Next Article in Journal
Mechanism Analysis of Antimicrobial Peptide NoPv1 Related to Potato Late Blight through a Computer-Aided Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Differential Transcription Profiling Reveals the MicroRNAs Involved in Alleviating Damage to Photosynthesis under Drought Stress during the Grain Filling Stage in Wheat
Previous Article in Journal
Emerging Topics in Protein Crystallography
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cytological, Phytohormone, and Transcriptome Analyses Provide Insights into Persimmon Fruit Shape Formation (Diospyros kaki Thunb.)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 25
Issue 10
10.3390/ijms25105310
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nitrate Signaling and Its Role in Regulating Flowering Time in Arabidopsis thaliana

by
Mengyun Wang
1,2,
Jia Wang
1,
Zeneng Wang
1,3 and
Yibo Teng
1,*
1
College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China
2
College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
3
Kharkiv Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(10), 5310; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25105310
Submission received: 21 March 2024 / Revised: 6 May 2024 / Accepted: 11 May 2024 / Published: 13 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Physiology and Molecular Nutrition)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Plant growth is coordinated with the availability of nutrients that ensure its development. Nitrate is a major source of nitrogen (N), an essential macronutrient for plant growth. It also acts as a signaling molecule to modulate gene expression, metabolism, and a variety of physiological processes. Recently, it has become evident that the calcium signal appears to be part of the nitrate signaling pathway. New key players have been discovered and described in Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis). In addition, knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of how N signaling affects growth and development, such as the nitrate control of the flowering process, is increasing rapidly. Here, we review recent advances in the identification of new components involved in nitrate signal transduction, summarize newly identified mechanisms of nitrate signaling-modulated flowering time in Arabidopsis, and suggest emerging concepts and existing open questions that will hopefully be informative for further discoveries.

1. Introduction

Nitrogen (N) is one of the essential macronutrients in plants. In the soil ecosystem, N exists in many different forms, including both inorganic (e.g., ammonium, nitrate) and organic forms derived by fertilizer or N fixation by legume plants. Nitrate is the major source of N in many soil systems. After being taken up by plant roots, nitrate is reduced to ammonium for further synthesis into cellular components such as nucleic acids, amino acids, proteins, and other cellular components necessary for their growth and development. In addition to its role as a nutrient, nitrate has been shown to act as a signaling molecule in plants [1,2,3]. It can trigger signaling pathways that regulate gene expression, metabolism, and many physiological processes [4,5,6,7]. Thus, the role of nitrate serving as a signaling molecule contributes greatly to morphological changes in plants [4].
In the currently established nitrate signaling model, NITRATE TRANSPORTER 1.1 (NRT1.1), located in the plasma membrane, is able to sense the fluctuation in nitrate levels. Upon nitrate levels being elevated, it activates the calcium-channel, resulting in a rapid influx of calcium (Ca2+) into the cytoplasm. This nitrate-coupled Ca2+ signal triggers downstream responses to alterations in N nutrient availability. In these downstream responses, the typical transcriptional regulation pathway is dependent on the NIN (nodule inception)-like proteins (NLPs), particularly NLP6 and NLP7, which can bind directly to many nitrate-responsive genes and stimulate their transcription (Figure 1). A more detailed description of the components in the nitrate signaling cascade and their roles are listed in Table 1.
During a fluctuation in nitrate levels in the soil environment, plants are able to integrate transcriptome and cellular metabolism with developmental patterning in order to adapt to environmental changes by shaping organ biomass and architecture. Among architectural features, the root system is the most significantly affected by N availability. For example, when Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis) seedlings are grown under severe N deficiency conditions, it restricts root branching and elongation. While mild N deficiency stimulates root elongation and branching [8]. A large amount of knowledge has accumulated regarding the signaling events occurring during the root adaptation to altered N supply, which have been extensively covered by excellent reviews [8,9,10,11,12]. Here, we specifically focus on the systematic regulation of flowering time by N signaling.
Table 1. Components involved in nitrate signaling.
Table 1. Components involved in nitrate signaling.
Gene NameLocusProtein IdentityRoles in Nitrate Signaling FunctionsReference
NRT1.1AT1G12110NITRATE TRANSPORTER 1.1 (NRT1.1)Plasma membrane
nitrate transceptor		Sensing a wide range of external nitrate concentrations and generating different levels of the primary nitrate response (PNR)[1]
CNGC15AT2G28260CYCLIC NUCLEOTIDE-GATED CHANNEL 15 (CNGC15)Nitrate-specific calcium channelDynamically interacting with NRT1.1 to control the calcium influx in a nitrate-dependent manner[13]
CPK10 (CDPK1)AT1G18890CALCIUM-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE 1 (CDPK1)Nitrate-coupled calcium sensorPhosphorylating NLP7/NLP6 to facilitate the cytoplasm-nuclear shuttling[3]
CPK30AT1G74740CALCIUM-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE 30 (CPK30)Nitrate-coupled calcium sensorPhosphorylating NLP7/NLP6 to facilitate the cytoplasm-nuclear shuttling[3]
CPK32AT3G57530CALCIUM-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE 32 (CPK32)Nitrate-coupled calcium sensorPhosphorylating NLP7/NLP6 to facilitate the cytoplasm-nuclear shuttling[3]
NLP7AT4G24020NIN LIKE PROTEIN 7 (NLP7)Intracellular nitrate sensor; Master transcription factor of PNRBinding nitrate via its amino terminus, which results in the derepression of NLP7 as a transcription activator; Binding the nitrate-responsive cis-element (NRE) to activate nitrate-responsive gene expression [2,14,15,16,17,18,19]
NLP6AT1G64530NIN-LIKE PROTEIN 6 (NLP6)Transcription factor Acting as a PNR regulator partially redundant with NLP7[2,20,21]
NLP2AT4G35270NIN-LIKE PROTEIN 2 (NLP2)Transcription factor Acting as a major PNR regulator [2,21,22]
NLP4AT1G20640NIN-LIKE PROTEIN 4 (NLP4)Transcription factorParticipating in the regulation of PNR[2,21]
NLP5AT1G76350NIN-LIKE PROTEIN 5 (NLP5)Transcription factorParticipating in the regulation of PNR[2,21]
NLP8AT2G43500NIN-LIKE PROTEIN 8 (NLP8)Transcription factorParticipating in the regulation of PNR[2,21]
NLP9AT3G59580NIN-LIKE PROTEIN 9 (NLP9)Transcription factorParticipating in the regulation of PNR[2]
In the currently accepted flowering model of Arabidopsis, several genetic pathways have been considered: the photoperiod pathway, the gibberellin (GA) pathway, the vernalization pathway, the autonomous pathway, the endogenous/age pathway, and the thermosensory pathway [23,24]. These pathways integrate endogenous and external cues into downstream effectors known as flowering pathway integrators, such as FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), SUPPRESSOR OF OVER EXPRESSION OF CONSTANS (SOC1), and LEAFY(LFY), to ensure flowering [25,26,27,28,29,30]. Flowering signals are translated into floral meristems at the flanks of the shoot apical meristem (SAM) through the mobile protein FT. Once in the SAM, FT forms a complex with several partners, causing changes in gene expression of downstream flowering components that reprogram the SAM to form flowers [31,32].
As an essential nutrient to support plant growth, N availability strongly influences flowering time [33,34]. A U-shaped flowering curve resulting from different N levels has been proposed [35]. There is an optimal concentration of nitrate to stimulate flowering. When the concentration is above or below this, flowering is retarded. Studies have suggested that nitrate serves as both a nutrient source and as a signaling molecule for floral induction [36,37,38]. Here we summarize the role of nitrate on flowering time from the perspective of signaling function. Nitrate signaling has been suggested to regulate flowering time through different flowering pathways, depending on nitrate treatment and concentration (Figure 2).
In this review, we summarize recent research achievements regarding the perception and transduction of nitrate signals based on studies performed using the model plant Arabidopsis. We analyze the nitrate signaling cascade from transceptor to key transcription factors and discuss how these critical components play their roles. In addition, we examine the relationship between nitrate availability and flowering time and highlight the role of nitrate signaling in modulating flowering time.

2. Nitrate Signal Perception

2.1. Nitrate Sensing in the Plasma Membrane

NITRATE TRANSPORTER 1.1 (NRT1.1) is a receptor on the plasma membrane that detects changes in soil nitrate concentrations in Arabidopsis [1]. Initially characterized as a dual-affinity transporter involved in root uptake of nitrate [39], the nrt1.1 mutant exhibited reduced growth of nascent roots, stems, leaves, and flower buds, as well as a late-flowering phenotype [40]. Additionally, nitrate-dependent gene transcription, lateral root growth, and seed germination were changed in a nrt1.1 mutant [41,42,43,44]. The phenotype provides useful cues for the crucial role of NRT1.1 in plant development. Then the question arising at that time was whether these defects in the nrt1.1 mutant were caused by reduced nitrate uptake or the involvement of NRT1.1 in nitrate signaling. To address this question, Ho et al. used an uptake- and sensing-decoupled mutant, chl1-9, and discovered that the sensor function of NRT1.1 is independent of its uptake activity. Plants are able to sense changes in nitrate concentration through the dual affinity binding of NRT1.1 and a phosphorylation switch at residue threonine 101 [1]. Since the discovery of NRT1.1 as a nitrate receptor, numerous studies have focused on NRT1.1-mediated nitrate sensing, providing evidence for the role of NRT1.1 in N signaling. This has been described extensively in several reviews [45,46].
Prior to the discovery of NRT1.1 as a nitrate receptor, it was suggested as early as 1997 that calcium (Ca2+) might be involved in nitrate signaling as a second messenger [47]. Several nitrate-induced genes were altered by pretreatment with the Ca2+ chelator ethylene-bis (oxyethylenenitrilo) tetraacetic acid or the Ca2+ channel blocker lanthanum chloride in maize, barley, and Arabidopsis [47,48,49]. These results strongly implicate an interplay between the nitrate response and calcium-related signaling pathways. Moreover, it was found that nitrate treatments transiently increased cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations, but this increase was abolished in nrt1.1 mutant seedlings with the facilitation of aequorin reporter plants [48]. Similarly, a unique and dynamic nuclear and cytosolic Ca2+ signature was shown to be specifically stimulated by nitrate using the ultrasensitive Ca2+ biosensor GCaMP6 expressed in single cells of mesophyll protoplasts [3]. Based on these early findings on the involvement of the Ca2+ signature in nitrate signaling, it raised the question of which component modulates the entry of Ca2+ ions into the cytoplasm coupled with nitrate signaling. Until 2021, the Ca2+ channel specific for the nitrate-induced Ca2+ spike in Arabidopsis was not identified. A cyclic nucleotide-gated channel (CNGC) protein, CNGC15, can interact with the nitrate transceptor NRT1.1 to regulate Ca2+ influx. When nitrate levels are low, NRT1.1 and CNGC15 form a complex to block the Ca2+ channel. Upon nitrate levels elevating, the NRT1.1-CNGC15 complex displays calcium-channel activity, resulting in nitrate-induced Ca2+ influx [13]. This important discovery provides direct evidence that Ca2+ is a second messenger in the Arabidopsis nitrate signaling pathway.

2.2. Nitrate Sensing in the Cytoplasm

Plants can also sense nitrate directly in the cytoplasm to adjust their metabolic and growth responses. The NIN (nodule inception)-like proteins (NLPs) are crucial transcription factors of the nitrate signaling pathway, initiating nitrate-induced transcriptional changes [50,51,52]. In addition to being a transcription factor, the NLP7 protein also acts as a nitrate sensor. It functions within the cytoplasm, which is distinct from NRT1.1 functioning on the plasma membrane [2]. Thus, plants possess two spatially different mechanisms for sensing nitrate, both intracellular and extracellular.
Using two Biomolecule Interaction Analyzers (microscale thermophoresis and surface plasmon resonance), it was shown that nitrate can bind directly to NLP7 [2]. In addition to the in vitro assays, a genetically encoded fluorescent split biosensor, mCitrine-NLP7, was developed, which acts as a fluorescent nitrate receptor in vivo [2]. This facilitates the visualization of nitrate dynamics in single cells in plants. 10 mM nitrate, but not potassium chloride, could induce a Citrine fluorescence signal in both mesophyll cells and primary root tip cells. Furthermore, the fluorescence signal was also detected in plants under a wide range of nitrate concentrations, from 100 µM to 10 mM [2]. As the nitrate biosensor is very sensitive and specific for nitrate, the real-time live imaging observation strongly supports that NLP7 binds to nitrate. The sensing mechanism is that NLP7 can perceive nitrate via its amino terminus, causing it to undergo a conformational change and to be transcriptionally derepressed [2].

3. Nitrate Signal Transduction, from the Extranuclear to the Nucleus

3.1. Calcium-Binding Proteins

Calcium (Ca2+) has been well established as a second messenger in plants, participating in many signal transduction processes, especially in response to environmental alterations [53,54,55]. A spatio-temporal pattern of Ca2+ could rise through channels, exporters, or pumps triggered by different environmental cues. This specific alteration of Ca2+ levels can be detected and decoded by Ca2+-binding proteins. These include calmodulin (CaM), calmodulin-like proteins (CMLs), Ca2+-dependent protein kinases (CPKs), and calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs) and their interacting kinases (CIPKs) [56]. These Ca2+-binding proteins bridge cytosolic Ca2+ elevations to downstream responses.
While NITRATE TRANSPORTER 1.1 (NRT1.1) perceives the nitrate change signal, an influx of Ca2+ into the cytoplasm is produced synergistically through the transceptor-channel complex. To translate nitrate-coupled cytosolic Ca2+ elevations into downstream actions, CPK10, CPK30, and CPK32 protein kinases have been identified as the main decoders that regulate universal nitrate-inducible responses in Arabidopsis [3]. The three kinases effectively activate the luciferase reporter gene driven by the nitrate marker gene promoter in response to nitrate in the protoplast system and control the primary nitrate-responsive transcriptome. The cpk10 cpk30 cpk32 triple mutant displayed defects in the primary nitrate-mediated shoot developmental program and root system architecture. Additionally, CIPK8 and CBL7 were found to be involved in a kinase cascade in nitrate signaling [57,58]. Nitrate rapidly induced CIPK8 expression. The cipk8 mutant was defective in the low-affinity phase of the primary nitrate response and nitrate-modulated primary root growth. CBL7 regulates the low-nitrate response in Arabidopsis.

3.2. The Nin like Proteins—Primary Nitrate Response Pathway

NIN LIKE PROTEIN 7 (NLP7) from Arabidopsis is one of the most extensively studied NLPs in plants. Arabidopsis nlp7 mutant plants displayed an N-starved phenotype, and the expression profiling of nitrate uptake, assimilation, and response genes in the nlp7 mutant was impaired [14]. Additionally, nitrate can induce the nuclear accumulation of the NLP7 protein [15]. Therefore, it was proposed that NLP7 is a key transcription factor involved in the regulation of nitrate assimilation in higher plants. As a key transcription factor, the process of nuclear translocation is a crucial step. A phosphorylation-mediated nuclear cytoplasmic shuttling mechanism for NLP7 translocation into the nucleus has been discovered, with CPKs playing a key role in phosphorylating NLP7 [3]. When the nitrate-induced increase in Ca2+ concentration was blocked by Ca2+ chelators or channel blockers, the nitrate-stimulated NLP7 phosphorylation by CPK10, CPK30, and CPK32 was greatly diminished. Furthermore, when the CPK phosphorylation site in NLP7, a uniquely conserved serine (Ser205), was mutated to alanine (S205A), the phosphorylation also failed. In addition, the cpk10 cpk30 cpk32 triple mutant plants also lost nitrate-stimulated phosphorylation. As a result, the expression of nitrate-responsive genes was markedly diminished, and nitrate-specific stimulation of the lateral root was severely retarded. This is due to the failure of the phosphorylation resulting from the absence of these Ca2+-binding protein kinases, which limits the nuclear translocation of NLP7. Consequently, it can’t regulate the gene expression response to nitrate. In addition, the nitrate-stimulated nuclear translocation of NLP7 was strongly blocked in the cyclic nucleotide-gated channel 15 (cngc15) mutant plants due to impaired Ca2+ signals [13]. This demonstrates that nitrate-dependent translocation of NLP7 is calcium signaling-dependent.
Once in the nucleus, NLPs can bind directly to nitrate-responsive cis-elements (NRE) in the promoter regions of nitrate-responsive genes and activate transcription [16]. The NRE is a conserved 43 bp sequence first identified in the promoter of the Arabidopsis nitrite reductase gene (NIR1), and the motif exists in the promoters of NIR1 from various higher plants [17,18,19]. Nitrate can induce numerous genes expression within minutes, which peak at around 30 min. This rapid transcriptional response is termed the primary nitrate response (PNR) [59]. Typical PNR genes include those involved in nitrate absorption or assimilation. NRE has been identified in many PNR genes. Genome-wide analyses revealed that NLP7 binds to the promoters of many PNR genes involved in N metabolism, such as transporters, enzymes, and transcription factors [15,60]. The expression of PNR genes is impaired in the absence of NLP7. It is believed that NLP7 acts as a master regulator of PNR [14,60]. NLP6, the closest homolog of NLP7, has redundant roles. Knockout mutations of NLP6 also result in reduced induction of many PNR target genes [20]. The transcriptome analysis of the PNR showed that NLP6 and NLP7 govern approximately 50% of nitrate-induced genes, with both distinct and partially functionally redundant patterns [21]. Other NLP family members, such as NLP2, -4, -5, -6, and -8, also participated in regulating the PNR, especially NLP2, which serves as the major transcription factor as NLP7 to regulate early nitrate responses by binding hundreds of genes related to the transcriptional response to nitrate [21,22]. Thus, NLPs-dependent pathways play a crucial role in mediating nitrate signal transduction from the extranuclear to the nucleus to regulate downstream nitrate-induced responses.
Numerous studies have demonstrated the significant role of NLPs in regulating plant growth dependent on N signaling. For example, NLP7 directly binds to the promoter of TRYPTOPHAN AMINOTRANSFERASE RELATED 2 (TAR2), a tryptophan aminotransferase-related gene, and activates its expression, thereby regulating lateral root development [61]. Additionally, NLP7 modulates auxin pathways to regulate root cap development [62]. Similarly, NLP8 directly activates the expression of CYTOCHROME P450 (CYP707A2), an ABA catabolic enzyme, to regulate nitrate-promoted germination [63]. There are still a large number of genes that are likely to be directly controlled by NLP activity. A comprehensive analysis of NLP target genes would establish the central network of NLP-PNR pathway that bridges PNR genes to physiological processes. This deserves further exploration.

4. Flowering Time Response to Nitrate Availability

4.1. Signal to the Photoperiod Pathway to Regulate Flowering

As a long-day (LD) plant, Arabidopsis relies on the photoperiod pathway to promote flowering. The central regulator in photoperiodic flowering is CONSTANS (CO), which directly binds to the promoter of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and activates its expression [64]. It was demonstrated that nitrogen (N) conditions may affect the transcriptional levels of CO [33,36,65]. Specifically, they were higher in the low-N conditions than those in the high-N conditions [36,65]. This suggests that CO may be one of the crucial components connecting N signaling with the flowering pathway.
One of the major features of CO is that it exhibits a diurnal expression pattern that is under the control of the circadian clock [66]. The central circadian components, such as CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1), LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL 1 (LHY), and TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1 (TOC1), influence the expression of downstream targets to regulate many aspects of plant growth, such as floral transition [67,68,69]. CO is controlled by several circadian clock-associated proteins at the transcriptional or post-translational level [70,71], and a genetic linkage between the central clock circuitry and the downstream CO-FT photoperiodic flowering pathway has been verified [72]. Thus, CO-FT photoperiodic flowering has been considered a circadian output. It has long been proposed that N signals may represent an input mechanism to affect plant circadian clock function [73]. Consistent with this, low-N conditions (1.94 mM nitrate/1 mM ammonia) increase the expression of key components of the central oscillator, CCA1, LHY, and TOC1, while high-N conditions (77.6 mM nitrate/46 mM ammonia) decrease the expression of these genes. As a circadian output, the transcriptional levels of CO were higher in the low-N conditions synchronously [65]. Yuan et al. (2016) also identified the components that bridge N signals to the central clock: cryptochrome blue-light receptor 1 (CRY1) and FERREDOXIN-NADP (+) OXIDOREDUCTASE (FNR1). FNR1 acts as an upstream positive regulator of CRY1, influencing the nuclear phosphorylation and degradation of CRY1 [65]. The abundance of cellular CRY1 protein plays a role in circadian clock input [74,75,76,77]. Therefore, it is possible that N functions as an input signal to the central circadian clock via CRY1 to mediate flowering time. In summary, the N signaling pathway regulates the abundance of cellular CRY1 protein, which in turn impacts the expression of crucial components of the central oscillator. As a result, the expression levels of CO, which are responsible for photoperiodic flowering activation, are altered, ultimately affecting the timing of flowering.
Additionally, there is a circadian clock-independent way that N levels regulate flowering time through the photoperiod pathway. The FLOWERING BHLH (FBH) transcription factor family plays a crucial role in activating CO gene transcription. They can directly bind to the E-box elements in the CO promoter and activate its transcription. In addition, the FBH proteins increase CO levels throughout the day without affecting their diurnal pattern [78]. Sanagi et al. identified FBH4 as a crucial regulator of N-responsive flowering in Arabidopsis [36]. The phosphorylation state of the FBH4 protein can be modulated by N conditions. Under low N conditions, FBH4 phosphorylation levels decrease, promoting FBH4 nuclear localization and transcriptional activation of the direct target CO and downstream florigen FT. Thus, FBH4 plays an equally important role in N signaling by interacting with the CO-FT photoperiodic pathway to modulate flowering time.

4.2. Crosstalk with Gibberellin Signaling in Flowering Regulation

The plant hormone gibberellin (GA) regulates various aspects of plant growth and development in response to environmental signals [79,80,81]. Bioactive GA promotes growth by counteracting the functions of DELLA growth repressing proteins (DELLAs) [82]. In the absence of GA, DELLA acts as a negative regulator of plant growth by altering the activity of transcription factors or regulators of GA-responsive genes through protein-to-protein interaction. After bioactive GAs bind to their receptor, GIBBERELLIN INSENSITIVE DWARF 1 (GID1), they promote GID1 to interact with DELLA protein, resulting in the destruction of DELLA protein via the ubiquitin/26S proteasome-dependent pathway. This releases the inhibitory interaction of DELLA protein with TFs, thereby promoting plant growth. GA is critical for flowering in Arabidopsis, promoting flowering by activating the floral integrator genes [83,84,85]. Exogenous treatment with GA compounds accelerated flowering time in Arabidopsis; the GA biosynthesis or receptor mutant plants showed a delayed flowering phenotype; the late-flowering mutant plants were impaired in GA biosynthesis or signaling [86,87,88,89,90].
It has been reported that nitrate modulates flowering time through the GA pathway [33,91]. Compared to Arabidopsis seedlings grown under 3 mM nitrate, the expression levels of bioactive GA biosynthesis-related genes, such as GIBBERELLIN 20-OXIDASE 1 (GA20OX1), GIBBERELLIN 3-OXIDASE 1 (GA3OX1), were higher when grown under 1 mM nitrate. Consistent with this, DELLA protein levels were lower under 1 mM nitrate. This means that seedlings grown under 1 mM nitrate have higher levels of bioactive GA compared to 3 mM nitrate, thereby promoting the degradation of DELLAs. The reduced DELLA accumulation, in turn, promotes flowering time. Another strong evidence is that the loss-of-function mutant plants of DELLA protein had the same flowering time when grown under either 1 mM or 3 mM nitrate. This suggests that higher levels of nitrate repress bolting through the accumulation of DELLA proteins [91].
GATA TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 21 (GNC) and GATA TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 22 (GNL/CGA1) are GATA-type transcription factors downstream of DELLA proteins that repress GA signaling [92], thereby controlling many aspects of plant development through growth regulatory signals [93]. It was found that nitrate-regulated flowering time is also dependent on the two transcription factors. Compared to Arabidopsis seedlings grown under 1 mM nitrate, the expression levels of GNC and CGA1/GNL were higher under 3 mM nitrate, consistent with the accumulation of DELLA proteins. Consequently, GNC and CGA1/GNL positively influence the expression of SCHLAFMUTZE (SMZ) and SCHNARCHZAPFEN (SNZ) [91]. SMZ and SNZ are two AP2 family transcription factors, acting as floral repressors. SMZ binds directly to the FT promoter and inhibits its expression [94,95]. When grown under higher nitrate, the transcriptional levels of the SMZ and SNZ are relatively higher due to the higher GNC and CGA1/GNL, which in turn delays flowering time [91].
Thus, here is another way for nitrate signaling to regulate flowering time: nitrate availability controls flowering time by modulating SMZ and SNZ gene expression, which is dependent on the GA pathway. Future research is required to clarify the mechanistic details of how nitrate signaling is involved in regulating the GA pathway.

4.3. Nitrate Signaling Directly Integrated into the Age Pathway in the Shoot Apical Meristem

Signaling events occurring in the shoot apical meristem (SAM) are crucial for successful reproduction [23]. Environmental or endogenous signals are integrated into the SAM, allowing fine-tuning for developmental responses. For example, plants can sense the availability of nitrate in the soil to control their organogenesis rate through long-range signaling by cytokinin hormone precursors that travel through the plant [96]. Trehalose-6-phosphate signaling affects flowering time directly in the SAM [97,98]. Genes related to sugar and hormone signaling and response were found to be involved in tissue specific events that control flowering in the SAM [99]. Most of all, signals in flowering pathways are initiated in the leaves and then transported to the SAM by the mobile FT proteins [31,100]. Once in the SAM, FT forms a complex with several partners and directly up-regulates large amounts of genes to induce the formation of flowers [32,101].
It has been suggested that nitrate signaling regulates flowering via the SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE (SPL) transcription factors [97]. The SPL family has the ability to promote flowering and functions in the endogenous/age pathway [102,103]. It shows a high degree of functional redundancy among its members. Eight members of the Arabidopsis SPL family, SPL2, SPL3, SPL4, SPL5, SPL9, SPL10, SPL11, and SPL15, have been implicated in the floral transition [24,104]. Among them, SPL3 and SPL5 were found to connect nitrate signaling to the endogenous flowering network in the SAM [97]. Functional nitrate-responsive cis-elements (NRE) motifs were identified in SPL3 and SPL5. Meanwhile, NIN LIKE PROTEIN 6 (NLP6) and NIN LIKE PROTEIN 7 (NLP7) are expressed in the SAM. In vitro assays provide evidence that the NRE motifs present in the upstream intergenic regions of SPL3 and SPL5 can activate transcription. SUPPRESSOR OF OVER EXPRESSION OF CONSTANS (SOC1) is one of the flowering integrators that acts as a central integrator for multiple flowering pathways in the SAM [28]. Since SOC1 expression was greatly reduced in the plants grown under limited nitrogen supply [97], it was postulated that SOC1 may be the main flowering integrator in nitrate-dependent flowering in the SAM. In summary, plants can directly sense the nitrate status and mediate flowering at the SAM through the nitrate-responsive factors NLP7 and NLP6, which directly bind to the promoters of SPL3 and SPL5 to regulate at the transcriptional level. Crosstalk between nitrate and phytohormone or sugar signaling pathways has been considered to modulate plant developmental programs [105,106,107]. The signaling overlaps between nitrate and hormones involved in root development have been largely investigated [108], but much less in the reproductive process. Therefore, it remains intriguing to elucidate the mechanistic details of how plants tissue-specifically integrate nitrate signaling with endogenous signals into floral pathway-related genes to mediate bolting time in the SAM.

5. Perspective

Significant advances have been made in the field of the nitrate signaling pathway and its regulatory role in plant growth. Based on the recent progress achieved from the studies on flowering time responses to nitrogen (N) in Arabidopsis, we now postulate a preliminary network of nitrate signaling on flowering time in this review. However, many key questions remain open.
A link between nitrate and other signals to regulate plant growth has been actively proposed. A good example is that nitrate signaling influences plant growth by interacting with hormone networks, such as auxin [108] or gibberellin (GA) [91,109,110]. Another example here is that N signaling as an input to the central clock interferes with circadian rhythms [73]. Consequently, it alters circadian output pathways, such as changes in flowering time [65]. However, our understanding of the mechanisms by which N availability affects either GA or the circadian clock is fragmentary and largely based on transcriptional data. The question is therefore: what are the underlying molecular mechanisms involved in the interaction between the nitrate signal and other internal or external signals? Moreover, other N-form molecules may be involved in a variety of biological processes, such as ammonium [111], glutamine [112], polyamines [113,114]. The interaction between nitrate signaling and these molecules on plant growth remains an open question.
Plants can directly sense the nitrate status and mediate flowering in the shoot apical meristem (SAM) [97]. This raises the question of how spatial and temporal nitrate signaling is activated to mediate flowering time. In recent years, cell-specific transcriptomes, cell-specific epigenomics, and the development of precise fluorescent reporters have facilitated the uncovering of spatial regulatory networks. The use of these refined approaches will help us to unravel the events involved in the spatio-temporal specificities of nitrate signaling in regulating flowering time.
A full understanding of how nitrate signaling output pathways are linked to reproductive processes will allow us to take advantage of these crucial components. Together with advances in the areas of genome editing and synthetic biology, it will greatly help us propose new biotechnological strategies to improve nitrogen-use efficiency in response to N status, ultimately making a contribution to sustainable agriculture.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.W., J.W. and Y.T.; writing—original draft preparation, M.W. and J.W.; visualization, J.W. and Z.W.; writing—review and editing, Y.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Hangzhou Science and Technology Development Plan, grant number 20201203B105.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ho, C.-H.; Lin, S.-H.; Hu, H.-C.; Tsay, Y.-F. CHL1 Functions as a Nitrate Sensor in Plants. Cell 2009, 138, 1184–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, K.-H.; Liu, M.; Lin, Z.; Wang, Z.-F.; Chen, B.; Liu, C.; Guo, A.; Konishi, M.; Yanagisawa, S.; Wagner, G.; et al. NIN-like Protein 7 Transcription Factor Is a Plant Nitrate Sensor. Science 2022, 377, 1419–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Liu, K.; Niu, Y.; Konishi, M.; Wu, Y.; Du, H.; Sun Chung, H.; Li, L.; Boudsocq, M.; McCormack, M.; Maekawa, S.; et al. Discovery of Nitrate–CPK–NLP Signalling in Central Nutrient–Growth Networks. Nature 2017, 545, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fredes, I.; Moreno, S.; Díaz, F.P.; Gutiérrez, R.A. Nitrate Signaling and the Control of Arabidopsis Growth and Development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2019, 47, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gaudinier, A.; Rodriguez-Medina, J.; Zhang, L.; Olson, A.; Liseron-Monfils, C.; Bågman, A.-M.; Foret, J.; Abbitt, S.; Tang, M.; Li, B.; et al. Transcriptional Regulation of Nitrogen-Associated Metabolism and Growth. Nature 2018, 563, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wang, R.; Okamoto, M.; Xing, X.; Crawford, N.M. Microarray Analysis of the Nitrate Response in Arabidopsis Roots and Shoots Reveals over 1,000 Rapidly Responding Genes and New Linkages to Glucose, Trehalose-6-Phosphate, Iron, and Sulfate Metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132, 556–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Vidal, E.A.; Álvarez, J.M.; Moyano, T.C.; Gutiérrez, R.A. Transcriptional Networks in the Nitrate Response of Arabidopsis Thaliana. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2015, 27, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Jia, Z.; von Wirén, N. Signaling Pathways Underlying Nitrogen-Dependent Changes in Root System Architecture: From Model to Crop Species. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 4393–4404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Forde, B.G. Nitrogen Signalling Pathways Shaping Root System Architecture: An Update. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 21, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, C.-H.; Yu, J.-Q.; Hu, D.-G. Nitrate: A Crucial Signal during Lateral Roots Development. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Undurraga, S.F.; Ibarra-Henríquez, C.; Fredes, I.; Álvarez, J.M.; Gutiérrez, R.A. Nitrate Signaling and Early Responses in Arabidopsis Roots. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2541–2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, H.; Rong, H.; Pilbeam, D. Signalling Mechanisms Underlying the Morphological Responses of the Root System to Nitrogen in Arabidopsis Thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 2329–2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, X.; Feng, C.; Tian, L.; Hou, C.; Tian, W.; Hu, B.; Zhang, Q.; Ren, Z.; Niu, Q.; Song, J.; et al. A Transceptor–Channel Complex Couples Nitrate Sensing to Calcium Signaling in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2021, 14, 774–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Castaings, L.; Camargo, A.; Pocholle, D.; Gaudon, V.; Texier, Y.; Boutet-Mercey, S.; Taconnat, L.; Renou, J.-P.; Daniel-Vedele, F.; Fernandez, E.; et al. The Nodule Inception-like Protein 7 Modulates Nitrate Sensing and Metabolism in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2009, 57, 426–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Marchive, C.; Roudier, F.; Castaings, L.; Bréhaut, V.; Blondet, E.; Colot, V.; Meyer, C.; Krapp, A. Nuclear Retention of the Transcription Factor NLP7 Orchestrates the Early Response to Nitrate in Plants. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Konishi, M.; Yanagisawa, S. Arabidopsis NIN-like Transcription Factors Have a Central Role in Nitrate Signalling. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Konishi, M.; Yanagisawa, S. Identification of a Nitrate-Responsive Cis-Element in the Arabidopsis NIR1 Promoter Defines the Presence of Multiple Cis-Regulatory Elements for Nitrogen Response: Nitrate-Responsive Element of Arabidopsis NIR1. Plant J. 2010, 63, 269–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Konishi, M.; Yanagisawa, S. The Regulatory Region Controlling the Nitrate-Responsive Expression of a Nitrate Reductase Gene, NIA1, in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 824–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Konishi, M.; Yanagisawa, S. Roles of the Transcriptional Regulation Mediated by the Nitrate-Responsive Cis-Element in Higher Plants. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 411, 708–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Guan, P.; Ripoll, J.-J.; Wang, R.; Vuong, L.; Bailey-Steinitz, L.J.; Ye, D.; Crawford, N.M. Interacting TCP and NLP Transcription Factors Control Plant Responses to Nitrate Availability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 2419–2424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cheng, Y.-H.; Durand, M.; Brehaut, V.; Hsu, F.-C.; Kelemen, Z.; Texier, Y.; Krapp, A.; Tsay, Y.-F. Interplay between NIN-LIKE PROTEINs 6 and 7 in Nitrate Signaling. Plant Physiol. 2023, 192, 3049–3068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Durand, M.; Brehaut, V.; Clement, G.; Kelemen, Z.; Macé, J.; Feil, R.; Duville, G.; Launay-Avon, A.; Roux, C.P.-L.; Lunn, J.E.; et al. The Arabidopsis Transcription Factor NLP2 Regulates Early Nitrate Responses and Integrates Nitrate Assimilation with Energy and Carbon Skeleton Supply. Plant Cell 2023, 35, 1429–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Freytes, S.N.; Canelo, M.; Cerdán, P.D. Regulation of Flowering Time: When and Where? Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 102049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Quiroz, S.; Yustis, J.C.; Chávez-Hernández, E.C.; Martínez, T.; Sanchez, M.d.l.P.; Garay-Arroyo, A.; Álvarez-Buylla, E.R.; García-Ponce, B. Beyond the Genetic Pathways, Flowering Regulation Complexity in Arabidopsis Thaliana. IJMS 2021, 22, 5716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Corbesier, L.; Vincent, C.; Jang, S.; Fornara, F.; Fan, Q.; Searle, I.; Giakountis, A.; Farrona, S.; Gissot, L.; Turnbull, C.; et al. FT Protein Movement Contributes to Long-Distance Signaling in Floral Induction of Arabidopsis. Science 2007, 316, 1030–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kardailsky, I.; Shukla, V.K.; Ahn, J.H.; Dagenais, N.; Christensen, S.K.; Nguyen, J.T.; Chory, J.; Harrison, M.J.; Weigel, D. Activation Tagging of the Floral Inducer FT. Science 1999, 286, 1962–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liu, C.; Zhou, J.; Bracha-Drori, K.; Yalovsky, S.; Ito, T.; Yu, H. Specification of Arabidopsis Floral Meristem Identity by Repression of Flowering Time Genes. Development 2007, 134, 1901–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Melzer, S.; Lens, F.; Gennen, J.; Vanneste, S.; Rohde, A.; Beeckman, T. Flowering-Time Genes Modulate Meristem Determinacy and Growth Form in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40, 1489–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Nilsson, O.; Lee, I.; Blázquez, M.A.; Weigel, D. Flowering-Time Genes Modulate the Response to LEAFY Activity. Genetics 1998, 150, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Samach, A.; Onouchi, H.; Gold, S.E.; Ditta, G.S.; Schwarz-Sommer, Z.; Yanofsky, M.F.; Coupland, G. Distinct Roles of CONSTANS Target Genes in Reproductive Development of Arabidopsis. Science 2000, 288, 1613–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abe, M.; Kobayashi, Y.; Yamamoto, S.; Daimon, Y.; Yamaguchi, A.; Ikeda, Y.; Ichinoki, H.; Notaguchi, M.; Goto, K.; Araki, T. FD, a bZIP Protein Mediating Signals from the Floral Pathway Integrator FT at the Shoot Apex. Science 2005, 309, 1052–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Collani, S.; Neumann, M.; Yant, L.; Schmid, M. FT Modulates Genome-Wide DNA-Binding of the bZIP Transcription Factor FD. Plant Physiol. 2019, 180, 367–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liu, T.; Li, Y.; Ren, J.; Qian, Y.; Yang, X.; Duan, W.; Hou, X. Nitrate or NaCl Regulates Floral Induction in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Biologia 2013, 68, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Marin, I.C.; Loef, I.; Bartetzko, L.; Searle, I.; Coupland, G.; Stitt, M.; Osuna, D. Nitrate Regulates Floral Induction in Arabidopsis, Acting Independently of Light, Gibberellin and Autonomous Pathways. Planta 2011, 233, 539–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lin, Y.-L.; Tsay, Y.-F. Influence of Differing Nitrate and Nitrogen Availability on Flowering Control in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2603–2609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sanagi, M.; Aoyama, S.; Kubo, A.; Lu, Y.; Sato, Y.; Ito, S.; Abe, M.; Mitsuda, N.; Ohme-Takagi, M.; Kiba, T.; et al. Low Nitrogen Conditions Accelerate Flowering by Modulating the Phosphorylation State of FLOWERING BHLH 4 in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2022942118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Weber, K.; Burow, M. Nitrogen–Essential Macronutrient and Signal Controlling Flowering Time. Physiol. Plantarum 2018, 162, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ye, J.Y.; Tian, W.H.; Zhou, M.; Zhu, Q.Y.; Du, W.X.; Jin, C.W. Improved Plant Nitrate Status Involves in Flowering Induction by Extended Photoperiod. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 629857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Liu, K.-H.; Huang, C.-Y.; Tsay, Y.-F. CHL1 Is a Dual-Affinity Nitrate Transporter of Arabidopsis Involved in Multiple Phases of Nitrate Uptake. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 865–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guo, F.-Q.; Wang, R.; Chen, M.; Crawford, N.M. The Arabidopsis Dual-Affinity Nitrate Transporter Gene AtNRT1.1 (CHL1) Is Activated and Functions in Nascent Organ Development during Vegetative and Reproductive Growth. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 1761–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Alboresi, A.; Gestin, C.; Leydecker, M.-T.; Bedu, M.; Meyer, C.; Truong, H.-N. Nitrate, a Signal Relieving Seed Dormancy in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28, 500–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Muños, S.; Cazettes, C.; Fizames, C.; Gaymard, F.; Tillard, P.; Lepetit, M.; Lejay, L.; Gojon, A. Transcript Profiling in the Chl1-5 Mutant of Arabidopsis Reveals a Role of the Nitrate Transporter NRT1.1 in the Regulation of Another Nitrate Transporter, NRT2.1. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 2433–2447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Remans, T.; Nacry, P.; Pervent, M.; Filleur, S.; Diatloff, E.; Mounier, E.; Tillard, P.; Forde, B.G.; Gojon, A. The Arabidopsis NRT1.1 Transporter Participates in the Signaling Pathway Triggering Root Colonization of Nitrate-Rich Patches. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 19206–19211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Walch-Liu, P.; Forde, B.G. Nitrate Signalling Mediated by the NRT1.1 Nitrate Transporter Antagonises l-Glutamate-Induced Changes in Root Architecture. Plant J. 2008, 54, 820–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Krapp, A.; David, L.C.; Chardin, C.; Girin, T.; Marmagne, A.; Leprince, A.-S.; Chaillou, S.; Ferrario-Méry, S.; Meyer, C.; Daniel-Vedele, F. Nitrate Transport and Signalling in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 789–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Maghiaoui, A.; Gojon, A.; Bach, L. NRT1.1-Centered Nitrate Signaling in Plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 6226–6237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Sakakibara, H.; Kobayashi, K.; Deji, A.; Sugiyama, T. Partial Characterization of the Signaling Pathway for the Nitrate-Dependent Expression of Genes for Nitrogen-Assimilatory Enzymes Using Detached Maize Leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 1997, 38, 837–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Riveras, E.; Alvarez, J.M.; Vidal, E.A.; Oses, C.; Vega, A.; Gutiérrez, R.A. The Calcium Ion Is a Second Messenger in the Nitrate Signaling Pathway of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 1397–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sueyoshi, K.; Mitsuyama, T.; Sugimoto, T.; Kleinhofs, A.; Warner, R.L.; Oji, Y. Effects of Inhibitors for Signaling Components on the Expression of the Genes for Nitrate Reductase and Nitrite Reductase in Excised Barley Leaves. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1999, 45, 1015–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chardin, C.; Girin, T.; Roudier, F.; Meyer, C.; Krapp, A. The Plant RWP-RK Transcription Factors: Key Regulators of Nitrogen Responses and of Gametophyte Development. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 5577–5587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Konishi, M.; Yanagisawa, S. Emergence of a New Step towards Understanding the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Nitrate-Regulated Gene Expression. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 5589–5600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yan, D.; Nambara, E. Conserved and Unique Functions of NIN-like Proteins in Nitrate Sensing and Signaling. Plant Sci. 2023, 336, 111842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kleist, T.J.; Wudick, M.M. Shaping up: Recent Advances in the Study of Plant Calcium Channels. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2022, 76, 102080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Luan, S.; Wang, C. Calcium Signaling Mechanisms Across Kingdoms. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 37, 311–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Tian, W.; Wang, C.; Gao, Q.; Li, L.; Luan, S. Calcium Spikes, Waves and Oscillations in Plant Development and Biotic Interactions. Nat. Plants 2020, 6, 750–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Luan, S. The CBL–CIPK Network in Plant Calcium Signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hu, H.-C.; Wang, Y.-Y.; Tsay, Y.-F. AtCIPK8, a CBL-Interacting Protein Kinase, Regulates the Low-Affinity Phase of the Primary Nitrate Response. Plant J. 2009, 57, 264–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ma, Q.; Tang, R.-J.; Zheng, X.-J.; Wang, S.-M.; Luan, S. The Calcium Sensor CBL7 Modulates Plant Responses to Low Nitrate in Arabidopsis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 468, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Wang, Y.-Y.; Cheng, Y.-H.; Chen, K.-E.; Tsay, Y.-F. Nitrate Transport, Signaling, and Use Efficiency. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2018, 69, 85–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Alvarez, J.M.; Schinke, A.-L.; Brooks, M.D.; Pasquino, A.; Leonelli, L.; Varala, K.; Safi, A.; Krouk, G.; Krapp, A.; Coruzzi, G.M. Transient Genome-Wide Interactions of the Master Transcription Factor NLP7 Initiate a Rapid Nitrogen-Response Cascade. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, T.-T.; Kang, H.; Fu, L.-L.; Sun, W.-J.; Gao, W.-S.; You, C.-X.; Wang, X.-F.; Hao, Y.-J. NIN-like Protein 7 Promotes Nitrate-Mediated Lateral Root Development by Activating Transcription of TRYPTOPHAN AMINOTRANSFERASE RELATED 2. Plant Sci. 2021, 303, 110771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kumar, N.; Caldwell, C.; Iyer-Pascuzzi, A.S. S. The NIN-LIKE PROTEIN 7 Transcription Factor Modulates Auxin Pathways to Regulate Root Cap Development in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 3047–3059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Yan, D.; Easwaran, V.; Chau, V.; Okamoto, M.; Ierullo, M.; Kimura, M.; Endo, A.; Yano, R.; Pasha, A.; Gong, Y.; et al. NIN-like Protein 8 Is a Master Regulator of Nitrate-Promoted Seed Germination in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Suárez-López, P.; Wheatley, K.; Robson, F.; Onouchi, H.; Valverde, F.; Coupland, G. CONSTANS Mediates between the Circadian Clock and the Control of Flowering in Arabidopsis. Nature 2001, 410, 1116–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Yuan, S.; Zhang, Z.-W.; Zheng, C.; Zhao, Z.-Y.; Wang, Y.; Feng, L.-Y.; Niu, G.; Wang, C.-Q.; Wang, J.-H.; Feng, H.; et al. Arabidopsis Cryptochrome 1 Functions in Nitrogen Regulation of Flowering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 7661–7666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Shim, J.S.; Kubota, A.; Imaizumi, T. Circadian Clock and Photoperiodic Flowering in Arabidopsis: CONSTANS Is a Hub for Signal Integration1[OPEN]. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Alabadí, D.; Oyama, T.; Yanovsky, M.J.; Harmon, F.G.; Más, P.; Kay, S.A. Reciprocal Regulation Between TOC1 and LHY/CCA1 Within the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock. Science 2001, 293, 880–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ding, Z.; Doyle, M.R.; Amasino, R.M.; Davis, S.J. A Complex Genetic Interaction Between Arabidopsis Thaliana TOC1 and CCA1/LHY in Driving the Circadian Clock and in Output Regulation. Genetics 2007, 176, 1501–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Fujiwara, S.; Oda, A.; Yoshida, R.; Niinuma, K.; Miyata, K.; Tomozoe, Y.; Tajima, T.; Nakagawa, M.; Hayashi, K.; Coupland, G.; et al. Circadian Clock Proteins LHY and CCA1 Regulate SVP Protein Accumulation to Control Flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 2960–2971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Imaizumi, T. Arabidopsis Circadian Clock and Photoperiodism: Time to Think about Location. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Valverde, F.; Mouradov, A.; Soppe, W.; Ravenscroft, D.; Samach, A.; Coupland, G. Photoreceptor Regulation of CONSTANS Protein in Photoperiodic Flowering. Science 2004, 303, 1003–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Niwa, Y.; Ito, S.; Nakamichi, N.; Mizoguchi, T.; Niinuma, K.; Yamashino, T.; Mizuno, T. Genetic Linkages of the Circadian Clock-Associated Genes, TOC1, CCA1 and LHY, in the Photoperiodic Control of Flowering Time in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007, 48, 925–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Gutiérrez, R.A.; Stokes, T.L.; Thum, K.; Xu, X.; Obertello, M.; Katari, M.S.; Tanurdzic, M.; Dean, A.; Nero, D.C.; McClung, C.R.; et al. Systems Approach Identifies an Organic Nitrogen-Responsive Gene Network That Is Regulated by the Master Clock Control Gene CCA1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 4939–4944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Cashmore, A.R. Cryptochromes: Enabling Plants and Animals to Determine Circadian Time. Cell 2003, 114, 537–543. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  75. Mo, W.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Z.; Yang, L.; Yao, N.; Xiao, Y.; Li, T.; Li, Y.; Zhang, G.; et al. Arabidopsis Cryptochrome 2 Forms Photobodies with TCP22 under Blue Light and Regulates the Circadian Clock. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Somers, D.E.; Devlin, P.F.; Kay, S.A. Phytochromes and Cryptochromes in the Entrainment of the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock. Science 1998, 282, 1488–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Wang, X.; Jiang, B.; Gu, L.; Chen, Y.; Mora, M.; Zhu, M.; Noory, E.; Wang, Q.; Lin, C. A Photoregulatory Mechanism of the Circadian Clock in Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants 2021, 7, 1397–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Ito, S.; Song, Y.H.; Josephson-Day, A.R.; Miller, R.J.; Breton, G.; Olmstead, R.G.; Imaizumi, T. FLOWERING BHLH Transcriptional Activators Control Expression of the Photoperiodic Flowering Regulator CONSTANS in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 3582–3587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Achard, P.; Cheng, H.; De Grauwe, L.; Decat, J.; Schoutteten, H.; Moritz, T.; Van Der Straeten, D.; Peng, J.; Harberd, N.P. Integration of Plant Responses to Environmentally Activated Phytohormonal Signals. Science 2006, 311, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Colebrook, E.H.; Thomas, S.G.; Phillips, A.L.; Hedden, P. The Role of Gibberellin Signalling in Plant Responses to Abiotic Stress. J. Exp. Biol. 2014, 217, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. De Lucas, M.; Davière, J.-M.; Rodríguez-Falcón, M.; Pontin, M.; Iglesias-Pedraz, J.M.; Lorrain, S.; Fankhauser, C.; Blázquez, M.A.; Titarenko, E.; Prat, S. A Molecular Framework for Light and Gibberellin Control of Cell Elongation. Nature 2008, 451, 480–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Davière, J.-M.; Achard, P. Gibberellin Signaling in Plants. Development 2013, 140, 1147–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Bao, S.; Hua, C.; Shen, L.; Yu, H. New Insights into Gibberellin Signaling in Regulating Flowering in Arabidopsis. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 118–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Fukazawa, J.; Ohashi, Y.; Takahashi, R.; Nakai, K.; Takahashi, Y. DELLA Degradation by Gibberellin Promotes Flowering via GAF1-TPR-Dependent Repression of Floral Repressors in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2021, 33, 2258–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Mutasa-Göttgens, E.; Hedden, P. Gibberellin as a Factor in Floral Regulatory Networks. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 1979–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Blázquez, M.A.; Green, R.; Nilsson, O.; Sussman, M.R.; Weigel, D. Gibberellins Promote Flowering of Arabidopsis by Activating the LEAFY Promoter. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 791–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Eriksson, S.; Böhlenius, H.; Moritz, T.; Nilsson, O. GA4 Is the Active Gibberellin in the Regulation of LEAFY Transcription and Arabidopsis Floral Initiation. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 2172–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Griffiths, J.; Murase, K.; Rieu, I.; Zentella, R.; Zhang, Z.-L.; Powers, S.J.; Gong, F.; Phillips, A.L.; Hedden, P.; Sun, T.; et al. Genetic Characterization and Functional Analysis of the GID1 Gibberellin Receptors in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 3399–3414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Porri, A.; Torti, S.; Romera-Branchat, M.; Coupland, G. Spatially Distinct Regulatory Roles for Gibberellins in the Promotion of Flowering of Arabidopsis under Long Photoperiods. Development 2012, 139, 2198–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wilson, R.N.; Heckman, J.W.; Somerville, C.R. Gibberellin Is Required for Flowering in Arabidopsis Thaliana under Short Days. Plant Physiol. 1992, 100, 403–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gras, D.E.; Vidal, E.A.; Undurraga, S.F.; Riveras, E.; Moreno, S.; Dominguez-Figueroa, J.; Alabadi, D.; Blázquez, M.A.; Medina, J.; Gutiérrez, R.A. SMZ/SNZ and Gibberellin Signaling Are Required for Nitrate-Elicited Delay of Flowering Time in Arabidopsis Thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 619–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Richter, R.; Behringer, C.; Müller, I.K.; Schwechheimer, C. The GATA-Type Transcription Factors GNC and GNL/CGA1 Repress Gibberellin Signaling Downstream from DELLA Proteins and PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTORS. Genes. Dev. 2010, 24, 2093–2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Behringer, C.; Schwechheimer, C. B-GATA Transcription Factors–Insights into Their Structure, Regulation, and Role in Plant Development. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Glazińska, P.; Zienkiewicz, A.; Wojciechowski, W.; Kopcewicz, J. The Putative miR172 Target Gene InAPETALA2-like Is Involved in the Photoperiodic Flower Induction of Ipomoea Nil. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 166, 1801–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Mathieu, J.; Yant, L.J.; Mürdter, F.; Küttner, F.; Schmid, M. Repression of Flowering by the miR172 Target SMZ. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7, e1000148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Landrein, B.; Formosa-Jordan, P.; Malivert, A.; Schuster, C.; Melnyk, C.W.; Yang, W.; Turnbull, C.; Meyerowitz, E.M.; Locke, J.C.W.; Jönsson, H. Nitrate Modulates Stem Cell Dynamics in Arabidopsis Shoot Meristems through Cytokinins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 1382–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Olas, J.J.; Van Dingenen, J.; Abel, C.; Działo, M.A.; Feil, R.; Krapp, A.; Schlereth, A.; Wahl, V. Nitrate Acts at the Arabidopsis Thaliana Shoot Apical Meristem to Regulate Flowering Time. New Phytol. 2019, 223, 814–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Wahl, V.; Ponnu, J.; Schlereth, A.; Arrivault, S.; Langenecker, T.; Franke, A.; Feil, R.; Lunn, J.E.; Stitt, M.; Schmid, M. Regulation of Flowering by Trehalose-6-Phosphate Signaling in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Science 2013, 339, 704–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Zhu, Y.; Klasfeld, S.; Jeong, C.W.; Jin, R.; Goto, K.; Yamaguchi, N.; Wagner, D. TERMINAL FLOWER 1-FD Complex Target Genes and Competition with FLOWERING LOCUS T. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wigge, P.A.; Kim, M.C.; Jaeger, K.E.; Busch, W.; Schmid, M.; Lohmann, J.U.; Weigel, D. Integration of Spatial and Temporal Information During Floral Induction in Arabidopsis. Science 2005, 309, 1056–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Abe, M.; Kosaka, S.; Shibuta, M.; Nagata, K.; Uemura, T.; Nakano, A.; Kaya, H. Transient Activity of the Florigen Complex during the Floral Transition in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Development 2019, 146, dev171504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Wang, J.-W.; Czech, B.; Weigel, D. miR156-Regulated SPL Transcription Factors Define an Endogenous Flowering Pathway in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Cell 2009, 138, 738–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Yamaguchi, A.; Wu, M.-F.; Yang, L.; Wu, G.; Poethig, R.S.; Wagner, D. The microRNA-Regulated SBP-Box Transcription Factor SPL3 Is a Direct Upstream Activator of LEAFY, FRUITFULL, and APETALA1. Dev. Cell. 2009, 17, 268–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Hyun, Y.; Richter, R.; Coupland, G. Competence to Flower: Age-Controlled Sensitivity to Environmental Cues1[OPEN]. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Fichtner, F.; Dissanayake, I.M.; Lacombe, B.; Barbier, F. Sugar and Nitrate Sensing: A Multi-Billion-Year Story. Trends Plant Sci. 2021, 26, 352–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Krouk, G. Hormones and Nitrate: A Two-Way Connection. Plant Mol. Biol. 2016, 91, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Vega, A.; O’Brien, J.A.; Gutiérrez, R.A. Nitrate and Hormonal Signaling Crosstalk for Plant Growth and Development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2019, 52, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Asim, M.; Ullah, Z.; Oluwaseun, A.; Wang, Q.; Liu, H. Signalling Overlaps between Nitrate and Auxin in Regulation of The Root System Architecture: Insights from the Arabidopsis Thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Camut, L.; Gallova, B.; Jilli, L.; Sirlin-Josserand, M.; Carrera, E.; Sakvarelidze-Achard, L.; Ruffel, S.; Krouk, G.; Thomas, S.G.; Hedden, P.; et al. Nitrate Signaling Promotes Plant Growth by Upregulating Gibberellin Biosynthesis and Destabilization of DELLA Proteins. Curr. Biol. 2021, 31, 4971–4982.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ren, Y.-R.; Zhao, Q.; Yang, Y.-Y.; Zhang, R.; Wang, X.-F.; Zhang, T.-E.; You, C.-X.; Huo, H.-Q.; Hao, Y.-J. Interaction of BTB-TAZ Protein MdBT2 and DELLA Protein MdRGL3a Regulates Nitrate-Mediated Plant Growth. Plant Physiol. 2021, 186, 750–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Li, B.; Li, G.; Kronzucker, H.J.; Baluška, F.; Shi, W. Ammonium Stress in Arabidopsis: Signaling, Genetic Loci, and Physiological Targets. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Lee, K.-T.; Liao, H.-S.; Hsieh, M.-H. Glutamine Metabolism, Sensing and Signaling in Plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2023, 64, 1466–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Krysenko, S.; Okoniewski, N.; Kulik, A.; Matthews, A.; Grimpo, J.; Wohlleben, W.; Bera, A. Gamma-Glutamylpolyamine Synthetase GlnA3 Is Involved in the First Step of Polyamine Degradation Pathway in Streptomyces Coelicolor M145. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Takahashi, T.; Kakehi, J.-I. Polyamines: Ubiquitous Polycations with Unique Roles in Growth and Stress Responses. Ann. Bot. 2010, 105, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 25 05310 g001
Figure 1. The nitrate signaling pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. At elevated nitrate levels, it leads to the activation of calcium−channel activity of the NRT1.1−CNGC15 complex, resulting in a rapid nitrate−induced influx of Ca2+ into the cytoplasm. As cytosolic Ca2+ levels increase, the calcium−dependent kinases CPK10, CPK30, and CPK32 promote the phosphorylation of NLP7/NLP6. This triggers the nuclear translocation of NLPs. Meanwhile, NLP7 senses nitrate directly in the cytoplasm. Once nitrate binds to NLP7, it causes NLP7 to undergo a conformational change and to be transcriptionally derepressed. This occurs simultaneously and synergistically with the phosphorylation process. In the nucleus, NLP6 and NLP7 can bind directly to nitrate−responsive cis−elements (NRE) in the promoter regions of PNR genes and activate nitrate−responsive transcription. Abbreviations: NO3−, nitrate; Ca2+, calcium; P, phosphorylation; NRT1.1, NITRATE TRANSPORTER 1.1; CNGC15, CYCLIC NUCLEOTIDE-GATED CHANNEL 15; CPK10, CALCIUM-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE 1; CPK30, CALCIUM-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE 30; CPK32, CALCIUM-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE 32; NLP7, NIN LIKE PROTEIN 7; NLP6, NIN LIKE PROTEIN 6; NRE, nitrate-responsive cis-elements; PNR, primary nitrate response.
Figure 1. The nitrate signaling pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. At elevated nitrate levels, it leads to the activation of calcium−channel activity of the NRT1.1−CNGC15 complex, resulting in a rapid nitrate−induced influx of Ca2+ into the cytoplasm. As cytosolic Ca2+ levels increase, the calcium−dependent kinases CPK10, CPK30, and CPK32 promote the phosphorylation of NLP7/NLP6. This triggers the nuclear translocation of NLPs. Meanwhile, NLP7 senses nitrate directly in the cytoplasm. Once nitrate binds to NLP7, it causes NLP7 to undergo a conformational change and to be transcriptionally derepressed. This occurs simultaneously and synergistically with the phosphorylation process. In the nucleus, NLP6 and NLP7 can bind directly to nitrate−responsive cis−elements (NRE) in the promoter regions of PNR genes and activate nitrate−responsive transcription. Abbreviations: NO3−, nitrate; Ca2+, calcium; P, phosphorylation; NRT1.1, NITRATE TRANSPORTER 1.1; CNGC15, CYCLIC NUCLEOTIDE-GATED CHANNEL 15; CPK10, CALCIUM-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE 1; CPK30, CALCIUM-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE 30; CPK32, CALCIUM-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE 32; NLP7, NIN LIKE PROTEIN 7; NLP6, NIN LIKE PROTEIN 6; NRE, nitrate-responsive cis-elements; PNR, primary nitrate response.
Ijms 25 05310 g001
Ijms 25 05310 g002
Figure 2. Nitrate signaling regulates flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. N signaling as an input to the central circadian clock, by modulating the cellular CRY1 protein abundance, affects the expression of key components of the central oscillator. Subsequently, as a circadian output, the expression of some flowering genes in the photoperiod pathway, such as CO, is altered, and this affects flowering time. Additionally, the phosphorylation state of the FBH4 protein can be modulated by N conditions. Under low N conditions, FBH4 phosphorylation levels decrease, promoting FBH4 nuclear localization and transcriptional activation of the direct target CO and downstream florigen FT to accelerate flowering. In another pathway, nitrate availability controls bolting and flowering time by modulating SMZ and SNZ gene expression via the GA pathway. In the third pathway, nitrate signaling directly integrates into the age pathway in a tissue-specific manner. NLP7 and NLP6 directly regulate SPL3 and SPL5 at the transcriptional level in the SAM. SOC1 is considered the main flowering integrator involved in this pathway. Abbreviations: P, phosphorylation; FNR1, FERREDOXIN-NADP (+) OXIDOREDUCTASE 1; CRY1, cryptochrome blue-light receptor 1; CCA1, CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1; LHY, LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL 1; TOC1, TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1; CO, CONSTANS; FT, FLOWERING LOCUS T; FBH4, FLOWERING BHLH 4; GNC, GATA TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 21; GNL/CGA1, GATA TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 22; SMZ, SCHLAFMUTZE; SNZ, SCHNARCHZAPFEN; NLP6, NIN LIKE PROTEIN 6; NLP7, NIN LIKE PROTEIN 7; SPL3, SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE 3; SLP5, SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE 5.
Figure 2. Nitrate signaling regulates flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. N signaling as an input to the central circadian clock, by modulating the cellular CRY1 protein abundance, affects the expression of key components of the central oscillator. Subsequently, as a circadian output, the expression of some flowering genes in the photoperiod pathway, such as CO, is altered, and this affects flowering time. Additionally, the phosphorylation state of the FBH4 protein can be modulated by N conditions. Under low N conditions, FBH4 phosphorylation levels decrease, promoting FBH4 nuclear localization and transcriptional activation of the direct target CO and downstream florigen FT to accelerate flowering. In another pathway, nitrate availability controls bolting and flowering time by modulating SMZ and SNZ gene expression via the GA pathway. In the third pathway, nitrate signaling directly integrates into the age pathway in a tissue-specific manner. NLP7 and NLP6 directly regulate SPL3 and SPL5 at the transcriptional level in the SAM. SOC1 is considered the main flowering integrator involved in this pathway. Abbreviations: P, phosphorylation; FNR1, FERREDOXIN-NADP (+) OXIDOREDUCTASE 1; CRY1, cryptochrome blue-light receptor 1; CCA1, CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1; LHY, LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL 1; TOC1, TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1; CO, CONSTANS; FT, FLOWERING LOCUS T; FBH4, FLOWERING BHLH 4; GNC, GATA TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 21; GNL/CGA1, GATA TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 22; SMZ, SCHLAFMUTZE; SNZ, SCHNARCHZAPFEN; NLP6, NIN LIKE PROTEIN 6; NLP7, NIN LIKE PROTEIN 7; SPL3, SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE 3; SLP5, SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE 5.
Ijms 25 05310 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, M.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Teng, Y. Nitrate Signaling and Its Role in Regulating Flowering Time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 5310. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25105310

AMA Style

Wang M, Wang J, Wang Z, Teng Y. Nitrate Signaling and Its Role in Regulating Flowering Time in Arabidopsis thaliana. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(10):5310. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25105310

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Mengyun, Jia Wang, Zeneng Wang, and Yibo Teng. 2024. "Nitrate Signaling and Its Role in Regulating Flowering Time in Arabidopsis thaliana" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 10: 5310. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25105310

APA Style

Wang, M., Wang, J., Wang, Z., & Teng, Y. (2024). Nitrate Signaling and Its Role in Regulating Flowering Time in Arabidopsis thaliana. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(10), 5310. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25105310

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop