Next Article in Journal
Millepora spp. as Substrates of Their Hydrozoan Counterparts Stylaster sp. in the Pacific Ocean
Previous Article in Journal
Karyological Study of Acanthocephalus lucii (Echinorhynchida): The Occurrence of B Chromosomes in Populations from PCB-Polluted Waters
Previous Article in Special Issue
Occurrence of Aspergillus chevalieri and A. niger on Herbal Tea and Their Potential to Produce Ochratoxin A (OTA)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Three New Periconia Species Isolated from Wurfbainia villosa in Guangdong, China: A Discussion on the Doubtful Taxa Clustering in this Genus

by
Chunfang Liao
1,2,3,
Kevin D. Hyde
1,2,3,
Kandawatte Wedaralalage Thilini Chethana
1,2,3,
Wei Dong
1,
Yunhui Yang
1,2,3 and
Mingkwan Doilom
1,*
1
Innovative Institute for Plant Health/Key Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control on Fruits and Vegetables in South China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China
2
Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand
3
School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2024, 16(3), 141; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16030141
Submission received: 2 January 2024 / Revised: 9 February 2024 / Accepted: 19 February 2024 / Published: 23 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Hidden Fungal Diversity in Asia 2.0)

Abstract

:
During a survey of fungi on Wurfbainia villosa in Guangdong Province, China, three novel species, Periconia endophytica, P. yangjiangensis, and P. wurfbainiae, belonging to Periconiaceae in Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes are proposed based on morphological and phylogenetic evidence. Periconia endophytica was isolated from the healthy leaves of W. villosa, while P. yangjiangensis and P. wurfbainiae were obtained from the dead stems of the same host. Notably, holomorphs were observed in P. wurfbainiae. The morphological characteristics of the novel taxa are compared with closely related species within Periconia. Illustrations, morphological descriptions, and phylogenetic analyses are provided for the novel taxa. Multilocus phylogeny of the combined internal transcribed spacer (ITS), large subunit nuclear rDNA (LSU), small subunit nuclear ribosomal rDNA (SSU), and partial translation elongation factor 1–α (tef1-α) regions supported the establishment of three new species. Furthermore, the taxa clustering in Periconia, Flavomyces fulophazii, and Sporidesmium tengii, are discussed for further investigation of their taxonomic placements.

1. Introduction

Wurfbainia villosa is a perennial, evergreen herb belonging to the ginger family (Zingiberaceae: Alpinioideae). This traditional medicinal herb is one of the four major southern Chinese medicines [1]. The fruits of W. villosa are commonly used in traditional Chinese medicine due to their numerous therapeutic properties, including dampness elimination, diarrhea treatment, miscarriage prevention, spleen warming, and as appetite stimulants [2]. Wurfbainia villosa is mainly distributed in southeast and east Asia (e.g., Cambodia, China, India, Indonesia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam) [3,4]. In China, it is distributed in Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, and Yunnan provinces [5]. Yangchun City in the Guangdong Province is widely recognized as a hub for sourcing this medicinal herb [6]. However, limited taxonomic and phylogenetic information is available regarding the fungi associated with W. villosa, particularly in Yangchun City. A total of six fungal species have been reported on this medicinal plant in this region [7,8]. During a survey conducted in Yangchun City, Guangdong Province, China, to investigate microfungi associated with the traditional medicinal plant W. villosa, ascomycetous fungi resembling Periconia were isolated from the dead stems and healthy leaves of this plant.
Periconia was introduced by Tode [9] with P. lichenoides as the type species. Periconia was previously classified under Massarinaceae [10]. Subsequently, Tanaka et al. [11] reclassified Periconia in Periconiaceae based on the multi-locus phylogenetic analysis, which showed that Periconia species formed a distinct cluster separate from Massarinaceae. Until now, the latest treatment of Periconia by Tanaka et al. [11] has been followed by subsequent studies [12,13,14,15,16,17]. Most Periconia species have been reported based on their asexual morphs, while five species have been reported based on their sexual morphs, viz., P. didymosporum, P. homothallica, P. igniaria, P. prolifica, and P. pseudodigitata [11,17]. The asexual morph is mainly characterized by macronematous, mononematous, brown, branched, or unbranched conidiophores, with brown, ovoid to clavate or spherical conidial heads, intercalary or terminal conidiogenous cells with catenate or solitary, golden brown to dark brown, globose to subglobose, aseptate, smooth or verruculose conidia [11,15,18,19,20,21]. The sexual morph is characterized by immersed or erumpent, scattered or aggregated, globose to subglobose, ostiolate ascomata, hyaline periphyses, 8-spored, bitunicate, cylindrical, pedicellate asci, with an ocular chamber, and fusiform, 1-septate, hyaline, guttulate, smooth-walled ascospores with an entire sheath [16,17,22,23].
Periconia species have been reported as saprobes, endophytes, plant and human pathogens, distributed widely in terrestrial habitats and rarely in aquatic and marine environments [24,25,26,27]. Periconia byssoides was isolated from the gastrointestinal tract of sea hares (Aplysia kurodai) [28]. Periconia aquatica and P. submersa were isolated from decaying wood in the Nujiang River [12]. Periconia circinata was isolated as a pathogen causing blackening and rotting of wheat roots and stem bases [24], while P. igniaria and P. macrospinosa were reported as pathogens causing leaf spots on yellow starthistle [29] and leaf necrosis of pointed gourd [30], respectively. Furthermore, P. keratitis was reported as a human pathogen causing mycotic keratitis in India [27].
Periconia is the source of many economically important bioactive compounds [31]. From 1969 to the present, more than 100 compounds have been isolated from Periconia species, including aromatic compounds, carbohydrate derivatives, cytochalasans, macrolides, macropshelides, meroterpenes, polyketides, and terpenoids [25,28,31,32,33,34,35]. Periconia atropurpurea isolated from the leaves of Xylopia aromatica was reported to produce aromatic compounds [25]. Moreover, Periconia sp., isolated from branches of Taxus cuspidata, produces two fusicoccane diterpenes, namely periconicins A (1) and B (2), exhibiting potent antibacterial activity [36]. Therefore, a taxonomic study of the Periconia fungi could facilitate species identification to explore their potential for bioactive compounds.
In this study, we have reported three new species, Periconia endophytica, P. yangjiangensis, and P. wurfbainiae, based on morphological and multilocus phylogenetic analyses. The saprobic taxa, P. yangjiangensis and P. wurfbainiae, as well as the endophytic taxon, P. endophytica, were respectively isolated from decaying stems and healthy leaves of Wurfbainia villosa in Guangdong Province, China. Both asexual and sexual morphs are described for P. wurfbainiae. Furthermore, we also discussed the clustering of doubtful taxa, namely Flavomyces fulophazii and Sporidesmium tengii, within the genus Periconia.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection, Observation and Isolation of Samples

Endophytic fungi were isolated from the healthy leaves of Wurfbainia villosa collected in Yongning Town, Yangchun City, Guangdong Province, China in 2022. Fresh and healthy leaves were washed under tap water and dried with tissue paper, then cut into 0.3–0.5 cm × 0.3–0.5 cm sections using scissors. The leaf fragments were surface sterilized in 2.5% sodium hypochlorite for 1 min, 75% ethanol for 2 min, washed three times in sterilized water for 3 min, and finally dried on tissue filter paper. The surface-sterilized plant fragments were aseptically transferred onto PDA containing chloramphenicol (30 mg/mL) and incubated at 25 °C. The hyphae were purified two to three times under sterile conditions using a SZ650 stereo microscope in order to obtain a pure culture.
Saprobic samples were collected from the dead stem of Wurfbainia villosa in Heshui Town, Yangchun City, Guangdong Province, China in 2022. The methods used for capturing the observed samples and fungal structures, such as ascomata, hamathecium, asci, ascospores, conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, and conidia followed the protocol described by Liao et al. [8]. The isolation of single spores was conducted according to the methods described by Senanayake et al. [37].
The fungal isolates were preserved, fungal structures were measured, and herbarium specimens and living cultures were deposited according to the protocol described by Liao et al. [8]. The new species in this study were registered in Faces of Fungi (FoF) (http://www.facesoffungi.org, accessed on 30 December 2023) and Index Fungorum (IF) databases (http://www.indexfungorum.org/names/names.asp, accessed on 30 December 2023).

2.2. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Sequencing

Fungal genomic DNA was extracted using the methods described by Liao et al. [8], with adherence to the manufacturer’s instructions (Guangzhou Magen Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China). Extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C for future PCR amplification. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS), large subunit rDNA (LSU), small subunit nuclear ribosomal rDNA (SSU), and partial translation elongation factor 1–α (tef1-α) were amplified and sequenced using primers ITS1 and ITS4 [38], LR5 and LR0R [39], NS1 and NS4 [38], and EF1-728F and EF2 [40], respectively.
The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed with a volume of 25 µL, and the thermal cycling program was used to amplify ITS, LSU, and tef1-α following the protocol described by Liao et al. [8]. SSU amplification was conducted according to the ITS protocol. PCR products were purified and sequenced by Tianyi Huiyuan Gene Technology & Services Co. (Guangzhou, China). The sequences in this study were submitted to GenBank (Table 1).

2.3. Phylogenetic Analyses

The sequences used for phylogenetic analyses were downloaded from GenBank and corresponded to published literature based on the Blastn search of the ITS gene against the GenBank database [16,17]. A total of 78 sequences were used in the phylogenetic analyses (Table 1), with Morosphaeria ramunculicola (KH 220) and M. velatispora (KH 221) as the outgroup taxa. Four single-gene loci were aligned in the MAFFT v. 7 online program. The sequence was trimmed with Trimal version v. 3 (Gappyout option) [41]. Alignments were converted to NEXUS format using the Alignment Transformation Environment online platform (http://www.sing-group.org/ALTER/, accessed on 30 December 2023).
Phylogenies based on the combined ITS, LSU, SSU, and tef1-α sequence data were generated using maximum-likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses performed in the CIPRES Science Gateway online platform (https://www.phylo.org/portal2/home.action, accessed on 30 December 2023). The maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was conducted via RA × ML-HPC2 on XSEDE (8.2.10), with the GTR + G + I evolutionary substitution model and 1000 replicates of rapid bootstrap inferences. The free model parameters were estimated using RA × ML ML with 25 per site rate categories. The likelihood of the final tree was evaluated and optimized using GAMMA. The jModelTest2 on XSEDE (2.1.6) online platform (https://www.phylo.org/portal2/createTask.action, accessed on 30 December 2023) was performed for each locus to estimate the best-fit evolutionary model under the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) [42]. The Bayesian inference (BI) analysis was conducted with the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method in MrBayes version 3.2.7a on the XSEDE tool on the CIPRES portal [43]. Four simultaneous Markov chains were run for 5,000,000 generations. The phylogenetic trees were sampled every 100th generation. The resulting trees were visualized in FigTree v. 1.4.0 [44] and formatted using PowerPoint 2010 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Phylogeny

The phylogenetic tree of the combined ITS (1–605 bp), LSU (606–1450), SSU (1451–2470), and tef1-α (2471–3403) sequence data comprised 78 taxa, including Morosphaeria ramunculicola (KH 220) and M. velatispora (KH 221) as the outgroup taxa. The topology of the ML analysis was similar to the BI analysis, and the best ML tree with a final ML optimization likelihood value of −19495.411175 is shown in Figure 1. The matrix, comprising a total of 3403 characters, exhibits 1235 distinct alignment patterns, with 32.42% undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.236736, C = 0.256383, G = 0.268919, T = 0.237962; substation rates: AC = 1.512523, AG = 2.690423, AT = 1.737420, CG = 1.087709, CT = 9.882829, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter: α = 0.206248.
In this study, our tree topology is similar to the previous studies of Yang et al. [16] and Su et al. [17]. Nonetheless, the inclusion of newly discovered taxa, such as the six novel species (P. chengduensis, P. cynodontis, P. festucae, P. imperatae, P. penniseti, and P. spodiopogonis) reported by Su et al. [17], has led to minor changes in the positions of certain species. The addition of our novel species resulted in Sporidesmium tengii (HKUCC 10837) clustering with Periconia cynodontis CGMCC 3.23927 instead of P. didymosporium MFLU 15-0058 as in Yang et al. [16]. Phylogenetic analyses showed that our six strains clustered within Periconia. Two strains, ZHKUCC 23-0997 and ZHKUCC 23-0998 of P. yangjiangensis, formed a distinct lineage, separated from other Periconia species with 95% ML and 1.00 BYPP. Two strains of P. endophytica, ZHKUCC 23-0995 and ZHKUCC 23-0996, formed a distinct branch, separated from other Periconia species with 89% ML and 1.00 BYPP. Two P. wurfbainiae strains, ZHKUCC 23-0999 and ZHKUCC 23-1000, formed a distinct branch, separated from other Periconia species with 62% ML and 0.94 BYPP (Figure 1).

3.2. Taxonomy

Periconia endophytica C.F. Liao, Doilom & K.D. Hyde, sp. nov.
Index Fungorum number: IF851407; Facesoffungi number: FoF 15276; Figure 2.
Etymology. The epithet “endophytica” refers to the endophytic lifestyle of the species.
Holotype. MHZU 23-0245
Endophytic associated with leaves of Wurfbainia villosa. Sexual morph: undetermined. Asexual morph: sporulation on the sterile plant tissue in PDA after a month of incubation, spore masses visible as black spot, scattered on colonies. Hyphae 1.5–3.5 µm wide ( x ¯ = 2.5 μm, n = 30), branched, hyaline, septate, smooth to slightly verruculose. Conidiophores 15–110 × 2.5–5.5 µm ( x ¯ = 45 × 4 μm, n = 30), micro to semimacronematous, mononematous, erect, flexuous or straight, branched, sparsely septate, slightly constricted at septa, rough-walled, verruculose, thin-walled, hyaline, pale brown to yellowish brown in the upper portion. Conidiogenous cells 5–20 × 2.5–5.5 µm ( x ¯ = 9 × 4 μm, n = 30), holoblastic, mono- and poly-blastic, integrated, determinate, terminal, subcylindrical, obovoid, ellipsoidal with truncate ends, pale brown to yellowish brown, verruculose. Conidia 4–6 × 3–5 µm ( x ¯ = 5 × 4 μm, n = 30), globose to subglobose, aseptate, catenate, with 4–10 conidia in a chain, hyaline when young, becoming pale brown, yellowish brown and reddish brown when mature, verruculose.
Culture characteristics. Colonies on PDA reaching 4.2 cm in two weeks at 28 ± 2 °C, medium dense, center umbonate, circular, floccose to fluffy, velvety, filiform edge, golden brown at the center, pale brown at the margin from above; orange-brown to golden brown at the center, pale brown at the margin from reverse.
Material examined. China, Guangdong Province, Yangjiang City, Yongning Town (22.256185 N, 111.609037 E), from healthy leaves of Wurfbainia villosa (Zingiberaceae), 10 April 2022, C.F. Liao & Y.H. Yang, AML04C-3 (MHZU 23-0245, holotype); ex-type culture, ZHKUCC 23-0995; ibid., living culture ZHKUCC 23-0996.
Notes. Phylogenetically, P. endophytica formed a distinct linage and clustered with other sister Periconia species with 89% ML and 1.00 BYPP (Figure 1). Periconia endophytica differs from its phylogenetically close species P. wurfbainiae and P. yangjiangensis based on size and shape of conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, and conidia (Table 2). Based on the morphological differences and molecular support, Periconia endophytica is introduced as a new species.
Periconia wurfbainiae C.F. Liao, Doilom & K.D. Hyde, sp. nov.
Index Fungorum number: IF851409; Facesoffungi number: FoF 15277; Figure 3 and Figure 4.
Etymology. In reference to the host genus Wurfbainia from which it was isolated.
Holotype. MHZU 23-0247
Description. Saprobic on dead stems of Wurfbainia villosa. Sexual morph from MHZU 23-0248: Ascomata 220–300 × 150–220 µm, solitary to scattered, immersed to semi-immersed, pyriform, black, papillate stain the substrate purple, visible as black dots on the host surface. Peridium 13–30 µm thick ( x ¯ = 19 μm, n = 20), composed of 6–12 layers, hyaline to brown cells of textura angularis. Hamathecium 1.5–4 μm wide ( x ¯ = 3 µm, n = 30), comprises of dense, trabeculate, filiform, septate, branching pseudo-paraphyses. Asci 65–100 × 9.5–15 µm ( x ¯ = 81 × 12 μm, n = 20), 8-spored, bitunicate, cylindrical, with rounded apex and narrower, short pedicellate, with an obscured ocular chamber. Ascospores 20–26 × 5–8 µm ( x ¯ = 23.5 × 7 μm, n = 30), overlapping uniseriate, biseriate in the middle portion, fusiform, slightly curved, 1-septate, slightly constricted at the septum, narrowly rounded at both ends, hyaline, guttulate, smooth-walled, surrounded by a mucilaginous sheath. Asexual morph from MHZU 23-0247: colonies superficial on the host substrate, hairy, solitary, gregarious, dark brown. Conidiophores 225–315 × 8–14 µm ( x ¯ = 265 × 10 μm, n = 20), macronematous, mononematous, sometimes 1–2 cluster together on the stroma, erect, subcylindrical, with robust and swollen base, straight or slightly curved, 5–7-septate, black, unbranched, smooth-walled to slightly rough. Conidiogenous cells 7–11 × 5–9 µm ( x ¯ = 8 × 6 μm, n = 10), holoblastic, poly-blastic, with several prominent conidiogenous loci at the apex, integrated, determinate, terminal and intercalary, reddish brown to black, subcylindrical, verruculose. Conidia 3.5–7 µm diam. ( x ¯ = 5 μm, n = 15), globose, aseptate, catenate, usually 6–8 conidia in a chain, initially hyaline, becoming yellowish brown and greenish brown, and reddish brown to dark brown at maturity, thick-walled and verruculose.
Culture characteristics. Ascospores from specimen number MHZU 23-0248 germinating on PDA within 24h, germ tube produced from both ends. Colonies on PDA reaching 5.5 cm diam. after two weeks at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C), medium dense, center umbonate, circular, center zone forming a clear bound with margin zone, floccose to fluffy, velvety, filiform edge, white from above, brown at the center, cream at the margin from reverse. Conidia from specimen number MHZU 23-0247 germinating on PDA within 12–24 h, germ tube produced from both ends. Colonies on PDA reaching 4.5 cm diam. after two weeks at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C), medium dense, center umbonate, circular, floccose to fluffy, velvety, filiform edge, cream white from above, brown at the center, pale luteous at the margin from reverse. No reproduction structures of asexual morph or fruit bodies of a sexual morph on PDA.
Material examined. China, Guangdong Province, Yangchun City, Heshui Town (22.32718988 N, 111.89251818 E), on dead stems of Wurfbainia villosa, 10 April 2022, C.F. Liao & Y.H. Yang, YAM28 (MHZU 23-0247, holotype); ex-type culture, ZHKUCC 23-0999; ibid. YAM29 (MHZU 23-0248), living culture ZHKUCC 23-1000.
Notes. In the phylogenetic analyses, P. wurfbainiae formed a distinct lineage from other Periconia species with 62% ML and 0.94 BYPP (Figure 1). Periconia wurfbainiae differs from its phylogenetically related species P. variicolor by having longer conidiophores (225–315 × 8–14 µm vs. 20–271 × 3–8 μm) and smaller conidia (3.5–7 µm vs. 7.5–9.5 μm). The presence of conidiophores with a stipe and swollen apex is absent in P. wurfbainiae, whereas they are observed in P. variicolor [45]. Moreover, the conidiophores of P. wurfbainiae are macronematous, dark brown to black, and smooth to slightly rough-walled. In contrast, P. variicolor has macronematous and micronematous conidiophores, initially subhyaline, becoming pale to dark brown at maturity, and smooth-walled [46]. Based on the distinct morphological characteristics and phylogenetic support, we introduce P. wurfbainiae as a new species.
Periconia yangjiangensis C.F. Liao, Doilom & K.D. Hyde, sp. nov.
Index Fungorum number: IF851410; Facesoffungi number: FoF 15278; Figure 5.
Etymology. In reference to the collection location, Yangjiang City, Guangdong Province of China.
Holotype. MHZU 23-0246
Description. Saprobic on dead stems of Wurfbainia villosa. Sexual morph: undetermined. Asexual morph: colonies superficial on the host substrate, hairy, gregarious, dark brown. Conidiophores 275–420 × 5–15 µm ( x ¯ = 355 × 10 μm, n = 20), macronematous, mononematous, erect, subcylindrical, tapering towards the apex, with robust base, straight or slightly flexuous, dark brown to black in the lower portion, brown in the upper portion, with 1–4 times of enteroblastic percurrent proliferating, forming 1–4 swollen, pyriform or dumbbell-shaped, dark brown or paler cells from a collar cell, unbranched, sparsely septate, smooth-walled, thick-walled. Conidiogenous cells 15–25 × 8–10 µm ( x ¯ = 18 × 9 μm, n = 10), holoblastic, poly-blastic, integrated, determinate, terminal, oblong, with rounded apex, wider than conidiophores, brown, smooth-walled, thin-walled. Conidia 6–10 µm diam. ( x ¯ = 7.5 μm, n = 30), globose, catenate, mostly with three conidia in a chain, aseptate, initially hyaline, becoming golden brown at maturity, thick-walled, verruculose.
Culture characteristics. Conidia germinating on PDA within 24h, germ tube produced from both ends. Colonies on PDA reaching 35–45 diam., after two weeks at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C), medium dense, center raised, irregular, floccose to fluffy, velvety, lobate edge, golden brown at the center, pale brown at the margin from above and reverse.
Material examined. China, Guangdong Province, Yangchun City, Heshui Town (22.32718988 N, 111.89251818 E), on dead stems of Wurfbainia villosa (Zingiberaceae), 10 April 2022, C.F. Liao & Y.H. Yang, YAM04 (MHZU 23-0246, holotype); ex-type culture, ZHKUCC 23-0997; ibid., living culture ZHKUCC 23- 23-0998.
Notes. Periconia yangjiangensis resembles P. pseudobyssoides in the morphologies of conidiophores and conidia on the natural substrate [17,19]. However, conidia of P. yangjiangensis are initially hyaline, becoming golden brown at maturity, and verruculose but they are golden yellow to golden brown or reddish brown, spherical, verruculose when young, mature conidia with specific ornamentation consisting of irregular lobate crests in P. pseudobyssoides [17,19]. The morphological characteristics of P. yangjiangensis were also compared with those of P. endophytica and P. wurfbainiae, which were isolated from the same host plant, Wurfbainia villosa. The conidiophores of P. yangjiangensis are macronematous, dark brown to black, and unbranched, while they are micro and semimacronematous, hyaline, and branched in P. endophytica. The conidia of P. yangjiangensis are golden brown with typically three conidia found in a chain while they are pale brown to golden brown and typically form a long chain consisting of 4 to 10 conidia in P. endophytica. However, morphological differences could occur as P. yangjiangensis were directly observed on a dead host plant while P. endophytica were observed in PDA. Periconia yangjiangensis differs from P. wurfbainiae, in having conidiophores mostly 1–4 times of enteroblastic percurrent proliferating, forming 1–4 swollen, dark brown to black, paler towards the apex, terminal conidiogenous cells, with mostly three conidia in a chain. In contrast, P. wurfbainiae has conidiophores that are not swollen at the terminal cells, dark brown to black, with both terminal and intercalary conidiogenous cells, usually 6–8 conidia in a chain. In addition, P. yangjiangensis can be distinguished from P. wurfbainiae by its longer conidiophores (275–420 × 5–15 µm vs. 225–315 × 8–14 µm) and larger conidiogenous cells (15–25 × 8–10 µm vs. 7–11 × 5–9 µm). In the phylogenetic analyses, P. yangjiangensis formed a distinct branch separated from other Periconia species with 95% ML, and 1.00 BYPP (Figure 1) indicating that P. yangjiangensis is distinct from other Periconia species. Based on morphological and phylogenetic support, we introduce P. yangjiangensis as a new species.
Table 2. Synopsis of asexual morphological characteristics of Periconia endophytica, P. yangjiangensis, and P. wurfbainiae and its closely related species.
Table 2. Synopsis of asexual morphological characteristics of Periconia endophytica, P. yangjiangensis, and P. wurfbainiae and its closely related species.
Taxa ConidiophoresConidiogenous CellsConidiaReference
Periconia caespitosaUp to 500 µm long, 5–6 µm wide at the base, macronematous, mononematous, septate, unbranched or rarely branched, caespitose, straight to flexuous, setiform and sometimes uncinated at the tip, pale brown at the base, brown towards the apex, minutely roughened at the base and at the apex, as well as in the areas nearest of conidiogenous cells, otherwise smooth(6–)7.5–9 × 6.5–7.5 µm, poly-blastic, pale brown, finely roughened, intercalary and terminal, globose, subglobose or obpyriform(6–)6.5–9 µm, globose, aseptate, reddish brown, thick-walled, dry, solitary or in short basipetal chains of 2–4 conidiaCrous et al. [46]
P. cambrensis150–300 × 3–5 µm, erect, straight or tapering, pale brown, 5–9-septate, cylindrical, bearing a few short branches 6–7 × 5–6 µm, ovate, hyaline or pale brown, smooth, bearing single or short-chained conidia5–8 µm diam., spherical, brownEllis [47]
P. endophytica15–110 × 2.5–5.5 µm ( x ¯ = 45 × 4 μm, n = 30), micro- to semi-macronematous, mononematous, erect, flexuous or straight, branched, sparsely septate, slightly constricted at septa, rough-walled, verruculose, thin-walled, hyaline, pale brown to yellowish brown in the upper portion5–20 × 2.5–5.5 µm ( x ¯ = 9 × 4 μm, n = 30), holoblastic, mono- and poly-blastic, integrated, determinate, terminal, subcylindrical, obovoid, ellipsoidal with truncate ends, pale brown to yellowish brown, verruculose4–6 × 3–5 µm ( x ¯ = 5 × 4 μm, n = 30), globose to subglobose, aseptate, catenate, with 4–10 conidia in a chain, hyaline when young, becoming pale brown, yellowish brown and reddish brown when mature, verruculoseThis study
P. epilithographicola251.6–270 × 3.6–6.1 µm, macronematous, with creeping hyphae forming stipes straight, branched singly near the base, seven or more septate, grayish to black(5.1−) 7 × 10 (−11.5) µm, holoblastic, sub-globose to ellipsoid, finely roughened, yellowish to brown(7.8−) 9.2 (−10.7), globose, golden to brown, echinulated, catenated, sometimes forming long chainsCoronado-Ruiz et al. [48]
P. neobrittanica100–300 × 10–17 μm, solitary, or in clusters of 2–3, arising from a brown stroma, subcylindrical, straight to flexuous, unbranched, dark brown, smooth, thick-walled, base swollen, 15–25 μm diam.10–15 μm long, terminal and intercalary, occurring in an apical chain on primary, or directly on conidiophore(6–)8–10(–12) μm diam., aseptate, spherical, pale to medium brown, with delicate spines, occurring in branched chainsCrous et al. [49]
P. pseudobyssoides23–25 μm wide at the base, up to 300–600 μm long, macronematous, arising usually singly, but occasionally 2 or 3(−4) together on stromata, often verruculose, with brown to reddish brown conidial heads10–12 × 6–7.5 μm, discrete, determinate, usually monoblastic, sometimes poly-blastic, ellipsoidal, ovoid to clavate, pale brown to reddish brown, verruculose, arising directly from the swollen mid-brown apical cell cut off by a septum from the stipe apex(12–)15–17(−20) μm diam., spherical, golden yellow to golden brown or reddish brown, verruculose when young, mature conidia with specific ornamentation consisting of irregular lobate crests, born singly or in acropetal chains of 2–4 conidiaMarkovskaja and Kačergius [19]
P. variicolor20–271 × 3–8 μm, simple, macronematous and micronematous, unbranched, mononematous, initially subhyaline, becoming pale to dark brown with age, smooth, occasional rigid hyphae formed but typical conidiophores with a stipe and swollen apex and base lackingDiscrete, determinate, terminal or lateral on the conidiophore, subglobose, ovoid to clavate, often poly-blastic. Terminal conidiogenous cells often form branched, acropetal chains that produce dense clusters of conidia7.5–9.5 μm, globose, one-celled, dark brown and verruculose at maturityCantrell et al. [45]
P. wurfbainiae225–315 × 8–14 µm ( x ¯ = 265 × 10 μm, n = 20), macronematous, mononematous, sometimes 1–2 cluster together on the stroma, erect, subcylindrical, with robust and swollen base, straight or slightly curved, 5–7-septate, black, unbranched, smooth-walled to slightly rough7–11 × 5–9 µm ( x ¯ = 8 × 6 μm, n = 10), holoblastic, poly-blastic, with several prominent conidiogenous loci at the apex, integrated, determinate, terminal and intercalary, reddish brown to black, subcylindrical, verruculose3.5–7 µm diam. ( x ¯ = 5 μm, n = 15), globose, aseptate, catenate, usually 6–8 conidia in a chain, initially hyaline, becoming yellowish brown and greenish brown, and reddish brown to dark brown at maturity, thick-walled and verruculoseThis study
P. yangjiangensis275–420 × 5–15 µm ( x ¯ = 355 × 10 μm, n = 20), macronematous, mononematous, erect, subcylindrical, tapering towards the apex, with robust base, straight or slightly flexuous, dark brown to black in the lower portion, brown in the upper portion, with 1–4 times of enteroblastic percurrent proliferating, forming 1–4 swollen, pyriform or dumbbell-shaped, dark brown or paler cells from a collar cell, unbranched, sparsely septate, smooth-walled, thick-walled15–25 × 8–10 µm ( x ¯ = 18 × 9 μm, n = 10), holoblastic, poly-blastic, integrated, determinate, terminal, oblong, with rounded apex, wider than conidiophores, brown, smooth-walled, thin-walled6–10 µm diam. ( x ¯ = 7.5 μm, n = 30), globose, catenate, mostly with 3 conidia in a chain, aseptate, initially hyaline, becoming golden brown at maturity, thick-walled, verruculoseThis study

4. Discussion

Periconiaceae was resurrected by Tanaka et al. [11] and placed in Pleosporales based on morphological and phylogenetic evidence. This family comprises the genera Bambusistroma, Flavomyces, Noosia, and Periconia [11,50,51]. However, Yang et al. [16] re-evaluated the taxonomic status and synonymized Bambusistroma and Noosia under Periconia based on morphological characters of sexual morphs and multiloci phylogenetic analyses. Flavomyces was introduced by Knapp et al. [50] to accommodate the dark septate root endophyte, F. fulophazii, based on culture characteristics and phylogenetic analyses. Based on the phylogenetic analyses of combined ITS, LSU, SSU, and tef1-α sequence data in this study, F. fulophazii grouped within Periconia clade and formed a distinct lineage with Periconia endophytica, P. yangjiangensis, and P. wurfbainiae (Figure 1). We suggest that F. fulophazii should be synonymized with Periconia. However, the morphologies of F. fulophazii have not been described by Knapp et al. [51]. Therefore, more supporting evidence is required to validate the taxonomic placement of F. fulophazii.
Sporidesmium tengii (HKUCC 10837), which previously clustered closely with P. didymosporium in Yang et al. [16], groups within Periconia but forms a cluster with P. cynodontis (CGMCC 3.23927) in the current study with a 99% ML and 1.00 BYPP (Figure 1). This observed difference in the positioning could be attributed to differences in taxon sampling between the two studies. Unfortunately, no sequence data are available for the type of S. tengii [52]. Furthermore, the type of S. tengii described in Wu and Zhang [52] has macronematous, mononematous, erect, brown to dark brown conidiophores with terminal, brown, cylindrical, smooth-walled conidiogenous cells, which align with the generic characters of Periconia. However, the conidia of S. tengii differ from the generic characters of Periconia (globose to subglobose, aseptate), as they are acrogenous, solitary, obclavate, and 8-septate [52]. Otherwise, the strain of S. tengii (HKUCC 10837) that is clustered within Periconia only has the LSU sequence data [53] and its morphology has not been described in Shenoy et al. [53]. Given the contradictory evidence from different studies regarding the placement of S. tengii (HKUCC 10837), the taxonomic placement needs to be re-evaluated. Since S. tengii (HKUCC 10837) is only supported by LSU sequence data and lacks morphological support, it becomes challenging to transfer S. tengii (HKUCC 10837) to Periconia. Therefore, morphological reexamination of the holotype of S. tengii, molecular data (ITS, SSU, and tef1-α) from an epi-type along with additional fresh collections are required to confirm the taxonomic placement.
The phylogenetic relationships among Periconia species were analyzed based on the combined ITS, LSU, SSU, and tef1-α sequence data, which supported the recognition of P. endophytica, P. yangjiangensis, and P. wurfbainiae as new species (Figure 1). Morphologically, P. endophytica resembles P. cambrensis in having conidia that are produced on conidiogenous cells and branches along the sides of the conidiophores [45]. However, the conidiophores of P. endophytica are shorter (15–110 µm) compared to those of P. cambrensis (up to 300 µm), while its conidia have a smaller diameter (4–6 µm) than those of P. cambrensis (5–8 µm) [47]. The sexual morph of P. wurfbainiae shares similar morphological characteristics with the sexual morphs of other Periconia species (e.g., P. homothallica and P. pseudodigitata in having immersed, globose ascomata with a papilla, cylindrical asci with a pedicel, and an ocular chamber, broadly fusiform, hyaline, ascospores, with nearly median septum, surrounded by a mucilaginous sheath [11]. However, P. wurfbainiae has larger ascomata (220–300 × 150–220 µm vs. 140–190 × 160–180 μm) and narrower asci (20–26 × 5–8 µm vs. 22–31 × 7–10 μm) compared to those of P. homothallica. Periconia wurfbainiae has larger ascomata (220–300 × 150–220 µm vs. 160–200 × 130–250 µm) with thicker peridium (13–30 µm vs. 6–13 μm) than those of P. pseudodigitata [11]. The morphological characteristics of the novel species can be distinguished from closely related taxa by examining the size and shape of their conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, and conidia, as detailed in the notes and Table 2 and Table 3. To date, Periconia has 161 epithets listed in Species Fungorum (https://www.speciesfungorum.org/names/names.asp, accessed on 30 December 2023). Among these, approximately 133 have been accepted based on morphological characters, and 46 species, including three new species in this study, have molecular data. However, most Periconia species only have ITS and LSU sequence data. Therefore, it is recommended to incorporate additional loci (e.g., SSU and tef1-α) for accurate species identification. Also, more fresh collections are needed to reconfirm the taxonomic placements for the doubtful taxa mentioned before.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.L. and M.D.; methodology, C.L. and M.D.; software, C.L. and M.D.; validation, K.W.T.C., M.D., Y.Y., K.D.H. and W.D.; formal analysis, K.W.T.C., K.D.H. and M.D.; investigation, C.L., M.D., K.W.T.C., K.D.H. and W.D.; resources, C.L. and Y.Y.; data curation, C.L.; writing—original draft preparation, C.L. and M.D.; writing—review and editing, K.W.T.C., M.D., K.D.H. and W.D.; visualization, C.L.; supervision, M.D., K.W.T.C., K.D.H. and W.D.; project administration, M.D.; funding acquisition, M.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Science and Technology Bureau of Guangzhou City (grant numbers 2023A04J1425 and 2023A04J1426), and the Innovative Team Program of the Department of Education of Guangdong Province (2022KCXTD015 and 2022ZDJS020). K.D.H. acknowledges the support of the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) (grant no. N42A650547) entitled “Total fungal diversity in a given forest area with implications towards species numbers, chemical diversity and biotechnology”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data can be found in the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to Shaun Pennycook (Landcare Research, New Zealand) for his critical nomenclatural review. We would also like to thank Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering and Mae Fah Luang University for providing research facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lin, X.; Huang, L.; Liang, H.; Hou, C.; Ling, X.; Chen, Y.; Yang, P.; Wu, Q.; Zhao, H.; Wu, S.; et al. Genome-wide identification and functional characterization of borneol dehydrogenases in Wurfbainia villosa. Planta 2023, 258, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tian, Y.Q.; Ding, P.; Yan, X.H.; Hu, W.J. Discussion on quality control of preparations with cortex moutanin volume I pharmacopoeia of People’s Republic of China (2005 edition). Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi 2008, 33, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Zeng, Y.; Ali, M.K.; He, W.; Deng, L.; Yang, X.; Li, X.; Pu, X.; Yang, J. Chemical Constituents of Functional Food Amomum villosum to Combat Human Diseases. Curr. Chin. Sci. 2022, 2, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wu, Z.; Xue, Q.; Miao, P.; Li, C.; Liu, X.; Cheng, Y.; Miao, K.; Yu, Y.; Li, Z. Deep Learning Network of Amomum villosum Quality Classification and Origin Identification Based on X-ray Technology. Foods 2023, 12, 1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lai, Y.F.; Chen, L.X.; Chen, Y.N.; Zhao, J.; Leong, F.; Li, X.W.; Yang, Q.; Li, P.; Hu, H. Sustainable development of Amomum villosum: A systematic investigation on three different production modes. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 13, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Xu, J.; Yang, B.; Li, M.; Li, Z.; Tu, Y.; Tang, L.; He, G. Research on germplasm diversity of Amomum villosum. Lour in genuine producing area. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0268246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jiang, Z.D.; Chi, P.K. The identification of the fungi deseases of Amomun villosum. J. South China Agric. 1989, 10, 9–16. [Google Scholar]
  8. Liao, C.F.; Senanayake, I.C.; Dong, W.; Thilini Chethana, K.W.; Tangtrakulwanich, K.; Zhang, Y.X.; Doilom, M. Taxonomic and phylogenetic updates on Apiospora: Introducing four new species from Wurfbainia villosa and Grasses in China. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tode, H.J. Fungi Mecklenburgenses Selecti. Fasc. II; Generum Novorum Appendicem; Kessinger Publishing, LLC: Lüneburg, Germany, 1791; Volume 2, pp. 1–67. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hyde, K.D.; Jones, E.B.G.; Liu, J.K.; Ariyawansa, H.; Boehm, E.; Boonmee, S.; Braun, U.; Chomnunti, P.; Crous, P.W.; Dai, D.Q.; et al. Families of Dothideomycetes. Fungal Divers. 2013, 63, 1–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tanaka, K.; Hirayama, K.; Yonezawa, H.; Sato, G.; Toriyabe, A.; Kudo, H.; Hashimoto, A.; Matsumura, M.; Harada, Y.; Kurihara, Y.; et al. Revision of the Massarineae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes). Stud. Mycol. 2015, 82, 75–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hyde, K.D.; Norphanphoun, C.; Abreu, V.P.; Bazzicalupo, A.; Thilini Chethana, K.W.; Clericuzio, M.; Dayarathne, M.C.; Dissanayake, A.J.; Ekanayaka, A.H.; He, M.Q.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 603–708, taxonomic and phylogenetic notes on genera and species. Fungal Divers. 2017, 87, 1–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hyde, K.D.; Chaiwan, N.; Norphanphoun, C.; Boonmee, S.; Camporesi, E.; Chethana, K.W.; Dayarathne, M.C.; De Silva, N.I.; Dissanayake, A.J.; Ekanayaka, A.H.; et al. Mycosphere notes 169–224. Mycosphere 2018, 9, 271–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hyde, K.D.; Tennakoon, D.S.; Jeewon, R.; Bhat, D.J.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Rossi, W.; Leonardi, M.; Lee, H.B.; Mun, H.Y.; Houbraken, J.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 1036–1150: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 2019, 96, 1–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, N.G.; Hongsanan, S.; Yang, J.; Bhat, D.J.; Liu, J.; Jumpathong, J.; Liu, Z. Periconia thailandica (Periconiaceae), a new species from Thailand. Phytotaxa 2017, 323, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, E.F.; Phookamsak, R.; Jiang, H.B.; Tibpromma, S.; Bhat, D.J.; Karunarathna, S.C.; Dai, D.Q.; Xu, J.C.; Promputtha, I. Taxonomic reappraisal of Periconiaceae with the description of three new Periconia species from China. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Su, P.; Lu, Z.; Tian, W.; Chen, Y.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N. Six additions to the genus Periconia (Dothideomycetes: Periconiaceae) from Graminaceous plants in China. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ellis, M.B. Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes; Commonwealth Mycological Institute: Kew, UK, 1971; pp. 344–353. [Google Scholar]
  19. Markovskaja, S.; Kačergius, A. Morphological and molecular characterization of Periconia pseudobyssoides sp. nov. and closely related P. byssoides. Mycol. Prog. 2014, 13, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Calvillo-Medina, R.P.; Cobos-Villagran, A.; Raymundo, T. Periconia citlaltepetlensis sp. nov. (Periconiaceae, Pleosporales): A psychrotolerant fungus from high elevation volcanic glacier (Mexico). Phytotaxa 2020, 459, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hongsanan, S.; Hyde, K.D.; Phookamsak, R.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; McKenzie, E.H.; Sarma, V.V.; Lücking, R.; Boonmee, S.; Bhat, D.J.; Liu, N.G.; et al. Refined families of Dothideomycetes: Orders and families incertae sedis in Dothideomycetes. Fungal Divers. 2020, 105, 17–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Booth, C. Didymosphaeria igniaria sp. nov., the perfect state of Periconia igniaria. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1968, 51, 803–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kohlmeyer, J. Marine fungi of Hawaii including the new genus Helicascus. Can. J. Bot. 1969, 47, 1469–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Goga, N. Periconia circinata—A new pathogen of roots and stem base of wheat in northwestern Romania. Analele Institutului de Cercetări pentru Cereale și Plante Tehnice Fundulea 2000, 67, 205–214. [Google Scholar]
  25. Teles, H.L.; Sordi, R.; Silva, G.H.; Castro-Gamboa, I.; da Silva Bolzani, V.; Pfenning, L.H.; de Abreu, L.M.; Costa-Neto, C.M.; Young, M.C.; Araújo, Â.R. Aromatic compounds produced by Periconia atropurpurea, an endophytic fungus associated with Xylopia aromatica. Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 2686–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Phookamsak, R.; Hyde, K.D.; Jeewon, R.; Bhat, D.J.; Jones, E.B.G.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Raspé, O.; Karunarathna, S.C.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Hongsanan, S.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 929–1035: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungi. Fungal Divers. 2019, 95, 1–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gunasekaran, R.; Janakiraman, D.; Rajapandian, S.G.; Appavu, S.P.; Venkatesh, P.N.; Prajna, L. Periconia species-An unusual fungal pathogen causing mycotic keratitis. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2021, 39, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Numata, A.; Iritani, M.; Yamada, T.; Minoura, K.; Matsumura, E.; Yamori, T.; Tsuruo, T. Novel antitumour metabolites produced by a fungal strain from a sea hare. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 8215–8218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kolomiets, T.; Pankratova, L.; Mukhina, Z.; Kassanelly, D.; Matveeva, T.; Bogomaz, D.; Berner, D. First report of leaf spot caused by Periconia igniaria on yellow starthistle in Russia. Plant Dis. 2008, 92, 983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sarkar, T.; Chakraborty, P.; Karmakar, A.; Saha, A.; Saha, D. First report of Periconia macrospinosa causing leaf necrosis of pointed gourd in India. J. Plant Pathol. 2019, 101, 1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Azhari, A.; Supratman, U. The chemistry and pharmacology of fungal genus Periconia: A review. Sci. Pharm. 2021, 89, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wu, Y.H.; Chen, G.D.; He, R.R.; Wang, C.X.; Hu, D.; Wang, G.Q.; Guo, L.D.; Yao, X.S.; Gao, H. Pericolactines A–C, a new class of diterpenoid alkaloids with unusual tetracyclic skeleton. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 17082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wu, Y.H.; Chen, G.D.; Wang, C.X.; Hu, D.; Li, X.X.; Lian, Y.Y.; Lin, F.; Guo, L.D.; Gao, H. Pericoterpenoid A, a new bioactive cadinane-type sesquiterpene from Periconia sp. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 17, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, Y.H.; Xiao, G.K.; Chen, G.D.; Wang, C.X.; Hu, D.; Lian, Y.Y.; Lin, F.; Guo, L.D.; Yao, X.S.; Gao, H. Pericocins A–D, new bioactive compounds from Periconia sp. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2015, 10, 2127–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liu, J.; Chen, M.; Chen, R.; Xie, K.; Chen, D.; Si, S.; Dai, J. Three new compounds from endophytic fungus Periconia sp. F-31. J. Chin. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 29, 244–251. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kim, S.; Shin, D.S.; Lee, T.; Oh, K.B. Periconicins, two new fusicoccane diterpenes produced by an endophytic fungus Periconia sp. with antibacterial activity. J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 67, 448–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Senanayake, I.C.; Rathnayaka, A.R.; Marasinghe, D.S.; Calabon, M.S.; Gentekaki, E.; Lee, H.B.; Hurdeal, V.G.; Pem, D.; Dissanayake, L.S.; Wijesinghe, S.N.; et al. Morphological approaches in studying fungi: Collection, examination, isolation, sporulation and preservation. Mycosphere 2020, 11, 2678–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990; Volume 18, pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  39. Vilgalys, R.; Hester, M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 4238–4246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rehner, S.A. Primers for Elongation Factor 1-Alpha (EF1-Alpha). 2001. Available online: http://ocid.NACSE.ORG/research/ (accessed on 30 December 2023).
  41. Capella-Gutiérrez, S.; Silla-Martínez, J.M.; Gabaldón, T. trimAl: A tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1972–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Darriba, D.; Posada, D. jModelTest 2.0 Manual v0. 1.1. 2014. Available online: https://github.com/ddarriba/jmodeltest2 (accessed on 30 December 2023).
  43. Miller, M.A.; Pfeiffer, W.; Schwartz, T. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In Proceedings of the 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), New Orleans, LA, USA, 14 November 2010; IEEE: New Orleans, LA, USA, 2010; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  44. Rambaut, A. FigTree v1.4: Tree Figure Drawing Tool; Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh: Edinburgh, UK, 2012; Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (accessed on 30 December 2023).
  45. Cantrell, S.A.; Hanlin, R.T.; Emiliano, A. Periconia variicolor sp. nov., a new species from Puerto rico. Mycologia 2007, 99, 482–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Crous, P.W.; Luangsa-Ard, J.J.; Wingfield, M.J.; Carnegie, A.J.; Hernández-Restrepo, M.; Lombard, L.; Roux, J.; Barreto, R.W.; Baseia, I.G.; Cano-Lira, J.F.; et al. Fungal Planet description sheets: 785–867. Persoonia 2018, 41, 238–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ellis, M.B. More Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes; Commonwealth Mycological Institute: Kew, UK, 1976; p. 28. [Google Scholar]
  48. Coronado-Ruiz, C.; Avendaño, R.; Escudero-Leyva, E.; Conejo-Barboza, G.; Chaverri, P.; Chavarría, M. Two new cellulolytic fungal species isolated from a 19th-century art collection. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 7492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Crous, P.W.; Wingfield, M.J.; Lombard, L.; Roets, F.; Swart, W.J.; Alvarado, P.; Carnegie, A.J.; Moreno, G.; Luangsaard, J.; Thangavel, R.; et al. Fungal Planet description sheets: 951–1041. Persoonia 2019, 43, 223–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Knapp, D.G.; Kovács, G.M.; Zajta, E.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Crous, P.W. Dark septate endophytic pleosporalean genera from semiarid areas. Persoonia 2015, 35, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Wijayawardene, N.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Dai, D.Q.; Sanchez-Garcia, M.; Goto, B.T.; Magurno, F. Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa–2021. Mycosphere 2022, 13, 53–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wu, W.P.; Zhuang, W.Y. Sporidesmium, Endophragmiella and related genera from China. Fungal Divers. 2005, 15, 1–351. [Google Scholar]
  53. Shenoy, B.D.; Jeewon, R.; Wu, W.P.; Bhat, D.J.; Hyde, K.D. Ribosomal and RPB2 DNA sequence analyses suggest that Sporidesmium and morphologically similar genera are polyphyletic. Mycol. Res. 2006, 110, 916–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The maximum likelihood (ML) tree is based on the combined ITS, LSU, SSU, and tef1-α sequence data. Bootstrap support values with an ML greater than 70% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) greater than 0.90 are given above the nodes, shown as “ML/PP”. The tree is rooted with Morosphaeria ramunculicola (KH 220) and M. velatispora (KH 221). Isolates of the current study are indicated in blue and type strains are in bold. The different colors of the background indicated different genera, with color highlighting Periconia. The arrows indicate ML and PP support for each node when space is limited.
Figure 1. The maximum likelihood (ML) tree is based on the combined ITS, LSU, SSU, and tef1-α sequence data. Bootstrap support values with an ML greater than 70% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) greater than 0.90 are given above the nodes, shown as “ML/PP”. The tree is rooted with Morosphaeria ramunculicola (KH 220) and M. velatispora (KH 221). Isolates of the current study are indicated in blue and type strains are in bold. The different colors of the background indicated different genera, with color highlighting Periconia. The arrows indicate ML and PP support for each node when space is limited.
Diversity 16 00141 g001
Figure 2. Periconia endophytica (MHZU 23-0245, holotype). (a) Upper view and reverse view of culture on PDA. (b,c) Close-up of mycelia and conidia on the sterile plant tissue in PDA after a month of incubation. (dg) Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells with conidia. (h) Conidia. Scale bars: (df) = 50 µm, (g) = 20 µm, (h) = 5 µm.
Figure 2. Periconia endophytica (MHZU 23-0245, holotype). (a) Upper view and reverse view of culture on PDA. (b,c) Close-up of mycelia and conidia on the sterile plant tissue in PDA after a month of incubation. (dg) Conidiophores, conidiogenous cells with conidia. (h) Conidia. Scale bars: (df) = 50 µm, (g) = 20 µm, (h) = 5 µm.
Diversity 16 00141 g002
Figure 3. Periconia wurfbainiae (MHZU 23-0248). (ac) Ascomata developing on Wurfbainia villosa stem. (d,e) Vertical section of an ascoma. (f,g) Section through the peridium. (h,j,k) Immature and mature asci. (i) Paraphyses. (lo) Ascospores. (p) Ascospore in Indian ink. (q) Germinated ascospore. (r) Colony on PDA (front and below). Scale bars: (d,h,i) = 50 µm, e = 100 µm, (f,g,j,k,q) = 20 µm, (lp) = 10 µm.
Figure 3. Periconia wurfbainiae (MHZU 23-0248). (ac) Ascomata developing on Wurfbainia villosa stem. (d,e) Vertical section of an ascoma. (f,g) Section through the peridium. (h,j,k) Immature and mature asci. (i) Paraphyses. (lo) Ascospores. (p) Ascospore in Indian ink. (q) Germinated ascospore. (r) Colony on PDA (front and below). Scale bars: (d,h,i) = 50 µm, e = 100 µm, (f,g,j,k,q) = 20 µm, (lp) = 10 µm.
Diversity 16 00141 g003
Figure 4. Periconia wurfbainiae (MHZU 23-0247, holotype). (a,b) Colonies on the host substrate. (c,d) Conidiophores with conidia. (e,g) Conidiogenous cell with conidia. (f) Germinated conidium. (h) Conidia. (i) Colony on PDA (front and below). Scale bars: (c,d) = 100 µm, (eh) = 10 µm.
Figure 4. Periconia wurfbainiae (MHZU 23-0247, holotype). (a,b) Colonies on the host substrate. (c,d) Conidiophores with conidia. (e,g) Conidiogenous cell with conidia. (f) Germinated conidium. (h) Conidia. (i) Colony on PDA (front and below). Scale bars: (c,d) = 100 µm, (eh) = 10 µm.
Diversity 16 00141 g004
Figure 5. Periconia yangjiangensis (MHZU 23-0246, holotype). (a,b) Colonies on host substrate. (c,d) Conidiophore with conidia. (e,f) Swollen conidiophore, conidiogenous cell with conidia. (gi) Conidia. (j) Swollen conidiophore. (k) Germinated conidiophore. (l) Germinated conidia. (m) Colony on PDA (front and below). Scale bars: 1 (bd) = 100 µm, (e,f,jl) = 20 µm, (gi) = 10 µm.
Figure 5. Periconia yangjiangensis (MHZU 23-0246, holotype). (a,b) Colonies on host substrate. (c,d) Conidiophore with conidia. (e,f) Swollen conidiophore, conidiogenous cell with conidia. (gi) Conidia. (j) Swollen conidiophore. (k) Germinated conidiophore. (l) Germinated conidia. (m) Colony on PDA (front and below). Scale bars: 1 (bd) = 100 µm, (e,f,jl) = 20 µm, (gi) = 10 µm.
Diversity 16 00141 g005
Table 1. The GenBank accession numbers of the taxa utilized in the phylogenetic analyses conducted in this study.
Table 1. The GenBank accession numbers of the taxa utilized in the phylogenetic analyses conducted in this study.
Species NameStrain NumberGenBank Accession Number
ITSLSUSSUtef1-α
Flavomyces fulophazaeCBS 135664KP184000KP184039KP184081
F. fulophazae  TCBS 135761NR_137960NG_058131NG_061191
Lentithecium aquaticum  TCBS 123099NR_160229NG_064211NG_016507GU349068
L. clioninum  TKT 1149ALC014566AB807540AB797250AB808515
L. clioninumKT 1220LC014567AB807541AB797251AB808516
Massarina cisti  TCBS 266.62AB807539AB797249AB808514
M. eburneaCBS 473.64GU301840GU296170GU349040
Morosphaeria ramunculicolaKH 220AB807554AB797264AB808530
M. velatisporaKH 221LC014572AB807556AB797266AB808532
Periconia alishanicaKUMCC 19-0174MW063167MW063231MW183792
P. alishanica  TMFLUCC 19-0145MW063165MW063229MW183790
P. ananasi  TMFLUCC 21-0155OL753685OL606153OL606142OL912946
P. ananasiKUMCC 21-0470OM102539OL985955OL979226OM007977
P. aquatica  TMFLUCC 16-0912KY794701KY794705KY814760
P. artemisiae  TKUMCC 20-0265MW448657MW448571MW448658MW460898
P. banksiae  TCBS 129526NG_064279
P. byssoidesKUMCC 20-0264MW444854MW444855MW444856MW460895
P. byssoidesMFLUCC 17-2292MK347751MK347968MK347858MK360069
P. byssoidesMFLUCC 18-1548MK347794MK348013MK347902MK360070
P. byssoidesMFLUCC 18-1553MK347806MK348025MK347914MK360068
P. byssoides  TMFLUCC 20-0172MW063162MW063226
P. byssoidesNCYUCC 19-0314MW063163MW063227
P. caespitosa  TLAMIC 110 16MH051906MH051907
P. chengduensis  TCGMCC 3.23930OP955987OP956012OP956056OP961453
P. chengduensisUESTCC 22.0140OP955977OP956002OP956046OP961443
P. chengduensisUESTCC 22.0142OP955978OP956003OP956047OP961444
P. chimonanthi  TKUMCC 20-0266NR_176752MW448572MW448656MW460897
P. chimonanthiUESTCC 22.0133OP955964OP955989OP956033OP961430
P. citlaltepetlensis  TIOM 325319MH890645MT625978
P. citlaltepetlensisIOM 325319.2MT649221MT649216
P. cookeiMFLUCC 17-1399MG333490MG333493MG438279
P. cookeiMFLUCC 17-1679MG333492MG438278
P. cortaderiaeMFLUCC 15-0451KX965734KX954403KX986346KY429208
P. cortaderiae  TMFLUCC 15-0457KX965732KX954401KX986345KY310703
P. cynodontis  TCGMCC 3.23927OP909925OP909921OP909920OP961434
P. cyperacearum  TCPC 32138NR_160357NG_064549
P. delonicis  TMFLUCC 17-2584NG_068611NG_065770MK360071
P. didymosporum  TMFLU 15-0058KP761734KP761731KP761738KP761728
P. digitataCBS 510.77LC014584AB807561AB797271AB808537
P. elaeidis  TMFLUCC 17-0087MG742713MH108552MH108551
P. endophytica TZHKUCC 23-0995OR995582OR995588PP277722PP025968
P. endophyticaZHKUCC 23-0996OR995583OR995589PP277723PP025969
P. epilithographicola  TCBS 144017NR_157477
P. epilithographicolaMFLUCC 21-0153OL753687OL606155OL606144OL912948
P. festucae  TCGMCC 3.23929OP955973OP955998OP956042OP961439
P. philadelphiana  TCPC 42854OQ628486OQ629068
P. homothallica  TKT 916AB809645AB807565AB797275
P. igniariaCBS 845.96LC014586AB807567AB797277AB808543
P. imperatae  TCGMCC 3.23931 = UESTCC 22.0129OP955984OP956009OP956053OP961450
P. imperataeUESTCC 22.0145OP955979OP956004OP956048OP961445
P. imperataeUESTCC 22.0146OP955983OP956008OP956052OP961449
P. macrospinosaCBS 135663KP183999KP184038KP184080
P. minutissimaMFLUCC 15-0245KY794703KY794707
P. minutissimaMUT 2887MG813227
P. neobrittanica  TCPC 37903NR_166344NG_068342
P. neominutissima  TCPC 42368OQ628478OQ629060
P. palmicola  TMFLUCC 14-0400NG_068917MN648319MN821070
P. penniseti  TCGMCC 3.23928OP955971OP955996OP956040OP961437
P. prolificaDBOF74JQ724435
P. prolificaDBOF129JQ724490
P. pseudobyssoidesDUCC 0850MG333491MG333494MG438280
P. pseudobyssoidesKUMCC 20-0263MW444851MW444852MW444853MW460894
P. pseudodigitataKT 644LC014589AB807562AB797272AB808538
P. pseudodigitata  TKT 1395NR_153490NG_059396NG_064850AB808540
P. spodiopogonisCGMCC 3.23932OP955963OP955988OP956032OP961429
P. salina  TMFLU 19-1235MN047086MN017846MN017912
P. submersa  TMFLUCC 16-1098KY794702KY794706KY814761
P. thailandica  TMFLUCC 17-0065KY753887KY753888KY753889
P. thysanolaenae  TKUMCC 20-0262MW442967MW444850MW448659MW460896
P. variicolor  TSACCR-64DQ336713
P. verrucosa  TMFLUCC 17-2158MT310617MT214572MT226686MT394631
P. verrucosaUESTCC 22.0149OP955976OP956001OP956045OP961442
P. verrucosaUESTCC 22.0150OP955980OP956005OP956049OP961446
P. wurfbainiae TZHKUCC 23-0999OR995586OR995592PP277726PP025972
P. wurfbainiaeZHKUCC 23-1000OR995587OR995593PP277727PP025973
P. yangjiangensis TZHKUCC 23-0997OR995584OR995590PP277724PP025970
P. yangjiangensisZHKUCC 23-0998OR995585OR995591PP277725PP025971
Sporidesmium tengiiHKUCC 10837DQ408559
Notes: The newly generated sequences in this study are shown in blue, while the ex-type strains are denoted by “T”. Abbreviations: CBS: Culture Collection of the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands; CGMCC: China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center Beijing, China; CPC: Culture Collection of Pedro Crous, Netherlands; DBOF: DNA Barcoding Ocean Fungi; DUCC: Dali University Culture Collection, Yunnan, China; IOM: Instituto de Oftalmología “Fundación Conde de Valenciana” IAP Mexico Culture Collection; KH: K. Hirayama; KT: Kaz. Tanaka; KUMCC: Kunming Institute of Botany Culture Collection, Kunming, China; LAMIC: Laboratorio de Micologia, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Brazil; MFLU: Herbarium of Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand; MFLUCC: Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection, Chiang Rai, Thailand; MUT: Mycotheca Universitatis Taurinensis, Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; NCYUCC: National Chiayi University Culture Collection, Taiwan, China; UESTCC: University of Electronic Science and Technology Culture Collection, Chengdu, China.
Table 3. Synopsis of sexual morphological characteristics of P. wurfbainiae and its closely related species.
Table 3. Synopsis of sexual morphological characteristics of P. wurfbainiae and its closely related species.
TaxaAscomataPeridiumAsciAscospores
Periconia homothallica140–190 μm high, 160–180 μm diam., scattered, immersed to erumpent, globose, with an ostiole Longitudinal section uniformly 11–15 μm thick, composed of 4–6 layers of polygonal, thin-walled, 3–15 × 2–5 μm, pale brown cells85–119.5 × 13–17.5 μm ( x ¯ 96.5 × 15.3 μm, n = 20), fissitunicate, cylindrical to lageniform, with a shallow ocular chamber, short-stalked (3.5–6 μm long), with 8 biseriate ascospores22–31 × 7–10 μm ( x ¯ 26.3 × 8.7 μm, n = 60), l/w 2.6–3.7 ( x ¯ 3.0, n = 60), broadly fusiform, with a nearly median septum (0.48–0.53; x ¯ 0.51, n = 38), hyaline, smooth, with an entire sheath; sheath gelatinous, up to 10 μm wide when fresh, later 1–2 μm wideTanaka et al. [11]
P. pseudodigitata160–200 μm high, 130–250 μm diam., numerous, scattered or 2–3 grouped, immersed to erumpent, globoseLongitudinal section 8–13 μm thick at side, 5–8 μm thick at the base, composed of 3–5 layers of thin-walled, 6–13 × 2–5 μm, brown cells70–110 × 10.5–15.5 μm ( x ¯ 88.4 × 12.2 μm, n = 33), fissitunicate, cylindrical, rounded at the apex and with an apical chamber, short-stalked (5–15 μm long), with 8 irregularly biseriate ascospores19.5–27(–32) × 5–7 μm ( x ¯ 22.5 × 6.1 μm, n = 134), l/w 2.9–4.5 ( x ¯ 3.7, n = 134), broadly fusiform with rounded ends, straight or slightly curved, with almost median septum (0.48–0.55, x ¯ 5.1, n = 36), slightly constricted at the septum, hyaline, with or without guttules, smooth, with an entire sheath; sheath gelatinous, 1–2 μm wide at side and 2–4 μm wide at both ends in fresh, becoming delimited sheath in dry condition; senescent spores brown, echinulate, 1-septateTanaka et al. [11]
P. wurfbainiae220–300 × 150–220 µm, solitary to scattered, immersed to semi-immersed, pyriform, black, papillate stain the substrate purple13–30 µm thick ( x ¯ = 19 μm, n = 20), composed of 6–12 layers, hyaline to brown cells of textura angularis65–100 × 9.5–15 µm ( x ¯ = 81 × 12 μm, n = 20), 8-spored, bitunicate, cylindrical, with rounded apex and narrower, short pedicellate, with an obscured ocular chamber20–26 × 5–8 µm ( x ¯ = 23.5 × 7 μm, n = 30), overlapping uniseriate, biseriate in the middle portion, fusiform, slightly curved, 1-septate, slightly constricted at the septum, narrowly rounded at both ends, hyaline, guttulate, smooth-walled, surrounded by a mucilaginous sheathThis study
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liao, C.; Hyde, K.D.; Thilini Chethana, K.W.; Dong, W.; Yang, Y.; Doilom, M. Three New Periconia Species Isolated from Wurfbainia villosa in Guangdong, China: A Discussion on the Doubtful Taxa Clustering in this Genus. Diversity 2024, 16, 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16030141

AMA Style

Liao C, Hyde KD, Thilini Chethana KW, Dong W, Yang Y, Doilom M. Three New Periconia Species Isolated from Wurfbainia villosa in Guangdong, China: A Discussion on the Doubtful Taxa Clustering in this Genus. Diversity. 2024; 16(3):141. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16030141

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liao, Chunfang, Kevin D. Hyde, Kandawatte Wedaralalage Thilini Chethana, Wei Dong, Yunhui Yang, and Mingkwan Doilom. 2024. "Three New Periconia Species Isolated from Wurfbainia villosa in Guangdong, China: A Discussion on the Doubtful Taxa Clustering in this Genus" Diversity 16, no. 3: 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16030141

APA Style

Liao, C., Hyde, K. D., Thilini Chethana, K. W., Dong, W., Yang, Y., & Doilom, M. (2024). Three New Periconia Species Isolated from Wurfbainia villosa in Guangdong, China: A Discussion on the Doubtful Taxa Clustering in this Genus. Diversity, 16(3), 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16030141

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop