Next Article in Journal
Solar Energy Harvesting to Improve Capabilities of Wearable Devices
Next Article in Special Issue
Agrast-6: Abridged VGG-Based Reflected Lightweight Architecture for Binary Segmentation of Depth Images Captured by Kinect
Previous Article in Journal
Implementation of Omni-D Tele-Presence Robot Using Kalman Filter and Tricon Ultrasonic Sensors
Previous Article in Special Issue
3D Kinect Camera Scheme with Time-Series Deep-Learning Algorithms for Classification and Prediction of Lung Tumor Motility
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Automatic Personality Assessment through Movement Analysis

Sensors 2022, 22(10), 3949; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22103949
by David Delgado-Gómez 1,*, Antonio Eduardo Masó-Besga 2, David Aguado 3,4, Victor J. Rubio 5, Aaron Sujar 6 and Sofia Bayona 6,7
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sensors 2022, 22(10), 3949; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22103949
Submission received: 15 April 2022 / Revised: 9 May 2022 / Accepted: 18 May 2022 / Published: 23 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Kinect Sensor and Its Application)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Your paper is very interesting, clear and well organized. I really appreciated its strong interdiciplinarity

However I must point out that position data obtained by Kinect sensors are typically affected by a strong noise due to criticality in the location of the skeleton joint, change in the enlightement and reflexivity condition, temporary occlusions, etc... So the way you use to compute speed an acceleration of the joints should introduce large values, due to the presence of noise only. Typically in order to apply discrete derivatives to data from Kinect you need a strong filtering algorithm (e.g. Palmieri applied Kalman filters to obtain human arm motion tracking from Kinect measurement, Melchiorre and Scimmi  applied filtering algorithms to measure hand velocity from kinetic data in their human-robot hand-over application).

In order to explain the reader how you collected your data you should explain how did you filter row data.

You should also show at least a few examples of time history of the data that you measured, in order to let the unexperienced reader understand which kind of data you are processing

 

 

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

 

-The introduction and literature review seem long and could be shortened.

-The “Related Works” section could be consolidated into the Introduction section before the objectives of this study are stated.

-Sections may need to be renumbered. There are two Sec. 2.

-Some more details on how the experiments were conducted can be included. What’s the average response time or recording time per subject?

-The figure in Appendix A could be moved to the method section.

-There are many data that can be extracted from the Kinect recording. The authors need to justify and explain how they chose predictors.

-More data can be presented in addition to Table 1. What are the numbers of those predictors for other personality traits?

-More discussion on how other readers can benefit from the results of this study can be included.

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

In this manuscript entitled “Automatic personality assessment through movement analysis”, the authors developed a novel system to assess the personality traits of individuals from the movements, which were captured with the low-cost Kinect camera while examinee preforming a small interview. And the research identified the patterns that characterize each of the traits by Big Five model. The research methods were complete and appropriate. Considering this work is of great scientific and future clinical applications, I would like to recommend the publication of this manuscript in Sensors after the following issues are addressed. 1. Full names of all proper nouns should be indicated when the first appear in the text. 2. The section of “Results”, the more details of Table 1 should be added. 3. The size of Table 1 should be revised. 4. The section of More functions such as regression equations listed in data statistics may help the audiences understand this work. 5. Some up to date literatures are recommend to cite: (Engineered Regeneration, 2021, 2, 163-170, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engreg.2021.10.001.)

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for your revision, the paper is now ready for publication

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have addressed all the comments and improved the quality of the manuscript.

Back to TopTop