Next Article in Journal
Decoding Anotylus (Thomson 1859) Beetle Diversity: DNA and External Morphology Match in Área de Conservaciόn Guanacaste, Costa Rica
Next Article in Special Issue
Hoefkenia hunsrueckensis, a New Genus and Species from Europe, and the Identity of Virescentia vogesiaca (F.W.Schultz ex Skuja) Necchi, D.C.Agostinho & M.L.Vis (Batrachospermales, Rhodophyta)
Previous Article in Journal
Diversity and Distribution of Monocot Understory Herbs during Tropical Forest Succession in Northeastern Costa Rica
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Diatoms’ Diversity in the Assessment of the Impact of Diamond and Oil and Gas Mining on Aquatic Ecosystems of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia) Using Bioindication and Statistical Mapping Methods

1
Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, 199 Abba Khoushi Ave., Haifa 3498838, Israel
2
Institute for Biological Problems of Cryolithozone, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Science (IBPC SB RAS), 41 Lenin Ave., 677980 Yakutsk, Russia
3
Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences (IBIW RAS), Nekouz District, Yaroslavl Region, 152742 Borok, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2024, 16(8), 440; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16080440
Submission received: 20 June 2024 / Revised: 20 July 2024 / Accepted: 22 July 2024 / Published: 24 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Freshwater Biodiversity Hotspots in 2024)

Abstract

:
Diamond and oil and gas production carries risks to the aquatic ecosystem. In Eastern Siberia, on the territory of the Central Yakut Plain, mining development of the Yakut diamond-bearing province and Tas-Yuryakh oil and gas condensate field has been underway for several decades. But the problem of studying negative consequences in the region is covered only from the point of view of the impact on terrestrial ecosystems. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of diamond and oil and gas production on the aquatic ecosystems of the region using the bioindicative properties of diatoms. The work used previously widely tested methods of ecological mapping, JASP, and species–environments relationship analysis. The results of chemical analysis of water showed that in oil and gas production areas, there is no pollution with petroleum products, but the concentration of silicon and zinc is increased. The study identified key pollutants in the Central Yakut Plain and demonstrated the effectiveness of diatoms as bioindicators. Elevated chloride levels were found in diamond mining areas, and increased copper levels were noted in oil production regions. In the diatom flora of the region, 144 species were identified, of which 137 are indicator species. Natural and anthropogenic clusters of environmental factors are identified, characterized by a specific effect on the species composition and taxonomic structure of diatom communities. The results obtained are suitable for assessing the level of anthropogenic impact on aquatic communities of photosynthetic microorganisms in permafrost conditions.

1. Introduction

Eastern Siberia is a region where mining began in the 20th century and its scale is steadily increasing. The Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) has a rich diversity of mineral resources and produces 99 percent of Russia’s diamonds, annually amounting to between 20 and 25% of the world’s output [1]. In the territory of the Central Yakut Plain, the development of alluvial diamond deposits of the Yakut diamond-bearing province has been carried out since 1957, and in 1981, work was opened at the Tas-Yuryakh oil and gas condensate field. Oil and products formed during its extraction pose a great potential threat to biota [2,3]. In addition to the direct danger of oil spills, the formation of a film on the surface of waterbodies, the accumulation of toxic hydrocarbons, etc., oil production is associated with the transformation of landscapes and the disruption of water exchange, which can lead to the destruction of the wetland system and large-scale impacts on a wide range of living organisms. Diamond mining is associated with the same significant transformation of landscapes. The diamond mining process requires large amounts of water for various activities such as washing and processing the mined ore. This often leads to contamination of water sources with sediment, chemicals, and heavy metals. Consequently, this poses a threat to aquatic flora and fauna and degrades the quality of drinking water available to the local population. The negative impact of subsoil development on biota is aggravated in the north and permafrost zone, which is due to the extremely low restoration potential of northern ecosystems. Previous studies in various regions have examined the impact of industrial activities on aquatic ecosystems, showing significant alterations in water quality and biodiversity. Thus, in the polar part of the Krasnoyarsk Territory on 29 May 2020, as a result of an omission in the design and construction of the pile foundation of the oil product storage tank of the Norilsk Nickel company, it was accidentally damaged and leaked with a volume of 21 thousand tons to the natural environment [4]. By October 2020, the main stages of liquidation of the consequences were completed at the accident site: 90% of the spill was collected, and the removal of contaminated soil was completed. However, an analysis of the consequences of this accident showed high concentrations of organic carbon in bottom sediments, and the content of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons reached 3764.4 ng/g. The lakes were most affected due to their slow water exchange. According to experts, the large polar lake Pyasino will probably never be restored to its original state. It should be added to this that some of the oil products ended up in the marine ecosystem of the Kara Sea.
A number of authors note a trend towards a decrease in the biodiversity of algal communities for northern waterbodies under the influence of oil and diamond mining [5,6].
This problem has been reflected in a number of scientific publications. But existing studies in the region have primarily focused on terrestrial ecosystems [7], leaving a significant gap in understanding the impact on aquatic ecosystems. Changes in waterbodies can be more dangerous and large-scale, as shown by the first bioindication studies using statistical methods [8].
Diatoms are known as one of the most species-rich groups of aquatic organisms, which, in accordance with the European Union Water Framework Directive [9], are used for the environmental assessment of aquatic ecosystems [10,11,12]. Extensive knowledge of diatom ecology [13] facilitates their successful use as bioindicators [14,15].
The aim of the work was to identify the diversity of diatoms in waterbodies of the Central Yakut Plain and to assess the impact of diamond and oil and gas production on aquatic ecosystems using algal bioindication and statistical mapping methods.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Description of Study Area

The research area is located in the northeast of the Asian subcontinent, in Eastern Siberia, on the territory of Yakutia, in the interfluve of the Lena and Vilyuy Rivers and represents the Central Yakut Plain (Figure 1). The plain is flat with heights of up to 400 m, heavily swampy, and dissected by a network of shallow river valleys. Two of the largest rivers, Ulakhan-Botuobuya River and Ochchuguy-Botuobuya River, flow to the north and belong to the Vilyui River basin. And the other two, the Ulakhan-Murbayi and Tustakh Rivers, flow in a southerly direction and are tributaries of the Lena River. Permafrost is found everywhere on the territory. The plain is covered with larch and larch-pine forests interspersed with birch forests and meadow steppes (Figure 2a,c,d). The climate is markedly continental and harsh. The duration of the frost-free period is 30 days; the average January temperature and absolute minimum are −32 °C and −59 °C, respectively; the average July temperature and maximum air temperature are 16 °C and 35 °C, respectively [16]. The height of the snow cover is on average 50 cm. Wind speed is up to 22 m/s. The amount of precipitation for the warm period is 250 mm, and for the cold period it is 60 cm.
Various types of reservoirs were studied (Table 1), including small streams, puddles, swamps, and a lake. An artificial reservoir (station 6) created in the territory of oil and gas production was also investigated (Figure 2b). The reservoir was filled with water in 2018 by taking water from a neighboring stream, has dimensions of 250 × 400 m, a depth of 8 m, and is used to supply industrial water for production. In addition, two artificial reservoirs formed on the site of quarries that remained at the site of diamond mining were studied (stations 3 and 4). Diamond mining in these quarries was stopped in 1980, after which they filled with water naturally, due to precipitation and surface runoff. The diamond quarry named after XXIII Party Congress (station 3) reaches 300 m in diameter and 120 m in depth (Figure 2e); and a nameless diamond quarry (station 4) is 250 m in diameter and 100 m deep (Figure 2f). All of these waterbodies have not been previously explored in terms of algae diversity and water chemistry.

2.2. Sampling

Sites were selected based on the proximity to industrial activities and reference locations with minimal human impact (Table 1). Sampling was carried out using an Apstein plankton net (SEFAR NITEX fabric, Heiden, Switzerland, mesh diameter 15 µm) during the period from 4 September to 8 September 2022. Samples were preserved by adding neutral formaldehyde to 4% immediately upon collection. Preservation was necessary to prevent biological degradation, ensuring the integrity of chemical and biological analyses. Geographic position and altitude above sea level were determined using a Garmin eTrex GPS navigator (Garmin Ltd., Olathe, KS, USA). Water samples of 2 L were taken from each waterbody for chemical analysis. All samples for further study were transported to the Institute for Biological Problems of Cryolithozone SB RAS (Yakutsk).

2.3. Water Chemistry Analysis

Water temperature was measured during sampling with a Chektemp thermometer (Hanna Instruments, Woonsocket, RI, USA). Chemical analyses of water samples were performed following standard methods [17]. Water color was determined using a photometric method. pH was measured using a potentiometric method. Water salinity was calculated as the sum of ions using the following methods: turbidimetry for sulphate anions; flame spectrophotometry for potassium and sodium cations; mercurimetry for chloride ions; and titration for calcium, magnesium, and bicarbonate ions. A photometric method was applied to determine nutrients’ concentrations. Nessler’s reagent, Griess reagent, salicylic acid, ammonium molybdate, and sulfosalicylic acid were used for the measurement of ammonium ions, nitrite ions, nitrate ions, phosphate ions, and total iron, respectively. A combined reagent composed of ammonium molybdate and ascorbic acid was used to determine total phosphorus content. The content of manganese, nickel, copper, and zinc was determined by atomic absorption spectrometry with electrothermal vaporization. A fluorimetry method with the Fluorat-02-2M device (GC LUMEX; Saint Petersburg, Russia) was used to measure the petrochemicals. Instruments were calibrated immediately before performing analytics using standard solutions. Analytical methods were validated by analyzing standard reference materials and conducting duplicate analyses. Limitations include potential matrix effects, which were mitigated by using internal standards and matrix-matched calibration curves.

2.4. Diatom Analysis

Diatom shells were freed from organic matter by burning with 30% hydrogen peroxide followed by 6 h thermal treatment in a thermostat at 85 °C [18]. The preparations were examined in a JSM-6510 LV (JEOL Ltd.; Tokyo, Japan) scanning electron microscope. Relevant handbooks and papers were used for species determination [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. The modern species names were adopted using algaebase.org (accessed on 24 May 2024) [42].

2.5. Bioindication

Bioindicator analysis was performed according to [43] with species-specific ecological preferences of revealed indicator taxa [44]. The BioDiversity Pro 2.0 program was used for similarity calculation [45].

2.6. Ecological Mapping and JASP

Statistical maps were constructed in the Statistica 12.0 Program, the network analysis was conducted in JASP (Jeffreys’s Amazing Statistics Program), and only significant results were analyzed with the botnet package in R Statistica package of JASP 0.17.1 [46].

2.7. Species–Environments Relationship Analysis

Redundancy discriminant analysis (RDA) was conducted with the CANOCO program for the calculation of biological dominated variables and environment variables’ relationships [47].

3. Results

3.1. Water Chemistry

The water temperature of the studied waterbodies varied from 4.5 to 11.1 °C (Table 2). Most of the studied waterbodies are characterized by a slightly acidic reaction. The lake (station 5) and water reservoir (station 6) had a neutral reaction, and the abandoned diamond quarries had an alkaline reaction. The waters are fresh, low-mineralized, soft, or very soft in terms of hardness. The exception is the waters of abandoned quarries, which are characterized as hard, fresh with a high content of dissolved salts (Station 4) and moderately hard, brackish, and highly mineralized (station 3). The waters are mostly hydrocarbonate-calcium, with the exception of the quarry (station 3), where the waters had sodium chloride, and the lake (station 5) with sulfate-calcium waters. An increased concentration of ammonium nitrogen was noted in an abandoned quarry (station 3). A reduced concentration of nitrite nitrogen was recorded in artificial reservoirs: quarries and the water reservoir (stations 3, 4, and 6). The content of nitrate nitrogen in the studied waterbodies varied insignificantly. An increased content of mineral and total phosphorus was noted in the swamps (stations 7 and 9). High concentrations of organic phosphorus were detected in puddles (stations 1 and 2) and the swamp (station 10). A high content of total iron was noted in all studied waterbodies, with the exception of abandoned quarries (stations 3 and 4). The maximum silicon content was observed in streams (stations 8 and 11), the water reservoir (station 6), and the lake (station 5). The lowest color index was recorded in the quarry (station 4); a low color index was also typical for the water reservoir (station 6), quarry (station 3), and lake (station 5). In other waterbodies, the water color index is high. The content of petrochemicals in all reservoirs is insignificant. The manganese content in most waterbodies is below the detection threshold, with the exception of swamps (stations 7 and 9). The concentration of zinc is insignificant. The content of nickel and copper is increased in all studied waterbodies.

3.2. Taxonomic Analysis

A total of 144 diatom taxa affiliated with 49 genera, 26 families, and 13 orders were revealed during the study of communities from 11 aquatic habitats of the Central Yakut Plain in September 2022 (Appendix A Figure A1 and Appendix A Table A1). Since the present study represents the first data on diatoms in this area, a detailed taxonomic analysis was carried out to characterize the “face” of the identified flora. Appendix A Table A1 shows that only 137 taxa from 144 were defined up to the species level but all others were defined up to the genus level only, reflecting the high potential of diversity of this flora that can be rather enriched by species. In Appendix A Table A1, the distribution of diatom species over the studied community of 11 objects is also given, and no one species was presented in each object as a result of high individuality of the studied communities. The species number in studied communities varied from 9 at station 8 to 34 at 11. The richest order was Naviculales (Appendix A Table A2) that participated in each community and contained 22 species at station 8. The index of species richness per order ranged from 1.3 to 9.0 (averaged 3.4) and was greatest at station 7, where the community was composed of Naviculales species only (Appendix A Table A2). The revealed species were affiliated with 26 families, on average 9.9 species per family, with richest Naviculaceae and Pinnulariaceae at station 11, where 10 species of the last were revealed. The index of the family saturation by species was 2.6 on average and highest at station 7 with a low species number (Appendix A Table A3). Genera Pinnularia and Aulacoseira were richest in the studied communities with an average of 12.2 per genus with the prevalence of Pinnularia. The average species per genus index was 1.8 with the maximal value (4.5) at station 7 where species richness was minimal (Appendix A Table A4). So, the taxonomical step by step analysis revealed the Pinnularia genus as the most important in the formation of the first-time-studied diversity which flourishes in waterbodies of the Central Yakut Plain.

3.3. Bioindication

A bioindication analysis of the ecological preferences of the identified species in the studied communities was carried out to establish the main preferred conditions of their habitat. Algal species’ ecological preferences in 11 studied waterbodies of the Central Yakut Plain are presented in Appendix A Table A5. We summarized these data according to the main ecological groups and presented them in Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 and Appendix A Table A6. We divided the data of the studied stations into three parts affiliated with the spatial distribution of the points of sampling.
Figure 3a shows the dynamic of habitat preferences by diatom species in groups of indicators, of which plankto-benthic species prevailed at stations 1–6 but stations 7–11 were enriched mostly by benthic species. Despite the general prevalence of moderate temperature indicators, the communities at stations 7–11 are enriched with eurythermal and heat-loving species (Figure 3b). In general, the indicators show an average oxygen saturation of waters with a predominance of st-str species; however, communities at stations 7–11 contain a larger number of species associated with flowing waters (str) with a high oxygen content (Figure 3c). Among the indicators of salinity, indifferent inhabitants of fresh waters prevailed (Figure 3d).
Alkaliphile indicators predominated at stations 1–6, but at stations 7–11, there were more pH-indifferents and acidophiles (Figure 4a). Indicators for the Watanabe system, supported only by diatom species, showed a weak organic load at stations 1–6 with a predominance of saproxenes, but there was an enrichment in organics at stations 7–11 and a predominance of eurysaprobes and saprophiles (Figure 4b). All studied communities were composed of autotrophic species, but at stations 9 and 10, there were more nitrogen-autotrophic taxa, tolerating elevated concentrations of organically bound nitrogen (ate), and at station 6, there were even facultative nitrogen-heterotrophic taxa, needing periodically elevated concentrations of organically identified bound nitrogen (hne), which indicates the suppression of photosynthesis functions in this water reservoir (Figure 4c). Indicators of trophic status in the studied communities covered the entire spectrum from oligotrophic to eutrophic species with an average predominance of mesotrophic species in all communities (Figure 4d).
The dynamics of indicators with species-specific saprobity indices (Appendix A Table A5) were distributed within the boundaries of water quality classes and colored in Figure 5 in the colors of the European Monitoring System from green to red. In general, water quality indicators of classes 2 and 3 prevailed in all studied waterbodies.

3.4. Ecological Mapping

The spatial distribution of environmental (Figure 6) and biological (Figure 7) indicators, in the form of statistical maps, was made to identify similar influencing environmental factors on communities of the Central Yakut Plain. Environmental statistical maps show that there are warmer waters with higher pH in the north of the study area (Figure 6a,b), chlorides are associated with diamond mining (Figure 6c), water color and nitrate saturation are greater in the southern swampy area (Figure 6d,e), and copper concentrations are increased in oil production areas (Figure 6f).
Statistical maps constructed for the most important biological indicators demonstrate a more subtle response to natural and anthropogenic impacts (Figure 7). Thus, the number of species was greatest in the communities of the marshy, undisturbed southern part of the studied territory (Figure 7a). Eurythermic species, indicators of warm waters, were concentrated in communities accumulating runoff from the drainage basin after diamond mining enterprises (Figure 7b). Here, as well as in the oil production area, alcaliphilic species indicated the increased alkalinity of water (Figure 7c). Indicators of high salinity, mesohalobes, as well as indicators of eutrophic waters (o-e), pointed to a diamond mining area (Figure 7d,e). Here, as well as in the richest community in the southern area of the swamps, water quality class 4 indicators were found (Figure 7f).

3.5. Species–Environments Relationship Analysis

To identify which chemical or biological indicators are most important for analysis, we plotted similarity graphs using two different methods. The comparison was based on the data in Table 2 as well as biological data from Appendix A Table A6. At the first stage, similarity trees were built for all data, both biological and environmental (Figure 8). Then, similarity trees were built separately for environmental (Figure 9) and biological indicators (Figure 10), then the results were compared.
As a result of the comparison, it is clear that according to the composition of biological indicators, a separate cluster is identified with stations 7 and 9, where chlorides are increased in the oil production area, but station 3 with the maximum concentration of chlorides is not included in it, which indicates the association of biological indicators more with factors in the areas of oil production. At the same time, the similarity trees for the sum of indicators and for environmental indicators turn out to be similar, which indicates a significant influence of the values of chemical indicators on the statistical calculation of data similarity with the selection of stations 3 and 4, where diamond mining is carried out.
Similar operations carried out within the framework of JASP (Jeffrey’s Amazing Statistics Program) showed that plots of similarities for total bioindicators and chemical (Figure 11a) and environmental indicators only (Figure 11b) strictly differentiate data on diamond mining stations and oil production stations from reference unaffected stations.
However, the similarity of biological indicators of communities shows a more detailed picture of influences (Figure 12). It can be seen that all reference sites are grouped into two clusters, 1 and 2, depending on their position on the ground and their relationship to a particular drainage basin. Cluster 3 included all stations where oil and diamond mining enterprises are located, as well as station 1, located several hundred meters down the stream from the main diamond pipe.
Thus, performing a similarity analysis is more productive in the JASP program but constructing Bray–Curtis trees is also possible based on the sum of all chemical and biological data (or only chemical data) to identify the individuality of the studied stations. But for analyzing the intensity of anthropogenic impact, the best results can be obtained by JASP based on bioindication data.
Redundance discriminant analysis (RDA) for the species number, bioindicator groups, and environmental variables’ results can be seen on the triplot (Figure 13a). The calculation was based on data in Table 2 and Appendix A Table A6.
Environmental indicators were divided into two packages, one of which (upper left and right quadrants) can be called “natural”; it stimulates species richness, oligotrophic species, acidophiles, indicators of clean water of the 2nd quality class, and is represented by forms of nitrogen, phosphorus, silicon, and increased water color. The second package (lower left quadrant) consists of indicators of pollution with oil, metals, chlorides, and other ions, which can be called “anthropogenic”, which stimulates the development of indicators of salinization, eutrophication, and organic water pollution of quality class 4. Thus, the analysis showed an answer adequate to the question posed—which indicators are the indicator “face” of the studied area of the industrial region.
Figure 13b presents the results of RDA calculations for the same environmental indicators from Table 2, taxonomic data, and our calculated indices of species richness of higher taxa (Appendix A Table A1, Table A2, Table A3 and Table A4). According to the degree of influence on higher taxa, environmental indicators were also divided into two packages, natural and anthropogenic, as in Figure 13a. The natural package of environmental indicators stimulated the species richness of higher taxa, and the anthropogenic package stimulated the number of large taxa. This can serve as a significant indicator in determining the degree of susceptibility of natural flora to anthropogenic influence.

4. Discussion

As previously shown, the direct impacts of oil and gas development on biodiversity and ecosystem services include habitat loss and fragmentation, pollution, changes in water resources and flow regimes, and changes in the structure of freshwater communities [3,49], especially under the climatic fluctuation of ultraviolet radiation and the temperature range [50]. The effects of stressors on freshwater ecosystems are often combined and their impacts have a synergistic effect, leading to irreversible or difficult complex consequences, the counteraction of which is expensive in many situations [49,50]. Toxic oil suspended from oil spills, as well as wastewater, can affect all levels of biological organization from the organism to the ecosystem or landscape, and at the community level, impacts cause changes in species composition and diversity or alter the primary productivity of benthic algae. In addition to direct impacts, indirect threats from oil exploration and production can also exacerbate negative impacts on ecosystem functioning and biodiversity loss regardless of continent or climate zone as in Brasilia, Mississippi, or Polar Ural [51,52,53].
Regarding the impact of diamond mining operations, the literature is sparse because the locations of such industries are rare [7]. For example, there is information that in the river at the diamond deposits of the Arkhangelsk region, the concentration of silicon has increased, which the authors attribute to the pollution of river waters with saponite suspension associated with the mining process. In addition, the average concentration of dissolved oxygen decreased [54].
Therefore, assessing the impact of both types of enterprises, even those located close to each other, becomes highly important not only for recommendations on reducing the impact but also in methodological terms for the formation of monitoring indicators in oil and diamond mining areas. First of all, we provided a theoretical basis for the indicators that form aquatic communities in permafrost conditions. Our studies of aquatic communities in the Arctic [55,56] gave us the basis to assume that the high individuality of algal complexes in permafrost conditions is associated with the effects of climate. Accordingly, assessing the impact on such communities should be approached as objects of island biota. This assumption is based on the following reasoning.
To assess the spatial isolation and individuality of aquatic communities on a continent, ecosystem type is important because taxa in lotic systems exhibit stochastic distributions due to physical disturbances, unlike taxa in standing aquatic systems [57]. For continental diatom floras, the law of the square of the radius of area operates and as spatial scale increases, stochastic factors tend to become more dominant in structuring biological communities [58]. In the case of assessing the individuality of diatom diversity in Arctic waterbodies or the same located in the permafrost zone, we identified the influence of harsh climatic conditions on the process of community formation as a separation factor, which allows us to consider individual waterbodies as island biotas [55,56]. Thus, the biota of individual waterbodies in permafrost conditions can be considered as island-like. At the same time, homogeneous processes in the flora are higher on the islands, and disruption of the structure of diatom communities decreases as isolation increases. So, as the islands’ diatom communities are forming under the combined effect of environmental filtering, especially climatic variables, and dispersal limitation [59], we can assess the entire diatom communities as island diversity.
While it is understood that assessing the impact of oil and diamond mining operations is necessary, the methods used to do so fall in two directions. The first includes direct chemical analyses, as in our case, leading to an assessment of the concentrations of some elements directly at the sampling point and not taking into account the synergistic effect and, especially, the impact on the surrounding landscape. In our case, an increase in the concentrations of silicon and zinc, but not oil, is visible at the points of oil production. Mining activities often result in the contamination of natural waters with toxic heavy metals throughout the world [60]. And even long after the end of mining (in the case of abandoned quarries), heavy metals can enter natural waterbodies from mining waste through physical erosion and geochemical processes [1,61,62,63]. Increased concentrations of chlorides, TDS, sodium and bicarbonates are also visible at locations associated with diamond mining. However, direct water analysis cannot provide an environmental assessment for other natural elements.
The second strand of assessments includes elements of landscape, community, species richness, and beta diversity [59]. At the same time, the overwhelming influence of the spread of oil is noted, leading to the defragmentation of elements of terrestrial ecosystems and a decrease in diversity indicators in aquatic ones. In our case, a decrease in the number of species in oil and diamond mining areas was also noted, but only if unaffected landscapes were included in the assessments, since there is a priori no criterion for how many species there were before and after the impact.
Our efforts to include the bioindicator properties of aquatic communities in assessments, undertaken earlier [8], showed the effectiveness of this approach, since the assessments included not only indicators of the total diversity of communities but also indicator values of species in various indication systems [64]. In our case, nine indicator systems were used to assess nine environmental variables. The use of diatoms as bioindicators can inform environmental monitoring and policy-making in regions affected by industrial activities.
The studied flora contained 137 indicator species out of 144 identified, therefore, the use of bioindication methods was conducted on a very thorough basis. It turned out that the stations in the studied area of the flattened landscape belong to three different drainage basins, and this is noticeable in the distribution of species among indicator groups. Thus, the northern and western areas where the enterprises were located were distinguished by the predominance of plankto-benthic species, while in the reference areas of the southern part, the species preferred benthic habitats. In all studied communities, indicators of moderately oxygenated waters noticeably predominated. The reference stations in the southern part, according to the composition of indicators, were less saline and less alkaline, as well as more saturated with organic substances, but their trophic content was lower, and the class of water quality in terms of organic pollution was higher. All communities were composed of autotrophic species, and only at the oil production station were indicator species of mixotrophic nutrition found, which indicates a probable impact of photosynthesis.
With such an abundance of material and its diversity, it was necessary to apply statistical methods to identify general trends in the distribution of both chemical and biological indicators. Statistical maps showed that increased temperature and pH are characteristic of northern areas, and color and nitrates are characteristic of southern areas. Using the maps, specific indicators of the impact of diamond mining, including chlorides, and oil production, including copper, were identified.
Statistical comparison of chemical and biological data packages using the Bray–Curtis method showed that the similarity tree of the overall composition of indicators reveals the same clusters as the chemical tree, indicating the impact of diamond mining. However, a tree constructed only for biological indicators clearly identifies communities of stations under the anthropogenic influence of oil production. The construction of JASP rafts turned out to be more effective, where separate clusters were identified for reference sites, as well as one common cluster for sites under the anthropogenic influence of oil production and diamond mining.
Redundance discriminant analysis identified two packages of environmental indicators, which correlate with so-called “natural” indicators, which stimulate species richness in oligotrophic environments, and “anthropogenic” indicators, which stimulate the development of indicators of salinization, eutrophication, and organic pollution.
A comparison of the list of species first identified for the Central Yakut Plain with relatively closely located diatom floras of Yakutia [8,55,56] emphasized the high individuality of this flora. RDA analysis, performed for chemical indicators of the environment as independent and indicators of the species richness and species richness of higher taxa, also identified two clusters, natural and anthropogenic, and showed that the natural package of environmental indicators stimulated the species richness of higher taxa and the anthropogenic package stimulated the number of large taxes. These calculations can be used as a significant indicator in determining the degree of susceptibility of natural flora to anthropogenic impact [50,65,66]. Thus, we were able to include biodiversity indicators in the analysis of the combined impact of diamond mining and oil production enterprises on aquatic communities of the Central Yakut Plain in Eastern Siberia, located in the permafrost zone.
This study’s findings are limited by the short sampling period, which may not capture seasonal variations. Future research should focus on long-term monitoring to capture temporal changes and expand the geographical scope to include comparative studies in different regions.

5. Conclusions

Thus, for the previously unstudied flora of 11 reservoirs of the Central Yakut Plain, 144 species of diatoms were identified. Chemical analysis of water samples showed an increase in the concentration of silicon and zinc at oil and gas production sites, but a possible increase in the content of petroleum products was not noted here. The waterbodies in the territory of diamond mining were characterized by increased concentrations of chlorides, TDS, sodium, and bicarbonates.
The high number of indicator species in the studied flora created a reliable basis for bioindication. As a result, a difference was identified between reference stations and subsoil development sites, which manifested itself in the type of habitats and the composition of salinity and pH indicators. Using statistical mapping methods, the main abiotic factors of diamond mining (chlorides) and oil and gas mining (copper) areas were determined. Two clusters were identified, which should be characterized as natural and anthropogenic, differing in the taxonomic structure of the flora.
The studied area of the Central Yakut Lowland is a unique testing ground for studying the combined impact of diamond mining and oil and gas subsoil development on aquatic ecosystems. Particular interest in this region is also associated with the distribution of permafrost here. It is obvious that continued research of aquatic ecosystems is required, taking into account the control and probable anthropogenic transformations and the increased risk of the impact of global climate change on permafrost landscapes. Future studies should include long-term monitoring to capture seasonal and interannual variations, expand the geographical scope to different industrial regions, and investigate the combined effects of climate change and industrial activities on aquatic ecosystems. Additionally, further development of bioindicator systems tailored to specific pollutants and ecosystem types will enhance the precision and applicability of monitoring programs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.B. and V.G.; methodology, S.B. and V.G.; software, S.B.; validation, S.B., V.G., and S.G.; formal analysis, V.G., S.G., and O.G.; investigation, V.G. and O.G.; resources, V.G.; data curation, S.G. and V.G.; writing—original draft preparation, S.B. and V.G.; writing—review and editing, S.B., V.G., S.G., and O.G.; visualization, S.B.; supervision, V.G.; project administration, V.G.; funding acquisition, V.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was carried out within the state assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (theme No. FWRS-2021-0023, reg. No. AAAA-A21-121012190038-0; theme No. FWRS-2021-0026, reg. No. AAAA-A21-121012190036-6), (theme No. 124032100076-2).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data is available in the published article after it is cited.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Israeli Ministry of Aliyah and Integration for partial support of this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Electron micrographs of diatoms of studied waterbodies: (a)—Aulacoseira italica, (b)—Boreozonacola hustedtii, (c)—Brachysira brebissonii, (d)—Cyclotella distinguenda, (e)—Cymbella cymbiformis, (f)—Eunotia superbidens, (g)—Gyrosigma acuminatum, (h)—Gomphonema brebissonii, (i)—G. micropus, (j)—Lindavia comta, (k)—Pinnularia cf. globiceps var. linearis, (l)—P. ovata, (m)—P. sinistra, (n)—P. subrostrata, (o)—Rhoicosphenia abbreviata, (p)—Sellaphora pseudopupula.
Figure A1. Electron micrographs of diatoms of studied waterbodies: (a)—Aulacoseira italica, (b)—Boreozonacola hustedtii, (c)—Brachysira brebissonii, (d)—Cyclotella distinguenda, (e)—Cymbella cymbiformis, (f)—Eunotia superbidens, (g)—Gyrosigma acuminatum, (h)—Gomphonema brebissonii, (i)—G. micropus, (j)—Lindavia comta, (k)—Pinnularia cf. globiceps var. linearis, (l)—P. ovata, (m)—P. sinistra, (n)—P. subrostrata, (o)—Rhoicosphenia abbreviata, (p)—Sellaphora pseudopupula.
Diversity 16 00440 g0a1
Table A1. Diatom species richness in 11 studied waterbodies of the Central Yakut Plain, September 2022.
Table A1. Diatom species richness in 11 studied waterbodies of the Central Yakut Plain, September 2022.
Taxa1234567891011
Achnanthidium minutissimum (Kützing) Czarnecki01010000100
Amphipleura pellucida (Kützing) Kützing00001000000
Asterionella formosa Hassall10100100000
Aulacoseira ambigua (Grunow) Simonsen00010000010
Aulacoseira alpigena (Grunow) Krammer11100000011
Aulacoseira islandica (O.Müller) Simonsen10010000000
Aulacoseira italica (Ehrenberg) Simonsen00001000000
Aulacoseira pusilla (F.Meister) A.Tuji & A.Houki10000001110
Aulacoseira subarctica (O.Müller) E.Y.Haworth10010000000
Aulacoseira valida (Grunow) Krammer00001000000
Boreozonacola hustedtii Lange-Bertalot, Kulikovskiy & Witkowski00000001000
Brachysira brebissonii R.Ross00110000000
Caloneis silicula var. elliptica (Frenguelli) Frenguelli01000000000
Caloneis placentula Ehrenberg00001000010
Cocconeis lineata Ehrenberg10000000000
Craticula ambigua (Ehrenberg) D.G.Mann00000001000
Cyclostephanos dubius (Hustedt) Round10000000000
Cyclotella distinguenda Hustedt00010000101
Cymbella neogena (Grunow) Krammer00001000000
Cymbella cymbiformis C.Agardh00101000000
Cymbella sp.10000000000
Cymbopleura fluminea (R.M.Patrick & Freese) Lange-Bertalot & Krammer ex Lange-Bertalot & Genkal00000001001
Cymbopleura apiculata Krammer00000001000
Cymbopleura subcuspidata (Krammer) Krammer01000000000
Cymbopleura tynnii (Krammer) Krammer00000001000
Diploneis cf. fontanella Lange-Bertalot00000001000
Diploneis ovalis (Hilse) Cleve00000001000
Discostella stelligera (Cleve & Grunow) Houk & Klee00010000000
Encyonema silesiacum (Bleisch) D.G.Mann00001000000
Encyonema minutum (Hilse) D.G.Mann00000000001
Encyonema cf. leibleinii (C.Agardh) W.J.Silva, R.Jahn, T.A.V.Ludwig & M.Menezes01000000000
Entomoneis ornata (Bailey) Reimer00000100000
Eunotia pectinalis (Kützing) Rabenhorst00001100000
Eunotia bidens Ehrenberg01000001001
Eunotia bilunaris (Ehrenberg) Schaarschmidt00000000111
Eunotia boreotenuis Nörpel-Schempp & Lange-Bertalot00000000010
Eunotia curtagrunowii Nörpel-Schempp & Lange-Bertalot00000001000
Eunotia genuflexa Nörpel-Schempp00000001000
Eunotia mucophila (Lange-Bertalot, Nörpel-Schempp & Alles) Lange-Bertalot00000000001
Eunotia praerupta Ehrenberg00000001000
Eunotia scandiorussica Kulikovskiy, Lange-Bertalot, Genkal & Witkowski00000000001
Eunotia septentrionalis Østrup00000001011
Eunotia superbidens Lange-Bertalot00000000001
Fragilaria radians (Kützing) D.M.Williams & Round00010000000
Fragilaria aequalis Heiberg00000100100
Fragilariforma mesolepta (Rabenhorst) Kharitonov00001100000
Fragilaria rumpens (Kützing) G.W.F.Carlson10000000000
Fragilaris sp.00000100100
Frustulia crassinervia (Brébisson ex W.Smith) Lange-Bertalot & Krammer01001000000
Gomphonema naviculoides W.Smith00000100000
Gomphonema acuminatum Ehrenberg00001000000
Gomphonema angusticephalum E.Reichardt & Lange-Bertalot10000000000
Gomphonema brebissonii Kützing00001000001
Gomphonema micropus Kützing01000000000
Gomphonema pala E.Reichardt00001000000
Gomphonema pelisteriense Levkov, Mitic-Kopanja & E.Reichardt00000000001
Gomphonema truncatum Ehrenberg00001000000
Gomphonema sp.11001001001
Gyrosigma acuminatum (Kützing) Rabenhorst00110000000
Lindavia comta (Kützing) T.Nakov & al.11011000000
Kobayasiella parasubtilissima (H.Kobayasi & T.Nagumo) Lange-Bertalot00000010000
Luticola goeppertiana (Bleisch) D.G.Mann ex Rarick, S.Wu, S.S.Lee & Edlund01110000000
Luticola acidoclinata Lange-Bertalot01000000001
Luticola permuticopsis Kopalová & Van de Vijver11000000000
Luticola sp.00000000001
Mastogloia sp.01100000000
Meridion circulare (Greville) C.Agardh00000001000
Navicula salinicola Hustedt00010000000
Navicula antonii Lange-Bertalot10001000000
Navicula capitatoradiata H.Germain ex Gasse10000100000
Navicula cryptocephala Kützing10000001001
Cymbella lanceolata C.Agardh00000000001
Navicula moenofranconica Lange-Bertalot10000000000
Navicula radiosa Kützing10101000000
Navicula rostellata Kützing10000000000
Navicula semenicula Kulikovskiy, Lange-Bertalot & Metzeltin00010000000
Navicula sp.00000000001
Neidium hercynicum Ant.Mayer00000001000
Neidium affine (Ehrenberg) Pfitzer00000001000
Neidium ampliatum (Ehrenberg) Krammer00000001000
Neidium bisulcatum (Lagerstedt) Cleve00000001010
Neidium longiceps (W.Gregory) R.Ross00000001000
Neidium sp.00000001000
Nitzschia acidoclinata Lange-Bertalot01000001000
Nitzschia alpina Hustedt10000000000
Nitzschia archibaldii Lange-Bertalot00000001011
Nitzschia bacillum Hustedt10000000000
Nitzschia inconspicua Grunow00000001000
Nitzschia perminuta Grunow00000000011
Nitzschia vermicularis (Kützing) Hantzsch00010000000
Nitzschia sp.00000001000
Odontidium mesodon (Ehrenberg) Kützing00000100000
Pantocsekiella sp.00000100000
Pinnularia cf. globiceps var. linearis Krammer00010000000
Pinnularia acrosphaeria W.Smith00000001000
Pinnularia anglica Krammer00000000001
Pinnularia borealis var. scalaris (Ehrenberg) Rabenhorst00000000001
Pinnularia crucifera A.Cleve00000010011
Pinnularia eifeliana (Krammer) Krammer11000000000
Pinnularia flexuosa Cleve00000010000
Pinnularia ilkaschoenfelderae Krammer00000000001
Pinnularia isselana Krammer00000001000
Pinnularia lailaensis Foged00000000010
Pinnularia neomajor Krammer00001011001
Pinnularia obscura Krasske00000000001
Pinnularia ovata Krammer00000010000
Pinnularia pisciculus Ehrenberg00001000001
Pinnularia sinistra Krammer00000010011
Pinnularia spitsbergensis Cleve00000010000
Pinnularia stomatophora (Grunow) Cleve00000001000
Pinnularia subgibba var. sublinearis Krammer00000000001
Pinnularia subrostrata (A.Cleve) A.Cleve00000010000
Pinnularia undula (Schumann) Krammer00000001000
Pinnularia viridis (Nitzsch) Ehrenberg00000010011
Pinnularia sp.00010000000
Placoneis symmetrica (Hustedt) Lange-Bertalot00000000001
Platessa conspicua (Ant.Mayer) Lange-Bertalot00001000000
Psammothidium subatomoides (Hustedt) Bukhtiyarova & Round00010000000
Pseudostaurosira linearis (Pantocsek) E.A.Morales, Buczkó & Ector10000000000
Punctastriata subalpina C.E.Wetzel & Ector00000000100
Reimeria sinuata (W.Gregory) Kociolek & Stoermer10000000000
Rhoicosphenia abbreviata (C.Agardh) Lange-Bertalot00000000010
Epithemia gibba (Ehrenberg) Kützing00111000000
Sellaphora pseudopupula (Krasske) Lange-Bertalot00000001000
Sellaphora parapupula Lange-Bertalot00000001100
Sellaphora laevissima (Kützing) D.G.Mann00000001000
Stauroneis amphicephala Kützing00010001000
Stauroneis agrestis J.B.Petersen01000000000
Stauroneis anceps Ehrenberg10000001000
Stauroneis kuelbsii Lange-Bertalot00000000001
Stauroneis phoenicenteron (Nitzsch) Ehrenberg01000001011
Staurosira venter (Ehrenberg) Cleve & J.D.Möller10000000000
Stenopterobia anceps (F.W.Lewis) Brébisson ex Van Heurck00000001000
Stephanodiscus hantzschii Grunow00010000000
Tabellaria flocculosa (Roth) Kützing10110101010
Ulnaria acus (Kützing) Aboal00010100010
Ulnaria ulna (Nitzsch) Compère00001101000
Table A2. Richest orders in the communities of studied aquatic habitats of the Central Yakut Plain in September 2022.
Table A2. Richest orders in the communities of studied aquatic habitats of the Central Yakut Plain in September 2022.
OrderSt. 1St. 2St. 3St. 4St. 5St. 6St. 7St. 8St. 9St. 10St. 11
Achnanthales11021000100
Aulacoseirales41131001131
Bacillariales21010005022
Cymbellales54108106018
Eunotiales01001105136
Fragilariales30011400300
Licmophorales00011201010
Mastogloiales01100000000
Naviculales9848719221716
Rhabdonematales20210202010
Rhopalodiales00111000000
Stephanodiscales21041100101
Surirellales00000101000
No of Species28181022221294281834
No of Orders88699818676
Sp/Order3.52.31.72.42.41.59.05.31.32.65.7
Table A3. Richest families in the communities of studied aquatic habitats of the Central Yakut Plain in September 2022.
Table A3. Richest families in the communities of studied aquatic habitats of the Central Yakut Plain in September 2022.
FamilySt. 1St. 2St. 3St. 4St. 5St. 6St. 7St. 8St. 9St. 10St. 11
Achnanthidiaceae01021000100
Amphipleuraceae01002000000
Aulacoseiraceae41132001131
Bacillariaceae21010005022
Brachysiraceae00110000000
Cocconeidaceae10000000000
Cymbellaceae11102003003
Diadesmidaceae13110000002
Diploneidaceae00000002000
Entomoneidaceae00000100000
Eunotiaceae01001104136
Fragilariaceae10011400300
Gomphonemataceae43006103005
Mastogloiaceae01100000000
Naviculaceae61233112012
Neidiaceae00000006010
Pinnulariaceae110220850410
Rhoicospheniaceae00000000010
Rhopalodiaceae00111000000
Sellaphoraceae00000003100
Stauroneidaceae12010004012
Staurosiraceae20000000000
Stephanodiscaceae21041100101
Surirellaceae00000001000
Tabellariaceae20210202010
Ulnariaceae00011201010
No of Species28181022221394281834
No of Family131481312811461010
Sp/Family2.21.31.31.71.81.69.03.01.31.83.4
Table A4. Richest genera in the communities of studied aquatic habitats of the Central Yakut Plain in September 2022.
Table A4. Richest genera in the communities of studied aquatic habitats of the Central Yakut Plain in September 2022.
GenusSt. 1St. 2St. 3St. 4St. 5St. 6St. 7St. 8St. 9St. 10St. 11
Achnanthidium01010000100
Amphipleura00001000000
Asterionella10100100000
Aulacoseira41132001131
Boreozonacola00000001000
Brachysira00110000000
Caloneis01001000010
Cocconeis10000000000
Craticula00000001000
Cyclostephanos10000000000
Cyclotella00010000101
Cymbella10102000001
Cymbopleura01000003001
Diploneis00000002000
Discostella00010000000
Encyonema01001000001
Entomoneis00000100000
Epithemia00111000000
Eunotia01001105136
Fragilaria10010200200
Fragilariforma00001100000
Frustulia01001000000
Gomphonema32005103004
Gyrosigma00110000000
Kobayasiella00000010000
Lindavia11011000000
Luticola13110000002
Mastogloia01100000000
Meridion00000001000
Navicula60122101002
Neidium00000006010
Nitzschia21010005022
Odontidium00000100000
Pantocsekiella00000100000
Pinnularia110220850410
Placoneis00000000001
Platessa00001000000
Psammothidium00010000000
Pseudostaurosira10000000000
Punctastriata00000000100
Reimeria10000000000
Rhoicosphenia00000000010
Sellaphora00000003100
Stauroneis12010003012
Staurosira10000000000
Stenopterobia00000001000
Stephanodiscus00010000000
Tabellaria10110101010
Ulnaria00011201010
No of Species28181022221394281834
No of Genus17141018151121771013
Sp/Genus1.61.31.01.21.51.24.52.51.11.72.6
Table A5. Algal species ecological preferences in 11 studied waterbodies of the Central Yakut Plain, September 2022.
Table A5. Algal species ecological preferences in 11 studied waterbodies of the Central Yakut Plain, September 2022.
TaxaHABTOXYpHSALIndex SSAPDAUT-HETTRO
Achnanthidium minutissimum (Kützing) CzarneckiP-Betermst-strindi0.95besatee
Amphipleura pellucida (Kützing) KützingP-B-stalfi0.8bspateom
Asterionella formosa HassallPtempst-stralfi1.35bsxateme
Aulacoseira ambigua (Grunow) SimonsenPtempst-stralfi1.7b-ospateom
Aulacoseira alpigena (Grunow) KrammerP-Btempst-stralfi0.8x-bspateot
Aulacoseira islandica (O.Müller) SimonsenP-Bcoolst-strindi2.0besateo-e
Aulacoseira italica (Ehrenberg) SimonsenP-Bcoolst-strindi1.45besateme
Aulacoseira pusilla (F.Meister) A.Tuji & A.HoukiP--alfi-----
Aulacoseira subarctica (O.Müller) E.Y.HaworthPtempst-stralfi1.7b-o-atsom
Aulacoseira valida (Grunow) KrammerP-B--alfi1.3oesateom
Boreozonacola hustedtii Lange-Bertalot, Kulikovskiy & WitkowskiP-B--indi-----
Brachysira brebissonii R.RossP-Btempst-stracfhb0.4osxatsot
Caloneis silicula var. elliptica (Frenguelli) Frenguelli----------
Caloneis placentula Ehrenberg----------
Cocconeis lineata EhrenbergP-Btempst-stralfi1.2bsxatee
Craticula ambigua (Ehrenberg) D.G.MannBtempstalfi2.3bes-me
Cyclostephanos dubius (Hustedt) RoundP-Btempst-stralfhl2.0aesatee
Cyclotella distinguenda HustedtP-stralfhl1.3o--om
Cymbella neogena (Grunow) Krammer----------
Cymbella cymbiformis C.AgardhBtempst-stralfi2.0bsxatsom
Cymbella sp.----------
Cymbopleura fluminea (R.M.Patrick & Freese) Lange-Bertalot & Krammer ex Lange-Bertalot & Genkal----------
Cymbopleura apiculata KrammerB--ind-1.0oesatsot
Cymbopleura subcuspidata (Krammer) KrammerP-B-stracfi1.0osxatsom
Cymbopleura tynnii (Krammer) KrammerB---------
Diploneis cf. fontanella Lange-BertalotB---------
Diploneis ovalis (Hilse) CleveB-st-stralfi0.9x-b-atem
Discostella stelligera (Cleve & Grunow) Houk & KleeP-Btempst-strindi-----
Encyonema silesiacum (Bleisch) D.G.MannBtempst-strindi-----
Encyonema minutum (Hilse) D.G.MannBtempst-strindi1.5o-bsxats-
Encyonema cf. leibleinii (C.Agardh) W.J.Silva, R.Jahn, T.A.V.Ludwig & M.MenezesP-B-stralbi2.4b-asx-me
Entomoneis ornata (Bailey) ReimerB-st-stralfi2.0b-hne-
Eunotia pectinalis (Kützing) RabenhorstB-st-stracfi0.5x-osx-ot
Eunotia bidens EhrenbergP-B,aercoolst-stracfhb1.0o--ot
Eunotia bilunaris (Ehrenberg) SchaarschmidtBtempst-stracfi-----
Eunotia boreotenuis Nörpel-Schempp & Lange-BertalotB---hb1.0o--ot
Eunotia curtagrunowii Nörpel-Schempp & Lange-BertalotP-B--acfhb0.4x-o-atsot
Eunotia genuflexa Nörpel-Schempp----------
Eunotia mucophila (Lange-Bertalot, Nörpel-Schempp & Alles) Lange-BertalotP-Btempst-stracfhb-----
Eunotia praerupta EhrenbergP-Bcoolst-stracfhb0.3x---
Eunotia scandiorussica Kulikovskiy, Lange-Bertalot, Genkal & Witkowski----------
Eunotia septentrionalis ØstrupP-B-stracfhb1.0o--ot
Eunotia superbidens Lange-Bertalot----------
Fragilaria radians (Kützing) D.M.Williams & RoundP-Bwarmst-stralfi-----
Fragilaria aequalis Heiberg----------
Fragilariforma mesolepta (Rabenhorst) KharitonovP-B-st-stralfi1.0o--ot
Fragilaria rumpens (Kützing) G.W.F.CarlsonP-Betermst-strindi2.0b-atse
Fragilaris sp.----------
Frustulia crassinervia (Brébisson ex W.Smith) Lange-Bertalot & KrammerB-stracfhb0.5x-osxatsot
Gomphonema naviculoides W.Smith----------
Gomphonema acuminatum EhrenbergBtempst-strindi0.8x-b---
Gomphonema angusticephalum E.Reichardt & Lange-Bertalot----------
Gomphonema brebissonii KützingB-stindi----m
Gomphonema micropus KützingBtempst-strindi1.1----
Gomphonema pala E.ReichardtB----1.0o---
Gomphonema pelisteriense Levkov, Mitic-Kopanja & E.Reichardt----------
Gomphonema truncatum EhrenbergBtempst-strindi2.0b---
Gomphonema sp.----------
Gyrosigma acuminatum (Kützing) RabenhorstBtempst-stralfi-----
Lindavia comta (Kützing) T.Nakov & al.----------
Kobayasiella parasubtilissima (H.Kobayasi & T.Nagumo) Lange-BertalotBtempstracbhb1.5o-b---
Luticola goeppertiana (Bleisch) D.G.Mann ex Rarick, S.Wu, S.S.Lee & EdlundBtempstindi-----
Luticola acidoclinata Lange-Bertalot----------
Luticola permuticopsis Kopalová & Van de Vijver----------
Luticola sp.----------
Mastogloia sp.----------
Meridion circulare (Greville) C.AgardhP-Btempst-strindi-----
Navicula salinicola HustedtB---mh-----
Navicula antonii Lange-BertalotBtemp-alfoh--es--
Navicula capitatoradiata H.Germain ex GasseP-Btempst-stralfmh-----
Navicula cryptocephala KützingP-Btempst-strindi2.4b-a---
Cymbella lanceolata C.AgardhBtempst-stralfi2.5b-aesatee
Navicula moenofranconica Lange-Bertalot----------
Navicula radiosa KützingBtempst-strindi--sx--
Navicula rostellata KützingB-st-stralfi0.7o-x-ateot
Navicula semenicula Kulikovskiy, Lange-Bertalot & Metzeltin----------
Navicula sp.----------
Neidium hercynicum Ant.MayerB--acfi-----
Neidium affine (Ehrenberg) PfitzerBtempst-strindi-----
Neidium ampliatum (Ehrenberg) KrammerBtempstindi-----
Neidium bisulcatum (Lagerstedt) CleveB-st-strindi1.0o---
Neidium longiceps (W.Gregory) R.RossBtempstrindi-----
Neidium sp.----------
Nitzschia acidoclinata Lange-BertalotBtempstrindhb3.6a-b-atee
Nitzschia alpina HustedtP-Btempstracfi1.0o---
Nitzschia archibaldii Lange-BertalotBtempst-strindi-----
Nitzschia bacillum HustedtB--alfi2.0b---
Nitzschia inconspicua GrunowBtempst-stralfhl-----
Nitzschia perminuta GrunowP-Btempstralfhl-----
Nitzschia vermicularis (Kützing) HantzschP-Btempst-stralfi-----
Nitzschia sp.----------
Odontidium mesodon (Ehrenberg) KützingBcoolst-strindhb0.9x-b---
Pantocsekiella sp.----------
Pinnularia cf. globiceps var. linearis Krammer----------
Pinnularia acrosphaeria W.SmithBwarmst-strindi-----
Pinnularia anglica KrammerB--acf-2.3bes-e
Pinnularia borealis var. scalaris (Ehrenberg) RabenhorstB---i--sx--
Pinnularia crucifera A.Cleve----------
Pinnularia eifeliana (Krammer) KrammerB----1.0o---
Pinnularia flexuosa CleveB---i1.0o--m
Pinnularia ilkaschoenfelderae Krammer----------
Pinnularia isselana Krammer-----1.0oes-ot
Pinnularia lailaensis Foged----------
Pinnularia neomajor KrammerB--indi-----
Pinnularia obscura KrasskeB,aer-st-str,aerindi0.5x-o-atsot
Pinnularia ovata KrammerB---------
Pinnularia pisciculus Ehrenberg----------
Pinnularia sinistra KrammerB---------
Pinnularia spitsbergensis CleveB--indhb---atsot
Pinnularia stomatophora (Grunow) CleveB-st-stracfi-----
Pinnularia subgibba var. sublinearis Krammer----------
Pinnularia subrostrata (A.Cleve) A.CleveB--acfhb1.0o---
Pinnularia undula (Schumann) KrammerB--indi1.0o---
Pinnularia viridis (Nitzsch) EhrenbergP-Btempst-strindi0.9x-b--ot
Pinnularia sp.----------
Placoneis symmetrica (Hustedt) Lange-BertalotB---hb2.0b---
Platessa conspicua (Ant.Mayer) Lange-BertalotBtempst-stralfi-----
Psammothidium subatomoides (Hustedt) Bukhtiyarova & RoundP-Btempstracfhb2.0bsxatsme
Pseudostaurosira linearis (Pantocsek) E.A.Morales, Buczkó & Ector----------
Punctastriata subalpina C.E.Wetzel & Ector----------
Reimeria sinuata (W.Gregory) Kociolek & StoermerP-B, aertempst-strindi-----
Rhoicosphenia abbreviata (C.Agardh) Lange-BertalotBtempst-stralfi1.9o-aesateme
Epithemia gibba (Ehrenberg) KützingP-Btempst-stralfi1.4x-oesateom
Sellaphora pseudopupula (Krasske) Lange-Bertalot-----1.9o-a---
Sellaphora parapupula Lange-BertalotB-stindi1.0o-atem
Sellaphora laevissima (Kützing) D.G.MannB-st-strindi2.0b-atsom
Stauroneis amphicephala Kützing----------
Stauroneis agrestis J.B.PetersenB-aerindi-----
Stauroneis anceps EhrenbergP-Btempst-strindi1.3osxatsom
Stauroneis kuelbsii Lange-Bertalot----------
Stauroneis phoenicenteron (Nitzsch) EhrenbergP-Btempst-strindi-----
Staurosira venter (Ehrenberg) Cleve & J.D.MöllerP-Btempst-stralfi1.0o--ot
Stenopterobia anceps (F.W.Lewis) Brébisson ex Van Heurck----------
Stephanodiscus hantzschii GrunowPtempst-stralfi--sx--
Tabellaria flocculosa (Roth) KützingP-Betermst-stracfi3.0a---
Ulnaria acus (Kützing) AboalP-Bwarmst-stralfi1.85o-aesateme
Ulnaria ulna (Nitzsch) CompèreP-Btempst-stralfi2.4b-aesatee
Note: “-”, not found. Abbreviations: habitat (HAB) (P—planktonic; P-B—plankto-benthic; B—benthic); temperature (T) preferences (cool—cool water; temp—temperate; eterm—eurythermic; warm—warm water); oxygenation and water moving (OXY) (aer—aerophiles; str—streaming water; st-str—low streaming water; st—standing, H2S—sulfides); pH preferences groups (pH) according to F. Hustedt [67] (alb—alkalibiontes; alf—alkaliphiles; ind—indifferent; acf—acidophiles; neu—neutrophiles as a part of indifferents); salinity ecological groups (SAL) according to F. Hustedt [68] (hb—oligohalobes-halophobes; i—oligohalobes-indifferent; hl—halophiles; mh—mesohalobes; oh—oligohalobes of wide spectrum with optimum as indifferent); Index S, species-specific index saprobity according to V. Sládeček [69]; self-purification zone with index of saprobity (SAP) (x/0.0—xenosaprobe; x-o/0.4—xeno-oligosaprobe; o-x/0.6—oligo-xenosaprobe; x-b/0.8—xeno-betamesosaprobe; o/1.0—oligosaprobe; o-b/1.4—oligo-betamesosaprobe; b-o/1.6—beta-oligosaprobe; o-a/1.8—oligo-alphamesosaprobe; b/2.0—betamesosaprobe; b-a/2.4—beta-alphamesosaprobe; a-ο/2.6—alpha-oligosaprobe; a/3.0—alphamesosaprobe; p-a/4.0—poly-alphamesosaprobe; i/>4.0—i-eusaprobe); organic pollution indicators according to T. Watanabe et al. [48] (D): sx—saproxenes; es—eurysaprobes; sp—saprophiles; nitrogen uptake metabolism (AUT-HET) [15]: ats—nitrogen-autotrophic taxa, tolerating very small concentrations of organically bound nitrogen; ate—nitrogen-autotrophic taxa, tolerating elevated concentrations of organically bound nitrogen; hne—facultative nitrogen-heterotrophic taxa, needing periodically elevated concentrations of organically bound nitrogen; indicators of trophic state (TRO) [15] (ot—oligotraphentic; om—oligomesotraphentic; m—mesotraphentic; me—mesoeutraphentic; e—eutraphentic; o-e—oligo to hypereutraphentic).
Table A6. Distribution of species indicator numbers in the aquatic communities of the Central Yakut Plain, September 2022.
Table A6. Distribution of species indicator numbers in the aquatic communities of the Central Yakut Plain, September 2022.
VariableSt. 1St. 2St. 3St. 4St. 5St. 6St. 7St. 8St. 9St. 10St. 11
Habitat
B56431237192611
P-B12641065111178
P30140101221
Temperature
cool11011102001
temp135810932121810
eterm21120101110
warm00020101010
Oxygen
aer01000000000
str14021013123
st-str15581311911621011
st01112003101
Salinity
hb03121135024
i17881316732241112
hl10010001112
mh10010100000
pH
acb00000010000
acf23232217135
ind662471317248
alf111598605264
alb01000000000
Watanabe
sx43434201002
es31145204122
sp11111000021
Autotrophy-Heterotrophy
ats32232014002
ate63355304242
hne00000100000
Trophy
ot33213225045
om21244002111
m00001012101
me11121201020
e32011102102
o-e10010000000
Class of Water Quality
Class 101112102001
Class 286337349336
Class 350153305004
Class 411010101010
Class 500000001000
Note: “0”, not found. Abbreviations: habitat (Hab) (P—planktonic; P-B—plankto-benthic; B—benthic); temperature (T) preferences (cool—cool water; temp—temperate; eterm—eurythermic; warm—warm water); oxygenation and water moving (Oxy) (aer—aerophiles; str—streaming water; st-str—low streaming water; st—standing; H2S—sulfides); pH preferences groups (pH) according to F. Hustedt [67] (alb—alkalibiontes; alf—alkaliphiles, ind—indifferent; acf—acidophiles; neu—neutrophiles as a part of indifferents); salinity ecological groups (Sal) according to F. Hustedt [68] (hb—oligohalobes-halophobes; i—oligohalobes-indifferent; hl—halophiles; mh—mesohalobes); Index S, species-specific index saprobity according to V. Sládeček [69]; organic pollution indicators according to T. Watanabe et al. [48] (D): sx—saproxenes; es—eurysaprobes; sp—saprophiles; nitrogen uptake metabolism (Aut-Het) [15]: ats—nitrogen-autotrophic taxa, tolerating very small concentrations of organically bound nitrogen; ate—nitrogen-autotrophic taxa, tolerating elevated concentrations of organically bound nitrogen; hne—facultative nitrogen-heterotrophic taxa, needing periodically elevated concentrations of organically bound nitrogen; trophic state indicators (Tro) [15] (ot—oligotraphentic; om—oligomesotraphentic; m—mesotraphentic; me—mesoeutraphentic; e—eutraphentic; o-e—oligo to hypereutraphentic).

References

  1. Yakovleva, N.; Alabaster, T.; Petrova, P.G. Natural resource use in the Russian North: A case study of diamond mining in the Republic of Sakha. Environ. Manag. Health 2000, 11, 318–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mendelssohn, I.A.; Andersen, G.L.; Baltz, D.M.; Caffey, R.H.; Carman, K.R.; Fleeger, J.W.; Joye, S.B.; Lin, Q.; Maltby, E.; Overton, E.B.; et al. Oil Impacts on Coastal Wetlands: Implications for the Mississippi River Delta Ecosystem after the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. BioScience 2012, 62, 562–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Entrekin, S.; Evans-White, M.; Johnson, B.; Hagenbuch, E. Rapid expansion of natural gas development poses a threat to surface waters. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2011, 9, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kirakosyan, D.V.; Molchanova, Y.P. Analysis of first consequences of the oil spill in Norilsk. Uspekhi V Khimii I Khimicheskikh Tekhnologiyakh 2021, XXXV, 43–46. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  5. Nikolaeva, N.A.; Kopyrina, L.I. Evaluation of some aspects of the state of rivers and landscapes in Western Yakutia under anthropogenic impact. Uspekhi Sovrem. Yestestvoznaniya 2023, 6, 59–64. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Systerova, A.V. River’s algoflora of Perm Krai oil fields. In Proceedings of the All-Russian Conference Ecological Safety in Conditions of Anthropogenic Transformation of the Natural Environment, Perm, Russia, 20–21 April 2023; pp. 494–496. (In Russian). [Google Scholar]
  7. Volpert, Y.L. Transformation of land ecosystems as a result of diamond mining industry influence. Uspekhi Sovrem. Estestvozn. 2012, 11, 80–82. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  8. Skorobogatova, O.; Yumagulova, E.; Storchak, T.; Barinova, S. Bioindication of the Influence of Oil Production on Sphagnum Bogs in the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug–Yugra, Russia. Diversity 2019, 11, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nõges, P.; Poikane, S.; Cardoso, A.C.; van de Bund, W. Water Framework Directive the Way to Water Ecosystems Sustainability in Europe. LakeLine 2006, 21, 36–43. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kelly, M.; Bennion, H.; Burgess, A.; Ellis, J.; Juggins, S.; Guthrie, R.; Jamieson, J.; Adriaenssens, V.; Yallop, M. Uncertainty in Ecological Status Assessments of Lakes and Rivers Using Diatoms. Hydrobiologia 2009, 633, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Poikane, S.; Kelly, M.; Cantonati, M. Benthic Algal Assessment of Ecological Status in European Lakes and Rivers: Challenges and Opportunities. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 568, 603–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bennion, H.; Sayer, C.D.; Tibby, J.; Carrick, H.J. Diatoms as Indicators of Environmental Change in Shallow Lakes. In The Diatoms: Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010; p. 686. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hofmann, G.; Werum, M.; Lange-Bertalot, H.; Lange-Bertalot, H. Diatomeen im Süßwasser-Benthos von Mitteleuropa: Bestimmungs-Flora Kieselalgen für die Ökologische Praxis. Über 700 der Häufigsten Arten und Ihre Ökologie; Gantner: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 2011; p. 908. (In German) [Google Scholar]
  14. Charles, D.F.; Kelly, M.G.; Stevenson, R.J.; Poikane, S.; Theroux, S.; Zgrundo, A.; Cantonati, M. Benthic Algae Assessments in the EU and the US: Striving for Consistency in the Face of Great Ecological Diversity. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 121, 107082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Van Dam, H.; Mertens, A.; Sinkeldam, J. A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from The Netherlands. Neth. J. Aquat. Ecol. 1994, 28, 117–133. [Google Scholar]
  16. Izyumenko, S.A. (Ed.) Climate of the Yakut Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (Atlas); Gidrometeoizdat: Leningrad, USSR, 1968; 33p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  17. Semenov, A.D. Guidance on the Chemical Analysis of Surface Waters of the Land; Gidrometeoizdat: Leningrad, USSR, 1977; p. 541. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  18. Balonov, I.M. Preparation of diatoms and golden algae for electron microscopy. In Methods for the Study of Biogeocenoses of Inland Waterbodies; Nauka: Moscow, USSR, 1975; pp. 87–89. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  19. Lange-Bertalot, H.; Moser, G. Brachysira: Monographie der Gattung; wichtige indicator-species für das Gewässer-Monitoring und Naviculadicta nov. gen.; ein Lösungsvorschlag zu dem Problem Navicula sensu lato onhe Navicula sensu stricto. Bibl. Diatomol. 1994, 29, 1–212. [Google Scholar]
  20. Krammer, K. Die cymbelloiden Diatomeen. Teil 1. Allgemeines und Encyonema part. Bibl. Diatomol. 1997, 36, 1–382. [Google Scholar]
  21. Krammer, K. Die cymbelloiden Diatomeen. Teil 2. Encyonema part. Encyonopsis und Cymbellopsis. Bibl. Diatomol. 1997, 7, 1–469. [Google Scholar]
  22. Krammer, K. Pinnularia. In Diatoms of Europe; Lange-Bertalot, H., Ed.; Gustav Fisher Verlag: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 2000; Volume 1, pp. 1–703. [Google Scholar]
  23. Krammer, K. Cymbella. In Diatoms of Europe; Lange-Bertalot, H., Ed.; Gustav Fisher Verlag: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 2002; Volume 3, pp. 1–584. [Google Scholar]
  24. Krammer, K. Cymbopleura. Delicata. Navicymbula. Gomphocymbellopsis. Afrocymbella. In Diatoms of Europe; Lange-Bertalot, H., Ed.; Gustav Fisher Verlag: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 2003; Volume 4, pp. 1–530. [Google Scholar]
  25. Krammer, K.; Lange-Bertalot, H. Bacillariophyceae. Teil 1. Naviculaceae. In Die Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa; Gustav Fisher Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany, 1986; pp. 1–876. [Google Scholar]
  26. Krammer, K.; Lange-Bertalot, H. Bacillariophyceae. Teil 2. Epithemiaceae. Bacillariaceae. Surirellaceae. In Die Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa; Gustav Fisher Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany, 1988; pp. 1–536. [Google Scholar]
  27. Krammer, K.; Lange-Bertalot, H. Bacillariophyceae. Teil 3. Centrales. Fragilariaceae. Eunotiaceae. In Die Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa; Ettl, J., Gerloff, H., Eds.; Gustav Fisher Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany, 1991; pp. 1–576. [Google Scholar]
  28. Krammer, K.; Lange-Bertalot, H. Bacillariophyceae. Teil. 4. Achnanthaceae. Kritische Erganzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema. In Die Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa; Gustav Fisher Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany, 1991; pp. 1–437. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lange-Bertalot, H.; Genkal, S.I. Diatoms of Siberia. I. Iconogr. Diatomol. 1999, 6, 7–272. [Google Scholar]
  30. Reichardt, E. Zur revision der gattung Gomphonema. Iconogr. Diatomol. 1999, 8, 1–203. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lange-Bertalot, H. Navicula sensu stricto. 10 genera separated from Navicula sensu lato Frustulia. In Diatoms of Europe; Lange-Bertalot, H., Ed.; A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.-G.: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 2001; Volume 2, pp. 1–526. [Google Scholar]
  32. Werum, M.; Lange-Bertalot, H. Diatoms in springs from Central Europe and elsewhere under the influence of hydrogeology and anthropogenic impacts. Iconogr. Diatomol. 2004, 13, 1–417. [Google Scholar]
  33. Levkov, Z. Amphora sensu lato. In Diatoms of Europe; Lange-Bertalot, H., Ed.; A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.-G.: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 2009; Volume 5, pp. 1–916. [Google Scholar]
  34. Genkal, S.I.; Bondarenko, N.A.; Shchur, L.A. Diatoms of Lakes in the South and North of Eastern Siberia; Publisher OAO “Rybinsk Press House”: Rybinsk, Russia, 2011; p. 72. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lange-Bertalot, H.; Bak, M.; Witkowski, A. Eunotia and some related genera. In Diatoms of Europe; A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.-G.: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 2011; Volume 6, pp. 1–747. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kharitonov, V.G.; Genkal, S.I. Diatoms of Lake Elgygytgyn and Its Environs (Chukotka); NESC FEB RAS: Magadan, Russia, 2012; p. 402. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  37. Levkov, Z.; Metzeltin, D.; Pavlov, A. Luticola. Luticolopsis. In Diatoms of Europe; Lange-Bertalot, H., Ed.; A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.-G.: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 2013; Volume 7, pp. 1–697. [Google Scholar]
  38. Levkov, Z.; Mitić-Kopanja, D.; Reichardt, E. The diatom genus Gomphonema from the Republik of Macedonia. In Diatoms of Europe; Lange-Bertalot, H., Ed.; A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.-G.: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 2016; Volume 8, pp. 1–552. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Glushchtnko, A.M.; Genkal, S.I.; Kuznetsova, I.V. Identification Book of Diatoms from Russia; Filigran: Yaroslavl, Russia, 2016; p. 804. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lange-Bertalot, H.; Hofmann, G.; Werum, M.; Cantonati, M. Freshwater benthic diatoms of Central Europe; Koeltz Botanical Books: Schmitten-Oberreifenberg, Germany, 2017; p. 942. [Google Scholar]
  41. Beauger, A.; Allain, E.; Voldoire, O.; Blavignac, C.; Rossi, S.; Wetzel, C.; Ector, L. Gomphosphenia vallei (Bacillariophyta), a new diatom species from a stream in the “Réserve Naturelle Nationale de la Vallée de Chaudefour”, Massif Central (France). Phytotaxa 2022, 542, 167–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Guiry, M.D.; Guiry, G.M. AlgaeBase World-Wide Electronic Publication. National University of Ireland, Galway. Available online: http://www.algaebase.org (accessed on 24 May 2024).
  43. Barinova, S. Essential and practical bioindication methods and systems for the water quality assessment. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Nat. Resour. 2017, 2, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Barinova, S.S.; Medvedeva, L.A.; Anissimova, O.V. Diversity of Algal Indicators in Environmental Assessment; Pilies Studio Publisher: Tel Aviv, Israel, 2006; p. 498. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  45. McAleece, N.; Gage, J.D.G.; Lambshead, P.J.D.; Paterson, G.L.J. BioDiversity Professional Statistics Analysis Software; The Scottish Association for Marine Science: Oban, UK; Natural History Museum: London, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  46. Love, J.; Selker, R.; Marsman, M.; Jamil, T.; Dropmann, D.; Verhagen, J.A.; Ly, A.; Gronau, F.Q.; Smira, M.; Epskamp, S.; et al. JASP: Graphical statistical software for common statistical designs. J. Stat. Softw. 2019, 88, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ter Braak, C.J.F.; Šmilauer, P. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4.5); Microcomputer Power Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2002; p. 500. [Google Scholar]
  48. Watanabe, T.; Asai, K.; Houki, A. Numerical estimation of organic pollution of flowing water by using the epilithic diatom assemblage—Diatom Assemblage Index (DAIpo). Sci. Total Environ. 1986, 55, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Al-Robai, H.A.; Jasim, D.J.; Jassam, S.A.; Jasim, H.M.; Ameen, H.F.M.; Al-Rubaye, A.H. Petroleum’s Influence on the Aquatic Environment. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2023; Volume 1262, p. 022025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bănăduc, D.; Curtean-Bănăduc, A.; Barinova, S.; Lozano, V.L.; Afanasyev, S.; Leite, T.; Branco, P.; Gomez Isaza, D.F.; Geist, J.; Tegos, A.; et al. Multi-Interacting Natural and Anthropogenic Stressors on Freshwater Ecosystems: Their Current Status and Future Prospects for 21st Century. Water 2024, 16, 1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Esterhuyse, S.; Redelinghuys, N.; Charvet, P.; Fearnside, P.; Daga, V.; Braga, R.; Okello, W.; Vitule, J.; Verheyen, E.; van Steenberge, M. Effects of Hydrocarbon Extraction on Freshwaters. In Encyclopedia of Inland Waters, 2nd ed.; Mehner, T., Tockner, K., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; Volume 3, pp. 189–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Anhalt, E.M.; Dobrodomova, L.A.; Ryabinina, Z.N. Environmental and economic assessment of the impact of oil and gas production on the state of landscape and botanical complexes in the Urals. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 962, 042011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ko, J.Y.; Day, J.W. A review of ecological impacts of oil and gas development on coastal ecosystems in the Mississippi Delta. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2004, 47, 597–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kotova, E.I.; Netsvetaeva, O.P.; Reshetnyak, O.S. Impact of the Lomonosov diamond deposit exploitation on the Zolotitsa River ecosystem. Arkt. Ekol. Ekon. 2022, 12, 191–199. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Barinova, S.; Gabyshev, V.; Genkal, S.; Gabysheva, O. Diatoms of Small Water Bodies as Bioindicators in the Assessment of Climatic and Anthropogenic Impacts on the Coast of Tiksi Bay, Russian Arctic. Water 2023, 15, 1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Barinova, S.; Gabyshev, V.; Genkal, S. Diversity of Diatom Algae in the Lena Delta Nature Reserve and the Adjacent Territory in the Specific Ecological Factors of the Arctic. Diversity 2023, 15, 802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Soininen, J. A quantitative analysis of species sorting across organisms and ecosystems. Ecology 2014, 95, 3284–3292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. MacArthur, R.H.; Wilson, E.O. The Theory of Island Biogeography; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1967; p. 203. [Google Scholar]
  59. Pérez-Burillo, J.; Jamoneau, A.; Passy, S.I.; Tison-Rosebery, J.; Blanco, S.; Borrini, A.; Boutry, S.; Budnick, W.R.; Cantonati, M.; Valente, A.C.; et al. Stream diatom community assembly processes in islands and continents: A global perspective. J. Biogeogr. 2024, 51, 382–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gurrieri, J.T. Distribution of metals in water and sediment and effects on aquatic biota in the upper Stillwater River basin, Montana. J. Geochem. Explor. 1998, 64, 83–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Helgen, S.O.; Moore, J.N. Natural background determination and impact quantification in trace metal-contaminated river sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pirrie, D.; Power, M.R.; Wheeler, P.D.; Cundy, A.; Bridges, C.; Davey, G. Geochemical signature of historical mining: Fowey Estuary, Cornwall, UK. J. Geochem. Explor. 2002, 76, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pirrie, D.; Camm, G.S.; Sear, L.G.; Hughes, S.H. Mineralogical and geochemical signature of mine waste contamination, Tresillian River, Fal Estuary, Cornwall, UK. Environ. Geol. 1997, 29, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Barinova, S.; Gabyshev, V.; Gabysheva, O. Phytoplankton in the Ecological Assessment of the Mining Facilities Influence on the Anabar River in the Permafrost Zone of the Arctic, Eastern Siberia, Russia. Land 2023, 12, 1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gerhardt, A.; Janssens de Bisthoven, L.; Guhr, K.; Soares, A.M.V.M.; Pereira, M.J. Phytoassessment of Acid Mine Drainage: Combining Lemna gibba bioassay and Diatom community structure. Ecotoxicology 2008, 17, 7–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bănăduc, D.; Barinova, S.; Cianfaglione, K.; Curtean-Bănăduc, A. Editorial: Multiple freshwater stressors—Key drivers for the future of freshwater environments. Front. Environ. Sci. 2023, 11, 1143706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hustedt, F. Die Diatomeenflora des Flußsystems der Weser im Gebiet der Hansestadt Bremen. Abh. Naturwissenschaftlichen Ver. Brem. 1957, 34, 181–440. [Google Scholar]
  68. Hustedt, F. Systematisch und Ökologische Untersuchungen über die Diatomeenflora von Java, Bali und Sumatra. Arch. Für Hydrobiol. Suppl. 1938, 15, 131–177, 393–506, 638–790, Erratum in Archiv. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 1939, 16, 1–155, 274–394. [Google Scholar]
  69. Sládeček, V. Diatoms as indicators of organic pollution. Acta Hydrochim. Hydrobiol. 1986, 14, 555–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Map with green dots indicating the sampling points on the studied waterbodies of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia) and world map with a red point showing the geographic location of the study area. The violet-colored area is the territory of diamond mining. The red-colored area is the territory of oil and gas production. White dots with black outline show the settlements. Yellow lines show the highways. Blue arrows show the river flow direction.
Figure 1. Map with green dots indicating the sampling points on the studied waterbodies of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia) and world map with a red point showing the geographic location of the study area. The violet-colored area is the territory of diamond mining. The red-colored area is the territory of oil and gas production. White dots with black outline show the settlements. Yellow lines show the highways. Blue arrows show the river flow direction.
Diversity 16 00440 g001
Figure 2. Natural landscape of sampling station areas. Aerial photo of taiga and Ulakhan-Murbayi River, swamp (station 7) (a). Satellite image of artificial water reservoir (station 6) (b). Aerial photo of Tustakh River, small stream (station 11) (c). Sampling process, swamp (station 10) (d). Satellite image of abandoned diamond quarry named after XXIII Party Congress (station 3) (e). Panoramic photo of abandoned nameless diamond quarry (station 4) (f).
Figure 2. Natural landscape of sampling station areas. Aerial photo of taiga and Ulakhan-Murbayi River, swamp (station 7) (a). Satellite image of artificial water reservoir (station 6) (b). Aerial photo of Tustakh River, small stream (station 11) (c). Sampling process, swamp (station 10) (d). Satellite image of abandoned diamond quarry named after XXIII Party Congress (station 3) (e). Panoramic photo of abandoned nameless diamond quarry (station 4) (f).
Diversity 16 00440 g002
Figure 3. Bioindicators’ distribution in the 11 studied waterbodies of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia), 2022: (a) habitat preferences (P—planktonic; P-B—plankto-benthic; B—benthic); (b) temperature (cool—cool water; temp—temperate; eterm—eurythermic; warm—warm water); (c) oxygen (st—standing water; str—streaming water; st-str—low streaming water; aer—aerophiles); (d) salinity (hb—oligohalobes-halophobes; i—oligohalobes-indifferent; hl—halophiles; mh—mesohalobes).
Figure 3. Bioindicators’ distribution in the 11 studied waterbodies of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia), 2022: (a) habitat preferences (P—planktonic; P-B—plankto-benthic; B—benthic); (b) temperature (cool—cool water; temp—temperate; eterm—eurythermic; warm—warm water); (c) oxygen (st—standing water; str—streaming water; st-str—low streaming water; aer—aerophiles); (d) salinity (hb—oligohalobes-halophobes; i—oligohalobes-indifferent; hl—halophiles; mh—mesohalobes).
Diversity 16 00440 g003
Figure 4. Bioindicators’ distribution in the 11 studied waterbodies of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia), 2022: (a) pH (alb—alkalibiontes; alf—alkaliphiles; ind—indifferent; acf—acidophiles; acb—acidobiontes); (b) organic pollution indicators according to T. Watanabe et al. [48] (sx—saproxenes; es—eurysaprobes; sp—saprophiles); (c) nitrogen uptake metabolism [15] (ats—nitrogen-autotrophic taxa, tolerating very small concentrations of organically bound nitrogen; ate—nitrogen-autotrophic taxa, tolerating elevated concentrations of organically bound nitrogen; hne—facultative nitrogen-heterotrophic taxa, needing periodically elevated concentrations of organically bound nitrogen); (d) trophic state indicators [15] (ot—oligotraphentic; om—oligomesotraphentic; m—mesotraphentic; me—mesoeutraphentic; e—eutraphentic; o-e—oligo to hypereutraphentic).
Figure 4. Bioindicators’ distribution in the 11 studied waterbodies of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia), 2022: (a) pH (alb—alkalibiontes; alf—alkaliphiles; ind—indifferent; acf—acidophiles; acb—acidobiontes); (b) organic pollution indicators according to T. Watanabe et al. [48] (sx—saproxenes; es—eurysaprobes; sp—saprophiles); (c) nitrogen uptake metabolism [15] (ats—nitrogen-autotrophic taxa, tolerating very small concentrations of organically bound nitrogen; ate—nitrogen-autotrophic taxa, tolerating elevated concentrations of organically bound nitrogen; hne—facultative nitrogen-heterotrophic taxa, needing periodically elevated concentrations of organically bound nitrogen); (d) trophic state indicators [15] (ot—oligotraphentic; om—oligomesotraphentic; m—mesotraphentic; me—mesoeutraphentic; e—eutraphentic; o-e—oligo to hypereutraphentic).
Diversity 16 00440 g004
Figure 5. Distribution of water quality class indicator species based on their species-specific index s related to class in the 11 studied waterbodies of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia), 2022.
Figure 5. Distribution of water quality class indicator species based on their species-specific index s related to class in the 11 studied waterbodies of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia), 2022.
Diversity 16 00440 g005
Figure 6. Statistical maps of the chemical variables’ distribution in the 11 studied waterbodies of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia), 2022: (a) water temperature; (b) pH; (c) Cl; (d) Pt-Co; (e) N-NO3; (f) Cu.
Figure 6. Statistical maps of the chemical variables’ distribution in the 11 studied waterbodies of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia), 2022: (a) water temperature; (b) pH; (c) Cl; (d) Pt-Co; (e) N-NO3; (f) Cu.
Diversity 16 00440 g006
Figure 7. Statistical maps of the species number (a) and bioindicator variables; (b) eurythermic species; (c) alkaliphilic species; (d) mesohalobes; (e) oligo to hypereutraphentic species; (f) class 4 water quality distribution in the 11 studied waterbodies of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia), 2022.
Figure 7. Statistical maps of the species number (a) and bioindicator variables; (b) eurythermic species; (c) alkaliphilic species; (d) mesohalobes; (e) oligo to hypereutraphentic species; (f) class 4 water quality distribution in the 11 studied waterbodies of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia), 2022.
Diversity 16 00440 g007
Figure 8. Tree of similarity of the chemical and bioindicator variables in studied sites of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia), 2022.
Figure 8. Tree of similarity of the chemical and bioindicator variables in studied sites of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia), 2022.
Diversity 16 00440 g008
Figure 9. Tree of similarity of the chemical variables in studied sites of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia), 2022.
Figure 9. Tree of similarity of the chemical variables in studied sites of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia), 2022.
Diversity 16 00440 g009
Figure 10. Tree of similarity of the bioindicator variables in studied sites of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia), 2022.
Figure 10. Tree of similarity of the bioindicator variables in studied sites of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia), 2022.
Diversity 16 00440 g010
Figure 11. JASP (Jeffreys’s Amazing Statistics Program) plots of similarities of total bioindicators and chemical variables (a) and chemistry only (b) in studied sites of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia), 2022. Bold lines show largest similarity in the type of analysis, “Huge” correlation > 0.5.
Figure 11. JASP (Jeffreys’s Amazing Statistics Program) plots of similarities of total bioindicators and chemical variables (a) and chemistry only (b) in studied sites of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia), 2022. Bold lines show largest similarity in the type of analysis, “Huge” correlation > 0.5.
Diversity 16 00440 g011
Figure 12. JASP (Jeffreys’s Amazing Statistics Program) plot of bioindicator variables only showing similarities in the studied sites of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia), 2022. Bold lines show largest similarity in the type of analysis, “Huge” correlation > 0.5. Red lines—negative correlation; blue lines—positive correlation.
Figure 12. JASP (Jeffreys’s Amazing Statistics Program) plot of bioindicator variables only showing similarities in the studied sites of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia), 2022. Bold lines show largest similarity in the type of analysis, “Huge” correlation > 0.5. Red lines—negative correlation; blue lines—positive correlation.
Diversity 16 00440 g012
Figure 13. RDA triplots of the species number, bioindicator groups, and environmental variables (a) and the taxonomic groups and environmental variables’ (b) relationships in the studied sites of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia), 2022.
Figure 13. RDA triplots of the species number, bioindicator groups, and environmental variables (a) and the taxonomic groups and environmental variables’ (b) relationships in the studied sites of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia), 2022.
Diversity 16 00440 g013
Table 1. Sampling station, geographical position, and parameters.
Table 1. Sampling station, geographical position, and parameters.
No of StationWaterbodySampling DateAltitude, m a.s.l.Latitude, NLongitude, E
1Puddle8 September 202232962°30′12.7″113°45′05.2″
2Puddle8 September 202234962°30′04.1″113°45′05.0″
3Diamond quarry named after XXIII Party Congress8 September 202240062°27′10.9″113°46′00.5″
4Nameless diamond quarry8 September 202231162°27′56.4″113°57′10.6″
5Lake3 September 202232261°41′59.2″113°13′44.4″
6Water reservoir5 September 202232161°41′33.0″113°13′36.8″
7Swamp5 September 202234661°30′18.3″113°39′55.7″
8Stream5 September 202236261°30′02.4″113°42′34.0″
9Swamp5 September 202237061°29′05.2″113°45′33.8″
10Swamp5 September 202235561°26′41.1″113°50′49.3″
11Stream4 September 202230661°25′59.8″113°59′58.2″
Table 2. Averaged physical and chemical variables of the 11 studied waterbodies of the Central Yakut Plain, September 2022.
Table 2. Averaged physical and chemical variables of the 11 studied waterbodies of the Central Yakut Plain, September 2022.
Variables/StationSt. 1St. 2St. 3St. 4St. 5St. 6St. 7St. 8St. 9St. 10St. 11
Water temperature, °C4.5010.1011.1010.708.5011.105.106.608.307.106.90
pH6.256.298.578.397.427.346.116.285.866.236.31
TDS, mg L−1108.26112.101565.91522.94107.79109.39126.3277.65122.69114.8471.14
Hardness, mmol. L−11.351.385.986.981.381.421.811.051.761.400.96
Ca, mg L−118.0519.5062.12100.2019.2019.2424.4014.0022.4420.0413.63
Mg, mg L−15.464.9534.9924.065.135.597.204.277.784.863.40
Na, mg L−11.521.65422.0012.703.112.500.811.090.731.781.01
K, mg L−10.210.1811.803.780.690.660.770.120.730.180.10
HCO3, mg L−174.5078.70336.00226.0038.4842.6058.3639.8057.0082.0035.00
Cl, mg L−13.212.57620.0090.006.145.4025.009.0224.001.968.79
SO4, mg L−15.314.5579.0066.2035.0433.409.789.3510.004.029.21
N-NH4, mg L−10.250.270.570.280.290.280.280.210.300.230.22
N-NO2, mg L−10.070.050.010.020.040.020.060.050.050.090.06
N-NO3, mg L−10.170.200.160.170.190.180.190.190.200.190.19
P-PO4, mg L−10.040.050.040.040.040.040.190.040.230.040.05
Ptot, mg L−10.090.110.050.050.050.060.220.070.240.100.08
Porg, mg L−10.050.060.010.010.010.020.030.030.010.060.03
Fetot, mg L−11.111.180.120.240.610.670.750.640.781.240.62
Si, mg L−11.101.400.601.773.423.681.653.721.561.203.94
Pt-Co units96.0094.00551454.004991.0092.00889889
Petrochemicals, mg L−10.00500.00500.00500.00500.00500.00500.00500.00500.00500.00510.0050
Mn, mg L−10.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.74300.00100.10200.00100.0010
Ni, mg L−10.08410.07920.07200.07470.08970.09580.02740.03430.03280.08880.0358
Cu, mg L−10.00700.00500.01300.01100.01600.01700.00600.00600.00600.00700.0050
Zn, mg L−10.00100.00100.00540.00100.01820.01960.00180.00100.00330.00100.0010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barinova, S.; Gabyshev, V.; Genkal, S.; Gabysheva, O. Diatoms’ Diversity in the Assessment of the Impact of Diamond and Oil and Gas Mining on Aquatic Ecosystems of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia) Using Bioindication and Statistical Mapping Methods. Diversity 2024, 16, 440. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16080440

AMA Style

Barinova S, Gabyshev V, Genkal S, Gabysheva O. Diatoms’ Diversity in the Assessment of the Impact of Diamond and Oil and Gas Mining on Aquatic Ecosystems of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia) Using Bioindication and Statistical Mapping Methods. Diversity. 2024; 16(8):440. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16080440

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barinova, Sophia, Viktor Gabyshev, Sergey Genkal, and Olga Gabysheva. 2024. "Diatoms’ Diversity in the Assessment of the Impact of Diamond and Oil and Gas Mining on Aquatic Ecosystems of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia) Using Bioindication and Statistical Mapping Methods" Diversity 16, no. 8: 440. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16080440

APA Style

Barinova, S., Gabyshev, V., Genkal, S., & Gabysheva, O. (2024). Diatoms’ Diversity in the Assessment of the Impact of Diamond and Oil and Gas Mining on Aquatic Ecosystems of the Central Yakut Plain (Eastern Siberia, Yakutia) Using Bioindication and Statistical Mapping Methods. Diversity, 16(8), 440. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16080440

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop