Next Article in Journal
Human and Murine Toll-like Receptor-Driven Disease in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Next Article in Special Issue
Nanoformulations in Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Applications: Green Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
Electro-Metabolic Coupling of Cumulus–Oocyte Complex
Previous Article in Special Issue
Infection-Free and Enhanced Wound Healing Potential of Alginate Gels Incorporating Silver and Tannylated Calcium Peroxide Nanoparticles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fullerene C60 Conjugate with Folic Acid and Polyvinylpyrrolidone for Targeted Delivery to Tumor Cells

by
Alina A. Borisenkova
1,2,*,
Olga I. Bolshakova
2,
Anna V. Titova
1,2,
Irina S. Ryabokon
2,
Maria A. Markova
1,2,
Zhanna B. Lyutova
1,2,
Victor P. Sedov
2,
Elena Yu. Varfolomeeva
2,
Vadim V. Bakhmetyev
1,
Alexandr V. Arutyunyan
2,
Vladimir S. Burdakov
2 and
Svetlana V. Sarantseva
2
1
Radiation Technology Department, St. Petersburg State Institute of Technology (Technical University), 190013 St. Petersburg, Russia
2
Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute Named by B.P. Konstantinov of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 188300 Gatchina, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(10), 5350; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25105350
Submission received: 18 April 2024 / Revised: 4 May 2024 / Accepted: 12 May 2024 / Published: 14 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanoparticles in Nanobiotechnology and Nanomedicine)

Abstract

:
The use of targeted drug delivery systems, including those based on selective absorption by certain receptors on the surface of the target cell, can lead to a decrease in the minimum effective dose and the accompanying toxicity of the drug, as well as an increase in therapeutic efficacy. A fullerene C60 conjugate (FA-PVP-C60) with polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) as a biocompatible spacer and folic acid (FA) as a targeting ligand for tumor cells with increased expression of folate receptors (FR) was obtained. Using 13C NMR spectroscopy, FT-IR, UV-Vis spectrometry, fluorometry and thermal analysis, the formation of the conjugate was confirmed and the nature of the binding of its components was established. The average particle sizes of the conjugate in aqueous solutions and cell culture medium were determined using dynamic light scattering (DLS) and nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). The FA-PVP-C60 showed antiradical activity against DPPH, OH and O2, but at the same time, it was shown to generate 1O2. It was found that the conjugate in the studied concentration range (up to 200 μg/mL) is non-toxic in vitro and does not affect the cell cycle. To confirm the ability of the conjugate to selectively accumulate through folate-mediated endocytosis, its uptake into cells was analyzed by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. It was shown that the conjugate is less absorbed by A549 cells with low FR expression than by HeLa, which has a high level of expression of this receptor.

1. Introduction

One of the disadvantages of standard chemotherapy approaches to treating cancer is the inappropriate distribution of drugs in the body. In the case of brain tumors, the therapeutic challenge is compounded by the blood–brain barrier. Therefore, it is extremely important to develop delivery systems directed to specific tumor cells, including receptor-mediated pathways [1]. It is known that in some types of tumors there is an increased expression of folate receptors (FR) [2,3], responsible for the delivery of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, which is the cofactor necessary for cell proliferation. Since folic acid (FA) conjugates can bind to FR on the cell surface with properties similar to free folate [4,5], biocompatible conjugates of FA with antibodies, anticancer drugs, fluorescent labels, contrast and other agents are currently being widely investigated [6,7,8,9,10], while others are undergoing preclinical and clinical trials [3]. Conjugates of FA with carbon nanoparticles [11] and, in particular, with fullerenes [12,13] may become promising drugs for targeted delivery to tumor cells, including those resistant to standard chemotherapy [14]. The unique physicochemical properties of fullerenes, as well as their ability to penetrate the cell membrane [15,16], suggest their applicability in biomedicine, in particular, as vectors for drug delivery [14,17]. A number of studies have demonstrated that fullerenes and their derivatives have antitumor activity [18,19,20]. In addition, the use of fullerenes in photodynamic therapy [21,22,23] and as carriers of radioactive atoms for the treatment or diagnosis of oncological diseases [24,25,26] seems very interesting. Based on endohedral metallofullerenes, a new class of drugs for MRI with improved properties can be developed [27,28]. Moreover, their use will allow reducing the toxicity of metals used for these purposes. However, non-functionalized fullerenes are insoluble in water and have low biocompatibility. The most common solution to this problem is the synthesis of hydroxyl derivatives of fullerenes, namely fullerenols [29,30,31] and complexes of fullerenes with biocompatible polymers, such as polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) [32,33], polyethylene glycol [34,35], γ-cyclodextrin [36,37], dextran [38] and others. At the same time, the synthesis of such water-soluble fullerene derivatives does not solve the problem of their selective accumulation in tumor cells, whereas the creation of conjugates, including with FA, allows us to overcome this problem [39].
The aim of the present work is to obtain a C60 fullerene conjugate with FA as a targeted fragment for folate receptors, also containing PVP as a biocompatible hydrophilic spacer, which improves the bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs in water and is used as a carrier in controlled release systems [40]. The aggregation of the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate, its anti- and prooxidant activity and its toxicity towards normal and tumor cells were assessed, and the analysis of its internalization into cells with different levels of FR expression was conducted.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of the FA-PVP-C60 Conjugate

The advantage of polymer/fullerene complexes is considered to lie in the weaker perturbation of the fullerene’s π-electron system by the polymer compared to the change that occurs during the formation of covalent bonds between them. Standard methods for the synthesis of polymer/fullerene donor–acceptor complexes significantly limit the fullerene content in the complex, not exceeding 2 wt.% [41]. Obtaining complexes with a high C60 content is associated with significant difficulties caused by the lack of a common solvent for the components. In particular, this process is complicated by the aggregation of fullerenes in solvents [42]. At the same time, we needed to conjugate C60/PVP and FA into a complex. Therefore, for the synthesis of FA-PVP-C60, a one-component polar aprotic solvent, N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF), was chosen, which dissolves PVP well and forms fairly stable colloidal solutions of C60 [43], which allowed obtaining conjugates with a fullerene content of up to 10 wt.%. However, with such a C60 content in the conjugate, its solubility in water did not exceed ~10 mg/mL. Therefore, we selected the optimal fullerene content in the conjugate of 2.8 wt.%, at which the solubility of the conjugate in water is quite high and amounts to ~50 mg/mL, ensuring good bioavailability of the resulting compound.
The purity of fullerene C60, which was one of the starting reagents for the synthesis of the conjugate, was confirmed using HPLC (Figure S1A, Supplementary Materials), UV-Vis spectroscopy (Figure S1B, Supplementary Materials) and FT-IR spectrometry (Figure S1C, Supplementary Materials). The confirmation of C60 present in the conjugate was performed by solid-state 13C NMR spectroscopy (Figure 1A) and UV-Vis spectroscopy of FA-PVP-C60 in DMF (Figure S2B, Supplementary Materials). In the 13C NMR spectrum of FA-PVP-C60 (Figure 1A), the peak is around 140 ppm, corresponding to fullerene C60, and the other peaks correspond to pure PVP [44]. The UV-Vis spectrum of FA-PVP-C60 in DMF (Figure S2B, Supplementary Materials) had a strong maximum at around 330 nm. The absence of a shift in the wavelength of the characteristic for C60 absorption maximum in DMF [43] suggests the formation of a non-chemical bond between fullerene and PVP. The FA content in the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate, assessed by UV-Vis spectroscopy using a molar extinction coefficient of FA in water of 25,220 M−1 cm−1 at λmax = 280 nm [45], was 8.9 wt.%. The composition of the conjugate (excluding hydrogen) was confirmed by elemental analysis, according to which the C:N:O content was (68.6 ± 2.1) wt.%, (14.5 ± 1.3) wt.%, (16.9 ± 2.0) wt.% and (calc. value C:N:O 70.6 wt.%, 13.7 wt.%, 15.7 wt.%).
It should be noted that the formation of the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate is a statistical process. Therefore, only the average number of C60 molecules associated with one PVP chain can be estimated in accordance with Equation (1) [46]:
n C 60 = C 60 · M F A - P V P - C 60 1 C 60 · M C 60 1
where M(FA-PVP-C60) = 30.5 × 103 g/mol is the molar mass of the conjugate according to capillary viscometry, M(C60) = 720 g/mol is the molar mass of fullerene and [C60] = 0.028 is the fraction of fullerene in the conjugate.
The average number of FA molecules conjugated to a PVP molecule was assessed similarly. Thus, the macromolecular chain in the conjugate contained, on average, one C60 molecule and seven FA molecules. In this case, the final product was most likely a mixture of macromolecules of native PVP and the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate. These data are confirmed by the DLS results, which showed fairly wide particle size distributions of the conjugate.
FA is composed of three molecular moieties: pterin (PT), aminobenzoyl (PABA) and glutamate (Glu) (Figure 1B). The UV-Vis spectra of an aqueous solution of the intermediate FA–PVP conjugate and the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate (Figure 1C) contain absorption maxima characteristic of FA at 280 nm (peak characteristic of PABA-Glu) and 350 nm (peak characteristic of PT and its derivatives) [47]. As can be noted, the spectrum of FA-PVP-C60 does not differ significantly from the spectrum of native FA. When synthesizing FA conjugates, it is important that the PT fragment remains intact to maintain specificity for FR [47].
Possible mechanisms of FA and C60 to PVP binding were analyzed using FT-IR spectra of the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate, and the data obtained were compared with the spectra of the intermediate FA–PVP conjugate, pure C60 and FA (Figure S3, Supplementary Materials). In the FT-IR spectrum of the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate (Figure 1D), the bands characteristic of the C60 fullerene at 528 cm−1, 576 cm−1, 1180 cm−1, and 1428 cm−1 [48] partially overlap with the bands of bond vibrations in PVP (576 cm−1). We observed a shift of the strong absorption peak at 1653 cm−1, responsible for the C=O stretching vibration in PVP [49] in FA-PVP-C60 and FA-PVP. At the same time, the magnitude of this shift is not large, which indicates that no covalent bond was formed between fullerene and PVP. Thus, we can assume that the conjugation of C60 with PVP occurred by forming a charge-transfer complex involving the C=O bond of the PVP pyrrolidone ring [50].
The fluorescence emission spectrum of the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate labeled with FITC, excited at a wavelength of 350 nm, had a maximum around 445 nm (Figure 1E), which is characteristic of FA in neutral form [45,51]. When the fluorescence excitation wavelength increases to 370 nm, a small shoulder appears in the fluorescence emission spectrum (Figure 1F), whose appearance is associated with the fluorescence of the FITC label, the maximum of which was clearly visible in the emission spectrum at fluorescence excitation of 480 nm (Figure 1G).
Studies have shown that keeping in the dark for 1 h in a temperature range from 25 °C (room temperature (RT)) to 50 °C did not significantly affect the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate (Figure S4A, Supplementary Materials). The conjugate was also stable when stored in the dark for 6 months at RT and at 4 °C (Figure S4B,C, Supplementary Materials). The absorbance of conjugate solutions (taking into account a column dilution factor of 2.0) passing through a gel filtration column did not change significantly. Thus, we did not observe the appearance of free FA when the FA-PVP-C60 was stored under these conditions. However, when the conjugate was stored at RT under visible light, changes in the UV-Vis spectra were observed. As shown in Figure S4D, there was a hypsochromic shift of the absorption maximum at 280 nm, indicating that the bond between PABA-Glu and PT moieties in folic acid was broken. A similar effect was observed for UV-irradiated FA [47].
To study the thermal behavior of the synthesized conjugates, the decomposition curves of FA-PVP-C60 were studied in comparison with the curves of pure PVP and the intermediate FA–PVP conjugate. As can be seen in Figure 2, the behavior of thermal decomposition of FA-PVP-C60 differs from the behavior of pure PVP. The main mass loss in the TGA curves of decomposition of the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate at 435 °C corresponds to the decomposition of PVP to monomer [52], and this temperature is somewhat lower compared to native PVP. This further indicates the binding of the polymer to C60 and FA and was previously observed for other PVP-conjugated nanoparticles [49,53]. The loss of mass in the region of 65–70 °C is associated with the removal of sorbed water. A wide endothermic peak in the DTA curve with a maximum around 70 °C appears due to the occurrence of dehydration reactions. On the DTA curve, the drop in ∆T in the region of 178.8 °C corresponds to the glass transition process, which is not accompanied by a change in enthalpy. The wide endothermic maximum on the DTA curve at 624 °C corresponds to the decomposition of the residues of the lactam group of PVP [54]. The loss of mass in the region of 291 °C is a consequence of the decomposition of FA [55]. The remaining mass at 800 °C present in the conjugate, in contrast to pure PVP and FA-PVP, corresponds to fullerene, which further confirms the presence of C60 in the synthesized conjugate.

2.2. Particle Size Distributions and ζ-Potential Analysis

The size and stability of nanoparticles in drugs are important characteristics that determine the properties of drugs in vivo. In addition, the activation of receptors located on the cell membrane surface depends on the size of the agents that bind to it [56]. It has been shown that particles up to 300 nm in size are removed from the bloodstream more slowly than larger ones [57]. Particles smaller than 200 nm can be nonspecifically taken up by cells [58]. In this case, the maximum of the enhanced permeability and retention effect (EPR effect) in the tumor is observed [59]. It is also known that the size of fullerene derivatives in aqueous solutions is an important property in terms of their toxicity [60,61] and interaction with biological objects since they tend to form aggregates that can behave differently than individual nanoparticles [62]. Here, targeted delivery of drugs based on fullerene derivatives, their accumulation in the tumor and prevention of the diffusion of nanoparticles back into the vascular bed become of paramount importance [57,63,64].
We found that FA-PVP-C60 conjugates strongly aggregate in an aqueous solution. Similar results were obtained earlier for water-soluble fullerene derivatives with amino acids [65] and polymers [66]. According to dynamic light scattering (DLS) data, at a temperature close to physiological values (37 °C) in aqueous solutions of the conjugate (Figure 3A–C), two dominant groups of aggregates with average sizes of 40 and 150 nm can be distinguished. When the concentration of FA-PVP-C60 conjugate in aqueous solution was reduced to 1 μg/mL, only clusters with an average size of 130 nm were observed in the mass distribution of particles (Figure 3D). This effect may be associated with the inclusion of water molecules in a complex with smaller aggregates due to the transfer of electron density from the carbonyl groups of PVP [46], which leads to the formation of looser colloidal structures (shown in the insets to Figure 3A,D). In addition, at a higher concentration of the conjugate, the stabilizing property of PVP is more pronounced, preventing aggregation due to repulsive forces arising from hydrophobic carbon chains interacting with each other. At the same time, at higher concentrations of the conjugate, PVP coils can become more compact due to the attraction of C60 fullerenes due to hydrophobic interactions. This is confirmed by ζ-potential measurements, whose absolute values decrease with decreasing conjugate concentration (Figure 3E). According to other sources, the negative value of the ζ-potential of FA-PVP-C60 may be associated with the accumulation of PVP oxygen atoms on the C60 surface as a result of the chemisorption process [67]. According to the nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) data (Figure 3F), the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate in aqueous solution formed conjugates with an average size of 116 nm. Considering the reduced sensitivity of NTA to particles smaller than 50 nm, resulting in a shift of the distribution center towards larger sizes [68], these data are consistent with those obtained by DLS.
Equally important is the assessment of the behavior of FA-PVP-C60 in a cell culture medium, since the particle size matters in their interaction with biological objects and can affect cytotoxicity and the ability to penetrate the cell membrane. In addition, the protein present in the cell culture medium can interact with conjugates, affecting their hydrophobicity, reactivity and ζ-potential [61,69]. Despite the fact that in all samples of the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate in DMEM F12 + 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), as in aqueous solutions, we observed a bimodal particle size distribution (Figure 4), the aggregates in the cell culture medium were significantly smaller. In addition, the particle size of FA-PVP-C60 in the cell culture medium was found to be constant over the conjugate concentration range from 1 to 50 μg/mL; the average sizes of smaller and larger aggregates were about 5 and 19 nm, respectively. At the same time, as shown in the insets of Figure 4A, the components of the FBS-containing cell culture medium also formed aggregates with average sizes of 3.5 and 10 nm. Probably, FBS plays the main role in changing the behavior of conjugates in the cell culture compared to aqueous solutions. A similar behavior was also observed for fullerenols; aggregates of these nanoparticles in the FBS-containing cell culture medium were smaller than in a serum-free medium [62]. Unfortunately, we were unable to estimate the zeta potential of conjugate particles in the cell culture medium due to its high electrophoretic mobility and the need for special devices for these measurements [70].
Thus, our data show that the composition of the solvent plays a very important role in the creation of drugs based on fullerenes. In addition, it is necessary to take into account the fact that when the drug is placed in a biological environment, its parameters may change.

2.3. Radical Scavenging Activity of FA-PVP-C60 Conjugate In Vitro

Problems with using FA as a targeting ligand in targeted drug delivery systems are its low photostability under illumination [71,72] and radiolysis under the influence of ionizing radiation [73]. The presence of fullerene in the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate, which is known for its antioxidant properties [74], may be useful in terms of the possible inhibition of photoinduced destruction of FA, as has been shown for other antioxidants [75].
The FA-PVP-C60 conjugate demonstrated dose-dependent moderate activity against the model radical 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl(˙DPPH) (Figure 5A,B). Also, the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate was found to have moderate activity against reactive oxygen species such as hydroxyl radical OH (Figure 5C,D) and superoxide O2•− (Figure 5E,F). At the same time, the pro-oxidant light activity of the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate was detected in the oxidation reaction of 1,3-Diphenylisobenzofuran (DPBF) by singlet oxygen 1O2 generated by irradiation of the photosensitizer Rose Bengal (RB) (Figure 5G,H). In this case, DPBF was found to be oxidized to a greater extent in the presence of the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate than in its absence (Figure 5C). At the same time, the pure PVP used for comparison did not have a significant effect on the oxidation state of DPBF.
The detected photodynamic activity of the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate is consistent with data obtained previously both for C60 fullerene and for its conjugates with polymers [76,77]. At the same time, the fullerene conjugate studied in [66] did not exhibit significant light-induced cytotoxicity.

2.4. Toxicity Assay

The physical characteristics of nanoparticles are closely related to their toxicity, which in turn may depend on the cell type. It was previously shown that C60 fullerene itself has low toxicity [78]. However, it can increase with the functionalization of nanoparticles, which is necessary to increase biocompatibility [17]. At the same time, some publications [79,80] assert that C60 can be toxic to tumor cells. We analyzed the cytotoxicity of the conjugate containing C60 in comparison with the FA–PVP conjugate on several cell lines. We used both healthy (non-transformed) DF2 cells and transformed ECV cells obtained from healthy tissue, as well as transformed HeLa, A549 and CT26 cells, obtained from tumor tissue. Viability was determined using the MTT test, assessing the metabolic activity of cells after 24 h of exposure to the conjugates. During the experiment, the cells were kept mainly in the dark, and manipulations were carried out under dim lighting to eliminate phototoxicity that is likely to occur due to the presence of C60 in the conjugate [81], as well as photolysis of FA [47,82]. From the results presented in Figure 6 and Figure S5, it can be concluded that the conjugates at the tested concentrations (1, 20 and 200 μg/mL) did not reduce the viability of all cell lines analyzed when incubated for 24 h. In this case, neither the type of cells nor the level of expression of FR in them mattered. Thus, we have not confirmed the fact that C60 is more toxic to tumor cells than to healthy ones, at least as a component of this conjugate.

2.5. Conjugate FA-PVP-C60 Internalization into Cells

The targets of action for most antitumor drugs are located inside the cell, hence the effectiveness of drug internalization as part of a targeted delivery system determines the result of its action. It is assumed that the uptake of the conjugate with FA occurs due to FR-mediated endocytosis [10,39]. For analysis, we used tumor cells with different expressions of FR on the surface. According to data in the literature, HeLa cells are characterized by overexpression, while A549 cells are characterized by low expression of FR [39,83,84,85,86]. The penetration efficiency of the FITC-labeled conjugate was assessed by the fluorescence intensity of the cells using a flow cytometer as well as a confocal microscope at a wavelength of 488 nm. According to cytometry data, the fluorescence intensity in HeLa cells compared to the control is higher than in A549 cells (Figure 7). Consequently, the conjugate enters cells with a higher level of expression of FR more efficiently.
Confocal images confirm this conclusion (Figure 8a,b). Intracellular fluorescence is present in both cell lines; however, in HeLa cells with the overexpression of FR, higher emission is observed compared to the A549 cell line. This means that the conjugate accumulates in them in greater quantities. It can be noted that the conjugate is unevenly distributed inside the cell, thus in the future, it will be interesting to study its colocalization with nuclear material and cytoplasmic organelles, which is necessary when designing targeted effects on functions, that is, increasing the effectiveness of drugs [57].
Similar drugs created by other researchers showed similar behavior. Thus, in [87], using a nucleophilic addition reaction, conjugates of C60 fullerene with FA were obtained for use in photodynamic therapy. It was shown that the uptake of conjugates by FR-positive HeLa cells is significantly higher than by FR-negative N2a cells. J. Fan et al. [39] found that after 2 h of incubation with DOX-hydrazone-fullerenol-FA nanoparticles, FR-positive HeLa cells showed much brighter fluorescence than FR-negative cells (L929 and A549). Our data confirm the fact that fullerene conjugates with folic acid do not exhibit obvious nonspecific cellular uptake but have selectivity towards cells with increased expression of folate receptors, being transported into them through an FR-mediated endocytic process.

2.6. Cell Cycle Analysis

A higher degree of internalization of the conjugate into FR-positive HeLa cells did not correlate with increased toxicity, as demonstrated by the results of the MTT test. However, there is a possibility that a drug that does not affect the dehydrogenase activity of mitochondria may affect the cell cycle [88]. Using flow cytometry, we analyzed the cell cycle of the HeLa and A549 lines and did not see a significant difference either between the control and experimental cells in either line or between these lines, which indicates that the conjugate does not have pronounced cytostatic properties. The analysis data are presented in Figure 9 and Table 1.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. FA-PVP-C60 Conjugate Synthesis and Characterization

Fullerene C60 with a purity of 99.9+ wt.% was synthesized at the Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute named by B.P. Konstantinov of the National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute” [89]. Its purity was monitored using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) on an LC-20 Prominence liquid chromatograph (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), IR-Fourier spectrometry in the 4000–400 cm−1 range on an IRTracer-100 spectrometer with an attenuated total reflectance (ATR) attachment (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and UV-Vis spectrometry on an SF-2000 spectrophotometer (OKB Spectr LLC, Saint-Petersburg, Russia). The crystal structure of the sample was previously confirmed using powder X-ray diffractometry [90].
To synthesize the conjugate, 100 mg FA (purity 98 wt.%, Sisco, Mumbai, India) and 1 g PVP K25 (average molecular weight 30 kDa, Shanghai Yuking Water Soluble Material Tech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) were mixed in 50 mL N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF, Vecton JSC, Saint-Petersburg, Russia) for 2 h at a temperature of 40 °C. Then, a 150 μg/mL solution of C60 in DMF was added to the FA–PVP solution and stirred at 60 °C for 24 h. The resulting conjugate was centrifuged, evaporated, and vacuum-dried to remove solvent impurities. The solubility of the conjugate in water was ~50 mg/mL. For the subsequent analysis of the conjugate internalization into cells, FA-PVP-C60 was labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC). To do this, 100 μL of a solution of FITC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, purity 99.5%, Vecton JSC, Saint Petersburg) with a concentration of 1 mg/mL was added to 5 mL of a conjugate solution with a concentration of 5 mg/mL in water. The mixture was sonicated at 40 kHz for 15 min and kept in the dark at 4 °C for 8 h to allow the reaction to occur, which was then quenched by blocking the remaining unreacted isothiocyanate groups by adding ammonium chloride (Vecton JSC, Saint-Petersburg, Russia) to the final concentration of 50 mM. Next, the conjugate was purified from free FA and unreacted FITC by gel filtration on Sephadex G-25 (HiTrap Desalting, Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA) using deionized water as an eluent.
The solid-state 13C NMR studies were carried out on a Bruker Avance III 400WB spectrometer (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA). A two-channel sensor equipped with a magic angle sample rotation (MAS) system was used. The sample was placed in a 4 mm zirconium oxide rotor and rotated at a frequency of 12.5 kHz. Tetramethylsilane ((TMS), Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as an external standard. For excitation, a cross-polarization sequence (CP/MAS) was used with a 2 s relaxation delay time and 2 ms and 8 ms contact times; a sequence of direct excitation with decoupling from protons with a 30 s relaxation delay time and 3.2 μs of exciting pulse duration. Elemental analysis of the conjugate was performed using SEM Tescan Vega 3 SBH (Tescan, Brno, Czech Republic) using the AdvancedAztecEnergy elemental composition determination system based on an X-act semiconductor energy-dispersive detector (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK). To record IR spectra in the range of 4000–400 cm−1, an IRTracer-100 infrared Fourier spectrometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with an ATR attachment was used. Absorption spectra were recorded by means of an SF-2000 spectrophotometer (OKB Spectr LLC, Saint Petersburg, Russia). Fluorescence excitation and emission spectra were recorded by means of a CM2203 spectrofluorometer (Solar CJSC, Minsk, Republic of Belarus). Thermal analysis was carried out using a TG/DTA simultaneous measuring instrument DTG-60 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) in a temperature range from 26 to 800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min in a nitrogen atmosphere at a 200 mL/min gas flow rate. A capillary viscometry was used to determine the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate and pure PVP molar masses.

3.2. Particle Size Distribution and Zeta Potential Measurements

Experiments to determine particle sizes in solutions of the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate with a concentration of 1100 μg/mL were carried out after 24 h of incubation under standard conditions (37 °C, 5% CO2) in deionized water or DMEM F12 cell culture medium with glutamine (Biolot, Saint-Petersburg, Russia), antibiotics (penicillin and streptomycin (Biolot, Saint-Petersburg, Russia)) and 10% FBS (Biolot, Saint-Petersburg, Russia)) by dynamic light scattering (DLS). The studies were performed using the dynamic light-scattering method on a Photocor Compact-Z analyzer (Photocor LLC, Moscow, Russia) with a laser wavelength of 654 nm and a maximum light beam power of 25 mW, at a scattering angle of 90° and a stabilized sample temperature of 37.0 °C. Size distributions of light-scattering particles based on contribution to light scattering and the masses of particles were obtained by analyzing the autocorrelation function of the intensity of light scattered by the samples using DynaLS software (Vers. 2.9.1, Dr. Alexander Goldin, Alango Ltd., Tirat Carmel, Israel). Measurements of the ζ-potential using laser Doppler anemometry were carried out using the same device. Analysis of the Doppler shift of the studied samples was carried out using the PALS (Phase-Analysis Light Scattering) method. The stability of the determined size distribution of particles and the ζ-potential were determined by at least three measurements of each sample. In addition, the size and concentration distributions of FA-PVP-C60 aqueous solutions were measured using nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) on a NanoSight LM10 (Malvern, Worcestershire, UK). The FA-PVP-C60 solution was diluted to obtain the concentration in the operating range of the device (~108 particles/mL).

3.3. Radical Scavenging Activity of FA-PVP-C60 Conjugate In Vitro

3.3.1. DPPH Scavenging Activity

The antiradical activity of FA-PVP-C60 with the stable radical DPPH was studied using UV-Vis spectrometry on an SF-2000 spectrophotometer (OKB Spectr LLC, Saint-Petersburg, Russia). For this purpose, a solution of DPPH (extra pure, 95%, Sisco, Mumbai, India) in ethanol with a concentration of 130 μM and aqueous FA-PVP-C60 solutions at concentrations of 200–1000 μg/mL were prepared. After incubation in a 37 °C water bath for at least 1 h, equal volumes of DPPH and FA-PVP-C60 solutions were placed in a quartz cuvette, and absorbance was measured at 525 nm. A mixture of equal volumes of ethanol and a water solution of FA-PVP-C60 of the appropriate concentration was used as a blank sample. The solutions were quickly mixed, the quartz cuvettes were covered with a lid to prevent ethanol evaporation and measurements were taken immediately at room temperature in the dark. The experiment was independently repeated three times.
The antiradical activity of FA-PVP-C60 ARADPPH· was determined at 60 min after the start of the DPPH reduction reaction using Equation (2):
A R A D P P H · = A D P P H · A s a m p l e A D P P H · · 100 %
where   A s a m p l e and A D P P H are absorbance at 525 nm of DPPH solutions in the presence and absence of FA-PVP-C60, respectively.

3.3.2. Hydroxyl Radicals Scavenging Activity

The ability of FA-PVP-C60 to scavenge hydroxyl radicals was studied using spectrophotometric determination of the destruction degree of methyl violet (MV) when it reacts with ·OH [91]. The hydroxyl radicals were generated during the Fenton reaction Fe2+/Fe3+, occurring in the presence of H2O2. A mixture of equal volumes of aqueous solutions of 30 μM MV (LenReactiv, Saint-Petersburg, Russia), 50 mM H2O2 (Vecton JSC, Saint-Petersburg, Russia) and 0.4 mM iron (II) sulfate 7-hydrate (Vecton JSC, Saint-Petersburg, Russia) in deionized water, and an aqueous solution of FA-PVP-C60 at concentrations of 200–1000 μg/mL were incubated in a water bath at 37 °C for 60 min. A similar mixture was used as a blank experiment, replacing the MV solution with deionized water. The absorbance of the samples was measured at 585 nm using an SF-2000 spectrophotometer (OKB Spectr LLC, Saint-Petersburg, Russia). The A•OH absorbance was measured by replacing the FA-PVP-C60 solution with an equal volume of deionized water. The experiments were repeated independently three times.
The scavenging activity (%) of hydroxyl radical ARA•OH was calculated using the following Equation (3):
A R A O H = A O H A s a m p l e A O H · 100 %
where A O H   a n d   A s a m p l e   are absorption at 585 nm 60 min after the start of the reaction of the mixture of solutions of MV, H2O2 and iron (II) sulfate 7-hydrate in the absence and presence of FA-PVP-C60, respectively.

3.3.3. Superoxide Radicals Scavenging Activity

The ability of FA-PVP-C60 to remove superoxide radicals O2•− was determined by the degree of inhibition of the adrenaline autoxidation reaction. A detailed description of the experiment was presented previously [30]. The experiment was independently repeated three times.
The scavenging activity (%) of superoxide radical anion A R A O 2 ˙ was calculated using the following Equation (4):
A R A O 2 ˙ = A O 2 ˙ A s a m p l e A O 2 ˙ · 100 %
where A O 2 ˙   a n d   A s a m p l e   are absorption 15 min after the start of the reaction of solutions in carbonate buffer (pH 10.7) of adrenaline hydrochloride (Moscow Endocrine Plant, Moscow, Russia) and a similar solution in the presence of FA-PVP-C60 at concentrations of 200–1000 μg/mL, respectively.

3.3.4. Singlet Oxygen Pro-oxidant Activity

Singlet oxygen 1O2 was generated by the RB photosensitization reaction (RB, Sisco, Mumbai, India). The ability of FA-PVP-C60 to generate 1O2 was determined by the degree of its influence on the bleaching of DPBF (Leap Chem, Hong Kong, China), which is oxidized by 1O2 [92]. A 1 mL volume of 0.1 mM of RB in water, 100 μL of a 1 mM solution of DPBF in DMSO and 1 mL of an aqueous solution of FA-PVP-C60 at concentrations of 200–1000 μg/mL were placed in a cuvette. To generate 1O2, the cuvette was irradiated with a laser (λ = 532 nm) with a power of 1 mW (Yiwu Zhangkun Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd., Jinhua, Zhejiang, China) for 8 min. The oxidation of DPBF was monitored spectrophotometrically on an SF-2000 (OKB Spectr LLC, Saint-Petersburg, Russia) by reducing the absorption maximum to a wavelength of 418 nm relative to a similar mixture and replacing DPBF with an equal volume of pure DMSO. The experiments were independently repeated three times.
The generation activity (%) of singlet oxygen P R A O 2 1 was calculated using the following Equation (5):
P R A O 2 1 = A s a m p l e A O 2 1 A O 2 1 · 100 %
where A O 2 1   a n d   A s a m p l e are absorption 8 min after the start of the oxidation reaction of DPBF and a similar solution in the presence of FA-PVP-C60 at concentrations of 200–1000 μg/mL, respectively.

3.4. Cell Cultures

The following lines were used in the investigation: DF2, human dermal fibroblasts; ECV, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; A549, human lung cancer cells (with a low level of FR expression), as well as HeLa, human cervical carcinoma cells; and CT26, mouse colorectal adenocarcinoma (with a high level of FR expression). DF2 cells were obtained from the shared Vertebrate Cell Culture Collection research facility, while the rest were obtained from the collection at the Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute named by B.P. Konstantinov of the National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”. Cells were cultured under standard conditions (37 °C, 5% CO2) in DMEM F12 medium with glutamine (Biolot, Saint-Petersburg, Russia), with the addition of antibiotics (penicillin and streptomycin (Biolot, Saint-Petersburg, Russia)) and 10% FBS (Biolot, Saint-Petersburg, Russia). When cultivating DF2, fibroblast growth factor was added to the medium at a concentration of 20 ng/mL (cat#PSG060-10. Lot#16F0519F2, Sci-Store, Skolkovo, Russia).

3.5. Toxicity Assay

The toxicity of the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate was analyzed using the MTT assay. The ECV, A549, CT26 and HeLa cells were seeded in a 96-well plate, and after 24 h of incubation, the medium was replaced with fresh medium containing antibiotics, 10% FBS and the conjugate (FA-PVP-C60) at final concentrations of 1, 20 and 200 μg/mL. After another 24 h, tests were conducted as described in [93]. DF2 cells were grown until they reached 75% confluency; otherwise, the procedure was similar to that described above. Intact cells without the addition of the conjugate were always used as a control, with the medium replaced at the same time intervals as in the experiment. The absorbance of each well was measured using a Multiskan FC spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at a wavelength of 540 nm. The obtained data were processed using the KyPlot 6.0 program (KyensLab Inc., Tokyo, Japan), and Dunnett’s test was conducted. Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05.
To analyze the effect of FA-PVP-C60 on the cell cycle, cells were grown in 6-well plates for 24 h. Then, the conjugate was added at a concentration of 10 or 100 μg/mL for 24 h. After incubation with the conjugate, the cells were washed with Versene solution (Biolot, Saint-Petersburg, Russia), removed with Trypsin-Versene solution (Biolot, Saint-Petersburg, Russia), centrifuged for 5 min at 1000 rpm and the supernatant removed. Then, 0.1% Triton in phosphate-buffered saline (Biolot, Saint Petersburg, Russia) and 20 μg/mL propidium iodide (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were added to the cells. The cells were resuspended, and after 5 min, the cell cycle was analyzed on a CytoFLEX B3-R2-V2 flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) (20 thousand cells per experiment).

3.6. Internalization into Cells Assay

Conjugate internalization data were obtained on a CytoFLEX B3-R2-V2 flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). The A549 and Hela cells were grown in 6-well plates. After 24 h, FITC-labeled conjugates were added at a concentration of 100 μg/mL. After 3 h of incubation, control (without conjugate) and experimental cells were washed with the culture medium, then with Versene solution, disaggregated with Trypsin-Versene solution and centrifuged for 5 min at 1000 rpm. A 300 μL volume of fresh medium was added to the sediment and mixed. At least 20 thousand cells per sample were analyzed. Photographs of cells were obtained for the same samples. Cells were placed on a glass slide, covered with a coverslip and analyzed using a Leica TCS SP5 SMD FLCS laser scanning confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) at 40× magnification with oil immersion.

3.7. FA Stability

The stability of the FA in conjugate under changes of temperature was studied by keeping the aqueous solution of FA-PVP-C60 in the dark in a water bath for 1 h at temperatures of 25 °C (room temperature, (RT)), 37 °C, 45° C and 50 °C. After this, absorbance was measured. The stability of FA in the conjugate aqueous solution over storage for 6 months at RT and 4 °C was analyzed by measuring the absorption of the solution every 2 months. The release of FA from the conjugate was assessed by the absorbance change (taking into account the dilution factor) of the solution passed through the Sephadex G-25 desalting column (HiTrap Desalting, Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA) compared to the initial solution. The absorbance of the conjugate aqueous solution, stored for 6 months at RT under visible light, was also measured every two months. Absorbance in all experiments, independently repeated three times, was measured using a spectrophotometer SF-2000 (OKB Spectr LLC, Saint-Petersburg, Russia).

4. Conclusions

The synthesized FA-PVP-C60 conjugate has the parameters necessary for use in therapy or diagnostics. Namely, FA-PVP-C60 had good biocompatibility; the particle size of the conjugate both in aqueous solutions and in cell culture media containing salts, amino acids, proteins and other components of biological fluids allowed it to be internalized into tumor cells. In addition, the increased accumulation of the conjugate in cells with overexpression of folate receptors indicates the possibility of using it for delivery to target cells. At the same time, the accumulation of the drug does not lead to a decrease in the viability of FR-positive cells compared to FR-negative ones, since the conjugate demonstrates the absence of toxicity for the different types of cells used in our study. However, this study has limitations: we did not evaluate conjugate internalization into normal cells and the aggregation stability of FA-PVP-C60 solutions during storage. Despite the fact that our data contradict previously obtained information about the increased toxicity of C60 towards tumor cells, this fact opens up a good opportunity for further modification of the obtained conjugate as a means for photodynamic therapy or as a targeted radiopharmaceutical. We are currently developing this type of radiopharmaceutical by encapsulating a radioactive metal in a fullerene molecule and studying it in vitro and in vivo as a universal platform for tumor theranostics.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25105350/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A.B., O.I.B. and S.V.S.; methodology, A.A.B., O.I.B. and S.V.S.; formal analysis, A.A.B., O.I.B. and A.V.T.; investigation and visualization, A.A.B., O.I.B., A.V.T., I.S.R., M.A.M., V.V.B., Z.B.L., V.P.S., E.Y.V. and V.S.B., A.V.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A.B. and O.I.B.; writing—review and editing, A.A.B. and O.I.B.; funding acquisition, A.A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, grant number 23-73-01085.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Saint-Petersburg State University for performing 13C NMR spectroscopy (research project AAAA-A19-119091190094-6). The authors are grateful for the technical support from the Engineering Center of the St. Petersburg State Institute of Technology (Technical University).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Luiz, M.T.; Delello Di Filippo, L.; Tofani, L.B.; de Araújo, J.T.C.; Dutra, J.A.P.; Marchetti, J.M.; Chorilli, M. Highlights in Targeted Nanoparticles as a Delivery Strategy for Glioma Treatment. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 604, 120758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Garcia-Bennett, A.; Nees, M.; Fadeel, B. In Search of the Holy Grail: Folate-Targeted Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2011, 81, 976–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Scaranti, M.; Cojocaru, E.; Banerjee, S.; Banerji, U. Exploiting the Folate Receptor α in Oncology. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 17, 349–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Narmani, A.; Rezvani, M.; Farhood, B.; Darkhor, P.; Mohammadnejad, J.; Amini, B.; Refahi, S.; Abdi Goushbolagh, N. Folic Acid Functionalized Nanoparticles as Pharmaceutical Carriers in Drug Delivery Systems. Drug Dev. Res. 2019, 80, 404–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hilgenbrink, A.R.; Low, P.S. Folate Receptor-Mediated Drug Targeting: From Therapeutics to Diagnostics. J. Pharm. Sci. 2005, 94, 2135–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gruzdev, D.A.; Telegina, A.A.; Levit, G.L.; Solovieva, O.I.; Gusel’nikova, T.Y.; Razumov, I.A.; Krasnov, V.P.; Charushin, V.N. Carborane-Containing Folic Acid Bis-Amides: Synthesis and In Vitro Evaluation of Novel Promising Agents for Boron Delivery to Tumour Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. McCord, E.; Pawar, S.; Koneru, T.; Tatiparti, K.; Sau, S.; Iyer, A.K. Folate Receptors’ Expression in Gliomas May Possess Potential Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery Opportunities. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 4111–4118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kanemitsu, T.; Kawabata, S.; Fukumura, M.; Futamura, G.; Hiramatsu, R.; Nonoguchi, N.; Nakagawa, F.; Takata, T.; Tanaka, H.; Suzuki, M.; et al. Folate Receptor-Targeted Novel Boron Compound for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy on F98 Glioma-Bearing Rats. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 2019, 58, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kucheryavykh, Y.V.; Davila, J.; Ortiz-Rivera, J.; Inyushin, M.; Almodovar, L.; Mayol, M.; Morales-Cruz, M.; Cruz-Montañez, A.; Barcelo-Bovea, V.; Griebenow, K.; et al. Targeted Delivery of Nanoparticulate Cytochrome c into Glioma Cells through the Proton-Coupled Folate Transporter. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Clement, S.; Chen, W.; Deng, W.; Goldys, E.M. X-Ray Radiation-Induced and Targeted Photodynamic Therapy with Folic Acid-Conjugated Biodegradable Nanoconstructs. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 3553–3570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Elechalawar, C.K.; Bhattacharya, D.; Ahmed, M.T.; Gora, H.; Sridharan, K.; Chaturbedy, P.; Sinha, S.H.; Chandra Sekhar Jaggarapu, M.M.; Narayan, K.P.; Chakravarty, S.; et al. Dual Targeting of Folate Receptor-Expressing Glioma Tumor-Associated Macrophages and Epithelial Cells in the Brain Using a Carbon Nanosphere-Cationic Folate Nanoconjugate. Nanoscale Adv. 2019, 1, 3555–3567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sudimack, J.; Lee, R.J. Targeted Drug Delivery via the Folate Receptor. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2000, 41, 147–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shi, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, L.; Li, L.; Wang, H.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Chen, C.; Hou, L.; Zhang, C.; et al. PEI-Derivatized Fullerene Drug Delivery Using Folate as a Homing Device Targeting to Tumor. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ottone, F.; Miotti, S.; Bottini, C.; Bagnoli, M.; Perego, P.; Colnaghi, M.I.; Ménard, S. Relationship between Folate-Binding Protein Expression and Cisplatin Sensitivity in Ovarian Carcinoma Cell Lines. Br. J. Cancer 1997, 76, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Porter, A.E.; Gass, M.; Muller, K.; Skepper, J.N.; Midgley, P.; Welland, M. Visualizing the Uptake of C60 to the Cytoplasm and Nucleus of Human Monocyte-Derived Macrophage Cells Using Energy-Filtered Transmission Electron Microscopy and Electron Tomography. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 3012–3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Qiao, R.; Roberts, A.P.; Mount, A.S.; Klaine, S.J.; Ke, P.C. Translocation of C60 and Its Derivatives across a Lipid Bilayer. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 614–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bolshakova, O.I.; Slobodina, A.D.; Sarantseva, S.V. Carbon Nanoparticles as Promising Neuroprotectors: Pro et Contra. II. Application of Carbon Nanoparticles in Neurobiology and Neurology. Nanobiotechnol. Rep. 2022, 17, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ye, L.; Kollie, L.; Liu, X.; Guo, W.; Ying, X.; Zhu, J.; Yang, S.; Yu, M. Antitumor Activity and Potential Mechanism of Novel Fullerene Derivative Nanoparticles. Molecules 2021, 26, 3252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, H.J.; Chetyrkina, M.; Wong, C.W.; Kraevaya, O.A.; Zhilenkov, A.V.; Voronov, I.I.; Wang, P.H.; Troshin, P.A.; Hsu, S. hui Identification of Potential Descriptors of Water-Soluble Fullerene Derivatives Responsible for Antitumor Effects on Lung Cancer Cells via QSAR Analysis. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 812–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yasuno, T.; Ohe, T.; Ikeda, H.; Takahashi, K.; Nakamura, S.; Mashino, T. Synthesis and Antitumor Activity of Novel Pyridinium Fullerene Derivatives. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 6325–6337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hamblin, M.R. Fullerenes as Photosensitizers in Photodynamic Therapy: Pros and Cons. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2018, 17, 1515–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Antoku, D.; Sugikawa, K.; Ikeda, A. Photodynamic Activity of Fullerene Derivatives Solubilized in Water by Natural-Product-Based Solubilizing Agents. Chem.—A Eur. J. 2019, 25, 1854–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, T.X.; Li, J.J.; Li, H.B.; Guo, D.S. Deep Cavitand Calixarene–Solubilized Fullerene as a Potential Photodynamic Agent. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 710808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Valderrama, A.; Reynoso, R.; Gómez, R.W.; Marquina, V.; Romero, M. Interactions of Calcium with the External Surfaces of Fullerenes and Endofullerenes Doped with Radioactive Sodium Iodide. J. Mol. Model. 2017, 23, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ohtsuki, T.; Manjanath, A.; Ohno, K.; Inagaki, M.; Sekimoto, S.; Kawazoe, Y. Creation of Mo/Tc@C60and Au@C60and Molecular-Dynamics Simulations. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 19666–19672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Valderrama, A.; Guzman, J. Encapsulation of Sodium Radio-Iodide in Fullerene C60. J. Mol. Model. 2014, 20, 2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, T.; Murphy, S.; Kiselev, B.; Bakshi, K.S.; Zhang, J.; Eltahir, A.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, J.; Davis, R.M.; et al. A New Interleukin-13 Amino-Coated Gadolinium Metallofullerene Nanoparticle for Targeted MRI Detection of Glioblastoma Tumor Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 7881–7888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, Y.; Biswas, R.; Kopcha, W.P.; Dubroca, T.; Abella, L.; Sun, Y.; Crichton, R.A.; Rathnam, C.; Yang, L.; Yeh, Y.W.; et al. Structurally Defined Water-Soluble Metallofullerene Derivatives towards Biomedical Applications. Angew. Chem.—Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202211704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bolshakova, O.; Borisenkova, A.; Suyasova, M.; Sedov, V.; Slobodina, A.; Timoshenko, S.; Varfolomeeva, E.; Golomidov, I.; Lebedev, V.; Aksenov, V.; et al. In Vitro and in Vivo Study of the Toxicity of Fullerenols C60, C70 and C120O Obtained by an Original Two Step Method. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 104, 109945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bolshakova, O.I.; Borisenkova, A.A.; Golomidov, I.M.; Komissarov, A.E.; Slobodina, A.D.; Ryabova, E.V.; Ryabokon, I.S.; Latypova, E.M.; Slepneva, E.E.; Sarantseva, S.V. Fullerenols Prevent Neuron Death and Reduce Oxidative Stress in Drosophila Huntington’s Disease Model. Cells 2023, 12, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Djordjevic, A.; Srdjenovic, B.; Seke, M.; Petrovic, D.; Injac, R.; Mrdjanovic, J. Review of Synthesis and Antioxidant Potential of Fullerenol Nanoparticles. J. Nanomater. 2015, 2015, 567073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yamashita, K.; Yoshioka, Y.; Pan, H.; Taira, M.; Ogura, T.; Nagano, T.; Aoyama, M.; Nagano, K.; Abe, Y.; Kamada, H.; et al. Biochemical and Hematologic Effects of Polyvinylpyrrolidone-Wrapped Fullerene C60 after Oral Administration. Pharmazie 2013, 68, 54–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Saitoh, Y.; Tanaka, A.; Hyodo, S. Protective Effects of Polyvinylpyrrolidone-Wrapped Fullerene Against Nitric Oxide/Peroxynitrite-Induced Cellular Injury in Human Skin Keratinocytes. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2021, 21, 4579–4585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Piotrowski, P.; Klimek, K.; Ginalska, G.; Kaim, A. Beneficial Influence of Water-Soluble PEG-Functionalized C60 Fullerene on Human Osteoblast Growth in Vitro. Materials 2021, 14, 1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Asada, R.; Liao, F.; Saitoh, Y.; Miwa, N. Photodynamic Anti-Cancer Effects of Fullerene [C60]-PEG Complex on Fibrosarcomas Preferentially over Normal Fibroblasts in Terms of Fullerene Uptake and Cytotoxicity. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2014, 390, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, W.; Gong, X.; Liu, C.; Piao, Y.; Sun, Y.; Diao, G. Water-Soluble Inclusion Complex of Fullerene with γ-Cyclodextrin Polymer for Photodynamic Therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 5107–5115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, Y.; Pu, Y.; Sun, L.; Yao, H.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, Y. Folic Acid Functionalized γ-Cyclodextrin C60, a Novel Vehicle for Tumor-Targeted Drug Delivery. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2016, 12, 1393–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Biby, T.E.; Prajitha, N.; Ashtami, J.; Sakthikumar, D.; Maekawa, T.; Mohanan, P.V. Toxicity of Dextran Stabilized Fullerene C60 against C6 Glial Cells. Brain Res. Bull. 2020, 155, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fan, J.; Fang, G.; Zeng, F.; Wang, X.; Wu, S. Water-Dispersible Fullerene Aggregates as a Targeted Anticancer Prodrug with Both Chemo- and Photodynamic Therapeutic Actions. Small 2013, 9, 613–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Franco, P.; De Marco, I. The Use of Poly(N-Vinyl Pyrrolidone) in the Delivery of Drugs: A Review. Polymers 2020, 12, 1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ratnikova, O.V.; Melenevskaya, E.Y.; Mokeev, M.V.; Zgonnik, V.N. Complexation in Water-Soluble Systems Poly-N-Vinylpyrrolidone-Fullerene C60. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2003, 76, 1620–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mchedlov-Petrossyan, N.O.; Marfunin, M.O.; Kriklya, N.N. Colloid Chemistry of Fullerene Solutions: Aggregation and Coagulation. Liquids 2023, 4, 32–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. McHedlov-Petrossyan, N.O.; Marfunin, M.O.; Tikhonov, V.A.; Shekhovtsov, S.V. Unexpected Colloidal Stability of Fullerenes in Dimethyl Sulfoxide and Related Systems. Langmuir 2022, 38, 10000–10009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mouri, E.; Moroi, S. Association Behaviors of Poly(N-Vinylpyrrolidone)-Grafted Fullerenes in Aqueous Solution. J. Polym. Res. 2018, 25, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Off, M.K.; Steindal, A.E.; Porojnicu, A.C.; Juzeniene, A.; Vorobey, A.; Johnsson, A.; Moan, J. Ultraviolet Photodegradation of Folic Acid. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2005, 80, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Krasnou, I.; Tarabukina, E.; Melenevskaya, E.; Filippov, A.; Aseyev, V.; Hietala, S.; Tenhu, H. Rheological Behavior of Poly(Vinylpyrrolidone)/Fullerene C60 Complexes in Aqueous Medium. J. Macromol. Sci. Part B Phys. 2008, 47, 500–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tsyupka, D.V.; Mordovina, E.A.; Sindeeva, O.A.; Sapelkin, A.V.; Sukhorukov, G.B.; Goryacheva, I.Y. High-Fluorescent Product of Folic Acid Photodegradation: Optical Properties and Cell Effect. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2021, 407, 113045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Ma, X.; Abulimiti, B. Tuning the Spectrum Properties of Fullerene C60: Using a Strong External Electric Field. J. Clust. Sci. 2019, 30, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nathanael, A.J.; Seo, Y.H.; Oh, T.H. PVP Assisted Synthesis of Hydroxyapatite Nanorods with Tunable Aspect Ratio and Bioactivity. J. Nanomater. 2015, 2015, 621785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Behera, M.; Ram, S. Interaction between Poly(Vinyl Pyrrolidone) PVP and Fullerene C60 at the Interface in PVP-C60 Nanofluids-A Spectroscopic Study. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2018; Volume 330. [Google Scholar]
  51. Tyagi, A.; Penzkofer, A. Fluorescence Spectroscopic Behaviour of Folic Acid. Chem. Phys. 2010, 367, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, X.; Qiao, J.; Zhao, H.; Huang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Fang, M.; Wu, X.; Min, X. Preparation and Performance of Novel Polyvinylpyrrolidone/Polyethylene Glycol Phase Change Materials Composite Fibers by Centrifugal Spinning. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2018, 691, 314–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Du, Y.K.; Yang, P.; Mou, Z.G.; Hua, N.P.; Jiang, L. Thermal Decomposition Behaviors of PVP Coated on Platinum Nanoparticles. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 99, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Alibe, I.M.; Matori, K.A.; Sidek, H.A.A.; Yaakob, Y.; Rashid, U.; Alibe, A.M.; Zaid, M.H.M.; Khiri, M.Z.A. EFfects of Calcination Holding Time on Properties of Wide Band Gap Willemite Semiconductor Nanoparticles by the Polymer Thermal Treatment Method. Molecules 2018, 23, 873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Neves, D.A.; de Sousa Lobato, K.B.; Angelica, R.S.; Teixeira Filho, J.; de Oliveira, G.P.R.; Godoy, H.T. Thermal and in Vitro Digestion Stability of Folic Acid in Bread. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2019, 84, 103311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jiang, W.; Kim, B.Y.S.; Rutka, J.T.; Chan, W.C.W. Nanoparticle-Mediated Cellular Response Is Size-Dependent. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Bae, Y.H.; Park, K. Targeted Drug Delivery to Tumors: Myths, Reality and Possibility. J. Control. Release 2011, 153, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kim, I.Y.; Joachim, E.; Choi, H.; Kim, K. Toxicity of Silica Nanoparticles Depends on Size, Dose, and Cell Type. Nanomedicine 2015, 11, 1407–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Golombek, S.K.; May, J.N.; Theek, B.; Appold, L.; Drude, N.; Kiessling, F.; Lammers, T. Tumor Targeting via EPR: Strategies to Enhance Patient Responses. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018, 130, 17–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Kyzyma, O.A.; Avdeev, M.V.; Bolshakova, O.I.; Melentev, P.; Sarantseva, S.V.; Ivankov, O.I.; Korobov, M.V.; Mikheev, I.V.; Tropin, T.V.; Kubovcikova, M.; et al. State of Aggregation and Toxicity of Aqueous Fullerene Solutions. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 483, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Srdjenovic, B.U.; Slavić, M.N.; Stankov, K.M.; Kladar, N.V.; Jović, D.S.; Seke, M.N.; Bogdanović, V.V. Size Distribution of Fullerenol Nanoparticles in Cell Culture Medium and Their Influence on Antioxidative Enzymes in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells. Chem. Ind. 2015, 69, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Su, Y.; Xu, J.; Shen, P.; Li, J.; Wang, L.; Li, Q.; Li, W.; Xu, G.; Fan, C.; Huang, Q. Cellular Uptake and Cytotoxic Evaluation of Fullerenol in Different Cell Lines. Toxicology 2010, 269, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zhang, W.; Taheri-Ledari, R.; Ganjali, F.; Mirmohammadi, S.S.; Qazi, F.S.; Saeidirad, M.; KashtiAray, A.; Zarei-Shokat, S.; Tian, Y.; Maleki, A. Effects of Morphology and Size of Nanoscale Drug Carriers on Cellular Uptake and Internalization Process: A Review. RSC Adv. 2022, 13, 80–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Cheng, Y.H.; He, C.; Riviere, J.E.; Monteiro-Riviere, N.A.; Lin, Z. Meta-Analysis of Nanoparticle Delivery to Tumors Using a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation Approach. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 3075–3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Yang, J.; Alemany, L.B.; Driver, J.; Hartgerink, J.D.; Barron, A.R. Fullerene-Derivatized Amino Acids: Synthesis, Characterization, Antioxidant Properties, and Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis. Chem.—A Eur. J. 2007, 13, 2530–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zhang, X.; Ma, Y.; Fu, S.; Zhang, A. Facile Synthesis of Water-Soluble Fullerene (C60) Nanoparticles via Mussel-Inspired Chemistry as Efficient Antioxidants. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Behera, M.; Ram, S. Poly(Vinyl Pyrrolidone) Mediated Solubilization and Stabilization of Fullerene C60 in the Form of Nanofluid in an Alcoholic Medium. Fuller. Nanotub. Carbon Nanostruct. 2015, 23, 1064–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Serrano-Pertierra, E.; Oliveira-Rodríguez, M.; Matos, M.; Gutiérrez, G.; Moyano, A.; Salvador, M.; Rivas, M.; Blanco-López, M.C. Extracellular Vesicles: Current Analytical Techniques for Detection and Quantification. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Liu, W.; Rose, J.; Plantevin, S.; Auffan, M.; Bottero, J.Y.; Vidaud, C. Protein Corona Formation for Nanomaterials and Proteins of a Similar Size: Hard or Soft Corona? Nanoscale 2013, 5, 1658–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Austin, J.; Fernandes, D.; Ruszala, M.J.A.; Hill, N.; Corbett, J. Routine, Ensemble Characterisation of Electrophoretic Mobility in High and Saturated Ionic Dispersions. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 4628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Baibarac, M.; Smaranda, I.; Nila, A.; Serbschi, C. Optical Properties of Folic Acid in Phosphate Buffer Solutions: The Influence of PH and UV Irradiation on the UV-VIS Absorption Spectra and Photoluminescence. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 14278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gazzali, A.M.; Lobry, M.; Colombeau, L.; Acherar, S.; Azaïs, H.; Mordon, S.; Arnoux, P.; Baros, F.; Vanderesse, R.; Frochot, C. Stability of Folic Acid under Several Parameters. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 93, 419–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Araújo, M.M.; Marchioni, E.; Villavicencio, A.L.C.H.; Zhao, M.; di Pascoli, T.; Kuntz, F.; Bergaentzle, M. Mechanism of Folic Acid Radiolysis in Aqueous Solution. LWT 2015, 63, 599–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tang, N.; Ding, Z.; Zhang, J.; Cai, Y.; Bao, X. Recent Advances of Antioxidant Low-Dimensional Carbon Materials for Biomedical Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1121477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wusigale; Hu, L.; Cheng, H.; Gao, Y.; Liang, L. Mechanism for Inhibition of Folic Acid Photodecomposition by Various Antioxidants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 340–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Gsponer, N.S.; Baigorria, E.; Durantini, E.N.; Milanesio, M.E. Fullerene C60-Chitosan Conjugate Applied in the Photoinactivation of Staphylococcus Aureus. Eur. Polym. J. 2024, 204, 112678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wang, D.; Zhao, J.; Mulder, R.J.; Ratcliffe, J.; Wang, C.; Wu, B.; Wang, J.; Hao, X. Highly Aqueously Stable C 60-polymer Nanoparticles with Excellent Photodynamic Property for Potential Cancer Treatment. Smart Med. 2023, 2, e20230033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Aschberger, K.; Johnston, H.J.; Stone, V.; Aitken, R.J.; Tran, C.L.; Hankin, S.M.; Peters, S.A.K.; Christensen, F.M. Review of Fullerene Toxicity and Exposure—Appraisal of a Human Health Risk Assessment, Based on Open Literature. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2010, 58, 455–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Guo, W.; Liu, X.; Ye, L.; Liu, J.; Larwubah, K.; Meng, G.; Shen, W.; Ying, X.; Zhu, J.; Yang, S.; et al. The Effect of Polyhydroxy Fullerene Derivative on Human Myeloid Leukemia K562 Cells. Materials 2022, 15, 1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Bogdanović, G.; Kojić, V.; Dordević, A.; Čanadanović-Brunet, J.; Vojinović-Miloradov, M.; Baltić, V.V. Modulating Activity of Fullerol C 60 (OH) 22 on Doxorubicin-Induced Cytotoxicity. Toxicol. In Vitro 2004, 18, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Franskevych, D.; Palyvoda, K.; Petukhov, D.; Prylutska, S.; Grynyuk, I.; Schuetze, C.; Drobot, L.; Matyshevska, O.; Ritter, U. Fullerene C60 Penetration into Leukemic Cells and Its Photoinduced Cytotoxic Effects. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Attaf, S.E.; Hasan, H.M.A. Effect of Uv Irradiation on Folic Acid Drug. World J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 8, 103–114. [Google Scholar]
  83. Xia, J.M.; Wei, X.; Chen, X.W.; Shu, Y.; Wang, J.H. Folic Acid Modified Copper Nanoclusters for Fluorescent Imaging of Cancer Cells with Over-Expressed Folate Receptor. Microchim. Acta 2018, 185, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Yang, M.; Deng, J.; Guo, D.; Zhang, J.; Yang, L.; Wu, F. A Folate-Conjugated Platinum Porphyrin Complex as a New Cancer-Targeting Photosensitizer for Photodynamic Therapy. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019, 17, 5367–5374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Cheng, L.; Ma, H.; Shao, M.; Fan, Q.; Lv, H.; Peng, J.; Hao, T.; Li, D.; Zhao, C.; Zong, X. Synthesis of Folate-Chitosan Nanoparticles Loaded with Ligustrazine to Target Folate Receptor Positive Cancer Cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 16, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Choi, P.S.; Lee, J.Y.; Park, J.H.; Kim, S.W. Synthesis and Evaluation of 68Ga-HBED-CC-EDBE-Folate for Positron-Emission Tomography Imaging of Overexpressed Folate Receptors on CT26 Tumor Cells. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2018, 61, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Hu, Z.; Zhang, C.; Huang, Y.; Sun, S.; Guan, W.; Yao, Y. Photodynamic Anticancer Activities of Water-Soluble C 60 Derivatives and Their Biological Consequences in a HeLa Cell Line. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2012, 195, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Sosnowska, M.; Kutwin, M.; Jaworski, S.; Strojny, B.; Wierzbicki, M.; Szczepaniak, J.; Łojkowski, M.; Święszkowski, W.; Bałaban, J.; Chwalibog, A.; et al. Mechano-Signalling, Induced by Fullerene C60 Nanofilms, Arrests the Cell Cycle in the G2/M Phase and Decreases Proliferation of Liver Cancer Cells. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 6197–6215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Grushko, J.S.; Sedov, V.P. Method of Preparing Fullerene C60. Patent RU2001133222 (A), 27 March 2004. [Google Scholar]
  90. Nigmatullina, E.K.; Kibalin, I.A.; Sedov, V.P.; Borisenkova, A.A.; Bykov, A.A.; Golosovsky, I.V. “Phantom” Atoms and Thermal Motion in Fullerene C60revealed by x-Ray and Neutron Diffraction. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2021, 33, 455401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hashemian, S.; Tabatabaee, M.; Gafari, M. Fenton Oxidation of Methyl Violet in Aqueous Solution. J. Chem. 2013, 2013, 509097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Entradas, T.; Waldron, S.; Volk, M. The Detection Sensitivity of Commonly Used Singlet Oxygen Probes in Aqueous Environments. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2020, 204, 111787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Lebedev, V.T.; Török, G.; Kulvelis, Y.V.; Bolshkova, O.I.; Yevlampieva, N.P.; Soroka, M.A.; Fomin, E.V.; Vul, A.Y.; Garg, S. Diamond-Based Nanostructures with Metal-Organic Molecules. Soft Mater. 2022, 20, S34–S43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. FA-PVP-C60 conjugate characterization. (A) Solid-state 13C-NMR spectra of FA-PVP-C60 (black line) and pure PVP (blue line). (B) The structure and characteristic parts of the FA molecule. (C) UV-Vis spectra of FA-PVP-C60, intermediate conjugate FA-PVP, and pure FA and PVP in water. (D) FT-IR spectra of FA-PVP-C60 conjugate and pure PVP. (EG) Fluorescence spectra of FITC-labeled FA-PVP-C60 conjugate for various fluorescence excitation wavelengths.
Figure 1. FA-PVP-C60 conjugate characterization. (A) Solid-state 13C-NMR spectra of FA-PVP-C60 (black line) and pure PVP (blue line). (B) The structure and characteristic parts of the FA molecule. (C) UV-Vis spectra of FA-PVP-C60, intermediate conjugate FA-PVP, and pure FA and PVP in water. (D) FT-IR spectra of FA-PVP-C60 conjugate and pure PVP. (EG) Fluorescence spectra of FITC-labeled FA-PVP-C60 conjugate for various fluorescence excitation wavelengths.
Ijms 25 05350 g001
Figure 2. Simultaneous thermal analysis of pure PVP (A), intermediate FA–PVP conjugate (B), and FA-PVP-C60 conjugate (C).
Figure 2. Simultaneous thermal analysis of pure PVP (A), intermediate FA–PVP conjugate (B), and FA-PVP-C60 conjugate (C).
Ijms 25 05350 g002
Figure 3. (AD) The size distributions of FA-PVP-C60 by mass after 24 h incubation in water at 37 °C in the dark, measured by DLS. (E) ζ-potential ± SD of FA-PVP-C60 in aqueous solution measured by PALS. (F) Size distribution (on the inset) and concentration profiles (black curve) of FA-PVP-C60 based on NTA. Red error bars indicate ±1 SEM. The insets (A,D) show a sketch of the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate.
Figure 3. (AD) The size distributions of FA-PVP-C60 by mass after 24 h incubation in water at 37 °C in the dark, measured by DLS. (E) ζ-potential ± SD of FA-PVP-C60 in aqueous solution measured by PALS. (F) Size distribution (on the inset) and concentration profiles (black curve) of FA-PVP-C60 based on NTA. Red error bars indicate ±1 SEM. The insets (A,D) show a sketch of the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate.
Ijms 25 05350 g003
Figure 4. (AD) The size distributions of FA-PVP-C60 particles by mass after incubation in DMEM F12 + 10% FBS for 24 h at 37 °C in the dark. The inset (A) shows the size distributions of pure DMEM F12 + 10% FBS (incubated under the same conditions) particles.
Figure 4. (AD) The size distributions of FA-PVP-C60 particles by mass after incubation in DMEM F12 + 10% FBS for 24 h at 37 °C in the dark. The inset (A) shows the size distributions of pure DMEM F12 + 10% FBS (incubated under the same conditions) particles.
Ijms 25 05350 g004
Figure 5. (A,E) DPPH radical scavenging activity of FA-PVP-C60; (B,F) hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of FA-PVP-C60; (C,G) superoxide radical scavenging activity of FA-PVP-C60; (D,H) singlet oxygen prooxidant activity of FA-PVP-C60.
Figure 5. (A,E) DPPH radical scavenging activity of FA-PVP-C60; (B,F) hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of FA-PVP-C60; (C,G) superoxide radical scavenging activity of FA-PVP-C60; (D,H) singlet oxygen prooxidant activity of FA-PVP-C60.
Ijms 25 05350 g005
Figure 6. MTT assay. Conjugate FA-PVP-C60 was added to the culture 24 h after seeding and was present in the culture medium for 24 h. Control cells do not contain the conjugate. The difference between the control sample and the experimental sample is not significant (p ≥ 0.05). n ≥ 8 experiments.
Figure 6. MTT assay. Conjugate FA-PVP-C60 was added to the culture 24 h after seeding and was present in the culture medium for 24 h. Control cells do not contain the conjugate. The difference between the control sample and the experimental sample is not significant (p ≥ 0.05). n ≥ 8 experiments.
Ijms 25 05350 g006
Figure 7. Analysis of FA-PVP-C60 conjugate internalization into cells with different folate receptor expression levels. Flow cytometry data.
Figure 7. Analysis of FA-PVP-C60 conjugate internalization into cells with different folate receptor expression levels. Flow cytometry data.
Ijms 25 05350 g007
Figure 8. Confocal luminescence microscopy of the cells incubated with FITC-labeled FA-PVP-C60 (a) Hela cells, (b) A549 cells. Arrows show fluorescence signals. Scale bar, 8 μm.
Figure 8. Confocal luminescence microscopy of the cells incubated with FITC-labeled FA-PVP-C60 (a) Hela cells, (b) A549 cells. Arrows show fluorescence signals. Scale bar, 8 μm.
Ijms 25 05350 g008
Figure 9. Effect of the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate on the cell cycle in lines with different expressions of FR. (A) HeLa—FR-positive cells, (B) A549—FR-negative cells. G0, G1, G2, S—phase of the cell cycle preceding mitosis (G0—resting phase, G1—growth phase, S—phase of DNA replication, G2—period of protein synthesis and preparation of the cell for mitosis).
Figure 9. Effect of the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate on the cell cycle in lines with different expressions of FR. (A) HeLa—FR-positive cells, (B) A549—FR-negative cells. G0, G1, G2, S—phase of the cell cycle preceding mitosis (G0—resting phase, G1—growth phase, S—phase of DNA replication, G2—period of protein synthesis and preparation of the cell for mitosis).
Ijms 25 05350 g009
Table 1. Distribution of cells according to phases of the cell cycle after 24 h of incubation in a cell culture medium containing the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate.
Table 1. Distribution of cells according to phases of the cell cycle after 24 h of incubation in a cell culture medium containing the FA-PVP-C60 conjugate.
Cell Cycle PhasesG0/G1SG2
% cells
HeLa control73.58%6.94%14.21%
HeLa + FA-PVP-C6069.22%9.69%15.27%
A549 control66.88%12.07%14.25%
A549 + FA-PVP-C6062.70%14.25%16.89%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Borisenkova, A.A.; Bolshakova, O.I.; Titova, A.V.; Ryabokon, I.S.; Markova, M.A.; Lyutova, Z.B.; Sedov, V.P.; Varfolomeeva, E.Y.; Bakhmetyev, V.V.; Arutyunyan, A.V.; et al. Fullerene C60 Conjugate with Folic Acid and Polyvinylpyrrolidone for Targeted Delivery to Tumor Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 5350. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25105350

AMA Style

Borisenkova AA, Bolshakova OI, Titova AV, Ryabokon IS, Markova MA, Lyutova ZB, Sedov VP, Varfolomeeva EY, Bakhmetyev VV, Arutyunyan AV, et al. Fullerene C60 Conjugate with Folic Acid and Polyvinylpyrrolidone for Targeted Delivery to Tumor Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(10):5350. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25105350

Chicago/Turabian Style

Borisenkova, Alina A., Olga I. Bolshakova, Anna V. Titova, Irina S. Ryabokon, Maria A. Markova, Zhanna B. Lyutova, Victor P. Sedov, Elena Yu. Varfolomeeva, Vadim V. Bakhmetyev, Alexandr V. Arutyunyan, and et al. 2024. "Fullerene C60 Conjugate with Folic Acid and Polyvinylpyrrolidone for Targeted Delivery to Tumor Cells" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 10: 5350. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25105350

APA Style

Borisenkova, A. A., Bolshakova, O. I., Titova, A. V., Ryabokon, I. S., Markova, M. A., Lyutova, Z. B., Sedov, V. P., Varfolomeeva, E. Y., Bakhmetyev, V. V., Arutyunyan, A. V., Burdakov, V. S., & Sarantseva, S. V. (2024). Fullerene C60 Conjugate with Folic Acid and Polyvinylpyrrolidone for Targeted Delivery to Tumor Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(10), 5350. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25105350

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop