Next Article in Journal
Prevalence and severity of dental caries among 18-year-old Lithuanian adolescents
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of hydration status calculated from differences in venous and capillary plasma dilution during stepwise crystalloid infusions: A randomized crossover study in healthy volunteers
 
 
Medicina is published by MDPI from Volume 54 Issue 1 (2018). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Lithuanian Medical Association, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, and Vilnius University.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cesarean section rates in Lithuania using Robson Ten Group Classification System

by
Eglė Barčaitė
*,
Gintarė Kemeklienė
,
Dalia Regina Railaitė
,
Arnoldas Bartusevičius
,
Laima Maleckienė
and
Rūta Nadišauskienė
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eivenių 2, 50161 Kaunas, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2015, 51(5), 280-285; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medici.2015.09.001
Submission received: 7 July 2014 / Accepted: 27 August 2015 / Published: 14 September 2015

Abstract

Background and objective: The aim of this study was to analyze cesarean section (CS) rates using Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) and to identify the main contributors to the overall CS rate in Lithuania.
Materials and methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was carried out. All women who delivered between January 1 and December 31, 2012, in Lithuania were classified using the TGCS. The CS rates overall and in each Robson group were calculated, as was the contribution of each group to the overall CS rate.
Results: The CS rate was 26.4% (6697 among 25,373 deliveries) in 2012. Nulliparous women with single cephalic full-term pregnancy in spontaneous labor (Group 1) or who underwent induction of labor or prelabor CS (Group 2) and multiparous women with a previous CS (Group 5) were the greatest contributors (67.7%) to the overall CS rate. In addition, significant variation of CS rates between different institutions was observed, especially in women with single cephalic full-term pregnancy without previous CS (Groups 1–4), showing big differences in obstetric care across country.
Conclusions: Women in Groups 1, 2 and 5 were the largest contributions to the overall CS rate in Lithuania. It seems that efforts to reduce the overall CS rate should be directed on increasing vaginal birth after CS and reducing CS rates in nulliparous women with single cephalic full-term pregnancy (Groups 1 and 2).
Keywords: Cesarean section; Robson Ten Group Classification; System; Clinical audit; Classification of cesarean section Cesarean section; Robson Ten Group Classification; System; Clinical audit; Classification of cesarean section

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barčaitė, E.; Kemeklienė, G.; Railaitė, D.R.; Bartusevičius, A.; Maleckienė, L.; Nadišauskienė, R. Cesarean section rates in Lithuania using Robson Ten Group Classification System. Medicina 2015, 51, 280-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medici.2015.09.001

AMA Style

Barčaitė E, Kemeklienė G, Railaitė DR, Bartusevičius A, Maleckienė L, Nadišauskienė R. Cesarean section rates in Lithuania using Robson Ten Group Classification System. Medicina. 2015; 51(5):280-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medici.2015.09.001

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barčaitė, Eglė, Gintarė Kemeklienė, Dalia Regina Railaitė, Arnoldas Bartusevičius, Laima Maleckienė, and Rūta Nadišauskienė. 2015. "Cesarean section rates in Lithuania using Robson Ten Group Classification System" Medicina 51, no. 5: 280-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medici.2015.09.001

APA Style

Barčaitė, E., Kemeklienė, G., Railaitė, D. R., Bartusevičius, A., Maleckienė, L., & Nadišauskienė, R. (2015). Cesarean section rates in Lithuania using Robson Ten Group Classification System. Medicina, 51(5), 280-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medici.2015.09.001

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop