Next Article in Journal
Q-RPL: Q-Learning-Based Routing Protocol for Advanced Metering Infrastructure in Smart Grids
Previous Article in Journal
Geometry Selection in Three-Mirror Freeform Imagers with an Accessible Exit Pupil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Hybrid Metadetector for Measuring Bell States of Optical Angular Momentum Entanglement

1
School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Changshu Institute of Technology, Suzhou 215000, China
2
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117583, Singapore
Sensors 2024, 24(15), 4817; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24154817
Submission received: 30 May 2024 / Revised: 30 June 2024 / Accepted: 23 July 2024 / Published: 25 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Optical Sensors)

Abstract

:
High-dimensional entanglement of optical angular momentum has shown its enormous potential for increasing robustness and data capacity in quantum communication and information multiplexing, thus offering promising perspectives for quantum information science. To make better use of optical angular momentum entangled states, it is necessary to develop a reliable platform for measuring and analyzing them. Here, we propose a hybrid metadetector of monolayer transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) integrated with spin Hall nanoantenna arrays for identifying Bell states of optical angular momentum. The corresponding states are converted into path-entangled states of propagative polaritonic modes for detection. Several Bell states in different forms are shown to be identified effectively. TMDs have emerged as an attractive platform for the next generation of on-chip optoelectronic devices. Our work may open up a new horizon for devising integrated quantum circuits based on these two-dimensional van der Waals materials.

1. Introduction

Quantum circuits are widely regarded as the most promising candidate for the next generation of information-processing platforms. Entanglement is an essential resource for producing quantum information applications in corresponding systems. In reality, entangled photon states have been extensively utilized for the demonstration of diverse quantum tasks. Various types of entangled states have been proposed based on different degrees of freedom of photons, including polarization [1,2], frequency [3], and angular momentum [4,5,6]. For the last one, Ref. [7] presents a comprehensive review. It is worth mentioning that photonic entanglement of optical angular momentum attracts considerable interest recently because the accordingly constructed high-dimensional entangled states have an enormous potential for enhancing the security and data capacity of quantum information systems [8,9]. The angular momentum of a photon can be divided into spin angular momentum (SAM) and orbital angular momentum (OAM) [10,11,12]; hence, there are SAM-OAM hybrid entanglement and OAM entanglement [6,13]. In order to make better use of entangled photons carrying angular momentum in practice, it is necessary to develop a compact platform for analyzing and detecting those states.
A reliable material base is crucial for designing on-chip detectors of optical angular momentum entanglement. Recently, monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) have emerged as an attractive candidate for novel integrated photonic and optoelectronic devices [14,15,16,17,18] due to their optically allowed direct bandgap at visible and near-infrared frequencies benefiting from atomic thin thickness [19]. In this article, we propose a hybrid metadetector of TMD monolayer integrated with spin Hall nanoantenna arrays for measuring maximally entangled states of optical angular momentum. TMD monolayers support robust excitons, which can interact with photons to form polaritonic modes known as exciton polaritons [20,21,22]. The light–matter interaction in the region of spin Hall nanoantenna arrays gives rise to chirality-dependent separation of photons, and different incident OAM states are coupled into their respective paths. Consequently, optical angular momentum entanglement is transformed into path entanglement carried by the guiding polaritonic modes. Through applicable geometry design, the propagation length of polaritonic modes is able to reach several tens of micrometers, which is long enough to ensure a fine performance of the metadetector. The influence of intrinsic loss is considered not to hinder the sorting of optical angular momentum entangled states. Several states in different forms are shown to be identified effectively. Our work goes a step further towards developing quantum applications of two-dimensional TMD materials and may open up a new horizon for devising quantum polaritonic devices.

2. Hybrid Metadetector Design

We have established that the total angular momentum of a photon includes SAM and OAM. A circularly polarized photon carries a SAM of σħ, where σ = ±1 for right- and left-handed circular polarization (RCP/LCP), respectively [11]. The quantity of OAM associated with helical-phase exp(ilφ) is lℏ for each photon, where l is the quantum number of OAM defined as topological charge [11,23]. Different types of SAM-OAM hybrid entanglement and OAM entanglement have been demonstrated [6,13,24]. Here, we mainly focus on maximally entangled states, which represent an essential ingredient in most quantum information applications [25]. A bipartite entanglement of the following Bell state forms is first considered:
{ | Ψ h y b r i d = ( | R | l + | L | l ) / 2 | Ψ O A M = ( | l 1 | l 2 + | l 2 | l 1 ) / 2 .
In these two equations, | Ψ h y b r i d and | Ψ O A M are Bell states of SAM-OAM hybrid entanglement and OAM entanglement, respectively.
Multiple efficient OAM sorting methods have been demonstrated in bulky systems [26,27,28]. For on-chip detection, several strategies have been proposed in the realm of classical optics [29,30,31,32]. The most effective method is using an asymmetric grating design [30], which can also be adopted to measure OAM entangled states. However, this method is inapplicable to the analysis of SAM; thus, additional design is necessary. In fact, TMD monolayers support spin-polarized valley transitions at the K and K’ points of the associated Brillouin zone owing to the broken inversion symmetry combined with time-reversal symmetry [33,34,35], which leads to the chiral coupling of spin photons. Nevertheless, as we need to combine the OAM degree of freedom, a more flexible scheme to deal with both SAM and OAM simultaneously is desired. Here, we choose to introduce spin Hall nanostructures [31,36] into the asymmetric grating for sorting SAM. Correspondingly, the schematic of a hybrid metadetector consisting of a TMD monolayer integrated with asymmetric grating consisting of spin Hall nanoantenna arrays is shown in Figure 1.
The asymmetric grating couples OAM states with different topological charges into their respective propagation directions on the chip [30,31]; thus, the OAM entanglement can be converted into path entanglement. To introduce the working principle, we should first clarify the azimuthal k-vector carried by the OAM mode [31], as is sketched in Figure 2a. The corresponding spatial distribution exhibits circular symmetry. When the OAM state is launched onto a grating, guiding polaritons can be excited through light–matter interaction when the k-vector matching condition is satisfied:
k T P = G + k O A M .
In this equation, k T P denotes the wave vector of TMD polaritons, and G = 2 π / Λ is the reciprocal vector provided by the grating. k O A M represents the k-vector of the incident OAM mode. In the situation of normal incidence, k O A M can be expressed as [30,31]:
| k O A M | = l π 2 r ,
where r denotes the effective radius of the OAM mode field. Hence, the propagation direction of the excited propagative polaritonic mode can be defined according to the law of cosines, and the corresponding propagation angle θ is explicitly dependent on the topological charge l. As a result, OAM states with different absolute values of topological charge are coupled into distinct paths. However, the positive and negative signs of topological charge cannot be distinguished because the single grating provides reciprocal vectors in two horizontal directions, allowing propagative modes to be excited in four directions on both the left and right sides, as shown in Figure 2b. Therefore, an asymmetric grating design is introduced. The upper and lower parts have different periods, Λ1 and Λ2, respectively. They provide distinct reciprocal vectors; thus, they are matched to azimuthal OAM k-vectors in different directions. Therefore, the excitation of TMD polaritons by an OAM state with a certain positive or negative sign can be limited to one side of the asymmetric grating when the following condition is satisfied:
k T P = G 1 + k O A M , l o w e r = G 2 + k O A M , u p p e r .
The corresponding schematic is sketched in Figure 2c. To ensure the effective sorting of OAM, the center lines of the incident mode field and the asymmetric grating should be aligned. We can produce an OAM state with a positive topological charge by coupling it with TMD polaritons propagating to the right side. In contrast, when the OAM state has a negative topological charge, the generated TMD polaritons propagate towards the left.
To be able to further characterize SAM, we introduce spin Hall nanoantenna arrays as the built-in structures for the grating lines. They comprise gold nanoantenna pairs, whose orientations are ±π/4 and ∓π/4 in the upper and lower sections, respectively. The length, width, and height of a nanoantenna are 215 nm, 50 nm, and 40 nm. Each nanoantenna equivalent to a dipolar source brings a phase delay of Δφ  =  ±π/4, and the distance between the central lines of the (+π/4)/(−π/4) subarrays is set to be S = 2/(π|kTP|); thus, the conditions for giving rise to chirality-dependent separation of spin photons are satisfied [36,37]. Overall, the general effect of decomposing the Bell states of SAM-OAM hybrid entanglement and OAM entanglement is shown in Figure 2d. The first, second, third, and fourth quadrants contain the LCP/positive (topological charge), RCP/negative, LCP/negative, and RCP/positive channels, respectively. Correspondingly, the functional illustration of the metadetector is exhibited in Figure 2e. The signals can be collected with the assistance of out-coupling gratings, and then the coincidence measurements are carried out to identify the forms of Bell states.
The practical performance of the proposed metadetector depends on the geometry parameters, which need to be carefully chosen, especially the parameters of the planar TMD waveguide. We chose a tungsten diselenide (WSe2) monolayer for a detailed design, while the geometry parameters should also be correspondingly modulated if utilizing other TMDs such as tungsten disulfide (WS2) and molybdenum disulfide (MoS2). The TMD polaritonic modes can be classified into two families: TE modes and TM modes [38]. Here, we considered TE waveguide modes. The intrinsic loss of the modes can be reduced by enhancing the symmetry of the TMD waveguide; hence, the WSe2 monolayer is placed inside a silica surrounding, as is shown in Figure 3a. The corresponding mode field can be analyzed based on the waveguide electromagnetic theory. We used the following characteristic parameters of WSe2 for calculation: the resonance energy ℏω0 = 1.6 eV (A exciton) and the corresponding excitonic absorption αω0 = 0.15 with an FWHM linewidth of ℏγ = 50 meV [39]. The calculated TMD waveguide mode profile at 800 nm is sketched in Figure 3a. The curves of the propagation constant β and propagation length Lp, varying with wavelength (780–820 nm), are plotted in Figure 3b. It can be seen that the propagation length is in the range of 101–102 μm, which is long enough for effective metadetector operation.
Comprehensively considering the common wavelength range of entangled photon sources, the intrinsic loss, and the effective mode width, the working wavelength was set at 800 nm. The corresponding propagation constant β is 11.07 μm−1; thus, Λ1 and Λ2 were chosen to be 515 nm and 632 nm. The distance between the edges of the asymmetric grating and the out-coupling gratings was chosen to be 60 μm based on three factors. This distance should not be too short to avoid the overlap of the adjacent signals for different OAM states [30,31], and it also should not be too long because of the intrinsic loss and the challenges of sample preparation. The period of out-coupling grating was set at 568 nm.

3. Entangled State Measurement

Down-converted photon pairs at 800 nm can be effectively provided by nonlinear optical crystals such as β-barium borate (BBO) [1,2], lithium niobate (LiNbO3) [40], and potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) [41]. To further generate the Bell states of SAM-OAM hybrid entanglement and OAM entanglement, additional devices and elements, including a spatial light modulator (SLM), q-plate, and other wave plates are needed to modulate the wavefront and polarization of photon pairs. Several schemes have been demonstrated previously [4,13,42].
The hybrid SAM-OAM Bell states can be prepared based on photon pairs, single photons, or even classical beams [13]. For classical beams such as cylindrical vector vortex beams (CVVBs) [31], nonseparability is established between the SAM and OAM degrees of freedom, which is treated as a classical analog of quantum entanglement. Our proposed metadetector can be employed for hybrid measurement of all these distinct types of Bell states. In practice, a genuine quantum background is usually preferred; hence, Bell states based on single photons are the most convenient and effective choice. In view of the generation strategies, the OAM topological charges of these states are usually ±l. Correspondingly, the path attenuation is symmetric when converting into guiding modes; hence, the influence of intrinsic loss for hybrid entanglement measurement does not have to be considered but the coincidence rate is drawn down by ~2 orders of magnitude. For this issue, ultra-bright photon sources can be chosen to ensure the detection efficiency. Here, we take ( | R | 2 + | L | 2 ) / 2 as an example; the corresponding coincidence histogram is shown in Figure 4a.
For OAM entanglement, the situation is more complex, and the issue of SAM cannot be easily ignored. Although it is no longer a concerning degree of freedom, the SAM indeed influences the entanglement transfer. Therefore, we first set the same SAM for the entangled state, either RCP or LCP. Detailed considerations can be divided into two cases. If l1 + l2 = 0, the situation is still relatively simple to analyze. As |l1| = |l2|, the path attenuation is also symmetric; thus, the intrinsic loss does not influence the identification of states. As an illustration, the 3D histogram of ( | 2 | 2 + | 2 | 2 ) / 2 is shown in Figure 4b. The second case is l1 + l2 ≠ 0. It should be mentioned that |l1| = |l2| is not supposed to be chosen because entangled states degrade into product states with this condition. Correspondingly, we have |l1| ≠ |l2|, and the path attenuation becomes asymmetric. Therefore, the detection probabilities do not match in the two paths; thus, the coincidence results are expected to be affected. To deal with this problem, post-processing procedures are necessary. We choose a trigger gate processing. The gate shall be triggered when the most dissipative path with the largest absolute value of topological charge records an event. A signal shall be sent to the other path to open the detector for recording. After these procedures, the input state can still be successfully identified but the coincidence efficiency will be reduced by ~1 order of magnitude. Figure 4c exhibits the coincidence histogram of ( | 1 | 3 + | 3 | 1 ) / 2 . In addition, it is worth mentioning that an upper limit of |l| can be expected for detection owing to the signal-to-noise ratio and the separation distance [31]. Due to the noise and dissipation effects during propagation, the output spot of each channel shall be broadened. The critical condition for OAM discrimination is D|tan(θn+1) − tan(θn)| > (rn+1 + rn)/2, where D is equal to the length of pure WSe2 waveguide region and rn is the radius of the output spot. This upper limit could increase through improving the device’s performance by placing nanowires at the corresponding channels [32], but it is more difficult to prepare the metadetector in this way.
We next consider a situation in which the polarization of the OAM entangled states is not RCP or LCP. It is common in practice that down-converted photons are linearly polarized. Under this circumstance, the entangled photons launched on the metadetector are coupled into bi-paths for the same OAM, namely RCP/l and LCP/l. It is not hard to ensure that the polarization of the incident states is horizontal or vertical. Correspondingly, the photon flux is equally distributed to both paths of RCP/l and LCP/l at a ratio of 50%. There are two ways to present the coincidence results. One is combining the coincidence counts from bi-paths, and the other is to distinguish the RCP/l and LCP/l channels. In fact, compared to the Bell state with asymmetric topological charges, which is mainly discussed here, the state ( | l 1 | l 1 + | l 2 | l 2 ) / 2 is more suitable for this scenario. Controlling the polarization of ( | l 1 | l 1 + | l 2 | l 2 ) / 2 shall make the coincidence measurement for it more flexible and convenient.
Overall, an effective integrated platform for detecting and analyzing Bell states of SAM-OAM hybrid entanglement and OAM entanglement is developed. Existing types of systems for this task have predominantly relied on bulky devices. In Ref. [6], Mair et al. used fork-shaped hologram gratings for OAM entanglement analysis. Although this method is effective, each fork grating could only sort OAM modes with specific topological charge. With the advent of spatial light modulators (SLMs), it has become more convenient to modulate holograms for OAM entanglement detection [7]. However, these devices are all essentially bulky, suffering from large volume and low resolution. In contrast, the compact metadetector proposed here could significantly advance the practical applications of OAM quantum systems.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

It is worth discussing the experimental feasibility of the proposed hybrid metadetector. There are three main functional structures: the TMD monolayer, the spin Hall nanoantenna arrays, and the out-coupling gratings. The latter two can be conveniently prepared at a high quality using current mature nanofabrication technologies, such as focused ion beam (FIB) and electron beam lithography (EBL) [43,44,45]. FIB etching technology is well-suited for carving out nano-scale hollow structures and can thus be employed to effectively machine nano-groove arrays for constructing the out-coupling gratings. For nano-block structures like the spin Hall nanoantenna arrays, EBL technology is currently one of the most powerful and widely used choices for fabrication. Moreover, another challenge is the processing technology for the WSe2 monolayer. For the preparation of high-quality, large-size TMD monolayer samples, the most commonly used approaches are exfoliation and synthesis [46,47]. Exfoliation is straightforward, requiring only manual shaking for a few seconds. However, the resulting products are quite random. In contrast, the synthesis approach using chemical vapor deposition is more efficient but involves more complex processes. Though the flexibility of device design is still limited to a certain extent, a series of intriguing functional optoelectronic devices with large-area TMD monolayers have been demonstrated [48]. Additionally, the functionality of the metadetector can also be further enhanced by incorporating other types of polaritons, such as plasmon polaritons [49,50] and phonon polaritons [51,52].
In conclusion, we propose a hybrid metadetector for detecting and analyzing optical angular momentum entangled states. The critical functional section of the metadetector is composed of a WSe2 monolayer integrated with spin Hall nanoantenna arrays. A silica surrounding is introduced to reduce the influence of intrinsic loss. The proposed device is used for the hybrid measurement of SAM-OAM hybrid Bell states and the detection of OAM Bell states. Several states in different forms are considered in detail and are effectively identified. Developing quantum applications of TMD monolayers has attracted a growing interest in recent years. Our work may open up a new horizon for designing quantum polaritonic devices based on two-dimensional van der Waals materials.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Nos. 12274043 and 11704182).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kwiat, P.G.; Mattle, K.; Weinfurter, H.; Zeilinger, A.; Sergienko, A.V.; Shih, Y.H. New high-intensity source of polarization-entangled photon pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 75, 4337–4341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kwiat, P.G.; Waks, E.; White, A.G.; Appelbaum, I.; Eberhard, P.H. Ultrabright source of polarization-entangled photons. Phys. Rev. A 1999, 60, R773–R776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, X.; Yang, L.; Ma, X.; Cui, L.; Ou, Z.Y.; Yu, D. All-fiber source of frequency-entangled photon pairs. Phys. Rev. A 2009, 79, 033817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Agnew, M.; Salvail, J.Z.; Leach, J.; Boyd, R.W. Generation of orbital angular momentum Bell states and their verification via accessible nonlinear witnesses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 111, 030402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ming, Y.; Zhang, W.; Tang, J.; Liu, Y.; Xia, Z.L.; Liu, Y.S.; Lu, Y.Q. Photonic entanglement based on nonlinear metamaterials. Laser Photonics Rev. 2020, 14, 1900146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mair, A.; Vaziri, A.; Weihs, G.; Zeilinger, A. Entanglement of the orbital angular momentum states of photons. Nature 2001, 412, 313–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Krenn, M.; Malik, M.; Erhard, M.; Zeilinger, A. Orbital angular momentum of photons and the entanglement of Laguerre–Gaussian modes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 2017, 375, 20150442. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Steinlechner, F.; Ecker, S.; Fink, M.; Liu, B.; Bavaresco, J.; Huber, M.; Scheidl, T.; Ursin, R. Distribution of high-dimensional entanglement via an intra-city free-space link. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cozzolino, D.; Da Lio, B.; Bacco, D.; Oxenløwe, L.K. High-dimensional quantum communication: Benefits, progress, and future challenges. Adv. Quantum Technol. 2019, 2, 1900038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Allen, L.; Beijersbergen, M.W.; Spreeuw, R.J.C.; Woerdman, J.P. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes. Phys. Rev. A 1992, 45, 8185–8189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yao, A.M.; Padgett, M.J. Orbital angular momentum: Origins, behavior and applications. Adv. Opt. Photonics 2011, 3, 161–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ming, Y.; Intaravanne, Y.; Ahmed, H.; Kenney, M.; Lu, Y.Q.; Chen, X. Creating composite vortex beams with a single geometric metasurface. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2109714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Karimi, E.; Leach, J.; Slussarenko, S.; Piccirillo, B.; Marrucci, L.; Chen, L.; She, W.; Franke-Arnold, S.; Padgett, M.J.; Santamato, E. Spin-orbit hybrid entanglement of photons and quantum contextuality. Phys. Rev. A 2010, 82, 022115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tian, H.; Chin, M.L.; Najmaei, S.; Guo, Q.; Xia, F.; Wang, H.; Dubey, M. Optoelectronic devices based on two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nano Res. 2016, 9, 1543–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Krasnok, A.; Lepeshov, S.; Alú, A. Nanophotonics with 2D transition metal dichalcogenides. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 15972–15994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Taffelli, A.; Dirè, S.; Quaranta, A.; Pancheri, L. MoS2 based photodetectors: A review. Sensors 2021, 21, 2758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ye, M.; Zhang, D.; Yap, Y.K. Recent advances in electronic and optoelectronic devices based on two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Electronics 2017, 6, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vargas-Bernal, R. Electrical properties of two-dimensional materials used in gas sensors. Sensors 2019, 19, 1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mak, K.F.; Shan, J. Photonics and optoelectronics of 2D semiconductor transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Photonics 2016, 10, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hu, F.; Fei, Z. Recent progress on exciton polaritons in layered transition-metal dichalcogenides. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 8, 1901003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Q.; Hu, G.; Ma, W.; Li, P.; Krasnok, A.; Hillenbrand, R.; Alù, A.; Qiu, C.W. Interface nano-optics with van der Waals polaritons. Nature 2021, 597, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, Q.; Dong, S.; Cao, G.; Hu, G. Exciton polaritons in mixed-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides heterostructures. Opt. Lett. 2020, 45, 4140–4143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ming, Y.; Zhang, W.; Tang, J.; Yang, X.; Liu, Y.S.; Lu, Y.Q. Nonlinear wavy metasurfaces with topological defects for manipulating orbital angular momentum states. ACS Photonics 2021, 8, 1896–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ming, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, W.; Yan, Y.; Zhang, H. Tailoring nonlinear metamaterials for the controlling of spatial quantum entanglement. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 4001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Han, Y.G.; Li, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, H. Optimal verification of the Bell state and Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states in untrusted quantum networks. NPJ Quantum Inf. 2021, 7, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Berkhout, G.C.G.; Lavery, M.P.J.; Courtial, J.; Beijersbergen, M.W.; Padgett, M.J. Efficient sorting of orbital angular momentum states of light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 153601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wen, Y.; Chremmos, I.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, S. Spiral transformation for high-resolution and efficient sorting of optical vortex modes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 120, 193904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Mirhosseini, M.; Malik, M.; Shi, Z.; Boyd, R.W. Efficient separation of the orbital angular momentum eigenstates of light. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Mei, S.; Huang, K.; Liu, H.; Qin, F.; Mehmood, M.Q.; Xu, Z.; Hong, M.; Zhang, D.; Teng, J.; Dannera, A.; et al. On-chip discrimination of orbital angular momentum of light with plasmonic nanoslits. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 2227–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, J.; Chen, X.; Li, T.; Zhu, S. On-chip detection of orbital angular momentum beam by plasmonic nanogratings. Laser Photonics Rev. 2018, 12, 1700331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Feng, F.; Si, G.; Min, C.; Yuan, X.; Somekh, M. On-chip plasmonic spin-Hall nanograting for simultaneously detecting phase and polarization singularities. Light Sci. Appl. 2020, 9, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ren, H.; Wang, X.; Li, C.; He, C.; Wang, Y.; Pan, A.; Maier, S.A. Orbital-angular-momentum-controlled hybrid nanowire circuit. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 6220–6227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chervy, T.; Azzini, S.; Lorchat, E.; Wang, S.; Gorodetski, Y.; Hutchison, J.A.; Berciaud, S.; Ebbesen, T.W.; Genet, C. Room temperature chiral coupling of valley excitons with spin-momentum locked surface plasmons. ACS Photonics 2018, 5, 1281–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sun, L.; Wang, C.Y.; Krasnok, A.; Choi, J.; Shi, J.; Gomez-Diaz, J.S.; Zepeda, A.; Gwo, S.; Shih, C.K.; Alù, A.; et al. Separation of valley excitons in a MoS2 monolayer using a subwavelength asymmetric groove array. Nat. Photonics 2019, 13, 180–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hu, G.; Hong, X.; Wang, K.; Wu, J.; Xu, H.X.; Zhao, W.; Liu, W.; Zhang, S.; Garcia-Vidal, F.; Wang, B.; et al. Coherent steering of nonlinear chiral valley photons with a synthetic Au–WS2 metasurface. Nat. Photonics 2019, 13, 467–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lin, J.; Mueller, J.P.B.; Wang, Q.; Yuan, G.; Antoniou, N.; Yuan, X.C.; Capasso, F. Polarization-controlled tunable directional coupling of surface plasmon polaritons. Science 2013, 340, 331–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ming, Y.; Chen, P.; Ji, W.; Wei, B.Y.; Lee, C.H.; Lin, T.H.; Hu, W.; Lu, Y.Q. Tailoring the photon spin via light–matter interaction in liquid-crystal-based twisting structures. NPJ Quantum Mater. 2021, 7, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Alpeggiani, F.; Gong, S.H.; Kuipers, L. Dispersion and decay rate of exciton-polaritons and radiative modes in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97, 205436. [Google Scholar]
  39. Khurgin, J.B. Two-dimensional exciton–polariton—Light guiding by transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers. Optica 2015, 2, 740–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ming, Y.; Tan, A.H.; Wu, Z.J.; Chen, Z.X.; Xu, F.; Lu, Y.Q. Tailoring entanglement through domain engineering in a lithium niobate waveguide. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shi, B.S.; Wang, F.Y.; Zhai, C.; Guo, G.C. An ultra-bright two-photon source with a type-I bulk periodically poled potassium titanyl phosphate. Opt. Commun. 2008, 281, 3390–3394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kong, L.J.; Li, Y.; Liu, R.; Qi, W.R.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Z.X.; Huang, S.Y.; Si, Y.; Tu, C.; Hu, W.; et al. Complete measurement and multiplexing of orbital angular momentum Bell states. Phys. Rev. A 2019, 100, 023822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bassim, N.; Scott, K.; Giannuzzi, L.A. Recent advances in focused ion beam technology and applications. MRS Bull. 2014, 39, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yan, X.; Wei, H. Strong plasmon–exciton coupling between lithographically defined single metal nanoparticles and monolayer WSe2. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 9708–9716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dibos, A.M.; Zhou, Y.; Jauregui, L.A.; Scuri, G.; Wild, D.S.; High, A.A.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Lukin, M.D.; Kim, P.; et al. Electrically tunable exciton–plasmon coupling in a WSe2 monolayer embedded in a plasmonic crystal cavity. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 3543–3547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Peng, J.; Wu, J.; Li, X.; Zhou, Y.; Yu, Z.; Guo, Y.; Wu, J.; Lin, Y.; Li, Z.; Wu, X.; et al. Very large-sized transition metal dichalcogenides monolayers from fast exfoliation by manual shaking. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 9019–9025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, J.; Zhao, X.; Tan, S.J.R.; Xu, H.; Wu, B.; Liu, B.; Fu, D.; Fu, W.; Geng, D.; Liu, Y.; et al. Chemical vapor deposition of large-size monolayer MoSe2 crystals on molten glass. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 1073–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ko, T.J.; Wang, M.; Yoo, C.; Okogbue, E.; Islam, M.A.; Li, H.; Shawkat, M.S.; Han, S.S.; Oh, K.H.; Jung, Y. Large-area 2D TMD layers for mechanically reconfigurable electronic devices. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2020, 53, 313002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ming, Y.; Wu, Z.J.; Wu, H.; Xu, F.; Lu, Y.Q. Surface plasmon interferometer based on wedge metal waveguide and its sensing applications. IEEE Photonics J. 2012, 4, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, J.; Zhang, L.; Xu, W. Surface plasmon polaritons: Physics and applications. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2012, 45, 113001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ocelic, N.; Hillenbrand, R. Subwavelength-scale tailoring of surface phonon polaritons by focused ion-beam implantation. Nat. Mater. 2004, 3, 606–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ming, Y.; Wu, Z.J.; Tan, A.H.; Hu, X.K.; Xu, F.; Lu, Y.Q. Quantum entanglement based on surface phonon polaritons in condensed matter systems. AIP Adv. 2013, 3, 042122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The schematic of the proposed hybrid metadetector consisting of a TMD monolayer integrated with asymmetric grating consisting of spin Hall nanoantenna arrays. This structure is sandwiched in the surrounding silica. Out-coupling gratings are utilized for signal collection. As an integrated platform, the overall size of the on-chip functional region is in the range of 101~102 μm. The TMD monolayer requires an effective area of a few tens of micrometers, while the spin Hall nanoantennas are on the subwavelength scale. In the thickness direction, the TMD monolayer is atomically thin, whereas the typical thickness of the nanoantennas is 101~102 nm. Compared to previous bulky systems for OAM entanglement analysis, this detector is especially compact.
Figure 1. The schematic of the proposed hybrid metadetector consisting of a TMD monolayer integrated with asymmetric grating consisting of spin Hall nanoantenna arrays. This structure is sandwiched in the surrounding silica. Out-coupling gratings are utilized for signal collection. As an integrated platform, the overall size of the on-chip functional region is in the range of 101~102 μm. The TMD monolayer requires an effective area of a few tens of micrometers, while the spin Hall nanoantennas are on the subwavelength scale. In the thickness direction, the TMD monolayer is atomically thin, whereas the typical thickness of the nanoantennas is 101~102 nm. Compared to previous bulky systems for OAM entanglement analysis, this detector is especially compact.
Sensors 24 04817 g001
Figure 2. (a) The azimuthal k-vector carried by the OAM mode with l = 2 and l = −2. The spatial distribution exhibits circular symmetry. (b) The TMD polaritons excited by an OAM state launched on a single grating. The blue arrows depict the k-vector of the OAM modes. The single grating provides reciprocal vectors in two horizontal directions (green arrows), allowing the OAM modes to be coupled into four directions (black arrows) in this situation. (c) The excitation of TMD polaritons is limited to one side when an OAM state with positive topological charge is launched on an asymmetric grating. Since the upper and lower parts of the grating have distinct reciprocal vectors (green and magenta arrows), they are matched to azimuthal OAM k-vectors in different directions (blue and red arrows). (d) The general effect of decomposing the Bell states of SAM-OAM hybrid entanglement and OAM entanglement. (e) The functional illustration of the metadetector. The Bell states of SAM-OAM hybrid entanglement and OAM entanglement can be transferred into path entanglement for detection.
Figure 2. (a) The azimuthal k-vector carried by the OAM mode with l = 2 and l = −2. The spatial distribution exhibits circular symmetry. (b) The TMD polaritons excited by an OAM state launched on a single grating. The blue arrows depict the k-vector of the OAM modes. The single grating provides reciprocal vectors in two horizontal directions (green arrows), allowing the OAM modes to be coupled into four directions (black arrows) in this situation. (c) The excitation of TMD polaritons is limited to one side when an OAM state with positive topological charge is launched on an asymmetric grating. Since the upper and lower parts of the grating have distinct reciprocal vectors (green and magenta arrows), they are matched to azimuthal OAM k-vectors in different directions (blue and red arrows). (d) The general effect of decomposing the Bell states of SAM-OAM hybrid entanglement and OAM entanglement. (e) The functional illustration of the metadetector. The Bell states of SAM-OAM hybrid entanglement and OAM entanglement can be transferred into path entanglement for detection.
Sensors 24 04817 g002
Figure 3. (a) The lateral geometry of the TMD waveguide section together with the guiding mode profile. (b) The curves of propagation constant β (red curve) and propagation length Lp (blue curve) vary with wavelength.
Figure 3. (a) The lateral geometry of the TMD waveguide section together with the guiding mode profile. (b) The curves of propagation constant β (red curve) and propagation length Lp (blue curve) vary with wavelength.
Sensors 24 04817 g003
Figure 4. The coincidence histogram for the hybrid SAM-OAM Bell state (a) ( | R | 2 + | L | 2 ) / 2 , and OAM Bell states (b) ( | 2 | 2 + | 2 | 2 ) / 2 , (c) ( | 1 | 3 + | 3 | 1 ) / 2 .
Figure 4. The coincidence histogram for the hybrid SAM-OAM Bell state (a) ( | R | 2 + | L | 2 ) / 2 , and OAM Bell states (b) ( | 2 | 2 + | 2 | 2 ) / 2 , (c) ( | 1 | 3 + | 3 | 1 ) / 2 .
Sensors 24 04817 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ming, Y. A Hybrid Metadetector for Measuring Bell States of Optical Angular Momentum Entanglement. Sensors 2024, 24, 4817. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24154817

AMA Style

Ming Y. A Hybrid Metadetector for Measuring Bell States of Optical Angular Momentum Entanglement. Sensors. 2024; 24(15):4817. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24154817

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ming, Yang. 2024. "A Hybrid Metadetector for Measuring Bell States of Optical Angular Momentum Entanglement" Sensors 24, no. 15: 4817. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24154817

APA Style

Ming, Y. (2024). A Hybrid Metadetector for Measuring Bell States of Optical Angular Momentum Entanglement. Sensors, 24(15), 4817. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24154817

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop