Next Article in Journal
New 2,4-bis[(substituted-aminomethyl)phenyl]phenylquinazoline and 2,4-bis[(substituted-aminomethyl)phenyl]phenylquinoline Derivatives: Synthesis and Biological Evaluation as Novel Anticancer Agents by Targeting G-Quadruplex
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis, Antibacterial Effects, and Toxicity of Licochalcone C
Previous Article in Journal
Illuminating Dersimelagon: A Novel Agent in the Treatment of Erythropoietic Protoporphyria and X-Linked Protoporphyria
Previous Article in Special Issue
Curcuminoid Chalcones: Synthesis, Stability, and New Neuroprotective and Sonosensitising Activities
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 17
Issue 1
10.3390/ph17010032
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Chalconesulfonamides: En Route to Proapoptotic Agents with Antiestrogenic Potency

by
Stepan K. Krymov
1,
Diana I. Salnikova
2,
Lyubov G. Dezhenkova
1,
Fedor B. Bogdanov
2,
Alexander A. Korlyukov
3,
Alexander M. Scherbakov
2,4 and
Andrey E. Shchekotikhin
1,*
1
Gause Institute of New Antibiotics, 11 B. Pirogovskaya Street, 119021 Moscow, Russia
2
Department of Experimental Tumor Biology, Blokhin N. N. National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Kashirskoe sh. 24, 115522 Moscow, Russia
3
A. N. Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov Str. 28, 119334 Moscow, Russia
4
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, Prospekt Gagarina 23, 603950 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(1), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17010032
Submission received: 31 October 2023 / Revised: 7 December 2023 / Accepted: 20 December 2023 / Published: 25 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Developments of Chalcones and Their Derivatives in Medicinal Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Breast and other estrogen receptor α-positive cancers tend to develop resistance to existing drugs. Chalcone derivatives possess anticancer activity based on their ability to form covalent bonds with targets acting as Michael acceptors. This study aimed to evaluate the anticancer properties of a series of chalcones (7a–l) with a sulfonamide group attached to the vinyl ketone moiety. Chalconesulfonamides showed a potent antiproliferative effect at low micromolar concentrations against several cancer cell lines, including ERα-positive 4-hydroxytamoxifen-resistant MCF7/HT2. Immunoblotting of samples treated with the lead compound 7e revealed its potent antiestrogenic activity (ERα/GREB1 axis) and induction of PARP cleavage (an apoptosis marker) in breast cancer cells. The obtained compounds represent a promising basis for further development of targeted drugs blocking hormone pathways in cancer cells.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Despite the progress in antiestrogen therapy, achieved through the development of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs, for example, tamoxifen (1)) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs, for example, anastrozole (2), Figure 1), the development of tumor resistance reduces the efficiency of anticancer treatment and decreases survival rates of patients with breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers [1,2,3,4,5]. Therefore, the development of new chemotherapeutic agents with improved efficacy and that are capable of circumventing resistance mechanisms is an important task in pharmacology.
Development of covalent inhibitors is one of the promising directions in drug discovery and therapeutics [6]. Compared to common drugs with noncovalent interactions, covalent inhibitors could have increased efficacy, selectivity, and duration of action of the drug on the target [7]. Exemestane (3, Figure 2) is a covalent AI that is widely used in the treatment of estrogen receptor α (ER α)-positive breast cancer [8]. Unlike other AIs, which are reversible and competitive substrates, exemestane forms a covalent bond with the enzyme, leading to a prolonged and irreversible inhibition of aromatase activity [9]. Exemestane has shown significant benefits in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival rates in several clinical trials for the treatment of breast cancer [10,11]. The high antitumor efficacy of exemestane highlights the potential for the development of covalent inhibitors in the treatment of hormone-receptor-positive cancers [12].
Chalcones are naturally occurring compounds that have drawn the attention of researchers regarding the development of new anticancer agents [13,14]. Chalcone derivatives, such as xanthohumol (4), have been shown to possess potent anticancer activity by acting as Michael acceptors and covalently inhibiting various proteins, including IκB kinase [15] and thioredoxin reductase [16]. Recently, it was shown that the antiestrogenic effects of chalcones may underlie their anticancer activity [17,18]. Thus, the evaluation of new chalcone-based compounds may contribute to the development of new anticancer antiestrogen agents.
Sulfonamides and their derivatives represent another important class of compounds with antiestrogenic activity [19,20,21]. For example, sulfonamides on an oxabicyclo [2.2.1] heptene scaffold (5, Figure 2) are potent antiestrogens with nanomolar antiproliferative potency against breast cancer cells. In addition, other sulfonamides are known inhibitors of carbonic anhydrase IX, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K), and protein kinase BRAF with validated antitumor properties [22,23,24,25].
Taking into account the prospects for the development of chalcones as a privileged scaffold with a covalent mechanism with anticancer action and the antiestrogenic activity of sulfonamides, our research aims to design and evaluate the anticancer properties of novel chalconesulfonamides. According to a survey of the literature, the synthesis and biological properties of chalconesulfonamides have not been studied yet. Thereby, using Knoevenagel condensation of 2-oxo-2-phenylethanesulfonamide (6), we synthesized a series of chalconesulfonamides 7 and estimated their antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity and action on signaling pathways (Figure 3).

2. Results

2.1. Chemistry

The generation of nucleophilic reagents by ionization of C-H and N-H groups is a common method in organic synthesis. Metalation of methanesulfonamide derivatives allows for the synthesis of aliphatic sulfonamides with complex structures that are difficult to obtain with other methods [26,27,28]. Therefore, we use the metalation of methanesulfonamide as a useful approach to obtain the key intermediate 6 for the synthesis of the target compound 7.
To obtain methanesulfonamide 8 for the subsequent C-H activation, methanesulfonyl chloride was reacted with tert-butylamine. (Scheme 1). In the second step, sulfonamide 8 was metalated with LDA and reacted with benzaldehyde to give 2-hydroxyethanesulfonamide 9 in good yield [26].
In the next step, ketone 6 was synthesized in good yield via Jones oxidation of β-hydroxysulfonamide 9, using a chromium oxide (VI) solution in the presence of dilute sulfuric acid in acetone (Scheme 2) [29]. Cr (VI) reagents are often the preferred method due to their availability and scalability [30,31]. As we required gram quantities of ketone 6 for this and future research, we chose not to use the more expensive, less stable, and less available oxidizing reagents such as Swern oxidation reagent or Dess–Martin periodinane.
To obtain the target chalconesulfonamide 7, the Knoevenagel condensation of 2-oxo-2-phenylethanesulfonamide 6 with arene or heteroarene carbaldehydes was studied. The use of classical conditions [32] with catalytic amounts of piperidine acetate did not lead to the formation of the adduct 10. It was observed that the reaction with benzoylmethanesulfonamide 6 required additional equivalents of piperidine acetate, apparently due to the formation of dianion. Therefore, condensation of the activated methylene group of sulfonamide 6 with arene or heteroarene carbaldehydes in toluene at 70 °C afforded N-tert-butyl-derivatives of chalcone-2-sulfonamides 10a–l in moderate to good yields (Scheme 3). It is noteworthy that the reaction proceeds with good stereoselectivity, leading to the formation of one of the E/Z isomers.
In the final step, cleavage of the N-tert-butyl group of the adducts 10a–l via treatment with TFA in dichloromethane afforded the target series of chalcone-2-sulfonamides 7a–j,l in high yields (88–94%). It is worth mentioning that when the tert-butyl protecting group is removed from the 1-H-indole derivative 10k, there are side reactions involving dimerisation and polymerisation that result in a lower yield (43%) of the desired sulfonamide 7k. Therefore, it may be worth considering obtaining compound 7k via alkaline hydrolysis of the acetyl derivative 7l. The structures of all derivatives 7a–l were confirmed with 1H and 13C NMR spectra and HRMS data. The purity of compounds 7a–l (>95%) was confirmed with HPLC. Analysis of the NMR spectra confirmed the structure of the proposed chalconesulfonamides 10 and 7: the starting 2-oxo-2-phenylethanesulfonamide 6 contains a singlet signal of a CH2-group with a chemical shift value of 4.66 ppm, which is absent in the spectrum of compound 10a. Instead, a singlet signal of a CH-group occurs in the 7.91–7.88 region, which corresponds to the signal of the arylmethylidene fragment. Finally, in the spectra of compound 7a, the signals corresponding to tert-butyl and NH-groups are absent, but there is a singlet signal of the NH2 sulfonamide moiety with a chemical shift value close to 5.12 ppm.
The 1H NMR and 13C spectra do not allow for the E/Z configuration of the synthesized isomer of compound 7a to be determined. Therefore, to establish the stereochemistry of compound 7a, we used X-ray analysis that showed that the obtained 3-oxo-1,3-diphenylprop-1-en-2-sulfonamide (7a) is the E-isomer (Figure 4). The present X-ray crystallography (experimental details are presented in ESI) result is in agreement with previously published data on the structure of related compounds [33]. The structure of 7a crystallized in noncentrosymmetric space group Cc and contains four molecules in a unique part of the unit cell. The disposition of substituents at the double C1–C2 bond (mean length is 1.341 Å) that corresponds to E-configuration is caused due to two possible reasons. The first is bulky phenyl and sulfonamide groups and the second one is hydrogen bonding of sulfonamide groups in crystal. Indeed, the molecules of 7a form two types of centrosymmetric H-bonded dimers. In turn, H-bonded dimers are assembled into infinite chains parallel to the b-side of the unit cell. The experimental details and figures of the dimers and crystal packing can be found in the Supplementary Materials (Sections: X-ray study of 7a and Hydrogen bonding of 7a, Tables S1 and S2, Figures S1–S3).
Furthermore, in order to determine the role of the (hetero)arylmethylidene moiety in the antiproliferative activity of sulfonamide 7, we synthesized analog 11 without the chalcone moiety (Scheme 4).

2.2. Antiproliferative Effects and Selectivity

Screening of the antiproliferative properties of the synthesized 2-oxo-2-phenylethane sulfonamide 11 and chalconesulfonamides 7a–l was performed with an MTT test on breast cancer cells MCF7, hormone-resistant MCF7/HT2 subline [34], leukemia cell line K-562, resistant subline K-562/4 with Pgp [35,36], and colon cancer cells HCT-116. The results regarding antiproliferative activity are summarized in Table 1.
The results in Table 1 demonstrate that the synthesized chalconesulfonamides 7a–l suppress the growth of tumor cells at low micromolar concentrations. SAR analysis among compounds 7a and 11 clearly highlights the significance of the chalcone moiety for the antiproliferative potency of these derivatives. A comparison of the unsubstituted chalconesulfonamide 7a with monofluorophenyl derivatives 7b,c,d revealed that the introduction and position of the fluorine atom have no impact on the antiproliferative activity. However, the introduction of a chlorine atom (7e) or trifluoromethyl group (7f) at the para-position of the arylidene moiety enhances the antiproliferative activity against all tumor cells, especially against the resistant K-562/4 line that expresses P-glycoprotein. The introduction of hydroxy and methoxy (7g,h) groups results in reduced activity against all cancer cells. This suggests a correlation between antiproliferative activity, LogP, and the donor–acceptor characteristics of the substituents.
The IC50 values for furan 7i, pyridine 7j, and the indole 7k,l derivatives indicate that the inclusion of heterocycles in the chalcone structure results in a decrease in activity. Of note, among the indole derivatives, the N-acyl derivative 7l exhibits higher activity than the unsubstituted 7k. This reinforces the suggestion that LogP has a significant impact on the antiproliferative activity of synthesized sulfonamides 7a–l. Overall, chalconesulfonamides 7a–l display low micromolar inhibitory concentrations against leukemia, colon, and breast cancer cells. Furthermore, they retain a potent antiproliferative effect on hormone-resistant (MCF7/HT2) and Pgp-positive (K-562/4) sublines.
Evaluation of cytotoxicity and selectivity is an important step in drug development. Normal cell lines are used for such experiments—this avoids the need for animal experiments in the early stages of development. Human fibroblasts are chosen as a model of normal cells as previously described [37,38]. MCF7 breast cancer cells and fibroblasts were treated with compounds 7e and 11 for 72 h and the cell viability was evaluated with the resazurin test [39,40,41].
The IC50 values obtained in this assay were consistent with the data that were obtained with the MTT test (Table 1). Thus, compound 7e, at a concentration of about 2.5 μM, caused 50% of tumor cells to die, while fibroblasts were less sensitive to its effects. The selectivity data are presented in Table 2.

2.3. Signaling Pathways Regulated by Chalconesulfonamide 7e

The chalconesulfonamide 7e, which showed activity against hormone-sensitive and hormone-resistant cells at a micromolar range of concentration, was selected for in-depth biological studies. MCF7 and MCF7/HT2 breast cancer cells were treated with compound 7e for 24 h, and then samples were prepared for immunoblotting. The selected breast cancer cell lines differ primarily in the activity of the steroid hormone receptor signaling pathways. Prolonged incubation with the antiestrogen HT resulted in partial inhibition of ERα activity [34], limiting further application of such treatment. The compound 7e caused a decrease in ERα expression in MCF7 cells; the selected compound at a concentration of 2.5 μM almost completely blocked ERα expression (Figure 5). The effect of compound 7e on ERα expression in MCF7/HT2 cells was also observed, but it was less significant. Sulfonamides are a promising class for the development of selective antiestrogens. While the more polar secondary sulfonamides were weak ligands, some of the tertiary sulfonamides had very good estrogen receptor α binding affinity [19,20].
ERα activity in cancer cells can be assessed by analyzing the expression of genes that are under the control of estrogens [42]. Such genes include GREB1; its expression is regulated by estrogens and antiestrogens (SERMs or SERDs). A dose-dependent decrease in GREB1 expression was found in MCF7 cells that express this protein, suggesting an antiestrogenic effect of compound 7e. Compound 11, selected as a negative control in the experiments, had no effect on ERα and GREB1 expression. Hormone dependence of MCF7 cells is supported mainly through the ERα signaling pathway [43], and AR expression is also detected in these cells—this steroid hormone receptor is considered as a new target in breast cancer cells [44,45]. Chalconesulfonamide 7e induced a dose-dependent decrease in AR expression in MCF7 cells. Interestingly, AR expression was not altered in hormone-resistant cells. This may indicate the resistance mechanisms that are realized in MCF7/HT2 cells. In subsequent experiments, proteins that regulate the cell cycle and support cell survival were analyzed. Cyclin D1 is among the key regulators of the cell cycle and its expression increases significantly when cells are exposed to growth factors [46,47]. A number of epidemiologic studies suggest that cyclin D1 expression is increased in 50% of breast cancers [48]. In both parental and hormone-resistant cells, chalconesulfonamide 7e decreased the expression of cyclin D1, while compound 11 did not alter its expression. MCF7 cells treated with chalconesulfonamide 7e revealed decreased expression of CDK4. No changes in CDK4 expression were detected in MCF7/HT2 treated with 7e. This may indicate mechanisms of partial resistance of MCF7/HT2 cells to 7e, as well as ways to search for new drug combinations.
The PI3K/AKT axis is one of the most frequently activated intracellular pathways, which is commonly involved as a balancer in cancer [49]. AKT kinase is activated when the cell is exposed to various growth stimuli [50]. This kinase plays a role in increasing the survival of tumor cells and stimulating their proliferation. A decrease in phosphorylated AKT was found in parental and hormone-resistant cells treated with 7e. Compound 11 had no effect on AKT activity. Two markers of cell death, PARP and Bcl-2, were evaluated in subsequent experiments. Induction of programmed cell death causes activation of a number of enzymes, the final step in such signaling is the cleavage of PARP, and accumulation of cleaved PARP is indicative of apoptotic cell death. Sulfonamide 11 did not induce accumulation of cleaved PARP. In MCF7 and MCF7/HT2 cells treated with 7e, a significant amount of cleaved PARP was detected. The accumulation of cleaved PARP was accompanied by a decrease in the expression of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2. As in the case of PARP, compound 11, selected as a negative control, did not affect the expression of the marker. All described observations suggest a complex effect of chalconesulfonamide 7e on the signaling pathways of breast cancer cells. The selected sulfonamide regulates steroid receptor signaling, expression of cell cycle regulators, and apoptosis proteins. The detected effects are largely realized in MCF7 hormone-dependent breast cancer cells; hormone-resistant cells are also sensitive to chalconesulfonamide 7e, but some of the investigated proteins are not regulated by the selected compound. These data may provide a good basis for searching synergistic combinations of lead compound 7e with other antitumor drugs for the development of new therapeutic approaches for hormone-resistant breast cancer.

3. Discussion

To date, C-H activation of the methylene group of 2-oxo-2-phenylethanesulfonamide (6), an example of β-ketosulfonamides, is presented by a reaction with isatoic anhydride and electrophilic fluorination [51,52]. In this study, we explored the possibility of using compound 6 as a methylene component in the Knoevenagel reaction to obtain chalconesulfonamide 7. Thus, the reaction of benzoylmethanesulfonamide 6 with aldehydes afforded previously unknown Michael acceptors containing a sulfonamide group. Using various aromatic and heteroaromatic aldehydes, twelve examples of E-chalconesulfonamides 7a–l were synthesized.
Screening of the antiproliferative activity showed that the chalcone scaffold was responsible for the inhibition of solid and hematological cancer cells at low micromolar concentrations. According to the SAR results, the antiproliferative activity of chalconesulfonamides 7a–l increases with higher lipophilicity of the arylmethyledene fragment. The most active derivatives, specifically para-chloro- and para-trifluoromethylphenyl derivatives (7e,f), have shown IC50 values ranging from 1.3 to 5.1 µM against breast, colon, and leukemia cancer cells. When tested against resistant breast and leukemia cells, these compounds exhibited IC50 values between 2.5 and 3.8 µM. Selected for in-depth biological studies, 7e reduces the expression of estrogen and androgen receptors, key factors in the development and resistance of luminal breast cancer. The observed proapoptotic activity and effects on cell cycle regulators may provide an explanation for the antiproliferative activity of chalconesulfonamides against colon cancer and leukemia cells. The evaluation of the cytotoxicity of the lead compound 7e on fibroblasts demonstrated almost a 2-fold selectivity against MCF7 cancer cells, providing a basis for further research on chalconesulfonamides as anticancer agents.
The comparison of the biological properties of synthesized chalconesulfonamides 7a–l with other chalcone derivatives indicates that chalconesulfonamides exhibit similar or greater antiproliferative activity [53,54]. Previously, our colleagues synthesized chalcone analogues based on steroidal benzylidenes. These compounds and chalconesulfonamides demonstrated similar IC50 values against MCF7. Studying the mechanism of action revealed that steroidal benzylidenes are able to cause both ERα inhibition and down regulation [55]. However, the discovered chalconesulfonamide 7e required a 7-fold lower concentration in order to decrease the expression of ERα. This points out that the mechanism of action of chalconesulfonamide 7e against hormone-positive cancer cells is based on an antiestrogenic and proapoptotic effect.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Synthesis

NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian VXR-400 instrument (Varian Inc, Palo Alto, CA, USA) operated at 400 MHz (1H NMR) and 100 MHz (13C NMR). Chemical shifts were measured in DMSO-d6 and CDCl3 using tetramethylsilane as an internal standard. Analytical TLC was performed on Silica Gel F254 plates (Merck, Boston, MA, USA), using column chromatography with a SilicaGel Merck 60. Melting points were determined using a Buchi SMP-20 apparatus (Flawil, Switzerland) and were uncorrected. High-resolution mass spectra were recorded with electron spray ionization on a Bruker Daltonics microOTOF-QII instrument (Billerica, MA, USA). HPLC was performed using a Shimadzu Class-VP V6.12SP1 (Kyoto, Japan) system with a UV-vis detector: column Kromasil 100-5-C18 4.6 × 250 mm and flow—1 mL/min; samples were dissolved in MeCN. All solvents, chemicals, and reagents were obtained commercially and used without purification. The purity of final compounds 7a–m was ≥95% as determined with HPLC analysis.
The N-(tert-butyl)methanesulfonamide (8) and N-(tert-butyl)-2-hydroxy-2-phenylethane-1-sulfonamide (9) were synthesized as described in [26].
  • N-(tert-Butyl)-2-oxo-2-phenylethane-1-sulfonamide (6)
To a stirring solution of N-(tert-butyl)-2-hydroxy-2-phenylethane-1-sulfonamide (9 [26], 5.6 g, and 22.0 mmol) in acetone (30.0 mL), a solution of CrO3 (3.0 g and 30.0 mmol) and concentrated H2SO4 (3.0 mL) in water (20 mL) at 0–5 °C under argon was added. The cooling bath was removed, and the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was diluted with cold water (80 mL) and extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 20 mL); the organic fractions were combined, washed with 5% NaHCO3, water, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified with flash column chromatography (silica gel, hexane—EtOAc 1:1). The yield was 4.7 g (85%) of colorless crystals. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.98 (dd, J1 = 7.8, J2 =1.7 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.63 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.50 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 4.84 (s, 1H, NH), 4.66 (s, 2H, CH2), and 1.41 (s, 9H, 3CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 190.3, 135.7, 134.5, 128.9 (2C), 128.8 (2C), 61.1, 55.2, and 30.1 (3C). HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + Na]+: calculated for C12H17NNaO3S 278.0827, found 278.0864.
  • (E)-N-(tert-Butyl)-3-oxo-1,3-diphenylprop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (10a)
To a stirring solution of N-(tert-butyl)-2-oxo-2-phenylethan-1-sulfonamide (6, 150 mg, and 0.60 mmol) in toluene (5.0 mL), piperidine (145.0 μL and 1.50 mmol), acetic acid (70.0 μL and 1.20 mmol), and benzaldehyde (76.0 μL and 1.0 mmol) were added at room temperature and heated to 70 °C for 6 h. Upon completion of the reaction, the mixture was cooled, diluted with ethyl acetate (50 mL), washed with 5% aqueous HCl (15 mL) and water (15 mL), dried over sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified with column chromatography (hexane—EtOAc (1:1)). The yield was 93 mg (46%) of colorless powder. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.91–7.88 (m, 3H, 2Ar, CH), 7.46 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.31 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.27-7.17 (m, 5H, Ar), 4.65 (s, 1H, NH), and 1.44 (s, 9H, 3CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.6, 139.7, 138.8, 135.3, 134.3, 132.0, 130.4, 129.8 (2C), 129.8 (2C), 128.8 (2C), 128.7 (2C), 55.4, and 29.9 (3C). HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+: calculated for C19H22NO3S 344.1315, found 344.1333.
  • (E)-N-(tert-Butyl)-1-(2-fluorophenyl)-3-oxo-3-phenylprop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (10b)
This compound was prepared from 6 and 2-fluorobenzaldehyde as described for 10a. The yield was 119 mg (55%) of colorless powder. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.06 (s, 1H, CH), 7.85 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.45 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.31 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.24–7.17 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.09 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 6.95 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 6.88 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 4.72 (s, 1H, NH), and 1.44 (s, 9H, 3CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.1, 160.5, (d, J = 253.4 Hz, C-F), 141.5, 135.3, 134.3, 132.4 (d, J = 8.7 Hz), 131.9 (d, J = 2.7 Hz), 130.1, 129.7 (2C), 128.6 (2C), 124.3 (d, J = 2.7 Hz), 120.4 (d, J = 12.6 Hz, C-F), 115.9 (d, J = 21.7 Hz, C-F), 55.5, and 29.9 (3C). HRMS (ESI) (m/z) [M + H]+: calculated for C19H21FNO3S 362.1221, found 362.1238.
  • (E)-N-(tert-Butyl)-1-(3-fluorophenyl)-3-oxo-3-phenylprop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (10c)
This compound was prepared from 6 and 3-fluorobenzaldehyde as described for 10a. The yield was 126 mg (58%) of colorless powder. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.89 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.82 (s, 1H, CH), 7.49 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.34 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.20–7.12 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.01 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, Ar), 6.94–6.89 (m, 2H, Ar), 4.64 (s, 1H, NH), and 1.43 (s, 9H, 3CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.2, 162.5, (d, J = 248.2 Hz, C-F), 141.2, 137.1, 135.2, 134.5, 134.1 (d, J = 8.4 Hz), 130.4 (d, J = 8.4 Hz), 129.8 (2C), 128.8 (2C), 125.4 (d, J = 3.3 Hz), 117.4 (d, J = 21.6 Hz), 116.2 (d, J = 21.6 Hz), 55.5, and 29.9 (3C). HRMS (ESI) (m/z) [M + H]+: calculated for C19H21FNO3S 362.1221, found 362.1264.
  • (E)-N-(tert-Butyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-oxo-3-phenylprop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (10d)
This compound was prepared from 6 and 4-fluorobenzaldehyde as described for 10a. The yield was 132 mg (61%) of colorless powder. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.89 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.84 (s, 1H, CH), 7.49 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.33 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.21 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, Ar), 6.88 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, Ar), 4.63 (s, 1H, NH), and 1.43 (s, 9H, 3CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.5, 163.7 (d, J = 253.8 Hz, C-F), 139.6, 137.4, 135.2, 134.5, 131.8 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2C), 129.8 (2C) 128.8 (2C), 128.2 (d, J = 3.2 Hz), 116.1 (d, J = 22.7 Hz, 2C), 55.4, and 29.9 (3C). HRMS (ESI) (m/z) [M − H]−: calculated for C19H19FNO3S 360.1075, found 360.0943.
  • (E)-N-(tert-Butyl)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-oxo-3-phenylprop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (10e)
This compound was prepared from 6 and 4-chlorobenzaldehyde as described for 10a. The yield was 113 mg (51%) of colorless powder. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.89 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.81 (s, 1H, CH), 7.50 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.34 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.19–7.14 (m, 4H, Ar), 4.63 (s, 1H, NH), and 1.42 (s, 9H, 3CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.3, 140.3, 137.1, 136.6, 135.1, 134.6, 130.9 (2C), 130.5, 129.8 (2C), 129.1(2C), 128.8 (2C), 55.5, and 29.9 (3C). HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+: calculated for C19H21ClNO3S 378.0925, found 378.0897.
  • (E)-N-(tert-Butyl)-3-oxo-3-phenyl-1-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)prop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (10f)
This compound was prepared from 6 and 4-(trifluoromethyl)benzaldehyde as described for 10a. The yield was 152 mg (63%) of colorless powder. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.90 (s, 1H, CH), 7.88 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.50 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.45 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.37–7.31 (m, 4H, Ar), 4.65 (s, 1H, NH), and 1.43 (s, 9H, 3CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.0, 142.3, 136.5, 135.5, 135.0, 134.7, 131.8 (q, J = 32.4 Hz, C-CF3), 129.9 (2C), 129.8 (2C), 128.9 (2C), 125.7 (2C), 123.4 (q, J = 278.1 Hz, CF3), 55.6, and 29.9 (3C). HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+: calculated for C20H21F3NO3S 412.1189, found 412.1186.
  • (E)-N-(tert-Butyl)-1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-3-oxo-3-phenylprop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (10g)
This compound was prepared from 6 and 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde as described for 10a. The yield was 104 mg (48%) of colorless powder. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.88 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.80 (s, 1H, CH), 7.47 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.31 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.08 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, Ar), 6.61 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, Ar), 5.80 (s, 1H, OH), 4.62 (s, 1H, NH), and 1.40 (s, 9H, 3CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 194.0, 158.0, 139.0, 136.6, 135.4, 134.3, 132.1 (2C), 129.9 (2C), 128.7 (2C), 124.3, 115.9 (2C), 55.4, and 29.9 (3C). HRMS (ESI) (m/z) [M + H]+: calculated for C19H22NO4S 360.1264, found 360.1284.
  • (E)-N-(tert-Butyl)-1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-3-oxo-3-phenylprop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (10h)
This compound was prepared from 6 and 4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde as described for 10a. The yield was 98 mg (42%) of colorless powder. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.95 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.78 (s, 1H, CH), 7.50 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.35 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 6.85 (dd, J1 = 8.2, J2 =1.6 Hz, 2H, Ar), 6.76 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, Ar), 6.63 (s, 1H, Ar), 5.82 (s, 1H, OH), 4.62 (s, 1H, NH), 3.58 (s, 3H, CH3), and 1.42 (s, 9H, 3CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 194.0, 148.1, 146.3, 139.0, 136.7, 135.6, 134.4, 129.8 (2C), 128.9 (2C), 125.4, 124.1, 114.7, 111.7, 55.7, 55.2, and 29.9 (3C). HRMS (ESI) (m/z) [M – H]−: calculated for C20H24NO5S 388.1224, found 388.1022.
  • (E)-N-(tert-Butyl)-1-(furan-2-yl)-3-oxo-3-phenylprop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (10i).
This compound was prepared from 6 and furan-2-carbaldehyde as described for 10a. The yield was 121 mg (62%) of colorless powder. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.97 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.57–7.51 (m, 2H, CH, Ar), 7.41 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.17 (s, 1H, Ar), 6.60 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H, Ar), 6.35–6.31 (m, 1H, Ar), 4.56 (s, 1H, NH), and 1.40 (s, 9H, 3CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 192.5, 147.7, 146.2, 136.4, 135.9, 134.0, 129.6 (2C), 128.6 (2C), 124.7, 117.7, 112.4, 55.4, and 29.9 (3C). HRMS (ESI) m/z [M − H]−: calculated for C17H18NO4S 332.0962, found 332.0811.
  • (E)-N-(tert-Butyl)-3-oxo-3-phenyl-1-(pyridin-4-yl)prop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (10j)
This compound was prepared from 6 and pyridine-4-carbaldehyde as described for 10a. The yield was 109 mg (54%) of colorless powder. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.45 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.86 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.75 (s, 1H, CH), 7.50 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.34 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.07 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H, Ar), 4.82 (s, 1H, NH), and 1.43 (s, 9H, 3CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 192.5, 150.3 (2C), 144.5, 139.5, 135.0, 134.9, 134.8, 129.8 (2C), 128.9 (2C), 123.0 (2C), 55.7, and 29.9 (3C). HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+: calculated for C18H21N2O3S 345.1267, found 345.1294.
  • (E)-N-(tert-Butyl)-1-(1H-indol-3-yl)-3-oxo-3-phenylprop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (10k)
This compound was prepared from 6 and 1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde as described for 10a. The yield was 99 mg (43%) of yellowish powder. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.77 (br s, 1H, NH), 8.26 (s, 1H, CH), 8.00 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.69–7.65 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.51 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.32 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.29–7.19 (m, 3H, Ar), 6.89 (d, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H, Ar), 4.76 (s, 1H, NH), and 1.43 (s, 9H, 3CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.4, 137.5, 136.4, 134.3, 132.6, 130.1 (2C), 129.2 (2C), 128.9, 128.6, 128.2, 123.4, 122.0, 118.4, 111.9, 109.5. 55.1, and 29.9 (3C). HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+: calculated for C21H23N2O3S 383.1428, found 383.1453.
  • (E)-1-(1-Acetyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-N-(tert-butyl)-3-oxo-3-phenylprop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (10l)
This compound was prepared from 6 and 1-acetyl-1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde as described for 10a. The yield was 116 mg (55%) of colorless powder. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.33 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 8.12 (s, 1H, CH), 8.06 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.69 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.58 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.47–7.37 (m, 4H, Ar), 7.05 (s, 1H, Ar), 4.62 (s, 1H, NH), 2.22 (s, 3H, CH3), and 1.43 (s, 9H, 3CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 192.2, 168.6 139.3, 136.8, 136.4, 135.7, 129.8 (2C), 129.4 (2C), 128.7, 127.8, 127.3, 126.7, 124.8, 118.6, 116.6, 112.8, 55.5, 29.9 (3C), and 23.6. HRMS (ESI) [M + H]+: calculated for C23H25N2O4S 425.1530 found 425.1546.
  • (E)-3-Oxo-1,3-diphenylprop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (7a)
To a stirring solution of (E)-N-(tert-butyl)-3-oxo-1,3-diphenylprop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (10a, 80 mg, 0.20 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (4.0 mL), TFA (1.0 mL) was added at room temperature. The resulting mixture was stirred for 4 h. Upon completion, the solution was concentrated in vacuo, diluted with toluene (5 mL), and concentrated in vacuo again. The residue was crystallized from a mixture of CHCl3-hexane. The yield was 60 mg (90%) of colorless powder, mp 140–142 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.96 (s, 1H, CH), 7.88 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.48 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.32 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.25–7.15 (m, 5H, Ar), and 5.12 (s, 2H, NH2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.7, 139.3, 138.6, 134.9, 134.7, 131.4, 130.8, 130.1 (2C), 129.9 (2C), and 128.8 (4C). HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + Na]+: calculated for C15H13NNaO3S 310.0514, found 310.0520. HPLC (LW= 260 nm, A—H3PO4 (0.01 M) pH = 2.6, B—MeCN; gradient B 40→90%, 30 min): tR = 12.2 min, purity 99%.
  • (E)-1-(2-Fluorophenyl)-3-oxo-3-phenylprop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (7b)
This compound was prepared from 10b as described for 7a. The yield was 63 mg (91%) of colorless powder, 143–145 mp °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.13 (s, 1H, CH), 7.84 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.47 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.31 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.25–7.17 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.09 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, Ar), 6.94 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 6.88 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), and 4.18 (s, 2H, NH2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.0, 160.5, (d, J = 252.7 Hz, C-F), 140.3, 134.9, 134.6, 132.8 (d, J = 8.8 Hz), 132.3 (d, J = 2.9 Hz), 130.5, 129.7 (2C), 128.7 (2C), 124.3 (d, J = 2.9 Hz), 119.9 (d, J = 12.6 Hz), and 115.9 (d, J = 22.8 Hz). HRMS (ESI) (m/z) [M – H]−: calculated for C15H11FNO3S 304.0449, found 304.0297. HPLC (LW= 260 nm, A—H3PO4 (0.01 M) pH = 2.6, B—MeCN; gradient B 40→90%, 30 min): tR = 12.2 min, purity 96%.
  • (E)-1-(3-Fluorophenyl)-3-oxo-3-phenylprop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (7c)
This compound was prepared from 10c as described for 7a. The yield was 62 mg (90%) of colorless powder, mp 110–112 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.88 (s, 1H, CH), 7.86 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.49 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.33 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.19–7.10 (m, 1H, Ar), 6.98 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, Ar), 6.96–6.86 (m, 2H, Ar), and 5.27 (s, 2H, NH2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.3, 162.4 (d, J = 253.8 Hz, C-F), 140.0, 137.6, 134.9, 134.7, 133.4 (d, J = 7.8 Hz), 130.5 (d, J = 7.8 Hz), 129.9 (2C), 128.9 (2C), 125.8 (d, J = 2.8 Hz), 117.7 (d, J = 22.1 Hz), and 116.5 (d, J = 22.1 Hz). HRMS (ESI) (m/z) [M − H]−: calculated for C15H11FNO3S 304.0449, found 304.0485. HPLC (LW= 260 nm, A—H3PO4 (0.01 M) pH = 2.6, B—MeCN; gradient B 40→90%, 30 min): tR = 12.7 min, purity 99%.
  • (E)-1-(4-Fluorophenyl)-3-oxo-3-phenylprop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (7d)
This compound was prepared from 10d as described for 7a. The yield was 64 mg (91%) of colorless powder, mp 191–193 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.92 (s, 1H, CH), 7.88 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.52 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.35 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.24–7.19 (m, 2H, Ar), 6.88 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), and 5.09 (s, 2H, NH2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 188.8, 159.2 (d, J = 253.6 Hz, C-F), 133.7, 133.2, 130.1, 130.0, 127.5 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2C), 125.1 (2C), 124.2 (2C), 122.8 (d, J = 3.2 Hz), and 111.4 (d, J = 22.5 Hz, 2C). HRMS (ESI) (m/z) [M − H]−: calculated for C15H11FNO3S 304.0449, found 304.0450. HPLC (LW= 260 nm, A—H3PO4 (0.01 M) pH=2.6, B—MeCN; gradient B 40→90%, 30 min): tR = 12.6 min, purity 98%.
  • (E)-1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3-oxo-3-phenylprop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (7e)
This compound was prepared from 10e as described for 7a. The yield was 90 mg (92%) of colorless powder, mp 171–173 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.92–7.85 (m, 3H, CH, 2Ar), 7.52 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.35 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.18–7.13 (m, 4H, Ar), and 5.12 (s, 2H, NH2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.4, 139.2, 137.6, 137.1, 134.9, 134.7, 131.2 (2C), 129.9 (2C), 129.4, 129.1 (2C), and 129.0 (2C). HRMS (ESI) m/z [M − H]−: calculated for C15H11ClNO3S 320.0154, found 320.0046. HPLC (LW= 260 nm, A—H3PO4 (0.01 M) pH=2.6, B—MeCN; gradient B 40→90%, 30 min): tR = 15.4 min, purity 99%.
  • (E)-3-Oxo-3-phenyl-1-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)prop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (7f)
This compound was prepared from 10f as described for 7a. The yield was 97 mg (94%) of colorless powder, mp 95–97 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.94 (s, 1H, CH), 7.86 (dd, J1 = 8.2, J2 = 1.3 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.51 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.43 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.37–7.31 (m, 4H, Ar), and 5.18 (s, 2H, NH2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.1, 141.2, 137.0, 135.1, 134.8, 134.6, 133.6 (q, J = 33.5 Hz, C-CF3), 130.1 (2C), 129.9 (2C), 129.0 (2C), 125.7 (2C), and 124.0 (q, J = 280.3 Hz, CF3). HRMS (ESI) m/z [M − H]−: calculated for C16H11F3NO3S 354.0417, found 354.0376. HPLC (LW = 260 nm, A—H3PO4 (0.01 M) pH=2.6, B—MeCN; gradient B 40→90%, 30 min): tR = 16.4 min, purity 98%.
  • (E)-1-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-3-oxo-3-phenylprop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (7g)
This compound was prepared from 10g as described for 7a. The yield was 64 mg (89%) of colorless powder, mp 193–195 °C decomp. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 10.02 (s, 1H, OH), 7.89 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.64–7.57 (m, 2H, CH, Ar), 7.47 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.40 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.11 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), and 6.63 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, Ar). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 193.4, 160.0, 138.5, 136.5, 135.9, 134.8, 132.1 (2C), 129.9 (2C), 129.4 (2C), 123.0, and 116.3 (2C). HRMS (ESI) (m/z) [M + H]+: calculated for C15H14NO4S 304.0638, found 304.0643. HPLC (LW= 260 nm, A—H3PO4 (0.01 M) pH = 2.6, B—MeCN; gradient B 40→90%, 30 min): tR = 12.4 min, purity 100%.
  • (E)-1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-3-oxo-3-phenylprop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (7h)
This compound was prepared from 10h as described for 7a. The yield was 61 mg (88%) of colorless powder, mp 223–225 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.58 (s, 1H, OH), 7.73 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.54 (s, 1H, CH), 7.30 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.15 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 6.56 (dd, J1 = 8.2, J2 = 1.9 Hz, 1H, Ar), 6.49 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H, Ar), 6.38 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H, Ar), and 6.19 (s, 2H, NH2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.5, 149.1, 147.2, 138.3, 136.3, 135.4, 134.2, 129.6 (2C), 128.7 (2C), 125.2, 122.9, 115.4, 112.5, and 55.3. HRMS (ESI) (m/z) [M + H]+: calculated for C16H16NO5S 334.0744, found 334.0739. HPLC (LW = 260 nm, A—H3PO4 (0.01 M) pH = 2.6, B—MeCN; gradient B 40/90%, 30 min): tR = 7.1 min, purity 100%.
  • (E)-1-(Furan-2-yl)-3-oxo-3-phenylprop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (7i)
This compound was prepared from 10i as described for 7a. The yield was 89 mg (89%) of colorless powder, mp 135–137 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.96 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.62 (s, 1H, CH), 7.55 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.41 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.17 (s, 1H, Ar), 6.65 (d, J = 3.1 Hz, 1H, Ar), 6.36–6.31 (m, 1H, Ar), and 5.12 (s, 2H, NH2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 192.7, 147.2, 146.6, 136.1, 134.6, 134.3, 129.7 (2C), 128.7 (2C), 125.0, 118.9, and 112.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+: calculated for C13H12NO4S 278.0482, found 278.0529. HPLC (LW = 260 nm, A—H3PO4 (0.01 M) pH = 2.6, B—MeCN; gradient B 40→90%, 30 min): tR = 9.6 min, purity 99%.
  • (E)-3-Oxo-3-phenyl-1-(pyridin-4-yl)prop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (7j)
This compound was prepared from 10j as described for 7a. The yield was 85 mg (93%) of colorless powder, mp 119–121 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.65 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.89 (br s, 5H, CH, NH2, Ar), 7.65 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.54 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H, Ar), and 7.49 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 191.6, 148.4, 146.6 (2C), 144.7, 135.5, 135.1, 132.4, 130.1 (2C), 129.6 (2C), and 125.2 (2C). HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+: calculated for C14H13N2O3S 289.0641, found 289.0685. HPLC (LW = 260 nm, A—H3PO4 (0.01 M) pH = 2.6, B—MeCN; gradient B 40→90%, 30 min): tR = 11.9 min, purity 100%.
  • (E)-1-(1H-Indol-3-yl)-3-oxo-3-phenylprop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (7k)
This compound was prepared from 10k as described for 7a. The residue was purified with flash column chromatography (silica gel, hexane—EtOAc 2:1). The yield was 55 mg (43%) of yellow powder, mp 94–96 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.57 (br s, 1H, NH), 8.24 (s, 1H, CH), 8.00 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.76–7.72 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.49 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.33 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.25–7.21 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.18 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar), 6.93 (d, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H, Ar), and 5.11 (s, 2H, NH2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 194.6, 135.5, 134.8, 134.6, 132.5, 131.5, 130.0 (2C), 129.0 (2C), 128.3, 128.2, 123.6, 121.8, 118.6, 111.7, and 109.0. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+: calculated for C17H15N2O3S 327.0798, found 327.0802. HPLC (LW = 260 nm, A—H3PO4 (0.01 M) pH = 2.6, B—MeCN; gradient B 40→90%, 30 min): tR = 10.6 min, purity 95%.
  • (E)-1-(1-Acetyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-oxo-3-phenylprop-1-ene-2-sulfonamide (7l)
This compound was prepared from 10l as described for 7a. The yield was 92 mg (91%) of yellowish powder, mp 103–105 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.25 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, Ar), 8.02 (s, 1H, CH), 7.96 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.61 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.51 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.39–7.29 (m, 4H, Ar), 6.97 (s, 1H, Ar), 5.38 (s, 2H, NH2), and 2.23 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.9. 168.2, 137.9, 135.1 (2C), 134.6, 129.8 (2C), 129.2 (2C), 128.8, 128.5, 127.2, 126.4, 124.6, 118.5, 116.6, 113.6, and 23.5. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+: calculated for C19H17N2O4S 369.0904, found 369.0913. HPLC (LW= 260 nm, A—H3PO4 (0.01 M) pH = 2.6, B—MeCN; gradient B 40→90%, 30 min): tR = 13.7 min, purity 95%.
  • 2-Oxo-2-phenylethan-1-sulfonamide (11)
This compound was prepared from 6 as described for 7a. The yield was 138 mg (93%) of colorless powder, mp 160–161 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.02 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.67 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, Ar), 7.54 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.16 (s, 2H, NH2), and 4.80 (s, 2H, CH2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 190.4, 136.3, 134.4, 129.7 (2C), 129.1 (2C), and 62.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+: calculated for C8H10NO3S 200.0376, found 200.0368. HPLC (LW = 260 nm, A—H3PO4 (0.01 M) pH = 2.6, B—MeCN; gradient B 40→90%, 30 min): tR = 4.5 min, purity 99%.

4.2. X-ray Study of 7a

Single crystal X-ray studies of 7a were carried out in the Center for molecule composition studies of INEOS RAS with APEX3 software v.2019.11-0 [56]. The data were then integrated with SAINT. SADABS was used for scaling, empirical absorption corrections, and the generation of data files for structure solution and refinement.
The structures were solved with a dual-space algorithm and refined in anisotropic approximation for non-hydrogen atoms against F2(hkl). Hydrogen atoms of methyl, methylene, and aromatic fragments were calculated according to those idealized geometries and refined with constraints. All structures were solved with the ShelXT [57] program and refined with the ShelXL [58] program. Molecular graphics were drawn using the OLEX2 [59] program.
CCDC 2304141 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for 7a. These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures (accessed on 15 October 2023).

4.3. Antiproliferative Activity and Selectivity

Antiproliferative activity of the synthesized compounds 7a–l and 11 was evaluated against MCF7, MCF7/HT2 (human breast cancer), K-562 (chronic myelogenous leukemia), K-562/4 (characterized by a high resistance index for doxorubicin; a kind gift of Dr. Alexander Shtil, Blokhin N.N. National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia) [36,60], and HCT-116 (human colon carcinoma) cells via the MTT assay. The MCF7, K-562, and HCT-116 cell lines were obtained from the ATCC collection. MCF7/HT2 cell subline was obtained as described in our recent work [34]. The multidrug-resistant (MDR) subline K-562/4 was obtained via stepwise selection of K-562 cells for survival under continuous exposure to doxorubicin [60]. The selectivity of compounds 7e and 11 were evaluated using the resazurin test with recommendations from [39,40,41]. Fibroblasts and the protocol for their cultivation were kindly provided by Pavel B. Kopnin [37,38]. Cells were cultured in vitro in DMEM medium (PanEco, Moscow, Russia) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA), 50 U/mL penicillin, and 50 µg/mL streptomycin (PanEco, Moscow, Russia). Suspension cells (K-562 and K-562/4) were propagated in RPMI-1640 (PanEco, Moscow, Russia) with the same supplements. The incubation was performed at 37 °C, 5% CO2, and 80–90% relative humidity in the NU-5840E cell incubator (NuAire, Plymouth, MN, USA). Cells in the logarithmic phase were used in all experiments.
To determine the overall metabolic activity of the cells in the well, the MTT assay was used based on the reduction of the MTT reagent (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) in living cells to form violet formazan crystals insoluble in the culture medium; the assay was performed in a modified version as described previously [61]. The compounds were dissolved at a concentration of 10 mM in DMSO (AppliChem, Germany, Darmstadt) and stored at −20 °C. The cells were seeded on a 24-well plate (Corning, NY, USA) and the compounds were added within 24 h at concentrations in the range from 1 to 50 µM; doxorubicin was used as a reference agent. The appropriate volume of the solvent was added to the control cells; the final concentration of the solvent in the medium did not exceed 0.5%.
After 72 h of growth in the presence of the compounds, the medium was removed (suspension cells K562 and K-562/4 were precentrifuged on a plate centrifuge (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA)) and the MTT reagent (AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany) dissolved in medium was added to the cells. After 2 h of incubation, the MTT solution was removed and DMSO was added, and the plates were gently shaken to dissolve the formed formazan crystals. The absorbance of the solutions was measured on a MultiSkan FC spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 571 nm. Then the blank absorbance values (from wells without cells) were subtracted from the sample absorbance values; the absorbance of control samples was taken as 100%. The IC50 values were calculated using GraphPad 7.0 (Boston, MA, USA) as the concentration of the compound that decreased the absorbance of the solution by 50% compared to the control sample. More precisely, the IC50 values were determined using a nonlinear regression of the log(inhibitor) vs. normalized response with a variable slope (four parameters).
Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel and GraphPad Prism 7.0 (Boston, MA, USA). Each biology experiment was repeated three times, and the results were expressed as mean ± S.D. (standard deviation value). The Student’s t-test was used to evaluate the significance of differences in comparisons. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

4.4. Immunoblotting

MCF7 and MCF7/HT2 cells were seeded on 100 mm dishes (Corning, NY, USA), and after 24 h of growth, compounds 7e and 11 were added in a fresh medium. The cells were harvested after 24 h of incubation with the compounds. To prepare cell extracts, the cells were twice washed in phosphate buffer and incubated for 10 min on ice in the modified lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.5% Igepal CA-630, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF, 0.1 mM sodium orthovanadate and aprotinin, leupeptin, and pepstatin (1 µg/mL each) as described earlier [62]. The protein content was determined using the Bradford method [63].
Cell lysates were separated in 10% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (GE HealthCare, Addison, IL, USA,), and processed according to a standard protocol. To prevent nonspecific absorption, the membranes were treated with 5% nonfat milk solution in a TBS buffer (20 mM Tris, 500 mM NaCl, and pH 7.5) with 0.1% Tween-20 and then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C.
ERα, GREB1, AR, cyclin D1, CDK4, p-AKT, AKT, cleaved PARP, and Bcl-2 antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA); the antibodies against GAPDH (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, USA, MA) were added to standardize loading. Goat antirabbit IgGs (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA) conjugated to horseradish peroxidase were used as secondary antibodies. Signals were detected using the ECL reagent as described in Mruk and Cheng’s protocol [64] and an ImageQuant LAS4000 system (GE HealthCare, IL, USA).

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this research provides valuable insights into the design, synthesis, and evaluation of chalconesulfonamides as promising anticancer agents, indicating their potential for targeting hormone-dependent breast cancer cells. Compound 7e suppresses all cancer cell lines with IC50 values in the low micromolar range and retains activity against resistant cell lines. Further research could focus on optimizing the structure of the sulfonamide moiety and development of novel combinational strategies for the treatment of breast cancer and other hormone-dependent tumors.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ph17010032/s1. Figure S1. Centrosymmetric dimer in crystal structure of 7a formed by hydrogen bonds between sufonamide groups; Figure S2. Centrosymmetric dimer in crystal structure of 7a formed by hydrogen bonds between sufonamide and carbonyl groups; Figure S3. Crystal packing of 7a; Table S1. Crystallographic data for 7a; Table S2. Hydrogen Bonds for 7a.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, A.E.S.; investigation, S.K.K., A.M.S., F.B.B., L.G.D., D.I.S. and A.A.K.; data curation S.K.K., A.M.S. and A.A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, S.K.K. and A.M.S.; writing—review and editing A.M.S., S.K.K. and D.I.S.; supervision, A.E.S. and A.M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partly funded by the Russian Science Foundation (agreement 20-13-00402-P, https://rscf.ru/project/23-13-45035/, accessed on 24 October 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Supplementary material contains 1H and 13C NMR spectra. For all final compounds HPLC results are provided.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Danila V. Sorokin for assistance in signaling pathways studies (Blokhin N. N. National Medical Research Center of Oncology), N.M. Malyutina and S.E. Solov’eva for the HPLC, and I.V. Ivanov for the NMR studies (Gause Institute of New Antibiotics). We thank Alvina Khamidullina and the Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, for providing the equipment and research facilities (microplate spectrophotometer). The authors are deeply grateful to Alexander A. Shtil for providing the K-562/4 cell line (Blokhin N. N. National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russia) and Pavel B. Kopnin (Blokhin N. N. National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russia) for providing the fibroblasts and the protocol for culturing them. The X-ray study was performed employing the equipment of the Center for molecular composition studies of INEOS RAS and supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Contract/agreement No. 075-00697-22-00).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

HRMS High-resolution mass spectrometry;
HPLC High-performance liquid chromatography;
LDA Lithium diisopropylamide;
NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance;
PG Protecting group;
TFA Trifluoroacetic acid.
ER αEstrogen receptor α
AIAromatase inhibitor
SERMSelective estrogen receptor modulator
SISelectivity index
GAPDHGlyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
GREB1Gene regulated in breast cancer 1 protein
ARAndrogen receptor
CDK4Cyclin-dependent kinase 4
PARPPoly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1
Bcl-2B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2
HT4-hydroxytamoxifen
MDRMultidrug-resistant

References

  1. Hanker, A.B.; Sudhan, D.R.; Arteaga, C.L. Overcoming endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Cancer Cell 2020, 37, 496–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Härkönen, P.L.; Mäkelä, S.I. Role of estrogens in development of prostate cancer. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2004, 92, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mungenast, F.; Thalhammer, T. Estrogen biosynthesis and action in ovarian cancer. Front. Endocrinol. 2014, 5, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Martinkovich, S.; Shah, D.; Planey, S.L.; Arnott, J.A. Selective estrogen receptor modulators: Tissue specificity and clinical utility. Clin. Interv. Aging 2014, 2014, 1437–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ma, C.X.; Reinert, T.; Chmielewska, I.; Ellis, M.J. Mechanisms of aromatase inhibitor resistance. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2015, 15, 261–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lonsdale, R.; Ward, R.A. Structure-based design of targeted covalent inhibitors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 3816–3830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sutanto, F.; Konstantinidou, M.; Dömling, A. Covalent inhibitors: A rational approach to drug discovery. RSC Med. Chem. 2020, 11, 876–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Van Asten, K.; Neven, P.; Lintermans, A.; Wildiers, H.; Paridaens, R. Aromatase inhibitors in the breast cancer clinic: Focus on exemestane. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2014, 21, 31–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hong, Y.; Yu, B.; Sherman, M.; Yuan, Y.C.; Zhou, D.; Chen, S. Molecular basis for the aromatization reaction and exemestane-mediated irreversible inhibition of human aromatase. Mol. Endocrinol. 2007, 21, 401–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Coombes, R.C.; Hall, E.; Gibson, L.J.; Paridaens, R.; Jassem, J.; Delozier, T.; Bliss, J.M. A randomized trial of exemestane after two to three years of tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer. New Engl. J. Med. 2004, 350, 1081–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sobral, A.F.; Amaral, C.; Correia-da-Silva, G.; Teixeira, N. Unravelling exemestane: From biology to clinical prospects. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2016, 163, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kim, S.H.; Park, I.H.; Lee, H.W.; Lee, K.S.; Nam, B.H.; Ro, J.S. Efficacy of exemestane after nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor use in metastatic breast cancer patients. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2012, 13, 979–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhuang, C.; Zhang, W.; Sheng, C.; Zhang, W.; Xing, C.; Miao, Z. Chalcone: A privileged structure in medicinal chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 7762–7810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Salehi, B.; Quispe, C.; Chamkhi, I.; El Omari, N.; Balahbib, A.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; Les, F. Pharmacological properties of chalcones: A review of preclinical including molecular mechanisms and clinical evidence. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 11, 592654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Harikumar, K.B.; Kunnumakkara, A.B.; Ahn, K.S.; Anand, P.; Krishnan, S.; Guha, S.; Aggarwal, B.B. Modification of the cysteine residues in IkappaBalpha kinase and NF-kappaB (p65) by xanthohumol leads to suppression of NF-kappaB-regulated gene products and potentiation of apoptosis in leukemia cells. Blood 2009, 113, 2003–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhang, B.; Duan, D.; Ge, C.; Yao, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, X.; Fang, J. Synthesis of xanthohumol analogues and discovery of potent thioredoxin reductase inhibitor as potential anticancer agent. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 1795–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hegazy, M.E.F.; Mohamed, A.E.H.H.; El-Halawany, A.M.; Djemgou, P.C.; Shahat, A.A.; Paré, P.W. Estrogenic activity of chemical constituents from Tephrosia candida. J. Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 937–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kommidi, D.R.; Pagadala, R.; Rana, S.; Singh, P.; Shintre, S.A.; Koorbanally, N.A.; Moodley, B. Novel carbapenem chalcone derivatives: Synthesis, cytotoxicity and molecular docking studies. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 4344–4350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Min, J.; Nwachukwu, J.C.; Min, C.K.; Njeri, J.W.; Srinivasan, S.; Rangarajan, E.S.; Nettles, K.W. Dual-mechanism estrogen receptor inhibitors. Biophys. Comput. Biol. 2021, 118, e2101657118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhu, M.; Zhang, C.; Nwachukwu, J.C.; Srinivasan, S.; Cavett, V.; Zheng, Y.; Zhou, H.B. Bicyclic core estrogens as full antagonists: Synthesis, biological evaluation and structure-activity relationships of estrogen receptor ligands based on bridged oxabicyclic core arylsulfonamides. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 8692–8700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lefebvre, C.A.; Forcellini, E.; Boutin, S.; Côté, M.F.; René, C.; Mathieu, P.; Paquin, J.F. Synthesis of novel substituted pyrimidine derivatives bearing a sulfamide group and their in vitro cancer growth inhibition activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 27, 299–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, C.; Spevak, W.; Zhang, Y.; Burton, E.A.; Ma, Y.; Habets, G.; Bollag, G. RAF inhibitors that evade paradoxical MAPK pathway activation. Nature 2015, 526, 583–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hong, S.; Lee, S.; Kim, B.; Lee, H.; Hong, S.S.; Hong, S. Discovery of new azaindole-based PI3Kα inhibitors: Apoptotic and antiangiogenic effect on cancer cells. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 7212–7215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Krymov, S.K.; Scherbakov, A.M.; Salnikova, D.I.; Sorokin, D.V.; Dezhenkova, L.G.; Ivanov, I.V.; Shchekotikhin, A.E. Synthesis, biological evaluation, and in silico studies of potential activators of apoptosis and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors on isatin-5-sulfonamide scaffold. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 228, 113997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Krymov, S.K.; Scherbakov, A.M.; Dezhenkova, L.G.; Salnikova, D.I.; Solov’eva, S.E.; Sorokin, D.V.; Shchekotikhin, A.E. Indoline-5-Sulfonamides: A Role of the Core in Inhibition of Cancer-Related Carbonic Anhydrases, Antiproliferative Activity and Circumventing of Multidrug Resistance. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Thompson, M.E. N-Alkanesulfonamide dianions: Formation and chemoselective C-alkylation. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 1700–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Reddy, M.R.; Mallireddigari, M.R.; Pallela, V.R.; Cosenza, S.C.; Billa, V.K.; Akula, B.; Reddy, E.P. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of (E)-N-aryl-2-arylethenesulfonamide analogues as potent and orally bioavailable microtubule-targeted anticancer agents. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 5562–5586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Korolev, A.M.; Shchekotikhin, A.E.; Lysenkova, L.N.; Preobrazhenskaya, M.N. Synthesis of (Indol-3-yl) methanesulfonamide and its 5-Methoxy Derivative. Synthesis 2003, 3, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dauben, W.G.; Ponaras, A.A.; Chollet, A. An approach to angularly functionalized methylhydrindan systems. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 4413–4417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Corey, E.J.; Barrette, E.P.; Magriotis, P.A. A new Cr (VI) reagent for the catalytic oxidation of secondary alcohols to ketones. Tetrahedron. Lett. 1985, 26, 5855–5858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Burke, S.D.; Danheiser, R.L. Oxidizing and Reducing Agents, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 1999; pp. 100–102. [Google Scholar]
  32. Allen, C.F.H. Ethyl benzalmalonate. Org. Synth. 1945, 25, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Magee, D.I.; Ratshonka, S.; McConaghy, J.; Hood, M. Synthesis of β-and β, β-substituted Morita–Baylis–Hillman adducts using a two-step protocol. Can. J. Chem. 2012, 90, 450–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Scherbakov, A.M.; Basharina, A.A.; Sorokin, D.V.; Mikhaevich, E.I.; Mizaeva, I.E.; Mikhaylova, A.L.; Krasil’nikov, M.A. Targeting hormone-resistant breast cancer cells with docetaxel: A look inside the resistance. Cancer Drug Resist. 2023, 6, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tikhomirov, A.S.; Tsvetkov, V.B.; Volodina, Y.L.; Litvinova, V.A.; Andreeva, D.V.; Dezhenkova, L.G.; Kaluzhny, D.N.; Treshalin, I.D.; Shtil, A.A.; Shchekotikhin, A.E. Heterocyclic ring expansion yields anthraquinone derivatives potent against multidrug resistant tumor cells. Bioorg. Chem. 2022, 127, 105925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sagnou, M.; Novikov, F.N.; Ivanova, E.S.; Alexiou, P.; Stroylov, V.S.; Titov, I.Y.; Tatarskiy, V.V.; Vagida, M.S.; Pelecanou, M.; Shtil, A.A.; et al. Novel curcumin derivatives as P-glycoprotein inhibitors: Molecular modeling, synthesis and sensitization of multidrug resistant cells to doxorubicin. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 198, 112331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zorin, V.; Zorina, A.; Smetanina, N.; Kopnin, P.; Ozerov, I.V.; Leonov, S.; Isaev, A.; Klokov, D.; Osipov, A.N. Diffuse colonies of human skin fibroblasts in relation to cellular senescence and proliferation. Aging 2017, 9, 1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zorin, V.; Grekhova, A.; Pustovalova, M.; Zorina, A.; Smetanina, N.; Vorobyeva, N.; Kopnin, P.; Gilmutdinova, I.; Moskalev, A.; Osipov, A.N.; et al. Spontaneous γH2AX foci in human dermal fibroblasts in relation to proliferation activity and aging. Aging 2019, 11, 4536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kamiloglu, S.; Sari, G.; Ozdal, T.; Capanoglu, E. Guidelines for cell viability assays. Food Front. 2020, 1, 332–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Larsson, P.; Engqvist, H.; Biermann, J.; Ronnerman, E.W.; Forssell-Aronsson, E.; Kovacs, A.; Karlsson, P.; Helou, K.; Parris, T.Z. Optimization of cell viability assays to improve replicability and reproducibility of cancer drug sensitivity screens. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lavogina, D.; Lust, H.; Tahk, M.J.; Laasfeld, T.; Vellama, H.; Nasirova, N.; Vardja, M.; Eskla, K.-L.; Salumets, A.; Rinken, A.; et al. Revisiting the resazurin-based sensing of cellular viability: Widening the application horizon. Biosensors 2022, 12, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Welboren, W.J.; HStunnenberg, G.; Sweep, F.C.; Span, P.N. Identifying estrogen receptor target genes. Mol. Oncol. 2007, 1, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Clusan, L.; Ferrière, F.; Flouriot, G.; Pakdel, F. A Basic Review on Estrogen Receptor Signaling Pathways in Breast Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Anestis, A.; Zoi, I.; Papavassiliou, A.G.; Karamouzis, M.V. Androgen Receptor in Breast Cancer-Clinical and Preclinical Research Insights. Molecules 2020, 25, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kolyvas, E.A.; Caldas, C.; Kelly, K.; Ahmad, S.S. Androgen receptor function and targeted therapeutics across breast cancer subtypes. Breast Cancer Res. 2022, 24, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Qie, S.; Diehl, J.A. Cyclin D1, cancer progression, and opportunities in cancer treatment. J. Mol. Med. 2016, 94, 1313–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Montalto, F.I.; De Amicis, F. Cyclin D1 in Cancer: A Molecular Connection for Cell Cycle Control, Adhesion and Invasion in Tumor and Stroma. Cells 2020, 9, 2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Barnes, D.M.; Gillett, C.E. Cyclin D1 in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 1998, 52, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shi, X.; Wang, J.; Lei, Y.; Cong, C.; Tan, D.; Zhou, X. Research progress on the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in gynecological cancer. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019, 19, 4529–4535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rascio, F.; Spadaccino, F.; Rocchetti, M.T.; Castellano, G.; Stallone, G.; Netti, G.S.; Ranieri, E. The Pathogenic Role of PI3K/AKT Pathway in Cancer Onset and Drug Resistance: An Updated Review. Cancers 2021, 13, 3949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Coppola, G.M.; Hardtmann, G.E. The chemistry of 2H-3,1-benzoxazine-2,4(1H)dione (isatoic anhydride). 7. Reactions with anions of active methylenes to form quinolines. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1979, 16, 1605–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Soley, J. Synthesis of ß-Keto-and ß-Hydroxy-α, α-Difluorosulfonamides. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada, 2021. Available online: https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/handle/10012/17044 (accessed on 4 March 2023).
  53. Moreira, J.; Loureiro, J.B.; Correia, D.; Palmeira, A.; Pinto, M.M.; Saraiva, L.; Cidade, H. Structure–Activity Relationship Studies of Chalcones and Diarylpentanoids with Antitumor Activity: Potency and Selectivity Optimization. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lai, W.; Chen, J.; Gao, X.; Jin, X.; Chen, G.; Ye, L. Design and Synthesis of Novel Chalcone Derivatives: Anti-Breast Cancer Activity Evaluation and Docking Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Scherbakov, A.M.; Zavarzin, I.V.; Vorontsova, S.K.; Hajra, A.; Andreeva, O.E.; Yadykov, A.V.; Levina, I.S.; Volkova, Y.A.; Shirinian, V.Z. Synthesis and evaluation of the antiproliferative activity of benzylidenes of 16-dehydroprogesterone series. Steroids 2018, 138, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Bruker. APEX3, RLATT, CELL_NOW, TWINABS, SAINT-Plus and SADABS, Version 2019.11-0; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  57. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT—Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Cryst. 2015, A71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Cryst. 2015, C71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.K.; Puschmann, H. OLEX2: A complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Cryst. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Volodina, Y.L.; Dezhenkova, L.G.; Tikhomirov, A.S.; Tatarskiy, V.V.; Kaluzhny, D.N.; Moisenovich, A.M.; Isagulieva, A.K.; Shtil, A.A.; Tsvetkov, V.B.; Shchekotikhin, A.E. New anthra[2,3-b]furancarboxamides: A role of positioning of the carboxamide moiety in antitumor properties. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 165, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Komendantova, A.S.; Scherbakov, A.M.; Komkov, A.V.; Chertkova, V.V.; Gudovanniy, A.O.; Chernoburova, E.I.; Sorokin, D.V.; Dzichenka, Y.U.; Shirinian, V.Z.; Volkova, Y.A.; et al. Novel steroidal 1,3,4-thiadiazines: Synthesis and biological evaluation in androgen receptor-positive prostate cancer 22Rv1 cells. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 91, 103142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zapevalova, M.V.; Shchegravina, E.S.; Fonareva, I.P.; Salnikova, D.I.; Sorokin, D.V.; Scherbakov, A.M.; Maleev, A.A.; Ignatov, S.K.; Grishin, I.D.; Kuimov, A.N.; et al. Synthesis, Molecular Docking, In Vitro and In Vivo Studies of Novel Dimorpholinoquinazoline-Based Potential Inhibitors of PI3K/Akt/mTOR Pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mruk, D.D.; Cheng, C.Y. Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) for routine immunoblotting: An inexpensive alternative to commercially available kits. Spermatogenesis 2011, 1, 121–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pharmaceuticals 17 00032 g001
Figure 1. Structures of tamoxifen (1) and anastrozole (2).
Figure 1. Structures of tamoxifen (1) and anastrozole (2).
Pharmaceuticals 17 00032 g001
Pharmaceuticals 17 00032 g002
Figure 2. Exemestane (3)—AI with a covalent mechanism of action; chalcone 4 with antiproliferative activity; and general structure of sulfonamides 5 with antiestrogenic activity.
Figure 2. Exemestane (3)—AI with a covalent mechanism of action; chalcone 4 with antiproliferative activity; and general structure of sulfonamides 5 with antiestrogenic activity.
Pharmaceuticals 17 00032 g002
Pharmaceuticals 17 00032 g003
Figure 3. Development of chalconesulfonamide 7 with potential anticancer activity.
Figure 3. Development of chalconesulfonamide 7 with potential anticancer activity.
Pharmaceuticals 17 00032 g003
Pharmaceuticals 17 00032 sch001
Scheme 1. The synthesis of 2-hydroxy-2-phenylethane-1-sulfonamide 9.
Scheme 1. The synthesis of 2-hydroxy-2-phenylethane-1-sulfonamide 9.
Pharmaceuticals 17 00032 sch001
Pharmaceuticals 17 00032 sch002
Scheme 2. The synthesis of N-(tert-butyl)-2-oxo-2-phenylethane-1-sulfonamide (6).
Scheme 2. The synthesis of N-(tert-butyl)-2-oxo-2-phenylethane-1-sulfonamide (6).
Pharmaceuticals 17 00032 sch002
Pharmaceuticals 17 00032 sch003
Scheme 3. The synthesis of a series of chalconesulfonamides 7a–l.
Scheme 3. The synthesis of a series of chalconesulfonamides 7a–l.
Pharmaceuticals 17 00032 sch003
Pharmaceuticals 17 00032 g004
Figure 4. General view of molecule 7a.
Figure 4. General view of molecule 7a.
Pharmaceuticals 17 00032 g004
Pharmaceuticals 17 00032 sch004
Scheme 4. The synthesis of 2-oxo-2-phenylethane-1-sulfonamide (11).
Scheme 4. The synthesis of 2-oxo-2-phenylethane-1-sulfonamide (11).
Pharmaceuticals 17 00032 sch004
Pharmaceuticals 17 00032 g005
Figure 5. Impact of lead compound 7e on signaling pathways in breast cancer cells. Protein expression was detected with immunoblotting after a 24 h treatment. Compound 11 was applied as a negative control. GAPDH (a loading control)—glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; ERα—estrogen receptor α; GREB1—gene regulated in breast cancer 1 protein; AR—androgen receptor, CDK4—cyclin-dependent kinase 4; AKT—RAC-α serine/threonine-protein kinase; PARP—Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1; and Bcl-2—B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2. Densitometry for the tested proteins/GAPDH ratio was carried out using ImageJ software (version 1.53m).
Figure 5. Impact of lead compound 7e on signaling pathways in breast cancer cells. Protein expression was detected with immunoblotting after a 24 h treatment. Compound 11 was applied as a negative control. GAPDH (a loading control)—glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; ERα—estrogen receptor α; GREB1—gene regulated in breast cancer 1 protein; AR—androgen receptor, CDK4—cyclin-dependent kinase 4; AKT—RAC-α serine/threonine-protein kinase; PARP—Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1; and Bcl-2—B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2. Densitometry for the tested proteins/GAPDH ratio was carried out using ImageJ software (version 1.53m).
Pharmaceuticals 17 00032 g005
Table 1. Antiproliferative potency of compounds 7a–l and 11 with doxorubicin (Dox) as a reference drug (MTT assay after 72 h exposure; IC50, µM).
Table 1. Antiproliferative potency of compounds 7a–l and 11 with doxorubicin (Dox) as a reference drug (MTT assay after 72 h exposure; IC50, µM).
Pharmaceuticals 17 00032 i001
CmpdRIC50 (µM) a
MCF7MCF7/HT2K-562K-562/4HCT-116
7aPharmaceuticals 17 00032 i0023.6 ± 0.23.5 ± 0.23.7 ± 0.312.5 ± 1.210.3 ± 1.1
7bPharmaceuticals 17 00032 i0034.0 ± 0.34.5 ± 0.42.5 ± 0.36.4 ± 0.58.2 ± 0.8
7cPharmaceuticals 17 00032 i0044.0 ± 0.33.9 ± 0.42.2 ± 0.111.5 ± 1.510.3 ± 1.1
7dPharmaceuticals 17 00032 i0053.9 ± 0.24.8 ± 0.42.0 ± 0.115.3 ± 1.19.8 ± 1.1
7ePharmaceuticals 17 00032 i0062.0 ± 0.13.8 ± 0.21.3 ± 0.12.8 ± 0.25.1 ± 0.4
7fPharmaceuticals 17 00032 i0072.2 ± 0.32.5 ± 0.21.8 ± 0.22.8 ± 0.33.6 ± 0.3
7gPharmaceuticals 17 00032 i0085.5 ± 0.77.3 ± 0.73.2 ± 0.218.5 ± 1.415.0 ± 1.4
7hPharmaceuticals 17 00032 i0096.8 ± 0.38.8 ± 0.84.3 ± 0.632.0 ± 4.223.0 ± 3.0
7iPharmaceuticals 17 00032 i01039.9 ± 3.335.9 ± 3.111.5 ± 1.2NT45.0 ± 7.0
7jPharmaceuticals 17 00032 i0115.7 ± 0.35.1 ± 0.37.5 ± 0.8NT21.0 ± 2.5
7kPharmaceuticals 17 00032 i01219.9 ± 1.414.1 ± 1.19.2 ± 1.1NT23.2 ± 2.5
7lPharmaceuticals 17 00032 i0136.1 ± 0.46.7 ± 0.46.6 ± 0.7NT7.1 ± 0.8
11Pharmaceuticals 17 00032 i014>50>50>50>50>50
Dox b0.31 ± 0.04NT0.12 ± 0.015.1 ± 0.50.32 ± 0.04
a Mean ± S.D. of 3 independent experiments. b Dox, a reference drug. NT—not tested.
Table 2. Cytotoxicity and selectivity of compounds 7e and 11 (the resazurin assay after 72 h exposure).
Table 2. Cytotoxicity and selectivity of compounds 7e and 11 (the resazurin assay after 72 h exposure).
Cell LineCompounds
7e11
IC50, µMMCF7 cells2.6 ± 0.2>50
Fibroblasts4.9 ± 0.3>50
SI * 1.9-
* SI—selectivity index = IC50 value for fibroblasts/IC50 value for MCF7 cells.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Krymov, S.K.; Salnikova, D.I.; Dezhenkova, L.G.; Bogdanov, F.B.; Korlyukov, A.A.; Scherbakov, A.M.; Shchekotikhin, A.E. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Chalconesulfonamides: En Route to Proapoptotic Agents with Antiestrogenic Potency. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17010032

AMA Style

Krymov SK, Salnikova DI, Dezhenkova LG, Bogdanov FB, Korlyukov AA, Scherbakov AM, Shchekotikhin AE. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Chalconesulfonamides: En Route to Proapoptotic Agents with Antiestrogenic Potency. Pharmaceuticals. 2024; 17(1):32. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17010032

Chicago/Turabian Style

Krymov, Stepan K., Diana I. Salnikova, Lyubov G. Dezhenkova, Fedor B. Bogdanov, Alexander A. Korlyukov, Alexander M. Scherbakov, and Andrey E. Shchekotikhin. 2024. "Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Chalconesulfonamides: En Route to Proapoptotic Agents with Antiestrogenic Potency" Pharmaceuticals 17, no. 1: 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17010032

APA Style

Krymov, S. K., Salnikova, D. I., Dezhenkova, L. G., Bogdanov, F. B., Korlyukov, A. A., Scherbakov, A. M., & Shchekotikhin, A. E. (2024). Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Chalconesulfonamides: En Route to Proapoptotic Agents with Antiestrogenic Potency. Pharmaceuticals, 17(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17010032

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop