulation in Arabidopsis root tips [44]. AtWRKY33-deficient mutants were more sensitive to low Pi, producing a shorter PR than the wild type under Pi-limited conditions.
Unlike Arabidopsis, rice plants exhibit more PR and CR growth when grown in Pi-deficient conditions, the extent of which depends on their genetic background. This contrast suggests that rice and Arabidopsis use different mechanisms to control the root response to Pi limitation. Low Pi increased the expression of the five AtLPR1 homologous genes in rice [45,46], including OsLPR5, which was previously functionally characterized as a ferroxidase encoding gene [47]. The overexpression of OsLRP5 increased the Fe3+ concentration in the xylem sap, and the total Fe content in the rice roots and shoots. OsPDR2, a homolog of Arabidopsis AtPDR2, plays an important role in root development and Pi homeostasis in rice [48]; however, the mutation of OsLRP5 and OsPDR2 resulted in shorter PRs and CRs than the wild type, irrespective of the Pi conditions [47,48]. In addition, OsWRKY74-overexpressing plants produced a longer PR and accumulated more Fe than the wild-type plants under Pi-limited conditions, whereas the OsWRKY74 RNAi plants produced a shorter PR [49]. This result indicates that OsWRKY74 is involved in the Pi and Fe starvation responses and may act as an integrator of these stress response pathways in rice. It also highlights the important roles of WRKY family members in Pi-dependent PR growth in Arabidopsis and rice.

3.1.2. Plant Hormone Signaling Pathways Are Involved in PR (and CR in Rice) Growth under Pi Deficiency

Auxin plays fundamental roles in regulating Pi-dependent PR (and CR in rice) growth. The osaux4 (rice homolog of Arabidopsis auxin resistant 4) mutant, which has an aberrant auxin content and distribution, is insensitive to Pi starvation, suggesting that OsAUX4 positively regulates PR and CR elongation in response to low Pi [50]. The auxin efflux transporter PIN-FORMED 1b (OsPIN1b) affects PR and CR elongation by regulating the root apical meristem activity under low-Pi conditions [51]. In addition, the loss-of-function mutants of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 12 (OsARF12) and OsARF25 showed a reduced sensitivity to Pi deficiency in the PR and CR response [52]. These results suggest that auxin mediates PR and CR remodeling in response to Pi deficiency in rice. The attenuated sensitivity of Pi deficiency–inhibited PR growth in mutants of the auxin influx transporter gene AtAUX1 or in triple mutants of the auxin receptor gene TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESPONSE 1 (AtTIR1) and its closest paralogs, encoding the auxin signaling F-box proteins 2 and 3, highlights the important role of auxin in this process in Arabidopsis [21,53].
In Arabidopsis, AtSIZ1 regulates PR remodeling under Pi deficiency in an auxin-dependent way [54,55]. The expression of the auxin-responsive genes was unchanged in the atsiz1 mutant, but under Pi-starved conditions it accumulated auxin earlier in its roots than did the wild-type plants. By contrast, this auxin-dependent root architecture alteration under Pi deficiency was not observed in the ossiz1 and ossiz2 mutants in rice, the homologs of Arabidopsis SIZ1 [56,57]. The ossiz1 mutant had shorter PRs and CRs than the wild type, independent of the Pi status in the environment. Ding et al. investigated the role of auxin in Pi-dependent root elongation in rice using three varieties [58], revealing that Pi-starved Tongjing981 (TJ981) and Zhendao99 (ZD99) had a longer PR than they did under normal Pi, whereas Zhenghan6 (ZH6) produced a shorter PR under Pi starvation than it did under normal Pi. They further indicated that Pi deficiency increased the indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) contents in TJ981 and ZD99 but decreased the IAA content in ZH6. This increased IAA content induced the expression of expansin genes and the activation of expansin proteins, leading to cell wall relaxation and root elongation in TJ981 and ZD99. By contrast, the expansin genes were downregulated in Pi-starved ZH6, resulting in its shorter PR. Auxin is therefore involved in regulating Pi-dependent PR growth in both Arabidopsis and rice.
Ethylene is another important plant hormone regulating PR growth in response to Pi starvation [59]. HYPERSENSITIVE TO PI STARVATION 4 (AtHPS4), a new allele of SABRE encoding an important regulator of cell expansion, is known to respond to Pi starvation by interacting with ethylene signaling [59,60]. The athps4 mutant displayed a shorter PR than the wild type under high-Pi conditions, but also exhibited a stronger inhibition of PR growth under low-Pi conditions. Silver ions (Ag+), an inhibitor of ethylene action, suppressed this response, confirming the important role of ethylene in HPS4-dependent PR inhibition in response to low Pi. AtHPS7 (a tyrosylprotein sulfotransferase), AtHPS3, and ETHYLENE OVERPRODUCTION 1 (AtETO1) also regulate Pi-dependent PR growth through the ethylene signaling pathway [61,62,63]. The athps7 mutant displayed an exaggerated inhibition of PR growth, accompanied by an elevated expression of ethylene biosynthesis genes, compared with the wild-type plants under low-Pi conditions. Similarly, low Pi inhibited the PR growth of the athps3 mutant, which was attributed to the overproduction of ethylene under the regulation of AMINOCYCLOPROPANE-1-CARBOXYLATE SYNTHASE 4 (AtACS5), the rate-limiting enzyme in ethylene biosynthesis. Recently, the transcription factor Arabidopsis NAM/ATAF/CUC protein 44 (ANAC044) was illustrated to alter the PR length in Arabidopsis under Pi starvation conditions by increasing the cell wall Pi reutilization in an ethylene-dependent manner [64]. The anac044 mutant produced a longer PR than the wild type under Pi-limited conditions by regulating the expression of ethylene production genes. The role of ethylene in regulating PR growth in response to Pi starvation in rice has not been reported yet.
Gibberellin (GA) also participates in the Pi deficiency-mediated inhibition of PR growth [65]. GA stimulates growth by promoting the destruction of DELLA proteins in the 26S proteasome. The DELLA-deficient plants do not exhibit the Pi starvation–induced PR growth inhibition observed in the wild type [66]. AtMYB62, an R2R3-type transcription factor that regulates the GA metabolism and signaling in Arabidopsis, affects the PR growth response to Pi availability [65]. AtMYB62-overexpressing plants have shorter PRs than wild-type plants under Pi-replete conditions but showed comparable PR lengths under Pi-limited conditions. In rice, OsMYB1 affects both Pi starvation signaling and GA biosynthesis, with the osmyb1 mutant producing a longer PR than the wild type under Pi starvation, independent of GA [67].
Small signaling peptides are also involved in the Pi-dependent inhibition of PR growth. The small signaling peptide CLAVATA3/EMBRYO SURROUNDING REGION 14 (AtCLE14) has been proven to play a major role in the exhaustion of the meristematic cells under Pi-limited conditions [68]. The expression of AtCLE14 in the proximal meristem region was enhanced via Fe mobilization in the root apical meristem under the control of AtLPR1/AtLPR2. Low-Pi conditions induced AtCLE14 expression, with the resulting peptide perceived by the receptors CLAVATA2 (AtCLV2) and PEP1 RECEPTOR 2 (AtPEPR2), leading to the downregulation of SHORT ROOT/SCARECROW (AtSHR/AtSCR), WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX5 (AtWOX5), and the PIN proteins, which are involved in the maintenance of the root stem cell niche. This resulted in root meristem exhaustion and the inhibition of PR growth.
In addition to the above regulatory mechanisms, CASEIN KINASE 2 (AtCK2) was recently suggested to trigger Pi starvation-induced stem cell exhaustion and thus inhibit PR growth by activating the DNA damage–response pathway in Arabidopsis [69]. Whether OsCK2 and its interactors affect Pi-dependent root exhaustion in rice has yet to be investigated, however. On the other hand, the leaf tip necrosis1 (ltn1) mutant of the putative rice orthologous gene of PHOSPHATE 2 (PHO2) in Arabidopsis had longer PR and CRs than the wild type under Pi-limited conditions; however, there was no difference in PR and CR length between ltn1 and the wild type under Pi-replete conditions [70]. The ltn1 mutant had a greater Pi content in the shoot but lower Pi content in the root compared with the wild type, suggesting that this decreased Pi content in the roots of ltn1 may contribute to its longer PR and CRs under Pi deficiency. However, it has not been determined yet whether the root of Arabidopsis pho2 responds to Pi deficiency.
In summary, the molecular mechanisms by which low Pi inhibits PR growth are well studied in Arabidopsis (Figure 1). In rice, low Pi either promotes root growth or does not affect PR or CR growth, depending on the genetic background.

3.2. The Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the LR Response to Pi Limitation

Auxin acts as the major determinant in the Pi deficiency-induced establishment of the LR primordium and LR emergence [25]. The auxin receptor AtTIR1 and two auxin response factors, AtARF7 and AtARF19, are responsible for the increase in LR density under Pi-deficient conditions in Arabidopsis [53,71]. Under low-Pi conditions, the increased expression of AtTIR1 triggers the degradation of the AUX/IAA proteins, releasing the ARF transcription factors to regulate the expression of the genes responsible for LR formation and emergence [53,72,73]. In addition, under low-Pi conditions, AtTIR1 upregulates AtARF7 and AtARF19 which, in turn, directly regulate the expression of PHOSPHATE STARVATION RESPONSE 1 (AtPHR1), which encodes the core transcription factor regulating the expression of the P starvation response genes [74,75]. The impaired LR growth in the arf7 arf19 double mutant under Pi-limited conditions could be partially rescued by constitutively expressing AtPHR1. Under Pi-limited conditions, the phr1 mutants produced fewer LRs, while the AtPHR1-overexpressing plants displayed an increased LR number. These results suggest that the formation of LRs in response to Pi limitation is partially mediated by AtPHR1 in Arabidopsis.
Similarly, in rice, auxin plays an important role in LR remodeling under Pi starvation. The LRs of the osarf16 mutant showed less of a response to Pi deficiency than those of the wild type, suggesting that OsARF16 positively regulates the LR response to Pi deficiency [76]. Under Pi-deficient conditions, the LR number and density underwent a greater increase in the osarf12 mutants than in the wild type, suggesting that OsARF12 negatively regulates the LR response to Pi deficiency [77]. In addition, the phosphate transporter OsPHT1;8 affects Pi-dependent root growth, probably by regulating the distribution or polar transport of auxin [78]. This likely involved a feedback loop, as OsPHT1;8 expression was in turn induced by IAA. Plants overexpressing OsPHT1;8 produced more LRs than the wild type under Pi-replete conditions, but not under Pi-limited conditions. The OsPIN genes were upregulated in the OsPHT1;8-overexpressing plants under Pi-sufficient conditions, but not under Pi-limited conditions, further highlighting the interplay between auxin signaling and Pi signaling.
The SLs are also involved in regulating LR formation under low-Pi conditions in a MORE AXILLIARY BRANCHING 2 (AtMAX2)-dependent manner [23,79,80]. AtMAX2 encodes an F-box protein, which is a part of the Skp-Cullin-F-box (SCF) E3 ligase complex. Mutants of AtMAX2 (SL signaling) or AtMAX4 (SL biosynthesis) showed a reduced LR response to low-Pi conditions in comparison with the wild type, suggesting that SLs play a role in Pi-dependent LR formation [79,80].
In rice, the SL biosynthesis genes D10 and D27 and the SL signaling gene D3 (a homologous gene of AtMAX2) are responsible for regulating Pi-dependent LR formation [22]. Compared with the wild type, the d10, d27, or d3 mutants showed a loss of sensitivity in the LR response to Pi deficiency. It was suggested that D3 regulates the transport of auxin from shoot to root by modifying the expression level of the PIN family genes [22]. Although SLs play an important role in Pi-dependent LR growth in rice, the detailed molecular mechanism underlying SL signaling in this process requires further investigation. In addition, a recent study found that Pi deficiency inhibits LR growth in mutants of OsACS1, which catalyzes the rate-limiting step in ethylene biosynthesis in rice, suggesting that ethylene is also involved in low-Pi-mediated LR growth [81].
Taken together, the above knowledge demonstrates that although the LR response to Pi limitation differs between rice and Arabidopsis, the underlying molecular mechanisms seem to be conserved between them (Figure 2).

3.3. The Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the RH Response to Pi Limitation

Auxin is essential for RH growth in Pi-limited Arabidopsis [25]. Knocking out TRYPTOPHAN AMINOTRANSFERASE OF ARABIDOPSIS 1 (AtTAA1), an auxin biosynthesis gene, disrupted the promotion of RH by low-Pi conditions [25]. The RHs in the ataux1 and atpin2 mutants are not responsive to low-Pi conditions, suggesting that AtAUX1- and AtPIN2-mediated auxin distribution is essential for RH growth when Pi is limited [82]. Similarly, the RHs of osaux1 were insensitive to the external Pi concentration, suggesting that the auxin transport pathway required for the RH response to Pi starvation is conserved in rice and Arabidopsis [83]. ROOT HAIR DEFECTIVE 6-LIKE 2 (AtRSL2) and AtRSL4 are basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) family transcription factors, which play crucial roles in RH morphogenesis during the RH elongation stage [84,85]. This suggests that, under low-Pi conditions, auxin levels are upregulated at the root tip, increasing the AtARF19, AtRSL2, and AtRSL4 expression levels to trigger RH elongation through the regulation of the various RH-related genes [25].
Recently, KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE 2 (AtKAI2) was reported to regulate the Pi starvation-promoted RH density and elongation through the ethylene signaling pathway [86]. AtKAI2 is an alpha/beta-hydrolase required for the plant response to karrikins, which are smoke-derived compounds mimicking endogenous signaling molecules [87]. AtKAI2 interacts with AtMAX2 to mediate the degradation of the target regulator SUPPRESSOR of MAX2 (AtSMAX2) in a proteasome-mediated manner [88]. Low-Pi availability increases the expression of AtKAI2 and AtMAX2 and then represses the expression of AtACS7, an ethylene precursor, subsequently triggering ethylene biosynthesis and signaling in the root via the degradation of AtSMAX1 and SMAX1-LIKE 2 (AtSMXL2) [86]. Subsequently, ethylene enhances AtAUX1 accumulation in the LR cap and epidermis, and AtPIN2 accumulation in the meristematic and elongation zones, resulting in RH elongation [86]. ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE 3 (AtEIN3), the master transcription factor in ethylene signaling, functions antagonistically with AtMYB30, a R2R3-MYB family transcription factor, in promoting RH growth under Pi deficiency [89,90]. The atmyb30 mutant displayed longer RHs, while AtMYB30-overexpressing plants had shorter RHs than those of the wild type under Pi-limited conditions. By contrast, the RHs in atein3-1 were shorter than those of the wild type under Pi deficiency. Furthermore, the RHs of atmyb30-1 atein3-1 were shorter than those of atmyb30-1 but longer than the atein3-1 RHs under Pi-limited conditions, demonstrating the antagonistic relationship between AtMYB30 and AtEIN3. Another study indicated that AtMYB30 and AtEIN3 antagonistically regulate the transcription level of AtRSL4 and other RH genes [90].
Cytokinins also play a vital role in Pi deficiency-induced RH growth [91,92]. The phosphoribohydrolase LONELY GUY 4 (AtLOG4) and its close homolog AtLOG3, which are rate-limiting enzymes in converting cytokinin into its bioactive form, function together to regulate Pi-dependent RH growth. AtLOG3 and AtLOG4 can be upregulated by the heterodimer transcription factor complex MONOPTEROS 5–LONESOME HIGHWAY (AtTMO5–LHW). Wendrich et al. further proposed that low Pi increases auxin signaling, which then induces localized cytokinin biosynthesis through the enhanced AtTMO5–LHW pathway. The biosynthesized cytokinin might then diffuse from the vasculature to the epidermal cells to modify their length and cell fate, contributing to RH growth [91].
SL regulates Pi starvation-promoted RH elongation through the same signaling pathway as LR growth in an AtMAX2-dependent manner [79,80]. In addition, the homeodomain protein ALFIN-LIKE 6 (AtAL6) is another key regulator of the RH response to Pi starvation [93]; the atal6 mutant has shorter RHs than those of the wild type under Pi-limited conditions. Chandrika et al. suggested that AtAL6 might control RH elongation under Pi-limited conditions by regulating the expression of ENHANCER OF TRY AND CPC1 (AtETC1), which functions in promoting the RH cell fate [93,94].
Taken together, Pi limitation affects RH growth through a completed regulatory network in Arabidopsis, which is summarized in Figure 3; however, the molecular mechanisms underlying Pi-dependent RH growth in rice have yet to be investigated.

3.4. Response of the RGA to Pi Limitation

A topsoil foraging root system containing shallower roots (greater RGA) is assumed to improve Pi acquisition efficiency in crops [95]. Pi deficiency promotes a greater RGA in an auxin-dependent manner in Arabidopsis [53,96]. This effect was not observed in the attir1 atafb3 double mutant, however, indicating that the AtTIR1/AtAFB-mediated auxin signaling pathway plays an important role in RGA remodeling under Pi-deficient conditions [96]. Similarly in rice, Pi deficiency induces shallower root growth (bigger angles between the CRs and the direction of gravity). The rice actin-binding protein RICE MORPHOLOGY DETERMINANT 1 (OsRMD1) has been found to play a key role in regulating the CR growth angles in response to Pi [32]. OsRMD1 is localized on the statolith surface of the columella cells, controlling statolith sedimentation in response to gravitropic stimuli in the root tip by binding actin filaments and statoliths. The loss-of-function mutant osrmd1 produced smaller RGAs caused by the faster movement of statoliths, making the mutant unresponsive to low Pi [32].
Greater RGAs contribute to improving the root surface area for Pi exploring; however, the molecular mechanisms underlying low-Pi-mediated RGA remodeling have yet to be investigated.

4. Hints for Improving Pi-Efficient Root Architecture in Crops

Improving crop Pi-use efficiency is urgently needed in modern agriculture due to the depletion of Pi ores, low P-use efficiency in crops, and increasing ecological concerns about excessive P use. Roots are the organ by which plants take up water and nutrients critical for growth and crop yields. The gramineous crops have a fibrous root system composed of PR, CRs, LRs, and RHs. Recently, Kuppe et al. revealed that, with hairs on the respective root types, the CRs were responsible for 48.8% of the total P uptake, while large LRs and small LRs (<1 cm length and <80 μm diameter) took up 20.6% and 30.6% of the total P uptake, respectively [97], suggesting that genotypes with more and longer CRs and LRs would be better for adapting to low-Pi soils. One example is the OsPSTOL1-overexpressing plants harbor larger root systems with more CRs and a higher root dry weight, which enables them to take up not only more Pi but also other nutrients, such as nitrogen and potassium, providing more nutrients for growth and yield [98,99]. Another example is DJ123, a variety with a much larger root system and high root vigor, which shows a better adaptation to low-Pi conditions and better responsiveness to fertilizer applications, with a relatively high grain yield in low-P African soils than Nerica4 (a popular rice variety in Africa) [100,101]. DJ123 contains twice the number of CRs, longer and denser RHs than the other nine tested modern rice varieties, which contributed to its superior Pi uptake under Pi-deficient conditions [100,102,103,104].
Pi largely accumulates in the topsoil in the field; therefore, plants with a large RGA are Pi uptake-efficient. The quantitative trait locus for SOIL SURFACE ROOTING 1 (OsqSOR1) and DEEP ROOTING 1 (OsDRO1) QTLs were found to be associated with the RGA via QTL mapping [105,106,107]. Oo et al. (2021) compared the growth of the near-isogenic lines (NILs) qsor1-NIL, Dro1-NIL, and IR64, which produced shallow, deep, and intermediate RGAs, respectively, in soils in which Pi accumulated in the surface layer. The qsor1-NIL plants with shallow root growth had the greatest biomass and Pi uptake, suggesting that a shallow root system is beneficial for rice Pi uptake [108].
Identifying the genes underlying the ideal root traits is important for breeding nutrient-efficient and high-yielding rice varieties; thus, it is important to identify the genotypic variations underlying changes in the numbers, lengths, and densities of the CRs, LRs, and RHs (known candidate genes are summarized in Table 1). Modern molecular breeding technologies can facilitate genome-wide elite allele selection, which in combination with gene editing and transgene techniques will greatly speed up the breeding of ideal root architectures to produce nutrient-efficient, high-yielding, and widely adaptable rice varieties. On the other hand, breeding a smart rice that can adjust its root system according to the soil nutrient levels could optimize the uptake and use efficiency of Pi or other nutrients.

Author Contributions

Original draft preparation, M.R.; review and editing, C.M., M.R., Y.L., J.Z., K.Z., Z.W.; supervision, C.M.; funding acquisition, C.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFF1000400), the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China (LQ22C020001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31972486), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2021FZZX001-28), and the Ministry of Education and Bureau of Foreign Experts of China (B14027).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data can be found within the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We apologize for not being able to cite all related publications due to space limitations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Raghothama, K.G. Phosphate acquisition. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1999, 50, 665–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bieleski, R.L. Phosphate pools, phosphate transport, and phosphate availability. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1973, 24, 225–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Barber, S.A. Soil Nutrient Bioavailability: A Mechanistic Approach, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ashley, K.; Cordell, D.; Mavinic, D. A brief history of phosphorus: From the philosopher’s stone to nutrient recovery and reuse. Chemosphere. 2011, 84, 737–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gilbert, G.A.; Knight, J.D.; Vance, C.P.; Allan, D.L. Proteoid root development of phosphorus deficient lupin is mimicked by auxin and phosphonate. Ann. Bot.—Lond. 2000, 85, 921–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Lynch, J.P. Root phenes for enhanced soil exploration and phosphorus acquisition: Tools for future crops. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 1041–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Sparks, E.E.; Benfey, P.N. The contribution of root systems to plant nutrient acquisition. In Plant Macronutrient Use Efficiency; Hossain, M.A., Kamiya, T., Burritt, D.J., Tran, L.S.P., Fujiwara, T., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2017; pp. 83–92. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dolan, L.; Janmaat, K.; Willemsen, V.; Linstead, P.; Poethig, S.; Roberts, K.; Scheres, B. Cellular organisation of the Arabidopsis thaliana root. Development. 1993, 119, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Schiefelbein, J.W.; Somerville, C. Genetic control of root hair development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 1990, 2, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Digby, J.; Firn, R.D. The gravitropic set-point angle (GSA): The identification of an important developmentally controlled variable governing plant architecture. Plant Cell Environ. 1995, 18, 1434–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hochholdinger, F.; Park, W.J.; Sauer, M.; Woll, K. From weeds to crops: Genetic analysis of root development in cereals. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gilroy, S.; Jones, D.L. Through form to function: Root hair development and nutrient uptake. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Uga, Y.; Kitomi, Y.; Ishikawa, S.; Yano, M. Genetic improvement for root growth angle to enhance crop production. Breed. Sci. 2015, 65, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Liu, D. Root developmental responses to phosphorus nutrition. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 1065–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sánchez-Calderón, L.; López-Bucio, J.; Chacón-López, A.; Cruz-Ramírez, A.; Nieto-Jacobo, F.; Dubrovsky, J.G.; Herrera-Estrella, L. Phosphate starvation induces a determinate developmental program in the roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46, 174–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ward, J.T.; Lahner, B.; Yakubova, E.; Salt, D.E.; Raghothama, K.G. The Effect of Iron on the Primary Root Elongation of Arabidopsis during Phosphate Deficiency. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 1181–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Müller, J.; Toev, T.; Heisters, M.; Teller, J.; Moore, K.L.; Hause, G.; Dinesh, D.C.; Bürstenbinder, K.; Abel, S. Iron-dependent callose deposition adjusts root meristem maintenance to phosphate availability. Dev. Cell. 2015, 33, 216–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Mora-Macías, J.; Ojeda-Rivera, J.O.; Gutiérrez-Alanís, D.; Yong-Villalobos, L.; Oropeza-Aburto, A.; Raya-González, J.; Jiménez Domínguez, G.; Chávez-Calvillo, G.; Rellán-Álvarez, R.; Herrera-Estrella, L. Malate-dependent Fe accumulation is a critical checkpoint in the root developmental response to low phosphate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E3563–E3572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Zheng, Z.; Wang, Z.; Wang, X.Y.; Liu, D. Blue light triggered-chemical reactions underlie phosphate deficiency-induced inhibition of root elongation of Abrabidopsis seedlings grown in petri dishes. Mol. Plant. 2019, 12, 1515–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; Zheng, Z.; Dong, J.; Song, L.; Sui, L.; Nussaume, L.; Desnos, T.; Liu, D. Genetic dissection of Fe-dependent signaling in root developmental responses to phosphate deficiency. Plant Physiol. 2019, 179, 300–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Nacry, P.; Canivenc, G.; Muller, B.; Azmi, A.; Van Onckelen, H.; Rossignol, M.; Doumas, P. A role for auxin redistribution in the responses of the root system architecture to phosphate starvation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138, 2061–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Sun, H.W.; Tao, J.Y.; Liu, S.J.; Huang, S.J.; Chen, S.; Xie, X.N.; Yoneyama, K.; Zhang, Y.L.; Xu, G.H. Strigolactones are involved in phosphate- and nitrate-deficiency-induced root development and auxin transport in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 6735–6746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ruyter-Spira, C.; Kohlen, W.; Charnikhova, T.; van Zeijl, A.; van Bezouwen, L.; de Ruijter, N.; Cardoso, C.; Lopez-Raez, J.A.; Matusova, R.; Bours, R.; et al. Physiological effects of the synthetic strigolactone analog GR24 on root system architecture in Arabidopsis: Another belowground role for strigolactones? Plant Physiol. 2011, 155, 721–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Bai, H.; Murali, B.; Barber, K.; Wolverton, C. Low phosphate alters lateral root setpoint angle and gravitropism. Am. J. Bot. 2013, 100, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bhosale, R.; Giri, J.; Pandey, B.K.; Giehl, R.F.H.; Hartmann, A.; Traini, R.; Truskina, J.; Leftley, N.; Hanlon, M.; Swarup, K.; et al. A mechanistic framework for auxin dependent Arabidopsis root hair elongation to low external phosphate. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Hammond, J.P.; White, P.J. Sugar signaling in root responses to low phosphorus availability. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 1033–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Rubio, Z.; Liao, H.; Lucas, W.J. Molecular mechanisms underlying phosphate sensing, signaling, and adaptation in plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2014, 56, 192–220. [Google Scholar]
  28. Shimizu, A.; Yanagihara, S.; Kawasaki, S.; Ikehashi, H. Phosphorus deficiency-induced root elongation and its QTL in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2004, 109, 1361–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Negi, M.; Sanagala, R.; Rai, V.; Jain, A. Deciphering phosphate deficiency-mediated temporal effects on different root traits in rice grown in a modified hydroponic system. Front. Plant Sci. J. 2016, 7, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Vejchasarn, P.; Lynch, J.P.; Brown, K.M. Genetic Variability in Phosphorus Responses of Rice Root Phenotypes. Rice 2016, 9, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Nestler, J.; Keyes, S.D.; Wissuwa, M. Root hair formation in rice (Oryza sativa L.) differs between root types and is altered in artificial growth conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 3699–3708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Huang, G.; Liang, W.; Sturrock, C.J.; Pandey, B.K.; Giri, J.; Mairhofer, S.; Wang, D.; Muller, L.; Tan, H.; York, L.M.; et al. Rice actin binding protein RMD controls crown root angle in response to external phosphate. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Balzergue, C.; Dartevelle, T.; Godon, C.; Laugier, E.; Meisrimler, C.; Teulon, J.-M.; Creff, A.; Bissler, M.; Brouchoud, C.; Hagège, A. Low phosphate activates STOP1-ALMT1 to rapidly inhibit root cell elongation. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Ticconi, C.A.; Lucero, R.D.; Sakhonwasee, S.; Adamson, A.W.; Creff, A.; Nussaume, L.; Desnos, T.; Abel, S. ER-resident proteins PDR2 and LPR1 mediate the developmental response of root meristems to phosphate availability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 14174–14179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Svistoonoff, S.; Creff, A.; Reymond, M.; Sigoillot-Claude, C.; Ricaud, L.; Blanchet, A.; Nussaume, L.; Desnos, T. Root tip contact with low-phosphate media reprograms plant root architecture. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39, 792–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Ticconi, C.A.; Delatorre, C.A.; Lahner, B.; Salt, D.E.; Abel, S. Arabidopsis pdr2 reveals a phosphate-sensitive checkpoint in root development. Plant J. 2004, 37, 801–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Hoekenga, O.A.; Maron, L.G.; Piñeros, M.A.; Cancado, G.M.A.; Shaff, J.; Kobayashi, Y.; Ryan, P.R.; Dong, B.; Delhaize, E.; Sasaki, T.; et al. AtALMT1, which encodes a malate transporter, is identified as one of several genes critical for aluminum tolerance in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 9738–9743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Iuchi, S.; Koyama, H.; Iuchi, A.; Kobayashi, Y.; Kitabayashi, S.; Kobayashi, Y.; Ikka, T.; Hirayama, T.; Shinozaki, K.; Kobayashi, M. Zinc finger protein STOP1 is critical for proton tolerance in Arabidopsis and coregulates a key gene in aluminum tolerance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 9900–9905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Dong, J.; Piñeros, M.A.; Li, X.; Yang, H.; Liu, Y.; Murphy, A.S.; Kochian, L.V.; Liu, D. An Arabidopsis ABC transporter mediates phosphate deficiency-induced remodeling of root architecture by modulating iron homeostasis in roots. Mol. Plant. 2017, 10, 244–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Tian, W.H.; Ye, J.Y.; Cui, M.Q.; Chang, J.B.; Liu, Y.; Li, G.X.; Wu, Y.R.; Xu, J.M.; Harberd, N.P.; Mao, C.Z.; et al. A transcription factor STOP1-centered pathway coordinates ammonium and phosphate acquisition in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant. 2021, 14, 1554–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Godon, C.; Mercier, C.; Wang, X.Y.; David, P.; Richaud, P.; Nussaume, L.; Liu, D.; Desnos, T. Under phosphate starvation conditions, Fe and Al trigger accumulation of the transcription factor STOP1 in the nucleus of Arabidopsis root cells. Plant J. 2019, 99, 937–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Mercier, C.; Roux, B.; Have, M.; Le, P.L.; Duong, N.; David, P.; Desnos, T. Root responses to aluminium and iron stresses require the SIZ1 SUMO ligase to modulate the STOP1 transcription factor. Plant J. 2021, 108, 1507–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xu, J.; Zhu, J.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Ding, Z.; Tian, H. SIZ1 negatively regulates aluminum resistance by mediating the STOP1-ALMT1 pathway in Arabidopsis. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 1147–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jing, Y. Transcription factor WRKY33 mediates the phosphate deficiency-induced remodeling of root architecture by modulating iron homeostasis in Arabidopsis roots. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9275. [Google Scholar]
  45. Cao, Y.; Ai, H.; Jain, A.; Wu, X.; Zhang, L.; Pei, W.; Chen, A.; Xu, G.; Sun, S. Identification and expression analysis of OsLPR family revealed the potential roles of OsLPR3 and 5 in maintaining phosphate homeostasis in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Ding, Y.; Wang, Z.; Ren, M.; Zhang, P.; Li, Z.; Chen, S.; Ge, C.; Wang, Y. Iron and callose homeostatic regulation in rice roots under low phosphorus. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Ai, H.; Cao, Y.; Jain, A.; Wang, X.; Hu, Z.; Zhao, G.; Hu, S.; Shen, X.; Yan, Y.; Liu, X.; et al. The ferroxidase LPR5 functions in the maintenance of phosphate homeostasis and is required for normal growth and development of rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 4828–4842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Cao, Y.; Jain, A.; Ai, H.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Hu, Z.; Sun, Y.; Hu, S.; Shen, X.; Lan, X.; et al. OsPDR2 mediates the regulation on the development response and maintenance of Pi homeostasis in rice. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 149, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dai, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, W.H. OsWRKY74, a WRKY transcription factor, modulates tolerance to phosphate starvation in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 947–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Ye, R.G.; Wu, Y.R.; Gao, Z.Y.; Chen, H.; Jia, L.X.; Li, D.M.; Li, X.G.; Qian, Q.; Qi, Y.H. Primary root and root hair development regulation by OsAUX4 and its participation in the phosphate starvation response. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 1555–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sun, H.; Tao, J.; Bi, Y.; Hou, M.; Lou, J.; Chen, X.; Zhang, X.; Luo, L.; Xie, X.; Yoneyama, K.; et al. OsPIN1b is involved in rice seminal root elongation by regulating root apical meristem activity in response to low nitrogen and phosphate. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 13014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, S.; Zhang, S.; Sun, C.; Xu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yu, C.; Qian, Q.; Jiang, D.A.; Qi, Y. Auxin Response Factor (OsARF12), a Novel Regulator for Phosphate Homeostasis in Rice (Oryza Sativa). New Phytol. 2014, 201, 91–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Perez-Torres, C.A.; Lopez-Bucio, J.; Cruz-Ramırez, A.; Ibarra-Laclette, E.; Dharmasiri, S.; Estelle, M.; Herrera-Estrella, L. Phosphate availability alters lateral root development in Arabidopsis by modulating auxin sensitivity via a mechanism involving the TIR1 auxin receptor. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 3258–3272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Miura, K.; Rus, A.; Sharkhuu, A.; Yokoi, S.; Karthikeyan, A.S.; Raghothama, K.G.; Baek, D.; Koo, Y.D.; Jin, J.B.; Bressan, R.A.; et al. The Arabidopsis SUMO E3 ligase SIZ1 controls phosphate deficiency responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 7760–7765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Miura, K.; Lee, J.; Gong, Q.; Ma, S.; Jin, J.B.; Yoo, C.Y.; Miura, T.; Sato, A.; Bohnert, H.J.; Hasegawa, P.M. SIZ1 regulation of phosphate starvation-induced root architecture remodeling involves the control of auxin accumulation. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155, 1000–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Wang, H.; Sun, R.; Cao, Y.; Pei, W.; Sun, Y.; Zhou, H.; Wu, X.; Zhang, F.; Luo, L.; Shen, Q.; et al. OsSIZ1, a SUMO E3 ligase gene, is involved in the regulation of the responses to phosphate and nitrogen in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 2381–2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Pei, W.; Jain, A.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Ai, H.; Liu, X.; Sun, S. OsSIZ2 exerts regulatory influences on the developmental responses and phosphate homeostasis in rice. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ding, Y.; Wang, Z.G.; Mo, S.R.; Liu, J.; Xing, Y.; Wang, Y.P.; Ge, C.L.; Wang, Y.L. Mechanism of low phosphorus inducing the main root lengthening of rice. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 1032–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yu, H.; Luo, N.; Sun, L.; Liu, D. HPS4/SABRE regulates plant responses to phosphate starvation through antagonistic interaction with ethylene signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 4527–4538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Aeschbacher, R.A.; Hauser, M.T.; Feldmann, K.A.; Benfey, P.N. The SABRE gene is required for normal cell expansion in Ara-bidopsis. Genes Dev. 1995, 9, 330–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Kang, J.; Yu, H.; Tian, C.; Zhou, W.; Li, C.; Jiao, Y.; Liu, D. Suppression of photosynthetic gene expression in roots is required for sustained root growth under phosphate deficiency. Plant Physiol. 2014, 165, 1156–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Wang, K.L.; Yoshida, H.; Lurin, C.; Ecker, J.R. Regulation of ethylene gas biosynthesis by the Arabidopsis ETO1 protein. Nature 2004, 428, 945–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, L.; Dong, J.; Gao, Z.; Liu, N. The Arabidopsis gene HYPERSENSITIVE TO PHOSPHATE STARVATION 3 encodes ETHYLENE OVERPRODUCTION 1. Plant. Cell Physiol. 2012, 53, 1093–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Zhang, X.L.; Wu, Q.; Tao, Y.; Zhu, X.F.; Takahashi, N.; Umeda, M.; Shen, R.F.; Ma, J.F. ANAC044 is associated with P reutilization in P deficient Arabidopsis thaliana root cell wall in an ethylene dependent manner. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 185, 104386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Devaiah, B.N.; Madhuvanthi, R.; Karthikeyan, A.S.; Raghothama, K.G. Phosphate Starvation Responses and Gibberellic Acid Biosynthesis are Regulated by the MYB62 Transcription Factor in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant. 2009, 2, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Jiang, C.; Gao, X.; Liao, L.; Harberd, N.P.; Fu, X. Phosphate starvation root architecture and anthocyanin accumulation responses are modulated by the gibberellin-DELLA signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145, 1460–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Gu, M.; Zhang, J.; Li, H.; Meng, D.; Li, R.; Dai, X.; Wang, S.; Liu, W.; Qu, H.; Xu, G. Maintenance of phosphate homeostasis and root development are coordinately regulated by MYB1, an R2R3-type MYB transcription factor in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 3603–3615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Gutiérrez-Alanís, D.; Yong-Villalobos, L.; Jiménez-Sandoval, P.; Alatorre-Cobos, F.; Oropeza-Aburto, A.; Mora-Macías, J.; Herrera-Estrella, L. Phosphate starvation-dependent iron mobilization induces CLE14 expression to trigger root meristem differentiation through CLV2/PEPR2 signaling. Dev. Cell. 2017, 41, 555–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Wei, P.; Demulder, M.; David, P.; Eekhout, T.; Yoshiyama, K.O.; Nguyen, L.; Vercauteren, I.; Eeckhout, D.; Galle, M.; Jaeger, G.D.; et al. Arabidopsis casein kinase 2 triggers stem cell exhaustion under Al toxicity and phosphate deficiency through activating the DNA damage response pathway. Plant Cell 2021, 33, 1361–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Hu, B.; Zhu, C.; Li, F.; Tang, J.; Wang, Y.; Lin, A.; Liu, L.; Che, R.; Chu, C. LEAF TIP NECROSIS1 Plays a Pivotal Role in the Regulation of Multiple Phosphate Starvation Responses in Rice. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 1101–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Castrillo, G.; Teixeira, P.J.P.L.; Paredes, S.H.; Law, T.F.; de Lorenzo, L.; Feltcher, M.E.; Finkel, O.M.; Breakfield, N.W.; Mieczkowski, P.; Jones, C.D. Root microbiota drive direct integration of phosphate stress and immunity. Nature 2017, 543, 513–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Kepinski, S.; Leyser, O. The Arabidopsis F-box protein TIR1 is an auxin receptor. Nature 2005, 435, 446–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Dharmasiri, N.; Dharmasiri, S.; Estelle, M. The F-box protein TIR1 is an auxin receptor. Nature 2005, 435, 441–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Bustos, R.; Castrillo, G.; Linhares, F.; Puga, M.I.; Rubio, V.; Pérez-Pérez, J.; Solano, R.; Leyva, A.; Paz-Ares, J. A Central Regulatory System Largely Controls Transcriptional Activation and Repression Responses to Phosphate Starvation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6, e1001102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Rubio, V.; Linhares, F.; Solano, R.; Martin, A.C.; Iglesias, J.; Leyva, A.; Paz-Ares, J. A conserved MYB transcription factor involved in phosphate starvation signaling both in vascular plants and in unicellular algae. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 2122–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Shen, C.; Wang, S.; Zhang, S.; Xu, Y.; Qian, Q.; Qi, Y.; Jiang, D.A. OsARF16, a transcription factor, is required for auxin and phosphate starvation response in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36, 607–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Qi, Y.; Wang, S.; Shen, C.; Zhang, S.; Chen, Y.; Xu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Jiang, D. OsARF12, a transcription activator on auxin response gene, regulates root elongation and affects iron accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa). New Phytol. 2012, 193, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jia, H.; Zhang, S.; Wang, L.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Cui, H.; Shao, H.; Xu, G. OsPht1;8, a phosphate transporter, is involved in auxin and phosphate starvation response in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 5057–5068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Mayzlish-Gati, E.; De-Cuyper, C.; Goormachtig, S.; Beeckman, T.; Vuylsteke, M.; Brewer, P.B.; Beveridge, C.A.; Yermiyahu, U.; Kaplan, Y.; Enzer, Y.; et al. Strigolactones are involved in root response to low phosphate conditions in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160, 1329–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Kapulnik, Y.; Delaux, P.M.; Resnick, N.; Mayzlish-Gati, E.; Wininger, S.; Bhattacharya, C.; Sejalon-Delmas, N.; Combier, J.P.; Becard, G.; Belausov, E.; et al. Strigolactones affect lateral root formation and root-hair elongation in Arabidopsis. Planta 2011, 233, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lee, H.Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, C.; Yoon, G.M. Editing of the OsACS locus alters phosphate deficiency-induced adaptive responses in rice seedlings. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 1927–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Lin, D.L.; Yao, H.Y.; Jia, L.H.; Tan, J.F.; Xu, Z.H.; Zheng, W.M.; Xue, H.W. Phospholipase D-derived phosphatidic acid promotes root hair development under phosphorus deficiency by suppressing vacuolar degradation of PIN-FORMED2. New Phytol. 2020, 226, 142–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Giri, J.; Bhosale, R.; Huang, G.; Pandey, B.K.; Parker, H.; Zappala, S.; Yang, J.; Dievart, A.; Bureau, C.; Ljung, K.; et al. Rice auxin influx carrier OsAUX1 facilitates root hair elongation in response to low external phosphate. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Menand, B.; Yi, K.; Jouannic, S.; Hoffmann, L.; Ryan, E.; Linstead, P.; Schaefer, D.G.; Dolan, L. An ancient mechanism controls the development of cells with a rooting function on land plants. Science 2007, 316, 1477–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Yi, K.; Menand, B.; Bell, E.; Dolan, L. A basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor controls cell growth and size in root hairs. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42, 264–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Villaécija-Aguilar, J.A.; Körösy, C.; Maisch, L.; Hamon-Josse, M.; Petrich, A.; Magosch, S.; Gutjahr, C. KAI2 promotes Arabidopsis root hair elongation at low external phosphate by controlling local accumulation of AUX1 and PIN2. Curr. Biol. 2022, 32, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Guo, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Clair, J.J.L.; Chory, J.; Noel, J.P. Smoke-derived karrikin perception by the α/β-hydrolase KAI2 from Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 8284–8289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Wang, L.; Xu, Q.; Yu, H.; Ma, H.; Li, X.; Yang, J.; Li, J. Strigolactone and karrikin signaling pathways elicit ubiquitination and proteolysis of SMXL2 to regulate hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 2251–2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zhang, Y.J.; Lynch, J.P.; Brown, K.M. Ethylene and phosphorus availability have interacting yet distinct effects on root hair development. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54, 2351–2361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Xiao, F.; Gong, Q.; Zhao, S.; Lin, H.; Zhou, H. MYB30 and ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3 Antagonistically Modulate Root Hair Growth in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2021, 106, 480–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Wendrich, J.R.; Yang, B.; Vandamme, N.; Verstaen, K.; Smet, W.; Van de Velde, C.; Minne, M.; Wybouw, B.; Mor, E.; Arents, H.E.; et al. Vascular transcription factors guide plant epidermal responses to limiting phosphate conditions. Science 2020, 370, eaay4970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zlotorynski, E. The secret of increased (root) hair density. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chandrika, N.N.; Sundaravelpandian, K.; Yu, S.M.; Schmidt, W. Alfin-Like 6 is involved in root hair elongation during phosphate deficiency in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 709–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kirik, V.; Simon, M.; Huelskamp, M.; Schiefelbein, J. The ENHANCER OF TRY AND CPC1 gene acts redundantly with TRIPTYCHON and CAPRICE in trichome and root hair cell patterning in Arabidopsis. Dev. Biol. 2004, 268, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Lynch, J.P.; Brown, K.M. Topsoil foraging—An architectural adaptation of plants to low phosphorus availability. Plant Soil 2001, 237, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Roychoudhry, S.; Kieffer, M.; Del Bianco, M.; Liao, C.Y.; Weijers, D.; Kepinski, S. The developmental and environmental regulation of gravitropic setpoint angle in Arabidopsis and bean. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Kuppe, C.W.; Kirk, G.J.; Wissuwa, M.; Postma, J.A. Rice increases phosphorus uptake in strongly sorbing soils by intra-root facilitation. Plant Cell Environ. 2022, 45, 884–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Gamuyao, R.; Chin, J.H.; Pariasca-Tanaka, J.; Pesaresi, P.; Catausan, S.; Dalid, C.; Slamet-Loedin, I.; Tecson-Mendoza, E.M.; Wissuwa, M.; Heuer, S. The protein kinase Pstol1 from traditional rice confers tolerance of phosphorus deficiency. Nature 2012, 488, 535–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Wissuwa, M.; Wegner, J.; Ae, N.; Yano, M. Substitution mapping of Pup1: A major QTL increasing phosphorus uptake of rice from a phosphorus-deficient soil. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2002, 105, 890–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wissuwa, M.; Gonzalez, D.; Watts-Williams, S.-J. The contribution of plant traits and soil microbes to phosphorus uptake from low-phosphorus soil in upland rice varieties. Plant Soil 2020, 448, 523–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Vandamme, E.; Wissuwa, M.; Rose, T.; Dieng, I.; Drame, K.N.; Fofana, M.; Senthilkumar, K.; Venuprasad, R.; Jallow, D.; Segda, Z.; et al. Genotypic Variation in Grain P Loading across Diverse Rice Growing Environments and Implications for Field P Balances. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Zygalakis, K.C.; Kirk, G.J.D.; Jones, D.L.; Wissuwa, M.; Roose, T. A dual porosity model of nutrient uptake by root hairs. New Phytol. 2011, 192, 676–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Brown, L.K.; George, T.S.; Thompson, J.A.; Wright, G.; Lyon, J.; Dupuy, L.; Hubbard, S.F.; White, P.J. What are the implications of variation in root hair length on tolerance to phosphorus deficiency in combination with water stress in barley (Hordeum vulgare)? Ann. Bot. 2012, 110, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Nestler, J.; Wissuwa, M. Superior root hair formation confers root efficiency in some, but not all, rice genotypes upon P deficiency. Front Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Kitomi, Y.; Kanno, N.; Kawai, S.; Mizubayashi, T.; Fukuoka, S.; Uga, Y. QTLs underlying natural variation of root growth angle among rice cultivars with the same functional allele of DEEPER ROOTING 1. Rice 2015, 8, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Mori, A.; Fukuda, T.; Vejchasarn, P.; Nestler, J.; Pariasca-Tanaka, J.; Wissuwa, M. The Role of Root Size versus Root Efficiency in Phosphorus Acquisition in Rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 1179–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Uga, Y.; Sugimoto, K.; Ogawa, S.; Rane, J.; Ishitani, M.; Hara, N.; Kitomi, Y.; Inukai, Y.; Ono, K.; Kanno, N.; et al. Control of root system architecture by DEEPER ROOTING 1 increases rice yield under drought conditions. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 1097–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Oo, A.Z.; Tsujimoto, Y.; Mukai, M.; Nishigaki, T.; Takai, T.; Uga, Y. Synergy between a shallow root system with a DRO1 homologue and localized P application improves P uptake of lowland rice. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 9484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 24 05107 g001 550
Figure 1. A working model of the molecular mechanisms by which Pi starvation inhibits PR growth in Arabidopsis and rice. (A) The working model for Pi-dependent PR growth (rice homologous genes are labeled). The model is modified from that of Liu et al. (2021), with updated genes in Arabidopsis and rice. Arrows with solid lines indicate a promotion, dashed arrows represent unconfirmed events, and blunt arrows represent negative regulation. (B) Hormone signaling pathway genes known to be involved in the Pi deficiency-mediated regulation of PR growth in Arabidopsis and rice.
Figure 1. A working model of the molecular mechanisms by which Pi starvation inhibits PR growth in Arabidopsis and rice. (A) The working model for Pi-dependent PR growth (rice homologous genes are labeled). The model is modified from that of Liu et al. (2021), with updated genes in Arabidopsis and rice. Arrows with solid lines indicate a promotion, dashed arrows represent unconfirmed events, and blunt arrows represent negative regulation. (B) Hormone signaling pathway genes known to be involved in the Pi deficiency-mediated regulation of PR growth in Arabidopsis and rice.
Ijms 24 05107 g001
Ijms 24 05107 g002 550
Figure 2. A working model of the molecular mechanisms underlying Pi starvation-induced LR growth in Arabidopsis and rice. Arrows with solid lines indicate a promotion, dashed arrows represent unconfirmed events, and blunt arrows represent negative regulation. Names in bold represent genes from rice. The hormones are highlighted in red.
Figure 2. A working model of the molecular mechanisms underlying Pi starvation-induced LR growth in Arabidopsis and rice. Arrows with solid lines indicate a promotion, dashed arrows represent unconfirmed events, and blunt arrows represent negative regulation. Names in bold represent genes from rice. The hormones are highlighted in red.
Ijms 24 05107 g002
Ijms 24 05107 g003 550
Figure 3. The molecular regulatory pathway of Pi starvation-induced RH growth in Arabidopsis and rice. Arrows indicate a positive regulation, and blunt arrows represent negative regulation. Names in bold represent genes from rice. The hormones are highlighted in red.
Figure 3. The molecular regulatory pathway of Pi starvation-induced RH growth in Arabidopsis and rice. Arrows indicate a positive regulation, and blunt arrows represent negative regulation. Names in bold represent genes from rice. The hormones are highlighted in red.
Ijms 24 05107 g003
Table
Table 1. List of known root-related genes affecting the adaptation to low Pi in rice.
Table 1. List of known root-related genes affecting the adaptation to low Pi in rice.
GenePhenotype Compared with the Wild TypeFunction CategoryReference
OsWRKY74Longer PRs in OsWRKY74-overexpressing plants, shorter PRs in OsWRKY74 RNAi plants under Pi deficiencyWRKY transcription factor[49]
OsAUX4osaux4 produced a shorter PR under Pi-replete conditions but was insensitive to Pi deficiencyAuxin influx carrier[50]
OsAUX1osaux1 produced shorter RHs under Pi-replete conditions but was insensitive to Pi deficiencyAuxin influx carrier[83]
OsPIN1bospin1b produced shorter PRs and CRs under Pi-replete conditions but was insensitive to Pi deficiencyAuxin efflux transporter[51]
OsARF12osarf12 produced more CRs, an increased number and density of LRs, and longer RHs under Pi-limited conditionsAuxin response factor[52]
OsARF16osarf16 produced fewer LRs and shorter RHs under Pi-limited conditionsAuxin response factor[76]
OsMYB1osmyb1 produced a longer PR under Pi-limited conditionsMYB transcription factor[67]
LTN1ltn1 produced longer PRs and CRs under Pi-limited conditionsA ubiquitin-conjugase[70]
OsPHT1;8OsPHT1;8-overexpressing plants produced shorter PRs and CRs, but more LRs and RHs under Pi-replete conditions, but were insensitive to Pi deficiency Phosphate transporter[78]
D10/D27d10, d27 mutants produced shorter PRs and CRs and more LRs under Pi-replete conditions but were less sensitive to Pi deficiency SL biosynthesis genes[22]
D3d3 produced shorter PRs and CRs and more LRs under Pi-sufficiency but was less sensitive to Pi deficiencySL signaling gene[22]
OsACS1osacs1 produced fewer LRs under Pi-replete conditions but was less sensitive to Pi deficiencyEthylene biosynthesis gene[81]
OsRMD1osrmd1 had a smaller RGAAn actin-binding protein[32]
OsPSTOL1PSTOL1-overexpressing plants produced a larger root system with more CRs and a higher root dry weight, as well as an enhanced grain yield in the IR64 and Nipponbare backgrounds in Pi-deficient soilsProtein kinase[98,99]
OsqSOR1Plants containing the elite allele at this QTL produced shallow roots with a greater biomass and Pi uptake than the other two lines, Dro1-NIL and IR64, which had deep and intermediate RGAs, respectivelyA homolog of DRO1 that functions downstream of the auxin signaling pathway[108]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ren, M.; Li, Y.; Zhu, J.; Zhao, K.; Wu, Z.; Mao, C. Phenotypes and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Root Response to Phosphate Deprivation in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5107. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065107

AMA Style

Ren M, Li Y, Zhu J, Zhao K, Wu Z, Mao C. Phenotypes and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Root Response to Phosphate Deprivation in Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(6):5107. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065107

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ren, Meiyan, Yong Li, Jianshu Zhu, Keju Zhao, Zhongchang Wu, and Chuanzao Mao. 2023. "Phenotypes and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Root Response to Phosphate Deprivation in Plants" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 6: 5107. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065107

APA Style

Ren, M., Li, Y., Zhu, J., Zhao, K., Wu, Z., & Mao, C. (2023). Phenotypes and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Root Response to Phosphate Deprivation in Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(6), 5107. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065107

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop