Next Article in Journal
New Data on Exotic Muricid Species (Neogastropoda: Muricidae) from Spain Based on Integrative Taxonomy
Next Article in Special Issue
Reappraisal of the Identity of Batrachium pekinense (Ranunculaceae) and Its Implication for Biodiversity Conservation and Management
Previous Article in Journal
Occurrence of Aspergillus chevalieri and A. niger on Herbal Tea and Their Potential to Produce Ochratoxin A (OTA)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vanilla pompona Schiede (Vanilloideae-Orchidaceae): Morphological Variation of the Labellum in the Mexican Localities of Veracruz, Puebla, Jalisco and Oaxaca
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Recovery of Neglected Species with Cloud Water Micro Condense Capacity as a Response to Climate Change: The Case of Sclerophyllous Boxwoods of Buxus balearica Lam. in the Southern Spanish Mediterranean

by
J. Esteban Hernández-Bermejo
1,2,3,*,
Yalbeiry Labarca-Rojas
1,3,
Francisca Herrera-Molina
2,3,
José L. Quero
1,2 and
Rocío Hernández-Clemente
1
1
Forestry Engineering Department, School of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering (ETSIAM), University of Cordoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain
2
Andalusian Plant Germplasm Bank (BGVA), Autonomous Government of Andalusia, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
3
Red CultIVA—CYTED (NPO), 14005 Córdoba, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2023, 15(12), 1184; https://doi.org/10.3390/d15121184
Submission received: 17 October 2023 / Revised: 18 November 2023 / Accepted: 22 November 2023 / Published: 29 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Diversity, Ecology and Conservation of Endangered Species)

Abstract

:
Understanding the survival needs of neglected or underutilized species (NUS) in agroforestry can offer valuable insights to mitigate climate change and biodiversity loss. This paper analyses the habitat heterogeneity of Buxus balearica populations (palaeorelict of the Mediterranean Basin) using a methodology that integrates four approaches: ecological profiling, multivariate analysis, and the clustering of populations according to environmental variables and suitability. The habitat analysis was conducted on 240 occurrence points, integrating open-source databases and germplasm collection field work. Results reveal that the distribution of B. balearica in the south of the Iberian Peninsula is mainly conditioned by thermal variations, the humidity regime, and microtopography, which makes it very vulnerable to current and future climate change scenarios. The analysis of habitat heterogeneity demonstrates its capacity to estimate genetic diversity, which provides a solid basis for future research and conservation actions. The rapid extinction process of these boxwoods is evident by comparing the suitability model under different climate scenarios. There is an urgent need to improve the current status of the species and associated landscapes, considering B. balearica as an underutilized species, and establishing a sound management plan to reinforce its populations and protect its natural habitat.

1. Introduction

The NUS (neglected and underutilized species) paradigm has become one of the most promising tools in the last two decades for policies to increase agrodiversity, sustainability, food autonomy, agricultural innovation, and adaptation to climate change [1]. The species and varieties that have the character of NUS, both neglected and forgotten, salvageable from ancient food and agricultural cultures, as well as underutilized, reduced in their use to small geographical or cultural areas, below their potential capacities, make up a block of forgotten genetic resources that are, in many cases, at a risk of genetic erosion or disappearance [2]. Their conceptual framework goes beyond the agri-food horizon to include hundreds of ornamentals, industrial, medicinal, and forestry species. Among the latter, we include those that, due to their ecosystemic role, can reduce water pollution, prevent soil erosion, reduce the CO2 footprint, or improve aquifer recharge. For the last of these functions, important plant communities such as Laurel forests, Yungas, Guarani Atlantic forests, and Afromontane forests contribute to precipitating atmospheric water vapor [3,4,5,6,7]. Also, under Mediterranean climates and especially in their geographical environment, i.e., relict formations, species from the Late Tertiary vegetation (Messinian to Pliocene) survive, which retain a cryptoprecipitating character thanks to their evergreen, glabrous, microlauroid leaves, with oleoid, buxoid or myrtoid forms. They belong to genera such as Pistacia, Buxus, Rhamnus, Phyllirea, Coriaria, Maytenus, Osyris, Arbutus, Olea, or Quercus. Buxus balearica Lam. is one of these species [8].
It is, therefore, a residual species that continues to suffer a sharp reduction in its distribution area, frequency and abundance, a species that is disappearing along with other constituent elements of its thermophilic thickets (Maytenus senegalensis (Lam.) Exell., Osyris quadripartita Salzm. ex A.DC., Cneorum tricoccon L.), related to the lost laurel forests of the Mediterranean coastal mountains of the late Cenozoic. The profound impact of human presence on the environment of the riparian regions of the Mediterranean basin, forest fires and changes in the use and management of the forest environment, the disappearance of vectors related to their dispersal [9,10], and the accelerated climate change, generating the increase in summer water deficit, make the current existing protection measures insufficient. The areas declared as protected do not encompass all the small populations of boxwood in the Balearic Islands. While ex situ conservation measures such as seed banks aim to supplement these efforts by preserving boxwood accessions for the long term, the absence of reforestation or reintroduction plans for the species within its native habitats renders significant progress unattainable. B. balearica is not the only species of the genus threatened with extinction. This is also the case, for example, with B. vahlii Baill., a species endemic to Puerto Rico and Santa Cruz [11], or B. sinica (Rehder & E.H. Wilson) M. Cheng in China [12].
The leaf morphology of species such as B. balearica suggests the ability to condense moisture from fog and dew. Recent studies have demonstrated the influence of the Atlantic fog regime on the distribution of populations of Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels, with similar leaf morphology, in their natural range (mainly in Morocco), shows remarkable habitat heterogeneity [13,14]. A similar phenomenon is observed in B. balearica, according to the data and experience we have acquired in the last 30 years after monitoring its populations and studying the habitat and ex situ conservation of this species in the south of the Iberian territory [15,16,17]. The relict character and its presence in two different climatic floors, the thermo- and lower meso-Mediterranean, have been already confirmed by its phytosociology [18,19]. There is also evidence of genetically different populations at the molecular level associated with this phytogeographical heterogeneity [15,20].
B. balearica still occurs in the Western Mediterranean, in Sardinia, Balearic Islands (in Cabrera and Mallorca and in the Sierra de Tramontana), and very locally in N. Morocco (Rif, Middle Atlas, Saharan Atlas, and High Atlas). We also find possible historical references in other Tyrrhenian territories, as the commentary of Theophrastus (3rd century BC) refers to various localities and uses of boxwood, speaks of the very large and splendid boxwoods of Cirno (Corsica), and indicates how those of this island are more robust than those of any other place, which leads us to think that it may be B. balearica.
In the Iberian Peninsula, B. balearica is found exclusively in Andalusia (the provinces of Malaga, Granada, and Almeria). It occupies some coastal populations and other more inland ones until 1.900 m.a.s.l., between the mountains of Cázulas, Los Guajares, Tejeda, Almijara, and Alhama. It is also found in the Sierra de Gádor [17,21,22,23,24]. The area is subject to a climate that varies from the semi-arid Mediterranean (below 500 m.a.s.l.) to the sub-humid Mediterranean (above 600 and 700 m). Average monthly temperatures range from 11 °C to 26 °C and can reach up to 40 °C during the summer. Rainfall ranges from 450 to 500 mm in coastal areas and over 1000 mm in some mountain areas.
The Mediterranean influence is characterized by the interaction of warm and humid sea air with the land surface, leading to the condensation of water vapor and the formation of coastal fog. The region’s abrupt topography further shapes this meteorological phenomenon, acting as a natural barrier that compels the moist air from the Strait of Gibraltar and the Alboran Sea to ascend, cool, and condense, giving rise to orographic fogs [25,26]. Also, the cloudy fronts that reach these coastal mountains from the peninsular interior, pushed by winds of the west, create when descending after overcoming summits and water dividers, another type of orographic fog that generates humidity at the highest altitude levels.
The present study aims to identify and corroborate the presence of B. balearica boxwoods in the two types of habitats mentioned in the Iberian area studied, one sheltered at high altitudes and the other one that is more thermophilic and coastal. Furthermore, we aim to assess the significance of advection fogs in facilitating the survival of this species, particularly in coastal environments.
Advection fogs, a meteorological phenomenon of interest, form when the prevailing warm and dry westerly winds from the interior, locally referred to as “terral”, cease and push warm surface waters towards the Alboran Sea. This, coupled with the subsequent thermal inversion, condenses substantial humidity masses when the moist air comes into contact with a colder surface. These condensed fogs are transported inland, affecting coastal regions [25,26]. Remarkably, these fogs have been documented for millennia, with Phoenician colonies inhabiting this territory from the 8th to 3rd centuries BC. The Phoenicians referred to these fogs as “taró”, a term that has persisted up to the present day. These ancient mariners made offerings to the goddess Malak (Malaga, formerly Phoenician Malaka, lies within the sphere of influence of taró) in hopes of securing success in coastal fishing—a tradition that continues to hold economic and cultural significance in the region.
This article undertakes a comprehensive statistical and probabilistic analysis of the environmental factors that define the Andalusian region. Our goal is to present a thorough examination of the distribution patterns of B. balearica. Building on the suitability study previously conducted [17], we have integrated new climate change scenarios to account for periods of temperature fluctuations that would result in a greater water stress for the species. This information will inform the development of an ex situ conservation program that takes into account the assessed genetic diversity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Case Study Species and Its Ex Situ Conservation Program

The fieldwork consisted of collecting thirty-seven new locations of B. balearica that were included in a germplasm collection programme for ex situ conservation and analyzing the limits of the areas currently protected by regional and national legislation in Andalusia and Spain. The thirty-seven accessions are preserved in a seed bank using cold storage techniques. These accessions were collected over the last ten years and based on a variability criterion by selecting individuals from as many types of habitats as possible [27,28].
Since the presence of fog significantly increases atmospheric saturation, relative humidity data have been obtained from the ASOS (Automated Surface Observing System) network, using the station closest to the study area that is located in Málaga airport at latitude 36.67 N and longitude 4.49 W (LEMG) (https://mesonet.agron.iastate.edu (accessed on 17 October 2021)). Although other stations within the study area are part of the national observation networks operated by the State Meteorological Agency (AEMET), we exclusively relied on the ASOS station with 30 min data availability. This specific time resolution is essential to discern anomalies in records potentially linked to abrupt shifts in humidity that could result from fog events.

Source Data

Habitat analysis of B. balearica has been carried out using 240 occurrence points in the south of the Iberian Peninsula (provinces of Malaga, Granada, and Almeria) obtained from the GBIF and REDIAM databases, and mainly the accessions collected for their subsequent long-term ex situ conservation in the Andalusian Plant Germplasm Bank.
The information layers have been downloaded from the environmental information portal in Andalusia (https://portalrediam.cica.es/descargas, accessed on 30 July 2021), from which 20 environmental variables of temperature, precipitation, topography, and insolation have been obtained (Table 1).
The variable values for each occurrence point were extracted using the QGIS point sampling tool plugin that combines the information layers and the points of presence in the Coordinate Reference System: ETRS89 UTM 30 N, with a pixel size of 75 m for each variable.
To perform the three quantitative analyses, we standardized the input data using the z-score formula, ((XiX)/s), where Xi represents a specific data point, X is the sample mean, and s represents the sample’s standard deviation.

2.2. Numerical Ecology Approach

2.2.1. Ecological Profiles

The ecological profiles allow us to check the ecological requirements of the study species by analyzing the frequency distribution of the environmental data layers. The comparison of the maximum and minimum values for the entire range allows for the identification of ecological behaviors and preferences. Each variable acts as a descriptor, and for its representation, the generic function of R has been used, hist() [29].

2.2.2. Multivariate Analysis

The correlation analysis between the environmental variables has been achieved by applying the principal component analysis (PCA), which determines the variance explained by these few independent main axes and the contribution of the variables in defining these axes. The variables that provide a more significant variance in the construction of the axes have been used in the clustering analysis.
A hierarchical fusion method has been selected to find groups of individuals with similar demands and to differentiate populations. Clusters were built using the Ward.D2 method that was executed with the hclust() function of the STATS package of R version 1.3.1093.

2.2.3. Suitability Models

Climate change models used to predict the potential species distribution were the Local Climate Change Scenarios of Andalusia (ELCCA) updated to the 4th Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). These models are available in the catalogue of data for Andalusia in three climatic periods, i.e., 2011–2040, 2041–2070, and 2071–2099, calculated from the combination of the general circulation models of the atmosphere (CGCM2 and ECHAM4) and different emission scenarios (A2 and B2). These data were downloaded from the environmental information portal in Andalusia. The climate model used was the BCM2 in the sra2 scenario corresponding to average temperature values of 16.7 °C, 17.3 °C and 18.9 °C in the periods 2011–2040, 2041–2070, and 2071–2099, respectively [30].
The three potential scenarios have been modelled with the maximum entropy algorithm of MaxEnt software version 3.4.3, November 2020 [31,32]. The occurrence points provide the values of each variable in both the current and future scenarios described above. In this way, it is possible to predict the regions with the highest probability of suitability that meet the maximum entropy values. The suitability scale is represented between 0 (lowest suitability) and 1 (highest suitability), and the area under the ROC curve (receiver of characteristics) shows the discriminative capacity of the calculated model and presents a tighter distribution if greater than 0.75 (poor 0.75 < AUC > 0.95 excellent). The model configuration parameters have been calculated using the ENMevaluate function of the ENMeval package of R (v. 2.0.3) [33].

3. Results

The process of collecting accessions for ex situ conservation has enabled the incorporation of the accessions listed in Table 2 into the collections of the Bank of Andalusian Plant Germplasm (Junta de Andalucía) collections.
From 2004 to 2021, during the warm months of June, July, and August (refer to Table 3 and Figure 1), a total of 13,177 accumulated hours of relative humidity above 70% were recorded. Additionally, there were only 740 days with humidity exceeding 90%, with August showing the highest humidity in both cases. This observation may align with the increased fog frequency in the Alboran Sea during the warm period (June–August). It is asserted that during periods of heightened water stress, there is a noteworthy contribution of humidity in the area.
Observations reveal cyclical fluctuations occurring approximately every 7 years. Margalef [34,35] also references these climatic cycles in connection to the occurrence of colder winters and their impact on fishing yields along the Mediterranean coasts. This pattern could potentially be associated with advection fog events.
As can be seen in the temperature profiles (Figure 2), in the areas with a range of 4–16 °C, the species prefers lower temperatures, between 8–10 °C, and dropping to 4 °C during the coldest month. Regarding higher temperatures, there are no significant differences when compared to the rest of the territory.
The bimodal distributions of the frequencies related to temperatures (Figure 2), precipitation (Figure 3), altitude (Figure 4), and insolation models (Figure 5) show the existence of two populations.
The precipitation graphs by quarters (Figure 3) reveal a distinction between winter and autumn, suggesting that the existence of drier localities is possibly related to Almería. Notably, there is a preference for areas with higher precipitation. During winter, the species aims to accumulate the greatest amount of water (200–300 mm). Remarkably, in the summer, the species is found in areas with lower rainfall, indicating a resistance to drought or reliance on alternative sources of humidity beyond precipitation.
As shown in Figure 4, altitude presents a Gaussian distribution, tending to be bi-nomial, with a decrease in frequency between 300 and 500 m. This suggests the existence of populations favoring coastal areas and others with an optimum of around 800 m, disappearing above 1200 m. Orientation and slope show a slight preference, or a better preservation, with southern orientations.
The distance from the axis of the drainage network indicates that the plant tends to thrive in areas near ravines, streams, and rivers. This preference is likely due to lower incident radiation, reduced evapotranspiration, and enhanced defense against forest fires.
During equinoxes, the distribution exhibits a greater variance (Figure 5), allowing for a better diagnosis of heterogeneity. However, a stronger correlation with the distribution of localities is observed during solstices. Specifically, boxwood localities prefer areas with fewer hours of sun in winter (minimum sun elevation) and more sun in summer (maximum sun elevation). The MDI4 and MDI8 models best explain the distribution of populations.
There is a distinct behavior in the variables MDI12 and MDI22 compared to MDI0, evident in the factorial study. The ecological profile reveals that during days close to the winter solstice, numerous localities do not receive direct sunlight. Conversely, the profile during the summer solstice should feature many localities with a high number of sunshine hours, aligning with the equinox profiles. The October–November profile is intermediate.
These results correspond to those observed in the factorial study and the cluster of the species’ locality distribution. Specifically, the temperature frequency distributions show a clustering of localities in a thermophilic coastal sub-population and in another of a montane character, occupying the meso-Mediterranean level. The species does not seem to tolerate frost (or at least does not respond well to it due to competition with other species), disappearing below the mean temperatures of the coldest month below 7 °C and mean minimum temperatures of the coldest month below 3 °C.
According to PCA analysis, component 1 explains 38% and comprises the variables of the insolation models, with the spring and autumn equinoxes contributing the greatest weight (Figure 6). In contrast, the variables MDI4 and MDI8 contribute 0.26 and 0.32, respectively, to the same component (Table 4). Component 2 groups in one direction the temperatures of the warmest month and the minimum temperatures of the coldest month and in another the precipitation from January to June with an accumulated variance of 27%. Component 3 only contributes 12% but absorbs the topographic variables (MDT and Dist), the precipitation from July to December (PT03 and PT04), the maximum temperatures of the warmest month (TMMC), and the mean of the coldest month (TMF).
The first three axes together account for 77%. Axis 1 is highly correlated with the degree of insolation (and shielding in the opposite direction) that the vegetation receives, especially with respect to the number of hours of sunshine at the summer and winter equinoxes. Axis 2 is mainly configured according to the extreme temperatures recorded (minimum in the coldest months and maximum in the hottest months). The configuration of axis 3 is dominated by precipitation in the second half of the year (August onwards) together with altitude.
The 12 variables that contribute the most variance (>|0.33|) to the three principal components are TMC, TMMC, TMF, TMMF, PT01, PT02, PT03, PT04, MDT, DIST, MDI2, and MDI6 (Table 4). However, those with a correlation higher than |0.75| (TMF, TMMF, MDI2, and MDI6) have been removed. Due to the contribution of the insolation models during the two solstices (MDI4 and MDI8) and given that there is no correlation between these variables, the eight chosen variables are TMC, TMMC, PT01, PT03, MDT, DIST, MDI4, and MDI8 (Figure 6).
The variables included in the cluster analysis were PT01, PT03, TMC, TMMC, MDT, DIST, MDI4, and MDI8 (Figure 6). There are two sets of well-differentiated localities, those of the lower meso-Mediterranean and upper thermo-Mediterranean levels that are very thermal and free of frost with average temperatures of the coldest month above 11 °C and those of the upper thermo-Mediterranean meso-Mediterranean with average temperatures that drop to 7 °C.
According to Figure 7, within the coastal and thermal sub-population, there are five different nuclei: two more eastern ones (Rágol and Guadalfeo–Molvízar), another central one (Cantarriján), another western one (Nerja and lower Frigiliana), and finally the westernmost nucleus (Cómpeta). Within the mountain sub-population, we can distinguish the nucleus of Lentejí and Otívar, Competa and upper Nerja, and Los Guájares.
In these results (Figure 8), the Balearic populations were immediately differentiated from those of the Iberian Peninsula, and within these, the eastern population of the Sierra de Gádor (Almeria) was separated from the Malacitano-Granadina populations, where again the coastal populations were separated from the inland mountains, and in turn, these were separated in a western block (Sierra de Almijara: Nerja-Frigiliana) from the eastern populations of the Sierras de Cázulas and Guájares (Guadalfeo-Molvízar).
Different models of potential presence calculated for B. balearica using Maxent in the periods 2011–2040, 2041–2070, and 2071–2099 (Figure 9) were obtained with a reliability of 0.98, according to the analysis of the AUC values of each one. The algorithm effectively determines habitats, particularly under different climate change scenarios.
In the 1961–2000 scenario, the potential distribution extends west of the current central core through the Malacitan mountains. The 2011–2040 scenario shows a slight variation, despite demographic regression in current populations. The 2040–2070 scenario reduces the density of presence in its central core in Málaga–Granada, and its potentiality decreases more drastically in the western potential core. In the 2070–2100 scenario, B. balearica landscapes disappear completely from their western and eastern potential cores, while their presence in the current central core becomes anecdotal. The species and its landscapes disappeared almost entirely from the Iberian Peninsula.

4. Discussion

The study of a species’ habitat was, for a long time, the traditional method of assessing genetic diversity in forest sciences until the advent of molecular techniques. The difficulty of conventional genetic methods and the longer life cycle of most forest species justified this form of assessment. Recent studies [26,36] with Argania spinosa have already demonstrated the enormous usefulness of this approach, which is again evidenced here with B. balearica. Our strategy simultaneously and synergistically uses several numerical methods, from the classical study of ecological profiles (statistical analysis) and clustering and principal component methods (multivariate analysis), together with predictive models that include different climate change scenarios (Maxent), allowing us to compare and correlate results with those obtained from the study of genetic diversity at the molecular level [16,20,37].
The frequency distribution of the reticules in which the species appears does not correlate with the frequency of precipitation in all the reticules studied, except in the summer quarter, where its presence seems related to a low precipitation (between 20 and 40 mm). These localities receive an annual rainfall of >500 mm, with about 110 mm in the second quarter. Therefore, the species seems to require a certain reserve of rainwater in the soil, to which a quantity not yet estimated should be added, coming from leaf condensation. Given the climatic variation observed in the region over the last few decades, this water supply may be becoming increasingly scarce.
The habitat of B. balearica in the Southern Spanish Mediterranean suggests the existence of two very different sets of localities: those of the lower thermo-Mediterranean floor, very thermal, frost-free, with average temperatures in the coldest month above 11 °C, and those of the upper thermo- and meso-Mediterranean with temperatures that even drop to 7 °C. Indeed, within the coastal and thermal sub-population, an eastern nucleus (Guadalfeo-Molvízar) can be clearly distinguished from two others, a central one (Cantarriján and Arroyo de la Miel) and a more westerly one (lower Nerja). Within the mountain sub-population, several nuclei can be distinguished: (a) the nucleus of Otívar, probably characterized by the high slopes (the boxwoods are on vertical walls); (b) the upper eastern nucleus of Guájares-Cázulas; (c) the central nucleus of the upper valley of the river Chíllar; (d) the western nucleus of the valleys above Cómpeta, including that of Cázulas; and (e) the small nucleus of Canillas de Aceituno (Figure 8).
Furthermore, it is corroborated that the species only occurs on limestone soils with a pH > 7. In the provinces of Málaga and Granada, they are always found on kakiritized marmoreal limestones; and in the Almería locality of Rágol, they are also found on limestones, although not marmoreal.
Similarly, due to the low dependence on topographic variables, it can be deduced that the species tends or is tending to take refuge in those areas where it has a low-temperature oscillation and optimum humidity without following any strictly altitudinal or latitudinal pattern, as is the more general case of other species.
It remains to be demonstrated whether the habitat diversity is only due to the disappearance of boxwood in intermediate situations, between 300 and 500 m altitude, due to external aspects (greater occupation or human pressure), or whether these two phenotypically and genotypically differentiated populations exist.
The resulting clusters coincide with those obtained by other investigations at the molecular level using RAPDs [16,20], estimating practically the same grouping of populations. The easternmost population in Almería (Rágol) is differentiated from that of the Malacitano-Granadino group, and within these, a coastal nucleus was distinguished from a montane (meso-Mediterranean) nucleus. Within the latter, there were also differences between the eastern localities (Lentejí, Otívar, Guadalfeo, and Molvízar) and the western ones (Cómpeta). The genetic diversity observed by other authors [16,20] was greater at the intra-population level than at the inter-population level (because of the cross-population nature of the species). However, a significant genetic difference was observed between the populations of the meso-Mediterranean group.
Concerning the potential distribution of B. balearica in future climate change scenarios, the habitat of B. balearica would not only be reducing and fragmenting, but also it would be lost in the strict sense of the term. The climatic conditions that allowed the survival of a forest made up of myrtoid, ramnoid, or buxoid leaf species, which are coriaceous, glabrous, non-spiny, and capable of achieving cloud water interception by condensing the microclimatic humidity of the soft mists and sea breezes that occur even in the middle of summer, would disappear with them. This species was not and is not the only species with this function, as others within the same community, such as Rhamnus alaternus L., Pistacia lentiscus L., Coriaria myrtifolia L., or Quercus coccifera L., are species with leaves or leaflets like those of Buxus [8,18,36].
The application of the model in several consecutive future climate scenarios shows a process of progressive and rapid extinction of the boxwoods of B. balearica in the south of the Iberian Peninsula. The area of its potential presence under the climatic conditions of the first quarter of the 21st century is drastically reduced in only twenty more years, becoming almost completely extinct in the eastern half of its current area. By 2070, their extinction would be already profoundly affecting the western half as well, and by the end of the century, their extinction would be total. Unfortunately, climate change predictions are coming true faster than forecasts based on probability calculations [38]. As Schultes [39] said, in relation to the loss of traditional knowledge associated with biodiversity and the need for urgent action, also with regard to the in situ and ex situ conservation of B. balearica as with many other NUS species, it will soon be too late.
All these boxwoods constitute cultural landscapes formed by B. balearica, and many of the species mentioned above are phytosociologically associated with it. These are NUS (neglected or underutilized species) of a forestry nature that, in the past, were used not only for their firewood, wood, mastic, and other resins but also for a wide range of aromatic, medicinal, pickling, dyeing, melliferous, and condimentary uses. In addition to these uses, the important ecosystemic function is represented by its crypto-precipitating capacity, condensing fog (advection and orographic), which represents a capacity to recharge aquifers that has unfortunately largely disappeared today.
As a result of the habitat diversity study that was carried out, 65 doses of Balearic boxwood seeds from 20 different localities in the provinces of Granada, Malaga, and Ameria have been collected and conserved in the Andalusian Plant Germplasm Bank (Table 2). Ex situ cultivation has already generated new accessions in the Royal Botanical Garden of Cordoba. This set constitutes a genetic reserve that ensures its conservation and possible future in situ actions using reintroduction techniques. The study could also seriously correct the limits of the current area protected by the declared Natural Park “Sierras de Tejeda, Almijara, and Alhama” since many of the localities studied and collected for ex situ conservation are outside these limits. This makes ex situ and in situ conservation measures essential to ensure the future of these boxwoods and other rare and threatened species and plant communities in the Mediterranean region [40,41]. This involves implementing a comprehensive plan that includes expanding the boundaries of protected natural areas, choosing specific locations for population reinforcement or reintroduction, and, crucially, fostering a nuanced understanding of these ecosystems’ value. Not only do they serve as cultural landscapes, but also, they play a pivotal role in cloud water interception and water management within the Andalusian Mountain range.

5. Conclusions

This comprehensive study of Buxus balearica, a species integral to the Mediterranean’s highly fragmented cultural landscape, underscores its status as a neglected and underutilized species (NUS) with significant forest interest. Facing threats of extinction due to anthropogenic pressures, marginalization, and climate change, B. balearica’s conservation is crucial. The ex situ conservation efforts have been successful, with 31 new accessions from diverse localities like Nerja, Cómpeta, Cantarriján, and Guadalfeo, including a novel entry from Rágol, Almeria.
The study’s habitat heterogeneity analysis, building upon previous genetic diversity estimates, reveals critical insights into the environmental needs of B. balearica. It highlights the species’ distinct distribution in the Iberian Peninsula, separating into two sets of localities: those from the lower thermo-Mediterranean level influenced by summer water compensation through advection fogs and those from the high-Mediterranean and meso-Mediterranean levels, dependent on orographic humidity at higher altitudes. This distinction is vital in understanding the species’ adaptation and survival strategies.
Significantly, the study shows the species’ sensitivity to summer water stress and its reliance on microclimatic phenomena, highlighting its vulnerability to the ongoing climate change in the region. The detailed ecological profiles, including thermometric and pluviometric variables, provide a nuanced understanding of the species’ preferred environmental conditions, showing a preference for areas with higher precipitation and lower temperatures.
The findings also reveal a bimodal distribution in the species’ frequency related to temperature, precipitation, altitude, and insolation models, suggesting the existence of two distinct populations. This is further elucidated through the analysis of principal components, which sheds light on the interplay between various ecological factors like insolation, temperature extremes, and precipitation patterns in shaping the species’ distribution.
The potential distribution models for B. balearica, developed using MaxEnt ecological niche modeling (software version 3.4.3, November 2020), indicate a significant shift in the species’ habitat under future climate scenarios. The predictive models, with high reliability, show a worrying trend of habitat contraction and loss, particularly in the species’ western and eastern potential cores, with a marked reduction in the central Málaga–Granada area.
In summary, this study not only contributes to the understanding of B. balearica’s ecological requirements and its response to climatic changes but also highlights the urgency for targeted conservation strategies to preserve this valuable Mediterranean species.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.E.H.-B.; methodology, J.E.H.-B. and Y.L.-R.; investigation, J.E.H.-B., F.H.-M. and R.H.-C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.E.H.-B. and Y.L.-R.; writing—review and editing, J.E.H.-B., Y.L.-R., F.H.-M., J.L.Q. and R.H.-C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

PID2021-124058OA-I00: Funded by the State Plan for Scientific, Technical and Innovation Research (PEICTI) 2021-2023, Generation of Knowledge” and “Challenges of society”. GOPG-AL-20-0005 ARGAN: Funded by the operational groups under the European Innovation programme of Andalusia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this study’s findings are openly available in figshare repository at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24273055 (accessed on 9 October 2023).

Acknowledgments

The Andalusian Plant Germplasm Bank and its specialized staff Josefa Prados, Francisca Tarifa, Josefina Rodríguez, and María Auxiliadora Díaz López are thanked for preparing and maintaining the collected accessions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hossain, A.; Islam, M.T.; Maitra, S.; Majumder, D.; Garai, S.; Mondal, M.; Ahmed, A.; Roy, A.; Skalicky, M.; Brestic, M. Neglected and Underutilized Crop Species: Are They Future Smart Crops in Fighting Poverty, Hunger and Malnutrition Under Changing Climate? In Neglected and Underutilized Crops-towards Nutritional Security and Sustainability; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 1–50. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hunter, D.; Borelli, T.; Beltrame, D.M.O.; Oliveira, C.N.S.; Coradin, L.; Wasike, V.W.; Wasilwa, L.; Mwai, J.; Manjella, A.; Samarasinghe, G.W.L.; et al. The Potential of Neglected and Underutilized Species for Improving Diets and Nutrition. Planta 2019, 250, 709–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Guinea López, E. En El País de Los Bubis: Relato Ilustrado de Mi Primer Viaje a Fernando Póo; Instituto de Estudios Africanos, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas: Madrid, Spain, 1949. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ceballos-Fernández de Córdoba, L.; Ortuño-Medina, F. Estudio Sobre La Vegetación y La Flora Forestal de Las Canarias Occidentales; Ministerio de Agricultura. Dirección General de Montes, Caza y Pesca: Madrid, Spain, 1951. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cabrera, A.L. Regiones Fitogeográficas Argentinas; Editorial Acme: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1976; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  6. Takhtadzhian, A.L.; Crovello, T.J. Floristic Regions of the World; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1986; ISBN 0520040279. [Google Scholar]
  7. Navarro-Cerrillo, R.M.; Clemente, M.; Padron, E.; Hernandez-Bermejo, E.; Garcia-Ferrer, A.; Kasimis, N. Forest Structure in Harvested Sites of Afromontane Forest of Prunus africana (Hook.f.) Kalkm., in Bioko (Equatorial Guinea). Afr. J. Ecol. 2008, 46, 620–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nieto, J.M.; Cabezudo, B. Series de Vegetación Climatófilas de Las Sierras Tejeda y Almijara (Málaga-Granada; España). Acta Bot. Malacit. 1988, 13, 229–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Palamarev, E. Paleobotanical Evidences of the Tertiary History and Origin of the Mediterranean Sclerophyll Dendroflora BT—Woody Plants—Evolution and Distribution since the Tertiary; Ehrendorfer, F., Ed.; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 1989; pp. 93–107. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kovar-Eder, J.; Kvaček, Z.; Martinetto, E.; Roiron, P. Late Miocene to Early Pliocene Vegetation of Southern Europe (7–4Ma) as Reflected in the Megafossil Plant Record. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2006, 238, 321–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Carrero-Rivera, G. Population Ecology and Reproductive Behavior of the Endangered Buxus vahlii Baillon (Buxaceae). Master’s Thesis, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  12. Huang, Y.; Ji, K.; Jiang, Z.; Tang, G. Genetic Structure of Buxus sinica Var. Parvifolia, a Rare and Endangered Plant. Sci. Hortic. 2008, 116, 324–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Labarca-Rojas, Y.; Hernández-Bermejo, J.E.; Quero, J.L.; Herrera-Molina, F. Bioclimatic Habitat Limitations for Argan Trees (Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels) in Northern Africa and Spain. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2022, 22, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Labarca-Rojas, Y.; Hernández-Bermejo, J.E.; Herrera-Molina, F.; Hernandez-Clemente, M.; Quero, J.L. Assessing Argan Tree (Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels) Ex-Situ Collections as a Complementary Tool to in-Situ Conservation and Crop Introduction in the Mediterranean Basin. Trees 2023, 37, 567–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hernández-Bermejo, J.E.; Herrera-Molina, F. Estudio de La Distribución Actual y Modelos de Potencialidad de Buxus balearica Lam. en Andalucía. Cordoba. 2010. Available online: https://portalrediam.cica.es/geonetwork/srv/api/records/e4536e97-4038-4bab-9a06-7c61bc40e2f9 (accessed on 11 September 2021).
  16. Martín-Consuegra, E.; De la Fuente Cantó, C.; Díaz-López, A.; Hernández-Bermejo, J.E. Diferenciación Genética de Las Poblaciones Ibéricas (Andalucía) de Buxus balearica Lam. (Buxaceae) Mediante RAPDs. In Proceedings of the V Congreso Biología de la Conservación de Plantas, Menorca, Spain, 28 September–1 October 2011. [Google Scholar]
  17. Navarro-Cerrillo, R.M.; Hernández-Bermejo, J.E.; Hernández-Clemente, R. Evaluating Models to Assess the Distribution of Buxus balearica in Southern Spain. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2011, 14, 256–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cabezudo, B.; Latorre, A.V.P.; Fernández, D.N.; Gavira, Ó.; Caballero, G. Contribución Al Conocimiento de La Flora Del Parque Natural de Las Sierras Tejeda, Almijara y Alhama (Málaga-Granada, España). Acta Botánica Malacit. 2005, 30, 55–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Díez-Garretas, B.; Asensi, A.; Rivas-Martínez, S. Las Comunidades de Maytenus senegalensis Subsp. Europaeus (Celastraceae) En La Península Ibérica. Mediterr. Bot. 2005, 26, 83. [Google Scholar]
  20. De la Fuente Cantó, C. Genetic Diversity of the Spanish Populations of Buxus balearica, an Endangered Species in Andalucía. Master’s Thesis, Cordoba University, Cordoba, Spain, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lázaro, A.; Traveset, A. Reproductive Success of the Endangered Shrub Buxus balearica Lam. (Buxaceae): Pollen Limitation, and Inbreeding and Outbreeding Depression. Plant Syst. Evol. 2006, 261, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lázaro, A.; Traveset, A.; Castillo, A. Spatial Concordance at a Regional Scale in the Regeneration Process of a Circum-Mediterranean Relict (Buxus balearica): Connecting Seed Dispersal to Seedling Establishment. Ecography 2006, 29, 683–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lázaro, A.; Traveset, A.; Méndez, M. Masting in Buxus balearica: Assessing Fruiting Patterns and Processes at a Large Spatial Scale. Oikos 2006, 115, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lázaro, A.; Traveset, A. Does the Spatial Variation in Selective Pressures Explain Among-Site Differences in Seed Mass? A Test with Buxus Balearica. Evol. Ecol. 2009, 23, 847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Polvorinos Pascual, F. Nieblas de Irradiación En El Mar de Alborán. Colapso Del Regimen de Levante y Cambio a Poniente. Transición de Estratos a Nieblas. In Proceedings of the Acta de las Jornadas Científicas de la Asociación Meteorológica Española, Seville, Spain, 1–3 March 2010. [Google Scholar]
  26. Polvorinos Pascual, F. Nieblas de Irradiación En El Litoral Nordeste Del Mar de Alborán. In Proceedings of the Acta Las Jornadas Científicas Asociación Meteorológica Española, Oviedo, Spain, 7–9 April 2014. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hernández Bermejo, J.E.; Clemente Muñoz, M. Protección de La Flora de Andalucía. In Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid; Real Jardín Botánico: Madrid, Spain, 1994; Volume 52, p. 258. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hernández Bermejo, E.; Herranz-Sanz, J.M. Protección de La Diversidad Vegetal y de Los Recursos Fitogenéticos En Castilla-La Mancha: La Perspectiva Existente y El Compromiso Del Jardín Botánico; Instituto de Estudios Albacetenses Don Juan Manuel: Albacete, Spain, 2011; p. 478. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gounot, M. Méthodes d’étude Quantitative de La Végétation. In Annales de Géographie; Bertrand, M.J., Ed.; Armand Colin: Paris, France, 1971; pp. 591–592. Available online: https://www.persee.fr/doc/geo_0003-4010_1971_num_80_441_15388_t1_0591_0000_3 (accessed on 28 December 2021).
  30. Consejería de Agricultura, Ganadería, Pesca y Desarrollo Sostenible. Portal Ambiental de Andalucía. Distribución de Especies Forestales En Andalucía. Escenarios de Cambio Climático 4o Informe Del IPCC. Available online: https://portalrediam.cica.es/descargas (accessed on 28 December 2021).
  31. Phillips, S.J.; Anderson, R.P.; Schapire, R.E. Maximum Entropy Modeling of Species Geographic Distributions. Ecol. Model. 2006, 190, 231–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Elith, J.; Phillips, S.J.; Hastie, T.; Dudík, M.; Chee, Y.E.; Yates, C.J. A Statistical Explanation of MaxEnt for Ecologists. Divers. Distrib. 2011, 17, 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Muscarella, R.; Galante, P.J.; Soley-Guardia, M.; Boria, R.A.; Kass, J.M.; Uriarte, M.; Anderson, R.P. ENM Eval: An R Package for Conducting Spatially Independent Evaluations and Estimating Optimal Model Complexity for Maxent Ecological Niche Models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2014, 5, 1198–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Margalef, R. Perspectives in Ecological Theory. 1968. Available online: https://philpapers.org/rec/MARPIE-3 (accessed on 5 July 2022).
  35. Margalef, R. Ecología, 2nd ed.; Ediciones Omega, SA: Barcelona, Spain, 1974; p. 952. [Google Scholar]
  36. Pérez Latorre, A.V.; Navas Fernández, D.; Gavira, Ó.; Caballero, G.; Cabezudo, B. Vegetación Del Parque Natural de Las Sierras Tejeda, Almijara y Alhama (Málaga-Granada, Andalucía, España). Acta Bot. Malacit. 2004, 29, 117–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rossello, J.A.; Lazaro, A.; Cosín, R.; Molins, A. A Phylogeographic Split in Buxus balearica (Buxaceae) as Evidenced by Nuclear Ribosomal Markers: When ITS Paralogues Are Welcome. J. Mol. Evol. 2007, 64, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. IPCC. 2023: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Core Writing Team, Lee, H., Romero, J., Eds.; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Schultes, R.E. La Urgencia de La Conservación Etnobotánica. In Proceedings of the Memorias del Simposio Internacional Ecobios Colombia 88: El Desarrollo Sostenible: Estrategias, Políticas y Acciones, Inderena, Bogotá, Colombia, 20–23 September 1989; Rodríguez Mahecha, J.V., Sánchez Páez, H., Eds.; pp. 217–222. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wagensommer, R.P.; Venanzoni, R. Geranium lucarinii Sp. Nov. and Re-Evaluation of G. Kikianum (Geraniaceae). Phytotaxa 2021, 489, 252–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Perrino, E.V.; Tomaselli, V.; Wagensommer, R.P.; Silletti, G.N.; Esposito, A.; Stinca, A. Ophioglossum lusitanicum L.: New Records of Plant Community and 92/43/EEC Habitat in Italy. Agronomy 2022, 12, 3188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Graph of historical (2004–2021) total hours in June, July, and August against relative humidity obtained from the LEMG station (ASOS network 36.67 N, 4.49 W) above 70% (comfort point) and 90% (condensation point).
Figure 1. Graph of historical (2004–2021) total hours in June, July, and August against relative humidity obtained from the LEMG station (ASOS network 36.67 N, 4.49 W) above 70% (comfort point) and 90% (condensation point).
Diversity 15 01184 g001
Figure 2. Ecological profiles of thermometric variables of Buxus balearica during the period of 1971–2000: (a) tmc (mean temperature of the warmest month), (b) tmmc (maximum warmest month temperature), (c) tmf (coldest month temperature), and (d) tmmf (minimum coldest month temperature). The gray bars in the background represent the mean values of the territory, and the green bars represent the mean values of the species.
Figure 2. Ecological profiles of thermometric variables of Buxus balearica during the period of 1971–2000: (a) tmc (mean temperature of the warmest month), (b) tmmc (maximum warmest month temperature), (c) tmf (coldest month temperature), and (d) tmmf (minimum coldest month temperature). The gray bars in the background represent the mean values of the territory, and the green bars represent the mean values of the species.
Diversity 15 01184 g002
Figure 3. Ecological profiles of pluviometric variables of Buxus balearica during the period of 1971–2000. (a) PT01 (mean precipitation of the first quarter), (b) PT02 (mean precipitation of the second quarter (c) PT03 (mean precipitation of the third quarter), and (d) PT04 (Mean precipitation of the fourth quarter). The gray bars in the background represent the mean values of the territory, and the green bars represent the mean values of the species.
Figure 3. Ecological profiles of pluviometric variables of Buxus balearica during the period of 1971–2000. (a) PT01 (mean precipitation of the first quarter), (b) PT02 (mean precipitation of the second quarter (c) PT03 (mean precipitation of the third quarter), and (d) PT04 (Mean precipitation of the fourth quarter). The gray bars in the background represent the mean values of the territory, and the green bars represent the mean values of the species.
Diversity 15 01184 g003
Figure 4. Ecological profiles of topographic variables of Buxus balearica during the period of 1971–2000. (a) MDT (elevation from the digital elevation model), (b) ORI (Aspect), (c) DIST (Euclidean distance from drainage network), and (d) SLP (slope). The gray bars in the background represent the mean values of the territory, and the green bars represent the mean values of the species.
Figure 4. Ecological profiles of topographic variables of Buxus balearica during the period of 1971–2000. (a) MDT (elevation from the digital elevation model), (b) ORI (Aspect), (c) DIST (Euclidean distance from drainage network), and (d) SLP (slope). The gray bars in the background represent the mean values of the territory, and the green bars represent the mean values of the species.
Diversity 15 01184 g004
Figure 5. Ecological profiles of the insolation models of Buxus balearica during the period of 1971–2000. (a) MDI1 (insolation model between December–March), (b) MDI2 (insolation during spring equinox), (c) MDI3 (insolation model between March–June), (d) MDI4 (insolation model during summer solstice), (e) MDI5 (insolation model between June–September), (f) MDI6 (insolation model during autumn equinox), (g) MDI7 (insolation model between September–December), (h) MDI8 (insolation model during winter solstice). The gray bars in the background represent the mean values of the territory, and the green bars represent the mean values of the species.
Figure 5. Ecological profiles of the insolation models of Buxus balearica during the period of 1971–2000. (a) MDI1 (insolation model between December–March), (b) MDI2 (insolation during spring equinox), (c) MDI3 (insolation model between March–June), (d) MDI4 (insolation model during summer solstice), (e) MDI5 (insolation model between June–September), (f) MDI6 (insolation model during autumn equinox), (g) MDI7 (insolation model between September–December), (h) MDI8 (insolation model during winter solstice). The gray bars in the background represent the mean values of the territory, and the green bars represent the mean values of the species.
Diversity 15 01184 g005
Figure 6. Principal component analysis between dimensions one and two using 20 bioclimatic variables of Buxus balearica during the period of 1971–2000. Green arrows represent the eight variables included in the cluster analysis.
Figure 6. Principal component analysis between dimensions one and two using 20 bioclimatic variables of Buxus balearica during the period of 1971–2000. Green arrows represent the eight variables included in the cluster analysis.
Diversity 15 01184 g006
Figure 7. Dendrogram of habitat heterogeneity of Buxus balearica in Andalusia using eight variables (PT01, PT03, TMC, TMMC, MDT, DIST, MDI4, and MDI8). Each color represents a subpopulation, and it is correlated to the Figure 8 representation. (a) Cómpeta, (b) Chillar river basin, (c) Lentejí > 600 m, (d) Lentejí < 400 m, (e) Frigiliana, South Cómpeta, (f) South Guájares, (g) North Guájares, (h) Middle Nerja, (i) Cerro Gordo, Arroyo de la Miel, (j) Low Chillar, (k) Guadalfeo, Molvízar, and (l) Almería.
Figure 7. Dendrogram of habitat heterogeneity of Buxus balearica in Andalusia using eight variables (PT01, PT03, TMC, TMMC, MDT, DIST, MDI4, and MDI8). Each color represents a subpopulation, and it is correlated to the Figure 8 representation. (a) Cómpeta, (b) Chillar river basin, (c) Lentejí > 600 m, (d) Lentejí < 400 m, (e) Frigiliana, South Cómpeta, (f) South Guájares, (g) North Guájares, (h) Middle Nerja, (i) Cerro Gordo, Arroyo de la Miel, (j) Low Chillar, (k) Guadalfeo, Molvízar, and (l) Almería.
Diversity 15 01184 g007
Figure 8. Representation of the clusters obtained based on habitat heterogeneity of Buxus balearica in Andalusia using eight variables (PT01, PT03, TMC, TMMC, MDT, DIST, MDI4, and MDI8). The black line represents the higher elevation group, and the red line represents the lower elevation group. Red dots represent the coastal subpopulation, purple dots represent the western subpopulation, blue dots represent the central and upper elevation subpopulation, and green dots represent the subpopulation that is closest to the drainage network.
Figure 8. Representation of the clusters obtained based on habitat heterogeneity of Buxus balearica in Andalusia using eight variables (PT01, PT03, TMC, TMMC, MDT, DIST, MDI4, and MDI8). The black line represents the higher elevation group, and the red line represents the lower elevation group. Red dots represent the coastal subpopulation, purple dots represent the western subpopulation, blue dots represent the central and upper elevation subpopulation, and green dots represent the subpopulation that is closest to the drainage network.
Diversity 15 01184 g008
Figure 9. Potential distribution of Buxus balearica generated by MaxEnt ecological niche modelling using eight environmental variables: Dist, Lit, MDT, pH, prec, tmc, tmf, tmmc, and tmmf. Bluer shades represent less suitability and redder ones represent more suitability. (a) Potential model during the period of 1971–2000, (b) Potential model during the period of 2011–2040, (c) Potential model during the period of 2041–2070, and (d) Potential model during the period of 2071–2100.
Figure 9. Potential distribution of Buxus balearica generated by MaxEnt ecological niche modelling using eight environmental variables: Dist, Lit, MDT, pH, prec, tmc, tmf, tmmc, and tmmf. Bluer shades represent less suitability and redder ones represent more suitability. (a) Potential model during the period of 1971–2000, (b) Potential model during the period of 2011–2040, (c) Potential model during the period of 2041–2070, and (d) Potential model during the period of 2071–2100.
Diversity 15 01184 g009
Table 1. Climatic and environmental variables collected for this ecogeographic study.
Table 1. Climatic and environmental variables collected for this ecogeographic study.
CodeVariableDescription
TMCMean temperature of the warmest month (°C)Mean value in August *
Maximum value in August *
TMMCMaximum temperature of the warmest month (°C)
TMFMean temperature of the coldest month (°C)Mean value in January *
Minimum value in January *
TMMFMinimum temperature of the coldest month (°C)
PT01Mean precipitation of the first quarter (mm)January–February–March *
PT02Mean precipitation of the second quarter (mm)April–May–June *
PT03Mean precipitation of the third quarter (mm)July–August–September *
PT04Mean precipitation of the fourth quarter (mm)October–November–December *
MDTElevation from the Digital Elevation Model (m)DEM of Andalusia
ORIAspect (degree)Calculated from DEM
SLPSlope (%)
DISTEuclidean distance to the drainage network (m)Calculated from water bodies
MDI1Intermediate insolation model Between December–March
MDI2Insolation model during spring equinoxOn 21 March
MDI3Intermediate insolation modelBetween March–June
MDI4Insolation model during summer solsticeOn 21 June
MDI5Intermediate insolation modelBetween June–September
MDI6Insolation model during autumn equinoxOn 21 September
MDI7Intermediate insolation modelBetween September–December
MDI8Insolation model during winter solsticeOn 21 December
* The period from 1971 to 2000.
Table 2. Accessions of Buxus balearica (Andalusian Seed Bank (BG), Spain).
Table 2. Accessions of Buxus balearica (Andalusian Seed Bank (BG), Spain).
BG Accession NumberCollection LocalityProvinceType of Collection
14779NerjaMálagaBase
15596FrigilianaMálagaBase
15636 *NerjaMálagaBase
16208NerjaMálagaBase
16662Vélez de BenaudallaGranadaBase
17667Vélez de BenaudallaGranadaBase
17779AlmijaraMálagaBase
18579AlmuñécarGranadaBase
19213MotrilGranadaBase
19214LobresGranadaBase
19215CómpetaMálagaBase
19216AlmijaraMálagaBase
19217CómpetaMálagaBase
19218CómpetaMálagaBase
19219NerjaMálagaBase
19220CómpetaMálagaBase
19221CómpetaMálagaBase
19222CómpetaMálagaBase
19223CómpetaMálagaBase
19224NerjaMálagaBase
19225RagorAlmeríaBase
19226CázulasGranadaBase
19227OtívarGranadaBase
19238Arroyo de la MielMálagaBase
19520Güájares (Los)GranadaBase
20593Vélez de BenaudallaGranadaBase
22061Vélez de BenaudallaGranadaBase
50949Guadalfeo (ex situ)GranadaActive
51043Guadalfeo (ex situ)GranadaActive
51439Guadalfeo (ex situ)GranadaActive
Base = −20 °C storage condition. Active = −5 °C storage condition. * Accession 15636 is stored in Active and Base collections.
Table 3. Historical (2004–2021) summary of records of total hours in June, July, and August with relative humidity obtained from the LEMG station (ASOS network 36.67 N, 4.49 W) above 70% (comfort point) and 90% (condensation point).
Table 3. Historical (2004–2021) summary of records of total hours in June, July, and August with relative humidity obtained from the LEMG station (ASOS network 36.67 N, 4.49 W) above 70% (comfort point) and 90% (condensation point).
RelH > 70%RelH > 90%
YearRecordsJuneJulyAugustTotal Hours% RecordsJuneJulyAugustTotal Hours%
20041586434676476793.037651494232.52
20051025279285461512.52443012.00
20061175350317508587.52730031.50
20071164276420468582.027141497.00
20081316361430525658.03031124615.51
20091141352421368570.52621190210.50
20101615369545701807.537623818631.01
20111786656480650893.041703053535.02
20121561433489639780.5362339138104116.55
20131481372431678740.534401714920.01
20141838460620758919.04344374177192221.510
20151173215580378586.527561640028.01
20161763506521736881.541371416718.51
20171779471574734889.541589321729.01
20181096271312513548.025593981229.51
20191449404426619724.534693732934.52
20201583305744534791.5378919294144.52
20211824483581760912.04212636187263.03
Total26,3556997885210,50613,177.5 1480458435587740.0
Table 4. Loadings and the accumulated variance explained with principal components.
Table 4. Loadings and the accumulated variance explained with principal components.
CodeVariablePrincipal Component (PC)
123
TMCMean temperature of the warmest month (°C)0.12−0.340.07
TMMCMaximum temperature of the warmest month (°C) 0.05−0.220.40
TMFMean temperature of the coldest month (°C)0.13−0.290.35
TMMFMinimum temperature of the coldest month (°C)0.13−0.330.05
PT01Mean precipitation of the first quarter (mm)−0.090.340.26
PT02Mean precipitation of the second quarter (mm)−0.090.340.20
PT03Mean precipitation of the third quarter (mm)−0.120.280.36
PT04Mean precipitation of the fourth quarter (mm)−0.090.320.37
MDTElevation from the Digital Elevation Model (m)−0.120.31−0.37
ORIAspect (degree)0.240.01−0.04
SLPSlope (%)−0.18−0.10−0.21
DISTEuclidean distance to the drainage network (m)−0.010.16−0.33
MDI1Intermediate insolation model 0.320.08−0.09
MDI2Insolation model during spring equinox0.340.11−0.04
MDI3Intermediate insolation model0.320.140.06
MDI4Insolation model during summer solstice0.260.150.12
MDI5Intermediate insolation model0.320.140.06
MDI6Insolation model during autumn equinox0.340.11−0.04
MDI7Intermediate insolation model0.320.08−0.09
MDI8Insolation model during winter solstice0.300.05−0.10
Standard deviation2.762.321.57
Proportion of Variance0.380.270.12
Cumulative Proportion0.380.650.77
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hernández-Bermejo, J.E.; Labarca-Rojas, Y.; Herrera-Molina, F.; Quero, J.L.; Hernández-Clemente, R. Recovery of Neglected Species with Cloud Water Micro Condense Capacity as a Response to Climate Change: The Case of Sclerophyllous Boxwoods of Buxus balearica Lam. in the Southern Spanish Mediterranean. Diversity 2023, 15, 1184. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15121184

AMA Style

Hernández-Bermejo JE, Labarca-Rojas Y, Herrera-Molina F, Quero JL, Hernández-Clemente R. Recovery of Neglected Species with Cloud Water Micro Condense Capacity as a Response to Climate Change: The Case of Sclerophyllous Boxwoods of Buxus balearica Lam. in the Southern Spanish Mediterranean. Diversity. 2023; 15(12):1184. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15121184

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hernández-Bermejo, J. Esteban, Yalbeiry Labarca-Rojas, Francisca Herrera-Molina, José L. Quero, and Rocío Hernández-Clemente. 2023. "Recovery of Neglected Species with Cloud Water Micro Condense Capacity as a Response to Climate Change: The Case of Sclerophyllous Boxwoods of Buxus balearica Lam. in the Southern Spanish Mediterranean" Diversity 15, no. 12: 1184. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15121184

APA Style

Hernández-Bermejo, J. E., Labarca-Rojas, Y., Herrera-Molina, F., Quero, J. L., & Hernández-Clemente, R. (2023). Recovery of Neglected Species with Cloud Water Micro Condense Capacity as a Response to Climate Change: The Case of Sclerophyllous Boxwoods of Buxus balearica Lam. in the Southern Spanish Mediterranean. Diversity, 15(12), 1184. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15121184

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop