Determination of the Content of Heavy Metals in Pyrite Contaminated Soil and Plants
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Experimental Section
2.1 Soil and plant analysis
2.2 Oat production
- Control soil – damaged soil without amendment
- Damaged soil + CaCO3 (40g/kg)
- Damaged soil + CaCO3 (40g/kg) + NPK (300 mg/kg)
- Damaged soil + CaCO3 (40g/kg) + NPK (300 mg/kg) + dung (60g/kg)
- Damaged soil + CaCO3 (40g/kg) + NPK (300 mg/kg) + earthworm cast (20g/kg)
- Damaged soil + CaCO3 (40g/kg) + NPK (300 mg/kg) + straw (20g/kg)
- Damaged soil + CaCO3 (40g/kg) + NPK (300 mg/kg) + coal dust (60g/kg)
- Normal Soil + NPK (300 mg/kg)
3. Results and Discussion
3.1 Particle size distribution and texture
3.2 Soil pH and X-ray analysis
3.3. Soil chemical composition
3.4 Concentration of elements in soil during oat production
3.5 Heavy metals concentration in plant
4. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References and Notes
- Michelutti, B.; Wiseman, M. Environmental Restoration of the Industrial City; Lal, R., Stewart, B.A., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1995; pp. 135–141. [Google Scholar]
- Antonijevic, M.M.; Dimitrijevic, M.D.; Jankovic, Z.D.; Vukanovic, V. Mogucnost zagadjivanja voda i zemljista usled oksidacije pirita, Nasa ekoloska istina, Zbornik radova; 1995; pp. 91–96, (on serbian). [Google Scholar]
- Day, P.R. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part I; Black, C.A., Ed.; American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, 1965; pp. 545–566. [Google Scholar]
- Sumner, M.E. Measurement of soil pH: problems and solutions. Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis 1994, 25(7-8), 859–879. [Google Scholar]
- Walkley, A. A critical examination of a rapid method for determining organic carbon in soils effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents. Soil Science 1947, 63, 254–264. [Google Scholar]
- Bugarski, P. Handbook of analytical chemistry; Institute of copper: Bor, 1997; pp. 123–145. [Google Scholar]
- Cottenie, A.; Camerlynck, R.; Verloo, M.; Dhaese, A. Fractionation and determination of trace elements in plants, soils and sediments. Pure Appl Chem 1979, 52, 45–53. [Google Scholar]
- Jones, J.B. Plant tissue analysis in micronutrients. In Micronutrients in Agriculture, 2nd Edition ed; Mortvedt, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Matula, J. Determination of potassium, magnesium, phosphorus, manganese and cation exchange capacity for fertilizer recommendations used by Czech union of rapeseed growers. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 1996, 27(5-8), 1679–1691. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson, D.B.; Hallberg, K.B. The microbiology of acidic mine waters. Res. Microbiol. 2003, 154, 466–473. [Google Scholar]
- Kloke, A. Orientierungsdaten fur tolerierbare Gesamtgehalte einiger Elemente in Kulturboden. Mitteilungen VDLUFA, 1/III 1980, 9–11. [Google Scholar]
- Chaudhry, F.M.; Loneragan, J.E. Zinc absorption by wheat seedlings. II. Inhibition by hydrogen ions and by micronutrient cations. Soil Sci. Amer. Proc. 1972, 36, 327–331. [Google Scholar]
- Kabata-Pendias, A.; Dudka, S. Baseline data for cadmium and lead in soils and some cereals of Poland. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 1991, 57/58, 723–731. [Google Scholar]
- Wiklander, L.; Vahtras, K. Solubility and uptake of heavy metals from a Swedish soil. Geoderma 1977, 19, 123–129. [Google Scholar]
Depth (cm) | Particle size(mm) | Texture | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coarse sand >0.2 | Fine sand 0.2-0.02 | Silt 0.02-0.002 | Clay <0.002 | ||
0-22 | 2.55 | 69.47 | 21.3 | 6.7 | Loamy sand |
22-36 | 15.4 | 67.3 | 11.7 | 5.7 | Loamy sand |
36-44 | 5.2 | 72.2 | 16.0 | 6.6 | Loamy sand |
44-104 | 6.6 | 57.9 | 22.5 | 13.0 | Sandy loam |
104-129 | 21.1 | 42.2 | 19.1 | 17.6 | Sandy loam |
129-144 | 33.6 | 38.0 | 15.3 | 13.1 | Sandy loam |
Type of soil | pH | ||
---|---|---|---|
Before seeding | 120 days after seeding | ||
1 | Control soil – damaged soil without amendment | 2.07 | 2.16 |
2 | Damaged soil + CaCO3 | 6.35 | 3.01 |
3 | Damaged soil + CaCO3 + NPK | 6.55 | 2.90 |
4 | Damaged soil + CaCO3 + NPK + dung | 6.68 | 3.95 |
5 | Damaged soil + CaCO3 + NPK + earthworm cast | 6.60 | 3.60 |
6 | Damaged soil + CaCO3 + NPK + straw | 6.56 | 4.90 |
7 | Damaged soil + CaCO3 + NPK + coal dust | 6.50 | 4.36 |
8 | Normal soil | 6.90 | 6.95 |
P2O5 Available mg/kg | K2O Available mg/kg | Ca % | Cu Total mg/kg | Cu Available mg/kg | Zn Total mg/kg | Zn Available mg/kg | Pb mg/kg | Fe % | S % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36 | 56 | 2.25 | 433 | 41.2 | 8.87 | 6.6 | 66.9 | 4.65 | 3.45 |
Type of soil | Total Zn (mg/kg) | Total Cu (mg/kg) | Pb (mg/kg) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before seeding | 120 days after seeding | Before seeding | 120 days after seeding | Before seeding | 120 days after seeding | ||
1 | Control soil – damaged soil without amendment | 8.87 | 9.27 | 433.82 | 428.16 | 66.92 | 42.16 |
2 | Damaged soil + CaCO3 | 11.59 | 10.82 | 406.21 | 149.16 | 55.11 | 32.28 |
3 | Damaged soil + CaCO3 + NPK | 12.51 | 11.44 | 384.30 | 140.60 | 64.55 | 35.81 |
4 | Damaged soil + CaCO3 + NPK + dung | 12.54 | 12.36 | 410.80 | 150.11 | 69.28 | 34.63 |
5 | Damaged soil + CaCO3 + NPK + earthworm cast | 19.46 | 15.76 | 389.02 | 137.74 | 64.55 | 40.53 |
6 | Damaged soil + CaCO3 + NPK + straw | 15.29 | 10.20 | 427.49 | 151.06 | 52.74 | 38.17 |
7 | Damaged soil + CaCO3 + NPK + coal dust | 16.38 | 16.99 | 399.07 | 134.84 | 65.78 | 39.36 |
8 | Normal soil | 56.15 | 58.20 | 49.36 | 67.32 | 36.13 | 33.38 |
Type of soil* | Heavy metals (mg/kg) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cu | Zn | Pb | Fe | ||||
stems | grain | stems | grain | stems | grain | ||
2 | Damaged soil + CaCO3 | 116.96 | 0 | 98.60 | 0 | 67.00 | 882.4 |
3 | Damaged soil + CaCO3 + NPK | 157.61 | 52.00 | 70.30 | 50.00 | 66.90 | 1008.8 |
4 | Damaged soil + CaCO3 + NPK + dung | 134.85 | 47.50 | 64.20 | 56.50 | 57.40 | 714.8 |
5 | Damaged soil + CaCO3 + NPK + earthworm cast | 201.08 | 52.50 | 82.80 | 51.50 | 56.40 | 1293.6 |
6 | Damaged soil + CaCO3 + NPK + straw | 200.81 | 57.25 | 87.60 | 42.05 | 48.00 | 665.3 |
7 | Damaged soil + CaCO3 + NPK + coal dust | 172.85 | 45.00 | 91.30 | 43.15 | 48.00 | 636.3 |
8 | Normal soil | 22.6 | 18.50 | 46.20 | 42.30 | 12.60 | 489.1 |
© 2008 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
Share and Cite
Antonijević, M.M.; Marić, M. Determination of the Content of Heavy Metals in Pyrite Contaminated Soil and Plants. Sensors 2008, 8, 5857-5865. https://doi.org/10.3390/s8095857
Antonijević MM, Marić M. Determination of the Content of Heavy Metals in Pyrite Contaminated Soil and Plants. Sensors. 2008; 8(9):5857-5865. https://doi.org/10.3390/s8095857
Chicago/Turabian StyleAntonijević, Milan M., and Miroslava Marić. 2008. "Determination of the Content of Heavy Metals in Pyrite Contaminated Soil and Plants" Sensors 8, no. 9: 5857-5865. https://doi.org/10.3390/s8095857
APA StyleAntonijević, M. M., & Marić, M. (2008). Determination of the Content of Heavy Metals in Pyrite Contaminated Soil and Plants. Sensors, 8(9), 5857-5865. https://doi.org/10.3390/s8095857