Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of a Ground Subsidence Zone in an Urban Area Using Geophysical Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Artificial Vision System on Digital Devices for Real-Time Head Tilt Control
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optical Chemical Sensors: Design and Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nitrophenyl Thiourea-Modified Polyethylenimine Colorimetric Sensor for Sulfate, Fluorine, and Acetate

by
Kediye Kuerbanjiang
1,2,
Kuerbanjiang Rouzi
3,4,* and
Si-Yu Zhang
3
1
College of Chemistry, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
2
Chemical Engineering Department, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C5, Canada
3
School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
4
Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Fine Chemicals, Ministry of Education & Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830017, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2024, 24(12), 3751; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24123751
Submission received: 28 April 2024 / Revised: 3 June 2024 / Accepted: 5 June 2024 / Published: 9 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Collection Optical Chemical Sensors: Design and Applications)

Abstract

:
A thiourea-based colorimetric sensor incorporating polyethyleneimine (PEI) and chromophoric nitrophenyl groups was synthesized and utilized for detecting various anions. Structural characterization of the sensor was accomplished using FTIR and 1H-NMR spectroscopy. The sensor’s interactions and colorimetric recognition capabilities with different anions, including CI, Br, I, F, NO3, PF6, AcO, H2PO4, PO43−, and SO42−, were investigated via visual observation and UV/vis spectroscopy. Upon adding SO42−, F, and AcO anions, the sensor exhibited distinct color changes from colorless to yellow and yellowish, while other anions did not induce significant color alterations. UV/vis spectroscopic titration experiments conducted in a DMSO/H2O solution (9:1 volume ratio) demonstrated the sensor’s selectivity toward SO42−, F, and AcO. The data revealed that the formation of the main compounds and anion complexes was mediated by hydrogen bonding, leading to signal changes in the nitrophenyl thiourea-modified PEI spectrum.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Anion recognition technology has a wide range of applications in various fields, due to its selective recognition and sensing functions. Anion acceptors are vital in chemistry, medicine, life science, environmental science, and other fields [1]. The different sizes and shapes of anions are responsible for the slow development of anion-binding agents compared with cation-binding agents [2,3,4]. The ‘naked-eye’ detection of anions without using spectroscopic instrumentation is an important area in the design and fabrication of new anion receptors. Naked-eye or optically detectable receptors have been developed via the covalent attachment of chromogenic or fluorogenic groups [5]. The anionic recognition groups are usually hydrogen bond donors, such as urea, thiourea, amide, amine, guanidine, pyrrole, phenolic hydroxyl groups, etc. The signal reporter groups are photosensitive or electrochemically active materials, thus establishing different anionic-type sensing modes [6,7].
The (thio)urea motif, characterized by two parallel NH groups flanking a carbonyl in a planar topology, demonstrates remarkable efficacy in binding trigonal planar anions such as oxoanions or carboxylates [8,9]. Notably, thiourea/urea incorporating a nitrophenyl group as a signaling unit exhibits an enhanced hydrogen-bonding capability and proton release tendency [10]. The specificity of receptors incorporating one or more urea and thiourea subunits is dictated by the strength of the receptor–anion interaction. Robust hydrogen bond interactions form with anions harboring highly electronegative atoms, such as fluoride [11,12] or inorganic oxoanions [13,14]. Thiourea-containing polymers find diverse applications, including in heavy metal ion sorption [15,16], dye retention [17], optical chemical sensing for anion detection [18], and gene delivery [19].
Polyethyleneimine (PEI) emerges as a responsive synthetic polycation, boasting the highest concentration of amino groups in each macromolecular chain, with one amino group for every two methylene units. Branched PEI is commercially available in various molar masses and chain architectures (hyperbranched, branched, or linear) and typically presents a composition of approximately 1:2:1 primary–secondary–tertiary amine groups. These exceptional attributes render PEI intriguing for a plethora of potential applications, either in its pristine form [20] or as a constituent within composite materials (e.g., hydrogels [21,22], composite nanoparticles [23], and layer-by-layer thin films [24,25]). Emerging utilizations of PEI and PEI-derived materials span across diverse domains, including metal ion sensing [20,26], trinitrotoluene (TNT) [27], curcumin [28], and para-nitrophenol [29], and as a specific adsorbent matrix for treating heavy metals [30], nitrate ions, anionic dyes, phosphate anions, and organic pollutants in wastewater [31,32,33]. Additionally, PEI finds utility in drug delivery systems [24,34], antibacterial coatings [35,36], and catalysts [37]. Recently, Li et al. [19] introduced methyl-TU groups onto the PEI backbone, enabling interactions with DNA phosphate groups via hydrogen bonds. Ghiorghita et al. [38] investigated the flocculation of inorganic particles using a thiourea derivative of branched polyethyleneimine (PEITU), demonstrating the synergistic effect of hydrogen bonding and electrostatic attraction forces.
Compared with small organic molecule probes that are less soluble in water, polymer ion probes are less demanding for the detection environment, and some can even detect ions in pure water. However, there are no reports on using (thio)urea polyethyleneimine as an anion recognition tool. Here, we designed and synthesized polyethyleneimine-based colorimetric anion receptors for three main reasons: (i) Polyethyleneimine contains many free and active groups of amino (–NH2). Multiple thiourea and amino groups are good hydrogen bond donors for the construction of polyethyleneimine-based anion receptors. It is known that stronger interactions in the host–guest systems are usually a consequence of a larger number of H-bonds in the complex [9]. Therefore, the complex stability highly depends on the strength and the number of the H-bonds. (ii) Polyethylenimide copolymer with low charge density can be easily reacted with isothiocyanate. (iii) The 4-nitrophenyl group is appended to the thiourea moiety, and the presence of –NO2 electron-withdrawing group enhances the acidity and colorimetric recognition ability of the receptor.
In this paper, a nitrophenyl thiourea–polyethyleneimine (NTU−PEI) receptor L was synthesized via the reaction of PEI with 4-nitrophenyl thioisocyanate. The receptor’s structure was characterized using infrared spectroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance hydrogen spectroscopy, while its anion-sensing properties were investigated via UV/vis spectroscopy. Notably, the receptor’s remarkable color response enabled the straightforward determination of its sensing behavior with the naked eye. TU derivatives were easily synthesized using a straightforward reaction involving an amino group and isothiocyanate [39]. In this study, NTU−PEI was prepared via an addition reaction between the amino group in PEI and the reactive isocyanate group of NPTI, as illustrated in Scheme 1.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Branched polyethyleneimine (PEI) (average Mw: ~800 with LS and ~600 with GPC) was purchased from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai China) 4-nitrophenyl isothiocyanate (NPTI) and the tetrabutylammonium (TBA) salts of all anions (with [(Bu)4N]2SO4] in a 50% aqueous solution) were supplied by Alfa Aesar and employed as received. Dichloromethane anhydrous was purchased from Hengyue Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All other reagents utilized in the experiment were of analytical grade and used without additional purification. In brief, 3 mmol of PEI (based on the structural unit’s molar mass) was introduced into a two-necked flask that had been evacuated under vacuum and purged with nitrogen 3 times. The PEI was dissolved in 30 mL of dry dichloromethane via magnetic stirring. Subsequently, 6.0 mmol of NPTI was dissolved in 20 mL of dry dichloromethane and added dropwise to the reaction mixture, followed by stirring at ambient temperature for 48 h. Afterward, stirring was ceased, and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure, resulting in 5 mL of the residual solvent. The reaction mixture was dialyzed against distilled water for five days. Lastly, the purified polymer was freeze-dried using a Fu Rui LGJ-10C device.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Fourier-Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Spectroscopy

The solid-state FT-IR spectral data of PEI and NTU−PEI were obtained using a BRUKER EQUINOX-55 spectrometer (Ettlingen, Germany). The spectral data were acquired in the 4000–400 cm−1 range utilizing KBr pellets. The 5 mg samples were then filtered using a Millex-HV PVDF 0.45 µm, 33 mm Before analysis, all specimens were vacuum-dried at 60 °C for 24 h.

2.2.2. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy

Liquid-state 1H NMR spectroscopy was employed to elucidate the chemical structures of PEI and NTU−PEI. The 1H NMR spectral data were acquired utilizing a VARIAN INOVA-400 spectrometer (400 MHz, Palo Alto, CA, USA), with a 5 mg sample dissolved in 0.6 mL DMSO-d6.

2.2.3. UV/vis Absorption Titration

Absorption spectral data were acquired using a UV-6100S UV/vis spectrophotometer (Shanghai, China). The receptor solution concentration was determined based on the monomeric units of NTU−PEI (4.0 × 10−5 M) in DMSO/H2O (9:1 volume ratio), and the guest anions (2.0 × 10−3 M) were prepared in DMSO. For titration, small aliquots (2–5 μL) of the guest ion titration specimens were added to the receptor solution (2 mL), and the spectral data were scanned after each addition. All measurements were conducted at ambient temperature.

2.2.4. Absorption Titrations and Hill Plots [40]

Sample solutions containing different levels of anions were prepared following a similar procedure, and their UV/vis absorption values were determined to monitor changes. A titration curve was generated by plotting the absorbance at the appropriate wavelength against the ratio of [anion] to [monomeric units of receptor]. The binding data were subsequently determined using the Hill Equation (1):
log [ Y ( 1 Y ) ] = n log [ a n i o n ] + n log K a
where Y, n, and Ka denote the fractional saturation of the host, the Hill coefficient (the average number of anions bound by each receptor molecule), and the apparent binding constant, respectively. The Y-value was determined using Equation (2):
Y = Δ A o b s Δ A max = ( A o b s A 0 ) ( A max A 0 )
where A0, Amax, and Aobs denote the inherent absorbance of the urea–chitosan sample, the maximum absorbance reached upon the completion of absorption changes at the selected wavelength, and the absorbance in the presence of the guest anion, respectively. The slope n and Ka values were calculated based on the slope and Y-intercept in the obtained Hill plots.

2.2.5. Solubility Test

The solubility of the compound nitrothiourea polyethyleneimine was tested in common organic solvents such as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), dimethylformamide, distilled water, dichloromethane, ethanol, and acetonitrile at 25 °C. The samples were immersed in each solvent at a concentration of 10 mg/mL.

2.2.6. Test Paper Experiment

Filter paper was cut into 4 × 4 squares, immersed in the receptor solution (1 × 10−3 mol/L) for 6 h, and then air-dried. Subsequently, the filter paper was labeled with “F” using fluoride ion solutions of 0.1 mol/L, 0.5 mol/L, and 1 mol/L, respectively. The color changes on the filter paper were observed, and a visual recognition experiment for the anion was conducted.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. FT-IR Analysis

Figure 1 illustrates the FT-IR spectral data of PEI and NTU–PEI. In the spectrum of PEI, characteristic peaks are observed at (i) 3282 and 3348 cm−1 for symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibrations of the –N–H group, (ii) 2823 and 2939 cm−1 for symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibrations of the –C–H group, (iii) 1666 cm−1 for bending vibrations of the –NH2 group, (iv) 1461 and 1593 cm−1 for bending vibrations of the –CH2 and –N–H groups, (v) 1299 and 1353 cm−1 for C–H bending vibrations, and (vi) 1049 and 1122 cm−1 for –C–N– and –C–C– stretching vibrations, respectively [41]. In contrast, the spectrum of NTU-PEI exhibits slight changes owing to incorporating NTU moieties. The peak centered at 1569 cm−1 may be ascribed to a combination of the bending vibrations of –NH2 groups and the stretching vibrations of –NH–C=S groups (previously reported at 1539 cm−1) [19,38]. The distinct peak at 1176 cm−1 corresponds to the stretching vibrations of –C=S groups [42]. Other notable peaks include those at 1326 cm−1 (–NO2), 1504, 852, 752, 717, and 655 cm−1 (phenyl) [18]. Furthermore, several peaks exhibit slight downshifts, indicating altered electronic effects from integrating NTU groups into the PEI backbone.

3.2. 1H NMR Analysis

In Figure 2a, the 1H NMR spectrum of PEI displays a signal ranging from 2.50 to 3.00 ppm, representing the characteristic broad resonance associated with branched groups, including methylene groups (N–CH2, CH2–NH–CH2, and CH2–NH2). Proton peaks corresponding to amine groups are evident from 1.10 to 2.10 ppm, encompassing –NH2 and CH2–NH–CH2 [18,43]. Additionally, solvent hydrogens exhibit a singular peak at approximately 7.27 ppm.
In Figure 2b, the 1H NMR spectrum of NTU-PEI reveals aromatic proton peaks ranging from 7.50 to 8.50 ppm, characteristic of mono-substituted benzene derivatives such as δ 1.90–1.40 ppm (–CH2) and δ 3.45 ppm (–NH), respectively. Notably, a new absorption peak at 2.64 ppm signifies the chemical shift of the amine proton of the introduced thiourea group to the PEI amine group. Similar observations have been documented in the literature [44,45]. The combined findings of the FT-IR and 1H NMR analyses affirm the successful synthesis of NTU−PEI with varying NTU contents.

3.3. UV/vis Spectrophotometric Titration

The receptor’s anion-sensing capability was evaluated using UV/vis spectrophotometric approaches in a DMSO/H2O solution. Absorption titration was conducted with the receptor (4.0 × 10−5 M) in DMSO/H2O, where 2.0 × 10−3 M of tetrabutylammonium sulfate, fluoride, and acetate were incrementally added to the DMSO, up to 10 equiv. The resulting spectra for all tested anions are depicted in Figure 3. A prominent absorption peak at 394 nm was observed in the UV/vis spectral data of the receptor in DMSO/H2O. The experimental findings indicate that the receptor L exhibited either minimal or no response to tetrabutylammonium salts such as CI, Br, I, NO3, PF6, and H2PO4. However, notable color changes were observed after adding 10 equivalents of SO42−, F-, and AcO under the same conditions.
Significant alterations in the UV/vis absorption spectral data were detected by introducing SO42− into the receptor solution, indicating the complexity between the receptor and the anion. The intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) band at 394 nm for the receptor is depicted in Figure 4a. This band gradually diminished as complexation progressed, with the emergence of a new peak at 520 nm (bathochromic shift). Isosbestic points were discerned at 326 nm and 428 nm for L. The saturation of the absorbance value of L was achieved by adding 27 equivalents of SO42−.The detection limit was 4.68 × 10−7 M, as determined by colorimetric data [46].
Figure 5a demonstrates that the absorption peak at 394 nm gradually diminished while a new peak emerged at 518 nm with increasing concentrations of F anions. Isosbestic points were detected at 332 nm and 454 nm. The absorbance value of L reached saturation by adding 30 equivalents of F. The detection limit was calculated to be 5.12 × 10−7 M for the F.
Figure 6a demonstrates that increasing concentrations of AcO anions led to a gradual decline in the absorption peak at 398 nm, along with the appearance of a new peak at 524 nm. Isosbestic points were discerned at 290 and 410 nm. The absorbance value of L reached saturation with 7.6 equivalents of AcO. AcO with a detection limit of 3.26 × 10−6 M. Incorporating other anions as their TBA salts elicited no significant response, underscoring the receptor’s strong affinity for preferential binding interactions with SO42−, F, and AcO anions. These findings affirm the receptor’s higher selectivity for fluoride and sulfate over other anionic species.

3.4. Recognition Performance

The visual detection experiments were first conducted in DMSO/H2O by introducing the corresponding anions (2.0 × 10−3 M) into solutions of the receptor (1.0 × 10−5 M). Discernible color alterations from colorless to yellow occurred upon adding TBA fluoride anions into the DMSO solutions of the receptor. This change was accompanied by the emergence of broad new bands centered at 516 and 512 nm in the receptor’s UV/vis spectral data, indicating a stronger interaction between fluoride and the receptor owing to its smaller size and higher electronegativity than other halides. The selective color change induced in the receptor with dihydrogen sulfate and acetate resulted in a distinct yellowish hue upon adding SO42−and AcO (1.0 × 10−5 M) (Figure 7). The observed alterations in color are likely attributed to the establishment of hydrogen bond interactions between the thiourea groups and the respective anions [47].
A colorimetric detection assay was carried out in DMSO/H2O upon adding various anions to the receptor solution (1 × 10−5 M). Incorporating 10 equivalents of SO42−, F, and AcO resulted in observable color changes—yellow for F and yellowish for SO42− and AcO (Figure 7)—which were discernible with the naked eye. However, no color changes were observed with CI, Br, I, NO3, PF6, and H2PO4. This lack of response may be due to the strong hydrogen bonding between SO42−, F, and AcO with a high negative charge density and the -NH group in the receptor.

3.5. Hill Plots

The binding constants (Ka) of L for the SO42−, F, and AcO anions were determined in DMSO via UV/vis titration experiments based on 1:1 stoichiometry. The findings are summarized in Table 1. Hill plots illustrating SO42−, F, and AcO are presented in Figure 4b, Figure 5b and Figure 6b. The following binding constants were obtained from the slopes and intercepts of the Hill plots: n = 1.59 and Ka = 7.19 × 103 M−1 for L/SO42− (R2 = 0.992), n = 1.7 and Ka = 6.87 × 103 M−1 for L/F (R2 = 0.993), and n = 1.08 and Ka = 2.38 × 103 M−1 for L/AcO (R2 = 0.983). These results demonstrate L’s strong binding affinity to form stable complexes with SO42−, F, and AcO. An n-value exceeding one indicates positive cooperativity between L and SO42−, F, and AcO [48].

3.6. Solubility of NTU−PEI

The solubility of PEI and NSPEI in different solvents was studied at 25 °C (Table 2). As shown in the table, PEI is only insoluble in DMSO and can be dissolved in other organic solvents and water. NTU−PEI is insoluble in ethanol and acetonitrile and shows good solubility properties in both polar nonprotonic solvents and protonic solvents.

3.7. Test Paper Experiment Analysis

As the concentration of anions increases, the color of the font gradually intensifies. Therefore, while qualitatively detecting anions, it is also possible to preliminarily quantify the magnitude of the anion concentration based on the depth of the color, thereby enhancing the versatility of Receptor L in practical applications (Figure 8). This gradual intensification of color is attributed to the increased formation of receptor–anion complexes.

4. Recognition Mechanism

When acceptor molecules coexist with anionic F, the solution turns yellow. With the coexistence of acceptor molecule L and the anion F in the solution, introducing a small quantity of methanol intensified the yellow coloration with the increasing methanol quantity. Simultaneously, the absorption peak at 394 nm gradually increased until reaching a state without anions. Concomitantly, the absorption peak at 518 nm gradually diminished. This phenomenon arose from the competition between methanol molecules and the anionic acceptor molecules for hydrogen bonding sites, highlighting the hydrogen bonding interactions between the guest and host.
The nitrophenyl thiourea-modified polyethyleneimine receptor demonstrated selectivity toward SO42−, forming stable complexes. This may be because (i) incorporating the potent electron-withdrawing group (–NO2) onto the aromatic moiety within receptor L enhanced the thiourea NH proton’s ability and increased the SO42− complex’s stability; (ii) numerous thiourea and amino groups present in the receptor allowed multiple hydrogen bond donors to form, with the complex’s stability contingent on the number and strength of hydrogen bonds; (iii) the basicity of the sulfate anions significantly contributed to the selectivity of NTU-PEI for sulfate anions; and (iv) thiourea can act as an oxoanion receptor due to its ability to establish two N-H O bonds with the adjacent oxygen atoms of the anion. Figure 9 illustrates the potential complexes formed with the anion.
Fluoride is unique as it is similar to oxygen in size but carries a net negative charge. Among anions, fluoride forms the most robust hydrogen bond interactions with the NH fragment of the thiourea subunit, potentially involving an advanced phase of proton transference. These results can be attributed to the elevated charge density, diminutive size, and increased basicity. Moreover, the dual-deprotonation of the thiourea receptor by fluoride is conceivable due to the robust electron-withdrawing groups on the receptor.

5. Conclusions

In summary, a simple colorimetric receptor was successfully synthesized, and here, a nitrophenyl group was treated as a signaling unit and thiourea group as the binding sites. The anion recognition properties via hydrogen-binding interactions were investigated by UV–vis titrations, and the spectrum could be easily changed on addition of anions. The sensor exhibited responsiveness upon introducing SO42−, F, and AcO anions in DMSO/H2O (9:1) solution, leading to visible color alterations with the naked eye:from colorless to yellow for F, and yellowish for SO42−, and AcO at ambient temperature. No response was observed with the other anions such as CI, Br, I, NO3, PF6, and H2PO4. The underlying mechanisms of this receptor may involve hydrogen bonding interactions.

Author Contributions

K.R. designed and performed the experiments and wrote the paper; K.K. participated in the experiment design and was one of the instructors for the experiments and participated in some data analysis; S.-Y.Z. performed the experiments. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China (No. 2021D01C039), PhD research startup foundation of Xinjiang University (No. BS190203).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Fine Chemicals of the Ministry of Education & Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region for providing the experimental platform.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Amendola, V.; Fabbrizzi, L.; Mosca, L. Anion recognition by hydrogen bonding: Urea-based receptors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 3889–3915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gale, P.A.; Howe, E.N.; Wu, W.X. Anion receptor chemistry. Chem 2016, 1, 351–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wenzel, M.; Weigan, J.J. Recent advances in anion recognition. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2017, 89, 247–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, A.F.; Wang, J.H.; Wang, F.; Jiang, Y.B. Anion complexation and sensing using modified urea and thiourea-based receptors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 3729–3745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chauhan, S.M.S.; Bisht, T.; Garg, B. Anion sensing by Phenazine-based urea/thiourea receptors. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 6646–6649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pandurangan, K.; Kitchen, J.A.; Gunnlaugsson, T. Colorimetric “naked eye” sensing of anions using at hiosemicarbazide receptor: A case study of recognition through hydrogen bonding versus deprotonation. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 2770–2775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, L.; Liu, Y.L.; Liu, C.G.; Fu, Y.; Ye, F. A naked-eye visible colorimetric and ratiometric chemosensor based on Schiff base for fluoride anion detection. J. Mol. Struct. 2021, 1236, 130343–130350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lane, J.D.E.; Shiels, G.; Ramamurthi, P.; Müllner, M.; Jolliffe, K.A. Water-Soluble Squaramide-Functionalized Copolymers for Anion Recognition. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2023, 202300406–202300414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bregović, V.B.; Basarić, N. Anion binding with urea and thiourea Derivatives. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015, 295, 80–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kang, J.; Lee, Y.J.; Lee, S.K.; Lee, J.H.; Park, J.J.; Kim, Y.; Kim, S.J.; Kim, C. A naked-eye detection of fluoride with urea/thiourea receptors which have both a benzophenone group and a nitrophenyl group as a signalling group. Supramol. Chem. 2010, 22, 26–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jose, D.A.; Kumar, D.K.; Ganguly, B.; Das, A. Efficient and Simple Colorimetric Fluoride Ion Sensor Based on Receptors Having Urea and Thiourea Binding Sites. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3445–3448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Piatek, P.; Jurezak, J. A selective colorimetric anion sensor based on an amide group containing macrocycle. Chem. Commun. 2002, 2450–2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bonizzoni, M.; Fabbrizzi, L.; Taglietti, A.; Tiengo, F. (Benzylideneamino)thioureas—Chromogenic Interactions with Anions and N–H Deprotonation. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 16, 3567–3574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Amendola, V.; Esteban-Gómez, D.; Fabbrizzi, L.; Licchelli, M. What anions do to N-H-containing receptors. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 343–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ghiorghita, C.-A.; Borchert, K.B.L.; Vasiliu, A.-L.; Zaharia, M.-M.; Schwarz, D.; Mihai, M. Porous thiourea-grafted-chitosan hydrogels: Synthesis and sorption of toxic metal ions from contaminated waters. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2020, 607, 125504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gao, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y. Biosorption and reduction of Au (III) to gold nanoparticles by thiourea modified alginate. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 159, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bondock, S.; El-Zahhar, A.A.; Alghamdi, M.M.; Keshk, S.M. Synthesis and evaluation of N-allylthiourea-modified chitosan for adsorptive removal of arsenazo III dye from aqueous solutions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 137, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rouzi, K.; Abulikemu, A.; Zhao, J.; Wu, B. A study on the synthesis and anion recognition of a chitosan-urea receptor. RSC Adv 2017, 7, 50920–50927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, Y.; Tian, H.; Ding, J.; Dong, X.; Chen, J.; Chen, X. Thiourea modified polyethylenimine for efficient gene delivery mediated by the combination of electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonds. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 3598–3607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shao, H.; Ding, Y.; Hong, X.; Liu, Y. Ultra-facile and rapid colorimetric detection of Cu2+ with branched polyethylenimine in 100% aqueous solution. Analyst 2018, 143, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Privar, Y.; Malakhova, I.; Pestov, A.; Fedorets, A.; Azarova, Y.; Schwarz, S.; Bratskaya, S. Polyethyleneimine cryogels for metal ions sorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 334, 1392–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, X.; Pejcic, B.; Heath, C.; Wood, C.D. Carbon capture with polyethylenimine hydrogel beads (PEI HBs). J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 21468–21474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhu, J.; Li, H.; Xiong, Z.; Shen, M.; Conti, P.S.; Shi, X.; Chen, K. Polyethyleneimine-Coated Manganese Oxide Nanoparticles for Targeted Tumor PET/MR Imaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 34954–34964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ghiorghita, C.-A.; Bucatariu, F.; Dragan, E.S. Sorption/release of diclofenac sodium in/from free-standing poly(acrylic acid)/poly(ethyleneimine) multilayer films. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 43752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bucatariu, F.; Ghiorghita, C.A.; Zaharia, M.M.; Schwarz, S.; Simon, F.; Mihai, M. Removal and Separation of Heavy Metal Ions from Multicomponent Simulated Waters Using Silica/Polyethyleneimine Composite Microparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 37585–37596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xu, N.; Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.-Y.; Meng, L. A sensitive detection of Cr(VI) in wide pH range using polyethyleneimine protected silver nanoclusters. Anal. Methods 2016, 8, 5684–5689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Şen, F.B.; Beĝiç, N.; Bener, M.; Apak, R. Fluorescence turn-off sensing of TNT by polyethylenimine capped carbon quantum dots. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2022, 271, 120884–120895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cai, Z.; Wu, L.; Xi, J.; Hao, E.; Qi, K. Green and facile synthesis of polyethyleneimine-protected fluorescent silver nanoclusters for the highly specific biosensing of curcumin. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 615, 126228–126235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Saini, A.K.; Jali, B.R.; Sahoo, S.K. Polyethyleneimine-based fluorescent polymeric nanoparticles: Synthesis and application in fluorescence sensing of pH and para-nitrophenol. New J. Chem. 2023, 47, 9250–9256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gou, X.; Li, Y.; Ahmad, Z.; Zhu, X.; Chen, J. Thiolated Polyethyleneimine-Based Polymer Sponge for Selective Removal of Hg2+ from Aqueous Solution. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 31955–31963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xanthopoulou, M.; Giliopoulos, D.; Tzollas, N.; Triantafyllidis, K.S.; Kostoglou, M.; Katsoyiannis, I.A. Phosphate Removal Using Polyethylenimine Functionalized Silica-Based Materials. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xanthopoulou, M.; Katsoyiannis, I.A. Enhanced Adsorption of Chromate and Arsenate Ions from Contaminated Water with Emphasis on Polyethylenimine Modified Materials: A Review. Separations 2023, 10, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hussain, D.; Musharraf, S.G.; Fatima, B.; Saeed, A.; Jabeen, F.; Ashiq, M.N.; Najam-ul-Haq, M. Magnetite nanoparticles coated with chitosan and polyethylenimine as anion exchanger for sorptive enrichment of phosphopeptides. Microchim. Acta 2019, 186, 852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Shirakura, T.; Ray, A.; Kopelman, R. Polyethylenimine incorporation into hydrogel nanomatrices for enhancing nanoparticle-assisted chemotherapy. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 48016–48024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Azevedo, M.M.; Ramalho, P.; Silva, A.P.; Teixeira-Santos, R.; Pina-Vaz, C.; Rodrigues, A.G. Polyethyleneimine and polyethyleneimine-based nanoparticles: Novel bacterial and yeast biofilm inhibitors. J. Med. Microbiol. 2014, 63, 1167–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chrószcz, M.; Barszczewska-Rybarek, I. Nanoparticles of Quaternary Ammonium Polyethylenimine Derivatives for Application in Dental Materials. Polymer 2020, 12, 2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wang, J.; Ke, C.; Jia, X.; Ma, C.; Liu, X.; Qiao, W.; Ling, L. Polyethyleneimine-functionalized mesoporous carbon nanosheets as metal-free catalysts for the selective oxidation of H2S at room temperature. Appl. Catal. B 2021, 283, 119650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ghiorghita, C.-A.; Ghimici, L.; Ailiesei, G.-L. Synthesis of thiourea-Graft-Polyethyleneimine and Its Performance in Flocculation of Some Inorganic Particles. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021, 60, 5167–5175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nagai, D.; Yoshida, M.; Kishi, T.; Morinaga, H.; Hara, Y.; Mori, M.; Kawakami, S.; Inoue, K. A facile and high-recovery material for rare-metals based on a water-soluble polyallylamine with side-chain thiourea groups. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 6852–6854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Su, M.J.; Wan, W.; Yong, X.; Lu, X.W.; Liu, R.Y.; Qu, J.Q. Urea-based polyacetylenes as an optical sensor for fluoride ions. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2013, 31, 620–629. [Google Scholar]
  41. Idris, S.A.; Mkhatresh, O.A.; Heatley, F. Assignment of 1H NMR spectrum and investigation of oxidative degradation of poly(ethylenimine) using 1H and 13C 1-D and 2-D NMR. Polym. Int. 2006, 55, 1040–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lin, Y.-C.; Wang, H.-P.; Gohar, F.; Ullah, M.H.; Zhang, X.; Xie, D.-F.; Fang, H.; Huang, J.; Yang, J.-X. Preparation and copper ions adsorption properties of thiosemicarbazide chitosan from squid pens. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 95, 476–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yu, H.-B.; Wen, J.; Zhang, L.-F.; Zhan, N.-N.; Teng, H.-K.; Zhou, L.-S.; Zhao, J.; Fang, W.-J. Hyperbranched polyethyleneimine for high-effective oil-water separation. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2022, 213, 110403–110410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Holycross, D.R.; Chai, M. Comprehensive NMR Studies of the Structures and Properties of PEI Polymers. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 6891–6897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Misra, A.; Shahid, M.; Dwivedi, P. An efficient thiourea-based colorimetric chemosensor for naked-eye recognition of fluoride and acetate anions: UV–vis and 1HNMR studies. Talanta 2009, 80, 532–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhao, L.Y.; Wang, G.K.; Chen, J.H.; Zhang, L.M.; Liu, B.; Zhang, J.F.; Zhao, Q.H.; Zhou, Y. 1,8-Naphthalimide-based visible colorimetric sensor for the selective sensing of fluoride, acetate and hydroxyl anions. J. Fluorine Chem. 2014, 158, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ahmet, O.; Erdemir, S.; Kocyigit, O. ‘Naked-eye’ detection of fluoride and acetate anions by using simple and efficient urea and thiourea based colorimetric sensors. J. Mol. Struct. 2013, 1048, 392–398. [Google Scholar]
  48. Takeuchi, M.; Ikeda, M.; Sugasaki, A.; Shinkai, S. Molecular design of artificial molecular and ion recognition systems with allosteric guest responses. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 865–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Synthetic route of NTU-PEI.
Scheme 1. Synthetic route of NTU-PEI.
Sensors 24 03751 sch001
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of PEI and NTU−PEI.
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of PEI and NTU−PEI.
Sensors 24 03751 g001
Figure 2. 1H NMR spectral data of PEI (a) and NTU−PEI (b) in DMSO-d6 solution.
Figure 2. 1H NMR spectral data of PEI (a) and NTU−PEI (b) in DMSO-d6 solution.
Sensors 24 03751 g002aSensors 24 03751 g002b
Figure 3. UV/vis titration spectral data of probe L in DMSO/H2O (99%/1%) containing various anions.
Figure 3. UV/vis titration spectral data of probe L in DMSO/H2O (99%/1%) containing various anions.
Sensors 24 03751 g003
Figure 4. UV/vis titration spectral data of DMSO/H2O (99%/1%) with SO42− for probe L (a) and UV/vis spectral data of the receptor in DMSO/H2O (99%/1%) solution with different concentrations of SO42− anions at 516 nm (b). Inset: Hill plot analysis of the receptor and SO42−.
Figure 4. UV/vis titration spectral data of DMSO/H2O (99%/1%) with SO42− for probe L (a) and UV/vis spectral data of the receptor in DMSO/H2O (99%/1%) solution with different concentrations of SO42− anions at 516 nm (b). Inset: Hill plot analysis of the receptor and SO42−.
Sensors 24 03751 g004
Figure 5. UV/vis titration spectral data of DMSO/H2O (99%/1%) with F for probe L (a) and UV/vis spectral data of probe L in DMSO/H2O (99%/1%) solution with different concentrations of F anions at 518 nm (b). Inset: Hill plot analysis of the receptor and F.
Figure 5. UV/vis titration spectral data of DMSO/H2O (99%/1%) with F for probe L (a) and UV/vis spectral data of probe L in DMSO/H2O (99%/1%) solution with different concentrations of F anions at 518 nm (b). Inset: Hill plot analysis of the receptor and F.
Sensors 24 03751 g005
Figure 6. (a) UV/vis titration spectra of DMSO (99%)/H2O (1%) with AcO and probe L; (b) UV/vis spectra of probe L in DMSO (90%)/H2O (10%) solution with different concentrations of AcO anions at 518 nm. Inset: Hill plot analysis of the receptor and AcO.
Figure 6. (a) UV/vis titration spectra of DMSO (99%)/H2O (1%) with AcO and probe L; (b) UV/vis spectra of probe L in DMSO (90%)/H2O (10%) solution with different concentrations of AcO anions at 518 nm. Inset: Hill plot analysis of the receptor and AcO.
Sensors 24 03751 g006
Figure 7. Visual representations of L in DMSO/H2O (9:1, v/v) solutions after incorporating 10 equivalents of TBA salts of different anions (solvent: DMSO).
Figure 7. Visual representations of L in DMSO/H2O (9:1, v/v) solutions after incorporating 10 equivalents of TBA salts of different anions (solvent: DMSO).
Sensors 24 03751 g007
Figure 8. Photographs of different concentration of F on receptor L test paper.
Figure 8. Photographs of different concentration of F on receptor L test paper.
Sensors 24 03751 g008
Figure 9. Potential structures of the complexes formed between the receptor and SO42−.
Figure 9. Potential structures of the complexes formed between the receptor and SO42−.
Sensors 24 03751 g009
Table 1. Ka values for L and anionic substrates at 1.0 × 10−5 M in DMSO solution at 25 °C b.
Table 1. Ka values for L and anionic substrates at 1.0 × 10−5 M in DMSO solution at 25 °C b.
ReceptorAssociation Constant Ka (M−1) a
FCIBrINO3SO42−PF6H2PO4AcO
L6.87× 103n.d cn.d cn.d cn.d c7.19 × 103n.d cn.d c2.38 × 103
a Calculated via absorption spectroscopic titration. b All uncertainties are within ±10%. c Insufficient changes in the UV/vis spectral data prevented the calculation of the binding constants.
Table 2. Solubility properties of NTU−PEI.
Table 2. Solubility properties of NTU−PEI.
SamplesSolubility a
DMSO DMFH2OCH2Cl2C2H5OHCH3CN
PEI+++++
NTU-PEI+++±
a (+: soluble; ±: partially soluble; −: insoluble).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kuerbanjiang, K.; Rouzi, K.; Zhang, S.-Y. Nitrophenyl Thiourea-Modified Polyethylenimine Colorimetric Sensor for Sulfate, Fluorine, and Acetate. Sensors 2024, 24, 3751. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24123751

AMA Style

Kuerbanjiang K, Rouzi K, Zhang S-Y. Nitrophenyl Thiourea-Modified Polyethylenimine Colorimetric Sensor for Sulfate, Fluorine, and Acetate. Sensors. 2024; 24(12):3751. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24123751

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kuerbanjiang, Kediye, Kuerbanjiang Rouzi, and Si-Yu Zhang. 2024. "Nitrophenyl Thiourea-Modified Polyethylenimine Colorimetric Sensor for Sulfate, Fluorine, and Acetate" Sensors 24, no. 12: 3751. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24123751

APA Style

Kuerbanjiang, K., Rouzi, K., & Zhang, S. -Y. (2024). Nitrophenyl Thiourea-Modified Polyethylenimine Colorimetric Sensor for Sulfate, Fluorine, and Acetate. Sensors, 24(12), 3751. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24123751

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop