Three-Dimensional Morphology and Size Measurement of High-Temperature Metal Components Based on Machine Vision Technology: A Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Machine vision methods, which use non-contact measurement technology, only need to collect multiple images of a measured object to obtain its 3D morphology and size data; hence, they can realize the 3D morphology and size measurement tasks of high-temperature metal components. These methods are technical methods that use machines to replace human eyes for measurement and judgment.
- High-temperature radiation can cause objects to transfer heat to the outside world and radiate visible light. As the temperature increases, an object can produce bright white light. High temperatures can cause the light to bend during propagation, which leads to unstable images, large deviations and even the inability to obtain images.
- Harsh working conditions. There exists a vibration influence in the actual production process of high-temperature metal components, which results in the deviation of measurement data.
- The presence of oxidation reactions on metal surfaces. Metal surfaces react with oxygen at high temperatures, producing a large amount of oxide coating and emitting banded light waves below 400 nm in the ultraviolet spectrum.
2. Laser Scanning Measurement Method
2.1. TOF
2.1.1. Basic Principle
2.1.2. Introduction and Description of Specific Applications
2.1.3. Comparative Analysis
2.2. Laser Triangulation Method
2.2.1. Basic Principle
2.2.2. Introduction to Specific Applications
2.2.3. Comparative Analysis
3. Multi-View Stereo Vision Measurement Method
3.1. Basic Principles
3.1.1. Sinusoidal Phase Encoding
- 1.
- The research results of sinusoidal phase encoding obtained in 2018 are as follows:
- 2.
- The improvements in the measurement stability of the system obtained in 2019:
- 3.
- The latest research progress in grating projection technology accomplished in 2020:
- 4.
- Many innovative new technologies have been developed with other algorithms, such as deep learning:
- 5.
- The breakthroughs in system calibration and matching of 3D measurements with phase-shift profiling mainly include the following related research work:
3.1.2. Binary Defocusing
3.1.3. Statistical Pattern
3.1.4. Binary Coding
3.1.5. Other Research Work
3.1.6. Analysis of Structured Light Technology
3.2. Specific Application Description
3.3. Comparative Analysis
- The ability to overcome the problems of difficult extraction of laser stripes and unclear images caused by high-temperature radiation.
- The ability to improve the accuracy of extracting feature points of metal components and effectively remove the impact of the factory environment.
- The capability of adopting different algorithms to improve the operating speed of the system.
- The capacity to adopt feasible and effective protection equipment to reduce the influence of high temperatures, dust and other factors on equipment life.
- The ability to develop a reasonable neural network to detect the surface defects of the measurement target.
4. Discussion and Comparative Analysis
- 1.
- Analysis of the differences in measurement principles:
- 2.
- Analysis of different measurement objects and tasks:
5. Future Development Trends
5.1. Fusion of Multi-Modal Image Data
5.2. Improvements in Various Hardware Equipment Adopted by a System
5.3. Automatic Control Technology
5.4. Intelligent Development of Algorithms
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wang, L.; Xuan, Z. Study on 3D ultrasound imaging technology for measuring bladder tumour health care and information sensing. Measurement 2020, 163, 107926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Z.; Li, S.; Lowerison, M.R.; Pan, J.; Zou, J.; Song, P. Fast Acoustic Steering via Tilting Electromechanical Reflectors (FASTER): A Novel Method for High Volume Rate 3D Ultrasound Imaging. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2020, 68, 675–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, T.; Kang, D.H.; Shim, S.; Im, M.; Seo, B.K.; Kim, H.; Lee, B.C. Versatile Low-Cost Volumetric 3D Ultrasound Imaging Using Gimbal-Assisted Distance Sensors and an Inertial Measurement Unit. Sensors 2020, 20, 6613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Du Plessis, A.; Rossouw, P. X-ray computed tomography of a titanium aerospace investment casting. Case Stud. Nondestruct. Test. Eval. 2015, 3, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yang, Z.; Kang, J.; Wilkinson, D.S. Characterization of Pore Defects and Fatigue Cracks in Die Cast AM60 Using 3D X-ray Computed Tomography. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2015, 46, 1576–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du Plessis, A.; Le Roux, S.G.; Guelpa, A. Comparison of medical and industrial X-ray computed tomography for non-destructive testing. Case Stud. Nondestruct. Test. Eval. 2016, 6, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yang, Z.; Maurey, A.; Kang, J.; Wilkinson, D.S. 2D and 3D characterization of pore defects in die cast AM60. Mater. Charact. 2016, 114, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, Y.-J.; Shin, S.-K.; Miyoshi, T. A Study on Non-contact Measurement of 3D-Objects by Optical Probe Method. J. Korean Soc. Precis. Eng. 1995, 12, 119–126. [Google Scholar]
- Leslie, L.D. Modern hign precision interferometric testing of optical components. In Proceedings of the 16th National Optical Testing Academic Exchange, Shanghai, China, 25 September 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Jia, Z.; Wang, B.; Liu, W.; Sun, Y. An improved image acquiring method for machine vision measurement of hot formed parts. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2010, 210, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- May, S.; Droeschel, D.; Holz, D.; Fuchs, S.; Malis, E.; Nuchter, A.; Hertzberg, J. Three-dimensional mapping with time-of-flight cameras. J. Field Robot. 2010, 26, 934–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, K.; Liu, H.; Ju, H. Accurate ranging method of pulse laser time-of-flight based on the principle of self-triggering. In Proceedings of the 32nd Chinese Control Conference, Xi’an, China, 26 July 2013; pp. 5583–5587. [Google Scholar]
- Cui, Y.; Schuon, S.; Chan, D.; Thrun, S.; Theobalt, C. 3D shape scanning with a time-of-flight camera. In Proceedings of the Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing, San Francisco, CA, USA, 13–18 June 2010; pp. 23–29. [Google Scholar]
- Minerals Technologies. Available online: https://www.mineralstech.com/ (accessed on 1 July 2021).
- Tian, Z.; Gao, F.; Jin, Z.; Zhao, X. Dimension measurement of hot large forgings with a novel time-of-flight system. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2009, 44, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, J.; Gao, F.; Wu, S.; Liu, R.; Zhao, X. Measure dimension of rotating large hot steel shell using pulse laser on PRRR robot. Measurement 2012, 45, 1814–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bokhabrine, Y.; Seulin, R.; Voon, L.F.L.Y.; Gorria, P.; Girardin, G.; Gomez, M.; Jobard, D. 3D characterization of hot metallic shells during industrial forging. Mach. Vis. Appl. 2012, 23, 417–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, Z.; Wu, Z.; Yang, J. 3D measuring and segmentation method for hot heavy forging. Measurement 2016, 85, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.; Tao, W.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, S.; Yin, X.; Hui, Z. Reduction of the Influence of Laser Beam Directional Dithering in a Laser Triangulation Displacement Probe. Sensors 2017, 17, 1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kienle, P.; Batarilo, L.; Markus, A.; Khler, M.H.; Koch, A.W. Optical Setup for Error Compensation in a Laser Triangulation System. Sensors 2020, 20, 4949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Struckmeier, F.; Zhao, J.; León, F.P. Measuring the supporting slats of laser cutting machines using laser triangulation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 108, 3819–3833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Supri, T.B.M.; Yang, S.; Qin, Y. A new static method of calibration for low-cost laser triangulation systems. Measurement 2020, 156, 107613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Kong, T.; Fu, X.; Wang, Y. The dynamic position compensation method of the online laser detection system for the ring workpiece. Measurement 2019, 135, 555–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, X.; Liu, B.; Zhang, Y. Measurement technology of the hot-state size for heavy shell ring forging. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2013, 65, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Han, J.; Fu, X.; Lin, H. An online measurement method based on line laser scanning for large forgings. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2014, 70, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Tao, K.; Li, S. The outer diameter detection and experiment of the circular forging using laser scanner. Optik Int. J. Light Electron. Optics 2017, 128, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, K.; Yucun, Z.; Xianbin, F. The model of feature extraction for free-form surface based on topological transformation. Appl. Math. Model. 2018, 64, 386–397. [Google Scholar]
- Schch, A.; Salvadori, A.; Germann, I.; Balemi, S.; Savio, E. High-Speed Measurement of Complex Shaped Parts at Elevated Temperature by Laser Triangulation. Int. J. Autom. Technol. 2015, 9, 558–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veitch-Michaelis, J.; Tao, Y.; Walton, D.; Muller, J.P.; Chown, A. Crack Detection in “As-Cast” Steel Using Laser Triangulation and Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE 13th Conference on Computer and Robot Vision, Victoria, BC, Canada, 1–3 June 2016; pp. 342–349. [Google Scholar]
- Bračun, D.; Škulj, G.; Kadiš, M. Spectral selective and difference imaging laser triangulation measurement system for on line measurement of large hot workpieces in precision open die forging. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 90, 917–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nextsense. Available online: https://www.nextsense-worldwide.com/en/ (accessed on 1 July 2021).
- Li, T.; Liu, C.; Liu, Y.; Wang, T.; Yang, D. Binocular stereo vision calibration based on alternate adjustment algorithm. Optik Int. J. Light Electron. Optics 2018, 173, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, C.; Tan, G.; Luo, Y. Research on Stereo Matching Technology Based on Binocular Vision. Open Access Libr. J. 2019, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, N.; Li, L.; Yan, F.; Li, T. Binocular stereo vision calibration based on constrained sparse beam adjustment algorithm. Optik 2020, 208, 163917. [Google Scholar]
- Paulus, S. Measuring crops in 3D: Using geometry for plant phenotyping. Plant Methods 2019, 15, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Zhang, M.; Liang, J.; Ren, M.; Zong, Y.; Ye, M.; Li, Y. Accurate and efficient 3D reconstruction system for the human body with color texture based on DIC. Optics Lasers Eng. 2020, 127, 105946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Cui, W. A comparative analysis between active structured light and multi-view stereo vision technique for 3D reconstruction of face model surface. Optik 2020, 206, 164190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Be, T.; Zhang, S. High-resolution 3D optical sensing and real-time 3D video data streaming. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), Auckland, New Zealand, 1 July 2018; pp. 521–526. [Google Scholar]
- Spagnolo, G.S.; Cozzella, L.; Leccese, F. Projected fringes profilometry for cultural heritage studies. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Metrology for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, Florence, Italy, 4–6 December 2019; pp. 435–438. [Google Scholar]
- Das, A.J.; Valdez, T.A.; Vargas, J.A.; Saksupapchon, P.; Rachapudi, P.; Ge, Z.; Estrada, J.C.; Raskar, R. Volume estimation of tonsil phantoms using an oral camera with 3D imaging. Biomed. Optics Express 2016, 7, 1445–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehta, R.P.; Zhang, S.; Hadlock, T.A. Novel 3-D video for quantification of facial movement. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2008, 138, 468–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gsvik, K.J.; Robbersmyr, K.G.; Vadseth, T. Online dimensional control of rolled steel profiles using projected fringes. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 107, 1725–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ghandali, P.; Khameneifar, F.; Mayer, J.R.R. A pseudo-3D ball lattice artifact and method for evaluating the metrological performance of structured-light 3D scanners. Optics Lasers Eng. 2019, 121, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gayton, G.; Su, R.; Leach, R. Modelling fringe projection based on linear systems theory and geometric transformation. In Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Measurement Technology and Intelligent Instruments (ISMTII), Niigata, Japan, 1–4 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Su, X.; Zhang, Q. Dynamic 3-D shape measurement method: A review. Optics Lasers Eng. 2010, 48, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorthi, S.S.; Rastogi, P. Fringe projection techniques: Whither we are? Optics Lasers Eng. 2010, 48, 33–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, S. High-speed 3D shape measurement with structured light methods: A review. Optics Lasers Eng. 2018, 106, 119–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.; Zhang, S. Status, challenges, and future perspectives of fringe projection profilometry. Optics Lasers Eng. 2020, 106193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S. Rapid and automatic optimal exposure control for digital fringe projection technique. Optics Lasers Eng. 2020, 128, 106029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xing, Y.; Quan, C. Enhanced reference-plane-based dual-frequency absolute phase retrieval for depth measurement. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2018, 29, 105003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, J.; Zhang, Q.; Li, C.; Lang, W.; Hu, Y. 3D face profilometry based on galvanometer scanner with infrared fringeprojection in high speed. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, Y.; Liu, L.; Wu, J.; Chen, X.; Wang, Y. Enhanced phase-coding method for three-dimensional shape measurement with half-period codeword. Appl. Optics 2019, 58, 7359–7366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, X.; Kofman, J. Real-time 3D surface-shape measurement using background-modulated modified Fourier transform profilometry with geometry-constraint. Optics Lasers Eng. 2019, 115, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, S.; Sun, Q.; Yang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, J. An improved phase-coding method for absolute phase retrieval based on the path-following algorithm. Optics Lasers Eng. 2019, 122, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, N.; Meng, Z. 3D shape measurement of diffused/specular surface by combining fringe projection and direct phase measuring deflectometry. Optics Express 2020, 28, 27561–27574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, K.; Hua, W.; Wei, J.; Song, J.; Xu, B. Divide and conquer: High-accuracy and real-time 3D reconstruction of static objects using multiple-phase-shifted structured light illumination. Optics Express 2020, 28, 6995–7007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, L.; Yin, Y.; Su, Z.; Ren, X.; Luan, Y. General model for phase shifting profilometry with an object in motion. Appl. Optics 2018, 57, 10364–10369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fei, C.; Ma, Y.; Jiang, S.; Liu, J.; Fang, J. Real-Time Dynamic 3D Shape Reconstruction with SWIR InGaAs Camera. Sensors 2020, 20, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Falaggis, K.; Porras-Aguilar, R. Grey-level coding for structured-light illumination systems. In Proceedings of the 19th Interferometry Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 18 August 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y. High Speed 3D Shape Measurement with Temporal Fourier Transform Profilometry. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xiang, S.; Yang, Y.; Deng, H.; Wu, J.; Yu, L. Multi-anchor spatial phase unwrapping for fringe projection profilometry. Optics Express 2019, 27, 33488–33503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, W.; Chen, Q.; Feng, S.; Tao, T.; Huang, L.; Trusiak, M.; Asundi, A.; Zuo, C. Temporal phase unwrapping using deep learning. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 20175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, W.; Zuo, C.; Feng, S.; Tao, T.; Chen, Q. Bi-frequency temporal phase unwrapping using deep learning. In Proceedings of the Dimensional Optical Metrology and Inspection for Practical Applications VIII, Baltimore, MD, USA, 13 May 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen, H.; Li, H.; Qiu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z. Single-shot 3D shape reconstruction using deep convolutional neural networks. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1909.07766. [Google Scholar]
- Shi, J.; Zhu, X.; Wang, H.; Song, L.; Guo, Q. Label enhanced and patch based deep learning for phase retrieval from single frame fringe pattern in fringe projection 3D measurement. Optics Express 2019, 27, 28929–28943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, J.; Feng, S.; Tao, T.; Hu, Y.; Liu, K.; Wu, S.; Chen, Q.; Zuo, C. High-resolution real-time 360° 3D model reconstruction of a handheld object with fringe projection profilometry. Optics Lett. 2019, 44, 5751–5754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, H.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, D.; Han, J. Dynamic 3-D measurement based on fringe-to-fringe transformation using deep learning. Optics Express 2020, 28, 9405–9418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyu, C.; Li, P.; Wang, D.; Yang, S.; Sui, C. High-speed optical 3D Measurement sensor for Industrial Application. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 21, 11253–11261. [Google Scholar]
- An, H.; Cao, Y.; Li, H.; Chen, J.; Yang, N. An accuracy improving method for composite grating phase measuring profilometry. Optics Commun. 2020, 477, 126343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, W.; Su, X.; Chen, W. Whole-field high precision point to point calibration method. Optics Lasers Eng. 2018, 111, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juarez-Salazar, R.; Diaz-Ramirez, V.H. Flexible camera-projector calibration using superposed color checkerboards. Optics Lasers Eng. 2019, 120, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sui, C.; He, K.; Lyu, C.; Wang, A.; Liu, Y. Active Stereo 3-D Surface Reconstruction Using Multistep Matching. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 2020, 17, 2130–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vargas, R.; Marrugo, A.G.; Zhang, S.; Romero, L.A. Hybrid calibration procedure for fringe projection profilometry based on stereo-vision and polynomial fitting. Appl. Optics 2020, 59, D163–D169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, W.; Zuo, C.; Feng, S.; Tao, T.; Hu, Y.; Lei, H.; Ma, J.; Chen, Q. High-speed three-dimensional shape measurement using geometry-constraint-based number-theoretical phase unwrapping. Optics Lasers Eng. 2019, 115, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, W.; Feng, S.; Tao, T.; Huang, L.; Trusiak, M.; Chen, Q.; Zuo, C. High-speed 3D shape measurement using the optimized composite fringe patterns and stereo-assisted structured light system. Optics Express 2019, 27, 2411–2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiao, Y.; Wang, G.; Hu, X.; Shi, C.; Yang, H. Guided, Fusion-Based, Large Depth-of-field 3D Imaging Using a Focal Stack. Sensors 2019, 19, 4845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wu, Z.; Guo, W.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Q. High-speed and high-efficiency three-dimensional shape measurement based on Gray-coded light. Photonics Res. 2020, 8, 819–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wu, Z.; Zuo, C.; Guo, W.; Tao, T.; Zhang, Q. High-speed three-dimensional shape measurement based on cyclic complementary Gray-code light. Optics Express 2019, 27, 1283–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Z.; Guo, W.; Zhang, Q. High-speed three-dimensional shape measurement based on shifting Gray-code light. Optics Express 2019, 27, 22631–22644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, Y.; Chang, H.; Song, Z.; Zhao, J. An Accurate Infrared Structured Light Sensing Systemfor Dynamic 3D Acquisition. Appl. Optics 2020, 59, E80–E88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, S.; Zuo, C.; Yin, W.; Gu, G.; Chen, Q. Micro deep learning profilometry for high-speed 3D surface imaging. Optics Lasers Eng. 2019, 121, 416–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, F.; Feng, J.; Xie, P.; Cao, H.; Song, Z. Robust Feature Detection Method in High-density Structured Light System. In Proceedings of the CSAI2019: 2019 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Beijing, China, 6–8 December 2019; pp. 191–195. [Google Scholar]
- Sancho, L.F.; Díaz, J.; Alvarez, I.; Fraga, C. Automated industrial slab surface inspection system, based on contact-less technologies. ATS J. Sider. Int. 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Technologies, O.G. HotEye (tm) Based Coordinate Measuring Machine for Forging Industry. Off. Sci. Tech. Inf. Tech. Rep. 2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yo, O.; Yasuhiro, W.; Yasunori, K. Development of shape measuring device for hot large forged steel products. R&D Kobe Steel Tech. Rep. 2007, 57, 29–33. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Z.; Cui, S.; Yin, H.; Lin, Y. Comparative Analysis of Image Measurement Accuracy in High Temperature Based on Visible and Infrared Vision. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2013, 2307, 1681–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Xia, Q.; Pan, Y.; Wu, Z. Internal Contour Extraction Algorithm Based on Quadratic B-spline for Images of Hot Long Shaft Forgings. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 1671, 2274–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, Z.; Yang, J.; Liu, W.; Wang, F.; Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Fan, C.; Zhao, K. Improved camera calibration method based on perpendicularity compensation for binocular stereo vision measurement system. Optics Express 2015, 23, 15205–15223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, Z.; Liu, Y.; Liu, W.; Zhang, C.; Yang, J.; Wang, L.; Zhao, K. A spectrum selection method based on SNR for the machine vision measurement of large hot forgings. Optik–Int. J. Light Electron. Optics 2015, 126, 5527–5533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Liu, W.; Zhang, R.; Jia, Z.; Wang, F.; Li, S. A method for measuring the thermal geometric parameters of large hot rectangular forgings based on projection feature lines. Mach. Vis. Appl. 2018, 29, 467–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Jia, X.; Jia, Z.; Liu, S.; Wang, B.; Jian, D. Fast dimensional measurement method and experiment of the forgings under high temperature. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 2011, 211, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Jia, Z.; Wang, F.; Ma, X.; Wang, W.; Jia, X.; Song, D. An improved online dimensional measurement method of large hot cylindrical forging. Measurement 2012, 45, 2041–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Jia, Z.; Liu, W.; Wang, L.; Fan, C.; Xu, P.; Yang, J.; Zhao, K. An improved image acquisition method for measuring hot forgings using machine vision. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2016, 238, 369–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, Z.; Wang, L.; Liu, W.; Yang, J.; Liu, Y.; Fan, C.; Zhao, K. A field measurement method for large objects based on a multi-view stereo vision system. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2015, 234, 120–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.; Liu, J.; Zhang, H.; Wu, Y. Measuring the 3D shape of high-temperature objects using blue sinusoidal structured light. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2015, 26, 125205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, X.; Song, K.; Niu, M.; Yan, Y.; Dong, Z. A three-dimensional inspection system for high temperature steel product surface sample height using stereo vision and blue encoded patterns. Optik Int. J. Light Electron. Optics 2017, 130, 131–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, L.; Li, Z.; Zhong, K.; Zhang, G.; Huang, Y.; Yang, G.; Zhou, M. Robot-based automatic dimension inspection for hot stamping parts. Advanced High Strength Steel and Press Hardening. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference (ICHSU2015), Changsha, China, 1 May 2016; pp. 661–666. [Google Scholar]
- Han, L.; Li, Z.; Zhong, K.; Yi, J.; Shi, Y.; Cheng, X.; Zhan, G.; Chen, R. Automatic 3D inspection metrology for high-temperature objects. In Proceedings of the SPIE Optical Metrology, Munich, Germany, 26 June 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Bai, W.; Li, G.; Han, L. Correction algorithm of LIDAR data for mobile robots. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Applications, Wuhan, China, 16–18 August 2017; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 101–110. [Google Scholar]
- Han, L.; Cheng, X.; Li, Z.; Zhong, K.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, H. A Robot-Driven 3D Shape Measurement System for Automatic Quality Inspection of Thermal Objects on a Forging Production Line. Sensors 2018, 18, 4368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Han, L.; Li, Z.; Zhong, K.; Cheng, X.; Luo, H.; Liu, G.; Shang, J.; Wang, C.; Shi, Y. Vibration Detection and Motion Compensation for Multi-Frequency Phase-Shifting-Based 3D Sensors. Sensors 2019, 19, 1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhou, Y.; Wu, Y.; Luo, C. A fast dimensional measurement method for large hot forgings based on line reconstruction. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 99, 1713–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, L.; Li, F.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, X.; Feng, Y. A Deep-Learning-based 3D Defect Quantitative Inspection System in CC Products Surface. Sensors 2020, 20, 980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhao, L.; Ouyang, Q.; Chen, D.; Udupa, J.K.; Wang, H.; Zeng, Y. Defect detection in slab surface: A novel dual charge-coupled device imaging-based fuzzy connectedness strategy. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2014, 85, 115004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.M.; Kim, M.S.; Lee, G.J.; Jang, H.J.; Song, Y.M. Miniaturized 3D Depth Sensing-Based Smartphone Light Field Camera. Sensors 2020, 20, 2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Yang, S.P.; Seo, Y.H.; Kim, J.B.; Kim, H.; Jeong, K.H. Optical MEMS devices for compact 3D surface imaging cameras. Micro Nano Syst. Lett. 2019, 7, 6762013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Son, Y.; Yoon, S.; Oh, S.Y.; Han, S. A Lightweight and Cost-Effective 3D Omnidirectional Depth Sensor Based on Laser Triangulation. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 58740–58750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mattoccia, S.; Marchio, I.; Casadio, M. A Compact 3D Camera Suited for Mobile and Embedded Vision Applications. In Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, Columbus, OH, USA, 25 September 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Piyawattanametha, W.; Park, Y.H.; Wippermann, F.C.; Brückner, A.; Oberdörster, A.; Reimann, A. Novel multi-aperture approach for miniaturized imaging systems. SPIE OPTO 2016, 9760, 97600S. [Google Scholar]
- Grüger, H.; Knobbe, J.; Pügner, T.; Reinig, P.; Meyer, S. New way to realize miniaturized complex optical systems in high volume. Moems Miniat. Syst. XVII 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, Y.; Song, K.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Yan, Y.; Yu, H.; Li, X. Triplet-Graph Reasoning Network for Few-Shot Metal Generic Surface Defect Segmentation. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2021, 70, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, H.; Song, K.; Wang, Q.; Yan, Y.; Jiang, P. Deep metric learning-based for multi-target few-shot pavement distress Classification. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ref. | Detection Target | Hardware Equipment | Key Technologies and Algorithms | Measurement Accuracy | Efficiency and Robustness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
[14] | Shaft parts | 3D scanner, Laser rangefinder | Cooling protective shell, Wide measurement perspective | All not given | Medium |
[15] | Crankshaft | TOF laser rangefinder, SPM scanning device | Stable scanning system, Measurement self-adaptability | 4.5 mm | High |
[16] | Cylindrical metal housing | PRRR robot, Laser sensor | High precision of scanning system, Optimization of motion parameters | Measurement error is less than 0.235% and 0.205% | Medium |
[17] | Cylindrical metal housing | Laser scanner | 3D segmentation, RANSAC algorithm, ICP algorithm | ≤8 mm. | Low |
[18] | Large forgings | LMS100 radar, GT-400-SG motion control card | Three-step extraction algorithm, 3D Delaunay triangulation algorithm | 2%. | Low |
Ref. | Detection Target | Hardware Equipment | Key Technologies and Algorithms | Measurement Accuracy | Efficiency and Robustness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
[25] | Cylindrical forgings | MV-VE078SM/SC camera, MGL-III laser transmitter | PSO algorithm | Measurement error is less than 1 mm. | High |
[26] | Cylindrical forgings under rotation | VZ-1000 3D laser scanner | Least square method, Coordinate rotation processing | Measurement error is less than 6 mm. | Medium |
[27] | Complex ring forgings | VQ-180 2D laser scanner | Topological embedding mapping, Topological differential theory | 1.74 mm. | High |
[28] | Complicated surface parts such as turbine blades | Mobile platform, Point laser transmitter | Combine eight sensors, Custom meshing algorithm | Length measurement error range 0.1 mm. | High |
[29] | Surface defects of cast steel plate | SL-405-35-S-C-15.0 laser transmitter, UI-3370CPs IDS camera | Center of mass peak detection algorithm, Deep learning algorithm. | The system performs defect detection in the steel mill. | Medium |
[30] | Large hot forging | camera. | Principle of differential imaging | 1 mm. | High |
[31] | Hot rolled metal component | CALIPRI RCX system | Rotating scanning technology | All not given | Medium |
Method | Ref. | Hardware Equipment | Number of Cameras | What Problem to Solve |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sinusoidal phase encoding | [49] | Camera (GS3-U3-23S6M), Projector (4500) | 1 | Automatically control exposure |
[50] | DMD projector | 1 | ERDF | |
[51] | Camera (UI-3250CP-M-GL), Projector (PDC03) | 1 | Structured light projection system using MEMS. | |
[52] | Camera (Point Grey Chameleon3), Projector (4500) | 1 | A phase-enhanced encoding method | |
[53] | Cameras (acA1300- 200), Projector (PRO4500) | 2 | GPU parallel computing saves time. | |
[54] | Camera (MER-131-210U3M-L), Projector (6500). | 1 | Improve the accuracy of absolute phase extraction. | |
[55] | Camera (ECO445CVGE), Projector (4500) | 1 | 3D measurement of complex reflectivity | |
[56] | Camera (GC640C), Projector (XJ-M140) | 1 | Real-time calculation of phase. | |
[57] | Camera (504C), Projector (4500) | 1 | Multi-target recognition and reconstruction | |
[58] | SWIR camera | 1 | Low light measurement | |
[56] | All not given | All not given | (GL) coding techniques, FPP and PMD techniques | |
[60] | Mechanical projector | 1 | TFTP | |
[61] | Computer (I7-8700) | 1 | MASU | |
[62,63] | Camera (acA640-750), Projector (4500Pro) | 1 | DL-TPU | |
[64] | i3-8100 processor | All not given | Convolutional neural network | |
[65] | PC (i5-7500H) | 1 | Neural network | |
[66] | Computer (1226 v3 CPU/K2200GPU) | 4 | Achieve 360° measurement | |
[67] | Projector (DLP6500), Camera (acA800-510) | 1 | FPTNet | |
[68] | Projector (4500), Camera (model: MER-301-125U3M) | 2 | embedded binocular structured light 3D measurement sensor | |
[69] | Camera (GEV-B1610M- SC000), DLP (PLED-W200). | 1 | The effect of noise on accuracy | |
[70] | Camera (model:22.6.3.2) | 1 | Reduce distortion error, system error | |
[71] | LED projector | 1 | Improved system calibration accuracy | |
[72] | Projector (4500), Camera (131-210U3M), | 2 | A new 3D matching frame | |
[73] | Camera (Ace-1600gm), Projector (DELL M115HD) | 1 | Improved hybrid calibration method of the system |
Method | Ref. | Hardware Equipment | Number of Cameras | What Problem to Solve |
---|---|---|---|---|
Binary defocusing | [74] | Camera (V611), XGA resolution (1024 × 768) DMD | 1 | Solve the problem of high-frequency phase unwrapping |
Method | Ref. | Hardware Equipment | Number of Cameras | What Problem to Solve |
---|---|---|---|---|
Statistical pattern | [75] | Cameras (V611), Digital micro-mirror device (DMD) | 2 | Composite structured light stripes for 3D measurement |
Method | Ref. | Hardware Equipment | Number of Cameras | What Problem to Solve |
---|---|---|---|---|
Binary coding | [76] | Camera (acA1920-155), Projector (MP-CL1A) | 1 | Large-scale scene 3D reconstruction technology |
[78] | Projector (4500), Camera (Mini UX50) | 1 | Cyclic complementary gray code | |
[79] | Projector (4500), Camera (Mini UX100) | 1 | Reduced edge phase unwrapping error of codeword | |
[80] | Camera (FLIR BFS-U3-04S2M), Projector (TI-DLP4500) | 1 | Dynamic infrared structured light sensing system |
Method | Ref. | Hardware Equipment | Number of Cameras | What Problem to Solve |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other works | [81] | Projector (4100), Camera (V611) | 1 | Neural network for phase calculation |
[82] | All not given | All not given | Realize structured light high-density coding |
Ref. | Detection Target | Hardware Equipment | Key Technologies and Algorithms | Measurement Accuracy | Efficiency and Robustness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
[83] | Metal slab | Scan camera | Cone holography | 90% | Medium |
[84] | Hot rolled metal component | Sensor, Computer module | On-line detection technology | ±0.1 mm | Medium |
[85] | Cylindrical metal component | Binocular vision system | Use infrared light for optical calibration | ±5 mm | Medium |
[86] | components in wind tunnel | Thermal Imager | BP artificial neural network | 0.4 mm | High |
[87] | Long shaft forgings | Camera (31BU03) | Section lines extract feature points, Euclidean distance algorithm | 2.5–3.5 mm | Medium |
[92] | Large forgings | Camera (ES4020) | Morphological operation, 3D matching algorithm | 0.7% | Medium |
[93] | Large forgings | Camera (ES4020) | ISNR compensation technology | 0.32 mm, | High |
[94] | Large forging | Camera (SVS11002) | Multi-eye vision system | 0.10% | High |
[95] | Forgings | Camera | Channel separation technique | Relative error is less than 1:1000 | Medium |
[96] | Steel | Camera (MER-030-120UC) | Combined filtering, CPU/GPU | 2 mm | Medium |
[97,98,99] | Forgings | IRB1600 industrial robot | Infrared cut filter, Path optimization algorithm | 0.28mm | High |
[100] | Automobile front axle section | Air cooling device, Camera. | Three-frequency four-step phase shifting method, | Online measurement | High |
[101] | Vibration error compensation algorithm | High | |||
[102] | Large forgings | Camera (MER-132-30GC) | 3D reconstruction technology of feature line | 0.79% | High |
[103,104] | Surface defects | Camera (MER-500-14GC-P) | Binocular vision system, Neural network | Use ACC to test system performance | Medium |
Method | Advantage | Disadvantage | Precision | Applicable Scenario |
---|---|---|---|---|
TOF | Principle is simple and reduces the interference of ambient light | High cost, low precision | Low | Remote measurement |
Laser triangulation technology | Low cost | The larger the measurement distance, the greater the error, sensitive to external interference | Medium | Close-range and high-precision measurement |
Multi-view stereo vision measurement method | Measurement Angle of view is many, highest precision | Principle is complex | High | Measurements where depth information is required |
Object of Measurement | Method | Technical Difficulties |
---|---|---|
High-temperature metal components | Laser triangulation, Multi-eye stereo vision | High-temperature thermal radiation effect, Fine internal and surface defects are difficult to identify |
Cylindrical shell parts | Laser scanning measurements, Multi-eye stereo vision measurements | Large parts are difficult to measure, Scanning device has low accuracy, Lens distortion error |
High-temperature metal components with complex surfaces | Laser triangulation, Multi-vision stereo vision | Complete surfaces are difficult to obtain, Occlusion exists in the measurement perspective |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wen, X.; Wang, J.; Zhang, G.; Niu, L. Three-Dimensional Morphology and Size Measurement of High-Temperature Metal Components Based on Machine Vision Technology: A Review. Sensors 2021, 21, 4680. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21144680
Wen X, Wang J, Zhang G, Niu L. Three-Dimensional Morphology and Size Measurement of High-Temperature Metal Components Based on Machine Vision Technology: A Review. Sensors. 2021; 21(14):4680. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21144680
Chicago/Turabian StyleWen, Xin, Jingpeng Wang, Guangyu Zhang, and Lianqiang Niu. 2021. "Three-Dimensional Morphology and Size Measurement of High-Temperature Metal Components Based on Machine Vision Technology: A Review" Sensors 21, no. 14: 4680. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21144680
APA StyleWen, X., Wang, J., Zhang, G., & Niu, L. (2021). Three-Dimensional Morphology and Size Measurement of High-Temperature Metal Components Based on Machine Vision Technology: A Review. Sensors, 21(14), 4680. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21144680